Hubbry Logo
Retroflex ejective fricativeRetroflex ejective fricativeMain
Open search
Retroflex ejective fricative
Community hub
Retroflex ejective fricative
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Retroflex ejective fricative
Retroflex ejective fricative
Retroflex ejective fricative
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Retroflex ejective fricative
ʂʼ
Audio sample
Encoding
X-SAMPAs`_>

A retroflex ejective fricative is a type of consonantal sound, used in some spoken languages. The symbol in the International Phonetic Alphabet that represents this sound is ⟨ʂʼ⟩.

Features

[edit]

Features of a retroflex ejective fricative:

  • Its manner of articulation is fricative, which means it is produced by constricting air flow through a narrow channel at the place of articulation, causing turbulence.
  • Its place of articulation is retroflex, which prototypically means it is articulated subapical (with the tip of the tongue curled up), but more generally, it means that it is postalveolar without being palatalized. That is, besides the prototypical subapical articulation, the tongue can be apical (pointed) or, in some fricatives, laminal (flat).
  • Its phonation is un-voiced, which means it is produced without vibrations of the vocal cords.
  • It is an oral consonant, which means that air is not allowed to escape through the nose.
  • It is a central consonant, which means it is produced by directing the airstream along the center of the tongue, rather than to the sides.
  • The airstream mechanism is ejective (glottalic egressive), which means the air is forced out by pumping the glottis upward.

Occurrence

[edit]
Language Word IPA Meaning Notes
Keresan [example needed] Contrasts /sʼ, ʃʼ, ʂʼ, tsʼ, tʃʼ, tʂʼ/.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Retroflex ejective fricative

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A retroflex ejective fricative is a rare type of consonantal sound employed in a few spoken languages worldwide, featuring a manner of articulation that generates turbulent airflow through a narrow , involving the curled-back tip of the against the post-alveolar or palatal region, and an ejective achieved via simultaneous glottal closure and supraglottal air pressure buildup for egressive release. In the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), it is denoted by the symbol ʂʼ, representing the voiceless variant, which is the form attested in natural languages. This sound combines articulatory features that are individually common—such as retroflexion in languages like or Mandarin and ejectives in Caucasian or Native American languages—but their intersection as a fricative is phonetically complex and typologically uncommon due to the challenges of maintaining subapical tongue positioning during the prolonged friction and ejective burst. Acoustically, it exhibits low-frequency noise with a lowered third (F3 around 676 Hz in examples) and a downward-sloping spectrum, distinguishing it from alveolar or palatal fricatives. The retroflex ejective fricative occurs in the , a small isolate family spoken by communities in , , where Western dialects like Acoma and Laguna include the voiceless retroflex ejective fricative /sr'/ (realized as [ʂʼ]), often in sequences with stops or approximants, though retroflexes are phonologically restricted and do not occur before front vowels. No other languages are reliably documented as having this sound in their phonemic inventory, making it one of the rarest types cross-linguistically, with potential for allophonic realizations in related ejective systems but no broader areal patterns. Research on the retroflex ejective fricative has focused on its articulatory realization and perceptual cues, drawing from instrumental phonetics to elucidate why such combinations are infrequent. In , grammatical descriptions emphasize its role in a consonant inventory with seven ejective series, where the retroflex variant contributes to morphophonological alternations but is marginal compared to alveolar ejectives. These investigations underscore the sound's dependence on specific phonological environments, such as avoidance of high vowels, and its potential diachronic origins from developments or borrowing, though no unified evolutionary pathway has been established.

Phonetics

Articulation

The retroflex ejective fricative is articulated with the tip of the tongue curled backward toward the hard palate, forming a subapical point of contact in the postalveolar region without accompanying palatalization of the tongue body. This retroflex configuration involves raising the tongue tip and creating a sublingual cavity beneath it, accompanied by retraction of the tongue body to maintain the posterior articulation point. The manner of articulation is fricative, achieved by narrowing the vocal tract at the retroflex constriction between the curled underside of the tongue tip and the postalveolar region, generating turbulent airflow through the restricted channel. The ejective quality arises from a , in which the closes simultaneously with the oral to prevent pulmonic , while the elevates to compress the air trapped in the supraglottal cavity and build intraoral . This is released abruptly following the turbulence, distinguishing the sound from pulmonic egressive airstreams. The entire production is voiceless, with no vibration of the due to the glottal closure and absence of pulmonic . What uniquely defines this consonant is the integration of the retroflex tongue curling with the glottalic ejective mechanism, setting it apart from non-ejective pulmonic retroflex fricatives such as [ʂ].

Acoustics

The retroflex ejective fricative exhibits acoustic properties that combine the spectral characteristics of retroflex fricatives with the glottalic egressive mechanism of ejectives. In general, retroflex fricatives are marked by a lowered third (F3), typically resulting from tongue tip retraction and the formation of a sublingual cavity, which lengthens the front vocal tract and shifts energy to lower frequencies. This lowering of F3—often denoted as a [-2F3] effect for subapical articulations—contrasts with higher F3 values in alveolar fricatives and contributes to a darker, muffled quality. Spectral peaks for retroflex fricatives generally fall in the 2-4 kHz range, with primary energy concentrated below 2 kHz and a rapid amplitude drop-off above 4 kHz, as observed in languages like Mandarin (starting around 2 kHz) and /Tamil (around 3-4 kHz). The ejective component introduces distinct temporal and intensity features, primarily due to the glottalic airstream that builds intraoral without pulmonic . Frication duration is notably shorter in ejective fricatives, averaging 80-100 ms compared to 100-120 ms in pulmonic counterparts, often followed by a glottal release burst and a brief silent lag (20-25 ms). This results in reduced overall intensity relative to pulmonic fricatives, though initial-position ejectives may show slightly higher intensity (around 58 dB vs. 54 dB). The voiceless nature concentrates in high frequencies without voicing bars on spectrograms, but the retroflex articulation lowers the center of ( moment M1) compared to alveolar ejectives, typically placing it below 5 kHz. Perceptually, retroflexion is cued by the lowered F3 and extended transitions (longer than in alveolar fricatives), while ejectivity is identified through the abrupt frication offset, pulsing or "scrapiness" in the , and absence of sustained pulmonic . Due to the typological rarity of retroflex ejective fricatives, empirical acoustic remain limited; however, the retroflex articulation typically lowers the center of compared to alveolar fricatives.

Occurrence

In Keres languages

The Keres languages, also known as Keresan, form a small spoken by approximately 13,000 people as of 2022 across several communities in central States. The family is divided into Eastern Keres (including dialects at Cochiti, , San Felipe, Santa Ana, and Zia pueblos; ~4,000 speakers based on 1990s estimates) and Western Keres (including Acoma, Laguna, and Acoma-Laguna varieties; ~4,500 speakers based on 1970s-1990s estimates), each featuring complex phonological systems with large consonant inventories that include multiple series of stops, affricates, and fricatives distinguished by voicing, aspiration, and . In Western Keres dialects such as Laguna and Acoma, the retroflex ejective fricative, transcribed as /ʂʼ/ (or orthographically as <sr’>), functions as a distinct phoneme within an expanded three-way laryngeal contrast series—voiceless, aspirated, and ejective—that applies not only to stops and affricates but also to sibilant fricatives. This series reflects the languages' rich ejective system, where ejectives are produced with glottal closure and pulmonic egression, contributing to the family's typologically notable consonant complexity. The sound /ʂʼ/ contrasts phonemically with the /sʼ/, the postalveolar ejective fricative /ʃʼ/, and the /tʂʼ/ (or <tr’>), helping to differentiate lexical items within the ejective paradigm. While minimal pairs are not extensively documented due to the languages' polysynthetic nature and limited descriptive literature, near-contrasts illustrate the distinctions; for instance, forms involving /sʼ/ (as in s’iu pi 'deer meat') versus /ʃʼ/ versus /ʂʼ/ (as in sr’aguya 'I sat you down') highlight place-of-articulation differences in ejective fricatives. Attested examples of /ʂʼ/ are relatively scarce in published sources, often appearing in initial or medial positions within native stems or in limited clusters, such as /ʂʼp-/ or /ʂʼk-/ sequences in hypothetical derivations, though concrete forms like sr’aguya demonstrate its use in verbal roots. In native Keresan words, /ʂ/ (the plain retroflex fricative) and /ʃ/ primarily occur in the sole permitted consonant cluster type: sibilant fricative followed by a stop or affricate (e.g., /ʂk/, /ʃt/), suggesting potential complementary distribution where /ʂ/ may alternate with /ʃ/ before certain non-ejective stops to avoid marked sequences. Ejective realizations like /ʂʼ/ follow similar distributional patterns but are less frequent in clusters due to their glottalized nature. Dialectal variation affects the prominence of /ʂʼ/, with clearer phonemic status and frequent attestation in Western Keres dialects like Laguna and Acoma, where it integrates fully into the ejective series. Documentation for Eastern Keres varieties is limited.

Typological rarity

The retroflex ejective fricative is among the rarest consonant types cross-linguistically, with phonemic attestations confirmed solely in the Keres languages, an isolate family spoken in . Ejective fricatives more broadly occur infrequently, appearing in fewer than 5% of languages that possess ejectives, which themselves are found in only about 16% of the world's languages. This scarcity underscores the sound's marginal status in phonological inventories, where it typically emerges only in small families or isolates with expanded ejective series. The typological rarity stems from phonetic and aerodynamic challenges inherent to its production. Retroflexion demands precise curling to create a subapical , which must be sustained for while coordinating glottal closure and supraglottal buildup for the ejective release—a combination that risks airflow leakage and acoustic instability. Ejectives thus preferentially manifest as stops rather than , as the complete oral closure in stops better facilitates pressure accumulation without compromising the . Typological patterns reflect this, with implicational universals indicating that ejectives, when present, require corresponding stop ejectives in the inventory, often in languages with complex consonant systems. No phonemic occurrences outside Keres have been verified, though marginal or disputed cases appear in the literature, such as potential allophonic realizations in (Na-Dene) ejective fricatives or unconfirmed reports in some ; these remain unverified and typically involve non-retroflex variants reanalyzed as clusters. In Indian English, retroflex ejectives occur but as stops rather than fricatives. The sound was first systematically described in mid-20th-century studies of phonology, notably in analyses of Acoma dialect. As dialects are classified as definitely endangered with declining fluent speakers, the retroflex ejective fricative faces imminent risk of extinction.

Notation

IPA symbol

The primary symbol for the retroflex ejective fricative in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) is ⟨ʂʼ⟩, formed by combining the retroflex fricative ⟨ʂ⟩ (Unicode U+0282) with the modifier letter apostrophe ⟨ʼ⟩ (Unicode U+02BC) to indicate the ejective release. In certain fonts, the apostrophe modifier may appear as a right half-ring positioned below the symbol for improved legibility, though the standard form places it superscripted immediately after the base symbol. The symbol ʂʼ is used by convention for the retroflex ejective fricative, analogous to the ejective stops shown in the non-pulmonic consonants section of the IPA chart (such as ʈʼ for the retroflex stop), reflecting its glottalic egressive distinct from pulmonic sounds. Ejectives, including this , are inherently voiceless due to the glottal closure that prevents vocal fold vibration, making additional devoicing diacritics such as ⟨ʂ̥ʼ⟩ redundant in standard notation, though they may occasionally appear for explicit emphasis in detailed transcriptions. The retroflex symbol ⟨ʂ⟩ was first adopted in the 1926 revision of the IPA chart, as part of expansions to represent apical-postalveolar articulations more precisely. The apostrophe modifier for ejectives also originated in the 1926 chart for denoting glottalic egressives on stops, and was extended to fricatives by convention; it received further standardization during the 1989 Kiel Convention, which reorganized the non-pulmonic consonants into their current chart format. In linguistic transcription, ⟨ʂʼ⟩ is used in descriptions of languages featuring this sound, such as the Keresan languages, where it represents a phoneme in dialects like Laguna Keres.

Orthographic use

In practical orthographies for Keres languages, the retroflex ejective fricative is commonly represented using digraphs combined with an apostrophe to denote the ejective glottalization. For instance, in the Laguna dialect of Western Keres, the sound /ʂʼ/ is written as ⟨sr'⟩, where ⟨sr⟩ indicates the retroflex fricative quality and the apostrophe marks the ejective release. A similar convention applies in Acoma Pueblo Keres, employing ⟨sr'⟩ for /ʂʼ/, though orthographic practices vary by dialect without a fully unified standard across the Keresan family. The apostrophe serves as the primary marker for ejectives in these systems, distinguishing them from plain and aspirated consonants, as seen in broader Keres consonant representations like ⟨k'⟩ for /kʼ/ and ⟨t'⟩ for /tʼ/. Outside Keres languages, where the sound is typologically rare, no established orthographic conventions exist, and linguistic literature defaults to the International Phonetic Alphabet symbol ⟨ʂʼ⟩ for transcription. In Toda, where a related ejective retroflex affricate-fricative sequence occurs, the sound is typically represented using IPA symbols in linguistic descriptions, as standard orthographies based on the Toda script or Tamil script do not have dedicated markers for ejectives. Early 20th-century missionary writings, such as John Menaul's 1880 Child's Catechism in English and Laguna, employed inconsistent digraphs for Keres consonants, using apostrophes for ejectives but lacking specific markers for retroflexion, often approximating fricatives with basic Latin letters like ⟨s⟩ or ⟨sh⟩. Contemporary revitalization efforts in Keres communities, including educational programs at Acoma and Laguna Pueblos, have promoted standardization of ejective markers like the apostrophe in dictionaries and teaching materials to support language preservation. For example, a Keres word like /ʂʼa/ (hypothetical form evoking a scraping action) would be rendered as "sr'a" in these modern systems.

References

  1. https://clts.clld.org/parameters/voiceless_retroflex_ejective_sibilant_fricative_consonant
  2. https://www.lotpublications.nl/Documents/075_fulltext.pdf
  3. https://kuppl.ku.edu/sites/kuppl/files/documents/publications/Jongman%2520OREL%25202024%2520Phonetics%2520of%2520Fricatives.pdf
  4. https://enunciate.arts.ubc.ca/linguistics/world-sounds/consonants-non-pulmonic/
  5. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0995.pdf
  6. https://brill.com/view/journals/aall/9/1-2/article-p139_8.pdf
  7. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0481.pdf
  8. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01287685v1/document
  9. https://atomicscribe.com/the-keres-language-a-language-family-fighting-for-survival/
  10. https://theswissbay.ch/pdf/Books/Linguistics/Mega%2520linguistics%2520pack/North%2520American/Tanoan%2520%2526%2520Keresan/Laguna%2520Keres%252C%2520A%2520Grammar%2520of%2520%2528Lachler%2529.pdf
  11. https://wals.info/chapter/7
  12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287921281_Why_Make_Life_Hard_Resolutions_to_Problems_of_Rare_and_Difficult_Sound_Types
  13. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-international-phonetic-association/article/affricating-ejective-fricatives-the-case-of-tigrinya/0141F97F9A434152164B03B5260F7AB5
  14. https://www.ethnologue.com/language/kjq
  15. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/content/full-ipa-chart
  16. https://ia801006.us.archive.org/6/items/intonation-practice/Handbook_of_the_IPA.pdf
  17. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/IPAcharts/inter_chart_2018/IPA_2018.html
  18. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/IPAcharts/IPA_hist/IPA_hist_2018.html
  19. https://lingweb.eva.mpg.de/channumerals/Keres-Western.htm
  20. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/keres.htm
  21. https://books.google.com/books?id=Nm5NAAAAYAAJ
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.