Hubbry Logo
Time delay and integrationTime delay and integrationMain
Open search
Time delay and integration
Community hub
Time delay and integration
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Time delay and integration
Time delay and integration
Time delay and integration
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A time delay and integration or time delay integration (TDI) is a forward motion compensation (FMC) technique for capturing images of moving objects at low light levels. It's a type of line scanning where multiple linear arrays are placed side by side. After the first array is exposed, the charge is transferred to the neighboring line. When the object moves the distance of the separation between lines, a second exposure is taken on top of the first with the next array, and so on. Thus, each line of the object is imaged repeatedly, and the exposures are added to each other. This works by synchronized mechanical and electronic scanning, so that the effects of dim imaging targets on the sensor can be integrated over longer periods of time.

TDI is more of an operating mode of an image sensor than a separate type of imaging device altogether, even if technical optimizations for the mode are also available. The most used way to perform TDI is called dTDI from digital Time Delay Integration, which is software-based and independent of the type of underlying imaging sensor. The principle behind TDI—constructive interference between separate observations—is often applicable to other sensor technologies, so that it is comparable to any long-term integrating mode of imaging, such as speckle imaging, adaptive optics, and especially long exposure astronomical observation.

Detailed operation

[edit]

It is perhaps the easiest to understand TDI devices by contrast with more well-known types of CCD sensors. The best known is the staring array one. In it, there are hundreds or thousands of adjacent rows of specially engineered semiconductor that react to light by accumulating charge, and slightly separated in depth from it by insulation, a tightly spaced array of gate electrodes, whose electric field can be used to drive the accumulated charge around in a predictable and almost lossless fashion. In a staring array configuration, the image is exposed on the two-dimensional semiconductor surface, and then the resulting charge distribution over each line of the image is moved to the side, to be rapidly and sequentially read out by an electronic read amplifier. When done fast enough, this produces a snapshot of the applied photonic flux over the sensor; the readout can proceed in parallel over the several lines, and yields a two-dimensional image of the light applied. Along with CMOS detectors which sense the photocharge accumulation pixel by pixel instead of moving the charge out line by line, such sensors are commonly known as parts of digital cameras, from the small to the large.

A scanning array on the other hand involves just one such CCD line, or at most a couple of them. Its principle of operation is to rely on mechanical scanning, so that a single linear CCD element gets exposed to different parts of the object to be imaged, sequentially. Then the whole image is assembled from equally spaced lines through the field of view. Typical examples of this scanning mode are fax machines and other document scanners, where the imaging target is fed through at a constant linear velocity, and satellite sensing, where the constant orbital velocity of a satellite naturally exposes line after another of the underlying terrain to the transversely positioned sensor.

The advantage of using a CCD sensor this way is reduced complexity, and so price, or vice versa the possibility of utilizing much more refined and so more expensive CCD technology for the single line sensor array, for higher fidelity. CCDs can also be manufactured in configurations that are tolerant to the wide fluctuations in radiation and temperature, characteristic of space environments, and scanning ones can be made extra robust by the inclusion of multiple lines. Since the out-clocking mechanism of a well-phased CCD line is a continuous process, not divided into pixels, the eventual line-wise resolution of the image can also exceed the resolution of the gating infrastructure, leading to higher resolution than a pixel-based sensor. CCDs are also easier to make for cryogenic temperatures, such as are needed e.g. for far-infrared astronomy.

Motion

[edit]

At the same time, the continuous operation and slow, line-discrete readout also leads to a problem: if anything moves within the scene to be imaged, there will be blurring and tearing between lines. Wherever some accumulated packet of charge within a CCD line is moving on the sensor chip, any extra light shone upon it will lead to more charge, even if it comes from a wrong direction, or a newer moment of acquisition than intended. It will register just the same, so that it integrates over time to whatever will eventually be read out. This leads to what is in cinematography called motion blur, and since the readout of the multiple lines of the typical CCD array occurs at different successive times, it also causes screen tearing.

In TDI mode, motion blur and the pseudo-analogue nature of CCDs is turned from a fault into a special-purpose asset. The line or 2D array is turned 90 degrees so that the lines in the CCD sensor follow the expected trajectory of the object of interest in the field of view. Then, the readout speed from the sensor is adjusted so that the charge packets in the imaging plane track the object, accumulating charge over time. This is effectively the same as spinning the spacecraft or other platform to match the viewing angle towards an object; it yields time integration in the digital domain, instead of the physical one. Physical tracking and superimposition of images can be applied in addition, as more traditional forms of TDI.

With the high sensitivity of CCD sensors, into the photon counting regime, this can lead to extremely high detection and measurement sensitivity.[1] Additionally, it is difficult to achieve the kinds of coherent measurement gains with digital technologies besides CCDs, because they suffer from more prominent aliasing.

Technology specific to TDI CCD

[edit]

While the basic theory of TDI only mentions single-row CCDs, specifically designed parts and algorithms utilize everything from a few lines to entire staring arrays, with integration taking place over multiple lines, in software, as well. A designated TDI CCD improves upon the single-line-scan system by adding up multiple measured photocharges over its more complicated sensor, and by more comprehensive analysis of the interaction between continuous lines and discrete column structure. This e.g. aids in integration over physical tracking errors, imperfect lensing, background rejection, and multi-object tracking.

CCD technology and as such TDI is also used in x-ray astronomy. There, a different set of challenges prevails: TDI is used because high energy photons tend to exhibit high imaging loss, and then when they are fortuitously recovered, one-by-one tend the wreak havoc with the imaging element. Here, CCDs are often used because they can be manufactured in radiation hardened configurations, and are rather tolerant of radiation even as-is. This is especially important in solutions using coherent addition, because they focus and track intense radiation sources for a span of time, so that the total irradiative dose from the source reaches high levels over time, per a given area.

Applications

[edit]

TDI CCD is especially used in scanning of moving objects, for example letter and film scanning, or from a moving platform, for example aerial reconnaissance.[2]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Time delay and integration

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Time delay and integration (TDI) is a line-scanning technique employed in (CCD) and complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor () sensors, where the transfer of accumulated photocharge or digital data across multiple pixel rows is precisely synchronized with the of the imaged scene, enabling repeated exposure and summation of the same scene elements to boost signal strength and sensitivity without increasing readout noise. In TDI operation, a linear array of pixels captures the scene as it moves relative to the sensor—typically via platform motion in applications like satellite imaging or conveyor-based inspection—while clocking shifts the charge downward (in the scan direction) at matching velocity, allowing each scene point to integrate over numerous stages (often 32 to 256 rows). This process linearly extends the effective integration time proportional to the number of active stages, enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by a factor up to the square root of the stage count, as noise sources like dark current and read noise are not amplified during synchronized transfers. Advanced variants, such as progressive TDI (PTDI), further aggregate charges in multiples of the base integration time to expand dynamic range and assess sensor linearity in a single scan. TDI finds widespread use in high-speed, low-light applications requiring high resolution and throughput, including satellites for hyperspectral environmental monitoring, industrial for inspecting semiconductors and printed circuit boards, astronomical wide-field surveys to capture extended sky strips, and life sciences tools like DNA sequencers. Challenges such as blooming—where excess charge spills into adjacent pixels—are mitigated through anti-blooming clocking techniques that reverse-shift surplus charge from inactive stages. Modern implementations leverage nanoscale for digital TDI, reducing analog transfer inefficiencies and enabling gigapixel-per-second data rates in focal plane arrays.

Introduction

Definition and Basic Concept

Time delay and integration (TDI) is a motion-compensated technique that utilizes a multi-line linear to acquire high-sensitivity images of moving objects, particularly in low-light conditions. It operates as a forward method by aligning the internal shifting of charge packets within the with the linear of the scene, enabling the capture of two-dimensional images through line-by-line scanning. This approach is distinct from traditional modalities, as it repeatedly exposes the same scene point across elements rather than capturing a static frame or a single pass. The core purpose of TDI is to enhance the by integrating multiple short exposures of identical scene points over successive time intervals, thereby mimicking the effects of a prolonged single exposure without motion-induced blurring. In this process, photo-generated charges from each line are accumulated and transferred synchronously with the object's motion, allowing the signal from the same spatial location to build up across the . This integration effectively multiplies the exposure time by the number of stages involved, making TDI ideal for scenarios where light levels are insufficient for conventional methods. In contrast to frame-based staring imagers, which expose the entire scene at once and suffer from smear in dynamic settings, or single-line scanning techniques that sample each point only once with limited sensitivity, TDI employs multi-line arrays to perform repeated sampling and temporal integration of scene points as they traverse the . This repeated exposure across lines ensures that faint signals are amplified through charge summation, providing superior performance in high-speed or low-illumination . A basic TDI sensor setup consists of a linear segmented into multiple integration stages, typically 32 or 96 lines, with each stage functioning as a temporal slice for charge accumulation. As the scene advances, charges progress through these stages in lockstep with the motion, culminating in a composite with extended effective integration time upon readout.

Historical Development

The concept of time delay and integration (TDI) emerged in the film era during the mid-20th century as a technique to compensate for motion blur in imaging, where continuous exposure of moving scenes was needed to enhance signal-to-noise ratios without mechanical stabilization. This forward approach was initially applied in photographic systems to mitigate image smear during high-speed scans, laying the groundwork for electronic implementations. With the of charge-coupled devices (CCDs) in 1969, TDI transitioned to solid-state sensors in the early , leveraging noiseless charge transfer to enable line-by-line imaging of moving objects in applications like military surveillance and satellite . By the mid-1970s, TDI CCDs were actively developed for high-resolution document scanning and reconnaissance, with early prototypes addressing the need for electronic replacements of film-based systems in . Publications from this period documented advancements in TDI-CCD imagers tailored for and applications, emphasizing synchronization of charge packets with object motion to achieve low-light sensitivity. Adoption accelerated in the late 1970s, when Fairchild Imaging began producing commercial TDI CCDs ranging from 2,000 to 24,000 pixels, supplying tens of thousands of units for industrial inspection, postal letter scanners, and automated systems across the U.S. Post Offices. In the 1980s, these sensors gained prominence in platforms, such as the U-2 spy plane's SYERS system developed in collaboration with , marking a shift toward compact, low-power tactical for drones and . The 1990s saw TDI CCDs integrated into advanced scientific instruments, including detectors for observatories, further solidifying their role in high-sensitivity . Entering the 2000s, the technology evolved toward digital variants, with software-based digital TDI (dTDI) introduced to perform integration post-capture, independent of type and enabling flexible in CMOS systems. This period also featured seminal work on CMOS-compatible TDI architectures, such as column-parallel digital readout techniques, to reduce costs and improve readout speeds. Post-2010, a significant shift occurred toward CMOS implementations, driven by lower expenses and integrated circuitry; early examples include e2v's 2010 charge-transfer TDI in 0.18 μm process and CMOSIS prototypes, paving the way for hybrid designs in industrial and applications. Influential publications, including a 2010 Laser Focus World article, highlighted TDI CCDs' enduring advantages in demanding scenarios while underscoring the transition to for broader adoption. Since the , TDI technology has continued to advance with hybrid CCD-CMOS designs offering faster line rates and higher sensitivity, alongside integration of AI for enhanced image processing in applications like semiconductor inspection and detection. As of 2024, companies such as and Teledyne have introduced innovations in color TDI cameras and high-speed AOI systems, driving market growth projected to reach over USD 1 billion by 2032.

Operating Principles

Charge Transfer and Integration

In time delay and integration (TDI) sensors, charge generation occurs when photons incident on the photosensitive of a linear produce electron-hole pairs through photoelectric conversion, forming charge packets proportional to the light intensity during each brief exposure period. These charge packets are collected in potential wells within each of the stages. The transfer mechanism involves clock signals that apply multiphase voltages to shift the charge packets vertically down the array of stages at the sensor's line rate, ensuring the packets move in a direction that mimics the relative motion of the imaged object. This synchronous shifting prevents smearing and allows each charge packet to track the same point in the scene across multiple stages, with high charge transfer efficiency typically exceeding 99.99% to minimize signal loss. During the integration process, each stage exposes the same scene point for a short line exposure time tlinet_{\text{line}}, and the shifted charge packets from successive exposures are added together as they progress through all NN stages, resulting in the total signal for that point being the sum of contributions from each stage. The total signal SS is thus given by S=N×sS = N \times s, where ss is the signal from a single stage exposure, and the effective exposure time Teff=N×tlineT_{\text{eff}} = N \times t_{\text{line}}. Noise considerations in TDI arise primarily from the integration and readout stages; while charge transfer introduces minimal additional noise due to high efficiency, readout noise is applied only once at the end of the full integration across all stages, rather than per stage, which contributes to an improved compared to non-integrated .

Synchronization with Object Motion

In time delay and integration (TDI) sensors, with object motion is achieved by matching the internal charge shifting to the external of the imaged object, ensuring that charge packets from successive integration stages align with the same scene points. The sensor's is precisely set so that the line shift period TT corresponds to the time required for the object to traverse one width, given by v=aTv = \frac{a}{T}, where vv is the matched and aa is the size. This matching allows the accumulated signal to build coherently without displacement errors, effectively multiplying the integration time by the number of TDI stages while maintaining . TDI operation is inherently directional, typically along the scan axis to track linear object motion in one dimension. Standard unidirectional TDI shifts charges in a fixed direction to follow the object's progression, but bidirectional variants enable reversal of the shift direction to accommodate motions, such as in oscillatory or reversing conveyor systems. Mis-synchronization, or mismatch, leads to smear as scene points drift across pixels during integration. The resulting blur length can be quantified as b=δv×Δtb = \delta v \times \Delta t, where δv\delta v is the mismatch and Δt\Delta t is the line integration time; even small mismatches (e.g., 2-4% for 96-stage devices) can degrade modulation (MTF) significantly, reducing contrast. Calibration methods ensure dynamic alignment, particularly in variable-speed environments. Real-time velocity measurement using encoders on the motion platform provides feedback to adjust the , maintaining within acceptable tolerances for high-throughput scanning. Alternatively, self-synchronization algorithms sensor output directly via feedback loops to adapt charge shifts without external , enabling robust performance on resource-constrained platforms like FPGAs. For scenarios involving , such as aerial platforms, multi-phase operation adjusts shift rates per TDI stage to compensate for inertial changes, minimizing cumulative displacement errors through servo-controlled stabilization.

Implementations in Sensor Technology

TDI in Charge-Coupled Devices (CCDs)

Time delay and integration (TDI) in charge-coupled devices (CCDs) relies on a specialized consisting of multi-row linear CCD arrays, typically featuring dozens to hundreds of stages for charge accumulation. These arrays incorporate vertical charge transfer registers that shift photo-generated charges synchronously with the motion of the imaged object, allowing integration across multiple exposures without mechanical scanning adjustments. For instance, a common configuration includes 96 stages, where each row acts as a line sensor, and charges are transferred downward through the array at a rate matching the object's on the focal plane. A critical feature of TDI CCDs is their high charge transfer efficiency (CTE), often exceeding 99.99% per transfer, which is essential to prevent signal degradation as charges propagate through numerous stages—up to 256 in advanced designs—ensuring minimal loss even after repeated shifts. To manage blooming, where excess charge spills into adjacent pixels under high illumination, TDI CCDs employ that direct surplus electrons to a drain, maintaining integrity during extended integrations. These are biased to control the overflow threshold, allowing adjustable protection without significantly impacting quantum efficiency. For space applications, TDI CCDs incorporate radiation-hardening techniques such as buried channels to shield charges from displacement damage caused by cosmic rays, reducing charge trapping and preserving transfer efficiency over long missions. Additionally, thicker epitaxial layers, sometimes exceeding 100 microns, enhance tolerance to by increasing the depletion depth and minimizing bulk defects that could degrade performance in high-radiation environments. Representative examples include ' S10200 series TDI CCDs, widely used in industrial scanners for high-resolution line imaging, with formats such as 4096 x 128 pixels supporting bidirectional operation for versatile scanning. These devices achieve peak quantum efficiencies over 90% across UV to near-IR wavelengths, making them suitable for demanding tasks. Another format, like the 12k x 96 pixel configuration in similar back-thinned TDI CCDs, enables ultra-high-resolution imaging in fast-moving production lines. Unique drawbacks of CCD-based TDI include the need for significant power consumption in cooling systems, such as thermoelectric coolers, to suppress dark current—which doubles roughly every 6-8°C rise—ensuring low-noise operation during long integrations. Additionally, the fixed number of integration stages limits adaptability to varying object speeds or lighting conditions, requiring precise that cannot be dynamically adjusted without hardware modifications.

TDI in Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (CMOS) Sensors

The transition from analog (CCD) implementations to (CMOS) sensors for time delay and integration (TDI) gained momentum in the , driven by the need for on-chip and reduced system complexity. Unlike traditional CCDs, which rely on physical charge transfer, CMOS TDI enables digital summation of signals after exposure in each integration stage, often referred to as digital TDI (dTDI). This shift allows for more flexible and cost-effective designs, with early CMOS TDI prototypes emerging around 2010 to address limitations in speed and power consumption of CCD-based systems. Key architectures in TDI incorporate pipelined column-parallel analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) to facilitate real-time integration of multi-stage signals, enabling high-speed readout without the bottlenecks of serial processing in CCDs. These ADCs, often implemented in standard processes, process signals column by column to support line rates exceeding 300 kHz. Additionally, back-illuminated scientific (sCMOS) architectures enhance quantum efficiency, achieving up to 82% in visible wavelengths by minimizing light obstruction from wiring layers. Significant advancements include IMEC's 2017 hybrid TDI sensor, which integrates CCD-like pixels with CMOS readout circuitry in a backside-illuminated CCD-in-CMOS design, combining low-noise charge transfer with high-speed digital output up to 300 kHz for . More recently, Tucsen's 2025 back-illuminated TDI-sCMOS sensor, the Gemini 8KTDI, targets wafer inspection with 63.9% quantum efficiency at 266 nm wavelengths and stable 0°C chip temperature operation. Unique benefits of CMOS TDI include lower power consumption (typically under 10 ), compact form factors suitable for miniaturized systems, and programmable integration stages adjustable via software, allowing dynamic control of TDI depth from 8 to 64 levels without hardware modifications. For instance, Teledyne's CMOS TDI sensors, deployed in (LEO) satellites for , leverage these traits to achieve wide swath imaging with high signal-to-noise ratios while minimizing onboard power and size constraints. Despite these advantages, CMOS TDI faces challenges such as lower charge transfer efficiency compared to CCDs, primarily due to potential misalignment from platform motion or in dynamic environments. This is mitigated through algorithms, such as the 2025 minimum search domain alignment method, which uses feature matching and to achieve sub-pixel accuracy (error <0.01 pixels) and improve modulation transfer function coefficients to 0.68, enhancing overall in low-light conditions.

Applications

Industrial Inspection and Scanning

Time delay and integration (TDI) technology plays a pivotal role in industrial inspection by enabling high-speed, blur-free imaging of continuously moving objects on production lines, such as documents, films, printed circuit boards (PCBs), and packaging materials. In document and film scanning, TDI CCDs were integrated into high-volume printers starting in the 1980s, allowing for simultaneous scanning of multiple lines to achieve rapid digitization without motion artifacts. For instance, Xerox systems employed TDI arrays in raster input scanners to process documents at elevated speeds, supporting parallel line scanning with up to 20 lines concurrently for enhanced throughput in office automation environments. This approach facilitated blur-free imaging in high-volume applications, with TDI line-scan systems capable of handling web speeds up to 1000 feet per minute in related scanning contexts like packaging inspection. In PCB and inspection within fabrication facilities, CMOS-based TDI sensors have become essential for detecting defects such as scratches, particles, and misalignments during high-throughput (AOI) and automated inspection (AXI). These sensors synchronize charge transfer with wafer motion on conveyors, enabling real-time defect identification even under low-light conditions typical in environments. Teledyne DALSA's Linea HS series exemplifies this, offering charge-domain TDI line-scan sensors with resolutions up to 16k pixels and line rates exceeding 1 MHz, optimized for integration with conveyor systems where encoder feedback ensures precise of sensor readout with object velocity. For print in and web-based , line-scan TDI cameras provide sub-micron resolution to identify defects like misprints, color inconsistencies, and surface irregularities on moving substrates. These systems excel in continuous processes, such as roll-to-roll production, where TDI accumulates signal over multiple stages to boost sensitivity for low-contrast flaws without halting the line. The integration of TDI with conveyor-driven setups allows for seamless , maintaining image fidelity at production speeds. Post-2020, the adoption of affordable TDI sensors has driven market growth in industrial automation, with the global TDI camera market projected to expand from USD 932.7 million in 2025 onward, fueled by cost reductions and demand for high-resolution inspection in and sectors.

Remote Sensing and Astronomy

Time delay and integration (TDI) sensors have been integral to since the 1970s, with widespread adoption in during the 1990s to enable real-time high-resolution mapping despite high flight speeds. These systems, often employing CCD-based TDI arrays, compensated for platform motion at velocities exceeding 500 km/h, allowing for continuous scanning of terrain and targets without significant image smear. For instance, the transition from film-based to digital TDI sensors in U.S. platforms during this period facilitated near-real-time intelligence gathering in reconnaissance systems. In , CMOS-based TDI sensors have become prominent in (LEO) satellites for , addressing challenges from orbital velocities around 7.8 km/s. Post-2017 designs, such as IMEC's CCD-in-CMOS TDI imagers, integrate multiple spectral bands with line rates over 30 kHz, enabling sub-meter resolution despite rapid ground track motion and low light conditions. These sensors support applications like by synchronizing charge transfer with satellite velocity, achieving signal-to-noise ratios suitable for detecting subtle spectral signatures in or minerals. Astronomical applications of TDI leverage specialized CCDs in scanning telescopes to capture faint, extended sources in photon-limited regimes. Radiation-hardened multi-stage TDI CCD arrays, designed to withstand fluxes, have been employed in space-based observatories for deep-field imaging, where integration stages accumulate signal over multiple passes to boost sensitivity by factors of 10–100 compared to single-frame exposures. For example, in , TDI modes mitigate charge transfer inefficiencies in harsh radiation environments, preserving astrometric accuracy for point-source localization down to arcsecond levels. Recent advancements in the extend TDI to nano-satellite constellations for persistent monitoring, incorporating inertial compensation to handle non-linear orbital paths and attitude perturbations. CubeSats like AeroCube-11R3 utilize compact TDI imagers to achieve ground sample distances under 1 m at acquisition rates 10 times faster than conventional pushbroom sensors, enabling constellation-based revisit times of hours for or maritime surveillance. Techniques such as real-time attitude maneuvering and velocity estimation algorithms adjust TDI clocking dynamically, compensating for along-track drifts up to 0.1 pixels per line.

Performance Aspects

Advantages Over Conventional Methods

Time delay and integration (TDI) provides significant sensitivity enhancements over conventional methods by effectively extending exposure times without requiring global shutters or mechanical scanning adjustments. In TDI sensors, the signal accumulates across multiple stages (N), scaling linearly with N, while readout noise remains constant, leading to a (SNR) improvement of approximately √N compared to single-line scanning techniques. For example, with N=64 stages, this yields an SNR gain of about 8x over non-TDI line scans, enabling clearer images in challenging conditions. TDI excels in reducing motion blur by synchronizing charge transfer with object velocity, allowing high-speed imaging where traditional methods fail due to smearing. Conventional line scan cameras limit speeds to avoid blur, often below 10 m/s for fine details, but TDI supports velocities several times higher while preserving resolution, as each line integrates multiple exposures without relative motion artifacts. This is particularly beneficial for dynamic applications like industrial inspection, where conventional arrays would require short exposures that exacerbate blur at speed. In low-light environments, TDI performs exceptionally well in photon-limited regimes, equivalent to N times longer exposures in standard sensors, making it ideal for detecting faint signals. For instance, in astronomical , TDI enables observation of dim sources that would be undetectable with non-integrated pushbroom scanners, boosting sensitivity without increasing illumination or size. Compared to staring arrays, TDI reduces data volume by capturing line-by-line scans rather than full frames continuously, maintaining high resolution across large fields while minimizing storage and processing demands in scanning scenarios. Versus basic pushbroom scanners, TDI adds multi-stage integration for superior , handling high-contrast scenes with less saturation or amplification.

Limitations and Mitigation Strategies

One major limitation of TDI systems is their sensitivity to synchronization errors, where mismatches between the charge transfer and the object's motion lead to image smear that degrades the modulation transfer function (MTF). A mismatch ratio as low as 2% can significantly reduce MTF, particularly in systems with higher numbers of TDI stages. To mitigate this, adaptive clocking techniques synchronized with encoders on the scanning mechanism ensure precise alignment of the charge packet with object motion, allowing tolerances up to 2-4% mismatch in practical applications. Additionally, recent computational methods, such as minimum search domain alignment in digital TDI-CMOS imaging, dynamically correct for variations through post-processing steps that minimize alignment errors. TDI sensors traditionally operate in a unidirectional shift mode, restricting their use to linear scanning in and limiting flexibility for bidirectional or complex motion paths. This fixed directionality necessitates mechanical reversal of the sensor or object for return scans, increasing system complexity. Bidirectional TDI designs address this by incorporating transfer registers and outputs on both sides of the , enabling seamless reversal without mechanical repositioning. Alternatively, mechanical scanning systems can compensate by adjusting the sensor's orientation during operation. High-stage TDI implementations, particularly in CCDs, suffer from elevated and due to the need for multiple transfer stages and precise analog circuitry. The shift to CMOS-based TDI sensors since the has reduced production s through standard processing and integrated digital readout, simplifying external . Programmable digital integration in further mitigates by allowing software-configurable stage numbers and gain adjustments without hardware modifications. Long integration times in TDI amplify dark current and noise accumulation, especially in CCDs where thermal generation degrades . Cooling the sensor to reduce temperature by 6-7°C can suppress dark current exponentially, improving low-light performance. Low-dark-current CMOS variants minimize this issue inherently through pinned architectures, often eliminating the need for cooling in moderate conditions. In smaller sensors, 3D pixel effects exacerbate via increased interface states; epi-layer thickness optimization in fabrication reduces these defects and dark current by enhancing isolation. TDI systems are inherently limited to linear or unidirectional motion, posing scalability challenges for capturing wider fields of view beyond narrow scan lines. This constraint restricts applications to conveyor-based or push-broom scanning without additional adaptations. Hybrid approaches combining TDI sensors with panoramic expand the effective field by warping the linear scan into a curved or wide-angle projection, enabling broader coverage in setups.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9571889/
  2. https://www.imec-int.com/en/imec-magazine/imec-magazine-october-2017/image-sensor-combining-the-best-of-different-worlds
  3. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/71899/Tyrrell-2009-Time%20Delay%20Integration%20and%20In-Pixel%20Spatiotemporal%20Filtering%20Using%20a%20Nanoscale%20Digital%20CMOS%20Focal%20Plane%20Readout.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=1
  4. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20210018682/downloads/oci_ptdi_SPIE_conference_paper_08_2021_v1.pdf
  5. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22197520
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0030399298000784
  7. https://www.photonics.com/Articles/Hybrid-TDI-Sensors-Feature-Faster-Line-Rates-and/a62074
  8. https://www.laserfocusworld.com/detectors-imaging/article/16567663/tdi-ccds-are-still-the-sensors-of-choice-for-demanding-applications
  9. https://hub.hamamatsu.com/us/en/technical-notes/image-sensors/tdi-imaging-an-efficient-aoi-and-axi-tool.html
  10. https://fairchildimaging.com/about-us
  11. https://www.thephoblographer.com/2023/07/10/time-delay-integration-ccd-sensors-a-curious-piece-of-military-history-in-photography/
  12. https://www.astro.ku.dk/~erik/xx/GaiaNIR_lepage_2009_cmosTdi.pdf
  13. https://www.novuslight.com/summing-opportunities-in-tdi-cmos-sensor-architectures_N5687.html
  14. https://www.photonics.com/Articles/Time-Delay-Integration-Speeds-Up-Imaging/a50766
  15. https://semiconductorinsight.com/blog/teledyne-hamamatsu-nikon-lead-next-wave-of-innovation-in-x-ray-tdi-cameras/
  16. https://www.credenceresearch.com/report/tdi-time-delay-integration-cameras-market
  17. https://www.hamamatsu.com/content/dam/hamamatsu-photonics/sites/documents/99_SALES_LIBRARY/ssd/s10200-02-01_etc_kmpd1098e.pdf
  18. https://www.electronics.org/system/files/technical_resource/E5%26S08_01.pdf
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351079016_Velocity_mismatch_effect_on_the_dynamic_MTF_of_a_TDI_image_sensor
  20. https://www.imperx.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/White-Paper-Interline-CCD-Images-in-TDI-Scanning-Mode.pdf
  21. https://www.zaber.com/articles/tdi-imaging
  22. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1789134
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289690729_Digital_implementation_of_forward_motion_compensation_in_TDI-CCD_panoramic_aerial_camera
  24. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/journal-of-biomedical-optics/volume-12/issue-3/034011/Dynamic-autofocus-for-continuous-scanning-time-delay-and-integration-image/10.1117/1.2743078.pdf
  25. https://www.imagesensors.org/Past%20Workshops/2017%20Workshop/2017%20Papers/P16.pdf
  26. http://application-notes.digchip.com/233/233-48624.pdf
  27. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6805805
  28. https://www.teledyne-e2v.com/en-us/Solutions_/Documents/2020-01-22_e2v_the-future-is-bright-for-ccd-sensors_web.pdf
  29. https://optics.org/products/P000002710
  30. https://www.hamamatsu.com/content/dam/hamamatsu-photonics/sites/documents/99_SALES_LIBRARY/ssd/tdi-ccd_kmpd9004e.pdf
  31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270985828_Optimal_set_of_TDI_CCD_integration_stages_and_gains_of_space_remote_sensing_cameras
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336772538_CMOS_Implementation_of_Time_Delay_Integration_TDI_for_Imaging_Applications_A_Brief_Review
  33. https://www.tucsen.com/learning/why-tdi-technology-is-gaining-ground/
  34. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/14/11/21603
  35. https://www.imec-int.com/en/articles/imec-demonstrates-world-s-first-multispectral-time-delay-integration-image-sensor-based-on-ccd-in-cmos-technology
  36. https://www.teledynespaceimaging.com/en-us/products/cmos-tdi-sensors
  37. https://scdusa-ir.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Backside-illuminated-CMOS-TDI-line-scanner-for-space-applications_ICSO-2016.pdf
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12158263/
  39. https://patents.justia.com/patent/4433346
  40. https://patents.google.com/patent/US5365596A/en
  41. https://www.teledynevisionsolutions.com/products/linea-hs
  42. https://www.sodavision.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/2021-chromasens-brochure-soda-vision.pdf
  43. https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/tdi-time-delay-integration-cameras-market
  44. https://www.asprs.org/wp-content/uploads/pers/1996journal/mar/1996_mar_285-291.pdf
  45. https://www.imechyperspectral.com/en/articles/how-ccd-cmos-technology-enables-hyperspectral-tdi-imaging
  46. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.14532
  47. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019SPIE11180E..6HP/abstract
  48. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017PASP..129g5002T/abstract
  49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317159140_Radiation_Damage_Effects_in_Space-borne_CCD_Detectors_Operated_in_TDI_Mode
  50. https://indico.cern.ch/event/44501/contributions/1937474/attachments/942764/1337187/CERN_Pixel_Meeting_Nov_2008-2.pdf
  51. https://www.eoportal.org/satellite-missions/aerocube-11r3
  52. https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-31-25-41740
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336698218_Attitude_Maneuver_Planning_of_Agile_Satellites_for_Time_Delay_Integration_Imaging
  54. https://www.circuitinsight.com/pdf/tdi_imaging_ipc.pdf
  55. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b4f2/a215b7ed7006efe27614d7c97806197f62df.pdf
  56. https://www.teledynevisionsolutions.com/learn/learning-center/machine-vision/tdi-primer-high-sensitivity-line-scanning/
  57. https://www.electronics.org/system/files/technical_resource/E5%2526S08_01.pdf
  58. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA215712.pdf
  59. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13320-017-0448-7
  60. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/7/1113
  61. https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?uri=ao-60-14-4191
  62. http://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016SPIE10000E..1JW/abstract
  63. https://www.photonics.com/Articles/CMOS-vs-CCD-Maturing-Technologies-Maturing/a22471
  64. https://www.teledynevisionsolutions.com/learn/learning-center/imaging-fundamentals/ccd-vs-cmos/
  65. https://www.hamamatsu.com/content/dam/hamamatsu-photonics/sites/documents/99_SALES_LIBRARY/ssd/ccd_kmpd9002e.pdf
  66. https://www.teledynevisionsolutions.com/learn/learning-center/scientific-imaging/thermal-control-for-long-exposure-imaging/
  67. https://isl.stanford.edu/~abbas/ee392b/lect05.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.