Hubbry Logo
Net (economics)Net (economics)Main
Open search
Net (economics)
Community hub
Net (economics)
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Net (economics)
Net (economics)
from Wikipedia

A net (sometimes written nett) value is the resultant amount after accounting for the sum or difference of two or more variables.

In economics, it is frequently used to imply the remaining value after accounting for a specific, commonly understood deduction. In these cases it is contrasted with the term gross, which refers to the pre-deduction value. For example, net income is the total income of a company after deducting its expenses—commonly known as profit—or the total income of an individual after deducting their income tax. Profit may be broken down further into pre-taxed or gross profit and profit after taxes or net profit. Similarly, an individual's net worth is the difference between their assets (what they own) and their liabilities (what they owe to others).

Similarly, net investment in physical capital such as machinery equals gross (total) investment minus the dollar amount of replacement investment that offsets depreciation of pre-existing machinery, thus giving the change in the amount of machinery available for use. Likewise, net national product equals gross national product minus depreciation.

Etymology

[edit]

The word net, in this sense, originally derives from the Latin nitere (to shine) and nitidus (elegant, trim), and more recently from the French net (sharp, neat, clean).[1]

Grammatical usage

[edit]

In this sense, it may appear, separated by a comma, following the noun it modifies, e.g., "earned two million dollars, net".

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
In economics, the term net refers to the residual or effective value obtained after subtracting deductions, costs, opposing quantities, or other adjustments from a total or gross amount, providing a more accurate measure of economic reality by accounting for relevant factors. This contrasts with gross, which represents the unadjusted total before any subtractions. The concept is foundational across economic analysis, ensuring calculations reflect actual contributions or outcomes rather than nominal figures. The use of net appears in numerous key economic indicators and metrics. For instance, net income (or net profit) is a company's total earnings after deducting all expenses, taxes, and costs from revenue, serving as a primary measure of profitability. In international trade, net exports represent the difference between a country's exports and imports, contributing to gross domestic product (GDP) calculations by indicating the net contribution of trade to the economy. Similarly, net investment measures capital formation after accounting for depreciation, reflecting sustainable growth in productive capacity. Other applications include net worth, the difference between assets and liabilities for individuals or firms, which gauges financial health, and net domestic product (NDP), which subtracts depreciation from gross domestic product to show the value of goods and services net of capital wear. These applications highlight net's role in distilling complex economic data into actionable insights for policy, business, and personal finance decisions.

Etymology and Terminology

Origins of the Term

The term "net" in economics derives from the Old French adjective net or nette, meaning "clean" or "pure," which entered English usage by the early 15th century to denote something unadulterated or free from impurities. This sense evolved to signify a remainder after deductions, reflecting the idea of purity achieved by subtracting extraneous elements, and was influenced by the Italian netto (clean, elegant), attested around 1300 in commercial contexts. In 14th-century Italian accounting practices, particularly in the records of merchants like Francesco Datini, the concept of "net" emerged in the calculation of profit as the residual balance after offsetting revenues against costs and expenses, marking an early application in sole proprietorships to determine clear gains. This usage built on medieval trade ledgers where deductions for weights, tariffs, and allowances were subtracted from gross figures to yield a "net" amount, drawing indirectly from Latin roots emphasizing clarity and subtraction in transactional purity, though not directly from rete (mesh or net). By the , the term gained prominence in 17th-century English mercantile writings, influenced by the dissemination of principles outlined in Luca Pacioli's 1494 , where the net balance of represented the merchant's residual profit or loss after all adjustments. A specific example appears in mid-19th-century British naval and shipping accounting under the 1854 Merchant Shipping Act, where "net tonnage" referred to a vessel's cargo-carrying capacity after deducting spaces for crew quarters, engines, and other non-revenue areas, standardizing assessments to compute taxable or freightable volume. This historical development laid the groundwork for the term's transition to modern economic applications, such as net profit in financial reporting.

Grammatical and Conceptual Usage

In economic contexts, "net" functions primarily as an adjective modifying nouns to denote a value remaining after deductions, such as costs, taxes, or allowances, distinguishing it from broader or pre-deduction figures. For instance, "net price" refers to the price of a good or service after subtracting discounts, rebates, or other reductions from the gross price. This adjectival usage emphasizes the final, adjusted amount relevant for , contrasting with everyday language where "net" might simply imply "clear" or "undiluted" without quantitative implications. As a noun, "net" denotes the residual or bottom-line amount after subtractions, often phrased as "the net" in reference to outcomes like "the net of taxes" or "the net proceeds," highlighting the essence or remainder in transactional or accounting scenarios. This form underscores the outcome of a process rather than the process itself, a convention rooted briefly in historical trade practices where "net" captured settled balances after adjustments. Conceptually, in , "net" universally signifies the total inflows minus specific outflows—such as operating costs, taxes, or —prioritizing the remainder as the key metric over the absolute total, which enables precise assessments of and viability across various analyses. Unlike narrower synonyms like "after-tax," which pertains exclusively to deductions for taxation, "net" encompasses a wider array of subtractions, including non-tax elements, allowing for broader applicability in economic terminology. In compound phrases, such as "net-of-tax," hyphenation is standard when the term acts as a modifier before a to ensure clarity and prevent misreading, per established style guidelines.

Core Concepts

Gross versus Net Distinctions

In , gross measures denote the total or unadjusted aggregate value of economic activity, , or output prior to any deductions for costs, , or other subtractions. This captures the full scope of inflows or production without for outflows, providing a baseline representation of scale in economic aggregates such as or overall domestic product. Net measures, by contrast, refer to the adjusted value obtained after subtracting relevant costs, losses, or negative factors from the gross amount, thereby revealing the true economic gain, , or residual benefit. This adjustment process isolates the net contribution by removing elements that do not represent sustainable or value-adding components, such as consumption of or . A fundamental principle of the gross-net distinction is that net refines gross by systematically deducting non-value-adding elements to highlight actual performance, as illustrated by gross pay reduced by withholdings to yield net pay. This subtractive approach ensures that net figures better reflect disposable resources or genuine output. Conceptually, in economic theory, the gross-net framework underscores qualitative differences—gross being primarily additive in aggregating totals, while net is subtractive in emphasizing efficiency—thereby aiding evaluations of profitability, , and long-term without overestimating economic value.

Fundamental Calculation Principles

The fundamental principle underlying the calculation of net values in economics is the subtraction of relevant deductions from a gross base amount, expressed mathematically as: Net=GrossDeductions\text{Net} = \text{Gross} - \text{Deductions} where deductions encompass costs, taxes, allowances, or other subtractions that reduce the initial total. This formula provides a universal framework for deriving net figures across various economic contexts, ensuring that only the residual value after accounting for outflows or adjustments is considered. Deductions typically include fixed costs (unchanging with output levels, such as rent) and variable costs (fluctuating with production, such as materials), as well as taxes or allowances that reflect true economic burdens. To compute net values systematically, a step-by-step process is followed. First, identify the gross base, which represents the total unadjusted amount, such as revenue or output before any reductions. Second, categorize deductions into direct (traceable to a specific activity, like raw materials for a product) versus indirect (allocated across multiple activities, like administrative overhead). Third, apply subtractions sequentially, starting with direct costs to isolate contribution margins, followed by indirect costs and other allowances to arrive at the net figure. Finally, adjust for time periods or inflation if the analysis spans multiple years; this involves converting nominal values to real terms using a price index, such as dividing by the consumer price index (CPI) to maintain comparability across periods: Real Net Value=Nominal Net ValuePrice Index×100\text{Real Net Value} = \frac{\text{Nominal Net Value}}{\text{Price Index}} \times 100 (using a base year index of 100). This sequential approach ensures accuracy and prevents double-counting of deductions. When deductions exceed the gross base, the resulting net value is negative, termed a net loss or deficit, which indicates that outflows surpass inflows in the measured period. In financial accounting, such losses are recorded on the income statement and directly reduce retained earnings on the balance sheet, carrying forward the deficit to future periods as a cumulative impact on equity unless offset by subsequent profits. This handling reflects the continuity of economic entities, where losses are not erased but persist to inform ongoing viability assessments. From economic theory, net calculations incorporate marginal analysis to evaluate incremental changes, where the marginal net benefit is the additional gross benefit minus the of an action. Deductions in these computations must account for opportunity costs—the value of forgone alternatives—to ensure that net figures capture true rather than just entries. For instance, including implicit costs like the foregone return on invested capital refines net assessments in decision-making. This principle, rooted in microeconomic optimization, underscores that net values are not merely arithmetic residuals but tools for comparing alternatives and maximizing welfare.

Applications in Business and Personal Finance

Net Profit and Income

Net profit, also known as in the context of operations, represents the amount of remaining after deducting all associated costs, including the (COGS), operating expenses, , and taxes. This metric is calculated using the formula: \text{Net Profit} = \text{[Total Revenue](/page/Total_revenue)} - (\text{COGS} + \text{Operating Expenses} + \text{Taxes} + \text{Interest}) It provides a clear indicator of a company's overall profitability from core activities over a specific period. In business financial reporting, net profit appears at the bottom of the income statement and serves as a key measure of operational efficiency, allowing stakeholders to assess how effectively a firm converts revenue into profit after accounting for all outflows. Following the 1929 stock market crash, which exposed inconsistencies in financial disclosures, efforts to standardize reporting intensified; the American Institute of Accountants (now AICPA) collaborated with the New York Stock Exchange to promote uniform practices, culminating in the establishment of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 1934 and the foundational principles of U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Under U.S. GAAP, prior to the 2015 elimination of the category, net profit focused on recurring operations by excluding extraordinary items—such as gains or losses from rare and unusual events—reported separately to emphasize sustainable performance. For individuals, refers to earnings after subtracting mandatory deductions such as federal and state taxes, Social Security and Medicare contributions (FICA), and other withholdings like premiums. This "take-home pay" differs based on type: salaried employees typically see withholdings automatically deducted by their from gross wages, resulting in net pay directly deposited; for example, an individual with $5,000 monthly might have $800 in federal taxes, $200 in state taxes, $300 in FICA, and $150 in health premiums subtracted, yielding $3,550 in . In contrast, self-employed individuals calculate by first determining net earnings from minus allowable expenses like supplies and utilities—then applying self-employment tax at 15.3% on 92.35% of those net earnings, plus taxes, often requiring quarterly estimated payments. This structure ensures self-employed workers cover both employee and portions of Social Security and Medicare contributions not automatically withheld.

Net Worth and Assets

Net worth, in economic and financial contexts, represents the value of an entity's total assets minus its total liabilities, providing a snapshot of financial position at a given point in time. The standard formula for calculating is: Net Worth=Total AssetsTotal Liabilities\text{Net Worth} = \text{Total Assets} - \text{Total Liabilities} This metric applies to both individuals and organizations, where assets encompass , investments, , and other holdings, while liabilities include debts such as loans and mortgages. For individuals, net worth serves as a key tool in personal financial planning, helping to assess overall accumulation and guide decisions on , investing, and . It often includes illiquid assets like , which may not be easily convertible to cash but contribute significantly to long-term . In business contexts, net worth equates to shareholders' equity, reflecting the available to owners after settling obligations and indicating the company's . Calculating net worth involves nuances such as adjustments for asset , which reduces the of tangible items like equipment or vehicles over time to account for wear and obsolescence. Additionally, valuations may differ between —based on minus —and , which reflects current fair market prices; personal statements often prioritize market values for a more realistic assessment. For instance, the U.S. Federal Reserve's Survey of Finances, conducted triennially since 1989, tracks using self-reported data on assets and liabilities, including market-based estimates for homes and investments. Economically, net worth acts as an indicator of , where a positive value signals the ability to cover debts, while a negative figure suggests potential . It also highlights wealth inequality, as distributions reveal disparities across income groups; for example, data from the show that U.S. family fell by 38.8% from $125,400 in 2007 to $76,800 in 2010 amid the post-2008 , recovered slightly to $81,200 by 2013, and rose to $192,900 by 2022 (nominal dollars). Retained profits from business operations can contribute to increases in over time by bolstering asset values.

Applications in Macroeconomics

Net Exports and Trade Balance

Net exports, a key indicator in , represent the difference between the value of a country's total exports and its total imports of goods and services. The formula for net exports (NX) is calculated as: NX=XMNX = X - M where XX denotes exports and MM denotes imports. This measure serves as a component of (GDP) in the expenditure approach, contributing positively when exports exceed imports and negatively otherwise. A positive value for net exports signifies a trade surplus, indicating that a is exporting more than it imports, which can strengthen its by increasing for its domestic in international transactions. Conversely, a negative value reflects a trade deficit, where imports surpass exports, potentially depreciating the due to higher supply of the domestic abroad to finance purchases. These imbalances influence exchange rates through adjustments in currency supply and , affecting overall economic competitiveness. Historically, the United States has experienced persistent trade deficits since the 1970s, largely attributed to globalization, which expanded import competition from low-cost manufacturing hubs while boosting U.S. consumer demand for foreign goods. This shift marked a departure from earlier periods of relative balance, with deficits widening significantly in the 1990s and 2000s due to factors like offshoring and trade liberalization. Net exports play a central role in the balance of payments, specifically within the current account, where they capture the net flow of trade in goods and services, helping to assess a country's external economic position. In calculating net exports, adjustments for —defined as the ratio of export prices to prices—are sometimes applied to derive real values, for changes in over time. For instance, an improvement in can enhance the real value of net exports by making relatively cheaper. Basic measures of net exports often focus on merchandise , excluding services to isolate tangible goods flows, though comprehensive assessments include both for a fuller picture of dynamics.

Net Domestic Product

Net domestic product (NDP) is defined as the total value of produced within a country's borders over a specific period, adjusted for the of assets used in production. It is calculated using the NDP = GDP - Consumption of (CFC), where CFC represents the estimated value of capital wear and tear, also known as or capital consumption allowance. This measure provides a more accurate reflection of the sustainable level of economic output, as it subtracts the portion of production that merely replaces depreciated capital rather than contributing to net wealth creation. The primary purpose of NDP is to address the limitations of (GDP), which overstates economic welfare by ignoring the erosion of the capital through usage, , or natural decay. By deducting CFC, NDP indicates the amount of output available for consumption or reinvestment without diminishing the economy's productive capacity, offering a better gauge of long-term economic health. In national income accounting, CFC is typically estimated using the perpetual inventory method, which tracks asset accumulation and decline over time; for most assets, the U.S. (BEA) applies geometric patterns, assuming a constant annual percentage decline in value, akin to a declining balance approach. Straight-line methods, which allocate equal annually over an asset's useful life, are used less frequently in macro accounts but may apply to specific like certain government infrastructure. Internationally, NDP/GDP ratios vary based on and rates, typically ranging from 80% to 90%; for example, in the United States, NDP was approximately $24.5 trillion in 2024, representing about 84% of the $29.2 trillion GDP. Since the 1990s, NDP has been extended in frameworks to incorporate environmental depreciation, such as and degradation, providing a broader measure of sustainable . The of Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting (SEEA), first published in , enables adjustments to NDP by valuing these environmental costs monetarily, allowing for indicators like environmentally adjusted net domestic product (EDP) that highlight the true impact of economic activities on . This approach underscores NDP's role in policy-making for , contrasting with traditional GDP by revealing potential overestimation of wealth in resource-intensive economies.

Measurement and Standards

Accounting Methods for Net Values

Double-entry bookkeeping serves as the foundational method for deriving net values in financial reporting by ensuring that every transaction is recorded with equal debits and credits, thereby maintaining the accounting equation and accurately computing figures such as net income or net assets. In this system, increases in assets or expenses are debited, while increases in liabilities, equity, or income are credited, allowing net figures to emerge from the balance of these entries. For instance, to calculate net receivables, gross accounts receivable are adjusted via an allowance for doubtful accounts: a debit to bad debt expense (an income statement account reducing net income) is paired with a credit to the contra-asset allowance account, yielding net realizable value as gross receivables minus the allowance. This ledger adjustment ensures that net receivables reflect expected collectibility, preventing overstatement of assets and underreporting of expenses. Net income calculations vary significantly under accrual and cash basis accounting due to differences in timing for recognizing revenues and expenses. Under the cash basis, net income is determined by actual cash inflows and outflows, recording revenue only upon receipt and expenses upon payment, which can distort figures by ignoring earned but unpaid amounts. In contrast, accrual basis accounting matches revenues to the period they are earned and expenses to when they are incurred, often resulting in higher net income during growth phases because it includes accrued revenues that exceed cash collections. For example, a service contract worth $1,200 spread over 12 months yields $50 monthly net income under accrual ($100 revenue minus $50 expense), smoothing results across periods, whereas cash basis might front-load income upon payment, creating volatility. Under US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (), inventory valuation methods like FIFO (first-in, first-out) and LIFO (last-in, first-out) directly influence net profit through their effect on (COGS), particularly in inflationary environments. FIFO assigns older, lower costs to COGS, leaving higher current costs in ending inventory, which lowers COGS and boosts net profit. LIFO, conversely, applies recent, higher costs to COGS, elevating it and reducing net profit, as older costs remain in inventory. In rising price periods, this LIFO approach lowers reported net profit compared to FIFO in industries like , though it defers taxes. Note that LIFO is permitted under US but prohibited under (IFRS) per IAS 2. Post-2000s scandals, such as Enron's manipulation of , prompted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which mandated enhanced internal controls and CEO certification of financial disclosures, leading to stricter rules for transparent reporting of net profit impacts from methods like LIFO to prevent earnings misrepresentation. The computation of net values has evolved from manual ledger entries to digital tools, enhancing accuracy and efficiency in deriving figures like net profit. In the 19th century, manual ledgers required handwritten debits and credits for basic subtractions to obtain nets, prone to errors in complex adjustments. The advent of mechanical adding machines in the late 1800s and early computers in the mid-20th century automated summations, but spreadsheets like Excel, introduced in 1985, revolutionized net calculations by enabling formulas such as =SUM(B2:B10)-C2 for quick derivation of net income from revenue and expense ranges. Modern (ERP) systems, such as , automate net value computations through integrated modules that process transactions in real-time, reducing manual intervention. In , net is calculated automatically each period by aggregating profit and loss accounts, posting the result to items like , ensuring compliance with double-entry principles. This automation handles adjustments for accruals, methods, and allowances seamlessly, generating net figures for with minimal errors compared to earlier tools.

International and Regulatory Frameworks

The (IFRS), developed by the (IASB), and the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (), established by the (FASB) in the United States, exhibit key differences in the recognition and measurement of net profit and net assets. Under IFRS, entities may revalue property, plant, and equipment to , with subsequent gains or losses typically recognized in other unless reversing a prior loss, which can influence net asset values and overall net profit through periodic adjustments. In contrast, GAAP adheres to a model for most fixed assets, prohibiting upward revaluations and requiring impairments only when carrying amounts exceed recoverable values, thereby maintaining more conservative net profit figures without fair value uplifts. Additional differences include valuation, where IFRS (IAS 2) prohibits the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method, requiring alternatives like first-in, first-out (FIFO) or weighted average, which can lead to higher reported net profits in inflationary periods compared to LIFO under GAAP. These variances ensure comparability challenges in cross-border reporting but promote tailored economic representations suited to each framework's principles-based (IFRS) versus rules-based () approach. Regulatory bodies play a pivotal role in enforcing standardized disclosures of net values to enhance transparency and investor confidence. In the United States, the FASB, through its Accounting Standards Codification, mandates detailed presentations of net income in financial statements, which the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires in public company filings under Regulation S-X, including breakdowns of revenues, expenses, and resulting net profit to reflect comprehensive performance. Similarly, the IASB's International Accounting Standard (IAS) 1 governs the presentation of financial statements under IFRS, requiring a statement of profit or loss that prominently displays net income (or profit/loss) as the bottom-line figure after aggregating all income and expenses, with specific line items for unusual items to avoid misleading aggregates. These standards from FASB and IASB facilitate consistent net value reporting across jurisdictions, supporting global capital market efficiency. Internationally, frameworks have long emphasized disclosures in corporate reporting to assess financial health. The European Union's Fourth Directive 78/660/EEC, adopted on July 25, 1978, mandates that companies prepare annual accounts including a disclosing net assets (total assets minus liabilities and provisions), alongside profit and loss accounts, to provide a true and fair view of the entity's position, with size thresholds determining applicability. This directive harmonized reporting across member states, influencing subsequent updates like the 2013/34/EU Accounting Directive, which retains requirements for comparability. In , the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development () provides guidelines aligned with the 2008, recommending the calculation of (NNP) as minus consumption of fixed capital, to measure sustainable income available for consumption and in emerging economies. These principles aid policymakers in evaluating long-term growth without depleting capital stocks, as seen in annual data for member and partner countries. Post-2020 developments have integrated environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors into net value reporting under the (ISSB) standards, formed in 2021 by the . The ISSB's IFRS S1 (General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information), issued in June 2023, requires entities to disclose risks and opportunities that could reasonably affect net profit, net assets, or cash flows, such as climate-related impairments to asset values, thereby adjusting traditional net calculations for ESG impacts in . Similarly, IFRS S2 on climate-related disclosures mandates quantification of transition and physical risks influencing , with effective dates for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 and earlier application permitted. These updates, building on post-pandemic priorities, ensure net figures reflect forward-looking ESG adjustments without altering core accounting methods.

Economic Significance

Role in Decision-Making

In business decision-making, net profit margins serve as a critical indicator for guiding choices, with margins exceeding 10% often signaling sufficient profitability to support expansion initiatives such as new market entries or capital expenditures. For instance, during the 1980s leveraged buyout wave, firms prioritized net cash flows—calculated as operating cash inflows minus outflows—to assess the viability of highly indebted acquisitions, enabling them to service debt while restructuring operations for higher returns. Governments rely on net exports, defined as the difference between a country's exports and imports, to inform policies aimed at correcting trade imbalances and protecting domestic industries. Similarly, net domestic product (NDP), which adjusts for capital depreciation, provides a measure of sustainable economic output that policymakers use in fiscal assessments to evaluate long-term affordability and without eroding the capital stock. Analytical tools like ratio analysis further enhance the role of net measures in ; for example, the net profit margin ratio, computed as (Net Profit / × 100), helps executives benchmark and allocate resources toward high-return activities. In behavioral economics, net measures contribute to by framing decisions around expected net gains or losses, helping individuals and firms mitigate cognitive biases such as over-optimism in evaluating uncertain outcomes. The underscored the importance of in governmental interventions, as regulators examined banks' —assets minus liabilities—to determine eligibility and implement capital requirements, ultimately leading to the introduction of annual stress tests to ensure resilience against economic shocks.

Limitations and Criticisms

Net measures in , such as net profit, , and net domestic product, are susceptible to manipulation through practices that artificially inflate reported values. A prominent example is the of 2001, where the company utilized special purpose entities to conceal billions in debt and prematurely recognize projected future profits as current income, thereby overstating net earnings by hundreds of millions between 1997 and 2000. This approach allowed Enron to present a misleadingly robust financial position, contributing to its eventual bankruptcy and prompting regulatory reforms like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Traditional net economic measures often fail to account for externalities, particularly environmental costs, leading to incomplete deductions that overstate true economic welfare. Ecological economists, starting in the , have criticized metrics like GDP and net domestic product for treating depletion and as zero-cost factors, effectively ignoring the entropic throughput and ecological limits of the . , a foundational figure in , argued that post-1970 growth in developed economies generated more "illth"—harmful byproducts—than wealth, as these nets count defensive expenditures on environmental damage as positive contributions without deducting the underlying externalities. Comparability of net measures across countries is undermined by inconsistencies in calculation methods, notably varying depreciation rates for capital assets, which distort international benchmarks. Data from the OECD, covering 12 countries from 1970 to 1996, revealed such discrepancies in net capital stock estimates due to country-specific depreciation assumptions and differing national accounting standards, leading to the suspension of comparable public sector data after 1997. The IMF has highlighted that official net capital stock figures for governments often employ non-uniform geometric depreciation rates ranging from 2.5% to 4%, exacerbating cross-country variations when harmonized estimates are attempted for 22 OECD nations over 1960–2001. From a theoretical perspective, critiques net measures for undervaluing liquidity dynamics during recessions, where heightened can trap economies in low-output equilibria despite apparent net balances. In such scenarios, traditional nets like net investment or net exports overlook the role of hoarded and ineffective monetary transmission, as interest rates approach zero and fail to stimulate demand. As an alternative, (EVA), proposed in the late 1980s by G. Bennett Stewart III and Joel Stern of Stern Stewart & Co., adjusts by deducting the full to better reflect true economic value creation beyond liquidity distortions.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.