Hubbry Logo
TektiteTektiteMain
Open search
Tektite
Community hub
Tektite
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Tektite
Tektite
Tektite
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Two splash-form tektites, molten terrestrial ejecta from a meteorite impact

Tektites (from Ancient Greek τηκτός (tēktós) 'molten') are gravel-sized bodies composed of black, green, brown or grey natural glass formed from terrestrial debris ejected during meteorite impacts. The term was coined by Austrian geologist Franz Eduard Suess (1867–1941), son of Eduard Suess.[note 1][1] They generally range in size from millimetres to centimetres. Millimetre-scale tektites are known as microtektites.[2][3][4]

Tektites are characterized by:

  1. a fairly homogeneous composition
  2. an extremely low content of water and other volatiles
  3. an abundance of lechatelierite
  4. a general lack of microscopic crystals known as microlites
  5. not having a chemical relationship to the local bedrock or local sediments
  6. their distribution within geographically extensive strewn fields

Characteristics

[edit]

Although tektites are superficially similar to some terrestrial volcanic glasses (obsidians), they have unusual distinctive physical characteristics that distinguish them from such glasses. First, they are completely glassy and lack any microlites or phenocrysts, unlike terrestrial volcanic glasses. Second, although high in silica (>65 wt%), the bulk chemical and isotopic composition of tektites is closer to those of shales and similar sedimentary rocks and quite different from the bulk chemical and isotopic composition of terrestrial volcanic glasses. Third, tektites contain virtually no water (<0.02 wt%), unlike terrestrial volcanic glasses. Fourth, the flow-banding within tektites often contains particles and bands of lechatelierite, which are not found in terrestrial volcanic glasses. Finally, a few tektites contain partly melted inclusions of shocked and unshocked mineral grains, i.e. quartz, apatite, and zircon, as well as coesite.[2][3][4]

The difference in water content can be used to distinguish tektites from terrestrial volcanic glasses. When heated to their melting point, terrestrial volcanic glasses turn into a foamy glass because of their content of water and other volatiles. Unlike terrestrial volcanic glass, a tektite produces only a few bubbles at most when heated to its melting point, because of its much lower water and other volatiles content.[5]

Classification

[edit]
Muong Nong Indochinite with layered structure and inclusions.

On the basis of morphology and physical characteristics, tektites have traditionally been divided into four groups. Those found on land have traditionally been subdivided into three groups: (1) splash-form (normal) tektites, (2) aerodynamically shaped tektites, and (3) Muong Nong-type (layered) tektites. Splash-form and aerodynamically shaped tektites are only differentiated on the basis of their appearance and some of their physical characteristics. Splash-form tektites are centimeter-sized tektites that are shaped like spheres, ellipsoids, teardrops, dumbbells, and other forms characteristic of isolated molten bodies. They are regarded as having formed from the solidification of rotating liquids, and not atmospheric ablation. Aerodynamically shaped tektites, which are mainly part of the Australasian strewn field, are splash-form tektites (buttons) which display a secondary ring or flange. The secondary ring or flange is argued as having been produced during the high-speed re-entry and ablation of a solidified splash-form tektite into the atmosphere. Muong Nong tektites are typically larger, greater than 10 cm in size and 24 kg in weight, irregular, and layered tektites. They have a chunky, blocky appearance, exhibit a layered structure with abundant vesicles, and contain mineral inclusions, such as zircon, baddeleyite, chromite, rutile, corundum, cristobalite, and coesite.[2][3][4][5]

Microtektites, the fourth group of tektites, are less than 1 mm in size. They exhibit a variety of shapes ranging from spherical to dumbbell, disc, oval, and teardrop. Their colors range from colorless and transparent to yellowish and pale brown. They frequently contain bubbles and lechatelierite inclusions. Microtektites are typically found in deep-sea sediments that are of the same ages as those of the four known strewn fields.[3][4] Microtektites of the Australasian strewn field have also been found on land within Chinese loess deposits, and in sediment-filled joints and decimeter-sized weathering pits developed within glacially eroded granite outcrops of the Victoria Land Transantarctic Mountains, Antarctica.[6][7]

A very rare aerodynamically shaped Australite – Shallow Bowl

Occurrence

[edit]

Most tektites have been found within four geographically extensive strewn fields: the Australasian, Central European, Ivory Coast, and North American.[8][9][needs update?] As summarized by Koeberl,[10] the tektites within each strewn field are related to each other with respect to the criteria of petrological, physical, and chemical properties, as well as their age. In addition, three of the four strewn fields have been clearly linked with impact craters using those same criteria.[2][3][4] Recognized types of tektites, grouped according to their known strewn fields, their associated craters, and ages are:

Comparing the number of known impact craters versus the number of known strewn fields, Natalia Artemieva considered essential factors such as the crater must exceed a certain diameter to produce distal ejecta, and that the event must be relatively recent.[11] Limiting to diameters 10 km or more and younger than 50 Ma, the study yielded a list of 13 candidate craters, of which the youngest eight are given below.

Name Location Age
(million years) 		Diameter
(km) 		Strewn field
? Indochina? 0.788 ± .0028[12] 32–114?[13] Australasian strewn field
Zhamanshin Kazakhstan 0.9 ± 0.1 14 ?
Bosumtwi Ghana 1.07 10 Ivory Coast strewn field
Elgygytgyn Russia, Siberia 3.5 ± 0.5 18 ?
Karakul Tajikistan <5 52 ?
Karla Russia 5 ± 1 10 ?
Ries Germany 15.1 ± 0.1 24 Central European strewn field
Chesapeake Bay US 35.5 ± 0.3 40 North American strewn field
Popigai Russia, Siberia 35.7 ± 0.2 100 ?

Preliminary papers in the late 1970s suggested either Zhamanshin[14] or Elgygytgyn[15] as the source of the Australasian strewnfield.

Povenmire and others have proposed the existence of an additional tektite strewn field, the Central American strewn field. Evidence for this reported tektite strewn field consists of tektites recovered from western Belize in the area of the villages of Bullet Tree Falls, Santa Familia, and Billy White. This area lies about 55 km east-southeast of Tikal, where 13 tektites, two of which were dated as being 820,000 years old, of unknown origin were found. A limited amount of evidence is interpreted as indicating that the proposed Central American strewn field likely covers Belize, Honduras, Guatemala, Nicaragua, and possibly parts of southern Mexico. The hypothesized Pantasma Impact Crater in northern Nicaragua might be the source of these tektites.[16][17][18]

Age

[edit]

The ages of tektites from the four strewnfields have been determined using radiometric dating methods. The age of moldavites, a type of tektite found in the Czech Republic, was determined to be 14 million years, which agrees well with the age determined for the Nördlinger Ries crater (a few hundred kilometers away in Germany) by radiometric dating of Suevite (an impact breccia found at the crater). Similar agreements exist between tektites from the North American strewnfield and the Chesapeake Bay impact crater and between tektites from the Ivory Coast strewnfield and the Lake Bosumtwi Crater. Ages of tektites have usually been determined by either the K-Ar method, fission-track dating, the Ar-Ar technique, or combination of these techniques.[2][3][4] Tektites in geological and archaeological deposits have been used as age markers of stratified deposits, but this practice is controversial.[19]

Origins

[edit]

Terrestrial source theory

[edit]
A simple, spherical splash-form Indochinite tektite

The overwhelming consensus of Earth and planetary scientists is that tektites consist of terrestrial debris that was ejected during the formation of an impact crater. During the extreme conditions created by a hypervelocity meteorite impact, near-surface terrestrial sediments and rocks were either melted, vaporized, or some combination of these, and ejected from an impact crater. After ejection from the impact crater, the material formed millimeter- to centimeter-sized bodies of molten material, which as they re-entered the atmosphere, rapidly cooled to form tektites that fell to Earth to create a layer of distal ejecta hundreds or thousands of kilometers away from the impact site.[2][3][4][20][21][22]

A moldavite tektite

The terrestrial source for tektites is supported by well-documented evidence. The chemical and isotopic composition of tektites indicates that they are derived from the melting of silica-rich crustal and sedimentary rocks, which are not found on the Moon. In addition, some tektites contain relict mineral inclusions (quartz, zircon, rutile, chromite, and monazite) that are characteristic of terrestrial sediments and crustal and sedimentary source rocks. Also, three of the four tektite strewnfields have been linked by their age and chemical and isotopic composition to known impact craters. A number of different geochemical studies of tektites from the Australasian strewnfield concluded that these tektites consist of melted Jurassic sediments, or sedimentary rocks that were weathered and deposited about 167 Mya. Their geochemistry suggests that the source of Australasian tektites is a single sedimentary formation with a narrow range of stratigraphic ages close to 170 Mya, more or less. This effectively refutes multiple impact hypotheses.[clarification needed][2][3][4][21][22]

Although the formation and widespread distribution of tektites is widely accepted to require the intense (superheated) melting of near-surface sediments and rocks at the impact site and the following high-velocity ejection of this material from the impact crater, the exact processes involved remain poorly understood. One possible mechanism for the formation of tektites is by the jetting of highly shocked and superheated melt during the initial contact/compression stage of impact crater formation. Alternatively, various mechanisms involving the dispersal of shock-melted material by an expanding vapor plume, which is created by a hypervelocity impact, have been used to explain the formation of tektites. Any mechanism by which tektites are created must explain chemical data that suggest that parent material from which tektites were created came from near-surface rocks and sediments at an impact site. In addition, the scarcity of known strewn fields relative to the number of identified impact craters indicate that very special and rarely met circumstances are required for tektites to be created by a meteorite impact.[2][3][21][22]

Nonterrestrial source theories

[edit]
Aerodynamically shaped australite, its button shape caused by ablation of molten glass in the atmosphere
Tektite about 3cm long, mass 11 grams

Though the meteorite impact theory of tektite formation is widely accepted, there has been considerable controversy about their origin in the past. As early as 1897, the Dutch geologist Rogier Diederik Marius Verbeek (1845–1926) suggested an extraterrestrial origin for tektites: he proposed that they fell to Earth from the Moon.[23][note 2] Verbeek's proposal of an extraterrestrial origin for tektites was soon seconded by the Austrian geologist Franz E. Suess.[24] Subsequently, it was argued that tektites consist of material that was ejected from the Moon by major hydrogen-driven lunar volcanic eruptions and then drifted through space to later fall to Earth as tektites. The major proponents of the lunar origin of tektites include NASA scientist John A. O'Keefe, NASA aerodynamicist Dean R. Chapman, meteorite and tektite collector Darryl Futrell, and long-time tektite researcher Hal Povenmire.[25] From the 1950s to the 1990s, O'Keefe argued for the lunar origin of tektites based upon their chemical, i.e. rare-earth, isotopic, and bulk, composition and physical properties.[5][25] Chapman used complex orbital computer models and extensive wind tunnel tests to argue that the so-called Australasian tektites originated from the Rosse ejecta ray of the large crater Tycho on the Moon's near side.[26] O'Keefe, Povenmire, and Futrell claimed on the basis of behavior of glass melts that the homogenization, which is called "fining", of silica melts that characterize tektites could not be explained by the terrestrial-impact theory.[clarification needed] They also argued that the terrestrial-impact theory could not explain the vesicles and extremely low water and other volatile content of tektites.[5][25] Futrell also reported the presence of microscopic internal features within tektites, which argued for a volcanic origin.[27][28]

At one time, theories advocating the lunar origin of tektites enjoyed considerable support as part of a spirited controversy about the origin of tektites that occurred during the 1960s. Starting with the publication of research concerning lunar samples returned from the Moon, the consensus of Earth and planetary scientists shifted in favor of theories advocating a terrestrial impact versus lunar volcanic origin. For example, one problem with the lunar origin theory is that the arguments for it that are based upon the behavior of glass melts use data from pressures and temperatures that are vastly uncharacteristic of and unrelated to the extreme conditions of hypervelocity impacts.[29][30] In addition, various studies have shown that hypervelocity impacts are likely quite capable of producing low-volatile melts with extremely low water content.[10] The consensus of Earth and planetary scientists regards the chemical, i.e. rare-earth, isotopic, and bulk composition evidence as decisively demonstrating that tektites are derived from terrestrial crustal rock, i.e. sedimentary rocks, that are unlike any known lunar crust.[3][10][31]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

Literature

[edit]

Books

[edit]
  • Barnes, V., and M. Barnes (1973) Tektites. Dowden, Hutchinson, & Ross, Inc., New York, New York. 444 pp. ISBN 0-87933-027-9
  • Bouska, Vladimir (1994). Moldavites: The Czech Tektites. Stylizace, Prague, Czechoslovakia. 69 pp.
  • Heinen, Guy (1998) Tektites – Witnesses Of Cosmic Catastrophes. Guy Heinen, Luxembourg. 222 pp.
  • McCall, G.J.H. (2001) Tektites in the Geological Record. The Geological Society of London, London, United Kingdom. 256 pp. ISBN 1-86239-085-1
  • McNamara, K., and A. Bevan (1991) Tektites, 2nd ed. Western Australian Museum, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. 28 pp.
  • O'Keefe, J. A. (1976) Tektites And Their Origin. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 266 pp. ISBN 0-44441-350-2
  • Povenmire, Hal (2003) Tektites: A Cosmic Enigma. Florida Fireball Network, Indian Harbour Beach, Florida. 209 pp.
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Tektite

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Tektites are small, natural formed from the melting and rapid quenching of terrestrial materials during hypervelocity impacts on Earth. These impactites, typically ranging from millimeters to centimeters in size, exhibit a characteristic glassy, amorphous structure without crystalline components, distinguishing them from volcanic like . Their formation involves the extreme temperatures—exceeding 2,350 °C—generated in the early stages of an , which vaporize and melt surface rocks, ejecting molten droplets into the atmosphere where they solidify during flight and atmospheric re-entry. Tektites are chemically homogeneous, high in silica (68–98 wt%), low in water and volatiles, and often contain high-pressure minerals such as or as evidence of shock metamorphism. Shapes vary from splash-form types like spheres, teardrops, and dumbbells to layered, irregular Muong Nong tektites, with colors ranging from black and brown to green or yellow depending on composition. Tektites are distributed across four major strewn fields, including the vast Australasian field (covering , , and the , dated to ~788,000 years ago), the North American field (linked to the impact ~35.5 million years ago), the Central European field (moldavites from the Ries crater ~15 million years ago), and the field (from the Bosumtwi crater ~1.1 million years ago), as well as a recently discovered fifth, the Ananguites field in (~11 million years ago). Microtektites, smaller variants under 1 mm, are found in ocean sediments corresponding to these fields, supporting their aerial dispersal over thousands of kilometers. Despite their extraterrestrial trigger, tektites are entirely terrestrial in origin, with no lunar or other cosmic material, as confirmed by geochemical analyses and isotopic studies.

Definition and Characteristics

Definition

Tektites are gravel-sized natural bodies composed primarily of silica-rich material, formed when terrestrial is melted and rapidly quenched during impacts on . These objects result from the intense heat and pressure generated by such collisions, which eject molten droplets into the atmosphere, where they solidify into homogeneous glass without due to the swift cooling process. Unlike volcanic glasses such as , tektites exhibit distinct chemical signatures and low volatile content, reflecting their origin from surface sediments rather than magmatic sources. The term "tektite" was coined in 1900 by Austrian geologist Franz Eduard Suess, derived from the Greek word tektos, meaning "molten," to describe these enigmatic glassy objects that had puzzled scientists for centuries. Suess's nomenclature highlighted their fused, glassy nature, distinguishing them from meteorites or terrestrial rocks, and laid the foundation for modern studies linking them to impact events. This etymology underscores the rapid melting process central to their formation, as opposed to slower geological processes that allow crystallization. Tektites typically range in size from less than 1 millimeter for microtektites, which are often found in deep-sea sediments, to a few centimeters in diameter for common specimens, with rare larger examples reaching up to 10 centimeters or more, such as blocky Muong Nong types weighing several kilograms. Their shapes vary from spheres and teardrops to more irregular forms, sculpted by aerodynamic forces during atmospheric re-entry, but all share the hallmark of being non-porous, silica-rich glasses devoid of crystalline structures. These size variations reflect the dynamics of ejection and cooling, with smaller particles forming from finer debris and larger ones from more substantial molten blobs.

Physical and Chemical Properties

Tektites are composed of a homogeneous, non-porous with an extremely low , typically less than 0.02 wt% H₂O, distinguishing them from volcanic which often contain higher volatiles. Their is dominated by silica, exceeding 65 wt% SiO₂, and includes abundant , which consists of nearly pure silica formed from melted grains. This high-silica, low-alkali makeup results in a material that lacks , with no microlites, phenocrysts, or vesicles present, unlike typical igneous rocks. The external surfaces of tektites are smooth and fused, frequently exhibiting etched or pitted textures attributable to atmospheric during high-speed flight. Physical measurements reveal a range of 2.3–2.5 g/cm³ and a of approximately 1.48–1.52, reflecting their enrichment in silica and iron that contributes to a relatively high specific . Tektites show no direct chemical or isotopic correspondence to the underlying local at their discovery sites, a feature that supports their ejection and transport from distant impact origins. Their coloration varies from green, as seen in moldavites, to black resembling , primarily due to the presence and of iron oxides within the .

Classification

Morphological Types

Tektites are classified morphologically into several distinct types based on their shapes and structures, which arise from the dynamics of molten during atmospheric flight and cooling. These forms reflect the interplay of , rotation, and aerodynamic forces acting on superheated droplets expelled from impact sites. The primary categories include splash-form, aerodynamically shaped, Muong Nong, and microtektites, each exhibiting characteristic features tied to their solidification processes. Splash-form tektites represent the most common variety, displaying rounded shapes formed by the rapid cooling of molten droplets in free flight. These include spheres, resulting from spinning drops that achieve near-equilibrium under ; ellipsoids, often triaxial with varying axial ratios; teardrops, featuring a tapered bulbous end from partial separation of precursors; dumbbells, characterized by central thinning due to rapid rotation; and shapes, resembling canoes with elongated, curved profiles. Such forms solidify before reaching perfect sphericity, typically ranging from 0.1 cm to 20 cm in size, as observed in analyses of over 1,000 Australasian specimens. Aerodynamically shaped tektites exhibit forms modified by high-speed passage through the atmosphere, particularly during re-entry. These include disc-shaped buttons with prominent flanges or elongated tails, where the anterior surface displays ring waves and the posterior remains spherical yet pitted and rough. during entry at speeds exceeding 6.5 km/s and shallow angles (0°–29°) removes over 70% of the mass, reshaping the through and melt flow, as evidenced by experimental arc-jet simulations. Muong Nong tektites are distinguished by their irregular, blocky morphology, often exceeding 10 cm in length and weighing up to several kilograms. Unlike other types, they appear slab-like or layered with prominent internal banding, showing submillimeter-scale striations and elongated vesicles; their surfaces are less ablated, featuring matt fractures from post-landing etching rather than flight sculpting. These characteristics suggest limited atmospheric transport, with angular fragments often occurring in clusters indicative of breakage upon landing. Microtektites, the smallest variant, consist of sub-millimeter spheres (typically under 1 mm in diameter) recovered from deep-sea sediments. Predominantly spherical with occasional oval or irregular outlines, they mirror the splash-form shapes of larger tektites but on a reduced scale, appearing transparent or brownish with internal bubbles. These tiny spherules, found in cores from ocean basins, represent finer fractions that settled in marine environments. Common surface features across tektite types include , dimples, and fusion crust, all stemming from melting episodes during ejection and flight. manifest as swirling, contorted layers of varying , resembling folded flows that correlate with internal striae and arise from incomplete mixing of molten material. Dimples appear as hemispherical pits or cupules up to 1 mm deep, often on posterior surfaces and predating major , formed by pre-atmospheric splashing or early flight dynamics. Fusion crust forms a thin, ablated outer layer from atmospheric heating, exhibiting melt flow ridges, smooth dragged surfaces, and bald spots where was vaporized, with thicknesses of 8–15 mm in some cases. These morphological types are primarily associated with major strewn fields, such as the Australasian, where all varieties occur together.

Chemical and Regional Groups

Tektites are primarily classified into four major chemical groups, each associated with a distinct geographic , reflecting homogenized compositions derived from local source rocks but with field-specific signatures due to variations in parental materials and impact processes. These groups exhibit common enrichments such as high FeO (typically 5–10 wt%) and low volatile content, alongside slight differences in major oxides like Al₂O₃ (10–15 wt%) and CaO (<5 wt%), indicating intense melting and homogenization during formation. The Australasian group, the largest and most widespread, features high silica content (around 73 wt%) and low sodium (Na₂O ~1.5 wt%), with subtypes like australites, indochinites, and philippinites showing consistent compositions across Southeast Asia and Australia. Central European moldavites, found in the Czech Republic and surrounding areas, are distinguished by high aluminum (Al₂O₃ ~11 wt%) and a characteristic green hue attributed to iron content, chemically linked to local Bohemian sedimentary rocks such as shales and sandstones. Ivory Coast tektites (ivorites), from West Africa, resemble the Australasian group in overall composition but possess distinct iron isotopic ratios, lower silica (<70 wt%), and higher MgO (~3 wt%), tying them to the Bosumtwi impact structure's target materials. North American bediasites, primarily from Texas and Georgia, are enriched in trace elements like chromium (46–62 ppm) and molybdenum (~0.5 ppm), with Al₂O₃ ranging 13–18 wt% and low CaO and MgO, reflecting derivation from regional coastal plain sediments. These chemical profiles demonstrate that while tektites within each group are remarkably uniform—suggesting rapid high-temperature fusion—inter-group variations preserve signatures of diverse source lithologies, such as granitic or sedimentary precursors. No confirmed tektites exist outside these four groups, though debated tektite-like glasses from Central America (e.g., Belize) have been proposed as a potential fifth field based on preliminary geochemical analyses, but their classification remains unresolved. A 2025 study proposes reclassifying high Na/K australites as a new strewn field termed "ananguites," potentially from a ~1.7 million-year-old impact in a volcanic arc setting in Australia, which may represent an additional chemical group.
GroupKey Major Oxides (wt%)Notable FeaturesRegional Link
AustralasianSiO₂ ~73, Al₂O₃ 10–15, FeO 5–10, Na₂O low (~1.5), CaO <5High silica, low volatilesSoutheast Asia/Australia sediments
MoldavitesSiO₂ >75, Al₂O₃ ~11, FeO ~2–6High Al, green colorBohemian shales/sandstones
IvoritesSiO₂ <70, Al₂O₃ ~12, FeO ~6, MgO ~3Distinct Fe isotopes, Na₂O > K₂OWest African (Bosumtwi) targets
BediasitesSiO₂ ~70–75, Al₂O₃ 13–18, FeO 4–5Trace element enrichment (e.g., Cr 46–62 ppm)North American coastal sediments

Occurrence and Distribution

Major Strewn Fields

Tektite strewn fields represent discrete geographic regions where tektites exhibiting consistent morphological and compositional traits are distributed, typically forming elliptical patterns aligned with the ballistic trajectories of impact from a parent . These fields vary greatly in scale, from compact areas spanning hundreds of kilometers to vast expanses exceeding 10,000 km in length, reflecting the dynamics of high-velocity ejection during hypervelocity impacts. The Australasian strewn field stands as the largest known, encompassing approximately 50 million km²—nearly 10% of Earth's surface—and stretching from Indochina across , the , and . Microtektites from this field have been found as far south as . This expansive field includes several subtypes, such as indochinites primarily found in , , and ; australites scattered across southern and central ; and billionites recovered from the . In contrast, the Central European strewn field, dominated by moldavites, is far more localized, covering an area of roughly 6,000 km² primarily within the Czech Republic, with extensions into southern Germany and Austria. Moldavites are concentrated along river valleys and sedimentary basins in this region, where an estimated 30–60 metric tons have been collected through systematic and informal efforts over centuries. The strewn field, featuring ivorites, occupies a relatively small area in centered around the country of Côte d'Ivoire, with documented finds extending over at least 45 km from previously established limits. This field is directly associated with the Bosumtwi impact crater in , where dispersal appears confined due to the crater's modest size of 10.5 km in diameter. The North American strewn field includes bediasites mainly from eastern Texas and western Georgia, as well as georgiaites from central Georgia, distributed across an area of approximately 8.8 million km² from the central United States to the eastern seaboard. This field correlates with the submerged impact structure off the coast, illustrating how marine settings can influence the preservation and distribution of continental . A fifth strewn field has been identified in Central America, centered in western , where glasses termed Belize tektites (belizites) have been found covering an area of approximately 950 km². This field is associated with the Pantasma impact crater in (14 km diameter, dated to ~800 ka). Recently, as of 2025, two additional strewn fields have been confirmed. The Ananguite field in spans approximately 900 km, dated to ~11 million years ago, and represents a distinct population ejected from a volcanic arc impact crater. The Geraisite field, discovered in , , is the seventh known strewn field, with tektites showing unique compositions; age determination is ongoing. Tektites within each display chemical similarities, such as comparable silica content and ratios, underscoring their origin from a common .

Microtektites and Other Finds

Microtektites are small, typically spherical impact glasses less than 1 mm in diameter, commonly found embedded in deep-sea sediments. They were first discovered in the through analysis of sediment cores from the , where they appeared as glassy spherules in layers associated with the Australasian tektite . These microtektites exhibit chemical compositions closely matching those of larger macro-tektites from the same fields, including high silica content and ratios indicative of shared origins in impact of . The distribution of microtektites extends the known boundaries of major tektite strewn fields into marine environments, revealing broader dispersal patterns than observed on land. Australasian microtektites are widespread in sediments of the Pacific and Indian Oceans, with occurrences documented in over 100 deep-sea cores spanning from the to the central basin. In contrast, North American microtektites are primarily concentrated in the western equatorial Atlantic, including sites in the , , and around , though rarer examples have been reported in Pacific sediments. Microtektites linked to the and Central European fields are less common, mostly confined to Atlantic deep-sea deposits near the respective continental margins. Other notable finds include potential abyssal microtektites recovered from ultra-deep ocean sediments, which some researchers suggest may originate from undiscovered impact events beyond the four major strewn fields, though their attribution remains tentative due to limited sampling. In , Darwin glass—irregular, green-to-yellow impact melt fragments found near the island's west coast—has been debated as a proximal rather than a true tektite, given its location close to a suspected and distinct textural features like flow banding, distinguishing it from distal . The presence of microtektites in offshore sediments significantly expands the inferred size of strewn fields, demonstrating that impact ejecta can travel thousands of kilometers across ocean basins before settling. Concentrations in peak layers can reach up to several thousand particles per gram of dry sediment, providing a sensitive stratigraphic marker for impact events and highlighting the role of atmospheric and ballistic trajectories in their global dispersal. As of 2025, no entirely new microtektite strewn fields have been confirmed since 2020, but continued analysis of ocean drilling cores from programs like the International Ocean Discovery Program continues to refine distributions and uncover subtle variations in microtektite morphologies.

Age Determination

Dating Methods

The primary method for dating tektites is using the 40Ar/39Ar technique, which involves irradiation of potassium-bearing samples to produce 39Ar from 40K, followed by stepwise heating to release argon isotopes for analysis. This method allows for the calculation of precise plateau ages, representing the time since the sample cooled below the closure temperature, typically around 200–300°C for tektites. Stepwise heating is essential to identify and account for excess 40Ar incorporated during the hypervelocity , often from atmospheric entrapment or inherited from target materials, which can inflate apparent ages if not corrected via isochron plots that intercept the 40Ar/36Ar axis away from atmospheric values (e.g., ~300 instead of 295.5). Older radiometric approaches, such as conventional K-Ar dating, have been applied to tektites but offer lower precision due to reliance on total argon extraction without stepwise degassing, making them susceptible to contamination from excess argon or partial loss. Fission-track dating, which counts tracks from 238U in etched glass sections, provides insights into the thermal history of tektites by revealing annealing effects from post-formation heating, though it is less precise for absolute ages and requires corrections for track fading. For more recent tektite events, such as those associated with the strewn field (~1.1 Ma), U-Th disequilibrium methods measure the imbalances in uranium-series isotopes to estimate ages up to ~500 ka, complementing argon techniques where argon retention is incomplete. Impact formation poses challenges to argon-based dating, as the extreme temperatures (>2000°C) cause complete and resetting of the radiogenic 40Ar clock, while rapid can trap excess argon, necessitating diffusion modeling to simulate argon loss or retention under impact conditions. For microtektites, direct is often infeasible due to their small size (~<1 mm), so ages are determined via stratigraphic correlation with dated marine or continental sediments, such as linking Australasian microtektites to the Brunhes-Matuyama magnetic reversal boundary. Additionally, strontium (87Sr/86Sr) and neodymium (143Nd/144Nd) isotopic ratios are analyzed to trace tektite compositions back to source crater lithologies, providing indirect constraints on formation age by matching to known regional sedimentary formations. Modern 40Ar/39Ar analyses achieve high accuracy, with plateau ages for young tektites precise to ±0.002 Ma, enabling resolution of formation events within millennia.

Age Ranges by Strewn Field

Tektites are distributed across several major strewn fields, each associated with distinct formation ages determined primarily through radiometric dating methods such as 40Ar/39Ar analysis. These ages provide critical constraints on the timing of the hypervelocity impacts that generated the tektites, with refinements from high-precision isotopic studies refining earlier estimates. The overall age range for confirmed tektite strewn fields spans from approximately 0.8 million years ago (Ma) to 35 Ma, encompassing Cenozoic events exclusively, as no pre-Cenozoic tektites have been verifiably identified despite occasional reports of older impact glasses. The Australasian strewn field, covering Southeast Asia, Australia, and the Indian Ocean, represents the youngest major tektite event. Recent 40Ar/39Ar dating of samples from multiple sites yields a weighted mean age of 0.788 ± 0.0028 Ma, refining earlier estimates around 0.79 Ma and confirming a single impact origin. In the Central European field, moldavites are found in the Czech Republic, Austria, and Germany, with ages of 14.7–14.8 Ma established through precise 40Ar/39Ar measurements on multiple specimens. This timing closely aligns with the Nördlinger Ries impact crater, dated to approximately 15 Ma, supporting its role as the source. The Ivory Coast strewn field in West Africa has been dated to 1.07 ± 0.05 Ma via 40Ar/39Ar and fission-track methods on tektites and associated microtektites, correlating strongly with the nearby Bosumtwi impact crater at about 1.1 Ma. North American tektites, including bediasites and georgiaites, exhibit ages ranging from 34.8 to 35.5 Ma, primarily determined by 40Ar/39Ar step-heating analyses. These are linked to the Chesapeake Bay impact structure at 35.5 Ma, with possible contributions from the contemporaneous Popigai crater at 35.7 Ma, though isotopic distinctions suggest the former as the dominant source. The Central American field remains debated, with limited samples from Mexico and Belize yielding an approximate age of 0.82 Ma based on 40Ar/39Ar dating, potentially overlapping with the Australasian event but distinguished by compositional differences; further verification is needed to confirm its status as a discrete tektite strewn field.
Strewn FieldAge (Ma)Key Source Crater(s)Primary Dating Method
Australasian0.788 ± 0.0028Unknown40Ar/39Ar
Central European14.7–14.8Nördlinger Ries (~15)40Ar/39Ar
Ivory Coast1.07 ± 0.05Bosumtwi (~1.1)40Ar/39Ar, fission-track
North American34.8–35.5Chesapeake Bay (35.5), possibly Popigai (35.7)40Ar/39Ar
Central American~0.82 (debated)Unknown40Ar/39Ar

Formation and Origins

Impact Ejecta Theory

The impact ejecta theory explains tektite formation as a consequence of hypervelocity meteorite impacts on Earth's surface, where the projectile collides at speeds greater than 10 km/s, producing shock pressures and temperatures exceeding 1,700–2,200°C that selectively melt upper crustal sediments—predominantly quartz-rich, non-crystalline layers rather than underlying crystalline basement rocks. This melting occurs within seconds of impact, generating a spray of molten droplets that are rapidly ejected ballistically into the suborbital trajectory at altitudes of 10–20 km. The process favors sedimentary targets due to their lower melting points and higher silica content, resulting in the SiO₂-dominated compositions typical of tektites (72–82 wt%). During flight, these droplets achieve ejection velocities of 2–7 km/s, enabling them to traverse distances of 1,000–5,000 km across continental and oceanic regions before atmospheric re-entry. Upon re-entry, intense aerodynamic heating causes significant ablation—up to 50% mass loss for larger particles—while surface tension and drag mold the molten material into aerodynamic shapes such as spheres, teardrops, and dumbbells, which solidify rapidly in the cooling atmosphere. Numerical simulations of oblique impacts (angles of 30–45°) confirm that such dynamics produce the observed strewn field asymmetries and size gradients, with smaller microtektites traveling farther due to lower drag. Strong evidence for this mechanism includes geochemical similarities between tektites and proximal crater ejecta; for instance, moldavites exhibit near-identical major and trace element profiles (e.g., high SiO₂, Al₂O₃, and K₂O) to Tertiary sediments surrounding the Ries crater in Germany. Distal deposits in strewn fields contain shocked quartz grains with planar deformation features (PDFs) diagnostic of shock pressures above 5–10 GPa, as seen in Ries ejecta layers, alongside iridium enrichments (up to 10–100 ppb) signaling extraterrestrial input from the impactor. Recent discoveries include coesite in Australasian microtektites, confirming shock pressures indicative of hypervelocity impacts. These features, absent in volcanic glasses, align with hydrodynamic models showing vaporization and fractionation during ejection. Specific source craters have been linked through integrated geochemical, isotopic, and stratigraphic data: the 24-km-diameter Ries crater (formed ~15 Ma) for Central European moldavites; the 10.5-km Bosumtwi crater in Ghana (~1.07 Ma) for West African Ivory Coast tektites, matching in age and oxygen isotope ratios (δ¹⁸O ~14–16‰); and the 85-km Chesapeake Bay crater in the USA (~35.5 Ma) for North American tektites, evidenced by identical ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar ages and sedimentary clast compositions. The vast Australasian strewn field lacks a confirmed source, but recent ballistic, geochemical, and geophysical modeling suggests possible locations in Southeast Asia, such as Indochina or the Bolaven Plateau in Laos. This theory achieved consensus in the 1960s following geochemical exclusions of lunar origins, reinforced by Apollo lunar samples showing no compositional overlap with tektites (e.g., lower FeO/MgO ratios in basalts). Age matches between tektites and these craters further corroborate the connections.

Alternative Theories and Debates

The lunar origin theory for tektites was initially proposed by the Dutch mineralogist R.D.M. Verbeek in 1897, who suggested they represented ejecta from lunar volcanoes based on their unusual morphology and chemistry compared to terrestrial rocks. This hypothesis gained renewed prominence in the 1960s through the work of John A. O'Keefe, who argued that tektites formed as molten droplets from lunar volcanic eruptions or impact-related launches, aerodynamically shaped during passage through Earth's atmosphere. However, the return of lunar samples by the provided definitive refutation: tektites exhibit chemical mismatches with lunar materials, including higher volatile contents and oxygen isotope ratios (δ¹⁸O of +9.6‰ to +11.5‰ in tektites versus <7‰ in lunar rocks), distinct lead isotope systematics, and the absence of any tektite-like glass analogs in the lunar regolith despite evidence of recent lunar volcanism. Alternative terrestrial explanations, such as formation via volcanic ignimbrite flows or melting induced by cosmic airbursts, were advanced in early 20th-century studies but have been largely dismissed. These theories fail to account for tektites' extremely low water and volatile contents (<0.03 wt% H₂O), which contrast sharply with hydrous volcanic glasses, as well as the presence of lechatelierite inclusions—pure silica glass formed under extreme shock pressures characteristic of hypervelocity impacts, not volcanic processes. Persistent debates center on unresolved aspects of tektite formation and distribution. The source crater for the vast Australasian strewn field remains unidentified, with candidates in Indochina potentially obscured by thick sedimentary or volcanic overburden, complicating geophysical surveys. Muong Nong-type tektites, distinguished by their blocky, layered structures and higher volatile contents, are interpreted by some as proximal ejecta deposited near the impact site, while others argue they represent transitional forms en route to distal splash-forms, affecting aerodynamic and dispersal models. Additionally, the nature of the impacting body—potentially a comet rather than an asteroid—continues to be discussed, given the strewn field's immense scale (over 50 million km²) and the lack of enriched siderophile elements typical of iron meteorites. Key uncertainties persist in confirming less-established strewn fields and refining dispersal dynamics. The proposed Central American tektite field, centered in Belize with glasses dated to ~800 ka, requires further validation to distinguish it from local impactites, as its extent and chemical homogeneity remain debated. Post-2020 hydrodynamic models for microtektite dispersal, particularly explaining their presence in far-distal sites like Antarctica (>10,000 km from the presumed source), highlight unresolved questions about high-velocity jetting and atmospheric re-entry trajectories. Over 99% of the scientific community now concurs that tektites originate from terrestrial hypervelocity impacts, a view solidified since the 1960s, though efforts to locate source craters and model ejecta trajectories continue unabated.

History of Study

Discovery and Early Theories

Tektites have been recognized and utilized by humans for millennia, with evidence of their collection and use dating back to prehistoric times. In , australites were gathered and employed as tools and ritual objects by for over 30,000 years, while systematic scientific collections began in the 1860s through efforts like those of the Geological Survey of Victoria. In , moldavites—greenish tektites from the —were known since the Middle Ages, where they were valued as gems called "vltavín" and incorporated into jewelry and , often associated with mystical properties and restricted to . Across and , tektites featured in cultural narratives, serving as amulets, tools from the to the , and symbols in Khmer and Aboriginal traditions. Scientific interest in tektites intensified in the late with key discoveries that highlighted their unusual characteristics. In 1897, Dutch geologist Rogier Verbeek described Javanese tektites (now known as billitonites) from , noting their glassy composition and proposing they originated as from lunar volcanoes, linking them to similar finds in and . The following year, in 1900, Austrian geologist Franz Eduard Suess coined the term "tektite" (from the Greek "tektos," meaning melted) to describe these objects collectively, grouping moldavites, australites, and billitonites; he suggested an extraterrestrial origin, interpreting their forms as resulting from fusion followed by . These works marked the shift from viewing tektites as mere curiosities to subjects of geological inquiry, with early specimens often misidentified as or volcanic bombs. The and saw vigorous debates over tektite origins, pitting extraterrestrial hypotheses against terrestrial ones, while initial classifications treated them as either meteoritic or volcanic glasses without a clear impact connection. Proponents of lunar origins, building on Verbeek and Suess, included Oskar Linck (1928), who extended the idea to volcanic activity on the shaping their aerodynamics during fall. Terrestrial advocates, such as Charles Fenner, argued for volcanic melting on , countering meteorite impact suggestions from L.J. Spencer, who in 1933 first recognized the vast Australasian spanning millions of square kilometers and proposed impacts as the source of fusion. Other theories emerged, like Viktor Goldschmidt's (1921) idea of a meteorite colliding with a cosmolith or W.H. Easton's (1921) siliceous gel drying, but no consensus formed, and impact links remained speculative until the mid-20th century.

Modern Research and Consensus

In the 1960s, the analysis of Apollo mission lunar samples provided crucial evidence refuting the extraterrestrial origin of tektites, as the geochemical compositions, particularly the silica content exceeding 50% in tektites, did not match those of lunar rocks. Concurrently, advancements in 40Ar/39Ar techniques established direct links between tektites and terrestrial impact craters; for instance, a 1969 study correlated the age of moldavites with the Ries crater in , confirming their terrestrial impact origin. Key studies in the 1970s, through ocean drilling programs like the , identified widespread microtektites in marine sediments, expanding the known extent of strewn fields and supporting aerodynamic shaping during atmospheric flight. In the , isotopic analyses, including and ratios, further confirmed that tektite parent materials derived from continental sedimentary deposits rather than mantle or oceanic sources. More recently, Jourdan et al. (2019) refined the age of the Australasian tektites to 788 ± 3 ka using high-precision 40Ar/39Ar methods, providing a benchmark for correlating strewn field distributions. Technological advances have enhanced understanding of tektite formation, with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealing nanoscale textures such as vesicles and inclusions that indicate rapid quenching from impact melts. Numerical simulations, including those by Artemieva and colleagues, model the ejection mechanics of impact events, demonstrating how oblique impacts can propel molten material thousands of kilometers while preserving compositional integrity. Ongoing research includes geophysical surveys using gravity and magnetic data to locate the elusive Australasian source crater, with recent models favoring sites in based on anomaly patterns. Studies also explore the climatic ramifications of large strewn fields, such as potential atmospheric dust loading from the Australasian event contributing to Pleistocene cooling episodes. Ethical concerns surround collection, as surging demand has led to unregulated in the , prompting calls for sustainable practices and legal protections to preserve sites. The current consensus views tektites as distal impact glasses formed by hypervelocity collisions with Earth, melting and ejecting sedimentary targets into suborbital trajectories. Unresolved aspects include precise mapping of all boundaries and the origins of rare subtypes, such as those with anomalous high Na/K ratios.

References

  1. https://meteoritical.org/meteorites/tektites
  2. https://www.jsg.utexas.edu/npl/collections/meteorites-tektites/tektites/
  3. https://craterexplorer.ca/tektite/
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X2500398X
  5. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19750015372/downloads/19750015372.pdf
  6. https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/STFC-150222-Tektite-fact-sheets.compressed.pdf
  7. https://oxfordre.com/planetaryscience/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190647926.001.0001/acrefore-9780190647926-e-263
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016703718304757
  9. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/JB077i035p07057
  10. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19680028543/downloads/19680028543.pdf
  11. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19630003053/downloads/19630003053.pdf
  12. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/5993747
  13. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-40177-7
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0016703764900456
  15. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/msa/elements/article/14/3/212/531537/The-Enduring-Mystery-of-Australasian-Tektites
  16. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11038-010-9359-y
  17. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19660014236/downloads/19660014236.pdf
  18. https://progearthplanetsci.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40645-020-00378-4
  19. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02875247
  20. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-021-00155-1
  21. https://www.britannica.com/science/strewn-field
  22. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2024GC012133
  23. https://progearthplanetsci.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40645-024-00660-9
  24. https://www.klenota.com/Blog/Gems-and-pearls/Moldavite-the-mysterious-Czech-gemstone
  25. http://www.geology.cz/bulletin/fulltext/04trnkafinal.pdf
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1464343X23001632
  27. https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2024/pdf/1960.pdf
  28. https://repository.hou.usra.edu/bitstreams/9fda31c9-864d-4ff6-8d97-7c8bb3f2e0df/download
  29. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70135344
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7611520/
  31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377848660_Belize_tektites_and_the_tektite_strewn_field_of_western_Belize
  32. https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/metsoc2024/pdf/6019.pdf
  33. https://www.nature.com/articles/214372b0
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0012821X73901131
  35. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2006JE002857
  36. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/JB090iS01p00175
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/tektite
  38. https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/655586
  39. https://arizona.aws.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10150/656106/15243-17596-2-PB.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  40. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article/53/9/727/654978/Coesite-discovered-in-Australasian-microtektites
  41. https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/metsoc2007/pdf/5221.pdf
  42. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/maps.12309
  43. https://repository.arizona.edu/bitstream/handle/10150/655704/14817-17153-1-PB.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0012821X71900938
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274097287_Recent_advances_and_future_prospects_of_the_U-Th_and_U-Pb_chronometers_applicable_to_archaeology
  46. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maps.13305
  47. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-abstract/89/10/1455/190449/Australasian-microtektites-and-the-stratigraphic
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/001670379290146A
  49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016703797000264
  50. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/books/book/440/chapter-standard/3798925/Tektite-origin-by-hypervelocity-asteroidal-or
  51. https://www.psi.edu/wp-content/uploads/Pierazzo-ESASP06.pdf
  52. https://tektites.info/primary-shape-formation
  53. http://www.geology.cz/bulletin/fulltext/05artemievafinal.pdf
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/001670376990057X
  55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8018947/
  56. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.216.4548.885
  57. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article-abstract/22/8/691/206078/Meteoroid-mayhem-in-Ole-Virginny-Source-of-the
  58. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.153.3732.173
  59. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.271.5253.1263
  60. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article/52/12/865/648099/Clues-on-the-Australasian-impact-crater-site
  61. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0016703761901144
  62. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19640005370/downloads/19640005370.pdf
  63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-8252(73)90074-3
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6983443/
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353146159_Revisiting_the_paleomagnetism_of_Muong_Nong_layered_tektites_Implications_for_their_formation_process
  66. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/nsu/rgg/article/38/3/669/650889/AUSTRALASIAN-TEKTITES-AND-A-GLOBAL-DISASTER-OF
  67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349085453_Multi-collector_40Ar39Ar_dating_of_microtektites_from_Transantarctic_Mountains_Antarctica_A_definitive_link_with_the_Australasian_tektitemicrotektite_strewn_field
  68. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19920001650
  69. https://collections.museumsvictoria.com.au/collections/14164
  70. https://australian.museum/learn/minerals/shaping-earth/tektites/
  71. https://www.gemrockauctions.com/learn/a-z-of-gemstones/moldavite-the-gem-from-the-sky
  72. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258680643_A_review_of_volatile_compounds_in_tektites_and_carbon_content_and_isotopic_composition_of_moldavite_glass
  73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281466094_Moldavites_A_review
  74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/004019519090112L
  75. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/maps.13305
  76. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285807544_Numerical_modeling_of_tektite_origin_in_oblique_impacts_Implication_to_Ries-Moldavites_strewn_field
  77. https://www.gemsociety.org/article/tektite-jewelry-and-gemstone-information/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.