Hubbry Logo
Neural dustNeural dustMain
Open search
Neural dust
Community hub
Neural dust
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Neural dust
Neural dust
Neural dust
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Neural dust is a class of nanometer-sized devices operated as wirelessly powered nerve sensors; it is a type of brain–computer interface. The sensors may be used to study, monitor, or control the nerves and muscles and to remotely monitor neural activity. In practice, a medical treatment could introduce thousands of neural dust devices into human brains. The term is derived from "smart dust", as the sensors used as neural dust may also be defined by this concept.[1]

Background

[edit]

The design for neural dust was first proposed in a 2011 presentation[2] by Jan Rabaey from the University of California, Berkeley Wireless Research Center and was subsequently demonstrated by graduate students in his lab.[3][4] While the history of BCI begins with the invention of the electroencephalogram by Hans Berger in 1924, the term did not appear in scientific literature until the 1970s. The hallmark research of the field came from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), following a research grant from the National Science Foundation.[5]

While neural dust does fall under the category of BCI, it also could be used in the field of neuroprosthetics (also known as neural prosthetics). While the terms can sometimes be used interchangeably, the main difference is that while BCI generally interface neural activity directly to a computer, neuroprosthetics tend to connect activity in the central nervous system to a device meant to replace the function of a missing or impaired body part.

Function

[edit]

Components

[edit]

The principal components of the neural dust system include the sensor nodes (neural dust), which aim to be in the 10-100 μm3 scale, and a sub-cranial interrogator, which would sit below the dura mater and would provide both power and a communication link to the neural dust.

Neural dust sensors can use a multitude of mechanisms for powering and communication, including traditional RF [3] as well as ultrasonics. An ultrasound based neural dust motes consist of a pair of recording electrodes, a custom transistor, and a piezoelectric sensor.[4] The piezoelectric crystal is capable of recording brain activity from the extracellular space, and converting it into an electrical signal.

Data and Power Transfer

[edit]

While many forms of BCI exist, neural dust is in a class of its own due to its size and wireless capability. While electromagnetic waves (such as radio frequencies) can be used to interact with neural dust or other wireless neural sensors,[3][6][7][8] the use of ultrasound offers reduced attenuation in the tissue. This results in higher implantation depths (and therefore easier communication with the sub-cranial communicator), as well as a reduction of energy being distributed into the body's tissues due to scattering or absorption.[4] This excess energy would take the form of heat, which could cause damage to the surrounding tissue if temperatures rose too high. Theoretically, ultrasound would allow smaller sensor nodes, allowing for sizes less than 100 μm, however, many practical and scalability challenges remain.

Backscatter Communication

[edit]

Due to the extremely small size of the neural dust sensors, it would be impractical and nearly impossible to create a functional transmitter in the sensor itself. Thus backscatter communication, adopted from radio frequency identification (RFID) technologies, is employed. In RFID passive, battery-less tags are capable of absorbing and reflecting radio frequency (RF) energy when in close proximity to a RF interrogator, which is a device that transmits RF energy. As they reflect the RF energy back to the interrogator, they are capable of modulating the frequency, and in doing so, encoding information. Neural dust employs this method by having the sub-dural communicator send out a pulse (either RF or ultrasound) that is then reflected by the neural dust sensors.

While neural dust can use a traditional amplifier to sense action potentials,[3] in the case of an ultrasound based neural dust sensor, a piezoelectric crystal can also be used to measure from its location in the extracellular space. The ultrasound energy reflected back to the interrogator would be modulated in a way that would communicate the recorded activity.[9] In one proposed model of the neural dust sensor, the transistor model allowed for a method of separating between local field potentials and action potential "spikes", which would allow for a greatly diversified wealth of data acquirable from the recordings.[2]

Clinical and health applications

[edit]

Neural prosthetics

[edit]

Some examples of neural prostheses include cochlear implants that can aid in restoring hearing,[10] artificial silicon retina microchips that have shown to be effective in treating retinal degeneration from retinitis pigmentosa,[11] and even motor prostheses that could offer the capability for movement in those affected with quadriplegia or disorders like amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.[12] The use of neural dust in conjunction with motor prostheses could allow for a much finer control of movement.

Electrostimulation

[edit]

While methods of electrical stimulation of nerves and brain tissue have already been employed for some time, the size and wireless nature of neural dust allows for advancement in clinical applications of the technique. Importantly, because traditional methods of neurostimulation and certain forms of nerve stimulation such as spinal cord stimulation use implanted electrodes that remain connected to wires, the risk of infection and scarring is high. While these risks are not a factor in the use of neural dust, the challenge of applying sufficient electrical current to the sensor node, is still present.

Sleep apnea

[edit]

Electrostimulation devices have already shown some efficacy in treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). Researchers that used a surgically implanted electrostimulation device on patients with severe OSA found significant improvement over a 12-month period of treatment with the device.[13] Stimulation of the phrenic nerve has also been shown to be effective in reducing central sleep apnea.[14]

Bladder control in paraplegics

[edit]

Electrical stimulation devices have been effective in allowing spinal cord injury patients to have improved ability to urinate and defecate by using radio-linked implants to stimulate the sacral anterior root area of the spine[15]

Epilepsy

[edit]

Electrical stimulation therapy in patients with epilepsy has been a well established procedure for some time, being traced back to as early as the 1950s.[16] A paramount goal of the American Epilepsy Society is the continued development of automated brain electrical stimulation (also known as contingent, or closed loop stimulation), which provides seizure-halting electrical stimulation based on brain patterns that indicate a seizure is about to happen. This provides a much better treatment of the disorder than stimulation that is based on an estimate of when the seizure might occur.[17] While vagal nerve stimulation is often a target area for treatment of epileptic seizures, there has been research into the efficacy of stimulation in the hippocampus, thalamus, and subthalamic nucleus. Closed-loop cortical neuromodulation has also been investigated as a treatment technique for Parkinson's disease[18]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Neural dust

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Neural dust refers to a class of ultra-miniaturized, , batteryless bioelectronic devices, typically on the millimeter scale, designed to record and stimulate neural activity within the body by leveraging ultrasonic power delivery and communication. These sensors, often comprising a piezoelectric for , electrodes for signal detection, and a for amplification, enable precise, real-time monitoring of nerves, muscles, or organs without the need for batteries or wires. The concept of neural dust originated from theoretical work in 2013, which proposed free-floating, micron-scale sensors for chronic brain-machine interfaces using low-power circuitry and to overcome limitations in and invasiveness of traditional neural implants. This vision was realized in prototypes developed at the , under DARPA's ElectRx program, with the first demonstrations in 2016 involving implants in rat peripheral nerves and muscles that successfully transmitted high-fidelity electromyogram (EMG) and electroneurogram (ENG) signals over distances up to 9 mm. Key to the technology's operation is the piezoelectric , which converts incoming ultrasonic pulses into electrical power and modulates reflected waves to encode neural data for external readout, allowing for passive, biocompatible deployment deep in tissue. By 2018, advances focused on further toward sub-millimeter sizes, improved encapsulation for chronic implantation, and integration of capabilities to support applications in electroceuticals, such as treating or inflammatory disorders through targeted . Commercialization efforts led to the founding of Biosciences in 2017 by Berkeley researchers Michel Maharbiz and Carmena, which advanced the platform for bioelectronic medicine; the company was acquired by in 2020 for up to $304 million to accelerate development. In October 2024, 's neural dust devices received FDA investigational device exemption for an early (NCT06956209) in underactive bladder treatment, where ultrasound-powered implants stimulate bladder contractions to aid voiding; the study initiated enrollment in April 2025 and is ongoing as of October 2025, marking a step toward clinical translation in markets projected to reach $11.4 billion by 2033.

Introduction and Background

Definition and Overview

Neural dust consists of micrometer-sized sensors, proposed with dimensions on the order of 10-100 μm (volumes ~10³-10⁶ μm³), designed to monitor or stimulate neural activity within the . These ultra-miniature devices, often referred to as motes, are envisioned as independent, free-floating nodes capable of detecting extracellular electrophysiological signals at a cellular resolution. The primary purpose of neural dust is to enable scalable, batteryless brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) that facilitate the recording of action potentials and , as well as the delivery of targeted neural stimulation. By integrating with external interrogators, these sensors support chronic implantation for long-term neural interfacing without the need for onboard power sources. Key advantages include minimally invasive implantation methods, the ability to distribute sensing across extensive neural regions, and wireless operation powered by signals. Compared to traditional BCIs, such as electrode arrays, neural dust devices are substantially smaller, permitting the deployment of thousands of motes per region while eliminating the requirement for physical wired connections.

Historical Development

The concept of neural dust emerged as an extension of earlier advancements in neural recording and brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). The foundational technique of , which enabled noninvasive measurement of brain electrical activity, was pioneered by in 1924 through the first human scalp recordings. Building on this, the 2000s saw significant progress in BCIs, including invasive implants that decoded motor intentions from neural signals in primates and humans, laying the groundwork for distributed, high-density sensing systems. The initial formal proposal for neural dust as a wireless, ultrasonic neural interface platform was outlined in 2013 by researchers including Dongjin Seo, Jose M. Carmena, Michel M. Maharbiz, Elad Alon, and Jan M. Rabaey at the , emphasizing sub-millimeter-scale devices for chronic brain-machine interfaces powered and communicated via to overcome limitations of electromagnetic methods. This work explored system design trade-offs for scaling to thousands of motes, targeting distributed neural recording without batteries or tethers. Early modeling and validation followed in 2015, simulating untethered ultrasonic motes for cortical applications and confirming feasibility for power delivery and data telemetry in tissue. A pivotal milestone came in 2016 with the first in vivo demonstration, published in Neuron, where a 1 mm × 3 mm × 0.8 mm prototype recorded nerve activity from the and in rats using ultrasonic backscatter communication, achieving signal-to-noise ratios sufficient for extracellular detection and highlighting scalability for human neural prosthetics. This ultrasonic approach allowed batteryless operation and minimized tissue disruption compared to prior wired implants. Post-2016 developments advanced the platform's practicality. In 2017, Berkeley researchers Michel Maharbiz and Jose Carmena founded Biosciences to commercialize the technology for bioelectronic medicine. The company was acquired by in 2020 for up to $304 million to accelerate development. In 2018, a comprehensive review and thesis detailed refinements to the ultrasonic neural dust system, including improved mote fabrication and in vitro testing for peripheral and central nervous system interfacing, underscoring its potential as a batteryless, scalable alternative to traditional BCIs. As of 2024, 's devices received FDA investigational device exemption for an early in underactive bladder treatment. More recently, simulations in 2024–2025 have incorporated piezoelectric enhancements for bio-electronic integration, such as nanosphere transceivers in bio-neural dust systems, evaluating feasibility for light-emitting nanosensors powered by in neural environments. These efforts continue to shift focus toward dust-scale distributed sensing for high-resolution neural mapping.

Technical Components

Core Elements

Neural dust motes are microscopic, wireless sensors designed for implantation within neural tissue to record electrophysiological signals. Each mote consists primarily of a piezoelectric crystal, which serves as the ultrasound transducer for energy harvesting and communication, paired with complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) circuitry for onboard signal processing and modulation. In the original 2013 proposal, the target volume for a single mote was 10–100 μm³ to enable microscale integration while maintaining functionality for neural interfacing. Prototypes have achieved larger but sub-millimeter volumes, such as approximately 2.4 mm³ in 2016 and 0.065 mm³ as of 2021. The supporting hardware includes an interrogator device, typically a subcutaneous or external unit with a volume of approximately 1 cm³, that incorporates an transducer array to simultaneously power and communicate with multiple motes. This device facilitates the deployment and interrogation of motes without requiring individual wiring, leveraging for efficient multi-mote operation. To ensure and longevity in biological environments, motes are encapsulated in materials such as medical-grade UV-curable with potential parylene coatings, or use substrates, which shield the electronics from immune responses while exposing recording electrodes for direct neural contact. Miniaturization is achieved through micro-electro-mechanical systems () fabrication techniques, allowing precise assembly of the piezoelectric and components at sub-millimeter scales. The design emphasizes scalability, permitting the deployment of 100–1000 independent motes per cubic centimeter of tissue, where each mote operates autonomously but can be collectively addressed via frequency-based interrogation. This distributed supports high-density neural recording across large tissue volumes without compromising individual mote performance.

Power and Sensing Mechanisms

Neural dust motes are powered through wireless energy transfer using ultrasonic waves transmitted from an external interrogator, typically operating in the 1-10 MHz frequency range to balance penetration depth and efficiency in biological tissue. These waves are converted into electrical energy via the piezoelectric effect in materials such as lead zirconate titanate (PZT) or barium titanate (BaTiO₃) transducers integrated into the mote. The piezoelectric transducer vibrates in response to the acoustic pressure, generating voltage that rectifies and stores charge on a capacitor to power the onboard electronics. This batteryless approach enables sub-millimeter-scale devices, with power harvesting efficiencies ranging from 0.1% to 1% under typical conditions, sufficient for low-duty-cycle operation despite losses from acoustic attenuation in tissue. The harvested power PP is given by the equation P=η⋅I⋅AP = \eta \cdot I \cdot A where η\eta is the conversion efficiency, II is the incident acoustic intensity (typically limited to 0.1-1 W/cm² for safety), and AA is the effective area of the piezoelectric receiver. This formulation derives from the acoustic power flux through the transducer surface, accounting for electromechanical coupling and impedance matching; for a 100 μm mote, it yields microwatts of power at depths up to several centimeters. To minimize tissue heating, motes are activated intermittently with short pulses of 1-10 ms duration, maintaining specific absorption rates below 1 mW/cm³ in line with FDA guidelines. Sensing in neural dust relies on integrated electrodes that detect extracellular voltage fluctuations arising from neuronal activity. These electrodes, typically pads on a substrate, capture (LFPs) in the 0.1-600 Hz range with amplitudes around 0.5 mV, or higher-frequency single-unit spikes (0.8-10 kHz, ~100 μV). These mechanisms provide high for recording from distributed neural sites, with the powered electronics amplifying and digitizing signals during active cycles before modulation for communication.

Operational Principles

Data Acquisition

Neural dust motes capture extracellular neural signals, primarily action potentials () and (LFPs), which arise from activity in nearby neurons. These signals are detected via onboard electrodes that sense voltage fluctuations in the , with spikes typically exhibiting amplitudes around 10 µV (at ~100 µm separation) in the 0.8–10 kHz frequency range and LFPs showing larger amplitudes of approximately 0.5 mV in the 0.1–600 Hz band. The acquisition process begins with amplification of these microvolt-level signals using low-noise onboard amplifiers integrated into the mote's CMOS circuitry, achieving a noise efficiency factor (NEF²·Vdd) of about 9.42 to preserve within severe power constraints. The amplified analog signals then undergo analog-to-digital conversion at sampling rates of 10–20 kHz to capture the full bandwidth required for both and LFPs, ensuring a exceeding 70 dB. Noise reduction is critical due to the motes' sub-millimeter and biological environment; techniques include bandpass filtering tailored to signal types, such as 0.1–600 Hz for LFPs or 0.8–10 kHz for to isolate relevant frequencies while attenuating low-frequency drift and high-frequency artifacts. Additionally, spatial averaging across the mote array or differential measurements subtract common-mode , yielding a (SNR) greater than 10 dB in targeted designs, though minimum achievable SNRs of 3 dB have been demonstrated in prototypes. Local processing on the mote employs basic spike detection algorithms, such as threshold crossing, where detected action potentials trigger (FET) modulation to identify events and reduce raw data volume by focusing on timestamps or features rather than continuous waveforms. This on-mote computation minimizes the bandwidth demands for subsequent steps, enabling efficient handling of high-density neural recordings.

Communication and Control

Neural dust motes employ ultrasonic communication to transmit recorded neural data wirelessly to an external interrogator. The motes modulate the reflection of incoming waves by dynamically varying their , typically using a (FET) connected to the . This impedance variation alters the or phase of the backscattered signal, encoding the neural voltage across the mote's electrodes without requiring onboard active transmission circuitry. The process achieves rates of up to 0.5 Mbps, sufficient for low-power of high-density neural signals. Communication follows a (TDMA) protocol, where the interrogator sequentially addresses individual motes by timing pulses, avoiding interference in multi-mote arrays. The interrogator then decodes the phase and shifts in the returning echoes to reconstruct the transmitted bits. The backscattered signal can be modeled as S=α⋅Ptx⋅(1+m⋅d)S = \alpha \cdot P_{tx} \cdot (1 + m \cdot d), where α\alpha is the , PtxP_{tx} is the transmit power, mm is the , and dd represents the bit (0 or 1). For control and stimulation, the reverse principle applies: targeted ultrasound pulses from the interrogator induce voltage in the mote's piezoelectric element, which drives electrical microstimulation through the electrodes. This generates currents in the range of 50–400 μA, suitable for , with the pulse timing and amplitude dictating the pattern. The piezoelectric actuator's response ensures precise, delivery without additional power sources.

Medical Applications

Neural Prosthetics

Neural dust holds significant promise for advancing neural prosthetics by enabling high-density, recording of neural activity to restore motor and sensory functions in individuals with disabilities. Unlike traditional wired implants, neural dust consists of millimeter-scale, batteryless sensors powered and interrogated via , allowing for distributed deployment across neural tissues to capture electrophysiological signals with minimal invasiveness. This approach facilitates real-time interfacing between the and external devices, such as prosthetic limbs or exoskeletons, by decoding intent from cortical or peripheral signals. In motor prosthetics, neural dust has potential for real-time decoding of activity to control artificial limbs or exoskeletons, potentially overcoming the limitations of current systems that typically rely on 100-channel arrays like the Utah electrode. The technology's scalability enables deployment of thousands of dust motes, each acting as an independent recording channel, to achieve resolutions exceeding 1,000 channels for more precise movement decoding and whole-limb innervation. Early demonstrations in models confirmed the feasibility of recording for such decoding, with ultrasonic neural dust successfully recording electroneurogram () and electromyogram (EMG) signals from peripheral nerves and muscles, transmitting data for analysis of movement-related activity. For sensory restoration, neural dust has been proposed to enhance cochlear and implants by providing finer-grained neural feedback loops through distributed sensing of auditory or visual pathway activity. These motes could monitor voltage spikes in relevant nerves, enabling adaptive stimulation that refines sensory input processing beyond the resolution of existing electrode-based systems. In closed-loop configurations, neural dust integrates sensing of user intent with haptic feedback delivery, forming bidirectional systems where recorded neural patterns guide prosthetic responses, as validated in initial implants that supported continuous signal readout. Key advantages of neural dust over wired prosthetics include reduced risk of infection from percutaneous connectors and electrodes that penetrate the skull, as the wireless design eliminates external wiring. Additionally, its communication enables high-channel-density data transmission without batteries, supporting long-term implantation and scalability for innervating entire limbs or sensory fields.

Therapeutic Interventions

Neural dust enables targeted electrical as a therapeutic intervention for various neurological and physiological disorders, leveraging its distributed, wireless mote architecture to deliver precise with minimal invasiveness. In closed-loop systems, neural dust motes simultaneously record (LFPs) to detect aberrant neural activity and respond by delivering biphasic electrical pulses, typically with durations of 50-200 μs, to modulate dysfunctional circuits in real time. This approach contrasts with traditional deep brain stimulators by allowing scalable deployment of motes across nerve targets, potentially reducing surgical risks and enabling adaptive therapy based on physiological feedback. Neural dust has been proposed for stimulation in to maintain airway patency during obstructive or central events, with motes positioned along the nerve to provide precise, adaptive dosing synchronized to breathing patterns detected via integrated sensing. Early conceptual designs draw from existing peripheral successes, where distributed motes could adjust stimulation intensity dynamically to minimize energy use and side effects like . In paraplegics with , neural dust has been proposed to facilitate sacral nerve root stimulation to induce controlled voiding, where multiple motes enable selective activation of specific nerve fibers, avoiding unintended stimulation of adjacent structures that could cause pain or incontinence. This distributed configuration allows for finer than conventional sacral implants, improving efficacy in restoring control while reducing complications such as dyssynergic contractions. As of 2024, following Biosciences' acquisition by in 2020, neural dust-based devices received FDA investigational device exemption for an early in underactive treatment, involving ultrasound-powered implants to stimulate contractions and aid voiding. Neural dust has been proposed for to offer responsive suppression through hippocampal triggered by LFP detection of pre-ictal activity, delivering targeted biphasic pulses to interrupt aberrant synchronization without constant high-frequency . This closed-loop has the potential to decrease the invasiveness of current deep brain stimulators by distributing sub-millimeter motes throughout the hippocampus, enabling high-density coverage and personalized thresholds for intervention to better control refractory . parameters are modulated via external , as detailed in communication protocols.

Challenges and Future Prospects

Technical and Biological Limitations

Neural dust systems face significant technical limitations stemming from the physics of ultrasound propagation in biological tissue. Ultrasound waves, while offering better penetration than electromagnetic alternatives, experience attenuation of approximately 0.5 dB per cm per MHz in soft tissue, which restricts effective power delivery and communication to depths of less than 10 cm at typical operating frequencies around 10 MHz. In practice, demonstrated ranges in tissue are limited to about 8.9 mm due to a 10 dB signal loss, necessitating sub-cranial placement for central nervous system applications and posing challenges for deep-brain motes where power efficiency drops to levels as low as 20 pW for sub-100 μm devices. Biological barriers further complicate long-term deployment of neural dust motes. Immune rejection manifests as responses, including formation around implants, which degrades signal-to-noise ratios over time by encapsulating the devices and impeding neural interfacing. , involving protein adsorption and cellular adhesion on mote surfaces, reduces signal quality within months, as the accumulation of biological material interferes with piezoelectric transduction and function. Additionally, the free-floating of these untethered motes raises concerns about post-implantation migration, potentially displacing them from target neural sites and disrupting consistent recording. Safety considerations are paramount, particularly regarding thermal effects from interrogation. While current prototypes operate well below FDA thermal limits (e.g., at 0.03% of the 720 mW/cm² spatial-peak pulse-average intensity threshold, resulting in negligible heating), scaling to higher powers for deeper penetration risks tissue temperatures exceeding °C, which could induce protein denaturation and cellular damage. Long-term biocompatibility data remain limited to trials, with lead-containing piezoelectric materials like PZT raising concerns that require alternative biocompatible encapsulants such as parylene or , yet unproven for human chronic use. Scalability gaps hinder widespread adoption of neural dust arrays. Fabricating thousands of sub-millimeter motes involves complex microassembly processes, driving up costs and limiting production to scales without economies of mass manufacturing. Interrogation bandwidth for simultaneous operation of multiple motes is constrained by modulation limits and noise floors, with achievable data rates dropping significantly for arrays beyond a few dozen devices due to interference and power scaling issues.

Ongoing Research and Potential Advances

Recent advancements in neural dust technology have focused on improving penetration and efficiency through hybrid approaches combining radiofrequency (RF) and signaling. In 2022, researchers demonstrated an RF- relay system that enhances powering across tissue interfaces, allowing deeper implantation of sub-millimeter sensors with reduced compared to single-modality methods. This hybrid technique addresses limitations in ultrasound-only powering by leveraging RF for external communication while using for targeted energy delivery. Optimizations in piezoelectric materials have also progressed, particularly for neural regeneration applications. A 2025 Springer review highlights cutting-edge technologies in neural regeneration, including neural dust platforms for long-term neural recordings using ultrasonic power delivery. These materials facilitate better electromechanical coupling, supporting long-term monitoring and stimulation for tissue repair without frequent recharging. Looking ahead, future enhancements emphasize scaling down to true nanoscale motes using advanced micro-electro-mechanical systems () fabrication. A 2025 MDPI publication introduces a bio-inspired simulation platform that models mote interactions in neural networks, accelerating design iterations. Human clinical trials for neural dust-based interfaces, such as those for underactive bladder treatment, received FDA investigational device exemption in 2024 for an early . Research frontiers encompass advanced simulation frameworks for virtual testing of neural dust deployments. The 2025 simulation platform models bio-neural dust systems, aiding in the prediction of long-term performance. Collaborations between academic labs and companies akin to are driving clinical translation, as seen in partnerships for ultrasound-powered implants targeting disorders.

References

  1. https://www.darpa.mil/news/2016/implantable-neural-dust
  2. https://news.berkeley.edu/2016/08/03/sprinkling-of-neural-dust-opens-door-to-electroceuticals/
  3. https://arxiv.org/abs/1307.2196
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627316303440
  5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29331738/
  6. https://cen.acs.org/pharmaceuticals/neuroscience/Astellas-acquire-neural-dust-startIota/98/i41
  7. https://www.clinicaltrialsarena.com/news/astellas-iota-receives-fda-go-ahead-for-bladder-implant-trial/
  8. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06956209
  9. https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/neural-dust-could-treat-body-inside
  10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724003778
  11. https://inria.hal.science/hal-01656743/document
  12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165027014002842
  13. https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2018/EECS-2018-146.pdf
  14. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-3951/6/1/8
  15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.034
  16. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abf6312
  17. https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/1307.2196
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10825050/
  19. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2cw282nx
  20. https://www.cell.com/neuron/fulltext/S0896-6273(16)30344-0
  21. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27497221/
  22. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/tiny-neural-dust-sensors-could-one-day-control-prostheses-or-treat-disease-180960190/
  23. https://vcresearch.berkeley.edu/news/sprinkling-neural-dust-opens-door-electroceuticals
  24. https://escholarship.org/content/qt2cw282nx/qt2cw282nx_noSplash_8ce843bfed11bf0ce64b380de2577844.pdf
  25. https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~rikky/News/Entries/2018/4/10_Dr._Benjamin_Johnson_presents_StimDust_at_the_2018_IEEE_Custom_Integrated_Circuits_Conference_files/Johnson_CICC_2018.pdf
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360586708_An_RF-Ultrasound_Relay_for_Adaptive_Wireless_Powering_Across_Tissue_Interfaces
  27. https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/admt.202400797
  28. https://cellregeneration.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13619-025-00260-y
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349987032_Neural_dust_swept_up_in_latest_leap_for_bioelectronic_medicine
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.