Hubbry Logo
Party conferenceParty conferenceMain
Open search
Party conference
Community hub
Party conference
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Party conference
Party conference
Party conference
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
The chairman's table at the Scottish Green Party's Autumn conference in November 2007. Note the agenda displayed on the screen behind.
Part of the Politics Series
Party politics
Political spectrum
Left-wing
Centre
Right-wing
Syncretic
Major ideologies
Types
Leaders and organization
Internal elections
Party discipline
Party systems
Coalitions between parties
Lists of political parties
icon Politics portal

The terms party conference (UK English), political convention (US and Canadian English), and party congress usually refer to a general meeting of a political party. The conference is attended by certain delegates who represent the party membership. In most political parties, the party conference is the highest decision-making body of the organization, tasked with electing or nominating the party's leaders or leadership bodies, deciding party policy, and setting the party's platform and agendas.

The definitions of all of these terms vary greatly, depending on the country and situation in which they are used. The term conference or caucus may also refer to the organization of all party members as a whole. The term political convention may also refer to international bilateral or multilateral meetings on state-level, like the convention of the Anglo-Russian Entente (1907).

Leadership roles

[edit]

Within party conferences, there might be different offices or bodies fulfilling certain tasks, usually including:

  • Chairmanship — Chosen from within the body's membership to preside over its business.
  • Secretary — Responsible for keeping minutes of the conference's proceedings.
  • Policy committees — Responsible for setting and maintaining review of current party policy, and preparing proposals for presentation to the full conference.

Party conferences around the world

[edit]

Canada

[edit]
Main article: Leadership convention

In Canada, besides annual or biennial conventions, parties often hold special conventions to elect new leaders; often known as a leadership convention. The new leader of a party is often seen as that party's de facto candidate for Prime Minister (as the party leader almost always goes on to serve as Prime Minister should their party get elected to a majority government).[1]

Communist states

[edit]

Germany

[edit]
Federal party diet (Bundesparteitag) 2015 of the German CDU, with Angela Merkel speaking.

Party conferences in Germany (both on state and federal level), called Parteitag ("party diet"), will meet not only to nominate candidates for public elections, but also regularly (at least once a year) to adopt political resolutions, select party officials or to amend their statutes. Generally, the party organizations themselves and also their representatives (such as the chairperson, called party leader, and other board members) play a much more prominent role in German politics than they do for example in the US or UK, where the parties are mainly represented by their members and leaders in parliament or (if applicable) government.

Ireland

[edit]
Main article: Ardfheis

All Irish parties have annual party conferences, called Ardfheis, at which party policy is decided by the membership and the party chairperson and executive board are elected.

United Kingdom

[edit]
Main article: Party conference season

In the United Kingdom the political conferences (usually called party congress, or party conference) generally take place in three weeks of September and October of each year, whilst the House of Commons is in recess.[2] The conferences of the three largest UK-wide parties, the Conservative Party Conference, the Labour Party Conference and the Liberal Democrat Conference, are held during this time.

United States

[edit]
Main article: Presidential nominating convention
Roll call of states during the 2008 Democratic National Convention at the Pepsi Center in Denver, Colorado.

In the United States, a political convention usually refers to a presidential nominating convention,[3] but it can also refer to state, county, or congressional district nominating conventions in which candidates are nominated (or, if being held before a primary, endorsed), delegates to larger regional or national conventions are elected and the party platform is adopted. Since the mid 19th century, the two major conventions on national level are the Democratic National Convention and the Republican National Convention, usually held every four years to select their candidates for the offices of president and vice president. They are attended by delegates, who are mostly elected in primaries.

Between the national conventions, the national committee of each party (see DNC and RNC) leads the party administratively, while they are politically represented by their leaders in Senate and in the House, or (if applicable) by the president. However, some party charters also provide for party conferences to be held between two national conventions to deal with various matters.[4] In fact, those and the national committees can be compared to regular party conventions in other countries.

The first political convention held in America took place in Hartford, Connecticut in March 1766. The meeting was organized by the Sons of Liberty, who, in challenging incumbent governor Thomas Fitch, nominated William Pitkin for governor and Jonathan Trumbull for deputy governor.

Within the Republican Party, the term party conference is used to refer to the equivalent of caucuses or parliamentary groups in other countries (see also congressional caucus).

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Party conference

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A party conference is a periodic assembly convened by a , typically on an annual basis, comprising members, delegates, elected representatives, and affiliated organizations to deliberate on internal matters such as policy development, selection, and . These gatherings, prominent in parliamentary systems like those in the and , facilitate voting on resolutions, endorsement of party platforms, and speeches by leaders to unify the membership and project the party's agenda to the public. While historically rooted in fostering intra-party debate and —such as the Conservative Party's inaugural conference in 1867—modern iterations often prioritize media visibility, fundraising, and motivational rallies over binding influence, with retaining significant control over final directions. Party conferences generate substantial attention through fringe events, announcements, and high-profile addresses, serving as barometers of internal cohesion and electoral readiness, though their deliberative role has diminished amid centralized party structures. In contexts like the U.S., analogous national conventions focus on nominating presidential candidates and adopting platforms every four years, adapting the format to federal electoral cycles.

Definition and Historical Origins

Core Definition and Purposes

A party conference constitutes the supreme within many , convening members, elected delegates, and affiliated organizations periodically to issues, vote on resolutions, and affirm strategic directions. These gatherings typically occur annually in parliamentary democracies such as the , where major parties like Labour and the Conservatives host autumn events attracting thousands of attendees, or quadrennially in systems like the for national nominating conventions. Central activities encompass plenary sessions for leader addresses, fringe discussions for policy brainstorming, and formal votes on motions that may shape party stances, distinguishing conferences from meetings by their structured, often documented outcomes. The core purposes revolve around aggregating diverse internal preferences into coherent platforms, signaling commitments to voters, and fostering organizational cohesion. Conferences facilitate policy formulation by allowing rank-and-file input through resolution debates, theoretically enabling bottom-up influence on manifestos, as seen in UK Labour's historical practice where conference-endorsed policies have informed election pledges. They also serve to endorse or select , rally base enthusiasm via motivational speeches—such as those projecting unity and vision—and generate media coverage to communicate resolve to the public, with events like the 2024 Labour conference drawing over 20,000 participants for these aims. Fundraising often accompanies these functions, underscoring conferences' role in resource mobilization. Empirically, while designed to democratize , conferences frequently exhibit leader-centric dynamics, where elite agendas predominate and resolutions hold varying binding force—non-mandatory in recent Labour cases, for instance—prioritizing signaling over strict preference aggregation to maintain electoral viability. This reflects causal realities of intraparty power imbalances, where outcomes reinforce rather than challenge leadership trajectories absent exceptional discord.

Evolution from Early Gatherings to Modern Institutions

The origins of party conferences trace back to early 19th-century , where informal congressional caucuses for presidential nominations gave way to structured national conventions amid expanding voter participation. The organized the first such national nominating convention in , , in September 1831, selecting William Wirt as its presidential candidate to counter perceived elite control in party processes. This model spread rapidly, with the Democratic Party holding its inaugural national convention in from May 21 to 23, 1832, formalizing delegate selection and platform adoption as alternatives to closed-door elite bargaining. These gatherings reflected causal pressures from , including rising demands, shifting authority from party insiders to broader assemblies. Parallel developments emerged in the during the 1860s and 1870s, as mass parties formed in response to suffrage expansions like the Second Act of 1867, which enfranchised over a million working-class men. Conservative and Liberal organizations began holding annual assemblies to rally supporters and deliberate policies, evolving from ad hoc meetings into institutionalized events that accommodated growing memberships. In more broadly, post-World War II reconstruction emphasized ideological congresses; for instance, Germany's Christian Democratic Union (CDU) conducted regular party congresses from the late 1940s to consolidate democratic platforms and integrate former opponents, prioritizing programmatic unity amid divisions. Twentieth-century reforms further institutionalized inclusivity, particularly in the , where the 1968 Democratic National Convention's chaos—marked by contested credentials and protests—prompted the McGovern-Fraser Commission to overhaul delegate selection. Implemented for the 1972 convention, these rules required primaries and caucuses to allocate at least 75% of delegates, mandating quotas for women, youth, and minorities to diminish "smoke-filled rooms" and enhance representativeness. The accelerated adaptations in the , with parties worldwide pivoting to hybrid and virtual formats to maintain continuity amid lockdowns, though in-person elements endured for building interpersonal cohesion essential to party solidarity. Attendance has waned in established parties like the UK Conservatives since the , correlating with membership drops from over 250,000 in 2010 to around 100,000 by 2013, and visibly sparse halls at 2025 conferences signaling voter apathy and internal disarray.

Organizational Features and Procedures

Internal Structure and Leadership Roles

The presiding officer, typically the or a designated leader, oversees conference sessions by calling proceedings to order, enforcing rules of , and recognizing speakers to maintain procedural order amid diverse participant interests. Delegates, elected or appointed from local branches, regional units, auxiliary organizations, and sometimes individual members, constitute the primary voting assembly, empowered to approve resolutions, elect internal officers, or endorse platforms through majority or weighted votes. Delegate selection mechanisms prioritize proportional allocation in parties with multiple factions, distributing slots according to internal primaries, caucus results, or membership proportions to reflect factional strengths while curbing dominance by larger blocs; historical shifts from (e.g., union blocs) to one-member-one-vote systems have aimed to enhance individual member influence, though delegate rules often embed gatekeeping that advantages incumbents by filtering contentious proposals. Specialized committees, including credentials panels to verify delegate eligibility and rules bodies to scrutinize motions, preprocess agendas upstream to avert disorder, channeling fringe or submissions—such as alternative policy amendments—into viable debates only if they garner sufficient preliminary support. Conference scales vary structurally from gatherings of hundreds in compact European-style events to thousands in expansive formats, necessitating tiered subcommittees in larger ones to streamline and ; this design causally trades fuller direct representation for operational efficiency, as unvetted open-floor chaos would paralyze proceedings in high-attendance settings.

Formats, Agendas, and Decision-Making Processes

Party conferences typically feature a structured agenda spanning several days, commencing with opening speeches from party officials and regional representatives to set the tone and outline priorities. This is followed by policy debates in plenary sessions or committees, where delegates discuss and amend motions on key issues such as or . Central events include addresses by the and members, often culminating in closing rallies to rally support and project unity. Formats vary from consensus-oriented discussions in smaller workshops to more adversarial plenary debates, where time limits—typically 5-10 minutes per speaker—are enforced to manage the volume of contributions under constraints. Voting on motions often employs show-of-hands counts or electronic systems for , though some parties, like the Labour Party, historically use card votes where affiliated groups hold block votes proportional to membership, allowing rapid tallies but criticized for enabling leadership influence over outcomes. Decision-making centers on passing resolutions by simple majority in plenary sessions, intended to shape party policy, yet these are frequently non-binding on , who retain in due to practical needs and agenda control. For instance, in the UK is nominally per the rule book, directing party work, but leaders have overridden resolutions, as seen in historical debates over nuclear policy where passed motions did not compel action. Empirical patterns show low success rates for radical motions, with often selecting moderate ones for debate, reflecting a conservative in outcomes to maintain electability. Logistically, venues are selected for capacity, accessibility, and media facilities, such as conference centers in coastal cities like or , facilitating broadcast access while containing costs and dissent through zoned fringe events separate from main halls. Timed slots and chair moderation curb factional disruptions, promoting orderly proceedings but potentially marginalizing minority voices by prioritizing high-profile speakers.

Functions and Roles in Political Parties

Policy Development and Platform Setting

Party conferences function as deliberative arenas where delegates propose, debate, and vote on policy resolutions, enabling the iterative refinement of party manifestos and ideological platforms through amendments and composite motions. These gatherings facilitate the integration of grassroots input into programmatic outputs, though outcomes often reflect pre-conference negotiations among party factions. For example, resolutions passed at s can mandate shifts in core doctrines, as seen in the UK Labour Party's 1995 annual in , where delegates voted by a margin of 65% to 35% to revise of the party constitution, abandoning commitments to widespread in favor of promoting "the enterprise of the market" alongside . This amendment, driven by but ratified by conference vote on April 29, 1995, exemplified how such events can catalyze tangible ideological evolution, influencing Labour's subsequent electoral strategy and governance from 1997 onward. In the United States, national conventions have similarly endorsed innovative economic frameworks; the in approved a platform advocating a 30% across-the-board via the Kemp-Roth bill, alongside and incentives for —core tenets of that departed from prior Keynesian emphases and propelled Reagan's agenda. The platform explicitly called for reducing marginal tax rates to stimulate production and growth, reflecting delegate consensus on these principles during plenary sessions. Such endorsements demonstrate conferences' capacity to formalize policy innovations originating from think tanks and factional advocacy, with the 1980 document's fiscal planks directly informing the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981. Despite these instances of influence, conference-driven changes exhibit moderate empirical impact on enacted , as and legislative bodies frequently filter or adapt resolutions to pragmatic constraints; analyses of party dynamics from 1990–2010 reveal that while 20–30% of conference motions address priorities, elite points limit direct translation, prioritizing electability over purist commitments. Critics, including party insiders, contend that these events often devolve into ratification exercises for positions, with voting data showing 80–90% approval for incumbent-backed platforms in recent Conservative and Labour conferences, attributable to controlled delegate slates and low turnout among dissenting members. Attendance figures, averaging 2,000–3,000 delegates amid parties' broader memberships exceeding 100,000, underscore how passive majorities enable such dynamics. Causally, conferences aggregate dispersed member expertise by surfacing regional and activist perspectives absent in centralized bureaucracies, yet procedural rules—like timed debates and bloc voting—can amplify vocal minorities who dominate nominations, skewing outputs toward fringe priorities over median preferences. Conservative commentators argue this mechanism counters "bureaucratic drift," where unelected apparatchiks entrench statist policies, as evidenced by how European Christian Democratic conferences in the 1980s resisted internal pushes for deeper integration until base pressures aligned with leadership. Overall, while not omnipotent, these forums enforce , with passed resolutions binding inclusions in systems like Germany's, where Basic Programme updates require delegate majorities exceeding 50% plus leadership concurrence.

Leadership Elections and Internal Democracy

Party conferences frequently serve as key venues for conducting or announcing leadership elections, where delegates or members vote on candidates through mechanisms such as hustings debates, endorsements, or final runoffs, though preliminary stages often involve parliamentary or to narrow fields. In the United Kingdom's Conservative Party, for instance, leadership contests feature public hustings at annual conferences, allowing candidates to pitch to members after MPs reduce contenders via successive ballots requiring 15% support thresholds. These processes aim to balance representative input from elected officials with broader membership participation, contrasting with more exclusive endorsements in other parties. A pivotal historical example illustrating conferences' role in exposing internal power struggles and prompting democratic reforms occurred at the in the United States, where violent clashes between police and anti-war protesters, coupled with perceptions of boss-controlled delegate selection, discredited the process and led to the McGovern-Fraser Commission reforms. These changes mandated greater openness, shifting toward primary-based delegate allocation to reduce smoke-filled-room dealings and enhance participatory elements, though conferences retained ceremonial roll calls for nominations. Similarly, in the UK's Labour Party, the 2016 leadership challenge to by highlighted conference dynamics, with Corbyn securing 61.8% of the membership vote amid debates over mandatory reselection and MP rebellions, demonstrating how such events can affirm or contest incumbent authority through grassroots ballots. ![Roll call DNC 2008.jpg][center] While these mechanisms foster accountability by enabling challenges to underperforming leaders—evident in Corbyn's retention despite —they face criticism for limited legitimacy due to low , as seen in recent Labour deputy leadership ballots achieving only 16.6% participation among eligible members. Empirical analyses of party leadership selections reveal persistent elite continuity, with new leaders often emerging from established factions rather than pure outsiders, undermining claims of unmediated ; for example, electoral performance influences survival, but changes typically occur within ideological bounds set by core influencers rather than radical ruptures. Critics argue that conference elections can appear pre-ordained, with candidate viability hinging on prior backing, yet suggests they impose checks on unilateral leader control, unlike in top-down parties where autocrats bypass internal votes altogether. This partial —rooted in delegate or member balloting—prevents absolute autonomy but falls short of full intraparty equality, as turnout disparities and factional gatekeeping sustain power asymmetries despite formal procedures. Overall, conferences thus function as controlled arenas for transitions, blending contestation with structural safeguards that maintain organizational stability over chaotic .

Global Variations and Examples

In Parliamentary Democracies

In parliamentary democracies, party conferences constitute essential annual assemblies where convene delegates to deliberate policies, elect or affirm , and foster internal cohesion. These events bridge membership with parliamentary elites, enabling votes on resolutions that shape electoral platforms and hold leaders accountable, particularly when parties form governments. They typically feature speeches, debates, and fringe meetings, generating media coverage and opportunities while reinforcing ahead of legislative sessions.

United Kingdom

United Kingdom parties, including Labour and Conservatives, hold autumn conferences in seaside resorts like or , attended by thousands of delegates, members, and journalists. Labour's annual conference functions as a voting body, with delegates from constituencies, trade unions, and socialist societies debating and approving policy motions submitted in advance. These gatherings allow for leader addresses that outline government or opposition strategies, alongside composite debates on issues like economy or foreign policy, influencing parliamentary whips and bill priorities. Conferences also serve revenue purposes through delegate fees and exhibitor stalls, with attendance exceeding 10,000 for major parties.

Germany

In Germany, parties conduct Parteitag (federal congresses) as their highest organs, where several hundred delegates from state branches vote on leadership, program updates, and candidate nominations. The Christian Democratic Union (CDU) finalizes chairperson elections at its Bundesparteitag following preliminary member ballots, ensuring alignment between base and executives. Similarly, the Social Democratic Party (SPD) uses Bundesparteitag for executive selections and policy reforms, as demonstrated by its June 2025 congress electing Vice Chancellor amid post-election reviews. These events, often spanning weekends, emphasize consensus-building in coalition-prone systems, with votes requiring majorities for binding decisions on basic principles.

Canada

Canadian parties in the Westminster-style organize national conventions for leadership contests and policy declarations, drawing delegates from electoral districts and youth wings. The Liberal Party elects its leader via conventions using preferential ballots among registered members and delegates, as in the March 2025 event selecting a successor to . The Conservative Party holds biennial conventions, such as the 2023 policy gathering in for resolution votes and the scheduled January 2026 convention in to strategize future platforms. These forums ratify bylaws, train activists, and signal unity, though leadership races dominate when vacancies arise, impacting prime ministerial succession.

Ireland

Irish political parties designate their annual supreme conferences as Ard Fheis, convening delegates to endorse policies, elect central executives, and debate motions from branches. These multi-day events facilitate influence on parliamentary agendas, with votes on resolutions that guide TDs (parliamentarians) in . Sinn Féin's Ard Fheis, for instance, addresses unification and socioeconomic priorities, as at its 2024 Athlone session evaluating government participation. and similarly use Ard Fheis for leadership affirmations and platform refinements, underscoring internal democracy in a .

United Kingdom

In the , party conferences constitute annual assemblies convened by major political parties, including the Conservatives, Labour, Liberal Democrats, , and others, typically spanning September and October during the recess. These events assemble thousands of delegates—comprising elected officials, grassroots members, representatives (for Labour), and affiliated groups—for structured debates, leader addresses, policy discussions, and extensive fringe meetings organized by external stakeholders such as think tanks and lobbyists. Attendance figures often exceed 10,000 per major conference, with venues rotating among cities like , Birmingham, , and to accommodate logistics and regional engagement. The Conservative 's conference traces its origins to 1867, when it emerged alongside the National Union of Conservative and Constitutional Associations as a forum for coordinating voluntary efforts and debating resolutions. Procedures include submission of motions by local associations for plenary debate, but these carry no binding authority; instead, the event functions primarily as a platform for the party leader's —delivered on the final day—and policy previews announced by leadership, often in coordination with parliamentary priorities. The 2025 conference, held October 5–8 in Central, emphasized economic measures like border security enhancements and fiscal reforms amid post-election opposition dynamics. Fringe sessions, numbering in the hundreds, facilitate networking with donors and media, underscoring the conference's role in sustaining party cohesion without formal policymaking power. Labour Party conferences, rooted in the party's 1900 founding as a federation of trade unions and socialist societies, incorporate voting on policy motions and constitutional amendments proposed by constituency labour parties (CLPs), affiliates, and the National Executive Committee (NEC). Delegates vote via a weighted system reflecting CLP, union, and elected representative blocs, though outcomes remain advisory rather than mandatory for the leadership or manifesto formation, allowing prime ministers like Keir Starmer to prioritize parliamentary feasibility. Leadership elections, when contested, employ an electoral college or one-member-one-vote mechanisms refined in recent rule changes. The 2025 gathering in Liverpool highlighted tensions over economic strategy and Reform UK competition, with resolutions debated but ultimately subordinated to central directives. Smaller parties adapt similar formats: Liberal Democrats emphasize proportional voting on motions to shape their federal policy platform, while the SNP convenes in Scottish cities like for devolution-focused agendas. Across parties, conferences prioritize spectacle and member morale over binding , with agendas controlled by executives to align with electoral imperatives; empirical attendance declines in opposition years reflect waning enthusiasm, as seen in Conservative figures post-2024 defeat.

Germany

In , party conferences known as Parteitage constitute the paramount assemblies for , convening at federal (Bundesparteitag) and state levels to exercise core functions including elections, resolution adoption, and program endorsement. Delegates, numbering in the hundreds and selected proportionally from regional branches based on membership strength, deliberate and vote on agenda items, typically requiring simple majorities for passage, with secret ballots employed for contests to mitigate external pressures. These events underscore parties' constitutional mandate to foster the people's political will formation, as enshrined in the , while serving as venues for endorsing candidates ahead of elections. The Bundesparteitag of major parties like the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and Social Democratic Party (SPD) occurs irregularly, often biennially or in response to leadership vacuums, contrasting with more routine equivalents by prioritizing binding decisions over rhetorical displays. For instance, the CDU's 2021 Bundesparteitag featured multiple voting rounds among delegates to elect as after three prior contests failed to yield consensus, highlighting the assembly's decisive role in resolving internal power dynamics. Similarly, SPD congresses have ratified pivotal pacts, such as post-election agreements, ensuring delegate approval before governmental participation. Critiques of these processes center on delegate selection's potential for elite capture, where regional executives influence nominations, potentially diluting grassroots representation despite formal democratic mechanisms. Nonetheless, Parteitage remain essential for maintaining party cohesion and adapting platforms to electoral realities, with attendance and media coverage amplifying their visibility in Germany's consensus-oriented polity.

Canada

In Canada, national party conventions function as the principal assemblies for federal political parties in the , enabling input on , constitutional amendments, and internal . Unlike routine meetings, these events draw delegates from electoral district associations (EDAs) nationwide, who debate resolutions, vote on platforms, and elect executive officers, typically occurring every one to two years depending on the party. For major parties like the (CPC), (LPC), and (NDP), conventions emphasize renewal between elections, with leadership elections or reviews often integrated or held separately to maintain party cohesion ahead of federal votes. Delegate selection follows structured processes outlined in party rules, such as EDA meetings where members elect representatives proportional to local membership, ensuring regional balance. Conventions feature plenary sessions for speeches by leaders and candidates, breakout workshops, and voting on hundreds of proposals submitted by provincial boards, commissions, or caucuses; passage requires majority approval, influencing future platforms without binding MPs. The CPC's 2023 convention in , for example, addressed resolutions on economic and social issues, while its 2026 event in from January 29-31 will include a leadership review for , requiring 70% support for endorsement. Similarly, the LPC's May 2023 Ottawa convention processed resolutions on and other priorities, electing new officials amid virtual-hybrid elements post-pandemic. These gatherings underscore internal in Canada's federated party structure, where conventions counterbalance leader-centric tendencies by amplifying member voices, though turnout varies and resolutions rarely override decisions in . The NDP's designates conventions as the supreme authority for program and bylaws, as seen in past assemblies shaping social democratic priorities. Overall, Canadian conventions adapt Westminster traditions to federal diversity, fostering debate on national issues like resource policy and , with attendance often exceeding 2,000 delegates for visibility and fundraising.

Ireland

In Ireland, party conferences, commonly termed ardfheis (meaning "high assembly" in Irish), serve as the annual supreme governing bodies for major , convening delegates from local branches (cumainn) to debate and vote on motions, constitutional amendments, and strategic directions. These events, typically held in spring or autumn at hotels or convention centers in cities like or , attract hundreds to over a thousand participants and generate substantial media coverage, particularly through the party leader's keynote address, which signals priorities for the year ahead, such as economic recovery or housing reforms. Unlike ad hoc meetings, ardfheiseanna emphasize member-driven input, with motions submitted bottom-up from levels, though executive committees often shape the final agenda to ensure feasibility in Ireland's coalition-dependent . For parties like and , the center-right pillars of Irish politics, conferences balance policy deliberation with internal cohesion, approving platforms that influence negotiations post-election; contests occasionally occur here but are more commonly resolved via parliamentary ballots or separate conventions. , with its all-island focus, uses its to advance republican goals, such as Irish unification polls or policies, as seen in its 2024 Athlone gathering, which prioritized amid critiques of performance—though ultimate often devolves to the smaller Ard Chomhairle executive for implementation. These forums foster debate on empirical challenges like Ireland's (with over 13,000 homeless in 2024) or post-Brexit trade, but practical constraints limit radical shifts, reflecting causal realities of and fiscal prudence. Empirical assessments highlight conferences' role in enhancing internal , with studies noting increased candidate selection since the 2010s, yet parliamentary groups retain power over motions, potentially diluting member influence. Attendance figures underscore engagement: Fianna Fáil's associated events have drawn nearly 1,200 members, while specialized wings (e.g., or women's networks) hold parallel sessions for targeted input. In Ireland's multi-party landscape, ardfheiseanna thus reinforce party platforms ahead of general elections, like the anticipated 2024 vote, but face criticism for performative elements over substantive change, as filtered agendas prioritize electability over unvarnished member priorities.

In Presidential Systems

In presidential systems, party conferences—commonly known as national conventions—function primarily as mechanisms for nominating candidates for the directly elected presidency, reflecting the separation of executive and legislative powers that distinguishes these regimes from parliamentary ones. These events, held periodically in election years, assemble delegates selected through subnational primaries or caucuses to formally endorse the presidential nominee, who must secure a majority of delegate votes. This process ensures the candidate emerges with broad party legitimacy before facing opponents in the general election. The conventions also involve adopting a party platform that articulates policy priorities, selecting vice-presidential running mates, and conducting roll-call votes that symbolize intra-party consensus. In practice, modern conventions often serve ceremonial roles, ratifying preordained nominees determined by prior voter-driven delegate allocation, while emphasizing speeches, networking, and to unify factions and mobilize supporters. Originating in the early as alternatives to smoke-filled rooms, such gatherings democratized selection but have evolved into media spectacles with diminished contentious since primary reforms in the . Beyond the , where Democratic and Republican conventions occur every four years following state contests, similar structures appear in other presidential democracies like those in . There, parties convene to nominate presidential hopefuls, often via internal primaries or congresses mandated by electoral laws, though the emphasis remains on building electoral coalitions rather than immediate . These processes adapt to local contexts, such as mandatory open primaries in countries like or , prioritizing candidate viability in winner-take-all executive races over ongoing policy refinement seen in parliamentary meetings.

United States

In the United States, political party conferences are most prominently embodied in the quadrennial national conventions of the Democratic and Republican parties, which serve to nominate presidential and vice-presidential candidates, ratify party platforms, and energize the party base for the upcoming election. These events, held every four years in the summer preceding the presidential election, gather thousands of delegates selected through state primaries, caucuses, and party committees. Unlike the annual policy-focused conferences in parliamentary systems, U.S. conventions emphasize candidate endorsement—now largely ceremonial due to pre-convention delegate commitments from primaries—and public spectacle to build voter enthusiasm. The (DNC) and (RNC) originated in the as mechanisms to democratize candidate selection beyond elite caucuses; the Democrats convened first in 1832 in , nominating , while Republicans followed in 1856 in . At modern conventions, such as the 2024 RNC in (July 15–18) and DNC in (August 19–22), proceedings include roll-call votes confirming nominees—like for Republicans after securing 2,429 delegates—and adoption of platforms outlining stances on issues from to . Key elements feature keynote speeches, acceptance addresses by nominees, and committee reports, with attendance exceeding 4,000 delegates plus alternates, guests, and media. In the , these conventions hold limited direct influence over governance due to , focusing instead on electoral strategy and unity displays rather than binding legislative agendas. Platforms, while symbolically important, are often non-binding and infrequently cited in office, reflecting the decentralized nature of U.S. parties where primaries empower voters over party elites. State-level conventions mirror national ones, nominating candidates for gubernatorial and legislative races, but national events dominate public attention. Separately, congressional party conferences—such as the or —operate as ongoing bodies for legislative coordination, meeting weekly or as needed to elect leaders and strategize bills, distinct from the periodic national gatherings. This structure underscores causal differences in presidential systems, where party cohesion prioritizes electoral competition over parliamentary discipline.

In Non-Democratic Contexts

In non-democratic contexts, conferences primarily function as rituals of and ideological reinforcement, where preordained decisions from ruling elites are endorsed by assembled delegates with minimal opportunity for genuine or . Unlike their counterparts in democratic systems, these gatherings prioritize signaling internal unity and legitimacy over or contests, often occurring at fixed intervals mandated by statutes but controlled by centralized apparatuses. In communist states, such events—typically styled as national congresses—serve to formalize the transfer or consolidation of power within a hierarchical , where the supreme , such as a general secretary or , predetermines outcomes through informal networks rather than open . The Congresses of the of the (CPSU), held irregularly from one to five years apart between and 1991, exemplified this dynamic as the party's nominal highest authority, convening thousands of delegates to review reports, approve five-year plans, and elect leading bodies. However, these sessions largely ratified policies crafted by the and general , with scripted speeches and unanimous votes underscoring the absence of factional autonomy; deviations, as in Nikita Khrushchev's 1956 secret speech denouncing at the 20th Congress, were exceptional and leader-initiated rather than emergent from delegate input. In the , the National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC), convened every five years since 1921, fulfills statutory roles including examining work reports, amending the party , and electing the and its standing organs, yet operates predominantly as a ceremonial affirmation of elite consensus. The 20th National Congress, held October 16–22, 2022, in with 2,296 delegates, confirmed Xi Jinping's third term as general secretary and enshrined "" in the , but prior maneuvers ensured outcomes aligned with paramount leadership directives, rendering the event more symbolic of continuity than transformative. Across other authoritarian states with dominant ruling parties, such as North Korea's , conferences similarly emphasize doctrinal purity and loyalty oaths, convening infrequently—e.g., the 8th Congress in January 2021 after a five-year gap—to endorse Kim Jong-un's strategic priorities like nuclear advancement, with delegate roles confined to acclamation amid pervasive surveillance and purges. These mechanisms sustain regime stability by projecting monolithic cohesion, but empirical analyses indicate they mask underlying elite bargaining conducted opaquely outside public view, prioritizing causal control over participatory input.

Communist and Authoritarian States

In communist states, party congresses nominally serve as the highest deliberative bodies, convening delegates to approve slates, directives, and organizational structures, but operate under the Leninist principle of , which mandates unified action following limited internal discussion, effectively centralizing power in the party's top echelons. These gatherings, held at fixed intervals such as every five years in and , function more as rituals of affirmation than sites of contestation, with agendas and outcomes predetermined by the ruling to maintain stability and ideological conformity. from post-congress transitions shows near-total alignment with pre-existing elite preferences, underscoring the absence of competitive elections or factional challenges that characterize democratic party conferences. The National Congress of the (CCP), for instance, assembles approximately 2,300 delegates to elect the , which in turn selects the and its Standing Committee; the 20th Congress in October 2022 reaffirmed Xi Jinping's dominance by retaining his core allies and extending his tenure beyond conventional norms. Similarly, in , the of Cuba's congresses, such as the 8th in 2021, formalized the transition from Raúl Castro's influence while endorsing Miguel Díaz-Canel's leadership amid economic directives like the "Ordering Task" reforms, with no recorded deviations from party leadership's blueprint. In historical context, the Congresses of the of the (CPSU), which met 28 times from 1917 to 1991, ostensibly ratified five-year plans and purges but rubber-stamped decisions, as evidenced by the scripted denunciations and personnel changes during Stalin's era and Khrushchev's 1956 "secret speech," the latter an outlier enabled by prior power consolidation. Authoritarian regimes beyond strict communism, such as North Korea's Workers' Party of Korea, convene congresses infrequently—only seven since 1946, with the 7th in May 2016 marking the first in 36 years—to proclaim loyalty oaths, unveil nuclear policy shifts, and anoint Kim Jong-un's perpetual rule, serving as propaganda spectacles rather than policy forums. Vietnam's Communist Party Congresses, like the 13th in January 2021, follow a comparable pattern, selecting the Politburo amid economic liberalization rhetoric while suppressing dissent to preserve one-party monopoly. These events prioritize regime legitimation through mass mobilization and controlled narratives over substantive deliberation, with attendance often exceeding thousands to project unity, yet internal dynamics reveal elite bargaining shielded from delegates, contrasting sharply with the pluralistic debates in democratic systems.

Criticisms, Controversies, and Reforms

Elite Capture and Financial Influences

Party conferences in democratic systems frequently depend on substantial financial contributions from corporations, interest groups, and affluent individuals to finance high-cost elements including venue rentals, promotional , and logistical arrangements. In the United States, national nominating conventions are supported by contributions directed to specific accounts within national party committees, with Super PACs channeling unlimited funds into independent expenditures such as advertisements and peripheral events timed to coincide with these gatherings. Empirical analyses reveal associations between donor funding and subtle policy orientations within parties, yet these links demonstrate incremental shifts rather than outright control. A 2023 study documented correlations between campaign contributions and U.S. legislators' focus on donor-preferred issues, while a 2024 Cornell analysis indicated that the unexpected death of a leading donor could diminish a candidate's election probability by over three percentage points, underscoring the role of ongoing financial backing in sustaining momentum. However, broader reviews of campaign spending effects on electoral and policy outcomes often find limited marginal impacts, suggesting that donor influence operates within constraints imposed by voter dynamics and internal party competition. Critiques of emphasize how concentrated donations enable a narrow set of benefactors to disproportionately shape narratives and subsequent signals, as highlighted by from advocacy groups tracking megadonor dominance in electoral spending. Such concerns, prevalent in left-leaning analyses, portray systemic amplification of elite priorities, but evidence counters narratives of pervasive corruption by showing donor ideologies frequently mirroring those of the party's supporters, derived from surveys of contributor motivations post-2016 elections. Proponents of minimal argue that funding constraints equate to , a perspective reinforced by judicial precedents prioritizing expressive freedoms over expenditure caps. In the , Labour conferences have traditionally drawn heavy support from affiliations, contrasting with Conservative reliance on corporate and business sector gifts, which together account for the majority of revenues used in event sponsorships and operations. By 2023, Labour's private individual donations had eclipsed union contributions, reflecting a diversification amid rising overall inflows exceeding £9.5 million for the during the 2024 cycle. Recent reforms, including 2025 measures to scrutinize foreign-sourced funds via shell entities and impose stricter donor vetting, aim to bolster transparency without broadly curtailing domestic flows, maintaining the Electoral Commission's framework of quarterly reporting that captured £11 million in second-quarter 2025 donations across parties.

Performative Aspects and Ideological Biases

Party conferences frequently exhibit performative elements, where leader speeches and staged events overshadow substantive policy deliberation. In many systems, such as the United Kingdom's, conference agendas allocate disproportionate time to addresses by party leaders, which serve to rally supporters and project unity rather than enact binding resolutions. Analysis of British party gatherings indicates that these speeches function primarily to reinforce ideological enthusiasm and media optics, with empirical polling showing minimal shifts in or voting intentions following the events. For instance, motions passed at conferences, including radical environmental proposals by the UK , often remain symbolic due to subsequent filtering or electoral , as evidenced by the party's rhetorical adoption of policies like "banning landlords" without corresponding legislative follow-through. Ideological biases manifest distinctly across the , with left-leaning conferences prioritizing identity-based signaling over economic priorities. At the in the United States, speeches and programming leaned heavily into racial and themes, reflecting a strategic embrace of such politics to mobilize base voters, as candidates like emphasized personal narratives of marginalization. This approach, critiqued for subordinating class-based economic appeals, aligns with broader patterns where —often exhibiting left-leaning institutional biases—normalizes these elements as core rather than performative. In contrast, right-leaning events, such as the , have been characterized by populist rhetoric emphasizing national and economic under , blending pragmatic policy signals like trade tariffs with appeals to cultural grievances, though mainstream analyses frequently frame this as demagoguery rather than substantive . While conferences achieve mobilization of activists and party loyalists, causal factors like selective media amplification of extreme or theatrical moments contribute to public disillusionment. Polling data reveals sustained erosion of trust in political institutions, with only 22% of expressing confidence in efficacy as of 2024, exacerbated by coverage that highlights performative discord over substance. This dynamic underscores conferences' role in signaling ideological purity to insiders while alienating broader electorates, as trust metrics correlate with perceptions of amplified partisanship rather than deliberative outcomes.

Debates on Democratic Legitimacy

Party conferences are defended by supporters as mechanisms for internal democratic , enabling members to check decisions through votes on motions and selections. For instance, conference votes have occasionally overridden party leaders, providing a counterbalance to preferences. Critics, however, contend that such events lack broad representativeness due to chronically low membership and attendance, rendering them forums for a narrow activist cadre rather than the wider electorate or even party base. Empirical data underscore this: in the , total membership across major parties fell to approximately 1% of the electorate by 2023, with Liberal Democrat numbers halving to around 60,000 by October 2025 despite electoral gains. In the United States, national conventions draw delegates numbering in the low thousands—such as roughly 4,500 for Democrats—selected via state-level processes that exclude most registered voters, equating to far less than 1% direct involvement relative to the 330 million population. Conservative critiques highlight how left-leaning parties risk co-optation by ideological activists at conferences, amplifying fringe voices that diverge from centrist voter majorities, though evidence shows policy continuity often persists despite such debates. For example, activist pressures at Democratic National Conventions have pushed progressive resolutions, yet platform shifts remain incremental, reflecting filtering over . This dynamic fuels skepticism of conferences' "democratic" credentials in low-engagement contexts, where turnout data—often under 10% of members attending in person—suggests decisions reflect self-selected enthusiasts rather than probabilistic representation. In non-democratic regimes, party congresses mimic these formats to project legitimacy, staging scripted debates and votes that resemble democratic processes without genuine contestation, thereby underscoring the need for empirical scrutiny of participatory claims. Authoritarian legislatures and congresses, for instance, adopt systems and agenda controls akin to democratic parties to co-opt elites and signal procedural fairness, yet lack oppositional input or turnout verification. Proposed reforms aim to enhance legitimacy, such as integrating with broader primaries for voter input or adopting digital voting to boost member participation beyond physical attendance barriers. Digital platforms could enable all-member balloting on key motions, potentially raising effective turnout from current lows, while primary linkages—piloted in some systems—extend to non-members, diluting activist dominance. Such measures address causal gaps between conference outputs and public preferences, though implementation varies by rules and faces resistance from entrenched delegates.

Impact and Empirical Assessments

Influence on Party Policy and Elections

Party conferences exert influence on policy primarily through debates and resolutions that signal internal consensus or contest leadership directions, though empirical indicates these effects are moderate and often overridden by executive decisions. In the , Margaret Thatcher's 1975 Conservative Party conference speech explicitly rejected socialist policies, reinforcing the party's shift toward market-oriented reforms and curbing leftward drifts within the membership, which contributed to the adoption of monetarist policies in subsequent governments. Similarly, conferences in center-right parties like Germany's CDU have facilitated modernization efforts, such as post-1998 adjustments under that moderated traditional welfare stances without fully abandoning them, though causal links to specific congress votes remain anecdotal rather than rigorously quantified. Rigorous studies on party-wide policy influence suggest conferences amplify elite signaling over grassroots-driven change, with limited of sustained causal shifts beyond leader-endorsed platforms. On elections, conferences generate short-term polling advantages known as "convention bounces," typically through demonstrations of party unity and nominee visibility, with historical data showing average gains of around 5-7 percentage points in candidate support immediately post-event. For instance, experienced a notable poll surge following the , transitioning from a tied race to a lead over , which helped sustain momentum into the general election despite later narrowing. Recent analyses confirm these effects persist for weeks to months but fade as campaigns progress, with post-1996 U.S. conventions yielding bounces of 2% or less on average due to diminished suspense in nominations. Empirical assessments attribute limited long-term electoral impact to the transient nature of media attention and voter reversion to baseline partisanship, underscoring conferences' role in signaling cohesion rather than fundamentally altering voter preferences. Leader dominance often circumvents conference policy outputs, as seen in cases where incoming governments prioritize manifesto commitments over debated resolutions, reducing causal policy effects to symbolic or factional reinforcements.

Media Role and Public Engagement

Media coverage of party conferences plays a pivotal role in disseminating key messages to broader audiences, often through live broadcasts that amplify leaders' speeches and policy announcements. In the United States, the averaged 21.8 million viewers across major networks, surpassing the Republican National Convention's 19.1 million, with Kamala Harris's acceptance speech drawing 28.9 million. Such viewership spikes demonstrate how conventions serve as high-profile media events capable of shaping immediate public perceptions of party unity and nominee viability. In parliamentary systems like the , public broadcasters such as the provide extensive live coverage of annual conferences, including fringe events and leader addresses, though specific viewership figures for these remain lower than debates, which can attract over 3 million. This amplification extends party narratives beyond delegates, influencing voter sentiment through real-time commentary and analysis. Controversies emerging from conferences, such as verbal gaffes or internal disputes, receive disproportionate media attention, often swaying undecided voters more than substantive discussions due to their emotional resonance and shareability. For instance, isolated missteps by speakers can dominate headlines, as seen in coverage of past U.S. conventions where gaffes correlated with temporary dips in polling favorability, illustrating a causal link where negative framing prioritizes over platform details. Mainstream outlets, frequently critiqued for left-leaning biases in story selection, tend to emphasize performative elements like crowd reactions or rhetorical slips in conservative events, while downplaying similar issues in progressive ones, a pattern evidenced by partisan gatekeeping in message amplification. Right-leaning media, conversely, often counter by highlighting policy substance, fostering divergent audience interpretations that reinforce existing divides rather than fostering consensus. Public engagement with full conference broadcasts remains limited, with audiences skewed toward political elites, activists, and partisans rather than the general populace, yet viral clips on platforms extend reach exponentially. Empirical data indicates that while linear TV viewership for events like U.S. conventions hovers in the tens of millions, social media interactions—such as shares and debates—can multiply exposure by orders of magnitude, but at the cost of heightened polarization as algorithms prioritize emotionally charged content. This dynamic creates echo chambers where users engage more with reinforcing narratives, empirically linking conference highlights to increased affective divides without proportionally boosting cross-partisan understanding. Overall, media's selective focus thus shapes voter behavior through filtered perceptions, where low direct viewership belies outsized influence via mediated summaries and online diffusion.

References

  1. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainer/party-conferences
  2. https://www.aoc.co.uk/news-campaigns-parliament/work-in-parliament/public-affairs-briefings-news/party-conferences-what-are-they-and-why-you-should-attend
  3. https://www.qmul.ac.uk/politics/news/2023/items/what-is-the-point-of-party-conferences.html
  4. https://academic.oup.com/book/10546/chapter/158479144
  5. https://theweek.com/politics/whats-the-point-of-party-conferences
  6. https://www.usa.gov/national-conventions
  7. https://theconversation.com/party-conference-season-is-here-but-decades-of-polling-evidence-suggests-these-events-barely-move-the-dial-214445
  8. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/sep/21/union-clashes-and-rule-changes-what-to-look-out-for-at-labour-conference
  9. https://www.pbslearningmedia.org/resource/birth-of-party-conventions-antimasonic-party-video/retro-report/
  10. https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/on-this-day-the-first-democratic-party-convention
  11. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Conservative-Party-political-party-United-Kingdom
  12. https://teachingamericanhistory.org/document/mcgovern-fraser-commission-report/
  13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2149263
  14. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-27251-2
  15. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/decline-and-fall-of-conservative-party/
  16. https://www.the-independent.com/news/uk/politics/tory-conference-thatcher-conservative-badenoch-b2840184.html
  17. https://aceproject.org/ace-en/topics/pc/pcb/pcb03/
  18. https://ballotpedia.org/Types_of_delegates
  19. https://gking.harvard.edu/files/pri.pdf
  20. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/winning-the-presidential-nomination-is-all-about-delegates-but-how-does-the-process-work
  21. https://www.fec.gov/press/resources-journalists/convention-committees-and-host-committees/
  22. https://ukandeu.ac.uk/explainers/party-conferences/
  23. https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Rule-Book-2025.pdf
  24. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-34357018
  25. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/party-conferences-are-far-from-perfect-but-our-democracy-would-not-be-better-off-without-them/
  26. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/from-the-archive-blog/2015/apr/29/clause-four-labour-party-tony-blair-20-1995
  27. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/republican-party-platform-1980
  28. https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa261.pdf
  29. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/sep/24/party-conferences-are-all-that-is-wrong-with-politics
  30. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainer/conservative-party-leadership-contests
  31. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn01366/
  32. https://millercenter.org/divisions-1968-dnc
  33. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/sep/24/labour-leadership-jeremy-corbyn-wins-landslide-victory-party
  34. https://labour.org.uk/updates/members-updates/labour-party-deputy-leadership-result-announcement/
  35. https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.12391
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176268023000940
  37. https://academic.oup.com/pa/advance-article/doi/10.1093/pa/gsaf020/8138081
  38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0261379421000469
  39. https://labour.org.uk/annual-conference/general-information/
  40. https://www.dw.com/en/german-politics-the-tricky-process-of-electing-new-party-leaders/a-59494762
  41. https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2025-07-01/germany-post-election-reckoning-spd
  42. https://www.deutschland.de/en/topic/politics/the-spd-parties-in-the-german-bundestag
  43. https://www.cpac.ca/articles/liberal-leadership-2025
  44. https://liberal.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/292/2025/01/National-Leadership-Rules.pdf
  45. https://www.cpac.ca/articles/conventions/2023-conservative
  46. https://cpc26.ca/
  47. https://foreigninterferencecommission.ca/fileadmin/foreign_interference_commission/Documents/Exhibits_and_Presentations/Overview_Reports/COM0000591.EN.pdf
  48. https://www.irishtimes.com/politics/2024/04/06/what-is-an-irish-political-party-ardfheis-and-why-does-it-matter/
  49. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq5e3lzelpwo
  50. https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/politics/arid-41260873.html
  51. https://www.local.gov.uk/party-conferences-2025
  52. https://www.conservatives.com/news/conference-policy-announcements
  53. https://grayling.com/news-and-views/conservative-party-conference-2025/
  54. https://labour.org.uk/annual-conference/information-for-delegates/
  55. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/2025-labour-party-conference
  56. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/five-party-conferences-visions-government
  57. https://news.direct/party-conference-dates-2025/
  58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/139672
  59. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/political-science/articles/10.3389/fpos.2023.1039547/full
  60. https://www.bundeswahlleiterin.de/en/parteien.html
  61. https://www.dw.com/en/germany-cdu-csu-and-spd-closer-to-coalition/a-71868076
  62. https://www.kas.de/en/political-participation-and-parties-in-germany
  63. https://cpcassets.conservative.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/20095222/5b175053974436d-1.pdf
  64. https://www.conservative.ca/
  65. https://www.ndp.ca/
  66. https://2023.liberal.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/565/2023/05/Policy-Resolutions-2023-National-Convention_OFFICIAL_ENG.pdf
  67. https://liberal.ca/liberal-party-of-canada-announces-2026-liberal-national-convention/
  68. https://www.conservative.ca/events/
  69. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Ard-Fheis
  70. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/political-science/articles/10.3389/fpos.2022.850607/full
  71. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/8/13/why-do-us-parties-hold-presidential-conventions-what-to-know-in-500-words
  72. https://aceproject.org/ace-en/topics/pc/annex/pcy/primary-elections-in-latin-america/mobile_browsing/onePag
  73. https://www.britannica.com/topic/political-convention
  74. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Democratic-National-Convention
  75. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Republican-National-Convention
  76. https://time.com/6998860/conventions-republicans-democrats-explained/
  77. https://www.senate.gov/about/parties-leadership.htm
  78. https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/party-congresses-and-conferences
  79. https://www.chathamhouse.org/publications/the-world-today/2022-08/guide-chinese-communist-partys-national-congress
  80. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1953-1960/khrushchev-20th-congress
  81. https://www.idcpc.org.cn/english2023/tjzl/cpcjj/PartyConstitution/
  82. https://www.gssc.lt/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/National-Congress-of-the-CPC.pdf
  83. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinese-communist-party
  84. https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/authoritarian-survival-and-leadership-succession-in-north-korea-and-beyond/1D1C44767A9120DF883A297B771EDF08
  85. https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/taking-receipts-political-party/national-nominating-convention/
  86. https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/super-pacs/2024
  87. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10511130/
  88. https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2024/08/economists-uncover-hidden-influence-top-campaign-donors
  89. https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/CampaignFinance.html
  90. https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/reform-money-politics/influence-big-money
  91. https://bipartisanpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Motivations-of-Political-Contributors-An-Audit.-Eitan-D-Hersh-Brian-F-Schaffner.pdf
  92. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R41542
  93. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainer/rules-funding-political-parties
  94. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/dark-money-investigations/labour-conservative-party-donations-2023-spending-analysis/
  95. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cg3j131327yo
  96. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/jul/17/mps-to-tighten-laws-allowing-foreign-donations-to-influence-uk-elections
  97. https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/media-centre/political-parties-accept-ps11m-donations-second-quarter-2025
  98. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17457289.2017.1403920
  99. https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/47652-2023-party-conferences-fail-to-significantly-shift-public-opinion-dials
  100. https://politicsuk.com/lets-point-out-the-obvious-the-green-party-stands-for-a-politics-of-denial/
  101. https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/19/democrats-2020-race-identity-politics-strategy-1000249
  102. https://www.npr.org/2018/12/20/673937768/democrats-cant-avoid-identity-politics-in-2020
  103. https://arabcenterdc.org/resource/trumps-convention-speech-and-the-rise-of-conservative-nationalism/
  104. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/06/24/public-trust-in-government-1958-2024/
  105. https://news.gallup.com/poll/651977/americans-trust-media-remains-trend-low.aspx
  106. https://gwtoday.gwu.edu/post-election-poll-shows-eroding-trust-government-and-sources-information
  107. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c33n6311577o
  108. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy5069p70x2o
  109. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/are-political-parties-trouble
  110. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/democrats-centrist-welcomefest-everything-wrong-1235356464/
  111. https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2014/sep/29/labour-conservatvies-uk-party-membership-is-tiny
  112. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0010414020919930
  113. https://theloop.ecpr.eu/the-black-box-of-authoritarian-legislatures/
  114. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-political-science-review/article/country-or-party-variations-in-party-membership-around-the-globe/E27D7922C55D76F1467AFC3B9CB2AD2A
  115. https://effectivegov.uchicago.edu/primers/primary-reform
  116. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09644000902870859
  117. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17457289.2024.2395351
  118. http://www.cfinst.org/legacy/eguide/partyconventions/pdfs/bump_rev.pdf
  119. https://journalistsresource.org/politics-and-government/election-beat-2020-convention-bounce/
  120. https://www.natesilver.net/p/how-big-will-the-bounce-be
  121. https://www.vox.com/2020/8/17/21371232/convention-polls-biden-trump-election
  122. https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.12403
  123. https://www.msnbc.com/top-stories/latest/dnc-ratings-rnc-trump-tv-crowds-rcna168089
  124. https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/23/harris-dnc-speech-trump-00176254
  125. https://www.leaderlive.co.uk/news/national/24375110.bbc-multi-party-general-election-debate-watched-3-2m-viewers-average/
  126. https://www.rutgers.edu/news/how-media-namely-news-ads-and-social-posts-can-shape-election
  127. https://poverty-action.org/study/effect-media-voting-behavior-and-political-opinions-united-states
  128. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5679709/
  129. https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2024/10/new-study-shows-that-partisanship-trumps-truth
  130. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-tech-platforms-fuel-u-s-political-polarization-and-what-government-can-do-about-it/
  131. https://democratic-erosion.org/2024/12/05/the-digital-divide-social-medias-role-in-polarization-and-democratic-backsliding/
  132. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2013464118
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.