Hubbry Logo
Voluntary controlled schoolVoluntary controlled schoolMain
Open search
Voluntary controlled school
Community hub
Voluntary controlled school
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Voluntary controlled school
Voluntary controlled school
Voluntary controlled school
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A voluntary controlled school (VC school) is a state-funded school in England and Wales in which a foundation or trust (usually a Christian denomination) has some formal influence in the running of the school. Such schools have less autonomy than voluntary aided schools, in which the foundation pays part of any building costs.

Originally the term is derived from the funding of the schools through voluntary subscriptions and contributions. Although it is also the case that these are schools previously independent of local or national government that volunteered to be controlled by the state.

Characteristics

[edit]

Voluntary controlled schools are a kind of "maintained school", meaning that they are funded by central government via the local authority, and do not charge fees to students. The majority are also faith schools.

The land and buildings are typically owned by a charitable foundation, which also appoints about a quarter of the school governors. However, the local authority employs the school's staff and has primary responsibility for the school's admission arrangements. Specific exemptions from Section 85 of the Equality Act 2010 enables VC faith schools to use faith criteria in prioritising pupils for admission to the schools.[1]

Pupils at voluntary controlled schools follow the National Curriculum.[2][3][4]

History

[edit]

The state began to provide elementary education in 1870 and secondary education in 1902, but also continued to increase funding to the schools run by other organisations (usually the churches), now known as voluntary schools. The Voluntary Schools Act 1897 refers to school income 'derived from voluntary contributions, rates, school fees, endowments, or any source whatever other than the Parliamentary grant' and specifically defines a voluntary school as a public elementary day school not provided by a school board'.[5] Following the aforementioned Act these schools were increasingly influenced by the state, and were subject to jointly administered inspections.[6]

The Education Act 1944 imposed higher standards on school facilities, and offered voluntary schools a choice in funding the costs this would incur.

  • Voluntary controlled schools would have all their costs met by the state, but would be controlled by the local education authority.
  • Voluntary aided schools would have all of their running costs met by the state, but their capital costs would only be partially state funded, with the foundation retaining greater influence over the school.

The Roman Catholic Church chose to retain control of its schools, while more than half of Church of England schools became voluntary controlled.[7]

By 2008, in England, approximately 15% of primary schools were voluntary controlled, almost all of them associated with the Church of England. Only 3% of secondary schools were voluntary controlled, of which about half were Church of England schools.[8]

In 2012, the Fair Admissions Campaign began to encourage local authorities to stop using faith criteria in admissions policies for VC schools.[9]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Voluntary controlled school

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A voluntary controlled school is a category of state-maintained school in , funded entirely by the local authority, which employs staff, sets admissions criteria, and holds primary responsibility for operations, while the land and buildings are usually owned by a voluntary body such as a religious charity that appoints foundation governors to the school's . These schools trace their origins to 19th-century voluntary initiatives, predominantly by the and other religious organizations, which established elementary schools prior to widespread state involvement in education. The category was formalized by the , which restructured existing voluntary schools into controlled, aided, or special agreement types; controlled schools received full state funding for maintenance and improvements in return for local education authority oversight, distinguishing them from aided schools where the voluntary body retains greater influence over premises and admissions. In contemporary practice, voluntary controlled schools must adhere to the and are often designated as faith schools, though and ethos reflect the founding body's influence without overriding local authority control. Governing bodies include a specified proportion of foundation governors appointed by the voluntary body—typically at least two but no more than one-quarter of the total—to represent the school's charitable origins, alongside parent, staff, and local authority representatives. This structure balances historical voluntary foundations with public accountability, comprising a significant portion of maintained primary and secondary schools, particularly those affiliated with the .

Historical Development

Origins in 19th-Century Voluntary Provision

In the early decades of the , elementary and depended primarily on voluntary schools initiated by religious organizations and private benefactors to serve the working classes and poor. These institutions emphasized moral and religious instruction alongside rudimentary reading, writing, arithmetic, and sometimes industrial training, often employing the monitorial system—where older pupils taught younger ones—to manage large classes cost-effectively. The led this effort through the National Society for Promoting the Education of the Poor in the Principles of the Established Church, established in 1811, which founded thousands of schools to instill Anglican doctrine and counter perceived threats from nonconformist influences. Nonconformist groups, including Methodists and , operated parallel schools, while the interdenominational British and Foreign School Society, formed around 1808, advanced non-sectarian monitorial education open to all Protestant denominations. By the 1830s, government support emerged with annual parliamentary grants totaling £20,000 initially, directed exclusively to inspected voluntary schools deemed efficient, marking the onset of state financial aid without direct control. This funding expanded amid industrialization's demands, with voluntary schools accommodating the bulk of elementary pupils; for instance, schools numbered about 6,382 by 1870, educating roughly 882,000 children in average daily attendance. The , introduced by William Forster, preserved voluntary schools' autonomy and operations, allowing them to receive continued while establishing elected school boards in underserved districts to build board s funded by local rates. Rather than displacing voluntary provision—which covered most existing elementary places—the Act stimulated further voluntary expansion, as denominations raced to board , thereby entrenching church-founded schools as a foundational element of England's educational landscape that persisted into later statutory frameworks.

Establishment under the 1944 Education Act

The classified voluntary schools into three categories—controlled, aided, and special agreement schools—to integrate existing voluntary provision, predominantly church-founded institutions, into the emerging state-maintained system while addressing post-war educational reorganization. Controlled schools were defined as those where managers or governors bore no responsibility for maintenance expenses, with local education authorities (LEAs) required to defray all such costs, including repairs, improvements, and premises care. This category appealed to many voluntary school providers, as the Act imposed higher facility standards that existing buildings often failed to meet, shifting financial burdens to the state in exchange for greater LEA oversight. Establishment of a voluntary as controlled required proposals from its managers or the LEA, submitted to the Minister of for approval via order, typically within six months of an area's endorsement or initial proposals. For existing voluntary schools, transitional provisions deemed them aided until reclassification, allowing continuity of pre-Act management and maintenance arrangements pending categorization decisions. Once designated controlled, governance shifted to an instrument of management featuring foundation managers (limited to one-third of the body, appointed to safeguard religious character) alongside LEA and minor authority appointees forming the majority, ensuring LEA dominance in secular and operations. Religious elements persisted in controlled schools, with instruction aligned to the school's trust deed or prior practice, limited to designated periods (often two per week), and delivered by reserved teachers appointed by foundation managers (not exceeding one-fifth of teaching staff). LEAs retained control over secular instruction, teacher appointments (except reserved roles), and premises use for broader educational needs, while parents could seek exemptions from religious education. This structure facilitated the absorption of numerous church schools into the maintained sector post-1944, enabling free compulsory education up to age 15 without proprietors funding upgrades, though it diluted voluntary bodies' autonomy compared to aided status where they retained maintenance liabilities and greater governance influence.

Post-War Expansion and Reforms

Following the end of , the was fully implemented, prompting many church schools to adopt voluntary controlled status for comprehensive state funding of revenue costs and participation in the national rebuilding effort, while ceding majority governance to local education authorities (LEAs). Anglican dioceses, facing financial strains from war damage and maintenance burdens, saw approximately two-thirds of their voluntary schools transition to controlled status by the early , retaining foundation governors for oversight of but aligning operations with LEA priorities. In contrast, most Roman Catholic schools opted for voluntary aided status to preserve greater autonomy over admissions and curriculum, highlighting denominational differences in prioritizing control versus funding security. The post-war baby boom and the 1947 raising of the to 15 drove rapid expansion, with secondary pupil numbers in surging from 1.3 million in 1946 to 3.2 million by 1961. A government-led building program, outlined in annual development plans under the Ministry of Education, delivered over 1.15 million new or extended school places by the end of , at a total projected cost of £360 million for 2 million places through 1961. Voluntary controlled schools benefited directly, as LEAs integrated them into these initiatives, funding reconstructions, extensions, and new builds to address overcrowding and obsolete facilities, with cost efficiencies achieved through standardized designs reducing per-place expenses from £320 (secondary) in 1949 to £264 by . This expansion preserved the schools' religious ethos—mandated daily worship and syllabus-based instruction—within the tripartite secondary of , technical, and modern schools. Reforms in the and emphasized equity and modernization, with voluntary controlled schools adapting under LEA direction to national policies like the 1959 Education Act's extension of nursery provisions and the shift away from selection-based systems. Circular 10/65 in 1965 accelerated reorganization into non-selective comprehensives, compelling most voluntary controlled grammar and modern schools to merge or convert by the early , as LEAs held ultimate authority over structural changes. This process reduced the proportion of selective voluntary controlled schools but maintained their integration in state provision, with pupil numbers in secondary schools reaching 3.2 million by 1965 amid broader enrollment growth. Such adaptations underscored the controlled model's emphasis on local over denominational , sustained expansion without additional church capital investment.

Contemporary Shifts toward Academisation

Since the Academies Act 2010, voluntary controlled schools in have increasingly converted to status, allowing them to operate independently of local authorities while maintaining their foundational through specific agreements that preserve religious character where applicable. This shift accelerated in the , driven by opportunities for greater autonomy in budgeting, staffing, and design, as local authorities faced reductions that limited support for maintained schools. By 2023, approximately 43.5% of all state-funded schools in were academies, with voluntary controlled schools—predominantly primary and often faith-affiliated—contributing to this trend through voluntary conversions seeking enhanced control over operations previously dictated by local bodies. A key driver for faith-based voluntary controlled schools, which constitute a significant portion of the category (e.g., many institutions), has been the ability to join multi-academy trusts (MATs) that align with their religious foundations, thereby safeguarding ethos amid declining local authority influence. The proportion of faith schools operating as academies rose from 26% in 2018 to 38% in 2022, reflecting conversions among voluntary controlled establishments motivated by flexibilities in admissions policies and resource sharing within trusts. For instance, schools, including former voluntary controlled ones, now include 1,540 academies among their 4,630 total institutions, enabling foundations to retain oversight via trust structures rather than local authority mediation. In the early 2020s, conversions persisted despite challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic, with some voluntary controlled schools opting for academisation to access direct Department for Education funding and avoid local authority redundancies. However, applications for academy status slumped to a 10-year low in the first two months of 2025, with only 17 schools applying in February, signaling caution amid proposed government reforms to standardize academy regulations and potentially reintegrate oversight elements. Despite this, the overall trajectory for voluntary controlled schools remains toward academisation, as evidenced by ongoing transfers into MATs that offer economies of scale for capital maintenance—historically a foundation obligation—while empirical studies indicate heterogeneous performance gains, particularly for lower-achieving pupils in early converter academies.

Ownership, Funding, and Maintenance Obligations

Voluntary controlled schools in are owned by a charitable foundation or trust, most commonly a religious body such as the or , which holds legal title to the school land, buildings, and playing fields. This stems from the historical voluntary origins of these schools, where providers transferred assets to the state under specific terms in the , retaining property rights while ceding operational control to local authorities. The foundation's requires its consent for significant alterations to the site, such as expansions or closures, to protect its interests. Funding for voluntary controlled schools is provided entirely by the local authority (LA), which receives dedicated schools grant from and distributes it via a local formula based on pupil numbers, needs, and other factors. Unlike voluntary aided schools, no capital contribution is required from the foundation or governors; the LA covers all and without expectation of voluntary top-ups for core operations. This full public funding aligns voluntary controlled schools with community schools in financial structure, ensuring no fees or charges for admission or attendance. Maintenance obligations fall primarily on the local , which is legally responsible under the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 for both revenue (day-to-day upkeep) and capital (major repairs, improvements) works to the premises, regardless of foundation ownership. The LA typically delegates budgets for minor repairs and routine maintenance directly to the school's through its scheme for financing schools, but retains oversight and funds larger projects via allocations like the schools condition allocation. Foundation trustees may advise on works affecting the site's religious character but bear no financial liability, with the LA insuring and managing compliance with health, safety, and building regulations.

Governing Body Composition and Decision-Making

The of a voluntary controlled school must comprise at least two governors, the headteacher (unless they have resigned from the governing body), one staff governor, and one local authority governor. Additionally, it must include at least two foundation governors appointed by the school's foundation or trust, with foundation governors numbering no more than one quarter of the total membership to reflect the school's religious or charitable character where applicable. The total number of governors must be at least seven, though the inclusion of foundation governors typically results in a minimum of nine members, and the body may appoint co-opted governors for additional expertise; however, staff governors including the headteacher cannot exceed one third of the total. Foundation governors are selected by the originating voluntary body, such as a , to safeguard the school's , while parent governors are elected by parents, staff governors by school staff excluding the headteacher, and the local authority governor nominated by the local authority. The must appoint a to administer meetings and ensure procedural compliance, with decisions made collectively by simple majority vote unless otherwise specified in the . In decision-making, the holds primary responsibility for the school's strategic direction, including setting aims, monitoring pupil progress, approving the budget, and overseeing performance against targets, while ensuring financial accountability. Unlike voluntary aided schools, however, the local authority retains authority over admissions policies and acts as the direct employer of staff, limiting the governing body's control in these areas to consultation and recommendations. Foundation governors influence and collective worship to align with the school's character but lack powers over broader operational decisions, which are subject to local authority oversight for premises maintenance and capital works. All decisions must comply with the School Governance (Constitution) (England) Regulations 2012, with conflicts resolved through local authority intervention if necessary.

Admissions Authority and Policies

In voluntary controlled schools in , the local authority acts as the admissions authority, holding responsibility for establishing admission arrangements, processing applications, and allocating school places. This contrasts with voluntary aided schools, where the governing body assumes this role. The local authority must ensure policies comply with the School Admissions Code, which mandates fair, objective criteria and prohibits based on factors such as , except where explicitly permitted for preserved faith-based elements in certain historical cases. Admission policies for voluntary controlled schools are typically coordinated through the local authority's scheme, providing parents with a single offer of a place while managing oversubscription via prioritized criteria. Common oversubscription priorities include: first, looked-after children and those previously in care, supported by evidence such as an adoption order; second, children with , and Care (EHCP) naming the school; third, pupils with exceptional or social needs substantiated by professional evidence; fourth, siblings of current pupils; and finally, proximity to the school measured by straight-line distance from home to the main entrance. These criteria emphasize geographical and familial ties over denominational affiliation, reflecting the local authority's secular oversight. Local authorities are required to consult the school's , other admission authorities, and parents at least once every seven years—or sooner if proposing changes—on admission arrangements, with final determinations published by 28 February for the following . Appeals against refusals are handled by an independent panel, whose decisions are binding, though success rates vary by case specifics like evidence of need. This framework ensures transparency but has drawn for potentially prioritizing distance over other merit-based factors, as evidenced in analyses of regional admission .

Employment Practices and Staff Conditions

In voluntary controlled schools, the local authority serves as for both and non-teaching staff, a structure established under the and retained in subsequent legislation such as the School Standards and Framework Act 1998, which differentiates these schools from voluntary aided models where governing bodies assume employer responsibilities. This arrangement subjects staff to local authority terms, including pay scales under the School Teachers' Review Body recommendations and conditions outlined in the Burgundy Book, which governs annual leave, maternity provisions, and secondments for maintained school teachers in . Appointment processes for teachers involve collaboration between the governing body and local authority, with governors forming a selection panel to shortlist and interview candidates before recommending appointees to the authority for final approval, ensuring compliance with safer recruitment practices under the Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 as adapted for maintained schools. In voluntary controlled schools with a religious character, foundation governors hold veto rights over appointments to verify candidates' suitability for upholding the school's ethos, particularly for religious education teachers who must demonstrate competence in delivering denomination-specific instruction, though the local authority retains ultimate hiring authority unlike in voluntary aided schools. Headteacher appointments follow a similar protocol, with governors establishing a panel of at least three members to select and notify the local authority, which confirms the role in writing, often requiring the National Professional Qualification for Headship since 2009 amendments. Staff conditions emphasize statutory entitlements, including a 1,265-hour directed annually for teachers and protections against redundancy under the School Staffing (England) Regulations 2009, which mandate consultation and priority redeployment within the authority. Non-teaching staff, such as support roles, operate under local authority collective agreements, with probation periods typically lasting six months extendable to nine, and access to schemes like the Local Government Pension Scheme. For supply staff, the advocates treating the local authority as the hirer in voluntary controlled settings to secure continuous employment rights after 12 weeks, aligning with Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 where applicable. These practices balance local authority oversight with foundation input to maintain operational efficiency and religious character without the greater autonomy afforded to aided schools' governing bodies.

Operational Characteristics

Curriculum Requirements and Religious Education

Voluntary controlled schools in , as local authority maintained schools, are legally required to follow the statutory , which specifies programmes of study for key stages 1 to 4 in core subjects such as English, , and , as well as foundation subjects including history, , and . This requirement ensures a standardized baseline of across maintained schools, with adaptations permitted for pupils with special educational needs or disabilities to promote access and inclusion. Schools must also provide for the spiritual, moral, social, and cultural development of pupils through the curriculum, though operates outside the framework as a distinct statutory obligation. Religious education (RE) in voluntary controlled schools is compulsory for pupils aged 5 to 16 and follows the locally agreed syllabus developed by the Standing Advisory Council on Religious Education (SACRE) for the local authority area, unless parents withdraw their children. The syllabus must principally reflect Christian traditions while accounting for other principal religions in Great Britain, emphasizing a multi-faith, non-confessional approach rather than doctrinal indoctrination specific to the school's foundation. In voluntary controlled schools with a religious character, such as many Church of England institutions, parents may request that their child receives RE aligned with the tenets of the school's designated religion as per the trust deed, though the default remains the agreed syllabus determined by the local authority rather than the foundation body. This contrasts with voluntary aided schools, where the religious body has greater autonomy over RE content. A daily act of collective is mandatory in voluntary controlled schools, predominantly of a broadly Christian character to reflect Britain's religious heritage, unless a by the SACRE allows otherwise following parental consultation. The organizes these acts, with the responsible for oversight in consultation with the local authority, ensuring they contribute to pupils' and spiritual development without compelling participation—parents retain the right to withdraw pupils wholly or partially. In faith-designated voluntary controlled schools, worship aligns with the school's but adheres to legal standards avoiding , with up to one-fifth of teaching staff potentially designated as "reserved teachers" required to lead worship according to the trust deed.

Daily Practices and Ethos

Voluntary controlled schools, predominantly affiliated with the , maintain an ethos centered on Christian principles integrated with broader educational aims, emphasizing values such as respect, forgiveness, kindness, , and to foster and spiritual development alongside academic growth. This ethos is articulated in school statements that align with the foundation's religious character while incorporating statutory requirements for promoting British values like , , and mutual respect. Governance arrangements ensure the religious designation influences cultural tone, though operational control rests with the local authority, which may temper overt religiosity in non-worship aspects to comply with inclusive mandates. Daily practices revolve around a mandated act of collective , conducted at least once per school day for all pupils, predominantly reflecting the school's Christian foundation through elements like prayers, hymns, readings, and reflections on faith-based themes such as , wonder, and . Assemblies often serve as the primary vehicle, gathering students for structured sessions led by staff, clergy, or visitors, designed to reinforce the by linking spiritual content to personal and communal values; for instance, half-termly focuses on specific virtues like perseverance or embedded in routine interactions. These acts comply with the , which requires worship to be "wholly or mainly of a religious character" in faith-designated voluntary controlled schools, though parents retain the right to withdraw children without penalty. Beyond worship, the ethos permeates daily operations through informal practices, including classroom discussions tying lessons to ethical frameworks derived from Christian teachings, pastoral support emphasizing forgiveness and community, and extracurricular activities like charity initiatives or links with local parishes to embody service-oriented values. Staff selection, where up to one-fifth of teaching posts may be reserved for those committed to the religious ethos, helps sustain this consistency, though all employees adhere to local authority employment standards prioritizing child welfare over doctrinal conformity. Critics, including secular advocacy groups, argue that such practices can impose a singular worldview, potentially marginalizing non-Christian pupils despite legal accommodations, highlighting tensions between preserved religious identity and state-funded inclusivity.

Facilities and Capital Maintenance

In voluntary controlled schools, the local holds primary responsibility for capital maintenance of school premises, including major repairs, refurbishments, and improvements to ensure compliance with statutory standards such as those outlined in the School Premises (England) Regulations 2012. This encompasses funding for structural works, heating systems, roofing, and electrical installations, with costs borne by the rather than the school's or trustees. Although land and buildings are often owned by charitable trustees—typically a religious foundation—the local must maintain the premises as part of its statutory duty under the Education Act 1996, without financial contribution required from governors for capital expenses. Facilities in these schools generally align with those of other local authority-maintained institutions, featuring classrooms, assembly halls, libraries, laboratories, sports fields, and playgrounds designed to support the and any preserved religious character. The local authority conducts periodic condition assessments, such as through the Department for Education's (DfE) Condition Data Collection programme, to identify priorities for intervention, with funding sourced from allocations like the Condition Allocations or basic need grants. For instance, in 2023-2024, DfE distributed over £4 billion in capital funding to local authorities for maintained maintenance, prioritizing high-risk buildings to mitigate issues like or structural decay. Day-to-day revenue , such as minor repairs and cleaning, may involve delegated budgets to the via the local 's formula, but capital projects exceeding routine thresholds—typically those over £5,000 or affecting building fabric—revert to oversight and . Trustees retain certain , such as vetoing uses incompatible with the school's foundation character, but cannot impede necessary works approved by the . This arrangement contrasts with voluntary aided schools, where governors shoulder greater capital liabilities, and reflects the controlled status's emphasis on local to standardize facilities across maintained provision.

Comparisons with Other School Models

Differences from Community Schools

Voluntary controlled schools differ from community schools primarily in their foundational origins and influences, despite both being maintained by local authorities in . In voluntary controlled schools, the land and buildings are typically owned by a charitable foundation or trust, often affiliated with a religious body such as the , whereas community schools are entirely owned and controlled by the local authority without such external ownership. The voluntary body in controlled schools contributes to the by appointing foundation governors, usually comprising about one-third of the total, to preserve the school's , in contrast to community schools where the governing body lacks such foundation representation and operates under full local authority oversight. Both school types share operational similarities, including local authority responsibility for admissions, staff employment, and day-to-day running, as well as adherence to the national curriculum. However, voluntary controlled schools frequently maintain a designated religious character, requiring daily collective worship of a broadly Christian nature and religious education that reflects the foundation's faith, while community schools are secular and not required to incorporate religious elements unless opted into locally. Capital maintenance obligations also diverge subtly: local authorities fully fund upkeep for community schools' assets, but for voluntary controlled schools, while the authority handles ongoing maintenance, the voluntary trustees retain ownership rights and may influence long-term decisions on premises use aligned with the school's founding principles.
AspectVoluntary Controlled SchoolsCommunity Schools
Ownership of Land/BuildingsOwned by voluntary foundation/trust (e.g., religious charity); local authority maintains.Fully owned by local authority.
Governing BodyIncludes foundation governors (up to 1/3 appointed by voluntary body) to uphold ethos.No foundation governors; fully local authority-influenced.
Religious CharacterOften designated (e.g., ); requires faith-based and RE.Secular; no mandatory religious designation or .
Admissions & EmploymentLocal authority as authority for both.Local authority as authority for both.
Funding & MaintenanceFully state-funded via local authority; trustees may advise on premises aligned with origins.Fully state-funded via local authority; no external trustee input.
These distinctions stem from historical voluntary contributions to , allowing controlled schools to retain a measure of foundational influence without the greater autonomy seen in voluntary aided schools. Empirical data from the indicates that as of 2023, voluntary controlled schools number around 2,800, predominantly primary and often faith-linked, compared to over 15,000 community schools serving as the default secular model.

Contrasts with Voluntary Aided Schools

Voluntary controlled schools differ from voluntary aided schools primarily in the degree of autonomy granted to the founding body, typically a religious or charitable foundation. In voluntary controlled schools, the local authority assumes full responsibility for employing staff, determining admissions policies, and maintaining premises, thereby exerting greater oversight compared to voluntary aided schools, where the —dominated by foundation representatives—controls these functions. This structural divergence stems from historical funding arrangements: voluntary aided schools require the foundation to contribute at least 10% of on buildings and improvements, with the local authority covering the remaining 90%, fostering shared financial stakes and enhanced foundation influence. In contrast, voluntary controlled schools place the full maintenance burden on the local authority, despite the foundation often retaining ownership of the land and buildings, which limits the foundation's leverage over operational decisions. Governing bodies in voluntary controlled schools include foundation governors but lack the majority held by foundations in voluntary aided schools, resulting in diluted influence over curriculum emphases, particularly , and site-specific policies. Consequently, voluntary aided schools exhibit greater flexibility in prioritizing faith-based admissions and staffing aligned with denominational requirements, while voluntary controlled schools align more closely with community school models under local authority direction.
AspectVoluntary Controlled SchoolsVoluntary Aided Schools
Staff EmploymentLocal authority employs and manages staff.Governing body (foundation majority) employs staff.
Admissions AuthorityLocal authority sets criteria and processes.Governing body determines criteria, often prioritizing .
Premises MaintenanceFully funded and managed by local authority, despite foundation ownership of land/buildings.Shared: foundation contributes ≥10% ; local authority 90%.
Governing BodyIncludes foundation governors but local authority influence predominates.Foundation governors hold majority, enhancing .
Overall AutonomyLower; resembles community schools with voluntary origins.Higher and for foundation.

Relations to Academy and Free Schools

Voluntary controlled schools, while maintained by local authorities, share historical roots with and free schools in their origins from voluntary bodies, particularly religious foundations that established many such institutions prior to widespread state involvement in . In , a significant portion of voluntary controlled schools—often or Catholic—are faith-based, mirroring the ethos-driven setup of faith academies and free schools, where trusts or proposers maintain religious character through reserved positions and provisions for collective . However, unlike academies, which operate under independent trusts with direct funding, voluntary controlled schools remain subject to local authority oversight for admissions, staffing, and strategic decisions, limiting their operational flexibility. A key relational dynamic is the conversion pathway, whereby voluntary controlled schools can transition to status, thereby aligning more closely with the autonomous model of academies and free schools. Between 2010 and 2018, thousands of maintained schools, including voluntary controlled ones, converted to academies, driven by policy incentives for greater school-led and escape from local . For faith voluntary controlled schools, academization often involves partnering with diocesan multi-academy trusts, preserving foundational influence over while gaining control over budgets, curriculum design beyond the national requirements, and site decisions—freedoms not available under maintained status. schools, as a subset of academies established de novo by voluntary groups such as parent or faith organizations since 2011, represent an alternative entry point for similar proposers, bypassing the local authority-maintained structure altogether and emphasizing innovation in ethos and pedagogy from inception. Structurally, voluntary controlled schools diverge from academies and free schools in and : the former channel resources via local authorities, adhering strictly to mandates except in , whereas academies receive per-pupil directly and must only cover core subjects like English, , and , allowing tailored approaches. This autonomy gap has prompted critiques that voluntary controlled schools, despite their voluntary heritage, function more akin to schools in daily operations, prompting conversions to academy models for enhanced agency—though such shifts can introduce risks like reduced local coordination on support. Free schools, often pioneered by voluntary or charitable entities, further differentiate by their startup nature, contrasting with the established, inherited of voluntary controlled schools, yet both models underscore a shared emphasis on non-local involvement in school founding and preservation.

Empirical Outcomes and Societal Impact

Academic Performance Data

Voluntary controlled schools, predominantly primaries with some secondaries, demonstrate academic outcomes that align closely with broader local authority maintained schools but show modest raw attainment advantages attributable to their faith designation. Analysis of 2015 data indicates that at , pupils in schools—including voluntary controlled—achieved 60.6% attaining 5 or more GCSEs at grades A*-C including English and , exceeding the 57.4% rate in non-faith schools. This raw differential reflects faith schools' intake of fewer disadvantaged pupils, with free school meals eligibility at 12.1% versus 18.0% in non-faith primaries. After statistical adjustment for pupil prior attainment, socioeconomic factors, and demographics, the performance edge for schools narrows to approximately one-twentieth of a grade higher per subject, suggesting a small but positive school-level effect from and practices rather than selection alone. Roman Catholic faith schools, fewer of which are voluntary controlled, exhibited a larger adjusted premium of about one-sixth of a grade per subject. At , where the majority of voluntary controlled schools operate as primaries, raw attainment rates were slightly higher (83% at level 4+ in reading, writing, and maths for versus 81% non-faith), but adjustments eliminated meaningful differences, indicating performance largely mirrors pupil intake quality. Recent statistics on attainment do not disaggregate voluntary controlled schools separately from other local authority maintained types, limiting updated comparisons; however, aggregated maintained school Progress 8 scores in 2023 averaged -0.03 nationally, with faith-maintained subsets consistently outperforming non-faith equivalents in unadjusted metrics across cycles. Faith schools overall remain over-represented among England's top 500 performers under attainment measures, comprising more than their 19% share of total schools, though voluntary controlled specifics remain embedded within this category without isolated breakdowns. These patterns hold after accounting for urban-rural distributions and deprivation indices, underscoring ethos-driven contributions to and engagement as causal factors in observed outcomes.

Discipline, Attendance, and Behavioral Metrics

Voluntary controlled schools, as state-maintained institutions with a religious designation, generally record lower rates of disciplinary exclusions than comparable non-faith schools, reflecting the influence of their faith-based ethos on pupil conduct. analysis of 2009/10 data indicates fixed-term exclusion rates in primary voluntary controlled schools at 6.60% of the school population, versus 9.04% in primaries; permanent exclusions stood at 0.09% compared to 0.15%. These figures align with broader patterns in faith-designated maintained schools, where structured moral frameworks—often emphasizing values like and —correlate with reduced behavioral disruptions, though voluntary controlled schools show marginally higher rates than voluntary aided counterparts due to local authority oversight of admissions, which limits self-selection of compliant families.
Exclusion TypePrimary Voluntary Controlled (%)Primary Community (%)Primary Voluntary Aided (%)
Fixed-term6.609.046.72
Permanent0.090.150.13
Attendance metrics in voluntary controlled schools also tend to exceed those in secular maintained schools, with historical Department analyses linking faith governance—particularly voluntary statuses—to absence rates 0.4 to 1.0 percentage points below school averages, attributed to ties and parental emphasis on fostered by the school's religious mission. Recent DfE aggregates for maintained schools do not disaggregate by voluntary controlled subtype, but persistent ethos-driven advantages are evident in lower persistent (over 10% sessions missed) among faith cohorts, as confirmed in Welsh data where faith school pupils face 20-30% fewer exclusion risks overall, suggesting causal links via value reinforcement rather than selection artifacts alone. Behavioral surveys in faith contexts further highlight reduced incidents, with parental satisfaction tied to the ethos's role in promoting prosocial norms. While mainstream reporting often underemphasizes these outcomes amid biases favoring secular critiques, empirical records substantiate the stabilizing effect of religious frameworks in diverse intakes managed by local authorities.

Long-Term Contributions to Social Cohesion

Voluntary controlled schools, largely foundations under local authority oversight, promote social cohesion through an ethos that integrates Christian principles of service, mutual , and communal responsibility with statutory civic requirements. This approach aims to cultivate pupils' understanding of shared societal values, encouraging long-term behaviors such as and involvement that strengthen interpersonal bonds and collective resilience. For instance, the Church of England's educational framework emphasizes human dignity and as foundational to communities, equipping graduates to navigate diversity while upholding moral consistency. Empirical assessments, including Ofsted inspections of over 700 primary and 400 secondary faith schools analyzed in 2009, indicate that these institutions outperform community schools in fostering community cohesion, as measured by pupil attitudes toward inclusion, , and local . Studies on Christian faith schools further reveal that pupils develop more positive orientations toward other ethnic and religious groups compared to secular peers, attributing this to explicit embedded in . In rural contexts, where many voluntary controlled schools operate, church-school partnerships generate bonding within parishes and bridging capital across generations, sustaining village vitality amid demographic shifts. Long-term outcomes include elevated moral judgement capabilities among , with 2017 research showing pupils scoring higher on metrics that correlate with civic participation and reduced social fragmentation. These schools' non-selective admissions, aligned with local authority policies, facilitate integration of diverse socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds under a unifying ethical framework, countering isolation and promoting enduring societal trust. While some analyses highlight challenges like pupil commuting affecting immediate ties, the persistent emphasis on service-oriented values yields graduates more inclined to reciprocal community contributions, as inferred from broader patterns in religious education's linkage to prosocial behaviors.

Controversies and Critical Perspectives

Debates on State Funding for Religious Institutions

Opponents of state funding for religious institutions, including voluntary controlled schools, argue that taxpayer money should not subsidize confessional religious education, as it compels non-adherents to finance institutions promoting specific doctrines. In England and Wales, approximately one-third of state-funded schools possess a religious character, receiving full public funding despite mandatory collective worship and faith-based religious education curricula determined by the school's foundation. Secular organizations contend this arrangement violates principles of neutrality, with a 2005 ICM poll indicating 64% opposition to such funding due to risks of social fragmentation from religiously selective admissions. For voluntary controlled schools, where local authorities control admissions and provide 100% funding for both revenue and capital, critics highlight that religious bodies retain influence over governance and ethos without contributing financially, potentially prioritizing faith over broader public needs. Proponents counter that state funding upholds historical agreements dating to the 1944 Education Act, which integrated voluntary schools into the public system to ensure universal access while preserving parental choice in moral and spiritual formation. They cite empirical data showing faith schools, including Catholic voluntary controlled institutions, admit 50% more pupils from deprived backgrounds than the state average, educating over 850,000 students across 2,169 schools comprising 9% of the sector. Academic performance advantages persist even after controlling for pupil selection, as evidenced by LSE analysis of primary test scores, attributing gains to ethos-driven discipline rather than mere intake bias. Advocates argue this efficiency justifies funding, fostering social cohesion through value-based education without intrinsic divisiveness, as undesirable practices like overt discrimination are not inherent to faith-based models. Recent legislative shifts have intensified the debate, with the government in February 2025 defeating amendments to maintain a 50% non-faith admissions cap for new faith academies and free schools, potentially extending to expansions of voluntary controlled models. Secular critics, including , warn this erodes equity by enabling full religious prioritization, while supporters emphasize empirical success in outcomes like higher attendance and , outweighing cohesion concerns unsubstantiated by causal evidence of harm. The discourse reflects tensions between fiscal accountability—given faith schools' 18% share of secondary provision—and first-principles support for diverse provision where voluntary bodies demonstrate superior results without excess cost.

Concerns over Indoctrination and Secular Neutrality

Critics, including secular advocacy groups such as , contend that the mandatory daily act of collective worship in voluntary controlled faith schools—required under the School Standards and Framework Act 1998 to reflect the school's religious designation—exposes pupils to denominational practices that amount to subtle , particularly for children from non-religious or dissenting families who may face social pressures not to withdraw. This concern is heightened in voluntary controlled schools, where the local authority controls admissions and staffing but the school's foundation body influences the religious character, potentially prioritizing doctrinal conformity over open inquiry. Although (RE) in these schools must adhere to a locally agreed that is non-confessional—meaning it teaches about religions objectively rather than promoting one—opponents argue that the pervasive religious undermines this, fostering an environment where faith is presented as normative and critical is sidelined. has highlighted cases where faith schools, including voluntary controlled ones, contribute to and division, citing data from the 2021 showing higher concentrations of single-faith pupils in such institutions, which they claim entrenches ideological silos incompatible with a pluralistic society. On secular neutrality, organizations like the Accord Coalition assert that state funding for voluntary controlled schools breaches principles of impartiality, as public resources support institutions that embed a specific religious in and delivery, even under local authority oversight; they advocate for inclusive admissions policies to prevent religious criteria from dominating access, noting that while most councils avoid faith-based selection in these schools, exceptions persist and exacerbate perceptions of state endorsement of religion. These groups, often drawing on precedents emphasizing neutrality in education, argue that parental opt-outs from worship and RE—available under Section 71 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998—fail to address , as non-participating pupils may still absorb the dominant atmosphere. Empirical critiques remain limited, with no large-scale studies documenting widespread indoctrination outcomes in voluntary controlled schools specifically; however, broader analyses of faith schooling, such as those from secular think tanks, point to potential long-term effects like reduced exposure to diverse viewpoints, potentially hindering social cohesion in diverse communities. Proponents of reform, including the , have called for phasing out the preserved religious character in older voluntary controlled schools—many originating from 19th-century church foundations—to align with modern secular standards, arguing that historical entitlements should not perpetuate state-subsidized .

Criticisms Regarding Diversity and Selection Practices

Critics contend that the incorporation of faith-based criteria in admissions for voluntary controlled schools, which prioritize applicants demonstrating adherence to the school's religious ethos—such as through or parental —effectively enables religious selection despite local oversight of the process. This practice, permitted under the School Admissions Code, allows up to 100% prioritization based on faith in oversubscribed cases for existing schools, leading to student bodies that reflect the demographics of practicing religious communities rather than the broader local population. Such selection mechanisms contribute to reduced ethnic and religious diversity, as religious affiliation often correlates with ethnicity in the UK; for instance, Church of England voluntary controlled schools tend to draw disproportionately from White British families, while other faith designations amplify concentrations of specific groups like South Asian pupils in non-Christian contexts. Empirical analyses indicate that faith schools, including voluntary controlled ones, consistently elevate ethnic clustering, with multilevel modeling showing positive coefficients for increased concentration across ethnicities—ranging from 0.46 for Other White pupils to 4.03 for White Irish pupils per additional faith school in a locality. In diverse urban areas like Birmingham and London, this manifests in faith schools exhibiting extreme homogeneity, such as over 90% Asian or 50% Black enrollments, compared to more mixed non-faith schools. Secular advocacy groups, such as , argue that these practices exacerbate social division by segregating pupils along religious and ethnic lines, undermining intergroup contact and long-term societal cohesion in multicultural Britain; they highlight cases where faith schools fail to reflect local diversity, instead serving as ethnic enclaves that perpetuate parallel communities. Studies corroborate this concern, noting that among the most socially selective comprehensives, faith schools—including 11 of the top 100—are overrepresented and often feature intakes exceeding 90% , limiting exposure to diverse peers. While academic sources documenting these patterns, such as those from journals, provide data-driven evidence, critics from secular perspectives may overemphasize risks of division, potentially overlooking instances where faith schools integrate local minorities through proximity-based admissions. Nonetheless, the causal link between faith prioritization and demographic skewing remains evident, as self-selection by religious families compounds formal criteria to yield less representative student populations.

Defenses Based on Parental Choice and Empirical Success

Advocates for voluntary controlled schools contend that these institutions uphold of parental by offering state-funded options that integrate religious character into , allowing families to select schools consonant with their beliefs rather than defaulting to uniformly secular ones. In , where voluntary controlled schools—predominantly —are maintained by local authorities but governed with foundation input on , parents practicing the school's faith often receive admission priority, fostering environments where moral and ethical instruction aligns with home values. This mechanism respects pluralism in a diverse society, as evidenced by surveys indicating broad public support for faith-based options when framed as individual family rights rather than impositions. Empirical data supports claims of success, with church-affiliated voluntary controlled schools frequently showing superior academic outcomes compared to non-faith counterparts. A 2005 National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER) study analyzed performance across Key Stages, finding that church schools outperformed non-religious schools in English at and achieved higher results, even after basic adjustments for pupil demographics. Similarly, raw attainment figures from 2016 (EPI) analysis revealed 60.6% of pupils (many in voluntary controlled settings) attaining five good GCSEs including English and maths, versus 57.4% in non-faith schools, with a residual advantage of about one-seventh of a grade per subject persisting after controlling for prior attainment, deprivation, and ethnicity. Proponents further argue that this edge stems from cohesive school ethos promoting and , though direct causal on voluntary controlled schools remains limited; faith schools overall correlate with lower exclusion rates and stronger pupil motivation tied to shared values, contributing to sustained societal benefits like reduced in value-aligned settings. Such outcomes validate state funding by demonstrating efficient use of public resources for measurable gains in development.

References

  1. https://www.oxfordshire.gov.uk/residents/our-work-schools/school-types
  2. https://childlawadvice.org.uk/information-pages/types-of-school/
  3. https://www.leicester.gov.uk/schools-and-learning/school-and-colleges/school-admissions/understanding-the-different-types-of-school/
  4. https://www.cofesuffolk.org/schools/resources-and-information/school-buildings/voluntary-controlled-schools/
  5. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/7-8/31/part/II/enacted
  6. https://www.education-uk.org/documents/acts/1944-education-act.html
  7. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/1034/body
  8. https://historyofeducation.org.uk/types-of-school-in-nineteenth-century-england/
  9. https://www.nse.org.uk/about/our-history
  10. https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/transformingsociety/livinglearning/school/overview/in19thcentury/
  11. https://branchcollective.org/?ps_articles=florence-s-boos-the-education-act-of-1870-before-and-after
  12. https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1883/jul/27/education-act-1870-the-school-rate
  13. https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/transformingsociety/livinglearning/school/overview/1870educationact/
  14. https://education-uk.org/history/chapter06.html
  15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3120304
  16. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/7-8/31/section/15/enacted
  17. https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/olympic-britain/education/preachers-and-teachers/
  18. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/7-8/31/section/32/enacted
  19. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/7-8/31/section/18/enacted
  20. https://chesterdbe.co.uk/history-of-church-schools
  21. https://www.angelfire.com/nb/lt/docs/history.htm
  22. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN04252/SN04252.pdf
  23. https://www.education-uk.org/documents/minofed/pamphlet-33.html
  24. https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/41969_9780857027382.pdf
  25. https://technicaleducationmatters.org/2009/08/20/chapter-12-developments-in-the-1950s-and-1960s/
  26. https://education-uk.org/history/chapter12.html
  27. https://www.theaccessgroup.com/en-gb/blog/edu-what-is-academisation-and-why-do-schools-do-it/
  28. https://lordslibrary.parliament.uk/academy-schools-government-plans-for-change/
  29. https://www.churchofengland.org/about/education-and-schools/church-schools-and-academies
  30. https://ffteducationdatalab.org.uk/2022/07/faith-schools-and-academisation/
  31. https://prospect.org.uk/news/pandemic-not-enough-to-stop-academy-conversions
  32. https://educationuncovered.co.uk/news/academy-conversions-slump-to-10-year-low-for-the-first-two-months-of-2025
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775723000134
  34. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/good-estate-management-for-schools/understanding-and-managing-your-land-and-buildings
  35. https://dcsleadership.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/Upon-Doc-3-v1.pdf
  36. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/schemes-for-financing-schools/schemes-for-financing-local-authority-maintained-schools
  37. https://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/residents/children-and-families/schools-learning/education-system/types-of-schools
  38. https://opendata.camden.gov.uk/download/bdsx-jpg2/application/pdf
  39. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67d42f046ec9d5faee33f7e7/RPA_membership_rules_VC.pdf
  40. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/1034/regulation/13/made
  41. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/1034/regulation/14/made
  42. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/governance-in-maintained-schools/5-governance-structures
  43. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/governance-in-maintained-schools
  44. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/1034/part/3/made
  45. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60ebfeb08fa8f50c76838685/School_admissions_code_2021.pdf
  46. https://www.education-uk.org/documents/pdfs/2006-school-admissions-code.pdf
  47. https://www.cumberland.gov.uk/schools-and-education/apply-school-place-or-change-schools/admission-process-and-appeal-decision/community-and-voluntary-controlled-schools-admission-policies
  48. https://www.buckinghamshire.gov.uk/schools-and-learning/schools-index/school-admissions/school-admissions-guides-policies-and-statistics/school-admissions-policies/primary-community-and-voluntary-controlled-schools-admissions-policy-september-2025/
  49. https://edemocracy.northyorks.gov.uk/documents/s48828/Appendix%2B3%2B-%2BProposed%2BNYC%2BAdmissions%2BPolicy%2Bfor%2Bcommunity%2Band%2Bvoluntary%2Bcontrolled%2Bschools%2B2026-2027.pdf
  50. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/school-admissions-arrangements
  51. https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/guidance/teachers-staff-in-maintained-schools
  52. https://www.nasuwt.org.uk/static/uploaded/9ebde249-daf6-4b76-8e25956a84e4b636.pdf
  53. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/68b836c9cc8356c3c882aa13/Staffing_and_employment_guidance_for_schools_-_Sept_2025.pdf
  54. https://www.gov.wales/sites/default/files/publications/2018-03/10-staffing.pdf
  55. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6628c402b0ace32985a7e516/Recruiting-a-headteacher-v2.pdf
  56. https://www.rpaclaimforms.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Voluntary_controlled_schools_RPA_membership_rules.pdf
  57. https://neu.org.uk/advice/member-groups/supply-staff
  58. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/10/1277
  59. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a81a9abe5274a2e8ab55319/PRIMARY_national_curriculum.pdf
  60. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-framework-for-key-stages-1-to-4/the-national-curriculum-in-england-framework-for-key-stages-1-to-4
  61. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06798/SN06798.pdf
  62. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/subject-report-series-religious-education/deep-and-meaningful-the-religious-education-subject-report
  63. https://natre.org.uk/about-re/
  64. https://faithschoolersanonymous.uk/the-law-and-your-rights/religious-education/
  65. https://www.interfaith.org.uk/activity/types-of-schools-and-their-religious-education-across-the-uk
  66. https://humanists.uk/education/parents/collective-worship-and-school-assemblies-your-rights/
  67. https://bramford.bramsomfederation.net/a-christian-ethos/
  68. https://www.st-lukes.manchester.sch.uk/serve_file/22266550
  69. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/what-maintained-schools-must-publish-online
  70. https://www.fladbury.worcs.sch.uk/page/?title=Our%2BChristian%2BValues%2Band%2BEthos&pid=65
  71. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7cfc1f40f0b60a7f1a9914/Leadership-and-faith-schools-issues-and-challenges.pdf
  72. https://www.standrewslowerschool.co.uk/our-church-school-1/worship-in-school
  73. https://www.st-laurenceprimary.com/media/23142/worship-policy-23.pdf
  74. https://www.diltonmarsh.wilts.sch.uk/124/collective-worship
  75. https://stmichaelsstone.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Collective-worship.pdf
  76. https://schoolsweb.buckinghamshire.gov.uk/media/95083/collective-worship-guidelines-2024.docx
  77. https://www.geecross.tameside.sch.uk/tameside/primary/geecross/site/pages/aboutus/schoolethosandchristianvalues
  78. https://www.st-michaelangels.lancs.sch.uk/page/our-church/138656
  79. https://www.secularism.org.uk/opinion/2016/08/governors-perspective-beware-an-increasingly-assertive-religious-ethos-in-church-schools
  80. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/governance-in-maintained-schools/7-compliance
  81. https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/glossary/voluntary-controlled-school
  82. https://www.parentkind.org.uk/for-parents/understanding-education/about-schools/school-types
  83. https://www.gov.uk/types-of-school
  84. https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/vat-government-and-public-bodies/vatgpb7600
  85. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/voluntary-aided-schools-capital-funding
  86. https://www.gov.uk/types-of-school/academies
  87. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Converting-maintained-schools-to-academies.pdf
  88. https://www.lse.ac.uk/social-policy/Assets/Documents/PDF/Research-reports/Academies-Vision-Report.pdf
  89. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN07059/SN07059.pdf
  90. https://www.thestar.co.uk/education/what-the-difference-between-academy-maintained-school-key-differences-explained-5067968
  91. https://engage-education.com/blog/what-are-the-different-types-of-schools-in-the-uk-a-complete-guide/
  92. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00071005.2023.2258191
  93. https://academic.oup.com/jeea/article/17/4/1107/5049125
  94. https://epi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Pupil_characteristics_and_performance_at_faith_schools.pdf
  95. https://www.secularism.org.uk/faith-schools/faith-school-facts
  96. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7a3dc240f0b66a2fc00ea6/DFE-RR190.pdf
  97. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2005/02/0405212.pdf
  98. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03054985.2024.2379918
  99. https://res.org.uk/mediabriefing/faith-and-faith-schools-new-evidence-of-the-impact-on-life-outcomes/
  100. https://www.churchofengland.org/media/1180094/community%20cohesion%20and%20faith%20schools%202009.doc
  101. https://civitas.org.uk/pdf/Conway_FaithSchools.pdf
  102. https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/109208/3/Rural%2520Faith%2520Schools%2520and%2520Community%2520Cohesion%2520FINAL%2520Sociologia%2520Ruralis.pdf
  103. https://www.secularism.org.uk/uploads/faith-schools-research-bank-pdf-version.pdf
  104. https://humanists.uk/campaigns/schools-and-education/faith-schools/
  105. https://humanists.uk/campaigns/schools-and-education/faith-schools/faith-schools-why-not/
  106. https://religionmediacentre.org.uk/factsheets/faith-schools-in-the-uk/
  107. https://www.catholiceducation.org.uk/news/catholic-schools-educate-50-more-of-the-most-deprived-pupils-than-the-state
  108. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/30752/1/__lse.ac.uk_storage_LIBRARY_Secondary_libfile_shared_repository_Content_Gibbons%2C%2520S_Faith%2520primary%2520schools_Gibbons_Faith%2520primary%2520schools_2015.pdf
  109. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232944484_Should_the_State_Fund_Faith_Based_Schools_A_Review_of_the_Arguments
  110. https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/jare/article/view/902
  111. https://humanists.uk/2025/02/06/government-votes-to-allow-100-faith-selection-by-new-state-schools/
  112. https://www.secularism.org.uk/news/2025/09/peers-back-move-to-expose-level-of-religious-selection-in-schools
  113. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06972/SN06972.pdf
  114. https://humanists.uk/2024/10/11/six-hard-hitting-facts-about-faith-schools/
  115. https://accordcoalition.org.uk/take-action/campaigning-for-inclusive-admissions-in-local-voluntary-controlled-faith-schools/
  116. https://newhumanist.org.uk/articles/5944/faith-in-education
  117. https://www.birmingham.gov.uk/download/downloads/id/30108/determined_admissions_arrangements_for_community_and_voluntary_controlled_schools_2026_to_2027.pdf
  118. https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/berj.70026
  119. https://www.suttontrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Worlds_apart-1.pdf
  120. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-social-policy/article/attitudes-towards-school-choice-and-faith-schools-in-the-uk-a-question-of-individual-preference-or-collective-interest/3ABB2C31789B4EDB6F825E1C706A4D19
  121. https://cre.org.uk/choice.html
  122. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/media/nzcn320q/91015.pdf
  123. https://epi.org.uk/publications-and-research/faith-schools-pupil-performance-social-selection/
  124. https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/jare/article/download/902/821/952
  125. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15582159.2023.2169814
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.