Hubbry Logo
Vertical positionVertical positionMain
Open search
Vertical position
Community hub
Vertical position
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Vertical position
Vertical position
Vertical position
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Vertical position or vertical location is a position along a vertical direction (the plumb line direction) above or below a given vertical datum (a reference level surface, such as mean sea level). Vertical distance or vertical separation is the distance between two vertical positions. Many vertical coordinates exist for expressing vertical position: depth, height, altitude, elevation, etc. Points lying on an equigeopotential surface are said to be on the same vertical level, as in a water level. A function with domain along the vertical line is called a vertical distribution or vertical profile.

Definitions

[edit]

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO), more specifically ISO 19111, offers the following two definitions:[1]

  • depth: "distance of a point from a chosen reference surface measured downward along a line perpendicular to that surface."[1]
  • height: "distance of a point from a chosen reference surface measured upward along a line perpendicular to that surface";[1]

ISO 6709 (2008 version) makes the following additional definition:

  • altitude: "height where the chosen reference surface is mean sea level"[1]

The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) offers similar definitions:[2]

  • altitude: "the vertical distance of a level, a point or an object considered as a point, measured from the mean sea level (MSL);"[2]
  • height: "the vertical distance of a level, a point or an object considered as a point, measured from a specific datum."[2]

ICAO further defines:

  • elevation: "the vertical distance of a point or a level, on or affixed to the surface of the earth, measured from mean sea level."[2]

I.e., elevation would be the altitude of an earth-bound feature, such as the ground or a building.

Derived quantities

[edit]
Further information: Heights in geodesy

Several physical quantities may be defined based on the definitions above:

Units

[edit]

Vertical distance quantities, such as orthometric height, may be expressed in various units: metres, feet, etc.

Certain vertical coordinates are not based on length, for example, geopotential numbers have units of m2/s2. Normalization by a constant nominal gravity value (units of m/s2) yields units of metre, as in geopotential height (based on standard gravity) or dynamic height (based on normal gravity at 45 degrees latitude). Despite the physical dimension and unit of length, the vertical coordinate does not represent distance in physical space, as would be measured with a ruler or tape measure. Sometimes a geopotential metre (symbol gpm or m') or dynamic metre is introduced for emphasis.[3][4] However, this practice is not acceptable with the International System of Units (SI).[a]

Another non-SI unit is the vertical metre, introduced when there may be confusion between vertical, horizontal, or slant distances. It is used for distance climbed during sports such as mountaineering, skiing, hiking, running or cycling[6] In German-speaking countries the abbreviation 'Hm' for Höhenmeter ("height metre") is used; if it is preceded by a '±' it refers to the cumulative elevation gain.

Determination

[edit]

Various instruments and techniques may be used for measuring or determining vertical position:

Phenomena

[edit]

Many physical phenomena are related to vertical position, as driven by gravity:

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Vertical position

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Vertical position, also known as vertical coordinate or , is the position of a point along the vertical direction—typically the direction of or plumb line—measured as the distance above or below a reference surface called a . This concept is central to , , , and geographic information systems (GIS), enabling accurate representation of elevations for applications in mapping, , , and . Vertical positions are commonly expressed as orthometric heights (relative to the , approximating mean ) or ellipsoidal heights (relative to a mathematical model of ). Examples of vertical datums include the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) in the United States and the global 1984 (WGS 84) for ellipsoidal heights. Determination of vertical position involves various methods, such as spirit leveling and GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems), which are explored in later sections of this article.

Fundamentals

Definitions

Vertical position refers to a location specifier along a plumb line, which is the direction of at a given point, measured relative to a such as or a local reference surface like the . This concept is fundamental in geospatial referencing, where the vertical component complements horizontal coordinates to define a point in . According to ISO 19111:2019, a vertical coordinate system (CRS) records heights or depths using the direction of to define the vertical axis, with vertical datums including sounding datums for hydrographic purposes where heights may be expressed as negative values or depths. The standard distinguishes depth as the downward distance from the surface and height as the upward distance from it. :2022 further specifies vertical position as height or depth per the coordinate system, with heights measured upward from the origin and allowing for the more general term "height" to encompass vertical location, including as depth. It defines altitude as the where the chosen surface is . In aviation, the (ICAO) introduces context-specific terms, such as , which is a surface of constant related to the standard datum of 1013.2 hectopascals (hPa), separated from other levels by standard pressure intervals and used for altitude indications above the transition altitude. A key distinction in is between geometric height, also known as ellipsoidal height, which measures the straight-line distance from a point to the reference , and , which is the vertical distance along the plumb line from the point to the , thereby accounting for variations in gravity. are preferred for applications requiring physical consistency with the Earth's gravity field, as they approximate distances above . The terminology for vertical position evolved from 19th-century surveying practices, where height and altitude were often used interchangeably in geodetic leveling to reference mean sea level, as seen in early U.S. efforts like the 1856 Hudson River leveling by the Coast Survey. By the early 20th century, formal adjustments of vertical networks, such as the 1900 U.S. general adjustment, standardized these terms for national datums. Modern standardization accelerated post-2000 with international efforts, including the 2003 and 2007 editions of ISO 19111 establishing vertical CRS frameworks and the 2008 and 2022 editions of refining altitude definitions for global data interchange.

Units

The primary unit for quantifying vertical position—encompassing height, depth, altitude, and elevation—is the metre (m), the base unit of length in the International System of Units (SI). This unit provides a universal standard for linear measurements, ensuring consistency in scientific and engineering applications worldwide. Non-SI units, such as the foot (ft), are widely employed in specific domains. Defined exactly as 0.3048 m, the foot is standard in aviation for altitude reporting and in surveying for elevation determinations, particularly in the United States. In aviation, this choice facilitates clear communication and adherence to international standards set by organizations like the International Civil Aviation Organization. Specialized units address variations in gravitational effects. The geopotential metre, dimensionally equivalent to m²/s² but normalized by a standard gravity value (approximately 9.80665 m/s²) to behave like a unit, is used in and for calculations involving per unit mass. Similarly, in , dynamic height employs dynamic metres—also with underlying dimensions of m²/s² per unit but scaled to approximate metres—for expressing vertical displacements based on differences. Conversions between these units are straightforward but require precision to maintain accuracy. For instance, 1 km of altitude corresponds to approximately 3280.84 ft, derived directly from the foot's definition relative to the . In global positioning systems, unit selection influences error propagation; inconsistent choices, such as lingering use of the deprecated U.S. survey foot (slightly differing from the international foot), can introduce conversion discrepancies that amplify in iterative computations like coordinate transformations.

Measurement

Determination Methods

Vertical position is determined relative to established vertical datums, which provide reference surfaces for elevation measurements. The World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84) serves as a global for ellipsoidal heights, defined by a semi-major axis of 6,378,137 meters and an inverse flattening of 298.257 223 563. Mean sea level (MSL), a tidal datum, is the arithmetic mean of hourly tide heights observed over the National Tidal Datum Epoch (1983–2001), though an update to a new epoch is planned for 2025. These datums ensure consistency in vertical positioning, with orthometric datums like the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88) approximating the based on gravity; however, NAVD88 is scheduled to be replaced by a new vertical reference frame as part of the modernized (NSRS) in late 2025 or 2026. Mathematical methods for vertical position rely on satellite and gravity data. Ellipsoidal height (h) from Global Positioning System (GPS) observations is the height above the WGS84 reference ellipsoid, computed from the satellite-derived 3D position coordinates incorporating parameters such as the semi-major axis (a), flattening (f), and latitude (φ). Orthometric height (H), representing elevation above the geoid, is derived by correcting ellipsoidal height for geoid undulation (N) via H = h - N, where N is determined from gravity potential models that account for Earth's irregular gravity field. The geopotential number (C) further refines this, with H = C / g(Ω), where g(Ω) is the mean gravity along the plumbline, decomposed into normal gravity, disturbances, topographic effects, and atmospheric contributions. Leveling techniques provide ground-based determinations of height differences. Differential leveling involves measuring cumulative height differences along a line using a level instrument and calibrated staffs, with the instrument fixed to read backsights and foresights for elevation transfer from a known benchmark. This method achieves high accuracy by minimizing instrumental errors through reciprocal observations. Trigonometric leveling computes height differences from measured zenith angles and slope distances using total stations, applying corrections for and employing reciprocal (F1 and F2) setups to average out angular uncertainties. It is particularly useful over long or obstructed distances where differential leveling is impractical. Modern computational models integrate vertical position with horizontal coordinates through transformations in geospatial software. In systems like , vertical coordinate systems (VCS) define height origins (e.g., gravity-based like EGM2008 ) and align with horizontal datums via on-the-fly projections, ensuring consistent 3D positioning. Tools such as VDatum perform datum transformations, converting between ellipsoidal, orthometric, and tidal references using gridded models. Error sources in vertical position determination include atmospheric refraction, which bends light paths in leveling and GPS, introducing systematic biases up to several centimeters; tidal variations, causing MSL fluctuations with standard deviations of 3–5 cm in coastal regions; and datum inconsistencies, such as offsets between NAVD88 and global standards reaching 1 meter due to terrestrial leveling distortions and post-glacial adjustments. These errors are mitigated through modeling and calibration, but require careful datum selection for accuracy.

Instruments and Techniques

Traditional instruments for measuring vertical position have long relied on mechanical and optical devices to establish relative heights. The , often combined with a in a leveling instrument, enables precise determination of height differences by aligning a bubble vial to indicate horizontal planes, achieving accuracies on the order of millimeters over short distances. The facilitates trigonometric leveling by measuring vertical angles to distant points, allowing elevation calculations when horizontal distances are known, with typical accuracies of 1-5 arcseconds for angles. Barometers, particularly through , estimate absolute altitudes by correlating atmospheric pressure reductions with height, though they are sensitive to and weather variations, yielding accuracies of about 30 meters under standard conditions. A key historical milestone in pressure-based methods was the invention of the aneroid barometer in 1843 by French physicist Lucien Vidie, which used a flexible metal capsule to detect pressure changes without mercury, improving portability for field altitude estimations. Another milestone occurred in the 1990s, when (GPS) techniques enabled the first routine vertical measurements, initially achieving decimeter-level accuracy through differential processing of carrier-phase signals from multiple receivers. Modern techniques have shifted toward satellite-based systems for absolute vertical positioning. Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), including GPS, provide vertical accuracies of approximately 1-5 centimeters when using Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) corrections from a nearby , which resolve ambiguities in carrier-phase observations to mitigate ionospheric and tropospheric errors. Satellite altimetry missions, such as TOPEX/Poseidon launched in 1992, measure ocean surface heights by timing radar pulses from orbit, delivering global topography data with 4.2 cm accuracy relative to reference datums like WGS84. As of 2025, methods such as airborne and (InSAR) continue to enhance resolution and monitoring capabilities. Airborne employs laser scanning from to generate models, offering vertical accuracies of 5-10 cm and point densities of 5-30 points per square meter for detailed topographic surveys. (InSAR) uses phase differences in radar images from satellites to detect surface deformations, such as , with millimeter-level precision over wide areas through repeated acquisitions. Calibration and best practices are essential for reliable vertical measurements across these instruments. Datum alignment ensures consistency, such as tying GNSS data to models for orthometric heights, while multi-method fusion—like combining GPS with spirit leveling—improves overall accuracy by leveraging complementary strengths. Error mitigation involves repeated surveys with closed loops or redundant observations to identify and correct systematic biases, such as instrument collimation or .

Derived Concepts

Derived Quantities

One key derived quantity from vertical position is gravitational potential energy, which quantifies the an object possesses due to its in a relative to a reference level. The formula for gravitational potential energy UU near Earth's surface is given by U=mghU = m g h, where mm is the of the object, gg is the local (approximately 9.81 m/s²), and hh is the vertical above the reference point./5:_Uniform_Circular_Motion_and_Gravitation/5.7:_Gravitational_Potential_Energy) In , represents the vertical distance from the (an surface approximating mean ) to a point on Earth's surface, derived from ellipsoidal height measurements. It is calculated as H=h−NH = h - N, where hh is the ellipsoidal height above a reference , and NN is the geoid undulation, which accounts for deviations due to Earth's irregular gravity field and typically ranges from -100 m to +100 m. Geopotential height approximates the vertical coordinate along equipotential surfaces in a varying field, commonly used in atmospheric and oceanic sciences to normalize heights. It is defined as Z=Γg0∫gΓ dsZ = \frac{\Gamma}{g_0} \int \frac{g}{\Gamma} \, ds, where Γ\Gamma is the value, g0=9.80665g_0 = 9.80665 m/s² is the reference , gg is the local , and dsds is the path element along the vertical. This formulation ensures that surfaces of constant correspond to equal per unit mass. Bathymetric depth extends the concept of vertical position to underwater environments, representing negative elevations relative to the reference sea level for seafloor features. It is derived from acoustic soundings that measure the vertical distance from the water surface to the seabed, providing a topographic map of ocean floors essential for navigation and resource exploration. In oceanography, dynamic height is a derived quantity used to describe pressure differences in fluid columns, facilitating the study of ocean currents and circulation. It is computed as ΔD=∫g−1 dp/ρ\Delta D = \int g^{-1} \, dp / \rho, where gg is gravity, dpdp is the pressure differential, and ρ\rho is the fluid density, often integrated from a reference pressure level. Post-2023 advancements, such as those from the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite mission, have enhanced satellite-derived models of dynamic height by improving resolution of sea surface height anomalies to sub-mesoscale features, enabling better integration with in-situ density profiles. Gravitational acceleration decreases with increasing vertical position due to the of gravitation, given by gh=GM(R+h)2g_h = \frac{GM}{(R + h)^2}, where GG is the , MM is Earth's , RR is Earth's radius, and hh is altitude; for small altitudes, this approximates to gh≈g(1−2hR)g_h \approx g \left(1 - \frac{2h}{R}\right), resulting in a roughly 3% reduction at 100 km altitude. This variation historically impacted clocks, which rely on a constant gg for accurate timekeeping; at higher altitudes, the reduced gg lengthens the 's period, causing clocks calibrated at to run slow, as observed in 18th-century expeditions like those by in the Andes. In satellite orbits, the weaker gravity at orbital altitudes (typically 200–2,000 km) necessitates lower orbital velocities to maintain balance against the reduced pull, influencing mission design and stability against perturbations. Variations in vertical position also drive atmospheric lapse rates, where typically decreases with altitude at an environmental rate of about 6.5 °C per kilometer in the , shaping patterns through and stability. Associated changes follow an with a of approximately 8 km, causing to halve roughly every 5.5 km of , which lowers points—for instance, boils at around 93 °C at 1,500 m altitude—and affects cooking, , and formation in mountainous regions. The Coriolis effect subtly influences vertical motion in the atmosphere due to , generating horizontal deflections on rising air parcels; although vertical velocities are small (typically <1 cm/s on large scales), this force can induce eastward or westward biases in updrafts, contributing to asymmetries in convective systems like thunderstorms. Geological processes linked to vertical position include isostatic rebound, where rises after the removal of overlying ice sheets, as seen in post-glacial uplift across ; rates range from 1 to 10 mm per year, with higher values (up to ~10 mm/year) in areas like the due to ongoing viscoelastic adjustment. Climate change exacerbates vertical position changes through global sea-level rise, averaging 3.7 mm per year from 2006–2018 according to IPCC assessments, which shifts coastal vertical datums and requires updates to reference levels for mapping and infrastructure, with projections indicating acceleration to 5–10 mm/year by mid-century under high-emission scenarios.

Applications

In Geodesy and Surveying

In and , vertical position is integral to geoid modeling, where it defines the equipotential surface that approximates mean through the integration of data from terrestrial, airborne, and sources. A gravimetric geoid model relies on these vertical components to compute accurate heights relative to the reference surface, enabling precise height datums compatible with space-based technologies like GPS. Vertical datums establish standardized reference frameworks for measuring vertical positions, with notable examples including the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88) in the United States, which uses a leveling network across North America fixed to a single benchmark, and the European Vertical Reference System 2007 (EVRS2007), realized through geopotential numbers from the United European Levelling Network. These systems, however, show global inconsistencies of up to 1-2 meters arising from variations in local sea surface topography and reference realizations. Vertical positions underpin key applications in topographic mapping, where elevation data from vertical control points ensures accurate contour placement on maps. In flood risk assessment, the (FEMA) employs base flood elevations—computed relative to vertical datums—to delineate zones, identifying areas with a 1% annual chance of flooding. Tectonic monitoring also leverages vertical positions from GPS networks to track crustal deformations, providing insights into plate boundary dynamics. Challenges in utilizing vertical positions stem from plate tectonics, which induce ongoing vertical shifts; for instance, the 1999 İzmit earthquake generated maximum vertical displacements of up to 2.3 meters along the İzmit-Sapanca segment of the North Anatolian Fault. Recent developments highlight the integration of vertical position data, particularly bathymetric measurements, with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) for resolving maritime boundaries and continental shelf claims, as demonstrated by the U.S. announcement of extended continental shelf outer limits in December 2023, which relied on precise seafloor elevation data to extend beyond 200 nautical miles in regions like the Arctic and Atlantic.

In Aviation and Meteorology

In aviation, vertical position is essential for maintaining safe separation and navigation, primarily through altimetry systems that measure altitude relative to or . Pressure is determined by setting the aircraft altimeter to the standard datum of 29.92 inHg (1013.2 hPa), serving as the basis for high-altitude operations above the transition altitude, typically 18,000 feet MSL in the U.S. True altitude, representing the actual height above mean sea level, requires corrections to the indicated reading for non-standard temperature and pressure; for instance, cold temperatures reduce true altitude below indicated values, increasing the risk of terrain collision. Radio altimetry provides precise height above ground level using radar pulses to time the reflection from the surface below, offering critical low-level data unaffected by barometric variations. Flight levels standardize vertical position in the upper airspace to ensure consistent separation, defined relative to a constant pressure of 1013.2 hPa as per ICAO standards in Annex 2 (Rules of the Air). For example, Flight Level 180 (FL180) equates to a pressure altitude of 18,000 feet under standard conditions, with levels separated by 500-foot pressure intervals to minimize errors from local pressure variations. In meteorology, vertical position informs weather analysis through the hypsometric equation, which computes the thickness of air layers between pressure surfaces to infer temperature and stability from observations. The equation is: Z2−Z1=RdTˉgln⁡(p1p2)Z_2 - Z_1 = \frac{R_d \bar{T}}{g} \ln \left( \frac{p_1}{p_2} \right) where Z2−Z1Z_2 - Z_1 is the geopotential height difference, RdR_d is the gas constant for dry air (287 J/kg·K), Tˉ\bar{T} is the mean virtual temperature of the layer, gg is gravitational acceleration (9.81 m/s²), and p1p_1, p2p_2 are the pressures at the upper and lower levels, respectively. This formula is applied to data from weather balloons (radiosondes), which measure pressure and temperature profiles to assign heights to constant-pressure surfaces, enabling forecasters to map atmospheric layers and predict weather patterns. Safety in aviation relies on vertical position for terrain avoidance and hazard mitigation; Ground Proximity Warning Systems (GPWS) integrate radio altimeter and barometric data to detect excessive sink rates or closure with terrain, issuing alerts to prevent controlled flight into terrain (CFIT). Additionally, vertical wind shear—the change in horizontal wind speed or direction with height—drives turbulence forecasting, as quantified in the Ellrod index, which multiplies shear magnitude by horizontal deformation to predict clear-air turbulence intensity for pilot briefings. As of 2025, Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) mandates require real-time broadcasting of vertical position (altitude) via GPS-derived data for all equipped aircraft in controlled airspace, enhancing collision avoidance through improved traffic situational awareness. In October 2025, Senators Maria Cantwell and Ted Cruz reached a bipartisan agreement on the ROTOR Act (S.2503), which passed the Senate Commerce Committee and, if enacted, would require ADS-B In capabilities by 2031, closing exemptions for military operations and bolstering vertical tracking to reduce mid-air risks near civilian routes.

References

  1. https://www.e-education.psu.edu/natureofgeoinfo/c5_p13.html
  2. https://geodesy.noaa.gov/datums/vertical/index.shtml
  3. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:19111:ed-2:en
  4. https://portal.ogc.org/files/?artifact_id=6716
  5. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#!iso:std:74039:en
  6. https://www.iso.org/standard/75147.html
  7. https://www.icao.int/sites/default/files/airnavigation/AIG/ECCAIRS-Aviation-1.3.0.12-Entities-and-Attributes-en.id_.pdf
  8. https://geodesy.science/item/height-systems/
  9. https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/web/about_ngs/history/Berry1.pdf
  10. https://www.bipm.org/en/measurement-units/si-base-units
  11. https://www.nist.gov/pml/us-surveyfoot
  12. https://skybrary.aero/articles/altitude-flight-level-and-height
  13. https://eospso.gsfc.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atbd/ATBD-GLAS-06.pdf
  14. https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5/WOA94/dyn.html
  15. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/10/05/2020-21902/deprecation-of-the-united-states-us-survey-foot
  16. https://vdatum.noaa.gov/docs/datums.html
  17. https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/datum_options.html
  18. https://geodesy.noaa.gov/datums/newdatums/release.shtml
  19. https://www.esri.com/about/newsroom/arcuser/mean-sea-level-gps-geoid
  20. https://gge.ext.unb.ca/Personnel/Vanicek/OrthometricHeights.pdf
  21. https://geodesy.noaa.gov/heightmod/Leveling/
  22. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/tm11D3
  23. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/mapping/properties/vertical-coordinate-systems.htm
  24. https://vdatum.noaa.gov/docs/est_uncertainties.html
  25. https://www.asce.org/publications-and-news/civil-engineering-source/civil-engineering-magazine/issues/magazine-issue/article/2020/11/getting-the-height-right-the-north-american-vertical-datum-of-1988
  26. https://geodesy.noaa.gov/INFO/history/spirit-leveling.shtml
  27. https://www.amirajcollege.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/3140601_surveying_module-3-trigonometric-leveling.pdf
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9735476/
  29. https://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/object/nmah_1183996
  30. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2006.1746
  31. https://www.ardusimple.com/rtk-explained/
  32. https://sealevel.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/topex-poseidon/summary/
  33. https://lidarmag.com/2025/02/09/airborne-lidar-a-tutorial-for-2025-2/
  34. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/land-subsidence-in-california/science/interferometric-synthetic-aperture-radar-insar
  35. https://www.online-pdh.com/mod/resource/view.php?id=3848
  36. https://group-md.com/lpt/best-practices-during-gnss-data-collection/
  37. https://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?g
  38. https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/GEOID/PRESENTATIONS/2007_02_24_CCPS/Roman_B_PLSC2007notes.pdf
  39. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0303243411001425
  40. https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/ftp/hrd/annane/prelim_notes/hypsometric_equation.pdf
  41. https://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?gn
  42. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/bathymetry.html
  43. https://faculty.washington.edu/luanne/pages/ocean420/notes/Dynamic.pdf
  44. https://os.copernicus.org/articles/21/931/2025/
  45. https://www.vcalc.com/wiki/gravity-acceleration-by-altitude
  46. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/hess/earth-sciences-history/article/29/1/1/614488/BOUGUER-REDEEMED-THE-SUCCESSFUL-1737-1740-GRAVITY
  47. https://www.nesdis.noaa.gov/news/why-dont-satellites-fall-out-of-the-sky
  48. https://scied.ucar.edu/learning-zone/atmosphere/change-atmosphere-altitude
  49. https://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/kristen/ATM317/Reference_Material_files/ApparentForces_Coriolis.pdf
  50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590197420300240
  51. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/chapter/chapter-9/
  52. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/39739
  53. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1195103624004658
  54. https://geodesy.noaa.gov/datums/vertical/north-american-vertical-datum-1988.shtml
  55. https://evrs.bkg.bund.de/Subsites/EVRS/EN/References/Definitions/Def_EVRS-pdf.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674984716301495
  57. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/24/4137
  58. https://www.usgs.gov/educational-resources/topographic-mapping
  59. https://www.fema.gov/flood-maps
  60. https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/kmz/FEMA_NFHL_v3.2.kmz
  61. https://spotlight.unavco.org/how-gps-works/gps-and-tectonics/gps-and-tectonics.html
  62. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2016JB013458
  63. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/bssa/article/92/1/43/102910/The-Surface-Rupture-and-Slip-Distribution-of-the
  64. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/five-takeaways-us-continental-shelf-announcement
  65. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47912
  66. https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aim_html/chap7_section_2.html
  67. https://flightsafety.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/alar_bn3-1-altimeter.pdf
  68. https://www.pilot18.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Pilot18.com-ICAO-Annex-2-Rules-of-air.pdf
  69. https://geo.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Meteorology_and_Climate_Science/Atmospheric_Processes_and_Phenomena/01%3A_Atmospheric_Basics/1.05%3A_Hypsometric_Equation
  70. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/wefo/28/3/waf-d-12-00114_1.xml
  71. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_23-18.pdf
  72. https://www.ecmwf.int/en/newsletter/168/meteorology/forecasting-clear-air-turbulence
  73. https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/avs/offices/afx/afs/afs400/afs410/ads-b
  74. https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/3935/text
  75. https://www.commerce.senate.gov/2025/10/cantwell-cruz-bipartisan-aviation-safety-agreement-requires-full-implementation-of-ads-b-technology-delivers-aviation-safety-results-for-families
  76. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/2503
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.