Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Tristerix
View on Wikipedia
| Tristerix | |
|---|---|
| Tristerix corymbosus | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Plantae |
| Clade: | Tracheophytes |
| Clade: | Angiosperms |
| Clade: | Eudicots |
| Order: | Santalales |
| Family: | Loranthaceae |
| Genus: | Tristerix Mart.[1] |
| Species | |
Tristerix is a genus of mistletoe in the family Loranthaceae, native to the Andes, ranging from Colombia and Ecuador to Chile and Argentina.[2][3] They are woody perennials usually occurring as aerial parasites, are pollinated by hummingbirds and flowerpiercers, with seed-dispersal generally by birds but occasionally by mammals (Dromiciops).[3] The genus is distinguished from other New World Loranthaceae by its simple, terminal, racemose inflorescences, together with its of 4- or 5-merous flowers, versatile anthers, and the presence of endosperm.[2] Further differences include fused cotyledons and the absence of epicortical roots.[2]

Phylogeny
[edit]Tristerix was first described in 1830 by Martius,[1] who published three species: T. viridiflorus (now Macrosolen viridiflorus, T. tetrandus (now T. corymbosus), and T. reinwardtianus (now Macrosolen avenis). In 1868, Eichler placed Loranthus aphyllus and L. tetrandrus in the genus Phrygillanthus.[4] However, in 1973, Barlow & Wiens recognised these two Phrygilanthus species as Tristerix aphyllus and T. corymbosus, respectively, returning Tristerix to use.[5]
Martius described the genus as having three bracts.[1] However, this characteristic applies to only two species of the genus, (T. aphyllus and T. corymbosus). In these, two bracteoles inside a primary bract lie below the ovary.[2] The other members of the genus have no bracteoles.[2] Van Tieghem (1895) divided the genus into two subgenera, those species without bracteoles - Metastachys (with nine species), and those with bracteoles - Tristerix (with two species, T. aphyllus and T. corymbosus).[6] This division is accepted by Kuijt.[2]
A phylogenetic study of ten Tristerix species by Amico et al. (2007) found evidence for three groupings.[3] A simplified consensus cladogram of their conclusions, from analyses which used two different character sets and three methods (maximum likelihood, minimum parsimony, and Bayesian inference) for finding the tree, is given below. Note that the grouping of the Tristerix species with bracteoles remains.

References
[edit]- ^ a b c von Martius, C.F.P. 1830. Flora 13(1): 108. 1830. Regensburg.
- ^ a b c d e f g Kuijt J (1988) Revision of Tristerix (Loranthaceae). Systematic Botany Monographs 19, 1-61.Kuijt, Job (1988). "Revision of Tristerix (Loranthaceae)". Systematic Botany Monographs. 19: 1–61. doi:10.2307/25027693. JSTOR 25027693.
- ^ a b c d Amico, GC, Vidal-Russell, R, Nickrent, DL (2007) Phylogenetic Relationships and Ecological Speciation in the Mistletoe Tristerix (Loranthaceae): The Influence of Pollinators, Dispersers, and Hosts. American Journal of Botany 94, 558-567.doi:10.3732/ajb.94.4.558
- ^ Eichler, A.W. 1868. Flora Brasiliensis 5(2): 47. Vol. v.5, pt.2. 1866.
- ^ Barlow, B.A. & Wiens, D. 1973. The classification of the generic segregates of Phrygilanthus (= Notanthera) of the Loranthaceae. Brittonia 25, 26. doi:10.2307/2805488 (p.39̟)
- ^ van Tieghem, P. 1895. Sur Le Groupement Des Espèces En Genres Dans Les Loranthées A Calice Dialysépale Et Anthères Oscillantes Ou Struthanthées. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France 42(2): 161–180. doi:10.1080/00378941.1895.10830585 Van Tieghem, M. Ph. (1895). "PDF". Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France. 42 (2): 161–180. doi:10.1080/00378941.1895.10830585.
- ^ Romina Vidal-Russell and Daniel L. Nickrent (2007). "The biogeographic history of Loranthaceae" Archived 2012-09-23 at the Wayback Machine, DARWINIANA 45(suplemento) 34-54.
- ^ Guillermo C Amico and Daniel L Nickrent (2009). "Population structure and phylogeography of the mistletoes Tristerix corymbosus and T. aphyllus (Loranthaceae) using chloroplast DNA sequence variation", American Journal of Botany 96:1571-1580. doi:10.3732/ajb.0800302
External links
[edit]- Govaerts, R. et al. 2018. Tristerix in Kew Science Plants of the World online. The Board of Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Published online. Accessed 4 April 2018.
Tristerix
View on GrokipediaTaxonomy and Phylogeny
Etymology and History
The genus name Tristerix is derived from the Greek words tris (three) and stemon (stamen), alluding to the three fertile stamens characteristic of some species in the genus.[4] The genus Tristerix was first established by Carl Friedrich Philipp von Martius in 1830, based on specimens collected from South America, particularly from regions in Chile and Peru. Martius described three initial species: T. viridiflorus, T. tetrandrus, and T. longebracteatus, marking the initial recognition of the group as distinct within the Loranthaceae. Early taxonomic treatments included some misclassifications, such as T. viridiflorus, which was later reclassified into the genus Macrosolen due to differences in floral and inflorescence structure.[4][5] In the late 19th century, Henri van Heurck van Tieghem contributed significantly to the understanding of Tristerix through his 1895 work on Loranthaceae classification, where he introduced subgenera to organize the diverse species based on bract and inflorescence traits, distinguishing groups like those later aligned with Metastachys.[6] During the 20th century, major revisions refined species boundaries; Brian A. Barlow and Delbert Wiens (1973) re-evaluated segregates from related genera like Phrygilanthus, transferring several species to Tristerix and emphasizing morphological distinctions in anther and corolla features. Job Kuijt's comprehensive 1988 monograph further updated the taxonomy, accepting 11–13 species and solidifying the subgeneric framework.[7] Recent phylogenetic studies have bolstered these classifications using molecular evidence. Amico et al. (2007) analyzed nuclear ribosomal ITS and chloroplast trnL-F sequences from multiple Tristerix species, revealing three major clades that largely support the subgeneric divisions: subgenus Metastachys (encompassing 9 species lacking bracteoles) and subgenus Tristerix (2 species with bracteoles), while also suggesting minor adjustments to species placements based on evolutionary relationships.[2]Phylogenetic Position
Tristerix is a genus within the family Loranthaceae, which belongs to the order Santalales, the largest lineage of parasitic flowering plants encompassing approximately 2,500 species of hemi- and holoparasites.[8] Multi-gene phylogenetic analyses, including plastid (matK, rbcL, accD) and nuclear (SSU, LSU rDNA, RPB2) loci, confirm Loranthaceae as a monophyletic family in the parasitic mistletoe clade of Santalales, with root-parasitic ancestors giving rise to aerial hemiparasites like Tristerix.[8] Within Loranthaceae, Tristerix occupies a position in the neotropical Psittacantheae tribe, part of the core Loranthaceae subclade that diversified in association with the emergence of tropical forests and songbird radiations during the Eocene (~50 Ma).[9] It shares close relationships with other Andean genera such as Gaiadendron (an early-diverging South American lineage) and Psittacanthus (a more derived neotropical group), based on nuclear and chloroplast DNA phylogenies.[9] Morphological synapomorphies supporting this placement include simple terminal racemose inflorescences and versatile anthers, distinguishing Tristerix from basal Loranthaceae genera.[2] At the genus level, Tristerix is monophyletic, as demonstrated by phylogenetic analyses of nuclear ITS and chloroplast trnT-trnF and rpl16 regions across 11 species, revealing two primary clades corresponding to Andean diversification patterns.[2] The northern clade encompasses six species (e.g., T. chodatianus, T. grandiflorus) adapted to high-elevation cloud forests, while the southern clade includes four species (e.g., T. corymbosus, T. aphyllus) in lower-elevation temperate and arid zones.[2] Updated analyses incorporating chloroplast and nuclear DNA further support this structure with central-north and central-south lineages, linking diversification to Miocene Andean uplift events that created topographic barriers and new habitats.[10] Divergence within the genus is estimated to have occurred primarily during the early to middle Miocene (approximately 23–11 Ma), aligning with accelerated orogeny and climatic shifts that promoted speciation along the Andean cordillera.[10] Subgenerically, Tristerix was historically divided into subgenus Tristerix (two southern species with bracteoles and tetramerous flowers) and subgenus Metastachys (nine species lacking bracteoles), but molecular evidence indicates paraphyly of Metastachys, with its species nested within the Tristerix clade.[2] The Metastachys-like group exhibits hemiparasitic habits with broader host ranges, contrasting the more specialized pollination and host preferences in the core Tristerix lineage.[2] A key distinguishing feature from related South American Loranthaceae genera is the absence of epicortical roots, which are otherwise common for vegetative spread in groups like Psittacanthus.[2] This morphology, combined with fused cotyledons, underscores Tristerix's relictual position among the five ancient South American genera.[2]Accepted Species
The genus Tristerix currently includes 13 accepted species, according to Plants of the World Online as of 2025, with phylogenetic and biogeographic studies confirming this count through revisions and additional taxa.[5][10] These species are classified into two primary subgenera based on morphological and molecular data, with subgenus Metastachys encompassing ebracteolate species and subgenus Tristerix including those with bracteoles, though phylogenetic analyses suggest potential polyphyly and a possible third subgenus for certain taxa.[2] Subgenus Metastachys contains 10 species, primarily distributed along the Andean cordillera:- T. aphyllus (Chile; holoparasitic on cacti, lacking leaves and stems above ground).[11]
- T. chodatianus (Bolivia; known from limited collections in highland regions).[12]
- T. corymbosus (Chile and Argentina; widespread on shrub hosts, with red tubular flowers).[13]
- T. divaricatus (Peru; characterized by spreading inflorescences).
- T. grandiflorus (Ecuador and Peru; features large, showy flowers).
- T. longebracteatus (Colombia; distinguished by elongated bracts).[14]
- T. penduliflorus (Ecuador; pendulous flowering habit).
- T. peruvianus (Peru; adapted to montane forests).
- T. quadraticus (Peru; notable for quadrangular stems).[5]
- T. secundus (Colombia to Peru; paired inflorescences in northern clade).[5]
- T. peytonii (Ecuador; described from recent collections in cloud forests, with diagnostic red flowers).
- T. pubescens (Colombia to Peru; pubescent stems and leaves).
- T. verticillatus (Peru to Argentina; whorled leaves, southern clade with bracteoles).[5]