Hubbry Logo
Cable-stayed bridgeCable-stayed bridgeMain
Open search
Cable-stayed bridge
Community hub
Cable-stayed bridge
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cable-stayed bridge
Cable-stayed bridge
Cable-stayed bridge
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Cable-stayed bridge
The Russky Bridge in Vladivostok has a central span of 1,104 metres (3,622 ft), the world's second longest cable-stayed bridge span as of 2025.
The Russky Bridge in Vladivostok has a central span of 1,104 metres (3,622 ft), the world's second longest cable-stayed bridge span as of 2025.
AncestorSuspension bridge
RelatedExtradosed bridge
DescendantSide-spar cable-stayed bridge, Self-anchored suspension bridge, cantilever spar cable-stayed bridge
CarriesPedestrians, bicycles, automobiles, trucks, light rail
Span rangeMedium to Long
MaterialSteel rope, post-tensioned concrete box girders, steel or concrete pylons
MovableNo[citation needed]
Design effortmedium
Falsework requiredNormally none
Øresund Bridge from Malmö to Copenhagen in Sweden and Denmark

A cable-stayed bridge is a type of bridge that has one or more towers (or pylons), from which cables support the bridge deck. A distinctive feature are the cables or stays, which run directly from the tower to the deck, normally forming a fan-like pattern or a series of parallel lines. This is in contrast to the modern suspension bridge, where the cables supporting the deck are suspended vertically from the main cables, which run between the towers and are anchored at both ends of the bridge. The cable-stayed bridge is optimal for spans longer than cantilever bridges and shorter than suspension bridges. This is the range within which cantilever bridges would rapidly grow heavier, and suspension bridge cabling would be more costly.

Cable-stayed bridges found wide use in the late 19th century. Early examples, including the Brooklyn Bridge, often combined features from both the cable-stayed and suspension designs. Cable-stayed designs fell from favor in the early 20th century as larger gaps were bridged using pure suspension designs, and shorter ones using various systems built of reinforced concrete. It returned to prominence in the later 20th century when the combination of new materials, larger construction machinery, and the need to replace older bridges all lowered the relative price of these designs.[1]

History

[edit]
Chain-stayed bridge by the Renaissance polymath Fausto Veranzio, from 1595/1616. Prior to industrial manufacture of heavy wire rope (steel cable), suspended or stayed bridges were firstly constructed with linked rods (chain).

Cable-stayed bridges date back to 1595, where designs were found in Machinae Novae, a book by Croatian-Venetian inventor Fausto Veranzio. Many early suspension bridges were partially cable-stayed in construction, including the 1817 footbridge Dryburgh Abbey Bridge, James Dredge's patented Victoria Bridge, Bath (1836), and the later Albert Bridge (1872) and Brooklyn Bridge (1883). Their designers found that the combination of technologies created a stiffer bridge. John A. Roebling took particular advantage of this to limit deformations due to railway loads in the Niagara Falls Suspension Bridge.

The earliest known surviving example of a true cable-stayed bridge in the United States is E.E. Runyon's largely intact wrought iron Bluff Dale Suspension bridge with wooden stringers and decking in Bluff Dale, Texas (1890), or his weeks earlier but ruined Barton Creek Bridge between Huckabay, Texas and Gordon, Texas (1889 or 1890).[2][3] In the twentieth century, early examples of cable-stayed bridges included A. Gisclard's unusual Cassagnes bridge (1899),[4] in which the horizontal part of the cable forces is balanced by a separate horizontal tie cable, preventing significant compression in the deck, and G. Leinekugel le Coq's bridge[5] at Lézardrieux in Brittany (1924). Eduardo Torroja designed a cable-stayed aqueduct[6] at Tempul in 1926.[7] Albert Caquot's 1952 concrete-decked cable-stayed bridge[8] over the Donzère-Mondragon canal at Pierrelatte is one of the first of the modern type, but had little influence on later development.[7] The steel-decked Strömsund Bridge designed by Franz Dischinger (1955) is, therefore, more often cited as the first modern cable-stayed bridge.

Abdoun Bridge, Amman, Jordan, example of an extradosed bridge

Other key pioneers included Fabrizio de Miranda, Riccardo Morandi, and Fritz Leonhardt. Early bridges from this period used very few stay cables, as in the Theodor Heuss Bridge (1958). However, this involves substantial erection costs, and more modern structures tend to use many more cables to ensure greater economy.

Comparison with suspension bridge

[edit]
Ada Bridge at dusk in Belgrade (Serbia)
Prins Clausbrug across the Amsterdam-Rhine Canal in Utrecht

Cable-stayed bridges may appear to be similar to suspension bridges, but they are quite different in principle and construction. In suspension bridges, large main cables (normally two) hang between the towers and are anchored at each end to the ground. This can be difficult to implement when ground conditions are poor. The main cables, which are free to move on bearings in the towers, bear the load of the bridge deck. Before the deck is installed, the cables are under tension from their own weight. Along the main cables smaller cables or rods connect to the bridge deck, which is lifted in sections. As this is done, the tension in the cables increases, as it does with the live load of traffic crossing the bridge. The tension on the main cables is transferred to the ground at the anchorages and by downwards compression on the towers.

  • Difference between types of bridges
  • Suspension bridge
    Suspension bridge
  • Cable-stayed bridge, fan design
    Cable-stayed bridge, fan design

In cable-stayed bridges, the towers are the primary load-bearing structures that transmit the bridge loads to the ground. A cantilever approach is often used to support the bridge deck near the towers, but lengths further from them are supported by cables running directly to the towers. That has the disadvantage, unlike for the suspension bridge, that the cables pull to the sides as opposed to directly up, which requires the bridge deck to be stronger to resist the resulting horizontal compression loads, but it has the advantage of not requiring firm anchorages to resist the horizontal pull of the main cables of a suspension bridge. By design, all static horizontal forces of the cable-stayed bridge are balanced so that the supporting towers do not tend to tilt or slide and so must only resist horizontal forces from the live loads.

The following are key advantages of the cable-stayed form:

  • Much greater stiffness than the suspension bridge, so that deformations of the deck under live loads are reduced
  • Can be constructed by cantilevering out from the tower – the cables act both as temporary and permanent supports to the bridge deck
  • For a symmetrical bridge (in which the spans on either side of the tower are the same), the horizontal forces balance and large ground anchorages are not required

Designs

[edit]

There are four major classes of rigging on cable-stayed bridges: mono, harp, fan, and star.[9]

  • The mono design uses a single cable from its towers and is one of the lesser-used examples of the class.
  • In the harp or parallel design, the cables are parallel, or nearly so, so that the height of their attachment to the tower is proportional to the distance from the tower to their mounting on the deck.
  • In the fan design, the cables all connect to or pass over the top of the towers. The fan design is structurally superior with a minimum moment applied to the towers, but, for practical reasons, the modified fan (also called the semi-fan) is preferred, especially where many cables are necessary. In the modified fan arrangement, the cables terminate near the top of the tower but are spaced from each other sufficiently to allow better termination, improved environmental protection, and good access to individual cables for maintenance.[10]
  • In the star design, another relatively rare design, the cables are spaced apart on the tower, like the harp design, but connect to one point or a number of closely spaced points on the deck.[11]
  • Difference between types of bridges
  • mono design
    mono design
  • harp design
    harp design
  • fan design
    fan design
  • star design
    star design
All seven column arrangements of a cable-stayed bridge

There are also seven main arrangements for support columns: single, double, portal, A-shaped, H-shaped, inverted Y, and M-shaped. The last three are hybrid arrangements that combine two arrangements into one.[9]

  • The single arrangement uses a single column for cable support, normally projecting through the center of the deck, but in some cases located on one side or the other. Examples: Millau Viaduct in France and Sunshine Skyway Bridge in Florida.
  • The double arrangement places pairs of columns on both sides of the deck. Examples: Øresund Bridge between Denmark and Sweden, and Zolotoy Bridge in Russia.
  • The portal is similar to the double arrangement but has a third member connecting the tops of the two columns to form a door-like shape or portal. This offers additional strength, especially against transverse loads. Examples: Hale Boggs Bridge in Louisiana and Kirumi Bridge in Tanzania.
  • The A-shaped design is similar in concept to the portal but achieves the same goal by angling the two columns towards each other to meet at the top, eliminating the need for the third member. Examples: Arthur Ravenel Jr. Bridge in South Carolina, Helgeland Bridge in Norway, and Christopher S. Bond Bridge in Missouri.
  • The H-shaped design combines the portal on the bottom with the double on top. Examples: Grenland Bridge in Norway, Vasco da Gama Bridge in Portugal, Greenville Bridge in Arkansas, and John James Audubon Bridge in Louisiana.
  • The inverted Y design combines the A-shaped on the bottom with the single on top. Examples: Pont de Normandie in France and Incheon Bridge in South Korea.
  • The M-shaped design combines two A-shaped arrangements, side by side, to form an M. This arrangement is rare, and is mostly used in wide bridges where a single A-shaped arrangement would be too weak. Examples: Fred Hartman Bridge in Texas, and its planned sister bridge Ship Channel Bridge, also in Texas.

Depending on the design, the columns may be vertical, angled relative to vertical, or curved.

Variations

[edit]

Side-spar cable-stayed bridge

[edit]
Puente de la Unidad, joining San Pedro Garza García and Monterrey, a Cantilever spar cable-stayed bridge

A side-spar cable-stayed bridge uses a central tower supported only on one side. This design allows the construction of a curved bridge.

Cantilever spar cable-stayed bridge

[edit]

Far more radical in its structure, the Puente del Alamillo (1992) uses a single cantilever spar on one side of a single span, with cables on one side only to support the bridge deck. Unlike other cable-stayed types, this bridge exerts considerable overturning force upon its foundation, and the spar must resist bending caused by the cables, as the cable forces are not balanced by opposing cables. The spar of this particular bridge forms the gnomon of a large garden sundial. Related bridges by the architect Santiago Calatrava include the Puente de la Mujer (2001), Sundial Bridge (2004), Chords Bridge (2008), and Assut de l'Or Bridge (2008).

Multiple-span cable-stayed bridge

[edit]
Zhivopisny Bridge in Moscow is a multiple-span design.

Cable-stayed bridges with more than three spans involve significantly more challenging designs than do two-span or three-span structures.

In a two-span or three-span cable-stayed bridge, the loads from the main spans are normally anchored near the end abutments by stays in the end spans. For more spans, this is not the case, and the bridge structure is less stiff overall. This can create difficulties in both the design of the deck and the pylons. Examples of multiple-span structures in which this is the case include Ting Kau Bridge, where additional 'cross-bracing' stays are used to stabilise the pylons; Millau Viaduct, where twin-legged towers are used; and General Rafael Urdaneta Bridge, where very stiff multi-legged frame towers were adopted. A similar situation with a suspension bridge is found at both the Great Seto Bridge and San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge, where additional anchorage piers are required after every set of three suspension spans – this solution can also be adapted for cable-stayed bridges.[12]

Extradosed bridge

[edit]
The Twinkle-Kisogawa is an extradosed design, with long gaps between the cable supported sections.

An extradosed bridge is a cable-stayed bridge with a more substantial bridge deck that, being stiffer and stronger, allows the cables to be omitted close to the tower and for the towers to be lower in proportion to the span. The first extradosed bridges were the Ganter Bridge and Sunniberg Bridge in Switzerland. The first extradosed bridge in the United States, the Pearl Harbor Memorial Bridge was built to carry I-95 across the Quinnipiac River in New Haven, Connecticut, opening in June 2012.

Cable-stayed cradle-system bridge

[edit]

A cradle system carries the strands within the stays from the bridge deck to bridge deck, as a continuous element, eliminating anchorages in the pylons. Each epoxy-coated steel strand is carried inside the cradle in a one-inch (2.54 cm) steel tube. Each strand acts independently, allowing for removal, inspection, and replacement of individual strands. The first two such bridges are the Penobscot Narrows Bridge, completed in 2006, and the Veterans' Glass City Skyway, completed in 2007.[13]

[edit]

Self-anchored suspension bridge

[edit]

A self-anchored suspension bridge has some similarity in principle to the cable-stayed type in that tension forces that prevent the deck from dropping are converted into compression forces vertically in the tower and horizontally along the deck structure. It is also related to the suspension bridge in having arcuate main cables with suspender cables, although the self-anchored type lacks the heavy cable anchorages of the ordinary suspension bridge. Unlike either a cable-stayed bridge or a suspension bridge, the self-anchored suspension bridge must be supported by falsework during construction and so it is more expensive to construct.

Notable cable-stayed bridges

[edit]
See also: List of longest cable-stayed bridge spans and Category:Cable-stayed bridges
A view of the Clark Bridge from West Alton, Missouri
  • Changtai Yangtze River Bridge, connecting the cities of Changzhou and Taizhou across the Yangtze River in China, opened in 2025. It has the world's longest span, at 1,208 metres (3,963 ft) meters
  • Clark Bridge, named after explorer William Clark, carries U.S. 67 between Illinois and Missouri. Opened in 1994, the 108-foot-wide bridge (33 m) replaced the old Clark Bridge, a truss bridge built in 1928 which was only 20 feet (6.1 m) wide. The bridge is sometimes referred to as the Super Bridge as its construction process was documented in the 1997 NOVA episode Super Bridge, which highlighted the challenges of building the bridge, especially during the Great Flood of 1993. Total length is 4,620 feet (1,408 m) with a longest span of 756 feet (230 m).
Erasmus Bridge, Erasmusbrug, in Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • Erasmus Bridge crosses the Nieuwe Maas in Rotterdam, Netherlands. The southern span of the bridge has an 89 metres (292 ft) bascule bridge for ships that cannot pass under the bridge. The bascule bridge is the largest and heaviest in West Europe and has the largest panel of its type in the world.
A view of the Golden Horn Metro Bridge, with the Galata Tower at the left end of the frame, Istanbul, Turkey
Margaret Hunt Hill Bridge over the Trinity River in Dallas, Texas, U.S. (2012)
  • Margaret Hunt Hill Bridge in Dallas, Texas, U.S., which opened in 2012 and spans the Trinity River. In 2012, the bridge received an Outstanding Civil Engineering Achievement Award from the Texas section of the American Society of Civil Engineers.[18][19] The bridge also received a 2012 European Convention for Constructional Steelwork Award For Steel Bridges.[20]
  • Millau Viaduct, the bridge with the tallest piers in the world: 341 metres (1,119 ft) tall and roadway 266 metres (873 ft) high, spanning the river Tarn in France. With a total length of 2,460 metres (8,070 ft) and seven towers, it also has the longest cable-stayed suspended deck in the world.
Most SNP (Bridge of the Slovak National Uprising) – the world's longest cable-stayed bridge to have one pylon and one cable-stayed plane (Bratislava, Slovakia, 1967–1972)
  • Most SNP (Nový most), the world's longest cable-stayed bridge in category with one pylon and with one cable-stayed plane, spanning the Danube in Bratislava, Slovakia. The main span is 303 metres (994 ft), total length 430.8 metres (1,413 ft). The only member of World Federation of Great Towers that is primarily used as a bridge. It houses a flying-saucer restaurant at the top of pylon 85 metres (279 ft) tall.
  • Octavio Frias de Oliveira bridge crosses the Pinheiros River in São Paulo, 2008. It has a 138 metres (453 ft)-high pylon under which two stayed roads cross each other turning 90° to the opposite bank of the river.
  • Oresund Bridge, a combined two-track rail and four-lane road bridge with a main span of 490 metres (1,610 ft) and a total length of 7.85 kilometres (4.88 mi), crossing the Öresund between Malmö, Sweden, and the Danish Capital Region.
Pelješac Bridge connects the southeastern Croatian exclave to the rest of the country.
  • Pelješac Bridge, Dubrovnik-Neretva County, Croatia. It is a 2,404 metres (7,887 ft) long and 98 metres (322 ft) tall road bridge that connects the southeastern semi-exclave to the rest of the country, spanning the sea channel between Komarna and Pelješac.
  • Penobscot Narrows Bridge and Observatory, a road bridge with an observatory at the top of one of the towers, and a span of 2,120 feet (646 m).
  • Ponte Morandi, part of which collapsed during a rainstorm on 14 August 2018
  • Pont de Normandie, crosses the Seine in Normandy, France (1988–1995) – briefly the world's longest cable-stayed bridge.
  • Queensferry Crossing (formerly the Forth Replacement Crossing) is a road bridge in Scotland. It is built alongside the existing, suspension, Forth Road Bridge across the Firth of Forth and upon completion in 2017 became the longest triple-tower cable-stayed bridge in the world at 2700m.[21]
  • Pont de Brotonne, first modern cable-stayed bridge of that type, opened to traffic in 1977.[citation needed]
  • Rande Bridge in Spain near Vigo is the highway cable-stayed bridge with the longest and slenderest span in the world at the time of construction (1973–1977). Three long spans of 148 metres (486 ft) + 400 metres (1,300 ft) + 148 metres (486 ft). Pylons in concrete, girder in steel.
  • Rio-Antirio bridge crosses the Gulf of Corinth near Patras, Greece. At a total length of 2,880 metres (9,450 ft) and four towers, it has the second longest cable-stayed suspended deck (2,258 metres (7,408 ft) long) in the world, with only the deck of the Millau Viaduct in southern France being longer at 2,460 metres (8,070 ft). However, as the latter is also supported by bearings at the pylons apart from cable stays, the Rio–Antirrio bridge deck might be considered the longest cable-stayed fully suspended deck in the world.
Rio–Antirrio bridge that crosses the Gulf of Corinth near Patras, linking the town of Rio on the Peloponnese peninsula to Antirrio on mainland Greece by road.
Rio Negro Bridge, at 3,595 metres (11,795 ft), is the longest cable-stayed bridge in Brazil.[14]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cable-stayed bridge

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A cable-stayed bridge is a type of bridge structure in which the roadway deck is supported directly by inclined cables anchored to one or more towers, or pylons, allowing the cables to transfer loads from the deck straight to the towers without the need for additional suspending cables between towers. Unlike suspension bridges, where the deck hangs from main cables draped over the towers, cable-stayed designs use multiple diagonal stays that act in tension, often creating a fan, , or semi-fan pattern, while the deck itself functions as a continuous under compression. This configuration enables efficient spanning of distances typically ranging from 100 to over 1,000 meters, with high-strength cables providing the primary support. The concept of cable-stayed bridges dates back to sketches in the 16th century, but early implementations in the 19th century often blended features with suspension designs, such as the Drylburgh Abbey Bridge in Scotland (1817) and hybrid elements in the Brooklyn Bridge (1883). Modern cable-stayed bridges emerged in the mid-20th century, with the Strömsund Bridge in Sweden (1956) recognized as the first fully developed example, featuring a 182-meter main span supported by just two cables per side. Their popularity surged post-World War II due to advances in materials like high-strength steel and post-tensioning concrete, as well as improved analysis methods, leading to over 67 bridges exceeding 500 meters by 2020. Today, they represent a dominant form for long-span crossings, with ongoing innovations in cable damping and aerodynamics to mitigate vibrations. Cable-stayed bridges offer several advantages over other long-span types, including faster construction times due to simpler erection sequences like the cantilever method, lower costs for spans up to 1,100 meters, and greater structural that reduces deck deformations under live loads. They provide flexibility with options for symmetric or asymmetric layouts, or materials, and aesthetically pleasing forms that integrate well with varied landscapes. However, they are less suitable for ultra-long spans beyond 1,200 meters compared to suspension bridges, require specialized expertise for cable arrangement and control, and demand rigorous deformation analyses during . Key components include the towers for vertical support, the deck girder for load distribution, and stay cables often equipped with dampers or crossties to counter wind-induced oscillations. Notable examples highlight their engineering prowess: the Strömsund Bridge pioneered the modern form, while the in (2005), spans 471 meters with a distinctive diamond-shaped tower. The in (2004), the world's tallest bridge at 343 meters, crosses the Tarn Valley with seven cable-supported piers and a 2,460-meter total length, easing traffic between and the Mediterranean. For span length, the in (2012) held the record at 1,104 meters until the Changtai Yangtze River Bridge in opened in September 2025 with a 1,208-meter main span, connecting and Taizhou over the . These structures demonstrate the bridge type's evolution from practical crossings to iconic landmarks.

Fundamentals

Definition and Characteristics

A cable-stayed bridge is a structural system in which the bridge deck is supported directly by inclined cables anchored to one or more towers, known as pylons, with the cables operating in tension to transfer loads from the deck to the pylons and ground anchorages. Unlike suspension bridges, the cables connect straight from the pylons to the deck without intermediary suspenders, creating a continuous girder that functions as an elastic beam under prestress from the cable forces. This configuration allows for efficient load distribution, with the deck primarily in compression and the cables in tension, minimizing the need for massive anchor blocks compared to other cable-supported designs. Key characteristics of cable-stayed bridges include their suitability for medium to long spans, typically ranging from 100 to 1,100 meters, making them ideal for crossings where or arch bridges become inefficient. The cables are arranged in patterns such as fan (converging at the pylon top), (parallel lines from evenly spaced points on the pylon), or harped (a semi-parallel variant with adjusted spacing), which influence both structural performance and visual design. These bridges often exhibit aesthetic appeal due to the prominent, diagonal cable arrays that create a dynamic, modern silhouette against the skyline. In terms of load paths, vertical forces from traffic and environmental loads on the deck are primarily carried by the cable stays, which resolve these into axial tension and direct the resultant forces to the pylons for vertical support and to anchorages for horizontal balance. Cable-stayed bridges can be classified by span length as short-span (under 200 meters), medium-span (200–500 meters), and long-span (over 500 meters), with the majority falling into the medium category for optimal economy and constructability. This versatility positions them as a preferred choice for urban and coastal where both functionality and visual impact are prioritized.

Key Structural Components

The key structural components of a cable-stayed bridge consist of the pylons, stay cables, deck, and anchorage systems supported by , each designed to specific forces while ensuring overall stability. Most are earth-anchored, though self-anchored exist where end spans to the deck itself. Pylons, or towers, provide the primary vertical support and serve as points for the stay cables. Typically constructed from reinforced or for or for fabrication efficiency, they feature cross-sections that are either hollow (for to reduce weight) or solid/truss-like (for to enhance rigidity). Common shapes include A-shaped, H-frame, inverted Y-frame, diamond, or twin-diamond configurations to optimize load distribution and site constraints. Pylon heights generally range from 20% to 25% of the main span length, allowing for effective cable angles while minimizing material use. Stay cables are the tension elements that connect the pylons to the deck, directly transferring loads. Composed of high-strength in configurations such as parallel wire strands, locked coil ropes, or spiral strands, they achieve tensile strengths of 1,570 to 1,860 N/mm² and are often protected by polyethylene sheathing against . Cables are arranged in parallel (harp), fanned (fan), or semi-fanned patterns, with anchorage points at the pylon tops and along the deck at intervals of 5 to 15 meters. Typical cable diameters vary from 10 to 20 cm, accommodating bundles of 5 to 7 mm wires or 15 to 15.7 mm strands scaled to span demands. The deck forms the bridge's , carrying traffic loads and distributing them to the cable attachment points. Predominantly a for torsional , it is built from for long spans exceeding 500 meters, for medium spans under 250 meters, or steel-concrete composites for balanced performance. Deck widths are engineered for vehicular capacity, often 20 to 30 meters to support multiple lanes, with depths typically 1/80 to 1/300 of the span length to maintain slenderness without excessive deflection. Anchorages and foundations secure the system against tensile and compressive forces. Cable anchorages, embedded in the pylons and deck, use steel saddles or deviators to grip strands and transfer loads without slippage, often requiring complex detailing in fan arrangements. End piers function as primary anchorages for cables, resisting horizontal pulls, while deep foundations such as drilled shafts or piles extend to to counter uplift from cable tension and vertical compression from pylons, with base dimensions scaled to site for overturning resistance.

Principle of Operation

In a cable-stayed bridge, dead loads such as the self-weight of the deck and live loads from are transferred from the bridge deck to the pylons primarily through the inclined stay cables, which carry these forces in tension. The vertical components of the cable tensions support the downward loads, while the horizontal components induce axial compression in the deck, helping to stiffen it against . These cable forces are then balanced at the pylons, where the tensions resolve into compressive forces within the pylon structure, and anchorage reactions at the base or backstays transfer the loads to . The relies on principles of static equilibrium, ensuring vertical and horizontal force balance across the system. For vertical equilibrium, the sum of the upward vertical components from the stay cables equals the total downward load on the deck. Horizontally, the inward-pulling components from opposing cable sets cancel at the pylon top, preventing net lateral movement. Additionally, the cable stays provide moment resistance by counteracting the deck's tendency to deflect under load; the inclined cables create a triangulated force path that minimizes rotational moments, enhancing overall rigidity without relying heavily on the deck's . A simplified model for cable tension in a symmetric cable-stayed bridge assumes a uniform vertical load WW distributed over the main span, supported equally by cable sets on either side of the pylon. For equilibrium, the vertical component of tension in each cable set balances half the total load, leading to the relation Tsin⁡θ=W/2T \sin \theta = W/2, where TT is the cable tension and θ\theta is the cable inclination to the horizontal. Solving for TT yields the basic formula: T=W2sin⁡θT = \frac{W}{2 \sin \theta} This derivation starts with vertical force balance per side: the cable's vertical resolution Tsin⁡θT \sin \theta equals W/2W/2. The horizontal components Tcos⁡θT \cos \theta from both sides cancel at the pylon, maintaining equilibrium without shear buildup. In practice, this approximation applies to idealized cases with end or average-angle cables; actual tensions vary along multi-cable arrangements due to distributed loading. Dynamically, cable-stayed bridges respond to wind and vibrations through the stays' role in distributing torsional and flexural modes across the structure. The cables stiffen the deck against aerodynamic torsion by coupling lateral and vertical motions, reducing flutter risks under crosswinds. However, stay cables themselves are prone to vibrations from wind, rain, or traffic, with low inherent damping (typically 0.1-0.3% of critical) necessitating supplemental measures. Rain-wind-induced vibrations, common at wind speeds of 5-18 m/s, arise from upper rivulet formation on the cable surface, exciting oscillations at 0.5-3.3 Hz; effective damping requires achieving 0.5-1.0% of critical via external viscous dampers or cross-ties to limit amplitudes and prevent fatigue.

History

Early Developments

The origins of cable-stayed bridges trace back to 19th-century engineering experiments in , where early iron cable systems were tested in small-scale footbridges. For instance, in 1822, French engineer Marc Séguin constructed an iron wire suspension bridge at Vernosc-les-Annonay that incorporated inclined wire supports, serving as a precursor to direct cable anchorage concepts by blending suspension and stayed elements for pedestrian use. These structures marked initial explorations of tensioned cables to support decks, though limited by material strength and primarily temporary in nature. In the mid-19th century, American engineer advanced these ideas through hybrid "stayed suspension" designs influenced by European inclined suspenders. His 1845 Pittsburgh Aqueduct featured parabolic main cables supplemented by inclined stays that carried up to one-third of the load, enhancing stability without full reliance on suspenders; similar configurations appeared in the 1867 Cincinnati-Covington Bridge (main span 1,057 ft) and the 1883 (main span 1,595 ft). Roebling's strength-based equilibrium method, using safety factors of 4–5, demonstrated the feasibility of stays for load distribution in longer spans, transitioning concepts from experimental footbridges toward permanent vehicular applications. German engineer Franz Dischinger contributed theoretical advancements in the 1920s and 1930s through patents on cable-stayed systems, laying groundwork for modern designs. An early example of a vehicular stayed suspension bridge in was the 1928 Port à l'Anglais Bridge (Anglais Bridge) in , (span approximately 50 m), which featured inclined suspenders in a hybrid configuration, shifting from temporary pedestrian setups toward enduring road use. Post-World War II material innovations, particularly high-strength cables, enabled longer spans and permanent construction; Dischinger's design for the 1956 Strömsund Bridge in (182 m main span) became the first modern cable-stayed example, with radial stays from A-frame pylons supporting a deck. French engineers contributed through post-war reconstruction efforts, adopting cables for efficient, economical spans in hybrid systems that influenced European adoption.

Modern Advancements

The post-1970s era marked a significant boom in cable-stayed bridge construction, driven by advancements in materials and design that enabled longer spans and greater global adoption. During the 1970s and 1980s, projects like the (formerly Annacis Island Bridge) in , completed in 1986 with a main span of 465 meters, exemplified this growth and set a then-record length. This period also saw the introduction of aerodynamic improvements, such as streamlined deck shapes and wind mitigation strategies, to enhance stability against vortex-induced vibrations and gusts, making longer spans feasible in windy environments. The 1980s energy crises further influenced designs by emphasizing material efficiency, reducing and usage through optimized cable arrangements that minimized overall structural weight while maintaining load capacity. In the and , span records continued to escalate, with the integration of tools revolutionizing structural analysis and optimization. The in , opened in 2004 with a central span of 342 meters, highlighted these capabilities through finite element modeling that allowed precise simulation of complex load distributions and construction sequencing. By the late , spans reached approximately 890 meters, as seen in Japan's Tatara Bridge (1999), surpassing earlier benchmarks like the Higashi-Kobe Bridge's 485-meter span from 1990. These computational advancements enabled engineers to iterate designs rapidly, incorporating nonlinear cable behaviors and dynamic responses, which supported the proliferation of cable-stayed bridges worldwide for spans between 200 and 1,000 meters. Twenty-first-century innovations have focused on , , and resilience, particularly in seismically active regions like . The use of composite materials, such as -concrete hybrid decks, has improved stiffness and reduced weight, as demonstrated in projects like the in the UK (2017, 650-meter spans). Smart monitoring systems, employing wireless sensors to measure cable tension via vibration analysis, have become standard for real-time health assessment, with deployments on bridges like South Korea's Jindo Bridge (1984) enabling and early damage detection. features, including recycled —up to 19,000 tonnes in some structures—have lowered embodied carbon, while seismic adaptations in , such as fluid viscous dampers and isolated foundations, have enhanced performance against earthquakes, as refined through post-2000 studies on bridges like the Higashi-Kobe during the 1995 Kobe event. As of 2025, the longest span stands at 1,208 meters with China's Changtai River Bridge, reflecting ongoing evolution toward spans exceeding 1,200 meters through these integrated technologies.

Engineering and Design

Structural Analysis

Structural analysis of cable-stayed bridges involves evaluating the interactions among the deck, cables, and pylons under various loading conditions to ensure stability, , and serviceability. Static analysis addresses dead loads from the bridge's self-weight and live loads from or pedestrians, while dynamic analysis considers time-varying forces such as , seismic events, and vehicle-induced vibrations. These analyses typically employ finite element methods (FEM) to model the nonlinear behavior of cables and the coupled responses of structural components. For instance, three-dimensional FEM simulations capture deck-stay-pylon interactions by discretizing the structure into beam, shell, and truss elements, enabling accurate prediction of internal forces and deformations. In static analysis, the at the pylon base, MM, arises from the horizontal components of cable tensions and is given by M=∑((Tisin⁡θi)⋅zi)M = \sum ( (T_i \sin \theta_i) \cdot z_i ) where TiT_i is the tension in the ii-th cable, θi\theta_i is its inclination from vertical, and ziz_i is the vertical height from the pylon base to the cable's anchorage point on the pylon. This arises from balancing the horizontal components of cable pulls against the pylon's resistance, often computed iteratively in FEM models to account for geometric nonlinearities. Deflection limits are enforced per codes, such as L/800 for live load deflections in bridges, to prevent excessive deformations that could affect drivability or . Load factors are applied according to standards like AASHTO LRFD or Eurocode EN 1990 to distinguish between ultimate limit states (ULS) for structural strength and serviceability limit states (SLS) for user comfort and functionality. In AASHTO, ULS combinations use factors such as 1.25 for dead loads and 1.75 for live loads to verify capacity against collapse, while SLS checks control vibrations and deflections under unfactored or reduced loads. Eurocode similarly defines ULS for safety against rupture or instability and SLS for limiting vibrations in pedestrian or traffic scenarios, ensuring accelerations remain below thresholds like 0.5 m/s² for comfort. Dynamic analysis extends to aerodynamic stability, where flutter—a self-excited oscillation—poses risks to long-span bridges under crosswinds. Flutter analysis involves modal decomposition and aeroelastic modeling to determine critical speeds, often using Scanlan's flutter derivatives to quantify motion-induced forces on the deck. Cables introduce additional complexity through their sag, which reduces effective by allowing geometric nonlinearity; the sag effect lowers the cable's axial rigidity, impacting overall bridge frequencies and requiring equivalent modulus adjustments in models, such as Ernst's formula for the reduced . Specialized software facilitates these analyses, with tools like MIDAS Civil and SAP2000 enabling comprehensive simulations of construction stages, load paths, and nonlinear effects. MIDAS Civil supports automated cable force optimization and time-history analysis for seismic and wind loads, while SAP2000 provides robust FEM capabilities for modal and evaluations in cable-deck-pylon systems. These platforms integrate code-based load factors and deflection checks to validate designs against ULS and SLS criteria.

Cable and Pylon Configurations

Cable-stayed bridges employ various configurations for cables and pylons to optimize structural , aesthetics, and load distribution. These arrangements influence the transfer of forces from the deck to the pylons, affecting overall stability and economy. Common cable patterns include fan, , and semi-fan layouts, while pylon shapes typically feature H, A, Y, or diamond forms, either as single or multiple units in portal or diamond frames. The fan pattern, also known as radial, arranges cables to converge at a single point atop the pylon, creating a radiating effect that minimizes material usage due to more favorable cable inclinations and reduces bending moments in the pylon compared to other patterns. This configuration is particularly advantageous for shorter spans, as it applies minimal transverse moments to the pylon, enhancing structural superiority, though it becomes impractical for very long spans where cable angles become excessively steep or spacing at the pylon top is unfeasible. In multi-pylon bridges, the radiant fan pattern extends this convergence principle across multiple supports, promoting efficient force resolution but requiring careful alignment to avoid uneven loading. In contrast, the harp pattern maintains parallel cables throughout their length, providing even load distribution across the deck and pylon, which is beneficial for uniform stress management and aesthetic appeal through symmetrical lines. However, this setup demands taller pylons to achieve adequate inclinations, increasing material demands and inducing larger longitudinal bending moments in the pylon due to nonsymmetrical horizontal components. The semi-fan, or modified fan, hybrid combines elements of both, with cables converging partially toward the pylon top but remaining roughly parallel in the lower sections, balancing the fan's efficiency with the harp's practicality for moderate spans by reducing pylon moments while avoiding extreme convergence issues. Pylon shapes significantly impact force paths and behavior, with common forms including the H-shaped portal, which uses vertical or slightly inclined legs connected by a crossbeam for robust resistance to lateral loads and torsion; the A-shaped, featuring inclined legs converging at the top to efficiently channel cable forces axially and minimize ; and the Y-shaped (or inverted Y), where a single upright splits into two legs at the base, offering good stability for asymmetric loading while reducing material in the upper section. Diamond-shaped pylons, resembling crossed braces, provide enhanced rigidity through diagonal framing, particularly in single-pylon setups, and are favored for their aesthetic integration and ability to lower moments by distributing transverse forces effectively. Single pylons suit simple spans, whereas multiple pylons in multi-span bridges allow for radiant cable patterns but introduce complex interactions in moments, often requiring portal frames to counteract differential settlements. Key configuration parameters include cable spacing on the deck, typically ranging from 5 to 20 meters to ensure each cable can be a single strand for ease of replacement and to optimize load transfer without excessive deck stiffening. Inclination angles for cables generally fall between 20 and 60 degrees, with a minimum of 25 degrees recommended to prevent excessive tension and compression in the deck while maximizing vertical force components; angles above 65 degrees can lead to inefficient horizontal pulls on the pylon. These parameters directly influence pylon bending moments, as steeper inclinations in fan patterns reduce them, whereas parallel harp arrangements amplify longitudinal moments, necessitating stronger pylon cross-sections.

Deck and Foundation Systems

The roadway deck in a cable-stayed bridge serves as the primary load-carrying element, directly supported by the stay cables and designed to integrate seamlessly with the overall structural system. Common deck types include orthotropic decks, which are prevalent in longer-span applications due to their lightweight construction and high strength-to-weight ratio; these consist of a plate with longitudinal ribs supported on transverse cross-girders, providing efficient use and rapid fabrication. For moderate spans, composite concrete decks—typically girders topped with a slab—are widely used, offering enhanced durability and stiffness through the synergy of materials while reducing long-term maintenance needs. Concrete box-girder decks are another standard choice, particularly in prestressed configurations, where the closed cross-section delivers superior torsional resistance by minimizing warping and distortion under asymmetric loading from the cables. These box sections, often single-cell or multi-cell, are engineered with varying widths to optimize aerodynamic performance and cable anchorage, ensuring the deck's cross-section resists twisting moments effectively. To achieve structural efficiency, deck depths are typically maintained at 1/40 to 1/60 of the main span length, allowing for slender profiles that reduce self-weight while preserving bending and shear capacity. Support systems for the deck emphasize secure and flexible connections to handle dynamic forces and environmental movements. Cable attachment points, known as saddles or deviators, are critical at the pylon tops and deck anchors; saddles guide and distribute cable forces evenly across the pylon, often using curved supports to minimize bending in the stays, while deviators on the deck redirect cables with low-friction interfaces to prevent premature wear. Expansion joints accommodate , contraction, and seismic shifts, typically modular designs with elastomeric seals to allow up to several meters of relative movement without compromising or ride quality. Bearings at pylon-deck interfaces and end supports provide rotational freedom and controlled translation; fixed bearings restrain horizontal and vertical loads while permitting , guided bearings limit multi-directional movement, and free-sliding or rotating types enable longitudinal expansion. These elements ensure the deck's stability and longevity under varying loads. Foundation systems anchor the pylons and backstays, transferring substantial compressive and tensile forces into the ground while accounting for site-specific geotechnical conditions. Pile foundations, often bored or driven piles arranged in groups under pylon bases, are commonly employed in soft or variable soils to achieve deep embedment and high axial capacity, with diameters ranging from 1 to 3 meters depending on load demands. Caisson foundations, such as open or pneumatic types, are preferred in marine or riverine environments for cable-stayed bridges, providing robust resistance to scour and lateral loads through their cellular or box-like structures sunk into the . significantly influences pylon base design, as flexible soil layers can amplify base rotations and settlements under wind or seismic excitation, necessitating advanced modeling to predict differential movements and optimize foundation . control measures, including tuned mass dampers installed on the deck or pylons, mitigate aeroelastic effects like flutter or buffeting; these devices, tuned to the bridge's natural frequencies, dissipate energy through counter-oscillations, reducing amplitudes by up to 80% in long-span examples.

Comparisons with Other Bridges

Versus Suspension Bridges

Cable-stayed bridges differ fundamentally from suspension bridges in their load transfer mechanism. In cable-stayed designs, stay cables connect directly from the deck to the pylons, providing immediate support and distributing loads axially through the cables to the pylons. In contrast, suspension bridges employ main cables that span between towers in a curve, with vertical transferring the deck's weight to these main cables, which then convey loads to the towers and end anchorages. This direct attachment in cable-stayed bridges eliminates the need for , resulting in a more integrated structural system. Span capabilities highlight another key distinction, with cable-stayed bridges suited to medium-length spans typically ranging from 200 meters to over 1,100 meters, such as the 856-meter main span of the Pont de Normandie. Suspension bridges, however, excel in ultra-long spans exceeding 1,000 meters, like the 2,023-meter 1915 Çanakkale Bridge in Turkey, due to the efficient catenary shape of the main cables that minimizes material use for greater distances. For spans under 800 meters, cable-stayed bridges are often more economical, requiring less steel and simpler anchorage systems without the massive end anchors needed in suspension designs. Construction processes further underscore practical differences. Cable-stayed bridges allow for progressive erection, where the deck is built segmentally and supported by stays as construction advances, avoiding the need for a temporary catwalk or complex cable-spinning operations required for suspension bridge main cables. This results in shorter construction times—often 20-30% faster for comparable projects—and reduced material demands, making them preferable for medium spans. Suspension bridges, while ideal for record spans, involve more intricate assembly of main cables from thousands of wires, increasing both time and cost. Additionally, cable-stayed bridges typically feature 50 to 200 stay cables per bridge, providing distributed support, whereas suspension bridges rely on just two main cables supplemented by dozens of suspenders. Pylons in cable-stayed bridges primarily experience compression forces from the inclined stays and deck loads, balanced by tension in the cables. Suspension bridge towers similarly bear compression from the draped main cables but must also resist significant horizontal thrust components, necessitating robust foundations. Overall, cable-stayed bridges offer greater stiffness and wind resistance for their span range due to the direct cable-deck connection, reducing dynamic responses compared to the more flexible suspension systems.
AspectCable-Stayed BridgesSuspension Bridges
Typical Span Range200–1,200 m>1,000 m (up to 2,000 m+)
Material UseLess for spans 700–1,500 m; 50–200 cablesMore overall; 2 main cables +
Erection TimeFaster (e.g., no cable spinning; 20–30% quicker)Longer due to main cable installation

Versus Arch and Beam Bridges

Cable-stayed bridges differ fundamentally from arch bridges in their structural principles, with cable-stayed designs relying on tension in the stays to support the deck, while arch bridges depend on compression within the curved arch rib to transfer loads to the abutments. This tension-based system in cable-stayed bridges eliminates the horizontal reactions that arch bridges impose on their foundations, making them particularly suitable for sites in valleys or over deep water where strong abutments are impractical or costly to construct. In contrast, arch bridges are most efficient for shorter spans, typically ranging from 100 to 500 meters, and require firm, stable foundations to resist the outward , which can complicate construction in soft soils or uneven terrain. When compared to beam or bridges, cable-stayed bridges offer superior performance for medium to long spans by using inclined stays to directly transfer loads from the deck to the pylon, significantly reducing bending moments and allowing for spans that exceed the practical limits of continuous beam designs. Traditional beam bridges, whether simply supported or continuous, are constrained by strength and deflection limits, with economic spans generally limited to 200 to 400 meters due to excessive flexural stresses and the need for deep to control deflections under L/1000 serviceability criteria. Cable-stayed configurations alleviate these issues by distributing loads axially through the cables, providing an economic crossover point around 150 to 300 meters where they become more cost-effective than beam alternatives, especially for roadways or railways requiring minimal vertical clearance. Arch bridges generate significant horizontal reactions at the abutments, which must be countered by massive end supports or tie rods, whereas cable-stayed bridges produce primarily vertical anchorage pulls at the deck ends and pylons, simplifying foundation in constrained sites. Beam bridges suffer from pronounced deflection problems under live loads, often necessitating stiffening trusses or increased section depths, a challenge mitigated in cable-stayed bridges through the stays' ability to limit mid-span sags and vibrations.
AspectCable-Stayed BridgesArch BridgesBeam/Girder Bridges
Primary Load PathTension in stays from deck to pylonCompression in arch rib to abutments in longitudinal
Typical Span Range200–1,000 m (economic 150–600 m)100–500 mUp to 200–400 m (continuous)
Terrain AdaptabilityHigh (valleys, water; no on abutments)Moderate (needs firm for )High (flat sites; sensitive to settlement)
Load HandlingEfficient for distributed and point loads via staysBest for uniform compression; limitsProne to deflection and moments; needs stiffening

Variations

Standard Single-Span Types

Standard single-span cable-stayed bridges feature a primary span supported directly by cables anchored to one or more pylons, typically without intermediate piers in the main span, making them suitable for crossings where a clear span is prioritized. These configurations are classified primarily by pylon arrangement and cable layout, with the main span lengths commonly ranging from 300 to 600 meters for applications. In mono-pylon designs, a single central tower supports the deck, often resulting in an asymmetric configuration with one main span and a shorter side span on one end. This setup is efficient for urban environments or skewed crossings, as seen in the in , where the inclined pylon enhances aesthetic appeal while managing unbalanced loads. Pylon slenderness in such designs typically follows a height-to-width of 1:5 to 1:10 to balance structural integrity and visual elegance. Duo-pylon configurations employ two towers flanking a symmetric main span, often with equal side spans on either side for balanced force distribution. This is the most prevalent for river or highway crossings, exemplified by the in with a 366-meter main span. Side spans in these bridges generally comprise 0.25 to 0.5 of the main span length to optimize stability and reduce pylon moments. Cable arrangements further define these types, with fan-stayed systems radiating from the pylon top in a triangular to efficiently transfer loads and minimize deck bending. This subtype is widely used in 300- to 600-meter highway bridges like the Arthur Ravenel Bridge (471 meters) in , where it supports heavy traffic loads over waterways. Harp-stayed variants feature parallel cables attached at regular intervals along the pylon height, providing an orderly aesthetic suitable for urban settings, as in the Dames Point Bridge (396 meters) in . These layouts draw from established cable and pylon configurations that enable efficient single-span erection.

Multi-Span and Specialized Forms

Multi-span cable-stayed bridges extend the standard single-span design by incorporating a continuous deck supported by multiple pylons, typically more than three spans without intermediate anchor blocks to maintain structural continuity. This configuration enables load sharing across spans through frame action involving the deck, pylons, and cables, where the continuous distributes vertical loads and moments among adjacent segments for enhanced overall stiffness. Such bridges can achieve total lengths up to approximately 2.25 km, as demonstrated by the Rion-Antirion Bridge in , which features a continuous deck over four pylons. However, multi-span arrangements introduce stability challenges, particularly sensitivity to differential settlements of the pylons, which can induce uneven cable tensions and secondary bending moments in the deck, necessitating advanced foundation designs and monitoring systems. Specialized forms of cable-stayed bridges adapt the core concept for specific site constraints, aesthetic goals, or efficiency gains. Extradosed bridges, for instance, employ shorter stay cables that function akin to external prestressing tendons, paired with a stiffer deck to achieve a lower pylon profile compared to traditional cable-stayed designs; this makes them suitable for main spans in the 200-400 m range, where they offer economic advantages over longer-span alternatives while minimizing visual impact. Side-spar configurations position the pylon at the deck edge rather than centrally, with cables extending from one side to support the span, allowing for asymmetric layouts that accommodate urban or navigational restrictions, as seen in the Riel Bridge with its 110 m main span. spar variants further innovate by using a single, inclined spar cantilevered from one side of the deck, which resists bending from cable forces without a traditional vertical tower, enabling slender profiles and spans up to several hundred meters in hybrid applications. The cradle-system represents another specialized approach, where stay cables pass continuously through a sheath or saddle (cradle) at the pylon top, connecting directly from one deck anchorage to another, which simplifies cable arrangement and reduces pylon-top deviations under load for improved durability and aesthetics. This system has been applied in bridges like the , with a 471 m main span, enhancing serviceability by minimizing cable and . Self-anchored variants eliminate ground anchorages by having the cables anchor directly to the deck ends, creating a self-balancing system where the deck resists compressive forces from cable tensions; this reduces foundation requirements but demands a robust to handle increased axial loads, making it viable for spans of 100-1,000 m in constrained sites.

Construction Processes

Pylon and Cable Erection

The construction of pylons in cable-stayed bridges begins with the erection of these vertical or inclined towers, which serve as the primary supports for the stay cables. For concrete pylons, a common method is slip-form pouring, where formwork is continuously elevated using hydraulic jacks as concrete is placed in incremental lifts, typically 2 to 4 meters per day, ensuring a monolithic structure suitable for tapered cross-sections often required in long-span designs. This technique involves assembling lightweight glass-fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) panels or steel forms around reinforcement bars, followed by precise concrete placement, vibration, and curing before the form is jacked upward; innovative systems incorporate GPS and inclinometer-guided alignment to maintain verticality. Experimental validations, including full-scale mockups of 10-meter-high pylon sections, have demonstrated that slip-form methods reduce construction time by at least 50% compared to traditional climbing forms while enhancing surface quality and thermal insulation during winter pours. For steel pylons, erection typically employs segmental assembly using balanced cantilever techniques, where prefabricated sections are lifted and welded or bolted in place from the base upward, progressing symmetrically to maintain stability against and self-weight. Temporary bracing, such as diagonal or guy wires anchored to the foundation or ground, is essential during this to counteract and lateral forces, particularly for inclined or A-shaped pylons exceeding 100 meters in height. cranes, specialized fixed or guyed rigs capable of lifting 100-500 ton loads to elevations over 200 meters, are frequently used for hoisting these heavy segments in high pylon constructions, allowing precise placement without excessive site disruption. Temporary stays or auxiliary cables may also be installed early in the erection sequence to provide additional stability, simulating partial load conditions and preventing dynamic instabilities during progressive assembly. Once pylons are completed, cable installation follows, prioritizing precision to achieve the designed and load distribution. A prevalent technique is strand-by-strand , where individual high-strength strands (typically 15.2 mm , 7-wire prestressing type) are hoisted from the deck anchorage to the pylon using winches or auxiliary cranes, then individually tensioned and grouted within protective HDPE sheathing. Alternatively, prefabricated parallel-wire strands (PPWS) are used for efficiency in longer stays, consisting of 100-400 parallel wires (5-7 mm ) bundled hexagonally off-site, fitted with sockets, and installed as complete units via floating or methods before final tensioning. Strand systems ensure protection through cement filling, while PPWS rely on wire and HDPE sheathing; both allow for modular replacement if needed. Tensioning of the cables is performed sequentially using hydraulic jacks at the deck or pylon ends, applying force to approximately 50-70% of the cable's to balance dead loads and minimize deflections during subsequent deck erection; this prestress level is verified through load cells and measurements to confirm the target modulus and avoid over-stressing. protocols during cable work strictly limit operations to wind speeds below 20-30 km/h to prevent uncontrolled swaying or entanglement, with anemometers monitoring conditions in real-time. Pylon erection typically spans 6-12 months depending on height and site , enabling the bridge to progress to deck phases without undue delays.

Deck Installation and Tensioning

The installation of the bridge deck in cable-stayed bridges is a critical phase that ensures structural integrity and alignment with the pylons and cables, typically employing methods tailored to site constraints, span length, and material choices. Incremental launching involves constructing the deck in sequential segments on land behind an , then sliding it forward over temporary supports or permanent pylons using hydraulic jacks and a lightweight launch nose to reduce moments. This technique is particularly advantageous for cable-stayed bridges in valleys or over obstacles, as it allows pylons to be erected independently and uses the advancing deck as a platform for cable installation, potentially reducing time compared to other methods. Balanced construction, on the other hand, builds the deck outward from the pylons in precast segments—often weighing up to 300 tons each—using form travelers or overhead gantries to position and post-tension segments progressively from both sides of each pylon. Full-span lifting employs strand jacks to hoist entire prefabricated deck sections into place, suitable for shorter spans or urban environments where minimizing on-site work is essential, as demonstrated in projects requiring rapid assembly over active waterways. Once the deck segments are erected, continuity is achieved through epoxy-glued joints applied to match-cast faces, which provide shear transfer, , and to prevent slippage under load. These joints, typically dry or wet types, are sandblasted and coated with (excluding the top slab edge to allow for adjustment), ensuring long-term durability without leakage or cracking in well-executed segmental cable-stayed bridges. application occurs immediately before segment placement to maximize . Cable tensioning follows a staged sequence to achieve the designed geometry and load distribution. Primary tensioning occurs during deck erection, where stay cables are stressed incrementally as segments are added—often using the nonlinear advancing partial scheme (NAPS) to target a continuous beam profile on rigid supports while accounting for cable sag effects—ensuring pylon stability and minimizing unbalanced moments. Secondary tensioning, performed after deck completion, involves fine adjustments to all cables using the influence matrix method, compensating for construction uncertainties like thermal variations or initial force deviations, with targets keeping differences within 5% of design values. Alignment during both phases relies on deflectometers and dynamic frequency measurements at control points, such as cable anchorages, to monitor vertical deflections and horizontal displacements in real time. Final camber adjustments are essential to counter long-term effects like concrete creep, which causes and axial shortening in the deck, potentially leading to excessive sagging. Pre-camber—upward curvatures built into the deck, such as 1.6 meters at midspan—is incorporated during , followed by post-closure re-stressing of stays to redistribute forces and restore the intended profile, mimicking rigid support conditions. A two-step stresses new and existing cables during , then re-tensions the entire system upon completion to offset creep-induced deformations. Challenges in this phase include differential settlements of or pylons during tensioning, which can induce significant force variations in outer stay cables, altering load distribution and risking structural misalignment. These settlements, often from or uneven loading, require precise monitoring and iterative adjustments to maintain , as observed in single-pylon cable-stayed bridges where outer spans are particularly sensitive.

Materials and Innovations

Cable Materials and Fabrication

Stay cables in cable-stayed bridges primarily utilize high-strength wires, typically with tensile strengths (grades) ranging from 1,770 MPa to 1,960 MPa, to withstand the substantial tensile forces encountered in service. These steels are often galvanized to provide initial resistance or coated with for enhanced durability in harsh environments. Emerging alternatives include carbon fiber reinforced (CFRP) composites, which offer superior resistance, lower weight, and high tensile strength, making them suitable for long-term exposure to environmental stressors without degradation. Fabrication of stay cables typically involves either parallel strand systems, where multiple high-strength prestressing strands (each consisting of 7 or 19 wires of approximately 4-5 mm ) are assembled in parallel, or parallel wire systems, using numerous individual wires of 5-7 mm , to maximize load distribution and minimize twisting under tension. These strands or wires are then protected by extruding a (HDPE) sheathing around the bundle, which forms a waterproof barrier while allowing for compatibility. Corrosion inhibitors, such as or grease, are injected into the interstices between strands prior to sheathing to further prevent ingress and electrochemical reactions. Stay cables must demonstrate a minimum fatigue life of 2 million cycles under specified stress ranges to ensure reliability over the bridge's design lifespan, as verified through standardized testing protocols. To mitigate wind- or traffic-induced vibrations that could accelerate , viscous dampers are often installed at cable ends, functioning by dissipating through shear and achieving ratios of 2-5%. Fabrication and costs for these cables typically range from 500 to 1,000 USD per meter, influenced by strand count, coatings, and length. Design and testing of stay cables adhere to guidelines from the Post-Tensioning Institute (PTI), which specify requirements for material properties, corrosion protection, and fatigue endurance in document PTI DC45.1-18. Complementing these, the International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib) provides model code recommendations in Bulletin 89, emphasizing acceptance criteria for prestressing steels in stay systems, including qualification tests for long-term performance.

Pylon and Deck Materials

Pylons in cable-stayed bridges primarily utilize for its high and durability, often employing C50/60 grade , which achieves a characteristic of 50 MPa (cylinder) or 60 MPa () to support the compressive forces from stay cables. High-performance , such as S355 and S460, are also common for pylons requiring enhanced tensile and yield strength, with S355 offering a minimum yield strength of 355 MPa and S460 up to 460 MPa, enabling slender designs in longer spans. Hybrid composites, combining steel- elements, provide lightness and improved load distribution, as demonstrated in the Fifth River Bridge, where such pylons reduce overall weight while maintaining structural integrity. Bridge decks in cable-stayed structures frequently incorporate orthotropic plating, a welded steel plate system with longitudinal and transverse stiffeners that distributes loads efficiently and minimizes dead weight, commonly used in spans exceeding 200 meters. Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) segments offer superior tensile strength (over 8 MPa) and for deck construction, often cast in prefabricated units that enhance crack resistance and longevity. Fiber-reinforced (FRP) overlays provide a , corrosion-resistant surface layer on decks, improving performance and reducing needs when combined with UHPC. To mitigate shrinkage in pylons and UHPC deck segments, admixtures such as shrinkage-reducing agents (SRAs) are incorporated, which can reduce 28-day drying shrinkage by up to 58% by altering the surface tension of pore water. For components in pylons and orthotropic decks, coatings serve as a primary protection method, functioning through barrier isolation and galvanic sacrifice, with inorganic -rich primers applied directly to for atmospheric exposure in bridge environments. is enhanced by the high recyclability of these materials, with achieving rates exceeding 90% through repeated without quality loss, while aggregates support over 90% reuse in new construction. Modern innovations include 3D-printed elements in experimental bridge designs, enabling precise, topology-optimized components that can reduce material use by up to 50% in some cases. , incorporating porous lightweight aggregates for internal curing in bridge decks, can extend lifespan by more than 20 years compared to standard high-strength by reducing shrinkage and cracking.

Advantages and Limitations

Structural and Functional Benefits

Cable-stayed bridges exhibit a high due to the direct load transfer from the deck to the pylons via inclined stay cables, which act as a prestressed system that compresses the deck and minimizes material usage for enhanced rigidity. This configuration allows for more slender superstructures compared to traditional bridges, as the multi-stay arrangement distributes vertical loads efficiently, reducing the required of the deck by a factor of 10 relative to suspension bridges. The cable system also provides inherent , with alternative load paths that maintain structural integrity even under single cable failure scenarios, as demonstrated in analyses of long-span designs. Furthermore, these bridges handle unbalanced loads effectively through adjustable cable tensions and asymmetric arrangements, which enhance overall without excessive pylon modifications. Functionally, cable-stayed bridges offer clear navigation clearance beneath the deck, as the stay cables and single pylon per span eliminate intermediate supports within the waterway or roadway, supporting efficient spans from 100 m to over 1,000 m. Their elegant, fan-like cable patterns integrate aesthetically with landscapes, often serving as iconic landmarks that blend with visual appeal. Construction is typically faster than for suspension bridges, achieving 20-30% time savings through erection methods and prefabricated segments, as seen in projects completed in under 30 months without lengthy main cable spinning. Maintenance is facilitated by accessible cable inspections using techniques, such as visual and magnetic particle methods, to detect or fractures early and ensure long-term . For seismic resilience, base isolators like high-damping rubber bearings or lead-rubber bearings decouple the from ground motions, reducing base shear and deck accelerations by up to 50% in near-fault events. These bridges demonstrate span-to-cost optimal for main spans of 400-800 m, where material economy and load distribution minimize overall structural demands compared to shorter beam or longer suspension alternatives. Deflection ratios under live loads often achieve L/800 or better—surpassing typical limits of L/360—due to the cables counteracting up to 50% of temporary loads for improved ride comfort and serviceability.

Economic and Environmental Challenges

Cable-stayed bridges incur high initial construction costs, often ranging from $4,500 to $5,000 per square meter, primarily due to the specialized materials and erection techniques required for the stay cables and pylons. The stay cables alone can account for a substantial portion of the budget, with advanced options like carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) cables increasing upfront expenses compared to traditional , though they offer potential long-term savings. Specialized labor is essential for precise cable tensioning and installation, contributing significantly to these elevated costs. Despite the high initial outlay, cable-stayed bridges provide lifecycle economic benefits from their , with designed service lives typically reaching 100 years under proper , allowing for amortized costs over extended periods. For medium spans (around 200-500 meters), construction costs are influenced by site-specific factors like conditions and seismic requirements, though these figures can vary widely based on regional labor and prices. Environmentally, cable-stayed bridges exhibit high material intensity, with steel and concrete production driving the majority of embodied carbon emissions—often comprising over 90% of the total lifecycle footprint due to the large volumes required for cables, pylons, and decks. However, for long spans exceeding 500 meters, their carbon footprint per unit length is comparable to or lower than alternatives like suspension bridges, as the efficient load distribution reduces overall material needs relative to span length. Mitigation strategies include the adoption of "green" cables, such as CFRP composites, which lower emissions through reduced weight and corrosion resistance. Key challenges include cable fatigue from cyclic loading and environmental exposure, necessitating replacements every 20-50 years depending on conditions, with associated costs estimated at 1-5% of the initial budget per intervention to ensure structural integrity. Wind-induced vibrations, particularly under rain-wind conditions, pose another issue, often requiring the installation of viscous or tuned dampers on stay cables to limit amplitudes and prevent acceleration, adding 5-10% to expenses over the bridge's life. As of 2025, innovations such as increased CFRP adoption and AI-assisted real-time monitoring are addressing these challenges by enhancing durability and reducing long-term environmental impacts.

Notable Examples

Iconic Bridges in Europe and North America

In Europe, the Millau Viaduct in southern France stands as a pinnacle of cable-stayed engineering, completed in 2004 with a total length of 2,460 meters spanning the Tarn River valley. Designed by engineer Michel Virlogeux and architect Norman Foster, it features seven pylons, the tallest reaching 343 meters—surpassing the Eiffel Tower by 19 meters—and six main spans of 342 meters each, flanked by 204-meter side spans. This multi-span configuration addressed the challenging topography, with construction innovations including incremental launching of the deck segments and on-site cable spinning to minimize environmental disruption during the four-year build. The viaduct has transformed regional traffic, reducing congestion on the A75 motorway and handling over 2.5 million vehicles annually while enhancing connectivity between Paris and the Mediterranean. Another landmark in is the , opened in 2000, linking , , and , , across the with a cable-stayed main span of 490 meters. Part of a 15.9-kilometer fixed link that includes an and immersed tunnel, the bridge supports four lanes of motorway and dual railway tracks on its 7.8-kilometer cable-stayed section, elevated to allow maritime passage below. Its 204-meter-high pylons and streamlined design incorporate aerodynamic features to withstand high winds and ice loads, a critical for the Baltic region's harsh conditions. Since , it has facilitated over 20 million annual crossings, boosting by cutting travel time to 15 minutes by train and fostering cross-border labor mobility. Shifting to North America, the Arthur Ravenel Jr. Bridge in Charleston, South Carolina, completed in 2005, exemplifies aesthetic and functional advancements in cable-stayed design with its 471-meter main span—the longest in the Western Hemisphere at the time. Featuring distinctive diamond-shaped towers rising 170 meters, the 3.7-kilometer structure replaced aging cantilever bridges, incorporating a composite steel-concrete deck and 456 stay cables arranged in a fan pattern for efficient load distribution. Construction utilized balanced cantilever erection to navigate the Cooper River's shipping channel, completed ahead of schedule under a design-build contract valued at $531 million. The bridge now carries Interstate 526, accommodating 30,000 daily vehicles and providing pedestrian paths that highlight its role in urban revitalization and tourism. In , the , opened in 1986 near , , marked a North American milestone as the world's longest cable-stayed span upon completion at 465 meters. Spanning the with a total length of 2,525 meters, it features twin concrete towers and a composite deck supported by 208 cables in a semi-fan arrangement, designed to handle seismic activity and heavy truck traffic on Highway 99. Innovations included precast segmental construction and deep foundations drilled into glacial till, enabling rapid assembly over waterways prone to flooding. Today, it serves over 130,000 vehicles daily, alleviating bottlenecks in the and underscoring early adoption of cable-stayed technology for long-span crossings in seismically active zones.

Prominent Bridges in Asia and Beyond

Asia hosts some of the longest and most innovative cable-stayed bridges, driven by rapid infrastructure development and the need to cross expansive river systems. The Sutong Bridge in , completed in 2008, exemplifies this with its 1,088-meter main span, which set a for cable-stayed bridges at the time and remains a benchmark for structural efficiency. Its design features a semi-floating system with double towers and steel box girders, incorporating post-tensioned tie-beams in the pylons to mitigate seismic responses, a critical adaptation in China's seismically active River region. Post-2010 constructions in have pushed spans beyond 1 kilometer, enhancing connectivity for . The Changtai Yangtze River Bridge in , inaugurated in 2025, achieves a record 1,208-meter main span across a 10.3-kilometer structure, utilizing advanced aerodynamic shaping and damping systems to withstand wind and seismic loads. The , completed in 2011 as part of China's , spans 164.8 kilometers overall, with cable-stayed sections enabling trains to reach speeds over 300 km/h while navigating complex terrain including rivers and wetlands. These bridges integrate with networks, boosting by shortening travel times between major economic hubs like and . Beyond Asia, cable-stayed bridges in South America, Africa, and Oceania adapt to local environmental challenges while supporting trade and urban expansion. In South America, the Ponte da Integração linking Brazil and Paraguay, completed in 2022, features South America's longest cable-stayed main span at 470 meters within its 760-meter total length, using corrosion-resistant coatings to combat tropical humidity and facilitate cross-border commerce along the Paraná River trade route. Africa's Mohammed VI Bridge in Morocco, opened in 2016, has a total length of 950 meters with a main span of 376 meters, featuring enhanced galvanization for saline coastal exposure and serving as a vital economic link between Rabat and Salé to promote regional development. However, as of June 2025, Africa's longest cable-stayed bridge by main span is the J.P. Magufuli Bridge in Tanzania, with a 520-meter main span over Lake Victoria. In Oceania, while fewer ultra-long examples exist, bridges like Australia's Anzac Bridge in Sydney (345-meter span, 1995) demonstrate adaptations for seismic and wind loads in island settings, underscoring their role in urban economic corridors. These non-Asian examples highlight corrosion-resistant materials for tropical and coastal climates, contrasting with Asia's emphasis on earthquake resilience.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/cable-stayed-bridges
  2. https://www.structuremag.org/article/cable-stayed-bridges/
  3. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/bridge/05083/chap1.cfm
  4. https://petroleumservicecompany.com/blog/history-cable-stayed-bridge/
  5. https://www.fosterandpartners.com/news/10-facts-about-the-millau-viaduct
  6. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3325066/china-launches-record-smashing-cable-stayed-mega-bridge-over-yangtze-river
  7. https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/eng/undergraduate/offerholders/tasterday/es196relevant_reading.pdf
  8. https://dywidag.com/products/stay-cable-enhancements/stay-cable-strands
  9. https://concrete.ethz.ch/assets/brd/autographies/cable-supported-bridges-part-2-cable-stayed-bridges-2024-02-13_notes_inv.pdf
  10. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/bridge/05084/05084.pdf
  11. https://www.bridgeengineer.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/2005-page-134x.pdf
  12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279536631_Strengthening_historic_pedestrian_suspension_bridges_Public_safety_goes_first
  13. https://www.ce.jhu.edu/perspectives/handouts_unprotected/buonopaneCambridge2006.pdf
  14. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/JSDEAG.0003334
  15. https://www.webull.com/news/13479380477236224
  16. https://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/38197/InTech-Finite_element_analysis_of_cable_stayed_bridges_with_appropriate_initial_shapes_under_seismic_excitations_focusing_on_deck_stay_interaction.pdf
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187770581201079X/pdf?md5=3c4d675d992d732f0cd55f6deb7084c8&pid=1-s2.0-S187770581201079X-main.pdf
  18. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/21643/dot_21643_DS1.pdf
  19. https://trb.org/publications/nchrp/nchrp_w46.pdf
  20. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/pubs/nhi15047.pdf
  21. https://eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2021-12/jrc_53442.pdf
  22. https://skyciv.com/docs/tech-notes/load-combinations/en-1990-2002/
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705817304940
  24. http://www.techno-press.org/content/?page=article&journal=sem&volume=8&num=1&ordernum=3
  25. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/4/2611
  26. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDrOaRpuABA
  27. https://fgg-web.fgg.uni-lj.si/~/pmoze/esdep/master/wg15b/l0800.htm
  28. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1079756/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  29. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/80924/47088666-MIT.pdf?sequence=2
  30. https://scholar.uprm.edu/bitstreams/5562d06f-d585-4caa-918e-198943a09495/download
  31. https://www.fdot.gov/docs/default-source/maintenance/STR/BI/Reference-Manual/BMRM-Chapter-3.pdf
  32. https://www.ijbe.net/issues/volumes/item/download/218_891d84dc8e5288a7a767ca9daa7ad923
  33. https://resource.midasuser.com/en/solution/cable-stayed-bridge
  34. https://www.pci.org/PCI_Docs/Design_Resources/Guides_and_manuals/references/bridge_design_manual/JL-87-September-October_Cable_Stayed_Bridges_with_Prestressed_Concrete.pdf
  35. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/49743/dot_49743_DS1.pdf
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S096599780000003X
  37. https://www.academia.edu/83856821/Design_Criteria_of_Under_Deck_Cable_Stayed_Composite_Bridges_for_Short_and_Medium_Spans
  38. https://www.emerald.com/books/book/11872/chapter/81853233/Cable-stayed-bridges
  39. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%2528ASCE%2529BE.1943-5592.0000500
  40. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/resourcecenter/teams/structures-geotechnical-hydraulics/Redundancy_Final_Report.pdf
  41. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/TPEJAN.0000563
  42. https://www.enr.com/articles/57761-global-project-of-the-year-1915canakkale-bridge
  43. https://newgdbridge.com/cable-stayed-vs-suspension-bridges/
  44. https://blog.enerpac.com/7-types-of-bridges-every-engineer-should-know-about/
  45. https://www.enr.com/articles/61643-worlds-longest-cable-stayed-bridge-opens-in-china
  46. https://rbt.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/LAB2-Chapter-J-DIGITAL.pdf
  47. https://resource.midasuser.com/en/blog/bridge/bridgeinsight/dynamic-analysis-of-fan-semi-fan-and-harp-type-of-cable-stayed-bridges
  48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263496802_Multi-span_cable_stayed_bridges
  49. https://concrete.ethz.ch/assets/sed17.pdf
  50. https://dywidag.com/projects/esplanade-riel-pedestrian-bridge
  51. https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/side-spar-cable-stayed-bridge-royalty-free-image/557097097
  52. https://www.figgbridge.com/cable-stayed
  53. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=49673
  54. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/pubs/nhi15044.pdf
  55. https://www.cranestodaymagazine.com/analysis/derricks-rise-again-7864242/
  56. https://trid.trb.org/View/722521
  57. https://tokyorope-intl.co.jp/content/pdf/engineering/Catalog_StructuralCableSystem.pdf
  58. https://www.freyssinet.com/case-study/saemangeum-bridge/
  59. https://www.bekaert.com/en/products/construction/building-industry/steel-strands-for-cable-stayed-bridges
  60. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1008946132034
  61. https://www.bekaert.com/content/dam/corporate/en/products/construction/roads-and-bridges/pdf/Bekaert-HDPE-sheathed-stay-cable-strands.pdf
  62. https://global-sei.com/steel-wire/products/strand/anti-corrosion/galvanized.html
  63. https://vsl.com/home/technologies/stay-dampers/
  64. https://www.post-tensioning.org/Portals/13/Files/PDFs/Publications/Reprints/2020_July/PJ2020_V16_N1_Castiglioni.pdf
  65. https://www.fib-international.org/component/virtuemart/fib-bulletins/acceptance-of-stay-cable-systems-using-prestressing-steels-1-detail.html?Itemid=0
  66. https://steel-sci.com/assets/downloads/High-Strength-Steel-and-Execution-Guide-P432.pdf
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10125975/
  68. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/22617/chapter/5
  69. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141029621012049
  70. https://rip.trb.org/View/2536274
  71. https://vtrc.virginia.gov/media/vtrc/vtrc-pdf/vtrc-pdf/16-R13.pdf
  72. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/bridge/zinc.cfm
  73. https://www.steel.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Steel-Sustainability-in-Construction-FactSheet-rev-January-2025.pdf
  74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926580525005254
  75. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/environment/self-healing-concrete-could-double-lifespan-of-bridges-idUS2528987728/
  76. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S235201242400691X
  77. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/13689/inspection-and-maintenance-of-bridge-stay-cable-systems
  78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1644966516301546
  79. https://bentleysystems.service-now.com/community?id=community_question&sys_id=a23092be1b51ce90f3fc5287624bcbbe
  80. https://www.partnershipborderstudy.com/pdf/Cable%20Stay%20Bridge_2.pdf
  81. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/8/4890
  82. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Costs-for-the-six-types-of-cable-stayed-bridges_tbl4_223793606
  83. https://academic.oup.com/ijlct/article/doi/10.1093/ijlct/ctae180/7760117
  84. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9105326/
  85. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352012422002612
  86. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/bridge/05084/
  87. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/17/9791
  88. https://www.freyssinet.com/case-study/millau-viaduct-construction/
  89. https://www.eiffagegeniecivil.com/milau-viaduct
  90. https://www.highestbridges.com/wiki/index.php?title=Millau_Viaduct
  91. https://www.cnn.com/travel/millau-viaduct-tallest-bridge-construction
  92. https://www.gihub.org/connectivity-across-borders/case-studies/the-%25C3%25B8resund-fixed-link/
  93. https://www.thecivilengineer.org/news/the-spectacular-bridge-that-connects-denmark-to-sweden
  94. https://nordics.info/show/artikel/a-short-history-of-the-oresund-bridge
  95. https://www.wsp.com/en-gl/projects/arthur-ravenel-jr-bridge
  96. https://www.hdrinc.com/portfolio/arthur-ravenel-jr-bridge-cooper-river-bridge
  97. https://www.somerseteng.com/project-gallery/arthur-ravenel-jr-bridge
  98. https://www.freyssinetusa.com/case-study/arthur-ravenel-jr-bridge/
  99. https://www.cgs.ca/pdf/heritage/Rev5-CGA5-Alex_Fraser_Bridge-EN.pdf
  100. https://structurae.net/en/structures/alex-fraser-bridge
  101. https://www.bridgeinfo.net/bridge/index.php?ID=192
  102. http://cedb.asce.org/cgi/WWWdisplay.cgi?312877
  103. https://www.engineering.org.cn/sscae/CN/PDF/1160099753029591548
  104. https://english.www.gov.cn/news/photos/201912/05/content_WS5de87a49c6d0bcf8c4c18604.html
  105. https://dywidag.com/projects/longest-stay-cable-bridge-in-south-america-links-brazil-and-paraguay
  106. https://structurae.net/en/structures/mohammed-vi-bridge
  107. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/06/26/3105613/0/en/Africa-s-Longest-Low-Pylon-Cable-Stayed-Bridge-Opens-in-Tanzania.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.