Hubbry Logo
Trisynaptic circuitTrisynaptic circuitMain
Open search
Trisynaptic circuit
Community hub
Trisynaptic circuit
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Trisynaptic circuit
Trisynaptic circuit
Trisynaptic circuit
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The trisynaptic circuit or trisynaptic loop is a relay of synaptic transmission in the hippocampus. The trisynaptic circuit is a neural circuit in the hippocampus, which is made up of three major cell groups: granule cells in the dentate gyrus, pyramidal neurons in CA3, and pyramidal neurons in CA1. The hippocampal relay involves three main regions within the hippocampus which are classified according to their cell type and projection fibers. The first projection of the hippocampus occurs between the entorhinal cortex (EC) and the dentate gyrus (DG). The entorhinal cortex transmits its signals from the parahippocampal gyrus to the dentate gyrus via granule cell fibers known collectively as the perforant path. The dentate gyrus then synapses on pyramidal cells in CA3 via mossy cell fibers. CA3 then fires to CA1 via Schaffer collaterals which synapse in the subiculum and are carried out through the fornix of the brain. Collectively the dentate gyrus, CA1, and CA3 of the hippocampus compose the trisynaptic loop.

EC → DG via the perforant path (synapse 1), DG → CA3 via mossy fibres (synapse 2), CA3 → CA1 via schaffer collaterals (synapse 3)[1]

History

[edit]

The circuit was initially described by the neuroanatomist Santiago Ramon y Cajal,[2] in the early twentieth century, using the Golgi staining method. After the discovery of the trisynaptic circuit, a series of research has been conducted to determine the mechanisms driving this circuit. Today, research is focused on how this loop interacts with other parts of the brain, and how it influences human physiology and behaviour. For example, it has been shown that disruptions within the trisynaptic circuit lead to behavioural changes in rodent and feline models.[3]

Structures

[edit]

Entorhinal cortex

[edit]

The entorhinal cortex (EC) is a structure in the brain located in the medial temporal lobe. The EC is composed of six distinct layers. The superficial (outer) layers, which include layers I through III, are mainly input layers that receive signals from other parts of the EC, but also project to hippocampal structures via the perforant path. Layer II of the entorhinal cortex projects mainly to the dentate gyrus and CA3, while layer III is thought to project mainly to the CA1 of the hippocampus. The deep (inner) layers, layers IV to VI, are the main output layers, and send signals to different parts of the EC and other cortical areas.

Dentate gyrus

[edit]

The dentate gyrus (DG) is the innermost section of the hippocampal formation. The dentate gyrus consists of three layers: molecular, granular, and polymorphic. Granule neurons, which are the most prominent type of DG cells, are mainly found in the granular layer. These granule cells are the major source of input of the hippocampal formation, receiving most of their information from layer II of the entorhinal cortex, via the perforant pathway. Information from the DG is directed to the pyramidal cells of CA3 through mossy fibres. Neurons within the DG are famous for being one of two nervous system areas capable of neurogenesis, the growth or development of nervous tissue.

Cornu ammonis 3

[edit]

The CA3 is a portion of the hippocampal formation adjacent to the dentate gyrus. Input is received from the granule cells of the dentate gyrus through the mossy fibres. The CA3 is rich in pyramidal neurons (like those found throughout the neocortex), which project mainly to the CA1 pyramidal neurons via the Schaffer collateral pathway. The CA3 pyramidal neurons have been analogized as the "pacemaker" of the trisynaptic loop in the generation of the hippocampal theta rhythm. One study[4] has found that the CA3 plays an essential role in the consolidation of memories when examining CA3 regions using the Morris water maze.

Cornu ammonis 1

[edit]

The CA1 is the region within the hippocampus between the subiculum, the innermost area of the hippocampal formation, and region CA2. The CA1 is separated from the dentate gyrus by the hippocampal sulcus. Cells within the CA1 are mostly pyramidal cells, similar to those in CA3. The CA1 completes the circuit by feeding back to the deep layers, mainly layer V, of the entorhinal cortex.

Associated brain areas

[edit]

There are many brain structures that transmit information to, and from the trisynaptic circuit. The activity of these different structures can be directly or indirectly modulated by the activity of the trisynaptic loop.

Fornix

[edit]

The fornix is a C-shaped bundle of axons that begins in the hippocampal formation of both hemispheres, referred to as the fimbria, and extend through the crus of fornix, also known as the posterior pillars. The fimbria section of the fornix is directly connected to the alveus, which is a portion of the hippocampal formation that arises from the subiculum and the hippocampus (specifically the CA1). Both crura of the fornix form intimate connections with the underside of the corpus callosum and support the hippocampal commissure, a large bundle of axon that connects the left and right hippocampal formations. The fornix plays a key role in hippocampal outputs, specifically in connecting CA3 to a variety of subcortical structures, and connecting CA1 and the subiculum to a variety of parahippocampal regions, via the fimbria. The fornix is also essential for hippocampal information input and neuromodulatory input, specifically from the medial septum, diencephalic brain structures, and the brain stem.

Cingulate gyrus

[edit]

The cingulate gyrus plays a key role in the limbic system's emotion formation and processing. The cingulate cortex is separated into an anterior and a posterior region, which corresponds to areas 24, 32, 33 (anterior) and 23 (posterior) of the Brodmann areas. The anterior region receives information mainly from the mamillary bodies while the posterior cingulate receives information from the subiculum via the Papez circuit.

Mammillary bodies

[edit]

The mammillary bodies are two clusters of cell bodies found at the ends of the posterior fibres of the fornix within the diencephalon. The mammillary bodies relay information from the hippocampal formation (via the fornix) to the thalamus (via the mammillothalamic tract). The mammillary bodies are integral parts of the limbic system and have been shown to be important in recollective memory.[5]

Thalamus

[edit]

The thalamus is a bundle of nuclei located between the cerebral cortex and the midbrain. Many of the thalamic nuclei receive inputs from the hippocampal formation. The mammillothalamic tract relays information received from the mamillary bodies (via the fornix) and transmits it to the anterior nuclei of the thalamus. Research has shown that the thalamus plays a key role with respect to spatial and episodic memories.[6]

Association cortex

[edit]

The association cortex includes most of the cerebral surface of the brain and is responsible for processing that goes between the arrival of input in the primary sensory cortex and the generation of behaviour. Receives and integrates information from various parts of the brain and influences many cortical and subcortical targets. Inputs to the association cortices include the primary and secondary sensory and motor cortices, the thalamus, and the brain stem. The association cortex projects to places including the hippocampus, basal ganglia, and cerebellum, and other association cortices. Examination of patients with damages to one or more of these regions, as well as noninvasive brain imaging, it has been found that the association cortex is especially important for attending to complex stimuli in the external and internal environments. The temporal association cortex identifies the nature of stimuli, while the frontal association cortex plans behavioural responses to the stimuli.[7]

Amygdala

[edit]

The amygdala is an almond-shaped group of nuclei found deep and medially within the temporal lobes of the brain. Known to be the area of the brain responsible for emotional reaction, but plays an important role in processing of memory and decision making as well. It is part of the limbic system. The amygdala projects to various structures in the brain including the hypothalamus, the thalamic reticular nucleus, and more.

Medial septum

[edit]

The medial septum plays a role in the generation of theta waves in the brain. In an experiment,[8] it has been proposed that the generation of theta oscillations involves an ascending pathway leading from the brainstem to hypothalamus to medial septum to hippocampus. The same experiment demonstrated that injection of lidocaine, a local anesthetic, inhibits theta oscillations from the medial septum projecting to the hippocampus.

Relationship with other physiological systems

[edit]

Role in rhythm generation

[edit]

It has been proposed that the trisynaptic circuit is responsible for the generation of hippocampal theta waves. These waves are responsible for the synchronization of different brain regions, especially the limbic system.[9] In rats, theta waves range between 3–8 Hz and their amplitudes range from 50 to 100 μV. Theta waves are especially prominent during ongoing behaviors and during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep.[10]

Respiratory system

[edit]

Studies have shown that the respiratory system interacts with the brain in generating theta oscillations in the hippocampus. There are numerous studies on the different effects of oxygen concentration on hippocampal theta oscillations, leading to implications of anesthetic use during surgeries, and influence on sleep patterns. Some of these oxygen environments include hyperoxic conditions, which is a condition where there is excess oxygen (greater than 21%). There are adverse effects involved with rat placement in hyperoxia condition. Hypercapnia is a condition where there is high oxygen concentrations with a mixture of carbon dioxide (95% and 5%, respectively). In normoxic conditions, which is basically the air we breath (with oxygen concentrations at 21%). The air we breath is composed of the following five gases:[11] nitrogen (78%), oxygen (21%), water vapor (5%), argon (1%), and carbon dioxide (0.03%). Finally, in hypoxic conditions, which is a condition of low oxygen concentration (less than 21% oxygen concentrations).

There are physiological and psychological disorders related to prolonged exposure to hypoxic conditions. For example, sleep apnea[12] is a condition where there is partial, or complete, blockage of breathing during sleep. In addition, the respiratory system linked to central nervous system via base of brain. Thus, prolonged exposure to low oxygen concentration has detrimental effects on the brain.

Sensorimotor system

[edit]

Experimental research has shown that there are two prominent types of theta oscillation which are each associated with different related to a motor response.[13] Type I theta waves correspond with exploratory behaviours including walking, running, and rearing. Type II theta waves are associated with immobility during the initiation or the intention of initiation of a motor response.

Limbic system

[edit]

Theta oscillations generated by the trisynaptic loop have been shown to be synchronized with brain activity in the anterior ventral thalamus. Hippocampal theta has also been linked to the activation of the anterior medial and the anterior dorsal areas of the thalamus.[14] The synchronization between these limbic structures and the trisynaptic loop is essential for proper emotional processing.

See also: EC-hippocampus system

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Trisynaptic circuit

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The trisynaptic circuit is a neural pathway in the mammalian hippocampus that relays sensory and cognitive information from the through three sequential synaptic relays, forming a core component of hippocampal processing. It consists of the perforant pathway, which originates in layer II of the and projects to the granule cells of the ; the mossy fiber pathway, connecting granule cells to pyramidal neurons in the CA3 subfield; and the Schaffer collaterals, which link CA3 pyramidal neurons to those in the CA1 subfield. This circuit extends longitudinally along the septotemporal axis of the hippocampus, enabling coordinated excitation and inhibition across its subregions. The trisynaptic circuit is essential for memory functions, particularly the acquisition and recall of episodic and spatial memories, by integrating neocortical inputs and facilitating their consolidation into long-term storage through outputs from CA1 and the subiculum to the limbic system and neocortex. Disruptions in this pathway, such as those observed in Alzheimer's disease, impair memory formation due to its role in synaptic plasticity mechanisms like long-term potentiation (LTP). First described in detail through anatomical studies in the early 20th century, the circuit has been a focal point of neuroscience research, revealing its involvement in network dynamics like high-frequency oscillations and feedforward inhibition that refine information flow.

Overview

Definition and Pathway

The trisynaptic circuit is the primary excitatory within the mammalian hippocampus, characterized by a sequential flow through three major synaptic relays: from layer II neurons of the (EC) to granule cells in the (DG), then to pyramidal cells in cornu ammonis 3 (CA3), and finally to pyramidal cells in cornu ammonis 1 (CA1). This circuit serves as the canonical route for information processing in the hippocampal formation, integrating cortical inputs for downstream functions. The pathway begins with the perforant path, where axons from EC layer II neurons project to the outer molecular layer of the DG, forming excitatory onto the dendrites of granule cells. These granule cells then extend mossy fiber axons that onto the proximal dendrites of CA3 pyramidal cells in the , providing a high-fidelity relay with large, multivesicular boutons. From CA3, the Schaffer collaterals—axonal branches of pyramidal cells—project to the apical dendrites of CA1 pyramidal cells in the stratum radiatum, completing the trisynaptic loop and enabling output to subcortical and cortical targets. Transmission across all three synapses is predominantly , utilizing ionotropic receptors such as and NMDA subtypes to mediate fast excitatory postsynaptic potentials and plasticity mechanisms like . This neurochemical uniformity supports efficient signal propagation and synaptic modification. The trisynaptic circuit exhibits evolutionary conservation across mammalian species, forming a core architectural feature of the hippocampal formation that has been maintained through phylogenetic adaptations. Its standardized connectivity has positioned it as a foundational model for investigating dynamics, synaptic integration, and computational principles in the hippocampus.

Anatomical Significance

The trisynaptic circuit is situated within the hippocampal formation, a key component of the medial , positioned medial to the inferior horn of the lateral ventricle in each . This formation encompasses the , the cornu ammonis regions (CA1–CA3), and the subicular complex, which includes the , presubiculum, parasubiculum, and , all embedded as an integrated unit within the broader of the medial . The circuit's anatomical placement underscores its role as a gateway for cortical inputs to the hippocampus, facilitating structured information processing through its core structures. In terms of scale, the trisynaptic circuit involves approximately 1–2 million principal neurons across its primary components in , with the containing the highest density of granule cells, estimated at up to 1.2 million per hippocampal formation. These numbers reflect the circuit's capacity for extensive parallel processing, where granule cells in the outnumber upstream entorhinal inputs, enabling sparse and patterned representation of sensory information. The circuit exhibits a strictly unidirectional flow of information, progressing from the through the to CA3 and then CA1, in contrast to alternative monosynaptic paths (such as direct layer III entorhinal projections to CA1) or disynaptic routes (like entorhinal inputs bypassing the dentate to reach CA3 directly). This trisynaptic specificity ensures sequential elaboration of signals, introducing temporal delays and integrative opportunities not present in shorter pathways. Understanding the trisynaptic circuit is prerequisite to appreciating the hippocampal formation's laminar organization, where projections from the —particularly from its layer II—terminate in a highly ordered, trilaminar fashion within the dentate gyrus's molecular layer, dividing it into outer, middle, and inner sublayers based on input sources. This layered architecture, with entorhinal afferents occupying the outer two-thirds, exemplifies the circuit's precision in synaptic targeting and supports the broader trilaminar cytoarchitecture of allocortical regions like the itself.

Historical Development

Discovery and Early Descriptions

Theodor Meynert discussed the hippocampal formation in his 1868 book on , providing early observations on its organization and connections to adjacent cortical regions. These 19th-century accounts built on prior macroscopic views of the hippocampal formation but introduced microscopic insights into its laminar architecture, emphasizing the transitional nature of entorhinal-hippocampal interfaces. Meynert's work highlighted the layered cellular arrangement in the hippocampus, which would later inform interpretations of information flow through the region. Advancing into the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Santiago Ramón y Cajal employed the Golgi staining technique between 1893 and 1909 to visualize key cellular elements of the circuit, notably the granule cells in the dentate gyrus and their unmyelinated axons forming mossy fibers that project to the CA3 region. In his comprehensive 1911 publication Histologie du système nerveux de l'homme et des vertébrés, Cajal illustrated these connections with unprecedented clarity, revealing the mossy fibers' characteristic varicosities and thorny excrescences that synapse onto CA3 pyramidal cells, thus delineating a critical segment of the pathway. This Golgi-based approach not only confirmed the discrete neuronal elements but also suggested a sequential relay mechanism within the hippocampus, influencing subsequent anatomical models. In the 1930s and 1940s, Rafael Lorente de Nó extended these observations through meticulous Golgi analyses, producing detailed mappings of hippocampal intrinsic circuits in his seminal 1934 "Studies on the Structure of the ." Lorente de Nó integrated Cajal's cellular details into a cohesive framework for hippocampal intrinsic circuits, describing the connections from mossy fibers to CA3 and Schaffer collaterals to CA1, while defining the cytoarchitectonic subdivisions of the cornu Ammonis fields. His descriptions proposed a sequential pathway as the primary route for cortical-hippocampal processing. Early characterizations sparked debates on the pathway's completeness, particularly concerning the precise termination of entorhinal perforant path fibers and potential direct projections bypassing the . These uncertainties were largely resolved by mid-20th-century tract-tracing studies, including Trygve Blackstad's 1958 application of the Nauta silver impregnation method, which confirmed the perforant path's dual projections to the and CA fields while validating the loop's integrity. Such techniques provided unequivocal evidence of the circuit's sequential connectivity, solidifying the trisynaptic model against alternative reticular interpretations.

Key Researchers and Milestones

In the 1950s, John D. Green and colleagues pioneered the use of recordings to map the sequential activation of the trisynaptic circuit in the hippocampus, demonstrating the flow from to , CA3, and CA1 in anesthetized cats and rabbits. These electrophysiological studies provided the first functional confirmation of the circuit's relay-like organization, establishing a foundational model for subsequent investigations. During the 1970s and 1980s, Per Andersen and his team advanced this understanding through intracellular recordings in hippocampal slices, revealing synaptic potentiation mechanisms along the pathway, including frequency-dependent enhancement at perforant path-dentate and Schaffer collateral-CA1 synapses. Their work highlighted the circuit's capacity for activity-dependent plasticity, using preparations to isolate and characterize excitatory transmission dynamics. In the 1990s, Tim Bliss and Terje Lømo extended their seminal LTP discoveries to specific synapses within the trisynaptic circuit, showing robust at mossy fiber-CA3 and Schaffer collateral-CA1 connections in rat hippocampal slices, which underscored the pathway's role in enduring synaptic strengthening. These findings linked circuit-level plasticity to potential mechanisms, with mossy fiber LTP exhibiting presynaptic expression and Schaffer collateral LTP involving activation. From the onward, technological advances like and viral tracing refined circuit mapping, with Menno Witter and colleagues in the 2010s delineating entorhinal layer-specific projections using anterograde tracers in , clarifying how layer II inputs drive the leg and layer III inputs bypass it to reach CA1 directly. By the 2020s, efforts in models, including electron microscopy reconstructions of hippocampal subregions, confirmed the precision of trisynaptic wiring, revealing synaptic densities and convergence patterns that align with classical descriptions while identifying subtle variations in connectivity fidelity. Post-2020 milestones include imaging studies using high-resolution to examine hippocampal activity during tasks, such as episodic encoding, where signals in the hippocampus correlated with successful recall in healthy adults. These non-invasive approaches have bridged models to , demonstrating circuit engagement in relational formation.

Core Structures

Entorhinal Cortex

The serves as the primary origin of the trisynaptic circuit, relaying cortical inputs to the hippocampus through its superficial layers. Layer II of the contains the principal neurons responsible for initiating this pathway, consisting predominantly of stellate cells and pyramidal cells. Stellate cells, characterized by their multipolar morphology and expression, are abundant in the medial , while pyramidal cells, often calbindin-positive, are found in both medial and lateral regions. These layer II neurons extend axons that form the perforant path, projecting directly to the outer molecular layer of the . The projections from the exhibit a distinct topographical organization, with the lateral entorhinal cortex (LEC) and medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) contributing differentially to the circuit. The LEC, connected to object- and feature-based sensory areas such as the , conveys non-spatial "what" information via the lateral perforant path, targeting the outer third of the molecular layer. In contrast, the MEC, linked to spatial processing regions like the presubiculum, transmits "where" or spatial cues through the medial perforant path, innervating the middle third of the same layer. This segregation allows the trisynaptic circuit to integrate and navigational information at its input stage. Synaptically, the perforant path axons from layer II neurons form synapses onto the distal dendrites of dentate granule cells, utilizing glutamate as the primary to drive excitatory transmission. These synapses are distributed along the axonal trajectory, enabling broad convergence onto multiple granule cells and facilitating pattern separation in the circuit. In humans, layer II of the contains approximately 650,000 neurons per hemisphere, underscoring its substantial contribution to hippocampal input. Notably, the MEC harbors grid cells, which fire in a pattern during spatial navigation and provide periodic spatial representations that influence the trisynaptic circuit's processing of environmental geometry. These cells, primarily located in superficial layers including layer II, encode self-motion and distance metrics, enhancing the circuit's role in path integration.

Dentate Gyrus

The serves as the primary relay station in the trisynaptic circuit, receiving inputs from the via the perforant path and relaying processed signals to CA3 through its principal s. These s are small, spindle-shaped neurons densely packed in a V-shaped layer, with an estimated 10-15 million cells in the human hippocampus, far outnumbering pyramidal cells in other hippocampal subfields. Each features a compact soma and extensive apical dendrites that extend into the molecular layer to receive excitatory inputs primarily from the perforant path, enabling integration of spatial and contextual information. The output of s occurs via mossy fibers, which are unmyelinated s that project to the CA3 region, forming the second leg of the trisynaptic pathway. These fibers are characterized by large, thorn-like boutons that onto the proximal dendrites of CA3 pyramidal cells, with each granule cell contacting up to 15-50 such targets, facilitating powerful but divergent excitation. Mossy fibers also release ions upon activation, which can modulate synaptic transmission and contribute to network dynamics within the hilus. A key functional feature of the is its implementation of sparse coding, where s exhibit high activation thresholds, resulting in only a small fraction (typically 1-4%) firing in response to inputs, which helps orthogonalize similar patterns for enhanced discriminability. This sparse representation is thought to underlie pattern separation, a computational that reduces overlap between similar sensory inputs, such as distinguishing contexts that differ subtly in space or time, thereby supporting distinct engrams. Hilar , including basket cells that provide perisomatic inhibition and mossy cells that offer excitatory feedback, modulate activity to refine this sparsity and prevent overexcitation. Adult neurogenesis continuously replenishes the granule cell population in the subgranular zone of the dentate gyrus, with approximately 700 new neurons added daily in each human hippocampus, integrating into the existing circuit to potentially enhance plasticity and adaptability. These newborn granule cells initially exhibit heightened excitability before maturing to adopt the sparse firing properties of the resident population, contributing to the circuit's role in learning and memory formation.

Cornu Ammonis 3 (CA3)

The Cornu Ammonis 3 (CA3) region serves as a critical associative hub within the trisynaptic circuit of the hippocampus, characterized by its dense network of pyramidal neurons that integrate and process inputs from the via mossy fibers. These pyramidal cells, numbering approximately 200,000 to 330,000 per hippocampus in , feature large apical dendrites with specialized thorny excrescences that receive mossy fiber inputs on their proximal portions, facilitating strong excitatory drive. The basal dendrites of these neurons, in contrast, primarily accommodate recurrent collateral inputs from other CA3 cells, while the distal apical dendrites extend into the lacunosum-moleculare to receive direct perforant path projections from the . This dendritic architecture enables CA3 pyramidal cells to perform complex computations, with their somata concentrated in the pyramidale and axons forming extensive recurrent connections that span the region. A defining feature of CA3 is its recurrent collateral system, where axons of pyramidal cells form excitatory synapses onto the dendrites of neighboring pyramidal cells, creating an auto-associative network capable of pattern completion. This recurrent connectivity, with connection probabilities around 4-6% between pyramidal cells, allows partial or degraded input patterns to retrieve complete stored representations, a process essential for memory recall and . Theoretical and experimental models demonstrate that this network's high recurrent excitation supports the storage of thousands of memory patterns, with synaptic weights adjusted via Hebbian plasticity to enhance recall fidelity. The system's symmetry in bidirectional connectivity further enables efficient auto-association, distinguishing CA3 from upstream sparse-coding stages like the . Synaptic dynamics at mossy fiber-CA3 synapses exhibit a high initial vesicle release probability (approximately 0.2-0.4), which facilitates rapid short-term facilitation and supports the quick induction of (LTP) during high-frequency stimulation. This high release probability, coupled with multivesicular release from large boutons, ensures robust transmission of dentate gyrus signals into CA3, promoting associative integration while minimizing failure rates under physiological conditions. Such properties underlie CA3's role in rapid plasticity, where even brief bursts can trigger associative changes that propagate through the recurrent network. Place cells emerge prominently in CA3, where they encode spatial maps with greater overlap and complexity compared to the sparser representations in the , allowing for the integration of contextual and episodic information. These cells fire in multiple, distinct place fields that can remap independently across environments, reflecting CA3's capacity for orthogonal storage of spatial memories through its recurrent dynamics. Inhibitory networks in CA3, dominated by parvalbumin-expressing , provide precise perisomatic control, targeting the soma and proximal dendrites of pyramidal cells to regulate firing rates and synchronize population activity during rhythms. These fast-spiking , comprising about 10-15% of local cells, enforce sparse activity patterns and prevent runaway excitation in the recurrent network.

Cornu Ammonis 1 (CA1)

The Cornu Ammonis 1 (CA1) region serves as the primary output station of the trisynaptic circuit in the hippocampus, characterized by its distinct laminar architecture that enables segregated processing of convergent inputs. The stratum lacunosum-moleculare (SLM) occupies the outermost layer and receives direct excitatory inputs from layer III of the via the temporoammonic pathway, providing non-spatial contextual information. In contrast, the stratum radiatum, located below the layer, is the primary site for inputs originating from CA3 , which convey processed spatial and associative data from upstream circuit stages. This layered organization allows CA1 to integrate disparate signals in a spatially organized manner, with dendritic compartments in each stratum tuned to specific afferent sources. CA1 is predominantly composed of pyramidal neurons, numbering approximately 5 million in the human hippocampus, which feature prominent apical dendrites extending upward through the radiatum and branching tufts in the SLM to maximize input reception. These apical dendrites are smooth and lack the thorny excrescences characteristic of CA3 neurons, instead forming numerous spines that support synapses. synapses onto these dendrites in the radiatum exhibit particularly high susceptibility to (LTP), a form of Hebbian plasticity essential for strengthening connections following coincident activity, as demonstrated in foundational slice studies. This LTP induction typically requires activation and is a key mechanism for activity-dependent modifications in CA1 output. Through its integrative role, CA1 synthesizes temporal associations by combining sequential patterns from CA3 with contextual cues from the , supporting in behavioral tasks such as trace conditioning. The axons of CA1 pyramidal neurons converge in the alveus, a superficial bundle, before diverging to project heavily to the and layer V of the , thereby relaying processed hippocampal information back to neocortical circuits and facilitating . These projections form the gateway for hippocampal output to broader limbic and cortical networks. CA1 displays heightened vulnerability in neurodegenerative conditions, emerging as an early site of pathology in , where hyperphosphorylated aggregates preferentially accumulate in pyramidal somata and proximal dendrites. This disrupts synaptic function partly through alterations in subtypes, notably GluN2B-containing receptors at synapses, leading to and impaired LTP. Such selective degeneration in CA1 contributes to early deficits observed in the disease.

Connections and Associated Areas

Afferent Inputs

The trisynaptic circuit receives a direct monosynaptic input from layer III of the to the CA1 region, bypassing the and CA3, which provides an alternative pathway for cortical information to reach CA1 pyramidal cells and supports rapid temporal coding and spatial representation. This projection originates from glutamatergic neurons in both the lateral and medial , conveying non-spatial and spatial inputs, respectively, and is crucial for maintaining hippocampal output under conditions where the full trisynaptic loop may be less engaged. Lesions to this direct pathway impair performance, highlighting its functional independence from the classical trisynaptic route. Cholinergic afferents to the trisynaptic circuit arise primarily from the medial septum and diagonal band of Broca, releasing that modulates and network dynamics across the , , and CA regions. These inputs enhance attention-related gating by increasing the excitability of principal neurons and suppressing , thereby facilitating selective information processing during cognitive tasks. Septal neurons exhibit target selectivity, with projections densely innervating the hippocampus to regulate oscillations, which are essential for coordinating circuit activity in response to behavioral demands. Dopaminergic modulation of the trisynaptic circuit stems from the , with projections targeting the to influence activity and promote novelty detection. This input forms a functional loop with the hippocampus, where release signals environmental novelty, gating the entry of salient information into storage. Activation of D1/D5 receptors in the by these afferents strengthens for novel stimuli, enabling while weak or familiar inputs are filtered. Noradrenergic inputs from the project densely to the hippocampus, particularly the , where they enhance signal-to-noise ratios during stress by modulating neuronal excitability and synaptic transmission. Norepinephrine release under stress conditions activates β-adrenergic receptors, sharpening hippocampal responses to relevant stimuli and suppressing irrelevant noise, which supports adaptive behavioral adjustments. This modulation is phasic during acute stress, transiently boosting circuit gain to prioritize threat-related processing. Serotonergic projections from the , including both dorsal and median raphe, innervate the trisynaptic circuit to regulate mood-related activity, with fibers targeting CA1 and other hippocampal subfields to influence emotional . These inputs fine-tune excitatory transmission and oscillatory patterns, promoting resilience to mood perturbations by modulating serotonin receptor-mediated inhibition in principal neurons. Dorsal raphe serotonin neurons projecting to CA1 are particularly involved in anxiety-like behaviors, where their suppresses excessive responses through circuit-wide dampening.

Efferent Outputs

The efferent outputs of the trisynaptic circuit primarily originate from the CA1 region and the , serving to relay processed information to downstream targets in subcortical and cortical structures. Pyramidal neurons in CA1 project their axons through the alveus, a layer of on the ventricular surface, to the , which acts as a key gateway for further dissemination. From the , these projections continue via the postcommissural fornix, a major fiber bundle arching around the , to reach the mammillary bodies and anterior thalamic nuclei. Specifically, the medial mammillary nucleus receives light but direct input from ventral CA1 via this route, while projections to the paraventricular and interanteromedial nuclei of the anterior are similarly sparse but contribute to diencephalic relay. In primates, such as macaque monkeys, these subicular efferents to the medial mammillary nucleus are denser from caudal portions and travel exclusively through the fornix, with minimal direct contributions from CA1 itself. Layer V pyramidal cells in the provide additional efferent feedback, projecting to and association cortices to facilitate reciprocal loops with neocortical areas. These projections target the prelimbic region of the medial , originating from distinct subregions of layers V and VI, and support the integration of hippocampal outputs with higher-order cognitive processing. In , entorhinal layer V efferents to the medial exhibit topographic organization, with superficial neurons receiving stronger input from the medial to close memory-related circuits. A subset of CA1 pyramidal neurons, particularly in the ventral hippocampus, sends direct projections to the lateral , providing an additional outflow pathway for tagging information with emotional valence. These axons form unilateral connections, influencing septal neurons and contributing to the modulation of social and anxiety-related behaviors. Topographically, approximately 80% of the total hippocampal output is channeled through the CA1-subiculum pathway, emphasizing its dominance in efferent signaling over direct CA1 projections to other sites. This route ensures efficient distribution to limbic and diencephalic targets, with dorsal CA1-subiculum fibers favoring anterior thalamic relays and ventral portions targeting mammillary regions. The axons in the fornix, including those from CA1-subiculum projections, are partially myelinated, enabling rapid conduction velocities essential for timely information relay across distant brain regions. Myelination in the fornix begins with large axons from the hippocampus and , forming a compact tract that supports the circuit's efficiency.

Integration with Limbic Structures

The trisynaptic circuit integrates with the basolateral amygdala (BLA) through reciprocal connections with the , enabling the incorporation of emotional information into hippocampal processing. The BLA sends direct projections to the medial , which serves as a gateway for amygdala influences on , particularly in contextual where BLA activity modulates the encoding of -associated spatial contexts. These projections facilitate the integration of aversive stimuli with hippocampal representations, as evidenced by optogenetic inhibition of BLA-entorhinal pathways impairing memory formation without affecting non-emotional spatial learning. Reciprocal inputs from the to the BLA further support bidirectional emotional modulation of trisynaptic activity, allowing signals to refine hippocampal output during detection. The (ACC) connects to the trisynaptic circuit indirectly via the medial septal pathway, contributing to conflict monitoring and motivational regulation of memory processing. ACC projections to the medial provide modulation that influences hippocampal oscillations, enhancing to emotionally salient conflicts during tasks. This pathway allows the ACC to gate trisynaptic inputs for , as disruptions in ACC-medial interactions impair error detection and linked to hippocampal-dependent learning. Outputs from the cingulate gyrus to entorhinal regions via diencephalic relays further integrate cognitive control over limbic-driven responses in the trisynaptic loop. The mammillary bodies form a critical diencephalic relay in the trisynaptic circuit through the mammillary-thalamus-fornix loop, supporting consolidation. Hippocampal projections via the fornix terminate in the mammillary bodies, which in turn excite the anterior thalamic nuclei, relaying back to the cingulate and entorhinal cortices to reinforce episodic-spatial representations. Lesions in this loop disrupt consolidation of spatial memories, highlighting its role in stabilizing trisynaptic outputs for long-term storage without altering initial encoding. This circuit integrates limbic feedback to prioritize motivationally relevant spatial contexts, as seen in tasks requiring under emotional duress. Hypothalamic links to the trisynaptic circuit occur primarily via the mammillary bodies, coupling hippocampal activity with autonomic responses for survival-oriented memory. The , an extension of the , projects directly to the and CA fields, modulating stress-induced plasticity in response to autonomic . These connections enable hypothalamic regulation of hippocampal excitability during , linking emotional states to physiological adjustments like tied to memory retrieval. Functionally, these limbic integrations assign emotional valence to spatial and episodic memories processed by the trisynaptic circuit, enhancing adaptive encoding. Amygdala-entorhinal interactions imbue contextual memories with or reward salience, while mammillary-hypothalamic relays consolidate motivationally driven spatial maps. Cingulate modulation via septal pathways ensures conflict-sensitive prioritization, allowing the circuit to differentiate neutral from emotionally charged experiences for behavioral flexibility.

Physiological Functions

Role in Memory and Learning

The trisynaptic circuit in the hippocampus plays a pivotal role in formation and learning by enabling the orthogonalization, storage, and retrieval of episodic and spatial memories through specialized processing at each stage. In the , pattern separation transforms similar input representations from the into distinct neural patterns, minimizing interference between overlapping experiences and facilitating the encoding of unique memory traces. This process is crucial for distinguishing subtle contextual differences, such as slight variations in spatial environments during tasks. Subsequent transmission to CA3 supports pattern completion, where partial or degraded cues can reconstruct full memory representations via recurrent collaterals, allowing rapid of complete episodes from fragmentary reminders. Finally, CA1 integrates these signals for consolidation and output to cortical areas, refining traces for long-term storage and behavioral expression. A key mechanism underlying these functions is (LTP), a form of that strengthens connections across the circuit. High-frequency stimulation of Schaffer collaterals (from CA3 to CA1) induces LTP, resulting in synaptic strengthening exceeding 200% of baseline efficacy, which persists for hours and models the cellular basis of memory engrams. This Hebbian learning principle—"cells that fire together wire together"—operates across the three synapses, promoting associative strengthening when correlated activity occurs, as seen in the co-activation of entorhinal inputs with dentate outputs or CA3 patterns with CA1 responses. Such plasticity ensures that repeated exposure to stimuli refines memory precision without overwriting prior traces. In spatial navigation, the circuit supports path integration through sequential activation of place and grid cells along the pathway. Entorhinal grid cells provide metric spatial scaling, which the refines via sparse coding, enabling CA3 and CA1 place cells to form stable representations of locations and trajectories for efficient . For , the trisynaptic circuit serves as a primary engram storage site, where experience-specific neuronal ensembles form during encoding and replay during to consolidate traces, bridging immediate learning with remote . This replay mechanism, supported by the core pathway's connectivity, reinforces stability without delving into oscillatory details.

Rhythm Generation and Synchronization

The trisynaptic circuit in the hippocampus generates distinct neural oscillations that coordinate activity across the , , CA3, and CA1 regions. rhythms, oscillating at 4-12 Hz, are primarily paced by rhythmic inputs from the , which synchronize hippocampal neurons through and projections. These inputs entrain pyramidal cells and , producing large-amplitude field potentials that facilitate temporal organization of neural firing. In the and CA3, rhythms support phase precession, where place cells fire at progressively earlier phases of the cycle as an animal traverses its place field, enabling the encoding of spatial sequences. Dentate inputs are particularly crucial for this precession in CA3, sharpening spike timing and promoting sequential activation during . Direct projections from layer III to CA1 distal dendrites further modulate phase precession and sequences (6-10 Hz during active states), providing supervisory signals for learning and representational updates independent of the trisynaptic path. Gamma oscillations, ranging from 30-100 Hz, emerge intrinsically within the trisynaptic circuit through networks of fast-spiking interneurons, such as parvalbumin-positive basket cells. These interneurons generate rhythmic inhibition via reciprocal synaptic connections, with slow decay kinetics of GABA_A receptors allowing population synchrony at gamma frequencies. This interneuron-driven rhythm imposes periodic inhibition on pyramidal cells across the dentate gyrus, CA3, and CA1, synchronizing their discharges and enhancing signal coherence along the circuit. Optimal synchronization occurs around 40 Hz, requiring modest network heterogeneity and sufficient synaptic contacts per interneuron. Sharp wave-ripples (SWRs), high-frequency oscillations at 150-250 Hz, arise from coordinated bursts in CA3 that propagate to CA1, forming transient population events lasting approximately 100-200 ms. These ripples, consisting of 3-9 fast waves per event, are generated by recurrent excitation in CA3 pyramidal networks interacting with perisomatic , producing synchronous discharges that replay spatial sequences. SWRs occur prominently during rest or , serving as a mechanism for by reactivating experience-related patterns in compressed time. Cross-frequency coupling within the trisynaptic circuit integrates and gamma rhythms, with phase modulating gamma amplitude to enable information multiplexing. This -gamma coupling peaks during active behaviors like locomotion, allowing nested gamma cycles to carry distinct computational signals within each phase, such as input-specific patterns in CA1. harmonics up to 40 Hz further strengthen this coupling, coordinating activity across hippocampal subregions without strong reliance on gamma for inter-regional synchrony. Rhythm generation in the trisynaptic circuit is further supported by intrinsic cellular mechanisms, including gap junctions between interneuron dendrites that enhance gamma synchrony over distances up to 1 mm. These electrical synapses, with conductances of 0.5-1.5 nS, overcome conduction delays and heterogeneities, promoting coherent oscillations across distributed networks. In pyramidal cells, potassium-mediated M-currents (I_M) contribute to theta-frequency at depolarized potentials around -60 mV, amplifying subthreshold oscillations and facilitating entrainment to septal pacing. Together, these mechanisms ensure robust synchronization intrinsic to the circuit, with medial septal modulation providing extrinsic timing as detailed in afferent inputs.

Interactions with Other Systems

The trisynaptic circuit in the hippocampus interacts with non-limbic systems to integrate sensory, motor, and autonomic signals, enabling adaptive behaviors beyond core processing. Respiratory represents a key modulatory influence, where hippocampal oscillations (typically 4-12 Hz) become entrained to breathing cycles through inputs from the , facilitating the temporal alignment of olfactory stimuli with encoding. This entrainment supports odor-memory associations by synchronizing neural activity across olfactory and hippocampal networks during active sniffing, as observed in models where respiration-driven rhythms in the hippocampus interact bidirectionally with olfactory bulb oscillations to enhance for -guided . Sensorimotor integration occurs via projections from the parietal association cortex to the , which updates visuo-spatial representations within the trisynaptic circuit to align with ongoing body movements and environmental changes. These inputs, primarily targeting the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC), incorporate multisensory spatial information from visual and somatosensory modalities, allowing the circuit to refine and activity for precise navigation. In , this pathway supports the transformation of allocentric spatial maps into egocentric coordinates, essential for sensorimotor coordination during exploration. Autonomic feedback from the vagus nerve modulates the excitability of the trisynaptic circuit, particularly during stress, through noradrenergic pathways originating from the locus coeruleus that project to hippocampal regions. Vagal stimulation enhances neurotransmitter release, including norepinephrine, which alters synaptic plasticity and circuit dynamics in CA1 and dentate gyrus, thereby influencing arousal states and adaptive responses to environmental stressors. This interaction helps regulate hippocampal activity under physiological stress, preventing maladaptive overexcitation while promoting resilience in sensory-motor tasks. Outputs from CA1 to the bridge spatial learning with habit formation, channeling hippocampal representations into circuits for the consolidation of action sequences. These projections, primarily to the ventral and , integrate declarative spatial knowledge with procedural , enabling the transition from goal-directed behaviors to efficient habits in complex environments. In learning paradigms, this hippocampal-striatal axis facilitates value-based decision-making by updating reward predictions with spatial context. Cross-system specificity is evident in the phase-locking of hippocampal (4-12 Hz) to sniffing-respiration cycles, particularly in where respiration-entrained oscillations synchronize with olfactory bulb-driven rhythms during discrimination tasks. This coupling, observed during active exploration, ensures precise timing between respiratory phases and neural firing, optimizing sensory sampling and memory retrieval without relying on intrinsic hippocampal rhythms alone.

Clinical and Pathophysiological Relevance

Involvement in Epilepsy

The trisynaptic circuit in the hippocampus plays a central role in the of (TLE), where disruptions lead to hyperexcitability and seizure propagation. In TLE, approximately 70% of cases involve , characterized by neuronal loss and that preferentially affect the trisynaptic pathway, including the , CA3, and CA1 regions. This sclerosis disrupts the balance between excitation and inhibition, facilitating recurrent seizures originating in the . A key mechanism of hyperexcitability is mossy fiber sprouting, where axons in the form aberrant excitatory synapses onto CA3 pyramidal cells and neighboring s following injury or prolonged seizures. This sprouting creates recurrent excitatory loops within the trisynaptic circuit, acting as "spark plugs" that ignite synchronized neuronal firing and contribute to epileptogenesis. In post-injury states, such as after , these sprouted mossy fibers enhance synaptic efficacy in CA3, bypassing normal dentate gating and amplifying perforant path inputs. Seizure propagation in the trisynaptic circuit is exemplified by the entorhinal-dentate kindling model, where repeated stimulation of the progressively lowers the , leading to discharges that spread via the perforant path to the and ignite hyperexcitable CA3 networks as a primary site of initiation. In this model, CA3 back-projections reinforce entorhinal activity, sustaining limbic characteristic of TLE. The kindling process mimics chronic by inducing long-term plasticity changes that favor excitation over inhibition in the circuit. Animal models, such as pilocarpine-induced in , replicate these disruptions by causing widespread neuronal hyperexcitability that imbalances the trisynaptic circuit, resulting in mossy fiber sprouting and reduced in the . In pilocarpine-treated animals, the model induces chronic with spontaneous seizures, highlighting how initial overactivation leads to persistent alterations in CA3 synaptic transmission and circuit-wide synchronization. These changes underscore the circuit's vulnerability to acute insults that precipitate enduring epileptogenic states. Diagnostic markers of trisynaptic involvement in include EEG patterns showing reduced dentate inhibition, manifested as diminished evoked potentials following perforant path stimulation, and enhanced excitability along the entorhinal-dentate pathway, often appearing as interictal spikes or rhythmic theta-like activity in TLE patients. High-frequency oscillations in EEG recordings from the hippocampus further indicate dentate hyperexcitability, correlating with onset zones in the circuit. These electrophysiological signatures aid in identifying circuit dysfunction non-invasively.

Implications in Neurodegenerative Diseases

The trisynaptic circuit in the hippocampus exhibits particular vulnerability in (AD), a primary neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive cognitive decline. Early pathological changes often begin in the , where layer II neurons are among the first to accumulate tangles, initiating degeneration of the perforant path that provides critical input to the . This selective neuronal loss disrupts the circuit's foundational connectivity, contributing to the initial breakdown of memory processing pathways. In parallel, amyloid-beta accumulation in the synaptic cleft interferes with (LTP) at synapses between CA3 and CA1 regions, thereby impairing synaptic strengthening essential for . Such disruptions manifest as early deficits in , underscoring the circuit's role in AD pathogenesis. As AD advances, significant neuronal attrition occurs in the CA1 subfield, with studies reporting up to 46-50% reduction in pyramidal neuron numbers even in stages preceding full . This loss correlates with the system, where tau pathology invades the trisynaptic circuit from stages I-II onward, starting in the and transentorhinal regions before spreading to hippocampal layers. These early-stage changes are tightly linked to emerging impairments, as tau burden in entorhinal-hippocampal projections predicts declines in and recognition tasks. The progressive atrophy along the circuit's trisynaptic pathway thus serves as a neuropathological hallmark, distinguishing AD from normal aging. Structural imaging further highlights the circuit's degeneration, with (MRI) volumetry revealing 20-30% hippocampal shrinkage in early , attributable to in key trisynaptic components like the and CA1. This volume loss reflects underlying synaptic and neuronal depletion within the circuit, providing a quantifiable for disease progression and cognitive correlates. Overall, these alterations emphasize the trisynaptic circuit's susceptibility to proteinopathies in , driving the selective impairment of memory functions central to daily cognition.

Therapeutic Targeting

Antiepileptic drugs such as modulate the trisynaptic circuit by targeting mossy fiber hyperexcitability through voltage-gated blockade, thereby stabilizing neuronal firing in the dentate gyrus-CA3 pathway during epileptic activity. This mechanism reduces aberrant synchronization and seizure propagation in hippocampal networks, as demonstrated in models of where inhibits sharp wave-ripple complexes associated with mossy fiber reorganization. Clinical use of in patients with hippocampal further supports its role in dampening trisynaptic hyperexcitability, though resistance can develop in chronic cases due to altered channel expression. In therapies, anti-amyloid antibodies such as (Leqembi) and (Kisunla) aim to preserve perforant path integrity within the trisynaptic circuit by promoting amyloid-beta plaque clearance in the entorhinal-hippocampal region. , approved by the FDA in 2023, and donanemab, approved in 2024, bind aggregated amyloid forms, facilitating microglial-mediated removal and reducing early synaptic disruption along the perforant path, which is vulnerable to amyloid accumulation. This preservation supports dentate function and downstream trisynaptic signaling, potentially slowing memory decline in mild cases. Deep brain stimulation via fornix electrodes enhances theta rhythms in the trisynaptic circuit to restore memory processes in associated with . Phase II trials have shown that chronic fornix stimulation increases theta-band power, correlating with improved verbal memory recall and hippocampal activation in patients. Theta-burst protocols specifically amplify entorhinal-hippocampal oscillations, promoting across the circuit without significant adverse effects. Optogenetic approaches in animal models target the trisynaptic circuit by silencing CA3 to prevent propagation. Using archaerhodopsin for hyperpolarization, inhibition of CA3 activity disrupts recurrent excitation, attenuating kainic acid-induced and reducing ictal discharge duration in hippocampal slices. This selective silencing restores balanced inhibition-excitation dynamics, offering a precise tool for circuit-specific control in preclinical research. Future prospects include gene editing technologies like / for , which hold potential for addressing genetic factors contributing to neurodegeneration in the trisynaptic circuit.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/perforant-pathway
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4422028/
  3. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hipo.70046
  4. https://openbooks.lib.msu.edu/introneuroscience1/chapter/molecular-mechanisms-of-memory-hippocampus/
  5. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2015.00160/full
  6. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00424-006-0093-2
  7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/schaffer-collateral-pathway
  8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3446225/
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4706817/
  10. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-73547-6
  11. https://people.sissa.it/~ale/EvolNeurComp/2022/KunzeTreves_LM_chapter_2024.pdf
  12. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hipo.22038
  13. https://nba.uth.tmc.edu/neuroscience/m/s4/chapter05.html
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10026515/
  15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2492885/
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5050062/
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3836574/
  18. https://jnnp.bmj.com/content/66/3/330
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3717221/
  20. https://archive.org/details/histologiedusyst01ram
  21. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1935-01111-001
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4253658/
  23. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cne.901100308
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2570652/
  25. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13212425/
  26. https://www.sfn.org/-/media/SfN/Documents/TheHistoryofNeuroscience/Volume-4/c1.pdf
  27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627316309576
  28. https://www.jneurosci.org/content/41/8/1665
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12424771/
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5488372/
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3866456/
  32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959438814002086
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7047217/
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6578866/
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4416067/
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/dentate-gyrus
  37. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.94.23.12676
  38. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fncel.2013.00210/full
  39. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27764589/
  40. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/systems-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00042/full
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5993616/
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6035081/
  43. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3567627/
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10861929/
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3718552/
  46. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3691555/
  47. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2312281120
  48. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms11552
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3912358/
  50. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.93.23.13304
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6773116/
  52. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-23260-3
  53. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1421056111
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4929320/
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627307007106
  56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3775914/
  57. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096999612500378X
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4561404/
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8933866/
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9468059/
  61. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4917574/
  62. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1448791/full
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6772564/
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089662730701029X
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3726829/
  66. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/systems-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2017.00067/full
  67. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1716531115
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627305003971
  69. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6352318/
  70. https://www.jneurosci.org/content/26/29/7723
  71. https://www.cell.com/neuron/fulltext/S0896-6273%2821%2900332-9
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10937036/
  73. https://www.jneurosci.org/content/37/48/11605
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11267773/
  75. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/26/3/1234
  76. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-35346-7
  77. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-27977-7
  78. https://www.eneuro.org/content/8/6/ENEURO.0315-21.2021
  79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10960288/
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1571536/
  81. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7231447/
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5852655/
  83. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29431646/
  84. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10911886/
  85. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8297467/
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5106245/
  87. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5608081/
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2936113/
  89. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393223002622
  90. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3298821/
  91. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4498492/
  92. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5671506/
  93. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5406700/
  94. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1135801
  95. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627313010854
  96. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301008224000728
  97. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7970048/
  98. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-54943-2
  99. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-61453-2
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6578902/
  101. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4648295/
  102. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222017291
  103. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6763900/
  104. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2290731/
  105. https://www.jneurosci.org/content/36/1/162
  106. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/jn.00200.2019
  107. https://elifesciences.org/articles/79545
  108. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11096324/
  109. https://www.cell.com/cell-reports/fulltext/S2211-1247%2824%2901164-1
  110. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hipo.23145
  111. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10342206/
  112. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00044/full
  113. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13311-015-0417-z
  114. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/behavioral-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00079/full
  115. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016622361100124X
  116. https://www.cell.com/cell-reports/fulltext/S2211-1247%2822%2901231-1
  117. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4758648/
  118. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-87562-8
  119. https://www.jneurosci.org/content/33/19/8250
  120. https://academic.oup.com/brain/article-abstract/122/6/1007/387859
  121. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554432/
  122. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6891178/
  123. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK98174/
  124. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6573610/
  125. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/jn.2000.83.3.1115
  126. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6736326/
  127. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep42090
  128. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK98207/
  129. https://www.jneurosci.org/content/41/46/9669
  130. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4034155/
  131. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9877178/
  132. https://www.jneurosci.org/content/32/48/17401
  133. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/780350
  134. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5777108/
  135. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2274580724000888
  136. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197458097000018
  137. https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.12009
  138. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23566163/
  139. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8232098/
  140. https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/129/12/3290/266209
  141. https://www.alz.org/alzheimers-dementia/treatments/lecanemab-leqembi
  142. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-treatment-adults-alzheimers-disease
  143. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2212948
  144. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2309381
  145. https://alzres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13195-021-00809-4
  146. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26106097/
  147. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/aging-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2022.809972/full
  148. https://www.eneuro.org/content/early/2016/02/10/ENEURO.0003-16.2016/tab-article-info?versioned=true
  149. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969996123002498
  150. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4259846/
  151. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9481950/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.