Hubbry Logo
READMEREADMEMain
Open search
README
Community hub
README
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
README
README
README
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Screenshot of the README file of cURL

In software distribution and software development, a README file contains information about the other files in a directory or archive of computer software. A form of documentation, it is usually a simple plain text file called README, Read Me, READ.ME, README.txt,[1] or README.md (to indicate the use of Markdown)

The file's name is generally written in uppercase. On Unix-like systems in particular, this causes it to stand out – both because lowercase filenames are more common, and because the ls command commonly sorts and displays files in ASCII-code order, in which uppercase filenames will appear first.[nb 1]

Contents

[edit]

A README file typically encompasses:

History

[edit]

The convention of including a README file began in the mid-1970s.[3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Early Macintosh system software installed a Read Me on the Startup Disk, and README files commonly accompanied third-party software.

In particular, there is a long history of free software and open-source software including a README file; the GNU Coding Standards encourage including one to provide "a general overview of the package".[10]

Since the advent of the web as a de facto standard platform for software distribution, many software packages have moved (or occasionally, copied) some of the above ancillary files and pieces of information to a website or wiki, sometimes including the README itself, or sometimes leaving behind only a brief README file without all of the information required by a new user of the software.

The popular source code hosting website GitHub strongly encourages the creation of a README file – if one exists in the main (top-level) directory of a repository, it is automatically presented on the repository's front page.[11] In addition to plain text, various other formats and file extensions are also supported,[12] and HTML conversion takes extensions into account – in particular a README.md is treated as GitHub Flavored Markdown.

As a generic term

[edit]

The expression "readme file" is also sometimes used generically, for other files with a similar purpose.[13] For example, the source-code distributions of many free software packages (especially those following the Gnits Standards or those produced with GNU Autotools) include a standard set of readme files:

README General information
AUTHORS Credits
THANKS Acknowledgments
CHANGELOG A detailed changelog, intended for programmers
NEWS A basic changelog, intended for users
INSTALL Installation instructions
COPYING / LICENSE Copyright and licensing information
BUGS Known bugs and instructions on reporting new ones
CONTRIBUTING / HACKING Guide for prospective contributors to the project

Also commonly distributed with software packages are an FAQ file and a TODO file, which lists planned improvements.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

README

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A README file is a plain text file, typically named README or README.md, that serves as the primary documentation for a software project, providing essential information such as the project's purpose, installation instructions, usage guidelines, and contributing details. The convention of including a README file originated in early Unix source distributions during the late 1970s, where it functioned as an initial reference point for users to understand and set up software packages before consulting more detailed documentation. Over time, this practice evolved into a widespread standard in open-source software development, promoted by organizations like the GNU Project, which mandates a README in package distributions to outline the package name, version, and general overview. In modern contexts, particularly on platforms like GitHub, README files often employ Markdown formatting to include structured sections such as badges for build status, screenshots, and links to related resources, enhancing accessibility and project discoverability. Key components typically cover:
  • Project description: A concise summary of what the software does and its intended audience.
  • Installation: Step-by-step setup instructions, including dependencies.
  • Usage examples: Code snippets or tutorials demonstrating core functionality.
  • Contributing guidelines: Information on how others can participate in development.
  • License and acknowledgments: Legal terms and credits for contributors.
This format ensures that developers, users, and potential collaborators can quickly grasp the project's scope without delving into code, fostering collaboration in repositories hosted on systems.

Definition and Purpose

Core Concept

A README file is a plain text document, commonly named README, README.txt, or README.md, situated in the root directory of a software project's repository to deliver an initial overview and operational guidance for the project. This file serves as the primary entry point, offering essential details that enable quick comprehension without requiring deep exploration of the codebase. The fundamental purpose of a README file is to orient both developers and end-users to the project's objectives, functionality, and practical application, including explanations of installation procedures, usage instructions, and guidelines for contributions. By encapsulating this information accessibly, it functions as the first resource for newcomers, streamlining onboarding and fostering effective interaction with the software. Key characteristics of a README file include its conciseness, accessibility, and human-readable format, which prioritize clarity and brevity over exhaustive detail. Unlike formal such as user manuals or references, a README adopts an informal and immediate tone, providing just enough context to guide users without overwhelming them. In development environments, the README's role in self-documenting the project is particularly significant, as it empowers users and contributors to resolve common queries independently, thereby minimizing the volume of support requests directed to maintainers. This self-sufficiency empowers users and contributors in initiatives.

Role in Project Documentation

The README file serves as a central gateway within a software project's documentation ecosystem, providing an accessible entry point that directs users and contributors to more specialized resources such as detailed user manuals, API references, or project wikis. By incorporating relative links to files like CONTRIBUTING.md or external documentation sites, it facilitates seamless navigation, ensuring that high-level overviews transition smoothly into in-depth technical details without overwhelming initial readers. This integration is particularly vital in repository platforms like GitHub, where the README is prominently displayed and can embed sections that reference broader documentation structures, thereby maintaining a cohesive knowledge base across the project lifecycle. In development workflows, the README enhances efficiency by streamlining for new contributors through clear setup instructions, environment specifications, and contribution guidelines, allowing developers to begin contributing within hours or days rather than weeks. It supports / (CI/CD) pipelines by including precise build and deployment steps that align local environments with production setups, such as Docker configurations or dependency management, which reduces configuration errors and accelerates team productivity. Additionally, on platforms like , a well-crafted README boosts discoverability by summarizing purpose and usage in a format that search engines and repository browsers prioritize, thereby attracting more potential users and fostering community growth. The README addresses key challenges in fast-paced open-source environments by bridging the divide between raw and end-user needs, offering immediate context on goals, installation procedures, and usage norms that might otherwise remain buried in code comments or scattered files. This role is especially critical for contributor , as it sets expectations and provides support focused on technical configuration, helping to sustain activity in collaborative settings where gaps can deter participation. Empirical studies highlight the effectiveness of high-quality READMEs in driving project , with analyses of over 1,950 repositories across ten programming languages showing strong positive correlations between README features—like external links, images, lists, and contribution sections—and popularity metrics such as (p-value < 0.05, large in most cases), forks, and pull requests. Projects with comprehensive READMEs incorporating references and "who/what/how" contextual elements exhibit higher engagement, as these elements enhance comprehension and encourage reuse, leading to observable increases in repository and overall rates. Such findings underscore that investing in README quality directly contributes to measurable project success in open-source ecosystems.

Historical Development

Origins in Unix Systems

The README file emerged in the Unix operating system during the 1970s as a straightforward text-based mechanism for distributing essential , installation instructions, and setup information alongside software packages. This practice began with early commercial and academic distributions from , where the need for concise documentation in resource-constrained environments prompted the creation of these files. The earliest documented instance appears in the Programmer's Workbench (PWB) 1.0 edition of Unix, released in July 1977, which included a README file in the /sys/source/lex directory to guide users on compiling and using the lexical analyzer tool. Similarly, the first (1BSD), compiled by and released on March 9, 1978, featured a README describing the tape's contents, including sources and binaries for UC Berkeley software such as the Pascal system. Key early examples of README files proliferated in subsequent AT&T Unix versions, such as those in the /usr/doc directory for system-wide notes, establishing them as a standard component of Unix software releases. In the academic sphere, the Berkeley distributions continued this tradition, with README files providing overviews of added utilities and modifications to the base Unix. By the early 1980s, adopted README files in the nascent Project's distributions, using them to outline project goals, build instructions, and licensing details in line with the emerging ethos. These instances underscored the file's role in facilitating software sharing within Unix-centric communities. The primary motivation for README files stemmed from the command-line-centric nature of Unix systems, which lacked graphical interfaces and required users to rely on terminal-based tools like or more for quick access to documentation. In an era of limited storage and slow networks, these files addressed the need for immediate, self-contained references without depending on extensive manuals or external help systems. This approach aligned closely with the , which emphasized simplicity, modularity, and doing one thing well—principles articulated by early developers like and Doug McIlroy to promote efficient, user-friendly software design. Initial conventions for README files prioritized accessibility in text-only environments, mandating a format compatible with basic editors like ed or vi and avoiding any formatting that could hinder terminal display. The was conventionally set to "README" in uppercase to signal its importance and ensure it appeared first in directory listings sorted alphabetically, a practice rooted in Unix's case-sensitive filesystem. Content focused on brevity, typically spanning a few paragraphs or sections to enable rapid reading on character-based terminals, often covering installation steps, known issues, and usage summaries without delving into full details.

Evolution in Open Source and Version Control

In the 1990s, README files gained prominence within communities as systems like CVS, originally developed in 1986, became widely adopted for collaborative development. Platforms such as , launched in 1999 by VA Linux Systems, further elevated their role by hosting thousands of projects where README files served as essential entry points for downloads and instructions. The Perl community accelerated this trend through the Comprehensive Perl Archive Network (CPAN), established in 1995, which required modules to include README files for installation guidance and module overviews, standardizing their use in package distributions. Similarly, the Python community in the late 1990s incorporated README files into early package distributions, aligning with the introduction of tools like Distutils in Python 1.6 around 2000 to facilitate module sharing. The advent of in 2005 and 's launch in 2008 marked a pivotal shift, transforming README files into a requirement for repositories. prominently rendered README files—particularly in format—as the default landing page for each repository, enhancing visibility and encouraging comprehensive documentation from the outset. This integration boosted adoption, as developers recognized READMEs as key to attracting contributors and users in the growing ecosystem of . Standardization efforts intensified during this period, with open source licenses like the —originating in 1988—emphasizing the inclusion of associated documentation files, a practice that gained renewed focus post-2000 amid the rise of collaborative platforms. The introduction of in 2004 by provided a lightweight, readable format for richer README content, enabling features like headings, lists, and links without complex . This format quickly became the norm, especially with GitHub's native support for README.md files. Web platforms like GitHub amplified the impact by automatically generating project overview pages directly from README content, including table of contents and formatted rendering, which streamlined user engagement and influenced widespread adoption. By the 2020s, studies of open source repositories indicated high prevalence of README files, reflecting their entrenched role in facilitating collaboration.

Standard Contents

Essential Components

The essential components of a README file provide a foundational structure that enables users to quickly understand, install, and engage with a software project. These core elements, widely recommended by platforms like GitHub and established standards, ensure accessibility and clarity from the outset. A and description form the opening of the README, offering a concise one-paragraph overview of the software's purpose, target audience, and key features. This section typically begins with the project's name in a prominent heading, followed by explanatory text that highlights what the project achieves—for instance, "This provides efficient tools for workflows, aimed at developers building scalable applications, featuring modular APIs and optimized performance." Such descriptions are present in nearly all analyzed READMEs, serving to orient readers immediately. Installation instructions follow, detailing step-by-step commands to set up the project, including dependencies and build processes. These often include prerequisites like required software versions (e.g., "Requires v14 or higher") and commands such as npm install for package managers or git clone https://github.com/user/repo.git followed by make build. This "how-to" guidance appears in over 88% of GitHub repositories, emphasizing practical setup to lower entry barriers. Usage examples illustrate basic operation through code snippets or commands, demonstrating how to run the project after installation. For example:

npm start

npm start

or a Python snippet like:

python

from myproject import Processor processor = Processor() result = processor.run(data) print(result)

from myproject import Processor processor = Processor() result = processor.run(data) print(result)

These examples, including any necessary prerequisites, help users verify functionality and explore core capabilities, forming a key part of the "usage" directive in standard specifications. Contributing guidelines outline processes for community involvement, such as reporting issues via GitHub's issue tracker, submitting pull requests with specific branching strategies (e.g., "Fork the repo, create a feature branch, and ensure tests pass"), or adhering to coding standards like PEP 8 for Python. While often detailed in a separate CONTRIBUTING.md file, a summary in the README directs users to these norms, appearing in about 28% of repositories to foster healthy collaboration. License information summarizes the project's licensing terms and provides a link to the full text, such as "This project is licensed under the —see the LICENSE file for details." This element clarifies usage rights and is a required section in standardized README formats to promote legal transparency.

Common Variations

Many README files incorporate badges at the top to provide quick visual metadata about the project's status, such as build success, version numbers, or download counts, often generated using services like Shields.io. These badges, rendered as images, integrate seamlessly into and update dynamically to reflect real-time metrics from integrated tools like systems or package registries. Beyond essential elements, READMEs frequently include advanced sections tailored to user needs, such as FAQs addressing common queries, guides for error resolution, overviews outlining endpoints and usage, and deployment instructions for web applications, including server setup and environment configuration steps. These additions enhance by anticipating potential issues and providing deeper guidance without requiring external . Domain-specific adaptations further customize READMEs to suit project types. For software libraries, emphasis is placed on integration examples, demonstrating how to import and use the library in code snippets across supported languages or frameworks. In application projects, particularly web apps, screenshots or UI demos illustrate functionality, often embedded as images or GIFs to showcase user interfaces and workflows. projects typically feature detailed descriptions, covering file structures, formats, update histories, and relationships between components to ensure . README length varies significantly based on project scale; simple scripts often employ concise versions limited to a brief overview and basic usage instructions, while large frameworks expand into multi-page documents with extensive examples and references. This adaptability maintains focus without overwhelming readers in smaller repositories. For global or collaborative projects, appears through multi-language versions, where separate files like README.es.md for Spanish or README.fr.md for French are created alongside the primary README.md, with links or badges directing users to translations. This approach supports diverse audiences while preserving the core structure.

Broader Applications

As a Generic Instructional Format

Beyond its origins in software documentation, the term "" has evolved into a generic shorthand for any introductory instructional guide, particularly in digital and print media where quick-start overviews are essential. This linguistic shift reflects the broader adoption of concise, user-facing explanations to facilitate immediate understanding and use of complex materials. By the early , "readme" had been formalized in English as a denoting an explanatory or file providing essential instructions, often in contexts but applicable more widely. In digital environments, "Read Me" files exemplify this generic format, appearing in PDFs, application installers, and websites to deliver preliminary guidance without requiring deep navigation. For instance, Apple's macOS installers have incorporated "Read Me" documents since the , offering late-breaking updates, installation notes, and tips directly within software packages. These files prioritize , using or simple formatting to ensure users can quickly grasp key information before proceeding, a practice that mirrors the instructional across various digital products. Culturally, the README concept permeates tech humor and online discourse, where phrases like ("Read The Fine Manual")—a longstanding urging consultation of —frequently extend to "read the README" in developer communities and memes. This extension underscores the perceived importance of such overviews in avoiding common errors, often invoked lightheartedly in forums and tutorials to emphasize through initial reading. In non-technical standardization efforts, guidelines such as ISO/IEC Guide 37:2012 for product instructions recommend structured introductory sections that outline purpose, safety, and usage basics, effectively endorsing README-style overviews to enhance user comprehension and compliance in consumer manuals.

Usage in Non-Software Contexts

In hardware and consumer products, README files or equivalent setup sheets have been used since the to provide initial instructions for assembly and operation, particularly in electronics kits. Modern open-source hardware projects extend this practice, where README files accompany kits with schematics, (BOM), and usage guidelines to enable replication by hobbyists and makers. In educational resources, README files serve as introductory guides within courseware and DIY project folders, helping students navigate assignments and materials. (OER) repositories often include README files to outline project objectives, required tools, and learning outcomes, facilitating self-paced learning in subjects like and . For example, OER templates for courses on operating systems or computer structures use README.md files to describe content structure, licensing, and adaptation instructions for educators and students. This approach supports by providing clear entry points for beginners, similar to how digital folders in platforms like host student assignments with READMEs explaining setup and ethical considerations. In business and administrative contexts, README documents function as overviews in employee packets and folders, offering concise introductions to organizational norms and expectations. A prominent example is the "Manager README," a personal document shared by leaders with new hires to detail , communication preferences, and performance guidelines, streamlining the integration process. These files, often distributed digitally during , include sections on company , role responsibilities, and resources, reducing ambiguity and fostering quicker team alignment. Similarly, folders in corporate shared drives use READMEs to summarize compliance rules and access protocols, ensuring employees can quickly reference key information without sifting through extensive handbooks. Archival and library uses of README files have become standard in digital collections since the early 2000s, particularly in projects, where they describe metadata, file structures, and access rules to preserve context and usability. In research , README.txt files act as codebooks for Digital Research Objects (DROs), detailing origins, variables, and ethical usage to enable long-term . initiatives, such as those involving text analytics or archives, incorporate README files to document processing workflows, , and licensing, aiding scholars in interpreting complex collections. For instance, university libraries recommend READMEs in data deposits to outline folder hierarchies and quality controls, ensuring compliance with standards like those from the Centre. Emerging trends highlight README files in AI datasets and 3D printing repositories, where they explain model usage, data , and ethical implications to promote responsible application. On platforms like , AI datasets routinely include README.md files detailing dataset composition, es, licensing, and intended uses, helping researchers mitigate risks such as fairness issues in training models. In 3D printing, repositories like allow creators to upload instructional text files, such as README.txt, alongside STL models to cover print settings, material recommendations, and notes, guiding users and preventing misuse. These practices underscore the README's role in addressing , such as in anatomical models or in AI training data, ensuring transparency in interdisciplinary applications.

Modern Practices and Tools

Writing Best Practices

Writing effective README files requires prioritizing clarity to ensure users and contributors can quickly understand and engage with the project. Begin with a concise hook that describes the project's purpose and value, such as "This project solves X by providing Y functionality," to immediately capture attention and set expectations. Use simple, active voice language throughout, avoiding complex jargon unless explained, and structure the content with a logical flow that answers key questions: What does the project do? Why is it useful? How do users get started? Where can they seek help? This approach makes the document accessible, particularly for non-native English speakers or newcomers to the domain. To enhance readability, employ consistent formatting elements like headings for sections, bullet points for lists of features or requirements, and code blocks for installation commands or examples. For instance, enclose commands in fenced code blocks with language specifiers, such as ```bash for shell scripts, to improve on platforms like . Aim to keep the entire file under 1000 words—or ideally shorter—to prevent overwhelming readers, as longer content may be truncated in repository views. Additionally, incorporate an auto-generated using Markdown headings to facilitate navigation, and use relative links (e.g., Contributing Guide) to maintain functionality when the repository is cloned. Inclusivity in README writing involves considering diverse audiences from the outset, such as by using gender-neutral pronouns like "they" and welcoming language to encourage broad participation. Include references to features, like keyboard-navigable examples or alt text for images, and pair the README with a to outline community expectations, fostering an environment where contributors from varied backgrounds feel supported. Avoid unexplained technical terms by providing brief definitions or links to further resources, ensuring the document serves both experts and beginners effectively. Treat the README as a living document that evolves with the project, updating it alongside major releases to reflect changes in features, dependencies, or status—such as marking sections as outdated if needed. Leverage version control to track revisions, allowing collaborators to propose improvements via pull requests, which helps maintain accuracy and incorporates community feedback over time. Regularly review the file for relevance, such as adding notes on supported platforms or deprecation warnings, to prevent it from becoming a source of confusion as the project matures. Common pitfalls in README authoring include vagueness in instructions, such as generically stating "install dependencies" without specifying versions or environments, which can lead to user frustration. To avoid this, test all setup and usage steps in a clean, isolated environment—like a fresh —to verify reproducibility across common operating systems. Steer clear of absolute URLs, which break in offline clones, and limit content to essentials, deferring detailed documentation to wikis or separate files to keep the README focused and actionable. By addressing these issues, authors can create documents that reliably guide users without introducing unnecessary barriers.

Formats and Generation Tools

README files have evolved from simple plain text documents to more structured formats, with Markdown emerging as the dominant standard since the 2010s due to its native rendering support on platforms like GitHub. Originally used in Unix systems as unformatted text, READMEs transitioned to lightweight markup languages to enable better readability and formatting without requiring complex tools. Alternatives such as reStructuredText (reST) and AsciiDoc continue to be employed in specific ecosystems, particularly for Python documentation and technical writing where advanced features like cross-references and multi-output formats (e.g., PDF, HTML) are needed. These formats offer greater extensibility compared to Markdown but see less widespread adoption for casual project READMEs due to their steeper learning curve. Several tools facilitate the creation and management of README files, streamlining modern development workflows. Online generators like readme.so provide Markdown editors and pre-built templates to quickly assemble professional READMEs with sections for installation, usage, and contributing guidelines. For project scaffolding, Cookiecutter is a command-line utility that generates entire repositories from templates, including customizable README files in or other formats, supporting languages from Python to . Validation tools, such as markdownlint, enforce style consistency by checking for issues like improper headings, line lengths, and syntax errors in -based READMEs, integrating easily into editors or processes. Integration with version control platforms enhances README usability through automated features. GitHub offers live preview rendering for Markdown READMEs directly in the web editor, allowing real-time adjustments to formatting and links. Similarly, GitLab supports embedding badges in READMEs to display pipeline status, coverage, or deployment info, with options for wiki synchronization to keep documentation aligned across project areas. Automation in CI pipelines, such as those using GitHub Actions or GitLab CI, dynamically updates badges (e.g., build status or version numbers) in the README upon successful runs, ensuring the file remains current without manual intervention. Advanced features in modern README formats leverage multimedia to improve engagement and clarity. Markdown supports embedding images and animated GIFs for demos using simple syntax like ![Alt text](path/to/image.gif), with GitHub automatically optimizing relative paths across branches. Videos, including MP4 files and GIFs, can be incorporated by dragging media into the GitHub editor or linking to hosted files, enabling interactive elements like tutorial clips since the platform's early Markdown enhancements in the 2010s. Looking ahead, AI-assisted generation tools are shaping future README practices, with integrations like enabling automated drafting based on repository analysis. Introduced in 2021, with features like Copilot Chat for prompt-based README generation becoming generally available in 2023, Copilot uses prompts to produce comprehensive READMEs, including sections for setup and examples, by interpreting code structure and generating content. Other tools, such as ReadmeAI (as of 2025), provide open-source AI generation supporting multiple language models for repository-based README creation. This trend reduces boilerplate writing, allowing developers to focus on customization while maintaining adherence to best practices for clarity and completeness.

References

  1. https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/about-readmes
  2. https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Releases.html
  3. https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/creating-and-managing-repositories/best-practices-for-repositories
  4. https://github.com/readme/guides/developer-onboarding
  5. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.10772
  6. https://wiki.tuhs.org/doku.php?id=systems:pwb
  7. https://www.oreilly.com/openbook/opensources/book/kirkmck.html
  8. https://archive.org/details/1bsd.tar_201503
  9. https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/96966/origin-of-readme
  10. https://www.gnu.org/gnu/initial-announcement.en.html
  11. https://cscie2x.dce.harvard.edu/hw/ch01s06.html
  12. https://corecursive.com/tdih-cpan/
  13. http://the-hitchhikers-guide-to-packaging.readthedocs.io/en/latest/history.html
  14. https://opensource.org/license/mit
  15. https://github.com/RichardLitt/standard-readme
  16. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5363&context=sis_research
  17. https://google.github.io/styleguide/docguide/READMEs.html
  18. https://shields.io/
  19. https://github.com/othneildrew/Best-README-Template
  20. https://www.makeareadme.com/
  21. https://data.research.cornell.edu/data-management/sharing/readme/
  22. https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/31132
  23. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/readme
  24. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso-iec:guide:37:en
  25. https://ptgmedia.pearsoncmg.com/images/9780321906045/samplepages/9780321906045.pdf
  26. https://github.com/open-education-hub/oer-template
  27. https://gitlab.com/oer/OS/blob/master/README.md
  28. https://managerreadme.com/
  29. https://www.joincandor.com/blog/posts/personal-readme-complete-guide
  30. https://libraries.ou.edu/content/how-make-readmetxt-file
  31. https://fordham.libguides.com/DigitalHumanities/ProjectPlanningData
  32. https://guides.library.upenn.edu/c.php?g=564157&p=9554906
  33. https://medium.com/%40pi_45757/working-with-datasets-on-hugging-face-478e1a47c7b6
  34. https://opensource.guide/starting-a-project/
  35. https://opensource.guide/best-practices/
  36. https://docs.asciidoctor.org/asciidoc/latest/asciidoc-vs-markdown/
  37. https://www.dewanahmed.com/markdown-asciidoc-restructuredtext/
  38. https://readme.so/
  39. https://cookiecutter.readthedocs.io/en/stable/README.html
  40. https://github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint
  41. https://dev.to/asyraf/how-to-add-video-in-readme-md-file-1him
  42. https://github.blog/news-insights/product-news/universe-2023-copilot-transforms-github-into-the-ai-powered-developer-platform/
  43. https://github.com/eli64s/readme-ai
  44. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/tutorials/customization-library/prompt-files/create-readme
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.