Hubbry Logo
The InterviewThe InterviewMain
Open search
The Interview
Community hub
The Interview
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
The Interview
The Interview
The Interview
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Interview
Theatrical release poster[a]
Directed by
Screenplay byDan Sterling
Story by
  • Seth Rogen
  • Evan Goldberg
  • Dan Sterling
Produced by
  • Seth Rogen
  • Evan Goldberg
  • James Weaver
Starring
CinematographyBrandon Trost
Edited by
Music byHenry Jackman
Production
companies
Distributed bySony Pictures Releasing[b]
Release dates
  • December 11, 2014 (2014-12-11) (Los Angeles)
  • December 25, 2014 (2014-12-25) (United States)
Running time
112 minutes[3]
CountryUnited States
LanguagesEnglish
Korean
Budget$44 million[4][5]
Box office$12.3 million[6]

The Interview is a 2014 American political satire[7] action comedy film produced and directed by Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg in their second directorial work, following This Is the End (2013). The screenplay was written by Dan Sterling, which he based on a story he co-wrote with Rogen and Goldberg. The film stars James Franco and Rogen as journalists who set up an interview with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, played by Randall Park, only to end up being recruited by the CIA to assassinate him.

Rogen and Goldberg developed the idea for The Interview in the late 2000s, with Kim Jong Il as the original assassination target. Following Kim Jong Il's death and Kim Jong Un's succession as the North Korean leader in 2011, Rogen, Goldberg and Sterling redeveloped the script to focus on Kim Jong Un's character. The Interview was first announced in March 2013 at the beginning of pre-production, with principal photography taking place in Vancouver from October to December 2013. The film was produced by Columbia Pictures, LStar Capital and Rogen and Goldberg's Point Grey Pictures, and distributed by Sony Pictures Releasing.

In June 2014, the North Korean government threatened action against the United States if Sony released the film. This prompted Sony to delay the film's theatrical release from October 10 to December 25 and reportedly reedit the film to make it more acceptable to North Korea. In November of that year, Sony's computer systems were hacked by the "Guardians of Peace", a cybercrime group allegedly connected to the North Korean government[8] that also threatened terrorist attacks against theaters showing the film. This led to major theater chains opting not to screen the film and Sony instead releasing it for online digital rental and purchase on December 24, 2014, followed by a limited theatrical release at selected theaters the following day.

The Interview grossed $40 million in digital rentals, making it Sony's most successful digital release, and earned an additional $12.3 million worldwide in box office ticket sales on a $44 million budget. It received mixed reviews from critics for its humor and subject matter, although the performances of Franco, Park and Diana Bang were praised.

Plot

[edit]

Dave Skylark is the host of the talk show Skylark Tonight, where he interviews celebrities about personal topics. The show's broadcast gets interrupted by news reports about North Korea, regarding its leader Kim Jong Un and concerns about its nuclear weapons.

When Skylark and his crew celebrate producer Aaron Rapaport's 1,000th episode, another producer criticizes the show for not being a real news program. Upset by this, Rapaport urges change and Skylark agrees before discovering Kim is a fan of their show, prompting Rapaport to arrange an interview. CIA Agent Lacey visits the duo and requests they assassinate Kim with a transdermal strip of ricin via handshake to prevent a possible nuclear launch against the West Coast; they reluctantly agree.

Skylark carries the strip inside a gum pack. Upon their arrival in Pyongyang, the group is greeted by North Korean chief propagandist Sook-yin Park and taken to the palace, where they are introduced to Kim's security officers Koh and Yu, who are suspicious of them. When Koh finds the strip, he mistakes it for gum and chews it. After making a secret request for help, Lacey airdrops them two more strips via a drone. To get it back to their room however, Rapaport is forced to evade a Siberian tiger and hide the container in his rectum, before getting caught and stripped naked by security.

Skylark meets and befriends Kim, who convinces Skylark that he is misunderstood as a cruel dictator and a failed administrator, and spends the day playing basketball, hanging out, riding in his personal tank and partying with escort women together. At a state dinner, Koh suffers a seizure and diarrhea from the ricin poisoning, accidentally shooting Yu before dying. A guilt-ridden Skylark discards one of the ricin strips the next morning and thwarts Rapaport's attempt to poison Kim with the second strip.

At a dinner mourning the deaths of the bodyguards, Skylark witnesses Kim's malicious self as he angrily threatens South Korean "capitalists", the United States and everyone who attempts to undermine his power, and later discovers Kim has been lying to him upon seeing that a nearby grocery store is fake. At the same time, while seducing Rapaport, Sook reveals she despises Kim and apologizes for defending his regime. Skylark returns and tries to get Sook's support to assassinate Kim, but she suggests they instead damage his cult of personality and show the North Koreans the dire state of the country. The trio devises a plan to expose Kim on-air, arming themselves with guns.

In the internationally-televised interview with Kim, Skylark addresses increasingly sensitive topics, including the food shortage and America-imposed economic sanctions, then challenges his need for his father's approval. Rapaport takes over the control room to fight off the guards trying to cut the broadcast. Initially resistant and rebuffed by Skylark's claims, Kim cries and defecates himself after Skylark, having known his fondness for Katy Perry, ruins his reputation by singing "Firework". Enraged at Skylark's betrayal, Kim shoots him and vows revenge by preparing the nuclear missiles. Skylark, whose bulletproof vest has saved him, escapes with Rapaport and Sook and hijacks Kim's tank to get to their pickup point. In a helicopter, Kim attempts to issue the command to launch the missiles, only to get shot down by Skylark before he could do so.

With the nuclear threat thwarted, Sook guides Skylark and Rapaport to an escape route, saying she has to return to Pyongyang to maintain security. Skylark and Rapaport are later tracked down and rescued by SEAL Team Six members disguised as North Korean soldiers. Back in America, Skylark writes a book about his experience, Rapaport returns to work as producer and maintains contact with Sook via Skype, and North Korea becomes a denuclearized democracy under Sook's interim leadership.

Cast

[edit]

The film also features cameo appearances from Eminem, Rob Lowe, Bill Maher, Seth Meyers, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Song Kang-ho, Brian Williams and Scott Pelley. Iggy Azalea, Nicki Minaj, Emma Stone, Zac Efron and Guy Fieri appear in the title card for Skylark Tonight. Robbie, a Siberian tiger from the former Bowmanville Zoo, portrays the tiger who attacks Rapaport in the film.[9]

Production

[edit]

Development

[edit]

Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg developed the idea for The Interview in the late 2000s, joking about what would happen if a journalist was required to assassinate a world leader.[10] Screenwriter Dan Sterling's screenplay for the film initially revolved around a fictional dictator from a fictional country reminiscent of The Dictator, but Rogen, Goldberg and Sony Pictures executives asked him to focus the script on Kim.[11] The film's working title was Kill Kim Jong Un.[12] Originally, Kim Jong Il was the assassination target in the film, but the project was put on hold when he died in 2011 and was succeeded by his son Kim Jong Un. Development resumed when Rogen and Goldberg realized that Kim Jong Un was closer to their own age, which they felt was more humorous. To write the story, Rogen, Goldberg and Sterling researched meticulously by reading non-fiction books and watching video footage of North Korea. The script was later reviewed by an employee in the State Department.[13] Rogen and Goldberg aimed to make the project more relevant and satirical than their previous films, while still retaining toilet humor.[10] The two were pleased when former NBA star Dennis Rodman visited North Korea and met Kim, as it reinforced their belief that the premise of the film was realistic.[10]

In March 2013, it was announced that Rogen and Goldberg would direct a comedy film for Columbia Pictures in which Rogen would star alongside James Franco, with Franco playing a talk show host and Rogen playing his producer.[14] Rogen and Goldberg were on board to produce along with James Weaver through Point Grey Pictures, while Columbia was said to finance the $30 million budgeted film.[14] In October 2013, Lizzy Caplan signed on to play Agent Lacey, a CIA agent who recruits Franco and Rogen's characters to assassinate Kim.[15] Randall Park and Timothy Simons signed on to co-star later that month. Park and Simons starred as Kim Jong Un and the director of Skylark Tonight, respectively.[16][17] Park was the first to audition for the role of Kim and got the part immediately. Before filming began, Park gained 15 pounds and cut his hair to make it resemble Kim's signature crew cut. His role was praised by critics.[10][18] Although Rogen and Goldberg wrote the character of Kim as "robotic and strict", Park instead played it "sheepish and shy", which they found more humorous.[10] Diana Bang was cast as Sook-yin Park, for which she was well received by critics.[18][19]

Filming

[edit]

Principal photography on the film began in Vancouver, British Columbia, on October 10, 2013,[20] and concluded on December 20, 2013.[21] There are hundreds of visual effects in the film; for instance, a crowd scene at the Pyongyang airport was digitally manipulated with a shot from 22 Jump Street.[10]

Pre-release reaction

[edit]

In June 2014, The Guardian reported that the film had "touched a nerve" within the North Korean government, as they are "notoriously paranoid about perceived threats to their safety."[22][23] The Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), the state news agency of North Korea, reported that their government promised "stern" and "merciless" retaliation if the film was released. KCNA said that the release of a film portraying the assassination of the North Korean leader would not be allowed and it would be considered the "most blatant act of terrorism and war".[24][25] The next month, North Korea's United Nations ambassador Ja Song-nam condemned the film, describing its production and distribution as "an act of war" and because of Kim's assassination in the film, "the most undisguised sponsoring of terrorism."[26] The Guardian described Song-nam's comments as "perfect publicity for the movie".[26] Later in July, KCNA wrote to U.S. President Barack Obama, asking to have the film pulled.[27] Shortly before the planned release of the film on December 25, 2014, screenwriter Dan Sterling told Creative Screenwriting: "I couldn't believe that the most infamous man in the world knew about my script – but most importantly, I would never want something I wrote to lead to some kind of humanitarian disaster. I would be horrified if anyone got hurt over this."[11]

Release

[edit]

Delay and changes

[edit]

In August 2014, Sony delayed The Interview's release date from October 10 to December 25, 2014[28] and made post-production alterations to the film to modify its portrayal of North Korea, including changing the designs of buttons worn by characters, which were originally modeled after real North Korean military buttons praising the country's leaders, and cutting a portion of Kim Jong Un's death scene.[29] In December 2014, South Korean singer Yoon Mi-rae revealed that the film used her song "Pay Day" without permission, and that she was taking legal action.[30] Yoon Mi-rae and her label Feel Ghood Music reached a settlement with Sony Pictures on May 13, 2015.[31]

Sony Pictures hack and threats

[edit]
Main article: Sony Pictures hack
A hacker group compromised much of Sony Pictures Entertainment's computer system in late 2014 in retaliation for the film's content.

On November 24, 2014, an anonymous group identifying themselves as the "Guardians of Peace" hacked the computer networks of Columbia's parent company Sony Pictures Entertainment.[32] The hackers leaked internal emails, employee records and several recent and unreleased Sony Pictures films, including Annie, Mr. Turner, Still Alice and To Write Love on Her Arms. The North Korean government denied involvement in the hack.[33][34][35] On December 8, the hackers leaked further materials, including a demand that Sony pull "the movie of terrorism", widely interpreted as referring to The Interview.[36][37][38]

On December 16, 2014, the hackers threatened to attack the New York City premiere of The Interview and any theater showing the film.[34] Two further messages were released on December 1; one, sent in a private message to Sony executives, said that the hackers would not release further information if Sony never released the film and removed it from the internet. The other, posted to Pastebin, a web application used for text storage which the Guardians of Peace had used for previous messages, stated that Sony had "suffered enough" and could release The Interview, but only if Kim Jong Un's death scene was not "too happy". The message also threatened that if Sony made another film antagonizing North Korea, the hackers "will be here ready to fight".[39]

Distribution

[edit]

The Interview was not released in Russia and Japan, as live-action comedy films do not often perform well in the latter country's market.[citation needed][40] In the Asia-Pacific region, it was released only in Australia and New Zealand.[41]

Due to the Sony Pictures hack, references to the company and its logos, and the "A Sony Company" byline from the Columbia Pictures logo were all removed from the final film and marketing. Columbia's 1960s logo is featured in the beginning of the film and the print Columbia Pictures logo is used in place of Sony Pictures Home Entertainment's logo on the film's physical media releases, for only Columbia Pictures to be associated with the film.[42]

Rogen predicted that the film would make its way to North Korea, stating that "we were told one of the reasons they're so against the movie is that they're afraid it'll actually get into North Korea. They do have bootlegs and stuff. Maybe the tapes will make their way to North Korea and cause a revolution."[10] Business Insider reported via Free North Korea Radio that there was high demand for bootleg copies of the film in North Korea.[43] The South Korean human rights organizations Fighters for a Free North Korea and Human Rights Foundation, largely made up of North Korean defectors, planned to distribute DVD copies of The Interview via balloon drops.[44][45] The groups had previously air-dropped offline copies of the Korean Wikipedia into North Korea on a bootable USB memory device.[46] The balloon drop was scrapped after the North Korean government referred to the plan as a de facto "declaration of war".[47][48]

Cancellation of wide theatrical release

[edit]

The film's world premiere was held in Los Angeles on December 11, 2014.[49] The film was scheduled a wide release in the United Kingdom and Ireland on February 6, 2015.[50] Following the hackers' threats on December 16, Rogen and Franco canceled scheduled publicity appearances and Sony pulled all television advertising.[51] The National Association of Theatre Owners said that they would not object to theater owners delaying the film to ensure the safety of filmgoers. Shortly afterward, the ArcLight and Carmike cinema chains announced they would not screen the film.[52]

On December 17, Sony canceled the New York City premiere. Later that day, other major theater chains including AMC, Cinemark, Cineplex, Regal, Southern Theatres and several independent movie theaters either delayed or canceled screenings of the film,[53] leading to Sony announcing they were scrapping the wide theatrical release of the film altogether.[54] The chains reportedly came under pressure from shopping malls where many theaters are located, which feared that the terror threat would ruin their holiday sales. They also feared expensive lawsuits in the event of an attack; Cinemark, for instance, contended that it could not have foreseen the 2012 Aurora, Colorado shooting, which took place at one of its multiplexes, a defense that would not hold in the event of an attack at a screening of The Interview.[55]

Sony Pictures' statement regarding the cancellation of the wide theatrical release

In light of the decision by the majority of our exhibitors not to show the film The Interview, we have decided not to move forward with the planned December 25 theatrical release. We respect and understand our partners' decision and, of course, completely share their paramount interest in the safety of employees and theater-goers. Sony Pictures has been the victim of an unprecedented criminal assault against our employees, our customers, and our business. Those who attacked us stole our intellectual property, private emails, and sensitive and proprietary material, and sought to destroy our spirit and our morale – all apparently to thwart the release of a movie they did not like. We are deeply saddened at this brazen effort to suppress the distribution of a movie, and in the process do damage to our company, our employees, and the American public. We stand by our filmmakers and their right to free expression and are extremely disappointed by this outcome.

The cancellation also affected other films portraying North Korea. An Alamo Drafthouse Cinema location in Dallas planned to hold a free screening of Team America: World Police, which satirizes Kim Jong Un's father Kim Jong Il, in place of its previously scheduled screening of The Interview,[56][57] but Paramount Pictures refused to permit the screening.[58] 20th Century Fox and New Regency pulled out of a planned film adaptation of the graphic novel Pyongyang starring Steve Carell, who declared it a "sad day for creative expression".[59]

Sony received criticism for canceling the film's wide release.[60][61][62] Guardian film critic Peter Bradshaw wrote it was an "unprecedented defeat on American turf", but that "North Korea will find that their bullying edict will haunt them."[63] In the Capital and Gizmodo suggested the cancellation caused a Streisand effect, whereby the attempt to remove or censor a work has the unintended consequence of publicizing it more widely.[64][65] In a press conference, U.S. President Barack Obama said that though he was sympathetic to Sony's need to protect employees, he thought Sony had "made a mistake. We cannot have a society in which some dictator in some place can start imposing censorship in the United States. I wish they'd spoken to me first. I would have told them: do not get into the pattern in which you are intimidated."[66]

According to Sony Pictures CEO Michael Lynton, the cancellation of the wide release was not a response to the hackers' threats, but to the refusal of cinema chains to screen the film and that Sony would seek other ways to distribute the film. Sony released a statement saying that the company "is and always has been strongly committed to the First Amendment… Free expression should never be suppressed by threats and extortion."[67]

Revised release

[edit]

After the wide release cancellation, Sony considered other ways to release the film citing pressure from the film industry, theater owners and the White House.[67][68][69] On NBC's Meet the Press on December 21, Sony's legal counsel David Boies confirmed that the company was still committed to releasing the film.[69] Sony planned a limited theatrical release on December 25, 2014 at more than three hundred American independent and arthouse theaters.[70][71][72][73] Lynton stated that Sony was trying to show the film to the largest audience by securing as many theaters as they could.[71][72]

Sony released The Interview for rental or purchase via the streaming services Google Play, Xbox Video and YouTube on December 24, 2014. It was also available for a limited time on SeeTheInterview.com, a website operated by the stealth startup Kernel.com, which Sony previously worked with to market The Fifth Wave.[74] Within hours, The Interview spread to file sharing websites after a security hole allowed people to download rather than stream the film.[75] TorrentFreak estimated that The Interview had been downloaded illegally via torrents at least 1.5 million times in just two days.[76] On December 27, the North Korean National Defense Commission released a statement accusing President Obama of forcing Sony to distribute the film.[77] The film was released on iTunes on December 28.[78]

In the first week of January 2015, Sony announced The Interview would receive a wide theatrical release in the United Kingdom and Ireland on February 6, but it would not be distributed digitally in the United Kingdom.[79] The film became available for streaming on Netflix on January 24.[80]

Home media

[edit]

Sony released the film on Blu-ray Disc and DVD on February 17, 2015. The home release was packaged as the "Freedom Edition", and included 90 minutes of deleted scenes, behind-the-scenes featurettes, a blooper reel, feature commentary with directors Rogen and Goldberg, and a special episode of Naked and Afraid featuring Rogen and Franco.[81] As of July 21, 2015, the film had earned over $6.7 million in sales in the U.S.[82]

Reception

[edit]

Box office and online rentals

[edit]

The Interview opened to a limited release in the United States on December 25, 2014, across 331 theaters[83] and earned over $1 million on its opening day. Variety called the opening gross "an impressive launch for a title playing in only about 300 independent theaters in the U.S."[84] It went on to earn over $1.8 million in its opening weekend, and by the end of its run on January 25, 2015, had grossed $6.1 million at the box office.[85] Within four days of its online release on December 24, 2014, The Interview earned over $15 million through online rentals and purchases. It became Sony Pictures' highest-grossing online release, outselling Arbitrage ($14 million), Bachelorette ($8.2 million) and Snowpiercer ($7 million).[86] It was the top-selling Google Play and YouTube film of 2014.[87] By January 20, 2015, the film had earned more than $40 million from online sales and rentals.[88]

Sony expected The Interview to break-even through video-on-demand sales and saving millions of dollars on marketing.[89] The National Association of Theatre Owners contended that Sony would lose at least $30 million due to the film's poor box office performance.[90]

Critical response

[edit]

On review aggregation website Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds a 51% approval rating, based on 154 reviews, with an average rating of 5.70/10. The site's consensus reads: "Unfortunately overshadowed by controversy (and under-screened as a result), The Interview's screenplay offers middling laughs bolstered by its two likable leads."[91] On Metacritic, the film has a score of 52 out of 100, based on 33 critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews".[92]

IGN's Roth Cornet wrote that "though it's unlikely to stand out as one of the shrewdest political satires of its time, [it] is a clever, unrestrained and—most importantly—sidesplitting parody that pokes fun at both a vapid media and one of the world's most dangerous dictators".[93] Edward Douglas of ComingSoon.net said the film was "hilarious, but it will probably get us nuked".[94] Jordan Hoffman of The Guardian gave the film three out of five stars, writing that "if this unessential but agreeable movie really triggered an international response, this is life reflecting art in a major way".[95]

Scott Foundas of Variety panned the film for being "cinematic waterboarding" and "about as funny as a communist food shortage, and just as protracted", but praised the performances of Randall Park and Diana Bang.[18] Mike Hale of The New York Times also praised Park and Bang, but wrote that "after seeing The Interview and the ruckus its mere existence has caused, the only sensible reaction is amazement at the huge disconnect between the innocuousness of the film and the viciousness of the response".[96]

Political response

[edit]

In the wake of the Sony Pictures hack, leaks revealed e-mails between Sony Pictures CEO Michael Lynton and RAND Corporation defense analyst Bruce Bennett from June 2014. Bennett advised against toning down The Interview's graphic Jong-un death scene, in the hope that it would "start some real thinking in South Korea and, I believe, in the North once the DVD leaks into the North". Bennett expressed his view that "the only resolution I can see to the North Korean nuclear and other threats is for the North Korean government to eventually go away", which he felt would be likeliest to occur following an assassination of Kim. Lynton replied that a senior figure in the United States Department of State agreed. Bennett responded that the office of Robert R. King, U.S. Special Envoy for North Korean Human Rights Issues, had determined that the North Korean statements had been "typical North Korean bullying, likely without follow-up".[97]

In an interview with CNN, Bennett said Lynton sits on the board of trustees of the RAND Corporation, which had asked Bennett to talk to Lynton and give his opinion on the film.[98] Bennett felt The Interview was "coarse" and "over the top", but that "the depiction of Kim Jong-un was a picture that needed to get into North Korea. There are a lot of people in prison camps in North Korea who need to take advantage of a change of thinking in the north." Bennett felt that if the DVD were smuggled into the country it might have an effect "over time".[99] Bennett contacted the Special Envoy for North Korean Human Rights Issues, a personal friend of his, who "took the standard government approach: we don't tell industry what to do".[98] Jen Psaki, then a spokesperson for the United States Department of State, confirmed that Daniel R. Russel, the U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, had spoken to Sony executives; she reiterated that "entertainers are free to make movies of their choosing, and we are not involved in that".[100]

North Korean state press threatened "merciless" retaliation for his depiction in the film. Rogen responded, "People don't usually wanna kill me for one of my movies until after they've paid 12 bucks for it."[101]

Legacy

[edit]

In Greece in April 2017, the film's opening scene, depicting a young girl reciting a poem with hate speech, was mistakenly broadcast in the news bulletin of Alpha TV and the news program Live News on Epsilon TV, as a real-life provocative event against the United States.[102] In response to the backlash on various online newspapers, Antonis Sroiter and Nikos Evangelatos, the hosts of the said programs, apologized in posts they made on their social accounts.[103][104]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

The Interview

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
is a 2014 American action comedy film co-written, produced, and directed by and , starring as celebrity interviewer Dave Skylark and Rogen as his producer Aaron Rapoport. The story follows the duo after they secure an interview with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un—portrayed by —and are recruited by the CIA to assassinate him during their trip to , blending crude humor with satirical elements targeting the North Korean regime. The film's production and impending release provoked vehement opposition from , which labeled it "undisguised sponsoring of terrorism" and an act of war, prompting threats of retaliation against theaters screening it. In November 2014, Entertainment suffered a destructive by hackers identifying as "Guardians of Peace," who leaked unreleased films, executive emails, and employee data while demanding the film's cancellation; the FBI concluded the attack originated from , marking a rare attributed state-sponsored cyber operation against a private U.S. entity. Amid escalating threats of violence at screenings, major theater chains withdrew, leading to initially scrap the wide theatrical release, though independent venues later screened it after online distribution on December 25, 2014, generated over 2 million video-on-demand rentals in its first day. Despite the controversy boosting public interest and framing debates on free speech versus , The Interview earned modest theatrical gross of approximately $12 million worldwide against a $44 million , recouping costs primarily through digital , while receiving mixed critical reception for its provocative overshadowed by juvenile . The incident highlighted vulnerabilities in corporate cybersecurity and prompted U.S. government sanctions against North Korean entities, though attribution to remains debated by some cybersecurity experts.

Film Overview

Plot

Dave Skylark () and his producer Aaron Rapoport () host Skylark Tonight, a tabloid focused on and sensational . Seeking to elevate their journalistic credibility, they learn that North Korean Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un () is a fan of the program and successfully arrange an exclusive with him in . As Skylark and Rapoport prepare for the trip, they are approached by CIA agent Lacey (), who recruits the unlikely pair for a to assassinate Kim Jong-un using a device disguised as a containing . Upon arriving in , they encounter strict security and propaganda, but Kim initially bonds with Skylark over Western pop culture, including and margaritas, portraying a more relatable persona that sows doubt in Skylark about the mission. Rapoport, however, experiences the regime's brutality firsthand, including public executions, and presses to proceed with the . During the live, internationally broadcast interview, Skylark probes Kim on personal insecurities, such as his relationship with his late father Kim Jong-il, leading to emotional outbursts and revelations of Kim's manipulative tactics to maintain power. The situation deteriorates into chaos when Kim discovers the plot, sparking a violent pursuit involving North Korean forces, tanks, and helicopters. With assistance from a defecting North Korean officer, Sook-hee (), Rapoport and Skylark evade capture, ultimately destroy Kim's helicopter with a tank-fired , killing him and destabilizing the regime. The pair escapes to safety, hailed as heroes, with Skylark later authoring a about the ordeal.

Cast and Characters

The film centers on two protagonists recruited by the CIA for an assassination plot against North Korean leader Kim Jong-un. James Franco portrays Dave Skylark, the vain and celebrity-obsessed host of the tabloid-style interview show Skylark Tonight, which features sensationalized celebrity gossip. Seth Rogen plays Aaron Rapoport, Skylark's long-suffering producer and technical director who manages the show's production and shares a close friendship with Skylark. Randall Park depicts President Kim Jong-un, the film's antagonist portrayed as a dictatorial figure with an unexpected admiration for Western pop culture, particularly Skylark's program; Park is credited as "President Kim" in the film. Lizzy Caplan stars as Agent Lacey, a CIA operative who briefs Rapoport and Skylark on their mission to assassinate Kim using a transdermal toxin. Diana Bang portrays Sook-yeon, Kim's fiercely loyal head of propaganda who develops a romantic interest in Skylark. Supporting roles include as Agent McHugh, Lacey's CIA colleague assisting in the operation; Reese Alexander as Agent Botwin, another CIA handler; and various cameos, such as voicing his approval of the assassination plan and as himself in a Skylark Tonight segment. The ensemble emphasizes comedic archetypes, with characters driven by personal ambitions, loyalties, and cultural clashes central to the plot's satirical premise.

Production

Development and Writing

The concept for The Interview originated in the late 2000s when and began discussing a premise involving a recruited by the CIA to assassinate a foreign during an interview. Around 2010, they formalized the idea, initially considering North Korean leader Kim Jong-il or a fictional counterpart named Kim Il-hwan, but ultimately setting the story in for satirical relevance. They hired screenwriter to adapt their story into a full screenplay, which Sterling completed while incorporating their input on tone and key comedic elements. In December 2011, following Kim Jong-il's death, Rogen and Goldberg paused further development to evaluate the emerging profile of his successor, Kim Jong-un, before proceeding. By March 13, 2013, they signed a deal with Sony Pictures Entertainment to write and direct the film, initially pitching it around assassinating "the North Korean " to test studio receptivity. During script revisions in 2013, the team shifted to explicitly featuring Kim Jong-un, citing his youth and public image as aligning better with the ages of stars and Rogen for humorous effect. Rogen and Goldberg faced internal debates over naming North Korea and Kim Jong-un directly, consulting peers like and , who favored specificity for comedic impact. They rejected alternatives like a , arguing that would undermine the 's bold and inadvertently empower authoritarian sensitivity to criticism, likening it to avoiding depictions of historical tyrants like Hitler out of fear. This decision shaped the final script's unapologetic focus on real-world , prioritizing authenticity over risk mitigation during meetings with executives.

Filming and Technical Aspects

Principal photography for The Interview took place from October to December 2013, primarily in , , Canada, which served as a for various U.S. and North Korean settings. Specific locations included Robson Square (depicting exteriors of Kim Jong-un's presidential complex), areas like Keefer Street and Gore Avenue (for Chinese scenes), Richmond, , and Squamish. Some additional filming occurred in other parts of Canada and the , including . Directors and , filming in their hometown of , employed practical sets and location shoots to capture the comedy's action sequences and satirical elements. The film was shot digitally on Arri Alexa Plus 4:3 cameras with G-Series, ATZ, and AWZ2 lenses, achieving a 2.35:1 and processing for its visuals. Cinematographer utilized smooth gliding and handheld camera movements to evoke sleek action aesthetics reminiscent of spy thrillers, supporting the film's blend of humor and tropes. Post-production involved standard digital workflows, though specific details on the editing process or software remain undocumented in primary production records.

Pre-Release Controversies

North Korean Government Response

The North Korean government first publicly condemned The Interview on June 25, 2014, through a statement from its Foreign Ministry published via the (KCNA), describing the film as "the most undisguised sponsoring of " for depicting the of Kim Jong-un and labeling its creators "gangster-like scoundrels". The statement warned that any U.S. allowance of the film's release would constitute "an act of war provocation" against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK), promising a "merciless countermeasure" in response. On July 10, 2014, North Korea lodged a formal complaint with the United Nations, reiterating its opposition to the film as an infringement on its sovereignty and demanding international intervention to prevent its distribution. Following the November 2014 Sony Pictures hack, which the U.S. government attributed to North Korea, DPRK officials denied involvement on December 19, 2014, via KCNA, while proposing a joint U.S.-DPRK investigation into the incident and accusing the U.S. of being "deeply involved" in producing the film as part of a hostile policy. After the film's limited release on December 25, 2014, a KCNA statement on December 27 denounced President Barack Obama as the "chief culprit" for compelling Sony to distribute it, framing the action as "reckless U.S. hostile policy" and vowing continued retaliation. These responses consistently portrayed the film as state-sponsored aggression, though North Korean statements provided no evidence beyond rhetorical assertions of sovereignty violation.

Sony Pictures Hack and Attribution

In late November 2014, Sony Pictures Entertainment experienced a destructive cyberattack perpetrated by a group identifying itself as the Guardians of Peace (GOP). The intrusion, which likely began earlier but was publicly revealed on November 24, 2014, resulted in the theft and leakage of approximately 100 terabytes of data, including executive emails, employee personal information affecting over 47,000 individuals, scripts, financial records, and unreleased films such as Fury and Annie. The attackers deployed wiper malware that erased data from thousands of computers and servers, displaying skull imagery and threats on affected systems, severely disrupting operations. The GOP explicitly linked the attack to The Interview, demanding Sony cancel the film's release, which satirizes North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, under threat of further leaks and violence resembling the . Leaked emails revealed embarrassing internal discussions, including Sony executives' disparaging remarks about celebrities and President , fueling media scrutiny. The group released The Interview itself online on December 15, 2014, prior to its official debut. On December 19, 2014, the FBI formally attributed the hack to the government, citing forensic evidence including similarities to prior operations, internet protocol addresses tied to infrastructure, and linguistic patterns in the code consistent with Korean-language development. The U.S. government imposed sanctions on in response, viewing the incident as retaliation for the film's content. denied involvement, labeling the accusations "unfounded" and suggesting an "inside job." Attribution faced initial skepticism from some cybersecurity experts, who argued the publicly disclosed —such as shared tools and IP traces—could be circumstantial or spoofed, lacking unique forensic ties or captured perpetrators. Figures like antivirus pioneer claimed alternative culprits, including disgruntled insiders. However, subsequent U.S. investigations reinforced the link: in 2018, the Department of indicted North Korean Park Jin Hyok, associating him with the , for the Sony attack alongside other global incidents like WannaCry . This aligned with patterns of North Korean state-sponsored cyber operations targeting perceived ideological threats.

Release and Distribution Challenges

Initial Theatrical Plans and Delay

Entertainment initially scheduled The Interview for a on , 2014, but announced on , 2014, that it would shift to a on December 25, 2014, positioning the comedy for the competitive holiday season. The studio intended a broad rollout across major U.S. theater chains, including partnerships with exhibitors like Regal Entertainment Group, , and , to maximize audience reach during the window. This plan unraveled following threats issued by the hacker group Guardians of Peace (GOP), who on December 16, 2014, warned of terrorist attacks against theaters screening the film, likening potential violence to the and vowing to make an "example" of venues. In response, major chains swiftly withdrew: AMC announced on it would not screen the film, citing the threats' gravity; Regal followed suit, emphasizing safety concerns; and Cinemark similarly opted out, leaving without viable distribution partners. On December 17, 2014, canceled the and entire theatrical , stating: "In light of the decision by the majority of our partner theaters to not show the , has decided not to move forward with the planned December 25 of The Interview. We are deeply saddened at this turn of events." The decision followed the FBI's attribution of the preceding hack to , amid escalating geopolitical tensions over the 's satirical depiction of Kim Jong-un, though maintained the cancellation stemmed directly from exhibitor pullouts rather than capitulation to foreign pressure.

Terror Threats and Security Responses

On December 16, 2014, the hacker group identifying itself as the Guardians of Peace (GOP), which had previously claimed responsibility for the Entertainment cyber intrusion, issued threats against theaters planning to screen The Interview. In emails sent to outlets including the , the group warned that "the world will be full of fear" and invoked the , 2001, attacks, stating, "Remember the 11th of September 2001. We recommend you to keep yourself distant from the places of that event," while demanding an immediate halt to the film's distribution to avert "the biggest war in history." The threats explicitly targeted cinemas, promising attacks akin to 9/11 if screenings proceeded, framing the comedy as an act of "" that could provoke regional conflict. In immediate response, major U.S. theater chains including Regal Entertainment Group, , and Cinemark announced on December 17, 2014, that they would not exhibit the film, citing concerns over patron safety and potential liability from the unspecified terror acts. initially released a statement allowing theaters to make independent decisions but canceled the planned December 25 wide release later that day, describing it as a precautionary measure against an "act of terror." The New York premiere scheduled for December 17 was also scrapped amid concerns. The (FBI) treated the threats as credible extensions of the ongoing Sony hack probe, launching inquiries into their origins and potential execution risks. On December 19, 2014, the FBI publicly attributed both the and associated threats—including those against theaters—to operatives directed by the North Korean government, citing forensic evidence such as similarities to prior North Korean operations and infrastructure links to . The agency emphasized that such intimidation via "cyber-enabled means [or] threats of violence" constituted a threat, vowing to counter it through and international cooperation, though no arrests or specific preventive security protocols for theaters were detailed publicly at the time. When limited screenings resumed on in select independent venues, operators implemented heightened measures like bag checks and increased presence, with no incidents reported during the run. The threats ultimately dissipated following the film's alternative distribution, as GOP communications ceased after initial online releases.

Alternative Release Strategies

Following the withdrawal of major theater chains amid threats from the , Sony Pictures Entertainment shifted to a hybrid model prioritizing over traditional wide theatrical rollout. On December 23, 2014, the studio announced that The Interview would become available for (VOD) rental and purchase starting the evening of December 24, marking one of the first instances of a major Hollywood studio opting for a digital-first release to circumvent physical exhibition challenges. The digital strategy involved partnerships with multiple platforms, including , Movies, Xbox Video, and a dedicated (seetheinterview.com), where the film was offered at $5.99 for a 48-hour rental or $14.99 for permanent purchase. This approach allowed immediate accessibility to a broad online audience, bypassing the need for physical distribution infrastructure and enabling Sony to retain a larger share of compared to standard theatrical splits. Concurrently, authorized limited theatrical screenings in independent cinemas, initially with over 200 locations confirmed by December 23 and expanding to 331 theaters by opening day on , 2014. These venues, unaffiliated with dominant chains like Regal or AMC, provided a selective physical outlet while minimizing security risks associated with larger multiplexes; screenings required enhanced protocols, such as bag checks and police presence in some cases. This dual-path release—digital primacy supplemented by boutique theaters—served as a pragmatic response to pressures, testing the viability of VOD as a standalone distribution mechanism for controversial content.

Final Rollout and Accessibility

Following the cancellation of its wide theatrical release due to threats, Sony Pictures opted for a hybrid distribution model emphasizing digital availability and limited screenings in independent theaters. On December 24, 2014, the film became accessible for digital rental at $5.99 for 48 hours or purchase at $14.99 through platforms including , Movies, Xbox Video, and Sony's dedicated website, enabling immediate streaming in high definition starting at 10 a.m. PT. This video-on-demand (VOD) rollout marked a departure from traditional windows, prioritizing online access to circumvent theater chain refusals from major operators like AMC, Regal, and Cinemark. Theatrical distribution resumed on December 25, 2014, in 331 independent venues across the , drawing capacity crowds and sell-out showings amid heightened security measures. This limited rollout, focused on smaller, non-chain cinemas willing to screen the film, contrasted with the absence from multiplexes and underscored the controversy's impact on conventional exhibition. Digital accessibility proved pivotal, generating over $15 million in rentals and purchases within the first four days—equivalent to 4.3 million transactions—and ultimately exceeding $31 million in VOD revenue, establishing it as Sony's highest-grossing online title to date. Home media followed with a Blu-ray and DVD release on February 17, 2015, further broadening long-term availability through physical and subsequent streaming channels. The strategy's success in VOD metrics highlighted a shift toward digital platforms for crisis-driven releases, allowing global audiences—beyond U.S. theaters—to view the film without reliance on physical distribution networks vulnerable to external pressures.

Commercial Performance

Box Office Results

The Interview earned $6,105,175 in North American theaters, reflecting its limited rollout to a maximum of 581 screens following security threats that deterred wider distribution. Internationally, the film grossed $6,237,457, primarily from markets including the , , and , where it faced fewer restrictions. This resulted in a worldwide theatrical total of $12,342,632, a figure that fell short of the film's reported $44 million when considering theatrical alone, though digital offset losses elsewhere. Opening on December 25, 2014, in 331 U.S. theaters, the generated $1,283,699 on its first day, followed by a three-day weekend haul of approximately $1.8 million. Despite positive word-of-mouth in some independent venues, the restricted exhibition—canceled in major chains like Regal, AMC, and Cinemark—limited its earning potential, with per-theater averages reaching $10,470 during peak weeks but unable to sustain momentum amid . Analysts noted that a full , as initially planned, could have projected $20 million or more over the holiday period, underscoring the impact of external pressures on its trajectory.

Digital and Home Media Metrics

The digital release of The Interview occurred on December 25, 2014, through video-on-demand (VOD) platforms such as , Movies, Video, and , priced at $5.99 for rental and $19.99 for purchase. In the initial four days, it amassed over $15 million in revenue from more than 2 million rentals and purchases. By January 6, 2015, VOD earnings reached $31 million across 4.3 million transactions, significantly outpacing its concurrent limited theatrical gross of $5 million. Cumulative VOD sales surpassed $40 million by mid-January 2015, establishing the film as ' most profitable digital release to date and demonstrating the viability of premium VOD for wide distribution amid theatrical constraints. Physical home media releases, including DVD and Blu-ray under the "Freedom Edition," followed in February 2015 via . Domestic sales generated $7.6 million in total revenue from 521,150 units.
FormatUnits SoldRevenue
DVD308,538$3,082,295
Blu-ray212,612$2,804,678
Total521,150$7,639,363
Peak physical sales occurred during the week of February 22, 2015, with 205,774 DVD units ($2.06 million) and 150,694 Blu-ray units ($1.97 million). These figures reflect modest performance relative to digital metrics, consistent with the film's emphasis on post-controversy.

Reception

Critical Evaluations

Critical reception to The Interview was mixed, with aggregate scores reflecting divided opinions on its comedic merits amid its controversial premise. On , the film holds a 51% approval rating based on 155 reviews, with the consensus noting that its delivers "middling laughs bolstered by its two likable leads," though overshadowed by external events. assigns a score of 52 out of 100 from 33 critics, categorizing it as having "mixed or average reviews," where praise centered on sporadic humor but criticism focused on juvenile execution. Positive evaluations highlighted the chemistry between leads Seth Rogen and James Franco, as well as isolated effective gags in the buddy-comedy vein. The Guardian described it as a "tasteless but amusing comedy" that succeeds in delivering laughs through its irreverent assassination plot, crediting Rogen and Franco's rapport for carrying the film's absurd setup. Some reviewers, per Metacritic aggregates, commended its willingness to pursue "anything-for-a-laugh" sequences, including dark elements tied to the North Korean dictatorship, arguing it proved Rogen and director Evan Goldberg's commitment to boundary-pushing humor. The Hollywood Reporter summarized it as a "buddy comedy with a slob aesthetic," appreciating moments of provocation that aligned with the stars' established raunchy style. Conversely, detractors faulted the film for relying on repetitive, scatological humor and failing to elevate its geopolitical satire beyond sophomoric levels. The New York Times called it a "goofy, strenuously naughty, hit-and-miss farce," observing that while the premise intrigued, the execution devolved into inconsistent gags without deeper insight. RogerEbert.com awarded 2 out of 4 stars, critiquing its lack of novelty and overemphasis on "things going in and coming out of rear ends," which prolonged the runtime without advancing the narrative. The Rotten Tomatoes critics' consensus echoed this, deeming the tone "more sophomoric than politically astute," with the script's laughs undermined by underdeveloped characters and predictable plotting. The Wall Street Journal, via aggregates, noted its provocation felt incidental rather than substantive, prioritizing gross-out antics over commentary on authoritarianism. These assessments, drawn from major outlets, consistently prioritized the film's technical and tonal shortcomings over its topical timeliness, with no widespread evidence of review suppression despite pre-release threats.

Audience and Commercial Reception

Audience reception to The Interview was generally positive among viewers, contrasting with mixed critical evaluations. On IMDb, the film holds a 6.5 out of 10 rating based on over 371,000 user votes, reflecting appreciation for its comedic elements despite acknowledged crudeness and absurdity. Similarly, Rotten Tomatoes audience score stands at 73% positive from verified viewers, with many praising its satirical take on North Korean dictatorship and the chemistry between leads Seth Rogen and James Franco, though some criticized it as juvenile or overly reliant on shock humor. User reviews often highlighted the film's ridiculous premise as a strength for escapist entertainment, with comments noting it as "pretty funny" amid over-the-top sequences, though divisive on its cultural portrayal of Kim Jong-un. A post-release survey by Vision Monday indicated that while 70% of American viewers deemed the film "culturally insensitive" toward , a plurality still found elements amusing, underscoring a split between offense at its provocations and enjoyment of its irreverence. This audience tolerance for vulgarity and political edge contributed to word-of-mouth buzz, amplified by the Sony hack and release , which framed the film as a defiant rather than a prestige . Commercially, The Interview achieved notable success in , generating $40 million in video-on-demand rentals and sales—Sony's highest for any at the time—far outpacing its $6.1 million domestic theatrical gross. This VOD performance, including $15 million in the first four days across platforms like and , marked it as a top digital seller of 2014, driven by heightened audience curiosity from geopolitical threats and limited theatrical access. Despite the $44 million and underwhelming , the digital revenue positioned it as a viable model for controversy-fueled releases, recouping costs through demand rather than traditional theaters.

Political and Ideological Debates

The controversy surrounding The Interview centered on tensions between artistic freedom and external intimidation, particularly after canceled the film's theatrical release on December 17, 2014, following threats of terrorist attacks attributed to North Korean operatives by U.S. intelligence. This decision drew sharp rebukes from free speech advocates who argued it exemplified corporate capitulation to authoritarian pressure, potentially emboldening foreign regimes to suppress dissenting content through cyber means or violence. President Barack Obama publicly stated on December 19, 2014, that Sony "made a mistake" by yielding, asserting that the could not allow "a somewhere" to impose on American expression, while noting the studio's liability concerns as a private entity. The eventual pivot to a limited theatrical and online release on December 25, 2014, was framed by supporters as a reaffirmation of First Amendment principles against non-state and state-sponsored coercion. North Korea's regime framed the film as an existential ideological assault, denouncing it as early as , 2014, as an "act of war" and "undisguised sponsoring of terrorism" for its satirical premise of assassinating Kim Jong-un, which clashed with the state's ideology of absolute leader veneration and anti-imperialist sovereignty. lodged formal protests with the in July 2014, portraying the comedy as a deliberate U.S.-backed provocation designed to destabilize the Democratic People's Republic of Korea's foundational myths of invincibility and moral superiority. This reaction underscored broader geopolitical debates on whether cultural products like The Interview constitute tools that erode totalitarian legitimacy by humanizing and ridiculing authoritarian figures, or whether they escalate risks of retaliation without advancing diplomatic realism. Critics from academic and circles, often aligned with critiques of U.S. , contended that the film served propagandistic ends by aligning with Washington's long-standing regime-change objectives toward , simplifying complex geopolitical dynamics into a of heroic American intervention culminating in post-assassination. , co-writer and star, maintained that depictions drew from "a lot" of on North Korean realities, yet detractors argued it reinforced causal fallacies about unilateral U.S. actions resolving entrenched ideological states, mirroring historical patterns in Hollywood's portrayal of adversaries. Such views, while empirically grounded in the film's plot mechanics, overlooked its primary function as lowbrow comedy rather than blueprint, with empirical outcomes showing no verifiable shift in North Korean behavior attributable to the release. Additional ideological friction arose from claims that The Interview propagated racist of North as uniformly fanatical or subhuman, a purportedly advancing U.S. by dehumanizing an entire populace to justify interventionism. These assertions, voiced by scholars in outlets with ties to anti-Western perspectives, contrasted with defenses that the film's crude exaggerations targeted the regime's elite cult rather than ethnic traits, though they highlighted ongoing debates on cultural insensitivity in depictions of Asian autocracies. Overall, the film's saga illuminated causal realities of asymmetric power: a minor prompted outsized threats from a nuclear-armed state, revealing vulnerabilities in global information flows while prompting scrutiny of institutional biases in how media and academia frame such clashes, often prioritizing over the empirical brutality of the offended regime.

Legacy and Long-Term Impact

Free Speech and Censorship Discussions

The decision by to indefinitely postpone the December 25, 2014, theatrical release of The Interview on December 17, 2014, following threats of terrorist attacks from the hacker group Guardians of Peace (GOP), sparked widespread debate over corporate and its compatibility with free speech principles. The GOP, whose actions the FBI attributed to on December 19, 2014, had demanded Sony cancel the film depicting the assassination of Kim Jong-un, warning of "9/11-style" attacks on theaters. Critics, including free speech organizations and filmmakers, argued that yielding to such threats set a dangerous precedent, effectively allowing a foreign to suppress American artistic expression without under the First , as private companies like are not bound by it but face market and safety pressures. President publicly criticized Sony's initial cancellation during a December 19, 2014, , stating that the studio "made a mistake" by acceding to what he described as an attempt by "some someplace" to impose . Obama emphasized that while no one expects companies to ignore legitimate safety concerns, societies cannot tolerate external dictating content availability, drawing parallels to historical refusals to bow to . This stance aligned with voices like actor , who in a January 2015 op-ed condemned Hollywood's reluctance to rally against the suppression, highlighting how leaked emails revealed internal fears but also a broader industry timidity toward geopolitical sensitivities. The controversy fueled academic and legal analyses on balancing cyber threats with expressive freedoms, with scholars noting that the hack—exposing terabytes of data including unreleased films and executive communications—illustrated how could coerce private entities into preemptive restraint, potentially chilling future projects critical of authoritarian regimes. Proponents of Sony's caution countered that theaters, as private venues, could independently refuse screenings without constituting formal , prioritizing public safety amid credible threats reminiscent of post-9/11 vulnerabilities. However, the eventual limited release on December 25, 2014, via online platforms and select independent theaters, following public outcry and distribution deals, was hailed by advocates as a partial vindication of resilience against , though it underscored ongoing tensions between commercial interests and unyielding commitment to open .

Influence on Hollywood Practices

The , triggered by threats over The Interview, prompted Hollywood studios to bolster cybersecurity protocols, including enhanced firewalls, stricter password policies, and improved incident reporting structures. Industry experts noted a shift toward greater for and management, as the breach exposed systemic weaknesses like lax access controls that allowed hackers to exfiltrate terabytes of data, including unreleased films and executive emails. While no studio achieved impenetrable defenses, the event marked a turning point, with firms like implementing post-audit reforms by early 2015 to mitigate risks from state-sponsored actors. In distribution practices, the controversy accelerated experimentation with hybrid and digital-first models, as opted for a limited theatrical rollout on December 25, 2014, alongside video-on-demand (VOD) access after initial cancellations. This approach generated over $40 million in digital revenue within days, yielding a per-theater average of $3,142 across 331 screens on opening day, demonstrating VOD's potential for crisis-driven releases but not supplanting traditional theatrical exclusivity preferred by major chains. Analysts observed that while The Interview's success stemmed from unique publicity factors like national curiosity rather than broad applicability, it influenced contingency planning for threat scenarios, though most studios retained theatrical windows as the revenue "engine." The leaked communications also reshaped executive accountability, contributing to high-profile departures such as co-chair Amy Pascal's resignation in February 2015 amid scrutiny of candid emails revealing internal biases and deal-making. This transparency forced greater caution in digital correspondence and elevated risks assessments for content satirizing foreign leaders, fostering debates on balancing creative provocation with geopolitical sensitivities without yielding to external pressures. Overall, the incident underscored vulnerabilities in centralized studio operations, prompting a decade-long toward decentralized , though fragmented industry coordination limited uniform policy changes.

Broader Cultural and Geopolitical Reflections

The controversy surrounding The Interview underscored the tensions between artistic expression and in an era of asymmetric cyber threats, highlighting how non-state actors like film studios could become proxies in state conflicts. North Korea's response, including threats of against theaters and the subsequent FBI-attributed hack of on November 24, 2014, which exposed sensitive data and disrupted operations, demonstrated the regime's willingness to employ cyber operations against perceived cultural provocations. This incident marked one of the first high-profile cases of state-sponsored hacking targeting Hollywood, revealing vulnerabilities in private sector cybersecurity and prompting discussions on whether such attacks constitute acts of rather than mere vandalism, as characterized by the Obama administration. Culturally, the film's eventual limited release on December 25, 2014, via digital platforms after initial theater cancellations fueled debates on in entertainment, with critics arguing that yielding to threats incentivizes authoritarian regimes to weaponize intimidation against free speech. The portrayal of Kim Jong-un as a vulnerable figure through crude reflected Hollywood's tradition of using to deflate dictators, yet it also drew accusations of perpetuating reductive stereotypes of North Koreans, potentially reinforcing U.S. exceptionalism in narratives of without addressing underlying policy failures like stalled denuclearization talks. Proponents viewed the backlash as validation of the film's soft-power efficacy, akin to historical uses of , though empirical outcomes showed limited deterrence against Pyongyang's provocations. Geopolitically, the episode exposed the interplay between and , as U.S. sanctions against n entities in January 2015 aimed to signal resolve but highlighted the challenges of responding to cyber intrusions without escalation. It foreshadowed broader patterns of , where regimes like leverage hacking for asymmetric leverage, influencing U.S. policy toward greater emphasis on public-private cybersecurity partnerships and offensive cyber doctrines. The absence of regional releases, particularly in , further isolated diplomatic efforts, underscoring how cultural exports can complicate alliances amid ongoing tensions over the Korean Peninsula.

References

  1. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2788710/
  2. https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_interview_2014
  3. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2788710/plotsummary/
  4. https://www.cnn.com/2014/12/27/world/asia/north-korea-the-interview-reaction
  5. https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/update-on-sony-investigation
  6. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2014/12/17/371521313/u-s-officials-believe-sony-was-hacked-by-north-korea
  7. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/north-korean-programmer-charged-in-sony-hack-wannacry-attack
  8. https://time.com/3639275/the-interview-sony-hack-north-korea/
  9. https://abcnews.go.com/Business/interview-opens-singing-sold-crowds-sony-ceo-explains/story?id=27836610
  10. https://saturation.io/budgets/the-interview
  11. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/02/-sp-north-korea-hack-sony
  12. http://www.dvdmg.com/interview.shtml
  13. https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-interview-2014
  14. https://spoilertown.com/the-interview-2014/
  15. https://jhmovie.fandom.com/wiki/The_Interview
  16. https://www.sonypictures.com/movies/theinterview
  17. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2788710/fullcredits/
  18. https://www.themoviedb.org/movie/228967-the-interview/cast?language=en-US
  19. https://www.vulture.com/2014/12/how-the-interview-got-made-a-timeline.html
  20. https://www.vulture.com/2014/12/dan-sterling-screenwriter-interview-sony-hack.html
  21. https://variety.com/2015/film/news/seth-rogen-censoring-north-korea-in-the-interview-seemed-wrong-1201424038/
  22. https://giggster.com/guide/movie-location/where-was-the-interview-filmed
  23. https://thecinemaholic.com/where-was-the-interview-filmed/
  24. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2788710/locations/
  25. https://moviemaps.org/movies/19i
  26. https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/18-locations-vancouver-interview-filmed
  27. https://shotonwhat.com/the-interview-2014
  28. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2788710/technical/
  29. https://www.nknews.org/2014/06/north-korea-foreign-ministry-denounces-u-s-film-the-interview-as-terrorism/
  30. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-28014069
  31. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/26/world/asia/north-korea-warns-us-over-film-parody.html
  32. https://time.com/2921071/kim-jong-un-seth-rogen-the-interview-james-franco/
  33. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/jul/10/north-korea-un-the-interview-seth-rogen-james-franco
  34. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/20/north-korea-proposes-joint-inquiry-us-sony-pictures-hack
  35. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/north-korea-claims-us-deeply-759786/
  36. https://www.cnn.com/2014/12/26/world/asia/north-korea-the-interview-reaction
  37. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-30608179
  38. https://deadline.com/2014/12/sony-hack-timeline-any-pascal-the-interview-north-korea-1201325501/
  39. https://frameworksecurity.com/post/the-sony-pictures-breach-a-deep-dive-into-a-landmark-cyber-attack
  40. https://www.bankinfosecurity.com/sony-pictures-cyber-attack-timeline-a-7710
  41. https://www.wired.com/2014/12/evidence-of-north-korea-hack-is-thin/
  42. https://www.jhuapl.edu/sites/default/files/2022-12/SonyNightmareBeforeChristmas.pdf
  43. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/north-korean-regime-backed-programmer-charged-conspiracy-conduct-multiple-cyber-attacks-and
  44. https://variety.com/2014/film/news/the-interview-delayed-release-date-1201277869/
  45. https://variety.com/2014/film/news/sony-cancels-theatrical-release-for-the-interview-on-christmas-1201382032/
  46. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/dec/17/sony-pictures-cancels-christmas-release-the-interview
  47. https://www.npr.org/2014/12/17/371514094/sony-cancels-theatrical-release-of-the-interview
  48. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-30526406
  49. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sony-pictures-cancels-the-interview/
  50. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/dec/18/fbi-north-korea-sony-pictures-hack-the-interview
  51. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/dec/16/employees-sue-failure-guard-personal-data-leaked-hackers
  52. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2014/12/16/371259776/amid-threats-by-hackers-actors-pause-promotion-of-sony-movie
  53. https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/sony-hack/theaters-pull-sonys-interview-after-hacker-threat-violence-n269761
  54. https://abcnews.go.com/US/sony-theaters-show-interview-threats/story?id=27641600
  55. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/dec/17/the-interview-new-york-premiere-cancelled-in-wake-of-hacker-bomb-threats
  56. https://time.com/3642161/sony-hack-north-korea-the-interview-fbi/
  57. https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-30912524
  58. https://coverlink.com/case-study/sony-pictures-entertainment-hack/
  59. https://www.sonypictures.com/corp/press_releases/2014/12_14/122314_theinterviewtheatrical.html
  60. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2014/12/24/372903307/sony-to-stream-the-interview-on-youtube-other-sites-starting-tonight
  61. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/watch-interview-online-760314/
  62. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/streaming-release-of-the-interview-a-test-for-movie-industry/
  63. https://variety.com/2014/film/news/the-interview-christmas-day-screenings-new-release-1201386144/
  64. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-the-interview-20141229-story.html
  65. https://time.com/3645866/sony-limited-release-the-interview/
  66. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/dec/23/the-interview-us-screening-christmas-day
  67. https://deadline.com/2014/12/interview-online-plan-youtube-google-play-xbox-sony-1201335280/
  68. https://www.chron.com/nationworld/article/The-Interview-released-on-digital-platforms-12033222.php
  69. https://time.com/3637565/interview-theaters-cancel/
  70. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/26/business/the-interview-begins-screening-in-select-theaters.html
  71. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-interview-hitting-theaters-after-being-released-online/
  72. https://variety.com/2014/film/news/sony-the-interview-has-made-over-15-million-online-1201388557/
  73. https://deadline.com/2015/01/sony-the-interview-31m-vod-sales-1201342414/
  74. https://www.cnbc.com/2015/01/06/sony-the-interview-broke-major-sales-records.html
  75. https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Interview-Blu-ray/121699/
  76. https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Interview-The
  77. https://www.boxofficemojo.com/release/rl559580673/
  78. https://www.haaretz.com/2014-12-26/ty-article/interview-grosses-over-1m-on-dec-25/0000017f-e6ad-df5f-a17f-ffff682d0000
  79. https://deadline.com/2015/01/the-interview-vod-sales-sony-1201353855/
  80. https://www.metacritic.com/movie/the-interview/
  81. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/dec/12/the-interview-review-stoned-anally-fixated-funny
  82. https://www.metacritic.com/movie/the-interview/critic-reviews/
  83. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/interview-review-what-critics-are-760309/
  84. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/26/movies/the-interview-with-james-franco-and-seth-rogen.html
  85. https://editorial.rottentomatoes.com/article/Critics-Consensus-The-Interview-Earns-Mixed-Reviews/
  86. https://thehill.com/homenews/news/228085-critics-hate-the-interview/
  87. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2788710/reviews/
  88. https://variety.com/2014/film/news/survey-watchers-deem-the-interview-culturally-insensitive-1201387309/
  89. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-12-29/-the-interview-is-top-2014-film-on-google-play-youtube
  90. https://www.forbes.com/sites/insertcoin/2014/12/29/the-interview-made-15m-at-the-digital-box-office-on-a-44m-budget/
  91. https://www.rferl.org/a/north-korea-the-interview-sony-obama-free-speech-debate/26755060.html
  92. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/dec/19/obama-sony-the-interview-mistake-north-korea
  93. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-30555997
  94. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/12/24/the-interview-really-does-subvert-north-koreas-regime/
  95. https://apjjf.org/2014/12/52/christine-hong/4244
  96. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-american-studies/article/an-act-of-war-the-interview-affair-the-sony-hack-and-the-hollywoodwashington-power-nexus-today/2CEF6EF20CFBF6E201769A2F6BFC8907
  97. https://www.kpolicy.org/the-interview-a-racist-narrative-ab
  98. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353967359_Analysis_of_United_States_Propaganda_Against_North_Korea_Through_The_Film_The_Interview
  99. https://www.wired.com/2014/12/obama-sony-made-a-mistake/
  100. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/obama-sony-made-a-mistake-by-canceling-release-of-the-interview/
  101. https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1058&context=pipself
  102. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/dec/24/sony-threat-free-speech-north-korea-the-interview
  103. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-25/the-interview-released-online-despite-threats/5988174
  104. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/five-years-who-hacked-sony-1257591/
  105. https://fortune.com/longform/sony-hack-part-two/
  106. https://apnews.com/general-news-movies-6dbdb634b51149d79c45cb556432257f
  107. https://www.theringer.com/2024/08/19/movies/the-hollywood-hack-sony-pictures-2014-cyberattack-the-interview
  108. https://variety.com/2023/film/news/seth-rogen-the-interview-backlash-catastrophic-1235516015/
  109. https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2014/12/did-north-korea-hack-sony-pictures-entertainment.html
  110. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/dec/18/the-interview-sony-hack-north-korea-film
  111. https://www.article19.org/resources/interview-cancellation-sets-dangerous-precedent-censorship/
  112. https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/what-interview-gets-right-and-wrong-about-us-policy-towards-north-korea/
  113. https://culturedigitally.org/2015/02/freedom-edition-considering-sony-pictures-and-the-interview/
  114. https://deadline.com/2014/12/the-interview-asia-release-political-impact-north-korea-china-1201320054/
  115. https://learningenglish.voanews.com/a/the-interview-tension-us-north-korea/2583739.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.