Hubbry Logo
National Air and Space Intelligence CenterNational Air and Space Intelligence CenterMain
Open search
National Air and Space Intelligence Center
Community hub
National Air and Space Intelligence Center
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
National Air and Space Intelligence Center
National Air and Space Intelligence Center
National Air and Space Intelligence Center
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

National Air and Space Intelligence Center
ActiveJuly 1961 – present
CountryUnited States
Branch United States Air Force
Part ofAir Staff A2/6
Garrison/HQWright-Patterson Air Force Base
DecorationsAir and Space Organizational Excellence Award
WebsiteOfficial website Edit this at Wikidata

The National Air and Space Intelligence Center (NASIC) is the United States Air Force unit for analyzing military intelligence on foreign air forces, weapons, and systems. NASIC assessments of aerospace performance characteristics, capabilities, and vulnerabilities are used to shape national security and defense policies and support weapons treaty negotiations and verification.[1] NASIC provides the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) with specialized intelligence regarding foreign air threats.

History

[edit]

In 1917 the Foreign Data Section of the Army Signal Corps' Airplane Engineering Department was established at McCook Field,[2] and a NASIC predecessor operated the Army Aeronautical Museum (now National Museum of the Air Force) initially at McCook and then on 22 August 1935 at Wright Field in Dayton, Ohio.[3][4] The Office of the Chief of Air Corps's Information Division had become the OCAC Intelligence Division by 1939, which transferred into the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) as AC/AS, Intelligence and was known as A-2[5] (in April, 1942, the Air Intelligence School was at the Harrisburg Academy.)[6] The United States Army Air Forces evaluated foreign aircraft during World War II with the "T-2 Intelligence Department at Wright Field and Freeman Field, Indiana".[4] In July 1944, Wright Field analysts fired a V-1 engine reconstructed from "Robot Blitz" wreckage[7] (an entire V-1 was reconstructed at Republic Aviation by 8 September).[8][9] Post-war, Operation Lusty recruited German technology experts who were interrogated prior to working in the United States, e.g., Dr. Herbert Wagner at a Point Mugu USMC detachment and Walter Dornberger at Bell Aircraft. The "capability…anticipated for Soviet intercontinental jet bombers" (e.g., in NSC 20/4 in the fall of 1945) determined a Radar Fence was needed for sufficient U.S. warning and that the "1954 Interceptor" (F-106) was needed (specified in the 13 January 1949, Air Development Order): "the appearance of a Soviet jet bomber [was in the] 1954…May Day parade".[10]

"By 1944, it had become obvious that German aeronautical technology was superior in many ways, to that of this country, and we needed to obtain this technology and make use of it," said P-47 and Messerschmitt Me 262 pilot USAAF Lieutenant Roy Brown during a speech at NASIC in 2014. To accomplish this task, then Colonel Harold E. Watson was sent from Wright Field to Europe in 1944, to locate German aircraft of advanced design. Watson would become an integral part of forming the intelligence unit that would eventually become NASIC.[11]

Air Technical Intelligence Center

[edit]
Emblem of Air Technical Intelligence Center

On 21 May 1951, the Air Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC) was established as a USAF field activity of the Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence.[4] ATIC analyzed engine parts and the tail section of a Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-15 and in July, the center received a complete MiG-15 that had crashed. ATIC also obtained IL-10 and Yak-9 aircraft in operational condition, and monitored a captured MiG-15's flight test program. ATIC awarded a contract to Battelle Memorial Institute for translation and analysis of materiel and documents gathered during the Korean War. Analysis allowed FEAF to develop fighter engagement tactics. In 1958 ATIC had a Readix Computer in Building 828, 1 of 6 WPAFB buildings used by the unit prior to the center built in 1976.[4]

Discoverer 29 (launched 30 April 1961) then photographed the "first Soviet ICBM offensive launch complex" at Plesetsk.[12] The Defense Intelligence Agency was created on 1 October.

Foreign Technology Division

[edit]
National Air and Space Intelligence Center, new Foreign Materiels Exploitation (FME) center at Wright-Paterson Air Force Base.

In 1961 ATIC became the Foreign Technology Division (FTD) which was reassigned to Air Force Systems Command (AFSC). FTD intelligence estimates were subsequently provided to the National Security Council.[12]: 111  At Tonopah Test Range Airport, FTD conducted test and evaluation of captured Soviet fighter aircraft (AFSC [13] The pilots were recruited from the Air Force Test Center at Edwards AFB. The aircraft of the 1966 Iraqi Air Force MiG-21 defection was loaned by Israel to the U.S. Air Force and transferred to Nevada for study.[13] In 1968, the US Air Force and Navy HAVE DOUGHNUT project flew the aircraft at Area 51 for simulated air combat training (renamed HAVE DRILL and transferred to the Tonopah TTR c. 1968). U.S. casualties flying foreign aircraft included those in the 1979 Tonopah MiG-17 crash during training versus a Northrop F-5 and the 1984 Little Skull Mountain MiG-23 crash which killed a USAF general.[14]

FTD detachments were located in Virginia, California (Det 2), Germany (Det 3), Japan (Det 4), and Det 5—first in Massachusetts and later Colorado (Buckley ANGB).[15] By 1968 FTD had an "Aerial Phenomenon Office"[16] and in 1983, FTD/OLAI at the Cheyenne Mountain Complex published the Analysis of Cosmos 1220 and Cosmos 1306 Fragments.[17]

In 1971 the FTD obtained, translated, and published a copy of the paper Method of Edge Waves in the Physical Theory of Diffraction, originally a Russian-language work by Pyotr Ufimtsev of the Central Research Radio Engineering Institute [ЦНИРТИ] of the Defense Ministry of the Soviet Union, which became the basis for stealth aircraft technology.[18][19][20][21]

National Air Intelligence Center

[edit]

In October 1993 at the end of the Cold War, FTD became the National Air Intelligence Center[22] as "a component of the Air Intelligence Agency",[23] and by 2005 had a Signals Exploitation Division SAM.gov | Home after being renamed the National Air and Space Intelligence Center on 15 February 2003.[15]

NASIC's Defense Intelligence Space Threat Committee coordinates "a wide variety of complex space/counterspace analytical activities."[24] The Center includes a library with interlibrary loan to Air University, etc.[1]

Organization

[edit]

NASIC is an operation wing and Field Operating Agency (FOA) of the USAF; as an FOA, it reports to the Air Staff through the Deputy Chief of Staff for ISR and Cyber Effects Operations.[1] The Center is led by a Commander, currently Col. Ariel Batungbacal, and has an annual budget of over $507 million.[25]

NASIC's 4,100 civilian, military, Reserve, National Guard, and contract personnel are split between the Centers' four intelligence analysis groups, four support directorates, and 18 squadrons.

The Air and Cyberspace Intelligence Group; Geospatial and Signatures Intelligence Group; Global Exploitation Intelligence Group; and Space, Missiles and Forces Intelligence Group comprise the four intelligence groups; the Directorate of Communications and Information, Directorate of Personnel, Directorate of Facilities and Logistics, and Directorate of Plans and Operations comprise the four support directorates.[1]

Lineage

[edit]
  • Established, activated, and organized as Foreign Technology Division on 1 July 1961
Redesignated: Air Force Foreign Technology Center on 1 October 1991
Redesignated: Foreign Aerospace Science and Technology Center on 1 January 1992
Redesignated: National Air Intelligence Center on 1 October 1993
Redesignated: National Air and Space Intelligence Center on 20 February 2003

Assignments

[edit]

List of commanders

[edit]
  • Brig. Gen. Arthur J. Pierce, February 1961 – July 1964
  • Brig. Gen. Arthur W. Cruikshank Jr., July 1964 – August 1966
  • Col. Raymond S. Sleeper, August 1966 – November 1968
  • Col. George R. Weinbrenner, November 1968 – July 1974
  • Col. James W. Rawers, July 1974 – July 1975
  • Col. John B. Marks, Jr., July 1975 – January 1977
  • Col. Howard E. Wright, January 1977 – June 1981
  • Col. David S. Watrous, June 1981 – February 1983
  • Col. Earl A. Pontius, February 1983 – June 1986
  • Col. Gary Culp, June 1986 – August 1988
  • Brig. Gen. Francis C. Gideon, August 1988 – June 1992
  • Col. James E. Miller, Jr., June 1992 – July 1994
  • Col. Gary D. Payton, July 1994 – August 1996
  • Col. Kenneth K. Dumm, August 1996 – December 1997
  • Col. Richard G. Annas, December 1997 – September 2000
  • Col. Steven R. Capenos, September 2000 – July 2002
  • Col. Mark C. Christian, July 2002 – September 2004
  • Col. Joseph J. Pridotkas, September 2004 – July 2006
  • Col. Karen A. Cleary, July 2006 – June 2008
  • Col. D. Scott George (BG Select), June 2008 – June 2010[27]
  • Col. Kathleen C. Sakura, June 2010 – May 2012
  • Col. Aaron M. Prupas, May 2012 – June 2014[28]
  • Col. Leah G. Lauderback, June 2014 – May 2016
  • Col. Sean P. Larkin, May 2016 – June 2018
  • Col. Parker H. Wright, 28 June 2018 – May 2020[29]
  • Col. Maurizio D. Calabrese, 9 June 2020 – 2 June 2022
  • Col. Ariel G. Batungbacal, 2 June 2022 – present[30]

Decorations

[edit]
  • Air and Space Organizational Excellence Award
    • 1 October 1996 – 30 September 1998 (as National Air Intelligence Center)[31]
    • 1 June 2000 – 31 May 2002 (as National Air Intelligence Center)[32]
    • 1 June 2001 – 31 May 2003 (as National Air Intelligence Center)[33]
    • 1 June 2003 – 31 May 2004 [34]
    • 1 November 2007 - 31 December 2008[35]
    • 1 January 2013 – 31 December 2014 [36]
    • 1 January 2015 – 31 December 2016 [37]

Stations

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

National Air and Space Intelligence Center

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The National Air and Space Intelligence Center (NASIC) is the Air Force's primary organization for analyzing and characterizing foreign air, space, missile, and cyber threats to support national defense operations. Headquartered at in , NASIC traces its lineage to the Foreign Technology Division established in 1961, with roots extending back nearly a century to early Army Air Service efforts at McCook Field. As a global intelligence enterprise, it delivers specialized assessments to the Department of Defense, shapes policy through exploitation of foreign , and enables warfighters by reverse-engineering adversary technologies for tactical advantages. Notable for its role in dissecting captured systems like Soviet MiGs during the and modern hypersonic threats, NASIC maintains a low public profile while fulfilling critical functions in multi-domain intelligence.

History

Origins in Early Aviation Intelligence (1917–1944)

The Foreign Data Section of the Army Signal Corps' Airplane Engineering Department was established in 1917 at McCook Field in , shortly after the entered , to evaluate foreign scientific and technical information on designs, engines, and related technologies. This unit addressed the U.S. military's initial deficiencies in capabilities, as the country lacked a mature domestic industry and relied heavily on Allied imports and captured German equipment for rapid development. By analyzing foreign data, including blueprints, performance reports, and components shipped from Europe, the section supported engineering efforts to produce over 11,000 by the war's end, enabling the U.S. to field squadrons equipped with modified foreign models like the British and French 2A2. During the interwar period, the Foreign Data Section evolved into predecessor organizations at McCook Field, which transitioned to Wright Field in 1927, focusing on systematic evaluation of foreign aircraft and components acquired through purchases, diplomatic exchanges, or salvage. These efforts included disassembly and testing of approximately 200 foreign aircraft types by the 1930s, providing data on aerodynamics, propulsion, and materials that informed U.S. designs such as the Boeing P-26 Peashooter and informed doctrinal debates on air power roles. The work emphasized empirical reverse-engineering over theoretical speculation, yielding practical advancements like improved engine superchargers derived from European samples, amid budget constraints that limited U.S. innovation to incremental adaptations of proven foreign technologies. As escalated in Europe, the U.S. Army Air Forces expanded capabilities from 1940 onward, establishing field exploitation units and central laboratories to process increasing volumes of enemy . By , the Technical Data Laboratory at Wright Field assumed primary responsibility for the Army Air Forces' scientific and mission, coordinating analysis of captured Axis equipment shipped stateside, including over 100 German and Italian evaluated by 1944 for vulnerabilities in , armor, and weaponry. These operations, supported by specialized teams in theaters like and , generated reports on enemy performance metrics—such as Messerschmitt climb rates exceeding 3,000 feet per minute—that directly influenced Allied countermeasures and U.S. production priorities, though early shortages in trained personnel delayed full integration until mid-1944.

Air Technical Intelligence Center Period (1945–1961)

Following World War II, the Technical Data Laboratory at Wright Field, Ohio, continued the U.S. Army Air Forces' mission of scientific and technical intelligence analysis, focusing initially on exploited German aeronautical technologies before pivoting to emerging Soviet threats amid rising Cold War tensions. This laboratory, operational since December 1942, processed captured equipment and data to inform U.S. aircraft development and countermeasures. Reorganizations in the late 1940s streamlined intelligence functions under the newly independent U.S. Air Force, culminating in the formal establishment of the Air Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC) on May 21, 1951, as a field activity of the Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence within Air Materiel Command, based at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base with approximately 411 personnel. ATIC's primary mission involved collecting, evaluating, and disseminating intelligence on foreign air and missile systems to prevent technological surprise and support U.S. airpower superiority. During the Korean War (1950–1953), ATIC conducted critical analyses of Soviet-designed Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-15 jet fighters, including engine components recovered from crash sites in April 1951 and a complete aircraft obtained via defection in 1953, revealing advancements in swept-wing design and high-altitude performance that initially outmatched U.S. straight-wing jets like the F-80. These evaluations informed tactical adaptations, such as emphasizing F-86 Sabre engagements in "MiG Alley," and contributed to post-war publications like a 1955 MiG-15 user's guide. ATIC also exploited other Soviet hardware, including Ilyushin and Yakovlev aircraft, and monitored radar and missile developments amid escalating nuclear delivery threats. Recognizing the growing significance of space-related technologies, ATIC was redesignated the Aerospace Technical Intelligence Center on September 21, 1959, expanding its scope to encompass ballistic missiles and early systems. Throughout the 1950s, the center integrated photographic reconnaissance, , and laboratory testing to produce assessments that shaped procurement and doctrine. By 1961, accumulating expertise in foreign technology exploitation prompted its transfer to the Office of the Director of Intelligence and redesignation as the Foreign Technology Division, marking the transition from a broad intelligence hub to a specialized exploitation entity.

Foreign Technology Division Era (1961–1991)

The Foreign Technology Division (FTD) was established on July 1, 1961, at , , as the successor to the Air Technical Intelligence Center under the newly formed . This reorganization formalized the Air Force's scientific and technical intelligence (S&TI) efforts, shifting focus from broad technical data laboratory functions to specialized exploitation of foreign technologies amid escalating tensions. FTD's creation addressed the need for systematic analysis of adversary capabilities to prevent technological surprise, drawing on predecessor expertise in evaluating captured enemy equipment. FTD's primary mission encompassed acquiring, collecting, analyzing, producing, and disseminating on foreign scientific and technical developments, with particular emphasis on Soviet systems. Personnel specialized in dissecting , missiles, systems, and associated , producing reports that informed U.S. design, tactics, and countermeasures. During the era, FTD exploited captured Soviet MiG-17, MiG-21, and MiG-23 fighters, integrating them into evaluation programs at sites like to assess performance against U.S. . Notable efforts included Project , which involved over 100 test flights of a MiG-21F-13 to compare its agility, vulnerabilities, and tactical employment, yielding data that shaped pilot training and interceptor strategies. Throughout the 1960s and 1970s, FTD issued bulletins on emerging threats, such as probable Soviet titanium space capsules and electronic systems in Badger bombers, enabling predictive assessments of adversary advancements. The division maintained a fleet of flyable Soviet-block aircraft for ongoing ground and flight testing, collaborating with CIA and other agencies to refine U.S. understandings of foreign propulsion, avionics, and materials. By the 1980s, FTD's analyses extended to stealth countermeasures and space-based systems, contributing to broader intelligence community products despite resource constraints from defense budget shifts. This era solidified FTD's role as the Air Force's premier S&TI hub, culminating in its redesignation as the National Air Intelligence Center in 1991 amid post-Cold War realignments.

National Air Intelligence Center Formation (1991–2002)

The Foreign Technology Division (FTD), which had served as the U.S. 's for scientific and on foreign air and space systems since 1961, underwent initial reorganization steps toward forming the National Air Intelligence Center (NAIC) in 1991. On 1 October 1991, FTD was redesignated the Air Force Foreign Technology Center and realigned under the Intelligence Command, reflecting broader post-Cold War efforts to streamline intelligence functions amid reduced strategic threats and fiscal constraints. This transition continued on 1 January 1992 with the redesignation to the Foreign Aerospace Science and Technology Center (FASTC), emphasizing the fusion of specialized scientific and (S&TI) with broader general (GMI) to enhance predictive analysis of adversary capabilities. The FASTC maintained its headquarters at , , and focused on exploiting foreign and producing threat assessments derived from . NAIC was formally established on 1 October 1993 via the integration of FASTC with the 480th Intelligence Group, a unit previously focused on tactical and operational intelligence production, thereby consolidating Air Force-wide expertise in air domain threats under a single entity. This merger addressed gaps in integrated intelligence by combining FASTC's technical exploitation capabilities—such as captured systems—with the 480th's all-source fusion, enabling more comprehensive evaluations of foreign developments. From 1993 to 2002, NAIC operated as the Air Force's primary node for foreign threat characterization, supporting warfighter requirements, acquisition programs, and policy decisions through detailed reports on systems like advanced fighters, missiles, and emerging technologies.

Establishment and Evolution of NASIC (2002–Present)

The National Air Intelligence Center (NAIC) was redesignated as the National Air and Space Intelligence Center (NASIC) on February 20, 2003, to more accurately encompass its expanding role in space intelligence analysis alongside air domain threats. This redesignation occurred under the Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Agency, highlighting the integration of space-based systems into foreign threat assessments amid post-Cold War shifts toward multidimensional aerial and orbital challenges. In April 2008, NASIC underwent internal restructuring, including the activation of additional groups and squadrons on , formalized through a that enhanced its operational capacity for exploitation and threat characterization. This was complemented by the opening of a new 100,000-square-foot facility on May 2, 2008, equipped with advanced laboratories and a 500-seat to support collaborative efforts. These enhancements addressed surging demands for rapid of adversary technologies, particularly in response to emerging hypersonic and threats. On September 29, 2014, NASIC transitioned to a Field Operating Agency (FOA) status directly under the Headquarters U.S. Deputy Chief of Staff for (A2), streamlining command lines and emphasizing its strategic alignment with Air Force-wide priorities. This realignment bolstered NASIC's independence in producing on foreign air and space systems, enabling more agile responses to peer competitors' advancements in domains like electronic warfare and space dominance. As of 2025, NASIC maintains this FOA structure at , , with ongoing expansions in personnel and capabilities to counter evolving global threats from state actors.

Mission and Strategic Role

Core Intelligence Functions

The core intelligence functions of the National Air and Space Intelligence Center (NASIC) center on discovering, characterizing, and assessing foreign threats in the air, space, missile, and cyber domains to support full-spectrum multi-domain operations, weapon system acquisition, and national defense policy. As the Department of Defense's primary producer of foreign air and space intelligence, NASIC integrates all-source data to generate predictive assessments of adversary capabilities, performance characteristics of foreign weapons systems, and potential intents, thereby enabling U.S. forces to counter technological surprises and maintain superiority. These functions emphasize engineering-level scientific and technical intelligence (S&TI), leveraging specialized analytic expertise to evaluate advanced threats from peer competitors such as ballistic missiles, air defense systems, and emerging cyberspace vulnerabilities. A primary function involves all-source threat analysis, where NASIC processes intelligence from disciplines including (SIGINT), (IMINT), and (MASINT) to produce integrated products like executive summaries, comprehensive studies, and simulations of adversary operations. This analysis maintains order-of-battle databases for foreign forces, assesses effectiveness, and forecasts doctrinal employment, directly informing warfighter planning, force modernization, and policymaker decisions. NASIC's global threat group, for instance, focuses on cross-domain evaluations, while specialized squadrons handle domain-specific assessments in air and or and missiles. Materiel exploitation represents another critical function, encompassing the acquisition, , and technical evaluation of foreign aerospace hardware to derive actionable on , materials, and operational parameters. Conducted in secure facilities at , this process exploits captured or acquired items—such as missiles, aircraft components, or cyber tools—to validate open-source claims, identify vulnerabilities, and support signature for and detection countermeasures. NASIC serves as a national node for processing and disseminating such exploitation results, ensuring timely integration into broader products that underpin acquisition programs and operational tactics. Through these functions, NASIC maintains a foundational of adversary technologies, producing over 3,000 personnel-driven outputs annually that avoid reliance on unverified assumptions and prioritize empirical validation from diverse intelligence streams. This rigorous approach, rooted in and predictive modeling, directly contributes to U.S. strategic deterrence by characterizing threats with precision, such as hypersonic systems or integrated air defense networks, without succumbing to overstated or politicized narratives prevalent in some non-military analyses.

Support to National Security and Policy

The National Air and Space Intelligence Center (NASIC) supports and policy by delivering engineering-level scientific and on foreign air, space, , and cyber threats, enabling the characterization of adversary capabilities and vulnerabilities to inform U.S. defense strategies, weapon system acquisitions, and policymaking. These assessments provide foundational data for national defense policies, helping to prevent technological surprises and ensure U.S. forces can counter evolving threats. NASIC's all-source analysis is a primary resource for senior U.S. decision-makers, including the President, , and Department of Defense officials, who rely on it to form defense policy decisions. The center advises and civilian leaders on the implications of foreign adversaries' weapons systems, drawing from classified sources and specialized exploitation to produce predictive intelligence tailored for policy needs. In 2022, NASIC produced over 158,000 intelligence products directly supporting national policymakers, joint warfighters, and acquisition programs, contributing to alignment with the National Defense Strategy. This output includes integrated assessments that shape force modernization and multi-domain operational planning, ensuring policies reflect accurate threat characterizations rather than assumptions. NASIC further aids policy through unclassified reports that publicize threat overviews for broader strategic discourse, such as the 2019 "Competing in Space" assessment detailing risks to U.S. and allied space access, and the 2021 Ballistic and Cruise Missile Threat Report providing overviews of foreign missile developments. These documents equip policymakers with evidence-based insights to guide resource allocation and international engagements without compromising classified details.

Organizational Structure

Command and Subordinate Groups

The National Air and Space Intelligence Center (NASIC) is commanded by a U.S. Air Force colonel serving as the center's director, reporting directly to the Deputy Chief of Staff of the Air Force for Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance, and Cyber Effects Operations (AF/A2). As of July 26, 2024, Colonel Kenneth A. Stremmel assumed command during a ceremony at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, succeeding Colonel Jason K. Brown. The commander oversees operations as the Air Force's primary service intelligence production center for foreign air, space, missile, and cyber threats, managing a workforce of approximately 4,100 military, civilian, Reserve, Guard, and contractor personnel. NASIC's operational structure features four intelligence analysis groups, each directing specialized squadrons that perform threat characterization, exploitation, and assessment. These groups, activated in a 2008 reorganization to align with squadron-based models, total 17 to 18 squadrons as of 2024, enabling focused production of for warfighters, policymakers, and acquisition programs. Key subordinate groups include the Air and Intelligence Group, which analyzes foreign , air forces, and cyber capabilities through squadrons like the Aircraft Analysis Squadron; the Geospatial and Intelligence Group, responsible for electromagnetic exploitation and geospatial ; and the Weapons and Countermeasures Intelligence Group (incorporating elements like the Networked Weapons and Modeling Group), focused on foreign munitions, countermeasures, and networked systems. A fourth group addresses integrated multi-domain threats, though space-specific analysis has partially transitioned to the co-located National Space Intelligence Center under U.S. since 2021. These groups coordinate with four support directorates for logistics, resources, and engineering, ensuring seamless intelligence dissemination across Department of Defense components.

Personnel Composition and Expertise

The National Air and Space Intelligence Center (NASIC) employs more than 3,000 personnel, encompassing active-duty members, Department of the Air Force civilians, Air Force Reserve and components, and contractors. This workforce has expanded significantly since the September 11, 2001, attacks, roughly doubling in size to meet heightened demands for air and space threat analysis. Civilian personnel form a substantial portion, with dedicated recruiting efforts targeting individuals for roles requiring security clearances and specialized skills, alongside officers and enlisted personnel who provide operational and expertise. NASIC's personnel possess multidisciplinary expertise tailored to generating engineering-level scientific and on foreign air, space, , and cyber threats. Approximately 30 percent of employees hold backgrounds in , , or similar fields, focusing on all-source analysis and strategic assessments. The remainder includes engineers, scientists, and technical specialists proficient in areas such as aeronautical systems, , , signatures , and materiel exploitation, enabling detailed evaluations of adversary capabilities through and predictive modeling. This blend supports NASIC's role in delivering predictive intelligence to leadership, the , and national policymakers, with personnel often requiring top-secret clearances and domain-specific knowledge honed through advanced training and operational experience. Recruitment emphasizes high-caliber talent capable of integrating analytic with technical , as evidenced by contracts seeking contractors with agile, specialized skills to augment core functions like threat characterization and production. The center's , including colonels commanding squadrons and senior enlisted advisors, oversees this diverse team to ensure alignment with mission priorities, fostering an environment where empirical data and drive assessments of evolving global threats.

Key Capabilities

Foreign Air and Space Threat Analysis

The National Air and Space Intelligence Center (NASIC) conducts foreign air and space threat analysis as its foundational mission, characterizing the performance, capabilities, and vulnerabilities of adversary systems to enable U.S. forces to counter evolving threats and avoid technological surprise. This process integrates data from multiple domains, including air platforms, missiles, space assets, and counterspace weapons, to produce assessments that support Department of Defense planning, acquisition, and operations. NASIC's outputs emphasize empirical evaluation of foreign technological advancements, such as advanced sensors, hypersonic , and jamming systems, prioritizing causal factors like engineering limitations and operational doctrines over speculative narratives. In the air domain, NASIC analysts assess threats from foreign fixed-wing aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles, and cruise missiles, deriving metrics on speed, range, payload, and electronic warfare resilience through modeling and historical performance data. For example, evaluations have historically informed countermeasures against Soviet-era designs like the MiG-15 during the Korean War, where early threat assessments highlighted superior climb rates and interception tactics that prompted U.S. doctrinal shifts. Contemporary efforts extend to modern peer competitors' stealth fighters and integrated air defense systems, with annual events like Air Threat Week 2024 facilitating interagency collaboration to refine these analyses amid rapid prototyping by adversaries. Space and counterspace threat analysis at NASIC focuses on foreign orbital architectures, anti-satellite weapons, and directed-energy systems, producing integrated assessments of their kinetic, non-kinetic, and cyber-enabled effects. The 2019 unclassified "Competing in Space" report, a 25-page document incorporating imagery and projections, outlined threats to U.S. and allied space operations, including ground-based lasers and co-orbital interceptors developed by major powers, projecting increased vulnerability in contested orbits by the 2020s. Missile threat assessments complement this, as seen in the 2021 Ballistic and Cruise Missile Threat Report co-authored with the Defense Intelligence Ballistic Missile Analysis Committee, which detailed foreign programs' ranges exceeding 5,500 kilometers, accuracy improvements via inertial guidance, and proliferation risks from entities like North Korea and Iran. These analyses incorporate rigorous validation against open-source and collected intelligence, emphasizing quantifiable parameters such as cross-sections under 0.1 square meters for low-observable threats or orbital velocities enabling rapid maneuvering. By prioritizing primary data over institutional consensus, NASIC's work counters potential biases in broader intelligence estimates, delivering tailored products to warfighters and policymakers for multi-domain superiority.

Materiel Exploitation and Reverse Engineering

The National Air and Space Intelligence Center's exploitation and efforts are primarily conducted by the Foreign Exploitation Squadron (FMXS), which focuses on dissecting foreign air, space, and cyberspace-related military systems to uncover adversary capabilities and vulnerabilities. This process involves acquiring physical samples through battlefield recoveries, intelligence collections, or cooperative programs, followed by systematic assessment in secure facilities at . enables detailed analysis of system components, materials, and performance, providing empirical data that informs U.S. threat assessments and countermeasures. FMXS personnel, comprising engineers, scientists, and technicians from over 10 expertise areas, undergo rigorous screening to ensure specialized skills in areas like , , and . Exploitation activities include non-destructive testing, disassembly, and simulated operational evaluations within fortified laboratories designed to handle classified and hazardous materials. These efforts have historical roots dating to 1917, evolving from World War I-era examinations of enemy equipment to modern programs supporting pilot training, weapon system development, and policy decisions. In , NASIC broke ground on an expansion of its FME facilities, tripling the available space by incorporating Haynes Hall to accommodate growing demands for analyzing advanced foreign technologies. This infrastructure supports the center's mandate under Department of Defense foreign programs, yielding actionable that enhances U.S. air and space superiority without relying on unverified assumptions about foreign designs.

Geospatial and Signature Intelligence

The Geospatial and Signatures Intelligence Group (GSIG) of the National Air and Space Intelligence Center produces and signatures intelligence to characterize foreign air and space threats, including objects, activities, and events, through advanced exploitation of data sources. This group delivers specialized analysis that supports decision-making for the and apparatus, leveraging unique capabilities to maintain a competitive edge in threat assessment. Geospatial intelligence activities within GSIG emphasize the and analysis of imagery-derived data, such as and , to generate location-based insights on adversary systems and . The GEOINT/MASINT Intelligence Squadron handles exploitation of geospatial data within NASIC's role as a national , exploitation, and node, integrating it into broader all-source fusion for predictive assessments of air and space domains. Signatures intelligence centers on measurement and signature intelligence (MASINT), for which NASIC acts as the primary executive agent at national and Department of Defense levels, managing data from , electro-optical/ (EO/IR), and (RF) sensors. The group develops , spatial, and temporal signatures of foreign threat targets—such as radar cross-sections, emissions, and emission patterns—to enable precise identification, tracking, and countermeasures for air and forces. NASIC retains dedicated databases for these MASINT collections, facilitating long-term analysis and tool development for signature fusion and simulation. GSIG innovates analytical tools and methodologies, including techniques and modeling software, to enhance MASINT and GEOINT integration, supporting modernization and against evolving threats like hypersonic vehicles and stealth technologies. These efforts contribute to NASIC's production of authoritative products, such as threat characterizations used in targeting and force structure decisions, with historical emphasis on empirical validation through data and exploitation contracts dating back to at least 2005.

Operational Achievements

Historical Contributions to Threat Assessment

The Air Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC), established on 21 May 1951 at as a field activity of the Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence, initiated systematic technical analysis of foreign air threats during the early . During the , ATIC exploited captured MiG-15 wreckage and materials to produce performance evaluations, including combat radius charts, which were provided to the Far East Air Forces (FEAF) to enhance tactical countermeasures against Soviet-supplied fighters in contested airspace. These analyses contributed to national intelligence estimates on Communist air capabilities and probable courses of action through mid-decade. In the late 1950s, ATIC—renamed the in —expanded assessments to include Soviet bombers like the and series, alongside early evaluations of and nuclear warhead technologies. The organization produced specialized studies, such as a postulated for –1969 and technical working papers on (ICBM) capabilities, informing U.S. amid escalating competition. Following the Soviet Sputnik launch in , focus intensified on domain threats, including analyses of foreign vehicles and Chinese offensive missiles by . The Foreign Technology Division (FTD), activated in under , built on these foundations by becoming the primary experts in Soviet aircraft, missiles, space systems, and associated technologies across the intelligence community. FTD developed automated photo tools in and threat databases by 1963, enabling predictive assessments of foreign weapon system performance, vulnerabilities, and production rates that shaped Department of Defense acquisition and policy decisions through the . These efforts, continued by successors like the National Air Intelligence Center in 1993, provided products essential for threat evaluations.

Support in Conflicts and Policy Shaping

The National Air and Space Intelligence Center (NASIC) has provided critical intelligence support to U.S. military operations by delivering detailed assessments of foreign air and space threats, enabling commanders to anticipate adversary capabilities in dynamic conflict environments. For instance, NASIC's analysis of foreign weapons systems, including aircraft, missiles, and space assets, has informed tactical planning and force protection measures during operations, ensuring warfighters receive timely data on enemy performance and vulnerabilities. This support extends to direct inputs for operational units, where NASIC products help mitigate risks from air-integrated threats, such as integrated air defense systems encountered in post-9/11 contingencies. In shaping policy, NASIC's foundational threat characterizations influence Department of Defense acquisition priorities and by highlighting emerging risks from peer competitors. A key example is the 2019 unclassified "Competing " assessment, which detailed foreign advancements in space capabilities, including anti-satellite weapons and orbital maneuvers by actors like and , thereby underscoring the need for enhanced U.S. space resilience and contributing to doctrinal shifts toward multi-domain operations. These reports, derived from rigorous exploitation of foreign and , provide policymakers with empirical baselines for budgeting and force modernization, such as investments in counter-space technologies. NASIC's role in policy formulation also encompasses broader national intelligence efforts, where its specialized analyses feed into interagency products like annual threat assessments, guiding executive and congressional decisions on air and space domains. By focusing on verifiable foreign intent and doctrine—rather than speculative narratives—NASIC's outputs have historically prompted realistic adjustments, including realignments in space intelligence architecture to address validated gaps in domain awareness. This causal linkage between threat data and policy is evident in how NASIC's work supports the Defense Intelligence Agency's inputs to national strategy, prioritizing of adversary asymmetries over institutional optimism.

Recent Technological and Contractual Advances

In August 2022, the National Air and Space Intelligence Center awarded a $4.8 billion multi-award indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity to five companies—Altamira Technologies, , International, , and SAIC—for research, development, test, evaluation, and software services to support scientific and analysis over a 10-year period. This NOVASTAR , managed through Air Force Life Cycle Management Center at , enables task orders for advanced analytic tools and data processing critical to assessing foreign air, space, and threats. In February 2023, NASIC issued its first two task orders under NOVASTAR to MTSI and team partners for scientific and technical intelligence analytic capability support, focusing on enhanced data exploitation and threat characterization. Complementing these, a July 2024 contract valued at $9.27 million was awarded to HPI Solutions LLC for upgrading the security system at NASIC's COMET facility, incorporating modern surveillance and access control technologies to safeguard sensitive exploitation operations. On the technological front, NASIC personnel advanced mission support through four innovations prototyped during a National Security Innovation Network Bootcamp from March 25-29, 2024, at the Institute in . These included mapping communities of interest to optimize tool utilization and collaboration; formalizing meeting structures for efficient decision-making; developing a rubric for assessing squadron performance; and treating sets as owned products to enforce accountability in intelligence production. Such process and enhancements, stemming from internal collaborations since 2019, facilitate faster integration of empirical threat into operational analyses.

Challenges and Controversies

Relocation and Resource Allocation Debates

In 2010, state interests advocated for relocating select National Air and Space Intelligence Center (NASIC) jobs from in to facilities in Huntsville, amid broader competition for Department of Defense functions and employment. Dayton Development Coalition Vice President Michael Gessel described this as "a very serious threat to NASIC jobs," highlighting risks to the center's operational continuity and the local economy dependent on the base. Despite such pressures, no significant NASIC relocation occurred, with the center maintaining its primary footprint at ; subsequent investments, including groundbreaking for a new $300 million intelligence facility in 2020 and its unveiling in May 2024, underscored commitments to on-site expansion rather than dispersal. The formation of the U.S. Space Force in December 2019 prompted debates over resource allocation between NASIC and emerging Space Force intelligence entities, particularly regarding the division of space domain analysis expertise. Proponents of realignment argued for hiving off space-specific functions to a dedicated National Space Intelligence Center (NSIC) under Space Force to streamline domain-focused operations, with plans announced in 2020 to transfer two NASIC squadrons as initial NSIC staffing. However, not all space-related analysts shifted; NASIC retained key personnel to preserve integrated air-space threat assessment capabilities and mitigate risks of fragmented intelligence production. This partial transfer included nine NASIC members (one officer and eight enlisted) moving to Space Force in September 2020 as part of a broader reassignment of approximately 2,400 Air Force personnel, though they remained stationed at Wright-Patterson. Critics of the transition, including local advocates and congressional figures, warned that such reallocations could dilute NASIC's overall effectiveness through personnel losses and bureaucratic redundancies, necessitating "constant vigilance" to safeguard the center's resources amid service branch shifts. In a 2011 hearing, then-Rep. Michael Turner (R-OH) raised concerns that NASIC faced restrictions on conducting original research, attributing this to potential misprioritization of intelligence resources in space activities. Broader analyses, such as a 2016 assessment, recommended optimizing intelligence resource allocation across entities like NASIC to minimize overlap while enhancing efficiency against evolving threats. NSIC achieved initial operating capability in 2022 at Wright-Patterson, co-locating with NASIC to facilitate collaboration despite the functional split.

Space Domain Transitions and Realignments

The establishment of the on December 20, 2019, initiated a series of realignments in space domain intelligence to delineate responsibilities between the Air Force and the new service. For the National Air and Space Intelligence Center (NASIC), this entailed transferring space-specific analysis functions previously integrated with air threat assessments. In November 2020, two NASIC squadrons—the 15th and 16th Intelligence Squadrons, focused on space threat characterization and missile and space intelligence—were designated for realignment to the , forming the core of the newly created National Space Intelligence Center (NSIC). This shift aimed to centralize foundational intelligence on foreign space capabilities, including satellite systems, anti-satellite weapons, and orbital threats, directly supporting operations, force modernization, and policymaking. The NSIC was officially established on , 2022, as part of an intelligence domain realignment strategy detailed in the Chief of Space Operations Intelligence Directive, which sought to eliminate redundancies and enhance domain-specific expertise amid growing peer threats from nations like and . Personnel transitions began earlier, with approximately nine NASIC space operators—comprising one officer and eight enlisted members—transferring to the in September 2020 as part of a broader movement of 2,400 personnel. Over 300 additional NASIC and personnel underwent training to qualify as space professionals during this period, facilitating the handover of mission sets. However, the realignment was not wholesale; NASIC retained certain space-related analysts to address overlapping air-space threats, such as hypersonic systems and integrated defenses, preserving integrated analysis capabilities within the . These transitions posed operational challenges, including temporary disruptions in continuity as missions and expertise were divided, potentially complicating holistic threat assessments during a period of heightened space contestation. The partial retention of analysts at NASIC highlighted tensions in defining "space-exclusive" , given the domain's interdependence with aeronautical systems, which critics argued could foster rather than seamless inter-service . By June 28, 2024, NSIC was redesignated as a Field Operating Agency under Headquarters , broadening its customer base to include national community partners beyond the military, while NASIC refocused on air-centric threats. This evolution reflected broader Department of the Air Force efforts to adapt to domain-specific warfare demands, though it required ongoing adjustments in resource allocation and data sharing protocols to mitigate identified gaps.

Criticisms of Bureaucracy and Intelligence Gaps

Criticisms of NASIC's assessments have centered on perceived gaps in evaluating adversarial advancements, notably and domains. A 2005 report by the analyzed NASIC's "Challenges to U.S. Superiority" assessment, contending that it underestimated China's antisatellite (ASAT) progress by inadequately translating and contextualizing Chinese technical publications and ignoring indicators of operational testing. This analysis attributed the shortfall to methodological flaws, such as overreliance on classified sources over open Chinese disclosures, which contributed to broader U.S. surprise during China's 2007 ASAT demonstration. Such gaps have persisted in other areas, including unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP), where NASIC's exploitation capabilities were invoked amid acknowledged deficiencies in airborne object identification. In February 2023 congressional , officials highlighted systemic problems in detection and analysis, prompting mandates for NASIC's expanded role in UAP data processing under the 2022 to address these voids. Bureaucratic inefficiencies within NASIC have drawn internal critiques, with employee accounts describing excessive administrative layers and processes that foster a toxic environment and hinder operational agility. These reports, aggregated from multiple reviewer submissions as of 2025, point to redundant approvals and rigid hierarchies impeding timely threat analysis, echoing wider Department of Defense concerns over sclerotic structures delaying adaptation.

Facilities and Infrastructure

Primary Location at Wright-Patterson AFB

The National Air and Space Intelligence Center maintains its headquarters at , located northeast of , spanning portions of Greene and Montgomery counties. This site has served as the center's primary operational hub since the establishment of its predecessor, the Air Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC), on May 21, 1951, as a field activity under the Assistant for . The base's aviation heritage, originating from Wilbur Wright Field in 1917 and McCook Field, provided an ideal foundation for intelligence operations focused on foreign aerospace technologies. Key facilities at Wright-Patterson include Building 828, constructed in 1958 with 100,000 square feet to accommodate ATIC operations, featuring the Readix computer for . Building 856 was added in 1976, dedicated on September 16, to support the expanded Foreign Technology Division. A additional 100,000-square-foot facility, including a 500-seat , was completed on May 2, , enhancing analytical and collaborative capabilities. These structures house NASIC's four groups and support co-location with the National Space Intelligence Center, enabling integrated air, space, and missile threat assessments. Recent infrastructure expansions address growing mission demands, including a $153 million contract awarded on August 21, 2020, for a new intelligence production center. Unveiled on May 17, 2024, this five-story, 255,000-square-foot complex adds 980 workstations, advanced laboratories, mission-specific functions, and secure collaboration spaces, expanding NASIC's footprint while maintaining sensitive compartmented information facilities.

Recent Developments in Facilities

In August 2020, the U.S. Air Force awarded a $153 million contract to for the expansion of NASIC facilities at , , marking a significant upgrade to address growing mission demands. This project, known as the Intelligence Production Complex III (IPC III), represented approximately a 40 percent increase in NASIC's footprint and constituted the largest single-site construction effort on the base at the time. occurred on November 5, 2020, with the new 255,000-square-foot structure designed to house advanced laboratories for mission-specific functions, including intelligence collection planning, modeling, simulation, and 3D visualization capabilities to support approximately 980 personnel. The IPC III addressed a documented shortfall exceeding 250,000 square feet of office space for intelligence analysts, driven by sustained mission growth in air and space threat assessment. Construction incorporated collaboration spaces tailored for interdisciplinary analysis, enhancing NASIC's capacity to process and disseminate foreign aerospace threat intelligence amid evolving geopolitical challenges. NASIC conducted a ribbon-cutting for the completed IPC III on May 13, 2024, formally opening the facility despite initial projections for completion in early 2023, reflecting typical delays in large-scale military projects. This development bolsters NASIC's resilience, enabling more efficient integration of from sensors, satellites, and exploitation activities without requiring off-base relocations. No major facility relocations or additional expansions beyond IPC III have been reported for NASIC through 2025, with ongoing investments prioritizing in-situ enhancements at Wright-Patterson.

Leadership and Lineage

Commanders and Key Leaders

Col. Kenneth A. Stremmel assumed command of the National Air and Space Intelligence Center on July 26, 2024, succeeding Col. Ariel Batungbacal, who had led the center as of April 2024. Stremmel, a career , previously served in senior roles within the intelligence community, including prior assignments at , emphasizing continuity in leadership focused on air and space threat assessment. Under his command, NASIC maintains its mission to deliver predictive intelligence on foreign capabilities to U.S. and leaders. Key subordinate leaders include the vice commander, responsible for operational oversight and deputy functions, and the command chief, the senior enlisted advisor who represents over 4,100 personnel across civilian, military, and contractor roles. The current command chief, Chief Master Sgt. Tabatha Sanders, assumed responsibility on June 30, 2025, guiding enlisted force management and welfare amid NASIC's expansion in geospatial and signatures . Historical commanders, such as Col. Daniel Putbrese (noted in early 2023 transitions), have similarly prioritized unit heritage tracing to 1961 while adapting to evolving threats like hypersonic and space domain challenges. NASIC's leadership structure aligns with intelligence doctrine, where commanders report through the Deputy for Intelligence, ensuring integrated analysis without undue bureaucratic interference. Recent changes, including Stremmel's return to , reflect emphasis on experienced officers familiar with Wright-Patterson's infrastructure for sustained mission effectiveness.

Organizational Lineage and Assignments

The National Air and Space Intelligence Center (NASIC) traces its official organizational lineage to the Foreign Technology Division (FTD), established and activated on 1 July 1961 at , , under the , with a mission to acquire, exploit, and analyze foreign . The FTD was redesignated as the Air Force Foreign Technology Center on 1 October 1977, reflecting expanded focus on scientific and . Further redesignations occurred on 1 January 1992 as the Foreign Aerospace Science and Technology Center (FASTC), emphasizing -specific analysis, and on 1 October 1993 as the National Air Intelligence Center (NAIC), incorporating broader national-level air threat assessments. On 20 February 2003, it became the National Air and Space Intelligence Center (NASIC), integrating space domain intelligence amid growing emphasis on integrated air and space threats. NASIC's deeper heritage, while not part of its formal lineage, originates from early technical intelligence efforts, including the Foreign Data Section established in 1917 at McCook Field for evaluating foreign aeronautical data, evolving into the Technical Data Laboratory on 3 December 1942, T-2 Intelligence on 1 July 1945, the Air Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC) on 21 May 1951, and the Aerospace Technical Intelligence Center on 21 September 1959. These predecessors laid foundational capabilities in foreign exploitation and threat analysis that informed NASIC's development. In terms of assignments, NASIC operated under various major commands and agencies aligned with intelligence structures, including initial subordination to Air Research and Development Command precursors before aligning with systems commands. From 2008 to 2014, it fell under the Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Agency (AFISRA), enhancing integrated ISR support. On 29 September 2014, NASIC was reassigned directly to the Air Staff as a Field Operating Agency (FOA) under the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance, and Cyber Effects Operations (A2), streamlining its role as the primary Department of Defense producer of foreign air and space scientific and technical intelligence. This FOA status positions it to deliver tailored assessments to leadership, combatant commands, and national policymakers without intermediate major command filtering.

References

  1. https://www.nasic.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Article/611841/national-air-and-space-intelligence-center/
  2. https://ww35.usafunithistory.com/PDF/F-S/NATIONAL%2520AIR%2520AND%2520SPACE%2520INTELLIGENCE%2520CENTER.pdf
  3. https://www.nasic.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Article/611728/national-air-and-space-intelligence-center-heritage/
  4. https://www.dvidshub.net/news/216127/acquire-assess-exploit-nasic-reverse-engineers-advantage-pilots-and-leaders
  5. https://media.defense.gov/2010/Sep/24/2001329769/-1/-1/0/development_air_doctrine_army_air_arm.pdf
  6. https://media.defense.gov/2010/Oct/13/2001329758/-1/-1/0/AFD-101013-007.pdf
  7. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA195714.pdf
  8. https://www.afrl.af.mil/Portals/90/Documents/HQ/AFRL_Aiming_Higher-HistoryBook.pdf?ver=IhaL_ybRxmuXF6lVKmOFxg%253D%253D
  9. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-D301-PURL-LPS47632/pdf/GOVPUB-D301-PURL-LPS47632.pdf
  10. https://www.nasic.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/611728/national-air-and-space-intelligence-center-heritage/
  11. https://ww35.usafunithistory.com/PDF/F-S/NATIONAL%20AIR%20AND%20SPACE%20INTELLIGENCE%20CENTER.pdf
  12. https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/ufos/ATIC1950.pdf
  13. https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/16252-document-01-mig-15s-korea-excerpt-far
  14. https://www.nasic.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/1010245/acquire-assess-exploit/
  15. https://usafunithistory.com/PDF/F-S/FOREIGN%2520TECHNICAL%2520DIVISION.pdf
  16. https://www.daytondailynews.com/news/how-this-secretive-wright-patt-unit-grew-into-one-the-country-most-important-watchdogs/PK4CS4uOSri9vrBXMrfG0H/
  17. https://www.roadrunnersinternationale.com/migs_area51.html
  18. https://www.f-106deltadart.com/pdf-files/Project-Have-Doughnut-Tactical-Project-DIA-Report.pdf
  19. https://www.archives.gov/files/declassification/iscap/pdf/2010-016-doc1.pdf
  20. https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/intelligence/2013-10-29/area-51-file-secret-aircraft-soviet-migs
  21. https://www.twz.com/37288/new-insights-into-mysterious-soviet-dome-of-light-phenomenon-in-declassified-documents
  22. https://www.dafhistory.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/432518/national-air-and-space-intelligence-center-acc/
  23. https://www.nasic.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/611841/national-air-and-space-intelligence-center/
  24. https://www.nasic.af.mil/Portals/19/DP%20Recruitment%20Trifold%202023sep6%20-%20V2.pdf
  25. https://www.nasic.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/3165669/team-nasic-awarded-for-excellence/
  26. https://www.nasic.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/3582568/a-look-back-gen-cq-browns-last-visit-to-nasic-as-csaf/
  27. https://www.nasic.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/1733201/usaf-nasic-releases-unclassified-competing-in-space-assessment/
  28. https://www.nasic.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/2468163/nasic-dibmac-release-unclassified-missile-assessment/
  29. https://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/af_a2/publication/afmd24/afmd24.pdf
  30. https://www.daytondailynews.com/local/nasic-welcomes-a-familiar-figure-as-its-new-commander/MND6KVSKSJBIZKG5BCJCONPDKQ/
  31. https://www.nasic.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/1825858/nasic-honors-flag-history/
  32. https://www.facebook.com/USAFNASIC/
  33. https://spacenews.com/space-force-establishes-intelligence-analysis-organization-at-wright-patterson-air-force-base/
  34. https://webapp2.wright.edu/web1/newsroom/2021/11/01/national-air-and-space-intelligence-center-to-hold-career-event-at-wright-state-on-nov-9/
  35. https://www.nasic.af.mil/NASIC-Careers/
  36. https://lohfeldconsulting.com/blog/2025/04/how-to-win-astra-high-stakes-and-higher-standards/
  37. https://investors.kbr.com/news-and-events/news/news-details/2022/KBR-Awarded-NOVASTAR-Contract-through-Xandar-Joint-Venture-for-U.S.-Air-Force/default.aspx
  38. https://www.nasic.af.mil/About-Us/Biographies/
  39. https://www.nasic.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/
  40. https://www.nasic.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/3952255/dod-and-intelligence-communities-convene-for-air-threat-week-2024/
  41. https://www.nasic.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/611039/center-breaks-ground-on-fme-expansion/
  42. https://www.wpafb.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/818929/nasic-provides-vital-scientific-technical-intelligence-solutions/
  43. https://www.nasic.af.mil/News/Article/611039/center-breaks-ground-on-fme-expansion/
  44. https://www.nasic.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/2695972/geospatial-and-signatures-intelligence-group-welcomes-new-commander/
  45. https://www.ball.com/newswire/article/123362/ball-aerospace-awarded-new-work-as-part-of-national-air-space-intelligence-center-masint
  46. https://www.governmentattic.org/47docs/HistATIC_01Jan-30Jun1952.pdf
  47. https://www.governmentattic.org/47docs/HistATIC_01Jul-31Dec1957.pdf
  48. https://www.governmentattic.org/47docs/HistATIC_01Jul-31Dec1959.pdf
  49. https://www.spaceforce.mil/portals/2/documents/2024/Competing_in_Space_-_2nd_Edition.pdf
  50. https://spacenews.com/five-companies-win-4-8-billion-in-contracts-from-the-national-air-and-space-intelligence-center/
  51. https://www.highergov.com/vehicle/novastar-idiq-7354/
  52. https://www.mtsi-va.com/category/contract-wins/
  53. https://orangeslices.ai/contract-award-9m-air-force-nasic-comet-facility-security-system/
  54. https://www.nasic.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/3855611/nasic-service-members-deliver-four-innovations-to-enable-improved-mission-suppo/
  55. https://www.daytondailynews.com/business/alabama-seeks-move-jobs-from-wright-patterson/F5gFDUDUrSDzoTkPH7cvuK/
  56. https://www.wpafb.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/3787044/nasic-unveils-new-intelligence-facility/
  57. https://www.daytondailynews.com/news/nasic-construction-moves-forward-at-wright-patt/PKQV7IK65ZGHTD7YO4P6ZD726Y/
  58. https://breakingdefense.com/2021/10/house-intel-committee-oks-space-force-intel-center/
  59. https://breakingdefense.com/2022/06/space-force-stands-up-new-intel-center-air-forces-nasic-keeps-some-space-related-analysts/
  60. https://www.nasic.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/2332816/nasic-space-operators-transfer-to-space-force/
  61. https://www.daytondailynews.com/business/protecting-nasic-will-take-constant-vigilance-advocates-say/qSZMCTVs2tUzDmdwrvz0dK/
  62. https://turner.house.gov/2011/3/turner-opening-statement-for-hearing-on-national-security-space-activities
  63. https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2019-10/2016_IndexOfUSMilitaryStrength_Intelligence%2520and%2520National%2520Defense.pdf
  64. https://www.bizjournals.com/dayton/news/2020/11/17/national-space-intelligence-center.html
  65. https://www.airandspaceforces.com/national-space-intelligence-center-takes-shape/
  66. https://www.spaceforce.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Fact-Sheet-Display/Article/3820323/national-space-intelligence-center/
  67. https://www.bizjournals.com/dayton/news/2022/06/24/nsic-establishment-ceremony.html
  68. https://www.wpafb.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/2360598/afit-and-nasic-airmen-transition-to-space-professionals/
  69. https://www.spaceforce.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/3822843/nsic-changes-commanders-redesignated-field-operating-agency/
  70. https://www.ucs.org/sites/default/files/2019-09/nasic-analysis-final-9-15-05.pdf
  71. https://www.daytondailynews.com/local/is-wright-pattersons-nasic-helping-to-id-airborne-objects/FTLDFEHXMBH3RN22N6H5H7XINU/
  72. https://www.unionleader.com/news/military/congress-mandates-role-for-nasic-at-wright-patterson-in-investigating-ufos/article_7cf8cf8d-3820-5550-8597-313660ff6b55.html
  73. https://www.indeed.com/cmp/National-Air-and-Space-Intelligence-Center/reviews
  74. https://www.heritage.org/defense/commentary/intelligence-disaster-bureaucratic-sclerosis
  75. https://www.wpafb.af.mil/Welcome/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/1146061/wright-patterson-air-force-base/
  76. https://www.afcec.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/2320222/air-force-awards-contract-for-nasic-expansion-at-wright-patterson-afb/
  77. https://www.army.mil/article/277414/as_one_project_finishes_at_wright_patterson_afb_another_project_begins
  78. https://www.tradelineinc.com/news/2019-12/us-air-force-plans-intelligence-production-complex
  79. https://www.nasic.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/2414855/nasic-breaks-ground-for-mission-extending-construction-project/
  80. https://www.wpafb.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/2679607/redesigned-holes-now-open-at-prairie-trace-golf-course/
  81. https://www.nasic.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/3778684/nasic-unveils-new-intelligence-facility/
  82. https://www.nasic.af.mil/News/
  83. https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3737628/
  84. https://www.nasic.af.mil/About-Us/Biographies/Article/3130017/col-kenneth-a-stremmel/
  85. https://www.nasic.af.mil/
  86. https://www.nasic.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/4244507/nasic-welcomes-new-command-chief/
  87. https://www.usgovernmentmanual.gov/Agency?EntityId=aiheBTHQXkk=&ParentEId=tv4LVSeIL00=&EType=/sbLHImeIYk=
  88. https://www.dvidshub.net/news/479397/familiar-face-takes-helm-nasic-commander
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.