Hubbry Logo
CompassionCompassionMain
Open search
Compassion
Community hub
Compassion
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Compassion
Compassion
Compassion
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Hugging is a common display of compassion

Compassion is a social emotion that motivates people to go out of their way to relieve the physical, mental, or emotional pains of others and themselves. Compassion is sensitivity to the emotional aspects of the suffering of others. When based on notions such as fairness, justice, and interdependence, it may be considered partially rational in nature.

Compassion involves "feeling for another" and is a precursor to empathy, the "feeling as another" capacity (as opposed to sympathy, the "feeling towards another"). In common parlance, active compassion is the desire to alleviate another's suffering.[1]

Compassion involves allowing oneself to be moved by suffering to help alleviate and prevent it. An act of compassion is one that is intended to be helpful. Other virtues that harmonize with compassion include patience, wisdom, kindness, perseverance, warmth, and resolve. It is often, though not inevitably, the key component in altruism. The difference between sympathy and compassion is that the former responds to others' suffering with sorrow and concern whereas the latter responds with warmth and care.[2] An article in Clinical Psychology Review suggests that "compassion consists of three facets: noticing, feeling, and responding".[3]

In Buddhism, compassion is the heartfelt wish to relieve the suffering of all beings, paired with the courage to act. Compassionate actions plant seeds of joy in others—and in ourselves—making them a true source of lasting happiness.

Etymology

[edit]

The English noun compassion, meaning "to suffer together with", comes from Latin. Its prefix com- comes directly from com, an archaic version of the Latin preposition and affix cum (= with); the -passion segment is derived from passus, past participle of the deponent verb patior, patī, passus sum. Compassion is thus related in origin, form and meaning to the English noun patient (= one who suffers), from patiens, present participle of the same patior, and is akin to the Greek verb πάσχειν (paskhein, to suffer) and to its cognate noun πάθος (= pathos).[4] Ranked a great virtue in numerous philosophies, compassion is considered in almost all the major religious traditions as among the greatest of virtues.

Theories on conceptualizing compassion

[edit]

Theoretical perspectives show contrasts in their approaches to compassion.

  • Compassion is simply a variation of love or sadness, not a distinct emotion.[5]
  • From the perspective of evolutionary psychology, compassion can be viewed as a distinct emotional state, which can be differentiated from distress, sadness, and love.[6]
  • Compassion is, however, a synonym of empathic distress, which is characterized by the feeling of distress in connection with another person's suffering.[7] This perspective of compassion is based on the finding that people sometimes emulate and feel the emotions of people around them.[8]
  • According to Thupten Jinpa, compassion is a sense of concern that arises in us in the face of someone who is in need or someone who is in pain. It is accompanied by a kind of a wishing (i.e. desire) to see the relief or end of that situation, along with wanting (i.e. motivation) to do something about it.[9] Compassion is, however, not pity, neither an attachment, nor the same as empathetic feeling, nor even just simply wishful thinking. Compassion is basically a variation of love.[10] To further this variation of love, Skalski and Aanstoos, in their article The Phenomenology of Change Beyond Tolerating, describe compassion with the definition of alleviate in mind. In the definition for alleviate there is no mention of taking, stopping, or fixing someone's suffering. It is simply trying to make it less severe. This has a connotation of desperation of sorts. Desiring so little from such a dire situation can be described as inspiring feelings to help with another's suffering in any way.
  • Emma Seppala distinguishes compassion from empathy and altruism as follows: "... The definition of compassion is often confused with that of empathy. Empathy, as defined by researchers, is the visceral or emotional experience of another person's feelings. It is, in a sense, an automatic mirroring of another's emotion, like tearing up at a friend's sadness. Altruism is an action that benefits someone else. It may or may not be accompanied by empathy or compassion, for example, in the case of making a donation for tax purposes. Although these terms are related to compassion, they are not identical. Compassion often involves an empathic response and altruistic behavior; however, compassion is defined as the emotional response when perceiving suffering which involves an authentic desire to help."[11]

In addition, the more a person knows about the human condition and human experiences, the more vivid the route to identification with suffering becomes.[12][page needed] Identifying with another person is an essential process for human beings, something that is even illustrated by infants who begin to mirror the facial expressions and body movements of their mother as early as the first days of their lives.[13] Compassion is recognized through identifying with other people (i.e. perspective-taking), the knowledge of human behavior, the perception of suffering, the transfer of feelings, and the knowledge of goal and purpose-changes in sufferers which leads to the decline of their suffering.[12][page needed]

Personality psychology agrees that human suffering is always individual and unique. Suffering can result from psychological, social, and physical trauma[14] which happens in acute and chronic forms.[14] Suffering has been defined as the perception of a person's impending destruction or loss of integrity, which continues until the threat is vanquished or the person's integrity can be restored.[12][page needed]

Compassion therefore has three major requirements: the compassionate person must feel that the troubles that evoke their feelings are serious; the belief that the sufferers' troubles are not self-inflicted; and the ability to picture oneself with the same problems in a non-blaming, non-shaming manner.[12][page needed]

Because the compassion process is highly related to identifying with another person and is possible among people from other countries, cultures, locations, etc., compassion is characteristic of democratic societies.[12][page needed]

The role of compassion as a factor contributing to individual or societal behavior has been the topic of continuous debate.[15] In contrast to the process of identifying with other people, a complete absence of compassion may require ignoring or disapproving identification with other people or groups.[12][page needed] Earlier[compared to?] studies established the links between interpersonal violence and cruelty which leads to indifference.[16] Compassion may induce feelings of kindness and forgiveness, which could give people the ability to stop situations that have the potential to be distressing and occasionally lead to violence.[17] This concept has been illustrated throughout history: The Holocaust, genocide, European colonization of the Americas, etc.[18] The seemingly essential step in these atrocities could be the definition of the victims as "not human" or "not us".[dubious – discuss] The atrocities committed throughout human history are thus claimed[by whom?] to have only been relieved, minimized, or overcome in their damaging effects through the presence of compassion,[12][page needed][19] although recently, drawing on empirical research in evolutionary theory, developmental psychology, social neuroscience, and psychopathy, it has been counterargued that compassion or empathy and morality are neither systematically opposed to one another, nor inevitably complementary, since over the course of history, mankind has created social structures for upholding universal moral principles, such as Human Rights and the International Criminal Court.[20]

On one hand, Thomas Nagel, for instance, critiques Joshua Greene by suggesting that he is too quick to conclude utilitarianism specifically from the general goal of constructing an impartial morality; for example, he says, Immanuel Kant and John Rawls offer other impartial approaches to ethical questions.[21][relevant?]

In his defense against the possible destructive nature of passions, Plato compared the human soul to a chariot: the intellect is the driver and the emotions are the horses, and life is a continual struggle to keep the emotions under control.[22] In his defense of a solid universal morality, Immanuel Kant saw compassion as a weak and misguided sentiment. "Such benevolence is called soft-heartedness and should not occur at all among human beings", he said of it.[23]

Psychology

[edit]

Compassion has become associated with and researched in the fields of positive psychology and social psychology.[24] Compassion is a process of connecting by identifying with another person. This identification with others through compassion can lead to increased motivation to do something in an effort to relieve the suffering of others.

Compassion is an evolved function from the harmony of a three grid internal system[jargon]: contentment-and-peace system, goals-and-drives system, and threat-and-safety system. Paul Gilbert defines these collectively as necessary regulated systems for compassion.[25][page needed][26]

Paul Ekman describes a "taxonomy of compassion" including: emotional recognition (knowing how another person feels), emotional resonance (feeling emotions another person feels), familial connection (care-giver-offspring), global compassion (extending compassion to everyone in the world), sentient compassion (extended compassion to other species), and heroic compassion (compassion that comes with a risk).[27]

Ekman also distinguishes proximal (i.e. in the moment) from distal compassion (i.e. predicting the future; affective forecasting): "...it has implications in terms of how we go about encouraging compassion. We are all familiar with proximal compassion: Someone falls down in the street, and we help him get up. That's proximal compassion: where we see someone in need, and we help them. But, when I used to tell my kids, 'Wear a helmet,' that's distal compassion: trying to prevent harm before it occurs. And that requires a different set of skills: It requires social forecasting, anticipating harm before it occurs, and trying to prevent it. Distal compassion is much more amenable to educational influences, I think, and it's our real hope."[28] Distal compassion also requires perspective-taking.[28]

Compassion is associated with psychological outcomes including increases in mindfulness and emotion regulation.[29]

While empathy plays an important role in motivating caring for others and in guiding moral behavior, Jean Decety's research demonstrates that this is far from being systematic or irrespective to the social identity of the targets, interpersonal relationships, and social context. He proposes that empathic concern (compassion) has evolved to favor kin and members of one own social group, can bias social decision-making by valuing one single individual over a group of others, and this can frontally conflict with principles of fairness and justice.[30]

Compassion fatigue

[edit]
Further information: Compassion fatigue

People with a higher capacity or responsibility to empathize with others may be at risk for "compassion fatigue", also called "secondary traumatic stress". Examples of people at risk for compassion fatigue are those who spend significant time responding to information related to suffering.[31] However, newer research by Singer and Ricard suggests that it is lack of suitable distress tolerance that gets people fatigued from compassion activities.[32] Individuals at risk for compassion fatigue usually display these four key attributes: diminished endurance and/or energy, declined empathic ability, helplessness and/or hopelessness, and emotional exhaustion.[33] Negative coping skills can also increase the risk of developing compassion fatigue.[34]

People can alleviate sorrow and distress by doing self-care activities on a regular basis. Improving consciousness[clarification needed] helps to guide people to recognize the impact and circumstances of past events. After people learn the experience from the situation in the past[clarification needed], they are able to find the causes of compassion fatigue in their daily life.[35] Practice of nonjudgmental compassion can prevent fatigue and burnout.[36] Some methods that can help people to heal compassion fatigue include physical activity, eating healthy food with every meal, good relations with others, enjoying interacting with others in the community, writing a journal frequently, and sleeping enough every day.[35] The practice of mindfulness and self-awareness also helps with compassion fatigue.[37]

Conditions that influence compassion

[edit]

Psychologist Paul Gilbert identifies several factors that can reduce a person's willingness to show compassion toward others. These include lower levels of perceived likability, competence, deservedness, and empathic capacity, as well as higher levels of self-focused competitiveness, anxiety and depression, feelings of being overwhelmed, and inhibiting influences within social structures and systems.[38]

Compassion fade

[edit]
Further information: Compassion fade and Identifiable victim effect

Compassion fade is the tendency of people to experience a decrease in empathy as the number of people in need of aid increases. The term was coined by psychologist Paul Slovic.[39] It is a type of cognitive bias that people use to justify their decision to help or not to help, and to ignore certain information.[40] To turn compassion into compassionate behavior requires the singular person's response to the group in need, followed by motivation to help that can lead to action[clarification needed].[41]

In an examination of the motivated regulation of compassion in the context of large-scale crises, such as natural disasters and genocides, research established that people tend to feel more compassion for single identifiable victims than single anonymous victims or large masses of victims (the Identifiable victim effect).[42] People only show less compassion for many victims than for single victims of disasters when they expect to incur a financial cost upon helping. This collapse of compassion depends on having the motivation and ability to regulate emotions.[43] People are more apt to offer help to a certain number of needy people if that number is closer to the whole number of people in need.[44] Humans feel more compassionate towards members of another species the more recently their species had a common ancestor.[45]

In laboratory research, psychologists are exploring how concerns about becoming emotionally exhausted may motivate people to curb their compassion for—and dehumanize—members of stigmatized social groups, such as homeless individuals and drug addicts.[46][better source needed]

Neurobiology

[edit]

Olga Klimecki (et al.), found differential (non-overlapping) fMRI brain activation areas in respect to compassion and empathy: compassion was associated with the mOFC, pregenual ACC, and ventral striatum. Empathy, in contrast, was associated with the anterior insula and the anterior midcingulate cortex (aMCC).[36]

In one study conducted by James Rilling and Gregory Berns, neuroscientists at Emory University, subjects' brain activities were recorded while they helped someone in need. It was found that while the subjects were performing compassionate acts, the caudate nucleus and anterior cingulate regions of the brain were activated, the same areas of the brain associated with pleasure and reward. One brain region, the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex/basal forebrain, contributes to learning altruistic behavior, especially in those with trait empathy.[47] The same study showed a connection between giving to charity and the promotion of social bonding and personal reputation.[48] True compassion, if it exists at all, is thus inherently motivated (at least to some degree) by self-interest.[dubious – discuss]

In a 2009 small fMRI experiment, researchers at the Brain and Creativity Institute studied strong feelings of compassion for social[clarification needed] and physical pain in others. Both feelings involved an expected change in activity in the anterior insula, anterior cingulate, hypothalamus, and midbrain, but they also found a previously undescribed pattern of cortical activity on the posterior medial surface of each brain hemisphere, a region involved in the default mode of brain function, and implicated in self-related processes[clarification needed]. Compassion for social pain in others was associated with strong activation in the interoceptive, inferior/posterior portion of this region, while compassion for physical pain in others involved heightened activity in the exteroceptive, superior/anterior portion. Compassion for social pain activated this superior/anterior section, to a lesser extent. Activity in the anterior insula related to compassion for social pain peaked later and endured longer than that associated with compassion for physical pain.[49] Compassionate emotions toward others affect the prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal cortex, and the midbrain.[49] Feelings and acts of compassion stimulate areas known to regulate homeostasis, such as the anterior insula, the anterior cingulate, the mesencephalon, the insular cortex and the hypothalamus, supporting the hypothesis that social emotions use some of the same basic devices involved in other, primary emotions.[50]

Compassion in practice

[edit]

Medicine

[edit]

Compassion is one of the most important attributes for physicians practicing medical services.[51][page needed] Compassion brings about the desire to do something to help the sufferer.[12][page needed] That desire to be helpful is not compassion, but it does suggest that compassion is similar to other emotions in that it motivates behaviors to reduce the tension brought on by the emotion.[12][page needed] Physicians generally identify their central duties as the responsibility to put the patient's interests first, including the duty not to harm, to deliver proper care, and to maintain confidentiality.[12][page needed] Compassion is seen in each of those duties because of its direct relation to the recognition and treatment of suffering.[12][page needed] Physicians who use compassion understand the effects of sickness and suffering on human behavior.[52][page needed] Compassion may be closely related to love and the emotions evoked in sickness and suffering. This is illustrated[how?] by the relationship between patients and physicians in medical institutions.[12][page needed] The relationship between suffering patients and their caregivers provides evidence that compassion is a social emotion that is related to[vague] the closeness and cooperation between individuals.

Psychotherapy

[edit]
Further information: Compassion focused therapy

Compassion-focused therapy, created by clinical psychologist Professor Paul Gilbert, focuses on the evolutionary psychology behind compassion: balancing of affect regulation systems (e.g. using affiliative emotions from the care-and-contentment system to soothe and reduce painful emotions from the threat-detection system).[jargon][53][54]

Self-compassion

[edit]
Further information: Self-compassion

Self-compassion is being kind to oneself and accepting suffering as a quality of being human. It has positive effects on subjective happiness, optimism, wisdom, curiosity, agreeableness, and extroversion.[55] Kristin Neff and Christopher Germer identified three levels of activities that thwart self-compassion: self-criticism, self-isolation, and self-absorption; they equate this to fight, flight, and freeze responses.[56] Parenting practices contribute to the development of self-compassion in children. Maternal support, secure attachment, and harmonious family functioning all create an environment where self-compassion can develop. On the other hand, certain developmental factors (i.e., personal fable[jargon]) can hinder the development of self-compassion in children.[57]

Authentic leadership centered on humanism and on nourishing quality interconnectedness increase compassion in the workplace to self and others.[58]

Judith Jordan's concept of self-empathy is similar to self-compassion, it implies the capacity to notice, care, and respond towards one's own felt needs. Strategies of self-care involve valuing oneself, thinking about one's ideations of needs[clarification needed] compassionately, and connecting with others in order to conversely experience[clarification needed] renewal, support, and validation. Research indicates that self-compassionate individuals experience greater psychological health than those who lack self-compassion.[59]

Religion and philosophy

[edit]

Abrahamic religions

[edit]

Christianity

[edit]
Compassion in action: painting of the parable of the Good Samaritan by Giacomo Conti (1813-1888)

The Christian Bible's Second Epistle to the Corinthians is but one place where God is spoken of as the "Father of mercies" (or "compassion")[60] and the "God of all comfort."

Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies and God of all comfort, who comforts us in all our affliction so that we will be able to comfort those who are in any affliction with the comfort with which we ourselves are comforted by God.

— 2 Corinthians 1:3–4[61]

Jesus embodies the essence of compassion and relational care. Christ challenges Christians to forsake their own desires and to act compassionately towards others, particularly those in need or distress.[62]: Ch. 1 

Carry each other's burdens, and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ.

— Galatians 6:2[63]

Be kind to one another, tender-hearted, forgiving each other, just as God in Christ also has forgiven you.

— Ephesians 4:32[64]

One of his most well-known teachings about compassion is the Parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:29–37), in which a Samaritan traveler "was moved with compassion" at the sight of a man who was beaten. Jesus also demonstrated compassion to those his society had condemned—tax collectors, prostitutes, and criminals—by saying "just because you received a loaf of bread, does not mean you were more conscientious about it, or more caring about your fellow man".[65] Here, as in Luke 15 and other places, the word ευσπλαχνία is used for a visceral emotion. Wycliff gives "entrails of mercy" and the King James Version's "bowels of mercy" seems the inspiration for Charles Wesley's hymn "Bowels of divine compassion".[66]

An interpretation of the incarnation and crucifixion of Jesus is that it was undertaken from a compassionate desire to feel the suffering of and effect the salvation of mankind; this was also a compassionate sacrifice by God of his own son ("For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son..."[67]).

A 2012 study of the historical Jesus claimed that he sought to elevate Judaic compassion as the supreme human virtue, capable of reducing suffering and fulfilling the God-ordained purpose of transforming the world into something more worthy of its creator.[65]

Islam

[edit]
A 1930s photograph of a desert traveler praying to Allah "the Compassionate, the Merciful"

In the Muslim tradition, foremost among God's attributes are mercy and compassion, or, in the canonical language of Arabic, Rahman and Rahim. Each of the 114 chapters of the Quran, with one exception, begins with the verse, "In the name of Allah the Compassionate, the Merciful."[68]

Certainly a Messenger has come to you from among yourselves; grievous to him is your falling into distress, excessively solicitous respecting you; to the believers (he is) compassionate.

— Quran 9:128

The Arabic word for compassion is rahmah. Its roots abound in the Quran. A good Muslim is to commence each day, each prayer, and each significant action by invoking Allah the Merciful and Compassionate, i.e., by reciting Bism-i-llah a-Rahman-i-Rahim. The womb and family ties are characterized by compassion and named after the exalted attribute of Allah "Al-Rahim" (The Compassionate).[69]

Judaism

[edit]

In the Jewish tradition, God is the Compassionate and is invoked as the Father of Compassion:[62] hence Raḥmana or Compassionate becomes the usual designation for His revealed word. (Compare, above, the frequent use of raḥman in the Quran).[70] Sorrow and pity for one in distress, creating a desire to relieve it, is a feeling ascribed alike to man and God: in Biblical Hebrew, (riḥam, from reḥem, the mother, womb), "to pity" or "to show mercy" in view of the sufferer's helplessness, hence also "to forgive" (Habakkuk 3:2), "to forbear" (Exodus 2:6; 1 Samuel 15:3; Jeremiah 15:15, 21:7). The Rabbis speak of the "thirteen attributes of compassion". The Bible identifies compassion of a mother for her offspring as comparable, though inferior, to a prophet's trust in God being validated upon appeal (Isaiah 49:15).[70]

A classic articulation of the Golden Rule came from the first century Rabbi Hillel the Elder. Renowned in the Jewish tradition as a sage and a scholar, he is associated with the development of the Mishnah and the Talmud and, as such, is one of the most important figures in Jewish history. Asked for a summary of the Jewish religion "while standing on one leg" (meaning in the most concise terms) Hillel stated: "That which is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow. That is the whole Torah. The rest is the explanation; go and learn."[71] Post 9/11, the words of Rabbi Hillel are frequently quoted in public lectures and interviews around the world by the prominent writer on comparative religion Karen Armstrong.

Many Jewish sources speak of the importance of compassion for and prohibitions on causing needless pain to animals. Significant rabbis who have done so include Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch,[72] Rabbi Simhah Zissel Ziv,[73] and Rabbi Moshe Cordovero.[74]

Ancient Greek philosophy

[edit]

In ancient Greek philosophy motivations based on pathos (feeling, passion) were typically distrusted. Reason was generally considered to be the proper guide to conduct. Compassion was considered pathos; hence, Justice is depicted as blindfolded, because her virtue is dispassion — not compassion.[75]

Aristotle compared compassion with indignation and thought they were both worthy feelings: Compassion means being pained by another person's unearned misfortune; indignation means being pained by another's unearned good fortune. Both are an unhappy awareness of an unjust imbalance.[76]

Stoicism had a doctrine of rational compassion known as oikeiôsis.

In Roman society, compassion was often seen as a vice when it was expressed as pity rather than mercy. In other words, showing empathy toward someone who was seen as deserving was considered virtuous, whereas showing empathy to someone deemed unworthy was considered immoral and weak.[77]

Confucianism

[edit]

Mencius maintained that everyone possesses the germ or root of compassion, illustrating his case with the famous example of the child at an open well:

"Suppose a man were, all of a sudden, to see a young child on the verge of falling into a well. He would certainly be moved to compassion, not because he wanted to get into the good graces of the parents, nor because he wished to win the praise of his fellow-villagers or friends, nor yet because he disliked the cry of the child".[78]: 18 & 82 

Mencius saw the task of moral cultivation as that of developing the initial impulse of compassion into an enduring quality of benevolence.[78]: 22–27 

Indian religions

[edit]

Buddhism

[edit]
Avalokiteśvara looking out over the sea of suffering. China, Liao dynasty.

The first of the Four Noble Truths is the truth of suffering or dukkha (unsatisfactoriness or stress). Dukkha is one of the three distinguishing characteristics of all conditioned existence. It arises as a consequence of not understanding the nature of impermanence anicca (the second characteristic) as well as a lack of understanding that all phenomena are empty of self anatta (the third characteristic).

When one has an understanding of suffering and its origins and understands that liberation from suffering is possible, renunciation arises.[79] Renunciation then lays the foundation for the development of compassion for others who also suffer.[80] This is developed in stages:

Ordinary compassion
The compassion one has for those close to them such as friends and family and a wish to free them from the 'suffering of suffering'[81]
Immeasurable compassion
This is the compassion that wishes to benefit all beings without exception. It is associated with both the Hinayana and Mahayana paths.[82]
It[ambiguous] is developed in four stages called The Four Immeasurables:[83]
  1. Loving kindness (Mettā)
  2. Compassion (Karuṇā)
  3. Joy (Mudita)
  4. Equanimity (Upekṣā)
The American monk Bhikkhu Bodhi states that compassion "supplies the complement to loving-kindness: whereas loving-kindness has the characteristic of wishing for the happiness and welfare of others, compassion has the characteristic of wishing that others be free from suffering, a wish to be extended without limits to all living beings. Like metta, compassion arises by considering that all beings, like ourselves, wish to be free from suffering, yet despite their wishes continue to be harassed by pain, fear, sorrow, and other forms of dukkha."[84]
Great Compassion
This is practiced exclusively in the Mahayana tradition and is associated with the development of Bodhicitta.[85] The Bodhisattva Vow begins (in one version): "Suffering beings are numberless, I vow to liberate them all."[86]

The 14th Dalai Lama has said, "If you want others to be happy, practice compassion. If you want to be happy, practice compassion."[87] But he also warned that compassion is difficult to develop:

This is no easy task... there is no blessing or initiation — which, if only we could receive it — or any mysterious or magical formula or mantra or ritual — if only we could discover it — that can enable us to achieve transformation instantly. It comes little by little, just as a building is constructed brick by brick or, as the Tibetan expression has it, an ocean is formed drop by drop.... Nor should the reader suppose that what we are talking about here is the mere acquisition of knowledge. It is not even a question of developing the conviction that may come from such knowledge. What we are talking about is gaining an experience of virtue through constant practice and familiarization so that it becomes spontaneous. What we find is that the more we develop concern for others' well-being, the easier it becomes to act in others' interests. As we become habituated to the effort required, so the struggle to sustain it lessens. Eventually, it will become second nature. But there are no shortcuts.[88]

Hinduism

[edit]
Main article: Karuṇā
See also: Hospitality, Moksha, and Samyama
Yoga aims at physical, mental, and spiritual purification, with a compassionate mind and spirit being one of its most important goals.[89] Various asanas and mudras are combined with meditation and self-reflection exercises to cultivate compassion.[90]

In classical literature of Hinduism, compassion[91] is a virtue with many shades, each shade explained by different terms. Three most common terms are daya (दया),[92] karuṇā (करुणा),[93] and anukampā (अनुकम्पा).[94] Other words related to compassion in Hinduism include karunya, kripa, and anukrosha.[95][96] Some of these words are used interchangeably among the schools of Hinduism to explain the concept of compassion, its sources, its consequences, and its nature. The virtue of compassion to all living beings, claims Gandhi and others,[97][page needed][98] is a central concept in Hindu philosophy.[91]

Daya is defined by Padma Purana as the virtuous desire to mitigate the sorrow and difficulties of others by putting forth whatever effort necessary.[95][99] Matsya Purana describes daya as the value that treats all living beings (including human beings) as one's own self, wanting the welfare and good of the other living being.[95][100] Such compassion, claims Matsya Purana, is one of necessary paths to being happy. Ekadashi Tattvam[101] explains daya is treating a stranger, a relative, a friend, and a foe as one's own self; and argues that compassion is that state when one sees all living beings as part of one's own self, and when everyone's suffering is seen as one's own suffering. Compassion to all living beings, including to those who are strangers and those who are foes, is seen as a noble virtue.[95]

Karuna, another word for compassion in Hindu philosophy, means placing one's mind in other's favor, thereby seeking to understand the best way to help alleviate their suffering through an act of karuna (compassion). Anukampa, yet another word for compassion, refers to one's state after one has observed and understood the pain and suffering in others.[102]

In Mahabharata, Indra praises Yudhishthira for his anukrosha – compassion, sympathy – for all creatures.[103] Tulsidas contrasts daya (compassion) with abhiman (arrogance, contempt of others), claiming compassion is a source of dharmic life, while arrogance a source of sin. Daya (compassion) is not kripa (pity) in Hinduism, or feeling sorry for the sufferer, because that is marred with condescension; compassion is recognizing one's own and another's suffering in order to actively alleviate that suffering.[104] Compassion is the basis for ahimsa, a core virtue in Hindu philosophy and an article of everyday faith and practice.[105] Ahimsa, or non-injury, is compassion-in-action that helps actively prevent suffering in all living things as well as helping beings overcome suffering and move closer to liberation.

Compassion in Hinduism is discussed as an absolute and a relative concept. There are two forms of compassion: one for those who suffer even though they have done nothing wrong and one for those who suffer because they did something wrong. Absolute compassion applies to both, while relative compassion addresses the difference between the former and the latter. An example of the latter include those who plead guilty or are convicted of a crime such as murder; in these cases, the virtue of compassion must be balanced with the virtue of justice.[95]

The classical literature of Hinduism exists in many Indian languages. For example, Tirukkuṛaḷ, written between 200 BCE and 400 CE, and sometimes called the Tamil Veda, is a cherished classic on Hinduism written in a South Indian language. It dedicates Chapter 25 of Book 1 to compassion,[106] further dedicating separate chapters each for the resulting values of compassion, chiefly, vegetarianism or veganism (Chapter 26), doing no harm (Chapter 32), non-killing (Chapter 33), possession of kindness (Chapter 8), dreading evil deeds (Chapter 21), benignity (Chapter 58), the right scepter (Chapter 55), and absence of terrorism (Chapter 57), to name a few.[107]

Jainism

[edit]
Further information: Ahimsa in Jainism

Compassion for all life is central to the Jain tradition. Though all life is considered sacred, human life is deemed the highest form of earthly existence. To kill any person, no matter their crime, is considered abhorrent. It is the only substantial religious tradition that requires both monks and laity to be vegetarian. It is suggested that certain strains of the Hindu tradition became vegetarian due to strong Jain influences.[108] The Jain tradition's stance on nonviolence, however, goes far beyond vegetarianism. Jains refuse food obtained with unnecessary cruelty. Many practice veganism. The Lal Mandir, a prominent Jain temple in Delhi, is known for the Jain Birds Hospital in a second building behind the main temple.[109][better source needed]

See also

[edit]
  • Agape – Greek word for love, Philia, Philautia, Storge, Eros: Greek terms for love
  • Brahmavihara – Four virtues In Buddhist ethic
  • Brotherly love
  • Charter for Compassion – 2009 call for world compassion
  • Christian humanism – Type of humanism
  • Compassion fatigue – Condition characterized by emotional and physical exhaustion
  • Compassion fade – Tendency to experience a decrease in empathy as the number of people in need of aid increase
  • Compassionate love – Love that focuses on the good of the other
  • Charity (virtue) – One of the seven theological virtues
  • Caregiving – Person helping another with activities of daily living
  • Daya Mata – President of Self-Realization Fellowship from 1955 to 2010
  • Empathic concern
  • Ethics – Philosophical study of morality
  • Fake compassion – Flattery, telling people what they want to hear
  • Forgiveness – Renunciation or cessation of resentment, indignation, or anger
  • Golden Rule – Principle of treating others
  • Greatness – Concept of superiority
  • Humanism – Philosophical school of thought
  • Karuna – Sanskrit term translated as empathy, compassion or mercy
  • Kindness – Type of behaviour
  • Moral emotions – Emotions concerning morality
  • Moral psychology – Interdisciplinary field of study
  • Perspective-taking – Act of analyzing from an alternative point of view
  • Pity – Sympathetic sorrow evoked by the suffering of others
  • Radical compassion – Israeli educator and philosophern
  • Role-taking theory – Social-psychological concept
  • Self-compassion – Extending compassion to one's self in instances of suffering or failure
  • Shabad (hymn) – Sanskrit term referring to utterance in the sense of linguistic performance
  • Social emotions – Emotions that depend upon other people

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Compassion

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Compassion is an emotion elicited by witnessing another's , involving an affective response of concern and a consequent to provide or relief. Unlike , which entails or mirroring the distress, compassion incorporates a prosocial orientation aimed at reducing the observed , often appraised as undeserved or akin to one's own potential . This response pattern distinguishes it from related states like , emphasizing behavioral impulses toward caregiving rather than mere emotional resonance. From an evolutionary perspective, compassion likely emerged as an adaptive mechanism to foster , kin , and cooperative bonds in social groups, with showing distinct neural activations—such as in the anterior insula and —linked to caregiving behaviors conserved across mammals. indicates that cultivating compassion correlates with measurable benefits, including lowered physiological stress responses, enhanced resilience to adversity, and improved interpersonal relationships, as demonstrated in meta-analyses of interventions like compassion . These effects extend to , which buffers against declines by promoting self-kindness amid personal setbacks, though chronic exposure to others' can induce fatigue or biased if not tempered by rational assessment. While compassion underpins moral systems across cultures, its expression varies, with studies revealing contextual moderators like perceived deservingness influencing activation thresholds.

Definitions and Conceptual Foundations

Etymology and Linguistic Origins

The English word compassion derives from the Old French compassion (14th century), which was borrowed from ecclesiastical Latin compassio (genitive compassionis), meaning "sympathetic suffering" or "fellow feeling." This Latin noun stems from the verb compati, composed of the prefix com- ("with, together") and pati ("to suffer, endure, or feel"), literally connoting "to suffer with" another. The root pati traces further to the Proto-Indo-European (PIE) base *penth- or *kwent(h)-, associated with suffering, pain, or enduring hardship, as seen in cognates like Greek penthos ("grief") and Old Irish cessaim ("I suffer"). In its earliest English usage, recorded around 1300–1350 in texts such as religious writings and translations of Latin works, compassion primarily denoted a deep emotional response to others' misfortune, often with a of divine or shared , as in Chaucer's (c. 1387–1400). An precursor, the loan-translation efenðrowung ("even-suffering" or "co-suffering"), appeared in glosses for Latin compassio but did not persist into . Linguistically, the concept parallels ancient Greek sumpatheia (συμπάθεια), from syn- ("with") + pathos ("suffering" or "feeling"), which influenced later European terms for emotional sharing, though compassion emphasizes active fellow-feeling over mere sympathy. Equivalents in non-Indo-European languages, such as Sanskrit karuṇā (active pity or tenderness toward the suffering, rooted in PIE *ǵʰer- "to call out" in distress), highlight cross-linguistic convergences on "co-suffering" as a core motif, though etymological paths differ. These origins underscore compassion's historical tie to involuntary emotional resonance with pain, distinct from voluntary aid or pity.

Core Definitions and Distinctions from , , and

Compassion is defined in psychological as the affective response triggered by witnessing or perceiving another's , accompanied by a motivational component to alleviate that . This emphasizes not merely emotional recognition but a prosocial orientation, distinguishing it from passive affective states; empirical studies, such as those reviewing compassion measures, consistently highlight this dual structure of sensitivity to distress and subsequent behavioral intent. Neuroscientific and evolutionary perspectives reinforce this by linking compassion to mammalian caregiving systems, where of pain in others activates circuits promoting aid rather than withdrawal. In contrast to empathy, which encompasses cognitive understanding of another's perspective or affective sharing of their emotions—often without implying action—compassion integrates empathetic elements but extends to a deliberate wish for relief, reducing the risk of emotional contagion leading to personal distress. Research grounded in emotion theory, including Paul Ekman's work, positions empathy as a precursor that can amplify compassion when paired with motivational factors, but empathy alone may result in burnout if unchanneled into helpful behaviors. Sympathy, meanwhile, involves sorrow or concern for another's plight from an observer's vantage, typically lacking the immersive emotional sharing of empathy or the action-oriented drive of compassion; it is often described as a more detached pity-like response that provides verbal acknowledgment but seldom translates to intervention. Pity shares superficial similarities with in evoking distress at misfortune but frequently implies a hierarchical dynamic, where the pitier views the sufferer as inferior or helpless, potentially undermining relational equality and . Compassion avoids this by framing as a universal human experience warranting active , as evidenced in therapeutic contexts where report compassion as empowering rather than patronizing, unlike which correlates with reduced patient agency. These distinctions are not merely semantic; empirical data from compassion-focused interventions show that fostering compassion—versus mere or —yields measurable improvements in prosocial outcomes, such as increased helping behaviors in controlled experiments.

Evolutionary and Biological Foundations

Evolutionary Origins and Adaptive Functions

Compassion, understood as an affective response to the suffering of others coupled with a motivational urge to alleviate it, is hypothesized to have originated in the social dynamics of mammalian ancestors, particularly among group-living primates, where it facilitated bonding and mutual aid essential for survival in competitive environments. Charles Darwin, in The Descent of Man (1871), proposed that sympathy—a close analog to compassion—evolved through natural selection because communities exhibiting higher levels of such prosocial sentiments were more cohesive and thus better equipped to thrive against rival groups, stating that "those communities, which included the greatest number of the most sympathetic members, would flourish best." This view aligns with observations of proto-compassionate behaviors in nonhuman primates, such as post-conflict consolation in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), where individuals affiliate with distressed victims of aggression to reduce stress and restore social harmony, behaviors absent or rarer in less social monkeys. The adaptive functions of compassion stem primarily from its role in enhancing via and . Under theory, formalized by in 1964, individuals gain indirect reproductive benefits by aiding relatives who share their genes, as seen in maternal care and , where compassion-like concern extends to vulnerable kin to boost group-level survival rates; empirical data from long-term studies of wild chimpanzees show that such targeted helping correlates with higher offspring survival in kin clusters. , as outlined by in 1971, extends this to non-kin through tit-for-tat exchanges, where initial compassionate acts—such as grooming or food sharing in distressed group members—build alliances that yield future returns, evidenced in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) sharing resources with recent helpers even at personal cost. These mechanisms underscore compassion's utility in mitigating risks like predation or injury in social groups, where isolating the weak could destabilize coalitions critical for and defense. In humans, compassion's evolutionary refinement likely amplified these functions through expanded cognitive capacities, enabling concern for distant or unrelated sufferers, which supported larger-scale in bands and early societies; fossil and archaeological evidence from sites (circa 1.8 million years ago) indicates communal care for injured individuals, suggesting early adaptive advantages in resource pooling and collective defense. However, compassion's limits—such as preferential toward in-group members—reflect its origins in small-scale kin and reciprocity networks, preventing exploitation while optimizing energy allocation in resource-scarce ancestral environments. Experimental models, including game-theoretic simulations, confirm that compassion-motivated strategies stably evolve under conditions of repeated interactions, outperforming pure by fostering trust and reducing rates in dilemmas.

Neurobiological and Physiological Mechanisms

Compassion engages neural circuits overlapping with those for empathy but distinct in motivational components, involving the anterior insula and anterior cingulate cortex for detecting and processing others' distress signals. Functional MRI studies reveal heightened activation in the medial orbitofrontal cortex during compassion elicitation, particularly when observing suffering, linking to reward and valuation processes that motivate prosocial action. Systematic reviews of neuroimaging data identify consistent involvement of the left inferior frontal gyrus (orbital part), bilateral middle temporal gyrus, and right cerebellum across compassion paradigms. These regions form part of a broader network including the medial prefrontal cortex and amygdala, which integrate affective resonance with cognitive appraisal of others' needs. Compassion training, such as practices, induces neuroplastic changes, enhancing connectivity in dopamine-innervated areas like the and reducing threat-related hyperactivation in the . Unlike pure empathic distress, which activates pain-matrix regions like the without resolution, compassion recruits approach-oriented pathways, as evidenced by activation coupled with prefrontal modulation. Oxytocin signaling amplifies these responses by heightening the perceptual salience of distress cues, facilitating affiliation and caregiving behaviors through hypothalamic-pituitary interactions. Physiologically, compassion correlates with increased vagally mediated , a marker of parasympathetic dominance that supports emotional and prosocial . This vagal activation, via the ventral , enables down- of personal distress while promoting affiliative responses, as shown in experiments where compassion induction elevates high-frequency HRV components. Oxytocin release during compassionate states further modulates autonomic balance, coordinating with to reduce sympathetic and enhance recovery from stressors. Meta-analyses confirm these effects are robust, with medium effect sizes linking compassion to adaptive physiological profiles independent of .

Psychological Aspects

Theoretical Models and Empirical Research

In , theoretical models of compassion emphasize its distinction from related constructs like and , framing it as a multifaceted response involving of , emotional resonance, and for prosocial action. One prominent framework, proposed by Goetz et al., posits compassion as an affective state triggered specifically by appraisals of undeserved in others, distinct from personal distress or general sadness, and linked to caregiving behaviors through distinct physiological signals such as facial expressions of concern. This model integrates evolutionary perspectives but highlights psychological processes, suggesting compassion evolved to motivate aid without the self-focused withdrawal often seen in empathy-induced distress. Similarly, Gilbert's (CFT) model, grounded in a biopsychosocial approach, views compassion as a regulatory system that balances threat-based emotions (e.g., , ) with affiliative soothing, drawing on social mentality theory where humans form cooperative bonds through shared vulnerability. In this view, compassion activates the to downregulate stress, contrasting with empathy's potential to overwhelm via sympathetic . A pattern-theoretic model further differentiates compassion by emphasizing dynamic patterns of , , and action, rather than static traits; it argues compassion emerges from integrated sensory-motor loops attuned to relational , avoiding with sympathy's passive sorrow or empathy's mirroring. These models converge on compassion's core elements—recognition of , emotional attunement without distress overload, tolerance of discomfort, and behavioral —as outlined in a identifying five definitional components supported across studies. Empirical validation comes from experimental paradigms, such as those distinguishing compassion's appraisals: participants exposed to vignettes of undeserved (e.g., innocent victims) report higher compassion and intentions than for deserved , with physiological markers like increased indicating affiliative engagement rather than threat. Empirical research underscores compassion's adaptive outcomes, with meta-analyses showing interventions like compassion training (e.g., loving-kindness meditation variants) yield small-to-moderate effect sizes in boosting positive affect (Cohen's d ≈ 0.4) and reducing depressive symptoms (d ≈ 0.3), effects sustained at 3-6 month follow-ups in randomized controlled trials involving over 1,000 participants. studies reveal compassion activates reward-related regions (e.g., ventral ) and oxytocin release, fostering without empathy's anterior insula overload, as seen in fMRI comparisons where compassion tasks enhance neural plasticity in emotion-regulation networks. Longitudinal data from community samples (n > 5,000) link trait compassion, measured via self-reports like the Santa Clara Brief Compassion Scale, to lower vital exhaustion and cardiovascular risk, with odds ratios of 0.7-0.8 for high scorers, independent of confounders like age and . However, methodological challenges persist, including reliance on self-reports prone to and context-dependent variability, prompting calls for multi-method assessments incorporating behavioral observation and physiological indices. Controversially, some studies find in high-exposure professions (e.g., healthcare) correlates not with volume but resource deficits like poor self-regulation, challenging assumptions of inevitable burnout. Overall, evidence supports compassion's causal role in resilience, though effect sizes vary by population, with stronger benefits in clinical groups (e.g., anxiety disorders) than non-clinical.

Individual Variations, Measurement, and Development

Individual variations in compassion are associated with traits, particularly higher and lower , which correlate with greater compassionate responses and prosocial behaviors. Low compassion combined with high predisposes individuals to rank-based depressive symptomatology, as evidenced in studies linking these traits to stress reactivity and social . Genetic influences contribute modestly, with twin studies estimating for emotional —a core component of compassion—at approximately 48%, compared to 27% for cognitive , suggesting a heritable basis for affective aspects of compassion though direct studies on compassion itself are limited. Gender differences consistently show women reporting higher levels of compassion and than men in empirical assessments, including self-reports and behavioral tasks, potentially due to neurobiological factors like oxytocin responsiveness, though effect sizes vary and cultural influences may amplify patterns. In prosocial donation tasks, women exhibit greater and compassion but not superior performance. These variations interact with environmental factors, such as early attachment , which buffers against deficits in compassionate development. Compassion is measured primarily through self-report scales, with the Santa Clara Compassion Questionnaire (SCQ) identified as the most valid and reliable for assessing other-directed compassion in healthcare and general contexts, demonstrating strong psychometric properties including and criterion validity. For self-compassion, the Scale (SCS) shows good reliability (e.g., omega >0.85 for subscales) and , correlating with observable behaviors rather than mere . Other instruments, like the Compassion Scale, exhibit factorial invariance across cultures and high test-retest reliability, supporting their use in cross-cultural research. Behavioral and physiological measures, such as oxytocin levels or prosocial tasks, complement self-reports but are less common due to logistical constraints. Compassion develops from infancy, beginning with innate comforting responses to distress in caregivers, which lay the foundation for attachment-based and prosociality across the lifespan. Longitudinal evidence indicates genetic to parental warmth, enhancing compassion in genetically predisposed children through secure early relationships. Interventions like (CFT) effectively cultivate compassion by targeting its components, yielding improvements in self- and other-compassion as measured pre- and post-training, with effects persisting in clinical populations. However, compassion may wane in adulthood without cultivation, influenced by or insecure attachments, underscoring the need for targeted programs to mitigate declines. Comprehensive developmental models remain underdeveloped, with calls for integrating biological, experiential, and training-based pathways to predict trajectories.

Self-Compassion and Its Outcomes

Self-compassion entails extending compassion toward oneself in instances of perceived inadequacy, failure, or , comprising three interrelated components: self-kindness, which involves a gentle understanding rather than harsh ; common humanity, recognizing that personal experiences of are part of the shared rather than isolating anomalies; and , maintaining balanced awareness of painful thoughts and emotions without over-identifying or suppressing them. This conceptualization, operationalized by psychologist , contrasts with by being less contingent on external validation or superiority over others, thereby fostering emotional stability across fluctuating life circumstances. Individual differences in self-compassion are typically assessed via the Self-Compassion Scale (), a 26-item self-report measure yielding subscale scores for the three positive components and their maladaptive opposites (self-judgment, isolation, over-identification), with higher overall scores indicating greater self-compassion. Meta-analytic evidence indicates that lower self-compassion levels robustly predict elevated , including symptoms of depression (r = -0.52), anxiety (r = -0.55), and stress (r = -0.47), across diverse populations, suggesting a protective role against mental health deterioration. In chronic illness contexts, self-compassion correlates negatively with psychological distress (r = -0.35 to -0.45), buffering against emotional burdens like perceived consequences and symptom severity. Interventions designed to cultivate , such as Mindful Self-Compassion programs, yield moderate improvements in self-compassion scores (Hedges' g ≈ 0.50) and reductions in anxiety, particularly among those with mental disorders (g = 0.42) compared to physical illnesses, though effects on broader metrics like remain inconsistent, with some studies showing null long-term gains. Relative to , self-compassion exhibits comparable associations with (r ≈ 0.40-0.50) and inversely with psychological problems (r ≈ -0.40 to -0.50), but demonstrates greater resilience to failure-induced drops, as evidenced by longitudinal studies where self-compassion buffers negative affect more effectively during daily stressors. Negative facets of self-compassion (e.g., reduced self-judgment) link more strongly to distress reduction, while positive facets enhance , underscoring the construct's dual protective and promotive functions. Empirical outcomes extend to enhanced and adaptive , with self-compassionate individuals displaying increased perseverance on difficult tasks via reduced of , unlike self-esteem's reliance on success for maintenance. However, while meta-analyses confirm these benefits, reliance on self-report data and potential toward positive findings warrant caution; experience-sampling studies corroborate moderate within-person links to (r = 0.25-0.35), supporting causal inferences from momentary fluctuations. Overall, self-compassion appears to foster psychological through mechanisms of emotional and reduced rumination, independent of self-esteem's contingencies.

Limits and Pathological Forms Including Fatigue

Compassion, while adaptive, exhibits inherent limits influenced by cognitive and emotional constraints. Research indicates that individual distress reduces available reserves for compassion, as heightened personal stress depletes and empathetic capacity, observed during events like the where caregivers reported diminished responses to others' amid their own overload. Additionally, compassion diminishes when suffering is attributed to the victim's responsibility, with studies showing lower empathetic engagement toward those perceived as self-inflicted cases compared to uncontrollable misfortunes. further reveals "psychic numbing," where sensitivity to declines with increasing victim numbers, leading to proportional under-response; for instance, donations drop sharply beyond a small group of affected individuals due to perceived inefficacy and attentional limits. Pathological manifestations arise when compassion overrides or discernment, fostering hyper-empathy that overwhelms the individual. Excessive , termed a "risky strength," correlates with heightened to anxiety and depression, as absorbing others' emotions without boundaries impairs emotional and personal well-being. In extreme forms, this can manifest as or enabling harmful behaviors, where unchecked concern perpetuates dependency rather than promoting resilience, though empirical data on "hyper-compassion" as a distinct disorder remains limited and often conflated with empathy overload in clinical contexts. Such patterns are genetically and neurophysiologically linked to variations in chemistry affecting emotional , potentially exacerbating interpersonal dysfunction. Compassion fatigue represents a well-documented pathological outcome, defined as secondary traumatic stress from prolonged exposure to others' trauma, converging with burnout to erode empathetic capacity. First conceptualized by Figley in 1995, it stems from the cumulative emotional toll of caregiving, distinct from general burnout by its trauma-specific origins. Symptoms include chronic exhaustion, , emotional numbness, disrupted , headaches, gastrointestinal issues, and reduced sense of purpose, often progressing to detachment from patients or colleagues. Prevalence is elevated among high-exposure professions; for example, a 2025 study of healthcare workers found secondary traumatic stress in 67% and burnout in 63%, overshadowing compassion satisfaction at 23%. Nurses and physicians report particularly high rates, with factors like inadequate and moral distress amplifying risk, as evidenced in scoping reviews of frontline providers. Interventions emphasizing resilience training mitigate , but unchecked exposure causally links to long-term impairment, underscoring compassion's finite nature.

Philosophical and Ethical Dimensions

Perspectives in Western Philosophy

In , compassion was primarily conceptualized through the term , denoting a painful aroused by the sight of undeserved misfortune befalling someone similar to oneself, as articulated by in his . viewed eleos not as a per se but as a rhetorical tool and emotional response integral to and ethical , requiring the perceiver to recognize the victim's similarity in status or to evoke the feeling. This framework emphasized compassion's cognitive elements, such as assessing desert and harm, distinguishing it from mere . Roman , exemplified by Seneca's De Clementia (c. 55–56 CE), reframed () as a rational restraint from vengeance rather than an emotional indulgence in , which Stoics regarded as a passion disruptive to . Seneca advised rulers like to practice clemency to foster loyalty and stability, defining it as "a restraining of the mind from vengeance when it is in its power to avenge itself," thereby prioritizing judicious over sympathetic weakness. This approach aligned with Stoic , where compassion extended to others derives from shared , not unchecked that could undermine personal . In medieval , integrated compassion into in the (c. 1265–1274), defining (misericordia) as "the compassion in our hearts for another person's misery, a compassion which drives us to do something about it." ranked as the foremost toward neighbors, surpassing other acts because it manifests superiority in aiding the inferior, rooted in God's own merciful nature, yet tempered by to avoid excess. He distinguished passionate compassion, permissible but subordinate, from elective aligned with reason and divine will. Enlightenment thinkers like David Hume elevated sympathy—closely akin to compassion—as the psychological foundation of moral approbation in A Treatise of Human Nature (1739–1740), positing it as a mechanism whereby one vicariously shares others' passions, generating benevolence and justice. Hume argued sympathy's influence stems from resemblance and contiguity, enabling impartial moral sentiments without rational deduction alone. This empirical view contrasted duty-based ethics, portraying compassion as a natural, vivacious principle countering selfishness. Arthur Schopenhauer, in On the Basis of Morality (1840), contended that compassion (Mitleid) constitutes the sole genuine moral incentive, transcending egoism through intuitive recognition of shared in the will-to-life underlying all beings. He critiqued Kantian as abstract, asserting ethical actions arise from denying the self-other divide via direct empathetic suffering-with (mitleiden), with marking its absence. Schopenhauer's framed compassion as a rare, ascetic counter to life's inherent pain, influencing later existential thought. Friedrich sharply critiqued (Mitleid)—often conflated with compassion—as a decadent force that multiplies suffering by preserving weakness and hindering life's affirmative striving, as expounded in works like (1883–1885) and The Antichrist (1888). He argued depletes the strong, fosters resentment, and stems from slave morality's valorization of suffering, urging instead a noble that overcomes it through creativity and self-mastery. distinguished potentially noble compassion from 's enervating form but ultimately subordinated both to , viewing unchecked as life-denying.

Perspectives in Eastern and Non-Western Thought

In , compassion, termed , constitutes one of the four immeasurables (brahmavihāras), defined as the active intention to alleviate the of all sentient beings through empathetic engagement with their pain and its causes. This extends beyond mere , requiring a cultivated resolve to transform , as articulated in , , and Vajrayāna traditions where practices like in visualize taking on others' afflictions. Empirical studies on , rooted in these teachings, demonstrate measurable reductions in stress markers, underscoring its practical efficacy. Hinduism similarly elevates karuṇā as a cardinal virtue, embodying empathetic sorrow for others' distress and the impetus to relieve it, prominently featured in epics like the where deities and sages exemplify mercy toward the afflicted. In the , Lord Krishna advises on balancing duty with compassion, framing it as an attribute of the divine that fosters without attachment to outcomes. Jainism intensifies this through kāruṇya, intertwining compassion with ahiṃsā (non-violence), mandating universal empathy toward all life forms to avert karmic bondage, as taught that true compassion arises from recognizing the soul's inherent purity in every being. Chinese traditions integrate compassion variably; in Confucianism, ren (humaneness) encompasses empathetic concern and reciprocity, as Mencius described it as innate responsiveness to others' plights, like aiding orphans, essential for . Taoism lists compassion (ci) among in the , portraying it as yielding non-contentiously to foster natural equilibrium, distinct from forced benevolence. Beyond , African philosophies like in Southern Bantu traditions emphasize communal interdependence, where compassion manifests as shared humanity—"I am because we are"—prioritizing collective welfare over individualism, influencing ethical conduct through and mutual support. These perspectives collectively view compassion as a causal force mitigating via reasoned action, though differing in scope from universal to relational applications.

Ethical Debates on Moral Prioritization and Universality

Philosophers debate whether compassion ought to serve as the primary basis for moral action or be subordinated to principles like , reciprocity, or rational self-interest, given that unchecked compassion can undermine incentives for personal responsibility and societal productivity. posited compassion (Mitleid) as the foundational sentiment, from which emerges as the intuitive aversion to causing harm to others, arguing that ethical behavior stems not from abstract rules but from empathetic identification with suffering. In contrast, critiqued compassion as a symptom of "slave morality," contending that it weakens strong individuals by fostering for the weak, thereby stifling human excellence and perpetuating rather than promoting vital, affirmative values like and self-overcoming. These views highlight a core tension: prioritizing compassion risks eroding by excusing wrongdoing through , as seen in critiques of models that favor offender rehabilitation over victim retribution, potentially incentivizing further harm if consequences are diluted. Effective altruism frameworks address by channeling compassion through evidence-based reasoning, advocating for interventions that maximize welfare gains, such as programs over less impactful local charities, to avoid the inefficiency of unguided . exemplifies this by urging moral agents to weigh impartially, prioritizing distant strangers in —where interventions like malaria nets save lives at $4,500 per life-year—over proximate attachments, based on utilitarian calculations of . Critics, however, argue this rational overlooks causal realities, such as diminished when personal ties are devalued, or the empirical observation that humans exhibit and , where repeated exposure to leads to emotional numbing and reduced after as few as three negative stimuli in lab settings. On universality, ethicists question whether compassion extends impartially to all sentient beings or remains legitimately partial to kin, community, or nation, reflecting evolutionary adaptations like kin selection that favor genetic relatives over strangers to enhance inclusive fitness. Singer defends universality through the "expanding circle" argument, asserting no moral relevance to spatial or temporal distance, as a child's drowning nearby demands action equally as famine abroad, obligating affluent individuals to donate substantially—up to the point of marginal utility equality—before personal luxuries. Opponents, including communitarians like Michael Walzer, counter that such impartiality ignores associative duties and cultural embeddedness, potentially destabilizing societies by eroding in-group solidarity, as evidenced by historical data showing stronger welfare states in homogeneous nations where trust and reciprocity correlate with ethnic similarity rather than abstract universalism. Nietzsche further rejected universal compassion as a Christian-derived pathology that equalizes all in weakness, advocating instead for a hierarchical ethic where compassion, if extended at all, preserves differences in strength and does not demand self-sacrifice from the exceptional. These debates underscore practical limits: empirical studies indicate compassion's universality strains under resource scarcity, with "compassion collapse" occurring when victim numbers exceed cognitive thresholds (e.g., effective aid drops sharply beyond 1-2 identifiable sufferers), suggesting moral systems must incorporate mechanisms to sustain long-term rather than relying on depletable emotional reserves. Philosophers like criticized Singer's demands as "one thought too many," arguing that intuitive partiality toward loved ones constitutes integrity, not bias, as impartial calculation in emergencies could erode the unreflective bonds essential for human flourishing. Thus, while compassion drives , ethical realism requires balancing it against and to avoid outcomes where universal extension fosters dependency or neglects , as Nietzsche warned in (1887).

Compassion in Religious Traditions

Abrahamic Religions

In Abrahamic traditions—, —compassion is portrayed as a core divine attribute emulated by humans through acts of , , and aid to the vulnerable. God's compassion serves as the , with scriptures urging believers to reflect this quality in interpersonal relations and . This emphasis stems from revelations depicting divine for human , balanced by moral , fostering communities oriented toward welfare without excusing wrongdoing. Judaism conceptualizes compassion through terms like rachamim (tender mercy) and (loving-kindness), integral to 's character as declared in Exodus 34:6: "The Lord, the Lord, a God merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness." This attribute informs commandments such as Deuteronomy 15:7-11, mandating generous aid to the poor without a grudging heart, linking compassion to (righteous giving) as an act of rather than optional charity. Rabbinic teachings extend this to arousing pity for the soul's before mitzvot observance, emphasizing internal motivation. The tradition underscores compassion's role in , as in protections for orphans, widows, and strangers, reflecting God's fairness toward the weak. Christianity inherits Judaism's compassionate God but amplifies it through ' ministry, where compassion (splagchnizomai, gut-level pity) prompts healings and teachings, as in Matthew 9:36: "When he saw the crowds, he had compassion for them, because they were harassed and helpless, like sheep without a ." The (Luke 10:25-37) exemplifies neighborly compassion transcending ethnic boundaries, commanding love for others as oneself. exhortations, such as Colossians 3:12—"Put on then, as God's chosen ones, holy and beloved, compassionate hearts, , , , and "—integrate compassion with virtues like (Ephesians 4:32). This active mirrors divine mercy, evident in ' restoration of sight to the blind (Matthew 20:29-34) and healing of lepers, prioritizing the marginalized. Islam centers compassion (rahma) as 's preeminent quality, invoked in every Quranic surah's opening: "In the name of , the Most Compassionate (), the Most Merciful (Ar-Rahim)" ( 1:1), denoting universal and specific . 7:156 states, "My encompasses all things," prevailing over wrath per authentic . The Prophet Muhammad taught, "The merciful will be shown by the Most Merciful; be merciful to those on the and the One in the heavens will have upon you" (), and that retained 99 parts of for while sending one part to . This fosters human compassion as emulation, extending to animals and adversaries, rooted in parental-like tenderness.

Indian and East Asian Religions

In Hinduism, karuṇā denotes compassion as an active empathy prompting alleviation of others' suffering, rooted in the Sanskrit term implying "to do" or perform remedial acts. This virtue aligns with righteous conduct in scriptures such as the Bhagavad Gītā and Dharmashāstra, fostering harmony through empathetic engagement without self-negation. Deities are often depicted as embodiments of karuṇā, with divine grace extending mercy to devotees amid cosmic cycles of suffering. Jainism integrates compassion via ahiṃsā (non-violence), mandating avoidance of harm to all life forms through physical, verbal, and mental restraint, thereby cultivating and as ethical imperatives. This evaluates actions holistically, prioritizing the intrinsic value of and prohibiting even unintentionally, as expounded in classical texts and commentaries. Practitioners extend dayā (compassion) universally, reinforcing non-violent lifestyles that minimize karmic bondage. Buddhism, emerging in ancient around the 5th century BCE, positions karuṇā as one of the four brahmavihāras—sublime mental states comprising loving-kindness (mettā), compassion (karuṇā), sympathetic joy (muditā), and equanimity (upekkhā)—cultivated through to counter (dukkha). In Theravāda traditions, karuṇā arises as heartfelt commiseration motivating relief of , following mettā in sequential development. Mahāyāna variants, influential in from the 1st century CE onward, elevate karuṇā through the path, where aspirants vow to postpone nirvāṇa for universal salvation, embodying great compassion (mahākaruṇā) as a paramita (). East Asian adaptations of Mahāyāna Buddhism, such as in , , and Korea, prominently feature bodhisattvas like ( in Chinese), symbolizing boundless compassion responding to worldly cries, as depicted in artifacts from the (907–1125 CE). complements this with rén (benevolence), a core virtue in the (compiled circa 475–221 BCE) entailing empathetic reciprocity and humane action to sustain social order, distinct from Buddhist universalism by emphasizing relational duties over soteriological delay. These traditions interweave in East Asian practice, with rén fostering compassionate governance and familial piety alongside Buddhist mercy rituals, though causal analyses reveal rén's focus on hierarchical potentially tempering boundless to prevent social disruption.

Applications in Practice

In Healthcare and Therapeutic Contexts

Compassion in healthcare manifests as a deliberate relational response by providers to alleviate , encompassing actions like attentive , empathetic communication, and tailored support, which empirical studies link to enhanced adherence to treatment, faster , and higher satisfaction scores. Randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses indicate that interventions fostering compassionate care, such as training programs emphasizing relational understanding, improve clinical outcomes including reduced depression in inpatients and better emotional regulation among recipients. For instance, compassionate practices in correlate with lower rates of complications and increased trust in provider- interactions, as evidenced by longitudinal data from settings where such approaches yielded measurable gains in recovery metrics. In therapeutic contexts, (CFT), developed by psychologist in the early 2000s, applies compassion as a core mechanism to address , , and mood disorders by cultivating and other-directed through structured exercises like and . Clinical trials demonstrate CFT's in reducing psychopathological symptoms, with one 2023 study of group interventions showing significant improvements in compassion competencies and symptom reduction compared to waitlist controls across diverse clinical populations. Meta-analyses of CFT applications confirm moderate to large effect sizes for positive outcomes, including decreased anxiety and enhanced , particularly in individuals with high , outperforming or equaling standard treatments in randomized designs. Healthcare applications extend to provider programs, where compassion cultivation via mindfulness-integrated protocols has been in randomized trials, yielding sustained in burnout risk factors like while preserving care quality. Evidence from scoping reviews underscores that while compassion's implementation varies by context—such as emphasizing end-of-life support—its consistent association with verifiable outcomes like improved adherence (e.g., 20-30% increases in medication compliance in intervention cohorts) supports its integration into protocols, though gaps persist in large-scale, long-term RCTs isolating causal effects from variables like provider .

In Education, Leadership, and Organizational Settings

In educational settings, compassion manifests through teacher-student interactions that emphasize and emotional support, often integrated into social-emotional learning (SEL) programs. Empirical research indicates that compassion-focused interventions, such as (CFT), can reduce psychopathic traits like callousness and among at-risk youth, with one randomized controlled trial showing significant decreases compared to cognitive-behavioral approaches. A meta-analysis of 21 randomized controlled trials involving over 1,200 participants further demonstrates that such interventions enhance overall wellbeing while reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety. For educators, Compassionate Mind (CMT) has been shown in randomized trials to boost , positive affect, and physiological regulation while lowering burnout and stress levels. However, direct links to academic performance remain indirect and understudied, with most evidence derived from or clinical subgroups rather than broad applications, highlighting limitations in generalizability due to multicomponent intervention designs. In leadership contexts, compassionate approaches involve leaders actively addressing employee distress through , , and support for , as outlined in six core dimensions from a of 41 studies spanning 2002–2021. These practices correlate with reduced employee burnout, particularly in high-stress sectors like healthcare, where supportive mitigates —one key burnout element—per linking compassion to lower rates. Compassionate leaders also foster greater job , satisfaction, and , with studies showing stronger trust and psychological connections that enhance and performance. Evidence from crisis periods, such as the , underscores improved collaboration and under such , though much of the data originates from qualitative healthcare-focused , potentially limiting applicability to non-service industries. Within organizational settings, compassion contributes to cultures that prioritize employee and inclusivity, yielding associations with higher , lower turnover, and strengthened interpersonal relationships. For instance, environments emphasizing and —hallmarks of compassionate practices—promote and reduce stress, leading to better overall workforce and . However, a of compassion-based interventions, such as programs, reveals no significant effects on reducing workplace distress (standardized mean difference = -0.24, 95% CI [-0.62, 0.14]) or depression (SMD = -0.096, 95% CI [-0.50, 0.31]), with high heterogeneity across small-sample studies (mean n=49). This suggests that while correlational benefits exist for compassionate climates, targeted interventions may not reliably translate to measurable improvements in or , possibly due to inadequate assessment of transfer or implementation .

In Social Policy and Interpersonal Relations

In social policy, compassion serves as a primary motivator for redistributive measures intended to mitigate undeserved , such as programs and anti-poverty initiatives. Empirical analyses reveal that compassion-driven support for welfare correlates with perceptions of need rather than merit, influencing public preferences for policies like expanded social safety nets; for instance, experimental studies demonstrate that vignettes evoking compassion increase endorsement of by 20-30% among participants, though this effect diminishes when recipients are perceived as responsible for their plight. However, virtue theory applications critique such policies for prioritizing subjective reduction over objective long-term , arguing that unchecked compassion can overlook structural incentives for dependency, as evidenced by longitudinal data from U.S. welfare reforms showing persistent intergenerational despite increased spending exceeding $1 trillion annually since 1965. Compassion fatigue among public administrators further complicates policy implementation, with surveys of over 3,300 state and employees indicating that 20% experience high levels of vicarious trauma from repeated exposure to societal hardships, correlating with reduced job and policy efficacy. This exhaustion, akin to burnout scores exceeding 30 on validated scales, arises from the emotional toll of sustained empathetic engagement without reciprocal outcomes, potentially leading to cynical or detached decision-making in . Critics from economic perspectives contend that institutionalized compassion supplants voluntary private aid, eroding communal bonds; historical comparisons show U.S. private charity rates dropping from 10% of GDP pre-New Deal to under 2% post-expansion, alongside welfare caseloads ballooning to 4.4% of population by 1994 before reforms. In interpersonal relations, compassion fosters deeper connections and resilience by buffering negative emotions and enhancing communication, with linking higher compassion levels to 15-25% greater relationship satisfaction scores in longitudinal couple studies. , in particular, correlates with reduced interpersonal and improved authenticity, as individuals with elevated trait compassion report lower depression symptoms and stronger networks over 6-12 month follow-ups. Yet, chronic provision of compassion can precipitate emotional depletion, termed , where givers experience heightened anxiety and relational strain; clinical data from helping professions show 40-60% prevalence rates, extending to personal dynamics when boundaries erode, enabling maladaptive behaviors in recipients. Evolutionary models suggest this stems from mismatched appraisal of cues, where unchecked overrides discernment of deservedness, potentially undermining mutual in bonds.

Criticisms, Controversies, and Societal Implications

Empirical Critiques of Excessive or Misguided Compassion

in and occupational identifies as a significant risk in helping professions, characterized by emotional and physical exhaustion from prolonged exposure to others' , leading to reduced and caregiving efficacy. Studies among nurses and veterinarians report prevalence rates where secondary traumatic stress and burnout dominate, affecting up to 67% and 63% of respondents respectively, resulting in increased , staff turnover, and diminished outcomes. Short-term manifestations include psychosomatic symptoms such as chronic , headaches, and gastrointestinal issues, while long-term effects encompass elevated risks of , , , and immune dysfunction due to sustained high levels. In veterinary and healthcare settings, this fatigue correlates with job dissatisfaction and premature career exits, impairing organizational and increasing litigation risks from errors in care. Distinctions between —often involving personal distress—and compassion highlight how excessive empathic engagement can exacerbate negative outcomes. studies demonstrate that observing others' activates observers' own -related regions, fostering empathic distress that promotes withdrawal and apathy rather than sustained helping, particularly under high-exposure conditions like pandemics affecting workers. This distress, unlike resilient compassion, contributes to health declines including anxiety and depression, underscoring empathy's potential to overwhelm rather than motivate effectively. In , empathy introduces biases such as the , where individuals prioritize aid to a single, vivid sufferer over broader groups; experimental data show approximately 75% of participants advancing a fictional identifiable in treatment queues at potential cost to statistical lives. Excessive affective has been linked to heightened PTSD symptoms, intrusive memories, and social avoidance in trauma-exposed contexts, while cognitive inaccuracies hinder flexible responses, fostering irrational self-blame and impaired trauma resolution. These patterns suggest misguided compassion can perpetuate inefficiencies or personal harm by favoring immediate emotional pulls over rational, scalable interventions.

Evolutionary and Incentive-Based Limitations

From an evolutionary perspective, compassion likely developed as a mechanism to promote and protection within kin groups and reciprocal relationships, rather than as a universal trait applicable to all humans. theory posits that altruistic behaviors, including compassionate responses, are favored when they enhance the of genetic relatives, as formalized by Hamilton's rule (rB > C, where r is relatedness, B the benefit to the recipient, and C the cost to the actor). , as modeled by Trivers in 1971, extends this to non-kin through repeated interactions where aid is exchanged, but requires cognitive capacities for recognizing partners, remembering past exchanges, and punishing cheaters to prevent exploitation. These mechanisms impose inherent limits, as compassion diminishes beyond immediate social circles due to the risks of non-reciprocation or genetic dilution in larger, anonymous populations. Empirical studies confirm ingroup biases in compassion, where individuals exhibit stronger empathetic responses toward members of their own social groups compared to outgroups. For instance, experiments show reduced neural in empathy-related regions when observing pain in outgroup versus ingroup members, leading to lower . This parochialism aligns with evolutionary pressures favoring intra-group cohesion for survival, but it constrains compassion's scope in diverse or global contexts, potentially exacerbating intergroup conflicts. Such biases persist even in controlled settings, with self-reported and charitable donations favoring similar others over dissimilar ones. Compassion fatigue further illustrates evolutionary constraints, manifesting as and reduced capacity for empathetic concern after prolonged exposure to , particularly outside core kin networks. Evolutionary psychologists suggest this arises from adaptive prioritization of resources for one's own group, as extending universally would deplete finite cognitive and energetic reserves shaped by ancestral environments. Caregivers in high-exposure roles, such as healthcare workers, report burnout rates exceeding 40% in longitudinal studies, underscoring the unsustainability of sustained compassion without reciprocal or kin-based . Incentive structures impose additional limitations by crowding out intrinsic compassionate motivations or fostering dependency that undermines long-term welfare. Economic experiments demonstrate that extrinsic rewards, intended to boost , often reduce voluntary by signaling that actions are transactional rather than morally driven, with effect sizes indicating up to 20-30% drops in intrinsic . In policy contexts, compassion-motivated welfare expansions can create , where recipients reduce self-reliant efforts due to guaranteed support, as evidenced by labor participation declines of 5-10% in response to expanded benefits in U.S. and European programs. Economist critiques such approaches, arguing they prioritize visible short-term aid over incentives for personal responsibility, perpetuating cycles of dependency rather than alleviating . theory reinforces this, positing that politicians exploit compassion rhetoric to secure votes, distorting toward politically salient groups while ignoring broader efficiency losses.

Cultural and Political Debates on Compassion's Role

In political discourse, compassion is often invoked to justify expansive social policies, yet critics argue it can lead to decisions prioritizing immediate emotional appeals over long-term societal benefits. For instance, Paul Bloom contends that —a cognitive and emotional process closely tied to compassion—biases moral judgments toward vivid, identifiable victims while neglecting broader statistical harms, resulting in suboptimal policies such as favoring disaster relief for dramatic events over preventive measures like vaccinations. Bloom's analysis, drawn from psychological experiments, illustrates how this distortion manifests in and systems, where empathic focus on individual stories can exacerbate inequalities by diverting resources inefficiently. Conservative thinkers frequently critique excessive compassion as undermining incentives and fiscal responsibility, positing that it fosters dependency in welfare systems without addressing root causes like family structure or . A report highlights how liberal appeals to compassion in U.S. policy have expanded entitlements, correlating with rising out-of-wedlock births (from 5% in 1960 to 40% by 2010) and intergenerational , as unchecked aid disincentivizes . Empirical studies support this by showing that while compassion boosts short-term support for redistribution, it correlates with policy outcomes like reduced labor participation in generous welfare states, as observed in cross-national from the U.S. and where higher aid levels link to lower employment among low-income groups. Proponents of compassionate , often aligned with progressive views, counter that such policies embody ethical imperatives for equity, citing compassion's role in galvanizing support for programs like the , though they rarely engage causal evidence of unintended incentives. Cultural variations further complicate these debates, as expressions of compassion differ in emotional valence and scope, influencing policy preferences. across U.S., German, and East Asian samples reveals that Americans emphasize positive uplift in compassionate acts to avoid negative emotions, leading to expressions with more and less compared to , who tolerate greater negativity. This cultural aversion to distress in individualistic societies like the U.S. may amplify political pushes for "feel-good" interventions, such as symbolic aid gestures, over rigorous reforms, whereas collectivist cultures prioritize harmony and duty-bound aid, potentially yielding more sustainable but less emotionally driven support systems. In versus the , higher coexists with greater fear of receiving compassion, reflecting cultural stigmas against vulnerability that temper expansive welfare expectations. Among some conservative Christians, compassion is reframed as potentially sinful when it overrides doctrinal truths, with recent discourse (2024-2025) portraying empathy as a manipulative tool advancing agendas like abortion access or LGBTQ+ rights, which they view as contrary to biblical order. This perspective aligns with broader right-wing skepticism of empathy as a weakness exploited in polarized politics, evidenced by interventions where inducing empathy backfires among high-individualism conservatives, reducing rather than enhancing policy support. Conversely, empirical work in social psychology indicates conservatives exhibit lower compassion toward outgroups due to emphases on loyalty and tradition, contributing to divides where left-leaning sources in academia—often critiqued for systemic bias—overstate empathy's universality to advocate universalist policies. These tensions underscore compassion's dual role: a motivator for altruism yet a vector for ideological capture when unmoored from evidence-based constraints.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2864937/
  2. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364661324000846
  3. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-23460-7
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8287292/
  5. https://www.etymonline.com/word/compassion
  6. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/compassion
  7. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/compassion_n?tl=true
  8. https://www.etymonline.com/word/compassionate
  9. https://www.medicinanarrativa.eu/one-word-in-four-hundred-words-compassion
  10. https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/topic/compassion/definition
  11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735816300216
  12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303600556_What_is_Compassion_and_How_Can_We_Measure_it_A_Review_of_Definitions_and_Measures
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10087504/
  14. https://www.mindandlife.org/insight/the-science-of-compassion/
  15. https://www.simplypsychology.org/sympathy-empathy-compassion.html
  16. https://www.paulekman.com/blog/what-is-global-compassion-and-how-can-we-attain-it/
  17. https://dictionary.apa.org/compassion
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5405806/
  19. https://familyfire.com/articles/understanding-sympathy-empathy-pity-compassion
  20. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.992705/full
  21. https://evolution-outreach.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s12052-009-0162-z
  22. https://www.wrc.kyoto-u.ac.jp/en/publications/ShinyaYamamoto/primate-empathy-2016.html
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362884817_The_Evolutionary_Basis_for_Human_Empathy_Compassion_and_Generosity
  24. https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/images/uploads/Trivers-EvolutionReciprocalAltruism.pdf
  25. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586161/full
  26. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-41835-5
  27. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-63846-3
  28. https://academic.oup.com/scan/article/16/10/1036/6265002
  29. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34963634/
  30. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/irish-journal-of-psychological-medicine/article/neuroscience-of-compassion-a-scoping-review-of-the-literature-on-the-neuroscience-of-compassion-and-compassionrelated-therapies/AD145E5F983F6E365AB735A0438EF75A
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8483284/
  32. https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/images/uploads/Simon-Thomas-fMRICaringVSelfFocus.pdf
  33. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/12/2/183
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0149763420304437
  35. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-03026-001
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9301262/
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7762265/
  38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876022000769
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8550749/
  40. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.547241/full
  41. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29152894/
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10406111/
  43. https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/papt.12270
  44. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32353470/
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1963313/
  46. https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/are_women_more_compassionate_than_men
  47. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375913867_Gender_differences_in_empathy_compassion_and_prosocial_donations_but_not_theory_of_mind_in_a_naturalistic_social_task
  48. https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/images/uploads/CompassionStressBuffering-PDF.pdf
  49. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35107822/
  50. https://self-compassion.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/ScaleMindfulness.pdf
  51. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00223891.2022.2093731
  52. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1508402/full
  53. https://sk.sagepub.com/ency/edvol/the-sage-encyclopedia-of-lifespan-human-development/chpt/compassion
  54. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/dev.22184
  55. https://brieflands.com/articles/ijpbs-138912
  56. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED662080.pdf
  57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328397758_Compassion_and_Human_Development_Current_Approaches_and_Future_Directions
  58. https://self-compassion.org/what-is-self-compassion/
  59. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35961039/
  60. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15298860309032
  61. https://positivepsychology.com/self-compassion-scale/
  62. https://self-compassion.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Ferrari2019.pdf
  63. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39511912/
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2212144723001205
  65. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12671-025-02606-8
  66. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925001023
  67. https://self-compassion.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Chio-et-al.-2021-Meta-analytic-review-on-the-differential-effects-o.pdf
  68. https://wisdomcenter.uchicago.edu/news/wisdom-news/why-self-compassion-not-self-esteem-leads-success
  69. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144725000444
  70. https://source.washu.edu/2025/08/lessons-from-the-pandemic-distress-puts-limits-on-compassion/
  71. https://wisdomcenter.uchicago.edu/news/wisdom-news/does-everyone-deserve-compassion
  72. https://www.vox.com/explainers/2017/7/19/15925506/psychic-numbing-paul-slovic-apathy
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4340688/
  74. https://theconversation.com/an-excess-of-empathy-can-be-bad-for-your-mental-health-178677
  75. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/pathological-relationships/201203/genetic-and-neuro-physiological-basis-hyper-empathy-0
  76. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4924075/
  77. https://ojin.nursingworld.org/table-of-contents/volume-16-2011/number-1-january-2011/overview-and-summary-compassion-fatigue/
  78. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7560777/
  79. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/compassion-fatigue
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12075678/
  81. https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-023-10356-3
  82. https://bmcnurs.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12912-025-03351-y
  83. https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/files/373913515/CairnsD2023TheNatureOfCompassion.pdf
  84. https://thestoicletters.com/review-seneca-of-clemency/
  85. https://www.jstor.org/stable/283442
  86. https://www.newadvent.org/summa/3030.htm
  87. https://www.thedivinemercy.org/articles/meaning-mercy
  88. https://www.newadvent.org/summa/5094.htm
  89. https://davidhume.org/texts/t/3/full
  90. https://iep.utm.edu/humemora/
  91. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/44929/44929-h/44929-h.htm
  92. https://philosophynow.org/issues/52/Schopenhauers_Compassionate_Morality
  93. https://www.samsara.clinic/nietzsches-critique-of-pity/
  94. https://aporia.byu.edu/pdfs/obdrzalek-on_the_contrast_between_pity_and_compassion.pdf
  95. https://www.samwoolfe.com/2022/03/nietzsche-opposition-to-pity-and-comfort.html
  96. https://www.themarketingsage.com/karuna-is-my-word-for-a-more-compassionate-2025/
  97. https://www.hinduwebsite.com/divinelife/essays/compassion3.asp
  98. https://www.wisdomlib.org/concept/karuna
  99. https://www.arihantainstitute.org/blog/121-jain-compassion-nonviolence-toward-animals
  100. https://www.alliancemagazine.org/analysis/traditions-of-giving-in-confucianism/
  101. https://alexchen373.medium.com/the-three-treasures-of-daoism-60de1d344f21
  102. https://iep.utm.edu/hunhu-ubuntu-southern-african-thought/
  103. https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/morality-from-compassion/
  104. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354056340_Nietzsche%27s_Compassion
  105. https://www.quora.com/Are-justice-and-compassion-mutually-exclusive-Why-or-why-not
  106. https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/HbeCxuCBnfjdjejYw/an-argument-for-discussion-of-increasing-compassion-as
  107. https://iai.tv/articles/peter-singers-universal-ethics-under-fire-auid-2612
  108. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09697330231196228
  109. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/28223/chapter/213257861
  110. https://philosophynow.org/issues/59/Ten_Reasons_Why_I_Love_Hate_Peter_Singer
  111. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3713770/
  112. https://theacademic.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/2.pdf
  113. https://www.chabad.org/parshah/article_cdo/aid/2269078/jewish/Tzedek-Justice-and-Compassion.htm
  114. https://www.chabad.org/library/tanya/tanya_cdo/aid/460129/jewish/Chapter-45.htm
  115. https://www.aju.edu/ziegler-school-rabbinic-studies/our-torah/back-issues/true-power-compassion
  116. https://rsc.byu.edu/covenant-compassion/disability-social-justice-ancient-israelite-culture
  117. https://bibleproject.com/videos/character-of-god-compassion/
  118. https://foundations.vision.org/9-stories-compassion-gospels-9281
  119. https://www.openbible.info/topics/compassion_to_others
  120. https://billygrahamlibrary.org/5-things-the-bible-says-about-compassion/
  121. https://www.compassion.com/poverty/what-does-the-bible-say-about-compassion.htm
  122. https://tarteel.ai/blog/the-boundless-mercy-of-islam-understanding-rahma/
  123. https://www.abuaminaelias.com/dailyhadithonline/2012/03/08/allah-rahmah-prevails-wrath/
  124. https://myislam.org/quran-verses/allahs-mercy/
  125. https://www.abuaminaelias.com/dailyhadithonline/2010/11/16/irhamu-man-fil-ard/
  126. https://sunnah.com/riyadussalihin:420
  127. https://prophetsofgod.net/rahma-mercy-of-allah/
  128. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00221678241233786
  129. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12793
  130. https://mahb.stanford.edu/blog/ahimsa/
  131. https://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/nyanaponika/wheel006.html
  132. https://drarisworld.wordpress.com/2020/01/31/compassion-karuna-in-theravada-buddhism/
  133. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1119&context=claritas
  134. https://zenstudiespodcast.com/avalokiteshvara/
  135. https://heartledsounds.co.uk/blog/2020/compassion
  136. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2023/08/30/confucianism-taoism-and-chinese-folk-religions/
  137. https://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/bioethics/_pdf/CCE.pdf
  138. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40029890/
  139. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9116004/
  140. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4413786/
  141. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032723000228
  142. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2024-33588-001
  143. https://bmcpalliatcare.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12904-016-0080-0
  144. https://www.aamc.org/news/can-compassion-help-heal-patients-and-providers
  145. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-psychologists-and-counsellors-in-schools/article/compassion-as-a-framework-for-creating-individual-and-grouplevel-wellbeing-in-the-classroom-new-directions/A006EE9C87D7F95B5E28B3E4269C31C4
  146. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10072040/
  147. https://hbr.org/2023/02/leading-with-compassion-has-research-backed-benefits
  148. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-024-05959-w
  149. https://pdescioli.com/papers/delton.petersen.descioli.robertson.welfare.polpsych18.pdf
  150. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/am-pdf/10.1111/pops.12620
  151. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-social-policy/article/compassion-in-contemporary-social-policy-applications-of-virtue-theory/D361B9211753837BAE81CE2DA0178F4B
  152. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3889&context=jssw
  153. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0734371X221081508
  154. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360201040_When_Perceptions_of_Public_Service_Harms_the_Public_Servant_Predictors_of_Burnout_and_Compassion_Fatigue_in_Government
  155. https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/when-perceptions-public-service-harms-public-servant-predictors-burnout-and-compassion
  156. https://www.heritage.org/welfare/commentary/welfare-state-turns-compassion-upside-down
  157. https://www.truecharity.us/james-whitford-could-government-welfare-be-undermining-compassion/
  158. https://jhwbjournal.com/uploads/files/9f59312d77591a33c35337b7e413fd61.pdf
  159. https://positivepsychology.com/why-is-compassion-important/
  160. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=12238&context=etd
  161. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4450657/
  162. https://www.verywellmind.com/compassion-fatigue-the-toll-of-caring-too-much-7377301
  163. https://sigmapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jnu.12307
  164. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200930-can-empathy-be-bad-for-you
  165. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982214007702
  166. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364661316301930
  167. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1090297/full
  168. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-athletes-way/201212/the-evolutionary-biology-altruism
  169. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29633906/
  170. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/spc3.12176
  171. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/spc3.12701
  172. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3906839/
  173. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-60497-3_16
  174. https://www.investors.com/politics/columnists/thomas-sowell-the-lefts-phony-compassion-for-the-downtrodden/
  175. https://sites.santafe.edu/~bowles/EconomicIncentives-final.pdf
  176. https://www.vox.com/conversations/2017/1/19/14266230/empathy-morality-ethics-psychology-compassion-paul-bloom
  177. https://news.yale.edu/2017/01/03/book-against-empathy-case-rational-compassion
  178. https://www.heritage.org/political-process/report/killing-us-kindness-how-liberal-compassion-hurts
  179. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/empathic-minds/202111/how-compassion-can-transform-our-politics-economy-society
  180. https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2015/03/cultural-differences-sympathy-032525
  181. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/27953/chapter/211536531
  182. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9806990/
  183. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/is-empathy-a-sin-some-conservative-christians-argue-it-can-be
  184. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/06/toxic-empathy-weakness/683355/
  185. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9400002/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.