Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Progressive music
View on Wikipedia

Progressive music is music that attempts to expand existing stylistic boundaries associated with specific genres of music.[2] The word comes from the basic concept of "progress", which refers to advancements through accumulation,[3] and is often deployed in the context of distinct genres, with progressive rock being the most notable example.[4] Music that is deemed "progressive" usually synthesizes influences from various cultural domains, such as European art music, Celtic folk, West Indian, or African.[5] It is rooted in the idea of a cultural alternative,[6] and may also be associated with auteur-stars and concept albums, considered traditional structures of the music industry.[7]
As an art theory, the progressive approach falls between formalism and eclecticism.[8][9] "Formalism" refers to a preoccupation with established external compositional systems, structural unity, and the autonomy of individual art works. Like formalism, "eclecticism" connotes a predilection toward style synthesis or integration. However, contrary to formalist tendencies, eclecticism foregrounds discontinuities between historical and contemporary styles and electronic media, sometimes referring simultaneously to vastly different musical genres, idioms, and cultural codes.[10] In marketing, "progressive" is used to distinguish a product from "commercial" pop music.[11]
Jazz
[edit]Progressive jazz is a form of big band that is more complex[12] or experimental.[1] It originated in the 1940s with arrangers who drew from modernist composers such as Igor Stravinsky and Paul Hindemith.[12][nb 1] Its "progressive" features were replete with dissonance, atonality, and brash effects.[14] Progressive jazz was most popularized by the bandleader Stan Kenton during the 1940s.[12] Critics were initially wary of the idiom.[12] Dizzy Gillespie wrote in his autobiography: "They tried to make Stan Kenton a 'white hope', called modern jazz and my music 'progressive', then tried to tell me I played 'progressive' music. I said, 'You're full of shit!' 'Stan Kenton? There ain't nothing in my music that's cold, cold like his."[15]
Progressive big band is a style of big band or swing music that was made for listening, with denser, more modernist arrangements and more room to improvise. The online music guide AllMusic states that, along with Kenton, musicians like Gil Evans, Toshiko Akiyoshi, Cal Massey, Frank Foster, Carla Bley, George Gruntz, David Amram, Sun Ra, and Duke Ellington were major proponents of the style.[16]
Pop and rock
[edit]Definitions
[edit]"Progressive rock" is almost synonymous with "art rock"; the latter is more likely to have experimental or avant-garde influences.[17] Although a unidirectional English "progressive" style emerged in the late 1960s, by 1967 progressive rock had come to constitute a diversity of loosely associated style codes.[9][nb 2] With the arrival of a "progressive" label, the music was dubbed "progressive pop" before it was called "progressive rock".[19][nb 3] "Progressive" referred to the wide range of attempts to break with the standard pop music formula.[21] A number of additional factors contributed to the label—lyrics were more poetic, technology was harnessed for new sounds, music approached the condition of "art", the album format overtook singles, some harmonic language was imported from jazz and 19th-century classical music, and the studio, rather than the stage, became the focus of musical activity, which often involved creating music for listening, not dancing.[22]
Background
[edit]Up until the mid 1960s, individual idiolects always operated within particular styles. What was so revolutionary about this post-hippie music that came to be called 'progressive' ... was that musicians acquired the facility to move between styles—the umbilical link between idiolect and style had been broken.
During the mid 1960s, pop music made repeated forays into new sounds, styles, and techniques that inspired public discourse among its listeners. The word "progressive" was frequently used, and it was thought that every song and single was to be a "progression" from the last.[23] In 1966, the degree of social and artistic dialogue among rock musicians dramatically increased for bands such as the Beach Boys, the Beatles, and the Byrds who fused elements of composed (cultivated) music with the oral (vernacular) musical traditions of rock.[3] Rock music started to take itself seriously, paralleling earlier attempts in jazz (as swing gave way to bop, a move which did not succeed with audiences). In this period, the popular song began signaling a new possible means of expression that went beyond the three-minute love song, leading to an intersection between the "underground" and the "establishment" for listening publics.[24][nb 4] The Beach Boys' leader Brian Wilson is credited for setting a precedent that allowed bands and artists to enter a recording studio and act as their own producers.[26]
The music was developed immediately following a brief period in the mid 1960s where creative authenticity among musical artists and consumer marketing coincided with each other.[27] Before the progressive pop of the late 1960s, performers were typically unable to decide on the artistic content of their music.[28] Assisted by the mid 1960s economic boom, record labels began investing in artists, giving them freedom to experiment, and offering them limited control over their content and marketing.[11][nb 5] The growing student market serviced record labels with the word "progressive", being adopted as a marketing term to differentiate their product from "commercial" pop.[11] Music critic Simon Reynolds writes that beginning with 1967, a divide would exist between "progressive" pop and "mass/chart" pop, a separation which was "also, broadly, one between boys and girls, middle-class and working-class".[30][nb 6] Before progressive/art rock became the most commercially successful British sound of the early 1970s, the 1960s psychedelic movement brought together art and commercialism, broaching the question of what it meant to be an artist in a mass medium.[31] Progressive musicians thought that artistic status depended on personal autonomy, and so the strategy of "progressive" rock groups was to present themselves as performers and composers "above" normal pop practice.[32][nb 7]

"Proto-prog" is a retrospective label for the first wave of progressive rock musicians.[35] The musicians that approached this genre harnessed modern classical and other genres usually outside of traditional rock influences, longer and more complicated compositions, interconnected songs as medley, and studio composition.[36] Progressive rock itself evolved from psychedelic/acid rock music,[3] specifically a strain of classical/symphonic rock led by the Nice, Procol Harum, and the Moody Blues.[17][nb 8] Critics assumed King Crimson's debut album In the Court of the Crimson King (1969) to be the logical extension and development of late 1960s proto-progressive rock exemplified by the Moody Blues, Procol Harum, Pink Floyd, and the Beatles.[37] According to Macan, the album may be the most influential to progressive rock for crystallizing the music of earlier "proto-progressive bands [...] into a distinctive, immediately recognizable style".[38] He distinguishes 1970s "classic" prog from late 1960s proto-prog by the conscious rejection of psychedelic rock elements, which proto-progressive bands continued to incorporate.[39]
Post-progressive
[edit]"Post-progressive" is a term invented to distinguish a type of rock music from the persistent "progressive rock" style associated with the 1970s.[40] In the mid to late 1970s, progressive music was denigrated for its assumed pretentiousness, specifically the likes of Yes, Genesis, and Emerson, Lake & Palmer.[41] According to musicologist John Covach, "by the early 1980s, progressive rock was thought to be all but dead as a style, an idea reinforced by the fact that some of the principal progressive groups has developed a more commercial sound. [...] What went out of the music of these now ex-progressive groups [...] was any significant evocation of art music."[42] In the opinion of King Crimson's Robert Fripp, "progressive" music was an attitude, not a style. He believed that genuinely "progressive" music pushes stylistic and conceptual boundaries outwards through the appropriation of procedures from classical music or jazz, and that once "progressive rock" ceased to cover new ground – becoming a set of conventions to be repeated and imitated – the genre's premise had ceased to be "progressive".[43]
A direct reaction to prog came in the form of the punk movement, which rejected classical traditions,[41] virtuosity, and textural complexity.[42][nb 9] Post-punk, which author Doyle Green characterizes "as a kind of 'progressive punk'",[44] was played by bands like Talking Heads, Pere Ubu, Public Image Ltd, and Joy Division.[41] It differs from punk rock by balancing punk's energy and skepticism with a re-engagement with an art school consciousness, Dadaist experimentalism, and atmospheric, ambient soundscapes. It was also majorly influenced from world music, especially African and Asian traditions.[41] In the same period, new wave music was more sophisticated in production terms than some contemporaneous progressive music, but was largely perceived as simplistic, and thus had little overt appeal to art music or art-music practice.[42] Musicologist Bill Martin writes; "[Talking] Heads created a kind of new-wave music that was the perfect synthesis of punk urgency and attitude and progressive-rock sophistication and creativity. A good deal of the more interesting rock since that time is clearly 'post-Talking Heads' music, but this means that it is post-progressive rock as well."[45]
Soul and funk
[edit]"Progressive soul" is used by Martin to refer to a musical development in which many African-American recording artists by the 1970s were creating music in a manner similar to progressive rock.[46] This development inspired greater musical diversity and sophistication, ambitious lyricism, and conceptual album-oriented approach in black pop.[47] Among the musicians at its forefront were Sly Stone, Stevie Wonder, Marvin Gaye, Curtis Mayfield, and George Clinton.[48] According to Geoffrey Himes, "the short-lived progressive-soul movement flourished" from 1968 to 1973 and demonstrated "adventurous rock guitar, socially conscious lyrics and classic R&B melody".[49] Similar to contemporaneous white prog musicians, progressive black musicians in the 1970s directed their creative control toward ideals of "individualism, artistic progression and writing for posterity", according to music academic Jay Keister, who notes that this pursuit sometimes conflicted with the collective political values of the Black Arts Movement.[50]
Among the stylistic characteristics shared from progressive rock in black progressive music of this period were extended composition, diverse musical appropriation, and recording music intended for listening rather than dancing. Rather than the song-based extended compositions and suites of progressive white music, black counterparts in the 1970s generally unified an extended recording with an underlying rhythmic groove. Instrumental textures were altered in order to signify a change in section over an extended track's course. Examples of these characteristics include Funkadelic's "Wars of Armageddon" (1971) and Sun Ra's "Space Is the Place" (1973).[51] Unlike the European art music appropriations used by white artists, progressive black music featured musical idioms from African and African-American music sources. However, some also borrowed elements from European American traditions to augment a song's lyrical idea. For example, Wonder added pleasant-sounding instrumental textures from a string section to "Village Ghetto Land" (1976), lending a sense of irony to an otherwise bleak critique of social ills in urban ghettos.[52]
Electronic
[edit]"Progressive electronic" is defined by AllMusic as a subgenre of new age music, and a style that "thrives in more unfamiliar territory" where the results are "often dictated by the technology itself". According to Allmusic, "rather than sampling or synthesizing acoustic sounds to electronically replicate them" producers of this music "tend to mutate the original timbres, sometimes to an unrecognizable state". Allmusic also states that "true artists in the genre also create their own sounds".[53]

Tangerine Dream's 1974 album Phaedra, recorded with a Moog sequencer, was described as "an early masterpiece of progressive electronic music" by Rolling Stone.[54] In house music, a desire to define precise stylistic strands and taste markets saw the interposition of prefixes like "progressive", "tribal", and "intelligent". According to disc jockey and producer Carl Craig, the term "progressive" was used in Detroit in the early 1980s in reference to Italian disco. The music was dubbed "progressive" because it drew upon the influence of Giorgio Moroder's Euro disco rather than the disco inspired by the symphonic Philadelphia sound.[55] By 1993, progressive house and trance music had emerged in dance clubs.[56] "Progressive house" was an English style of house distinguished by long tracks, big riffs, mild dub inflections, and multitiered percussion. According to Simon Reynolds, the "'progressive' seemed to signify not just its anti-cheese, nongirly credentials, but its severing of house's roots from gay black disco".[57]
In the mid-1990s, the lowercase movement, a reductive approach towards new digital technologies, was spearheaded by a number of so-called "progressive electronica" artists.[58]
Criticism
[edit]Reynolds[59] posited in 2013 that "the truly progressive edge in electronic music involves doing things that can't be physically achieved by human beings manipulating instruments in real-time".[59] He criticized terms like "progressive" and "intelligent", arguing that "it's usually a sign that it's gearing up the media game as a prequel to buying into traditional music industry structure of auteur-stars, concept albums, and long-term careers. Above all, it's a sign of impending musical debility, creeping self-importance, and the hemorrhaging away of fun."[60] Reynolds also identifies links between progressive rock and other electronic music genres, and that "many post-rave genres bear an uncanny resemblance to progressive rock: conceptualism, auteur-geniuses, producers making music to impress other producers, [and] showboating virtuosity reborn as the 'science' of programming finesse".[61]
Hip hop
[edit]"Progressive rap" has been used by academics to describe a certain type of hip hop music. Anthony B. Pinn regards it as a thematic subset alongside gangsta rap and "status rap", which expresses concerns about social status and mobility. While exploring existential crises and philosophical contradictions similar to gangsta rap, progressive rap, he says, "seeks to address these concerns without intracommunal aggression and in terms of political and cultural education, providing an interpretation of American society and a constructive agenda (e.g. self respect, knowledge, pride, and unity) for the uplift of Black America". He adds that works of the genre also utilize "a more overt dialogue with and interpretation of Black religiosity".[62] In a corollary analysis, fellow academic Evelyn L. Parker says that progressive rap "seeks to transform systems of injustice by transforming the perspective of their victims" while demonstrating "the clear prophetic voice reflecting the rage caused by the dehumanizing injustices that African Americans experience".[63]

Early works of progressive rap such as the 1982 Grandmaster Flash and the Furious Five song "The Message" and the music of Public Enemy featured expressions of anger about chaotic urban life.[62][63] Other formative groups such as De La Soul, A Tribe Called Quest, and Brand Nubian helped establish the genre's thematic mode.[64] At the turn of the 2000s, Outkast and The Roots were among the few progressive-rap acts who "ruminated on hip-hop's post-millennial direction" and "produced records in an avant-garde vein purposely intended to evolve the music" while achieving commercial success, according to Miles Marshall Lewis.[65] Kanye West, another influential artist in hip hop's progressive tradition, achieved even greater success with his opening trilogy of education-themed albums in the 2000s.[66] His 2010 album My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy has also been associated with prog-rap due largely to its sampling of records from progressive rock as well as its ostentatious sensibilities.[67]
The UK has also produced notable performers in progressive rap, including Gaika and Kojey Radical, who are credited by Vice in 2016 for working "deliberately outside the confines of grime and traditional UK hip hop to create genuinely progressive rap that rivals the US for creativity, urgency, and importance, and portrays a much broader black British music landscape than you hear on the radio".[68] More recently, American studies and media scholar William Hoynes highlights the progressive rap of Kendrick Lamar as being in the tradition of African-American art and activism that operated "both inside and outside of the mainstream to advance a counterculture that opposes the racist stereotypes being propagated in white-owned media and culture".[69]
Notes
[edit]- ^ According to academic Tim Wall, the most significant example of the struggle between Tin Pan Alley, African American, vernacular and art discourses was in jazz. As early as the 1930s, artists attempted to cultivate ideas of "symphonic jazz", taking it away from its perceived vernacular and black American roots. These developments succeeded in the respect that many people today no longer consider certain forms of jazz as popular music.[13]
- ^ The term was also partly related to progressive politics, but those connotations were lost early in the 1970s.[18]
- ^ Starting in about 1967, "pop music" was increasingly used in opposition to the term "rock music", a division that gave generic significance to both terms.[20]
- ^ Allan Moore writes; "It should be clear by now that, although this history appears to offer a roughly chronological succession of styles, there is no single, linear history to that thing we call popular song. [...] Sometimes it appears that there are only peripheries. Sometimes, audiences gravitate towards a centre. The most prominent period when this happened was in the early to mid 1960s when it seems that almost everyone, irrespective of age, class or cultural background, listened to the Beatles. But by 1970 this monolothic position had again broken down. Both the Edgar Broughton Band's 'Apache Dropout' and Edison Lighthouse's 'Love grows' were released in 1970 with strong Midlands/London connections, and both were audible on the same radio stations, but were operating according to very different aesthetics."[25]
- ^ This situation fell in disuse after the late 1970s and would not reemerge until the rise of Internet stars.[29]
- ^ The new pop movement of the 1980s was an attempt to bridge this divide.[30]
- ^ By 1970, a journalist at Melody Maker highlighted progressive pop as the "most fascinating and recent development" in popular music, writing that the music is "meant for a wide audience but which is intended to have more permanent value than the six weeks in the charts and the 'forget it' music of older pop forms".[33]
- ^ Author Doyle Greene believes that the "proto-prog" label can stretch to "the later Beatles and Frank Zappa", Pink Floyd, Soft Machine, and United States of America.[36] Edward Macan says that psychedelic bands like the Nice, the Moody Blues, and Pink Floyd represent a proto-progressive style and the first wave of English progressive rock.[35]
- ^ Groups such as the Sex Pistols, the Clash, and the Ramones adopted a "back-to-basics" stance, embracing the roots of rock music with direct sentiments, simple chord structures, and uncluttered arrangements.[41] While punk rock appeared to be a negation of progressive rock, both styles of music derived from the idea of a cultural alternative.[6]
References
[edit]Citations
- ^ a b "Progressive Jazz". AllMusic.
- ^ Willis 2014, p. 219, 'Progressive' music can be seen as an experimentation with alternative routes"; Moore 2004, p. 22, "What was so revolutionary about this post-hippie music that came to be called 'progressive' ... was that ... the umbilical link between idiolect and style had been broken."; Macan 1997, p. 246, "the progressive rock of the 1970s had been 'progressive' only as long as it pushed the stylistic and conceptual boundaries of rock outwards"
- ^ a b c Holm-Hudson 2013, p. 85.
- ^ Guern 2016, p. 33; Martin 1998, p. 41.
- ^ Holm-Hudson 2013, pp. 85–87.
- ^ a b Macan 2005, p. 250.
- ^ Reynolds 2013, pp. 6–7, 16.
- ^ Holm-Hudson 2013, pp. 16, 85–87.
- ^ a b Cotner 2000, p. 90.
- ^ Cotner 2000, p. 93.
- ^ a b c Allan F. Moore (1 Apr 2016). Song Means: Analysing and Interpreting Recorded Popular Song. Routledge. p. 202. ISBN 978-1-317-05265-4.
- ^ a b c d Ake, Garrett & Goldmark 2012, p. 131.
- ^ Wall 2013, pp. 42–43.
- ^ Butler 2002, pp. 103–105.
- ^ Gillespie 2009, p. 337.
- ^ "Progressive Big Band". AllMusic.
- ^ a b "Prog-Rock". AllMusic.
- ^ Robinson 2017, p. 223.
- ^ a b Moore 2004, p. 22.
- ^ Gloag, Kenneth (2006). Latham, Alison (ed.). The Oxford Companion to Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-866212-2.
- ^ Haworth & Smith 1975, p. 126.
- ^ Moore 2016, pp. 201–202.
- ^ Hewitt & Hellier 2015, p. 162.
- ^ Moore 2016, p. 201.
- ^ Moore 2016, pp. 199–200.
- ^ Edmondson 2013, p. 890.
- ^ Willis 2014, p. 219.
- ^ Willis 2014, p. 217.
- ^ Moore 2016, p. 202.
- ^ a b Reynolds 2006, p. 398.
- ^ Frith & Horne 2016, p. 99.
- ^ Frith & Horne 2016, pp. 74, 99–100.
- ^ Jacobshagen, Leniger & Henn 2007, p. 141.
- ^ Priore 2005, p. 79.
- ^ a b Holm-Hudson 2013, p. 84.
- ^ a b Greene 2016, p. 182.
- ^ Macan 2005, p. 75.
- ^ Macan 1997, p. 23.
- ^ Macan 2005, p. xxiii.
- ^ Hegarty & Halliwell 2011, p. 224.
- ^ a b c d e Rojek 2011, p. 28.
- ^ a b c Covach 1997, p. 5.
- ^ Macan 1997, p. 206.
- ^ Greene 2014, p. 173.
- ^ Martin 1998, p. 251.
- ^ Keister 2019, p. 20; Martin 1998, p. 41.
- ^ Politis 1983, p. 81; Martin 1998, p. 41; Hoard & Brackett 2004, p. 524.
- ^ Hoard & Brackett 2004, p. 524.
- ^ Himes 1990.
- ^ Keister 2019, p. 9.
- ^ Keister 2019, pp. 9–10.
- ^ Keister 2019, p. 10.
- ^ "Progressive Electronic". AllMusic.
- ^ Epstein, Dan. "50 Greatest Prog Rock Albums of All Time". Rolling Stone. Retrieved 18 February 2022.
- ^ Reynolds 2013, pp. 7, 16.
- ^ Reynolds 2013, p. 184.
- ^ Reynolds 2013, p. 376.
- ^ Potter & Gann 2016, p. 178.
- ^ a b Reynolds 2013, p. 50.
- ^ Reynolds 2013, pp. 6–7.
- ^ Reynolds 2013, p. 386.
- ^ a b Pinn, Anthony (2005). "Rap Music and Its Message". In Forbes, Bruce; Mahan, Jeffrey H. (eds.). Religion and Popular Culture in America. University of California Press. pp. 262–263. ISBN 9780520932579. Retrieved March 1, 2021 – via Google Books.
- ^ a b Parker, Evelyn L. (2003). Trouble Don't Last Always: Emancipatory Hope Among African American Adolescents. Pilgrim Press. ISBN 9780829821031.
- ^ Tate, Greg (2004). "Diatribe". In Cepeda, Raquel (ed.). And It Don't Stop: The Best American Hip-Hop Journalism of the Last 25 Years. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. p. 155. ISBN 9781466810464.
- ^ Lewis, Miles Marshall (August 9, 2007). "Common". Dallas Observer. Retrieved July 14, 2021.
- ^ Hussain, Shahzaib (November 23, 2008). "Renegade Man: The Legacy of Kanye West's '808s & Heartbreak'". Highsnobiety. Retrieved July 16, 2021.
- ^ Deville, Chris (November 20, 2020). "Kanye West 'My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy' 10th Anniversary Review". Stereogum. Retrieved March 1, 2021.
- ^ Vinti, Mike (January 29, 2016). "Beyond Grime: Why You Need to be Paying Attention to Britain's Other Rap Scenes". Vice. Retrieved March 1, 2021.
- ^ Croteau, David; Hoynes, William; Childress, Clayton (2021). Media/Society: Technology, Industries, Content, and Users. SAGE Publications. p. 274. ISBN 9781071819319.
Sources
- Ake, David Andrew; Garrett, Charles Hiroshi; Goldmark, Daniel (2012). Jazz/not Jazz: The Music and Its Boundaries. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-27103-6.
- Butler, David (2002). Jazz Noir: Listening to Music from Phantom Lady to The Last Seduction. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-275-97301-8.
- Cochrane, Naima (March 26, 2020). "2000: A Soul Odyssey". Billboard. Retrieved January 23, 2021.
- Cotner, John S. (2000). "Music Theory and Progressive Rock Style Analysis". Reflections on American Music: The Twentieth Century and the New Millennium. Pendragon Press. ISBN 978-1-57647-070-1.
- Covach, John (1997). "Progressive Rock, 'Close to the Edge', and the Boundaries of Style" (PDF). In John Covach; Graeme M. Boone (eds.). Understanding Rock: Essays in Musical Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Easlea, Daryl (2018). "18: The Tremble in the Hips: So". Without Frontiers: The Life & Music of Peter Gabriel (Revised and Updated ed.). Omnibus Press. ISBN 978-1-787-59082-3.
- Edmondson, Jacqueline, ed. (2013). Music in American Life: An Encyclopedia of the Songs, Styles, Stars, and Stories that Shaped our Culture. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-0-313-39348-8.
- * Frith, Simon; Horne, Howard (2016) [First published 1988]. Art Into Pop. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-22803-5.
- Gillespie, Dizzy (2009). To Be, Or Not-- to Bop. University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 978-0-8166-6547-1.
- Green, Tony (March 2002). "Joi: Star Kity's Revenge (Universal)". Spin. Retrieved January 23, 2021 – via Google Books.
- Greene, Doyle (2014). The Rock Cover Song: Culture, History, Politics. McFarland. ISBN 978-1-4766-1507-3.
- Greene, Doyle (2016). Rock, Counterculture and the Avant-Garde, 1966–1970: How the Beatles, Frank Zappa and the Velvet Underground Defined an Era. McFarland. ISBN 978-1-4766-2403-7.
- Guern, Philippe Le (2016). Stereo: Comparative Perspectives on the Sociological Study of Popular Music in France and Britain. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-05001-8.
- Haworth, John Trevor; Smith, Michael A. (1975). Work and Leisure: An Interdisciplinary Study in Theory, Education and Planning. Lepus Books. ISBN 9780860190097.
- Hegarty, Paul; Halliwell, Martin (2011). Beyond and Before: Progressive Rock Since the 1960s. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-8264-2332-0.
- Hoard, Christian; Brackett, Nathan, eds. (2004). The New Rolling Stone Album Guide. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 9780743201698.
- Holm-Hudson, Kevin, ed. (2013). Progressive Rock Reconsidered. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-71022-4.
- Hewitt, Paolo; Hellier, John (2015). Steve Marriott: All Too Beautiful. Dean Street Press. ISBN 978-1-910570-69-2.
- Himes, Geoffrey (May 16, 1990). "Records". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 26, 2021.
- Himes, Geoffrey (October 12, 2011). "Bilal '1st Born Second'". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 23, 2021.
- Jacobshagen, Arnold; Leniger, Markus; Henn, Benedikt (2007). Rebellische Musik: gesellschaftlicher Protest und kultureller Wandel um 1968. Verlag Dohr. ISBN 978-3-936655-48-3.
- Keister, Jay (2019). "Black Prog: Soul, Funk, Intellect and the Progressive Side of Black Music of the 1970s" (PDF). American Music Research Center Journal. 28. Retrieved January 26, 2021 – via colorado.edu.
- Macan, Edward (1997). Rocking the Classics: English Progressive Rock and the Counterculture. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-509887-7.
- Macan, Edward (2005). Endless Enigma: A Musical Biography of Emerson, Lake and Palmer. Open Court. ISBN 978-0-8126-9596-0.
- Martin, Bill (1998). Listening to the Future: The Time of Progressive Rock. Chicago: Open Court. ISBN 0-8126-9368-X.
- Moore, Allan (2004). Jethro Tull's Aqualung. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4411-1315-3.
- Moore, Allan F. (2016). Song Means: Analysing and Interpreting Recorded Popular Song. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-05265-4.
- Politis, John (1983). "Rock Music's Place in the Library". Drexel Library Quarterly. 19.
- Potter, Keith; Gann, Kyle (2016). The Ashgate Research Companion to Minimalist and Postminimalist Music. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-04255-6.
- Priore, Domenic (2005). Smile: The Story of Brian Wilson's Lost Masterpiece. London: Sanctuary. ISBN 1860746276.
- Reynolds, Simon (2006). "New Pop and its Aftermath". On Record: Rock, Pop and the Written Word. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-93951-0.
- Reynolds, Simon (2013). Generation Ecstasy: Into the World of Techno and Rave Culture. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-136-78316-6.
- Robinson, Emily (2017). The Language of Progressive Politics in Modern Britain. Palgrave Macmillan UK. ISBN 978-1-137-50664-1.
- Rojek, Chris (2011). Pop Music, Pop Culture. Polity. ISBN 978-0-7456-4263-5.
- Wall, Tim (2013). Studying Popular Music Culture. SAGE Publications. ISBN 978-1-4462-9101-6.
- Willis, Paul E. (2014). Profane Culture. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-6514-7.
Further reading
[edit]- Gendron, Bernard (2002). Between Montmartre and the Mudd Club: Popular Music and the Avant-Garde. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-28735-5.
- Official Charts Company (September 4, 2015). "Progressive music you didn't know you loved". Official Charts Company.
- Romano, Will (2014). Prog Rock FAQ: All That's Left to Know About Rock's Most Progressive Music. Backbeat Books. ISBN 978-1-61713-620-7.
- Smith, Bradley (1997). The Billboard Guide to Progressive Music. Billboard Books. ISBN 978-0-8230-7665-9.
Progressive music
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Characteristics
Core Definition
Progressive music denotes musical compositions that endeavor to extend the stylistic and technical frontiers of established genres through innovation, complexity, and fusion of disparate influences.[12] This approach prioritizes artistic ambition over commercial conventions, frequently resulting in works that challenge listeners with intricate arrangements and conceptual depth rather than adherence to verse-chorus structures.[1] Central characteristics encompass elongated song forms, often structured as multi-part suites with extended instrumental sections; employment of unconventional time signatures, such as 7/4 or 11/8, to create rhythmic intricacy; and amplified instrumentation that incorporates keyboards, orchestral elements, and virtuosic displays from performers.[12] Vocals, when present, emphasize dynamic range and narrative sophistication, supporting thematic lyrics drawn from literature, philosophy, or mythology, as seen in concept albums that unfold cohesive stories across tracks.[1] These elements distinguish progressive music from mainstream variants by fostering intellectual engagement and technical prowess, though the term functions descriptively rather than prescriptively, applying to evolutions within rock, metal, jazz fusion, and electronic forms.[12]Musical Features and Techniques
Progressive music emphasizes compositional complexity, often diverging from the standard verse-chorus framework of mainstream rock in favor of multi-part suites, thematic development, and through-composed forms that evoke classical music structures. Songs frequently extend beyond typical pop durations, incorporating extended instrumental passages, dynamic shifts between intense crescendos and delicate interludes, and narrative progression akin to symphonic movements.[1][3] This approach prioritizes musical ambition over commercial accessibility, with compositions that unfold as cohesive stories rather than repetitive hooks. Rhythmic techniques in progressive music commonly feature unconventional time signatures, polyrhythms, and frequent metric modulations, challenging listeners' expectations of steady 4/4 grooves. Examples include 5/4, 7/8, and compound meters, which create propulsion and tension, as heard in works by bands like King Crimson and Yes.[3][13] These elements demand virtuosic ensemble coordination and precision, often executed through interlocking patterns between drums, bass, and guitar. Instrumentation expands beyond standard rock setups, integrating orchestral elements such as flutes, violins, and woodwinds alongside electric guitars, with heavy reliance on keyboards like the Mellotron, Hammond organ, and early synthesizers (e.g., Moog) for textural depth and emulation of classical timbres.[1] Studio techniques further enhance these features, including tape loops, multi-tracking, and experimental effects like phasing and reverse playback, which contribute to immersive soundscapes.[1] Virtuosic solos—particularly on guitar, keyboards, and drums—serve as vehicles for improvisation within structured frameworks, blending jazz-inflected phrasing with rock energy.[3][13] ![Pink Floyd's The Dark Side of the Moon album cover, exemplifying progressive music's innovative studio techniques]float-rightHistorical Influences
Progressive music, particularly in its rock manifestations, emerged from a synthesis of earlier genres that emphasized experimentation, structural complexity, and departure from commercial pop conventions. Key influences included the intricate compositions and thematic depth of 20th-century classical music, which prog musicians adapted through rock instrumentation to achieve symphonic scale; for instance, British bands in the late 1960s drew on the rhythmic innovation and dissonance of Igor Stravinsky's works, as well as the contrapuntal techniques of Johann Sebastian Bach, to craft extended suites and multi-movement pieces.[14] [15] This classical infusion was not mere imitation but a deliberate elevation of rock's artistic ambitions, mirroring the modernist expansions seen in composers like Béla Bartók and Gustav Holst, whose folk-infused orchestral pieces informed prog's thematic storytelling and modal explorations.[16] Jazz contributed improvisational freedom, polyrhythms, and advanced harmonic progressions, bridging the gap between structured composition and spontaneous expression. In Britain during the mid-1960s, groups like the Canterbury scene's Soft Machine and Caravan integrated jazz's emphasis on odd meters and ensemble interplay—evident in Miles Davis's electric fusions from albums like Bitches Brew (1970)—to infuse rock with virtuosic solos and fusion elements, predating prog's full bloom but laying groundwork for bands such as Traffic and Colosseum.[14] [2] Psychedelic and experimental rock from the mid-1960s provided a foundational push against verse-chorus rigidity, with acts like the Beatles' Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (1967) and Pink Floyd's early improvisations incorporating tape loops, studio effects, and Eastern scales to expand song forms into conceptual narratives.[1] Folk traditions added pastoral lyricism and acoustic textures, as seen in British prog's evocation of medieval and Celtic motifs, while avant-garde elements from John Cage and Karlheinz Stockhausen encouraged sonic experimentation with electronics and prepared instruments.[2] These influences converged in the late 1960s UK scene, driven by technological advances like multitrack recording, enabling musicians to prioritize technical prowess and intellectualism over mass appeal.[17]Historical Development
Origins and Early Experiments (Pre-1960s)
The origins of progressive music trace back to experimental efforts in jazz during the 1940s, particularly through bandleader Stan Kenton's orchestras, which integrated complex harmonies and structures influenced by twentieth-century classical composers such as Claude Debussy, Igor Stravinsky, and Béla Bartók.[18] Kenton's "Progressive Jazz" period, spanning September 1947 to December 1948, featured innovative arrangements that expanded beyond traditional swing, employing larger ensembles and modernist elements to create a more ambitious form of jazz expression.[19] In 1950, Kenton launched the Innovations in Modern Music Orchestra, a 39-piece ensemble that further blurred lines between jazz and classical music by commissioning works from arrangers like Pete Rugolo and Shorty Rogers, aiming to establish a new American concert music tradition with extended compositions and sophisticated orchestration.[20] These efforts represented early attempts to elevate jazz through formal complexity and interdisciplinary fusion, laying conceptual groundwork for later progressive developments despite commercial challenges.[21] By the mid-1950s, additional experiments emerged, including Gunther Schuller's coining of "Third Stream" in a 1957 Brandeis University lecture, describing a deliberate synthesis of jazz improvisation with classical composition techniques, as exemplified in his own work Transformation for jazz ensemble that year.[22] This approach encouraged hybrid forms that prioritized structural innovation over conventional genre boundaries, influencing subsequent fusions in the genre.[23]Emergence and Innovation (1960s)
The mid-1960s marked the initial experiments in rock music that deviated from standard three-minute pop songs toward extended compositions, orchestral integrations, and studio innovations, influenced by psychedelic exploration and cross-genre borrowings from jazz and classical traditions.[2] Bands in the UK and US pushed boundaries amid the countercultural shift, with advancements in multitrack recording and synthesizers enabling denser soundscapes.[1] This period's innovations included concept albums and satirical critiques, as seen in Frank Zappa and the Mothers of Invention's Freak Out!, released on June 27, 1966, which was only the second double album in rock history and featured experimental collages blending doo-wop, spoken word, and avant-garde noise.[24] In 1967, several releases crystallized these trends. The Beatles' Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, issued on May 26, 1967, in the UK, employed artificial double-tracking, tape loops, and orchestral swells to create a cohesive "concept" album, inspiring musicians to view albums as artistic wholes rather than song collections and earning recognition as a foundational influence on progressive structures.[25] Similarly, the Moody Blues' Days of Future Passed, released November 10, 1967, fused rock instrumentation with the London Festival Orchestra's arrangements, using the Mellotron for symphonic emulation and framing tracks as a day-cycle narrative, which helped pioneer the orchestral-prog hybrid.[26] Pink Floyd's debut The Piper at the Gates of Dawn, out on August 5, 1967, emphasized psychedelic improvisation and literary themes drawn from Syd Barrett's visions, incorporating tape effects and non-standard song forms that foreshadowed progressive rock's emphasis on atmosphere over verse-chorus rigidity.[27] By late 1969, these elements coalesced into a definable style with King Crimson's In the Court of the Crimson King, released October 10, 1969, featuring Mellotron-driven epics like "21st Century Schizoid Man" and jazz-inflected rhythms, which Rolling Stone later described as the "big bang of prog rock" for its fusion of heavy riffs, free-form improvisation, and mythological storytelling.[28] These works collectively innovated by prioritizing technical virtuosity, thematic depth, and production experimentation, setting progressive music apart from mainstream rock while drawing from the era's technological advances like the Moog synthesizer's commercial availability around 1965-1967.[29]Commercial Peak and Expansion (1970s)
The 1970s represented the commercial apex of progressive rock, as ensembles such as Pink Floyd, Yes, Genesis, and Emerson, Lake & Palmer attained widespread chart dominance and substantial album sales in major markets including the United States and United Kingdom. Pink Floyd's The Dark Side of the Moon, released on March 1, 1973, exemplifies this era's breakthroughs, achieving number-one status on the Billboard 200 for a week and amassing sales estimates exceeding 45 million units worldwide, ranking it among the highest-selling albums in history.[30] Similarly, Yes's Fragile (1971) peaked at number four on the Billboard 200, while Emerson, Lake & Palmer's Tarkus (1971) reached the top ten in both the US and UK, underscoring the genre's appeal to broad audiences through elaborate compositions and studio innovations.[31] Jethro Tull and King Crimson also contributed to this surge, with albums like Tull's Aqualung (1971) entering the US top five, reflecting prog's integration of classical, jazz, and rock elements into marketable long-form works.[32] This period saw progressive rock expand beyond core rock structures into hybrid forms, notably jazz fusion, where bands fused improvisational jazz techniques with rock's electric instrumentation and rhythmic drive. Groups like the Mahavishnu Orchestra, formed in 1971 by John McLaughlin, and Return to Forever, led by Chick Corea, achieved commercial viability through albums such as McLaughlin's The Inner Mounting Flame (1971) and Corea's Hymn of the Seventh Galaxy (1973), which blended modal jazz, Indian influences, and high-energy rock grooves to attract fusion enthusiasts and prog fans alike.[33] Weather Report's Heavy Weather (1977), featuring hits like "Birdland," further exemplified this crossover, selling over 500,000 copies and peaking at number 30 on the Billboard 200, thus broadening progressive experimentation into accessible jazz-rock territories.[34] Electronic music also absorbed progressive tendencies during the decade, with acts like Kraftwerk pioneering synthesizer-driven compositions that influenced subsequent prog derivatives. Kraftwerk's Autobahn (1974), a 22-minute title track condensed for radio, charted in the UK top ten and sold over a million copies, demonstrating how minimalist, conceptual electronic works could achieve commercial traction akin to prog rock's ambitious narratives.[33] These expansions highlighted progressive music's adaptability, as core bands toured extensively—such as Yes's 1970s arena spectacles—and inspired subgenres, though punk's rise by decade's end began challenging prog's dominance.[31]Decline and Fragmentation (1980s)
The 1980s marked a period of sharp decline for progressive rock's mainstream viability, as the genre's emphasis on extended compositions and technical virtuosity clashed with shifting cultural and commercial priorities. The rise of punk and new wave in the late 1970s, which prioritized raw energy, brevity, and anti-elitist simplicity, eroded prog's dominance by portraying it as overly intellectual and detached from youthful rebellion.[35] This backlash intensified in the early 1980s, with critics and audiences dismissing prog as pretentious amid broader fatigue with its perceived staleness.[35] Concurrently, the launch of MTV in August 1981 amplified visual spectacle and concise formats, favoring image-driven pop and new wave acts over prog's album-oriented depth, which ill-suited three-minute video constraints.[36] Commercial pressures exacerbated the downturn, as record labels pushed bands toward accessible structures to recapture audiences amid slumping LP sales for complex works. Many pioneering acts fragmented: Emerson, Lake & Palmer effectively disbanded after Love Beach (1978) failed to sustain momentum, while Gentle Giant ceased operations by 1980 following underwhelming reception to Civil Surface (1979). King Crimson, under Robert Fripp, entered dormancy after Discipline (1981), pivoting to experimental math rock elements that diverged from symphonic prog norms. Sales data underscored the shift; whereas 1970s prog albums like Yes's Close to the Edge (1972) achieved gold status, 1980s equivalents struggled, with genre-wide viability confined to niche markets.[35] Surviving bands often adapted by incorporating pop sensibilities, diluting prog's core traits for chart success, which fueled debates over authenticity. Genesis, post-Peter Gabriel, streamlined via Duke (March 1980) and Abacab (September 1981), culminating in Invisible Touch (September 1986), which sold over 6 million copies in the U.S. alone but prioritized hooks over narrative suites. Yes's 90125 (November 1983), featuring "Owner of a Lonely Heart" (a #1 Billboard Hot 100 single in January 1984), embraced synthesizers and verse-chorus forms, marking a "radical departure" from epics like Tales from Topographic Oceans (1973). Rush followed suit with Permanent Waves (January 1980) and Signals (September 1982), blending prog instrumentation with radio-friendly concision. Supergroup Asia's self-titled debut (March 1982) topped charts with polished AOR, exemplifying fragmentation into "stadium rock." These concessions sustained careers but alienated purists, who viewed them as concessions to commercialism over artistic integrity.[36][35] Parallel to mainstream dilution, an underground neo-prog revival emerged in Britain around 1980, reviving symphonic elements for dedicated fans amid the genre's fragmentation. Marillion's Script for a Jester's Tear (March 1983) channeled Genesis influences with emotive vocals and concept-driven tracks, achieving modest UK success (peaking at #8 on the Albums Chart). IQ's The Wake (May 1985) and Pendragon's The Jewel (1984, reissued 1985) echoed 1970s grandeur through keyboards and odd meters, fostering a circuit of prog festivals and fanzines. This subgenre, while innovative in sustaining complexity, remained marginal, with sales dwarfed by pop-prog hybrids and confined to cult followings, signaling prog's retreat from cultural forefront to specialized enclaves.[37]Revivals and Evolution (1990s–Present)
The 1990s marked a niche revival of progressive rock amid broader commercial dominance of grunge and alternative music, with the neo-progressive subgenre sustaining interest through bands emphasizing symphonic arrangements and conceptual storytelling, such as IQ's Ever (1993) and Pendragon's The Window (1993).[38] This continuation from 1980s neo-prog acts like Marillion built on melodic hooks and keyboard-driven soundscapes, though sales remained limited outside dedicated fanbases.[39] Concurrently, progressive metal emerged as a commercially viable evolution, blending rock complexity with heavier riffs and extended solos; Dream Theater's Images and Words (1992) sold over 500,000 copies in the U.S. by 1994, propelled by the radio hit "Pull Me Under," which peaked at No. 10 on Billboard's Mainstream Rock chart.[40] Swedish bands like Änglagård revived 1970s-style symphonic prog with Epilog (1994), incorporating flute and Mellotron to evoke King Crimson influences without overt retroism.[41] Entering the 2000s, progressive music evolved through fusions with metal and alternative rock, as Porcupine Tree's In Absentia (2002) integrated psychedelic atmospheres with djent-like guitar tones, achieving sales exceeding 100,000 units and influencing a generation toward more introspective, album-oriented structures.[42] Opeth's Damnation (2003) and Ghost Reveries (2005) exemplified death-prog hybrids, shifting from growls to clean vocals and orchestral swells, with Ghost Reveries topping Japanese charts and earning over 4 million streams on Spotify by 2020.[42] Tool's Lateralus (2001) expanded the genre's reach into mainstream alternative, selling 1 million copies in its first year via polyrhythmic patterns and philosophical lyrics, while maintaining prog's emphasis on technical precision over verse-chorus simplicity.[40] These works reflected a causal shift toward digital production enabling intricate layering, though critics noted a dilution of pure prog's classical ambitions in favor of metal's aggression.[1] The 2010s onward saw further evolution with shorter, more accessible compositions amid streaming's rise, yet retaining core traits like time signature shifts and thematic depth; Haken's Visions (2011) fused djent, jazz, and prog rock in a 56-minute suite, garnering acclaim for its narrative cohesion and over 10 million Spotify streams by 2023.[42] Big Big Train's English Electric (2012) revived pastoral symphonic prog with folk elements, achieving cult status through vinyl reissues and festival performances.[43] Festivals like Cruise to the Edge, launched in 2015, hosted over 2,000 attendees annually by 2019, featuring acts such as Yes and Steven Wilson, signaling institutional support for live immersion in complex material.[44] Contemporary manifestations include math-prog in bands like Caligula's Horse's In Contact (2017), which layered hyper-technical riffs with emotional arcs, and broader infiltrations into indie and post-metal, though purists argue this fragments the genre's unified experimental ethos.[45] Overall, empirical data from platforms like Progarchives indicates sustained output—over 500 new releases yearly by 2020—driven by niche markets rather than mass appeal, with prog metal subvariants comprising 40% of modern entries.[46]Primary Manifestations in Rock
Progressive Rock Pioneers
The pioneers of progressive rock were predominantly British musicians and bands active from the late 1960s, who fused rock instrumentation with classical structures, jazz improvisation, and literary themes to create extended, narrative-driven compositions that rejected the verse-chorus pop formula. This shift arose from dissatisfaction with blues-based rock's limitations, drawing on influences like Bartók, Stravinsky, and jazz fusion to emphasize technical proficiency and conceptual ambition. Key figures included keyboardists like Keith Emerson and Rick Wakeman, whose virtuosity on organs and synthesizers enabled orchestral emulation within rock ensembles.[47] Early harbingers appeared in 1967, with The Moody Blues' Days of Future Passed (released November 10, 1967) integrating the band's Mellotron and guitars with the London Festival Orchestra's strings across a day-in-the-life suite, achieving commercial success by peaking at No. 27 on the Billboard 200 and introducing symphonic-rock hybrids.[26] Procol Harum's "A Whiter Shade of Pale" (issued May 12, 1967) similarly blended Bach-inspired Hammond organ with bluesy vocals, selling over 10 million copies worldwide and signaling rock's embrace of baroque counterpoint.[48] The Nice, formed in 1967 around Emerson's explosive keyboard adaptations of Bach and Holst, further bridged classical and rock through live deconstructions, releasing their debut The Thoughts of Emerlist Davjack in 1968 and influencing supergroup formations.[49] By 1969, foundational albums solidified the genre. King Crimson's In the Court of the Crimson King (October 10, 1969), led by Robert Fripp's guitar and Greg Lake's Mellotron, debuted at No. 5 on the UK charts with tracks like "21st Century Schizoid Man" featuring jagged time signatures (7/8 and 4/4) and distorted vocals, establishing prog's hallmark complexity and dystopian lyricism.[47] Yes's self-titled debut (July 25, 1969), fronted by Jon Anderson's ethereal vocals and Bill Bruford's jazz-inflected drums, explored modal harmonies and improvisational structures, laying groundwork for their later epics despite initial commercial underperformance.[50] Jethro Tull's Stand Up (July 1969), introducing flautist Ian Anderson's folk-prog fusion and Martin Barre's riffing, peaked at No. 20 in the UK with flute-driven odd meters in "Bourrée," blending British folk with progressive experimentation.[51] These acts' innovations—evident in studio techniques like multi-tracking Mellotrons and tape loops—propelled the genre's expansion, with subsequent pioneers like Emerson, Lake & Palmer (formed 1970) amplifying classical-rock synthesis through amplified Moog solos and Mars, the Bringer of War adaptations, though their debut followed the 1969 trailblazers.[52] This British core dominated early prog, exporting its sound via tours and albums that sold millions, though American critics later debated its accessibility amid rising punk influences.[50]Subgenres and Variations
Symphonic progressive rock emphasizes grand orchestral textures, multi-sectional compositions, and classical influences, often employing Mellotron and synthesizers to evoke symphonic forms. Bands such as Yes, with their 1971 album The Yes Album featuring extended tracks like "Starship Trooper," and Genesis, whose 1972 release Foxtrot included the 23-minute epic "Supper's Ready," exemplified this style through intricate arrangements and thematic suites.[53] [1] The Canterbury scene, originating from musicians associated with the University of Kent and London, integrated jazz improvisation, psychedelia, and rock rhythms in a whimsical, ensemble-driven manner. Key acts like Soft Machine, whose 1970 album Third showcased free-form jazz explorations over rock foundations, and Caravan, with In the Land of Grey and Pink (1971) blending Canterbury's signature humor and polyrhythms, defined this variation's emphasis on collective creativity rather than virtuosic display.[54] [55] Krautrock, a German experimental strand, rejected traditional song structures in favor of repetitive motorik beats, electronic textures, and avant-garde improvisation, influencing broader progressive developments. Pioneers including Can, whose 1971 album Tago Mago featured hypnotic grooves and tape manipulations, and Neu!, with their 1972 debut's minimalist propulsion, prioritized atmospheric immersion over narrative progression.[56] [33] Jazz fusion elements within progressive rock highlighted polyrhythmic complexity, modal improvisation, and fusion of electric instruments with acoustic jazz techniques. The Mahavishnu Orchestra's 1971 album The Inner Mounting Flame, led by John McLaughlin, combined rapid scalar runs and odd meters with rock energy, while Return to Forever's 1974 Hymn of the Seventh Galaxy integrated Latin influences and high-speed solos.[57] [33] Art rock variations diverged by stressing conceptual innovation, theatricality, and eclectic borrowing over symphonic scale, often incorporating glam or modernist aesthetics. Roxy Music's 1972 debut album blended lounge, artifice, and avant-garde noise, contrasting progressive rock's structural ambition with a focus on sonic novelty and cultural critique.[1][58]Key Albums and Milestones
King Crimson's In the Court of the Crimson King, released on October 10, 1969, is frequently cited as the inaugural progressive rock album, introducing extended compositions, jazz influences, and Mellotron-driven soundscapes that defined the genre's early parameters.[59] The track "21st Century Schizoid Man" exemplified its fusion of heavy riffing with avant-garde elements, influencing subsequent bands.[60] Emerson, Lake & Palmer's Tarkus, issued on June 14, 1971, marked a milestone in symphonic prog through its titular 29-minute suite depicting an armadillo-tank's dystopian battles, showcasing virtuosic keyboards and conceptual ambition.[61] The album's elaborate production and live adaptability solidified ELP's role in elevating rock instrumentation.[62] Yes's Close to the Edge (September 13, 1972) represented a pinnacle of technical complexity, anchored by the 18-minute title suite drawing from Hermann Hesse's Siddhartha for spiritual themes amid intricate time signatures and multi-part structures.[63] Its layered arrangements and vocal harmonies pushed prog's boundaries in cohesion and innovation.[64] Pink Floyd's The Dark Side of the Moon, released March 1, 1973, in the US, achieved unprecedented commercial success for prog, spending 937 weeks on the Billboard 200 and integrating thematic explorations of time, madness, and mortality with seamless studio effects.[65] This album bridged experimental prog with accessibility, selling over 45 million copies worldwide.[66] Genesis's Selling England by the Pound (October 5, 1973) exemplified narrative-driven symphonic prog, blending English pastoralism with satirical lyrics in tracks like "Firth of Fifth," which highlighted Tony Banks' piano and Steve Hackett's guitar textures.[67] It peaked at No. 3 in the UK, underscoring the band's maturation in blending folk, classical, and rock elements.[68]Extensions to Other Genres
Progressive Elements in Jazz
Progressive elements in jazz emerged prominently in the 1940s through bandleader Stan Kenton's innovations, where he applied the term "progressive jazz" to his orchestra's complex arrangements, loud brass sections, and integrations of classical music influences from composers like Igor Stravinsky and Béla Bartók. Kenton's ensembles, active from 1941 onward, emphasized symphonic scale and modernist dissonance over swing-era danceability, as evidenced by recordings like Artistry in Rhythm (1944), which featured extended compositions and polyphonic textures.[18][69] In the late 1950s, the Third Stream movement formalized progressive synthesis by merging jazz improvisation with classical composition, coined by Gunther Schuller in 1957 to describe works retaining jazz's rhythmic vitality and spontaneity alongside structured forms and orchestration. Key recordings include Schuller's Modern Jazz Concert (1958), which combined brass ensembles with improvisers like Jimmy Giuffre, producing hybrid pieces that expanded harmonic and formal boundaries beyond traditional jazz standards. This approach prioritized intellectual rigor and cross-genre fusion, influencing subsequent experimentalists.[70] Avant-garde jazz from the late 1950s onward introduced progressive complexity via atonality, collective improvisation, and rejection of chord changes, as pioneered by Ornette Coleman's The Shape of Jazz to Come (1959), which employed "harmolodics" for equal weighting of melody, harmony, and rhythm. John Coltrane's modal explorations in A Love Supreme (1965) and free-form ascents in Ascension (1966) further embodied these elements through extended durations, multiphonic techniques, and spiritual abstraction, challenging listener expectations with dense, evolving sonic landscapes.[71] The 1970s jazz fusion era amplified progressive traits by incorporating electric instrumentation, rock grooves, and amplified virtuosity, notably in Miles Davis's Bitches Brew (1970), a double album of 94 minutes blending funk rhythms, Indian influences, and studio editing for non-linear structures. Groups like the Mahavishnu Orchestra, formed in 1971 by John McLaughlin, fused high-speed improvisation with odd meters and Eastern scales, as on The Inner Mounting Flame (1971), bridging jazz's exploratory ethos with progressive rock's conceptual ambition. These developments prioritized technical innovation and genre transcendence, yielding works with symphonic scope and improvisational depth.[72][73]Applications in Electronic Music
Electronic music adopted progressive principles—such as extended compositions, unconventional structures, and fusion of classical or jazz influences with technological innovation—primarily through the pioneering use of synthesizers and tape manipulation in the late 1960s and early 1970s. This application diverged from rock's guitar-centric focus by emphasizing timbral exploration and sequencer-driven evolution, creating immersive, narrative-driven soundscapes that eschewed verse-chorus conventions for modular, improvisatory forms. Early exemplars emerged from Germany's kosmische and Berlin School movements, where artists like Tangerine Dream crafted albums with layered electronic textures akin to progressive rock's symphonic ambitions.[74][75] A landmark was Tangerine Dream's Phaedra, released on 8 February 1974, which integrated Moog synthesizers and sequencers to produce 40-minute suites of pulsating rhythms and cosmic drones, achieving commercial success with over 500,000 copies sold by 1975 and influencing subsequent electronic experimentation. Klaus Schulze's solo debut Irrlicht (1972) further exemplified this by processing concert grand piano and organs through effects for droning, multi-part compositions exceeding 20 minutes, drawing from Stockhausen-inspired electronic traditions while echoing progressive rock's instrumental depth. These works prioritized sonic architecture over danceability, with Schulze's output alone spanning over 60 albums by 2020, underscoring the genre's emphasis on endurance and evolution.[74] Kraftwerk's Trans-Europe Express (March 1977) applied progressive conceptualism to minimalist electronics, blending robotic vocals, custom-built instruments, and thematic suites that critiqued modernity, selling over 500,000 units and shaping both ambient and synth-pop trajectories. In parallel, Manuel Göttsching's E2-E4 (1984), a 55-minute seamless improvisation on guitar and drum machine, prefigured minimal techno while embodying progressive endurance, with its 2010s reappraisal crediting it as a foundational electronic milestone. By the 1990s, digital tools enabled further applications in subgenres like intelligent dance music (IDM), where Aphex Twin's Selected Ambient Works Volume II (1994) deployed fractal rhythms and abstract ambient structures, rejecting club norms for headphone-listening complexity and selling over 100,000 copies independently. This evolution extended progressive tenets into glitch and experimental electronica, as seen in Autechre's algorithmic compositions from Tri Repetae (1995), which fragmented beats into non-repetitive patterns, amassing critical acclaim for structural innovation.[76] Despite commercial fragmentation, these electronic applications preserved progressive music's core through verifiable metrics: Tangerine Dream's discography exceeds 100 releases, with Berlin School influencing over 20% of ambient citations in electronic historiography analyses.[75]Influences in Funk, Soul, and Hip Hop
Parliament-Funkadelic, under George Clinton's leadership, fused funk with psychedelic rock and progressive elements, including extended improvisational structures, heavy guitar riffs inspired by acid rock, and conceptual sci-fi narratives across multi-album arcs. This approach is evident in Funkadelic's Maggot Brain (released July 1971), which features a 10-minute title track with Eddie Hazel's guitar solo evoking progressive rock's emphasis on virtuosity and emotional depth.[77] Clinton drew from British Invasion sounds and progressive rock to expand R&B's rhythmic foundations into sludgy, experimental territories, as he noted in a 2018 interview.[78] In soul music, progressive tendencies emerged through artists like Stevie Wonder, whose self-produced albums in the early 1970s integrated synthesizers, polyrhythms, and orchestral arrangements to transcend standard soul formats. Wonder's Talking Book (October 27, 1972) and Innervisions (August 3, 1973) exemplify this with tracks like "Superstition," employing clavinet riffs and modal harmonies akin to jazz fusion's complexity, while addressing social issues in extended compositions.[79] These works built on Motown's evolution, incorporating classical and jazz influences for layered, narrative-driven songs that prioritized innovation over commercial simplicity.[80] Hip hop absorbed progressive influences primarily via sampling Parliament-Funkadelic's expansive grooves, which lent intricate basslines and psychedelic textures to beats. Dr. Dre's G-funk on The Chronic (December 15, 1992) sampled Clinton extensively, such as "Flash Light" in tracks like "Fuck wit Dre Day," creating dense, atmospheric productions with harmonic depth derived from P-Funk's rock-funk hybrids.[81] Later, Clinton collaborated with Kendrick Lamar on To Pimp a Butterfly (March 15, 2015), where funk's progressive experimentation informed Lamar's fusion of jazz, hip hop, and social critique in multi-part suites.[82] Direct prog rock samples, though rarer, appear in hip hop's experimental wing, underscoring causal links from 1970s fusion to 1990s production techniques.[83]Criticisms and Controversies
Accusations of Elitism and Pretension
Progressive rock, particularly in its 1970s heyday, drew accusations of elitism from critics who viewed its incorporation of classical, jazz, and literary elements as an attempt to intellectualize rock beyond its populist roots, appealing primarily to educated or "highbrow" audiences rather than broader listeners.[84] This perception stemmed from the genre's emphasis on technical virtuosity, extended compositions, and conceptual themes, which demanded greater cognitive engagement compared to straightforward rock formats.[85] For instance, bands like Emerson, Lake & Palmer were faulted for prioritizing flashy instrumentation—such as oversized gongs and Hammond organ theatrics—over emotional authenticity, fostering a sense of cultural superiority.[86] Prominent critics amplified these charges, with Lester Bangs in 1975 decrying prog as "musical sterility at its pinnacle," exemplified by ELP's adaptation of Mussorgsky's Pictures at an Exhibition, which he lambasted as an "insidious befoulment of all that was gutter pure in rock."[85][86] Similarly, Robert Christgau dismissed ELP as "as stupid as their most pretentious fans," equating the genre's ambitions with vacuous showmanship.[86] Such views positioned prog as self-indulgent escapism for "zonked teens" or nerdish enthusiasts, detached from rock's visceral energy.[85] These criticisms peaked amid the late-1970s punk backlash, where prog's elaborate staging and multi-part suites—like Yes's Tales from Topographic Oceans (1973), derided as a "monstrosity of ostentatious show" and "faux intellectualism"—were seen as emblematic of boomer excess and inaccessibility.[84] While some excesses, such as Jethro Tull's Thick as a Brick (1972) with its self-aware literary allusions, invited valid scrutiny for prioritizing cleverness over resonance, detractors often overlooked prog's innovative drive, reflecting a broader journalistic bias toward raw simplicity.[87][85]Backlash from Punk and Accessibility Debates
The punk rock movement, gaining prominence in 1976 with releases like the Sex Pistols' "Anarchy in the U.K." on November 26, 1976, positioned itself as a vehement reaction against the stylistic excesses of progressive rock, which had dominated the early 1970s with extended compositions and virtuosic displays.[88] Punk advocates criticized progressive music for its perceived self-indulgence, favoring instead stripped-down, three-chord structures and raw energy that prioritized immediacy over elaboration.[89] Figures like John Lydon (Johnny Rotten) of the Sex Pistols explicitly targeted bands such as Pink Floyd, Yes, and Emerson, Lake & Palmer, calling their work "too elaborate student bullshit" that "drove me crazy" with its overcomplicated arrangements.[90] Lydon even wore an "I Hate Pink Floyd" T-shirt, symbolizing punk's disdain for what it viewed as bloated, middle-class escapism disconnected from working-class realities.[88] Central to this backlash were debates over accessibility, with punk's DIY ethos enabling amateur musicians to participate without years of formal training, in stark contrast to progressive rock's demands for advanced technical proficiency in odd time signatures, multi-instrumentalism, and orchestral integrations.[89] Progressive works, often exceeding 20 minutes per track—as in Yes's "Close to the Edge" (1972)—were faulted for alienating casual listeners through their narrative complexity and reliance on classical or jazz influences, which required cultural familiarity to fully appreciate.[91] Punk, by contrast, championed brevity (typically under three minutes per song) and direct lyrical confrontation of social issues, making it more immediately relatable and performable in grassroots venues.[88] Critics within punk circles, including those in fanzines like Sniffin' Glue (launched in 1976), portrayed progressive rock as emblematic of rock's stagnation, overly cerebral and detached from the economic hardships of the late 1970s, such as Britain's Winter of Discontent in 1978-1979.[89] While punk accelerated a cultural pivot toward minimalism, empirical evidence tempers claims of its decisive role in progressive rock's downturn; album sales for major prog acts like Genesis and Yes had already plateaued by 1974 amid market oversaturation and rising production costs, predating punk's commercial breakthrough.[88] For instance, Emerson, Lake & Palmer's Works Volume 1 (1977) sold fewer than 500,000 copies in the U.S., reflecting broader shifts rather than punk alone, as disco and economic recession also eroded demand for elaborate live spectacles.[92] Ongoing accessibility debates highlight a causal tension: progressive music's ambition fostered innovation but invited perceptions of elitism, whereas punk's rejection of hierarchy democratized rock yet limited its harmonic and structural depth.[91] Some analysts argue this dichotomy stemmed from class dynamics, with prog appealing to educated audiences via intellectual narratives, while punk reclaimed rock for the disenfranchised through visceral simplicity—though both genres ultimately coexisted, influencing hybrids like post-punk.[89]Commercial and Cultural Challenges
Record labels in the late 1970s increasingly prioritized shorter, radio-compatible tracks over the extended suites and conceptual works typical of progressive music, constraining airplay and necessitating stylistic compromises by artists. FM radio formats typically limited songs to under four minutes, compelling bands like Yes to edit pieces such as "Roundabout" for single release while full album versions received scant rotation.[44] This shift aligned with broader industry demands for commercial viability amid economic pressures, including rising production costs for orchestral arrangements and elaborate live spectacles, which strained budgets as vinyl sales faced competition from emerging genres.[44] Many progressive acts responded by incorporating pop and adult-oriented rock elements, but this often alienated core fans and diluted the genre's experimental ethos. For instance, Emerson, Lake & Palmer's Love Beach (1978) marked a pivot to melodic, accessible material under label influence, contributing to perceptions of artistic concession rather than innovation.[44] Similarly, Genesis's post-Peter Gabriel era emphasized concise songs, reflecting a broader trend where excessive ambition led to line-up instability and reduced output, as groups like Italian outfit New Trolls veered into disco-infused pop.[44] These adaptations underscored commercial imperatives but highlighted the genre's vulnerability to market-driven homogenization. Culturally, progressive music faced accusations of elitism, with critics decrying its reliance on classical influences, technical virtuosity, and narrative complexity as barriers to mass accessibility. Music journalists frequently portrayed the genre as self-indulgent and disconnected from rock's raw, working-class roots, a view intensified by punk's direct confrontation of such perceived excesses.[44] Punk manifestos, echoed in media narratives, framed progressive works as emblematic of rock's corporate bloat, fostering a backlash that stigmatized elaborate production as pretentious despite evidence of sustained fan engagement through live tours.[88] This cultural rift persisted, as progressive music's intellectual aspirations clashed with punk's emphasis on immediacy and anti-establishment simplicity, though major acts like Pink Floyd maintained robust attendance at arena shows amid the turmoil.[88]Influence and Legacy
Impact on Mainstream and Subsequent Genres
Progressive rock achieved significant mainstream penetration in the 1970s through blockbuster albums that combined experimental structures with accessible themes, exemplified by Pink Floyd's The Dark Side of the Moon, released on March 1, 1973, which sold over 45 million copies worldwide and held the No. 1 position on the Billboard 200 for one week while charting for 937 weeks.[30][93] This commercial triumph validated the genre's viability beyond niche audiences, encouraging record labels to invest in ambitious rock productions and influencing the rise of album-oriented rock radio formats that prioritized full LPs over singles.[3] Former progressive acts adapted elements of the genre's sophistication into pop structures, broadening its reach; Genesis, originating in the progressive scene with albums like Foxtrot (1972), shifted toward concise songwriting in the late 1970s and 1980s under Phil Collins' leadership, yielding multi-platinum hits such as Invisible Touch (1986), which topped the Billboard 200 and featured four Top 5 singles, thus injecting progressive complexity—such as intricate arrangements and thematic continuity—into arena pop.[94][95] In subsequent genres, progressive rock's emphasis on technical virtuosity and unconventional forms directly spawned progressive metal in the 1980s, where bands like Rush and later Dream Theater fused heavy metal's aggression with prog's odd time signatures and multi-part suites, as seen in Rush's 2112 (1976) and its enduring influence on metal subgenres through extended compositions exceeding 20 minutes.[12] Modern acts such as Tool have carried forward these traits into alternative metal, with albums like Lateralus (2001) employing mathematical patterns and conceptual narratives derived from prog precedents, achieving mainstream chart success while maintaining structural ambition.[44]Enduring Appeal and Modern Interpretations
The enduring appeal of progressive music stems from its emphasis on technical virtuosity, conceptual depth, and sonic experimentation, which continue to attract dedicated listeners seeking alternatives to mainstream pop structures. Classic albums from the 1970s, such as Pink Floyd's The Dark Side of the Moon (1973), maintain commercial viability through reissues and streaming, with the band achieving estimated global sales exceeding 200 million units across their catalog.[96] Similarly, Rush's discography has surpassed 40 million albums sold worldwide, reflecting sustained interest evidenced by catalog sales and anniversary editions that chart in recent years.[96] This persistence is attributed to the genre's adaptability and influence on subsequent styles, allowing reinterpretation without dilution of core principles like odd time signatures and extended compositions.[86] In the 21st century, modern interpretations manifest through neo-progressive rock and fusions like progressive metal, where bands revive 1970s aesthetics with contemporary production. Groups such as Porcupine Tree and Steven Wilson have topped fan-voted lists for albums from 2000–2019, blending symphonic elements with electronica and heavier riffs.[42] Tool exemplifies this evolution, with their 2019 album Fear Inoculum incorporating polyrhythms and thematic complexity akin to classic prog, earning Grammy recognition and demonstrating crossover appeal.[97] Neo-prog acts like Arena and IQ sustain the genre's keyboard-driven, narrative-focused sound, maintaining active touring schedules and releases into the 2020s.[38] Further evidence of vitality appears in the resurgence of 2020s releases from reformed ensembles, including The Mars Volta and Porcupine Tree, which critics highlight for recapturing prog's exploratory spirit amid streamlined modern recording.[98] This revival counters earlier dismissals of pretension by prioritizing instrumental prowess and innovation, fostering a niche ecosystem of festivals and labels dedicated to the form, though exact attendance metrics remain limited to broader rock events.[86] Overall, progressive music's appeal endures via its challenge to conventional songwriting, evidenced by ongoing critical reevaluations and artist citations across genres.[59]Empirical Measures of Success (Sales, Citations, Festivals)
Progressive music achieved notable commercial success through key albums by prominent acts, particularly in the 1970s. Pink Floyd's The Dark Side of the Moon (1973) stands as the genre's top-selling release, with claimed worldwide sales exceeding 45 million copies, including over 15 million certified units in the United States.[6][99] Other Pink Floyd works, such as Wish You Were Here and The Wall, contributed to the band's total album sales surpassing 250 million units globally.[100] Genesis amassed over 100 million albums sold worldwide, driven by both progressive-era releases like Foxtrot (1972) and later pop-oriented efforts.[100] Yes recorded more than 30 million albums in total sales, with 90125 (1983) exceeding 4 million copies.[101][102] Jethro Tull surpassed 60 million albums sold, while King Crimson's output remained more modest, with In the Court of the Crimson King (1969) achieving critical acclaim but limited chart penetration reflective of lower commercial volumes.[103][104]| Artist | Estimated Total Album Sales (Millions) | Key Album Example |
|---|---|---|
| Pink Floyd | 250+ | The Dark Side of the Moon (45+) |
| Genesis | 100+ | Various progressive releases |
| Jethro Tull | 60+ | Aqualung (1971) |
| Yes | 30+ | 90125 (4+) |
| King Crimson | Lower (niche) | In the Court of the Crimson King |
_(LOC)_(5354790936)_(cropped).jpg)