Hubbry Logo
Spectral radianceSpectral radianceMain
Open search
Spectral radiance
Community hub
Spectral radiance
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Spectral radiance
Spectral radiance
Spectral radiance
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In radiometry, spectral radiance or specific intensity is the radiance of a surface per unit frequency or wavelength, depending on whether the spectrum is taken as a function of frequency or of wavelength. The SI unit of spectral radiance in frequency is the watt per steradian per square metre per hertz (W·sr−1·m−2·Hz−1) and that of spectral radiance in wavelength is the watt per steradian per square metre per metre (W·sr−1·m−3)—commonly the watt per steradian per square metre per nanometre (W·sr−1·m−2·nm−1). The microflick is also used to measure spectral radiance in some fields.[1][2]

Spectral radiance gives a full radiometric description of the field of classical electromagnetic radiation of any kind, including thermal radiation and light. It is conceptually distinct from the descriptions in explicit terms of Maxwellian electromagnetic fields or of photon distribution. It refers to material physics as distinct from psychophysics.

For the concept of specific intensity, the line of propagation of radiation lies in a semi-transparent medium which varies continuously in its optical properties. The concept refers to an area, projected from the element of source area into a plane at right angles to the line of propagation, and to an element of solid angle subtended by the detector at the element of source area.[3][4][5][6][7][8][9]

The term brightness is also sometimes used for this concept.[3][10] The SI system states that the word brightness should not be so used, but should instead refer only to psychophysics.

The geometry for the definition of specific (radiative) intensity. Note the potential in the geometry for laws of reciprocity.

Definition

[edit]

The specific (radiative) intensity is a quantity that describes the rate of radiative transfer of energy at P1, a point of space with coordinates x, at time t. It is a scalar-valued function of four variables, customarily[3][4][5][11][12][13] written as where:

  • ν denotes frequency.
  • r1 denotes a unit vector, with the direction and sense of the geometrical vector r in the line of propagation from
  • the effective source point P1, to
  • a detection point P2.

I (x, t ; r1, ν) is defined to be such that a virtual source area, dA1, containing the point P1 , is an apparent emitter of a small but finite amount of energy dE transported by radiation of frequencies (ν, ν + dν) in a small time duration dt , where and where θ1 is the angle between the line of propagation r and the normal P1N1 to dA1; the effective destination of dE is a finite small area dA2 , containing the point P2 , that defines a finite small solid angle dΩ1 about P1 in the direction of r. The cosine accounts for the projection of the source area dA1 into a plane at right angles to the line of propagation indicated by r.

The use of the differential notation for areas dAi indicates they are very small compared to r2, the square of the magnitude of vector r, and thus the solid angles dΩi are also small.

There is no radiation that is attributed to P1 itself as its source, because P1 is a geometrical point with no magnitude. A finite area is needed to emit a finite amount of light.

Invariance

[edit]

For propagation of light in a vacuum, the definition of specific (radiative) intensity implicitly allows for the inverse square law of radiative propagation.[12][14] The concept of specific (radiative) intensity of a source at the point P1 presumes that the destination detector at the point P2 has optical devices (telescopic lenses and so forth) that can resolve the details of the source area dA1. Then the specific radiative intensity of the source is independent of the distance from source to detector; it is a property of the source alone. This is because it is defined per unit solid angle, the definition of which refers to the area dA2 of the detecting surface.

This may be understood by looking at the diagram. The factor cos θ1 has the effect of converting the effective emitting area dA1 into a virtual projected area cos θ1 dA1 = r2 dΩ2 at right angles to the vector r from source to detector. The solid angle dΩ1 also has the effect of converting the detecting area dA2 into a virtual projected area cos θ2 dA2 = r2 dΩ1 at right angles to the vector r , so that dΩ1 = cos θ2 dA2 / r2 . Substituting this for dΩ1 in the above expression for the collected energy dE, one finds dE = I (x, t ; r1, ν) cos θ1 dA1 cos θ2 dA2 dν dt / r2: when the emitting and detecting areas and angles dA1 and dA2, θ1 and θ2, are held constant, the collected energy dE is inversely proportional to the square of the distance r between them, with invariant I (x, t ; r1, ν) .

This may be expressed also by the statement that I (x, t ; r1, ν) is invariant with respect to the length r of r ; that is to say, provided the optical devices have adequate resolution, and that the transmitting medium is perfectly transparent, as for example a vacuum, then the specific intensity of the source is unaffected by the length r of the ray r.[12][14][15]

For the propagation of light in a transparent medium with a non-unit non-uniform refractive index, the invariant quantity along a ray is the specific intensity divided by the square of the absolute refractive index.[16]

Reciprocity

[edit]

For the propagation of light in a semi-transparent medium, specific intensity is not invariant along a ray, because of absorption and emission. Nevertheless, the Stokes-Helmholtz reversion-reciprocity principle applies, because absorption and emission are the same for both senses of a given direction at a point in a stationary medium.

Étendue and reciprocity

[edit]

The term étendue is used to focus attention specifically on the geometrical aspects. The reciprocal character of étendue is indicated in the article about it. Étendue is defined as a second differential. In the notation of the present article, the second differential of the étendue, d2G , of the pencil of light which "connects" the two surface elements dA1 and dA2 is defined as

This can help understand the geometrical aspects of the Stokes-Helmholtz reversion-reciprocity principle.

Collimated beam

[edit]

For the present purposes, the light from a star can be treated as a practically collimated beam, but apart from this, a collimated beam is rarely if ever found in nature, though artificially produced beams can be very nearly collimated. For some purposes the rays of the sun can be considered as practically collimated, because the sun subtends an angle of only 32′ of arc.[17] The specific (radiative) intensity is suitable for the description of an uncollimated radiative field. The integrals of specific (radiative) intensity with respect to solid angle, used for the definition of spectral flux density, are singular for exactly collimated beams, or may be viewed as Dirac delta functions. Therefore, the specific (radiative) intensity is unsuitable for the description of a collimated beam, while spectral flux density is suitable for that purpose.[18]

Rays

[edit]

Specific (radiative) intensity is built on the idea of a pencil of rays of light.[19][20][21]

In an optically isotropic medium, the rays are normals to the wavefronts, but in an optically anisotropic crystalline medium, they are in general at angles to those normals. That is to say, in an optically anisotropic crystal, the energy does not in general propagate at right angles to the wavefronts.[22][23]

Alternative approaches

[edit]

The specific (radiative) intensity is a radiometric concept. Related to it is the intensity in terms of the photon distribution function,[5][24] which uses the metaphor[25] of a particle of light that traces the path of a ray.

The idea common to the photon and the radiometric concepts is that the energy travels along rays.

Another way to describe the radiative field is in terms of the Maxwell electromagnetic field, which includes the concept of the wavefront. The rays of the radiometric and photon concepts are along the time-averaged Poynting vector of the Maxwell field.[26] In an anisotropic medium, the rays are not in general perpendicular to the wavefront.[22][23]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Spectral radiance

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Spectral radiance is a fundamental quantity in that quantifies the emitted, reflected, transmitted, or received by a surface per unit projected area, per unit , and per unit or at a specific point and direction. It is typically denoted as Lλ(λ,θ,ϕ)L_\lambda(\lambda, \theta, \phi) for dependence or Lν(ν,θ,ϕ)L_\nu(\nu, \theta, \phi) for dependence, where θ\theta and ϕ\phi specify the direction. A common unit for spectral radiance, when expressed per unit , is the watt per per square meter per nanometer (W sr⁻¹ m⁻² nm⁻¹). The corresponding SI unit is the watt per per cubic meter (W sr⁻¹ m⁻³). In the context of thermal radiation, spectral radiance plays a central role in describing blackbody emission through Planck's law, which provides the spectral distribution of radiation from an ideal blackbody at temperature TT. The wavelength form of Planck's law is given by
Lλ(λ,T)=2hc2λ51ehc/λkT−1,L_\lambda(\lambda, T) = \frac{2hc^2}{\lambda^5} \frac{1}{e^{hc / \lambda kT} - 1},
where hh is Planck's constant, cc is the speed of light, kk is Boltzmann's constant, and λ\lambda is the wavelength; this formula resolves classical inconsistencies like the ultraviolet catastrophe and underpins modern quantum physics. For blackbodies, spectral radiance is isotropic and depends solely on temperature, serving as a universal reference for calibrating light sources and detectors across the electromagnetic spectrum from ultraviolet to infrared. Spectral radiance is essential for characterizing the full radiometric properties of electromagnetic fields, including , , and other forms, enabling precise modeling of propagation and interaction with . In and physics applications, it is critical for selecting and optimizing sources in , where it determines energy coupling into small apertures or fibers, and in optical system design for imaging and illumination. It also finds widespread use in for analyzing stellar spectra, in for atmospheric and surface monitoring, and in standards maintained by institutions like NIST to ensure in measurements from 225 nm to 2400 nm.

Fundamentals

Definition

Spectral radiance is a fundamental radiometric quantity that quantifies the amount of emitted, reflected, transmitted, or received per unit perpendicular to the direction of propagation, per unit , and per unit or interval. It describes the distribution of radiative energy across the in a specific direction from a point on a surface, making it essential for characterizing sources and scenes in . Denoted as LνL_\nu in the or LλL_\lambda in the wavelength domain, spectral radiance provides a detailed spectral breakdown of the directional intensity of radiation. The mathematical definition of spectral radiance in terms of frequency is given by the differential expression Lν(ν,θ,ϕ)=d3ΦdAcos⁡θ dΩ dν,L_\nu(\nu, \theta, \phi) = \frac{d^3\Phi}{dA \cos\theta \, d\Omega \, d\nu}, where Φ\Phi represents the radiant flux (in watts), AA is the differential area of the surface, θ\theta is the angle between the surface normal and the direction of propagation (zenith angle), Ω\Omega is the differential solid angle (in steradians), and ν\nu is the frequency (in hertz). This formulation accounts for the projected area Acos⁡θA \cos\theta to ensure the measurement is independent of the observer's orientation relative to the surface. An analogous expression exists for the wavelength domain, replacing dνd\nu with dλd\lambda and adjusting for the relationship ν=c/λ\nu = c / \lambda, where cc is the speed of light. Spectral radiance is distinct from related broadband quantities such as total radiance, which integrates LνL_\nu or LλL_\lambda over the entire to yield power per unit projected area per unit solid angle (in W/m²·sr), and from , which integrates over all directions in the hemisphere and the to give power per unit area (in W/m²). Unlike , which lacks directional information, spectral radiance preserves both spectral and angular details, enabling precise modeling of light propagation in free space. The term spectral radiance emerged within to address the need for spectrally resolved descriptions of light intensity in fields like and . Its conceptual roots trace to 19th-century , particularly Gustav Kirchhoff's 1860 introduction of principles, which emphasized wavelength-dependent emission and absorption, and Max Planck's 1900 derivation of the blackbody spectral radiance law, resolving the through quantum hypothesis.

Units and Notation

Spectral radiance is quantified in the (SI) using distinct forms depending on whether it is expressed per unit or per unit . In the , the spectral radiance LνL_\nu has units of watts per square meter per per hertz (W·m⁻²·sr⁻¹·Hz⁻¹). In the domain, the spectral radiance LλL_\lambda has units of watts per square meter per per meter (W·m⁻²·sr⁻¹·m⁻¹), though practical measurements often employ nanometers or micrometers, yielding W·m⁻²·sr⁻¹·nm⁻¹ or W·m⁻²·sr⁻¹·μm⁻¹, respectively. The relationship between these representations ensures conservation of radiant power across intervals, given by Lν=Lλ⋅λ2cL_\nu = L_\lambda \cdot \frac{\lambda^2}{c}, where λ\lambda is the and cc is the in (approximately 3 × 10⁸ m/s). This conversion arises from the differential relation dν=−cλ2dλd\nu = -\frac{c}{\lambda^2} d\lambda, maintaining Lν∣dν∣=Lλ∣dλ∣L_\nu |d\nu| = L_\lambda |d\lambda|. Dimensionally, spectral radiance [L][L] is analyzed as power per unit projected area, per unit solid angle, per unit spectral interval, expressed as [L]=[power][area]⋅[solid angle]⋅[frequency][L] = \frac{[\text{power}]}{[\text{area}] \cdot [\text{solid angle}] \cdot [\text{frequency}]} for the frequency form, or equivalently per wavelength. The projected area incorporates a cos⁡θ\cos\theta factor, where θ\theta is the angle between the surface normal and the direction of propagation, accounting for the effective emitting area in the radiance definition L=d3ΦdAcos⁡θ⋅dω⋅dνL = \frac{d^3\Phi}{dA \cos\theta \cdot d\omega \cdot d\nu}, with Φ\Phi as radiant power, AA as area, ω\omega as solid angle, and ν\nu as frequency. Common notations for spectral radiance include Le,νL_{e,\nu} to denote emitted spectral radiance in the , emphasizing emitted power. Directional dependence is often indicated by subscripts or arguments, such as L(ω)L(\omega) where ω\omega is the unit direction vector. In astronomy, particularly , is frequently expressed in janskys per (Jy/sr), where 1 Jy = 10⁻²⁶ ·m⁻²·Hz⁻¹, yielding units of 10⁻²⁶ ·m⁻²·Hz⁻¹·sr⁻¹. In contexts, units like watts per square centimeter per per micrometer (·cm⁻²·sr⁻¹·μm⁻¹) are prevalent for practical and photometry. In practical applications, such as , the notation aligns with for spectral radiance Bν(T)=2hν3c21ehν/kT−1B_\nu(T) = \frac{2h\nu^3}{c^2} \frac{1}{e^{h\nu / kT} - 1}, where hh is Planck's constant, kk is Boltzmann's constant, and TT is temperature in ; this form uses the frequency-domain units W·m⁻²·sr⁻¹·Hz⁻¹ to describe the ideal emitter's output.

Key Properties

Invariance Under Coordinate Transformations

Spectral radiance LνL_\nu, the radiant flux per unit area perpendicular to the direction of , per unit , and per unit , exhibits invariance under translations and rotations in . In relativistic settings, the quantity Lν/ν3L_\nu / \nu^3 remains invariant under Lorentz transformations, accounting for Doppler shifts in ν\nu and the transformation of s and energies, ensuring consistency across inertial frames. This conservation arises from the underlying principles of number and energy preservation in free space, where no absorption, emission, or occurs. In non-relativistic contexts, translations and rotations preserve LνL_\nu along ray paths due to the geometric nature of . The derivation of this invariance stems from in classical , applied to the six-dimensional of position and for . states that the phase-space volume element d3x d3pd^3\mathbf{x} \, d^3\mathbf{p} is conserved along trajectories in the absence of collisions, as the flow is incompressible. For , the distribution function f(x,p)f(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{p}), proportional to the spectral radiance, satisfies the collisionless , leading to constant ff along rays. Integrating over the appropriate differentials, this implies that the quantity d3Φ/(dAcos⁡θ dΩ dν)=Lνd^3\Phi / (dA \cos\theta \, d\Omega \, d\nu) = L_\nu remains constant, where d3Φd^3\Phi is the differential flux, dAdA the area element, θ\theta the angle to the normal, dΩd\Omega the , and dνd\nu the interval. In relativistic extensions, the invariance of the phase-space volume under Lorentz transformations further ensures Lν/ν3L_\nu / \nu^3 constancy. This invariance has profound physical implications for optical systems, enabling the preservation of brightness—the perceived intensity per unit area and —in devices such as and projectors, where travels through free space or lossless media. For instance, a can collect over a larger without altering the source's spectral radiance, limited only by and aberrations. In contrast, EE, the per unit area, decreases as 1/r21/r^2 with distance rr due to geometric spreading, highlighting radiance's role as a conserved "" measure. A practical example is the observation of : the spectral radiance from a reaches the observer unchanged in , ignoring interstellar absorption, allowing direct inference of the stellar .

Reciprocity Principle

The reciprocity principle in states that, for passive linear media, the spectral radiance propagating from a source at position rs\mathbf{r}_s in direction n^s\hat{\mathbf{n}}_s to a detector at rd\mathbf{r}_d in direction n^d\hat{\mathbf{n}}_d equals the spectral radiance propagating in the reverse direction: Lν(rs,n^s→rd,n^d)=Lν(rd,n^d→rs,n^s).L_\nu(\mathbf{r}_s, \hat{\mathbf{n}}_s \to \mathbf{r}_d, \hat{\mathbf{n}}_d) = L_\nu(\mathbf{r}_d, \hat{\mathbf{n}}_d \to \mathbf{r}_s, \hat{\mathbf{n}}_s). This theorem, an extension of Helmholtz reciprocity from wave to radiometric quantities, holds for and applies to the across frequencies. The mathematical basis derives from the reciprocity property of the electromagnetic scattering operator, rooted in field theory principles such as and time-reversal , which ensure symmetric propagation in lossless or absorbing passive media. This extends to bidirectional reflectance distribution functions (BRDFs), where the exchanged quantity is the specific intensity, equivalent to spectral radiance in radiometry. In imaging systems, the principle ensures symmetry in point spread functions (PSFs), constraining the radiation field such that the beam spread function exhibits reciprocal equality between forward and reverse directions, which aids in modeling light propagation through turbid media. It is also fundamental to radiometric , allowing source and detector positions to be interchanged without altering the measured response, thereby validating thermodynamic consistency in enclosure-based setups. The principle breaks down in active media, where time-varying elements like amplifiers introduce nonreciprocity by violating time-reversal invariance, leading to asymmetric field ratios upon source-detector exchange. For polarized light, extensions incorporate or to maintain reciprocity, though violations can occur in chiral or magneto-optic materials.

Optical Theorems and Applications

Étendue and Brightness Conservation

The étendue, denoted as GG, quantifies the throughput of light in an optical system and is defined as G=n2AΩG = n^2 A \Omega, where nn is the of the medium, AA is the cross-sectional area perpendicular to the beam, and Ω\Omega is the subtended by the beam. In lossless optical systems, étendue is conserved, meaning it remains constant along the propagation path despite transformations in area or angle by lenses, mirrors, or other elements. This conservation arises directly from the invariance of spectral radiance under coordinate transformations, as the product n2Lνn^2 L_\nu (where LνL_\nu is the spectral radiance) remains unchanged, ensuring that the total Φν=LνAΩ\Phi_\nu = L_\nu A \Omega is preserved for uniform sources. The theorem, a key consequence of étendue conservation, states that no passive optical system can increase the of beyond that of the source, with spectral radiance satisfying Lν≤Lν,sourceL_\nu \leq L_{\nu, \text{source}} at all points. This leads to fundamental limits on concentration: the maximum concentration factor Cmax⁡C_{\max} for transferring from an input medium with refractive index ninn_{\text{in}} and acceptance half-angle θin\theta_{\text{in}} to an output medium with noutn_{\text{out}} and maximum emission half-angle θout\theta_{\text{out}} (typically approaching 90°) is given by Cmax⁡=(noutnin)2(sin⁡θoutsin⁡θin)2C_{\max} = \left( \frac{n_{\text{out}}}{n_{\text{in}}} \right)^2 \left( \frac{\sin \theta_{\text{out}}}{\sin \theta_{\text{in}}} \right)^2. This limit derives from the conserved throughput integral ∫Lνcos⁡θ dA dΩ=constant\int L_\nu \cos \theta \, dA \, d\Omega = \text{constant}, which, under the assumption of invariant LνL_\nu for a uniform source, reduces to invariance and imposes non-imaging optics constraints on concentrator design. Specifically, matching at input and output ensures maximum flux transfer without exceeding source brightness, preventing thermodynamic violations in energy concentration. In practical applications, étendue conservation governs the design of solar concentrators, where it sets the theoretical upper bound on sunlight intensity at photovoltaic cells—for instance, achieving up to 46,000 times concentration for the sun's angular of 0.267° in air, though real systems fall short due to imperfections. Similarly, in fiber optics, étendue determines the maximum light acceptance via the NA=nsin⁡θ\text{NA} = n \sin \theta, limiting coupling efficiency from extended sources to the fiber core area times product.

Collimated Beam Analysis

In a , composed of nearly parallel rays, the spectral radiance LνL_\nu is uniform across the beam's cross-section for an ideal case without diffraction effects. This uniformity arises because all rays propagate in the same direction, concentrating the radiant flux within a minimal . In practice, however, the effective Ω\Omega subtended by the beam is not exactly zero but finite, typically on the order of microradians, due to inherent and any residual beam imperfections. During propagation through free space, the spectral radiance of a remains conserved in the absence of absorption, , or other losses. This conservation principle ensures that LνL_\nu at any point along the beam equals its initial value, as the optical throughput is preserved in lossless media. , however, gradually increases the beam's étendue, limiting the extent to which the beam can be focused without loss of . For a diffraction-limited , the far-field half-angle θ\theta is approximated by θ≈λπw0,\theta \approx \frac{\lambda}{\pi w_0}, where λ\lambda is the wavelength and w0w_0 is the beam waist radius; a common rough estimate uses the beam diameter D≈2w0D \approx 2w_0, yielding θ≈λ/D\theta \approx \lambda / D. Measurement of spectral radiance in collimated beams from lasers or LEDs typically involves integrating spheres to capture the total radiant flux, coupled with a spectrometer for wavelength resolution, allowing LνL_\nu to be computed from the flux, beam area, and estimated solid angle. Alternatively, goniophotometers or goniospectroradiometers provide detailed angular profiles of LνL_\nu by scanning the beam's directionality, essential for characterizing near-collimated sources where the emission is highly directional. These methods account for the beam's small divergence to ensure accurate radiance values. A prominent application is in spectroscopy, where the exceptionally high spectral radiance of collimated beams—often exceeding 10610^6 W m−2^{-2} sr−1^{-1} Hz−1^{-1}—enables precise excitation and detection of atomic or molecular transitions with minimal . This contrasts sharply with divergent sources like lamps, which have orders-of-magnitude lower spectral radiance due to their extended source areas and wide emission solid angles, making them unsuitable for high-resolution spectroscopic tasks.

Ray-Based Descriptions

In geometric ray optics, spectral radiance LνL_\nu is conceptualized as a quantity propagated along individual rays of light, where each ray in a lossless, homogeneous medium carries an invariant value of LνL_\nu directed along its path. This invariance arises from the conservation of energy in the ray's propagation, ensuring that the power per unit area perpendicular to the ray, per unit solid angle, and per unit frequency remains constant unless altered by absorption, emission, or scattering. For a bundle of closely parallel rays subtending a differential solid angle dΩd\Omega, the effective spectral radiance is the average value over the bundle, computed as the total power divided by the product of the projected area and dΩd\Omega, providing a local measure of directional intensity. When tracing rays through interfaces between media with different refractive indices, dictates the change in ray direction, while the spectral radiance adjusts to maintain the invariance of Lν/n2L_\nu / n^2, where nn is the . For a ray refracting from medium 1 (index n1n_1) to medium 2 (index n2n_2), the transmitted spectral radiance is given by Lν,2=Lν,1(n2n1)2,L_{\nu,2} = L_{\nu,1} \left( \frac{n_2}{n_1} \right)^2, reflecting the compression or expansion of the subtended by the ray bundle due to the bending at the interface; this holds for lossless without absorption. Along the ray path ss within a medium, the describes potential variations as dLν/ds=−κνLν+jνdL_\nu / ds = -\kappa_\nu L_\nu + j_\nu, where κν\kappa_\nu is the absorption coefficient and jνj_\nu the emission term, though in ideal geometric tracing through non-absorbing media, dLν/ds=0dL_\nu / ds = 0, preserving constancy. This ray-based framework finds extensive application in , where ray tracing algorithms compute spectral radiance maps by backward-tracing rays from the observer through scene geometries to light sources, enabling realistic rendering of illumination and color spectra. The RADIANCE synthetic imaging system exemplifies this, using stochastic ray tracing to simulate and generate high-fidelity radiance distributions for architectural visualization. In illumination engineering, similar techniques trace ray bundles to optimize light distribution in optical systems, ensuring conservation of LνL_\nu for efficient design of luminaires and displays. The geometric ray approximation underlying these descriptions holds only for scales much larger than the radiation wavelength, where diffraction and interference effects are negligible; at smaller scales comparable to the wavelength, wave optics must be invoked to account for phenomena like spreading and phase coherence.

Mathematical Formulations

Spectral Radiance in Frequency and Wavelength Domains

Spectral radiance can be expressed in either the frequency domain, denoted as Lν(ν)L_\nu(\nu), or the wavelength domain, denoted as Lλ(λ)L_\lambda(\lambda), where ν\nu is the frequency and λ\lambda is the wavelength related by ν=c/λ\nu = c / \lambda with cc the speed of light in vacuum. The two representations describe the same physical quantity but differ in how the radiance is distributed over the spectral variable, ensuring that the energy in a differential interval is invariant: Lλ(λ) dλ=Lν(ν) dνL_\lambda(\lambda) \, d\lambda = L_\nu(\nu) \, d\nu. Since dν=−(c/λ2) dλd\nu = -(c / \lambda^2) \, d\lambda, the magnitude relation yields Lλ(λ)=Lν(ν)⋅(c/λ2)L_\lambda(\lambda) = L_\nu(\nu) \cdot (c / \lambda^2), highlighting that radiance values in the wavelength domain scale inversely with the square of the wavelength for a given energy interval. This transformation is crucial for accurate spectral analysis, as neglecting the Jacobian factor c/λ2c / \lambda^2 leads to errors in peak positions and integrated intensities when switching domains. For , the spectral radiance follows in both domains. In the , the Planck function is Bν(ν,T)=2hν3c21ehν/kT−1,B_\nu(\nu, T) = \frac{2 h \nu^3}{c^2} \frac{1}{e^{h \nu / k T} - 1}, where hh is Planck's constant, kk is Boltzmann's constant, and TT is the . In the domain, it becomes Bλ(λ,T)=2hc2λ51ehc/λkT−1.B_\lambda(\lambda, T) = \frac{2 h c^2}{\lambda^5} \frac{1}{e^{h c / \lambda k T} - 1}. These expressions are related by the transformation above, and integrating either over all frequencies or wavelengths gives the total radiance B(T)=σT4/πB(T) = \sigma T^4 / \pi, where σ=5.670374419×10−8 W⋅m−2⋅K−4\sigma = 5.670374419 \times 10^{-8} \, \mathrm{W \cdot m^{-2} \cdot K^{-4}} is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. The peak of the spectral radiance shifts with according to : in , λmaxT≈2898 μm⋅K\lambda_\mathrm{max} T \approx 2898 \, \mu\mathrm{m \cdot K}; in frequency, νmax/T≈5.879×1010 Hz/K\nu_\mathrm{max} / T \approx 5.879 \times 10^{10} \, \mathrm{Hz/K}. This shift arises because the λ−5\lambda^{-5} term in BλB_\lambda biases the peak toward longer wavelengths compared to a direct conversion from the frequency form. In practice, the choice of domain depends on the application. The is preferred for phenomena involving quantum effects, such as physics, where energy levels are proportional to ν\nu via E=hνE = h \nu, allowing direct assessment of linewidths in hertz (e.g., lasers with linewidths of 1–10 MHz). Conversely, the domain is standard in visible and , where detector responses and material absorption features are calibrated in nanometers or micrometers. A numerical example of conversion errors occurs for a 300 K blackbody: the wavelength peak is at λmax≈9.66 μm\lambda_\mathrm{max} \approx 9.66 \, \mu\mathrm{m} with Bλ≈1.29×107 W⋅m−2⋅sr−1⋅μm−1B_\lambda \approx 1.29 \times 10^7 \, \mathrm{W \cdot m^{-2} \cdot sr^{-1} \cdot \mu\mathrm{m}^{-1}}, corresponding to ν≈3.10×1013 Hz\nu \approx 3.10 \times 10^{13} \, \mathrm{Hz}; however, the true peak is at νmax≈1.76×1013 Hz\nu_\mathrm{max} \approx 1.76 \times 10^{13} \, \mathrm{Hz}, and omitting the λ−2\lambda^{-2} factor in conversion can lead to significant errors in the radiance value at this point, distorting flux calculations in approximations. In , particularly , the domain predominates due to its alignment with atmospheric transmission windows and / signatures tabulated in units. The IEEE 4001 standard, finalized in 2025, emphasizes in terms of distinguishable s for hyperspectral cameras, facilitating quantitative analysis of spectral contrast in without the nonlinear scaling issues of conversion. This domain choice minimizes errors in retrieving surface properties from data, where frequency-domain processing is reserved for advanced signal analysis like Fourier transforms rather than primary radiance measurements.

Alternative Derivations and Approximations

In wave optics, spectral radiance can be derived from the and the degree of coherence for electromagnetic fields. The time-averaged ⟨S⟩=1μ0⟨E×B⟩\langle \mathbf{S} \rangle = \frac{1}{\mu_0} \langle \mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{B} \rangle provides the spectral irradiance (energy flux per unit and area), approximated for a monochromatic in a medium as ∣E∣22ηZ0\frac{|E|^2}{2 \eta Z_0} (with ∣E∣|E| the amplitude, η\eta the , and Z0Z_0 the free-space impedance). For partially coherent , radiance is obtained by integrating field correlations over the coherence and dividing by the , linking theory to radiometric quantities. For , approximations simplify the full Planck spectrum in specific regimes. In the low-frequency Rayleigh-Jeans limit, where hν≪kTh\nu \ll kT, the spectral radiance Bν(T)≈2ν2kTc2B_\nu(T) \approx \frac{2\nu^2 kT}{c^2}, treating as classical waves with equipartition of among modes. At high frequencies, where hν≫kTh\nu \gg kT, Wien's approximation yields Bν(T)≈2hν3c2e−hν/kTB_\nu(T) \approx \frac{2h\nu^3}{c^2} e^{-h\nu / kT}, emphasizing the exponential cutoff due to thermal occupation probabilities. Pre-quantum approaches provided foundational alternatives for spectral radiance. Josef Stefan's 1879 empirical law described total radiance as σT4\sigma T^4, later theoretically derived by in 1884 using and , assuming blackbody equilibrium without spectral detail. Wilhelm Wien's 1893 displacement law and 1896 approximation posited a spectral form Bλ(T)∝1λ5f(λT)B_\lambda(T) \propto \frac{1}{\lambda^5} f(\lambda T), fitting short-wavelength data but diverging at long wavelengths, predating quantum corrections. In modern computational radiometry, ray tracing simulates spectral radiance in complex scenes by stochastically tracing photon paths, accounting for , absorption, and emission to compute integrated radiance fields. This method excels for non-uniform geometries, as in atmospheric or material simulations, where analytic solutions fail. Recent advancements include neural radiance fields (), introduced in 2020, which parameterize scenes as continuous functions outputting view-dependent spectral radiance and density from sparse images, enabling high-fidelity reconstruction for rendering and analysis.

References

  1. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nbsspecialpublication250-1.pdf
  2. https://www.rp-photonics.com/radiometry.html
  3. https://www.energetiq.com/technote-understanding-radiance-brightness-irradiance-radiant-flux
  4. https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/S05824
  5. https://physics.info/planck/
  6. https://engineering.purdue.edu/~bethel/rad_table.pdf
  7. https://www.dgp.toronto.edu/~elf/418/content/lectureNotesWeb/MeasuringLight.pdf
  8. https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=902273
  9. https://wp.optics.arizona.edu/jpalmer/wp-content/uploads/sites/65/2018/11/BKAPPNDX.pdf
  10. https://www.bentham.co.uk/knowledge/tools-resources/technical-notes/measurement-of-spectral-radiance-154/
  11. https://roban.github.io/CosmoloPy/docAPI/cosmolopy.magnitudes-module.html
  12. https://pyspectral.readthedocs.io/en/latest/rad_definitions.html
  13. https://www.cv.nrao.edu/~sransom/web/Ch2.html
  14. https://topex.ucsd.edu/rs/radiation.pdf
  15. https://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/personalhomes/frieger/HEA4.pdf
  16. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.3301
  17. https://home.cis.rit.edu/~cnspci/references/nicodemus1963.pdf
  18. https://opg.optica.org/josaa/fulltext.cfm?uri=josaa-15-10-2735&id=67512
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022407316300358
  20. https://opg.optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm?uri=ao-37-16-3464
  21. https://journals.aps.org/prapplied/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.047001
  22. https://wp.optics.arizona.edu/jkoshel/wp-content/uploads/sites/78/2022/01/Photon-Snacks-11.pdf
  23. https://eclipseoptics.com/2024/06/04/etendue_optical_invariants/
  24. https://wp.optics.arizona.edu/jgreivenkamp/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2019/08/502-11-Radiative-Transfer.pdf
  25. http://kirkmcd.princeton.edu/examples/lamp.pdf
  26. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/113762/1022268856-MIT.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  27. https://www.energetiq.com/etendue-and-optical-throughput-calculations
  28. https://www.rp-photonics.com/radiance.html
  29. https://www.rp-photonics.com/beam_divergence.html
  30. https://www-eng.lbl.gov/~shuman/NEXT/CURRENT_DESIGN/TP/FO/etendue.pdf
  31. https://www.newport.com/t/integrating-sphere-fundamentals-and-applications
  32. https://pro-lite.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Technical-Note-Goniophotometry-versus-Goniospectroradiometry-Pro-Lite-June-2021.pdf
  33. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/ebooks/FG/Field-Guide-to-Radiometry/Basic-Radiance-and-Radiance-Invariance/Basic-Radiance-and-Radiance-Invariance/10.1117/3.903926.ch17
  34. https://radsite.lbl.gov/radiance/refer/ray.html
  35. https://graphics.cs.yale.edu/sites/default/files/radiance_0.pdf
  36. https://www.tec-science.com/thermodynamics/temperature/different-forms-of-plancks-law/
  37. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00116
  38. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/calcon/CALCON2025/All2025Content/2/
  39. https://www.neonscience.org/resources/learning-hub/tutorials/hyper-spec-intro
  40. https://openstax.org/books/university-physics-volume-3/pages/6-2-blackbody-radiation
  41. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2208.06470
  42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230970570_Monte_Carlo_method_in_optical_radiometry
  43. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018MS001602
  44. https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.08934
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.