Hubbry Logo
A. RajaA. RajaMain
Open search
A. Raja
Community hub
A. Raja
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
A. Raja
A. Raja
A. Raja
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Andimuthu Raja (born Andimuthu Sathyaseelan; 26 October 1963) is an Indian politician from Tamil Nadu, who serves as Member of Parliament for the Nilgiris constituency and the deputy general secretary of Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam.[1] He was a member of the 15th Lok Sabha representing the Nilgiris constituency of Tamil Nadu and had been elected to house four times since 1996. Raja is an advocate by profession and he did his master's degree from Government Law College in Tiruchirappalli.

Key Information

Raja was first elected to Parliament as a member of Lok Sabha in 1996 from the Perambalur constituency and was reelected from the same constituency in 1999 and 2004 elections and from Nilgiris constituency in 2009. He was Minister of State for Rural development from 1996 to 2000, Minister of State, Health and Family Welfare from September 2000 to May 2004 and a cabinet minister for Environment and Forests from May 2004 to May 2007. He became the cabinet minister for Communication and Information Technology from May 2007, following the resignation of Dayanidhi Maran. Raja was a co-accused in the 2G Spectrum case, along with two other members of the DMK, Dayanidhi Maran and Kanimozhi. All three were acquitted in 2017. Raja was re-elected as Nilgiris MP in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, and was elected Deputy General Secretary of the DMK in September 2020.

Early life

[edit]

Raja was born to S. K. Aandimuthu and Chinnapillai Ammal Andimadam of the day Perambalur District of Tamil Nadu. His grandparents, who belong to a Scheduled Caste community, went from Velur in Perambalur district to Sri Lanka to work on the tea estates. They returned to India in the 1950s, and Raja's father returned in 1961.Raja was first introduced to Periyar and Dravidar Kazhagam during his high school days in Perambalur. He quickly became interested in the atheistic, rationalistic Dravidian ideology, along with those of Ambedkar and Marx.[2] He did his B.Sc. in mathematics from the Government Arts College in Musiri. He completed his graduation in law from the Government Law College in Madurai and his masters from Government Law College Tiruchirapalli. He was married to M. A. Parameswari and the couple have a daughter named Mayuri.[3] Parameswari died of cancer on 29 May 2021 aged 57.[4]

Political career

[edit]

Raja started his political career in his final year as an undergraduate, when he joined DMK students wing and quickly rose through party ranks.[5] When Vaiko was expelled from DMK, Raja was recommended by Rajya Sabha MP S Siva Subramaniam and KN Nehru for the DMK's candidature in Perambalur for 1996 Lok Sabha elections which he won.[2]

Election results

[edit]

General Elections

[edit]
Year Constituency Party Votes % Opponent Opponent Party Opponent Votes % Result Margin %
2024 Nilgiris DMK 473,212 46.44 L. Murugan BJP 232,627 22.83 Won 240,585 23.61
2019 547,832 54.36 M. Thiyagarajan AIADMK 342,009 33.94 Won 205,823 20.42
2014 358,760 40.47 C. Gopalakrishnan 463,007 52.31 Lost -104,247 -11.84
2009 316,802 44.67 C. Krishnan MDMK 230,781 32.54 Won 86,021 12.13
2004 Perambalur 389,708 55.12 Dr. M. Sundaram AIADMK 236,375 33.43 Won 153,333 21.69
1999 330,675 48.58 P. Raja Rethinam 262,624 38.59 Won 68,051 9.99
1998 280,682 43.91 341,118 53.37 Lost -60,436 -9.46
1996 399,079 59.19 P. V. Subramanian INC 184,832 27.41 Won 214,247 31.78

Positions held

[edit]

As a minister

[edit]
A. Raja assumes the charge of Union Minister of Environment & Forests in New Delhi on 26 May 2004

Raja was deputed as the Minister of State, Rural Development on 13 October 1996 and he continued to retain the post till 29 September 2000. On 30 September 2001, he was deputed as the minister of state for Health and Family welfare during the National Democratic Alliance.[3][5] In December 2003, the DMK pulled out of the alliance and Raja resigned his minister's post along with his other DMK colleagues. He continued with the same ministry after the 2004 elections which was won by the Congress led alliance, which included the DMK.[5] His tenure as an Environment ministry came under intense scrutiny in 2011 during the 2G Spectrum case. His association with the key accused in the 2G case, Unitech and DB Realty, was rooted to 2004 when he was the Environment minister. One of the key points out of the CBI is the approval of 2016 clearances given by his ministry in a span of two years from 2006 to 2008, some of which were associated with the trading of hazardous waste. The other issue raised was about the large majority of Raja's supporters in the expert appraisals committee (EAC), responsible for granting clearances to various sectors.[6][7]

In May 2007, Dinakaran, the newspaper run by Kalanidhi Maran, the elder brother of Dayanidhi Maran who was the central minister for IT and Communication, ran into a controversy when it published the results of a series of opinion polls which showed M. K. Stalin, the second son of Karunanidhi, having more approval (70%) than his elder brother M. K. Azhagiri (2%) as the political heir of Karunanidhi. It also showed others as 20%, possibly indicating Dayanidhi Maran and Kanimozhi. The Madurai office of Dinakaran was fire bombed by supporters of Alagiri and three employees were killed.[8] The Sun TV office in Madurai was also attacked by the perpetrators.[9] A day after the incident, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi came to Chennai for felicitating Karunanidhi for 50 years in legislative assembly. Dayanidhi Maran, who usually accompanies Karunanidhi at every function, discarded the event as a mark of protest. On 13 May, the DMK administrative committee empowered Karunanidhi to remove Dayanidhi from the party. This subsequently led to his resignation from the central ministry.[10] Following his resignation, the IT portfolio was allocated to Raja on 16 May 2007.[11] On 17 October 2008, he submitted his post-dated resignation to the DMK party chief, M. Karunanidhi, in protest of the killings of Tamil civilians in Sri Lanka.[12]

2G spectrum case

[edit]
Main article: 2G spectrum case
Further information: Radia tapes controversy

The 2G spectrum financial scandal involved the alleged corrupt sale in 2008 of telecommunications bandwidth to selected organizations at prices that understated the real market value of the asset. The sale is claimed to have occurred when Raja headed the Telecommunications and IT Ministry; it has been considered the largest political corruption case in modern Indian history, amounting to around ₹1,766.45 billion (US$21 billion)[13][14] of lost income for the Government of India. It is alleged that the sale should have been put under a transparent auction system.

A first information report filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) claims that the allocation was not done as per market prices.[15] The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) holds Raja personally responsible for the sale of 2G spectrum at 2001 rates in 2008.[16] In August 2010, evidence was submitted by the CAG showing that Raja had personally signed and approved the majority of the questionable allocations.[17] Although the political opposition was demanding his resignation over the 2G spectrum case, Raja initially refused to resign, stating his innocence, and this view was backed by his party president M. Karunanidhi.[18] He eventually resigned on 14 November 2010.[19]

In 2011, the results of an investigation by retired judge Shivraj Patil, who was appointed by then telecom minister Kapil Sibal, also found Raja to have been directly responsible for "procedural lapses" regarding the sale.[20] The CBI and Enforcement Directorate estimated that Raja could have made as much as Rs 30 billion from the alleged bribes.[21]

In January and February 2011, Raja's houses and offices were raided by the CBI, who seized computers as potential evidence.[22] On 2 February 2011, the CBI arrested Raja with his aide, R. K. Chandolia, and Siddharth Behura, the former telecom secretary and placed them in Tihar jail.[23][24] Raja and R.K. Chandolia are heard in conversation with Niira Radia in the released Radia tapes.[25][26][27][28][29]

Subsequent to his arrest, the DMK supported him on the basis that he was innocent until proven guilty.[30]

On 6 June 2012, Delhi court permitted Raja to visit Tamil Nadu between 8 and 30 June, on grounds of discharging his previous duties in the state.[31]

On 15 May 2012, he was granted bail by the Supreme court under a condition that he would not visit the Department of Telecommunications nor his home state Tamil Nadu.[32][33][34] He stayed in Tihar jail for fifteen months.[35] The Enforcement Directorate grilled Raja on 10 July 2012 for four hours, to ascertain his role in grant of 2G licenses especially to Swan Telecom and Unitech Wireless.

Delhi court on 21 December 2017 acquitted all accused, including former Telecom Minister A. Raja and DMK Rajya Sabha member Kanimozhi in the 2G spectrum allocation case. [36]

Involvement in real estate

[edit]

Sadiq Batcha, a close friend of Raja's, shifted his base to Chennai from his hometown of Perambalur, after Raja became a central minister in 2004. He started a real estate firm called Green House Promoters, which had Raja's nephew Paramesh Kumar as joint managing director and Raja's brother A Kaliyaperumal and Raja's wife Parameswari as directors. Parameswari resigned from the post on account of investigations. Batcha started another real estate firm in 2008 called Equals Estates Pvt Ltd, which had Parameswari as a director. The firm had a turnover of 755 crores in two years, mainly attributed to the association of Raja. Batcha was put under the CBI scanner during the 2G spectrum case as they believed him to be the conduit for Raja.[37] On 16 March 2011, Batcha was found dead in his Chennai residence. Police found a suicide note that read the reason as the excessive media coverage that maligned his image. Police registered a case under suspicious circumstances under Section 174 of the IPC.[38][39][40]

Controversies

[edit]

Separate nation for Tamil Nadu

[edit]

On 3 July 2022, A Raja said that the Union government is not giving the state autonomy and the Prime Minister and the Home Minister should not force them into demanding a "thani nadu" (separate nation) while speaking at a meeting held for DMK local body representatives, in the presence of Chief Minister M K Stalin.[41][42][43][44][45]

"Prime Minister Narendra Modi says all states are to be seen the same, and Home Minister Amit Shah says if you want unity, learn Hindi. The party's founding father Periyar, until [his] death, demanded a thani nadu. But we (DMK) kept aside that demand for our democracy and national integrity, So, I am saying this with the utmost humility. Our CM is travelling in Anna's C. N. Annadurai path so far, do not push us into following Periyar's path. Do not make us revive our demand for a separate state"[41][42][45]

DMK immediately distanced itself from the comments and said that the comments made in support of a separate nation is not the stand of the party.[41][42][45]

Books

[edit]
  • Raja, Andimuthu (2018). 2G Saga Unfolds. Har-Anand Publications Pvt Limited. ISBN 978-81-241-1890-0.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

A. Raja

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Andimuthu Raja (born 26 October 1963) is an Indian politician from and a senior leader of the (DMK), currently representing the Nilgiris constituency as a in the . A by training who began his political career as a student activist, Raja has been elected to the five times since 1996, primarily from Nilgiris, a Scheduled Caste-reserved seat. Raja served as Union Minister of Environment and Forests from May 2004 to March 2007 and as Minister of Communications and Information Technology from May 2007 until his resignation in November 2010 amid the spectrum allocation controversy. In the case, he faced charges of and for allegedly undervaluing spectrum licenses granted to telecom firms in 2008, purportedly causing a notional loss of ₹1.76 crore to the exchequer as estimated by the Comptroller and Auditor General; however, a special CBI court acquitted him and all other accused in December 2017, citing insufficient evidence and prosecutorial lapses, a verdict the CBI has appealed to the , which admitted the appeal in March 2024. Despite the legal proceedings, Raja has remained a key DMK figure, contesting and winning elections post-acquittal, including in 2024.

Early Life and Education

Upbringing and Family Influences

Andimuthu Raja was born on 10 May 1963 in Velur, , , to S. K. Andimuthu and Chinapillai (also known as Krishnamal). His family hailed from modest circumstances in a rural setting, with his grandparents originating from a community and having migrated from Velur to to labor on tea estates, reflecting the economic migrations common among lower-caste families from the region during that era. Raja's early years unfolded in the agrarian landscapes of central , where socio-economic disparities were pronounced, particularly for Scheduled Caste households amid pervasive caste hierarchies and limited access to resources. This environment exposed him to the entrenched caste-based social structures and regional inequalities that characterized rural life, including land ownership patterns favoring dominant communities and the marginalization of groups in agricultural labor. The broader cultural milieu of during his upbringing was steeped in Dravidian social reform movements, which emphasized rationalism, self-respect, and opposition to caste oppression—ideals propagated by figures like E. V. Ramasamy and resonant with Scheduled Caste families seeking upliftment. While specific family engagements with these ideologies remain undocumented beyond the regional context, the Dravidian ethos of challenging Brahminical dominance and promoting linguistic-cultural identity permeated local discourse, influencing formative perspectives on equity and identity in such communities.

Academic Background and Early Career

A. Raja earned a degree from Madras University at the Government Arts College in , followed by a Bachelor of Law (B.L.) from at the Government Law College in . These qualifications provided the foundational legal training that underpinned his subsequent professional and political endeavors. After completing his legal education, Raja commenced practice as an advocate in , focusing on litigation in the region's courts. His work as a in rural involved representing clients in various disputes, which helped establish professional networks in southern districts. Raja's entry into student politics during his formative years introduced him to Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK)-affiliated groups, where he honed organizational skills and ideological alignment with the party's Dravidian principles. This early engagement marked the bridge from legal advocacy to active party involvement, positioning him for broader roles within the DMK structure.

Political Ascendancy

Association with DMK

A. Raja initiated his political involvement by joining the student wing of the (DMK) during his final year of undergraduate studies around the early 1980s, marking his entry into the party's organizational structure as a activist. This affiliation aligned him with the DMK's foundational principles under M. Karunanidhi's leadership, which emphasized Dravidian identity, opposition to perceived northern cultural imposition, and resistance to the Indian National Congress's centralizing tendencies in politics. Within the DMK, Raja demonstrated steadfast loyalty to amid internal party dynamics shaped by the broader Dravidian movement's focus on non-Brahmin social mobilization, rationalism, and advocacy for state autonomy. His rapid ascent through the ranks reflected the party's merit-based promotion of committed cadres, transitioning from to legal practice while deepening involvement in grassroots operations. This period underscored the DMK's role in sustaining regional against national-level dominance, a core tenet that Raja internalized during his formative years in the organization.

Electoral Contests and Victories

A. Raja entered Parliament by winning the 1996 Lok Sabha election from the (reserved) constituency as a DMK , securing his initial foothold in national politics amid the party's alliance with the Tamil Maanila Congress. He lost the seat in the general election to an AIADMK rival, R. Kaliyaperumal, reflecting the shifting dynamics of DMK-AIADMK competition in the region. In the 2009 Lok Sabha polls, Raja shifted to the Nilgiris (scheduled caste reserved) constituency, leveraging DMK's alliance with the Congress-led (UPA), and defeated the AIADMK candidate with a voter turnout of 70.7 percent among over 1 million electors, underscoring the coalition's dominance in where DMK allies captured 27 of 39 seats. This victory highlighted his appeal among and tribal voter bases in the hill district's tea areas, bolstered by UPA's national incumbency. Raja reclaimed Nilgiris in the , defeating AIADMK's M. Thiyagarajan by a margin of 205,823 votes after securing 547,472 votes for a 54 percent share, as DMK's secular front alliance capitalized on against the AIADMK-BJP tie-up. He repeated the success in , winning a third term under the DMK-led bloc by defeating BJP Union Minister with 473,212 votes to Murugan's 232,627, a margin exceeding 240,000 votes, amid fragmented opposition votes split between BJP and AIADMK. These outcomes demonstrated the pivotal role of DMK-led coalitions in amplifying his margins through consolidated anti-BJP and anti-AIADMK sentiments in diverse constituencies.

Ministerial Responsibilities

Tenure as Minister of Environment and Forests

A. Raja served as Union Minister of Environment and Forests from 23 May 2004 to 15 May 2007 under the United Progressive Alliance-I government. In this role, he oversaw the implementation of forest conservation laws, including the early stages of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, which sought to vest legal rights over forest land to tribal and traditional dwellers displaced by conservation efforts. The ministry under his leadership also managed wildlife protection programs, such as , with Raja addressing a national meeting of chief wildlife wardens and field directors of tiger reserves on 26 May 2005 to review conservation strategies. Raja released India's Initial National Communication to the Framework Convention on during his tenure, outlining the country's and vulnerability assessments. He also participated in international workshops on climate mitigation in the forestry sector, emphasizing and sustainable practices in addresses delivered in 2007. Critiques from environmental NGOs highlighted enforcement lapses, particularly weak pollution controls in industrial zones and insufficient promotion of clean energy initiatives, attributing these to a pro-industry orientation that prioritized clearances over stringent regulatory oversight. Empirical data from reports during 2004–2007 indicated persistent air and water quality deterioration in key industrial areas, with limited ministerial interventions to strengthen state-level enforcement mechanisms. Subsequent investigations revealed that numerous environmental clearances granted under Raja's ministry to and industrial projects were linked to allegations of regulatory favoritism, reflecting patterns of lax procedural scrutiny that echoed broader concerns about capture in sectors.

Role in Communications and Information Technology

A. Raja assumed the role of Union Minister of Communications and on May 16, 2007, succeeding , and prioritized expanding telecom access in rural areas as a core policy focus. He emphasized completing pending telecom reforms while directing resources toward bridging the urban-rural , including enhancements to the Universal Service Obligation (USO) Fund to subsidize infrastructure in underserved regions. Under his oversight, the ministry amended USO Fund rules in 2009 to streamline fund access for rural projects, aiming to deploy more public telephone booths and mobile towers in remote villages. These initiatives coincided with explosive growth in India's telecom subscriber base, which expanded from approximately 233 million connections at the end of 2007 to 621 million total subscribers by March 2010. The sector's rapid penetration, driven by low tariffs and private operator investments facilitated by ministry policies, helped elevate telecom's contribution to India's GDP, with estimates placing its direct and indirect economic impact at around 3% during the late . Raja's tenure involved regular consultations with the (TRAI) on spectrum management and service quality, including preparations for spectrum auctions recommended by TRAI in September 2007. He endorsed auction-based allocation for services limited to existing operators, aligning with TRAI's eligibility criteria to ensure orderly rollout of advanced . These efforts set the framework for the eventual auctions in early , while the ministry engaged with telecom industry stakeholders on regulatory adjustments to support network expansions. The period also saw advocacy for in the sector to bolster , reflecting interactions with corporate representatives amid growing demand for services.

2G Spectrum Allocation Scandal

Licensing Policy and Implementation

In January 2008, the (DoT), under Minister A. Raja, finalized a policy to allocate 122 unified access service licenses for spectrum on a first-come-first-served (FCFS) basis, pegging the entry fee at 2001 levels of Rs 1,658 crore for pan-India licenses. This approach retained administrative allocation rather than shifting to auctions, which had been recommended by the (TRAI) and aligned with principles for scarce natural resources where competitive bidding captures market-driven value and prevents arbitrary pricing. Prior allocations in 2001 had used fixed fees during a nascent market phase, but by 2008, surging demand and operator revenues—evidenced by TRAI data showing rising from Rs 48 in 2003 to Rs 76 by 2007—warranted price revision to reflect economic realities. The policy's proponents, including Raja, justified the 2001 pricing as essential for lowering barriers to new entrants, fostering competition in a sector dominated by incumbents, and ultimately reducing tariffs for consumers through increased supply. contended that auctioning spectrum would entrench high costs, stifling market expansion and teledensity, particularly in underserved rural areas. However, this defense overlooks the causal mechanism of resource scarcity: spectrum's finite nature means underpricing transfers unearned value to select licensees, forgoing fiscal revenue that could fund public infrastructure without relying on unsubstantiated trickle-down effects from competition. The and (CAG) later quantified this at Rs 1.76 lakh crore, deriving the figure from benchmarks like auction outcomes (yielding Rs 67,719 crore per equivalent) adjusted for 2G's lower bandwidth, though the estimate assumes full market realization and has been critiqued as hypothetical rather than direct loss. Implementation hinged on FCFS sequencing, but DoT advanced the application cut-off from 1 October 2007 to 25 September 2007 via a press note, enabling firms like Unitech Wireless (application dated 22 September 2007) to secure priority while excluding later submissions. Internal DoT memos documented this shift as abrupt, overriding procedural norms for equal opportunity and deviating from the original timeline announced for dual-technology approvals. Such adjustments, absent transparent rationale, undermined FCFS's purported fairness, prioritizing queue manipulation over standardized evaluation and contrasting with auction methods that eliminate discretion in entry sequencing.

Evidence of Procedural Deviations

The Department of Telecommunications (DoT) under A. Raja advanced the cut-off date for unified access service license (UAS) applications from October 1, 2007, to September 25, 2007, enabling select companies to submit applications just before the deadline and prioritizing them in a non-transparent manner, as detailed in the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) audit. This adjustment, made without formal cabinet approval or adherence to prior policy, favored applicants like Swan Telecom and Unitech Wireless, which were floated shortly before the revised date and received letters of intent despite TRAI's recommendations for competitive auctions to ensure transparency and revenue maximization. On January 10, 2008, DoT issued 122 UAS licenses in a single day using a first-come-first-served (FCFS) basis, deviating from TRAI's September 2007 guidelines that urged pricing through auctions or at least revising the 2001 entry fee of Rs 1,651 crore per circle to reflect 2007 market conditions, where comparable fetched higher bids. The FCFS process involved arbitrary queue management at DoT offices, where applicants were allowed to revise financial bids post-submission and were prioritized based on internal directives rather than chronological order, leading to allocation without competitive or financial closure verification. Swan Telecom, linked to DB Realty promoters Shahid Balwa and Vinod Goenka, secured licenses across 13 circles despite lacking telecom experience and using funds traced by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to Reliance Communications entities, with post-allocation equity transfers yielding over $1 billion in gains through sales to Etisalat DB. Similarly, Unitech Wireless obtained 22 circles' licenses and divested 60% stake to Telenor for Rs 6,200 crore shortly after, highlighting procedural lapses in eligibility checks and cross-holding restrictions under DoT rules. These deviations contributed to spectrum scarcity, as the low fixed pricing exhausted available 4.4 MHz blocks without reclamation from non-operational holders, delaying spectrum auctions until May and constraining network expansions amid rising demand, with telecom subscriber base growing from 299 million in 2008 to 811 million by . Empirical data from TRAI showed uneven rollout, with favored licensees like achieving only partial subscriber additions (under 1 million by ) compared to incumbents, while overall sector capacity bottlenecks persisted due to unpriced allocations.

Criminal Investigations and Outcomes

The (CBI) registered a (FIR) in October 2010 against A. Raja and others for alleged irregularities in the spectrum allocation, invoking sections of the including criminal conspiracy (Section 120B) and cheating (Section 420), alongside provisions of the , for abuse of official position to cause wrongful loss to the government and wrongful gain to private entities. Raja was arrested by the CBI on February 2, 2011, and placed in judicial custody shortly thereafter, remaining incarcerated for approximately 15 months before the granted him on May 15, 2012, citing prolonged detention and the right to a . A special CBI court in Delhi conducted the trial, framing charges against Raja and 16 co-accused in 2013 under the aforementioned statutes for alleged conspiracy to allocate spectrum licenses in a manner that favored specific companies through undue influence and bribery. On December 21, 2017, the court acquitted all accused, including Raja, ruling that the prosecution failed to establish criminal intent (mens rea) or a conspiracy to cause financial loss to the exchequer, describing the case as resting on "no evidence" of illegality beyond media-driven perceptions of a scam, and noting that policy deviations alone do not constitute corruption without proven dishonest motive. This acquittal contrasted sharply with the Supreme Court's February 2, 2012, judgment, which quashed all 122 licenses issued during Raja's tenure as arbitrary, capricious, and violative of equality under Article 14 of the , mandating auctions for future allocations to prevent revenue leakage estimated by the Comptroller and Auditor General at up to ₹1.76 lakh crore, thereby underscoring procedural malfeasance even if criminal culpability remained contested. The CBI challenged the 2017 acquittal in the , filing its appeal on March 20, 2018, arguing "glaring illegalities," erroneous factual interpretations, and overlooked evidence of deliberate actions indicating mens rea for . On March 22, 2024, the admitted the appeal, observing contradictions in the trial court's reasoning that warranted scrutiny, including inconsistencies between the license cancellations and the dismissal of intent-based charges. As of February 2025, the appeal remains pending, with the CBI asserting it is "ripe for hearing" and seeking expedited arguments, while Raja has maintained the proceedings reflect victimization over legitimate policy choices rather than substantiated graft.

Broader Controversies and Criticisms

Real Estate Transactions

In 2004, following his appointment as Union Minister of Environment and Forests, A. Raja and his family were linked to several property acquisitions in , including agricultural and residential lands registered under relatives or associated entities. The (CBI) later alleged that during his 2004–2007 ministerial tenure, Raja amassed disproportionate assets worth ₹5.53 crore, representing a 579% excess over his declared from known sources. These holdings included family-owned properties in districts such as and , acquired at valuations that raised questions about funding origins amid limited prior asset disclosures. The (ED) investigations into benami transactions revealed that 45 acres of land in , valued at approximately ₹55 crore, were held through a shell company allegedly controlled by Raja. Provisional attachment of these assets occurred in December 2022 under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, with final possession taken on October 10, 2023, after probes traced purchases to unexplained funds generated during the same post-2004 period. Allegations of benami holdings via relatives surfaced in 2010, prompting CBI raids on family residences in and over suspected land encroachments, though no convictions followed. Comparisons of Raja's pre-ministerial asset declarations, which showed modest holdings primarily from agricultural income, against post-2004 filings highlighted surges inconsistent with salary and declared earnings, fueling regulatory scrutiny. The CBI charge sheet in October 2022 formalized these discrepancies, but as of 2023, proceedings remained ongoing without judicial findings of in these matters. ED reports emphasized the properties' role in concealing wealth flows, yet emphasized investigative linkages to environmental ministry-era activities rather than subsequent roles.

Separatist Rhetoric on Tamil Nadu

In July 2022, A. Raja warned the central government against denying greater autonomy, stating that such actions could compel the DMK to revive demands for an "independent ," remarks made during a local body representatives' meeting in attended by . He referenced the Dravidian movement's founder E. V. Ramasamy's advocacy for —a proposed encompassing Tamil-speaking regions—but noted the DMK's historical shift away from toward following C. N. Annadurai's 1963 abandonment of the demand amid national integration pressures. These statements echoed pre-Independence Dravidian rhetoric, which framed Hindi promotion as cultural domination by , potentially justifying to preserve Tamil identity, a narrative rooted in the Justice Party's 1920s linguistic evolving into the DK's 1940s calls for a separate Dravidian nation. Critics, including the BJP and AIADMK, condemned the remarks as promoting , arguing they undermined India's constitutional unity under Article 1, which defines the nation as a union of states, and risked invoking provisions under Section 124A of the for exciting disaffection against the government. Raja reiterated similar themes in 2024 parliamentary speeches, asserting that " has never been a " in the sense of a singular entity with uniform language or culture, portraying it instead as a subcontinent of diverse regions vulnerable to central overreach, particularly from BJP policies perceived as favoring Hindi-speaking northern states. He framed these as defenses of Dravidian federalism against "North Indian dominance," aligning with DMK's electoral strategy to mobilize Tamil regionalism, though party leaders emphasized within the union rather than outright . Defenders invoked free speech protections under (1)(a), arguing the critiques unitary tendencies without advocating violence, while opponents highlighted its potential to fuel national unity debates, citing historical precedents like the 1965 anti-Hindi agitations that bolstered DMK's rise but stopped short of territorial fragmentation. No formal charges ensued, but the comments intensified scrutiny of DMK's ideological boundaries between federal demands and latent separatist echoes.

Attacks on Religious and National Narratives

In September 2023, A. Raja escalated a controversy initiated by DMK leader by likening Sanatana Dharma to diseases such as and , asserting that it represented a "" requiring eradication akin to medical intervention against illnesses like dengue or . Speaking at a protest meeting in on September 7, Raja framed Sanatana Dharma not as a philosophical tradition but as a vector for societal ills, aligning with Dravidian rationalist critiques rooted in E.V. Ramasamy Periyar's emphasis on eradicating superstition and caste hierarchies. This rhetoric drew immediate condemnations from the (BJP), which accused Raja of promoting hatred against , prompting against DMK figures including Stalin in multiple jurisdictions, though Raja himself faced legal scrutiny in courts. Raja's statements were defended by DMK adherents as a principled stand against irrational beliefs perpetuating inequality, echoing Periyarist atheism's historical opposition to temple rituals and mythological narratives viewed as tools of social control. Critics, however, contended that such analogies constituted an ideological assault on India's predominant religious framework, potentially eroding cultural cohesion by equating ancient dharma with pathological threats, with BJP leaders like highlighting it as evidence of DMK's anti-Hindu bias. Empirical backlash included widespread protests by Hindu groups and a temporary surge in national discourse, though DMK's vote share in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections in Tamil Nadu remained robust at around 27% for its alliance, suggesting consolidation among rationalist-leaning Dravidian voters rather than electoral erosion. On March 5, 2024, Raja further provoked outrage during a speech by declaring that DMK rejected the and Lord Ram as mythological constructs irrelevant to Tamil identity, mocking chants of "" and " ki Jai" as imposed by BJP-linked aggressors. He questioned the "idea of India" as a unified nation-state, implying along regional lines and framing ethnic violence in —where Meitei-Hindu and Kuki-Christian clashes had escalated since May 2023—as emblematic of majoritarian Hindu overreach rather than separatist . Video of the showed Raja ridiculing episodes as fictional impositions alien to Dravidian ethos, positioning them against Tamil literary traditions like Sangam poetry. These remarks elicited bipartisan rebuke, with ally urging restraint and BJP demanding Raja's for , portraying his narrative as an assault on national unity and Ram-centric symbolism central to Hindu identity post-Ayodhya temple consecration. Proponents within DMK viewed the critique as rational debunking of epic myths to foster equality, countering what they term Brahminical hegemony, while detractors argued it undermined shared civilizational narratives, evidenced by heightened social media virality and BJP's amplified campaigns in . No FIRs directly followed this incident, but it reinforced perceptions of DMK's ideological rigidity, with minimal quantifiable impact on DMK's 2024 assembly bypoll performances.

Publications and Ideology

Key Books and Writings

A. Raja's most prominent publication is 2G Saga Unfolds, released in January 2018 by Har-Anand Publications, in which he defends the first-come-first-served (FCFS) licensing policy implemented during his tenure as Minister of Communications and Information Technology from 2007 to 2008. The book asserts that FCFS facilitated rapid telecom expansion, reduced call rates from ₹12 per minute in 2003 to under ₹0.50 by 2010, and dismantled pre-existing oligopolies held by state-owned and favored private entities, framing the policy as pro-poor and market-liberalizing rather than corrupt. Raja attributes the ensuing scandal to political vendetta by opposition forces, including the BJP, and selective prosecutorial focus, while providing timelines of ministerial decisions and alleged media exaggerations of losses estimated at ₹1.76 lakh crore by the Comptroller and Auditor General in 2010. A Tamil edition, titled 2ஜி: அவிழும் உண்மைகள் (: Emerging Truths), parallels the English version and emphasizes similar defenses against charges post his 2017 acquittal by a special CBI court. The work relies on official records and Raja's personal accounts but has drawn criticism for omitting counter-evidence, such as the 2012 ruling invalidating the allocations for procedural arbitrariness, and for partisan framing that aligns with (DMK) narratives of targeted persecution. Raja has also authored Tamil-language books touching on Dravidian political history and critiques of national figures, including நேரு சிந்தனை: இலக்கும் ஏளனமும் (Nehru's Thoughts: Goal and Deception), which analyzes Jawaharlal Nehru's policies through a regionalist lens, and contributions to DMK-affiliated volumes like those on party leaders Karunanidhi and Stalin. These publications, often circulated via Tamil presses sympathetic to DMK ideology, promote themes of Tamil cultural autonomy and anti-centralization but lack independent circulation data or widespread academic review, receiving primarily supportive reception within party circles.

Ideological Stance and Public Discourse

A. Raja's public discourse reflects a staunch adherence to Dravidian , emphasizing and toward religious orthodoxy, as inspired by E. V. Ramasamy's critique of and hierarchies. In parliamentary speeches, he has advocated for empirical reasoning over faith-based narratives, positioning as a "menace" that perpetuates social divisions, a view he traces to Periyar's rationalist legacy. This stance manifests in his calls for party members to eschew religious symbols like tilaks during DMK events, arguing they mimic RSS aesthetics and undermine secular . Raja's oratory frequently underscores anti-centralist , framing Tamil Nadu's autonomy as essential against perceived northern dominance. In a July 2, 2024, debate, he invoked to assert Dravidian indigeneity, declaring that if Mughals were "aliens," so were , thereby challenging narratives of unified historical ownership and prioritizing regional sovereignty. His targets what he describes as "" cultural impositions, linking them to inequities in federal resource allocation and policy centralization. In 2025, Raja intensified critiques of BJP policies as inherently divisive, labeling Union Home Minister Amit Shah's June 9 speech "abominable and misleading" for stoking communal tensions and ignoring delimitation concerns that disadvantage southern states. He accused the BJP of fostering linguistic and religious cleavages, as in his February 22 response to rows, positioning Dravidian ideology as a bulwark against such "." These interventions align with DMK's emphasis on state rights over unitary impulses. Raja's provocative style has generated viral attention, with speeches like his Aryan-Mughal analogy amassing millions of views on platforms such as , energizing DMK's core base among rationalist and federalist supporters. However, empirical reception metrics reveal polarization: while boosting intra-party loyalty—evident in his retention as a key voice despite scandals—such remarks have alienated moderates and drawn cross-party condemnations, including from allies urging restraint. Coverage in outlets like highlights how these controversies sustain his influence within DMK but limit broader appeal, as measured by adverse reactions from national media and opposition benches.

Legacy and Assessments

Policy Impacts and Telecom Sector Effects

The allocation of 2G licenses in 2008 under A. Raja's tenure as telecom minister facilitated a rapid expansion in mobile subscriptions, with India's wireless subscriber base growing from approximately 347 million at the end of 2008 to over 670 million by 2010, driven by low entry barriers for new operators. This growth continued, reaching about 1.04 billion subscribers by March 2016, reflecting increased penetration in rural and underserved areas due to affordable entry-level services enabled by the undervalued pricing. However, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) estimated a presumptive loss to the of ₹1.76 lakh crore from the first-come-first-served allocation at 2001 prices, representing an under-recovery of potential auction revenues that could have offset public deficits during the government's fiscal expansions. Critics argue this revenue shortfall exacerbated budgetary pressures, as subsequent auctions post-2010, such as the 2015 spectrum sale yielding ₹1.1 lakh crore, demonstrated higher market valuations amid improved transparency. The policy's favoritism toward select entrants, including unqualified firms like Uninor and Swan Telecom, fostered that distorted competition by granting to entities lacking technical expertise, leading to inefficient network rollouts and eventual operator insolvencies. This inefficiency manifested in the sector's mounting debt, doubling from ₹2.41 lakh crore in 2012-13 to ₹4.6 lakh crore by 2016-17, as legacy players struggled with underinvestment; Reliance Jio's 2016 entry with and further exposed these weaknesses, triggering consolidations and exits among debt-laden incumbents. Defenders of the allocation highlight its role in an "access revolution," crediting cheap spectrum for plummeting tariffs—from over ₹8 per minute in 2008 to under ₹0.50 by 2016—and broad penetration that boosted digital inclusion, arguing that auction mandates would have delayed rollout and raised costs. In contrast, detractors contend the fiscal drain and competitive distortions outweighed these gains, as crony beneficiaries reaped windfall profits from stake sales while the state bore the , ultimately necessitating market corrections like Jio's disruption to restore efficiency.

Political Influence and Party Role

Despite the 2G spectrum scandal and subsequent legal scrutiny, A. Raja retained significant standing within the (DMK), securing re-election as from the Nilgiris constituency in the 2019 elections and again in 2024, where he defeated (BJP) candidate by a margin exceeding 2.4 votes. These victories underscored his electoral resilience in a Scheduled Caste-reserved seat, bolstered by DMK's alliance dynamics within the (INDIA bloc), despite ongoing criticisms from opponents who highlighted his scandal-linked past as a potential liability for the party's image. As a senior DMK figure and frequent party spokesperson, Raja has played a pivotal role in articulating opposition to the (NDA), particularly through sharp critiques of BJP leadership and policies aimed at countering their expansion in . In and public rallies, he has accused the BJP of promoting communal divisions and historical revisionism, positioning DMK as a bulwark against such ideologies. For instance, in June 2025, Raja condemned Union Home Minister Amit Shah's speech as "abominable, divisive and misleading," framing it as an attempt to import imposition and undermine Dravidian principles. Such rhetoric has contributed to DMK's strategy of galvanizing anti-BJP sentiment, though it has drawn retaliatory attacks from BJP leaders, who dismissed Raja's comments as those of an "idiot" tied to corruption allegations. Raja's influence extends to internal DMK cohesion, particularly among Thevar community networks, where his loyalty during the leadership transition from M. Karunanidhi to M.K. Stalin helped stabilize factional alignments amid post-2018 party restructuring. His steadfast support for Karunanidhi's decisions, including resigning as telecom minister in 2011 to facilitate parliamentary proceedings despite denying wrongdoing, reinforced his role as a reliable operative in maintaining continuity. Under Stalin, Raja has continued as a deputy general secretary-level voice, aiding opposition coordination without spearheading major infrastructure or policy legacies, focusing instead on rhetorical mobilization against NDA incursions. Critics within and outside DMK, including BJP spokespersons, argue his scandal-tainted profile burdens the party's credibility, yet his utility in sustaining anti-BJP narratives has preserved his prominence in Tamil Nadu's polarized politics.

References

  1. https://sansad.in/ls/members/biography/344
  2. https://indianexpress.com/about/a-raja/
  3. https://www.oneindia.com/politicians/andimuthu-raja-71706.html
  4. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-south-asia-12939509
  5. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/who-is-a-raja-439263
  6. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/2g-scam-case-verdict-former-telecom-minister-a-raja-and-dmk-leader-kanimozhi-acquitted-in-2g-case-1790406
  7. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/delhi-hc-allows-cbi-to-challenge-a-rajas-acquittal-in-2g-spectrum-case/article67979234.ece
  8. https://www.deccanherald.com/elections/india/lok-sabha-elections-2024-meet-the-leader-a-raja-2984494
  9. https://sansad.in/ls/members/biography/344?from=members
  10. https://electionpandit.com/candidate/a__raja
  11. https://starsunfolded.com/a-raja/
  12. https://www.careerguide.com/career/bio/a-raja-wife-net-worth-brother-daughter-house
  13. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/a-brief-history-of-a-raja/articleshow/7411326.cms
  14. https://www.examrace.com/Current-Affairs/2012/A-Raja.html
  15. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/i-will-come-out-clean-in-2g-case-a-raja-s-words-ring-true-three-years-later/story-dj9EYT2i9tKunltP5DxmKP.html
  16. https://celebrityborns.com/biography/a-raja/9510
  17. https://www.rediff.com/news/slide-show/slide-show-1-tn-assembly-perambalur-feels-raja-presence/20110408.htm
  18. https://www.hindustantimes.com/elections/lok-sabha-election/nilgiris-lok-sabha-constituency-dmk-a-raja-101717493674641.html
  19. https://thefederal.com/states/south/tamil-nadu/going-beyond-2g-the-many-faces-of-a-raja
  20. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Coimbatore/a-raja-to-contest-again-from-the-nilgiris/article67971545.ece
  21. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/chennai/Former-AIADMK-MP-dead/article16813006.ece
  22. https://www.indiavotes.com/pc/summary/7525
  23. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/coimbatore/raja-retakes-nilgiris-with-a-huge-margin/articleshow/69472566.cms
  24. https://www.indiatoday.in/elections/lok-sabha-2019/story/niligiris-lok-sabha-results-2019-dmk-s-a-raja-wins-seat-with-5-47-472-votes-1532980-2019-05-23
  25. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Coimbatore/a-raja-wins-third-term-as-the-nilgiris-mp/article68251618.ece
  26. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/nilgiris-sc-election-results-2024-tamil-nadu-nilgiris-sc-lok-sabha-elections-poll-result-updates-murugan-l-bjp-raja-a-dmk-logesh-tamilselvan-d-aiadmk/articleshow/110670354.cms
  27. https://mrajshekhar.in/on-the-drafting-of-the-forest-rights-act/
  28. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Union_Minister_for_Environment_%2526_Forests%2C_Shri_A._Raja_addressing_the_meeting_of_Chief_Wildlife_Wardens_and_Field_Directors_of_Project_Tiger_Reserves%2C_in_New_Delhi_on_May_26%2C_2005.jpg
  29. https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/erelcontent.aspx?relid=2023
  30. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Minister_for_Environment_%2526_Forests_Shri_A._Raja_addressing_the_delegates_at_the_Valedictory_function_of_the_International_Workshop_on_%25E2%2580%259CClimate_Change_Mitigation_in_Forestry_Sector_Using_results_of_projects.jpg
  31. https://cpcb.nic.in/openpdffile.php?id=UmVwb3J0RmlsZXMvTmV3SXRlbV8xMjJfTkFBUU1fMjAwNy5wZGY=
  32. https://www.deccanherald.com/india/tamil-nadu/ed-takes-possession-of-15-benami-assets-linked-to-dmk-mp-a-raja-2720195
  33. https://swarajyamag.com/analysis/cbi-seeks-sanction-to-prosecute-senior-dmk-leader-and-former-union-minister-a-raja-in-disproportionate-assets-case
  34. https://m.economictimes.com/tech/internet/rural-telephony-my-top-priority-raja/articleshow/2052903.cms
  35. https://www.oneindia.com/2007/05/16/telecom-reforms-to-be-completed-thrust-on-rural-telephony-1179317107.html
  36. https://www.thehindu.com/business/Rural-telephony-to-get-fresh-funds-Raja/article16882441.ece
  37. https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/erelcontent.aspx?relid=68713
  38. https://www.lightreading.com/mobile-core/a-guide-to-india-s-telecom-market
  39. https://www.met.edu/knowledge_at_met/telecom_sector_a_catalyst_in_the_growth_of_indian_economy
  40. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/raja-backs-auctions-for-3g-spectrum/articleshow/2536697.cms
  41. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/trai-opposes-rajas-move-on-3g-auctions/articleshow/2557164.cms
  42. https://m.economictimes.com/industry/telecom/trai-endorses-rajas-view-on-2g-spectrum-auctioning/articleshow/2623230.cms
  43. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/raja-to-push-fdi-rural-telephony/articleshow/2055865.cms
  44. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/2g-scam-raja-ignored-pms-advice-says-cag-report/articleshow/6934810.cms
  45. https://swarajyamag.com/politics/a-comprehensive-timeline-of-2g-scam-how-it-all-started-and-as-it-happened
  46. https://prsindia.org/theprsblog/presidential-reference-in-the-2g-case
  47. https://www.livemint.com/Home-Page/PcruA8Gk9UpMRIuU2rUZLM/Govt-finally-defends-2G-policy.html
  48. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/raja-defends-the-price-allotted-to-the-new-players/story-ugwhOe5Iz4ea30f0azSVZI.html
  49. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/i-acted-with-the-prime-ministers-concurrence-in-2g-case-a-raja/article5979591.ece
  50. https://drop.ndtv.com/pdf/CAG.pdf
  51. https://theprint.in/pageturner/excerpt/2g-spectrum-allocation-was-a-total-bankruptcy-of-any-pretense-of-morality-vinod-rai/24096/
  52. https://www.thequint.com/news/politics/a-look-at-the-detailed-timeline-of-the-2g-spectrum-case
  53. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/cut-off-date-changed-to-favour-unitech-cbi-to-a-raja/articleshow/38023377.cms
  54. https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/raja-gifted-away-national-asset-at-throwaway-prices-sc/
  55. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/cag-draft-report-nails-raja-role-in-2g-scam/articleshow/6458465.cms
  56. https://m.economictimes.com/industry/telecom/most-2g-licences-given-by-raja-illegal-cag/articleshow/6633036.cms
  57. https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/indias-2g-telecom-scandal-spans-the-spectrum-of-abuse/
  58. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/raja-conspired-with-bureaucrats-industrialists-in-2g-scam-cbi/articleshow/7852233.cms
  59. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/2g-scam-reliance-entirely-funded-swan-telecom-cbi-says-1238238
  60. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/2g-scam-sc-scraps-122-licences-granted-under-rajas-tenure-trial-court-to-decide-on-chidambarams-role/articleshow/11725097.cms
  61. https://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/2g-scam-verdict-as-kanimozhi-a-raja-walk-free-court-cites-lack-of-direct-evidence/985097/
  62. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/2g-case-verdict-a-timeline-of-events-a-raja-kanimozhi-upa-4992597/
  63. https://www.moneylife.in/article/2g-case-charges-framed-against-a-raja-and-16-other-accused/20853.html
  64. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/a-raja-gets-bail-after-15-months-in-jail-in-2g-spectrum-case/article64123834.ece
  65. https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2017/12/21/2g-spectrum-case-special-cbi-judge-acquits-accused-money-laundering-case/
  66. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/supreme-court-scraps-upas-illegal-2g-sale/article2853159.ece
  67. https://scroll.in/article/862349/if-there-was-no-2g-scam-why-did-the-supreme-court-cancel-122-licenses-in-2012
  68. https://www.nationalheraldindia.com/national/glaring-illegalities-cbi-on-acquittal-of-a-raja-others-in-2g-spectrum-case
  69. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/appeal-against-raja-acquittal-in-2g-case-ripe-for-hearing-cbi/articleshow/118340821.cms
  70. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/high-court-admits-cbis-appeal-challenging-acquittal-of-a-raja-in-2g-scam-case-5287975
  71. https://m.economictimes.com/news/india/appeal-against-acquittal-of-a-raja-others-in-2g-case-ripe-for-hearing-cbi-to-delhi-hc/articleshow/118252689.cms
  72. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/cbi-chargesheets-ex-telecom-minister-a-raja-in-disproportionate-assets-case/article65993824.ece
  73. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/politics/cbi-charge-sheet-dmk-a-raja-disproportionate-assets-8201666/
  74. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/probe-ordered-into-allegations-of-land-grab-by-raja-s-relatives/story-kF1fXxANBv4T1Xg1PH28GN.html
  75. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/ed-takes-possession-of-assets-belonging-to-dmk-mp-a-raja/article67403558.ece
  76. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ed-attaches-rs-55cr-plot-of-a-rajas-benami-co/articleshow/96436418.cms
  77. https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/chennai/ed-takes-possession-of-15-benami-assets-linked-to-dmk-mp-a-raja-8976459/
  78. https://www.thefederal.com/states/south/tamil-nadu/disproportionate-assets-case-cbi-files-charge-sheet-against-a-raja
  79. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/dont-nudge-us-to-seek-independent-tamil-nadu-dmks-a-raja-seeks-autonomy-with-cm-stalin-on-stage/article65599513.ece
  80. https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/dmk-mp-raja-heated-pitch-on-separate-tamil-nadu-autonomy-8008646/
  81. https://www.news18.com/news/politics/while-making-separate-country-comment-dmks-a-raja-cites-periyar-but-he-dumped-the-dream-66-years-ago-5497453.html
  82. https://theprint.in/politics/propagates-separatism-a-rajas-separate-tamil-nadu-comment-draws-bjp-aiadmk-rebuke/1024655/
  83. https://scroll.in/latest/1027595/dmk-leader-a-raja-demands-autonomy-for-tamil-nadu-at-an-event-attended-by-chief-minister
  84. https://www.firstpost.com/india/explained-why-dmk-mp-a-rajas-call-for-autonomy-in-tamil-nadu-sparked-a-row-10872621.html
  85. https://www.deccanherald.com/india/tamil-nadu/india-has-never-been-a-nation-dmk-leader-a-raja-stokes-row-2923258
  86. https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2024/Mar/05/india-has-never-been-a-nation-dmk-leader-a-rajas-speech-triggers-controversy
  87. https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/dmk-a-raja-ram-india-comments-political-firestorm-9197601/
  88. https://www.theweek.in/news/india/2022/07/04/dont-force-us-to-seek-independent-tamil-nadu-dmks-raja-tells-centre.html
  89. https://www.thenewsminute.com/tamil-nadu/give-us-autonomy-dont-push-tn-revive-separate-state-demand-dmk-s-raja-165525
  90. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/dmk-mp-a-raja-compares-sanatana-dharma-with-hiv/article67280601.ece
  91. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/sanatana-dharma-is-a-social-disgrace-like-hiv-and-leprosy-dmks-a-raja-says/articleshow/103463612.cms
  92. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/sanatana-dharma-should-be-compared-to-diseases-social-stigma-dmk-minister-a-raja-statement-2432332-2023-09-07
  93. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/fir-filed-against-udhayanidhi-stalin-in-mumbai-over-his-sanatan-dharma-remark/article67302122.ece
  94. https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-politics/sanatan-dharma-history-dmk-periyar-8923906/
  95. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/hindu-religion-a-menace-not-only-to-india-but-to-the-entire-world-dmk-mp-a-raja/articleshow/103617071.cms
  96. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/sanatana-dharma-row-and-its-impact-on-tamil-nadu-politics-101694977916078.html
  97. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/bjp-slams-dmk-mp-a-raja-for-his-india-is-not-a-nation-remark-5179499
  98. https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bjp-criticises-dmks-a-raja-for-making-fun-of-lord-ram-questioning-idea-of-india/articleshow/108229367.cms
  99. https://news.abplive.com/tamil-nadu/dmk-a-raja-tamil-nadu-bharat-mata-jai-shri-ram-nilgiris-mp-sparks-row-bjp-reacts-sanatan-dharma-row-1669633
  100. https://www.thenewsminute.com/tamil-nadu/what-dmk-mp-a-raja-actually-said-about-ramayana-and-jai-sri-ram
  101. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/congress-condemns-ally-dmk-leader-a-rajas-remarks/article67918149.ece
  102. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/bjp-says-dmk-mp-a-raja-declared-we-are-enemies-of-ram-in-hate-speech-101709626223555.html
  103. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/insulting-indias-ethos-and-hindu-gods-hallmark-of-india-bloc-bjp/articleshow/108246297.cms
  104. https://www.livemint.com/news/dmks-a-raja-says-we-re-enemies-of-ram-bjp-questions-india-bloc-stooping-low-for-political-gains-11709628364930.html
  105. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/dont-read-2g-book-with-politically-coloured-glasses-a-raja-5033099/
  106. https://www.amazon.in/2G-SAGA-Unfolds-ANDIMUTHI-RAJA/dp/8124118906
  107. https://www.commonfolks.in/books/a-raja
  108. https://www.theweek.in/news/india/2018/03/07/how-raja-periyar-comments-put-bjp-in-firing-line.html
  109. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/shun-tilaks-at-party-events-says-dmk-mp-a-raja-starts-a-row/articleshow/119919120.cms
  110. https://thesouthfirst.com/news/if-mughals-are-aliens-so-are-aryans-dmk-mp-a-raja-in-lok-sabha/
  111. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vb9OrYeu0U
  112. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/amit-shahs-speech-in-madurai-abominable-divisive-and-misleading-dmk-leader-a-raja/article69674153.ece
  113. https://newsarenaindia.com/states/bjp-is-fostering-division-dmk-mp-a-raja-on-language-row/37178
  114. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w553GAhNXk
  115. https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/a-raja-controversy-rows-key-leader-dmk-9207591/
  116. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/science-technology/all-about-mobile-spectrum-33106
  117. https://www.gsmaintelligence.com/research/network-shutdowns-to-reshape-indian-mobile-market-2g-licence-cancellations-and-regulatory-uncertainties-curbing-indian-mobile-growth
  118. https://www.ideasforindia.in/topics/governance/two-questions-about-the-2g-scandal.html
  119. https://paragkar.com/the-untold-story-of-the-2g-scam/
  120. https://www.rediff.com/business/report/how-2g-case-impacts-telecom-sector-to-this-day/20171222.htm
  121. http://www.trai.gov.in/sites/default/files/2024-11/CUTS_plimanry.pdf
  122. https://www.livemint.com/industry/telecom/india-was-stuck-with-2g-before-jio-ended-country-s-data-misery-mukesh-ambani-11602155145956.html
  123. https://www.reddit.com/r/india/comments/81vyw4/how_the_2g_scam_and_jio_ruined_indias_telecom/
  124. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/tamil-nadu/story/dmk-lok-sabha-mp-a-raja-calls-hm-union-amit-shah-fool-on-bjp-tn-expansion-party-responds-with-idiot-2745427-2025-06-24
  125. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/karunanidhi-got-raja-to-resign-to-enable-parliament-to-function-stalin/articleshow/63404797.cms
  126. https://www.deccanherald.com/india/tamil-nadu/dmk-not-afraid-of-ordinary-persons-like-modi-shah-a-raja-3577385
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.