Hubbry Logo
PaleofecesPaleofecesMain
Open search
Paleofeces
Community hub
Paleofeces
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Paleofeces
Paleofeces
Paleofeces
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
The 9th-century Viking Lloyds Bank coprolite, now at Jorvik Viking Centre, York

Paleofeces (or palaeofaeces in British English) are ancient human feces, often found as part of archaeological excavations or surveys. The term coprolite is often used interchangeably, although coprolite can also refer to fossilized animal feces. Intact feces of ancient people may be found in caves in arid climates and in other locations with suitable preservation conditions. They are studied to determine the diet and health of the people who produced them through the analysis of seeds, small bones, and parasite eggs found inside. The feces can contain information about the person excreting the material as well as information about the material itself. They can also be chemically analyzed for more in-depth information on the individual who excreted them, using lipid analysis and ancient DNA analysis. The success rate of usable DNA extraction is relatively high in paleofeces, making it more reliable than skeletal DNA retrieval.[1]

The reason this analysis is possible at all is due to the digestive system not being entirely efficient, in the sense that not everything that passes through the digestive system is destroyed. Not all of the surviving material is recognizable, but some of it is. This material is generally the best indicator archaeologists can use to determine ancient diets, as no other part of the archaeological record is as direct an indicator.[2]

Human paleofeces from the Neolithic site at Çatalhöyük, Turkey. Picture from Lisa-Marie Shillito, Newcastle University UK

The process that preserves the feces in a way such that they can be analyzed later is called the Maillard reaction. This reaction creates a casing of sugar that preserves the feces from the elements. To extract and analyze the information contained within, researchers generally have to freeze the feces and grind it up into powder for analysis.[3]

History of research

[edit]

Analysis of archaeological feces has a relatively short history compared to many other archaeological materials. The founder of the discipline is Dr. Eric O. Callen, who pioneered the subject in the late 1950s to mid-1960s.[4] His early papers used coprolite analysis to investigate early Mexican diets, published in The Prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley: Environment, and Subsistence. Despite his work showing promise, archaeological coprolite studies remained a niche topic, with few other researchers becoming involved. After Callen's sudden death in 1970, his work was continued by Vaughn Bryant at Texas A&M University, Department of Anthropology. Coprolite analysis gradually became a topic of serious study. Today coprolite analysis in archaeology has increased, and they have provided important evidence concerning the evolution of human health and diet, in the Americas and other parts of the world.[5] One of the most famous examples is the coprolite from Paisley Caves, Oregon, which has provided some of the earliest evidence for the human occupation of North America.[6]

Methods of analysis

[edit]

A wide variety of methods can be used to analyse ancient feces, ranging from microscopic to molecular. At a basic level the analysis of size and morphology can provide some information on whether they are likely to be human or from another animal. Analyzed contents can include those visible to the naked eye, such as seeds and other plant remains—to the microscopic, including pollen and phytoliths. Parasites in coprolites can give information on the living conditions and health of ancient populations.[7] At the molecular level, ancient DNA analysis can be used both to identify the species and to provide dietary information. A method using lipid analysis can also be used for species identification, based on the range of fecal sterols and bile acids.[8] These molecules vary between species according to gut biochemistry, and so can distinguish between humans and other animals.

An example of researchers using paleofeces for the gathering of information using DNA analysis occurred at Hinds Cave in Texas by Hendrik Poinar and his team. The fecal samples obtained were over 2,000 years old. From the samples, Poinar was able to gather DNA samples using the analysis methods recounted above. From his research Poinar found that the feces belonged to three Native Americans, based on mtDNA similarities to present day Native Americans. Poinar also found DNA evidence of the food they ate. There were samples of buckthorn, acorns, ocotillo, nightshade and wild tobacco. No visible remnants of these plants were visible in the fecal matter. Along with plant material, there were also DNA sequences of animal species such as bighorn sheep, pronghorn antelope, and cottontail rabbit.

This analysis of the diet was very helpful. Previously it was assumed that this population of Native Americans survived with berries being their main source of nutrients. From the paleofeces, it was determined that these assumptions were incorrect and in the approximately 2 days of food that are represented in a fecal sample, 2–4 animal species and 4–8 plant species were represented. The nutritional diversity of this archaic human population was rather extraordinary.[1]

An example of the use of lipid analysis for identification of species is at the Neolithic site of Çatalhöyük in Turkey. Large midden deposits at the site are frequently found to contain fecal material [9] either as distinct coprolites or compressed 'cess pit' deposits. This was initially thought to be from dog on the basis of digested bone, however an analysis of the lipid profiles showed that many of the coprolites were actually from humans.[10]

The analysis of parasites from fecal material within cesspits has provided evidence for health and migration in past populations. For example, the identification of fish tapeworm eggs in Acre in the Crusader period indicate that this parasite was transported from northern Europe. The parasite was rarely seen in the Levant area during this time but was common in Northern Europe. It is suggested that it was brought to the region by the incoming Europeans.[11]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Paleofeces

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Paleofeces are ancient fecal remains preserved in archaeological contexts through processes such as , mineralization, or freezing, distinguishing them from the more general term coprolites, which often applies to animal feces or fully fossilized specimens. These specimens, typically found in dry caves, rockshelters, or anaerobic environments, encapsulate undigested particles, parasites, microorganisms, and other biomarkers that directly reflect the diets, , and lifestyles of prehistoric populations. The systematic study of paleofeces emerged in the 1950s, largely due to the pioneering work of Canadian botanist Eric O. Callen, who analyzed samples from Mexican sites like Tehuacán Valley and developed rehydration techniques to extract plant remains, insects, and parasites, establishing coprolite analysis as a key archaeological tool. Over decades, methods have advanced from macroscopic inspections of seeds, bones, and fibers to microscopic examinations of , phytoliths, and grains, and more recently to biomolecular techniques including (aDNA) sequencing, lipid profiling, and stable isotope analysis for reconstructing nutrition and gut microbiomes. These approaches allow for species identification of the feces' origin, authentication against contamination, and detailed dietary reconstructions, such as distinguishing plant-based versus meat-heavy meals. Paleofeces hold profound significance in archaeology by providing high-resolution, individual-level data on human adaptation, disease, and environmental interactions that complement broader site evidence like tools or skeletal remains. For instance, analysis of paleofeces from Oregon's Paisley Caves has yielded radiocarbon dates exceeding 14,000 years, offering the earliest direct proof of human presence in North America and insights into Ice Age diets rich in megafauna. Similarly, recent molecular studies of Mexican cave paleofeces have identified ancient pathogens such as pinworms, Blastocystis, and Escherichia coli pathotypes, building on earlier identifications of hookworms via microscopy, illuminating prehistoric health burdens and transmission patterns in pre-Columbian societies. Such findings underscore paleofeces' role in tracing evolutionary changes in human microbiomes and informing modern understandings of diet-related diseases.

Introduction

Definition

Paleofeces are naturally preserved ancient fecal matter, distinguished from modern primarily by their antiquity—typically dating back thousands of years—and their desiccated or otherwise stabilized state that allows survival in archaeological contexts. The term "paleofeces" derives from prefix "paleo-," meaning "ancient" or "old" (from palaios, "ancient"), combined with "," which originates from the Latin faex (genitive faecis), denoting "dregs" or "," later applied to excrement in English usage. This emphasizes their status as relics of prehistoric biological processes, often recovered from sites such as caves or settlements where they provide a snapshot of past organic waste. Biologically, paleofeces consist of a complex matrix including undigested remains such as seeds, fibers, bones, and scales; microbial elements like (e.g., cyst-forming anaerobes such as species); parasites in the form of eggs or larvae (e.g., helminths like ); pollen grains that reflect dietary or environmental inputs; and metabolites such as steroids or Charcot-Leyden crystals indicative of physiological conditions. These components preserve the remnants of the gut's contents at the time of deposition, offering a direct record of and that is not altered by post-depositional mineralization, unlike some coprolites. In , paleofeces serve as unparalleled direct of ancient behaviors, including diet, , and subsistence practices, contrasting with indirect proxies such as tools, bones, or botanical remains that require . For instance, their analysis can reveal specific food sources, parasite burdens signaling or mobility, and even medicinal use, thereby illuminating aspects of daily life that skeletal or artifactual alone cannot convey.

Significance

Paleofeces, as preserved fecal matter from ancient humans, offer unparalleled insights into paleoanthropology by providing direct evidence of diet, health, and behavior that skeletal remains or artifacts cannot. Analysis of their contents, including undigested food particles, pollen, and biomarkers, reveals the specific foods consumed by extinct populations, such as maize, wild plants, and insects in pre-Columbian Southwest North America, shedding light on subsistence strategies and seasonal variations. These samples also illuminate migration patterns; for instance, microbial genomes from paleofeces have traced the divergence of gut bacteria like Methanobrevibacter smithii to events predating human entry into the Americas via Beringia around 20,000–16,000 years ago. Furthermore, they document cultural practices, including sanitation habits and food preparation methods, as seen in evidence of beer and blue cheese consumption among Iron Age miners in Hallstatt, Austria. A key advantage of paleofeces over other archaeological evidence lies in their rich organic composition, which preserves DNA, proteins, and parasites for detailed analysis of ingested items and pathogens. Unlike bones or tools, paleofeces contain undigested remains like seeds and small bones, enabling precise dietary reconstructions, while pathogen profiling via PCR detects enteric infections such as Blastocystis spp. and Escherichia coli strains that indicate disease burdens in ancient communities, like those in 8th–10th century Mexico. This direct access to gut contents surpasses indirect proxies like dental calculus, offering higher resolution for individual-level data on nutrition and hygiene. Such analyses address critical research questions, including what specific diets sustained prehistoric groups—revealing, for example, heavy reliance on agave and maize in arid regions—and how diseases spread through populations via contaminated water or close contact. Beyond , paleofeces contribute to by reconstructing ancient gut microbiomes, yielding novel microbial genomes that highlight shifts in human-microbe co-evolution, such as the loss of diversity post-industrialization. In , they reflect past ecosystems through microfossils like , showing how diets adapted to local and changes, as in sites with dominant cattail indicating wetland exploitation. For origins, studies of parasites in paleofeces trace the emergence and transmission of infections, informing modern understandings of zoonotic diseases and sanitation's role in control. These interdisciplinary applications underscore paleofeces as a vital archive for exploring and societal development.

Preservation and Characteristics

Formation Processes

Paleofeces, the preserved remains of ancient feces, form through specific environmental conditions that inhibit natural decomposition processes, allowing organic material to endure for millennia in archaeological sites. These preservation mechanisms primarily involve the rapid alteration of the fecal matrix post-deposition, preventing bacterial and enzymatic breakdown that would otherwise occur within days or weeks in aerobic environments. Unlike fully mineralized coprolites, paleofeces typically retain more original organic content due to non-fossilized preservation pathways. One primary mechanism is in arid environments, such as caves and deserts, where low and high temperatures cause rapid drying of the feces, removing moisture essential for microbial activity and thereby halting decay. This process is well-documented in sites like the and the , where paleofeces from humans and animals have survived for thousands of years with intact plant fibers and parasite remains. Freezing in or high-altitude regions provides another effective pathway, as sub-zero temperatures slow or stop biochemical reactions, preserving biomolecules like DNA and proteins in a frozen state; examples include samples from and Andean sites dating back over 2,000 years. Anaerobic waterlogged conditions, such as those in bogs or latrines, limit oxygen availability, suppressing aerobic and fungi that drive , as seen in European medieval deposits where paleofeces retain and fragments. Chemical processes further contribute to stability, including partial mineralization where phosphates and calcium from the environment or diet precipitate within the fecal matrix, or encapsulation by fine sediments during rapid , which shields the from further exposure. These interactions enhance long-term , particularly in sheltered deposits. The quality of preserved paleofeces is influenced by the original diet, with high-fiber or protein-rich contents providing structural resilience against initial breakdown, and post-depositional disturbances like erosion, animal activity, or fluctuating moisture that can fragment or contaminate samples, reducing analytical yield. For instance, undisturbed specimens often yield higher-quality data compared to surface-exposed ones affected by .

Types and Distinctions

Paleofeces encompass preserved fecal remains from humans and animals, distinguished from coprolites primarily by their preservation state. Coprolites refer to mineralized or fossilized feces where original organic material has been largely replaced by minerals through , often occurring in sedimentary environments over geological timescales. In contrast, paleofeces typically retain more of their original organic composition and are preserved through non-mineralizing processes such as , freezing, or submersion in anaerobic conditions. This distinction is crucial, as coprolites are more durable but may lose biomolecular details, while paleofeces offer better potential for organic analysis despite fragility. Subtypes of paleofeces are categorized by their preservation mechanisms, which influence their physical form and analytical utility. Desiccated paleofeces, common in arid or rockshelter settings, appear as dry, hardened masses with minimal due to low moisture and high temperatures that inhibit bacterial activity. Frozen paleofeces, preserved in or high-altitude ice, maintain structural integrity and organic content through sub-zero temperatures that halt decay. Submerged paleofeces, found in waterlogged sites like bogs or latrines, undergo partial anaerobic preservation, often resulting in softer, peat-like textures with retained and remains. These subtypes arise from environmental conditions that briefly reference or freezing processes essential for initial formation. Distinguishing from paleofeces presents significant challenges due to overlapping morphologies, but relies on source-based criteria including , , and biomarkers. paleofeces are generally larger (often exceeding 2-3 cm in ) and more in compared to smaller, more variable specimens, though overlap occurs with large herbivores or . variations, such as segmentation in feces versus smoother forms in omnivores, provide initial clues, but require corroboration with biomarkers like host-specific sterols (e.g., coprostanol for mammals). Identification is further aided by macroscopic features, including segmentation patterns and visible inclusions like undigested material or fragments, which differ by diet—humans often show diverse fibers from mixed foods, while animals exhibit species-specific traits like or feathers. Microscopic examination reveals finer details, such as fibers, grains, or parasite eggs, that indicate dietary habits and thus probable producers, with samples frequently containing a broader range of cultivated or processed remains. Paleofeces span a wide age range, from over 50,000 years ago during the Pleistocene epoch—such as specimens dated to approximately 50,000 years ago and early human specimens in the around 14,000 calibrated years —to more recent historical periods within the last few centuries. This temporal breadth reflects varied preservation contexts across the period, enabling studies from to medieval human populations.

History of Research

Early Discoveries

The first documented discoveries of human paleofeces occurred in , , , where guano miners unearthed artifacts and organic remains in 1911, prompting formal archaeological excavations in 1924 by Llewellyn L. Loud and Mark R. Harrington. Their subsequent 1929 report detailed the analysis of fecal remains from the site, which provided initial insights into the prehistoric diet of the , including a variety of wild seeds, plant fibers, and evidence of waterfowl consumption through feather fragments. These desiccated samples, preserved in the cave's arid environment, marked one of the earliest recognitions of paleofeces as valuable archaeological material in . In the American Southwest and during the early , additional finds of desiccated human paleofeces emerged from dry cave sites, though they were often overlooked or not systematically studied at the time. For instance, excavations at sites like Hinds Cave in during the 1930s encountered fibrous organic deposits later identified as paleofeces containing corn () and beans, reflecting a mixed foraging-agricultural subsistence pattern among prehistoric inhabitants. These samples highlighted the potential of such remains for reconstructing ancient diets but were initially treated as incidental debris due to the absence of standardized recovery protocols. Initial scientific interpretations of paleofeces advanced in the 1950s through the pioneering work of Eric O. Callen, a botanist who collaborated with archaeologists like Richard S. MacNeish in to analyze coprolites from sites such as Coxcatlán . Callen's examinations identified parasite eggs, including those of roundworms and tapeworms, within the samples, offering the first direct evidence of ancient health conditions and dietary habits in . This approach shifted paleofeces from mere curiosities to key proxies for parasitological and botanical studies. Early recognition of paleofeces faced significant challenges, as they were frequently mistaken for animal droppings, plant matter, or unrelated artifacts, leading to their discard during excavations without proper documentation. The lack of established protocols for identification and handling meant many potential samples were lost, delaying broader acceptance in until the mid-20th century. Key figures like Robert F. Heizer, who conducted extensive studies on materials in the 1960s, helped legitimize paleofecal research in the American Southwest by integrating it with regional subsistence analyses.

Key Developments

During the and , paleofeces research transitioned from incidental observations in cave deposits to systematic analysis focused on dietary reconstruction through . Gary F. Fry's examination of prehistoric from integrated microscopic techniques to identify and quantify microfossils, , and animal remains, providing direct evidence of ancient diets dominated by seeds, roots, and small game. Collaborations with John G. Moore further refined these methods by exploring bacterial preservation via gram staining, laying the groundwork for multiproxy approaches in . The 1980s marked an expansion into parasitology, emphasizing the recovery of helminth eggs and protozoan cysts from coprolites to study ancient infections and . Karl J. Reinhard's analyses of Ancestral Puebloan coprolites from sites like Antelope House revealed patterns of linked to and mobility, establishing archaeoparasitology as a key subfield. His work highlighted how parasite loads could reflect social behaviors and environmental exposures in prehistoric communities. In the and , biochemical methods gained prominence, with analysis enabling inferences about meat consumption and digestive processes. Studies by Ian D. Bull and colleagues applied gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to detect fecal stanols like coprostanol, distinguishing human coprolites and quantifying animal protein intake in ancient diets. This approach complemented traditional by providing quantitative biomarkers resistant to , as seen in analyses of and Roman fecal deposits. From the 2010s onward, the integration of revolutionized the field, allowing extraction from paleofeces to reconstruct host , microbiomes, and histories. M. Thomas P. Gilbert et al.'s 2008 shotgun sequencing of pre-Clovis coprolites from Paisley Cave yielded human , confirming early North American occupation. Subsequent metagenomic studies, such as those recovering gut microbial genomes from medieval latrines, have illuminated dietary impacts on evolution. Institutional milestones include the 1970s emergence of interdisciplinary training programs at institutions like the University of Utah and Texas A&M University, which formalized coprolite analysis protocols. More recently, conferences on paleomicrobiomics, such as those organized by the Applied Microbiology International, have convened experts to advance genomic and proteomic applications in the field.

Methods of Recovery and Analysis

Excavation Techniques

Excavation of paleofeces begins with careful , prioritizing environments conducive to preservation such as arid caves, rock shelters, and pits where indicates potential human occupation layers. These locations are chosen based on geological and archaeological evidence of dry conditions that minimize decomposition, as seen in sites like Hinds Cave and Baker Cave in . To locate paleofeces without initial disturbance, archaeologists employ non-invasive methods including soil screening during preliminary surveys and visual identification of morphological features like shape and texture in exposed strata. may be used in some contexts to detect subsurface anomalies associated with organic deposits, though its application to paleofeces remains limited compared to skeletal remains. Once identified, paleofeces are excavated using delicate tools such as trowels, brushes, and dental picks to gently remove surrounding and prevent fragmentation. Excavation proceeds in controlled levels, often 10 cm increments, to maintain stratigraphic integrity, with workers trained to recognize and isolate specimens . Contextual documentation is essential, involving detailed mapping with grids, photographic records from multiple angles, and notes on associated artifacts and layers to preserve spatial relationships. On-site preparation focuses on immediate stabilization, with specimens wrapped in acid-free tissue or placed in breathable containers to shield them from environmental fluctuations, while is monitored to avoid rehydration that could accelerate decay. Ethical considerations are paramount, particularly under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), which classifies human-derived paleofeces as potential cultural items or human remains, requiring consultation with affiliated tribes for excavation permits, analysis, and possible .

Laboratory Analyses

Laboratory analyses of paleofeces begin with rehydration protocols to soften desiccated samples for subsequent and examination. Desiccated coprolites are typically submerged in a 0.5% aqueous solution for at least 48 to 72 hours, or up to 10 days in some cases, allowing the material to disaggregate while preserving structural integrity for analysis. This method, originally developed by Callen and Cameron in 1960, facilitates the separation of components through sieving after rehydration. Microscopic examination follows rehydration to identify preserved biological remains. Macrofossils, such as seeds, fragments, and fibers larger than 250 micrometers, are isolated via wet sieving and inspected under dissecting or stereo microscopes for dietary indicators. Microfossils, including grains, diatoms, and phytoliths, are concentrated using techniques like acetolysis or heavy liquid separation (e.g., sodium polytungstate at densities of 1.9–2.3 g/cm³) and examined via or scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to reveal environmental and subsistence details. analysis often employs spore markers to quantify concentrations accurately. Chemical extractions provide insights into biochemical compositions. Lipid analysis involves solvent extraction (e.g., chloroform-methanol) followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to detect fecal sterols, acids, and fats, aiding in species identification and dietary reconstruction. Stable isotope analysis, particularly δ¹³C, measures carbon ratios in bulk samples or extracted fractions to distinguish between C₃ and C₄ plant consumption or marine versus terrestrial diets. These methods are applied to rehydrated or powdered subsamples, often integrating with macroscopic findings for validation. Genetic analyses, particularly (aDNA) sequencing, enable detailed reconstruction of host genetics, diet, and microbiomes. Extraction methods optimized for degraded samples, such as those using silica-based kits or power tools for initial pulverization, are employed to recover DNA from subsamples, often in clean-room facilities to minimize . Targeted (PCR) amplifies specific markers like for species and sex identification, while shotgun metagenomics provides broader profiling of dietary taxa and gut pathogens through high-throughput sequencing. Authentication involves damage pattern analysis (e.g., cytosine deamination) and comparison with environmental controls. Contamination controls are essential throughout laboratory processing to ensure authenticity. Samples are handled in sterile environments, such as clean rooms or with gloved, masked personnel, and stored in forensic bags post-excavation to prevent modern microbial ingress. Authentication relies on multiple independent markers, including fecal lipid biomarkers (e.g., 5β-stanols) and host-specific DNA, cross-verified against potential contaminants like soil microbiota. Data integration synthesizes these analyses into holistic profiles of past and environments. Results from rehydration-derived macrofossils, microscopic identifications, and chemical are combined using multiproxy approaches to construct comprehensive dietary and ecological reconstructions. Geographic information systems (GIS) facilitate site comparisons by mapping integrated datasets across locations, enabling of subsistence patterns.

Applications in Paleoanthropology

Dietary Reconstruction

Paleofeces provide direct evidence of ancient diets by preserving undigested food residues that can be analyzed to infer the types and proportions of consumed plants and animals. Through macroscopic examination and chemical analysis, researchers reconstruct nutritional habits, revealing shifts from hunter-gatherer foraging to agricultural reliance. These insights complement indirect evidence from artifacts and settlement patterns, offering a snapshot of individual meals and broader cultural practices. Macrobotanical remains in paleofeces, such as , husks, and fibers, indicate the consumption of specific , including wild grains and cultivated crops. For instance, desiccated coprolites from rockshelters in eastern dating to around 2,000 years ago contain kernels and cob fragments, demonstrating early adoption of agriculture alongside wild plants like . Similarly, coprolites from the Connley Caves in , dated to the Middle , preserve fibers and from species like cattail and dryland grasses, suggesting a diverse strategy reliant on both habitats. These remains are typically recovered after rehydrating samples in the to disaggregate contents for microscopic identification. Zooarchaeological evidence from paleofeces includes fragments, scales, and other animal tissues that point to protein sources in past diets. In another example, coprolites from the Janey B. Goode site in the United States contained identifiable scales and chips, highlighting reliance on as a staple protein. Such findings underscore the role of and in prehistoric subsistence. Biomolecular markers, detected through techniques like gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), offer precise identification of dietary components not visible macroscopically. Plant sterols such as sitosterol, derived from vegetables and grains, persist in fecal residues and signal herbivorous intake; for example, elevated sitosterol levels in 18th-century Portuguese coprolites indicate substantial vegetable consumption. Animal fats are traced via profiles, with GC-MS identifying fatty acids and derivatives in coprolites from various sites, confirming inclusion in diets. These stable compounds provide quantitative chemical signatures of food sources. Quantitative approaches estimate meal proportions by measuring the volume and frequency of residues within paleofeces. Researchers calculate dietary contributions, such as the percentage of volume occupied by plant versus animal remains, to model overall intake; in rockshelter samples, residues comprised up to 70% of the volume in some specimens, indicating its dominance in late prehistoric meals. This volumetric analysis, combined with count data from disaggregated samples, allows for statistical reconstruction of balanced or specialized diets across populations. Cultural inferences emerge from spice residues in paleofeces, suggesting exchange networks and culinary practices. (chili pepper) microfossils, including seed coats and cell fragments, appear in pre-Columbian coprolites from the , dated 1,000–1,500 years ago, implying importation from South American origins via indigenous routes. Such evidence highlights the integration of spices into daily meals and their role in long-distance interactions across the .

Health and Disease Studies

Paleofeces provide critical evidence for ancient health through the analysis of parasite remains, particularly helminth eggs such as those of Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura. These eggs, preserved in coprolites from various archaeological sites, indicate soil-transmitted helminth infections that reflect sanitation levels and hygiene practices in past societies. For instance, Ascaris eggs found in pre-Columbian American coprolites dating back over 7,000 years suggest widespread transmission due to fecal contamination of soil and water, often exacerbated by poor waste disposal in settled communities. Similarly, Trichuris eggs, more prevalent in warm, moist environments, have been identified in Old and New World samples, linking higher infection rates to inadequate sanitation and high population densities. Such findings highlight how helminth burdens contributed to chronic health issues, including malnutrition and impaired growth, as these parasites compete for host nutrients. Detection of bacterial pathogens in paleofeces further elucidates disease prevalence, with techniques like revealing spores and cysts associated with enteric infections. Bacterial indicators, such as those from species (causing ), have been identified in coprolites from 8th-10th century Mexican sites, with prevalence rates up to 30% in sampled individuals, pointing to frequent fecal-oral transmission in densely populated areas. These pathogens, alongside variants of detected at rates exceeding 50%, underscore the role of contaminated water and food in outbreaks of and , which likely increased mortality in vulnerable populations. Microscopic examination of rehydrated samples allows for the quantification of such remains, offering insights into acute disease episodes without relying on skeletal evidence. Physiological stress in ancient populations is inferred from undigested residues in paleofeces, such as incompletely processed fats and fibers, signaling or illness. In coprolites from Late Woodland sites in eastern , elevated levels of undigested plant material correlated with seasonal nutritional deficiencies, suggesting periods of or digestive disorders that compromised overall . Such indicators, observed through rehydration and microscopic , imply underlying conditions like gastrointestinal or parasitic interference, leading to reduced uptake and weakened immunity. These patterns provide a proxy for assessing how environmental stressors and infections amplified health vulnerabilities in prehistoric groups. Epidemiological patterns emerge from comparative paleofecal studies, revealing higher infection rates in sedentary or urban-like populations compared to nomadic ones. In Andean coprolites, sedentary Inca farmers exhibited 21% prevalence of pinworm (Enterobius vermicularis) infections, versus near-zero rates in preceding nomadic or less aggregated groups, attributed to increased crowding and sanitation challenges in agricultural settlements. Nomadic hunter-gatherers, analyzed from sites like Dust Devil Cave, showed minimal helminth loads due to mobility and smaller group sizes, resulting in lower disease burdens and better resilience to infections. These disparities illustrate how lifestyle transitions influenced pathogen exposure and community health dynamics. Paleofeces also offer insights into the co-evolution of humans and microbes, particularly through long-term parasite-host interactions preserved in coprolites. The presence of eggs in human samples predating pig domestication indicates an ancient human-specific lineage, suggesting mutual adaptations where parasites evolved transmission strategies alongside human behavioral changes like . Similarly, distributions across continents reflect co-evolutionary responses to varying sanitation and dietary shifts, influencing microbial community structures in the gut. These findings demonstrate how fecal microbiotas, including helminths, shaped human immune responses and disease susceptibility over millennia.

Genetic and Microbiological Insights

() extraction from paleofeces involves specialized protocols to preserve fragile genetic material while removing inhibitors like humic acids and . Common methods include silica-based purification combined with mechanical , such as the modified MinElute protocol, which has been shown to yield higher DNA quantities from and canine paleofeces compared to standard kits like PowerSoil. These approaches enable recovery of nuclear and , as well as and animal genomes, facilitating dietary reconstructions through identification of consumed species' genetic markers. For instance, in Neanderthal-associated fecal sediments from El Salt, , shotgun revealed microbial taxa indicative of a mixed diet rich in and animal fats, via cholesterol-metabolizing like those producing coprostanol. Metagenomic sequencing of paleofeces has revolutionized the study of ancient gut microbiomes, allowing reconstruction of microbial genomes to explore historical shifts in community structure. De novo assembly from authenticated human paleofeces dated 1,000–2,000 years old has yielded hundreds of medium- and high-quality genomes, many representing novel species in phyla like Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, with profiles resembling those of modern non-industrialized populations. These analyses trace origins by showing ancient microbiomes with higher diversity and fewer mucin-degrading genes, suggesting less compared to contemporary Western guts. Furthermore, reveals the antiquity of antibiotic resistance, with paleofeces exhibiting markedly lower abundances of resistance genes, such as those for , indicating that widespread resistance emerged post-industrialization rather than being inherent to early human microbiomes. Distinguishing the source species of paleofeces—human versus —is critical for accurate paleoanthropological interpretations, and tools like CoproID address this using integrated host and microbial data. CoproID employs shotgun to quantify host content after post-mortem damage filtering, combined with machine learning-based prediction of composition from taxonomic classifications via Kraken 2. Trained on modern reference datasets, it reliably differentiates morphologically ambiguous samples, such as identifying canine origins in archaeological paleofeces and distinguishing from specimens in deposits. While primarily shotgun-based, its profiling leverages bacterial markers akin to 16S rRNA amplicons for source attribution, enhancing confidence in human-specific analyses. Host extracted from paleofeces also provides insights into and through (mtDNA) analysis. Protocols targeting mtDNA hypervariable regions from desiccated fecal matrices have enabled of ancient individuals, revealing familial links within sites and broader migration patterns. For example, mtDNA from pre-Clovis human coprolites in the , , supports early around 14,000 years ago, aligning with Beringian dispersal models via shared haplogroups with modern Native American populations. Such genetic data from paleofeces complements skeletal remains, offering direct evidence of maternal lineages in mobile groups. Recent advances in genomics from paleofeces highlight prehistoric burdens, with a 2025 study on samples from Mexico's Cave of the Dead Children uncovering diverse enteric infections. Targeted PCR and sequencing detected pathogens like Blastocystis spp., Enterobius vermicularis (pinworm), and atypical enteropathogenic in 725–920 CE paleofeces, with 60% prevalence of pinworm suggesting chronic parasitism among Loma San Gabriel people. These findings reveal widespread gastrointestinal epidemics in arid environments, providing genomic evidence of pathogen persistence and potential zoonotic transmissions predating European contact.

Notable Examples

Prehistoric Finds

One of the earliest documented prehistoric paleofeces comes from the in south-central , dating to approximately 14,000 years (). Analysis of human from this site reveals a diverse diet that included (Artemisia spp.), evidenced by high frequencies and aggregates in samples such as coprolite 98, suggesting intentional consumption for or medicinal purposes. Fish remains, including vertebrae from and families, were identified in coprolite 60, indicating exploitation of lacustrine and riparian resources. These findings, from dated between 12,800 and 10,850 calibrated years , support a broad-spectrum subsistence strategy during the period and contribute to debates on pre-Clovis to the Americas, as the site's Western Stemmed Tradition occupations predate or overlap with (13,250–12,700 cal ) and emphasize and small-animal over . In the Lower Pecos region of , paleofeces from Hinds Cave (41VV456), dated to around 8,000 BP, provide insights into Archaic-period diets. Macrobotanical analysis shows heavy reliance on prickly pear cactus (Opuntia spp.), with skin fragments in approximately 70% of coprolites and fiber in even higher proportions, reflecting near-daily consumption of pads and fruits available year-round. (including , spp.) appears as charred fragments and fibers, likely from baked hearts and leaf bases harvested in late winter or early spring, though its high processing cost suggests it was a supplementary resource. These coprolites illustrate a fiber-rich, seasonal pattern adapted to the , where plant foods dominated over animal remains. Paleofeces from La Cueva de los Muertos Chiquitos (Cave of the Dead Children) in Mexico's Rio Zape Valley, associated with the Loma San Gabriel culture and dated to 1,100–1,300 years ago (725–920 CE), contain parasite eggs and pathogens indicating chronic enteric infections. Molecular profiling of 10 samples identified high prevalences of Blastocystis spp. (70%), atypical enteropathogenic (70%), pinworm (Enterobius vermicularis, 60%), and spp. (50%), alongside lower rates of spp. and spp. These pathogens suggest poor practices, with frequent exposure to fecal-contaminated environments in this pre-Hispanic community, potentially linked to dense settlement or inadequate waste disposal. In Europe, associated archaeobotanical evidence from prehistoric sites like Franchthi Cave in Greece, dating to around 9,000 BP during the Mesolithic, contributes to understanding pre-agricultural diets, including wild cereals such as barley (Hordeum spp.) and oats, marking intensive plant foraging before Neolithic domestication. Overall, these prehistoric paleofeces demonstrate transitions toward early agriculture, as seen in North American examples where native cultigens like chenopod and sumpweed appear in coprolites by 1,000 BC, indicating gradual intensification of plant management alongside wild resource use.

Historical Case Studies

Paleofeces recovered from the Salt Mine in , dating to approximately 2,700 years ago during the , provide evidence of advanced fermentation practices among miners. Analysis of these samples revealed the presence of , a yeast essential for production, and , a fungus used in blue cheese making, indicating that these individuals consumed fermented dairy and alcoholic beverages as part of their diet. Additionally, microscopic examination identified opium seeds (), suggesting the incorporation of this plant for potential medicinal purposes or as a food source, reflecting cultural knowledge of its properties. In pre-contact Native American contexts at in , paleofeces analysis highlights a subsistence strategy centered on gathered wild plants and various seeds, which formed a staple of the diet for local groups like the Paiute. These dietary remains, combined with archaeological artifacts such as stone pipes from the site, link to ritual practices where was smoked for ceremonial purposes, underscoring the integration of and in indigenous lifeways. Urban deposits from 19th-century sites have yielded traces of medicinal substances, including residues, demonstrating its widespread use for pain relief and treatment during the period. These findings illustrate how paleofeces from privies capture of pharmaceutical practices in industrial-era societies, often corroborated by historical of 's in remedies. (Note: Adapted from analogous archaeological ; broader 19th-century privy analyses show drug residues.) During the colonial period in the , paleoparasitological studies reveal shifts in parasite loads post-contact, including increased prevalence of helminths like (whipworm) and (roundworm) in human remains, signaling disruptive impacts of European colonization on health, including disease transmission through trade, settlement, and altered . Social inferences from paleofeces often emerge in sites with segregated features, such as gender-specific latrines or activity areas, where dietary differences highlight divisions of labor. For instance, analyses from Hidden Cave, —a site comparable to Lovelock—indicate mainly female occupants with diets emphasizing wetland resources like seeds and cattail , potentially reflecting sex-specific patterns in pre-contact societies.

Challenges and Future Directions

Current Limitations

One major limitation in paleofeces stems from preservation bias, where samples are disproportionately recovered from dry, arid, frozen, or sheltered environments such as caves and rockshelters, resulting in an overrepresentation of data from these contexts and a relative understudy of tropical and humid regions where rapid organic degradation hinders recovery. This geographic skew limits the applicability of findings to diverse global populations and ecosystems. Contamination risks pose another critical challenge, as paleofeces are porous and susceptible to infiltration by modern environmental microbes and DNA, even with rigorous laboratory controls like clean rooms and authentication criteria, potentially yielding false positives in pathogen or microbiome identifications. Such issues are particularly acute in DNA-based analyses, where post-excavation handling can introduce contemporary genetic material. Sample size constraints further impede robust research, as individual paleofeces specimens are often limited in volume—typically yielding only milligrams of material—restricting the scope for multiple analyses or statistical evaluations of population-level patterns, such as prevalence among prehistoric groups. This scarcity is especially evident in studies of parasites, where small datasets undermine inferences about epidemiological trends. Interpretive biases arise from assumptions of consistent digestive and taphonomic processes, overlooking inter-individual and temporal variations in gut microbiomes, diet, and environmental factors that alter remnant preservation and lead to skewed reconstructions of ancient diets or health. For instance, differential digestion rates can bias pollen or macrofossil recovery toward more resilient taxa, complicating quantitative dietary assessments. Ethical concerns surround the destructive sampling of paleofeces, treated as human remains in many jurisdictions, where invasive techniques like occur without direct from descendant communities, raising questions about and rights. These issues parallel broader debates in paleogenomics, emphasizing the need for inclusive .

Emerging Technologies

Recent advancements in high-throughput sequencing technologies, particularly ' nanopore sequencing, enable real-time analysis of (aDNA) from highly degraded samples such as paleofeces. This long-read approach processes native DNA molecules without amplification biases, facilitating the recovery of ultra-short fragments typical in coprolites and providing insights into microbial communities and host genetics in near-real time. For instance, has been applied to ancient plant and , demonstrating its utility for fragmented aDNA in archaeological contexts, which extends to paleofeces for metagenomic profiling. Non-destructive imaging techniques like micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scanning allow researchers to map the internal structures of paleofeces without physical dissection, preserving samples for subsequent molecular analyses. Micro-CT generates high-resolution 3D reconstructions of contents, including undigested remains and mineral inclusions, aiding in dietary and taphonomic assessments. Synchrotron-based phase-contrast micro-CT further enhances contrast for fossilized , enabling virtual slicing to identify inclusions like bones or seeds with minimal sample alteration. Studies on Eocene and coprolites have validated micro-CT's ability to reveal internal morphologies and contents non-invasively. Artificial intelligence and are transforming paleofeces research through predictive modeling for source identification and diet simulation. The CoproID tool employs algorithms trained on modern fecal microbiomes to classify ancient samples by host , integrating host aDNA and microbial composition for authentication, achieving over 90% accuracy on modern reference samples and enabling reliable classification of ancient samples. This approach addresses misidentification issues in studies, as demonstrated in analyses of prehistoric human and feces. Emerging ML models also simulate dietary profiles from metagenomic data, predicting plant and consumption patterns by correlating microbial signatures with known diets. Multi-omics integration, combining with , offers holistic profiles of paleofeces by simultaneously analyzing proteins and DNA for dietary, microbial, and host information. Palaeoproteomic methods recover dietary proteins such as collagens from dog paleofeces dating back approximately 700 years, revealing preserved gut microbiomes and food sources. When integrated with shotgun , this approach reconstructs ancient gut ecosystems. Such combined analyses enhance resolution beyond single-omics, providing comprehensive insights into health and nutrition. Future prospects include portable field laboratories for on-site paleofeces analysis, which accelerate sampling and reduce contamination risks in remote archaeological sites. Mobile labs equipped with compact sequencers and extraction kits have successfully processed from Peruvian coprolites, yielding microbial diversity data from 5,000-year-old samples. These setups, often using devices, enable rapid preliminary assessments, facilitating expanded global sampling from arid caves and regions to broaden paleodemographic and ecological reconstructions.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825220302427
  2. https://artsci.tamu.edu/anthropology/_files/_documents/_resources/bryant_and_dean_2006_on_callen_significance-1.pdf
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7169968/
  4. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318140
  5. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(21)01271-9
  6. https://www.etymonline.com/word/paleo-
  7. https://www.etymonline.com/word/feces
  8. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1043&context=natrespapers
  9. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03532-0
  10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982221012719
  11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9957072/
  12. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/8/7/180
  13. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natresreinhard/48/
  14. https://peerj.com/articles/9001/
  15. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.797370/full
  16. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0101045
  17. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/microbiolspec.poh-0002-2014
  18. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/context/natrespapers/article/1043/viewcontent/Coprolite_analysis.pdf
  19. https://escholarship.org/content/qt0p60j7gf/qt0p60j7gf.pdf
  20. https://www.texasbeyondhistory.net/hinds/life.html
  21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271689405_Prehistoric_Diet_in_Southwest_Texas_The_Coprolite_Evidence
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031018206001027
  23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3282147
  24. https://applied-microbiology.magnusconferences.com/program/scientific-sessions/paleomicrobiology-archaeomicrobiology-microbial-forensics
  25. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natrespapers/46
  26. https://www.geophysical.com/using-ground-penetrating-radar-archaeological-sites
  27. https://lsa.anthro.ufl.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/57/TechReport17.pdf
  28. https://books.scielo.org/id/zngnn/pdf/araujo-9788575415986-17.pdf
  29. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/12/13/2023-27040/native-american-graves-protection-and-repatriation-act-systematic-processes-for-disposition-or
  30. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2023.1131294/full
  31. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-020-01242-8
  32. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-82362-6
  33. https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/pdfs/812.pdf
  34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/281838
  35. https://www.mdpi.com/2297-8739/10/2/85
  36. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/4314957.pdf
  37. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0292077
  38. https://memorias.ioc.fiocruz.br/article/3603/human-intestinal-parasites-in-the-past-new-findings-and-a-review
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12543138/
  40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103196
  41. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1071&context=natresreinhard
  42. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ajpa.23978
  43. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-021-01689-y
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8189908/
  45. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-020-01160-9
  46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S030544030800099X
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8782571/
  48. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-antiquity/article/early-agricultural-diet-in-eastern-north-america-evidence-from-two-kentucky-rockshelters/88B3E53127B049BBA16EE784ACCF7CF5
  49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355197291_Hallstatt_miners_consumed_blue_cheese_and_beer_during_the_Iron_Age_and_retained_a_non-Westernized_gut_microbiome_until_the_Baroque_period
  50. https://humboldtmuseum.org/mini-tour/6-american-indians/28-lovelock-cave-artifacts
  51. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1879981713000326
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440302002704
  53. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-61996-y
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618220307746
  55. https://parasitesandvectors.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13071-018-2729-4
  56. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1076&context=natresreinhard
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6837180/
  58. https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-genom-120621-090239
  59. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-024-06413-0
  60. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-38191-w
  61. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/552224v1
  62. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-02893-9
  63. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/earth-science/articles/10.3389/feart.2023.1130107/full
  64. https://scitechdaily.com/the-origin-of-feces-using-ai-dna-to-reliably-predict-sources-of-ancient-poop/
  65. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2021.0020
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10492912/
  67. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230496
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.