Hubbry Logo
Open-mid vowelOpen-mid vowelMain
Open search
Open-mid vowel
Community hub
Open-mid vowel
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Open-mid vowel
Open-mid vowel
Open-mid vowel
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
This article contains phonetic transcriptions in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA. For the distinction between [ ], / / and ⟨ ⟩, see IPA § Brackets and transcription delimiters.

An open-mid vowel (also mid-open vowel, low-mid vowel, mid-low vowel or half-open vowel) is any in a class of vowel sound used in some spoken languages. The defining characteristic of an open-mid vowel is that the tongue is positioned approximately one third of the way from an open vowel to a close vowel.[1][2]

Examples

[edit]

Some of the open-mid vowels that have dedicated symbols in the International Phonetic Alphabet are:

Other open-mid vowels can be indicated with diacritics of relative articulation applied to letters for neighboring vowels.[citation needed]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Open-mid vowel

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
An open-mid vowel, also known as a low-mid vowel, is a class of vowel sounds in which the tongue is positioned approximately halfway between the height of a and an , resulting in an intermediate degree of oral cavity openness. The International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) distinguishes multiple vowel height levels, including open-mid between close-mid and open, with the acoustic correlate primarily being a moderate frequency of the first . Open-mid vowels occur in various languages and can differ in frontness, backness, rounding, and other articulatory features; prominent examples include the [ɛ], as in the English word "bet" or French "père" (father), and the [ɔ], as in the English "thought" (in General American) or French "porte" (door). These vowels play a key role in phonological contrasts, such as distinguishing word meanings in like French and Italian, where open-mid and close-mid pairs (e.g., [ɛ] vs. , [ɔ] vs. ) are phonemically distinct, often conditioned by syllable structure or lexical factors. In African languages like Zulu, open-mid vowels such as [ɛ] and [ɔ] form part of a five-vowel system and exhibit raised variants in specific phonetic environments. The precise realization of open-mid vowels can vary across dialects and languages, influenced by surrounding consonants, stress, and historical sound changes, making them a focal point in phonetic and phonological research.

Definition and Classification

Articulatory Phonetics

Open-mid vowels are articulated with the body of the at a height midway between that of mid vowels and open vowels, such that the highest point of the tongue arch is positioned lower than in close-mid vowels like and but higher than in open vowels such as and [ɑ]. This intermediate tongue height creates a relatively open vocal tract configuration while maintaining sufficient elevation to distinguish the vowel from fully low articulations. The jaw is lowered to a degree slightly greater than for mid vowels, facilitating the openness in the oral cavity and allowing the tongue to achieve the required elevation without excessive tension. In front open-mid vowels, such as [ɛ], the tongue advances forward in the mouth, raising the front portion toward the to constrict the front oral cavity. Conversely, in back open-mid vowels like [ɔ], the tongue retracts posteriorly toward the velum, thereby enlarging the pharyngeal space behind the tongue. Central open-mid vowels position the tongue body more neutrally in the horizontal plane, balancing the front and back cavity dimensions. These articulatory and acoustic properties can vary across languages, dialects, and speakers, influenced by factors such as vowel quality and phonetic context. Lip configuration varies systematically with vowel backness and rounding. The unrounded front open-mid vowel [ɛ] and unrounded central [ɜ] variants feature neutral or spread lips, promoting an open front resonance. Rounded counterparts, including the front [œ], central [ɞ], and back [ɔ], involve protrusion and rounding of the lips, which narrows the lip aperture and alters the overall vocal tract shape to emphasize lower formants. These articulatory adjustments ensure the distinct perceptual qualities of open-mid vowels across their positional variants.

Auditory and Acoustic Properties

Open-mid vowels are perceived as having a half-open or low-mid quality, intermediate in openness between close-mid and open vowels, primarily due to their position in the acoustic vowel space defined by frequencies. This perceptual distinctiveness arises from smoother transitions compared to fully open vowels, yet with greater than close-mid vowels, allowing listeners to categorize them based on auditory cues like and . Acoustically, the first formant (F1) of open-mid vowels typically ranges from 500 to 700 Hz across speakers, reflecting their intermediate tongue height; this is higher than the 300–500 Hz range for close-mid vowels but lower than the 700–900 Hz for open vowels. For instance, measurements from speakers show average F1 values of approximately 610 Hz for [ɛ] and 570 Hz for [ɔ] in adult males. The second formant (F2), which correlates with tongue frontness, varies markedly: front open-mid vowels such as [ɛ] exhibit high F2 values around 1800–2200 Hz, while back open-mid vowels like [ɔ] have lower F2 around 800–1200 Hz, contributing to their differential auditory brightness or roundness. In connected speech, open-mid vowels tend to have longer durations than close-mid vowels due to lower tongue body tension, which also results in relatively higher intensity patterns that enhance their perceptual prominence within syllables. These temporal and amplitude characteristics aid in maintaining vowel identity amid coarticulatory influences. Spectrograms provide a visual representation of open-mid vowels through distinct formant bands: F1 appears as a dark horizontal band in the 500–700 Hz region, with F2 positioned higher for front variants (near 2000 Hz) or lower for back ones (near 1000 Hz), allowing clear differentiation from adjacent vowel heights via band spacing and bandwidth.

IPA Symbols and Notation

Front and Central Open-Mid Vowels

The front open-mid unrounded vowel is represented in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) by the symbol ⟨ɛ⟩, known as , with IPA number 303. This symbol denotes a vowel articulated with the positioned midway between close-mid and open in the front region of the vocal tract, unrounded , and an open jaw. The symbol ⟨ɛ⟩ was introduced in the initial 1888 version of the IPA, appearing in early charts published in The Phonetic Teacher and Le Maître Phonétique. The rounded counterpart, the front open-mid rounded vowel, uses the symbol ⟨œ⟩, a ligature of lowercase o and e, assigned 309. It indicates the same tongue height and frontness as ⟨ɛ⟩ but with lip rounding, distinguishing it from unrounded front vowels in languages that contrast rounding. This symbol has been part of the IPA vowel chart since its early 20th-century developments, maintaining consistency across revisions. For central open-mid vowels, the unrounded variant is symbolized by ⟨ɜ⟩, called reversed epsilon, with IPA number 325. Positioned centrally in the vowel chart, it represents a vowel lower than mid-central [ə] but higher than open [ä], though its exact height has been debated in some phonetic analyses as potentially mid-central in certain contexts. Until 1993, ⟨ɜ⟩ was sometimes used for the mid central unrounded vowel [ə]; its current designation as open-mid central was formalized then. The symbol was introduced in 1907, removed in 1912, and reintroduced in 1926, replacing earlier notations like [ɛ̈] to better reflect central articulation. The rounded central open-mid vowel employs ⟨ɞ⟩, known as closed reversed epsilon, with IPA number 395. This rare symbol was added to the IPA in 1993 (previously often transcribed as ⟨ɔ̈⟩), combining central positioning and lip rounding at open-mid height. In cases where precise height distinctions are needed beyond primary symbols, the lowering diacritic (◌̞ or ˕, IPA number 430) is applied to close-mid vowels to approximate open-mid qualities, such as [e̞] for a lowered . This , placed below the base symbol, indicates a relative lowering of the , allowing flexible notation for non-cardinal vowels in .

Back Open-Mid Vowels

The primary symbol in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) for the rounded back open-mid vowel is [ɔ], known as , which represents a vowel with the tongue positioned halfway between an open back vowel and a mid back vowel, accompanied by lip rounding. For the unrounded back open-mid vowel, the IPA designates [ʌ], or , as the standard symbol; although realizations of [ʌ] are often central-back in practice, the official IPA classification positions it as open-mid back unrounded. To indicate length in phonemic transcriptions where distinction is relevant, a length mark is added, as in [ɔː] for the long rounded variant. In cases where precise approximation is needed without using the dedicated symbols, diacritics modify adjacent vowels; for instance, the raising diacritic (̝) applied to the open back rounded vowel [ɒ] yields [ɒ̝], approximating the open-mid height. These back open-mid symbols occupy the open-mid row in the IPA vowel quadrilateral, situated to the right of central vowels and below close-mid back vowels like . In contrast to front open-mid symbols such as [ɛ] or [œ], the back variants emphasize posterior tongue advancement and, for rounded forms, protrusion of the lips.

Occurrence in Natural Languages

Rounded vs. Unrounded Variants

Unrounded open-mid vowels, such as the front [ɛ] and the central [ʌ], are widespread in Germanic languages including English and German. In English, the unrounded open-mid front vowel [ɛ] appears in words like "bed" [bɛd], contributing to phonemic contrasts with higher vowels. Similarly, in German, [ɛ] occurs in "Bett" [bɛt] 'bed', distinguishing it from close-mid in minimal pairs like "Bett" versus "Beet" [beːt] 'garden bed'. Rounded variants of open-mid vowels, including the front rounded [œ] and back rounded [ɔ], are particularly prevalent in Romance, Dutch, and Scandinavian languages. In French, [œ] is realized in "cœur" [kœʁ] 'heart', while [ɔ] appears in "porte" [pɔʁt] 'door'. Dutch features [œ] in words like "keur" [kœr] 'choice', and Scandinavian languages such as Swedish use [œ] in "öppen" [œpːɛn] 'open'. These rounded forms often arise from historical vowel shifts that introduced lip rounding to distinguish merged categories. Phonemic contrasts between rounded and unrounded open-mid vowels are evident in several languages, notably French, where /œ/ and /ɛ/ form minimal pairs such as "mœurs" [mœʁ] 'customs' versus "mer" [mɛʁ] 'sea'. This distinction relies on lip rounding to maintain lexical differences, with formant analyses confirming acoustic separation in F2 values. In Dutch, similar contrasts exist between /œ/ and /ɛ/, as in "keur" [kœr] 'choice' versus "keer" [kɛr] 'turn', though minimal pairs are less frequent due to contextual constraints. Allophonic rounding of open-mid vowels can occur under the influence of adjacent consonants, particularly labials, in various languages including some Slavic ones. In Russian, the mid back vowel /o/ often realizes as the open-mid [ɔ] with variable lip that weakens progressively, especially in non-initial positions, creating allophones conditioned by consonantal context. This consonantal influence leads to subtle variations without phonemic change. Statistically, rounded open-mid vowels appear more frequently in European languages compared to global averages, occurring in about 9-18% of inventories with front rounded features, largely due to historical processes like and Romance diphthongizations that merged front-back mid vowels and preserved distinctions via rounding. These developments, evident in languages from the Indo-European family, explain the higher prevalence in versus unrounded dominance elsewhere.

Phonemic Status Across Language Families

Open-mid vowels, such as [ɛ] and [ɔ], serve as phonemes in a substantial but not predominant portion of the world's languages, appearing in approximately 37% and 35% of phonological inventories, respectively, according to the PHOIBLE database of over 3,000 languages. This frequency positions them as less common than close-mid vowels like and (found in about 70% and 65% of inventories) or open (93%), reflecting a typological preference for simpler distinctions in systems. In contrast to more peripheral vowels, open-mid realizations often emerge in systems with expanded contrasts, contributing to finer-grained phonemic oppositions within categories. Within the Indo-European family, open-mid vowels are frequently phonemic, particularly in Romance and Germanic branches. In Romance languages like Italian, /ɛ/ and /ɔ/ form core phonemes that contrast with close-mid /e/ and /o/ in stressed syllables, as in pèsca [ˈpɛska] ('peach') versus pésca [ˈpeska] ('fishing'), enabling robust lexical distinctions. Similarly, in Germanic languages such as Standard German, /ɛ/, /œ/, and /ɔ/ are established phonemes, contrasting with higher mid vowels in words like Bett [bɛt] ('bed') versus Beet [beːt] ('garden bed'), and they participate in the language's seven-vowel short system. In Austronesian languages, open-mid vowels are comparatively rare as phonemes and typically appear as allophones within vowel harmony or syllable-conditioned systems. For instance, in Indonesian, a major Austronesian language, the mid vowels /e/ and /o/ exhibit allophonic lowering to [ɛ] and [ɔ] in open syllables or before certain consonants, but lack independent phonemic status, as minimal pairs do not hinge on this height difference. Sino-Tibetan languages show limited phonemic use of open-mid vowels, often approximating them in tonal or syllabic contexts rather than as distinct segments. In Mandarin Chinese, open-mid qualities arise in finals like [jɛ] (as in yè 'leaf') or [uɔ] (as in wò 'lie down'), but the core inventory centers on /a/, /i/, /u/, /ɤ/, and /ə/, with open-mid realizations serving more as phonetic variants influenced by surrounding segments than stable phonemes. Among Niger-Congo languages, open-mid vowels are common phonemes, especially in Bantu subgroups where they support height-based contrasts in systems. Many , such as , feature a seven-vowel system with phonemic /ɛ/ and /ɔ/ alongside /i, e, a, o, u/, as in contrasts like ekikafu [ɛkikafu] ('small pot') with /ɛ/ versus forms using /e/. In , however, /e/ and /o/ realize as [ɛ] and [ɔ] allophonically in certain contexts (e.g., before /l/ or /r/), without phonemic height distinctions.

Phonological and Dialectal Variations

Contrasts with Adjacent Vowel Heights

Open-mid vowels often participate in phonemic contrasts with adjacent vowel heights, particularly distinguishing them from close-mid and open vowels through minimal pairs that highlight height differences. In languages like Italian, the front unrounded open-mid vowel /ɛ/ contrasts with the close-mid /e/, as seen in the minimal pair "pésca" [ˈpeska] 'peach' versus "pèsca" [ˈpɛska] 'he/she fishes', where the vowel height difference changes the word's meaning. Similarly, the back rounded open-mid /ɔ/ contrasts with close-mid /o/ in pairs like "fóro" [ˈforo] 'throat' versus "fóro" [ˈfɔro] 'forum', underscoring the phonemic role of in stressed syllables. These oppositions rely on precise articulatory positioning, with open-mid vowels featuring a lower than their close-mid counterparts, enabling listeners to perceive subtle acoustic differences in frequencies. Contrasts between open-mid and open vowels also occur, notably in English dialects where the open /ɑ/ opposes the open-mid central unrounded /ʌ/. A representative is "cot" [kɑt] versus "cut" [kʌt], where the higher tongue position for /ʌ/ creates a distinct phonological category, though realizations vary by (e.g., /ɑ/ may centralize in some American varieties). In , a comparable opposition appears in "father" [ˈfɑːðə] versus "fodder" [ˈfɒdə], pitting open /ɑː/ against open-mid /ɒ/, with the latter's mid-height and providing the contrast. These distinctions are crucial for intelligibility, as transitions and duration help maintain separation despite potential overlap in unstressed contexts. Mergers and instabilities frequently affect open-mid vowels, leading to raising toward close-mid in casual speech or specific environments. For instance, in , Canadian Raising elevates the nucleus of the diphthong /aɪ/ to an open-mid [ʌɪ] before voiceless consonants, as in "write" [rʌɪt] versus "ride" [raɪd], creating allophonic variation that borders on but preserves phonemic contrasts elsewhere. In bilingual contexts, such as Galician-Spanish speakers, open-mid and close-mid mid vowels often merge, reducing the inventory and complicating contrasts in . These patterns reflect ongoing phonological pressures, where casual reduction can blur boundaries without fully eliminating distinctions. Psycholinguistic experiments using vowel height continua demonstrate that open-mid vowels form a robust perceptual category. In identification and discrimination tasks with Catalan-Spanish bilinguals, participants accurately categorized open-mid /ɛ/ and /ɔ/ as distinct from close-mid /e/ and /o/, with high accuracy rates (over 90%) in forced-choice tests, indicating clear perceptual boundaries despite lexical processing challenges. These findings highlight how listeners rely on acoustic cues like F1 height to segment open-mid vowels separately along a continuum from open to close-mid positions. Phonological rules involving open-mid vowels include chain shifts that alter height relations over time. During the in English (circa 1400–1700), long open-mid /ɛː/ (as in "meete" 'meet') raised stepwise to close-mid [eː] and then to modern /iː/, part of a broader push-chain where higher vowels diphthongized, pulling lower ones upward. This systemic realignment preserved contrasts by redistributing the vowel space, illustrating how open-mid heights serve as intermediaries in historical sound changes.

Regional and Historical Shifts

In various dialects of , the open-mid back rounded vowel /ɔ/ (as in caught) undergoes merger with the /ɑ/ (as in cot), a phenomenon known as the low back merger or , which is widespread in regions such as the , the , and parts of the Midwest but absent in areas like the Northeast and Southern Atlantic states. This merger eliminates the phonemic contrast between the two vowels, resulting in a single low back vowel realization, often [ɑ] or a centralized variant. In British (RP), the central vowel /ʌ/ (as in strut) has centralized further to a near-open central [ɐ], a shift observed across the that distinguishes modern RP from earlier conservative forms where it was more back [ʌ]. Historical changes in English illustrate the lowering of open-mid front vowels from earlier stages. In , the short in open syllables, originally close-mid , lowered to open-mid [ɛ] by the period, establishing the modern /ɛ/ (as in bed) through processes like open syllable lengthening and subsequent diphthongization avoidance. Similarly, in French, the open-mid front unrounded /ɛ/ derives directly from Latin short ĕ under main stress, evolving in to /ɛ/ and later diphthongizing to /je/ in open syllables during the period (e.g., Latin mel "honey" > miel [mjɛl]). Cross-dialect influences appear in , where the /ɛ/ vowel (as in dress) has historically raised toward a close-mid in broad and general urban varieties, particularly in southeastern cities like and . Sociolinguistic factors play a key role in preserving open-mid distinctions, as seen in French dialects: Parisian French often merges /e/ and /ɛ/ in casual speech due to urban leveling and prestige norms favoring simplification, while maintains a clearer contrast between close-mid /e/ and open-mid /ɛ/, reflecting conservative rural influences and resistance to metropolitan standardization in formal and informal registers. Etymological dictionaries document such shifts from Proto-Indo-European (PIE), where *e occasionally developed into open-mid /ɛ/ in Ancient Greek under specific conditions like compensatory lengthening or before certain resonants, highlighting vowel gradation patterns across Indo-European branches.

References

  1. https://linguistics.ucla.edu/people/ladefoge/PhoneticStructure.pdf
  2. https://commons.princeton.edu/eng266-s25/wp-content/uploads/sites/433/2025/02/IPA-Introduction-Handbook.pdf
  3. https://edtechdev.stanford.edu/ipa-vowel-chart
  4. https://www.phon.ox.ac.uk/jcoleman/CardinalVowels.htm
  5. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/124456/300-5680-1-PB.pdf?sequence=1
  6. https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/24-914-language-variation-and-change-spring-2019/49a25c964f31b906cea286c9dadb824e_MIT24_914s19_lec2.pdf
  7. https://openlab.bmcc.cuny.edu/voorheeslin101b050/wp-content/uploads/sites/3384/2023/10/Articulatory-Phonetics-Louie-based-on-Ladefoged.pdf
  8. https://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~krussll/phonetics/acoustic/formants.html
  9. https://ia801006.us.archive.org/6/items/intonation-practice/Handbook_of_the_IPA.pdf
  10. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/IPAcharts/inter_chart_2018/IPA_2018.html
  11. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/IPAcharts/IPA_hist/IPA_hist_2018.html
  12. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/content/full-ipa-chart
  13. https://www.unicode.org/charts/nameslist/n_0300.html
  14. https://pressbooks.utrgv.edu/engl6360/chapter/describing-vowels/
  15. https://laits.utexas.edu/fi/html/pho/10.html
  16. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-slavic-linguistics/vocalism-the-vowels/CCD3F35C971438D3F6C1BDED03610B62
  17. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/iulcwp/article/download/36228/39968/100289
  18. https://twpl.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/twpl/article/download/28102/20797/0
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Russian-vowel-system-in-the-articulatory-vocalic-space-referring-to-the-tongue-positions_fig2_221836467
  20. https://wals.info/chapter/11
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3524587/
  22. https://phoible.org/parameters
  23. https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/9/4/150
  24. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-germanic-linguistics/article/phonology-of-mid-vowels-in-germanic-languages/6B9FEE88A6C84F9CCFB19CCEA2F0CCBE
  25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27863784
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0024384117302450
  27. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Niger-Congo-languages/Widespread-characteristics-of-Niger-Congo-languages
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5809139/
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0095447017302553
  30. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/applied-psycholinguistics/article/perception-of-languagespecific-phonetic-categories-does-not-guarantee-accurate-phonological-representations-in-the-lexicon-of-early-bilinguals/BFACF5A13A0E0E944AC02856FDAE3E6B
  31. https://scholarship.tricolib.brynmawr.edu/bitstreams/a2549d35-c1d2-48e3-a1d1-dcda231520b2/download
  32. https://repository.upenn.edu/bitstreams/22a4850d-68e1-418d-b195-3aa69448282a/download
  33. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-international-phonetic-association/article/variation-and-change-in-the-trap-and-strut-vowels-of-rp-a-real-time-comparison-of-five-acoustic-data-sets/48B615BD5E0C0A6ABAA633F71350BD8B
  34. https://www.britannica.com/topic/English-language/Historical-background
  35. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Romance-languages/Vowels
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374712051_Sociophonetic_Variation_in_Vowel_Categorization_of_Australian_English
  37. https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2350&context=utk_chanhonoproj
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.