Hubbry Logo
PhorusrhacidaePhorusrhacidaeMain
Open search
Phorusrhacidae
Community hub
Phorusrhacidae
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Phorusrhacidae
Phorusrhacidae
Phorusrhacidae
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Phorusrhacidae
Temporal range: Middle Eocene – Late Pleistocene[1][2]
~43–0.1 Ma Possible Early Eocene records
Reconstructed skeleton of Titanis walleri, Florida Museum of Natural History
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Aves
Order: Cariamiformes
Superfamily: †Phorusrhacoidea
Ameghino, 1889
Family: †Phorusrhacidae
Ameghino, 1889[3]
Type species
†Phorusrhacos longissimus
Ameghino, 1887
Subfamilies
  • †Physornithinae
  • †Mesembriornithinae
  • †Patagornithinae
  • †Phorusrhacinae
  • †Psilopterinae
Synonyms
Family synonymy
  • Pelecyornidae Ameghino, 1891
  • Brontornithidae Moreno & Mercerat, 1891
  • Darwinornithidae Moreno & Mercerat, 1891
  • Stereornithidae Moreno & Mercerat, 1891
  • Patagornithidae Mercerat, 1897
  • Hermosiornidae Rovereto, 1914
  • Psilopteridae Dolgopol de Saez, 1927
  • Devincenziidae Kraglievich, 1932
  • Mesembriorniidae Kraglievich, 1932

Phorusrhacids, colloquially known as terror birds, are an extinct family of large carnivorous, mostly flightless birds[a] that were among the largest apex predators in South America during the Cenozoic era. Their definitive fossil records range from the Middle Eocene to the Late Pleistocene around 43 to 0.1 million years ago,[1][2] though some specimens suggest that they were present since the Early Eocene.

They ranged in height from 1 to 3 m (3 to 10 ft). One of the largest specimens from the Early Pleistocene of Uruguay, possibly belonging to Devincenzia, would have weighed up to 350 kilograms (770 lb).[5][6] Their closest modern-day relatives are believed to be the 80-centimetre-tall (31 in) seriemas. Titanis walleri, one of the larger species, is known from Texas and Florida in North America. This makes the phorusrhacids the only known large South American predator to migrate north in the Great American Interchange that followed the formation of the Isthmus of Panama land bridge (the main pulse of the interchange began about 2.6 Ma ago; Titanis at 5 Ma was an early northward migrant).[7]

It was once believed that T. walleri became extinct in North America around the time of the arrival of humans,[8] but subsequent datings of Titanis fossils provided no evidence for their survival after 1.8 Ma.[9] However, reports from Uruguay of new findings of phorusrachids such as a specimen of Psilopterus dating to 96,040 ± 6,300 years ago would imply that phorusrhacids survived in South America until the late Pleistocene.[b]

Phorusrhacids may have even made their way into Africa and Europe, if the genus Lavocatavis from Algeria and Eleutherornis from France and Switzerland are included.[10][11] However, the taxonomic placement of both taxa within phorusrhacids are considered highly questionable, and their remains are too fragmentary to be included in phylogenetic analyses.[12][13][14] Possible specimens have also been discovered from the La Meseta Formation of Seymour Island, Antarctica, suggesting that this group had a wider geographical range in the Paleogene.[15]

The closely related bathornithids occupied a similar ecological niche in North America across the Eocene to Early Miocene; some, like Paracrax, were similar in size to the largest phorusrhacids.[16][17] At least one analysis recovers Bathornis as sister taxa to phorusrhacids, on the basis of shared features in the jaws and coracoid,[18] though this has been seriously contested, as these might have evolved independently for the same carnivorous, flightless lifestyle.[19]

Description

[edit]
Size comparison of some phorusrhacids, including Kelenken, Devincenzia, Phorusrhacos, and Titanis

The neck can be divided into three main regions. In the higher regions of the neck, the phorusrhacid has bifurcate neural spines (BNS), while it has high neural spines in its lower regions. This suggests that the phorusrhacid had a highly flexible and developed neck allowing it to carry its heavy head and strike with terrifying speed and power. Although the phorusrhacid externally looks like it has a short neck, its flexible skeletal neck structure proves that it could expand farther beyond the expected reach and intimidate its prey using its height, allowing it to strike more easily. Once stretched out into its full length in preparation for a downward strike, its developed neck muscles and heavy head could produce enough momentum and power to cause fatal damage to the terror bird's prey.[20]

Kelenken guillermoi, from the Langhian stage of the Miocene epoch, some 15 million years ago, discovered in the Collón Curá Formation in Patagonia in 2006, represents the largest bird skull yet found. The fossil has been described as being a 71-centimetre (28 in), nearly intact skull. The beak is roughly 46 cm (18 in) long and curves in a hook shape that resembles an eagle's beak. Most species described as phorusrhacid birds were smaller, 60–90 cm (2.0–3.0 ft) tall, but the new fossil belongs to a bird that probably stood about 3 m (9.8 ft) tall. Scientists theorize that the large terror birds were extremely nimble and quick runners, able to reach speeds of 48 km/h (30 mph).[21] Examination of phorusrhacid habitats also indicates that phorusrhacids may have presented intense competition to predatory metatherian sparassodonts such as borhyaenids and thylacosmilids, causing the mammalian predators to choose forested habitats to avoid the more successful and aggressive avian predators on the open plains.[22]

Phorusrhacinae skulls compared

The feet of the phorusrhacids had four toes, the first of which, known as the hallux, was reduced and did not touch the ground, while the others, corresponding to the second, third and fourth toes, were kept on the ground. Analysis of the resistance of the toes based on biomechanical models of curved beams, in particular of the second toe and its nail claw, indicate that it was modified into a "sickle claw" and was relatively uniform in various species and said claw would be relatively curved and large, which implies the need to keep it elevated to avoid wear or breakage due to contact with the ground, which would be achieved with a well-developed extensor tubercle and soft tissue pads on the fingers. The second toe, which was shorter and had fewer phalanges, also had more resistance and would make it easier to hold the claw off the ground and retain prey, a compromise with its predatory function and movement on the run, as occurs with modern seriemas, although to a lesser degree of specialization than dromaeosaurid dinosaurs.[23] This is further supported by footprints from the Late Miocene of the Río Negro Formation, showcasing a trackway made by a mid-to-large sized terror bird with functionally didactyl footprints, the inner toe with the sickle claw raised mostly off the ground akin to their Mesozoic counterparts.[24]

Skull structure

[edit]
Phorusrhacid skulls
Comparison of different phorusrhacid skulls

In the past, these birds were thought to have high beaks, round orbits, and vaulted braincases[25] though there was never enough empirical evidence to support this. However, new fossils have been discovered in Comallo, Argentina. These skulls reveal that the terror bird has a triangular dorsal view, a rostrum that is hooked and more than half the length of the actual skull, and a more compact caudal portion. The external nares and antorbital fenestras (areas found in the nose) were found to be more square than triangular. These all contribute to a skull that is more rectangular in view rather than triangular.[25] The structure of the fossils also suggest that these birds may have been swifter than originally thought.[25]

A skull from a smaller subspecies of this bird was also found recently[when?]. With this fossil, it was found that the internal structure of the beak is hollow and reinforced with thin-walled trabeculae. There is also an absence of both zona flexoria palatina and zona flexoria arcus jugalis, which are key features that relate to the evolution of cranial akinesis. The discovery of this skull allows for the establishment of primary osteological homologies, which are useful in comparative anatomy, functional morphology, and phylogenetic studies.[26]

Palaeobiology

[edit]
Restoration of Andalgalornis

All phorusrhacids possessed a large hooked beak and a relatively large skull. The bones of the beak were tightly fused together, making the beak more resilient to force from the front to back direction, thus suggesting that it could cause a great amount of harm through pecking, but earlier studies indicate relatively weak bite force quotients. This has led some to argue phorusrahcids were poorly suited to tackle larger prey due to them being unable to effectively inflict damage without repeated blows, forcing them to rely largely on relatively tiny prey like small rodents;[27] however, similar cranial and cervical adaptations combining relatively weak bite forces with resistance to vertical and front-to-back stresses also exist in machaidorontine felids, other sabre-toothed mammalian carnivores, and various allosauroid non-avian theropods, animals generally considered predators of larger herbivores[28][29], and later studies have found phorusrhacids to have had far greater bite forces than assumed previously.[30]

Only known phorusrhacid trackway, named Rionegrina, which confirms that they held their second toe off the ground like seriemas and dromaeosaurs

Some phorusrhacids like Andalgalornis, while very fast runners in a straight line, were poor at tight turns at speed, which contradicts the idea of phorusrhacids being agile predators of small prey and indicates a greater focus on larger prey.[31]

Diet

[edit]

All phorusrhacids are thought to have been carnivorous. The strong downwards curve from the tip of this beak suggests that it ripped the flesh from the body of other animals; many extant bird species with this feature are carnivorous. CT scans performed on the skull of a phorusrhacid reveal that the species would not have been able to shake its prey side to side, but rather exert significant downward force.[32] Florentino Ameghino claimed in a letter to Édouard Trouessart that he had specimens from Argentina of "petrified masses preserving skeletons of large rodents, Interatheriidae [small notoungulates] and even Proterotheriidae [deer-sized litopterns], with all their bones crushed and corroded, piled on with no apparent order and forming a nearly spherical mass with the skull in the center" that resembled giant owl pellets, suggesting that phorusrhacids may have swallowed their prey whole and regurgitated the indigestible parts similar to owls.[33][34] However, Ameghino never formally described these specimens and they have not yet been relocated, making it difficult to determine if they are phorusrhacid pellets.[34] Fossilized pellets from northwestern Argentina have also been suggested to pertain to small phorusrhacids like Procariama.[35]

Classification

[edit]

The etymology of the name Phorusrhacidae is based on the type genus Phorusrhacos. When first described by Florentino Ameghino in 1887, the etymology of Phorusrhacos was not given. Current thinking is that the name is derived from a combination of the Greek words "phoros", which means bearer or bearing, and "rhakos", which translates to wrinkles, scars or rents.[36] Researchers have compared Phorusrhacidae with the living families of Cariamidae and Sagittariidae, but their differences in body mass are too drastic and, thus, one cannot overly depend on these living families for answers.

During the early Cenozoic, after the extinction of the non-bird dinosaurs, mammals underwent an evolutionary diversification, and some bird groups around the world developed a tendency towards gigantism; this included the Gastornithidae, the Dromornithidae, the Palaeognathae, and the Phorusrhacidae.[37] Phorusrhacids are an extinct group within Cariamiformes, the only living members of which are the two species of seriemas in the family Cariamidae. While they are the most taxon-rich group within Cariamiformes, the interrelationships between phorusrhacids are unclear due to the incompleteness of their remains.[38] A lineage of related predatory birds, the bathornithids, occupied North America prior to the arrival of phorusrhacids, living from the Eocene to Miocene and filled a similar niche to phorusrhacids.[39] Only one genus belongs in the family, Bathornis, according to a 2016 analysis by paleontologist Gerald Mayr, who noted that Bathornis was more lightly built, with longer limbs proportionally and skulls more akin to those of Cariama.[40]

The red-legged seriema, the closest living relative of phorusrhacids

Phylogenetic analysis of Cariamiformes and their relatives according to Mayr (2016) in his redescription of Bathornis:[40] A 2024 study finds Bathornis as closer to seriemas than phorusrhacids were.[14]

Following the revision by Alvarenga and Höfling (2003), there are now 5 subfamilies, containing 13 genera and 22 species:[41] These species were the product of adaptive radiation.[42] The following classification is based on LaBarge, Garderner & Organ (2024), and taxa identified as incertae sedis were all excluded from phylogenetic analysis in their study (except for Brontornis):[14]

Reconstructed skeleton of Paraphysornis at the Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro
CT scan of the skull of P 14357, holotype of Andalgalornis ferox in the collections of the Field Museum of Natural History

Family Phorusrhacidae

Alvarenga and Höfling did not include the Ameghinornithidae from Europe in the phorusrhacoids; these have meanwhile turned out to be more basal members of Cariamae.[49] Though traditionally considered as members of the Gruiformes, based on both morphological and genetic studies (the latter being based on the seriema[50]) Cariamiformes may belong to a separate group of birds, Australaves, and their closest living relatives, according to nuclear sequence studies, are a clade consisting of Falconidae, Psittaciformes and Passeriformes.[51][52]

The following cladogram follows the analysis of Degrange and colleagues, 2015:[48]

Phorusrhacidae
Physornithinae
Phorusrhacinae
Patagornithinae

Extinction

[edit]
Life restoration of Procariama in paleoenvironment

During the Miocene and early Pliocene epochs, there was an increase in the phorusrhacid population size in South America, suggesting that, in that time frame, the various species flourished as predators in the savanna environment.

With the emergence of the Isthmus of Panama 2.7 million years ago, carnivorous dogs, bears, and cats from North America were able to cross into South America, increasing competition.[53] (They had been preceded by procyonids as early as 7.3 million years ago.[7]) The population of phorusrhacids declined thereafter according to older hypotheses, suggesting that competition with newly arrived predators was a major contributor to their extinction.[54] Similar ideas have been considered for sparassodonts and for South America's terrestrial sebecid crocodilians.[55]

However, the role of competitive displacement in South American predator lineages has been questioned by some researchers.[56] The timing of turnover events and the decline of South American predators do not correlate well with the arrival of large carnivores like canids or sabretooths (although they do correlate well with the earlier-arriving procyonids, which evolved to large body size in South America, but these were omnivorous[57]), with native South American predator lineages (including most phorusrhacids and all sparassodonts and sebecids) dying out well before the arrival of most larger placental carnivores.[58] Bathornithids, which were similar in ecology and are likely close relatives of phorusrhacids, existed entirely within North America during part of the Cenozoic and competed successfully for a time with large carnivorans such as nimravids,[17] before becoming extinct in the Early Miocene, about 20 million years ago. The phorusrhacid Titanis expanded northward into southern North America during the Interchange and coexisted for several million years with large canids and big cats like Xenosmilus, before its extinction about 1.8 million years ago. Paleohistological analysis further refutes competitive replacement, as their uninterrupted growth patterns contrasts that of birds that inhabit islands or well adapted, stable ecosystems with a lack of strong predation pressure. So the authors concluded that their extinction was due to environmental conditions.[59]

There were some suggestions that phorusrhacids, like the majority of Pleistocene megafauna, were killed off by human activity such as hunting or habitat change. This idea is no longer considered valid, as improved dating on Titanis specimens show that the last phorusrhacids went extinct over one million years before humans arrived.[9] However, several fossil finds of smaller forms have been described from the late Pleistocene of Uruguay in South America. Psilopterus may have been present until 96,040 ± 6,300 years ago (maximum age obtained from the bottom of the fossil-containing stratum), which would extend the existence of the smaller members of this group of avian predators considerably.[2] Another unidentified smaller type which may be a possible psilopterine[2] from the La Paz Local Fauna of Uruguay has also been dated to the late Pleistocene, perhaps 17,620 ± 100 years ago based on radiocarbon analysis using accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) for the molar enamel samples of a proboscidean from the same site,[60] but the validity of this previous radiocarbon dating has been considered highly questionable due to the enamel's lack of collagen;[61] the tibia of Macrauchenia patachonica from the same site has been more precisely dated to a mean value of approximately 21,600 ± 1,000 years ago based on gamma spectrometry and radiocarbon dating.[62]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Phorusrhacidae

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Phorusrhacidae, commonly referred to as "terror birds," was an extinct family of large, flightless, carnivorous birds that served as apex predators across during the era. These terrestrial birds, belonging to the order , were characterized by their elongated necks, powerful legs adapted for running, reinforced skulls, and large hooked beaks suited for slashing and striking prey, with body sizes ranging from about 80 cm to 3 m in height and masses up to 200–400 kg in the largest species, such as Kelenken guillermoi; a 2024 discovery in suggests some reached up to 3.6 m and bore bite marks from caimans, indicating even these predators faced threats. Fossils of Phorusrhacidae are primarily known from , particularly the and deposits of Argentine , though records extend to , (via the Pliocene-Pleistocene Great American Biotic Interchange), and possible Eocene sites in and , suggesting an early trans-Tethys dispersal. The family's temporal range spans from the Middle Eocene (around 43 million years ago) to the (as recently as approximately 12,000 years ago), with the oldest uncontested remains from and the youngest from Uruguay. Within Phorusrhacidae, a monophyletic closely related to modern seriemas (Cariamidae), several subfamilies are recognized, including the basal Psilopterinae (smaller, earlier forms) and the later, more gigantic Phorusrhacinae and Physornithinae, which exhibited niche partitioning through variations in cursoriality and body size for pursuit or ambush predation. The ecological success of Phorusrhacidae in the isolated South American continent allowed them to fill top predator roles in the absence of large mammals, but their decline coincided with the arrival of carnivorous mammals during the Great American Biotic Interchange around 3 million years ago, leading to competitive exclusion and eventual extinction by the end of the Pleistocene. Notable genera include Phorusrhacos longissimus, one of the first described in 1887, and the giant Kelenken guillermoi, which possessed one of the largest known bird skulls.

Taxonomy

Classification

Phorusrhacidae is an extinct family of large, carnivorous, flightless birds classified within the order , part of the clade among neoavians. Historically, the family was placed within (specifically Ralliformes) due to superficial similarities in morphology, such as elongated hindlimbs, but systematic revisions based on osteological and cladistic analyses have firmly established its position in , reflecting shared derived traits like a specialized pedal structure and cranial features with modern seriemas (Cariamidae). This reclassification underscores the family's role as a basal or stem-group lineage to crown-group , with origins likely in during the early (~30 Ma). The family comprises five subfamilies, as recognized in recent phylogenetic syntheses: Psilopterinae (small, early forms), Mesembriornithinae (Patagonian medium-sized taxa), Patagornithinae (agile, intermediate-sized predators), Physornithinae (robust South American giants), and Phorusrhacinae (late, large-headed forms). This subdivision, building on the foundational revision by Alvarenga and Höfling (2003), accounts for morphological diversity and temporal succession, with Physornithinae elevated from inclusion in the dubious Brontornithinae. Approximately 20–22 species are currently recognized across 13–15 valid genera, though some taxa remain debated due to fragmentary remains; for instance, Brontornis burmeisteri is often excluded from Phorusrhacidae pending resolution of its affinities to basal anseriforms or early cariamiforms. The valid genera, their type species, and notable synonyms are outlined below, with etymologies derived from Greek roots emphasizing size, form, or discovery context where applicable. The , meaning "rag-bearer" (from phoros, bearer, and rhakhos, rag, alluding to presumed loose throat skin), exemplifies the family's inspired by predatory or anatomical features.
SubfamilyGenusType SpeciesSynonyms/Notes
PsilopterinaePsilopterusP. bachmanni (Brinkmann, 1929)Small, early forms; synonym Pseudocariama.
PsilopterinaeProcariamaP. simplex (Ameghino, 1891)Basal, cursorial taxa from .
MesembriornithinaeMesembriornisM. milneedwardsi (Moreno, 1889)Revalidated from Eskualdunia; medium-sized.
MesembriornithinaeLlallawavisL. scagliai (Noriega et al., 2017); added post-2003 revision.
PatagornithinaePatagornisP. marshi (Moreno & Mercerat, 1891)"Patagonian bird"; agile predators.
PatagornithinaeAndrewsornisA. abbotti (Kraglievich, 1940)Named for collector; synonym Andalgalornis ferox debated.
PatagornithinaeA. steuletti (Kraglievich, 1923)From Andalgalá region; swift forms.
PhysornithinaePhysornisP. fortis (Ameghino, 1895)"Strong bird"; giant, robust build.
PhysornithinaeP. brasiliensis (, 1882)Brazilian giant; formerly in Brontornithinae.
PhorusrhacinaeP. longissimus (Ameghino, 1887); "longest jaw."
PhorusrhacinaeK. guillermoi (Ambrosio et al., 2005)Named for indigenous thunderbird; giant.
PhorusrhacinaeD. pozzi (Brandoni et al., 2011)Honors collector; robust skull.
PhorusrhacinaeT. walleri (Brodkorb, 1963)"Titanic"; North American, debated but accepted as phorusrhacid migrant via Great American Biotic Interchange.

Phylogeny

Phorusrhacidae, commonly known as terror birds, are an extinct within the avian order , characterized by their position as stem-group representatives basal to the crown-group seriemas (Cariamidae). Phylogenetic analyses consistently recover Phorusrhacidae as the to extant seriemas, with strong Bayesian support (pp = 0.99), though some studies debate whether they form a paraphyletic assemblage at the base of or a monophyletic closely allied to it. This placement within , specifically in the , contrasts with earlier classifications in the that allied them with gruiform birds like rails (Ralliformes), based on shared osteological features such as elongated hindlimbs and reduced wings. The affinity to seriemas is supported by morphological synapomorphies, including a similar structure and patterns, though genomic data remains limited due to the extinct nature of the group. Key phylogenetic studies have refined these relationships through combined morphological datasets. A seminal 2003 revision by Alvarenga and Höfling established the modern subfamilial framework using 13 synapomorphies, including a deep and elongated , placing Phorusrhacidae firmly within South American avifauna but without resolving broader ordinal affinities. Building on this, a 2017 Bayesian analysis incorporating 295 morphological characters across Galloanseres positioned Phorusrhacidae as a monophyletic group sister to Cariamidae, excluding unrelated giant flightless birds like Gastornithidae (now in ). More recently, a 2024 study employed on an expanded matrix of 148 characters from 24 phorusrhacid taxa, confirming the ordinal placement in while highlighting low support (pp = 0.50–0.86) for some interfamilial nodes. Within Phorusrhacidae, the 2024 consensus tree depicts a basal grade of smaller forms leading to a derived lineage of giants, with Psilopterinae (e.g., Psilopterus, Procariama) as the earliest diverging (pp = 0.62), followed by Mesembriornithinae (e.g., Mesembriornis, Llallawavis; pp = 0.64). Patagornithinae forms a monophyletic of intermediate-sized taxa (e.g., Patagornis, ; pp = 0.86), sister to a well-supported lineage (pp ≈ 1) comprising Physornithinae (e.g., Physornis, ) and a paraphyletic Phorusrhacinae. The latter splits into a gracile branch (, ; pp = 0.65) and a robust one (, ), with burmeisteri unresolved but potentially basal or allied to anseriforms rather than a core phorusrhacid. This topology underscores of size in unrelated avian giants like Gastornithidae, which serve as outgroups in broader analyses but show no close affinity. Fossil evidence strongly supports a South American origin for Phorusrhacidae, with the oldest records from the Early (~30 Ma) in , , and Psilopterus known from the Early Santa Cruz Formation (~17-16 Ma). Early tentative records include Paleopsilopterus from the Itaboraí Formation in (~53-50 Ma), though its phorusrhacid affinities remain debated and are excluded from recent analyses; while some studies suggest possible Eocene origins for close relatives, definitive Phorusrhacidae begin in the . These early taxa indicate diversification in the , filling niches in isolation. Dispersal events are evidenced by – fossils in , such as walleri from (ca. 5–2 million years ago), likely via the emerging during the Great American Biotic Interchange. Controversial Eocene records from (e.g., Eleutherornis in ) suggest possible transatlantic dispersal or wider , but these are tentatively attributed to phorusrhacids or close relatives based on tarsal morphology. Overall, the fossil record aligns with vicariance following the breakup of , with subsequent northward expansion.

Description

Physical characteristics

Phorusrhacids exhibited a distinctive as large, flightless birds adapted for terrestrial life, characterized by an upright posture supported by powerful hindlimbs and a reduced apparatus that precluded powered flight. Their overall emphasized locomotion, with elongated hindlimbs comprising a robust , tibiotarsus, and that enabled efficient running and pursuit across open terrains. Body size varied significantly across the family, ranging from smaller, seriema-like forms in the Psilopterinae subfamily, which were likely under 1 meter in height and weighed around 5-10 kg, to gigantic macropredators in the Physornithinae and Phorusrhacinae subfamilies that exceeded 100 kg and reached heights of up to 3 meters. For instance, the Phorusrhacinae Kelenken guillermoi represents one of the largest known members, with a measuring 437 mm in length, contributing to an estimated stature of approximately 2.5-3 meters. Key flightless adaptations included vestigial wings with reduced skeletal elements, such as a diminutive and , alongside a high, elongated with an extended postacetabular region that enhanced stability during rapid terrestrial movement. The hindlimbs were particularly robust, featuring enlarged tarsometatarsi that in larger genera like Phorusrhacos longissimus measured shorter but more sturdy proportions compared to smaller relatives, with midshaft widths up to 48 mm in . These bones supported tridactyl feet, where the hallux (toe I) was small and elevated, while toes II-IV were short and equipped with sharp claws suited for grasping prey during chases rather than perching or wading. The neck, though appearing short externally, possessed a flexible cervical vertebral structure allowing extension beyond the for reaching or striking, while the tail was relatively short and stiff, aiding balance in a manner similar to modern ratites. Variations in skeletal features reflected ecological diversification by subfamily. Psilopterinae displayed more slender, wader-like limbs with longer tibiotarsi relative to the , suggesting in forested or uneven habitats despite their smaller scale. In contrast, Patagornithinae and Mesembriornithinae subfamilies featured intermediate sizes with robust, akin to those of rheas, including a proportion exceeding 0.30 of total length, indicative of high-speed terrestrial specialization. The largest subfamilies, Physornithinae and Phorusrhacinae, showed graviportal tendencies in some genera like brasiliensis, with thicker femoral shafts for supporting masses up to approximately 200 kg, while others like retained traits for active hunting. These differences in limb robusticity and proportions likely partitioned niches, minimizing size overlap among coexisting species.

Skull and dentition

The skulls of phorusrhacids were characterized by a robust, dorsoventrally tall and laterally compressed rostrum, often featuring a cassowary-like casque on the cranium that contributed to their overall height and rigidity. This structure included deep temporal fossae for jaw musculature attachment and a complex basipterygoid articulation that rendered the skull akinetic, lacking the bending zones typical of kinetic avian skulls. The rostrum was elongated and terminated in a raptor-like hooked tip, with falcated tomial edges adapted for tearing flesh, though no true serrations or pseudoteeth were present in examined specimens. Phorusrhacids were completely edentulous, lacking teeth as in all modern birds, with the serving as the primary tool for predation through its sharp, reinforced edges rather than . Neurovascular foramina along the rostrum supported sensory , such as the ophthalmic and nasopalatine, enhancing tactile feedback during feeding. The braincase featured a robust interorbital and a large, vertical occipital region, with variations in the prominentia cerebellaris between morphotypes. Large orbits, often with preserved sclerotic rings in some taxa, positioned the eyes forward-facing to facilitate , akin to modern raptors, which would have aided in for hunting. Skull morphology exhibited notable variations across phorusrhacids, with two primary morphotypes: the smaller psilopterine type, seen in early forms like Psilopterus lemoinei, which had a lower, more globular and overall reduced dimensions suited to smaller body sizes. In contrast, the 'terror bird' morphotype in later giants like Titanis walleri displayed a more massive, rigid scaled to support larger heads on bodies up to 1.9 meters tall, reflecting evolutionary trends toward in Phorusrhacinae.

Distribution and paleoecology

Temporal and geographic range

Phorusrhacids, an extinct family of large carnivorous flightless birds, are documented in the fossil record from the Middle Eocene to the , spanning approximately 43 million years ago (Ma) to 0.018 Ma, with putative earlier records from the late Paleocene/early Eocene, and peak diversity occurring during the epoch. The earliest uncontested fossils come from middle Eocene deposits in , marking the initial appearance of the group in the . Subsequent records show a proliferation in the Eocene and , but the represents the zenith of their abundance and morphological diversity, with numerous genera preserved across multiple formations. Later occurrences extend into the and Pleistocene, though with declining diversity, and isolated finds suggest persistence until the late in some regions, around 0.018 Ma (approximately 18,000 years ago). Geographically, phorusrhacids were predominantly distributed across South America, ranging from the Andean regions in the west to Patagonia in the south, reflecting the continent's isolation during much of the Cenozoic. Isolated Eocene records also exist in Europe (e.g., France and Switzerland) and Africa (e.g., Algeria), indicating an early trans-Tethys dispersal from South America. Key fossil-bearing formations include the Miocene Santa Cruz Formation in Santa Cruz Province, Argentina, which has yielded taxa such as Phorusrhacos longissimus and Patagornis, providing insights into early to middle Miocene assemblages. Similarly, the Miocene La Venta Formation in Colombia has produced significant remains, including a recently described gigantic phorusrhacid specimen estimated at over 150 cm in height, highlighting their presence in northern South American tropical environments around 12 Ma. Fossils have been recovered from dozens of localities throughout these regions, with over 50 major sites documented, primarily in Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay, underscoring their widespread adaptation to diverse South American landscapes. A notable expansion beyond occurred during the via the Great American Biotic Interchange, when the connected the continents around 3 Ma. The genus , known from sites in and , USA, represents this northward dispersal, with fossils dated to the late (approximately 5–2.5 Ma), indicating limited migration patterns restricted to coastal and southeastern n environments. This incursion was short-lived, with no evidence of further spread or survival into the Pleistocene in , contrasting with the more prolonged presence in their n homeland.

Habitat and environment

Phorusrhacids inhabited a variety of paleoecological settings across from the Eocene to the , primarily open woodlands, grasslands, and savannas that transitioned from more closed, forested environments to increasingly open and arid landscapes. Early forms in the Eocene and occupied subtropical to temperate wet and humid forests in regions like Argentine , where dense vegetation supported ambush predation strategies among smaller species. By the early , as seen in the Santa Cruz Formation of southern , habitats consisted of a of open shrublands interspersed with woodland patches, marshes, and gallery forests, reflecting a warmer and wetter climate than modern conditions with annual rainfall of 1000–1500 mm and high seasonality including cool wet winters and dry warm summers. In the middle , northern sites like in indicate tropical environments conducive to large forms, while southern areas shifted toward expanding xeric grasslands and savannas by the late . Climatic conditions played a key role in shaping phorusrhacid distributions and adaptations, with warm, humid periods during the Eocene and early facilitating initial dispersal and diversification in forested biomes, while late promoted the spread of open habitats that favored larger, apex predators. This , linked to and regional tectonic uplift, reduced woodland cover and increased grass-dominated savannas, influencing habitat suitability and prey availability across southern . In the Santa Cruz Formation, seasonal flooding and pond formation supported elements within the broader semi-arid mosaic, with root casts evidencing periodic water stress and high rainfall variability. Phorusrhacids coexisted with diverse native South American , serving as apex predators that preyed on large herbivores such as notoungulates (e.g., homalodotheres) and litopterns (e.g., Theosodon), alongside smaller vertebrates and , in ecosystems lacking large mammalian carnivores until the . Competitors included sparassodont marsupials like and early Cariamidae birds, but phorusrhacids dominated the top trophic levels, particularly in open environments of the early Santa Cruz Formation, where associated taxa encompassed xenarthrans (e.g., sloths, anteaters), primates (e.g., ), rodents, and reptiles (e.g., lizards). At middle La Venta, prior faunal assemblages were dominated by aquatic birds, but the presence of gigantic phorusrhacids underscores their role in expanding predatory guilds within tropical palaeocommunities. Isotopic analyses from associated mammals in phorusrhacid-bearing sites, such as δ¹⁸O values in litopterns and notoungulates from formations, reveal shifts in water availability and aridity, with stable trends in some herbivores indicating to seasonal dryness in grassland-savanna settings. Palynological from the Santa Cruz Formation confirms a mixed of grasses, forbs, palms, and trees, supporting the inferred mosaic habitats and highlighting humid subtropical influences during the early before late grass expansion. These proxies collectively reconstruct environments with ample prey resources but increasing environmental stress toward the end of the .

Paleobiology

Locomotion and behavior

Phorusrhacids exhibited pronounced adaptations in their hind limbs, characterized by elongated femora, tibiotarsi, and that facilitated efficient . These proportions, particularly in subfamilies like Mesembriornithinae and Patagornithinae, closely resembled those of modern ratites such as rheas (Rheidae), with robust bones supporting high-speed running rather than walking or wading. Quantitative assessments using tarsometatarsus length-to-width ratios greater than 12 confirmed that most phorusrhacids, such as Mesembriornis milneedwardsi, were adapted for lifestyles, enabling sustained pursuit over open terrains. Estimates of maximum running speeds, derived from mechanical models based on tibiotarsal strength and limb , suggest phorusrhacids could achieve velocities of 14–27 m/s (50–97 km/h) depending on and size. For instance, Patagornis marshi and longissimus were modeled at approximately 50 km/h, while the more gracile Mesembriornis milneedwardsi reached up to 97 km/h, implying long strides optimized for rapid acceleration and endurance. Rare trace fossils provide direct evidence of their bipedal , including a trackway from (Rionegrina pozosaladensis) with a stride of 1.83 m, pace angulation of 168.8°, and an estimated walking speed of 2.74 m/s, indicating a functionally didactyl foot posture that enhanced cursorial efficiency through reduced weight and improved traction. Behavioral inferences for phorusrhacids draw from their anatomical parallels to modern seriemas (Cariamidae), their closest living relatives, suggesting predominantly solitary or paired lifestyles with territorial tendencies. The absence of bone beds indicating group aggregation supports this solitary hunting strategy, akin to seriemas that stalk and pursue prey individually in open habitats. Their locomotion combined ostrich-like sprinting for pursuit with raptor-inspired stealthy stalking, leveraging powerful hind limbs for short bursts of speed and precise foot placement during predatory approaches. histological analysis of phorusrhacids reveals rapid, uninterrupted growth, with individuals reaching adult size in less than one year via dense vascularized fibrolamellar bone. was likely achieved prior to full somatic maturity, and features such as Haversian systems indicate biomechanical adaptations for an active lifestyle, consistent with predatory behaviors involving running and prey restraint.

Diet and predation

Phorusrhacids were obligate carnivores, primarily targeting small to medium-sized vertebrates including mammals, reptiles, and fellow birds, a diet inferred from their robust cranial morphology and the ecological context of South American faunas lacking large mammalian competitors prior to the Great American Biotic Interchange around 3 million years ago. As the dominant terrestrial predators in these environments, they occupied the apex , exerting top-down control on prey populations through active hunting. While direct evidence of predation such as bite-marked prey bones remains limited due to the toothless beak's low preservation potential, associated faunal assemblages suggest they exploited a range of available vertebrates, from lithe notoungulates to squamates and smaller avians. The feeding mechanics of phorusrhacids centered on the powerful, hooked , which biomechanical studies indicate was optimized for rapid, dorsoventrally directed strikes to slash and dismember prey rather than sustained grappling. Finite element analysis of the of Andalgalornis steulleti, a mid-sized phorusrhacid (~40 kg), reveals low stress resistance under sagittal loading at the beak tip, supporting a strategy of precise, repetitive pecking motions to inflict lethal wounds or tear flesh, potentially aided by restraint with the robust hindlimbs. This adaptation aligns with prey capture in open or semi-open habitats, where the birds could deliver high-force bites (~133 N at the tip) to subdue agile but smaller targets, contrasting with the weaker lateral bite forces that limited confrontations with larger adversaries. In the absence of large placental carnivores before the Panama isthmus closure, phorusrhacids likely supplemented predation with opportunistic scavenging, as evidenced by the diverse bone assemblages in their localities that include remains of potential competitors or conspecifics. Early, smaller forms such as Psilopterus may have incorporated more or incidental matter, but morphological data confirm a predominantly meat-based diet across the . The skull's reinforced structure, featuring a tall for jaw muscle attachment, further facilitated this predatory lifestyle by enabling forceful manipulations.

Extinction

Timeline and patterns

Phorusrhacids reached their peak diversity during the and epochs, with five subfamilies (Psilopterinae, Mesembriornithinae, Patagornithinae, Physornithinae, and Phorusrhacinae) coexisting and encompassing at least 17 species through niche partitioning by body size. This period saw over 10 genera across , reflecting adaptive radiations in open habitats following the Eocene. Diversity began to decline in the epoch as subfamilies underwent successive replacements, such as Patagornithinae by Mesembriornithinae and Physornithinae by Phorusrhacinae, driven by competitive exclusion among apex predators. Regional extinction patterns varied across , with earlier disappearances in southern by the (approximately 10 Ma), where subfamilies like Patagornithinae reached their last appearance datums, while Physornithinae had disappeared earlier in the Early . In contrast, phorusrhacids persisted longer in northern regions, including the , with records extending into the middle in tropical environments of . The overall decline accelerated during the , marking the end of large-bodied forms. The last known North American species, Titanis walleri, persisted until approximately 1.8 Ma in the late of , following an initial dispersal around 5 Ma during the early in . In , larger phorusrhacids vanished by the early , but smaller representatives of Psilopterinae survived until the late , with fossils dated to about 96 ka in . These late records indicate a staggered , with diminutive taxa outlasting their gigantic relatives.

Proposed causes

The extinction of Phorusrhacidae, occurring gradually from the to the , has been attributed to a combination of environmental perturbations and ecological pressures, with multiple hypotheses emphasizing non-competitive factors over direct rivalry with invading mammals. One prominent proposal involves the Great American Biotic Interchange (GABI), which began around 9–4 Ma with the closure of the and intensified ~3 Ma, allowing placental carnivores such as canids, felids, and procyonids to migrate southward into . However, analyses of fossil diversity patterns show no significant correlation between the arrival of these northern invaders and phorusrhacid extinction rates, suggesting limited competitive displacement; instead, native metatherian carnivores like sparassodonts (e.g., borhyaenids) experienced parallel declines, indicating broader disruptions rather than targeted outcompetition. Climate change, particularly and during the to , is another key , as these shifts reduced the extent of open woodlands and grasslands favored by phorusrhacids for cursorial hunting. Evidence from oxygen isotope records (δ¹⁸O) in South American sediments indicates fluctuating and regimes that altered and prey availability, with positive correlations between declining atmospheric CO₂ levels, falling temperatures, and elevated phorusrhacid rates. Osteohistological studies of phorusrhacid bones further support environmental sensitivity, revealing rapid growth patterns adapted to continental variability but vulnerable to habitat contraction, without signs of insular that might buffer against invaders. Habitat fragmentation driven by Andean uplift provides additional mechanistic insight, with major orogenic phases between 10–5 Ma elevating the proto-Andes and promoting regional through effects, which fragmented ecosystems and isolated populations. Paleoelevation proxies from the and Eastern Puna correlate negatively with phorusrhacid persistence, as rising barriers disrupted migratory pathways and favored closed-canopy forests over the open terrains suited to these large, ground-dwelling predators. This tectonic activity, combined with cooling trends, likely exacerbated prey scarcity for phorusrhacids, which specialized in pursuing medium-to-large herbivores in expansive habitats. Alternative explanations, such as disease outbreaks or intrinsic biological limitations like low reproductive rates, have been proposed but lack robust fossil evidence and are generally critiqued for oversimplifying the record. Recent syntheses emphasize that over-reliance on competition ignores the gradual, multicausal nature of the decline, with ecological interactions among native taxa and environmental forcings playing dominant roles; for instance, phorusrhacids showed no physiological adaptations indicating vulnerability to invaders, reinforcing climate and habitat changes as primary drivers.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11040249/
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3842325/
  3. https://phys.org/news/2024-11-fossil-huge-terror-bird-wildlife.html
  4. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/even-apex-predators-like-terror-birds-had-enemies-research-suggests-180987035/
  5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322146104_The_last_terror_birds_Aves_Phorusrhacidae_new_evidence_from_the_late_Pleistocene_of_Uruguay
  6. https://www.scielo.br/j/paz/a/4Fg4WZvd43qzy65KSpSyWLb/
  7. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170975
  8. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2024.0235
  9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755691016000256
  10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26342981_Description_of_a_new_genus_and_species_of_giant_Phorusrhacidae_Aves_Paleognathae_from_the_Tertiary_of_Sergipe_State_Brazil
  11. https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2019.53
  12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2020.1848855
  13. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-paleontology/article/new-skull-remains-of-phorusrhacos-longissimus-aves-cariamiformes-from-the-miocene-of-argentina-implications-for-the-morphology-of-phorusrhacidae/78414E4359C85B439EA7981FC774FE70
  14. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/17/10/681
  15. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article/35/2/123/129774/Revised-age-of-the-late-Neogene-terror-bird
  16. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665397.017
  17. https://doi.org/10.1002/spp2.1601
  18. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/earth-and-environmental-science-transactions-of-royal-society-of-edinburgh/article/hind-limb-morphometry-of-terror-birds-aves-cariamiformes-phorusrhacidae-functional-implications-for-substrate-preferences-and-locomotor-lifestyle/5221E54C5560433ED1A19A53B0526850
  19. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pala.12224
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7664536_Terror_birds_on_the_run_A_mechanical_model_to_estimate_its_maximum_running_speed
  21. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-43771-x
  22. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17030153
  23. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2024.0235
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385543323_A_gigantic_new_terror_bird_Cariamiformes_Phorusrhacidae_from_Middle_Miocene_tropical_environments_of_La_Venta_in_northern_South_America
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2923598/
  26. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011856
  27. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20805872/
  28. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/newsroom/news-releases/2024/11/fossil-of-huge-terror-bird-offers-new-information-about-wildlife-in-south-america-12-million-years-ago
  29. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article-abstract/35/2/123/129774/Revised-age-of-the-late-Neogene-terror-bird
  30. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-05266-z
  31. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pala.12272
  32. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/17/3/153
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.