Hubbry Logo
Poison dressPoison dressMain
Open search
Poison dress
Community hub
Poison dress
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Poison dress
Poison dress
Poison dress
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A poison dress is a dress or robe that has in some way been poisoned, and is a common motif in legends and folktales of various cultures, including ancient Greece, Mughal India, and the United States.

Greek mythology

[edit]
Main articles: Medea and Shirt of Nessus

The poison dress motif is similar to the Shirt of Flame. In Greek mythology, when Jason left the sorceress Medea to marry Glauce, King Creon's daughter, Medea took her revenge by sending Glauce a poison dress and a golden coronet, also dipped in poison. This resulted in the death of the princess and, subsequently, the king, when he tried to save her.

The Shirt of Nessus is smeared with the poisoned blood of the centaur Nessus, which was given to Hercules by Hercules' wife, Deianira. Deianira had been tricked by Nessus and made to believe that the blood would ensure Hercules's faithfulness. According to Sophocles' tragedy The Women of Trachis, Hercules began to perspire when he put on the shirt, which soon clung to his flesh, corroding it. He eventually threw himself onto a pyre on Mount Oeta in extreme agony and burned to death.[1]

Indian folklore

[edit]
Aurangzeb (r. 1658–1707), considered by his subjects a fakir or wizard,[2] was credited with using poison khalats to eliminate some of his perceived enemies.

Numerous tales of poison khalats (robes of honour) have been recorded in historical, folkloric, and medical texts of British Indianists.[3][2] Gifts of clothing were common in major life-cycle rituals in pre-industrial India and these stories revolve around fears of betrayal, inspired by ancient custom of giving khalats to friends and enemies as demonstrations of a social relationship or a political alliance.[3]

In 1870, Norman Chevers, M.D., a Surgeon-Major to the Bengal Medical Service, authored Manual of Medical Jurisprudence for India, describing unusual crimes involving poisons native to India. The book included three cases of poison khalat death, attributing the cause of one of the deaths to lethal vesicants impregnating the fabric of the robe and entering the victim's sweat pores.[4]

American urban legends

[edit]

The theme of the poison dress appears in several American urban legends, which were recorded in folklore collections and journal articles in the 1940s and 1950s.[5][3]

Stith Thompson, an American folklorist, noted the classical prototype in these stories, "Shirt of Nessus", and assigned Motif D1402.5, "Magic shirt burns wearer up". Jan Harold Brunvand provides the summary of one of the stories:

Girl wears new formal gown to dance. Several times during the evening she feels faint, has escort take her outside for fresh air. Finally she becomes really ill, dies in the restroom. Investigation reveals that the dress has been the cause of her death. It had been used as the funeral dress for a young girl; it had been removed from the corpse before burial and returned to the store. The formaldehyde which the dress has absorbed from the corpse enters the pores of the dancing girl.[5]

Folklorist Ernest Baughman speculated that the story might have been used as adverse publicity to discredit a well-known store, since several variants of the story specifically mention the name of the store at which the dress was supposedly purchased.[5] The legend continued to be told long after its initial popularity, with "embalming fluid" sometimes replacing the formaldehyde mentioned in the earlier version.[5] This urban legend was dramatized in the episode "'Til Death Do We Part" from the crime-scene drama CSI: NY and in the second story ("Two Sisters") of the sixth episode of the third season of the television anthology series Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction.[citation needed]

Also contributing to the poison-dress theme is the prevalence of smallpox-contaminated blankets, which were given to Native Americans.[6] Well-documented examples include the tainted blankets gifted to Indians at Fort Pitt in 1763.[7]

Arabia

[edit]

The poet Imru' al-Qais is said to have died after being gifted a poisoned robe.[8]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Poison dress

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A poison dress is a garment treated with toxic substances, either deliberately as a in historical legends or unintentionally through hazardous dyes in 19th-century , resulting in irritation, respiratory ailments, organ damage, and fatalities from arsenic absorption via contact, , or of particles. The concept spans cultural motifs of betrayal, such as Italian Renaissance tales of sleeves coated in acrid poisons to silently assassinate rivals during embraces, and empirical realities of industrial-era textiles where vibrant Scheele's green and Paris green pigments—copper-arsenite compounds—infused dresses, wallpapers, and accessories prized for their intensity despite known perils. Arsenic content in fabrics often exceeded safe thresholds, with tests revealing up to 3 milligrams per meter in common dress goods by the 1890s, exacerbating risks for garment workers who suffered elevated rates of perforation of the nasal septum and lung cancers from chronic dust exposure, while wearers faced cumulative poisoning from perspiration dissolving the toxin into open pores. Notable incidents, including the 1861 death of dyer Matilda Scheurer from acute arsenicosis linked to green fabric handling, underscored causal links between these dyes and fatalities, prompting medical journals to decry dresses as ambulatory arsenals capable of endangering multiple victims in social settings. Despite early warnings from figures like chemist William H. Perkin, fashion's pursuit of novelty delayed reforms until regulatory scrutiny in the late 1800s phased out arsenic dyes in Europe and America, though legacy artifacts remain hazardous in museums requiring specialized handling. This interplay of aesthetic innovation and overlooked toxicology highlights broader 19th-century complacency toward chemical risks in consumer goods, with poison dresses exemplifying how empirical evidence of harm eventually curbed unchecked industrial practices.

Mythological and Folkloric Accounts

Greek Mythology

In , the represents a foundational poison dress narrative, where a deceptive garment laced with causes the hero ' demise. The centaur Nessus, mortally wounded by ' Hydra-poisoned arrow during an attempted abduction of Deianeira, tricked her into collecting his blood as a supposed love charm to ensure ' fidelity. Deianeira later smeared this substance on a shirt and dispatched it to amid suspicions of his infidelity; the triggered corrosive burns that peeled flesh from bone, rendering medical intervention futile and prompting to end his life via self-immolation on . The tale, rooted in oral traditions predating written records, is elaborated in Sophocles' Trachinian Women (circa 450–425 BCE), which depicts the shirt's adhesion and the ensuing torment as inexorable causation from the centaur's vengeful deceit. A parallel motif appears in Euripides' tragedy Medea (431 BCE), wherein the spurned sorceress Medea exacts revenge on Jason's bride through a poisoned robe and . Fabricated from Colchian magical compounds, the gifts ignite upon contact, with the robe fusing to 's skin and devouring her body in flames, secondarily engulfing her father Creon as he attempts aid. Euripides portrays the poisons' effects as rapid incineration without external fire, emphasizing Medea's premeditated betrayal via ostensibly bridal finery. Both stories underscore causal chains of and , wherein supernatural toxins—Hydra venom or arcane brews—transform innocuous apparel into instruments of prolonged agony or swift immolation, archetypes that propagate the poison garment as a trope of retribution in ensuing lore.

Indian Traditions

In Mughal India, khilats—robes of honor gifted by rulers to subordinates or allies—embodied Persian-derived customs symbolizing authority transfer and physical continuity between donor and recipient. These ceremonial garments, often richly embroidered, became central to legends of covert assassination, where toxins were allegedly impregnated into fabrics, dyes, or threads for skin absorption. Such narratives flourished from Akbar's reign (1556–1605) through Aurangzeb's (1658–1707), depicting delayed-onset causing progressive organ failure, blistering, or convulsions over days. Examples include tales of rivals receiving khilats from emperors or nobles, with attributed to subtle activation upon wearing or sweating. Seven variants, rooted in early modern Persian chronicles and , emphasize motifs of feudal betrayal, where the honorific gift masked lethal intent amid court rivalries. Historical context reveals genuine Mughal-era apprehensions over poisoning via gifts, as documented in memoirs like Mirza Nathan's, yet specific khilat cases lack empirical corroboration beyond anecdotal reports. Legends likely amplified real toxicological risks—such as mercury or compounds viable in textiles—for moralistic ends, underscoring distrust in hierarchical bonds and symbolic contamination fears.

Arabian Legends

In pre-Islamic Arabian tradition, the poet and king Imru' al-Qays ibn Hujr (c. 501–c. 540 AD) features in accounts of a poisoned robe sent as a deceptive gift by the Byzantine emperor , reflecting motifs of royal betrayal and toxic intrigue. According to classical Arabic sources, Imru' al-Qays, seeking Byzantine aid to reclaim his throne among the Kindite Arabs, allegedly seduced or was rumored to have involved the emperor's daughter, prompting retaliation via a garment laced with a contact poison that caused severe dermal ulceration upon donning. The robe induced blisters, sores, and sloughing of skin, leading to his death near Ancyra (modern ) around 540 AD, as detailed in biographical anecdotes emphasizing the garment's immediate and corrosive effects. These narratives underscore causal mechanisms rooted in known Arabian , where poisons from natural sources such as plant extracts (e.g., aconite) or animal venoms were applied to fabrics for absorption, exploiting permeability during in arid climates. Early translations of Indian toxicological texts, like Kitab as-Sumum (9th century), catalog poisoned garments alongside detection methods involving sensory cues or symptomatic onset, indicating practical familiarity rather than mere superstition. Such knowledge likely informed folkloric embellishments, portraying robes—symbols of alliance and status in and tribal exchanges—as vehicles for sorcery-like , akin to tales in nomadic lore where gifted attire concealed lethal intent. While not explicitly tied to compilations like (assembled 9th–14th centuries), the Imru' al-Qays legend parallels broader motifs of enchanted or alchemically tainted clothing in Islamic-era storytelling, where or scheming figures deploy hidden toxins to subvert hierarchy, often targeting royalty or warriors through ostensibly honorable presents.

Other Cultural Variants

In medieval , including Arthurian legends, motifs of poisoned clothing emerge as symbols of , where garments gifted or worn by deliver lethal toxins through skin contact, reflecting fears of intrigue among elites. These tales often depict clothing as an extension of , exploiting the intimacy of personal adornment to ensure undetectable harm. In Japanese yokai traditions, the —a vengeful spirit of a who died in —poisons unattended by smearing it with her blood, causing the wearer to suffer convulsions and death, underscoring themes of maternal grievance and supernatural vulnerability in everyday items. This variant highlights clothing's role as a passive vector for curses, where the poison activates upon bodily contact, mirroring broader cross-cultural patterns of intimate sabotage. Across these examples, poisoned garments persistently symbolize in close relationships, frequently implicating women as either victims or agents, due to adornment's direct exposure amplifying toxic risks without immediate detection. Such motifs persist independently of historical poisonings, emphasizing folklore's focus on causal vulnerabilities in trusted personal effects.

Historical Instances of Toxic Clothing

Arsenic-Based Dyes in the 19th Century

Scheele's green, chemically copper(II) arsenite (CuHAsO₃), was first synthesized in 1775 by Swedish chemist Carl Wilhelm Scheele as a vibrant yellowish-green pigment derived from arsenic and copper compounds. This pigment, later refined into the deeper emerald-toned Paris green around 1814, gained widespread adoption in textile dyeing during the early to mid-19th century, particularly for fashionable women's gowns, gloves, and artificial foliage in Victorian Europe and America. By the 1830s through 1860s, its intense color made it a staple for "emerald" dresses, despite early awareness of its toxicity, as manufacturers prioritized vibrancy over safety amid booming industrial production. Exposure occurred primarily through dermal contact, exacerbated by friction, sweat, or moisture, which released arsenic particles for absorption into the , leading to chronic systemic rather than immediate acute effects. Wearers and handlers reported symptoms including persistent skin rashes, ulcers, , gastrointestinal distress, convulsions, and in severe cases, organ failure culminating in death, with 's cumulative disrupting cellular function over months or years. Fabrics could contain substantial arsenic loads—up to hundreds of grains per garment—far exceeding safe thresholds, as arsenic comprised a significant portion of the pigment's composition, often around 40% by weight in the raw compound before dilution in dyes. Documented cases highlighted risks to dressmakers and wearers alike. In 1861, detailed the death of Matilda Scheurer, a 19-year-old artificial flower maker, who suffered violent convulsions, fluid, and after prolonged handling of Scheele's green-dyed materials, prompting parliamentary inquiries into occupational hazards. Similar European and U.S. incidents in the – linked green garments to fatalities, including reports of women experiencing and seizures from wearing arsenic-laden gowns, with friction and perspiration accelerating transfer to the bloodstream. These events underscored industrial practices' causal role, from impure sourcing to unventilated workshops, though regulatory bans emerged unevenly, persisting into the late 19th century due to the pigment's cost-effectiveness.

Earlier European and Asian Cases

In 16th-century , amid religious and political tensions, accusations of poisoned gloves emerged in the court of . Following the death of , Queen of , on June 9, 1572—shortly after receiving perfumed gloves as a gift from Catherine—Huguenot writers and propagandists claimed the items were laced with skin-absorbable toxins, such as herbal poisons incorporated into the leather or embroidery. These allegations, disseminated in partisan memoirs and pamphlets by Protestant adversaries seeking to discredit the Catholic queen regent, suggested mechanisms like aconite or other plant-derived venoms that could cause rapid systemic effects upon contact or inhalation of scents. Such claims reflect broader patterns of intrigue in , where gloves and embroidered fabrics were suspected vehicles for assassination due to their intimate contact with the body. Historical records from the era, including court correspondences and post-mortem inquiries, document similar suspicions in cases of noble poisonings, attributing symptoms like convulsions and organ failure to preservatives or treatments in textiles rather than means. However, these reports lack forensic verification, such as autopsies quantifying levels, and stem from biased sources motivated by sectarian conflict, limiting their reliability to circumstantial historical . Pre-19th-century Asian records offer fewer semi-verifiable instances of toxic garments, with most evidence anecdotal and tied to occupational exposure rather than deliberate intent. In the (1644–1912), imperial production involved mercury compounds for weighting fabrics and achieving luster, potentially leading to chronic exposure for handlers; eunuchs attending emperors reportedly exhibited tremors and cognitive decline consistent with mercurialism from prolonged contact with treated robes. Though no direct linked garment toxins to deaths— practices being rare in court settings—symptom patterns in palace annals align with heavy metal via dermal absorption or dust inhalation, distinct from ingested elixirs common in alchemical pursuits. These cases underscore practical toxicities from production processes, including lead stabilizers in dyes, over ritualistic or magical attributions.

Modern Urban Legends and Reports

American Urban Legends

In the mid-20th century, American urban legends about poison dresses often centered on second-hand garments acquired through thrift stores, pawnshops, or high-end retailers like or , where the dresses were purportedly returned after use on a deceased person's body. These tales typically described a young woman purchasing or renting an elegant gown—frequently white or intended for a or —who experiences severe skin blisters, fainting, or sudden death upon wearing it, attributed to absorption of embalming fluids such as through the . Variants from the 1940s in Midwestern cities like emphasized the odor of the dress as a harbinger, with the poison allegedly coagulating blood or entering pores during dancing. By the 1950s, similar stories proliferated under titles like "Embalmed Alive" or "Dressed to Kill," shifting settings to upscale stores in places like Beverly Hills or , where a grieving allegedly returned a corpse-dressed gown without disclosure, leading to the next wearer's rash or demise. Folklorist documented over 60-year-old iterations of these thrift shop narratives in his 1992 analysis, noting their spread via word-of-mouth among networks and store employees, often with implausible details like undetectable poisons despite formaldehyde's pungent smell. These legends reflected anxieties over post-World War II and the risks of mass-produced or recycled apparel, particularly for women navigating bargain hunting in expanding retail landscapes, though Brunvand classified them as recycled lacking verifiable incidents, drawing parallels to ancient motifs without evidence of real causation. Later retellings amplified thrift-store prom variants, blending vague chemical or needle hazards from imported goods, but remained debunked as exaggerated tales without documented deaths.

Contemporary Media and Hoaxes

In the era, platforms have amplified unsubstantiated claims about "poison dresses," particularly in the and beyond, where viral posts alleged that imported garments from fast-fashion brands contained toxic dyes capable of causing cancer or severe illness upon skin contact. These narratives often tied the supposed dangers to low-cost manufacturing in regions like , warning consumers against wearing items from retailers such as or , but empirical evidence has been limited to documented cases of elevated chemicals like , lead, and carcinogens exceeding regulatory limits in some products, without verified instances of acute or fatalities from apparel wear alone. Regulatory tests, such as those by South Korean authorities in 2024, confirmed high levels of substances like azo dyes in clothing—up to hundreds of times legal limits—but attributed risks primarily to long-term exposure rather than immediate dermatological lethality, debunking hyperbolic assertions of dress-induced deaths. Pop culture has perpetuated the motif through fictional dramatizations, as seen in the 1998 film Elizabeth, which invented an assassination plot against Queen Elizabeth I involving a French-gifted laced with poison, a device absent from historical records and rooted instead in mythological tropes like the Greek of . This cinematic liberty influenced subsequent media, including online true-crime discussions and short-form videos speculating on "unsolved poison " cases, though no corroborated modern incidents exist beyond allergy reports or chemical contamination alerts. Such content thrives on platforms like , where videos blending Victorian arsenic-green dye lore with contemporary fast-fashion fears garner views but rely on anecdotal escalation rather than forensic evidence. Globally, variants emerge in non-Western contexts, such as online scares in African markets linking counterfeit bridal fabrics to skin burns or , often amplified via chains, yet these trace to quality-control lapses in imported synthetics rather than intentional adulteration, with health agencies like Nigeria's NAFDAC issuing warnings on chemical residues without confirming hoax-level claims of deliberate . The digital dissemination of these stories underscores a pattern of , where isolated verified chemical findings morph into unproven narratives of peril, sustaining the poison dress legend amid genuine but manageable apparel safety concerns.

Scientific and Analytical Perspective

Toxicology and Mechanisms

The primary toxicological concern with arsenic-laden fabrics arises from chronic low-level exposure to inorganic compounds, such as acetoarsenite ( ), which can leach into the via absorption, particularly under conditions of or moisture that solubilize the particles. Dermal is generally limited for dry inorganic but increases significantly with or hydration, as sweat facilitates dissolution and transport across the , leading to systemic distribution. of respirable dust from fraying or shedding fabric further contributes to absorption through the , where is rapidly taken up into the bloodstream. Unlike acute dermal toxins such as snake venoms that induce localized necrosis via direct enzymatic disruption, arsenic in dyes primarily exerts chronic effects through bioaccumulation, as the element's biological half-life in humans ranges from 3 to 5 days for inorganic forms, with methylated metabolites persisting 20 to 30 hours, allowing cumulative buildup in tissues like liver, kidneys, and skin with repeated exposure. At the cellular level, trivalent arsenic species bind sulfhydryl groups in enzymes, inhibiting pyruvate dehydrogenase and other proteins critical for glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation, resulting in ATP depletion, oxidative stress, and apoptosis, particularly in high-turnover tissues. While arsine gas (AsH₃) formation via microbial reduction is documented in damp, moldy arsenical wallpapers, analogous release from clothing is minimal absent fungal contamination, with toxicity instead driven by direct compound solubility. Empirical validation comes from 19th-century autopsies and analyses showing elevated concentrations in keratin-rich structures like and , which serve as biomarkers due to arsenic's affinity for sulfhydryl bonds in ; for instance, victims exhibited arsenic levels in nails sufficient to produce greenish discoloration and systemic organ deposition, confirmed via chemical assays. corroborate , demonstrating dose-dependent arsenic accumulation in and dose-related toxicity thresholds, with human-equivalent chronic exposures as low as 10–50 μg/kg body weight daily linked to early symptoms like and gastrointestinal distress in historical contexts. These findings underscore that while acute thresholds exceed 1 mg/kg, subacute dermal/inhalational routes from fabrics amplify risk through protracted, subclinical dosing.

Verifiability and Debunking Exaggerations

Claims of poison dresses in frequently exaggerate effects, portraying garments that cause immediate, agonizing death upon contact, such as the mythical shirt of or Medea's toxic robe, which dissolve flesh or induce rapid systemic failure. In contrast, toxicology demonstrates that substances like in historical dyes—such as Scheele's green used in 19th-century fabrics—typically result in chronic exposure symptoms, including , gastrointestinal distress, and potential long-term organ damage from prolonged skin contact or of dust, rather than acute . No verifiable historical records confirm intentionally poisoned dresses as widespread assassination tools; purported cases, like rare Indian "khilat" robes or Italian sleeves, remain anecdotal or legendary without forensic or documentary substantiation beyond oral traditions. Urban legends, including 1990s variants alleging deadly dresses imported from that blistered skin on contact, have been identified as hoaxes or misattributions of chemical burns from residual manufacturing dyes and finishes, often formaldehyde or azo compounds, rather than deliberate toxins. These tales, circulating since at least the 1940s, amplify industrial negligence—such as inadequate rinsing in low-cost production—into conspiratorial narratives, ignoring causal chains like sweat-activated release of impurities over repeated wear. Modern analyses of fast-fashion items reveal detectable levels of heavy metals (e.g., lead exceeding 100 ppm in some accessories) and persistent chemicals like PFAS, posing cumulative health risks such as endocrine disruption, but these stem from regulatory gaps in global supply chains, not targeted , and require extended exposure for effects. Such exaggerations persist due to the psychological utility of attributing random misfortune to intentional agency, fostering narratives of hidden malice over mundane failures like poor . Verifiable risks, however, highlight the need for consumer scrutiny of material safety data and washing protocols to mitigate off-gassing or leaching, prioritizing empirical testing over alarmist while critiquing overreliance on distant regulatory bodies prone to lax enforcement in high-volume markets.

References

  1. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/dress-hat-fashion-clothing-mercury-arsenic-poison-history
  2. https://hyperallergic.com/133571/fatal-victorian-fashion-and-the-allure-of-the-poison-garment/
  3. https://beneathsilence.medium.com/poisoned-sleeves-the-dress-that-killed-without-touch-00bcd2cf0a73
  4. https://thepragmaticcostumer.wordpress.com/2014/06/11/drop-dead-gorgeous-a-tldr-tale-of-arsenic-in-victorian-life/
  5. https://katedolan.com/arsenic-in-old-lace-the-deadly-fashion-trend-that-attacked-people-where-they-lived/
  6. https://www.eternalgoddess.co.uk/posts/the-deadly-history-of-green-victorian-gowns
  7. https://www.rivermuseum.org/exhibits/green-dress
  8. https://teesvalleymuseums.org/blog/post/the-price-of-fashion/
  9. https://news.virginia.edu/content/killer-outfits-uva-collection-spotlights-deadly-designs-through-history
  10. https://mythopedia.com/topics/nessus
  11. https://www.greeklegendsandmyths.com/the-shirt-of-nessus.html
  12. https://johnstoniatexts.x10host.com/euripides/medeahtml.html
  13. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/35451/35451-h/35451-h.htm
  14. https://www.greekmythology.com/Myths/Elements/Shirt_of_Nessus/shirt_of_nessus.html
  15. https://archive.siasat.com/news/khilat-a-robe-of-honour-or-weapon-to-kill-2064176/
  16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249012978_Killer_Khilats_Part_1_Legends_of_Poisoned_Robes_of_Honour_in_India
  17. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00155870120037920
  18. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00155870120082218
  19. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Imru-al-Qays-Arab-poet
  20. https://fluentarabic.net/imru-al-qais-kitab-al-aghani/
  21. https://muslimheritage.com/toxicology/
  22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1005999
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249014195_Killer_Khilats_Part_2_Imperial_Collecting_of_Poison_Dress_Legends_in_India
  24. https://yokai.com/ubume/
  25. https://www.artistsnetwork.com/art-history/arsenic-art-history/
  26. https://www.mdhistory.org/the-dyes-of-death/
  27. https://www.mdhistory.org/an-update-on-arsenic-green-when-the-world-was-dying-for-color/
  28. https://www.racked.com/2017/3/17/14914840/green-dye-history-death
  29. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-many-myths-of-catherine-de-medici-180980722/
  30. https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/how-catherine-de-medici-made-gloves-laced-with-poison-fashionable
  31. https://www.historyextra.com/period/tudor/the-serpent-queen-review-real-history/
  32. https://kateclisson.wordpress.com/2022/06/24/the-case-of-the-poisoned-gloves/
  33. https://www.famsf.org/stories/poisons-part-i-the-mercurial-world-of-felt
  34. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/dressed-to-kill/
  35. https://www.deseret.com/1992/1/31/18965302/timeworn-tale-of-poison-dress-is-a-dead-giveaway-as-a-legend/
  36. https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/marketplace-fast-fashion-chemicals-1.6193385
  37. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2024/08/14/shein-and-temu-products-found-to-contain-high-levels-of-toxic-chemicals_6715032_4.html
  38. https://www.watchmojo.com/articles/top-10-things-elizabeth-1998-got-factually-right-and-wrong
  39. https://thehistoricalnovel.com/2021/01/05/elizabethan-assassination-attempts-not-feat-a-poisoned-dress/
  40. https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/elizabeth
  41. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/TSP/MMG/MMGDetails.aspx?mmgid=1424&toxid=3
  42. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20415415/
  43. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/arsenic-properties-incident-management-and-toxicology/arsenic-toxicological-overview
  44. https://www.southtees.nhs.uk/services/pathology/tests/arsenic-total-organic-and-inorganic/
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6466288/
  46. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/hac/hair_analysis/appendix_c_sharon.html
  47. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/arsenic
  48. https://www.uncannymagazine.com/article/deadly-frocks-and-other-tales-of-murder-clothes/
  49. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%257CA74483682&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=0015587X&p=AONE&sw=w
  50. https://bloody-disgusting.com/editorials/3639636/10-classic-urban-legends-seen-beyond-belief-fact-fiction/
  51. https://www.environmentalhealth.org/2024/04/26/toxic-lead-in-fashion-the-true-cost/
  52. https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2023/jul/02/fashion-chemicals-pfas-bpa-toxic
  53. https://ecocult.substack.com/p/7-myths-about-toxic-fashion
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.