Hubbry Logo
Solar cycle 24Solar cycle 24Main
Open search
Solar cycle 24
Community hub
Solar cycle 24
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Solar cycle 24
Solar cycle 24
from Wikipedia
Solar cycle 24
ISES Solar Cycle 24 Sunspot Number Progression
Sunspot data
Start dateDecember 2008
End dateDecember 2019
Duration (years)11.0
Max count81.8
Max count monthApril 2014
Min count2.2
Spotless days489
Cycle chronology
Previous cycleSolar cycle 23 (1996-2008)
Next cycleSolar cycle 25 (2019-present)
NASA Solar Cycle 24 Sunspot Number Prediction

Solar cycle 24 is the most recently completed solar cycle, the 24th since 1755, when extensive recording of solar sunspot activity began.[1][2] It began in December 2008 with a minimum smoothed sunspot number of 2.2,[3][failed verification] and ended in December 2019.[4] Activity was minimal until early 2010.[5][6] It reached its maximum in April 2014 with a 23 months smoothed sunspot number of 81.8.[7] This maximum value was substantially lower than other recent solar cycles, down to a level which had not been seen since cycles 12 to 15 (1878-1923).

Predictions

[edit]

Prior to the minimum between the end of Solar Cycle 23 and the beginning of Solar Cycle 24, two theories predicted how strong Solar Cycle 24 would be. One camp postulated that the Sun retained a long memory (Solar Cycle 24 would be active) while the other asserted that it had a short memory (quiet). Prior to 2006, the difference was substantial with a minority of researchers predicting "the smallest solar cycle in 100 years."[8] Another group of researchers, including one at NASA, predicted that it "looks like its going to be one of the most intense cycles since record-keeping began almost 400 years ago."[9]

The delayed onset of high latitude spots indicating the start of Solar Cycle 24 led the "active cycle" researchers to revise their predictions downward and the consensus by 2007 was split 5-4 in favor of a smaller cycle.[10] By 2012, consensus was a small cycle, as solar cycles are much more predictable 3 years after minima.

In May 2009 the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center's Solar Cycle 24 Prediction Panel predicted the cycle to peak at 90 sunspots in May 2013.[11] In May 2012 NASA's expert David Hathaway predicted a peak in Spring of 2013 with about 60 sunspots.[12]

NASA funded and used Ken Schatten's physics-based models,[13] which utilized a solar Dynamo model, to accurately predict the low. This method used the correlation between solar magnetic field strength at solar minimum to sunspot number at solar maximum to accurately predict the peak solar flux of each of the last three solar cycles. Schatten's predictions become accurate as early as solar minima, 5–6 years before solar max.

Results

[edit]

In early 2013, after several months of calm, it was obvious that the active 2011 was not a prelude to a widely predicted late 2012-early 2013 peak in solar flares, sunspots and other activity. This unexpected stage prompted some scientists to propose a "double-peaked" solar maximum, which then occurred. The first peak reached 99 in 2011 and the second peak came in early 2014 at 101.[14]

Speculation

[edit]
The 2008 breach of Earth's magnetic shield

According to NASA, the intensity of geomagnetic storms during Solar Cycle 24 may be elevated in some areas where the Earth's magnetic field is weaker than expected. This fact was discovered by the THEMIS spacecraft in 2008.[15][16] A 20-fold increase in particle counts that penetrate the Earth's magnetic field may be expected.[17] Solar Cycle 24 has been the subject of various hypotheses and commentary pertaining to its potential effects on Earth.

While acknowledging that the next solar maximum will not necessarily produce unusual geomagnetic activity, astrophysicist Michio Kaku took advantage of the media focus on the 2012 phenomenon to draw attention to the need to develop strategies for coping with the terrestrial damage that such an event could inflict. He asserted that governments should ensure the integrity of electrical infrastructure, so as to prevent a recurrence of disruption akin to that caused by the solar storm of 1859.[18]

The current solar cycle is currently the subject of research, as it is not generating sunspots in the expected manner. Sunspots did not begin to appear immediately after the last minimum (in 2008) and although they started to reappear in late 2009, they were at significantly lower rates than anticipated.[19]

On April 19, 2012, the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan predicted that the Sun's magnetic field would assume a quadrupole configuration.[20]

Throughout 2012, NASA posted news releases discrediting the 2012 phenomenon and the so-called Mayan prophecy, delinking them from solar activity and space weather.[21][22]

Events

[edit]
Solar flares by year
10
20
30
40
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
  •   M5-M9
  •   X1-X5
  •   X5-X9
The strongest flares of Solar Cycle 24 (above M5.0 class) and related events
Class Year Date Sunspot region Radio B. SR Storm CME GM Storm
X9.33 2017 Sep 6 2673 R3 S1 Yes -
X8.2 2017 Sep 10 2673 R3 S3 Yes -
X6.9 2011 Aug 9 1263 R3 S1 Yes -
X5.4 2012 Mar 7 1429 R3 S3 Yes G3
X4.9 2014 Feb 25 1990 R3 S1 Yes G2
X3.3 2013 Nov 5 1890 R3 - Yes -
X3.2 2013 May 14 1748 R3 - Yes -
X3.19 2014 Oct 24 2192 R3 - No -
X2.8 2013 May 13 1748 R3 - Yes -
X2.74 2015 May 5 2339 R3 - Yes -
X2.3 2013 Oct 29 1875 R3 - Yes -
X2.2 2011 Feb 15 1158 R3 - Yes G1
X2.2 2014 Jun 10 2087 R3 - ? -
X2.2 2015 Mar 11 2297 R3 - Yes -
X2.2 2017 Sep 6 2673 R3 - ? -
X2.1 2013 Oct 25 1882 R3 - Yes -
X2.1 2011 Sep 6 1283 R3 S1 Yes G3
X2.0 2014 Oct 26 2192 R3 - No -
X2.0 2014 Oct 27 2192 R3 - No -
X1.9 2011 Nov 3 1339 R3 - Yes -
X1.9 2011 Sep 24 1302 R3 S1 Yes G4
X1.8 2011 Sep 7 1283 R3 S1 Yes G1
X1.8 2012 Oct 23 1598 R3 - No -
X1.8 2014 Dec 20 2242 R3 - Yes -
X1.7 2013 Oct 25 1882 R3 - Yes -
X1.7 2012 Jan 27 1402 R3 S2 Yes -
X1.7 2013 May 13 1748 R3 - Yes -
X1.66 2014 Sep 10 2158 R3 S2 Yes G3
X1.6 2014 Oct 22 2192 R3 - No -
X1.5 2011 Mar 9 1166 R3 - Yes G2
X1.5 2014 Jun 10 2087 R3 - ? -
X1.4 2011 Sep 22 1302 R3 - Yes -
X1.4 2012 Jul 12 1520 R3 S1 Yes G2
X1.3 2012 Mar 7 1430 R3 S3 No -
X1.3 2014 Apr 25 2035 R3 - ? -
X1.3 2017 Sep 7 2673 R3 S2 No G4
X1.2 2014 Jan 7 1944 R3 S2 Yes -
X1.2 2013 May 15 1748 R3 S1 Yes G1
X1.1 2012 Mar 5 1429 R3 - Yes G2
X1.1 2012 Jul 6 1515 R3 S1 Yes G1
X1.1 2013 Nov 8 1890 R3 - Yes -
X1.1 2013 Nov 10 1890 R3 - Yes -
X1.1 2014 Oct 19 2192 R3 - No -
X1.0 2013 Nov 19 1893 R3 S1 Yes -
X1.0 2013 Oct 28 1875 R3 S1 Yes -
X1.0 2014 Mar 29 2017 R3 - ? -
X1.0 2014 Jun 11 2087 R3 - ? -
X1.0 2014 Oct 25 2192 R3 - No -
M9.9 2014 Jan 1 1936 R2 - Yes -
M9.3 2013 Oct 24 1877 R2 - Yes -
M9.3 2011 Aug 4 1261 R2 S1 Yes G4
M9.3 2011 Jul 30 1260 R2 - No -
M9.3 2014 Mar 12 1996 R2 - ? -
M9.2 2015 Mar 7 2339 R2 - Yes -
M9.0 2012 Oct 20 1598 R2 - Yes -
M8.7 2012 Jan 23 1402 R2 S3 Yes G1
M8.7 2014 Oct 22 2192 R2 - No -
M8.7 2014 Dec 17 2242 R2 - Yes -
M8.4 2012 Mar 10 1429 R2 - Yes -
M8.3 2010 Feb 12 1046 R2 - Yes -
M8.2 2015 Mar 3 2290 R2 - Yes -
M8.1 2017 Sep 8 2673 R2 - ? -
M7.9 2012 Mar 13 1429 R2 S2 Yes G2
M7.9 2014 Nov 5 2205 R2 - Yes -
M7.9 2015 Jun 25 2371 R2 S1 Yes G2
M7.7 2012 Jul 19 1520 R2 - Yes -
M7.6 2015 Sep 28 2422 R2 - ? -
M7.6 2016 Jul 23 2567 R2 - Yes -
M7.4 2011 Sep 25 1302 R2 - Yes G1
M7.3 2014 Apr 18 2036 R2 S1 ? -
M7.3 2014 Oct 2 2173 R2 - Yes -
M7.3 2017 Sep 7 2673 R2 - ? -
M7.2 2014 Jan 7 1944 R2 - No -
M7.1 2011 Sep 24 1302 R2 - Yes G4
M7.1 2014 Oct 27 2192 R2 - ? -
M6.9 2012 Jul 8 1515 R2 S1 Yes -
M6.9 2014 Dec 18 2241 R2 - Yes
M6.7 2011 Sep 8 1283 R2 - Yes G1
M6.7 2014 Oct 27 2192 R2 - ? -
M6.7 2016 Apr 18 2529 R2 - Yes -
M6.6 2011 Feb 13 1158 R2 - Yes -
M6.6 2011 Feb 18 1158 R2 - No -
M6.6 2014 Jan 30 1967 R2 - Yes -
M6.6 2014 Oct 28 2192 R2 - ? -
M6.6 2015 Jun 22 2371 R2 S2 Yes G4
M6.5 2013 Apr 11 1719 R2 S2 Yes -
M6.5 2014 Apr 2 2027 R2 - ? -
M6.5 2014 Jul 8 2113 R2 - ? -
M6.5 2014 Nov 3 2205 R2 S1 Yes -
M6.4 2010 Feb 7 1045 R2 - Yes -
M6.4 2013 Dec 31 1936 R2 - Yes -
M6.3 2013 Nov 1 1884 R2 - Yes -
M6.3 2012 Mar 9 1429 R2 - Yes G2
M6.1 2012 Jul 5 1515 R2 - No -
M6.1 2012 Jul 28 1532 R2 - Yes -
M6.1 2014 Dec 4 2222 R2 - Yes -
M6.0 2012 Nov 13 1613 R2 - Yes -
M6.0 2011 Aug 3 1261 R2 - Yes G4
M5.9 2013 Jun 7 1762 R2 - Yes -
M5.9 2014 Aug 24 2151 R2 - ? -
M5.8 2011 Sep 24 1302 R2 - ? -
M5.8 2015 Mar 9 2297 R2 - Yes -
M5.7 2012 May 10 1476 R2 - Yes -
M5.7 2013 May 3 1739 R2 - Yes -
M5.7 2014 Nov 16 2209 R2 - ? -
M5.7 2017 Apr 2 2644 R2 - No -
M5.6 2012 Jul 2 1515 R2 - Yes -
M5.6 2015 Jan 13 2257 R2 - No -
M5.6 2015 Aug 24 2403 R2 - ? -
M5.5 2012 Aug 18 1548 R2 - No -
M5.5 2015 Oct 2 2422 R2 - ? -
M5.5 2016 Jul 23 2567 R2 - Yes -
M5.5 2017 Sep 4 2673 R2 - ? -
M5.4 2010 Nov 6 1121 R2 - ? -
M5.4 2014 Nov 6 2205 R2 - ? -
M5.3 2011 Sep 6 1283 R2 - Yes G3
M5.3 2011 Mar 8 1165 R2 - Yes G1
M5.3 2012 Jul 4 1515 R2 - Yes -
M5.3 2014 May 8 2056 R2 - ? G1
M5.3 2017 Apr 2 2644 R2 - No -
M5.2 2014 Feb 4 1967 R2 - ? -
M5.1 2012 May 17 1476 R2 S2 Yes -
M5.1 2013 Oct 28 1875 R2 - Yes -
M5.1 2014 Sep 28 2173 R2 - Yes -
M5.1 2015 Mar 10 2297 R2 - Yes -
Source: Solarham.com[23] and NOAA's SWPC.[24] The CME field indicates whether the solar flare hurled a CME (oriented or not to Earth). The Radio B./SR Storm/GM Storm fields indicate the NOAA scales of radio blackouts/solar radiation storms/geomagnetic storms, being G1 (minor), G2 (moderate), G3 (strong), G4 (severe) and G5 (extreme).

2008

[edit]
Solar flares in 2008[25]
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
  •   C
  •   M
  •   X
Magnetogram showing the magnetic polarity of AR10981 (labeled as sunspot region 10981) compared to an active region from solar cycle 23.

On 4 January 2008, an active region appeared with magnetic polarity reversed compared to that expected by Hale's law for solar cycle 23. This presaged the start of solar cycle 24—though did not mark its official beginning. The region was located at the relatively high latitude 30° N which, according to Spörer's law, provided further evidence for the arrival of cycle 24. The NOAA assigned it the active region number AR10981.[5]

Only a few sunspots were observed on the surface of the Sun throughout 2008. The smoothed monthly sunspot number reached a minimum of 2.2 in December 2008, therefore an international panel of scientists declared that month as solar minimum and the beginning of Solar Cycle 24.[26]

2009

[edit]
Solar flares in 2009[27]
2.5
5
7.5
10
12.5
15
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
  •   C
  •   M
  •   X

Solar activity remained extremely low throughout 2009. The observed monthly sunspots exceeded 10 only in December.

2010

[edit]
Solar flares in 2010[28]
10
20
30
40
50
60
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
  •   C
  •   M
  •   X

On 19 January 2010, active region AR11041 produced an M2.3-class flare, the first flare of cycle 24 above M-class. It was followed by an M1.7-class flare seven hours later and four consecutive M-class flares the next day. Among the four flares, the strongest reached a strength of M3.4.

On 12 February 2010, active region AR11046 produced an M8.3-class flare. Later in the month, active regions AR11045 and AR11046 unleashed a total of nine M-class flares.

On 5 April 2010, the first coronal mass ejection (CME) of cycle 24 erupted at an active region causing a G3 (strong) geomagnetic storm on Earth. The Kp index, which quantifies disturbances in the horizontal component of Earth's magnetic field, reached a value of 7.

Video captured by NASA'sof the initial ejection taken August 1, 2010.
The coronal mass ejection starts at 2:36 UTC and ends at 3:56 UTC on August 1, 2010 in this animation on STEREO Ahead images.

On 1 and 2 August 2010, a series of four large CMEs were observed erupting from the Sun's Earth-facing side.[29] These CMEs were likely connected to a C3.2-class flare from active region AR11092 despite the CMEs taking place about 400,000 km apart from the region.[30] On 4 August 2010, a G2 (moderate) geomagnetic storm caused aurorae to be visible in the northern hemisphere at latitudes as far south as 45° N near Michigan and Wisconsin in the United States, and Ontario, Canada. European observers reported sightings as far south as Denmark near latitude 56° N. The aurorae were reportedly green in color due to the interaction of the solar particles with oxygen atoms in the relatively denser atmosphere of southern latitudes.[31][32]

On 14 August 2010, a C4.4-class flare produced the first solar radiation storm of cycle 24. The proton storm event was minor, rating at S1, and was easily absorbed by the Earth's ionosphere.

On 6 November 2010, active region AR11121 emitted an M5.4 flare.[33]

2011

[edit]
Solar flares in 2011[34]
50
100
150
200
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
  •   C
  •   M
  •   X

February

[edit]
'Valentine’s Day' 2011 flare
[edit]

Peaking at 01:56 UT on February 15, 2011, sunspot group 1158 produced an X2.2-class solar flare. Dubbed the Valentine's Day solar event by the scientific community, it was the first Solar Cycle 24 flare reaching X class level. In fact, it was the first of its class since December 2006. NOAA issued an R3 (strong) radio blackout alert pertaining this prominent x-ray flux event. In addition to flashing Earth with X and UV radiation, the explosion also hurled a CME in Earth's direction. The magnetosphere was impacted on February 18. The CME struck a minor G1-level geomagnetic storm.[35][36]
Shortly before, on February 13, sunspot 1158 had unleashed an M6.6-class solar flare. On February 18, the same active region produced another x-ray burst with the same strength.[37] 13 M-class bursts were registered in February 2011.

March

[edit]

A CME exploded from the vicinity of sunspot 1164 during the late hours of March 7, 2011. It leapt away from the Sun traveling ~2200 km/s, making it the fastest CME since September 2005.
On March 9, active region 1166 erupted in an X1.5 flare. An R3-level radio blackout was reported. The related CME caused a G2 geomagnetic storm two days later.[38] 21 M-class flares were registered this month.

July

[edit]

Sunspot 1260 produced an M9.3-class solar flare on July 30, 2011. Because of its brevity, the eruption did not hurl a substantial cloud of ionized material or CME toward Earth, so it was not geoeffective.[39]

The Aug 9, 2011 X6.9-class flare, taken by NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) in extreme UV light at 131 Angstroms.
The active region 1302, responsible for two X-class flares in Sep 22 and 24, 2011. Image taken that month by NASA's SDO.

August

[edit]

On August 5, 2011, the combined cloud of three consecutive CMEs produced brilliant aurorae, reported as far south as Oklahoma and Alabama. The geomagnetic storm reached a G4 (severe) level, enough to create power outages. It was one of the strongest geomagnetic storms in years. In the southern hemisphere, aurorae could be seen as far north as South Africa, Southern Chile and Southern Australia. The CMEs were hurled by three M-class flares erupting in active sunspot 1261: M1.4 on August 2, M6.0 on August 3 and M9.3 on August 4.[40][41][42]

X6.9-class flare
[edit]

On August 9 at 08:05 UT, sunspot 1263 produced a massive X6.9-class solar flare, the third X-flare of Solar Cycle 24 and the most powerful so far (as of May 2013). There was also a CME associated with this burst. Although the flare was not Earth-directed, radiation created waves of ionization in Earth's upper atmosphere, briefly disrupting communications at some VLF and HF radio frequencies. An R3-level (strong) radio blackout alert was issued. A proton event greater than 10 MeV (million electron volts) and exceeding 10 pfu (proton flux units) was also reported, so an S1-level solar radiation storm was also issued.[43]

September

[edit]

Sunspot 1283 erupted with an M5.3-class solar flare on September 6 at 01:50 UT. An R2 (moderate) blackout radio alert was issued. The burst was Earth-directed. Just 21 hours later, an X2.1-class flare – some four times stronger than the earlier flare – erupted from the same sunspot region. NOAA detected an R3 (strong) radio blackout and an S1 (minor) solar radiation storm. The combined CMEs of these bursts arrived at Earth on September 9, provoking a G3 (strong) geomagnetic storm.

The next day, September 7, an X1.8-class solar flare erupted from sunspot 1283, producing an S1 solar radiation storm. A fourth flare, an M6-class, was ejected by the same sunspot on September 8.[44][45][46]

This sequence of flares produced waves of ionization in Earth's upper atmosphere, briefly altering the propagation of low-frequency radio signals around Earth. Moreover, the eruptions hurled clouds of plasma in its direction. CME impacts, strong geomagnetic storms and aurorae were registered from September 9 onwards.

Then, on September 22, an X1.4-class solar flare erupted out of sunspot 1302. An R3-level radio blackout was registered. The blast produced a significant CME, but was not Earth directed. Two days later, an X1.9-class flare, followed in the next 31 hours by a spectacular string of 14 M-class flares, the biggest being two M7 flares, was mostly unleashed out of the same sunspot. The first two explosions, X1.9 and M7.1, propelled a pair of closely spaced CMEs. A G4 (severe) geomagnetic storm was reported on September 26.[47][48]

In total, the Sun produced four X flares and 31 M flares in September 2011, one of the most active months of Solar Cycle 24 so far.

October

[edit]

The Sun unleashed eight M-class flares this month, being the strongest the M3.9 event, followed by an Earth-directed CME, produced by sunspot 1305 on October 2. Just in the eve, sunspots 1302 and 1305 had emitted flares almost at the same time; the first event was a C-class and the second one reached a M1.2 category. This double eruption, which hurled a double CME as well, were particularly interesting as coincided with the arrival of a comet, discovered by amateur astronomers the previous day, that disintegrated in spectacular fashion when it plunged into the Sun. A very similar scenario happened on May 10–11, 2011.[49]

November

[edit]

On November 3, 2011, active region 1339, one of the largest sunspots in years - 40,000 km wide and at least twice that in length - unleashed an X1.9-class solar flare. Waves of ionization in the upper atmosphere created an R3 (strong) radio blackout. The related CME was not headed for Earth.[50] 13 M-class flares were registered this month. November 2011 may be considered the most active month of the current Cycle 24 so far, as monthly sunspot count was nearly 100 (96.7) and the same went for the F10.7 Solar Flux (the radio emission from the Sun at a wavelength of 10.7 cm) that racked up a value of 153.1. However, these numbers are well below those of Cycle 23 at its peak. Cycle 23 peak sunspot count was 170 and its F10.7 was about 235.[51]

December

[edit]

Solar activity increased again in late December, with the Sun unleashing eight M-flares. The most intense flare, produced by sunspot 1385, was an M4.0 event on December 25.[52] The year 2011 ended up with 111 M-class and 8 X-class solar flares.[53]

2012

[edit]
Solar flares in 2012[54]
50
100
150
200
250
300
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
  •   C
  •   M
  •   X

January

[edit]

Active sunspot 1401 erupted an M3.2-class solar flare and a full-halo CME on January 19, 2012. The CME hit the Earth's magnetic field in the early hours of January 22, with minor geomagnetic disturbances reported.[55]
Sunspot 1402 erupted a long-duration M8.7-class flare, followed by a CME, on January 23, 2012, at 03:59 UTC. According to NOAA, the flare's radiation storm was ranked as S3 (strong), the strongest since May 2005.[56] The very fast-moving CME arrived at the Earth on January 24 at approximately 15:00 UTC. The geomagnetic storm reached a G1 level (minor), the same level recorded by the previous M3-class flare.[57]

SOHO view of the Jan 23, 2012 M8.7 flare.
SDO shot of the Jan 23, 2012, M8.7 flare.
SDO shot of the Jan 23, 2012, M8.7 flare.
The M3.2 class solar flare of 19 January 2012, by SDO.

On January 27, at 18:37 UT, sunspot region 1402 unleashed an X1.7-class flare, prompting NOAA's Space Weather Prediction Center to issue an R3 (strong) Radio Blackout warning and an S2 (moderate) Solar Radiation Storm warning. Sunspot 1402 was rotating onto the far side of the Sun, so the blast site was not facing Earth. The explosion also produced a huge CME, but not Earth-oriented, so no geomagnetic storm was expected.[58][59]

March

[edit]
Enlil model for the March 2012 coronal mass ejection, plotted out to ten astronomical units (beyond the orbit of Saturn). The top view slices the data in the plane of the Earth's orbit and projects the planetary orbits onto that. The side view is a cross-section through the Sun-Earth line. The wedge-shape of the side view is because the ENLIL model only extends above and below the solar equator by 60 degrees.

Following several minor C-class flares, M-class flares and CMEs registered in previous days and weeks, active region 1429 erupted an X1.1-class flare on March 5 at 04:13 GMT. The wave of high energy electromagnetic rays, reaching Earth in minutes, caused an R3 (strong) radio blackout over China, India and Australia, according to NOAA. Sunspot region 1429, whose size was half of that of Jupiter and was rotating toward Earth, was being particularly active since it materialized on March 2. The CME that followed arrived at the Earth on March 7 and caused a G2 (moderate) geomagnetic storm. Just hours after ejecting the X1.1-class flare, it produced several minor C and M-class flares in quick succession.[60][61]

X5.4-class flare
[edit]

After releasing up to nine M-class flares in only one day, the active region 1429 erupted a powerful X5.4-class flare at 00:24 UTC on March 7. The related CME impacted the Earth on March 8, causing a G3 (strong) geomagnetic storm. This event marked the second strongest solar flare of Cycle 24 in terms of X-ray flux. NOAA launched R3 (strong) radio blackout and S3 (strong) solar radiation storm alerts.[62] Just one hour after that first flare, nearby sunspot 1430 released a less powerful X1.3-class flare. No CME associated to this event was reported.[63] Months later, in June, NASA reported that its Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope detected in this powerful flare the highest flux of gamma rays — greater than 100 MeV — ever associated with an eruption on the Sun.[64]

AR1429, rotating toward the other side of the Sun, generated an M6.3-class flare on March 9, an M8.5 flare one day later and an M7.9 flare on March 13. These eruptions hurled CMEs, all Earth-oriented. The first wave of plasma impacted the magnetosphere on March 12, causing a G2 (moderate) geomagnetic storm. The second CME was not geoeffective. The third wave of ionized gas reached Earth on March 15, causing another G2 storm.

In late March, the US Air Force Space Command reported that the solar storms of March 7–10 could have temporarily knocked American military satellites offline.[65] NASA also reported that these powerful flares heated the Earth's upper atmosphere with the biggest dose of infrared radiation since 2005. From March 8 to March 10, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from carbon dioxide and nitric oxide, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.[66]

March 2012, one of the most active months of Solar Cycle 24, ended up with 19 M-class and three X-class flares.

Short video of the eruption beginning on April 16th 2012. The video begins in 304 Angstrom extreme ultraviolet and ends with 171 Angstrom.

April

[edit]

A prominent eruption produced a CME off the east limb (left side) of the Sun on April 16, 2012.[67] Such eruptions are often associated with solar flares, and in this case an M1.7-class (medium-sized) flare occurred at the same time, peaking at 1:45 PM EDT (17.45 UTC).[67] The CME was not aimed toward Earth.[67] Nevertheless, this month was very quiet in comparison to the previous one, as only two M-class flares were recorded.

May

[edit]

Solar activity increased again this month, with 12 M-class flares ejected, the strongest being an M5.7 flare produced by active region 1476 on May 10. This so-called "monster" sunspot complex, the largest active region of the cycle to date, was about the size of Jupiter, or eleven times the diameter of Earth.[68]

June

[edit]

11 M-class solar flares were observed this month, the largest being an M3.3 flare.

July

[edit]

An X1.1-class flare erupted from sunspot 1515 on July 6, generating an R3 (strong) radio blackout and an S1 (minor) solar storm; its related CME caused a G1 (minor) geomagnetic storm. Six days after, sunspot 1520, the largest active region of Solar Cycle 24 to date, unleashed an X1.4-class flare, peaking at 12:52 PM EDT. This huge group of sunspots, which rotated into view on July 6, was located in the center of the Sun at the time of this event. The related CME caused a G2 (moderate) geomagnetic storm, following an R3 radio blackout and an S1 solar storm.[69]

Video of the July 12, 2012 X1.4 flare using SDO AIA footage in 131(teal), 171(gold) and 335 (blue) angstrom wavelengths.
The formation of the flux rope (lower right limb) that preceded the July 19, 2012 M7.7 flare.
The July 19, 2012 M7.7 flare.

The Sun emitted a moderate solar flare on July 19, 2012, beginning at 1:13 AM EDT and peaking at 1:58 AM. The flare was classified as an M7.7 flare. It was also emitted from sunspot 1520.[70] Other M-class flares registered this month included an M6.9 (July 8, sunspot 1515), an M6.1 (July 5, sunspot 1515), an M6.1 (July 28, sunspot 1532), an M5.6 (July 2, sunspot 1515) and an M5.3 (July 4, sunspot 1515). The month ended up with 45 M-class flares and 2 X-class flares, which is the highest number of such flares within the current solar cycle to date. Nevertheless, July 2012 was not the most active month in solar radio flux and number of sunspots.

Solar storm of 2012
[edit]
August 31, 2012 CME: pictured here is a lighten blended version of the 304 and 171 angstrom wavelengths.

August

[edit]

On August 31, 2012, a long filament of solar material that had been hovering in the Sun's atmosphere (the corona) erupted out into space at 4:36 p.m. EDT.[71] The CME traveled at over 1500 km (900 miles) per second. The CME did not travel directly toward Earth, but did connect with Earth's magnetic environment, or magnetosphere, with a glancing blow. causing aurorae to appear on the night of Monday, September 3.[71] A G2 (moderate) geomagnetic storm was registered on September 3 and September 5.[72] The Sun erupted 10 M-class flares this month, the largest being an M5.5 burst ejected on August 18.

September

[edit]

A filament eruption occurred during the late hours of September 27, resulting in a brief S1 (minor) radiation storm, alerted by NOAA in the early hours of the next day. The Earth-directed CME associated with this event affected Earth on September 30. A G3 geomagnetic storm was registered on October 1. The filament eruption was connected to a C3.7 flare which occurred in the vicinity of sunspot 1577.[73] Solar activity decreased remarkably this month. 4 minor solar flares, below M2, were registered in September 2012.

Video of the X1.8 class solar flare on Oct. 23, 2012,kel as captured by NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) in the 131 and 304 Angstrom wavelengths. The 131 wavelength of light is used for observing solar material heated to 10 million kelvin, as in a solar flare. The wavelength is typically colorized in teal, as it is here.

October

[edit]

On October 8 and 9, the arrival of a CME unrelated to solar flares and emitted on October 5 caused disturbances in the horizontal component of the Earth's magnetic field. The planetary Kp-index reached level 6, so a G2 (moderate) geomagnetic storm was reported.[74] The Sun released an M9.0 flare on October 20. This was followed three days later on October 23 by a very impulsive flare, peaking as an X1.8-class event at 3:17 a.m. UTC.[75][76] Both flares came from active region 1598, located on the left side (east) of the sun, which had previously been the source of a number of weaker flares. The M9.0 burst occurred when the sunspot was not yet rotated onto the Earth-facing side of the solar disk.[75] The NOAA categorized the radio blackout associated with the X1.8 event as an R3.[75] This was the 7th and last X-class flare in 2012.[75] There was no associated Earth-directed CME.[75]

November

[edit]

14 M-class flares were registered this month, the strongest being an M6.0 flare, which erupted on November 13 by AR1613.[77]

December

[edit]

Solar activity decreased significantly this month. For first time in two years (since December 2010), no X or M-class flares were emitted by the Sun's Earth-facing side (the strongest flare was merely a C4.1). The observed sunspots were 40.8 and the 10.7 cm radio flux value was 108.4, the lowest in ten months.[78]

2012 ended up with 129 M-class and 7 X-class solar flares.[53]

2013

[edit]
Solar flares in 2013[79]
50
100
150
200
250
300
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
  •   C
  •   M
  •   X

April

[edit]
The 13–15 May 2013 series of four X-class flares erupted by AR1748: X1.7, X2.8, X3.2 and X1.2. Shots taken by NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) in the 131 Angstrom wavelength of extreme UV light.
The 13–15 May 2013 series of four X-class flares as they were registered by the real-time monitor of GOES satellites X-ray Flux (NOAA/SWPC).

The unexpectedly low solar activity continued in April 2013. Only 13 M-class flares were reported from December 2012 to April 2013, the strongest being an M6.5 unleashed by active region 1719 on the 11th. This event generated an R2 radio blackout and an R2 radiation storm. The observed sunspots this month were 72.4 and the 10.7 cm radio flux value was 125.0.[78][80]

May

[edit]
String of X-class flares
[edit]

Solar activity increased rapidly in mid-May 2013 with four consecutive strong flares in two days. These powerful bursts all surged from the just-numbered sunspot AR1748, located on the eastern limb of the Sun and barely rotating around the front of the solar disk. AR1748 emitted the first flare, an X1.7-class, on May 13, peaking at 02:17 UTC. This event was quickly followed the same day at 16:09 UTC by an X2.8-class flare. On May 14 at 01:17 UTC the same sunspot emitted an X3.2-class flare, the third strongest of the current solar cycle so far. This was followed by an X1.2-class flare at 01:52 UTC on May 15. The four X-ray bursts generated an R3 (strong) radio blackout in the upper atmosphere.

Every X-ray event was followed by a CME. The first three CMEs were not geoeffective at all as they were not directed toward Earth; the fourth CME was partially geoeffective, so a G1 (minor) geomagnetic storm was expected to occur on May 18. An S1 (minor) proton storm event was also detected in connection with the May 15 X1.2 flare.[81]

2014

[edit]
Solar flares in 2014[82]
50
100
150
200
250
300
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
  •   C
  •   M
  •   X

February

[edit]

On February 24, 2014, the sun erupted with an X4.9-class solar flare, the strongest of that year.[83]

October

[edit]

Four solar flares occurred within 5 days from sunspot AR 12192, which is both the largest sunspot of solar cycle 24 and the largest since 1990. On October 19 there was a major X1.1-class solar flare. On October 22 an M8.7-class flare was followed by an X1.6 event. The October 24 X3.1-class solar flare was strong enough to trigger a radio blackout. Larger than the planet Jupiter, the AR 12192 sunspot was visible during a partial solar eclipse seen in North America.[83]

2015

[edit]
Solar flares in 2015[84]
50
100
150
200
250
300
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
  •   C
  •   M
  •   X

June

[edit]
The SDO captured an image of the June 25, 2015 event.

The sun emitted a mid-level solar flare, an M7.9-class, peaking at 4:16 a.m. EDT on June 25, 2015.[85]

November

[edit]

In early November 2015, solar flares disrupted the air traffic control system in central and southern Sweden, causing heavy delays for passengers.[86]

2016

[edit]
Solar flares in 2016[87]
25
50
75
100
125
150
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
  •   C
  •   M
  •   X

December

[edit]

A sunspot group originally attributed to the new solar cycle 25 is observed.[88] The sunspot numbers continue to decline.

During 2016, there were 26 days with no sunspots (preliminary numbers).[89]

2017

[edit]
Solar flares in 2017[90]
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
  •   C
  •   M
  •   X

March

[edit]

As of 31 March, preliminary reports indicate there had been 24 days during 2017 during which there were no sunspots.[89]

September

[edit]

On 6 September the largest X-class flare in a decade (X9.3) erupted from active region 2673.[91][92] Then, when this region was just crossing the west limb, another X-class flare (SOL2017-09-10, X8.2) produced only the second ground-level particle event of the cycle.[93] Sunspot region 2673 was one of the most active regions during the entire cycle, creating both of the largest flares in the cycle and 4 total X-class flares. No further M class flares would take place during the rest of Solar cycle 24.

2018

[edit]
Solar flares in 2018[94]
1
2
3
4
5
6
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
  •   C
  •   M
  •   X

January

[edit]

A small active region, NOAA 12694, appeared at the surprisingly high latitude of S32, near the disk center (January 8). Its location conflicted directly with the expectation from the butterfly diagram. In principle new-cycle spots should appear at such a latitude, but this region had the correct polarity for Cycle 24.

March

[edit]

NOAA reported that the number of sunspots was the lowest since 2009, and that recent activity matched that of the low activity in 2007 and 2008. Should this prove to be the solar minimum, Solar Cycle 24 would uniquely become a short (10 year) and weak cycle. Sunspots were observed on only 5 days that month.[citation needed]

2019

[edit]
Solar flares in 2019[95]
2.5
5
7.5
10
12.5
15
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
  •   C
  •   M
  •   X

May

[edit]

A C6.8 flare took place on 9 May 2019, the strongest solar flare to take place since October 2017.[96]

July

[edit]

NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory recorded a sunspot from Solar Cycle 25. This sunspot is significant compared to previous sunspots from Solar Cycle 25 due to the fact that it lasted long enough to get a designation.[97]

October

[edit]

The sun reached its absolute solar minimum in October 2019, marking the end of Solar cycle 24 and the beginning of Solar cycle 25.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Solar cycle 24 was the 24th since 1755, when reliable observations began, spanning from December 2008 to December 2019 and characterized by its unusually weak activity compared to recent cycles. It began following a prolonged with a smoothed number of 2.2, the lowest in over a century, and exhibited a double-peaked maximum, with the first peak in 2012 and the primary maximum in April 2014 reaching a smoothed number of 116.4—about 35% weaker than cycle 23. The cycle's duration of approximately 11 years aligned with the typical 11-year periodicity of solar activity, driven by the Sun's processes that reverse its magnetic polarity roughly every decade. Despite its subdued intensity, solar cycle 24 produced several notable events, including the strongest flare of the cycle—an X9.3-class eruption on September 6, 2017, from AR12673, which triggered radio blackouts and auroral displays. Earlier highlights included an X6.9 on August 9, 2011, from AR11263, the most powerful Earth-directed event early in the cycle, and multiple coronal mass ejections (CMEs) that caused geomagnetic storms, such as the July 2012 event from AR1520, which rivaled the in potential impact had it been Earth-facing. Overall, the cycle featured fewer large sunspots and reduced high-energy particle events than predecessors, with only one solar proton event exceeding 10,000 particles/cm²/sr/s compared to four in each of cycles 21–23, leading to milder geoeffectiveness for operations and power grids. The cycle's asymmetry, with the northern solar hemisphere peaking earlier and more prominently than the southern, contributed to its irregular profile and highlighted ongoing challenges in solar dynamo modeling. Observations from missions like NASA's provided unprecedented data on these dynamics, revealing weaker heliospheric magnetic fields and lower speeds that influenced Earth's . As the weakest cycle since the early , solar cycle 24 offered insights into long-term solar variability, including potential links to grand minima like the , though it did not descend to such extremes.

Predictions and Expectations

Early Forecasts

Predictions for solar cycles have historically relied on precursor methods, which analyze indicators from preceding cycles to forecast the amplitude and timing of the next cycle. These include geomagnetic indices such as or Ap indices, which measure disturbances caused by solar activity, and trends in areas or polar strengths observed during the declining phase of the previous cycle. Such methods assume that solar dynamo processes, which generate the Sun's , exhibit patterns that can be extrapolated, often using statistical models or physics-based simulations calibrated against historical data from cycles 1 through 23. Early forecasts for Solar Cycle 24, issued between 2000 and 2006, showed significant divergence, reflecting the limitations of these precursor techniques amid varying interpretations of Cycle 23 data. NASA's David Hathaway and Robert Wilson, using solar meridional circulation speeds as a precursor, predicted a peak smoothed sunspot number of 145 ± 30 in late 2011 or early 2012. Updating this with geomagnetic aa index analysis, they later forecasted an even stronger cycle at 160 ± 25, peaking around 2012. In contrast, Svalgaard and colleagues, basing their model on polar strengths—a key precursor for cycle amplitude—anticipated a weak cycle with a maximum of only 70 ± 2 sunspots. Mausumi Dikpati's team at the employed a flux-transport dynamo model incorporating sunspot area trends from Cycle 23, yielding a high prediction of 155 to 180 sunspots at maximum in 2012–2013. These estimates, compiled by organizations like and NOAA, highlighted a range from below-average to above-average activity, with no consensus emerging before 2007. Uncertainties in these early predictions were amplified by the unusually prolonged minimum at the end of Cycle 23, which lasted longer than typical 11-year cycles and featured exceptionally low activity. Observations indicated over 800 spotless days—days without visible sunspots—during the transition from Cycle 23 to Cycle 24, surpassing records from previous minima and complicating precursor signals like geomagnetic indices. This deep minimum, with 266 spotless days alone in 2008, suggested potential disruptions in the solar dynamo, leading models to produce wide-ranging outcomes depending on assumptions about and from prior cycles.
YearAuthors/TeamMethodPredicted Peak Sunspot NumberExpected Maximum Year
2004Hathaway & Wilson ()Meridional circulation precursor145 ± 302011–2012
2005Svalgaard et al.Polar magnetic fields70 ± 2~2013
2006Dikpati et al. (NCAR)Flux-transport dynamo with sunspot areas155–1802012–2013
2006Hathaway & Wilson ()Geomagnetic aa index160 ± 252012

Refined Predictions

In 2007, the Solar Cycle 24 Prediction Panel, comprising experts from NOAA, , and the International Space Environment Service, issued two alternative forecasts: a strong cycle with a maximum smoothed sunspot number (SSN) of 140 in October 2011 or a weak cycle with 90 SSN in May 2013, with the panel split 5-4 in favor of the weak scenario. The anticipated onset of the cycle was March 2008 (±6 months). This represented a convergence from earlier divergent estimates that had ranged widely in expected and timing. Drawing on observations of weakened polar at the end of cycle 23, these predictions highlighted the potential for reduced activity, with polar field measurements indicating diminished transport to the poles. By 2008–2009, prolonged low activity during the prompted adjustments to the timeline, shifting the official cycle start to December 2008 while lowering peak expectations to 70–80 SSN amid ongoing observations of the delayed rise. These revisions reflected growing recognition of the extended minimum's influence on cycle progression. Refinements in predictive methodologies during this period incorporated advanced solar dynamo models, which simulated the Sun's internal and attributed the anticipated weakness to subdued polar field reversals observed at the cycle 23 minimum. Such models emphasized the role of meridional circulation and in generating the solar , providing a physical basis for the consensus on a below-average cycle.

Cycle Progression

Onset and Rising Phase

Solar cycle 24 officially began in 2008, when the smoothed international sunspot number reached a minimum value of 2.2, signaling the transition from the preceding cycle. This date was determined based on the analysis of sunspot data by the Solar Influences Data Analysis Center (SIDC), confirming the end of the extended minimum phase. The solar minimum leading into cycle 24 was exceptionally deep and prolonged, lasting longer than average and featuring 817 spotless days from 2008 to 2011—far exceeding the typical count of around 300 to 500 days observed in previous minima. This unusual quiet period, characterized by low solar magnetic activity and minimal formation, contributed to a delayed onset of the new cycle and heightened interest in potential influences on Earth's . The rising phase from late 2008 through 2010 exhibited a characteristically slow progression, with emergence limited to small, isolated groups in 2009 that produced only sporadic activity; the annual mean number for that year stood at 4.8. By 2010, activity accelerated noticeably, as larger active regions developed more frequently, leading to an annual mean number of 24.9 and marking the transition toward increased solar output. Key observations during this initial buildup came from space-based solar observatories, including the (SOHO), which monitored the faint emergence of cycle 24 sunspots as early as late 2008, and the (SDO), launched in April 2010, which provided high-resolution imagery of evolving active regions and the onset of flares. For instance, SDO captured detailed views of emerging magnetic complexes in mid-2010, associated with the cycle's first M-class flares, such as the M1.9 event on August 14, highlighting the gradual intensification of solar phenomena.

Maximum and Declining Phases

Solar cycle 24 exhibited a distinctive double-peaked maximum, a feature driven by hemispheric in activity. The northern solar hemisphere reached its peak earlier, in November 2011, leading to the first maximum in the sunspot number series around early 2012, while the lagged, peaking in 2014 and producing the stronger second peak. This resulted in the overall maximum occurring later than initially anticipated, with the northern activity declining as southern activity rose. The official maximum for the cycle, based on the 13-month smoothed international sunspot number (version 2.0), was recorded in April 2014 at 116.4, marking one of the lowest peaks in over a century. The first peak in March 2012 was notably weaker, with a smoothed value of 98, highlighting the irregular progression of the cycle's high-activity period from 2011 to 2014. The declining phase commenced in 2015, characterized by steadily reducing sunspot numbers and overall solar activity, consistent with the cycle's weak nature. Activity levels dropped progressively, reaching a minimum smoothed sunspot number of 1.8 in December 2019, officially ending the cycle after a duration of 11 years (from the December 2008 minimum). This made solar cycle 24 shorter and less intense than average, with an average smoothed sunspot number of approximately 52 over its span, significantly weaker than solar cycle 23's maximum of 120.8 and average around 80. The low activity during the decline contributed to extended periods of quiet Sun conditions, influencing space weather patterns through 2019.

Solar Activity Patterns

Sunspot Development

Solar Cycle 24 exhibited a notably weak progression, with the smoothed international number (SSN) starting near zero during the minimum in late 2008 and gradually rising to a maximum of 116.4 in April 2014, the lowest peak since Solar Cycle 14 in the early . This subdued activity resulted in a total of 489 spotless days throughout the cycle, reflecting extended intervals of minimal solar magnetism and underscoring the cycle's overall feebleness compared to predecessors like Cycle 23, which peaked at 180.3. The progression, tracked by the Solar Influences Data Analysis Center (SILSO), highlighted a slow ascent during the rising phase from 2009 to 2011, followed by a plateau and decline toward the end of the decade. Active regions during Solar Cycle 24 were characteristically smaller in size and shorter in duration than those observed in prior cycles, contributing to reduced magnetic complexity and energy release. Data from the and SILSO indicate that the average area of sunspot groups was approximately 20-30% less than in Cycle 23, with many regions dissipating within 2-3 days rather than persisting for a week or more. This trend toward more ephemeral and compact structures aligned with the cycle's diminished activity, as evidenced by lower total sunspot areas and fewer large spot groups exceeding 1000 millionths of the solar hemisphere. The latitudinal distribution of sunspots followed the classic pattern but displayed a delayed equatorward migration, with activity bands starting at higher latitudes (around 30-40 degrees) and drifting southward at a slower rate of about 4.5 degrees per year, compared to the typical 5-6 degrees per year in stronger cycles. This sluggish progression, visible in hemispheric analyses from SILSO, meant that sunspots remained confined to mid-latitudes longer than usual, delaying the convergence toward the until late in the cycle around 2017-2018. The asymmetry between northern and southern hemispheres further accentuated this pattern, with the north leading in activity but both showing protracted high-latitude persistence. A prominent anomaly in sunspot development was the quiet interval from late 2012 to early 2013, bridging the first and second peaks of the cycle's double-maximum structure, during which monthly SSN dropped below 50 for several months amid reduced active region emergence. This lull, documented by SILSO observations, represented a temporary resurgence of near-minimum conditions roughly midway through the cycle, with sunspot counts falling to levels reminiscent of the 2008-2009 trough before rebounding to the secondary maximum in 2014. Such intermittency highlighted the irregular nature of Cycle 24's magnetic evolution, deviating from the smoother progressions of earlier cycles.

Flare and Eruption Activity

Solar cycle 24 exhibited relatively subdued flare and eruption activity compared to preceding cycles, characterized by fewer high-energy events amid an overall weaker solar maximum. This weakness manifested in a predominance of M-class and C-class flares, which accounted for the majority of eruptive phenomena, while X-class flares were less frequent, underscoring the cycle's diminished magnetic complexity. Solar flares during this period were classified using GOES satellite measurements of soft flux in the 1–8 wavelength band, where classes are defined logarithmically: C-class (10^{-6} to 10^{-5} W/m²), M-class (10^{-5} to 10^{-4} W/m²), and X-class (≥10^{-4} W/m²). A total of 49 X-class occurred, with notable examples including long-duration events in 2011–2012, such as the X6.9 on August 9, 2011, and the X5.4 on March 7, 2012, which exhibited extended decay phases exceeding 30 minutes and were often associated with filament eruptions. The strongest , an X13.3 event on September 6, 2017, from 2673, highlighted sporadic peaks in activity late in the cycle. Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) complemented flare activity, with over 260 halo CMEs—fully Earth-directed events appearing as halos in imagery—observed by the /LASCO instrument during the cycle. These peaked in frequency during 2012–2014, aligning with the delayed , and typically originated from active regions near the solar limb or disk center. Eruptive mechanisms in cycle 24 were primarily driven by within active regions, where oppositely directed magnetic fields in sheared arcades suddenly reconnect, releasing stored energy as accelerated particles, heated plasma, and expelled material. This process powered both s and CMEs, with reconnection sites often evidenced by flare ribbons and post-eruption arcades in EUV observations.

Major Events and Impacts

2008–2012 Events

Solar Cycle 24 officially began on December 2008, following a prolonged minimum, with the first of the new cycle appearing on January 4, 2008, marking the initial reversal in magnetic polarity. Throughout 2008 and 2009, solar activity remained exceptionally low, characterized by sparse and predominantly minor C-class flares, with no significant coronal mass ejections (CMEs) producing widespread geomagnetic disturbances. Precursor effects reminiscent of the intense 2003 Halloween storms were absent, as the Sun exhibited minimal eruptive behavior during this period, contributing to an unusually quiet start to the cycle. In 2010, solar activity began to ramp up modestly, with the first notable CME of the cycle occurring on April 3, leading to a G3 (strong) and visible auroral displays at mid-latitudes. This event was followed by a series of four powerful CMEs between May 22 and May 24, which triggered additional auroral activity observable across much of the , highlighting the cycle's emerging eruptive potential despite the absence of X-class that year. activity was limited to M-class events, such as the M8.3 on February 12 from 11046, but these contributed to heightened awareness as the rising phase progressed. The year 2011 saw a marked increase in flare intensity, beginning with an M6.6 on February 13 from sunspot 1158, which was among the strongest events early in the cycle and produced a minor CME. This was quickly overshadowed two days later by the cycle's first X-class , an X2.2 event on February 15 from the same region, causing widespread radio blackouts but limited geomagnetic impact. Later that year, on August 9, active region 1263 unleashed an X6.9 —the strongest of the cycle to that point—accompanied by a fast CME that reached on August 11, inducing a G4 (severe) , enhanced auroras, and disruptions to operations. Activity peaked further in 2012 during the cycle's first maximum phase. On March 7, sunspot region 1429 produced an X5.4 flare, the second-most intense of the cycle at the time, which ejected a massive CME arriving at on March 9 and sparking a severe with a Kp index of 9, the strongest of the year and one of the most intense in the cycle. This storm led to global auroral displays visible as far south as the and temporary high-latitude blackouts in high-frequency radio communications. Amid rising solar activity in June, the rare across the Sun on June 5-6 occurred without major disruptions, though nearby active regions produced several M-class flares, underscoring the cycle's growing dynamism. Multiple s followed throughout the year, including additional G3-G4 events tied to CMEs from persistent active regions, amplifying effects on technology and aviation.

2013–2019 Events

During the second peak of Solar Cycle 24 in late 2013 and early , sunspot activity surged again after an initial maximum in 2012, with active region AR2192 emerging as the largest sunspot group observed in over two decades. This region produced multiple X-class flares, including an X3.1 event on October 24, , which triggered a (CME) that impacted Earth's , resulting in widespread auroral displays visible at mid-latitudes. The associated reached G2 intensity, enhancing auroral activity across the . Subsequent flares from the same region, such as an X2.0 on October 27, further contributed to heightened solar activity during this phase. From 2015 to 2016, solar activity notably declined, marked by fewer intense events and extended periods of quiescence. A prominent example was the on , 2015, from AR2339, which released significant but did not produce a major Earth-directed CME. This period saw increasing spotless days, with 2016 recording 32 such days as numbers dropped below 20 on multiple occasions, reflecting the cycle's weakening influence. These quiet intervals contrasted with the more frequent outbursts of the cycle's earlier years, allowing for prolonged low geomagnetic activity. In 2017, despite the overall decline, Solar Cycle 24 produced some of its most powerful flares during the late declining phase. The X9.3 flare on from AR2673 stands as the strongest event of the entire cycle, peaking at 12:02 UTC and causing widespread radio blackouts across the sunlit side of , affecting high-frequency communications and . This was followed by an X8.2 flare on from the same region, which ejected a CME that enhanced auroral visibility in polar regions. Earlier in the year, sporadic M-class flares contributed to minor geomagnetic disturbances, underscoring the sporadic nature of late-cycle activity. By 2018 and 2019, flare activity continued to wane, with events limited to M-class flares representing the final significant outbursts of Cycle 24. As activity subsided, high-latitude sunspots began appearing in early 2019, signaling the onset of and the official minimum in December 2019. These developments marked a smooth transition, with Cycle 24 concluding after 11 years of below-average intensity.

Analysis and Legacy

Double-Peaked Phenomenon

Solar cycle 24 displayed an anomalous double-peaked structure in its maximum phase, characterized by a primary peak driven by activity in the northern hemisphere around March 2012 with a monthly smoothed sunspot number (SSN) of 98.3, followed by a secondary and higher peak from southern hemisphere activity in April 2014 with an SSN of 116.4. This pattern resulted in a prolonged maximum phase spanning over three years, with a notable Gnevyshev gap of reduced activity between the peaks lasting approximately 18 months from early 2012 to mid-2013. The hemispheric asymmetry was pronounced, as the northern hemisphere's activity led by about 26 months, contributing to the overall weaker cycle amplitude compared to predecessors. Observations from the Solar Dynamics Observatory's Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (SDO/HMI) revealed distinct evolution in the during this period, with unsigned in the corona showing surges aligned with the Gnevyshev peaks. Specifically, photospheric flux maps from Carrington rotations 2097 to 2220 (June 2010 to August 2019) indicated that the total unsigned flux at heights of 1.0–2.5 solar radii peaked near the end of 2014, lagging the SSN maximum by about 10 months, and exhibited hemispheric asymmetries strongest during the Gnevyshev gap. Sunspot-related flux accounted for only about 5% of the total within ±30° latitudes, underscoring the role of diffuse coronal fields in sustaining the double structure. Proposed mechanisms for this double-peaked behavior include a mid-cycle of polar and interference in waves. In cycle 24, the northern polar field began in June but was delayed, completing only in November 2014 after a prolonged zero-field phase of ~2.5 years, which correlated with the northern double activity peaks in January and November 2014; the southern , by contrast, finished earlier in November 2013. models attribute the phenomenon to abrupt fluctuations in the Babcock-Leighton process, where reduced poloidal field generation from tilted bipolar regions propagates via waves to create secondary toroidal field enhancements, leading to the observed peaks. These explanations are bolstered by helioseismic measurements of subsurface flows and , which indicate enhanced meridional circulation variations during the cycle that could amplify such interferences. This double-peaked profile in cycle 24 echoes rare historical instances, such as in cycle 2 (1833–1843), where similar hemispheric desynchronizations produced extended maxima, though cycle 24 stands out as the first with a stronger second peak. Such events challenge and refine solar interior models, emphasizing the need for stochastic elements in Babcock-Leighton dynamos to account for polar field variability and its propagation, with implications for predicting cycle irregularities and associated risks.

Comparisons and Implications

Solar Cycle 24 exhibited significantly reduced activity compared to its predecessors, Cycles 22 and 23, with approximately 30–40% fewer at maximum, peaking at a smoothed sunspot number of 116.4 versus 180.3 for Cycle 23. This weakness extended to solar phenomena, featuring nearly 80% fewer intense geomagnetic storms (Dst < −100 nT) than Cycle 23, marking it as the weakest cycle since Cycle 16 in the early . The cycle's diminished yet erratic activity underscored challenges in space weather forecasting, emphasizing persistent risks to satellites and infrastructure despite lower overall output. A notable example was the July 23, 2012, coronal mass ejection (CME)—a Carrington-level event that narrowly missed —highlighting how even rare intense outbursts in a weak cycle could disrupt operations, , and communications if directed planetward. This near-miss prompted enhanced modeling efforts to predict CME trajectories more accurately, revealing gaps in probabilistic forecasts during subdued cycles. Cycle 24's legacy profoundly shaped predictions for Cycle 25, which exhibited a delayed onset with its minimum extending into late 2019–2020, later than initially anticipated based on prior cycle transitions. Its prolonged minimum fueled ongoing debates about a potential grand solar minimum, akin to the Maunder Minimum, with some analyses suggesting a multi-decadal decline in activity that could temper future cycles, though observations indicate Cycle 25 may match or slightly exceed its predecessor's strength. On , the cycle resulted in fewer widespread blackouts from compared to more active periods, but isolated strains on power grids occurred, such as during the March 17, 2015, superstorm, which induced up to 200 mV/km in northeastern U.S. networks without causing failures yet stressing transformers and highlighting vulnerabilities in mid-latitude . Overall, these events reinforced the need for resilient grid designs amid variable solar forcing.

References

  1. https://earthobservatory.[nasa](/page/NASA).gov/images/44362/may-2010-solar-storm
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.