Hubbry Logo
Teach FirstTeach FirstMain
Open search
Teach First
Community hub
Teach First
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Teach First
Teach First
Teach First
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Teach First office building in Greenwich.

Key Information

Teach First (also Teach First Cymru) is a social enterprise registered as a charity which aims to address educational disadvantage in England and Wales.[3][4][5] Teach First coordinates an employment-based teaching training programme whereby participants achieve Qualified Teacher Status through the participation in a two-year training programme that involves the completion of a PGDE along with wider leadership skills training and an optional master's degree.[6]

Trainees are placed at participating primary and secondary schools where they commit to stay for the duration of the 2-year training programme. Eligible schools are those where more than half of the pupils come from the poorest 30% of families according to the Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index. Following completion of the two-year programme, participants become Teach First ambassadors. This network of ambassadors aims to address educational disadvantage either in school or in other sectors.

Teach First is the largest recruiter of graduates in the United Kingdom,[7] and was ranked 2nd only to PwC in The Times annual Top 100 Graduate Employers list in 2014 and 2015.[8][9][10]

History

[edit]

In the summer of 2001 Charles, Prince of Wales as president of Business in the Community hosted a group of business leaders and headteachers.[5] At this event Ian Davis of McKinsey and Company agreed to produce a report on the question of why inner-London Schools were not doing as well as they could do, and what business could do to contribute to the improvement of London schools for the event organisers and London First.[5][11] The report highlighted the problems with the quality of London's schools, particularly in inner London. It confirmed the link between poverty and educational outcomes and noted that the proportion of pupils on Free school meals in inner London was three times the national average. The report also highlighted how the scale of pupil mobility was inhibiting the progress of many young people. Fifteen per cent of students attending inner London schools were entering school, leaving school or changing schools during the school year. This cycle was affecting student performance at age 16.

More London, the location of Teach First 2010–2016

In terms of potential solutions McKinsey & Co. reinforced the value of a school being well led by a high quality head teacher, but also highlighted the importance of the quality of classroom teaching. The number of excellent teachers was, they reported, one of the strongest predictors of improved pupil performance, especially in challenging schools. Good teachers made an impact on pupil performance because they:

  • Increased pupil motivation
  • Improved knowledge transfer
  • Provided good role models
  • Gave more individual support to pupils
  • Monitored pupils' achievements systematically

However, the high vacancy and turnover rates in London were making it difficult to build a group of skilled teachers. Salary levels were also part of the problem – but only a small part of it.[12] Poor management, inadequate resources, long hours, taxing duties, poor student behaviour and a lack of professional opportunities also contributed to the large numbers of teachers leaving the profession.[12] Building on the experience of Teach for America (which had been formed in 1990) McKinsey & Co. proposed creating a programme to recruit and train the best and brightest graduates and place them in London's disadvantaged and underperforming schools.

Brett Wigdortz, Teach First founder

One of the consultants involved in compiling the report, Brett Wigdortz, set about developing a business plan for a Teach for America style enterprise in London.[12] In February 2002 Brett took a six-month sabbatical from McKinsey to develop a business plan for what was tentatively called Teach for London before it evolved to become Teach First.[12]

Teach First officially launched in July 2002, in Canary Wharf with a team of 11 committed employees led by Brett Wigdortz as CEO and Stephen O’Brien CBE & George Iacobescu CBE as co-chairs of the board of trustees. Canary Wharf Group and Citi become the first corporate supporters of Teach First.[5]

Teach First's first cohort of participants started to teach in 45 secondary schools in London. Haling Manor High School in Croydon was the first school to sign up to Teach First. It was based solely in London until September 2006 when it expanded into Greater Manchester schools.[13]

In 2007, Teach First collaborated with Teach for America to create Teach for All, a global network of independent social enterprises that are working to expand educational opportunity in their nations.[14]

Teach First Programme

[edit]

Participants teach in the same school throughout the two years. In the first year, participants work towards a PGDE whilst undertaking around 90% of a Newly Qualified Teacher (NQT) timetable, In their second year participants work as NQTs.[15] Trainees are placed at participating primary and secondary schools where they commit to stay for the duration of the training programme.[6] Eligible schools are those where more than half of the pupils come from the poorest 30% of families according to the Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index.[9] Participants are paid and employed by the schools they are placed at.[16]

Following completion of the two-year programme, participants become Teach First ambassadors.[15] This network of ambassadors aims to address educational disadvantage either in school or in other sectors.

Summer Institute

[edit]

Before entering the classroom, participants attend a five-week Summer Institute. Four weeks of this is spent in their region and the final week at a residential course where they learn about the organisation's mission and develop their understanding of educational theory and practice to prepare them to begin teaching in the following September. Participants spend time training in the region in which they will teach, usually with an observation period in the school they will join after the summer. They then attend a residential course together as an entire cohort.

Leadership Development

[edit]

Throughout their two years teaching, participants have access to a range of leadership development opportunities. The two-year Leadership Development programme is designed to enable participants to develop the knowledge, skills and attributes for use inside and outside the classroom. This training is delivered through workshops, panel events and one to one coaching. For example, participants have access to qualified teacher-led training sessions to provide them with tools and strategies they can apply in their classrooms. They will also attend workshops and reflective seminars to help them develop a good understanding of their strengths and areas for development. In addition, they will have the opportunity to have a coach to help them overcome the challenges they face, as well as business school training to teach them the fundamental aspects of business theory and practice which they can apply to their school context.

Participants also have the opportunity to apply to undertake a one-three week mini-internship during the school holidays – known as a Summer Project. These provide an opportunity to join one of Teach First's supporting or partner organisations to complete or contribute to a short-term goal or objective.

Recruits also have the opportunity to complete a master's degree, starting in their second year on the programme through various partner universities.[17]

Expansion

[edit]

Regional

[edit]

Teach First was initially based solely in London, as part of the London Challenge initiative,[18] until September 2006 when it expanded into Greater Manchester schools. The programme was subsequently extended to cover a total of 11 local areas:[19] East Midlands, London, North East, North West, South Coast, South East, South West, East of England, West Midlands and Yorkshire and the Humber.[20]

In Wales Teach First was given a three-year contract by the Welsh Government to pilot a graduate training programme for three years from 2013 as Teach First Cymru.[21]

Teach First has not been established in Scotland, in 2013 the charity met with the General Teaching Council for Scotland (the independent body for teaching in Scotland) but was told the recruits would not be permitted to teach in Scottish schools, as the General Council will only allow those already holding teaching certificates to teach.[22] The Educational Institute of Scotland opposed the expansion of Teach First into the country with The Herald describing Teach First as controversial.[22] In 2017 Scottish universities offering teacher training agreed to not work with Teach First[23] in light of the Scottish Government putting out to tender a fast-track teacher training scheme.[24]

Cohort

[edit]

Since launching in 2002, Teach First has placed increasing numbers of participants in schools each year.

Year No. of Applicants No. of Incoming Teachers Success rate of applications Position in Times Top 100 Graduate Employers
2003 186 62nd
2004 197 42nd
2005 183 19th
2006 265 16th
2007 272 14th
2008 373 9th
2009 2,918 485 16.6% 8th
2010 4,994 560 11.2% 7th
2011 5,324 770 14.5% 7th
2012 7,113 997 14.0% 4th
2013 7,602 1,262 16.6% 3rd
2014 9,000 1,400 15.5% 2nd
2015[25] 1,685 2nd

Training provision

[edit]

Teach First expanded from recruiting for secondary school teaching into recruiting primary teachers in 2011.[26]

Recruitment

[edit]

Teach First is increasingly seen as attractive to young professionals and career changers with 22% of applicants in 2014 coming from these backgrounds.[27] Teach First launched a new campaign in October 2015 which focuses less on the social reward aspects of teaching and more on the challenge of a teaching career, following research by the Behavioural Insights Team.[28]

Similar schemes

[edit]

School Direct and School-Centred Initial Teacher Training are school based schemes where participants can earn a salary during training.[29][30] The Teach First model has also been applied in other areas of public sector recruitment with Frontline for children's social work, Think Ahead for mental-health social work, Police Now a two-year graduate leadership programme of the Metropolitan Police, and Unlocked Graduates for prison officers.[31][32]

Alumni ('Ambassadors')

[edit]

As of 2017, 26 ambassadors of the programme were in Head Teacher roles and 36 social enterprises had been founded by ambassadors.[33] Seventeen of these are recognised as official 'Innovation Partners' including The Access Project, Boromi, The Brilliant Club, CPDBee, The Difference, Enabling Enterprise, First Story, Franklin Scholars, Frontline, Future Frontiers, The Grub Club, Hackney Pirates, Jamie's Farm, Maths with Parents, MeeTwo, Right to Succeed and Thinking Reading.[34]

Notable alumni of Teach First include:

Criticism

[edit]

Criticisms have been raised about the cost effectiveness of Teach First, with training costs higher per participant when compared to other training routes.[35][36]

Teach First asks for the graduates it recruits to give two years of teaching, and so retention rates for Teach First are lower than other routes into teaching, forty per cent of Teach First participants stay in teaching after 5 years compared to much higher percentages (ranging from 62 to 70%) coming through PGCE and GTP programmes.[37] It is anticipated and accepted that many of them will go on to careers in other sectors (hence the name, Teach First),[38] also described as "teach first, then get a better job".[39] The higher turnover rate and rapidly increasing cohort size of Teach First has been alleged as allowing schools to reduce their costs by employing teaching staff at unqualified teacher pay scales, it has been alleged that Teach First has been targeted by some academy school chains because of this.[40][41]

Teach First has been accused of elitism,[42] and has also been accused of being biased to middle-class applicants within the application process.[38] Teach First participants interviewed as part of an evaluation were predominantly middle‐class, possessing social and cultural capital which had facilitated their access to the Teach First scheme.[38] A Study by London Metropolitan University found some recruits displayed patronising middle-class attitudes, coupled with a belief that they as graduates of prestigious universities, have much to offer but nothing to learn from low-income communities.[42]

In 2009 it was reported that Teach First participants were being placed in schools where GCSE grades were above the local and national averages, and not in the worst performing secondary schools.[35] Education Data Surveys analysed the results of all the schools involved in Teach First and found 15 of the 79 London secondaries (19 per cent) had GCSE achievements above their local authority average, and 17 schools had results above the national average.[35] In the North West, five Teach First schools, or 23 per cent, had exam results which were the same or better than the local authority average.[35] In the Midlands, results at five schools, or 18 per cent, were the same or better than the local authority average and two had results at or above the national average, raising the question of why schools with GCSE results up to 80 and 70 per cent were taking part.[35]

In response Teach First said that exam results were not the "whole story" of the initiative, and the number of children claiming free school meals was as important in selecting schools to be involved.[35] Stating "Teach First selects the schools into which it places exceptional graduates through consideration of a range of criteria that indicate the level of challenge experienced at the school, including the percentage of free schools meals, the exam results at GCSE, staff turnover and the difficulties experienced by schools in recruiting new teachers."[35]

Teach First's relationship with businesses and deferred entry schemes has opened it to suggestions that it operates as an elite graduate scheme for them to recruit from.[42][43]

Teach First has also been said to place too much emphasis on schools in London, to where it places 40% of its recruits.[44] It has been subject to criticism that London and larger cities are able to attract the best graduates, but coastal and rural communities struggle to attract these graduates.[44][45] Brett Wigdortz in response said "We made the same mistake many implementations make – starting in the place where it's easiest to implement things, the big cities, and taking a while to get to the areas which really need it".[44]

The Teach First model whereby teachers enter the classroom after only a six-week summer camp can leave recruits feeling their in-class levels of support as variable.[46] A Teach First recruit has said the experience left her feeling expendable, saying the Teach First leadership were more focussed on expansion rather than the experience of recruits in a "survival of the fittest" atmosphere.[46] Teach First had a 92% retention rate of recruits in 2012, with the recruit earning a "good" teacher label by observers.[46]

The so-called "London effect" where the capital has seen a turnaround in educational achievement since the millennium, which has seen Teach First (and other interventions such as the London Challenge and the rise of academies) being credited with the turnaround of education in London,[47] has been analysed in an academic study as coming instead from gradual improvements in primary education in the capital.[48]

Teach First has been supported by politicians of the Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties.[49]

In 2017 the Journalist and director of the New Schools Network, Toby Young, attended a social mobility summit hosted by Teach First, who asked him to write a blog for them.[50][1] Teach First disagreed with the content of the work submitted by Young, and published it with a rebuttal from another author working in the field.[50] Teach First then decided that they were in error to publish the blog, even with a rebuttal, and removed it as being against their values and vision,[50] stating that they did not want to act as a platform for the views contained therein.[50] Toby Young claimed that he only found out about this decision via Twitter, and questioned why Teach First published it in the first place, stating that he felt as though he had been censored by the charity.[1] Teach First apologised to Young and he accepted their apology.[1]

The Teach First scheme has been met with some controversy and criticism since its inception,[51] which has impeded its planned expansion into Scotland.[52]

In June 2020 Teach First failed to provide places on its programme to 120 trainees due to lack of training opportunities because of COVID-19, sending out a generic email. Some prospective trainees has already given up steady jobs in order to take up placements.[53]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Teach First

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Teach First is a British education charity established in 2002 that recruits high-achieving university graduates to teach in schools serving disadvantaged pupils, providing a two-year salaried postgraduate training programme to address educational inequality and enhance life chances for children facing poverty. Founded by Brett Wigdortz, the organization draws inspiration from models like Teach for America and focuses on developing participants into school leaders capable of systemic change in underperforming education settings. By 2024, Teach First had trained more new teachers than any other provider in England, supported thousands of educators and leaders, and reached over a million pupils through its initiatives in challenging schools. Independent evaluations, including those from the National Foundation for Educational Research, demonstrate that Teach First participants contribute to school-wide improvements in pupil attainment, such as gains equivalent to about 5% of a grade in GCSE results, and are significantly more likely to advance into senior leadership roles early in their careers compared to other teachers. While the programme has faced criticism for deploying relatively inexperienced teachers into high-needs environments, empirical evidence indicates net positive effects on both pupil outcomes and teacher retention in leadership positions, countering claims of detriment to school quality.

History

Founding and Initial Launch

Teach First was founded by Brett Wigdortz, a former McKinsey consultant originally from the , who drew inspiration from the model to address in the UK. Wigdortz authored the organization's initial and left his position at McKinsey to establish the charity, aiming to recruit high-achieving graduates to teach for two years in schools serving disadvantaged communities. The organization officially launched on July 15, 2002, with support from then-Minister for Schools , initially focusing on secondary schools in . The first cohort consisted of 182 trainees, selected from top graduates and placed in underperforming schools in deprived areas to deliver intensive training combined with on-the-job teaching. This pioneering approach emphasized to tackle systemic educational challenges, marking Teach First as an independent charity committed to long-term impact beyond the initial two-year placement.

Growth and Key Milestones

Teach First's inaugural cohort commenced training in 2003, marking the start of its operations after founding in 2002, with initial focus on schools serving disadvantaged communities. The program expanded incrementally thereafter, growing from a niche initiative to a major provider of initial teacher training, training 5% of postgraduate entrants by 2017. A pivotal milestone occurred in 2013, when Teach First became the United Kingdom's largest recruiter of university graduates, surpassing traditional employers like firms. This reflected rapid scaling in recruitment and geographic expansion beyond to regions across , reaching over 1,000 schools by 2018. Cohort sizes continued to rise, achieving a record of 1,735 trainees in 2019—38% more than the prior year—and placing them in schools serving disadvantaged pupils. Growth faced setbacks in 2020, with a reduction of 120 trainees due to schools withdrawing vacancies amid the crisis. By 2023, cumulative growth had produced 16,000 trained teachers supporting over 2 million pupils, alongside alumni progression to leadership: 50% of completers from 2003–2019 cohorts in middle leadership after four years, and over 40 headteachers. In 2024, the program recruited over 1,000 trainees—1 in 10 of England's secondary trainees—extending support to 26,500 teachers and leaders across 5,500 schools, with ambassadors in senior roles at 1 in 5 low-income secondary schools. This expansion underscores Teach First's role as England's largest trainer of new teachers since 2003.

Recent Developments

In 2023/24, Teach First supported over 26,500 s and leaders, reaching more than 1.5 million pupils across nearly 6,000 schools serving low-income communities. The organization's 2024 Impact Report highlighted ongoing efforts to train s, develop school leaders, and influence policy aimed at reducing educational disparities. Recruitment targets faced shortfalls, with the 2024 cohort totaling 1,415 participants against an annual goal of 1,750, following 1,335 in 2023; these declines reflect broader teacher supply pressures amid the program's emphasis on high-achieving graduates for initial two-year placements. In response to increased use of AI tools by applicants, Teach First shifted to mandatory in-person interviews starting in 2025 to better assess candidate suitability. Under the Labour government elected in 2024, proposals emerged in July 2025 to reform Teach First's by prioritizing graduates committed to long-term careers, critiquing the model's historical focus on short-term high-flyers who often transition to leadership roles elsewhere. Ministers subsequently intervened to preserve the charity's contract after backlash accusing the government of attempting to dismantle it, ensuring continuity despite underlying tensions over retention rates. James Toop assumed the role of CEO in 2025, pledging to "double down" on training quality, boost participant retention, and cultivate 500 headteachers from the program by 2030 to amplify systemic impact. However, in September 2025, the reduced its funding offer for the next contract phase by £74 million, signaling potential constraints on expansion amid fiscal priorities.

Program Design and Delivery

Recruitment and Selection Process

The recruitment and selection process for Teach First's two-year Training Programme is multi-staged and rigorous, aimed at identifying candidates with high potential to lead educational improvement in under-resourced schools. Applicants must first meet basic eligibility criteria, including holding or being predicted a 2:1 degree or higher (or equivalent experience for career changers), GCSE equivalents in English and maths (and science for primary teaching), and the right to work in the UK. The process begins with an online application form, where candidates submit details of their degree, qualifications, subject preferences, and regional choices. This is followed by a task-based assessment provided by Arctic Shores, a psychometric firm specializing in behavioral evaluations grounded in ; the assessment, lasting 15-50 minutes and completable on various devices, measures observable behaviors predictive of teaching success through interactive tasks with no predetermined right or wrong answers, emphasizing natural responses to gauge potential beyond traditional metrics. Applications are then screened by two trained assessors using a bias-mitigation protocol, evaluating alignment with Teach First's nine core competencies—, and ; interaction; understanding and motivation; ; and organising; ; resilience; self-evaluation; and adaptability—within 15 working days, with approximately two-thirds of applicants historically advancing past this stage as of 2019. Successful candidates proceed to a Development Centre, conducted virtually or in-person in , comprising a competency-based , a group on a school-related (with up to six participants), a 5-minute episode requiring preparation and re-delivery with feedback, and two self-evaluations. Pre-work for these activities is provided seven days in advance, along with an optional preparation workshop, allowing assessors—who are blind to prior application materials—to evaluate demonstrated strengths, growth potential, and fit for the programme's demands. Outcomes are communicated within three weeks, with successful applicants receiving a conditional offer contingent on completing tasks such as references, a subject assessment, and a personal information form; unsuccessful candidates receive a feedback call and written report within 30 days. Overall rates hover around 40-50%, reflecting the programme's selectivity in choosing from thousands of annual applicants to ensure trainees possess the qualities needed for challenging environments, though recent adjustments aim to enhance diversity without specified impacts on standards.

Initial Training and Placement

Trainees commence the Teach First Training Programme with a five-week Summer Institute, an intensive preparatory phase conducted prior to the academic term, focusing on essential classroom skills such as , lesson delivery, and subject-specific . This hybrid program, combining online and in-person elements, equips participants with foundational competencies through lectures, practical sessions, and simulated experiences, typically spanning late to late . Following this institute, participants transition directly into full-time roles in partner schools serving communities, assuming approximately 80% of a qualified teacher's timetable (or 60% for primary and early years phases) from the first day of the school year. Placement occurs in schools identified by Teach First as facing systemic challenges, with trainees matched based on regional needs, subject expertise, and school partnerships rather than individual preferences, ensuring deployment to areas of high educational disadvantage across . During Year 1, ongoing support includes weekly mentoring from school-based experts, university tutors for academic components, and Teach First development leads, culminating in the award of (QTS) and a (PGCE) upon successful completion of assessments and teaching standards. This school-centered initial teacher training (SCITT) model emphasizes rapid immersion, with historical data from an inspection (2006–2007) indicating that around 50% of early cohorts achieved outstanding QTS standards, though school-based training quality varied, being good or better in most but requiring improvements in areas like second placements.

Ongoing Support and Leadership Training

Participants in the Teach First two-year programme receive ongoing support from school-based mentors who provide regular guidance, feedback, and assistance with goal-setting throughout their teaching placement. Development Leads from Teach First offer specialized teaching support and act as liaisons between participants, schools, and the organization, while university tutors assist with assignments for the (PGCE) and (QTS). In the second year, participants are supported as Early Career Teachers (ECTs) with continued training sessions and resources focused on professional growth and classroom efficacy. Wellbeing support includes access to an online course and an Employee Assistance Programme to address personal and professional challenges. Leadership training forms a core component of the programme, particularly in the second year, where participants engage in targeted to build skills in school improvement, team , and systemic educational change. This development is integrated into the teaching qualification, emphasizing practical application in under-resourced , and prepares participants for roles influencing broader policy and practice. Over 3,000 former participants have advanced into school leadership positions as a result of this training. Upon completing the programme, become ambassadors and gain lifelong access to a network exceeding 20,000 members, facilitating peer collaboration, career advice, and events. Ongoing includes free one-to-one professional coaching tailored to advancement, personal goals, or coach . Ambassadors can pursue National Professional Qualifications (NPQs) at various levels to enhance leadership capabilities in and . Additional opportunities encompass short-term Summer Projects—1- to 3-week internships with corporate partners, the , or charities—and the Ambassador Fellowships Programme, which supports deeper involvement in educational initiatives. These elements aim to sustain participant impact beyond initial , with many founding enterprises or influencing through the ambassador network.

Scale and Operations

Geographic and Demographic Reach

Teach First operates across , recruiting and placing teachers in schools within multiple regions, including the (with a focus on and ), , the North West, North East, , West Midlands, and others, prioritizing areas of high educational disadvantage such as urban centers and coastal towns. The program targets secondary schools serving low-income communities, where placements emphasize subjects like maths, English, and sciences amid persistent shortages; it also maintains a presence in via Teach First Cymru, though the majority of activity remains in . Cumulatively, Teach First has trained over 26,500 s and leaders, who have served in more than 5,500 schools, reaching approximately 1.5 million pupils, including one in three secondary pupils in . In the 2024 cohort, 1,415 trainees were recruited—the largest intake to date—primarily for placements in these high-need schools, supporting efforts to mitigate teacher vacancies that exceed 10% in some regions. Trainees are typically high-achieving recent graduates, with over 50% holding degrees from universities, but the program's demographics have diversified: 37% of participants identify from ethnic minority backgrounds, surpassing other teacher training routes by 10 percentage points, while 28% were eligible for free school meals during their own education, reflecting targeted recruitment from underrepresented groups. Schools served predominantly feature pupil demographics marked by socioeconomic disadvantage, with placements in institutions where eligibility often exceeds 40%, alongside higher proportions of ethnic minority and English as an additional students compared to national averages. Teach First's cohorts expanded significantly in its early years, growing from an initial intake of fewer than 200 trainees in 2003 to approximately 1,500 by the mid-2010s, reflecting ambitions to scale impact amid shortages in disadvantaged schools. This growth aligned with support, including a 2012 commitment to train up to 2,000 high-achieving graduates annually by 2015–2016, quadrupling earlier volumes to address systemic inequities in pupil attainment. By 2019, the organization reported its largest-ever cohort, with a 38% year-on-year increase in recruits and a rise in career changers to 30% of the intake, up from 22% in 2015, indicating broader appeal beyond recent graduates. Recent recruitment has fallen short of targets amid broader initial teacher training (ITT) challenges in , where applicant volumes for postgraduate courses stagnated or declined despite rising needs. Teach First achieved 1,335 new trainees in 2023 and 1,415 in 2024, below the contractual target of 1,750 annually extended through 2025, contributing to funding adjustments like a £74 million cut in a contract renewal. These shortfalls occur in a "tough market" for ITT, with overall new entrants to postgraduate routes up only modestly (9% in 2023/24) against higher targets, exacerbated by competition from other providers and economic factors deterring entrants.
YearCohort SizeNotes
2003<200Founding cohort.
Mid-2010s~1,500Steady expansion phase.
Largest on record (exact figure undisclosed)38% growth from prior year.
20231,335Below 1,750 target.
20241,415Below target; most diverse cohort yet.
Recruitment trends emphasize diversity and equity, with the 2024/25 cohort featuring 36% ethnic minority trainees—above the 22% sector average for ITT—alongside efforts to broaden selection beyond academic metrics to include underrepresented groups. Adjustments like reinstating in-person interviews in 2025 responded to rising AI-assisted applications (from 38% to 50% year-over-year), aiming to verify authenticity amid quality concerns. Despite these, overall ITT recruitment pressures, including subdued headteacher expectations for staff increases, limit expansion potential without policy interventions.

Partnerships and Training Infrastructure

Teach First maintains extensive partnerships with schools, educational organizations, and universities to facilitate its training programs. Partner schools, numbering over 5,500 across England, serve as primary placement sites where trainees teach full-time while receiving mentorship, contributing to the delivery of Qualified Teacher Status (QTS) and Postgraduate Certificate in Education (PGCE) qualifications. These schools, often in disadvantaged communities, collaborate by hiring trainees and nominating existing staff for training, with Teach First providing tailored support including research-led coaching and early career frameworks. Additionally, Teach First works with 82 delivery partners, such as teaching school hubs and multi-academy trusts, to co-deliver School-Centred Initial Teacher Training (SCITT), Early Career Training Programmes (ECTP), and National Professional Qualifications (NPQs), leveraging local expertise alongside Teach First's curriculum design. University partnerships support the academic components of training, enabling trainees to earn PGCE credentials through collaborative programs developed with institutions like and others specified in operational agreements. Corporate partners, including firms like , contribute through fundraising, mentoring placements, and expertise sharing to expand teacher training capacity and address educational gaps for disadvantaged pupils. Broader alliances with organizations such as Frontline and Police Now facilitate the exchange of best practices in and training, enhancing program efficacy without direct infrastructural overlap. The training infrastructure is predominantly school-based and decentralized, with no centralized facilities beyond assessment development centres. Trainees undergo a five-week intensive summer institute before placement in partner schools across , followed by two years of on-site teaching supported by school mentors and Teach First coaches. SCITT variants operate locally within school clusters for one-year routes, emphasizing practical immersion over dedicated campuses. This model, rated outstanding by , integrates digital tools and national networks for ongoing , though it relies heavily on partner schools' capacities rather than proprietary physical infrastructure.

Empirical Evidence of Impact

Effects on Pupil Attainment and School Performance

Independent evaluations using quasi-experimental methods, such as matched difference-in-differences analyses on National Pupil Database records, indicate that Teach First trainees generally do not negatively affect pupil attainment in partner schools, which are often in areas facing challenges. Early studies, including one analyzing from 2003 to 2009, found that schools partnering with Teach First outperformed matched comparison schools in GCSE A*-C pass rates, with the program explaining 39-47% of variance in outcomes after controlling for pupil background factors like free school meals eligibility and deprivation indices. This suggests a positive association at the school level, potentially linked to the structured, direct-instruction-oriented observed in Teach First classrooms, where second-year teachers scored highly on and instructional support but lower on promoting metacognitive skills. Subsequent research focusing on subject-specific and school-wide effects reinforces that initial placement of inexperienced Teach First teachers produces no statistically significant impact on overall GCSE performance in the first year, but yields small positive gains in subsequent years. A 2017 analysis of early-adopting schools (2003/4–2012/3 cohorts) estimated school-wide improvements equivalent to approximately 5% of a pupil standard deviation—or about one grade across the best eight GCSE subjects—in years two and three post-placement, with departmental effects in core subjects like English and science exceeding 5% of a subject grade (potentially up to 30% in direct Teach First-taught classes, assuming no spillovers). These findings held after matching on school characteristics and pupil fixed effects, implying that Teach First placements mitigate potential harms from teacher shortages in hard-to-staff schools without broader dilution. More recent evidence from a 2023 evaluation updates these estimates using data up to 2018/19 and finds persistent small positive effects at the department level (0.01 standard deviations in standardized capped scores, statistically significant in years 2–4), though with a temporary negative dip in year one attributable to pre-existing downward trends. However, no statistically significant whole-school impact on attainment emerged, suggesting that departmental uplifts may be offset by factors such as or spillovers in non-Teach First areas. Effect sizes remain modest across studies, with methodologies relying on observational comparisons rather than , limiting strong causal inferences but consistently ruling out damage relative to alternatives in comparable schools.

Teacher Retention and Professional Outcomes

Teach First teachers complete the initial two-year training programme at a rate of 94%, substantially higher than the 68% progression rate for trainees from other routes. One year following the newly qualified teacher (NQT) year, however, retention drops to 69% for Teach First participants, compared to 87-88% for those trained via higher education or school-led routes. Longer-term retention remains below that of traditional routes, particularly for earlier cohorts. For participants qualifying between 2008/09 and 2011/12, retention five years post-qualified status (QTS) lagged 12-24 points behind comparable teachers. Gaps have narrowed in recent years; for the 2017/18 cohort, one-year post-QTS retention was only 6 points below higher education routes (60% versus 66%) and 13 points below school- or employment-based routes (versus 73%). In professional outcomes, Teach First alumni advance more rapidly into leadership. Three years post-NQT, 50% occupy middle leadership roles, and half reach such positions within four years of teaching. They are 12 times more likely to enter senior leadership within three years than peers from other training pathways. Five and seven years post-NQT, progression to senior roles exceeds that of school- or employment-based trainees by 9 and 12 percentage points, respectively, though advantages diminish over longer horizons. Beyond classroom retention, many sustain influence in systems. As of 2020, over 2,000 served as school leaders, including 69 headteachers, within a network surpassing 20,000 ambassadors who engage in policy, training, and advocacy roles. In alone, more than 1,000 hold middle or senior positions across schools. This broader impact aligns with the programme's design, emphasizing systemic contributions over lifelong classroom tenure.

Long-Term Systemic Contributions

Teach First's alumni have progressively ascended to influential roles within the UK's sector, fostering systemic advancements beyond initial placements. By 2023, over 18,000 individuals had completed the program since its inception in , with a significant portion advancing to senior leadership positions in schools, trusts, and government bodies. This network has enabled contributions to national frameworks, including the development of the Early Career Framework for induction, which emphasizes structured in the first two years post-qualification, and elements of the Department for 's recruitment strategy. These efforts reflect a causal pathway from intensive initial training to policy-level interventions aimed at elevating standards across disadvantaged settings. The program's Policy First initiative, launched to harness expertise, has facilitated direct engagement with policymakers, resulting in advocacy for evidence-informed reforms such as enhanced and reduced educational disparities. involvement in coalitions like the Fair Education Alliance has amplified calls for systemic shifts, including greater investment in high-need schools and data-driven measures, though independent evaluations note that while pupil attainment benefits persist (e.g., school-wide GCSE gains equivalent to 5% of a standard deviation), broader causal attribution to leadership requires isolating program effects from concurrent reforms. Longitudinally, Teach First has contributed to a cultural shift in , prioritizing high-achieving graduates for challenging contexts and promoting retention through pipelines, with studies indicating higher progression rates to headship among participants compared to traditional routes. This has supported sustained improvements in departmental performance and pupil progression to higher education, particularly in underperforming areas, underpinning incremental systemic resilience against teacher shortages and inequality persistence. However, cost-benefit analyses highlight that per-trainee investments, averaging £11,000 net to schools, yield returns primarily through these extended impacts rather than immediate gains alone.

Criticisms and Debates

Training Quality and Pedagogical Shortcomings

Critics of Teach First's training model contend that its accelerated structure—comprising a six-week summer institute followed by school-based placements with —provides insufficient preparation for the complexities of , particularly in and lesson planning in challenging environments. This approach contrasts with traditional (PGCE) routes, which typically involve a full of university-led theoretical and practical training, leading some educators to argue that Teach First prioritizes graduate enthusiasm and leadership potential over rigorous instructional foundations. Participant feedback underscores these concerns, with surveys indicating that over 50% of early cohorts felt only "satisfactory" levels of readiness after the initial institute, citing gaps in practical skills like adapting to diverse needs. Anecdotal reports from trainees describe the training as disorganized and overly focused on motivational elements rather than evidence-based pedagogical techniques, such as explicit instruction or strategies. Independent critiques, including from educational researchers, highlight that this model may foster a "leadership-first" that delays mastery of core competencies, potentially exacerbating early-career challenges in high-deprivation schools where attainment gaps persist despite program placements. While inspections have rated the program "outstanding" in training quality across multiple categories as of 2011, discrepancies arise when comparing external validations to internal trainee experiences, with some qualitative studies noting that university-partnered elements feel "wishy-washy" relative to deeper academic scrutiny of . These shortcomings are attributed by detractors to an overreliance on on-the-job learning, which may not adequately address causal factors in pupil underperformance, such as inconsistent implementation of evidence-based practices amid high initial workloads. Empirical comparisons with traditional routes remain limited, but critics from within the profession argue that the model's has diluted focus on individualized pedagogical development, contributing to broader debates on whether alternative certification adequately substitutes for extended pre-service preparation.

Retention Challenges and Program Sustainability

Teach First participants face notable retention challenges, with only 69% remaining in teaching one year after completing their Newly Qualified Teacher (NQT) year, compared to 87% for higher education routes and 88% for school- or employment-based routes. This disparity stems partly from the program's two-year commitment model, which creates a natural exit point post-NQT, and the placement of trainees in disadvantaged schools where overall retention is lower across training routes. Early cohorts, such as those from 2011-12, exhibited even lower retention at 50.6%, though the gap has narrowed for later groups; for the 2017-18 cohort, Teach First retention exceeded higher education routes by 4 percentage points but lagged school-based routes by 8. Additionally, Teach First teachers are more mobile, with just 64% staying at their initial school post-NQT versus 86-87% for other routes, exacerbating turnover in partner schools serving low-income communities. While 94% progress from the first to second year—higher than 68% for higher education trainees—the program's intensity, high accountability, and focus on challenging environments contribute to attrition during and after . These patterns align with broader teacher retention issues, where disadvantaged schools experience heightened shortages, but Teach First's model amplifies this due to its emphasis on short-term high-impact placements rather than lifelong classroom careers. These retention dynamics challenge program , as Teach First incurs higher training costs—£38,000 per trainee versus a £23,000 average—and relies on steady to sustain partnerships and pupil impact. Declining trainee in subjects, such as (from 30% of cohorts in the early to 18% by 2018-19), compounds this, potentially straining the program's capacity to address systemic gaps amid national targets consistently unmet since the . Although often advance rapidly to leadership—12 times more likely to reach senior roles within three years than university-trained peers—this shifts away from frontline teaching, questioning the model's long-term viability for stabilizing workforce s in high-need s. further hinges on external funding from corporate partners, which supports scalability but exposes the program to economic fluctuations without guaranteed offsets for turnover costs.

Ideological Framing and Opportunity Costs

Teach First frames educational disadvantage as the central impediment to children's potential and , positing that targeted, high-quality teaching in underperforming schools can substantially mitigate attainment gaps attributable to socio-economic factors. This perspective prioritizes school-based interventions and leadership development among elite graduates to drive systemic change, often attributing persistent inequalities to educational deficits rather than multifaceted causes such as family environment or cultural influences, which empirical studies identify as strong predictors of outcomes. The organization's discourse cultivates a of heroic, transformative agency, recruiting top graduates for a two-year commitment framed as a for equity. Critiques, including academic discourse analyses, contend that this framing embeds neo-liberal principles, positioning trainees as entrepreneurial leaders who internalize market-oriented approaches like performance metrics, school competition, and autonomy, which may propagate efficiency-driven reforms over holistic social reforms. Such positioning, per the analysis, encourages alumni to carry these values into policy and business networks, potentially reinforcing individualistic, data-centric solutions that undervalue structural non-educational barriers, though the critique originates from education scholarship prone to ideological preferences against market mechanisms. Teach First's emphasis on "closing the gap" aligns with equity-focused rhetoric prevalent in progressive institutions, yet lacks robust causal evidence that teacher deployment alone overrides entrenched predictors like parental involvement. The program's opportunity costs manifest at multiple levels, beginning with participants: high-achieving recruits from forgo immediate entry into lucrative fields such as or consulting, where starting salaries often exceed £40,000 annually, versus the circa £30,000 earned during training. This two-year deferral, compounded by intensive demands, represents unquantified but substantial foregone earnings and career acceleration, particularly as only about 40% of trainees remain in teaching beyond the initial period, with many transitioning to higher-compensated roles leveraging the program's prestige. Systemically, Teach First incurs elevated fiscal costs—averaging £38,000 per trainee versus £23,000 for other routes—exacerbated by retention rates where approximately 60% exit teaching within five years, double the overall average departure rate. This yields a cost per retained teacher surpassing £60,000 after five years, compared to £25,000–£44,000 for alternatives, implying inefficient if pupil impact does not proportionally offset the premium. Broader societal costs include diverting top talent from potentially higher-impact sectors, while the ideological emphasis on educational fixes may crowd out investments in complementary areas like family policy, where causal evidence for inequality reduction is stronger.

Alumni and Network Influence

Career Trajectories and Achievements

Teach First , referred to as ambassadors, demonstrate accelerated career progression within , with 50% reaching middle positions three years after their newly qualified (NQT) year, compared to 36% from higher education routes and 40% from school- or employment-based routes. This rapid advancement continues, as are 12 times more likely to attain senior roles three years post-NQT and four times more likely after seven years relative to peers from other pathways. By 2019, the network included nearly 60 headteachers and over 2,000 individuals in middle or senior positions across schools. Salaries reflect this trajectory, with Teach First in middle earning £3,000 more by year three and £6,000 more by year five than comparable PGCE-trained teachers. While a majority of alumni—over 60%—remain in teaching or school leadership, many extend their influence beyond classrooms into , , and systemic reform. In London alone, more than 1,000 hold middle or senior leadership roles in schools serving low-income communities, contributing to sustained improvements in disadvantaged settings. Notable examples include James Toop, an inaugural 2003 cohort member who became Teach First's CEO in June 2025 after advancing through . Josh MacAlister, another ambassador, founded the Frontline social work program and chaired the UK's Independent Review of Children's , shaping national . Natasha Porter, a Teach First , established Unlocked Graduates to address rehabilitation in prisons, earning an OBE for her work. Alumni achievements also encompass political and entrepreneurial impact, with at least two serving as Members of Parliament and others launching initiatives like Frontline and Unlocked, adapting the Teach First model to sectors such as . By 2024, the network exceeded 17,000 , including over 100 headteachers, underscoring a pattern of early attainment and cross-sector influence driven by the program's emphasis on high-potential recruits committed to equity. Despite lower initial retention rates—69% one year post-NQT versus 87-88% for other routes—those who persist achieve outsized roles, often in challenging or improving schools.

Policy and Leadership Roles

Teach First alumni have increasingly occupied influential positions in UK government, education policy, and institutional leadership, leveraging their classroom experience to advocate for systemic reforms addressing . As of 2023, 280 programme completers held roles in and , contributing to on teacher training, school funding, and disadvantaged outcomes. By 2025, this figure had risen to nearly 350 alumni in positions, reflecting the programme's pipeline for influence. These roles span advisory capacities, posts, and elected offices, where alumni apply evidence from frontline teaching to formulation. In , over 3,000 alumni lead schools or hold senior administrative positions, often in underserved areas, with 50% of completers reaching middle within four years of . This includes headteachers at more than 100 institutions, some of whom have founded academies or turned around underperforming schools. Such emphasizes data-driven interventions, like targeted interventions for low-attainment pupils, informed by their initial two-year placements. Prominent policy figures include Josh MacAlister, a 2009 cohort ambassador who taught citizenship in secondary schools before founding the Frontline social work charity in 2013; he was elected Labour MP for and in 2024 and appointed Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Children, Families and Wellbeing in the in September 2025. Another example is Will Bickford-Smith, who progressed from Teach First teaching to civil service roles in the , focusing on behaviour management policies grounded in evidence-based practices. Approximately 50 operate across policy levels, including direct advisors to the Secretary of State for Education, influencing initiatives like graduate recruitment expansions. This alumni network has shaped broader reforms, such as expanding fast-track teacher schemes and prioritizing leadership development in disadvantaged settings, though self-reported data from Teach First underscores the need for independent evaluations of long-term policy impacts.

International Comparisons

Similar Programs and Adaptations

Teach For America, established in 1990 in the United States, served as the foundational model for Teach First when it launched in the United Kingdom in 2002. TFA recruits top college graduates from diverse fields to teach for two years in high-need public schools, providing intensive training and emphasizing leadership development to address educational inequities. By 2023, TFA had deployed over 61,000 corps members who collectively taught more than 4.4 million students, primarily in underserved urban and rural districts. Teach First operates as the partner within the Teach For All network, a global organization launched in to expand the TFA-inspired model internationally. The network now encompasses independent affiliates in 63 countries across six continents, each adapting the core framework—selective recruitment of ambitious non-traditional candidates, accelerated teacher , and placement in low-income schools—to local educational systems, cultural norms, and environments. Partners share resources on recruitment, , and engagement while tailoring programs; for instance, many extend the commitment beyond two years or integrate mandatory subject-specific certifications to align with national standards. Notable adaptations include Teach For Australia, founded in 2012, which places participants in remote Indigenous communities and urban priority schools, emphasizing cultural competency amid Australia's decentralized landscape. In , Teach First Deutschland, operational since 2007, focuses on secondary schools in economically challenged areas like and requires a one-year preparatory before deployment, adapting to the country's rigorous state-exam certification process. Similarly, Teach For India, launched in 2009, recruits bilingual leaders for government schools in high-poverty regions such as slums, incorporating components to navigate India's multilingual and resource-scarce public system. These variations reflect causal factors like varying teacher supply shortages and systemic inequalities, with empirical evaluations in select countries showing improved outcomes in and math where fidelity is high, though scalability challenges persist due to local funding dependencies. Beyond the network, analogous initiatives exist independently, such as Mexico's Enseña por México (2010), which mirrors the model by deploying young professionals to rural and indigenous schools with a focus on post-service, having impacted over 50,000 students by 2022 through alumni-led reforms. In , experimental programs like Opetus2020 adapt selective tracks for equity-focused teaching amid a high-performing system, prioritizing research-based over rapid placement. Cross-national studies indicate that while the model's emphasis on ambitious entrants boosts short-term motivation, long-term retention and systemic impact hinge on integration with national teacher pipelines, with lower attrition in countries offering sustained professional pathways.

Lessons from Global Counterparts

Programs within the Teach For All network, such as in the United States and Enseña Chile in , provide empirical evidence that selectively recruited high-achieving graduates can deliver above-average student outcomes in core subjects. For instance, network-wide analyses indicate effect sizes of 0.05 in and 0.16 in science for students taught by participants, outperforming peers in comparison groups. In Enseña Chile, fellows demonstrate equivalent effectiveness to other novice teachers in academic gains during their first year, with notable improvement in the second year, highlighting the benefits of intensive initial training for motivated entrants. These findings suggest Teach First could refine its selection criteria to prioritize analytical skills and resilience, as evidenced by consistent math achievement boosts across diverse contexts. Retention data from counterparts underscore the need for robust post-program support to mitigate high attrition rates, a common challenge in two-year commitments. Teach For America studies show that while 76% of participants hail from selective colleges—correlating with early —many exit after the term, yet those remaining five years or more advance at double the rate of non-participants in classroom performance. Similarly, global critiques note abbreviated training (often 6-7 weeks) may limit pedagogical depth, potentially exacerbating turnover in under-resourced schools, as seen in expansions to over 60 countries. For Teach First, this implies investing in retention strategies, such as pipelines, to convert short-term placements into sustained cadres, countering the "Teach for a " pattern observed internationally. Adaptations in developing contexts like Teach For India and Enseña Perú emphasize culturally tailored leadership development for systemic equity, offering models for Teach First's evolution amid UK-specific challenges. In Enseña Perú, founded in 2009, the focus on catalyzing collective leadership has influenced local policy, with fellows placed in rural and urban high-need areas to address resource disparities. Network-wide lessons from the COVID-19 period reveal that cross-country sharing of distance learning innovations accelerated adaptations, such as hybrid models blending leadership training with remote instruction. However, evaluations caution against over-reliance on elite recruits without addressing broader teacher preparation biases, as short programs risk reinforcing inequalities if not paired with evidence-based local reforms. Teach First may thus benefit from enhanced cross-network collaboration to integrate such alumni-driven advocacy, fostering long-term policy shifts beyond classroom impacts.

References

  1. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/
  2. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/our-mission
  3. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/media/v5jmvos0/the_progression_and_retention_of_teach_first_teachers.pdf
  4. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/our-people
  5. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/press-release/teach-first-launches-new-brand-reflect-full-breadth-work
  6. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/our-impact
  7. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/impact-evaluation-of-the-teach-first-training-programme/
  8. https://ideas.repec.org/p/qss/dqsswp/1311.html
  9. https://cris.brighton.ac.uk/ws/files/13700718/2017_Allen_Allnutt_Teach_First_preprint.pdf
  10. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/media/gghnswwc/the_impact_of_the_teach_first_training_programme_on_schools_and_pupils.pdf
  11. https://www.economist.com/britain/2018/11/24/a-shortage-of-teachers-prompts-teach-first-to-change-tack
  12. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1512041/Teach-First-is-a-brilliant-idea-absolutely-everyone-wins.html
  13. https://teachforall.org/emeritus-director/brett-wigdortz
  14. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/14614/teach-first-celebrates-five-year-anniversary/
  15. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/reflecting-on-millions-learning-lessons-from-teach-firsts-scaling-story/
  16. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/reports/20-years-teach-first
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332474805_Teach_first_what_is_it_doing
  18. https://www.bbc.com/news/education-23227967
  19. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-does-one-follow-from-fifteen-years-best-job-world-wigdortz-obe
  20. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/press-release/teach-first-recruits-largest-ever-cohort-trainees
  21. https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/teach-first-recruits-biggest-and-best-cohort
  22. https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/teach-first-cuts-cohort-120-due-lack-vacancies
  23. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/reports/teach-first-annual-report-and-accounts-2023-2024
  24. https://www.tes.com/magazine/news/general/dfe-cuts-74m-teach-first-contract
  25. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jul/13/graduates-teach-first-in-person-interviews-ai
  26. https://schoolsweek.co.uk/labour-plans-teach-first-recruitment-scheme-revamp/
  27. https://uk.news.yahoo.com/teach-first-charity-helps-top-075900869.html
  28. https://schoolsweek.co.uk/toops-teach-first-target-500-headteachers-by-2030/
  29. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/knowledge-base/training-programme/application/eligibility-requirements
  30. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/knowledge-base/training-programme/application/task-based-assessment
  31. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/knowledge-base/training-programme/application/application-process
  32. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/knowledge-base/training-programme/application/eligibility-competencies
  33. https://schoolsweek.co.uk/record-year-for-teach-first-as-two-thirds-of-applicants-pass-screening/
  34. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/knowledge-base/training-programme/application/development-centre
  35. https://www.graduatesfirst.com/teach-first-job-tests
  36. https://ise.org.uk/knowledge/insights/188/how_teach_first_is_achieving_a_more_equitable_selection_model/
  37. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/training-programme
  38. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/content/10-things-youll-do-your-first-days-summer-institute
  39. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/knowledge-base/training-programme/programme-details
  40. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/8170/2/Rising%20to%20the%20challenge%20a%20review%20of%20the%20Teach%20First%20initial%20teacher%20training%20programme%20%28PDF%20format%29.pdf
  41. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/training-programme-journey
  42. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/ambassadors
  43. https://socialwhatnow.medium.com/the-rise-of-the-teach-first-empire-who-are-transform-society-guest-blog-by-joe-hanley-e9055c74315d
  44. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/knowledge-base/training-programme/application/teaching-locations
  45. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/schools
  46. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/blog/celebrating-diversity-teach-first-trainees
  47. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/sites/default/files/2025-03/Teach_First_impact_report_23_24.pdf
  48. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/teach-first-to-recruit-more-top-graduates
  49. https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/initial-teacher-training-census/2023-24
  50. https://schoolsweek.co.uk/teach-first-contract-extended-for-another-two-years/
  51. https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/141791/pdf/
  52. https://www.gatsby.org.uk/app/uploads/sites/2/2025/07/released-teacher-recruitment-and-retention-in-2025-002-1.pdf
  53. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/meet-our-delivery-partners
  54. https://www.bathspa.ac.uk/schools/education/teacher-education/teach-first/
  55. https://bcuassets.blob.core.windows.net/docs/teachfirst-secondary-key-requirements-131117568045620713.pdf
  56. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/corporate-partnerships
  57. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/our-partners
  58. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/school-centred-initial-teacher-training
  59. https://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2013/7480/pdf/JERO_2012_2_Muijs_Chapman_Armstrong_Teach_first.pdf
  60. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/press-release/teach-first-training-programme-impact-research
  61. https://schoolsweek.co.uk/teach-first-7-findings-revealing-its-impact-of-schools/
  62. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/blog/school-leadership-our-latest-thinking
  63. https://learning.teachforall.org/sites/default/files/2024-02/45cil_teachfirstukcommunityimpactcasestudy2020_v2.pdf
  64. https://teachforall.org/impact/TeachFirst
  65. https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/625276/3/02_Chapter02_From%2520TFA%2520to%2520Teach%2520First%2520UK--FINAL-1.pdf
  66. https://charity.dev.teachfirst.org.uk/sites/default/files/2024-05/Ending%2520Educational%2520Inequality%2520Report%2520FINAL.pdf
  67. https://ifs.org.uk/sites/default/files/output_url_files/R118.pdf
  68. https://joe-kirby.com/2013/09/08/is-teach-first-working/
  69. https://dailygenius.wordpress.com/2014/01/11/youre-my-teach-first-my-teach-last-my-teach-everything/
  70. https://www.teachingtimes.com/where-have-all-the-teachers-gone/
  71. https://ameera19.medium.com/why-are-programmes-like-teach-first-bad-for-you-and-the-teaching-profession-dfece8b3ea4a
  72. https://www.reddit.com/r/TeachingUK/comments/15awpft/my_experience_with_teach_first/
  73. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Trevor-Gale-2/publication/320705928_Teach_First_Ask_Questions_Later_A_summary_of_research_on_TF%27s_alternative_vision_of_teaching_and_teachers/links/59f657390f7e9b553ebd29af/Teach-First-Ask-Questions-Later-A-summary-of-research-on-TFs-alternative-vision-of-teaching-and-teachers.pdf
  74. https://yorkshirebylines.co.uk/news/education/solving-a-problem-of-their-own-making-teach-first-encounters-gen-z/
  75. https://files.ofsted.gov.uk/v1/file/1720861
  76. https://journals.uclpress.co.uk/lre/article/pubid/LRE-21-3/print/
  77. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0305764X.2025.2516524?src=
  78. https://ifs.org.uk/sites/default/files/output_url_files/r100.pdf
  79. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/blogs/three-key-findings-from-a-new-nfer-evaluation-of-the-teach-first-training-programme/
  80. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5804/cmselect/cmeduc/119/report.html
  81. https://www.aboutamazon.co.uk/news/community/amazon-1-million-investment-teach-first
  82. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1757743818771393
  83. https://ifs.org.uk/publications/longer-term-costs-and-benefits-different-initial-teacher-training-routes
  84. https://ffteducationdatalab.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/The-careers-of-Teach-First-Ambassadors-who-remain-in-teaching-FINAL.pdf
  85. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/blog?page=1
  86. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/press-release/teach-first-teacher-secondments
  87. https://www.schoolsweek.co.uk/profile-josh-macalister-mp-for-whitehaven-and-workington/
  88. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/teach-first_were-delighted-that-josh-macalister-mp-activity-7370779405218123776-SXk9
  89. https://www.teachfirst.org.uk/stories/teacher-policymaker-department-education
  90. https://teachforall.org/our-network
  91. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329011498_Teacher_Education_and_the_Global_Impact_of_Teach_For_All
  92. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14782103211063251
  93. https://teachforall.org/our-impact/research
  94. https://www.fondazioneagnelli.it/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/highlighted_research_of_the_teach_for_all_network_march_2022.pdf
  95. https://www.teachforamerica.org/press/news-release/meta-analysis-shows-teach-for-america-teachers-have-consistent-and-significant-impact-on-student-learning
  96. https://results4america.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/TFA_Investing_Innovation.pdf
  97. https://www.educationnext.org/teach-for-americas-fast-path-to-the-classroom-accelerates-performance-over-the-longer-haul/
  98. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272261007_Is_%27Teach_for_All%27_knocking_on_your_door
  99. https://rethinkingschools.org/articles/looking-past-the-spin-teach-for-america/
  100. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/453871599151537396/pdf/Peru-Ensena-Peru-Teach-for-Peru.pdf
  101. https://medium.com/teach-for-all-blog/lessons-from-this-worldwide-experiment-with-distance-learning-da9ed171ad
  102. https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/2055
  103. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/FINAL-Teach-For-All-Case-Study.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.