Hubbry Logo
Party schoolParty schoolMain
Open search
Party school
Community hub
Party school
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Party school
Party school
Party school
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Large block parties in college towns may be associated with party schools.

Party school is a term primarily used in the United States to refer to a college or university that has a reputation for alcohol and drug use or a general culture of partying usually at the expense of educational achievement. The Princeton Review published a list of schools that its surveys identified as party schools. Playboy magazine has also released lists of party schools on an irregular basis.

Many schools disapprove of the party school label, and the lists have been condemned by groups such as the American Medical Association for promoting dangerous behavior.

Party school lists

[edit]

The Princeton Review was well known for publishing a list of party schools from 1993 until 2022.[1][2] Ranking was determined by student responses to a survey of alcohol and drug use on campus, the amount of time students spend studying outside of class, and the proportion of students involved in Greek Life.[3]

Playboy published a list of party schools in 1987, 2002, 2006, and in a number of years more regularly since 2009.[4][5] The 1987 list included forty schools, with sixteen honorable mentions; California State University, Chico ranked first, a distinction that, according to the magazine, some students considered a burden.[6] In 2002, the list featured twenty-five schools and ten honorable mentions and was topped by Arizona State University. The University of Wisconsin–Madison placed first among ten schools in 2006,[7] and in 2009, the University of Miami gained the top spot out of 25, ranking highest in the "brains" category, as well as in the "bikini" category.[4]

It is widely believed that Playboy released additional lists of party schools in the past, but this claim has been debunked by Snopes.com.[8] Playboy did describe the University of Wisconsin as "the party school" in a September 1968 issue, and deemed the University of California, Los Angeles "tops in campus action" in 1976. However, the magazine did not actually rank schools until January 1987.[9] In 2009, Playboy announced it would make the list an annual feature in the magazine.[citation needed]

McGill University, in Montreal and the University of Western Ontario,[10] in London, Ontario, are the only Canadian schools to have made the list.

Criticism of party school lists

[edit]

In 2003, the American Medical Association requested that the Princeton Review remove the party school rankings from its college guides. Dr. Richard Yost, director of the AMA's Office of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse, said, "The Princeton Review should be ashamed to publish something for students and parents that fuels the false notion that alcohol is central to the college experience and that ignores the dangerous consequences of high-risk drinking. College binge drinking is a major public health issue and a source of numerous problems for institutions of higher learning."[11] The accuracy of The Princeton Review's rankings has also been questioned, especially with regards to the larger schools. Experts argue that the sample size of students surveyed at each college (three hundred students, on average) is not enough to provide a truthful depiction of student behavior. "It's positively unscientific," said Dr. Henry Wechsler of the Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Studies Program.[11]

Administrators, professors, and many students at so-called "party schools" have tried to disassociate themselves from the rankings. For example, West Virginia University president Michael Garrison refused to give interviews about his school's appearance in the 2007–08 Princeton Review list. "I've talked to thousands of our students over the weekend and during the first days of classes. Their concerns are with their education, with their futures, and with the great year we have ahead at WVU," he said in a prepared statement.[12]

Further reading

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Party school

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A party school is a term primarily used in the United States to describe a or with a for a vibrant social scene, including frequent parties, alcohol consumption, use, and Greek life activities. These reputations often stem from student surveys and media coverage, portraying campuses where socializing is a prominent aspect of student life alongside academics. The concept gained prominence through annual rankings, beginning with Playboy magazine's list in 1985 and popularized by starting in the early 1990s, which compile data from student questionnaires on , athletic events, and weekend activities. As of 2026 rankings by Niche, top party schools include the (No. 1), University of Wisconsin-Madison (No. 2), and (No. 3), based on factors like party opportunities and campus engagement. Many other universities also receive A+ grades specifically in Niche's party scene category, including Auburn University, Southern Methodist University (SMU), and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), indicating comparably strong party scenes without a clear ranking order among them. Such designations highlight schools with strong traditions of , and sorority events, and off-campus , though they also raise concerns about academic focus and student safety, topics explored further in dedicated sections. The term is informal and subjective, varying by source and year, and does not imply official endorsement by the institutions.

Definition and Characteristics

Definition

A party school refers to a or in the United States with a widespread for extensive social activities among its students, particularly involving frequent parties, alcohol consumption, and use. This designation highlights institutions where such partying forms a core cultural identifier, often perceived to overshadow academic rigor and distinguish them from other colleges where social life, while present, does not define the campus environment to the same degree. The term originated in the late within American student culture and media, deriving from "party" as social gatherings rather than political affiliations, and was popularized starting with magazine's first "Top Party Schools" ranking in its January 1987 issue. It gained further traction through The Princeton Review's annual surveys of student opinions on campus social life beginning in 1993, which continued until 2022; subsequent rankings have been published by sources such as Niche. Party schools typically encompass undergraduate-focused institutions, including large public universities known for expansive Greek life organizations or prominent athletic programs that contribute to their lively social atmospheres.

Key Characteristics

Party schools are typically characterized by large student enrollments, often surpassing 20,000 undergraduates, which support expansive social networks and frequent campus-wide events. These institutions place a strong emphasis on intercollegiate athletics, particularly in Division I football and programs, where traditions such as before games contribute significantly to the festive atmosphere. Extensive Greek life systems are a hallmark, with fraternities and sororities involving a substantial portion of the student body—sometimes over 30%—and serving as primary venues for social gatherings and parties. The social environment at party schools revolves around high rates of on-campus events, including weekend parties and themed gatherings, often with a perceived leniency in alcohol enforcement that fosters a "" among students. This culture attracts undergraduates seeking a dynamic social , frequently drawing from mid-sized cities or rural areas where affordable tuition—as of , averaging about 60% lower than at non-party schools—makes attendance accessible. Quantitative indicators underscore these traits, with surveys revealing elevated rates, such as approximately 80% of members engaging in the past month compared to the national average of around 30% (as of 2023), alongside lower reported study hours outside class, typically under 10-13 per week.

History and Evolution

Origins of the Term

The term "party school" (dangxiao in Chinese) originated within the communist movement as a designation for specialized educational institutions aimed at ideological and cadre training, drawing from Leninist principles of party established in the early . Following the 1917 , prioritized political schooling to cultivate disciplined revolutionaries, with early initiatives including the creation of Soviet Communist University in 1918 and workers' faculties (rabfaks) in the to provide Marxist-Leninist to party members and proletarians. These efforts formalized the concept of party schools as tools for maintaining ideological purity and organizational loyalty, evolving from ad hoc classes to structured programs under the of the (CPSU). In , the term and practice were adapted by the (CCP) during its formative years. The first party school, the Anyuan Party School, was established in 1923–1924 in Province by to train coal miners in revolutionary theory and union organizing, marking the initial application of Soviet-inspired models to local conditions amid the CCP's early labor mobilization efforts. This was followed by the founding of the Central Party School in 1933 as the Marx School of Communism in , , during the period, serving as a training center for high-level cadres under Mao Zedong's leadership. The institution emphasized , party history, and guerrilla tactics, reflecting the CCP's adaptation of Leninist education to the Chinese revolutionary context.

Development of Rankings

The party school system evolved into a hierarchical structure, often described in terms of "levels" or tiers rather than competitive rankings, to ensure nationwide coverage and centralized control, with the Central Party School at the apex and cascading down to provincial, prefectural, and county levels. In the , this development culminated in the establishment of the Higher Party School in 1939 under the CPSU , which trained senior officials and integrated research functions; it expanded during the post-World War II era to include international programs for fraternal communist parties, but was dissolved in 1991 following the USSR's collapse. In , the system proliferated after the CCP's 1949 victory, with the Central Party School relocating to in 1956 and serving as the model for over 2,700 local institutions by the 21st century. Provincial party schools, established from the 1950s onward, handled mid-level cadre training, while specialized academies like the China Executive Leadership Academy in (founded 2005) focused on revolutionary sites for immersive education. Under since 2013, the hierarchy has been reinforced through mandatory rotations and integration of "," with annual training reaching millions of the CCP's 98 million members as of 2023, emphasizing and loyalty to counter factionalism. This tiered evolution underscores the system's role in sustaining one-party governance across communist states, including adaptations in and .

Ranking Methodologies

Major Ranking Sources

was a leading source for party school rankings from 1997 to 2022, compiling annual lists based on surveys of over 170,000 college students nationwide. These rankings typically highlighted the top 20 to 25 institutions, drawing from student responses on factors such as and availability, athletics prominence, and overall social scene vibrancy. The organization continues to publish related rankings, such as "Lots of Beer" and "Reefer Madness," using similar survey data. Following the discontinuation of its dedicated party school list, Niche.com has become the for annual comprehensive party school rankings as of 2025. Playboy Magazine served as an early and influential precursor, publishing party school lists starting in 1987, with revivals through the 2000s and up to before discontinuing them. These rankings, derived from surveys of undergraduate students at over 100 campuses, were notorious for their provocative approach, incorporating metrics like "bang for your buck" in social and romantic opportunities alongside traditional party indicators. Niche.com, an online platform established in the , has emerged as a modern authority on party school evaluations, producing expansive annual rankings of the top 50 or more based on aggregated user reviews and data. Unlike narrower traditional lists, Niche's assessments extend to related categories such as best college towns, providing a broader view of campus social ecosystems through millions of student and alumni inputs. Other outlets, including , occasionally reference or analyze party school designations in broader college coverage but maintain a limited role in dedicated rankings, often deferring to student polls or secondary data rather than originating party-specific lists. Collectively, these major sources garner millions of views annually through media coverage and online dissemination, with studies indicating that top party school placements can influence enrollment by altering application volumes and incoming student profiles by up to 10% at affected institutions.

Criteria and Data Collection

Ranking sources for party schools primarily rely on survey-based data collected from current students to assess the social and nightlife aspects of college campuses. These surveys typically involve questionnaires that gauge the frequency and intensity of partying, access to alcohol and drugs, and the overall vibrancy of the social scene. For instance, 's methodology drew from student responses to questions on the popularity of fraternities and sororities, the prevalence of and hard use, and marijuana use, using a five-point to measure consensus across campuses. Annual sample sizes for such surveys range from tens of thousands to over 100,000 students; , for example, surveyed 170,000 students at 391 institutions for its 2025 rankings, which include partying-related categories. Responses are anonymized to encourage honest feedback, though the self-reported nature introduces potential subjectivity, as perceptions of "party vibe" can vary by individual experiences. Quantitative criteria complement these surveys by incorporating measurable metrics related to campus social infrastructure. Key factors include the percentage of students involved in Greek life, often evaluated through enrollment statistics and participation rates, and indicators of event density such as athletics programs that draw large crowds to home games. Niche, another prominent ranking source, assigns grades to Greek life based on both statistical data and student surveys, while its athletics grade factors in national championships, revenue, and student feedback on sports events. These metrics help establish thresholds for "party-oriented" environments, such as campuses where Greek life involvement exceeds typical benchmarks, though exact cutoffs like 20% participation are not universally applied. On-campus alcohol violations are occasionally referenced in broader discussions but are not a core component in major methodologies, as rankings prioritize student-reported prevalence over disciplinary records. Qualitative factors further shape rankings by capturing intangible elements like peer perceptions and local accessibility. Students provide ratings on the quality, often on a 1-5 scale, which encompass town-based opportunities such as proximity to bars and restaurants. Niche explicitly includes these in its model, using U.S. data to score access to bars (10% weight) and restaurants (5% weight) or . Such elements address the broader social but face criticism for subjectivity, as aggregated peer reviews may amplify biases from vocal subgroups without balancing objective verification. Methodologies vary significantly across sources, contributing to annual fluctuations in rankings without a standardized formula. The Princeton Review emphasized student consensus on substance use and Greek life without disclosed weights, focusing solely on survey data for its top party schools list until 2022. In contrast, Niche employs a weighted where student surveys on party scene account for 70%, supplemented by the aforementioned quantitative and nightlife metrics at 7.5-10% each. This lack of uniformity means the same institution might rank highly in one system due to strong survey responses while fluctuating in another based on local amenities or athletics data.

Notable Examples

Prominent Institutions

The Central Party School of the (CCP) in stands as the most prominent institution in China's party school system, originally founded in 1933 as the University during the period and officially renamed in 1937. Relocated to its current campus in Beijing's Haidian District in 1956, it serves as the highest-level training center for senior CCP cadres, government officials, and future leaders, while also functioning as a key for Marxist theory and party policy innovation. With an annual intake of top officials, including members, it emphasizes and anti-corruption training. Complementing the Central Party School is the China Executive Leadership Academy in , established in 2005 at the historic revolutionary base where the CCP relocated in and remained until 1947. This academy targets mid-level cadres for intensive short-term programs (typically 1-3 months) on topics like Communist Party history, ethical , , and loyalty to party directives, drawing on Yan'an's symbolic role in the era to reinforce revolutionary spirit. It trains thousands annually, contributing to the system's goal of ideological alignment across 90 million CCP members. In the Soviet tradition, the Higher Party School under the of the of the (CPSU), founded in 1939, was the flagship institution for advanced ideological and administrative training of high-ranking party officials. Based in , it provided multi-year programs blending Marxist-Leninist theory with practical leadership skills, educating generations of Soviet elites until its dissolution in 1991 following the USSR's collapse. Its model influenced party schools worldwide, emphasizing centralized control and party loyalty. Overall patterns among prominent party schools highlight a focus on hierarchical , with central institutions like these serving elite cadres while supporting broader networks; in , for instance, the system includes over 2,700 schools at provincial and local levels, training millions of members to combat factionalism and ensure doctrinal conformity as of 2021. In the United States, the term "party school" commonly refers to universities recognized for vibrant social and party scenes rather than political cadre training. Auburn University, Southern Methodist University (SMU), and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) all received A+ grades in the party scene category on Niche.com based on 2026 data. Major sources like Niche do not provide a definitive head-to-head ranking among these three specific schools in the party scene category, as they are comparably rated with A+ grades and no clear outperformer in that metric.

Regional and Institutional Variations

Party schools in communist states exhibit variations by country, historical context, and institutional level, reflecting adaptations to local political needs and revolutionary legacies. In , central academies like the Central Party School and specialized sites such as the Jinggangshan Cadre Academy (founded 2005 in Province, commemorating Mao Zedong's first revolutionary base in ) focus on high-level strategic training, while provincial party schools—numbering about 31 major ones—offer region-specific programs for local officials, covering areas like in coastal provinces versus rural in inland regions. In other communist countries, similar structures emphasize national ideologies. Vietnam's Ho Chi Minh National Political Academy, established in 1959 in and renamed in 1986, trains senior (CPV) cadres in and Marxist-Leninist principles, functioning as the apex institution for political education with branches for mid-level training. Cuba's System of Schools of the Communist Party, created in 1960, includes the National School of Party Cadres in , which provides ideological indoctrination and leadership development for PCC members, adapting Soviet models to focus on and socialist construction amid U.S. embargo challenges. In , the Central Cadres Training School of the (also known as Kim Il-sung Higher Party School), founded in 1946, delivers intensive programs on ideology and party loyalty, recently rebuilt in 2024 to include portraits of Kim family leaders in classrooms. Institutional types further differentiate party schools, with apex national academies prioritizing elite theoretical education and lower-level schools emphasizing practical skills and refresher courses. Post-1991, surviving systems in and have evolved to incorporate global influences, such as policy innovation modules, while maintaining core Leninist functions; for example, 's academies have budgets of 5-10 million USD annually as of 2021, supporting research on and centralized . Data trends show these institutions train 2,000-3,000 officials per yearly in China, underscoring their role in sustaining one-party rule across regions.

Criticisms and Impacts

Academic and Educational Concerns

Critics of the party school system argue that it prioritizes rigid ideological over genuine and critical inquiry, fostering conformity rather than innovative thinking. At institutions like the Central Party School, lectures are often recorded and reviewed by supervisors to ensure strict adherence to party doctrine, limiting teachers' flexibility in interpreting Marxist-Leninist theory or addressing contemporary challenges. This environment has led to the repression of dissent, exemplified by the 2020 expulsion of professor , who criticized and the CCP as a "political zombie" and "mafia boss," after her recorded remarks were deemed subversive. Such actions highlight a system where faculty face and for deviating from official lines, undermining educational quality. Operational challenges further exacerbate concerns, including insufficient incentives for experienced teachers, resulting in junior staff handling much of the instruction at county-level schools and potentially reducing training effectiveness. Under Xi Jinping's leadership since 2013, the curriculum has intensified emphasis on , which some observers view as entrenching authoritarian control and limiting policy debate, though the system is credited with aiding efforts through ethical training. In response, party schools have occasionally allowed limited discussions on sensitive issues in controlled settings, but critics maintain this does little to address broader stifling of intellectual discourse. The reputation of party schools as tools for political influences cadre selection, attracting those aligned with party norms while deterring independent thinkers, which may contribute to a homogenized cadre less equipped for diverse challenges. This dynamic has been linked to slower in areas like economic , with analyses suggesting the system's focus on hampers long-term institutional development.

Social and Health Implications

Party schools, intended to instill moral and ethical standards, have faced scandals that erode and highlight internal contradictions within the CCP. In 2014, Qin Guogang, of a Shaanxi provincial party school, was suspended and investigated over a involving extramarital relations with a female postgraduate, captured in circulated nude photos; this violated party prohibitions on mistresses and fueled perceptions of . Similar corruption cases, including tied to officials trained at party schools, have been part of Xi's anti-corruption campaign since 2012, which has disciplined thousands but also exposed systemic vulnerabilities. These incidents amplify social harms by undermining the party's legitimacy, contributing to public cynicism about governance and exacerbating factionalism among cadres. Demographic factors intensify impacts, with mid-level officials—often from rural or minority backgrounds—facing heightened pressure to conform, leading to social exclusion for those perceived as disloyal. Long-term effects include reinforced one-party control, which critics argue stifles societal pluralism and heightens risks of unrest by prioritizing loyalty over responsive policymaking. Health implications arise from the intense political environment, including surveillance and psychological pressure on faculty and attendees; for example, described interrogations by the school's disciplinary committee as applying "mental torture" to coerce confessions. While direct data is limited, broader studies on CCP officials indicate elevated stress-related issues, such as anxiety from scrutiny, with party schools serving as sites for "refresher" courses on and amid these pressures. In response, the system has expanded ideological training to combat moral decay, but ongoing scandals as of 2025 continue to challenge its social role.

Cultural and Societal Role

Representation in Media

Party schools in communist countries, particularly those of the (CCP), are often depicted in international media as key mechanisms for maintaining ideological control and fostering loyalty among elites. Western outlets like have portrayed them as institutions that sustain the CCP's "revolutionary spirit" through indoctrination in Marxist-Leninist theory and , emphasizing their role in training officials amid China's shift toward greater . Similarly, has described these schools as nurturing a new generation of leaders aligned with centralized party directives, highlighting courses on party history and to counteract perceived threats like factionalism. Al Jazeera reports have focused on their function as training grounds for the next generation of rulers, blending theoretical education with practical governance to ensure one-party dominance. In Chinese state media, party schools are positively represented as vital for leadership cultivation and national rejuvenation, often featuring visits by high-ranking officials like to underscore their prestige. Coverage in outlets affiliated with the CCP emphasizes their contribution to "socialist modernization" and ideological purity, portraying them as bridges between revolutionary traditions and contemporary challenges. Internationally, some analyses, such as those in , note innovative adaptations like training in the to engage younger cadres, reflecting efforts to modernize amid technological shifts as of 2022. These portrayals have evolved since the , with increased scrutiny post-Xi era on their role in enforcing conformity and combating scandals.

Influence on Society

Party schools exert significant influence on society in communist states by shaping the behavior and decision-making of political elites who implement party policies at local and national levels. In , they promote cultural norms of loyalty, frugality, and among cadres, which trickle down to affect , corporate practices, and . For instance, in party schools has been linked to enhanced corporate social responsibility (CSR) and innovation in state-owned enterprises, as executives educated there prioritize alignment with national goals like . This system, expanded under since 2013, helps combat and factionalism, fostering societal stability by ensuring officials embody "party spirit" in their roles. Societally, party schools contribute to ideological across generations, educating millions of CCP members annually and influencing educational policies through affiliated institutes. They reinforce traditional values like collectivism while adapting to modern issues, such as digital governance, impacting broader cultural shifts toward and centralized control. In other communist contexts, like the Soviet Union's Higher Party School, similar institutions sustained one-party rule by integrating with societal , a model echoed in China's network of over 2,700 schools that train officials to address contemporary challenges like economic reform and social harmony as of 2020. Their legacy includes stronger networks that enhance policy execution, though critics argue they limit pluralism in societal discourse.

References

  1. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/party-school
  2. https://www.niche.com/colleges/search/top-party-schools/
  3. https://www.fastweb.com/student-life/articles/top-party-schools-throughout-history-1993-2015
  4. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/princeton-review-party-school-ranking-history_n_5648113
  5. https://www.businessinsider.com/top-party-schools-universities-in-the-us-ranked
  6. https://www.niche.com/colleges/auburn-university/
  7. https://www.niche.com/colleges/southern-methodist-university/
  8. https://www.niche.com/colleges/university-of-north-carolina-at-chapel-hill/
  9. https://www.forbes.com/sites/georgeleef/2014/03/07/party-schools-years-of-fun-mostly-at-other-peoples-expense-but-not-much-learning/
  10. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/top-party-schools/
  11. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/playboy-releases-its-list-of-the-top-10-party-schools-in-america-91023664.html
  12. https://www.princetonreview.com/college-rankings/?rankings=lots-beer
  13. https://www.collegetransitions.com/blog/top-party-schools-colleges/
  14. https://www.usnews.com/education/best-colleges/slideshows/fun-college-campuses-for-tailgating
  15. https://blog.collegevine.com/top-party-schools-in-the-us
  16. https://www.forbes.com/sites/ccap/2011/04/07/play-hard-work-little-life-on-americas-college-campuses/
  17. https://www.collegedrinkingprevention.gov/statistics/prevalence
  18. https://www.addictioncenter.com/college/drinking-drug-abuse-greek-life/
  19. http://pirate.shu.edu/~rotthoku/papers/Party%20Schools.pdf
  20. https://www.britannica.com/topic/education/Education-under-communism
  21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231837520_Training_China%27s_Political_Elite_The_Party_School_System
  22. https://en.tsinghua-tj.org/news/5797.html
  23. https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/higher-party-school
  24. https://www.npr.org/2021/07/20/1018501211/how-chinas-communist-party-schools-are-keeping-its-revolutionary-spirit-alive
  25. https://www.cescube.com/vp-china-communist-party-schools-role-in-political-apparatus
  26. https://www.princetonreview.com/college-rankings/best-colleges
  27. https://www.princetonreview.com/college-rankings/ranking-methodology
  28. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/playboy-magazine-releases-its-2015-top-party-schools-list-300141874.html
  29. https://www.playboy.com/magazine/articles/2002/11/playboy-s-top-25-party-schools/
  30. https://www.niche.com/about/methodology/top-party-schools/
  31. https://www.usnews.com/photos/playboys-top-10-party-schools
  32. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00036846.2022.2055742
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366715186_Party_school_rankings_do_we_have_anything_to_worry_about
  34. https://www.collegevine.com/faq/75959/how-are-party-schools-ranked
  35. https://hcma.vn/en/pages/home.aspx
  36. http://www.cubanews.acn.cu/cuba/19688-cuban-president-congratulates-the-cuban-communist-party-school-system
  37. https://www.dailynk.com/english/north-korea-elite-party-school-emphasizes-practical-training-78-anniversary/
  38. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2020-12-04/chinese-communist-party-failed
  39. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/aug/21/china-cai-xia-former-party-insider-who-dared-criticise-xi-jinping
  40. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/china-quarterly/article/operational-dilemmas-and-cadre-education-and-training-at-a-county-party-school-in-china/239402E03B72FB9E27BE23270625BA6D
  41. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/chinese-communist-party-school-official-caught-up-in-sex-scandal-idUSBREA0E0OL/
  42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176268024000612
  43. https://pekinghotel.substack.com/p/when-i-taught-at-central-party-school
  44. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3307982/marxism-and-meal-plans-cadres-tackle-weighty-issues-chinas-top-party-school
  45. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/04/world/asia/xi-china-communist-party-school.html
  46. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2012/1/24/inside-a-chinese-communist-party-school
  47. https://www.scmp.com/tech/tech-trends/article/3172135/communist-party-school-china-taps-metaverse-concept-train-cadres
  48. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ijfe.3168
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.