Hubbry Logo
Apollo 13Apollo 13Main
Open search
Apollo 13
Community hub
Apollo 13
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Apollo 13
Apollo 13
from Wikipedia

Apollo 13
Odyssey's damaged service module, as seen from the Apollo Lunar Module Aquarius, hours before reentry
Mission typeCrewed lunar landing attempt (H)
OperatorNASA
COSPAR ID
  • CSM: 1970-029A
  • LM: 1970-029C
SATCAT no.4371[1]
Mission duration5 days, 22 hours, 54 minutes, 41 seconds[2]
Spacecraft properties
Spacecraft
Manufacturer
Launch mass44,069 kg (CSM: 28,881 kg;[3] LM: 15,188 kg)[4]
Landing mass5,050 kilograms (11,133 lb)[5]
Crew
Crew size3
Members
Callsign
  • CSM: Odyssey
  • LM: Aquarius
Start of mission
Launch dateApril 11, 1970, 19:13:00 (1970-04-11UTC19:13Z) UTC[6]
RocketSaturn V SA-508
Launch siteKennedy LC-39A
End of mission
Recovered byUSS Iwo Jima
Landing dateApril 17, 1970, 18:07:41 (1970-04-17UTC18:07:42Z) UTC
Landing siteSouth Pacific Ocean
21°38′24″S 165°21′42″W / 21.64000°S 165.36167°W / -21.64000; -165.36167 (Apollo 13 splashdown)
Flyby of Moon (orbit and landing aborted)
Closest approachApril 15, 1970, 00:21:00 UTC
Distance254 kilometers (137 nmi)
Docking with LM
Docking dateApril 11, 1970, 22:32:08 UTC
Undocking dateApril 17, 1970, 16:43:00 UTC
Apollo 13 logo Three astronauts posing behind a lunar globe
Jim Lovell, Jack Swigert, Fred Haise

Apollo 13 (April 11–17, 1970) was the seventh crewed mission in the Apollo space program and would have been the third Moon landing. The craft was launched from Kennedy Space Center on April 11, 1970, but the landing was aborted after an oxygen tank in the service module (SM) exploded two days into the mission, disabling its electrical and life-support system. The crew, supported by backup systems on the Apollo Lunar Module, instead looped around the Moon in a circumlunar trajectory and returned safely to Earth on April 17. The mission was commanded by Jim Lovell, with Jack Swigert as command module (CM) pilot and Fred Haise as Lunar Module (LM) pilot. Swigert was a late replacement for Ken Mattingly, who was grounded after exposure to rubella.

A routine stir of an oxygen tank ignited damaged wire insulation inside it, causing an explosion that vented the contents of both of the SM's oxygen tanks to space.[note 1] Without oxygen, needed for breathing and for generating electrical power, the SM's propulsion and life support systems could not operate. The CM's systems had to be shut down to conserve its remaining resources for reentry, forcing the crew to transfer to the LM as a lifeboat. With the lunar landing canceled, mission controllers worked to bring the crew home alive.

Although the LM was designed to support two men on the lunar surface for two days, Mission Control in Houston improvised new procedures so it could support three men for four days. The crew experienced great hardship, caused by limited power, a chilly and wet cabin and a shortage of potable water. There was a critical need to adapt the CM's cartridges for the carbon dioxide scrubber system to work in the LM; the crew and mission controllers were successful in improvising a solution. The astronauts' peril briefly renewed public interest in the Apollo program; tens of millions watched the splashdown in the South Pacific Ocean on television.

An investigative review board found fault with preflight testing of the oxygen tank and Teflon being placed inside it. The board recommended changes, including minimizing the use of potentially combustible items inside the tank; this was done for Apollo 14. The story of Apollo 13 has been dramatized several times, most notably in the 1995 film Apollo 13 based on Lost Moon, the 1994 memoir co-authored by Lovell – and an episode of the 1998 miniseries From the Earth to the Moon.

Background

[edit]

In 1961, U.S. President John F. Kennedy challenged his nation to land an astronaut on the Moon by the end of the decade, with a safe return to Earth.[11] NASA worked towards this goal incrementally, sending astronauts into space during Project Mercury and Project Gemini, leading up to the Apollo program.[12] The goal was achieved with Apollo 11, which landed on the Moon on July 20, 1969. Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walked on the lunar surface while Michael Collins orbited the Moon in Command Module Columbia. The mission returned to Earth on July 24, 1969, fulfilling Kennedy's challenge.[11]

NASA had contracted for fifteen Saturn V rockets to achieve the goal; at the time no one knew how many missions this would require.[13] Since success was obtained in 1969 with the sixth Saturn V on Apollo 11, nine rockets remained available for a hoped-for total of ten landings. After the excitement of Apollo 11, the general public grew apathetic towards the space program and Congress continued to cut NASA's budget; Apollo 20 was canceled.[14] Despite the successful lunar landing, the missions were considered so risky that astronauts could not afford life insurance to provide for their families if they died in space.[note 2][15]

see caption
Mission Operations Control Room during the TV broadcast just before the Apollo 13 accident. Astronaut Fred Haise is shown on the screen.

Even before the first U.S. astronaut entered space in 1961, planning for a centralized facility to communicate with the spacecraft and monitor its performance had begun, for the most part the brainchild of Christopher C. Kraft Jr., who became NASA's first flight director. During John Glenn's Mercury Friendship 7 flight in February 1962 (the first crewed orbital flight by the U.S.), one of Kraft's decisions was overruled by NASA managers. He was vindicated by post-mission analysis and implemented a rule that, during the mission, the flight director's word was absolute[16] – to overrule him, NASA would have to fire him on the spot.[17] Flight directors during Apollo had a one-sentence job description, "The flight director may take any actions necessary for crew safety and mission success."[18]

Houston's Mission Control Center was opened in 1965. It was in part designed by Kraft and now named for him.[16] In Mission Control, each flight controller, in addition to monitoring telemetry from the spacecraft, was in communication via voice loop to specialists in a Staff Support Room (or "back room"), who focused on specific spacecraft systems.[17]

Apollo 13 was to be the second H mission, meant to demonstrate precision lunar landings and explore specific sites on the Moon.[19] With Kennedy's goal accomplished by Apollo 11, and Apollo 12 demonstrating that the astronauts could perform a precision landing, mission planners were able to focus on more than just landing safely and having astronauts minimally trained in geology gather lunar samples to take home to Earth. There was a greater role for science on Apollo 13, especially for geology, something emphasized by the mission's motto, Ex luna, scientia (From the Moon, knowledge).[20]

Astronauts and key Mission Control personnel

[edit]
see caption
Swigert, Lovell and Haise the day before launch
Position Astronaut
Commander (CDR) James A. Lovell Jr.
Fourth and last spaceflight
Command Module Pilot (CMP) John "Jack" L. Swigert Jr.
Only spaceflight
Lunar Module Pilot (LMP) Fred W. Haise Jr.
Only spaceflight

Apollo 13's mission commander, Jim Lovell, was 42 years old at the time of the spaceflight. He was a graduate of the United States Naval Academy and had been a naval aviator and test pilot before being selected for the second group of astronauts in 1962; he flew with Frank Borman in Gemini 7 in 1965 and Buzz Aldrin in Gemini 12 the following year before flying in Apollo 8 in 1968, the first spacecraft to orbit the Moon.[21] At the time of Apollo 13, Lovell was the NASA astronaut with the most time in space, with 572 hours over the three missions.[22]

Jack Swigert, the command module pilot (CMP), was 38 years old and held a B.S. in mechanical engineering and an M.S. in aerospace science; he had served in the Air Force and in state Air National Guards and was an engineering test pilot before being selected for the fifth group of astronauts in 1966.[23] Fred Haise, the Lunar Module pilot (LMP), was 36 years old. He held a B.S. in aeronautical engineering, had been a Marine Corps fighter pilot, and was a civilian research pilot for NASA when he was selected as a Group 5 astronaut.[24][25]

According to the standard Apollo crew rotation, the prime crew for Apollo 13 would have been the backup crew[note 3] for Apollo 10, with Mercury and Gemini veteran Gordon Cooper in command, Donn F. Eisele as CMP and Edgar Mitchell as LMP. Deke Slayton, NASA's Director of Flight Crew Operations, never intended to rotate Cooper and Eisele to a prime crew assignment, as both were out of favor – Cooper for his lax attitude towards training, and Eisele for incidents aboard Apollo 7 and an extramarital affair. He assigned them to the backup crew because no other veteran astronauts were available.[28] Slayton's original choices for Apollo 13 were Alan Shepard as commander, Stuart Roosa as CMP, and Mitchell as LMP. However, management felt Shepard needed more training time, as he had only recently resumed active status after surgery for an inner ear disorder and had not flown since 1961. Thus, Lovell's crew (himself, Haise and Ken Mattingly), having all backed up Apollo 11 and being slated for Apollo 14, was swapped with Shepard's.[28]

Swigert was originally CMP of Apollo 13's backup crew, with John Young as commander and Charles Duke as lunar module pilot.[29] Seven days before launch, Duke contracted rubella from his son's friend.[30] This exposed both the prime and backup crews, who trained together. Of the five, only Mattingly was not immune through prior exposure. Normally, if any member of the prime crew had to be grounded, the remaining crew would be replaced as well, and the backup crew substituted, but Duke's illness ruled this out,[31] so two days before launch, Mattingly was replaced by Swigert.[23] Mattingly never developed rubella and later flew on Apollo 16.[32]

For Apollo, a third crew of astronauts, known as the support crew, was designated in addition to the prime and backup crews used on projects Mercury and Gemini. Slayton created the support crews because James McDivitt, who would command Apollo 9, believed that, with preparation going on in facilities across the US, meetings that needed a member of the flight crew would be missed. Support crew members were to assist as directed by the mission commander.[33] Usually low in seniority, they assembled the mission's rules, flight plan, and checklists, and kept them updated;[34][35] for Apollo 13, they were Vance D. Brand, Jack Lousma and either William Pogue or Joseph Kerwin.[note 4][40]

For Apollo 13, flight directors were Gene Kranz, White team[41] (the lead flight director);[42][43] Glynn Lunney, Black team; Milton Windler, Maroon team and Gerry Griffin, Gold team.[41] The CAPCOMs (the person in Mission Control, during the Apollo program an astronaut, who was responsible for voice communications with the crew)[44] for Apollo 13 were Kerwin, Brand, Lousma, Young and Mattingly.[45]

Mission insignia and call signs

[edit]
see caption
Apollo 13 flown silver Robbins medallion

The Apollo 13 mission insignia depicts the Greek god of the Sun, Apollo, with three horses pulling his chariot across the face of the Moon, and the Earth seen in the distance. This is meant to symbolize the Apollo flights bringing the light of knowledge to all people. The mission motto, Ex luna, scientia ("From the Moon, knowledge"), appears. In choosing it, Lovell adapted the motto of his alma mater, the Naval Academy, Ex scientia, tridens ("From knowledge, sea power").[46][47]

On the patch, the mission number appeared in Roman numerals as Apollo XIII. It did not have to be modified after Swigert replaced Mattingly, as it is one of only two Apollo mission insignia – the other being Apollo 11 – not to include the names of the crew. It was designed by artist Lumen Martin Winter, who based it on a mural he had painted for the St. Regis Hotel in New York City.[48] The mural was later purchased by actor Tom Hanks,[49] who portrayed Lovell in the movie Apollo 13, and it is now in the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center in Illinois.[50]

The mission's motto was in Lovell's mind when he chose the call sign Aquarius for the lunar module, taken from Aquarius, the bringer of water.[51][52] Some in the media erroneously reported that the call sign was taken from a song by that name from the musical Hair.[52][53] The command module's call sign, Odyssey, was chosen not only for its Homeric association but to refer to the recent film, 2001: A Space Odyssey, based on a short story by science fiction author Arthur C. Clarke.[51] In his book, Lovell indicated he chose the name Odyssey because he liked the word and its definition: a long voyage with many changes of fortune.[52]

Due to the accident and the last minute crew change of Jack Swigert replacing Ken Mattingly three days prior to launch, the Apollo 13 Robbins medallions flown aboard the mission were melted down and reminted after the mission to reflect the correct crew, and the absence of a lunar landing date.[54]

Space vehicle

[edit]
CSM-109 Odyssey in the Operations and Checkout Building

The Saturn V rocket used to carry Apollo 13 to the Moon was numbered SA-508, and was almost identical to those used on Apollo 8 through 12.[55] Including the spacecraft, the rocket weighed in at 2,949,136 kilograms (6,501,733 lb).[56] The S-IC first stage's engines were rated to generate 440,000 newtons (100,000 lbf) less total thrust than Apollo 12's, though they remained within specifications.[57] To keep its liquid hydrogen propellent cold, the S-II second stage's cryogenic tanks were insulated; on earlier Apollo missions this came in the form of panels that were affixed, but beginning with Apollo 13, insulation was sprayed onto the exterior of the tanks.[58] Extra propellant was carried as a test, since future J missions to the Moon would require more propellant for their heavier payloads. This made the vehicle the heaviest yet flown by NASA, and Apollo 13 was visibly slower to clear the launch tower than earlier missions.[57]

The Apollo 13 spacecraft consisted of Command Module 109 and Service Module 109 (together CSM-109), called Odyssey, and Lunar Module 7 (LM-7), called Aquarius. Also considered part of the spacecraft was the launch escape system, which would propel the command module (CM) to safety in the event of a problem during liftoff, and the Spacecraft–LM Adapter, numbered as SLA-16, which housed the lunar module (LM) during the first hours of the mission.[59][60]

The LM stages, CM and service module (SM) were received at Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in June 1969; the portions of the Saturn V were received in June and July. Thereafter, testing and assembly proceeded, culminating with the rollout of the launch vehicle, with the spacecraft atop it, on December 15, 1969.[59] Apollo 13 was originally scheduled for launch on March 12, 1970, but that January NASA announced the mission would be postponed until April 11, both to allow more time for planning and to spread the Apollo missions over a longer period.[61] The plan was to have two Apollo flights per year and was in response to budgetary constraints[62] that had recently seen the cancellation of Apollo 20.[63]

Training and preparation

[edit]
Lovell practices deploying the flag

The Apollo 13 prime crew undertook over 1,000 hours of mission-specific training, more than five hours for every hour of the mission's ten-day planned duration. Each member of the prime crew spent over 400 hours in simulators of the CM and (for Lovell and Haise) of the LM at KSC and at Houston, some of which involved the flight controllers at Mission Control.[64] Flight controllers participated in many simulations of problems with the spacecraft in flight, which taught them how to react in an emergency.[17] Specialized simulators at other locations were also used by the crew members.[64]

The astronauts of Apollo 11 had minimal time for geology training, with only six months between crew assignment and launch; higher priorities took much of their time.[65] Apollo 12 saw more such training, including practice in the field, using a CAPCOM and a simulated backroom of scientists, to whom the astronauts had to describe what they saw.[66] Scientist-astronaut Harrison Schmitt saw that there was limited enthusiasm for geology field trips. Believing an inspirational teacher was needed, Schmitt arranged for Lovell and Haise to meet his old professor, Caltech's Lee Silver. The two astronauts, and backups Young and Duke, went on a field trip with Silver at their own time and expense. At the end of their week together, Lovell made Silver their geology mentor, who would be extensively involved in the geology planning for Apollo 13.[67] Farouk El-Baz oversaw the training of Mattingly and his backup, Swigert, which involved describing and photographing simulated lunar landmarks from airplanes.[68] El-Baz had all three prime crew astronauts describe geologic features they saw during their flights between Houston and KSC; Mattingly's enthusiasm caused other astronauts, such as Apollo 14's CMP, Roosa, to seek out El-Baz as a teacher.[69]

Concerned about how close Apollo 11's LM, Eagle, had come to running out of propellant during its lunar descent, mission planners decided that beginning with Apollo 13, the CSM would bring the LM to the low orbit from which the landing attempt would commence. This was a change from Apollo 11 and 12, on which the LM made the burn to bring it to the lower orbit. The change was part of an effort to increase the amount of hover time available to the astronauts as the missions headed into rougher terrain.[70]

The plan was to devote the first of the two four-hour lunar surface extravehicular activities (EVAs) to setting up the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) group of scientific instruments; during the second, Lovell and Haise would investigate Cone crater, near the planned landing site.[71] The two astronauts wore their spacesuits for some 20 walk-throughs of EVA procedures, including sample gathering and use of tools and other equipment. They flew in the "Vomit Comet" in simulated microgravity or lunar gravity, including practice in donning and doffing spacesuits. To prepare for the descent to the Moon's surface, Lovell flew the Lunar Landing Training Vehicle (LLTV) after receiving helicopter training.[72] Despite the crashes of one LLTV and one similar Lunar Landing Research Vehicle (LLRV) prior to Apollo 13, mission commanders considered flying them invaluable experience and so prevailed on reluctant NASA management to retain them.[73]

Experiments and scientific objectives

[edit]
Lovell (left) and Haise during geology training in Hawaii, January 1970

Apollo 13's designated landing site was near Fra Mauro crater; the Fra Mauro formation was believed to contain much material spattered by the impact that had filled the Imbrium basin early in the Moon's history. Dating it would provide information not only about the Moon, but about the Earth's early history. Such material was likely to be available at Cone crater, a site where an impact was believed to have drilled deep into the lunar regolith.[74]

Apollo 11 had left a seismometer on the Moon, but the solar-powered unit did not survive its first two-week-long lunar night. The Apollo 12 astronauts also left one as part of its ALSEP, which was nuclear-powered.[75] Apollo 13 also carried a seismometer (known as the Passive Seismic Experiment, or PSE), similar to Apollo 12's, as part of its ALSEP, to be left on the Moon by the astronauts.[76] That seismometer was to be calibrated by the impact, after jettison, of the ascent stage of Apollo 13's LM, an object of known mass and velocity impacting at a known location.[77]

Other ALSEP experiments on Apollo 13 included a Heat Flow Experiment (HFE), which would involve drilling two holes 3.0 metres (10 ft) deep.[78] This was Haise's responsibility; he was also to drill a third hole of that depth for a core sample.[79] A Charged Particle Lunar Environment Experiment (CPLEE) measured the protons and electrons of solar origin reaching the Moon.[80] The package also included a Lunar Atmosphere Detector (LAD)[81] and a Dust Detector, to measure the accumulation of debris.[82] The Heat Flow Experiment and the CPLEE were flown for the first time on Apollo 13; the other experiments had been flown before.[79]

Haise practices removing the fuel capsule from its transport cask mounted on the LM. The real cask sank unopened into the Pacific Ocean with its radioactive contents.

To power the ALSEP, the SNAP-27 radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG) was flown. Developed by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, SNAP-27 was first flown on Apollo 12. The fuel capsule contained about 3.79 kilograms (8.36 lb) of plutonium oxide. The cask placed around the capsule for transport to the Moon was built with heat shields of graphite and of beryllium, and with structural parts of titanium and of Inconel materials. Thus, it was built to withstand the heat of reentry into the Earth's atmosphere rather than pollute the air with plutonium in the event of an aborted mission.[83]

A United States flag was also taken, to be erected on the Moon's surface.[84] For Apollo 11 and 12, the flag had been placed in a heat-resistant tube on the front landing leg; it was moved for Apollo 13 to the Modularized Equipment Stowage Assembly (MESA) in the LM descent stage. The structure to fly the flag on the airless Moon was improved from Apollo 12's.[85]

For the first time, red stripes were placed on the helmet, arms and legs of the commander's A7L spacesuit. This was done as, after Apollo 11, those reviewing the images taken had trouble distinguishing Armstrong from Aldrin, but the change was approved too late for Apollo 12.[86] New drink bags that attached inside the helmets and were to be sipped from as the astronauts walked on the Moon were demonstrated by Haise during Apollo 13's final television broadcast before the accident.[87][88]

Apollo 13's primary mission objectives were to: "Perform selenological inspection, survey, and sampling of materials in a preselected region of the Fra Mauro Formation. Deploy and activate an Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package. Develop man's capability to work in the lunar environment. Obtain photographs of candidate exploration sites."[89] The astronauts were also to accomplish other photographic objectives, including of the Gegenschein from lunar orbit, and of the Moon itself on the journey back to Earth. Some of this photography was to be performed by Swigert as Lovell and Haise walked on the Moon.[90] Swigert was also to take photographs of the Lagrangian points of the Earth-Moon system. Apollo 13 had twelve cameras on board, including those for television and moving pictures.[79] The crew was also to downlink bistatic radar observations of the Moon. None of these was attempted because of the accident.[90]

Flight of Apollo 13

[edit]
Apollo 13's circumlunar flight trajectory, showing its distance to the Moon when the accident occurred
The circumlunar trajectory followed by Apollo 13, drawn to scale. The accident occurred about 56 hours into the mission.

Launch and translunar injection

[edit]
Apollo 13 launches from Kennedy Space Center, April 11, 1970
Apollo 13 spacecraft configuration during most of the journey: Click on image for key to numbered components.

The mission was launched at the planned time, 2:13:00 pm EST (19:13:00 UTC) on April 11. An anomaly occurred when the second-stage, center (inboard) engine shut down about two minutes early.[91][92] This was caused by severe pogo oscillations. Starting with Apollo 10, the vehicle's guidance system was designed to shut the engine down in response to chamber pressure excursions.[93] Pogo oscillations had occurred on Titan rockets (used during the Gemini program) and on previous Apollo missions,[94][95] but on Apollo 13 they were amplified by an interaction with turbopump cavitation.[96][97] A fix to prevent pogo was ready for the mission, but schedule pressure did not permit the hardware's integration into the Apollo 13 vehicle.[93][98] A post-flight investigation revealed the engine could only withstand one additional cycle before it would suffer catastrophic failure.[93] The four outboard engines and the S-IVB third stage burned longer to compensate, and the vehicle achieved very close to the planned circular 190 kilometers (120 mi; 100 nmi) parking orbit, followed by a translunar injection (TLI) about two hours later, setting the mission on course for the Moon.[91][92]

After TLI, Swigert performed the separation and transposition maneuvers before docking the CSM Odyssey to the LM Aquarius, and the spacecraft pulled away from the third stage.[99] Ground controllers then sent the third stage on a course to impact the Moon in range of the Apollo 12 seismometer, which it did just over three days into the mission.[100]

The crew settled in for the three-day trip to Fra Mauro. At 30:40:50 into the mission, with the TV camera running, the crew performed a burn to place Apollo 13 on a hybrid trajectory. The departure from a free-return trajectory meant that if no further burns were performed, Apollo 13 would miss Earth on its return trajectory, rather than intercept it, as with a free return.[101] A free return trajectory could only reach sites near the lunar equator; a hybrid trajectory, which could be started at any point after TLI, allowed sites with higher latitudes, such as Fra Mauro, to be reached.[102] Communications were enlivened when Swigert realized that in the last-minute rush, he had neglected to file his federal income tax return (due April 15), and amid laughter from mission controllers, asked how he could get an extension. He was found to be entitled to a 60-day extension for being out of the country at the deadline.[103]

Entry into the LM to test its systems had been scheduled for 58:00:00; when the crew awoke on the third day of the mission, they were informed it had been moved up three hours and was later moved up again by another hour. A television broadcast was scheduled for 55:00:00; Lovell, acting as emcee, showed the audience the interiors of Odyssey and Aquarius.[104] The audience was limited since none of the television networks were carrying the broadcast,[105] forcing Marilyn Lovell (Jim Lovell's wife) to go to the VIP room at Mission Control if she wanted to watch her husband and his crewmates.[106]

Accident

[edit]

About six and a half minutes after the TV broadcast – approaching 56:00:00 – Apollo 13 was about 180,000 nautical miles (210,000 mi; 330,000 km) from Earth.[107] Haise was completing the shutdown of the LM after testing its systems while Lovell stowed the TV camera. Jack Lousma, the CAPCOM, sent minor instructions to Swigert, including changing the attitude of the craft to facilitate photography of Comet Bennett.[107][108]

The pressure sensor in one of the SM's oxygen tanks had earlier appeared to be malfunctioning, so Sy Liebergot (the EECOM, in charge of monitoring the CSM's electrical system) requested that the stirring fans in the tanks be activated. Normally this was done once daily; a stir would destratify the contents of the tanks, making the pressure readings more accurate.[107] The Flight Director, Kranz, had Liebergot wait a few minutes for the crew to settle down after the telecast,[109] then Lousma relayed the request to Swigert, who activated the switches controlling the fans,[107] and after a few seconds turned them off again.[108]

Ninety-five seconds after Swigert activated those switches,[109] the astronauts heard a "pretty large bang", accompanied by fluctuations in electrical power and the firing of the attitude control thrusters.[110][111] Communications and telemetry to Earth were lost for 1.8 seconds, until the system automatically corrected by switching the high-gain S-band antenna, used for translunar communications, from narrow-beam to wide-beam mode.[112] The accident happened at 55:54:53 (03:08 UTC on April 14; 10:08 PM EST, April 13). Swigert reported 26 seconds later, "Okay, Houston, we've had a problem here," echoed at 55:55:42 by Lovell, "Houston, we've had a problem. We've had a Main B Bus undervolt."[107] William Fenner was the guidance officer (GUIDO) who was the first to report a problem in the control room to Kranz.[107]

Lovell's initial thought on hearing the noise was that Haise had activated the LM's cabin-repressurization valve, which also produced a bang (Haise enjoyed doing so to startle his crewmates), but Lovell could see that Haise had no idea what had happened. Swigert initially thought that a meteoroid might have struck the LM, but he and Lovell quickly realized there was no leak.[113] The "Main Bus B undervolt" meant that there was insufficient voltage produced by the SM's three fuel cells (fueled by hydrogen and oxygen piped from their respective tanks) to the second of the SM's two electric power distribution systems. Almost everything in the CSM required power. Although the bus momentarily returned to normal status, soon both buses A and B were short on voltage. Haise checked the status of the fuel cells and found that two of them were dead. Mission rules forbade entering lunar orbit unless all fuel cells were operational.[114]

In the minutes after the accident, there were several unusual readings, showing that tank 2 was empty and tank 1's pressure slowly falling, that the computer on the spacecraft had reset and that the high-gain antenna was not working. Liebergot initially missed the worrying signs from tank 2 following the stir, as he was focusing on tank 1, believing that its reading would be a good guide to what was present in tank 2, as did controllers supporting him in the "back room". When Kranz questioned Liebergot on this, he initially responded that there might be false readings due to an instrumentation problem; he was often teased about that in the years to come.[17] Lovell, looking out the window, reported "a gas of some sort" venting into space, making it clear that there was a serious problem.[115]

Since the fuel cells needed oxygen to operate, when Oxygen Tank 1 ran dry, the remaining fuel cell would shut down, meaning the CSM's only significant sources of power and oxygen would be the CM's batteries and its oxygen "surge tank". These would be needed for the final hours of the mission, but the remaining fuel cell, already starved for oxygen, was drawing from the surge tank. Kranz ordered the surge tank isolated, saving its oxygen, but this meant that the remaining fuel cell would die within two hours, as the oxygen in tank 1 was consumed or leaked away.[114] The volume surrounding the spacecraft was filled with myriad small bits of debris from the accident, complicating any efforts to use the stars for navigation.[116] The mission's goal became simply getting the astronauts back to Earth alive.[117]

Looping around the Moon

[edit]
This depiction of a direct abort (from a 1966 planning report) contemplates returning from a point much earlier in the mission, and closer to Earth, than where the Apollo 13 accident occurred.
NASA – Apollo 13 Lunar Mission – Views Of The Moon (2:24)

The lunar module had charged batteries and full oxygen tanks for use on the lunar surface, so Kranz directed that the astronauts power up the LM and use it as a "lifeboat"[17] – a scenario anticipated but considered unlikely.[118] Procedures for using the LM in this way had been developed by LM flight controllers after a training simulation for Apollo 10 in which the LM was needed for survival, but could not be powered up in time.[117] Had Apollo 13's accident occurred on the return voyage, with the LM already jettisoned, the astronauts would have died,[119] as they would have following an explosion in lunar orbit, including one while Lovell and Haise walked on the Moon.[120]

A key decision was the choice of return path. A "direct abort" would use the SM's main engine (the Service Propulsion System or SPS) to return before reaching the Moon. However, the accident could have damaged the SPS, and the fuel cells would have to last at least another hour to meet its power requirements, so Kranz instead decided on a longer route: the spacecraft would swing around the Moon before heading back to Earth. Apollo 13 was on the hybrid trajectory which was to take it to Fra Mauro; it now needed to be brought back to a free return. The LM's Descent Propulsion System (DPS), although not as powerful as the SPS, could do this, but new software for Mission Control's computers needed to be written by technicians as it had never been contemplated that the CSM/LM spacecraft would have to be maneuvered from the LM. As the CM was being shut down, Lovell copied down its guidance system's orientation information and performed hand calculations to transfer it to the LM's guidance system, which had been turned off; at his request Mission Control checked his figures.[117][121] At 61:29:43.49 the DPS burn of 34.23 seconds took Apollo 13 back to a free return trajectory.[122]

The Apollo 13 crew photographed the Moon out of the Lunar Module.

The change would get Apollo 13 back to Earth in about four days' time – though with splashdown in the Indian Ocean, where NASA had few recovery forces. Jerry Bostick and other Flight Dynamics Officers (FIDOs) were anxious both to shorten the travel time and to move splashdown to the Pacific Ocean, where the main recovery forces were located. One option would shave 36 hours off the return time, but required jettisoning the SM; this would expose the CM's heat shield to space during the return journey, something for which it had not been designed. The FIDOs also proposed other solutions. After a meeting involving NASA officials and engineers, the senior individual present, Manned Spaceflight Center director Robert R. Gilruth, decided on a burn using the DPS, that would save 12 hours and land Apollo 13 in the Pacific. This "PC+2" burn would take place two hours after pericynthion, the closest approach to the Moon.[117] At pericynthion, Apollo 13 set the record (per the Guinness Book of World Records), which still stands, for the furthest distance from Earth by a crewed spacecraft: 400,171 kilometers (248,655 mi; 216,075 nmi) from Earth at 7:21 pm EST, April 14 (00:21:00 UTC April 15).[123][note 5]

While preparing for the burn, the crew was told that the S-IVB had impacted the Moon as planned, leading Lovell to quip, "Well, at least something worked on this flight."[126][127] Kranz's White team of mission controllers, who had spent most of their time supporting other teams and developing the procedures urgently needed to get the astronauts home, took their consoles for the PC+2 procedure.[128] Normally, the accuracy of such a burn could be assured by checking the alignment Lovell had transferred to the LM's computer against the position of one of the stars astronauts used for navigation, but the light glinting off the many pieces of debris accompanying the spacecraft made that impractical. The astronauts accordingly used the one star available whose position could not be obscured – the Sun. Houston also informed them that the Moon would be centered in the commander's window of the LM as they made the burn, which was almost perfect – less than 0.3 meters (1 foot) per second off.[126] The burn, at 79:27:38.95, lasted four minutes and 23 seconds.[129] The crew then shut down most LM systems to conserve consumables.[126]

Return to Earth

[edit]
Swigert with the rig improvised to adapt the CM's lithium hydroxide canisters for use in the LM

The LM carried enough oxygen, but that still left the problem of removing carbon dioxide, which was absorbed by canisters of lithium hydroxide pellets. The LM's stock of canisters, meant to accommodate two astronauts for 45 hours on the Moon, was not enough to support three astronauts for the return journey to Earth.[130] The CM had enough canisters, but they were of a different shape and size to the LM's, hence unable to be used in the LM's equipment. Engineers on the ground devised a way to bridge the gap, using plastic covers ripped from procedure manuals, duct tape, and other items available on the spacecraft.[131][132] NASA engineers referred to the improvised device as "the mailbox".[133] The procedure for building the device was read to the crew by CAPCOM Joseph Kerwin over the course of an hour, and was built by Swigert and Haise; carbon dioxide levels began dropping immediately. Lovell later described this improvisation as "a fine example of cooperation between ground and space".[134]

Lovell tries to rest in the frigid spacecraft

The CSM's electricity came from fuel cells that produced water as a byproduct, but the LM was powered by silver-zinc batteries which did not, so both electrical power and water (needed for equipment cooling as well as drinking) would be critical. LM power consumption was reduced to the lowest level possible;[135] Swigert was able to fill some drinking bags with water from the CM's water tap,[126] but even assuming rationing of personal consumption, Haise initially calculated they would run out of water for cooling about five hours before reentry. This seemed acceptable because the systems of Apollo 11's LM, once jettisoned in lunar orbit, had continued to operate for seven to eight hours even with the water cut off. In the end, Apollo 13 returned to Earth with 12.8 kilograms (28.2 lb) of water remaining.[136] The crew's ration was 0.2 liters (6.8 fl oz) of water per person per day; the three astronauts lost a total of 14 kilograms (31 lb) among them, and Haise developed a urinary tract infection.[137][138] This infection was probably caused by the reduced water intake, but microgravity and effects of cosmic radiation might have impaired his immune system's reaction to the pathogen.[139]

Apollo 13: Houston, We've Got a Problem (1970)—Documentary about the mission by NASA (28:21)

Inside the darkened spacecraft, the temperature dropped as low as 3 °C (38 °F).[140] Lovell considered having the crew don their spacesuits, but decided this would be too hot. Instead, Lovell and Haise wore their lunar EVA boots and Swigert put on an extra coverall. All three astronauts were cold, especially Swigert, who had got his feet wet while filling the water bags and had no lunar overshoes (since he had not been scheduled to walk on the Moon). As they had been told not to discharge their urine to space to avoid disturbing the trajectory, they had to store it in bags. Water condensed on the walls, though any condensation that may have been behind equipment panels[141] caused no problems, partly because of the extensive electrical insulation improvements instituted after the Apollo 1 fire.[142] Despite all this, the crew voiced few complaints.[143]

Flight controller John Aaron, along with Mattingly and several engineers and designers, devised a procedure for powering up the command module from full shutdown – something never intended to be done in flight, much less under Apollo 13's severe power and time constraints.[144] The astronauts implemented the procedure without apparent difficulty: Kranz later credited all three astronauts having been test pilots, accustomed to having to work in critical situations with their lives on the line, for their survival.[143]

Recognizing that the cold conditions combined with insufficient rest would hinder the time-critical startup of the command module prior to reentry, at 133 hours into flight Mission Control gave Lovell the okay to fully power up the LM to raise the cabin temperature, which included restarting the LM's guidance computer. Having the LM's computer running enabled Lovell to perform a navigational sighting and calibrate the LM's Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU). With the lunar module's computer aware of its location and orientation, the command module's computer was later calibrated in a reverse of the normal procedures used to set up the LM, shaving steps from the restart process and increasing the accuracy of the PGNCS-controlled reentry.[145]

Reentry and splashdown

[edit]

Despite the accuracy of the transearth injection, the spacecraft slowly drifted off course, necessitating a correction. As the LM's guidance system had been shut down following the PC+2 burn, the crew was told to use the line between night and day on the Earth to guide them, a technique used on NASA's Earth-orbit missions but never on the way back from the Moon.[143] This DPS burn, at 105:18:42 for 14 seconds, brought the projected entry flight path angle back within safe limits. Nevertheless, yet another burn was needed at 137:40:13, using the LM's reaction control system (RCS) thrusters, for 21.5 seconds. The SM was jettisoned less than half an hour later, allowing the crew to see the damage for the first time, and photograph it. They reported that an entire panel was missing from the SM's exterior, the fuel cells above the oxygen tank shelf were tilted, that the high-gain antenna was damaged, and there was a considerable amount of debris elsewhere.[146] Haise could see possible damage to the SM's engine bell, validating Kranz's decision not to use the SPS.[143] The crew then moved out of the LM back into the CM and reactivated its life support systems.[4]

Spaceship contacts ocean under parachute
Apollo 13 splashes down in the South Pacific on April 17, 1970

The last problem to be solved was how to separate the lunar module a safe distance away from the command module just before reentry. The normal procedure, in lunar orbit, was to release the LM and then use the service module's RCS to pull the CSM away, but by this point, the SM had already been released. Grumman, manufacturer of the LM, assigned a team of University of Toronto engineers, led by senior scientist Bernard Etkin, to solve the problem of how much air pressure to leave in the docking tunnel (rather than venting it completely to space) to push the modules apart. The astronauts applied the solution, which was successful.[147] The LM reentered Earth's atmosphere and was destroyed, the remaining pieces falling in the deep ocean.[119][148] Apollo 13's final midcourse correction had addressed the concerns of the Atomic Energy Commission, which wanted the cask containing the plutonium oxide intended for the SNAP-27 RTG to land in a safe place. The impact point was over the Tonga Trench in the Pacific, one of its deepest points, and the cask sank 10 kilometers (6 mi; 5 nmi) to the bottom. Later helicopter surveys found no radioactive leakage.[143]

Ionization of the air around the command module during reentry would typically cause a four-minute communications blackout. Apollo 13's shallow reentry path lengthened this to six minutes, longer than had been expected; controllers feared that the CM's heat shield had failed.[149] Odyssey regained radio contact and splashed down safely in the South Pacific Ocean, 21°38′24″S 165°21′42″W / 21.64000°S 165.36167°W / -21.64000; -165.36167 (Apollo 13 splashdown),[150] southeast of American Samoa and 6.5 km (4.0 mi; 3.5 nmi) from the recovery ship, USS Iwo Jima.[151] Although fatigued, the crew was in good condition except for Haise, who had developed a serious urinary tract infection because of insufficient water intake.[138] The crew stayed overnight on the ship and flew to Pago Pago, American Samoa, the next day. They flew to Hawaii, where President Richard Nixon awarded them the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest civilian honor.[152] They stayed overnight, and then were flown back to Houston.[153]

En route to Honolulu, President Nixon stopped at Houston to award the Presidential Medal of Freedom to the Apollo 13 Mission Operations Team.[154] He originally planned to give the award to NASA administrator Thomas O. Paine, but Paine recommended the mission operations team.[155]

Public and media reaction

[edit]

Nobody believes me, but during this six-day odyssey, we had no idea what an impression Apollo 13 made on the people of Earth. We never dreamed a billion people were following us on television and radio, and reading about us in banner headlines of every newspaper published. We still missed the point on board the carrier Iwo Jima, which picked us up, because the sailors had been as remote from the media as we were. Only when we reached Honolulu did we comprehend our impact: there we found President Nixon and [NASA Administrator] Dr. Paine to meet us, along with my wife Marilyn, Fred's wife Mary (who, being pregnant, also had a doctor along just in case), and bachelor Jack's parents, in lieu of his usual airline stewardesses.

— Jim Lovell[138]

Worldwide interest in the Apollo program was reawakened by the incident; television coverage was seen by millions. Four Soviet ships headed toward the landing area to assist if needed,[156] and other nations offered assistance should the craft have to splash down elsewhere.[157] President Nixon canceled appointments, phoned the astronauts' families, and drove to NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, where Apollo's tracking and communications were coordinated.[156]

The rescue received more public attention than any spaceflight to that point, other than the first Moon landing on Apollo 11. There were worldwide headlines, and people surrounded television sets to get the latest developments, offered by networks who interrupted their regular programming for bulletins. Pope Paul VI led a congregation of 10,000 people in praying for the astronauts' safe return; ten times that number offered prayers at a religious festival in India.[158] The United States Senate on April 14 passed a resolution urging businesses to pause at 9:00 pm local time that evening to allow for employee prayer.[156]

An estimated 40 million Americans watched Apollo 13's splashdown, carried live on all three networks, with another 30 million watching some portion of the 6+12 hour telecast. Even more outside the U.S. watched. Jack Gould of The New York Times stated that Apollo 13, "which came so close to tragic disaster, in all probability united the world in mutual concern more fully than another successful landing on the Moon would have".[159]

Investigation and response

[edit]

Review board

[edit]
Oxygen tank number 2, showing heater and thermostat unit

Immediately upon the crew's return, NASA Administrator Paine and Deputy Administrator George Low appointed a review board to investigate the accident. Chaired by NASA Langley Research Center Director Edgar M. Cortright and including Neil Armstrong and six others,[note 6] the board sent its final report to Paine on June 15.[161] It found that the failure began in the service module's number 2 oxygen tank.[162] Damaged Teflon insulation on the wires to the stirring fan inside Oxygen Tank 2 allowed the wires to short circuit and ignite this insulation. The resulting fire increased the pressure inside the tank until the tank dome failed, filling the fuel cell bay (SM Sector 4) with rapidly expanding gaseous oxygen and combustion products. The pressure rise was sufficient to pop the rivets holding the aluminum exterior panel covering Sector 4 and blow it out, exposing the sector to space and snuffing out the fire. The detached panel hit the nearby high-gain antenna, disabling the narrow-beam communication mode and interrupting communication with Earth for 1.8 seconds while the system automatically switched to the backup wide-beam mode.[163] The sectors of the SM were not airtight from each other, and had there been time for the entire SM to become as pressurized as Sector 4, the force on the CM's heat shield would have separated the two modules. The report questioned the use of Teflon and other materials shown to be flammable in supercritical oxygen, such as aluminum, within the tank.[164] The board found no evidence pointing to any other theory of the accident.[165]

Panel in the process of being blown out
Further along in the process
Panel similar to the SM Sector 4 cover being ejected during a test performed as part of the investigation

Mechanical shock forced the oxygen valves closed on the number 1 and number 3 fuel cells, putting them out of commission.[166] The sudden failure of Oxygen Tank 2 compromised Oxygen Tank 1, causing its contents to leak out, possibly through a damaged line or valve, over the next 130 minutes, entirely depleting the SM's oxygen supply.[167][168] With both SM oxygen tanks emptying, and with other damage to the SM, the mission had to be aborted.[169] The board praised the response to the emergency: "The imperfection in Apollo 13 constituted a near disaster, averted only by outstanding performance on the part of the crew and the ground control team which supported them."[170]

Oxygen Tank 2 was manufactured by the Beech Aircraft Company of Boulder, Colorado, as subcontractor to North American Rockwell (NAR) of Downey, California, prime contractor for the CSM.[171] It contained two thermostatic switches, originally designed for the command module's 28-volt DC power, but which could fail if subjected to the 65 volts used during ground testing at KSC.[172] Under the original 1962 specifications, the switches would be rated for 28 volts, but revised specifications issued in 1965 called for 65 volts to allow for quicker tank pressurization at KSC. Nonetheless, the switches Beech used were not rated for 65 volts.[173]

At NAR's facility, Oxygen Tank 2 had been originally installed in an oxygen shelf placed in the Apollo 10 service module, SM-106, but which was removed to fix a potential electromagnetic interference problem and another shelf substituted. During removal, the shelf was accidentally dropped at least 5 centimeters (2 in), because a retaining bolt had not been removed. The probability of damage from this was low, but it is possible that the fill line assembly was loose and made worse by the fall. After some retesting (which did not include filling the tank with liquid oxygen), in November 1968 the shelf was re-installed in SM-109, intended for Apollo 13, which was shipped to KSC in June 1969.[174]

The Countdown Demonstration Test took place with SM-109 in its place near the top of the Saturn V and began on March 16, 1970. During the test, the cryogenic tanks were filled, but Oxygen Tank 2 could not be emptied through the normal drain line, and a report was written documenting the problem. After discussion among NASA and the contractors, attempts to empty the tank resumed on March 27. When it would not empty normally, the heaters in the tank were turned on to boil off the oxygen. The thermostatic switches were designed to prevent the heaters from raising the temperature higher than 27 °C (80 °F), but they failed under the 65-volt power supply applied. Temperatures on the heater tube within the tank may have reached 540 °C (1,000 °F), most likely damaging the Teflon insulation.[172] The temperature gauge was not designed to read higher than 29 °C (85 °F), so the technician monitoring the procedure detected nothing unusual. This heating had been approved by Lovell and Mattingly of the prime crew, as well as by NASA managers and engineers.[175][176] Replacement of the tank would have delayed the mission by at least a month.[137] The tank was filled with liquid oxygen again before launch; once electric power was connected, it was in a hazardous condition.[169] The board found that Swigert's activation of the Oxygen Tank 2 fan at the request of Mission Control caused an electric arc that set the tank on fire.[177]

The board conducted a test of an oxygen tank rigged with hot-wire ignitors that caused a rapid rise in temperature within the tank, after which it failed, producing telemetry similar to that seen with the Apollo 13 Oxygen Tank 2.[178] Tests with panels similar to the one that was seen to be missing on SM Sector 4 caused separation of the panel in the test apparatus.[179]

Changes in response

[edit]
Redesigned oxygen tank for Apollo 14

For Apollo 14 and subsequent missions, the oxygen tank was redesigned, the thermostats being upgraded to handle the proper voltage. The heaters were retained since they were necessary to maintain oxygen pressure. The stirring fans, with their unsealed motors, were removed, which meant the oxygen quantity gauge was no longer accurate. This required adding a third tank so that no tank would go below half full.[180] The third tank was placed in Bay 1 of the SM, on the side opposite the other two, and was given an isolation valve that could isolate it from the fuel cells and from the other two oxygen tanks in an emergency and allow it to feed the CM's environmental system only. The quantity probe was upgraded from aluminum to stainless steel.[181]

All electrical wiring in Bay 4 was sheathed in stainless steel. The fuel cell oxygen supply valves were redesigned to isolate the Teflon-coated wiring from the oxygen. The spacecraft and Mission Control monitoring systems were modified to give more immediate and visible warnings of anomalies.[180] An emergency supply of 19 litres (5 US gal) of water was stored in the CM, and an emergency battery, identical to those that powered the LM's descent stage, was placed in the SM. The LM was modified to make transfer of power from the LM to the CM easier.[182]

Aftermath

[edit]
President Richard Nixon awarding the Apollo 13 astronauts the Presidential Medal of Freedom

On February 5, 1971, Apollo 14's LM, Antares, landed on the Moon with astronauts Alan Shepard and Edgar Mitchell aboard, near Fra Mauro, the site Apollo 13 had been intended to explore.[183] Haise served as CAPCOM during the descent to the Moon,[184] and during the second EVA, during which Shepard and Mitchell explored near Cone crater.[185]

None of the Apollo 13 astronauts flew in space again. Lovell retired from NASA and the Navy in 1973, entering the private sector.[186] He died in 2025 at age 97.[187] Swigert was to have flown on the 1975 Apollo–Soyuz Test Project (the first joint mission with the Soviet Union) but was removed as part of the fallout from the Apollo 15 postal covers incident. He took a leave of absence from NASA in 1973 and left the agency to enter politics, being elected to the House of Representatives in 1982, but died of cancer before he could be sworn in, aged 51.[188] Haise was slated to have been the commander of the canceled Apollo 19 mission, and flew the Space Shuttle Approach and Landing Tests before retiring from NASA in 1979.[189]

Several experiments were completed during Apollo 13, even though the mission did not land on the Moon.[190] One involved the launch vehicle's S-IVB (the Saturn V's third stage), which on prior missions had been sent into solar orbit once detached. The seismometer left by Apollo 12 had detected frequent impacts of small objects onto the Moon, but larger impacts would yield more information about the Moon's crust, so it was decided that, beginning with Apollo 13, the S-IVB would be crashed into the Moon.[191] The impact occurred at 77:56:40 into the mission and produced enough energy that the gain on the seismometer, 117 kilometers (73 mi) from the impact, had to be reduced.[100] An experiment to measure the amount of atmospheric electrical phenomena during the ascent to orbit – added after Apollo 12 was struck by lightning – returned data indicating a heightened risk during marginal weather. A series of photographs of Earth, taken to test whether cloud height could be determined from synchronous satellites, achieved the desired results.[190]

As a joke, Grumman issued an invoice to North American Rockwell, prime contractor for the CSM, for "towing" the CSM most of the way to the Moon and back. Line items included 400001 miles at $1 each (plus $4 for the first mile); $536.05 for battery charging; oxygen; and four nights at $8 per night for an "additional guest in room" (Swigert). After a 20% "commercial discount", and a 2% discount for timely payment, the final total was $312,421.24. North American declined payment, noting that it had ferried three previous Grumman LMs to the Moon without compensation.[192][193][194]

The Apollo 13 command module Odyssey on display at the Cosmosphere in Hutchinson, Kansas

The CM was disassembled for testing and parts remained in storage for years; some were used for a trainer for the Skylab Rescue Mission. The trainer was displayed at the Kentucky Science Center in Louisville, Kentucky. Max Ary of the Cosmosphere, made a project of restoring Odyssey and it is on display at the museum in Hutchinson, Kansas.[195]

Apollo 13 was called a "successful failure" by Lovell.[196] Mike Massimino, a Space Shuttle astronaut, stated that Apollo 13 "showed teamwork, camaraderie and what NASA was really made of".[120] The response to the accident has been repeatedly called "NASA's finest hour";[197][198][199][200] it is still viewed that way.[120] Author Colin Burgess wrote, "the life-or-death flight of Apollo 13 dramatically evinced the colossal risks inherent in manned spaceflight. Then with the crew safely back on Earth, public apathy set in once again."[201]

William R. Compton, in his book about the Apollo Program, said of Apollo 13, "Only a heroic effort of real-time improvisation by mission operations teams saved the crew."[202] Rick Houston and Milt Heflin, in their history of Mission Control, stated, "Apollo 13 proved mission control could bring those space voyagers back home again when their lives were on the line."[203] Former NASA chief historian Roger D. Launius wrote, "More than any other incident in the history of spaceflight, recovery from this accident solidified the world's belief in NASA's capabilities".[204] The accident, though, convinced some officials including Manned Spaceflight Center director Gilruth, that if NASA kept sending astronauts on Apollo missions, some inevitably would be killed and they called for as quick an end as possible to the program.[204] Nixon's advisers recommended canceling remaining lunar missions, saying that a disaster in space would cost him political capital.[205] Budget cuts made a decision easier and during the pause after Apollo 13, two missions were canceled, meaning that the program ended with Apollo 17 in December 1972.[204][206]

[edit]
see caption
Command module replica used during the filming of Apollo 13

The 1974 movie Houston, We've Got a Problem, while set around the Apollo 13 incident, is a fictional drama about the crises faced by ground personnel when the emergency disrupts their work schedules and places further stress on their lives. Lovell publicly complained about the movie, saying it was "fictitious and in poor taste".[207][208]

"Houston ... We've Got a Problem" was the title of an episode of the BBC documentary series A Life At Stake, broadcast in March 1978. This was an accurate, if simplified, reconstruction of the events.[209] In 1994, during the 25th anniversary of Apollo 11, PBS released a 90-minute documentary titled Apollo 13: To the Edge and Back.[210][211]

Following the flight, the crew planned to write a book, but they all left NASA without starting it. After Lovell retired in 1991, he was approached by journalist Jeffrey Kluger about writing a non-fiction account of the mission. Swigert died in 1982 and Haise was no longer interested in such a project. The resultant book, Lost Moon: The Perilous Voyage of Apollo 13, was published in 1994.[212]

In 1995, a film adaptation of the book, Apollo 13, was released, directed by Ron Howard and starring Tom Hanks as Lovell, Bill Paxton as Haise, Kevin Bacon as Swigert, Gary Sinise as Mattingly, Ed Harris as Kranz, and Kathleen Quinlan as Marilyn Lovell. James Lovell, Kranz, and other principals have stated that this film depicted the events of the mission with reasonable accuracy, given that some dramatic license was taken. For example, the film changes the tense of Lovell's famous follow-up to Swigert's original words from, "Houston, we've had a problem" to "Houston, we have a problem".[107][213] The film also invented the phrase "Failure is not an option", uttered by Harris as Kranz in the film; the phrase became so closely associated with Kranz that he used it for the title of his 2000 autobiography.[213] The film won two of the nine Academy Awards it was nominated for, Best Film Editing and Best Sound.[214][215]

In the 1998 miniseries From the Earth to the Moon, co-produced by Hanks and Howard, the mission is dramatized in the episode "We Interrupt This Program". Rather than showing the incident from the crew's perspective as in the Apollo 13 feature film, it is instead presented from an Earth-bound perspective of television reporters competing for coverage of the event.[216]

In 2020, the BBC World Service began airing 13 Minutes to the Moon, radio programs which draw on NASA audio from the mission, as well as archival and recent interviews with participants. Episodes began airing for Season 2 starting on March 8, 2020, with episode 1, "Time Bomb: Apollo 13", explaining the launch and the explosion. Episode 2 details Mission Control's denial and disbelief of the accident, with other episodes covering other aspects of the mission. The seventh and final episode was delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In "Delay to Episode 7", the BBC explained that the presenter of the series, medical doctor Kevin Fong, had been called into service.[217][218]

In advance of the 50th anniversary of the mission in 2020, an Apollo in Real Time site for the mission went online, allowing viewers to follow along as the mission unfolds, view photographs and video, and listen to audio of conversations between Houston and the astronauts as well as between mission controllers.[219] Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, NASA did not hold any in-person events during April 2020 for the flight's 50th anniversary, but premiered a new documentary, Apollo 13: Home Safe, on April 10, 2020.[220] A number of events were rescheduled for later in 2020.[221]

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Apollo 13 was the seventh crewed mission in NASA's Apollo space program and the third intended to achieve a lunar landing, launched on April 11, 1970, from in aboard a rocket. The primary objective was to explore the Fra Mauro formation on the , a geologically significant site, by landing astronauts James A. Lovell Jr. as commander, John L. Swigert Jr. as command module pilot, and Fred W. Haise Jr. as lunar module pilot. However, approximately 56 hours into the flight, at a distance of about 200,000 miles from Earth, an explosion in the service module's No. 2 oxygen tank—caused by damaged internal heating elements that had overheated during a pre-launch test—crippled the , leading to the loss of cabin oxygen, electrical power, and other critical systems. The , prompted by the iconic report "Houston, we've had a problem," quickly transferred to the Aquarius as a makeshift lifeboat to survive the crisis, while mission control in devised innovative solutions to conserve resources and plot a trajectory back to Earth. Key engineering improvisations included adapting command module lithium hydroxide canisters with plastic bags, tape, and cardboard to scrub from the lunar module's atmosphere, preventing a buildup that could have been fatal. The astronauts endured severe challenges, including (limited to about 6 ounces of water per day), totaling 31.5 pounds among the , and cabin temperatures dropping to 38°F (3°C), which disrupted sleep and exacerbated health issues like Haise's . Using the lunar module's descent engine for course-correction burns, the crew looped around the Moon without landing and reentered Earth's atmosphere after a tense four-day ordeal, splashing down safely in the on April 17, 1970, about 4 miles from the recovery ship USS Iwo Jima. Dubbed a "successful failure" by , the mission highlighted extraordinary teamwork between the crew and ground control, demonstrating resilience in the face of near-disaster and averting what could have been the program's greatest tragedy. Its legacy profoundly influenced 's safety protocols, enhancing mission assurance for future Apollo flights and underscoring the inherent risks of , while reigniting global public interest in the program during a time of waning enthusiasm.

Background and Context

Historical Significance

Apollo 13 represented a critical phase in the , which sought to build on the successes of and by conducting additional lunar landings to expand scientific exploration and demonstrate sustained U.S. capabilities in . Following the historic first in July 1969 and the precise touchdown of Apollo 12 in November 1969, accelerated its schedule to achieve multiple missions within the decade, aiming to gather diverse geological samples and deploy scientific instruments across varied lunar terrains. This progression was essential to fulfilling President Kennedy's 1961 commitment to land humans on the before 1970 while advancing broader goals of technological preeminence and national prestige. Launched on , 1970, and concluding with a safe return on April 17, 1970, Apollo 13 was designated as the third lunar landing attempt, targeting the Fra Mauro highlands for its potential to yield ancient lunar materials. The site's geological significance lay in its exposure of from the massive Imbrium Basin impact, offering scientists opportunities to study the Moon's early bombardment history and formation processes dating back over 3.8 billion years. Samples from this region were expected to provide insights into the solar system's violent origins, complementing the basaltic rocks collected from previous mare sites. Within the geopolitical framework of the U.S.-Soviet Space Race, Apollo 13 underscored the intense Cold War competition for space dominance, where each mission served as a symbol of technological superiority amid escalating tensions. The mission's near-disaster—an oxygen tank explosion that aborted the landing—initially raised doubts about NASA's reliability, yet the successful rescue effort transformed it into a "successful failure" that restored public confidence in the agency's ingenuity and crisis management. This event rekindled global interest in the Apollo program, with millions tuning in and ultimately bolstering support for future U.S. space endeavors during a period of waning enthusiasm.

Crew and Personnel Selection

The prime crew for Apollo 13 was selected based on 's standard rotation policy, where backup crew members from previous missions often advanced to prime roles to leverage their familiarity with spacecraft systems and procedures. Commander James A. Lovell Jr., a veteran astronaut selected by in 1962, brought extensive experience from (1965), (1966), and (1968), the first crewed lunar orbital mission. Command Module Pilot (CMP) Thomas K. Mattingly II, chosen as part of the 1966 astronaut class, had served on the support crew for , providing him with detailed knowledge of command module operations. Lunar Module Pilot (LMP) Fred W. Haise Jr., also from the 1966 class, had acted as backup LMP for both and , ensuring the crew's collective expertise in lunar landing preparations. The backup crew comprised Commander John W. Young, CMP John L. Swigert Jr., and LMP Charles M. Duke Jr., mirroring the rotation system to maintain continuity and cross-training. Young, a Gemini veteran and prime commander of , was positioned to lead the next mission if needed. Swigert, selected in 1966 and part of the support crew, offered strong technical skills in spacecraft systems. Duke, who had served as capsule communicator () for , provided recent mission insights as backup LMP. Just days before launch on , 1970, a crew change occurred due to a health risk: backup LMP had contracted (German measles) from his child, exposing the prime crew during a on April 1. While Lovell and Haise had childhood immunity, Mattingly did not and faced risks that could jeopardize reentry operations. thus replaced Mattingly with his backup, Swigert, who had immunity and recent simulator time, ensuring minimal disruption despite the tight timeline. Mission Control personnel were chosen for their specialized expertise in flight operations, with shifts structured to provide 24-hour coverage across teams led by experienced flight directors. , chief of the Flight Operations Directorate, led the White Team and was on duty during the critical explosion on , directing initial crisis response with his emphasis on disciplined teamwork. , a veteran flight director since Gemini, headed the Black Team and assumed lead during the subsequent shift, overseeing key adaptations like power conservation and trajectory corrections through reentry. Other directors, including M.P. "Pete" Frank (Gold Team) and Gerry Griffin (Orange Team), rotated to maintain focus on crew safety and mission recovery.

Mission Planning and Preparation

Spacecraft Configuration

The Apollo 13 spacecraft consisted of the Command and Service Module (CSM) designated as CSM-109, with the Command Module named , and the (LM-7) named Aquarius, launched atop a rocket (SA-508). The CSM measured approximately 45 feet in length and 12.8 feet in diameter, with a combined launch mass of about 63,500 pounds for the Block II configuration used in Apollo 13. The Command Module , serving as the crew's reentry vehicle, had a conical shape with a base diameter of 12.8 feet and a height of 11.4 feet, enclosing a habitable volume of 210 cubic feet for three astronauts. Its launch mass was around 12,250 pounds, including crew, equipment, and consumables, reducing to approximately 11,000 pounds by reentry after jettisoning the Service Module. The maintained a 5 psia pure oxygen atmosphere, with averaging 64°F, CO2 removal via lithium hydroxide canisters, and water supply from byproducts, designed to support the crew for up to 14 days in shirtsleeve conditions. For reentry, Odyssey featured an ablative capable of withstanding velocities up to 36,200 feet per second, enduring peak decelerations of about 6.5 g over roughly 14 minutes, enabling safe in the . The Service Module provided propulsion, power, and consumables, with a cylindrical structure 24.8 feet tall and 12.8 feet in diameter, weighing about 54,000 pounds fully loaded at launch. Its Service Propulsion System (SPS) delivered 20,500 pounds of thrust using Aerozine 50 fuel and nitrogen tetroxide oxidizer for major trajectory corrections and lunar orbit insertion. Electrical power came from three hydrogen-oxygen fuel cells generating 1.4 kilowatts each at 28 volts DC, also producing up to 1.8 pounds of potable water per hour as a byproduct. Oxygen was stored in two cryogenic tanks in Bay 4, each holding about 326 cubic feet of liquid oxygen at -297°F, with Tank 2 featuring Teflon-coated internal wiring and heaters rated for 65 volts— an upgrade from earlier 28-volt designs implemented in 1965 to improve thermal efficiency, though the thermostatic switches were not recalibrated accordingly. Aquarius, the , was configured as a two-stage with a total launch mass of 36,218 pounds, designed primarily for lunar landing but adapted as a lifeboat during the mission. The , 10.6 feet tall and 14.1 feet wide, weighed 22,300 pounds dry and housed the providing 9,870 pounds of , along with four 400-amp-hour silver-zinc batteries for initial power. Resource capacities included 152 pounds of in two tanks, sufficient oxygen for about 140 hours from the alone, and environmental controls for two astronauts over 75 hours, which were extended to support three for nearly four days. The ascent , 13.8 feet tall and 13.4 feet wide, weighed 10,300 pounds dry and featured an ascent with 3,500 pounds of for liftoff from the , powered by two 400-amp-hour batteries. The launch vehicle, standing 363 feet tall with a maximum of 33 feet, had a total launch mass of 6.5 million pounds and propelled the spacecraft to using three stages. The first stage () was 138 feet long, fueled by 815,000 liters of kerosene and 1,319,000 liters of , generating 7.5 million pounds of from five F-1 engines over 168 seconds to reach 42 miles altitude. The second stage (), 81.5 feet long, used 1,031,000 liters of and 334,000 liters of to produce 1 million pounds of from five J-2 engines for 384 seconds, accelerating to 15,647 miles per hour. The third stage (), 58.6 feet long and 21.7 feet in , burned 236,000 pounds of and 79,000 pounds of in its single J-2 engine for 147 seconds initially, achieving 24,200 miles per hour for translunar coast. A key modification for Apollo 13's Service Module involved the cryogenic oxygen tanks, stemming from issues during preparations. Tank 2, originally built for , was removed from that vehicle during modifications and reassigned to Apollo 13 after sustaining damage; during ground testing for Apollo 13, technicians opted to deplete its contents using the internal heaters for eight hours instead of replacing the tank, exposing the Teflon-insulated wiring to excessive heat beyond design limits and creating a latent vulnerability. This tank also incorporated the 1965 heater voltage increase to 65 volts without updated thermostats, exacerbating potential overheating risks during flight operations.

Training Regimen

The Apollo 13 crew underwent an intensive training cycle beginning with their prime crew assignment in August 1969, structured in phases that encompassed technical proficiency, geological expertise, and operational simulations to ensure readiness for lunar landing and surface exploration. Initial phases focused on spacecraft systems familiarization and basic flight procedures at the Manned Spacecraft Center (MSC, now ) in , transitioning to site-specific preparations after the Fra Mauro landing site selection in October 1969. This regimen, typical for later Apollo missions, allocated approximately 100 hours per month per crew member, emphasizing hands-on practice over theoretical instruction to build instinctive responses during mission execution. Geological training formed a core component, simulating lunar surface operations through field trips to volcanic and cratered terrains that mimicked the Moon's geology. The crew participated in exercises at sites including the Orocopia Mountains in California for crystalline rock sampling, Mono Crater in California for volcanic features, Meteor Crater in Arizona for impact structures, Kilbourne Hole in New Mexico for basaltic volcanism, Kilauea Volcano in Hawaii for active lava flows and traverse planning, and the Black Mesa Crater Field near Flagstaff, Arizona, where artificial craters were created with explosives to replicate lunar landing zones. Earlier in their careers, crew members like Fred Haise and Jack Swigert had joined geology trips to Iceland in 1967 to study barren volcanic landscapes devoid of vegetation, enhancing their ability to identify and document extraterrestrial samples under simulated low-gravity conditions using tools such as the Modularized Equipment Transporter (MET) and core tubes. These outings, led by U.S. Geological Survey experts like Lee Silver and Gene Shoemaker, involved multi-day traverses, verbal descriptions, photography, and post-trip critiques to refine sampling strategies for the Fra Mauro highlands. Key simulations replicated the physical and environmental stresses of , including centrifuge runs at Ellington Air Force Base to train for the high-g forces of launch and reentry, where the Command Module Pilot practiced deceleration maneuvers with replicated controls and displays. Vacuum chamber tests in Building 9 at MSC assessed performance and equipment functionality under near-vacuum conditions, ensuring crew comfort and mobility during extravehicular activities. Integrated mission rehearsals, conducted in the Command Module Simulator and Lunar Module Simulator linked to a real-time , simulated full mission timelines from liftoff to , incorporating dynamic interactions between crew and ground teams to hone communication and procedural efficiency. Contingency drills emphasized rapid response to critical failures, with scenarios rehearsed in simulators that included oxygen system leaks and power outages, using printed checklists to guide actions like switching to backup systems or conserving resources. These exercises, drawn from prior Apollo lessons, covered partial or total loss of service module oxygen or electrical power but did not anticipate the specific oxygen tank explosion that occurred; instead, they focused on abort procedures, manual navigation, and redistribution to maintain safety during or return trajectories. Support team training paralleled the crew's regimen, with flight controllers undergoing parallel simulations to master their roles in real-time decision-making. Capsule Communicators (CAPCOMs), such as and , practiced concise voice interactions with the crew during integrated exercises, while support crews like Vance Brand ran parallel drills to provide seamless shift handovers. Mission Control teams, divided into color-coded shifts (e.g., Gene Kranz's White Team), utilized computer-driven consoles to simulate anomalies, fostering a unified response framework that integrated engineering, guidance, and data for contingency support.

Scientific Objectives

The primary scientific objective of Apollo 13 was to achieve a precise lunar landing in the Fra Mauro highlands, a region interpreted as from the ancient Imbrium basin impact, to enable detailed selenological inspection, survey, and sampling of deep-rooted lunar materials. This site was selected for its potential to provide insights into the Moon's geological history, including subsurface structures up to several kilometers deep, through the collection and analysis of representative samples. The mission planned to deploy the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP), a suite of automated instruments designed to operate for at least one year, transmitting data back to Earth via radio signals to study the lunar environment continuously. Key experiments within the ALSEP focused on fundamental aspects of lunar geophysics and plasma physics. The Passive Seismic Experiment (PSE) aimed to detect and record moonquakes, meteoroid impacts, and tidal deformations using a network of seismometers, including three long-period and one short-period sensor capable of measuring vibrations as small as 0.3 millimicrons, to infer the Moon's internal structure. The Charged Particle Lunar Environment Experiment (CPLEE) was intended to measure the energy spectra of protons and electrons (ranging from 50 eV to 15 keV) interacting with the lunar surface, using two detector packages to assess plasma dynamics and radiation hazards. Complementing these, the Solar Wind Composition Experiment (SWC) planned to expose a 4-square-foot aluminum foil collector to solar wind particles for approximately 100 minutes, capturing noble gases to analyze the Sun's isotopic composition and flux. Additionally, soil mechanics investigations would evaluate lunar regolith properties through observations of the lunar module's landing dynamics, extravehicular activity (EVA) trenches at least 2 feet deep, and ALSEP deployment interactions, providing data on soil cohesion, bearing strength, and excavation behavior. Geological sample collection targeted 30–40 kg of lunar rocks, soil, and core samples from the Fra Mauro site, emphasizing breccias and subsurface materials to study impact processes and volcanic history, with tools like core tubes and for preservation in sample return containers. These samples would undergo preliminary examination at the Lunar Receiving Laboratory for composition, , and potential biological contamination before distribution to scientists. The crew, with primary members trained in field , was prepared to document collection sites verbally and photographically for contextual analysis. To support public engagement and scientific documentation, the mission incorporated advanced and capabilities, including a color TV camera mounted on the to provide live broadcasts of EVAs from approximately 50 feet away, capturing wide-angle views (up to 43 degrees) of surface activities in real time. Supplementary still photography using the Lunar Surface Camera would produce 100 stereo pairs of high-resolution images (covering 9 square inches per frame) for detailed mapping, while Hasselblad cameras and a 16mm system recorded panoramas, close-ups, and orbital phenomena like the solar corona.

Mission Execution

Launch and Early Flight

Apollo 13 launched successfully on April 11, 1970, at 2:13 p.m. EST (19:13 UTC) from Launch Complex 39A at NASA's in . The countdown proceeded nominally, with the crew—Commander James A. Lovell Jr., Command Module Pilot John L. Swigert Jr., and Lunar Module Pilot Fred W. Haise Jr.—consuming breakfast at 9:58 a.m. EST, departing their quarters at 11:07 a.m. EST, and boarding the command module by 11:44 a.m. EST. Weather conditions were favorable, featuring a temperature of 80°F (27°C), southeast winds at 12 knots, scattered cloud layers between 3,500 and 25,000 feet, and no precipitation in the forecast. Liftoff occurred within the planned window of 2:13 p.m. to 5:37 p.m. EST, with the rocket's first stage igniting on schedule. The ascent trajectory followed a launch azimuth of 72 degrees, directing the vehicle toward a low . The performed as expected, with the first stage providing approximately 34,025 kN of thrust and separating at 000:02:48 ground elapsed time (GET), when the vehicle had reached an altitude of 36.7 nautical miles. The second stage ignited immediately after, accelerating the stack to separate at 000:09:50 GET, followed by the third stage ignition at 000:09:57 GET and shutdown at 000:12:31 GET, achieving an initial orbit of 102.6 by 106.3 nautical miles at an inclination of 32.5 degrees. Maximum () occurred at 000:01:26 GET, and the vehicle experienced peak of 3.83 g at 000:02:42 GET, all within nominal parameters. After establishing Earth orbit, the crew conducted initial systems checks and prepared for (TLI). The TLI burn, using the stage's J-2 engine, ignited at 002:35:46.4 GET—slightly later than the planned 002:35:43 GET due to a minor guidance adjustment—and lasted 5 minutes and 47 seconds, imparting a change of 10,416.9 feet per second to place the spacecraft on a to the Moon. Engine shutdown occurred at 002:41:37 GET, with post-burn confirming a of 35,560 feet per second and all propulsion systems stable. The stage was then jettisoned, and the crew performed a separation maneuver using the command and service module's . Early flight operations transitioned smoothly into the translunar coast phase, with the crew conducting spacecraft checkouts and routine activities. During the initial orbit at approximately 001:37:22 GET, the crew activated a television transmission to demonstrate zero-gravity conditions, with Lovell appearing on camera and providing commentary on views of , including cloud formations over the . Communications with Mission Control in remained clear, with signal reacquisition over tracking stations such as Carnarvon at 000:52:16 GET and post-TLI at 002:45:30 GET; Lovell reported a "very nominal" ride with minor vibrations during the burn. data indicated normal performance across key systems: fuel cells and batteries supplied stable power, the service propulsion system and reaction control thrusters functioned without issues, and parameters—including cabin pressure at 5 psi, suit pressure at 5 psi, and oxygen flow—remained within limits throughout the first 55 hours of the mission.

In-Flight Anomaly

Approximately 56 hours into the mission on April 13, 1970, at 55:54:53 mission elapsed time (MET), the routine activation of fans to stir the cryogenic oxygen tanks in the service module triggered a catastrophic rupture in oxygen tank No. 2. This event followed a power surge and pressure fluctuations in the tank, which had reached a peak of 1008.3 psia just prior to the . The rupture produced a loud bang and vibration felt throughout the , accompanied by a master alarm, low-pressure warnings for oxygen and , and a visible flash observed from the window. Command Module Pilot immediately reported the issue to Mission Control, stating, "Okay, , I've had a problem here," followed seconds later by Commander confirming, ", we've had a problem." The crew conducted initial checks, noting a main bus B undervoltage and the rapid decay of oxygen tank No. 2 pressure to zero, while also verifying stable cabin pressure and conducting an external through the lunar module's window, which revealed from the service module. On the ground, Mission Control detected the anomaly through the sudden loss of from the fuel cells and oxygen supply systems, with oxygen tank No. 2 quantity readings becoming erratic before dropping off-scale low. Seismic data from the Apollo 12 passive on the lunar surface confirmed the planned impact of the Saturn V third stage at approximately 194 hours MET, with no additional lunar impacts detected from the in-flight event itself.

Crisis Response and Adaptation

Following the explosion in the Service Module's oxygen tank at 55 hours and 55 minutes into the mission, flight controllers at NASA's in directed the crew to power down the Command Module to minimal levels, preserving its limited battery capacity—approximately 120 amp-hours—for the critical reentry phase. Non-essential systems, including the S-band power (which drew about 2.57 amps), biomedical , and the S-band transmitter/receiver, were sequentially shut off starting around 64 hours ground elapsed time (GET), reducing overall power draw to around 17 amps. This procedure, drawn from pre-mission contingency planning, conserved electrical power and the water used for cooling electronics, as the Command Module's fuel cells were no longer operational due to the loss of oxygen supply. With the Service Module uninhabitable and the lunar landing aborted—a decision confirmed by Flight Director Gene Kranz's team within minutes of the anomaly to prioritize crew safety—the astronauts transferred to the Aquarius, repurposing it as a lifeboat for the duration of the return journey. This shift relied on the crew's prior training for emergency scenarios, enabling Commander James Lovell, Pilot , and Command Module Pilot to move essential equipment through the tunnel connecting the modules by approximately 57 hours GET. Aquarius's systems provided propulsion, , and , though designed for two astronauts on a short lunar stay, now sustaining three for nearly four days. Kranz rallied his teams across multiple shifts—rotating controllers like the White, Black, and Gold teams—with a directive to methodically "work the problem," fostering collaborative problem-solving under intense pressure. A pressing challenge emerged from rising carbon dioxide levels in Aquarius, as its round lithium hydroxide (LiOH) canister ports were incompatible with the square canisters from , which were the only remaining supply sufficient for the extended mission. Ground engineers, led by Ed Smylie in Mission Control's Crew Systems Division, devised a makeshift using onboard materials: two Odyssey LiOH canisters, s from the astronauts' liquid-cooled garments, a spacesuit oxygen , a piece of from a procedure , and . The fabrication steps, relayed to the crew via voice and photographs at around 90 hours GET, involved wrapping the canister with tape belts (sticky side out), forming an arch with the cardboard and securing it with tape, slipping the over the canister to align its circular "ears" with the LM's ports, cutting a hole in the bag for the insertion, and sealing everything airtight with additional tape. Swigert and Haise assembled the first "mailbox" in about an hour, installing it to route airflow through the canister via the suit circuit fan; a was added later for redundancy, successfully stabilizing CO2 levels below 15 mmHg . Resource constraints demanded stringent management to extend Aquarius's supplies. Water was rationed to six ounces per per day—about one-fifth of normal intake—primarily to limit the potable used in the module's electrical cooling , resulting in severe ; the crew lost an average of 5 to 10 pounds each, with Haise developing a from the cold, damp conditions. Lithium hydroxide cartridges, now adapted via the jury-rigged , were monitored closely, with the two Odyssey units providing the bulk of CO2 scrubbing capacity after Aquarius's limited stock depleted. For navigation, the crew used Aquarius's to sight stars and the , manually aligning the inertial platform every few hours to maintain the direct abort trajectory, compensating for the powered-down guidance computer in . These adaptations, executed under Kranz's oversight, ensured the crew's survival despite the cascading failures.

Trans-Lunar and Lunar Trajectory

Following the explosion in the service module's oxygen tank at 56 hours into the mission, the Apollo 13 crew and ground control opted for a , a pre-planned path that would use the Moon's gravity to the back toward without additional major propulsion burns. This circumlunar route was established through a critical midcourse correction (MCC-2) at 61 hours and 30 minutes ground elapsed time (GET) on April 13, 1970, utilizing the lunar module's (DPS) engine for a burn of 37.8 feet per second (11.5 m/s) delta-V, restoring the trajectory to loop around the Moon's . Subsequent corrections refined the path: MCC-3 at 105 hours and 18 minutes GET delivered 7.8 feet per second (2.4 m/s) delta-V using the DPS, while MCC-4 at 137 hours and 40 minutes GET applied a smaller 3.0 feet per second (0.9 m/s) adjustment via the lunar module's thrusters. These maneuvers accounted for the spacecraft's altered mass and propulsion constraints, ensuring a safe lunar flyby without relying on the damaged command module's service propulsion system. The spacecraft reached its closest approach to the Moon on April 15, 1970, at 76 hours and 19 minutes GET, passing 137 nautical miles (254 km) above the lunar surface over , where direct communication with was impossible during the approximately 30-minute period of signal loss. During this flyby, the captured photographs of prominent farside features, including craters such as Chaplygin and the uneven visible through the lunar module's windows, providing valuable despite the mission's abbreviated timeline. The pericynthion altitude was precisely tracked from ground stations, confirming the free-return path's stability and projecting an return in about 142 hours total mission time. Navigation during the trans-lunar coast posed significant challenges due to the command module's instrument failures and power-down state, forcing reliance on the lunar module's guidance systems for manual sightings. The crew used the alignment optical telescope to perform star and Sun checks, such as aligning on Nunki and , but floating debris from the explosion obscured some views, prompting shifts to horizon and Sun sightings for platform alignment verification within a ±1-degree tolerance. These manual techniques, supported by ground-computed updates, ensured accurate attitude control for the burns. Mission controllers evaluated abort options shortly after the incident, comparing a direct abort—which would require an immediate high-thrust of approximately 1,500 to 2,000 feet per second (457 to 610 m/s) delta-V using the lunar module's DPS to reverse course toward in under 100 hours—against the circumlunar free-return, which demanded far less propulsion (around 860 feet per second or 262 m/s for the later PC+2 trans-Earth injection ). The direct option was discarded due to its excessive demands, potential risks to the damaged service module, and limited time for precise calculations, favoring the more conservative lunar gravity-assisted path that conserved resources for the return. The PC+2 , executed at 79 hours and 28 minutes GET on April 14 using the DPS for 263.8 seconds at full throttle after an initial idle phase, accelerated the spacecraft by 860.5 feet per second (262 m/s) delta-V, shortening the Earth transit by about 9 hours and targeting a South Pacific .

Earth Return and Reentry

The Trans-Earth Injection (TEI) burn was performed on April 14, 1970, at 79 hours, 27 minutes, and 39 seconds of mission elapsed time, utilizing the Lunar Module's (DPS) engine to accelerate the spacecraft and shorten the return trajectory to while shifting the splashdown site to the South Pacific Ocean. This maneuver, lasting 4 minutes and 24 seconds, achieved a velocity change of 861 feet per second, establishing a direct return path after the earlier trajectory corrections. Roughly 62 hours later, at 141 hours and 30 minutes into the mission, the Lunar Module's descent stage was jettisoned to reduce mass and ensure stability during the final approach, with the ascent stage serving as a temporary lifeboat until separation. Approximately 6.5 hours prior to reentry, the crew initiated reactivation of the Command Module by powering up its systems using entry batteries that had been charged via the Lunar Module's —Battery A for 15 hours and Battery B for 3 hours—to conserve resources. Critical systems checks followed, including alignment of the Command Module's guidance and navigation platform to that of the Lunar Module, verification of the , and tests of the thrusters to confirm operational integrity for the impending . About 4 hours before reentry, the crew transferred from the Lunar Module Aquarius back to , undocking at 142 hours and 40 minutes and 46 seconds of mission elapsed time to prepare for separation and final maneuvers. Reentry commenced at entry interface—when the spacecraft crossed the 400,000-foot altitude mark—at 142 hours, 40 minutes, and 47 seconds, with the Command Module enduring peak heating loads on its ablative reaching approximately 5,000 degrees due to atmospheric . The descent profile remained nominal, experiencing peak deceleration forces of about 5 g's, followed by deployment of parachutes at around 25,000 feet and main parachutes at 19,000 feet to slow the capsule for . The splashed down safely in the South at 142 hours, 54 minutes, and 41 seconds of mission elapsed time, at coordinates 21 degrees 38 minutes 24 seconds south latitude and 165 degrees 21 minutes 42 seconds west longitude, on April 17, 1970. Recovery operations were promptly executed by the prime recovery ship , which retrieved the Command Module and crew within 45 minutes of , with helicopters airlifting the astronauts aboard shortly after to undergo initial medical evaluations. The crew was placed in medical upon return to prevent potential transmission of any lunar contaminants, though primary health concerns included severe affecting all members and a developed by Lunar Module Pilot , exacerbated by the mission's stressful conditions and limited fluid intake. Haise's condition, which included fever and discomfort, required post-mission treatment but did not compromise the overall success of the recovery.

Immediate Reactions and Investigation

Public and Media Response

The Apollo 13 crisis transformed what had been anticipated as a routine lunar mission into a gripping national drama, captivating American television audiences through extensive live coverage. anchor , known for his authoritative reporting on space missions, led the network's marathon broadcasts, providing real-time updates from mission control in . Estimates indicate that up to 70 million viewers tuned in for key moments, such as the on April 17, 1970, marking one of the largest television audiences for a non-landing space event. This coverage, spanning networks like ABC and as well, shifted public attention dramatically, with many Americans gathering around radios and televisions to follow the astronauts' plight. Public sentiment evolved rapidly from indifference to widespread concern and solidarity, as the explosion aboard the spacecraft on April 13 galvanized national unity. Churches, synagogues, and public gatherings held prayers for the safe return of astronauts James Lovell, , and , with reports of interfaith services across the and vigils at landmarks like Jerusalem's Wailing Wall. Schoolchildren participated in watches and sessions, reflecting the crisis's permeation into everyday life. Media outlets faced significant challenges in reporting the unfolding events, including managing rampant rumors and coordinating with official sources amid high uncertainty. False reports of the crew's death circulated briefly during communication blackouts, exacerbating public anxiety before clarifications. President engaged directly, placing a congratulatory phone call to the astronauts aboard the recovery ship and issuing a for a and Thanksgiving upon their safe return. conducted frequent press briefings from to provide accurate updates, helping to counter misinformation while maintaining transparency during the four-day ordeal. Internationally, the crisis elicited offers of assistance and expressions of global solidarity, transcending tensions. The , through Premier , extended help for potential recovery efforts and relayed messages of support via radio to the astronauts. At least 12 nations, including Britain, , and , volunteered resources such as ships or tracking stations to aid in the crew's return. News of the drama dominated headlines worldwide, fostering a sense of shared human endeavor as millions followed the mission's resolution with relief and admiration.

Official Inquiry Process

Following the Apollo 13 mission's safe return on April 17, 1970, Administrator and Deputy Administrator George M. Low established the Apollo 13 Review Board to formally investigate the causes of the in-flight explosion and the subsequent recovery efforts. Chaired by Edgar M. Cortright, Director of the , the board included eight core members—such as Neil A. Armstrong, John F. Clark, and Hans M. Mark—along with over 20 additional experts drawn from centers, industry contractors like North American Rockwell, and military representatives. These experts were organized into four specialized panels examining mission events, and testing operations, , and overall , conducting a seven-week inquiry guided by Management Instruction 8621.1. The board's investigation employed multiple rigorous methods to determine the failure's root causes, including physical examination of the recovered service module debris—which showed shrapnel damage consistent with an internal in the cryogenic oxygen system—and detailed review of onboard data recording pressure drops, temperature anomalies, and electrical surges. Post-mission interviews with the crew, conducted after their 21-day , provided firsthand accounts of the anomaly, while supplementary tests replicated conditions in ground-based oxygen tanks to validate hypotheses. This comprehensive approach confirmed the occurred at 55 hours, 54 minutes, and 53 seconds ground elapsed time, shortly after the activation of fans to stir Oxygen Tank 2's contents. The board's key findings pinpointed the explosion to structural and electrical damage in Oxygen Tank 2, originating from modifications made between 1965 and 1967 that switched the system to 65-volt DC power without fully updating internal components, leaving Teflon-insulated wires vulnerable to overheating. During pre-launch detanking at in March 1970, exposed wiring suffered further degradation from temperatures exceeding 1,000°F, leading to a and ignition when the tank was stirred in flight. Released on June 15, 1970, the final comprised a main volume and 11 appendices detailing data analyses, test results, and chronologies, ultimately concluding no evidence of but emphasizing systemic lapses in manufacturing, testing, and oversight.

Legacy and Impact

Procedural and Technological Changes

Following the Apollo 13 incident, implemented significant hardware modifications to the Command and Service Module (CSM) oxygen tanks to address vulnerabilities identified in the cryogenic storage system. The redesigned tanks for and subsequent missions incorporated upgraded thermostats capable of handling higher voltages (up to 65 V DC) to prevent overheating during ground tests, and the removal of internal stirring fans that had contributed to electrical faults. Fill tubes were reinforced with tighter tolerances to avoid dislodgment during handling or operations. These changes, along with stronger materials for tank components to mitigate over-pressurization and structural risks, aimed to enhance overall safety. Wiring insulation in the oxygen tanks was upgraded from vulnerable Teflon, which had degraded under heat and sparked combustion, to stainless steel sheathing for better thermal and mechanical resistance. Additionally, service module panels received reinforced shielding to protect against burn-through from potential oxygen fires, including evaluations of Mylar compatibility and conduit reinforcements. A third oxygen tank was added in a separate bay to provide redundancy and reduce single-point failure risks. Procedural updates emphasized comprehensive contingency planning for oxygen system anomalies, including detailed checklists for rapid Lunar Module activation as a lifeboat and power reconfiguration in emergencies. Redundant systems checks were expanded, such as pre-installation inspections of tank internals and verification of thermostat load-interrupting capabilities. Crew training was intensified with additional simulations for abort scenarios, focusing on lifeboat operations and abnormal events like electrical malfunctions in cryogenic systems. These reforms influenced through 17 by incorporating enhanced consumables management and abort drills into mission protocols, delaying 's launch from October 1970 to January 1971 to allow implementation. measures were strengthened through stricter vendor oversight of contractors like North American Rockwell and Beech Aircraft, including expanded reviews of manufacturing processes and material compatibility. The Apollo 13 Review Board, in its June 1970 report, directly informed these changes to enhance overall mission safety.

Cultural Representations and Commemorations

The mission's dramatic narrative has been extensively depicted in popular media, most notably through the 1994 book Lost Moon: The Perilous Voyage of Apollo 13 by astronaut and co-author Jeffrey Kluger, which provides a firsthand account of the crisis and crew's ingenuity. This book served as the basis for the 1995 feature film Apollo 13, directed by and starring as Lovell, as , and as , which dramatized the explosion, adaptations, and safe return while emphasizing themes of teamwork and resilience. The film, nominated for nine including Best Picture, grossed over $355 million worldwide and introduced the mission to broader audiences, reinforcing its status as a cornerstone of storytelling. Key artifacts from the mission are preserved in major space museums, including the command module , which underwent restoration from 1995 to 1997 and is now on permanent display at the Kansas Cosmosphere and Space Center in , allowing visitors to view the scorched and interior modifications made during the crisis. At NASA's in , features interactive exhibits and replicas related to the lunar module Aquarius, including a replica of the mission plaque intended for the and hardware used in the carbon dioxide adapter improvisation, highlighting the lifeboat role of the LM. These displays serve as tangible links to the mission's engineering triumphs and are integrated into visitor experiences that recount the crew's survival strategies. Apollo 13 has profoundly influenced STEM education, serving as a in curricula to illustrate problem-solving, , and under constraints. For instance, educators use the mission's CO2 scrubber adaptation to teach chemistry and , with hands-on activities where students construct similar devices from everyday materials to demonstrate interdisciplinary . simulations have extended this impact, enabling immersive recreations of the environment; programs like EON Reality's lessons allow students to explore the command module's interior and simulate crisis decision-making, enhancing engagement and retention in topics. Commemorative events have marked key anniversaries, underscoring the mission's enduring symbolism. In , for the 50th anniversary, hosted virtual livestreams, panel discussions with mission participants, and released archival footage to celebrate the "successful failure," while international philatelic issues, such as the Isle of Man's "One Giant Leap" stamp set featuring the mission control room, honored the achievement. By 2025, the 55th anniversary prompted events including a weekend celebration at the Tulsa Air and Space Museum on April 12 with historical talks and artifact viewings, sets at starting April 11, and a special IMAX screening of the Apollo 13 film at the Smithsonian's on September 18, featuring expert remarks on space history. The ongoing legacy of Apollo 13 centers on its "successful failure" narrative, a term coined by Lovell to describe the mission's failure to land on the yet triumphant safe return, which exemplifies human resilience and adaptive innovation in space exploration. This story continues to inspire discourse on perseverance, influencing modern programs like by highlighting the value of contingency planning and crew-ground teamwork in high-stakes environments.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.