Hubbry Logo
Trichonephila clavataTrichonephila clavataMain
Open search
Trichonephila clavata
Community hub
Trichonephila clavata
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Trichonephila clavata
Trichonephila clavata
Trichonephila clavata
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Trichonephila clavata
Female
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Subphylum: Chelicerata
Class: Arachnida
Order: Araneae
Infraorder: Araneomorphae
Family: Nephilidae
Genus: Trichonephila
Species:
T. clavata
Binomial name
Trichonephila clavata
(L. Koch, 1878)[2]
Synonyms[2]
  • Nephila clavata L. Koch, 1878
  • Nephila limbata Thorell, 1898
  • Nephila obnubila Simon, 1906
  • Nephila clavatoides Schenkel, 1953
  • Nephila clavata cavalierei Schenkel, 1963
  • Argiope maja Bösenberg & Strand, 1906

Trichonephila clavata, also known as the Joro-spider (ジョロウグモ, Jorō-gumo), is a spider in the Trichonephila genus. Native to East Asia, it is found throughout China, Japan (except Hokkaidō), Korea, and Taiwan, and has been spreading across North America since the 2010s. It rarely bites humans, and its venom is not medically significant.

In 2019, this species was moved from the genus Nephila to Trichonephila. Another species from this genus, Trichonephila plumipes, is commonly found in Australia. It also was moved from Nephila to Trichonephila, along with ten other species.[3]

Characteristics

[edit]
Female seen from below

Trichonephila clavata pass winter as eggs and scatter as tiny juveniles in the spring. Like most spiders, females are much larger than males. The adult female's body size is 17–25 millimetres (0.67–0.98 in) while the male's is 7–10 millimetres (0.28–0.39 in).

The web of females may reach several meters in length. In sunlight, the yellow threads appear to be a rich gold color. The structure of the web seen in cross-section is unusual for an orb web; it has three layers: the central orb, plus two irregular layers in front and behind the orb.

Both males and females have large abdomen and long legs. The adult female individual has stripes of yellow and dark blue, with red toward the rear of the abdomen. In autumn, smaller males may be seen in the webs of the females for copulating. After mating, the female spins an egg sack on a tree, laying 400 to 1,500 eggs in one sack. Her lifecycle ends by late autumn or early winter with the death of the spider. The next generation emerges in spring.

Relationship to humans

[edit]

Risks to people

[edit]

This spider's bite does not pose significant risks to humans. Their small fangs and reluctant biting behavior make it unlikely for a bite to occur. When bites do take place, the venom is weak. The temporary pain and redness has been compared to that of a bee sting.[4]

In folklore

[edit]

The common name of the spider comes from the jorōgumo, a legendary spider in Japanese folklore that can transform into a beautiful woman who can breathe fire and control other spiders.[5] She seeks men to seduce, whom she then binds in her silk and devours.

This spider was about 5 cm long. The large one is the female and the smaller one in the background is the male - filmed in Tokyo, Japan on 29 September 2013

Use

[edit]

N. clavata is a food for the Ao-Nagas.[6]

Introduced species in North America

[edit]

The Joro spider is an introduced species in northeast Georgia and northwest/upstate South Carolina, in the United States. They were first spotted in Hoschton, Georgia, in 2013. Since then, they have been seen in numerous locations in northeast Georgia, including the Athens area and also in Greenville, South Carolina. While the Joro spider was first observed in the warm climates of the Gulf and lower East Coast of the US, it is now expected to colonize much of the middle East Coast due to its relative imperviousness to modest cold.[7][8]

Scientists confirmed the first known occurrence of T. clavata in North America in 2014,[9] and as of October 2022, the spider's range spans at least 120,000 km2 (46,000 sq mi), occurring across the U.S. states of Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, and Tennessee, with additional reports in Alabama, Maryland, Oklahoma, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania. Its pattern of spread suggests it is primarily driven by natural dispersal mechanisms, such as ballooning, though human-mediated transport cannot be discounted.[10][9][11][12][13]

The Joro spider has been spotted in many eastern U.S. states, including Alabama, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Florida, and West Virginia, and it appeared in the southern portions of New York and neighboring states sometime in the summer of 2024.[14][15] The spiders "seem to be OK with living in a city", according to University of Georgia researcher Andy Davis, who added that he has seen them on streetlamps and telephone poles.[14] In September 2024, one was photographed in Beacon Hill, Boston, Massachusetts.[16]

As of 2022, because of the relative lack of information about the Joro spider's ecology, the impact it has on its new ecosystem is unknown. It has been observed catching the brown marmorated stink bug (Halymorpha halys), an invasive species that native spiders have not been known to eat, and there is hope that the impact of the species will be positive due to its harmless nature and consumption of primarily invasive or nuisance insects.[8][17]

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Nephila clavata.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Trichonephila clavata

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Trichonephila clavata, commonly known as the Jorō spider, is a large orb-weaving belonging to the family Araneidae. Native to , it is characterized by its striking appearance, with adult females possessing a body length of 17–25 mm and a leg span reaching up to 100 mm, featuring a bright cephalothorax and an marked by broad bluish-green bands dorsally and prominent red patches ventrally, along with long legs banded in and orange. In contrast, adult males are much smaller, measuring 7–10 mm in body length, with a light brown cephalothorax bearing two dark bands and an elongate-oval that is greenish-brown above with yellowish lateral stripes. The species is indigenous to regions including (except Hokkaido), the Korean Peninsula, , , , and parts of and the , where it inhabits diverse environments such as forests, parks, and urban areas. Introduced to the around 2010, likely via international shipping, T. clavata was first documented in northern Georgia in 2014 and has since established populations across the southeastern states, including , , , and , covering an area of approximately 120,000 km² by 2022, with further spread and detections in states such as , , , and a first record in as of October 2025; populations have shown explosive growth, doubling annually in some areas from 2022 to 2024. Models predict further expansion into temperate regions of the Midwest, Northeast, and , favoring subtropical to temperate climates with high humidity. Ecologically, T. clavata constructs conspicuous, wheel-shaped orb webs up to 1 meter in , often suspended between trees, shrubs, or man-made structures, using strong, golden silk to capture flying such as bees, wasps, and cockroaches. It exhibits a univoltine life cycle, with eggs laid in silken sacs in fall, hatching in spring, and adults emerging in late summer; females are notably reluctant to bite humans and pose no significant threat, though their abundance can alter local communities by reducing native orb-weaver diversity in invaded areas. As an invasive predator, ongoing examines its potential to disrupt ecosystems, particularly in human-modified landscapes.

Taxonomy and description

Classification

Trichonephila clavata, commonly known as the Jorō spider, belongs to the kingdom Animalia, phylum , class Arachnida, order Araneae, family Nephilidae, genus Trichonephila, and species clavata. The placement within Nephilidae reflects the current consensus from phylogenomic analyses, though there has been historical debate regarding its status as a separate family from Araneidae based on morphological traits like web architecture and genitalic features. The species was originally described as Nephila clavata by Ludwig Koch in 1878 from specimens collected in . It was subsequently recognized under various synonyms, including Nephila limbata Thorell, 1898, and Nephila obnubila Simon, 1906, before consolidation under N. clavata. In 2019, based on comprehensive molecular and morphological studies, T. clavata and several other large orb-weavers were transferred from the genus to Trichonephila to better reflect monophyletic groupings within the nephilid orb-weavers. As part of the Trichonephila, commonly known as golden orb-weavers, T. clavata is distinguished by unique genitalic structures, such as the male's complex and conductor, and leg spination patterns that differentiate it from close relatives like T. pilipes. These traits, combined with molecular data, support its position in a of ecologically similar spiders specialized for large, durable orb webs.

Physical characteristics

Adult females of Trichonephila clavata exhibit a striking morphology typical of orb-weaving spiders in the family . The measures 7–9 mm in length, featuring a silvery or white dorsal surface with a subtle metallic sheen. The is bulbous and cylindrical, ranging from 15–20 mm long, predominantly yellow with broad horizontal or bands dorsally and red and yellow markings ventrally, often including black and white checked patterns near the posterior end. The legs are long and slender, banded in red-brown or black and yellow, contributing to a total leg span of up to 100 mm. The silk produced by T. clavata is notable for its golden hue, attributed to pigments such as xanthurenic acid in the dragline threads from the major ampullate glands, with pyriform spigots contributing to the web's attachment coloration. This demonstrates exceptional tensile strength, approximately 1 GPa, comparable to that of on a weight-for-weight basis, enabling the construction of robust orb webs. Juveniles differ markedly from adults, being smaller in overall size with subdued coloration and less distinct ing on the and legs, making them harder to identify among other spiderlings. Key diagnostic features include the folium-like banded on the , which forms distinctive yellow and blue-green stripes, and the robust structure consisting of a basal segment and movable adapted for piercing prey. Females are significantly larger than males, a form of sexual size dimorphism.

Sexual dimorphism

Trichonephila clavata exhibits extreme sexual size dimorphism typical of the family, with adult females substantially larger than males. Females reach a body length of 17–25 mm and a leg span of up to 100 mm, while males measure 7–10 mm in body length with a leg span of approximately 30 mm, resulting in females being 2–3 times larger in linear dimensions. This pronounced difference underscores female-biased gigantism, where females dwarf their male conspecifics more than in most other orb-weaving spiders. Morphological distinctions extend beyond size to coloration and secondary sexual structures. Females feature vibrant , , and markings on the dorsal abdomen, contrasting with the drab brown coloration of males. Upon reaching maturity, males develop bulbous pedipalps modified as intromittent organs for sperm transfer, while females possess a distinct , the external sclerotized structure of their genitalia. This dimorphism has evolved primarily through , with larger female body size enhancing , egg production, and the ability to construct expansive orb webs for prey capture. In males, reduced size promotes agility for mate searching and ballooning dispersal, while minimizing vulnerability to predation or aggressive interactions with females during reproductive encounters.

Distribution and habitat

Native range

Trichonephila clavata is native to East and , where it occurs widely across , , the Korean Peninsula (encompassing both North and ), , , , and parts of including the Himalayan region. In , the species is present on the islands of , , and but is notably absent from , the northernmost island, owing to the region's harsher winter conditions that exceed the spider's cold tolerance limits. Its distribution aligns with subtropical to temperate climates, where average temperatures in the northern extent of its range, such as northern , range from -4°C to 0°C, allowing survival without exposure to prolonged extreme cold below approximately -10°C. The was first described in by L. Koch based on specimens from , with historical records indicating a stable native range through the pre-20th century. Within its native distribution, populations tend to be denser in forested lowlands, where suitable supports web construction, though the species can adapt to varied elevations up to moderate highlands.

Introduced range

Trichonephila clavata, commonly known as the Joro spider, was first detected in the northeastern region of Georgia, , in 2014. This initial establishment is believed to have occurred through human-mediated transport, likely via cargo shipments from its native East Asian range. As of 2025, the species had become established across multiple southeastern, mid-Atlantic, and western states, including Georgia, , , , , , , , , , , , , , and , covering an estimated area exceeding 120,000 km². Species distribution models indicate that its potential invasive range could expand twentyfold, encompassing much of the seaboard by 2030, driven by suitable climatic conditions. The spread occurs at an average rate of about 15 km per year, facilitated by natural ballooning of juveniles and human-assisted dispersal via vehicles and transport. In 2025, populations have shown particular dominance in the , where surveys documented explosive growth, with abundances doubling annually from 2022 to 2024. Reports of potential detections in and other regions outside remain unconfirmed as of 2025, with no verified establishments beyond the .

Habitat preferences

Trichonephila clavata exhibits a strong preference for semi-open habitats such as forest edges, gardens, and vegetated urban areas, where it can construct its orb webs in suitable microhabitats. In its native East Asian range, the species is commonly observed in lowland forests and adjacent small urban woodlands, often anchoring webs between shrubs and trees at heights of approximately 1–2 meters to optimize prey capture in semi-shaded environments. The climatic niche of T. clavata centers on subtropical to temperate latitudes with warm, summers characterized by temperatures of 20–30°C and relative humidity exceeding 60%, conditions that support web stability and efficiency. Mild winters with minimal freezing allow persistence in these regions, though the species shows some adaptability to cooler temperatures in marginal areas. In introduced ranges, such as the , individuals frequently utilize man-made substrates like fences, porch railings, and utility poles for web attachment, demonstrating flexibility in disturbed landscapes. This spider tolerates moderate levels of urban pollution and habitat fragmentation but achieves higher densities in less disturbed semi-open woodlands, where vegetation provides ample support structures and insect prey.

Behavior and life cycle

Web construction and foraging

Trichonephila clavata females construct large orb-shaped webs, typically vertical and measuring up to 1 meter in diameter, often positioned in shaded forest edges or understory vegetation. These webs feature a central hub offset toward the upper edge and are characterized by their golden hue, resulting from pigments like xanthurenic acid in the silk produced by the major ampullate glands. The construction process begins with the female laying out frame threads and radial lines, followed by an auxiliary spiral for support, and culminates in the sticky capture spiral made from flagelliform silk glands. Above the orb, a barrier web of tangled threads serves to deflect flying debris and potential predators while funneling prey toward the main web. The orb portion of the web is renewed daily, with the consuming the old sticky spiral and radial threads before rebuilding, a that recycles silk proteins efficiently; in contrast, the barrier web remains intact longer, contributing to the overall structure's persistence for 1–2 weeks until major repairs or relocation occur. This daily renewal aligns with the spider's diurnal activity, as webs are typically built and maintained during daylight hours in low-light environments to minimize UV degradation of the . The golden dragline from the major ampullate glands provides exceptional tensile strength, enabling the web to capture larger prey without frequent collapse. Foraging in T. clavata employs a passive strategy, with the positioned at the web's hub, alert to transmitted through the upon prey impact. Upon detection, she rapidly approaches the ensnared , envelops it in additional bands using aciniform glands to immobilize it, and then delivers a venomous bite to subdue and liquefy the prey for consumption. This sequence—vibration sensing, wrapping, and biting—optimizes energy use in shaded, low-traffic habitats, where the web's design enhances prey retention when combined with barrier elements. Webs are often rebuilt or repaired in response to damage, ensuring consistent foraging efficiency over the structure's lifespan.

Reproduction

Mating in Trichonephila clavata takes place during late summer and early fall, with males reaching by late August and females shortly thereafter. Cohabiting males are elicited to engage in by volatile chemical cues released by females immediately following their final molt, which signals receptivity and concentrates matings at this stage. Males risk during courtship and copulation, a observed in the where females may consume the male to gain nutritional benefits. Following successful mating, which often involves multiple insertions from the male's pedipalps, females produce a single egg sac containing 400 to 500 eggs. Oviposition occurs from mid-October to in the native range, with the papery, golden silken sac—typically basket-shaped and attached to tree bark, foliage, or structures—serving to protect the eggs through overwintering. The species completes one generation annually, with eggs hatching approximately one month after deposition but spiderlings remaining within the sac until emerging the following spring or early summer. Females provide limited maternal care by attending the egg sac for several days post-oviposition (mean duration of 4.09 ± 4.20 days), during which they may aggressively defend it against predators such as assassin bugs by swinging their forelegs or repositioning to block access. No further care is extended after the spiderlings hatch, as adult females perish in late fall or following oviposition. Males, in contrast, typically die shortly after due to exhaustion or predation risk.

Dispersal mechanisms

The primary dispersal mechanism for Trichonephila clavata in its native range is ballooning, where juvenile spiderlings release fine silk threads that act as parachutes, allowing them to be carried by wind currents over distances of tens to hundreds of kilometers. This aerial dispersal typically occurs shortly after the spiderlings emerge from sacs in spring, enabling rapid colonization of new areas within suitable habitats. In introduced ranges, human-mediated transport plays a significant role, particularly through the inadvertent movement of egg sacs attached to vehicles, shipping containers, nursery plants, or cargo pallets. These egg masses, which overwinter and the following spring, facilitate long-distance jumps beyond natural ballooning capabilities. Ballooning is seasonally timed with the spring hatching of spiderlings, often in May or June, when favorable winds trigger mass dispersal events. However, this method is highly dependent on wind conditions and atmospheric factors, limiting its effectiveness in calm weather or densely built urban environments where updrafts are scarce.

Ecological role and interactions

Diet and predation

Trichonephila clavata is a generalist predator that primarily targets flying , including flies, wasps, moths, bees, and dragonflies, as well as other arthropods such as beetles, grasshoppers, , and occasionally small s. These aerial prey items dominate the spider's diet, comprising the majority of captured individuals due to the orb-weaving that intercepts airborne . Visual surveys of webs have identified as the dominant prey (approximately 52%), followed by (24%), with at lower proportions. Prey size is typically limited to up to 30 mm in length, allowing the spider to subdue them effectively with its robust silk and fangs. Upon capture in the web, T. clavata immobilizes prey using that contains neurotoxic peptides, such as joro spider , which disrupt to induce . The then injects to externally liquefy the prey's tissues, absorbing the resulting fluids while discarding indigestible remnants. This enables efficient nutrient extraction. Notably, T. clavata exhibits prey selectivity, avoiding chemically defended species like monarch (Danaus plexippus), which contain cardenolides; visual surveys of webs show represent only a small fraction (less than 5%) of the diet, and laboratory trials confirm low attack rates on monarchs compared to palatable alternatives. Orb-weaver efficiency is enhanced by periodic web recycling, where the consumes old silk to reclaim and proteins for new web construction, minimizing energy costs. Predators of adult T. clavata include birds, such as cardinals, and parasitic wasps (e.g., sphecid wasps like mud daubers), which target the or its sacs. In native East Asian ranges, these interactions help regulate populations, but in introduced North American habitats, native predator communities exert lower pressure, contributing to the species' rapid expansion. Field observations indicate occasional attacks on adults, though juveniles may face higher risks from generalist predators.

Impact as an invasive species

In North America, Trichonephila clavata, known as the Joro spider, has demonstrated competitive impacts on native orb-weaving spiders, particularly by outcompeting species such as Trichonephila clavipes for suitable web-building sites in forested areas. High abundances of T. clavata limit available spaces for native orbweavers, leading to observed declines in their populations. A study in Atlanta-area forests documented a decline in native orbweaver encounter rates from 1.76 per hour in 2022 to 0.55 per hour in 2024 (≈69% reduction), coinciding with T. clavata encounter rates doubling annually to 59.14 per hour. As of November 2025, the species has been reported in new areas including California and Maryland, supporting models of further expansion. Recent studies (2025) affirm no significant ecological collapse and suggest standard management options if needed. Despite these competitive effects, T. clavata provides ecological benefits through pest control, preying on agricultural including the invasive (Halyomorpha halys). This predation helps reduce populations of crop-damaging pests without the need for chemical interventions, potentially aiding farmers in the southeastern U.S. Currently, no formal management or control programs target T. clavata due to its low to humans and ecosystems, with populations naturally limited by severe winter conditions in northern regions. While the species shows cold tolerance compared to some natives, prolonged freezes can reduce survival rates. Species distribution models project a potential expansion of T. clavata's invasive range to approximately 2.57 million km² in , a more than 20-fold increase from its current ~120,000 km² occupancy, primarily along the East Coast and into the Midwest. However, there is no evidence of broader collapse, as impacts appear localized to competition with similar orbweavers.

Interactions with other species

Trichonephila clavata exhibits intraspecific interactions characterized by non-sexual , particularly among females targeting smaller individuals, which may include juveniles or subadults. Observations in introduced populations in the document cases where larger females attack and consume smaller conspecifics, often without apparent provocation, potentially linked to resource competition or territorial defense. Such behavior appears more frequently reported in dense invasive aggregations compared to native Asian ranges, where colonial living is common but is less documented. Kleptoparasitism also occurs intraspecifically, with smaller spiders, likely juveniles, stealing prey from the webs of larger conspecifics, though this is less studied than interspecific cases. In web-sharing scenarios, these interactions contribute to hierarchical dynamics within groups. Interspecifically, T. clavata may coexist with ants on or near its webs, potentially facilitated by chemical deterrents in silk such as 2-pyrrolidinone observed in related species, allowing mutual avoidance of threats from other predators. The spider also demonstrates avoidance of toxic prey, such as monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus), attacking them only about 20% of the time compared to palatable insects, indicating learned or innate recognition of unpalatability even in introduced ranges without prior exposure. Symbiotic relationships include associations with kleptoparasitic spiders, such as those in the genus , which reside in T. clavata webs and steal portions of captured prey, benefiting from the host's without contributing to web maintenance; this commensal or parasitic interaction is more prevalent in larger webs.

Relationship with humans

Medical significance

Trichonephila clavata displays a notably shy , rarely humans unless directly handled or provoked, with such incidents comprising less than 1% of encounters. This reluctance stems from the spider's non-aggressive nature as an orb-weaver, prioritizing evasion over confrontation despite its large size, which can reach up to 3 cm in body length. In its native East Asian range and introduced North American populations, documented bites remain exceedingly rare, underscoring minimal risk to incidental contact during outdoor activities. The of T. clavata primarily consists of mild cytotoxins effective against prey, but elicits only localized reactions in humans. Symptoms typically include redness, swelling, and itching at the bite site, persisting for 1–2 days and comparable in severity to a , without progression to or systemic effects. A 2025 study analyzing reported cases confirmed low pain levels (rated 1–3 on a 10-point scale) and transient symptoms, with no instances of allergic reactions or long-term complications across the reviewed incidents. This aligns with observations from entomological surveys, where the spider's small fangs often fail to penetrate fully. Risks to pets such as dogs and cats are negligible, mirroring experiences due to the venom's weak potency against vertebrates. Veterinary reports indicate no significant adverse outcomes from potential bites, with any local irritation resolving quickly without medical intervention. Overall, T. clavata poses no substantial medical threat, emphasizing the importance of avoidance through gentle relocation rather than extermination.

Cultural significance

In , Trichonephila clavata, known locally as the , forms the basis for the , a supernatural entity depicted as a spider that transforms into a beautiful after reaching 400 years of age to seduce and entrap men. These tales, which emphasize themes of and peril, emerged prominently during the (1603–1868), as recorded in period literature such as the Taihei-Hyakumonogatari and Tonoigusa. In modern Japan, T. clavata is regarded as a seasonal symbol of autumn, with its large, golden webs becoming highly visible as adults mature and construct elaborate structures in the fall. By contrast, , where the species was first documented in , media coverage has often sensationalized it as an "invasive monster" due to its size and rapid spread, fueling public apprehension despite its harmless nature to humans. Educational initiatives by entomologists and extension services have worked to counter this hype, emphasizing the spider's ecological benefits and minimal risk to promote tolerance. The motif continues to influence contemporary and media, appearing in such as —where a disguises itself as a —and , featuring a predatory entity that ensnares victims. The of T. clavata, like that of related orb-weaver , has been explored for its mechanical properties and potential industrial applications. In its introduced range across the , T. clavata carries a stigma as an , with public outreach and research highlighting persistent concerns over its proliferation, even as evidence confirms it poses no direct threat to people or pets.

References

  1. https://extension.psu.edu/joro-spiders/
  2. https://fieldreport.caes.uga.edu/publications/C1273/joro-spider-trichonephila-clavata/
  3. https://animalia.bio/trichonephila-clavata
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10659957/
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12112690/
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287884X24000396
  7. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10530-022-02914-3
  8. https://wsc.nmbe.ch/speciesLsid/13940
  9. https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/article/68/4/555/5229942
  10. https://site.caes.uga.edu/entomologyresearch/2022/10/managing-joro-spiders-in-the-landscape/
  11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8070366/
  12. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2107065118
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227940290_Fine_structure_of_the_chelicera_in_the_spider_Nephila_clavata
  14. https://hgic.clemson.edu/factsheet/the-joro-spider/
  15. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025032
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4327315/
  17. https://academic.oup.com/jme/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jme/tjaf103/8296680
  18. https://complete.bioone.org/journals/southwestern-entomologist/volume-50/issue-4/059.050.0419/Detection-of-the-Joro-spider1-Trichonephila-clavata-in-California/10.3958/059.050.0419.full
  19. https://www.adirondackexplorer.org/almanack-adirondacks/the-giant-joro-spider/
  20. https://araneae.nmbe.ch/data/6728/Trichonephila_clavata
  21. https://peerj.com/articles/763/
  22. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02347009
  23. https://resjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/phen.12385
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395707667_Insights_into_the_adaptation_pattern_of_Joro_Spider_Trichonephila_clavata_in_a_new_geographical_distribution_at_Jammu_and_Kashmir_India
  25. https://www.mdpi.com/2813-3323/2/1/4
  26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.09.011
  27. https://www.nature.com/articles/pj2010119
  28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-020-01708-8
  29. https://www.americanarachnology.org/journal-joa/joa-all-volumes/detail/article/download/JoA_v24_p9.pdf
  30. https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article/16/2/377/297882
  31. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/kontyu/25/2/25_22-022/_pdf
  32. https://extension.psu.edu/joro-spiders
  33. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/16/5/443
  34. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/15/5/309
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1744117X22000260
  36. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35462116/
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11122559/
  38. https://foxbaltimore.com/news/local/invasive-joro-spiders-maryland-sightings
  39. https://news.clemson.edu/studies-show-joro-spiders-are-easy-to-kill-and-virtually-harmless/
  40. https://site.extension.uga.edu/paulding/2025/10/the-invasive-joro-spider-is-getting-comfy-in-the-georgia/
  41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380467953_Assessing_the_potential_invasive_range_of_Trichonephila_clavata_using_species_distribution_models
  42. https://www.mdpi.com/2813-3323/3/3/11
  43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393578836_It%27s_a_Spider-Eat-Spider_World_Observations_of_Nonsexual_Cannibalism_in_the_Invasive_Joro_Spider_Trichonephila_clavata
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3297460/
  45. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/arachnid-science/articles/10.3389/frchs.2025.1544428/full
  46. https://news.uga.edu/joro-spiders-are-shy/
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11597926/
  48. https://www.fox5ny.com/news/what-do-joro-spider-bites-you
  49. https://www.northjersey.com/story/news/2024/06/07/nj-joro-spider-bite-venomous-flying-spiders/74016538007/
  50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41123166/
  51. https://clay.ces.ncsu.edu/2025/10/joro-spider/
  52. https://time.com/6986804/joro-spider-your-questions-answered/
  53. https://www.jcehrlich.com/blog/spiders/are-joro-spiders-dangerous/
  54. https://www.11alive.com/article/news/local/verify-joro-spiders-dangerous-poisonous-pets-humans-no/85-b1b3ea41-4173-42e0-8745-d9eb5c6cff80
  55. https://yokai.com/jorougumo/
  56. https://www.japanpowered.com/folklore-and-urban-legends/jorogumo-the-whore-spider
  57. https://whyy.org/articles/joro-spiders-invasive-species/
  58. https://entomologytoday.org/2025/10/28/joro-spiders-management-methods-bite-unlikely-minimal-harm/
  59. https://dororo.fandom.com/wiki/Jorogumo
  60. https://news.vt.edu/articles/2024/06/Joro-spider-expert.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.