Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Unstructured data
View on Wikipedia
Unstructured data (or unstructured information) is information that either does not have a pre-defined data model or is not organized in a pre-defined manner. Unstructured information is typically text-heavy, but may contain data such as dates, numbers, and facts as well. This results in irregularities and ambiguities that make it difficult to understand using traditional programs as compared to data stored in fielded form in databases or annotated (semantically tagged) in documents.
In 1998, Merrill Lynch said "unstructured data comprises the vast majority of data found in an organization, some estimates run as high as 80%."[1] It is unclear what the source of this number is, but nonetheless it is accepted by some.[2] Other sources have reported similar or higher percentages of unstructured data.[3][4][5]
As of 2012[update], IDC and Dell EMC project that data will grow to 40 zettabytes by 2020, resulting in a 50-fold growth from the beginning of 2010.[6] More recently, IDC and Seagate predict that the global datasphere will grow to 163 zettabytes by 2025 [7] and majority of that will be unstructured. The Computer World magazine states that unstructured information might account for more than 70–80% of all data in organizations.[1]
Background
[edit]The earliest research into business intelligence focused in on unstructured textual data, rather than numerical data.[8] As early as 1958, computer science researchers like H.P. Luhn were particularly concerned with the extraction and classification of unstructured text.[8] However, only since the turn of the century has the technology caught up with the research interest. In 2004, the SAS Institute developed the SAS Text Miner, which uses Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to reduce a hyper-dimensional textual space into smaller dimensions for significantly more efficient machine-analysis.[9] The mathematical and technological advances sparked by machine textual analysis prompted a number of businesses to research applications, leading to the development of fields like sentiment analysis, voice of the customer mining, and call center optimization.[10] The emergence of Big Data in the late 2000s led to a heightened interest in the applications of unstructured data analytics in contemporary fields such as predictive analytics and root cause analysis.[11]
Issues with terminology
[edit]The term is imprecise for several reasons:
- Structure, while not formally defined, can still be implied.
- Data with some form of structure may still be characterized as unstructured if its structure is not helpful for the processing task at hand.
- Unstructured information might have some structure (semi-structured) or even be highly structured but in ways that are unanticipated or unannounced.
Dealing with unstructured data
[edit]Techniques such as data mining, natural language processing (NLP), and text analytics provide different methods to find patterns in, or otherwise interpret, this information. Common techniques for structuring text usually involve manual tagging with metadata or part-of-speech tagging for further text mining-based structuring. The Unstructured Information Management Architecture (UIMA) standard provided a common framework for processing this information to extract meaning and create structured data about the information.
Software that creates machine-processable structure can utilize the linguistic, auditory, and visual structure that exist in all forms of human communication.[12] Algorithms can infer this inherent structure from text, for instance, by examining word morphology, sentence syntax, and other small- and large-scale patterns. Unstructured information can then be enriched and tagged to address ambiguities and relevancy-based techniques then used to facilitate search and discovery. Examples of "unstructured data" may include books, journals, documents, metadata, health records, audio, video, analog data, images, files, and unstructured text such as the body of an e-mail message, Web page, or word-processor document. While the main content being conveyed does not have a defined structure, it generally comes packaged in objects (e.g. in files or documents, ...) that themselves have structure and are thus a mix of structured and unstructured data, but collectively this is still referred to as "unstructured data".[13] For example, an HTML web page is tagged, but HTML mark-up typically serves solely for rendering. It does not capture the meaning or function of tagged elements in ways that support automated processing of the information content of the page. XHTML tagging does allow machine processing of elements, although it typically does not capture or convey the semantic meaning of tagged terms.
Since unstructured data commonly occurs in electronic documents, the use of a content or document management system which can categorize entire documents is often preferred over data transfer and manipulation from within the documents. Document management thus provides the means to convey structure onto document collections.
Search engines have become popular tools for indexing and searching through such data, especially text.
Approaches in natural language processing
[edit]Specific computational workflows have been developed to impose structure upon the unstructured data contained within text documents. These workflows are generally designed to handle sets of thousands or even millions of documents, or far more than manual approaches to annotation may permit. Several of these approaches are based upon the concept of online analytical processing, or OLAP, and may be supported by data models such as text cubes.[14] Once document metadata is available through a data model, generating summaries of subsets of documents (i.e., cells within a text cube) may be performed with phrase-based approaches.[15]
Approaches in medicine and biomedical research
[edit]Biomedical research generates one major source of unstructured data as researchers often publish their findings in scholarly journals. Though the language in these documents is challenging to derive structural elements from (e.g., due to the complicated technical vocabulary contained within and the domain knowledge required to fully contextualize observations), the results of these activities may yield links between technical and medical studies[16] and clues regarding new disease therapies.[17] Recent efforts to enforce structure upon biomedical documents include self-organizing map approaches for identifying topics among documents,[18] general-purpose unsupervised algorithms,[19] and an application of the CaseOLAP workflow[15] to determine associations between protein names and cardiovascular disease topics in the literature.[20] CaseOLAP defines phrase-category relationships in an accurate (identifies relationships), consistent (highly reproducible), and efficient manner. This platform offers enhanced accessibility and empowers the biomedical community with phrase-mining tools for widespread biomedical research applications.[20]
The use of "unstructured" in data privacy regulations
[edit]In Sweden (EU), pre 2018, some data privacy regulations did not apply if the data in question was confirmed as "unstructured".[21] This terminology, unstructured data, is rarely used in the EU after GDPR came into force in 2018. GDPR does neither mention nor define "unstructured data". It does use the word "structured" as follows (without defining it);
- Parts of GDPR Recital 15, "The protection of natural persons should apply to the processing of personal data ... if ... contained in a filing system."
- GDPR Article 4, "'filing system' means any structured set of personal data which are accessible according to specific criteria ..."
GDPR Case-law on what defines a "filing system"; "the specific criterion and the specific form in which the set of personal data collected by each of the members who engage in preaching is actually structured is irrelevant, so long as that set of data makes it possible for the data relating to a specific person who has been contacted to be easily retrieved, which is however for the referring court to ascertain in the light of all the circumstances of the case in the main proceedings." (CJEU, Todistajat v. Tietosuojavaltuutettu, Jehovan, Paragraph 61).
If personal data is easily retrieved - then it is a filing system and - then it is in scope for GDPR regardless of being "structured" or "unstructured". Most electronic systems today,[as of?] subject to access and applied software, can allow for easy retrieval of data.
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Today's Challenge in Government: What to do with Unstructured Information and Why Doing Nothing Isn't An Option, Noel Yuhanna, Principal Analyst, Forrester Research, Nov 2010
References
[edit]- ^ Shilakes, Christopher C.; Tylman, Julie (16 Nov 1998). "Enterprise Information Portals" (PDF). Merrill Lynch. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 July 2011.
- ^ Grimes, Seth (1 August 2008). "Unstructured Data and the 80 Percent Rule". Breakthrough Analysis - Bridgepoints. Clarabridge. Archived from the original on 12 September 2014. Retrieved 16 September 2014.
- ^ Gandomi, Amir; Haider, Murtaza (April 2015). "Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics". International Journal of Information Management. 35 (2): 137–144. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.007. ISSN 0268-4012.
- ^ "The biggest data challenges that you might not even know you have - Watson". Watson. 2016-05-25. Retrieved 2018-10-02.
- ^ "Structured vs. Unstructured Data". www.datamation.com. Retrieved 2018-10-02.
- ^ "EMC News Press Release: New Digital Universe Study Reveals Big Data Gap: Less Than 1% of World's Data is Analyzed; Less Than 20% is Protected". www.emc.com. EMC Corporation. December 2012.
- ^ "Trends | Seagate US". Seagate.com. Retrieved 2018-10-01.
- ^ a b Grimes, Seth. "A Brief History of Text Analytics". B Eye Network. Retrieved June 24, 2016.
- ^ Albright, Russ. "Taming Text with the SVD" (PDF). SAS. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-09-30. Retrieved June 24, 2016.
- ^ Desai, Manish (2009-08-09). "Applications of Text Analytics". My Business Analytics @ Blogspot. Retrieved June 24, 2016.
- ^ Chakraborty, Goutam. "Analysis of Unstructured Data: Applications of Text Analytics and Sentiment Mining" (PDF). SAS. Retrieved June 24, 2016.
- ^ "Structure, Models and Meaning: Is "unstructured" data merely unmodeled?". InformationWeek. March 1, 2005.
- ^ Malone, Robert (April 5, 2007). "Structuring Unstructured Data". Forbes.
- ^ Lin, Cindy Xide; Ding, Bolin; Han, Jiawei; Zhu, Feida; Zhao, Bo (December 2008). "Text Cube: Computing IR Measures for Multidimensional Text Database Analysis". 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE. pp. 905–910. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.215.3177. doi:10.1109/icdm.2008.135. ISBN 978-0-7695-3502-9. S2CID 1522480.
- ^ a b Tao, Fangbo; Zhuang, Honglei; Yu, Chi Wang; Wang, Qi; Cassidy, Taylor; Kaplan, Lance; Voss, Clare; Han, Jiawei (2016). "Multi-Dimensional, Phrase-Based Summarization in Text Cubes" (PDF).
- ^ Collier, Nigel; Nazarenko, Adeline; Baud, Robert; Ruch, Patrick (June 2006). "Recent advances in natural language processing for biomedical applications". International Journal of Medical Informatics. 75 (6): 413–417. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.06.008. ISSN 1386-5056. PMID 16139564. S2CID 31449783.
- ^ Gonzalez, Graciela H.; Tahsin, Tasnia; Goodale, Britton C.; Greene, Anna C.; Greene, Casey S. (January 2016). "Recent Advances and Emerging Applications in Text and Data Mining for Biomedical Discovery". Briefings in Bioinformatics. 17 (1): 33–42. doi:10.1093/bib/bbv087. ISSN 1477-4054. PMC 4719073. PMID 26420781.
- ^ Skupin, André; Biberstine, Joseph R.; Börner, Katy (2013). "Visualizing the topical structure of the medical sciences: a self-organizing map approach". PLOS ONE. 8 (3) e58779. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...858779S. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058779. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3595294. PMID 23554924.
- ^ Kiela, Douwe; Guo, Yufan; Stenius, Ulla; Korhonen, Anna (2015-04-01). "Unsupervised discovery of information structure in biomedical documents". Bioinformatics. 31 (7): 1084–1092. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu758. ISSN 1367-4811. PMID 25411329.
- ^ a b Liem, David A.; Murali, Sanjana; Sigdel, Dibakar; Shi, Yu; Wang, Xuan; Shen, Jiaming; Choi, Howard; Caufield, John H.; Wang, Wei; Ping, Peipei; Han, Jiawei (Oct 1, 2018). "Phrase mining of textual data to analyze extracellular matrix protein patterns across cardiovascular disease". American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 315 (4): H910–H924. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00175.2018. ISSN 1522-1539. PMC 6230912. PMID 29775406.
- ^ "Swedish data privacy regulations discontinue separation of "unstructured" and "structured"".
External links
[edit]Unstructured data
View on GrokipediaFundamentals
Definition and Characteristics
Unstructured data refers to information that lacks a predefined data model, schema, or organizational structure, rendering it incompatible with traditional relational database management systems designed for tabular formats.[3] [8] This type of data typically includes multimedia content such as text documents, images, audio recordings, video files, and web pages, which do not adhere to fixed fields or rows.[9] [10] Its primary characteristics encompass heterogeneity in format and content, where data elements vary widely without consistent metadata or tagging, complicating automated parsing and integration.[1] Unstructured data often manifests in massive volumes—frequently reaching terabytes or petabytes per dataset—and grows at accelerated rates, with enterprise unstructured data expanding 55% to 65% annually.[3] [11] It constitutes the predominant share of organizational information, accounting for 80% to 90% of total enterprise data, including over 73,000 exabytes generated globally in 2023.[12] [13] Unlike structured data, it imposes no uniform limits on field sizes or character constraints, enabling richer but less predictable content representation.[10] In the context of big data analytics, unstructured data exemplifies the "variety" dimension, arising from diverse sources like sensors, social media, and human-generated inputs, while contributing to elevated "volume" and processing "velocity" demands.[14]Distinction from Structured and Semi-Structured Data
Structured data conforms to a predefined schema, typically organized into rows and columns within relational databases, enabling straightforward querying via languages like SQL.[1] This rigid format facilitates efficient storage, retrieval, and analysis, as each data element adheres to fixed fields such as integers for quantities or strings for identifiers. For example, in accounting data analytics, financial statements are a classic instance of structured data, organized in tables with predefined fields like numbers and categories.[1] In contrast, unstructured data lacks such a schema, presenting information in formats without inherent organization, such as free-form text documents, multimedia files, or raw sensor outputs, which resist direct tabular mapping and require specialized processing to extract value. For instance, product reviews are an example of unstructured data, consisting of free-form text without a fixed format.[3] Semi-structured data occupies an intermediate position, incorporating metadata like tags or markers (e.g., in JSON or XML formats) that impose partial organization without enforcing a strict schema.[1] This allows for self-description and flexibility, as seen in email headers or log files, where key-value pairs enable parsing but permit variability in content structure.[15] Unlike unstructured data, semi-structured forms support easier ingestion into analytical tools through schema-on-read approaches, yet they diverge from structured data by avoiding mandatory relational constraints, complicating joins across diverse sources.[16] These distinctions underpin fundamental differences in handling: structured data integrates seamlessly with traditional databases for transactional processing, semi-structured data benefits from NoSQL systems for scalable ingestion, and unstructured data demands advanced techniques like natural language processing or computer vision to impose retroactive structure.[14] The absence of inherent organization in unstructured data amplifies storage and computational demands, as it cannot leverage the efficiency of indexed queries inherent to structured formats.[17]Examples and Prevalence
Common examples of unstructured data include textual content such as emails, word processing documents, PDFs, product reviews, and social media posts; multimedia files like images, videos, and audio recordings; and other formats such as web pages, sensor outputs, surveillance footage, and geospatial data.[18][19] These forms lack predefined schemas or tabular organization, making them resistant to traditional relational database storage.[12] In contexts such as accounting data analytics, financial statements exemplify structured data, organized in tables with predefined fields like numbers and categories, while product reviews exemplify unstructured data, consisting of free-form text without a fixed format.[20] Unstructured data predominates in modern datasets, comprising 80% to 90% of enterprise information volumes as of 2024.[12][21][22] According to Gartner estimates cited in industry analyses, approximately 80% of enterprise data remains unstructured, often residing in documents, emails, and customer interactions.[21] An IDC report from September 2024 specifies that 90% of enterprise data falls into this category, including contracts, presentations, and images.[22] This volume grows at 55-65% annually, outpacing structured data and amplifying storage demands, with nearly 50% of enterprises managing over 5 petabytes of it as of 2024.[23][24][25]Historical Context
Emergence in the Digital Era
The digitization of information in the mid-20th century initially emphasized structured data in databases and early computing systems, but unstructured digital data emerged prominently with applications enabling free-form content creation and exchange. The first computer-based email program appeared in 1965, followed by the inaugural networked email transmission in 1971 by Ray Tomlinson on ARPANET, introducing digital text communications lacking rigid schemas.[26][27] These developments laid groundwork for unstructured formats like documents and messages, amplified by personal computers in the 1970s and word processing software such as WordStar in 1978, which facilitated the production of editable text files outside tabular constraints.[28] The 1990s accelerated unstructured data's emergence through the World Wide Web, proposed by Tim Berners-Lee in 1989 and publicly available from 1991, which proliferated hypertext documents, images, and multimedia lacking predefined structures.[29] Email adoption surged alongside internet expansion, with webmail prototypes emerging by 1993, transforming correspondence into vast repositories of narrative and attachment-based data.[30] This era shifted data paradigms, as web content—primarily HTML text, graphics, and early videos—outpaced structured relational databases, fostering environments where human-generated inputs dominated.[31] By the mid-2000s, Web 2.0 platforms and social media ignited exponential growth in unstructured data via user-generated content, with sites like Facebook (launched 2004) and YouTube (2005) generating billions of posts, videos, and images annually.[6] Retailers began leveraging such data for targeted analysis around this time, recognizing its value in emails, sensor logs, and multimedia for predictive marketing.[6] Market research from IDC indicates that unstructured data constituted a growing share of enterprise information, projected to reach 80% of global data by 2025, driven by these digital channels' scalability and the limitations of traditional processing tools.[32] This proliferation underscored causal shifts: cheaper storage, broadband proliferation, and interactive platforms causally amplified unstructured volumes, outstripping structured data's growth rate of 55-65% annually in enterprises.[11]Growth Amid Big Data Explosion
The exponential growth of digital content in the early 21st century, fueled by the widespread adoption of internet-connected devices and web-based services, markedly increased the volume of unstructured data. According to IDC projections, the global datasphere expanded from about 29 zettabytes in 2018 to an anticipated 163 zettabytes by 2025, reflecting a compound annual growth rate exceeding 30% for the period.[33] [22] This surge was driven primarily by unstructured formats, which consistently comprised 80-90% of newly generated data during the 2010s and 2020s, as opposed to the more manageable structured data stored in relational databases.[34] [12] Key contributors to this unstructured data proliferation included the rise of social media platforms and mobile computing. Platforms such as Facebook, launched in 2004, and YouTube, founded in 2005, enabled massive user-generated content in the form of text posts, images, and videos, with global social media data volumes reaching petabyte scales by the mid-2010s.[28] The introduction of the iPhone in 2007 accelerated smartphone penetration, leading to exponential increases in multimedia uploads, emails, and sensor data from apps, further amplifying unstructured volumes at rates of 55-65% annually in enterprise environments.[11] By the 2020s, streaming services and IoT devices compounded this trend, with IDC forecasting that 80% of data by 2025 would be video or video-like, underscoring the dominance of non-tabular formats.[35] This growth outpaced traditional data management capabilities, highlighting unstructured data's central role in the big data paradigm. IDC estimates place the CAGR for unstructured data at 61% through 2025, compared to slower growth for structured data, resulting in unstructured sources accounting for approximately 80% of all global data by that year.[36] [24] Such dynamics necessitated innovations in storage and processing, as conventional relational systems proved inadequate for handling the velocity, variety, and volume inherent to these datasets.[37]Challenges and Limitations
Technical and Analytical Hurdles
Unstructured data, comprising approximately 80-90% of generated data, poses significant technical hurdles due to its lack of predefined schemas, necessitating specialized preprocessing to convert it into analyzable forms.[38] This volume scale overwhelms traditional databases, as the data's heterogeneity—spanning text, images, audio, and video—demands diverse extraction techniques like natural language processing for textual content and computer vision for visuals, each with inherent computational intensity.[38] [39] Key challenges include inconsistent formatting across diverse file types, quality variation such as incomplete or erroneous content, and semantic complexity arising from contextual nuances and ambiguities.[3] [40] Extraction challenges arise from the absence of standardization, where varying formats and terminologies complicate feature identification; for instance, electronic health records often use inconsistent terms for the same concept, requiring manual or algorithmic normalization that introduces errors.[39] Accuracy in information extraction remains low without robust tools, as noise, ambiguities, and context dependencies in sources like social media or sensor logs lead to incomplete or biased parses, with studies indicating frequent failures in capturing multifaceted meanings.[41] [42] Preprocessing steps, such as noise filtering and outlier detection, further escalate resource demands, particularly for real-time applications where velocity—the speed of data influx—exacerbates latency issues.[39] [43] Analytically, integrating unstructured data with structured counterparts is hindered by quality inconsistencies, including missing values and inherent biases that propagate through models, reducing reliability in downstream inferences.[39] Scalability bottlenecks emerge from high computational requirements; processing large-scale unstructured datasets often necessitates distributed systems and advanced hardware, yet even these struggle with the variety of inputs, leading to inefficiencies in pattern recognition and insight generation.[44] [45] Lack of meta-information further impedes discoverability and alignment with analytical goals, as fragmented infrastructure and scarce expertise limit effective tool deployment for tasks like semantic analysis.[39] These hurdles collectively demand ongoing advancements in algorithms to mitigate veracity concerns, ensuring extracted insights reflect causal realities rather than artifacts of poor processing.[46]Security, Privacy, and Compliance Risks
Unstructured data, which constitutes about 80% of enterprise information, amplifies security risks due to its dispersed storage across endpoints, cloud repositories, and file shares, often without centralized oversight or consistent encryption.[36] This "data sprawl" enables unauthorized access, as seen in analyses of 141 million breached files where unstructured elements like financial documents and HR records heightened fraud potential.[47] Cyber attackers exploit this invisibility, targeting loosely controlled files for exfiltration, with unmanaged unstructured data contributing to insider threats and overprivileged permissions that bypass traditional database safeguards.[48] Privacy vulnerabilities arise from the embedded sensitive information in unstructured formats, such as personally identifiable information (PII) in emails, PDFs, and multimedia, which evades automated detection tools designed for structured databases.[49] Without robust classification, organizations inadvertently process or share PII, increasing exposure to identity theft or regulatory scrutiny; for instance, dark data—untapped unstructured content comprising up to 55% of holdings—remains unmonitored, fostering accidental leaks during analytics or migrations.[50] Human error compounds this, as manual handling of varied formats like text documents or videos lacks the validation layers inherent in relational systems.[51] Compliance challenges stem from regulations like GDPR and HIPAA, which mandate data mapping, minimization, and audit trails, yet unstructured data's volume and heterogeneity obstruct compliance; failure to identify regulated content in file shares can trigger violations, with loose controls risking internal non-adherence.[52] GDPR's emphasis on consent and deletion rights proves resource-intensive for unstructured archives, where redundant or outdated files evade automated purging, potentially leading to fines for inadequate protection of health or personal data under HIPAA.[53] Industry reports highlight that 71% of enterprises struggle with unstructured governance, underscoring the causal link between poor visibility and heightened legal exposure in sectors handling regulated information.[36]Processing and Extraction Techniques
Core Methodologies and Tools
Core methodologies for processing unstructured data revolve around pipelines that ingest, preprocess, extract features, and transform raw content into analyzable forms, often type-specific to handle variability in text, images, audio, and other formats. Preprocessing steps typically include cleaning to remove noise, deduplication, and normalization, such as standardizing formats or handling inconsistencies in textual data.[54][55] These foundational steps enable downstream extraction by mitigating issues like irrelevant artifacts or redundancy, which can comprise up to 80-90% of enterprise data volumes.[56] For textual unstructured data, dominant techniques involve natural language processing (NLP) methods like tokenization—which breaks text into words or subwords—stemming or lemmatization to reduce variants to root forms, and named entity recognition (NER) to identify entities such as persons, organizations, or locations. Topic modeling via algorithms like Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) uncovers latent themes by probabilistically assigning words to topics, while term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) vectorization quantifies word importance relative to a corpus.[57][58] These methods support information extraction, where rule-based patterns or statistical models pull key facts, as seen in processing emails or documents comprising the majority of unstructured text. Another key technique is Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), which specifically addresses making unstructured text accessible through semantic search by retrieving relevant information from large corpora of documents, such as PDFs and emails, and incorporating it into generative AI models to enhance accuracy and contextuality in applications like question answering and summarization.[39][59][60] Multimedia processing employs computer vision for images and videos, using feature detection algorithms like Scale-Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) for keypoint identification or edge detection for boundary recognition, alongside optical character recognition (OCR) to convert scanned text into editable strings. Audio data handling relies on signal processing techniques such as Fourier transforms for frequency analysis or automatic speech recognition (ASR) to transcribe spoken content, filtering noise via methods like wavelet denoising.[57][61] For mixed formats, content extraction tools parse metadata and embed structured elements, addressing the 64+ file types common in enterprise settings.[62] Key open-source tools include NLTK and spaCy for NLP pipelines, offering modular components for tokenization and NER with accuracies exceeding 90% on benchmark datasets like CoNLL-2003 for entity extraction. Apache Tika provides multi-format ingestion, extracting text and metadata from PDFs, images, and archives via unified APIs. For scalable extraction, libraries like Unstructured.io automate partitioning and cleaning across documents, supporting embedding generation for vector search.[60][62] Commercial platforms such as Azure Cognitive Services integrate OCR and vision APIs, processing millions of images daily with reported precision rates above 95% for printed text.[63]| Methodology | Primary Data Type | Key Techniques | Example Tools |
|---|---|---|---|
| NLP | Text | Tokenization, NER, TF-IDF | NLTK, spaCy[58] |
| Computer Vision | Images/Videos | Feature extraction, OCR | OpenCV, Tesseract[57] |
| Signal Processing | Audio/Sensor | Noise filtering, ASR | Librosa, Apache Tika[39][62] |