Hubbry Logo
Descent (aeronautics)Descent (aeronautics)Main
Open search
Descent (aeronautics)
Community hub
Descent (aeronautics)
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Descent (aeronautics)
Descent (aeronautics)
Descent (aeronautics)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In aeronautics, a descent is any time period during air travel where an aircraft decreases altitude, and is the opposite of an ascent or climb.

Descents are part of normal procedures, but also occur during emergencies, such as rapid or explosive decompression, forcing an emergency descent to below 3,000 m (10,000 ft) and preferably below 2,400 m (8,000 ft), respectively the maximum temporary safe altitude for an unpressurized aircraft and the maximum safe altitude for extended duration.[1][a]

An example of explosive decompression is Aloha Airlines Flight 243. Involuntary descent might occur from a decrease in power, decreased lift (wing icing), an increase in drag, or flying in an air mass moving downward, such as a terrain induced downdraft, near a thunderstorm, in a downburst, or microburst.

Normal descents

[edit]

Intentional descents might be undertaken to land, avoid other air traffic or poor flight conditions (turbulence, icing conditions, or bad weather), clouds (particularly under visual flight rules), to see something lower, to enter warmer air (see adiabatic lapse rate), or to take advantage of wind direction of a different altitude, particularly with balloons.

Normal descents take place at a constant airspeed and constant angle of descent (3 degree final approach at most airports). The pilot controls the angle of descent by varying engine power and pitch angle (lowering the nose) to keep the airspeed constant. Unpowered descents (such as engine failure) are steeper than powered descents but flown in a similar way as a glider.

Rapid descents

[edit]

Rapid descents relate to dramatic changes in cabin air pressure—even pressurized aircraft—and can result in discomfort in the middle ear. Relief is achieved by decreasing relative pressure by equalizing the middle ear with ambient pressure ("popping ears") through swallowing, yawning, chewing, or the valsalva maneuver.

Helicopters which lose power do not simply fall out of the sky. In a maneuver called autorotation, the pilot configures the rotors to spin faster driven by the upward moving air, which limits the rate of descent. Very shortly before meeting the ground, the pilot changes the momentum stored in the rotor to increase lift to slow the rate of descent to a normal landing (but without extended hovering).

Tactical descent

[edit]

A tactical descent is a maneuver typically used only by military aircraft. It consists of a steep angle dive to lose altitude rapidly, with the use of thrust reversers to prevent excessive speed.[2][3]

Dives

[edit]
Ju 87B "Stuka" dive bomber

A dive or nosedive[4][5][6] is "a steep descending flight path".[7] While there is no specific definition for what degree of steepness transforms a downward trajectory into a dive, it is necessarily a rapid, nose-forward descent. Dives are used intentionally in aerobatic flying to build speed for the performance of stunts, and by dive bombers to approach a target quickly while minimizing exposure to enemy fire before the dive, and in order to increase accuracy of the bombing. A dive may also be used as an emergency maneuver, for example to extinguish an engine fire.

Pilots of the World War II dive bomber known as the Stuka particularly noted the effects of the dive. Beginning at a height of 4,600 m (15,000 ft), the Stuka would roll 180°, automatically nosing into a dive. The aircraft would then dive at a 60-90° angle, holding a constant speed of 500 to 600 km/h (270 to 320 kn; 310 to 370 mph), until it had gone some 90% of the way to the ground, releasing its bombs at a minimum height of 450 m (1,480 ft).[8] Once the pilot released the bomb and initiated an automatic pull-out mechanism by depressing a knob on the control column, the aircraft automatically began a six g pullout.[8] The tremendous g-forces to which pilots were subjected during this maneuver could lead to momentary blackouts, necessitating the inclusion of mechanisms to automate pullout from the dive while the pilot was unconscious.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Descent (aeronautics)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
In , descent refers to the controlled phase of flight in which an reduces its altitude, typically transitioning from cruise to approach for , by decreasing and allowing to convert into while maintaining safe and descent rates. This process is essential for aligning the aircraft with the and ensuring compatibility with (ATC) spacing, often involving a glide determined by the (L/D), where the θg=arctan⁡(D/L)\theta_g = \arctan(D/L). Descent planning begins during cruise, factoring in variables such as current altitude, target approach altitude, groundspeed, wind, and performance to estimate required distance and time; a common rule of thumb for propeller is to divide the altitude to lose by 300 feet per (e.g., 6,000 feet requires approximately 20 s). Pilots use tools like flight management systems (FMS) for (), which can follow -based paths optimized for or geometric paths with fixed descent gradients, typically around 318 feet per on standard terminal arrival routes (STARs). ATC issues descent clearances, such as "descend and maintain" specific altitudes or "at pilot's discretion" for flexible timing, to maintain separation and prevent (). Key procedures emphasize precise control of descent angle and , often achieved by reducing power settings to minimize drag or power required, with maximum range at the best L/D speed and minimum rate at the minimum power-required speed. Modern practices promote continuous descent operations (CDO), where maintain a stabilized, low-drag path from cruise to , reducing fuel consumption, emissions, and noise compared to traditional step-down descents with level-offs. Safety considerations include monitoring for , terrain clearance, and visual references during non-precision approaches, with pilots trimming for the desired to ensure stability.

Principles of Descent

Aerodynamics and Physics

In aircraft descent, the four fundamental aerodynamic forces—lift, drag, thrust, and weight—interact to produce a controlled loss of altitude. Lift, generated primarily by the wings, acts perpendicular to the flight path and opposes the vertical component of weight, while drag acts parallel and opposite to the direction of motion, resisting forward progress. Thrust, provided by the engines, propels the aircraft forward but is typically reduced during descent to allow the aircraft to lose altitude. Weight, the downward force due to gravity acting through the aircraft's center of gravity, remains constant. To initiate descent, pilots reduce thrust below the level needed to balance drag, creating a net forward force from the component of weight aligned with the flight path; alternatively, increasing drag through configurations like extended flaps or speed brakes enhances altitude loss by further unbalancing the forces. Applying Newton's laws to descent reveals the force balance that governs steady, unaccelerated motion. Newton's implies that without net forces, the would maintain constant , but in descent, unbalanced forces along the flight path direction result in downward. Specifically, Newton's second law (F = ma) shows that for a steady at constant speed, the perpendicular to the flight path is zero, with lift slightly less than component normal to the path, supplemented by the vertical component of drag to balance . Along the flight path, the plus the forward component of equals drag, ensuring no ; if the vertical component of exceeds the opposing lift, a net downward force produces the descent path. This equilibrium prevents in speed or rate of , maintaining stability. The rate of descent (ROD), typically expressed in feet per minute, derives from the 's power-required curve, which plots the power needed to maintain level flight at various airspeeds against the power available from the engines. In steady descent, the difference between power required (P_req) and power available (P_av) represents the excess power (P_ex = P_av - P_req, negative for descent), leading to an energy deficit that converts (altitude) into or dissipation. From the energy equation for steady flight, the vertical velocity component (dh/dt) equals P_ex / W, where W is the weight; for descent, ROD = - (P_req - P_av) / W in consistent units (e.g., feet per second). To convert to feet per minute, multiply by 60: ROD (ft/min) = 60 × |(P_req - P_av) / W|. This derivation assumes negligible changes and small descent angles, highlighting how power imbalances directly dictate altitude loss rates from the power-required curve's intersection points with available power. Descent stability depends critically on (AoA)—the angle between the wing chord line and the oncoming airflow—and , as these influence lift generation and stall margins. At higher s, a lower AoA suffices to produce the required lift (approximately equal to weight for shallow descents), promoting stable flight with smooth airflow over the wings. However, as decreases during descent, the AoA must increase to maintain lift, approaching the critical AoA where airflow separates, causing a and sudden lift loss. This risk heightens at low speeds, common in phases, where insufficient can lead to aerodynamic even if appears adequate; stability is thus preserved by monitoring AoA to avoid exceeding the critical value, typically 15–20 degrees for most airfoils. Early understanding of controlled descent emerged from the ' glider experiments in the early 1900s, which laid the groundwork for powered flight . Between 1900 and 1902, Orville and Wilbur Wright conducted over 1,000 glider flights at , testing designs with wing areas up to 305 square feet to achieve stable glides. These unpowered descents, lasting up to 26 seconds and covering distances up to 622 feet, allowed them to refine control over pitch, roll, and yaw via and rudders, demonstrating how balanced forces enable predictable altitude loss without stalling. Their 1902 glider, featuring a 32-foot wingspan and forward for pitch control, achieved glides up to 622 feet, providing empirical data on lift-to-drag ratios that informed subsequent powered descent techniques.

Performance Factors

Aircraft-specific factors play a crucial role in determining descent performance. , defined as the aircraft's weight divided by its wing area, influences descent rates by affecting stall speeds and lift generation; higher wing loading typically results in higher minimum descent speeds and reduced maneuverability during descent. The governs the ability to control descent steepness, as lower ratios limit the power available to arrest or adjust the descent path, particularly in multi-engine aircraft during engine-out scenarios. Flaps and slats enhance descent capabilities by increasing lift and drag at lower speeds, allowing steeper profiles, but they impose speed limits such as VFE (maximum flap extended speed), beyond which structural damage may occur due to excessive aerodynamic loads. Environmental influences significantly affect descent efficiency and safety. Wind shear, a sudden change in wind speed or direction, can alter descent paths unpredictably, potentially causing altitude deviations or airspeed fluctuations during approach phases. Turbulence introduces irregular air motions that increase pilot workload and structural stresses, often necessitating speed reductions to maintain control. Density altitude, which rises with higher temperatures and lower pressures, reduces air density and thus engine performance and lift, leading to shallower descent angles and longer ground distances for the same rate of descent. Configuration changes profoundly impact descent dynamics through variations in drag. A clean configuration (flaps and gear retracted) minimizes drag for efficient high-speed descents, while a dirty configuration (flaps and gear extended) substantially increases drag—often doubling or tripling total drag in general aviation aircraft—to enable steeper, slower descents. This drag augmentation allows for controlled energy dissipation but requires adherence to extension speed limits to avoid overstressing components. Descent behaviors differ across speed regimes, particularly in jet aircraft. In subsonic regimes (Mach < 0.8), airflow remains largely incompressible, permitting stable, predictable descent profiles with minimal wave drag. Transonic descents (Mach 0.8–1.2) introduce compressibility effects, where local supersonic flows form shock waves over wings and control surfaces, increasing drag and potentially causing pitch-down moments () that demand careful speed management. Operational limitations ensure structural integrity during descent. VNE (never-exceed speed) represents the maximum allowable airspeed to prevent excessive aerodynamic forces from causing flutter or deformation, with exceedances risking . Structural G-loads are certified under FAA standards, such as FAR Part 25, which mandate designs withstand limit loads (e.g., +2.5g to +3.8g for transport category aircraft in normal operations) plus a safety factor, though descents in can approach these limits and require positive G maintenance. For example, descents prescribe bank angles of 30–45° to sustain positive load factors above 1g, avoiding negative G that could exacerbate structural risks.

Descent Planning

Calculating Descent Profiles

Calculating descent profiles involves determining the vertical and horizontal paths an follows from cruise altitude to a target, often using geometric, temporal, and energetic principles to ensure efficiency and compliance with requirements. These calculations account for factors such as and environmental conditions to predict the top-of-descent point, rate of descent, and ground coverage. The standard 3-degree glideslope, commonly used in instrument flight rules (IFR) approaches, provides a precise geometric method for final descent segments. The ground distance dd in nautical miles (NM) required to descend from a given altitude hh in feet is calculated as d=htan⁡(3∘)d = \frac{h}{\tan(3^\circ)}, where tan⁡(3∘)≈0.0524\tan(3^\circ) \approx 0.0524. This yields an approximation of d≈h318d \approx \frac{h}{318}, since 1 NM equals approximately 6,076 feet and the vertical gradient is about 318 feet per NM for a 3-degree angle. For example, descending from 3,000 feet above ground level (AGL) on an ILS approach requires roughly 9.4 NM of ground distance (3000/318≈9.43000 / 318 \approx 9.4), allowing pilots to establish the aircraft on the localizer and glideslope well in advance of the runway threshold. This calculation ensures obstacle clearance and stabilized approach criteria are met during IFR operations. Time-based descent planning integrates vertical speed with horizontal progress to forecast the descent timeline and distance. The time tt in minutes to descend an altitude difference Δh\Delta h in feet at a constant rate of descent (ROD) in feet per minute is given by t=ΔhRODt = \frac{\Delta h}{\text{ROD}}. The corresponding horizontal distance dd in NM is then d=GS×t60d = \frac{\text{GS} \times t}{60}, where GS is the groundspeed in knots, accounting for the fact that 1 knot equals 1 NM per hour. For instance, if an aircraft at 10,000 feet needs to reach 3,000 feet with an ROD of 1,500 fpm and GS of 240 knots, the time is t=7000/1500≈4.67t = 7000 / 1500 \approx 4.67 minutes, yielding a distance of approximately 18.7 NM ((240×4.67)/60(240 \times 4.67) / 60). This method allows iterative adjustments during flight if winds alter groundspeed. In unpowered descents, such as glides following engine failure, relies on the conservation of total , comprising (KE) from and (PE) from altitude. The total energy EE is expressed as: E=12mv2+mghE = \frac{1}{2} m v^2 + m g h where mm is aircraft , vv is , gg is (approximately 32.2 ft/s²), and hh is altitude. During a steady glide, drag dissipates energy, converting PE to KE and ; pilots trade altitude for speed or distance by adjusting the glide angle to minimize sink rate while maximizing range. This guides glide performance predictions, ensuring the aircraft reaches a suitable site. Air traffic control (ATC) constraints often dictate descent profiles through Standard Terminal Arrival Routes (STARs), which specify maximum descent gradients to maintain separation and noise abatement. These gradients typically range from 250 to 350 feet per NM, with 300 ft/NM as a common standard equivalent to a roughly 3-degree path. For a STAR requiring descent from 10,000 feet over 40 NM, the profile must not exceed this gradient, calculated as Δh/d≤300\Delta h / d \leq 300 ft/NM, prompting pilots to adjust ROD accordingly (e.g., 1,200 fpm at 240 knots GS). Compliance ensures integration into terminal airspace without vectoring deviations. Modern flight management systems (FMS) in airliners employ advanced algorithms for 4D trajectory prediction, incorporating time as the fourth dimension alongside , , and altitude. These systems synthesize reference trajectories by integrating aerodynamic models, wind forecasts, and performance databases to compute idle-thrust descent profiles that minimize fuel burn while meeting constraints like STAR gradients and arrival times. For example, FMS algorithms use of to predict vertical profiles, adjusting for speed schedules (e.g., 250 knots below 10,000 feet) and generating required time of arrival (RTA) solutions. This enables continuous descent operations, reducing emissions compared to stepped descents.

Rules of Thumb and Tools

Pilots employ various rules of thumb to quickly estimate descent distances without relying on detailed computations, enabling efficient planning during cruise. One widely used is the "rule of threes," which approximates the required descent distance in nautical miles (NM) as three times the altitude to lose in thousands of feet; for instance, descending 10,000 feet would necessitate approximately 30 NM. This rule assumes a typical groundspeed and a shallow of about 3 degrees, providing a conservative buffer for adjustments. The corresponding rate of descent (ROD) varies with groundspeed to maintain the (e.g., approximately 500 fpm at 100 knots GS). For , a standard ROD of 500 fpm is common to minimize passenger discomfort, with descent initiation planned at about 16 NM per 5,000 feet of altitude loss—for example, at 90 knots groundspeed, this aligns closely with the time required for a 500 fpm descent over that distance. For , typical RODs are higher (2000-3000 fpm during cruise descent), with distance planned at 3 NM per 1,000 feet plus about 10 NM for deceleration from cruise to approach speeds, scaled by groundspeed to maintain a 300 ft/NM . These approximations can be refined by adding buffer for or configuration changes. Modern tools enhance these heuristics through automation. (GPS) and Flight Management Systems (FMS) provide (VNAV) for precise descent guidance, computing optimal paths based on aircraft performance, constraints, and weather while integrating with lateral navigation (LNAV) for coupled operation. VNAV ensures a continuous descent , reducing fuel burn and noise by avoiding level-offs. Electronic aids further simplify real-time adjustments. descent planners, integrated into Electronic Flight Bags (EFBs), offer interactive charts and performance calculators for descent profiles, including fuel and time estimates tailored to specific . EFB apps on tablets, such as those from and similar providers, allow pilots to input variables like winds and weights for instant updates, replacing manual charts with dynamic visualizations. The evolution of these tools reflects advancements in aviation technology. In the 1950s, pilots relied on mechanical slide rules like the flight computer, a circular introduced in the 1940s for manual calculations of descent rates and distances. By the 2020s, (GA) pilots had transitioned to iPad-based EFBs, approved by regulators like the FAA for all flight phases, enabling seamless integration of GPS data and performance modeling. This shift has democratized advanced planning, making sophisticated descent tools accessible beyond commercial fleets.

Normal Descents

Cruise Descents

Cruise descents involve the controlled reduction of altitude during the enroute phase of flight, typically initiated at the top-of-descent (TOD) point to transition from level cruise to lower altitudes while optimizing efficiency. The procedure begins with pilots calculating the TOD based on factors such as remaining altitude in thousands of feet multiplied by approximately 3 nautical miles, plus an additional 10-20 miles for speed reduction, allowing the to commence descent approximately 100-120 miles from the destination for a typical cruise from 35,000 feet. Upon reaching TOD, is reduced to idle while initially maintaining cruise speed or , with gradual adjustments to descent speeds (e.g., transitioning from Mach 0.78 to 250-300 KIAS) to prevent as air increases below 30,000 feet. This idle- technique approximates a 3-degree glide path, minimizing drag and enabling a smooth profile. The primary goals of cruise descents are to achieve savings through continuous descent operations (CDO) and to reduce emissions over populated areas by avoiding level-off segments. CDO, as defined by ICAO, optimizes the descent profile with low-drag, low-thrust conditions from TOD to the initial approach point, averaging 35 kg of savings per arrival while lowering community by 1-5 dB compared to traditional step descents. These benefits are realized by maintaining a continuous vertical path where feasible, supported by advanced flight management systems that automate thrust and speed adjustments. Typical descent rates during cruise vary by aircraft type and phase: commercial airliners commonly use 1,500-2,500 feet per minute (fpm) to balance efficiency and passenger comfort, while aircraft employ slower rates of 500-1,000 fpm to manage smaller engines and lighter weights. Speed management is critical, with pilots monitoring to avoid exceeding limits (e.g., reducing from 300 KIAS at higher altitudes to 250 KIAS below 10,000 feet), often adjusting pitch or using speed brakes if necessary. Air traffic control (ATC) coordination plays a key role, distinguishing between step descents—where altitude reductions occur in increments for separation—and continuous descents, which ICAO standards enable on RNAV routes through procedures like "descend via" clearances that allow pilots to follow predefined vertical profiles. On high-density routes, ATC may issue step clearances to maintain separation, whereas RNAV-equipped airspace supports uninterrupted CDO for fuel-efficient operations when traffic permits. In transatlantic flights, for example, a cruise descent might involve stepping down from 350 (FL350) to FL240 in coordinated increments, incorporating wind corrections by adjusting the TOD point (e.g., adding 2 nautical miles per 10 knots of tailwind) to account for varying effects on groundspeed.

Approach and Landing Descents

Approach and landing descents represent the final phase of an 's arrival, where the flight path is precisely aligned with the for a safe , prioritizing stabilization to ensure and minimize risks. This phase typically begins after transitioning from en route or cruise descent procedures, with the configured for and maintaining a constant descent . Stabilized criteria are essential, requiring the to be fully configured (flaps, gear down) and stabilized by 1,000 feet above ground level (AGL) in (IMC) or 500 feet AGL in (VMC), with a maximum rate of descent (ROD) of 1,000 feet per minute (fpm) below these altitudes. Failure to meet these parameters, such as exceeding the ROD limit or being misconfigured, triggers an immediate to avoid unstabilized s. In instrument approaches like the (ILS) or (RNAV) procedures, the descent follows a nominal 3-degree glide path from the Fix (FAF), providing vertical guidance to maintain a stable profile toward the threshold. triggers include deviations from this path, such as excessive deviation from the localizer or glideslope, loss of required visual references, or inability to stabilize by the specified altitudes, as outlined in FAA and ICAO standards. For non-precision segments, two primary techniques are used: the traditional "dive-and-drive" method, where the aircraft levels off at the minimum descent altitude (MDA) after the FAF and then dives visually to the , and the Continuous Descent Final Approach (CDFA), which maintains a constant-angle descent (typically 3 degrees) from the FAF without leveling off. CDFA enhances safety by reducing the risk of abrupt corrections and offers environmental benefits, including lower fuel consumption and emissions through minimized low-altitude level flight. For visual pattern approaches in uncontrolled or tower-controlled environments, pilots typically aim for a descent rate of approximately 500 fpm from the base leg to the final approach leg, adjusting power and pitch to achieve a stabilized profile aligned with the runway. Crosswind conditions require compensatory adjustments, such as crabbing or sideslipping to maintain runway alignment while preserving the desired descent rate and airspeed, ensuring the aircraft remains within the stabilized criteria as it crosses the threshold. Commercial aviation standards for precision approaches, established by the FAA and ICAO since the , mandate a 3-degree glideslope to balance obstacle clearance, aircraft performance, and landing flare geometry across diverse runway environments. This angle has been the nominal reference in ILS installations and RNAV vertical guidance, promoting uniformity and reducing pilot workload in global operations.

Rapid Descents

Emergency Descents

Emergency descents in involve urgent, high-rate maneuvers to address immediate life-threatening situations, such as cabin fires or rapid depressurization, prioritizing rapid altitude loss to restore safe conditions for occupants. These procedures are distinct from routine descents, focusing on by minimizing time at hazardous altitudes while adhering to structural limits. The objective is to descend as quickly as possible without exceeding design speeds or loads, often achieving rates of 3,000 to 6,000 feet per minute (fpm) in commercial jets through optimized drag and configuration changes. Common triggers include rapid depressurization, such as a rapid increase in cabin altitude due to structural failure or system malfunction, uncontrolled smoke or fire in the cabin, or other emergencies like toxic fumes that demand immediate oxygen availability at lower altitudes. Structural issues, such as a hull breach, can also necessitate an emergency descent to prevent hypoxia or fire spread. Pilots must recognize these cues promptly, as delays can lead to crew incapacitation. Standard procedures begin with declaring an emergency to (ATC), donning oxygen masks and selecting 100% oxygen, and establishing crew communications via interphone. Thrust is set to idle, speed brakes or spoilers are deployed, and the aircraft is pitched for maximum permissible speed (often near Vmo/Mmo) to increase drag; landing gear and flaps are extended when safe (typically below 250 knots), and 30-45 degree banked turns may be used to further steepen the descent path while performing clearing turns to scan for . Passengers are briefed, oxygen masks deployed, and the cabin crew instructed to secure the cabin for rapid descent. These steps aim to maximize descent rate while maintaining control. The target altitude is typically 10,000 feet mean (MSL) or the minimum safe altitude (MSA) for the area, whichever is higher, to ensure breathable air and terrain clearance, completed in the minimum time possible—often 3-5 minutes from cruise altitudes in jets. For example, in the , the decompression checklist includes donning masks and setting regulators to 100%, establishing communications, setting pressurization mode to manual and holding the outflow valve switch in close until fully closed (if controllable), setting to idle, extending speed brakes, and descending to 10,000 feet while advising ATC of the emergency. This procedure is designed for rapid execution as items to handle sudden events. A notable incident illustrating the critical need for prompt emergency descents is in 2005, where a 737-300 experienced a gradual pressurization failure due to a misconfigured outflow valve left in manual mode, leading to undetected cabin depressurization and crew hypoxia. The crew failed to initiate an emergency descent, resulting in incapacitation and the aircraft crashing near Grammatiko, , killing all 121 on board; the investigation emphasized the importance of immediate recognition and response to pressurization warnings.

Tactical Descents

Tactical descents in refer to steep, high-rate maneuvers executed by and to rapidly transition from higher altitudes to lower levels, often achieving descent rates of 8,000 feet per minute (fpm) or more through the deployment of in-flight thrust reversers, speedbrakes, or aerodynamic configurations that maximize drag while controlling . These procedures differ from standard civil descents by prioritizing speed and surprise over fuel efficiency or passenger comfort, enabling to evade detection in hostile environments. A representative procedure involves the , a strategic airlifter used by the (USAF), where pilots engage reversers in flight during a tactical descent from approximately 25,000 feet to 5,000 feet in just over two minutes, achieving an average rate exceeding 10,000 fpm while maintaining structural limits and preventing . This maneuver requires coordination with for high descent rates and is typically conducted under to ensure terrain clearance, with pilots configuring flaps and gear as needed to stabilize the approach phase. The primary purposes of tactical descents include avoiding surface-to-air missile (SAM) and radar threats by minimizing exposure time in contested airspace, as well as facilitating rapid deployment of troops or cargo into forward operating areas. According to USAF tactics, these descents allow aircraft to cruise at safer altitudes until nearing the objective, then execute a sharp profile to penetrate low-level structures, thereby reducing vulnerability to enemy air defenses while preserving mission readiness. Key techniques encompass spiral descents, where the aircraft performs coordinated turning descents around a fixed point to manage energy and stay within protected , and penetration profiles that involve unrestricted visual descents from enroute altitudes to low-level routes, often at 800-1,000 feet per (equivalent to 8-10 degrees nose-low). These methods maintain by allowing seamless transition to assault landings or airdrops, with pilots monitoring to avoid exceeding velocity never exceed (VNE) limits during the high-drag phase. The concept of tactical descents evolved from World War II-era dive bombing tactics employed by aircraft like the German Stuka, which used steep powered descents for precision strikes, to postwar developments in fighter and evasion maneuvers during the . In the modern era, particularly post-1990s with the establishment of (AFSOC), these techniques advanced for special operations forces (SOF) insertions, integrating with platforms like the C-17 to enable rapid, low-observable penetrations in denied environments during operations such as those in the and .

Specialized Descents

Glide Descents

Glide descents in refer to unpowered flight phases where an descends primarily under the influence of , with aerodynamic drag providing the primary opposition to forward motion, typically employed during engine failure or as part of pilot training to maximize horizontal distance covered while minimizing altitude loss. The optimal performance in a glide descent occurs at the best glide speed, which corresponds to the maximum lift-to-drag (L/D) , allowing the to achieve the farthest possible ground distance for a given altitude loss. For example, in a , this speed is approximately 65 knots (KIAS), yielding a glide of about 9:1, or a practical of 1.5 nautical miles (NM) per 1,000 feet of altitude above ground level. Standard procedure for initiating and maintaining a glide descent following an engine-out scenario involves immediately pitching the nose to establish and hold the best glide speed, while minimizing drag by configuring the with flaps retracted, set to minimum drag (if adjustable), and to avoid sideslip. Pilots must then identify and select an site within the calculated glide range, prioritizing factors such as suitability and , and execute a structured approach pattern to reach it. Several environmental factors influence the of a glide descent, including and atmospheric conditions. Headwinds can significantly reduce ground-covered distance by opposing forward progress, with reductions ranging from 20% to 50% depending on wind strength relative to , necessitating adjustments like slightly increasing speed to optimize ground track. Conversely, thermal updrafts can extend glide distance by providing localized lift, allowing pilots to circle and gain altitude before resuming descent, though this requires precise identification of rising air currents. Training for glide descents is a core component of private pilot certification under FAA regulations, where applicants must demonstrate proficiency in simulated engine-out procedures, including establishing best glide speed, selecting a suitable landing area, and completing a power-off approach and landing. These requirements, outlined in the Airman Certification Standards (ACS) for private pilots, ensure pilots can safely manage unpowered descents from various altitudes, typically practiced at safe heights above terrain. A notable real-world example of an extended glide descent is the 2009 ditching of , an A320 that suffered dual engine failure due to bird strikes shortly after takeoff from ; the crew maintained a controlled glide for approximately 8.5 miles, covering the distance to the in about 208 seconds at an average descent rate of around 1,000 feet per minute, enabling a successful with no fatalities.

Dive Maneuvers

Dive maneuvers in refer to intentional, high-angle descents performed by for purposes such as , aerobatic displays, or recovery from unusual attitudes, typically involving steep pitch attitudes and rapid buildup. These maneuvers demand precise control to manage aerodynamic forces and structural loads, distinguishing them from shallower descents by their emphasis on speed and angle for targeted outcomes. Unlike glide descents that prioritize over distance, dive maneuvers focus on controlled to achieve specific tactical or goals. One primary type is dive bombing, where execute near-vertical descents to release ordnance with high accuracy. During , the German Stuka exemplified this, diving at angles of 70-80 degrees toward targets while deploying dive brakes to maintain stable speed and aim. Another type is the spiral dive, an unintentional or controlled tightening turn during descent characterized by increasing bank angle and descent rate due to uncoordinated flight. Recovery from a spiral dive involves immediately reducing power to idle, applying coordinated and opposite to level the wings, and gradually pulling up with the to arrest the descent without inducing a secondary . Recovery procedures for intentional dives emphasize adherence to the aircraft's never-exceed speed (VNE) and structural G-limits to prevent overload. Pilots initiate pull-up at or below VNE, applying smooth aft elevator input to achieve a positive load factor while monitoring airspeed to avoid exceeding design limits, such as +6 G positive and -3 G negative typical for aerobatic aircraft like the Aviat Pitts S-2C. Excessive speed buildup can lead to secondary stalls if recovery is abrupt, so gradual unloading of the airframe is critical. In aerobatic contexts, dive maneuvers serve to build for subsequent positive or negative G maneuvers, such as loops or pushovers. Positive G dives involve pulling up from a descent to generate upward , often reaching +4 G for several seconds in a 70-degree dive pull-out, while negative G dives push the nose down for inverted flight, requiring specialized certification. Speed typically builds to 1.5-2 times cruise velocity during entry, providing the momentum needed for sustained without engine power alone. Modern applications persist in , particularly fighter jets employing pop-up dives for precision strikes, where the aircraft climbs briefly before rolling into a steep descent for weapon release, integrated with (HUD) systems for real-time targeting cues. These maneuvers enhance survivability by minimizing exposure time over defended areas. In tactical military operations, dive techniques support brief, high-impact engagements against ground targets. Historically, early dive bombers in and early faced significant risks from uncontrolled speed buildup, leading to structural failures during pull-outs. For instance, the Curtiss XSBC-1 prototype suffered wing assembly failure in a 1934 dive test, and the later SB2C Helldiver experienced wing and stabilizer detachment in a 1941 recovery from a dive. These incidents contributed to advancements such as perforated dive brakes, first implemented on the Northrop BT-1 in 1935, which deployed to increase drag and stabilize descent angles, reducing flutter and overspeed risks that had caused prior catastrophes.

References

  1. https://pressbooks.lib.vt.edu/aerodynamics/chapter/chapter-5-altitude-change-climb-and-guide/
  2. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/instrument_procedures_handbook/FAA-H-8083-16B_Chapter_3.pdf
  3. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20100040848/downloads/20100040848.pdf
  4. https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/beginners-guide-to-aeronautics/four-forces-on-an-airplane/
  5. https://aerotoolbox.com/lift-weight-thrust-drag-explanined/
  6. https://aerotoolbox.com/newtons-laws-flight-physics-intro/
  7. https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/56286/when-an-aircraft-is-descending-does-any-lift-act-on-it-if-yes-how
  8. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/airplane_handbook/06_afh_ch5.pdf
  9. https://www.flexcompute.com/blog/2022/03/31/aerodynamic-stall/
  10. https://www.wright-brothers.org/Information_Desk/Just_the_Facts/Kites_&_Gliders/1902_Glider.htm
  11. https://pressbooks.lib.vt.edu/aerodynamics/chapter/chapter-9-the-role-of-performance-in-aircraft-design-constraint-analysis/
  12. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19760007025/downloads/19760007025.pdf
  13. https://www.flyingmag.com/everything-about-v-speeds-explained/
  14. https://community.wmo.int/en/activity-areas/aviation/hazards/turbulence
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025010452
  16. https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aim_html/chap7_section_6.html
  17. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/airplane_handbook/13_afh_ch12.pdf
  18. https://www.boldmethod.com/learn-to-fly/aerodynamics/emergency-descent-aerodynamics-how-to-fly-them-safely-high-to-low/
  19. https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/bgc.html
  20. https://pilotinstitute.com/mach-number-explained/
  21. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC25-21.pdf
  22. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/airplane_handbook/19_afh_ch18.pdf
  23. https://pilotinstitute.com/how-to-calculate-descent/
  24. https://code7700.com/descent.htm
  25. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/airplane_handbook/05_afh_ch4.pdf
  26. http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2013/ph240/eller1/
  27. https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aim_html/chap5_section_4.html
  28. https://www.optisyn.com/research/publications/2013/ZhaoAlgorithms2013.pdf
  29. https://www.pilotmall.com/blogs/news/descent-profile-optimization
  30. https://wiki.ivao.aero/en/home/training/documentation/VFR_Top_of_descent_calculation
  31. https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2023/july/flight-training-magazine/technique-gps-descent-planning
  32. https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/1971/what-is-a-rule-of-thumb-for-when-to-begin-a-descent
  33. https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aim_html/chap1_section_2.html
  34. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_120-108A.pdf
  35. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Notice/N_8900.403.pdf
  36. https://ww2.jeppesen.com/navigation-solutions/integrated-efb-solutions/
  37. http://aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2016/february/18/fuel-planning-efb-integration-added-to-aopa-flight-planner
  38. https://ww1.jeppesen.com/main/corporate/aviation/mobile-efb/index.jsp
  39. https://aviation.gleim.com/2019/12/27/celebrating-the-e-6bs-80th-birthday/
  40. https://aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2013/july/pilot/dogfight-the-e6b-computer
  41. https://flightsafety.org/asw-article/the-age-of-the-ipad/
  42. https://ipadpilotnews.com/2022/02/sportys-releases-new-e6b-app-for-apple-computers/
  43. https://www.eurocontrol.int/concept/continuous-climb-and-descent-operations
  44. https://flightsafety.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/alar_bn7-1stablizedappr.pdf
  45. https://www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/media/advisory_circular/ac120-29a.pdf
  46. https://www.icao.int/sites/default/files/safety/airnavigation/AIG/Documents/Safety-Recommendations-to-ICAO/Final-Reports/SS0005_final_report.pdf
  47. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_120-108.pdf
  48. https://www.boldmethod.com/learn-to-fly/navigation/flying-a-non-precision-approach-with-continuous-descent-final-approach-cdfa-vs-dive-and-drive/
  49. https://repository.gatech.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/696163d6-1c8a-4fb1-89b8-56d0db878811/content
  50. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/airplane_handbook/10_afh_ch9.pdf
  51. https://flightsafety.org/asw/oct07/precision_approaches_web.pdf?dl=1
  52. https://skybrary.aero/articles/emergency-descent-guidance-flight-crews
  53. https://flightsafety.org/asw-article/rapid-depressurization/
  54. https://www.cfinotebook.net/notebook/maneuvers-and-procedures/emergency/emergency-descent.php
  55. https://www.johanpercherin.info/airline-pilot-training/boeing-737-memory-items-cabin-altitude-warning-emergency-descent/
  56. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/2022-11/Helios737_AccidentReport.pdf
  57. https://skybrary.aero/bookshelf/accident-report-112006-helios-hcy522-boeing-737-31s-gramatikko-hellas-14-aug-2005
  58. https://theaviationist.com/2019/08/21/this-is-what-a-tactical-descent-in-a-c-17-globemaster-iii-cargo-aircraft-looks-like/
  59. https://www.twz.com/41823/watch-this-c-17-engage-its-thrust-reverses-in-mid-air-to-make-an-extremely-rapid-descent
  60. https://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/af_a3/publication/afman11-2c-17v3/afman11-2c-17v3.pdf
  61. https://www.reddit.com/r/Planes/comments/1f0l97c/thats_how_the_c17_globemaster_iii_descend_from/
  62. https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/23529/what-is-a-tactical-penetration-descent
  63. https://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/aetc/publication/aetcman11-248/aetcman11-248.pdf
  64. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/681c9855155568d3da1d2a64/MMATM_Issue_14.pdf
  65. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/tactical-air-evolution/
  66. https://www.afsoc.af.mil/About-Us/AFSOC-Heritage/
  67. https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/aviation/a46132152/c-17-globemaster-history/
  68. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/2022-01/Best%2520Glide%2520Speed%2520and%2520Distance.pdf
  69. https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2017/may/flight-training-magazine/engine-out
  70. https://www.boldmethod.com/learn-to-fly/maneuvers/how-to-handle-a-power-off-landing-engine-failure-best-glide-or-minimum-sink-how-to-manage-it/
  71. https://www.faa.gov/training_testing/testing/acs/private_airplane_acs_6.pdf
  72. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR1003.pdf
  73. https://www.ww2-weapons.com/dive-bombing-tactics/
  74. https://aviataircraft.com/aviat-pitts-aircraft/
  75. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/data_research/research/med_humanfacs/oamtechreports/AM72-28.pdf
  76. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA091229.pdf
  77. https://www.navalgazing.net/Air-Attack-on-Ships-Part-5
  78. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/to-attack-targets-from-a-steep-angle-curtiss-developed-the-sb2c-helldiver-the-beast/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.