Hubbry Logo
GitHub CopilotGitHub CopilotMain
Open search
GitHub Copilot
Community hub
GitHub Copilot
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

GitHub Copilot
DevelopersGitHub
OpenAI
Initial releaseOctober 2021; 4 years ago (2021-10)
Stable release
1.7.4421
Operating systemMicrosoft Windows, Linux, macOS, Web
Websitegithub.com/features/copilot/

GitHub Copilot is a code completion and programming AI-assistant developed by GitHub and OpenAI that assists users of Visual Studio Code, Visual Studio, Neovim, and JetBrains integrated development environments (IDEs) by autocompleting code.[1] Currently available by subscription to individual developers and to businesses, the generative artificial intelligence software was first announced by GitHub on 29 June 2021.[2] Users can choose the large language model used for generation.[3]

History

[edit]

On June 29, 2021, GitHub announced GitHub Copilot for technical preview in the Visual Studio Code development environment.[1][4] GitHub Copilot was released as a plugin on the JetBrains marketplace on October 29, 2021.[5] October 27, 2021, GitHub released the GitHub Copilot Neovim plugin as a public repository.[6] GitHub announced Copilot's availability for the Visual Studio 2022 IDE on March 29, 2022.[7] On June 21, 2022, GitHub announced that Copilot was out of "technical preview", and is available as a subscription-based service for individual developers.[8]

GitHub Copilot is the evolution of the "Bing Code Search" plugin for Visual Studio 2013, which was a Microsoft Research project released in February 2014.[9] This plugin integrated with various sources, including MSDN and Stack Overflow, to provide high-quality contextually relevant code snippets in response to natural language queries.[10]

Features

[edit]
GitHub Codespaces layout
GitHub Copilot on the left
Code editor in center
Terminal on the right

When provided with a programming problem in natural language, Copilot is capable of generating solution code.[11] It is also able to describe input code in English and translate code between programming languages.[11]

Copilot enables developers to utilize a variety of Large Language Models (LLMs) from leading LLM providers, including various versions of OpenAI's GPT (including GPT-5 and GPT-5 Mini[12]), Anthropic's Sonnet, and Google's Gemini.[13]

According to its website, GitHub Copilot includes assistive features for programmers, such as the conversion of code comments to runnable code, and autocomplete for chunks of code, repetitive sections of code, and entire methods and/or functions.[2][14] GitHub reports that Copilot's autocomplete feature is accurate roughly half of the time; with some Python function header code, for example, Copilot correctly autocompleted the rest of the function body code 43% of the time on the first try and 57% of the time after ten attempts.[2]

GitHub states that Copilot's features allow programmers to navigate unfamiliar coding frameworks and languages by reducing the amount of time users spend reading documentation.[2]

Implementation

[edit]

GitHub Copilot was initially powered by the OpenAI Codex,[15] which is a modified, production version of GPT-3.[16] The Codex model is additionally trained on gigabytes of source code in a dozen programming languages. Copilot's OpenAI Codex was trained on a selection of the English language, public GitHub repositories, and other publicly available source code.[2] This includes a filtered dataset of 159 gigabytes of Python code sourced from 54 million public GitHub repositories.[17] OpenAI's GPT-3 is licensed exclusively to Microsoft, GitHub's parent company.[18]

In November 2023, Copilot Chat was updated to use OpenAI's GPT-4 model.[19] In 2024, Copilot began allowing users to choose between different large language models, such as GPT-4o or Claude 3.5.[3]

On 6 February 2025, GitHub announced "agent mode", which is a more autonomous mode of operation for the Copilot. Given a programming task, it attempts to accomplish it by executing commands on a Visual Studio instance on the user's computer. The agent mode can connect to different LLMs, including GPT-4o, o1, o3-mini, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Gemini 2.0 Flash.[20]

On 17 May 2025, GitHub announced "coding agent", which is a more autonomous mode of operation for the Copilot. The user would assign a task or issue to Copilot, which would then initialize a development environment in the cloud (powered by GitHub Actions) and perform the request. It would compose a draft pull request and pushes commits to the draft as it works. After accomplishing the request, it tags the user for code review.[21] It is essentially an asynchronous version of agent mode.

Reception

[edit]

Since Copilot's release, there have been concerns with its security and educational impact, as well as licensing controversy surrounding the code it produces. With the nature of large language models relying on massive datasets scraped from public sources, this makes it difficult to ensure that the data used for training is fully accurate, unbiased, and ethically sourced. Including Copilot, which is based off of large language models, is no different. Copilot will generate code derived from vast datasets that may include copyrighted or insecure examples. According to a study in December 2021, Copilot was given 89 scenarios that could replicate a MITRE CWE to auto-fill, creating a total of 1689 programs, in which 40% of code auto-filled by Copilot was deemed vulnerable. [22][11][23]

Licensing controversy

[edit]

While GitHub CEO Nat Friedman stated in June 2021 that "training ML systems on public data is fair use",[24] a class-action lawsuit filed in November 2022 called this "pure speculation", asserting that "no Court has considered the question of whether 'training ML systems on public data is fair use.'"[25] The lawsuit from Joseph Saveri Law Firm, LLP challenges the legality of Copilot on several claims, ranging from breach of contract with GitHub's users, to breach of privacy under the CCPA for sharing PII.[26][25]

GitHub admits that a small proportion of the tool's output may be copied verbatim, which has led to fears that the output code is insufficiently transformative to be classified as fair use and may infringe on the copyright of the original owner.[22] In June 2022, the Software Freedom Conservancy announced it would end all uses of GitHub in its own projects,[27] accusing Copilot of ignoring code licenses used in training data.[28] In a customer-support message, GitHub stated that "training machine learning models on publicly available data is considered fair use across the machine learning community",[25] but the class action lawsuit called this "false" and additionally noted that "regardless of this concept's level of acceptance in 'the machine learning community,' under Federal law, it is illegal".[25]

Privacy concerns

[edit]

The Copilot service is cloud-based and requires continuous communication with the GitHub Copilot servers.[29] This opaque architecture has fueled concerns over telemetry and data mining of individual keystrokes.[30][31]

In late 2022 GitHub Copilot has been accused of emitting Quake game source code, with no author attribution or license.[32]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

GitHub Copilot

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
GitHub Copilot is an AI-powered coding assistant that provides real-time code suggestions, completions, and conversational support to developers within integrated development environments such as Visual Studio Code. Developed by GitHub in partnership with OpenAI, it leverages large language models trained primarily on publicly available code from GitHub repositories to generate context-aware programming assistance, enabling users to write code more efficiently while emphasizing problem-solving over rote implementation. Originally launched as a technical preview on , 2021, GitHub Copilot began with OpenAI's model, a descendant of fine-tuned for code generation, and has since expanded to support a variety of AI models tailored for tasks ranging from general-purpose coding to deep reasoning and optimization. By 2025, enhancements include custom models evaluated through offline, pre-production, and production metrics to improve completion speed and accuracy. Available in individual (Copilot Pro), business (Copilot Business), and enterprise (Copilot Enterprise) tiers priced at $10 per month or $100 per year for individuals, $19 per user per month for organizations, and $39 per user per month for large organizations, respectively, with free access for verified students, teachers, and popular open-source project maintainers, a 30-day free trial for paid plans, and a limited free version, it integrates chat interfaces for querying code explanations, bug fixes, and architecture interpretations directly in editors or on GitHub's platform. Adoption has grown substantially, with over 15 million developers using it by early 2025, reflecting its role in boosting through features like multi-file edits and autonomous task execution in coding agents. Studies and internal metrics indicate it accelerates code writing while requiring verification for accuracy, as suggestions can occasionally introduce errors or suboptimal patterns. GitHub Copilot has faced legal challenges over its training data, including a 2022 class-action by open-source developers accusing , , and of by ingesting licensed code without explicit permissions. In 2024, a federal judge dismissed most claims, including DMCA violations, allowing only select allegations to proceed, highlighting tensions between AI training practices and rights in publicly shared codebases.

History and Development

Origins and Initial Preview

GitHub Copilot originated as a collaborative project between , , and to leverage large language models for code generation and assistance in . The initiative built on OpenAI's advancements in , specifically adapting through fine-tuning on extensive public codebases to create a specialized model capable of understanding and generating programming syntax across multiple languages. This effort addressed longstanding challenges in developer productivity by automating repetitive coding tasks via contextual suggestions, drawing from patterns observed in billions of lines of open-source code scraped from repositories. On June 29, 2021, announced the technical preview of Copilot as an extension for , positioning it as an "AI pair programmer" that could suggest entire lines of code, functions, or even tests based on comments or partial code inputs. Initially powered by OpenAI's —a descendant of fine-tuned exclusively on code—the preview was made available to a limited group of developers via a waitlist, emphasizing its experimental nature and potential for integration into integrated development environments (IDEs). Early demonstrations highlighted its ability to handle diverse tasks, such as implementing algorithms from docstrings or translating into functional implementations, though with noted limitations in accuracy and context awareness. The preview phase rapidly garnered attention for accelerating coding speed—early user reports indicated up to 55% productivity gains in select scenarios—but also sparked debates over code originality, as the model occasionally reproduced snippets from its training data, raising concerns among developers. GitHub positioned the tool as a complement to programmers rather than a replacement, with safeguards like user acceptance prompts to mitigate errors or insecure suggestions. Access expanded gradually from GitHub Next researchers to broader developer sign-ups, setting the stage for iterative improvements based on feedback.

Public Launch and Early Milestones

GitHub Copilot entered technical preview on June 29, 2021, initially available as an extension for , , Neovim, and IDEs, powered by OpenAI's model trained on public repositories. The preview targeted developers seeking AI-assisted code suggestions, including lines, functions, and tests, with early support for languages such as Python, , , , and Go. On June 21, 2022, GitHub Copilot became generally available to all developers, expanding access beyond the limited preview spots and introducing a subscription model at $10 per month for individuals. This shift enabled broader IDE integration and positioned the tool as a commercial offering, with plans for enterprise rollout later that year. Early adoption was rapid, with over 1.2 million developers using the preview version in the year leading to general availability. In the first month post-launch, it acquired 400,000 paid subscribers. Surveys of approximately 17,000 preview users revealed that more than 75% reported decreased for repetitive coding tasks, while benchmarks showed task completion times halved for scenarios like setting up an HTTP server. These metrics underscored initial productivity gains, though independent verification of long-term effects remained limited at the time.

Key Updates and Expansions Through 2025

In December 2024, and announced free access to within , positioning it as a core component of the editor's experience and enabling broader adoption among individual developers in 2025. This expansion followed prior paid tiers, aiming to integrate AI assistance seamlessly into everyday workflows without subscription barriers for basic use. On May 19, 2025, at , revealed plans to open its Copilot implementation in , allowing community contributions to enhance the tool's extensibility and transparency in code generation mechanisms. This move addressed demands for greater control over AI behaviors in enterprise environments, where models had previously limited customization. By mid-2025, Copilot expanded multi-model support in its Chat interface, incorporating advanced providers such as OpenAI's GPT-5 and GPT-5 mini for general tasks, Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.1 and 4.5 for reasoning-heavy operations, Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro for efficient completions, and xAI's Code Fast in public preview for complimentary fast coding assistance. Users could switch models dynamically to optimize for speed, accuracy, or context depth, with general availability for most models tied to Copilot Business or Enterprise plans. On September 24, 2025, introduced a new model improving code search accuracy and reducing memory usage in VS Code, enabling faster retrieval of relevant snippets from large codebases. Feature expansions included the preview of Copilot CLI for terminal-based agentic tasks like local code editing, , and project bootstrapping with dependency management, integrated via the Model Context Protocol (MCP). Prompt file saving for reusable queries and customizable response instructions in VS Code further streamlined iterative development. On October 8, 2025, Copilot app modernization tools launched, using AI to automate upgrades and migrations in .NET applications, boosting developer velocity. Knowledge bases were convertible to Copilot Spaces on October 17, 2025, enhancing collaborative AI contexts. GitHub deprecated GitHub App-based Copilot Extensions on September 24, 2025, with shutdown on November 10, 2025, shifting to MCP servers for more flexible third-party integrations like Docker and PerplexityAI, which led extension adoption by early 2025. On October 23, 2025, a custom model optimized completions for speed and relevance was released, alongside deprecations of select older models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google to prioritize performant alternatives like Claude Haiku 4.5, which achieved general availability on October 20. These refinements reflected empirical tuning against usage data, reducing latency while maintaining output quality across languages like Python, JavaScript, and C#. On November 10, 2025, GitHub rolled out Raptor Mini in public preview as an experimental AI model for GitHub Copilot in Visual Studio Code, available to Pro, Pro+, and Free plans. Specialized for fast inline suggestions, explanations, and real-world developer tasks such as multi-file edits, it aims to enhance speed and efficiency in code assistance.

Technical Foundations

Core AI Models and Evolution

GitHub Copilot initially launched in technical preview in June 2021, powered exclusively by OpenAI's model, a fine-tuned variant of specialized for code generation through training on vast public code repositories. enabled context-aware completions by predicting subsequent code based on prompts, comments, and existing code, marking a shift from traditional to probabilistic next-token prediction derived from large-scale language modeling. By November 2023, Copilot's chat functionality integrated 's , enhancing reasoning and multi-turn interactions beyond Codex's code-centric focus, while core completions retained elements of the original architecture. This update reflected broader advancements in transformer-based models, prioritizing deeper contextual understanding over raw code prediction. The system evolved further in 2024 toward a multi-model framework, allowing users to select from large language models (LLMs) provided by , , and , driven by the recognition that no single model optimizes all tasks—such as speed versus complex debugging. As of August 2025, Copilot defaults to 's GPT-4.1 for balanced performance across code completions and chat, optimized for speed, reasoning in over 30 programming languages, and cost-efficiency. The platform now supports a diverse set of models, selectable via a picker in premium tiers, with capabilities tailored to task demands:
ProviderModel ExamplesKey StrengthsStatus/Notes
GPT-4.1, GPT-5, GPT-5 mini, GPT-5-CodexReasoning, code focus, efficiencyGPT-4.1 default; GPT-5-Codex preview for specialized coding
Claude Sonnet 4/4.5, Opus 4.1, Haiku 4.5Speed (Haiku), precision (Opus)Multipliers for cost; Sonnet 3.5 retiring November 2025
Gemini 2.5 ProMultimodal (e.g., image/code analysis)General-purpose with vision support
Model selection dynamically routes requests based on user choice or task heuristics—e.g., lightweight models like GPT-5 mini or Claude Haiku 4.5 for rapid syntax fixes, versus high-intelligence options like GPT-5 or Claude Opus 4.1 for multi-step problem-solving. This multi-model approach, orchestrated by GitHub's infrastructure, mitigates limitations of individual LLMs, such as in code logic or latency in agentic workflows, while incorporating xAI's Code Fast 1, generally available since October 2025 as a selectable option across integrated IDEs including VS Code, JetBrains, and Visual Studio for accelerated code generation, and GitHub's Raptor Mini, a specialized code-first experimental model optimized for fast, accurate inline suggestions, explanations, and multi-file workflows in Visual Studio Code, available to Pro, Pro+, and Free plans. Empirical evaluations, including internal benchmarks, show gains in completion acceptance rates and reduced iteration cycles with model diversification, though performance varies by language and complexity.

Data Sources and Training Methodology

GitHub Copilot's underlying models are trained primarily on publicly available from GitHub repositories, supplemented by text to enhance contextual understanding. The initial model, released in and powering early versions of Copilot, drew from approximately 159 gigabytes of across multiple programming languages, sourced from over 54 million repositories, with heavy emphasis on Python and other common languages. This dataset was filtered to prioritize high-quality, permissively licensed while removing duplicates and low-value content, though it included material under various open-source licenses that have sparked legal debates over and derivative works. The methodology employs supervised fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) derived from architectures like , optimized for via next-token prediction tasks. Public code snippets serve as input-output pairs, where the model learns to predict subsequent code tokens based on preceding , enabling suggestions. OpenAI's LLMs, integrated into Copilot, undergo this process on vast corpora to generalize patterns without retaining exact copies, though empirical tests have shown occasional regurgitation of snippets, prompting filters during to block high-similarity outputs. does not use private or enterprise user code for model ; prompts and suggestions from Copilot or Enterprise users are excluded by default. Repository owners can their code from future Copilot datasets via settings, a implemented post-launch to address concerns over unlicensed use, though pre-existing models reflect historical data prior to widespread opt-outs. By 2025, Copilot incorporates multiple LLMs, including evolved models and 's custom variants, evaluated through offline benchmarks, pre-production simulations, and production metrics to refine accuracy and reduce hallucinations. These custom models maintain reliance on code sources but emphasize efficiency gains, such as faster inference, without disclosed shifts to proprietary or at scale. Legal challenges, including class-action suits alleging infringement on copyrighted code, have not altered the core methodology but underscored tensions between data accessibility and rights.

System Architecture and IDE Integration

GitHub Copilot operates on a client-server designed to deliver real-time AI-assisted coding without overburdening local hardware. The client component, implemented as an extension or plugin within the IDE, monitors developer activity—such as the current file, surrounding , comments, and cursor position—to extract contextual data. This context is anonymized and augmented to form a structured prompt, which is securely transmitted over to GitHub's cloud infrastructure. On the server side, the prompt is processed by hosted large language models (LLMs), initially derived from OpenAI's architecture and later incorporating variants for enhanced reasoning and code generation capabilities. Inference occurs in a distributed environment leveraging Microsoft's Azure infrastructure, where the models predict probable code tokens or full snippets based on probabilistic next-token generation. Responses are filtered for relevance, syntax validity, and safety before being streamed back to the client, enabling inline suggestions that developers can accept, reject, or cycle through alternatives via keyboard shortcuts. This setup discards input data post-inference to prioritize privacy, with no long-term retention for training. Integration with IDEs emphasizes minimal invasiveness and broad compatibility, supporting environments like (via a dedicated extension installed from the marketplace), (native integration since version 17.10 in 2024), IDEs (through the GitHub Copilot plugin compatible with , , and ), Neovim (via plugin configuration), and (experimental support as of 2024). This IDE-based integration enables Copilot to assist with code from repositories hosted on other platforms, such as Bitbucket, by cloning the repository locally and opening it in a supported IDE, where the extension provides assistance regardless of the hosting provider; native integration within the Bitbucket UI is not available. For Visual Studio 2025 (preview available; full release expected soon) or future versions like 2026, particularly for C# desktop app development (WinForms, WPF, etc.), the primary and most recommended extensions are the official GitHub Copilot for inline code suggestions and GitHub Copilot Chat for conversational AI assistance, providing the best integration directly from GitHub/Microsoft; no third-party extensions are specifically endorsed as best for GitHub Copilot in this context, with Copilot working well alongside built-in VS features for C# projects. In each, the extension hooks into the IDE's (LSP) or equivalent APIs to intercept edit events and overlay suggestions seamlessly, such as ghost text for completions or chat interfaces for queries. For instance, in , the extension uses VS Code's completion provider API to render suggestions ranked by confidence scores from the model. This modular approach allows updates to core models independently of IDE versions, though it requires authentication via accounts and subscription checks on startup.

Features and Capabilities

Basic Code Assistance Tools

GitHub Copilot's basic code assistance tools center on real-time , providing inline suggestions for partial code, functions, or entire blocks as developers type in supported integrated development environments (IDEs) like and . These suggestions are generated contextually, drawing from the surrounding code, comments, and file structure to predict likely completions, such as filling in boilerplate syntax, loop structures, or calls. Developers accept a suggestion by pressing the Tab key, dismiss it with Escape, or cycle through alternatives using arrow keys, enabling rapid iteration without disrupting workflow. Inline suggestions can be temporarily paused using the 'Snooze' option in the Copilot status bar menu or permanently disabled through IDE-specific settings, such as configuring 'github.copilot.enable' to false in Visual Studio Code. The system supports over a dozen programming languages, including Python, , , , C#, and Go, with completions tailored to language-specific idioms and best practices. For instance, typing a comment like "// fetch user data from " may trigger a suggestion for an asynchronous HTTP request handler, complete with error handling. As of October 2025, remains the most utilized feature, powering millions of daily interactions by reducing manual typing for repetitive or predictable patterns. Next edit suggestions, introduced in public preview, extend basic assistance by anticipating subsequent modifications based on recent changes, such as refactoring a variable rename across a function. This predictive capability minimizes context-switching, though acceptance rates vary by task complexity, with simpler completions adopted more frequently than intricate ones. Unlike advanced agentic functions, these tools operate passively without explicit prompts, prioritizing speed and seamlessness in the coding flow.

Advanced Generative and Interactive Functions

GitHub Copilot's advanced generative functions extend beyond inline code completions to produce entire functions, modules, or even application scaffolds from natural language descriptions provided through integrated interfaces. These capabilities leverage large language models to interpret user intent and generate syntactically correct, context-aware code, often incorporating best practices for the specified programming language and framework. For instance, developers can prompt the system to create boilerplate for web APIs or data processing pipelines, with outputs adaptable via iterative refinements. The interactive dimension is primarily facilitated by Copilot Chat, a conversational tool embedded in IDEs like and , enabling multi-turn dialogues for tasks such as code explanation, debugging, refactoring suggestions, and unit test generation. Users can query the AI for clarifications on complex algorithms or request fixes for errors, with responses grounded in the current context. GitHub Copilot does not automatically check for broken tests or lint errors in the background like traditional linters or test runners, but assists users interactively through Copilot Chat prompts to diagnose test failures or fix lint errors, a "Fix Test Failure" button in Visual Studio Code's Test Explorer, the Copilot coding agent running tests and linters in ephemeral environments when assigned tasks, and Copilot code review surfacing linter feedback such as from ESLint in pull requests when enabled; these features require user prompts, task assignments, or configurations. Copilot Chat also supports vulnerability scanning, allowing users to analyze code for security issues and receive targeted recommendations for fixes through features like Copilot Autofix, an extension of code scanning that identifies and remediates alerts. Enhancements rolled out in July 2025 include instant previews of generated code, flexible editing options, improved attachment handling for files and issues, and selectable underlying models such as GPT-5 mini or Claude Sonnet 4 for tailored performance. Further advancing interactivity, Copilot Spaces, introduced in May 2025, enable users to organize and centralize context—such as repositories, code snippets, and issues—to ground Copilot's responses for specific tasks, thereby improving relevance, collaboration, and the accuracy of AI-generated outputs in project-specific workflows. The Copilot coding agent, launched in agent mode preview in February 2025 and expanded in May, functions as an autonomous collaborator capable of executing multi-step workflows from high-level instructions. This mode allows the agent to iteratively plan, code, test, and iterate on tasks like feature implementation or bug resolution, consuming premium model requests per action starting June 4, 2025, to ensure efficient resource use in enterprise settings. Such agentic behavior supports real-time synchronization with developer inputs, reducing manual oversight for routine or exploratory coding phases. To track the progress and completion of tasks assigned to the Copilot coding agent in Visual Studio Code, users can utilize the experimental Chat Sessions view in the sidebar, enabled via settings such as chat.agentSessionsViewLocation set to "view", or monitor real-time updates, logs, and status in the Copilot Chat panel. Alternatively, with the GitHub Pull Requests extension installed, active sessions and pull requests can be monitored in the "Copilot on My Behalf" section of the Pull Requests view under the GitHub tab in the sidebar. These functions collectively enable dynamic, context-sensitive code evolution, though their effectiveness depends on prompt quality and , with premium access unlocking higher-fidelity outputs via advanced models. Empirical usage in IDEs demonstrates improved handling of ambiguous requirements through conversational feedback loops, distinguishing advanced modes from static suggestions.

Customization and Multi-Model Support

GitHub Copilot provides customization options to align AI responses with user preferences and requirements, including personal custom instructions that apply across all interactions on the platform and specify individual coding styles, preferred languages, or response formats. Repository-specific custom instructions, stored in files like .github/copilot-instructions.md, supply context on architecture, testing protocols, and validation criteria to guide suggestions within that . In integrated development environments such as , users can further tailor behavior using reusable prompt files for recurring scenarios and custom chat modes that define interaction styles, such as verbose explanations or concise snippets. These customization features enable developers to enforce team standards, such as adhering to specific or avoiding deprecated libraries, by embedding instructions that influence both code completions and chat responses. For instance, instructions can direct Copilot to prioritize best practices or integrate with particular frameworks, reducing the need for repetitive prompts and improving consistency in outputs. Copilot also incorporates multi-model support, allowing users to select from a range of large language models for different tasks, with options optimized for speed, cost-efficiency, or advanced reasoning. Access to these advanced models and certain features is governed by the premium request system, which allocates usage limits based on subscription plans—for example, Copilot Free provides 50 premium requests per month and Copilot Pro provides 300, while higher tiers offer more extensive allowances to support intensive workloads. When monthly limits are reached, users receive in-interface notifications such as "You have exceeded your premium request allowance," after which the system switches to a default model; users can set budget alerts at 75%, 90%, or 100% usage thresholds to anticipate limits. Premium request overage billing occurs when usage exceeds the monthly included allowance per user and paid overage usage is enabled via organizational or enterprise policies or individual budget settings; overages are charged at standard rates, with possible multipliers for certain models, and billed monthly as part of the GitHub account's billing cycle, appearing on the payment method or Azure invoice. Allowances reset on the 1st of each month at 00:00:00 UTC, and for accounts created before August 22, 2025, a default $0 budget may reject overages unless adjusted. As of April 2025, generally available models include Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Claude 3.7 Sonnet for complex reasoning, OpenAI's o3-mini and GPT-4o variants for balanced performance, and Google's Gemini Flash 2.0 for rapid responses. Users can switch models dynamically in Copilot Chat via client interfaces like or the website, tailoring selections to workload demands—such as using faster models for quick autocompletions or reasoning-focused ones for architectural planning. This multi-model capability, introduced in late 2024 and expanded in 2025, provides flexibility by leveraging providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google, with model choice affecting response quality, latency, and token efficiency without altering core Copilot functionality. Enterprise users benefit from configurable access controls to restrict models based on organizational policies or compliance needs.

Adoption and Measured Impacts

Growth in User Base and Enterprise Use

GitHub Copilot's user base expanded rapidly following its broader availability. By early 2025, the tool had surpassed 15 million users across free, paid, and student accounts, reflecting a 400% year-over-year increase driven by growing developer adoption of AI-assisted coding. This growth accelerated further, reaching over 20 million all-time users by July 2025, up from 15 million in April of that year—an addition of 5 million users in three months. Enterprise adoption mirrored this trajectory, with significant uptake among large organizations. As of July 2025, approximately 90% of Fortune 100 companies utilized Copilot, highlighting its integration into professional workflows for code generation and review. Copilot Enterprise customers specifically increased by 75% quarter-over-quarter during Microsoft's 2025 fourth quarter, as firms customized the tool for internal codebases and compliance needs. This enterprise expansion contributed to overall revenue growth in Microsoft's developer tools segment, though specific Copilot revenue figures remained bundled within broader metrics.

Empirical Evidence on Productivity Gains

A controlled experiment involving recruited software developers tasked with implementing a balanced HTTP server in found that those using GitHub Copilot completed the task 55.8% faster than the control group without the tool. Randomized controlled trials across , , and an anonymous Fortune 100 company, encompassing 4,867 developers, reported a 26.08% increase in completed tasks with Copilot, alongside 13.55% more commits and 38.38% more builds; gains were pronounced among junior and short-tenure developers, with increases of 27-39% in pull requests for less experienced staff at . Case studies corroborate perceived productivity enhancements, with a survey of 2,047 Copilot users indicating reduced task times, lower , and higher enjoyment, particularly for junior developers who reported the largest benefits via the framework metrics. Usage data from this study showed a 0.36 (p < 0.001) between suggestion acceptance rates and self-reported , with juniors accepting more suggestions overall. However, a longitudinal of 26,317 commits across 703 repositories at NAV IT revealed no statistically significant post-adoption increase in developer activity metrics for the 25 Copilot users compared to 14 non-users, despite users maintaining higher baseline activity and reporting subjective improvements in surveys and interviews. Empirical comparisons highlight trade-offs; an experiment contrasting Copilot-assisted with human demonstrated higher productivity via increased lines of code added with Copilot, but inferior code quality evidenced by more lines subsequently removed. These findings suggest Copilot accelerates output volume and speed, especially for novices, though real-world activity gains may be limited to high-adopters, and quality metrics warrant scrutiny beyond speed.

Assessments of Code Quality and Developer Efficiency

A controlled experiment involving professional developers found that those using GitHub Copilot completed coding tasks 55.8% faster on average compared to a control group without the tool, with the effect most pronounced for repetitive or generation. Subsequent internal evaluations at organizations like reported productivity gains of 20-30% in task completion rates after Copilot adoption, attributed to reduced time spent on initial code drafting and syntax handling. However, these gains vary by developer experience; a 2025 with open-source contributors showed only modest 10-15% speed improvements for seasoned programmers, suggesting for complex, novel problem-solving where human oversight remains essential. On code quality, GitHub's 2024 of repositories using Copilot claimed generated code was more functional, readable, and reliable, with 85% of surveyed developers reporting higher in their output and fewer bugs in pull requests. Independent evaluations partially corroborate this for basic metrics like reduced duplication but highlight risks: an of Copilot-suggested snippets revealed vulnerabilities in 32.8% of Python and 24.5% of examples, often due to insecure defaults or overlooked edge cases. Broader repository from 2023-2024 indicates "downward pressure" on , with AI-assisted code exhibiting higher churn rates (up to 40% more revisions post-merge), less reuse of existing modules, and increased from verbose, unoptimized suggestions. Critiques of Copilot's impact emphasize that gains may come at the expense of deeper architectural understanding; a peer-reviewed review of literature notes shifts toward quantity over , with tools like Copilot accelerating output but potentially eroding skills in refactoring and error-prone code detection. While some case studies net improvements in controlled educational settings, real-world deployments show mixed results, with and long-term concerns persisting absent rigorous human review. Overall, supports short-term boosts for routine tasks but underscores the need for validation protocols to mitigate regressions in production systems.

Reception and Critiques

Achievements and Endorsements from Industry

CEO has publicly endorsed GitHub Copilot as a transformative tool in , stating that it unexpectedly revolutionized coding practices by enabling AI to assist directly in code generation, which few anticipated prior to its deployment. Nadella highlighted its integration into 's ecosystem during earnings calls, noting over 15 million users by May 2025, underscoring its rapid scaling and enterprise viability. Industry adoption metrics reflect broad endorsement, with 90% of Fortune 100 companies utilizing for as of July 2025, alongside a 75% quarter-over-quarter growth in enterprise deployments. Collaborations with firms like have yielded quantifiable achievements, including a 15% increase in pull request merge rates and enhanced developer fulfillment, where 90% reported greater and 95% noted improved task velocity in a joint study. Thomson Reuters, a multinational provider of legal and tax services, achieved successful widespread adoption, crediting GitHub Copilot for streamlining development workflows across its engineering teams through structured rollout strategies. Similarly, Lumen Technologies reported accelerated developer productivity and financial benefits following a trial program in its Bangalore operations, attributing reduced development cycles to Copilot's code suggestions. GitHub Copilot received recognition in the 2025 Data Quadrant Awards for AI code generation, affirming its leadership among tools for automating and boilerplate reduction in enterprise settings. These endorsements and metrics from tech giants and consultancies validate Copilot's role in boosting efficiency without evidence of systemic drawbacks overriding gains in controlled implementations.

Common Limitations and User-Reported Shortcomings

GitHub Copilot frequently generates suggestions that contain errors, such as incorrect syntax, logical flaws, or references to non-existent APIs, necessitating manual verification by developers. Users report that while Copilot can provide a starting point for boilerplate or routine tasks, its outputs often require , with one developer noting repeated failures after weeks of reliance on faulty suggestions. In empirical assessments, Copilot's suggestions have been found to introduce suboptimal structures, potentially exerting downward pressure on overall quality metrics like . The tool struggles with maintaining context in large or intricate codebases, where interdependencies and project-specific architectures exceed its effective reasoning depth. Developers commonly complain that Copilot performs poorly on novel problems or advanced logic, defaulting to generic patterns that fail to address unique requirements, as evidenced by critiques highlighting its inability to innovate beyond training data patterns. This limitation is particularly pronounced in domains requiring domain-specific knowledge, where suggestions may propagate biases or outdated practices inherited from training datasets. Performance degradation is another recurrent user-reported issue, with Copilot slowing down in resource-constrained environments or during extended sessions, attributed to high computational demands and network latency. The GitHub Copilot CLI, installed as a 'gh' extension, has user-reported issues with hanging or freezing, often due to network latency, authentication problems, large git diffs or contexts in repositories, or slow LLM responses; hanging can occur in directories where git operations like status or diff are slow or resource-intensive as the tool gathers context for prompts. Updating to the latest version, verifying internet connectivity, using --no-git-context flags if available, and checking official issues may mitigate these. glitches and integration bugs in IDEs like further exacerbate usability frustrations, leading some developers to disable the tool intermittently. Users may also encounter the error "Sorry, your request was rate-limited" when exceeding GitHub's rate limits for Copilot requests, implemented to ensure fair access and prevent abuse; this issue is particularly common with preview models due to capacity constraints. Resolution involves waiting the specified period before retrying; persistent problems should prompt contact with GitHub Support. Exact rate limits are not publicly detailed but apply across subscription plans. Additionally, Copilot's knowledge cutoff results in suggestions using deprecated libraries or ignoring recent updates, rendering it unreliable for cutting-edge frameworks as of mid-2025. Security shortcomings persist, as Copilot has been observed generating vulnerable code patterns, such as hardcoded secrets or injection risks, which demand rigorous human auditing to mitigate. User feedback underscores a broader concern: over-dependence on unverified AI outputs can foster complacency, potentially eroding developers' foundational skills, though quantitative studies on this effect remain preliminary and contested.

Major Controversies

In November 2022, a class-action , Doe v. GitHub, Inc., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of against , , and , alleging that GitHub Copilot infringes by training on publicly available open-source code without permission and generating outputs that reproduce protected material. The plaintiffs, represented by anonymous open-source developers, claimed violations of the (DMCA), breach of open-source licenses, and direct , arguing that Copilot's model, powered by OpenAI's , systematically copies and repurposes licensed code snippets, often without attribution or compliance with terms like those in GPL licenses requiring derivative works to be shared under the same conditions. They further asserted that this practice constitutes "unprecedented open-source software piracy," as the training dataset included billions of lines of code from repositories subject to restrictive licenses prohibiting commercial exploitation without reciprocity. Defendants countered that scraping public GitHub repositories for training data falls under doctrine, as the resulting AI model represents a —converting raw code into probabilistic suggestions for new programming—without supplanting the market for original works, akin to of copyrighted web content. 's terms of service, updated in 2021, explicitly permit the use of public code for purposes, though critics note this does not override individual repository licenses that predate or conflict with such terms. In response to early criticisms, implemented filters in 2022 to avoid suggesting code matching popular open-source snippets or those under certain licenses like GPL, but plaintiffs alleged these measures are inadequate and post-hoc, failing to address the core training data issues. On July 8, 2024, U.S. District Judge William Orrick dismissed most claims, including DMCA violations, ruling that plaintiffs failed to plausibly allege Copilot removes or alters copyright management information or outputs exact copies sufficient to trigger liability; however, two claims survived—direct for reproducing specific registered works and for disregarding license terms during training. The court rejected broad DMCA arguments, noting that AI-generated suggestions do not inherently strip metadata in a manner proscribed by the Act, and emphasized the need for concrete evidence of output infringement rather than speculative training data claims. As of October 2025, the case remains ongoing, with appeals potentially heading to the Ninth Circuit, highlighting unresolved tensions between AI development and rights in open-source ecosystems. Broader licensing disputes extend to Copilot's outputs, where generated code has been observed reproducing verbatim snippets from licensed repositories, potentially exposing users to indirect liability for deploying non-compliant code in proprietary projects. Organizations like the have criticized Copilot for undermining principles, arguing that probabilistic regurgitation erodes incentives for contributors expecting license enforcement, though empirical studies on infringement frequency remain limited and contested. Defendants maintain that users bear responsibility for reviewing suggestions, positioning Copilot as an assistive tool rather than a guarantor of , with defenses hinging on the non-expressive, functional nature of as distinguished from literary works.

Privacy, Security, and Data Handling Risks

GitHub Copilot transmits user code context, including prompts and surrounding snippets, to remote servers operated by and for generating suggestions, raising concerns for or sensitive . In enterprise deployments, users can opt for configurations with zero , where prompts are not stored or used for model training, but individual subscribers lack equivalent guarantees, potentially exposing code to processing without full retention controls. A critical vulnerability disclosed in June 2025, dubbed CamoLeak (CVSS score 9.6), enabled unauthorized exfiltration of private repository data, including and secrets, through manipulated Copilot Chat responses, highlighting risks even in private environments. Security analyses reveal that Copilot frequently generates code with vulnerabilities, as empirical studies detect weaknesses in a substantial portion of outputs. One study of 452 Copilot-generated snippets found security issues in 32.8% of Python code and 24.5% of code, including improper input validation and cryptographic flaws. A targeted replication confirmed that up to 40% of suggestions in security-sensitive scenarios, such as prevention, contained potential exploits, often due to the model's training on public repositories with historical bugs. Additionally, Copilot can inadvertently expose hardcoded secrets from user code in suggestions or leaks them via completions, as demonstrated in experiments where tools extracted credentials from prompts. Data handling practices under GitHub's policies process telemetry and usage data for service improvement, but enterprise agreements include data protection addendums limiting cross-use with other Microsoft services. Critics note that while GitHub asserts no direct code file access by Copilot, the inference process inherently risks inference attacks, where aggregated prompts could reconstruct proprietary logic if similar queries are made by adversaries. Mitigation requires manual review of suggestions, as automated tools alone fail to catch AI-introduced risks like package hallucination leading to supply chain compromises.

Broader Ethical and Regulatory Debates

Critics have raised concerns that tools like GitHub Copilot may contribute to among developers by encouraging over-reliance on AI suggestions, potentially eroding deep understanding of codebases and fundamental programming principles. A study on Copilot adoption in regulated environments found that while it boosts short-term , prolonged use risks creating gaps, as developers may accept suggestions without thorough comprehension, hindering and in complex systems. Similarly, analyses of generative AI systems, including code assistants, argue that of routine tasks could diminish cognitive engagement with problem-solving, echoing historical debates on technology-induced skill atrophy in technical fields. Broader ethical discussions extend to the profession's , questioning whether AI-generated code undermines attribution norms and the expected in . Proponents of Copilot emphasize augmentation of human creativity, but detractors contend it blurs lines between assisted and authored work, potentially devaluing human contributions and fostering a culture of unexamined code acceptance. These debates are compounded by risks of embedded biases from training data, where Copilot's suggestions may perpetuate suboptimal patterns or vulnerabilities inherited from public repositories, necessitating vigilant human oversight. On the regulatory front, frameworks like the EU AI Act have prompted scrutiny of code generation tools, with GitHub advocating exemptions for research, development, and open-source code sharing to avoid stifling innovation. The Act classifies certain AI systems as high-risk, raising questions about whether Copilot requires transparency reporting or risk assessments in enterprise deployments, particularly in sectors demanding compliance with standards like GDPR or ISO 27001. In the U.S., voluntary guidelines such as the NIST AI Risk Management Framework urge developers to address trustworthiness issues like bias and reliability, though enforcement remains limited, fueling calls for clearer liability rules on AI-induced errors in production code. Ongoing litigation and policy discussions highlight tensions between accelerating AI adoption and ensuring accountability, with no unified global standards yet emerging.

References

  1. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/get-started/what-is-github-copilot
  2. https://github.com/features/copilot
  3. https://github.blog/news-insights/product-news/introducing-github-copilot-ai-pair-programmer/
  4. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/reference/ai-models/supported-models
  5. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/reference/ai-models/model-comparison
  6. https://github.blog/ai-and-ml/github-copilot/the-road-to-better-completions-building-a-faster-smarter-github-copilot-with-a-new-custom-model/
  7. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/get-started/features
  8. https://github.com/features/copilot/copilot-business
  9. https://sqmagazine.co.uk/github-statistics/
  10. https://resources.github.com/learn/pathways/copilot/essentials/measuring-the-impact-of-github-copilot/
  11. https://www.saverilawfirm.com/our-cases/github-copilot-intellectual-property-litigation
  12. https://githubcopilotlitigation.com/
  13. https://www.legal.io/articles/5516216/Judge-Throws-Out-Majority-of-Claims-in-GitHub-Copilot-Lawsuit
  14. https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/08/github_copilot_dmca/
  15. https://venturebeat.com/ai/github-launches-copilot-to-power-pair-programming-with-ai
  16. https://techcrunch.com/2021/06/29/github-previews-new-ai-tool-that-makes-coding-suggestions/
  17. https://www.theverge.com/2021/6/29/22555777/github-openai-ai-tool-autocomplete-code
  18. https://github.blog/news-insights/product-news/github-copilot-is-generally-available-to-all-developers/
  19. https://venturebeat.com/ai/github-copilot-is-now-public-heres-what-you-need-to-know
  20. https://www.ciodive.com/news/github-copilot-microsoft-software-developer/628587/
  21. https://code.visualstudio.com/blogs/2024/12/18/free-github-copilot
  22. https://www.thurrott.com/a-i/github-copilot/321127/build-2025-big-updates-for-github-copilot-open-source-implementation-in-visual-studio-code
  23. https://github.blog/news-insights/product-news/copilot-new-embedding-model-vs-code/
  24. https://github.com/features/copilot/whats-new
  25. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/porting/github-copilot-app-modernization/overview
  26. https://github.blog/changelog/
  27. https://github.blog/changelog/2025-09-24-deprecate-github-copilot-extensions-github-apps/
  28. https://github.blog/changelog/label/copilot/
  29. https://github.blog/changelog/2025-11-10-raptor-mini-is-rolling-out-in-public-preview-for-github-copilot/
  30. https://github.blog/ai-and-ml/github-copilot/under-the-hood-exploring-the-ai-models-powering-github-copilot/
  31. https://github.blog/ai-and-ml/github-copilot/which-ai-model-should-i-use-with-github-copilot/
  32. https://github.blog/changelog/2025-10-16-grok-code-fast-1-is-now-generally-available-in-github-copilot/
  33. https://resources.github.com/learn/pathways/copilot/essentials/how-github-copilot-handles-data/
  34. https://milvus.io/ai-quick-reference/how-much-training-data-was-used-for-codex
  35. https://openai.com/index/introducing-codex/
  36. https://docs.github.com/en/github/copilot/research-recitation
  37. https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/152229
  38. https://docs.github.com/copilot/how-tos/manage-your-account/managing-copilot-policies-as-an-individual-subscriber
  39. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/1696286/github-copilot
  40. https://github.blog/developer-skills/github/how-to-use-github-copilot-in-your-ide-tips-tricks-and-best-practices/
  41. https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/building-github-copilot-into-visual-studio/
  42. https://www.atlassian.com/blog/bitbucket/github-copilot-bitbucket-jira-and-confluence
  43. https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/overview
  44. https://plugins.jetbrains.com/plugin/17718-github-copilot
  45. https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/ai-powered-suggestions
  46. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/completions/code-suggestions
  47. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/ide/visual-studio-github-copilot-extension?view=vs-2022
  48. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/how-tos/chat-with-copilot
  49. https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/chat/copilot-chat
  50. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/chat
  51. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/ide/visual-studio-github-copilot-chat?view=vs-2022
  52. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/tutorials/copilot-chat-cookbook/debug-errors/diagnose-test-failures
  53. https://docs.github.com/copilot/copilot-chat-cookbook/refactoring-code/fixing-lint-errors
  54. https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/guides/test-with-copilot
  55. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/agents/coding-agent/about-coding-agent
  56. https://github.blog/changelog/2025-11-20-linter-integration-with-copilot-code-review-now-in-public-preview/
  57. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/copilot-chat-cookbook/security-analysis
  58. https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning
  59. https://github.blog/changelog/2025-07-09-new-copilot-chat-features-now-generally-available-on-github/
  60. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/context/spaces
  61. https://github.blog/changelog/2025-05-29-introducing-copilot-spaces
  62. https://code.visualstudio.com/blogs/2025/02/24/introducing-copilot-agent-mode
  63. https://github.blog/news-insights/product-news/github-copilot-meet-the-new-coding-agent/
  64. https://github.blog/ai-and-ml/github-copilot/agent-mode-101-all-about-github-copilots-powerful-mode/
  65. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/how-tos/use-copilot-agents/coding-agent/track-copilot-sessions
  66. https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/copilot-coding-agent
  67. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/get-started/plans
  68. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/how-tos/configure-custom-instructions
  69. https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/customization/overview
  70. https://github.blog/ai-and-ml/github-copilot/5-tips-for-writing-better-custom-instructions-for-copilot/
  71. https://developer.microsoft.com/blog/introducing-awesome-github-copilot-customizations-repo
  72. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/billing/copilot-requests
  73. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/managing-copilot/monitoring-usage
  74. https://github.com/features/copilot/plans
  75. https://github.blog/changelog/2025-04-04-multiple-new-models-are-now-generally-available-in-github-copilot/
  76. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/how-tos/use-ai-models/change-the-chat-model
  77. https://techcrunch.com/2024/10/29/githubs-copilot-goes-multi-model-and-adds-support-for-anthropics-claude-and-googles-gemini/
  78. https://www.wearetenet.com/blog/github-copilot-usage-data-statistics
  79. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/investor/events/fy-2025/earnings-fy-2025-q4
  80. https://techcrunch.com/2025/07/30/github-copilot-crosses-20-million-all-time-users/
  81. https://mlq.ai/news/github-copilot-surpasses-20-million-all-time-users-accelerates-enterprise-adoption/
  82. https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar25/index.html
  83. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.06590
  84. https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/inline-files/draft_copilot_experiments.pdf
  85. https://cacm.acm.org/research/measuring-github-copilots-impact-on-productivity/
  86. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.20353
  87. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9793778
  88. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388353989_Experience_with_GitHub_Copilot_for_Developer_Productivity_at_Zoominfo
  89. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.20353
  90. https://github.blog/news-insights/research/does-github-copilot-improve-code-quality-heres-what-the-data-says/
  91. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.02059
  92. https://www.gitclear.com/coding_on_copilot_data_shows_ais_downward_pressure_on_code_quality
  93. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381609417_The_impact_of_GitHub_Copilot_on_developer_productivity_from_a_software_engineering_body_of_knowledge_perspective
  94. https://www.scitepress.org/Papers/2025/132947/132947.pdf
  95. https://www.madrona.com/the-bet-that-changed-everything-satya-nadella-on-ai-leadership-and-the-future-of-computing/
  96. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/05/19/microsoft-ai-github.html
  97. https://github.blog/news-insights/research/research-quantifying-github-copilots-impact-in-the-enterprise-with-accenture/
  98. https://www.worklytics.co/blog/the-roi-of-github-copilot-for-your-organization-a-metrics-driven-analysis
  99. https://resources.github.com/enterprise/thomson-reuters-ai-adoption/
  100. https://www.microsoft.com/en/customers/story/1769628185480172641-lumen-technologies-inc-azure-telecommunications-en-united-states
  101. https://www.softwarereviews.com/awards/2135
  102. https://intellias.com/github-copilot-review/
  103. https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/162634
  104. https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1ac7cb2/new_github_copilot_research_finds_downward/
  105. https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/t/Challenges-and-Limitations-of-GitHub-Cop/10911575
  106. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/5443057/copilot-gets-slower-and-slower
  107. https://github.com/github/gh-copilot/issues
  108. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/troubleshooting-github-copilot/troubleshooting-common-issues-with-github-copilot
  109. https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-copilot-release/issues/1100
  110. https://blog.gitguardian.com/github-copilot-security-and-privacy/
  111. https://www.netguru.com/blog/github-copilot
  112. https://arxiv.org/html/2504.06808v1
  113. https://www.bakerlaw.com/the-copilot-litigation/
  114. https://fossa.com/blog/analyzing-legal-implications-github-copilot/
  115. https://moginlawllp.com/developers-sue-github-microsoft-and-openai-over-copyright-in-creating-ai-tool-copilot/
  116. https://www.developer-tech.com/news/judge-dismisses-majority-github-copilot-copyright-claims/
  117. https://www.bakerlaw.com/services/artificial-intelligence-ai/case-tracker-artificial-intelligence-copyrights-and-class-actions/
  118. https://lawreview.syr.edu/update-in-copilot-copyright-claim-may-affect-future-challenges-of-artificial-intelligence/
  119. https://www.endava.com/insights/articles/navigating-ai-and-ip-law-insights-from-the-github-copilot-decision
  120. https://wolfgreenfield.com/articles/fair-use-in-ai-copyright-litigation-a-surprising-turn-in-thomson-reuters-v.-ross
  121. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/responsible-use/chat-in-your-ide
  122. https://github.com/customer-terms/github-data-protection-agreement
  123. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/zero-data-retention-copilot-what-you-need-know-your-shardorn-3soze
  124. https://www.legitsecurity.com/blog/camoleak-critical-github-copilot-vulnerability-leaks-private-source-code
  125. https://www.securityweek.com/github-copilot-chat-flaw-leaked-data-from-private-repositories/
  126. https://arxiv.org/html/2310.02059v2
  127. https://gangw.cs.illinois.edu/class/cs562/papers/copilot-sp22.pdf
  128. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382321925_Assessing_the_Security_of_GitHub_Copilot%27s_Generated_Code_-_A_Targeted_Replication_Study
  129. https://blog.gitguardian.com/yes-github-copilot-can-leak-secrets/
  130. https://docs.github.com/site-policy/privacy-policies/github-privacy-statement
  131. https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/60853
  132. https://blueradius.io/github-copilot-security-review-2025/
  133. http://eprints.umsida.ac.id/16344/1/GitHub%2520Copilot%2520Adoption%2520in%2520Regulated%2520Environments%2520A%2520Risk%2520and%2520Efficiency%2520Study.pdf
  134. https://citsci.syr.edu/sites/default/files/GAI_and_skills.pdf
  135. https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2022/10/19/the-ethical-and-legal-challenges-of-github-copilot/
  136. https://github.blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/GitHub_Position_Paper-AI_Act.pdf
  137. https://www.gocodeo.com/post/evaluating-ai-coding-tools-for-regulatory-compliance-testing-and-traceability
  138. https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework
  139. https://www.whitecase.com/insight-our-thinking/ai-watch-global-regulatory-tracker-united-states
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.