Hubbry Logo
History of the United States Air ForceHistory of the United States Air ForceMain
Open search
History of the United States Air Force
Community hub
History of the United States Air Force
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
History of the United States Air Force
History of the United States Air Force
from Wikipedia

The United States Air Force became a separate military service on 18 September 1947 with the implementation of the National Security Act of 1947.[1][2] The Act created the National Military Establishment, later renamed the United States Department of Defense, which was composed of four of the five branches, the Army, Marine Corps, Navy, and a newly created Air Force.[3] Prior to 1947, the responsibility for military aviation was divided between the Army for land-based operations and the Navy and Marine Corps for sea-based operations from aircraft carrier and amphibious aircraft. The Army created the first antecedent of the Air Force on 1 August 1907, which through a succession of changes of organization, titles, and missions advanced toward eventual separation 40 years later. The predecessor organizations leading up to today's U.S. Air Force are:

World War I and between wars

[edit]
U.S. aircraft cockade, or roundel, of late World War I

World War I

[edit]

In 1917, upon the American entry into World War I, the first major U.S. aviation combat force was created when an Air Service was formed as part of the American Expeditionary Force (AEF). Major General Mason Patrick commanded the Air Service of the AEF; his deputy was Brigadier General Billy Mitchell. These aviation units, some of which were trained in France, provided tactical support for the U.S. Army, especially during the Battle of Saint-Mihiel and the Meuse-Argonne offensives. Among the aces of the AEF Air Service were Captain Eddie Rickenbacker and 2nd Lieutenant Frank Luke. Concurrent with the creation of this combat force, the U.S. Army's aviation establishment in the United States was removed from control of the Signal Corps and placed directly under the United States Secretary of War. An assistant secretary was created to direct the Army Air Service, which had dual responsibilities for development and procurement of aircraft, and raising and training of air units. With the end of the First World War, the AEF's Air Service was dissolved and the Army Air Service in the United States largely demobilized.

In 1920, the Air Service became a branch of the Army and in 1926 was renamed the Army Air Corps. During this period, the Air Corps began experimenting with new techniques, including air-to-air refueling and the development of the B-9 and the Martin B-10, the first all-metal monoplane bombers, and new fighters.

Billy Mitchell: Air power court martialed

[edit]

Americans were fascinated with aviation in the 1920s and 1930s and refused to allow War Department conservatism to block innovation. General Billy Mitchell, the deputy director of the Air Service sought to wrest control of coastal defense away from the Navy. He went public insisting that his planes could sink battleships any day, a claim proven with a series of tests that culminated in the sinking of the SMS Ostfriesland. Mitchell lost his self-control in 1925 when he accused the Navy in a press release of "incompetency, criminal negligence and almost treasonable administration of the national defense."[5] He received the highly publicized court martial he wanted, and was allowed to expound his theory that air power alone would suffice to win the next big war. He was convicted, and resigned. He became a popular hero and public opinion forced the War Department to strengthen the Air Corps. Mitchell's main argument was air power had to be autonomous—had to be controlled by fliers who understood the new technology, new tactics, new strategies, and who would not waste precious air assets in trying to assist old-fashioned armies and navies. Until his death in 1936 Mitchell, as a civilian, was a tireless prophet of airpower before numerous civilian audiences, but he lost touch with aviation developments and ceased to be influential inside the services.[6] Indeed, his almost hysterical attacks made many generals hostile. The Air Corps managed a few publicity stunts, but always seemed to be overshadowed by glamorous civilians like Charles Lindbergh, Howard Hughes, or Amelia Earhart. In 1934 President Franklin Roosevelt, feuding with the airline industry, suddenly turned the delivery of air mail over to the Air Corps. Multiple crashes by inexperienced Air Corps pilots in mediocre planes with poor navigation gear emphasized the fragility of the new service, and undercut its claims that in wartime it could perform miracles. Roosevelt, however, had become a firm believer in air power and had behind him both public opinion and Congress. When mobilization began in spring 1940 Roosevelt was as energetic as anyone in expanding the Air Corps role, calling for 50,000 planes a year, and sending the best new models to Britain for its war against the Luftwaffe.[7]

Command structure

[edit]

In 1935, as a result of recommendations from two civilian review boards, the next advancement toward independence for the Air Force occurred when all flying units, which heretofore had been distributed to various ground commands, were grouped together as an aerial task force under one air commander as the General Headquarters Air Force. The Air Corps, headed by the Chief of the Air Corps, continued as before but now held responsibility only for supply, airfields, and training, in effect splitting the Air Force into two parts. Both were commanded by major generals (Frank Andrews and Oscar Westover, followed by Henry H. ("Hap") Arnold).

Technology

[edit]

In 1937, the B-17 Flying Fortress made its first appearance. In a feat of navigation impressive for the time, three B-17s intercepted the Italian passenger liner Rex at sea. Though intended to demonstrate the ability of the Air Corps to defend the nation's coasts, the mission also indicated the emerging doctrine within the Air Corps of the supremacy of strategic bombing.

During World War I, aviation technology developed rapidly; however, the Army's reluctance to use the new technology began to make airmen think that as long as the Army controlled aviation, development would be stunted and a potentially valuable force neglected. Air Service senior officer Billy Mitchell began to campaign for an independent Air Force, co-equal to the Army and Navy. But his campaign offended many and resulted in a court martial in 1925 that effectively ended his career. His followers, including future aviation leaders "Hap" Arnold and Carl Spaatz, saw the lack of public, congressional, and military support that Mitchell received and decided that America was not ready for an independent air force. Under the leadership of its chief of staff Mason Patrick and, later, Arnold, the Air Corps waited until the time to fight for independence arose again.

World War II

[edit]
U.S. aircraft roundel primarily of the interwar years to early World War II
1943 USAAF raid on ball-bearing works at Schweinfurt, Germany.

The Air Force came of age in World War II. President Franklin D. Roosevelt took the lead after the Munich Agreement, calling for a vastly enlarged air force based on long-range strategic bombing. President Roosevelt instituted a plan to construct 15,000 military aircraft per year, which grew to 50,000 per year after the Axis victory in the Battle of France.[8] Organizationally it became largely independent from the Army in 1941, when the Army Air Corps became a part of the new U.S. Army Air Forces (AAF), and the GHQ Air Force was re-designated the subordinate Combat Command. In the major reorganization of the Army by War Department Circular 59, effective March 9, 1942, the newly created Army Air Forces gained equal voice with the Army and Navy on the Joint Chiefs of Staff and complete autonomy from the Army Ground Forces and the Services of Supply, serving as a separate service in all but name. The reorganization also eliminated both Combat Command and the Air Corps as organizations (the latter remained a combat branch of the Army until 1947) in favor of a streamlined system of commands and numbered air forces for decentralized management of the burgeoning Army Air Forces.

The reorganization merged all aviation elements of the former Air Corps into the Army Air Forces. Although the Air Corps still legally existed as an Army branch, the position and Office of the Chief of the Air Corps was dissolved.

Major General Carl A. Spaatz took command of the Eighth Air Force in London in 1942; with Brigadier General Ira Eaker as second in command, he supervised the strategic bombing campaign. In late 1943, Spaatz was made commander of the new U.S. Strategic Air Forces, reporting directly to the Combined Chiefs of Staff. Spaatz began daylight bombing operations using the prewar doctrine of flying bombers in close formations, relying on their combined defensive firepower for protection from attacking enemy aircraft rather than supporting fighter escorts. The doctrine proved flawed when deep-penetration missions beyond the range of escort fighters were attempted, because German Luftwaffe fighter planes overwhelmed U.S. formations, shooting down bombers in excess of "acceptable" loss rates, especially in combination with the vast number of flak anti-aircraft batteries defending Nazi Germany's major targets. American fliers took heavy casualties during the Operation Tidal Wave raids on the oil refineries of Ploiești, Romania, and the ball-bearing factories at Schweinfurt and Regensburg, Germany, and it was the loss rate in crews and not materiel that brought about a pullback from the strategic offensive in the autumn of 1943.

The Eighth Air Force had attempted to use both the Republic P-47 Thunderbolt and the Lockheed P-38 Lightning as escorts, but while the Thunderbolt was a capable dog-fighter it lacked the range, even with the addition of drop tanks to extend its range, and the Lightning proved mechanically unreliable in the frigid altitudes at which the missions were fought. Bomber protection was greatly improved after the introduction of North American P-51 Mustang fighters in Europe. With its built-in extended range and competitive or superior performance characteristics in comparison to all existing German piston-engine fighters, the Mustang was an immediately available solution to the crisis. In January 1944 the Eighth Air Force obtained priority in equipping its groups, so that ultimately 14 of its 15 groups fielded Mustangs. P-51 escorts began operations in February 1944 and increased their numbers rapidly, so that the Luftwaffe suffered increasing fighter losses in aerial engagements beginning with Big Week in early 1944. Allied fighters were also granted free rein in attacking German fighter airfields, both in pre-planned missions and while returning to base from escort duties, and the major Luftwaffe threat against Allied bombers was severely diminished by D-Day.

In the Pacific Theater of Operations, the AAF provided major tactical support under General George Kenney to Douglas MacArthur in the South West Pacific theater. Kenney's pilots invented the skip-bombing technique against Japanese ships. Kenney's forces claimed destruction of 11,900 Japanese planes and 1.7 million tons of shipping. The first development and sustained implementation of airlift by American air forces occurred between May 1942 and November 1945 as hundreds of transports flew more than half a million tons of supplies from India to China over the Hump.

The AAF created the Twentieth Air Force to employ long-range B-29 Superfortress bombers in strategic attacks on Japanese cities. The use of forward bases in Free China (needed to be able to reach Japan by the heavily laden B-29's) was ineffective because of the difficulty in logistically supporting the bases entirely by air from its main bases in British India, and because of a persistent threat against the Chinese airfields by the Imperial Japanese Army. After the Mariana Islands were captured in the Mariana and Palau Islands campaign of mid-1944, providing locations for air bases that could be supplied by sea, Arnold moved all B-29 operations there by April 1945 and made General Curtis LeMay his bomber commander (reporting directly to Arnold, who personally commanded Twentieth Air Force until July). LeMay reasoned that the Imperial Japanese economy, much of which was cottage industry in dense urban areas where manufacturing and assembly plants were also located, was particularly vulnerable to area attack and abandoned inefficient high-altitude precision bombing in favor of low-level incendiary bombings aimed at destroying large urban areas. On the night of March 9–10, 1945, the bombing of Tokyo and the resulting conflagration resulted in the death of over 100,000 persons. 350,000 people died in 66 other Japanese cities as a result of this shift to incendiary bombing. At the same time, the B-29 was also employed in widespread mining of Japanese harbors and sea lanes. In early August 1945, the Twentieth Air Force conducted atomic bomb attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in response to Japan's rejection of the Potsdam Declaration which outlined the terms of surrender for Japan.[9][10] Both cities were destroyed with enormous loss of life and psychological shock. On August 15, Emperor Hirohito announced the surrender of Japan, stating:

Moreover, the enemy has begun to employ a new and most cruel bomb, the power of which to do damage is indeed incalculable, taking the toll of many innocent lives. Should We continue to fight, it would not only result in an ultimate collapse and obliteration of the Japanese nation, but also it would lead to the total extinction of human civilization. Such being the case, how are We to save the millions of Our subjects; or to atone Ourselves before the hallowed spirits of Our Imperial Ancestors? This is the reason why We have ordered the acceptance of the provisions of the Joint Declaration of the Powers.

Cold War and Korean War

[edit]
Special photo of Air Force bombers from the 1930s through the late 1940s. A Douglas B-18 "Bolo"; a Boeing B-17 "Flying Fortress"; a Boeing "B-29 Superfortress" and the B-36 "Peacemaker" dominating the group photo with a 230 Ft Wingspan. Taken at Carswell AFB, Texas after the receipt of the first B-36 in 1948. Note the Strategic Air Command 7th Bombardment Wing marking on the B-29.

Early American military space activities began immediately after the conclusion of the Second World War. On 20 June 1944, MW 18014, a German Heer A-4 ballistic missile launched from the Peenemünde Army Research Center became the first artificial object to cross the Kármán line, the boundary between air and space. The A-4 ballistic missile, more commonly known as the V-2, was used by the German Wehrmacht to launch long ranged attacks on Allied Forces cities on the Western Front, however its designer, Wernher von Braun, had aspirations to use it as a space launch vehicle, defecting to the United States at the end of the war. A number of former German scientists, along with significant amounts of research material, were covertly moved to the United States as part of Operation Paperclip, jumpstarting the space program.[11]

In practice, the Army Air Forces became virtually independent of the Army during World War II, but its leaders wanted formal independence. In November 1945, General Dwight D. Eisenhower became Army Chief of Staff, while General Carl Spaatz began to assume the duties of Commanding General, Army Air Forces,[12][13] in anticipation of General Arnold's announced retirement. One of General Eisenhower's first actions was to appoint a board of officers, headed by Lieutenant General William H. Simpson, to prepare a definitive plan for the reorganization of the Army and the Air Force that could be effected without enabling legislation and would provide for the separation of the Air Force from the Army. On 29 January 1946 "Generals Eisenhower and Spaatz agreed on an Air Force organization composed of Strategic Air Command, Air Defense Command, Tactical Air Command, Air Transport Command, Air Technical Service Command, Air Training Command, the Air University, and the Air Force Center."[14]

Test launch of a SM-65B Atlas intercontinental ballistic missile from Cape Canaveral Launch Complex 14.

On 12 November 1945, General of the Army Henry H. Arnold, the commanding general of the United States Army Air Forces, sent a report to Secretary of War Robert P. Patterson emphasizing that the future United States Air Force would need to invest heavily in space and ballistic missile capabilities, rather than just focus on current aircraft. General Arnold received strong backing from Theodore von Kármán, the head of the Army Air Forces Scientific Advisory Group, and later United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board. A 1946 study by Project RAND, directed by General Arnold and conducted by Louis Ridenour to determine the feasibility of a strategic reconnaissance satellite, identified nearly all future space mission areas, including intelligence, weather forecasting, satellite communications, and satellite navigation.[15][16]

The first instance of interservice rivalry in military space development occurred in 1946, when the United States Navy Bureau of Aeronautics Electronics Division proposed testing the feasibility of an artificial satellite, however it was unable to get Navy funding to attempt a launch, instead requesting a joint program with the War Department Aeronautical Board. General Carl Spaatz, commanding general of the Army Air Forces and later the first chief of staff of the Air Force and Major General Curtis LeMay, then Deputy Chief of Staff for Research and Development, denied the Navy's request, as their position was that military space was an extension of strategic air power and thus an Air Force mission. By 1948, the Navy had suspended its satellite program, focusing instead on rocketry.

Over the continuing objections of the Navy, which feared losing its air arm and strategic role to the new service, the United States Department of the Air Force was created by the National Security Act of 1947. It became effective 18 September 1947 when the first Secretary of the Air Force, Stuart Symington, took office.[17] In 1948, the service chiefs agreed on usage of air assets under the Key West Agreement.

On 18 September 1947, the Army Air Forces became the United States Air Force as a separate and equal element of the United States Armed Forces. The fledgling Air Force quickly established its own identity.[18][19] Army Air Fields were renamed Air Force Bases and personnel were soon being issued new uniforms with new rank insignia. Once the new Air Force was free of army domination, its first job was to discard the old and inadequate ground army organizational structure. This was the "Base Plan" where the combat group commander reported to the base commander, who was often regular army, with no flying experience.

General Carl A. Spaatz established a new policy, "No tactical commander should be subordinate to the station commander". This resulted in a search for a better arrangement. The commander of the 15th Air Force, Major General Charles Born,[20] proposed the Provisional Wing Plan, which basically reversed the situation and put the wing commander over the base commander. The USAF basic organizational unit became the Base-Wing.

Under this plan, the base support functions – supply, base operations, transportation, security, and medical were assigned to squadrons, usually commanded by a Major or Lieutenant Colonel. All of these squadrons were assigned to a Combat Support Group, commanded by a Base Commander, usually a Colonel. Combat fighter or bomber squadrons were assigned to the Combat Group, a retention of the USAAF Group. All of these groups, both combat and combat support, were in turn assigned to the Wing, commanded by a Wing Commander. This way the Wing Commander commanded both the combat operational elements on the base as well as the non-operational elements. The Wing Commander was an experienced air combat leader, usually a Colonel or Brigadier General. All of the hierarchical organizations carried the same numerical designation. In this manner, for example, the 28th became the designation for the Wing and all the subordinate groups and squadrons beneath it. As a result, the base and the wing became one and the same unit. On 16 June 1952, the legacy combat groups were inactivated and the operational Combat Squadrons were assigned directly to the Wing. The World War II history, lineage and honors of the combat group were bestowed on the Wing upon its inactivation.

The USAAF Wing then was redesignated as an Air Division, which was commanded Brigadier General or higher, who commanded two or more wings usually, but not always, on a single base. Numbered Air Forces (NAF) commanded both Air Divisions or Wings directly, and the NAF was under the Major Command (SAC, TAC, ADC, etc.).

After World War II, relations between the United States and the Soviet Union began to deteriorate, and the period in history known as the Cold War began. The United States entered an arms race with the Soviet Union and competition aimed at increasing each nation's influence throughout the world. In response, the United States expanded its military presence throughout the world. The USAF opened air bases throughout Europe, and later in Japan and South Korea. The United States also built air bases on the British overseas territories of British Indian Ocean Territory and Ascension Island in the South Atlantic.

The first test for the USAF during the Cold War came in 1948, when Communist authorities in the Soviet occupation zone of Germany cut off road and air transportation to West Berlin. The USAF, along with the Royal Air Force (RAF) and Commonwealth air forces, supplied the city during the Berlin airlift under Operation Vittles, using C-54 Skymasters. The efforts of these air forces saved the city from starvation and forced the Soviets to back down in their blockade.

Conflict over post-war military administration, especially with regard to the roles and missions to be assigned to the Air Force and the U.S. Navy, led to an episode called the "Revolt of the Admirals" in the late 1940s, in which high-ranking Navy officers argued unsuccessfully for the case for carrier-based aircraft rather than strategic bombers.

In 1947, the USAF began Project Sign, a study of unidentified flying objects what would be twice revived (first as Project Grudge and finally as Project Blue Book) and which would last until 1969.[21]

In 1948 the Women's Armed Services Integration Act gave women permanent status in the Regular and Reserve forces of the Air Force.[22] On 8 July 1948, Esther McGowin Blake became the first woman in the Air Force, enlisting the first minute of the first hour of the first day regular Air Force duty was authorized for women.[22][23][24]

During the Korean War, which began in June 1950, the Far East Air Forces (FEAF) were among the first units to respond to the invasion by North Korea, but quickly lost its main airbase at Kimpo, South Korea. Designated to provide close air support to the defenders of the Pusan pocket from bases in Japan, the FEAF also conducted a strategic bombing campaign against North Korea simultaneously. General Douglas MacArthur's landing at Inchon in September 1950 enabled the FEAF to return to Korea and develop bases from which they supported MacArthur's UN offensive into North Korea.

When the Chinese People's Volunteer Army attacked in December 1950, the USAF provided tactical air support. The introduction of Soviet-made MiG-15 jet fighters caused problems for the B-29s used to bomb North Korea, but the USAF countered the MiGs with its new F-86 Sabre jet fighters. Although both air superiority and close air support missions were successful, a lengthy attempt to interdict communist supply lines by air attack was not as successful and was replaced by a systematic campaign to inflict as much economic cost to North Korea and the Chinese forces as long as war persisted, including attacks on the capital city of Pyongyang and against the North Korean hydroelectric system.

Vietnam War

[edit]
A U.S. B-66 Destroyer and four F-105 Thunderchiefs dropping bombs on North Vietnam in 1966

The USAF was heavily deployed during the Vietnam War. The first bombing raids against North Vietnam occurred in 1964, following the Gulf of Tonkin Incident. In March 1965, a sustained bombing campaign began, code-named Operation Rolling Thunder. This campaign's purpose was to destroy the will of the North Vietnamese to fight, destroy industrial bases and air defenses, and to stop the flow of men and supplies down the Ho Chi Minh Trail, while forcing North Vietnam into peace negotiations. The USAF dropped more bombs in all combat operations in Vietnam during the period 1965–68 than it did during World War II,[25] and the Rolling Thunder campaign lasted until the U.S. presidential election of 1968. Except for heavily damaging the North Vietnamese economy and infrastructure, Rolling Thunder failed in its political and strategic goals.

The USAF also played a critical role in defeating the North Vietnam People's Army's Easter Offensive of 1972. The rapid redeployment of fighters, bombers, and attack aircraft helped the Army of the Republic of Vietnam repel the invasion. Operation Linebacker demonstrated to both the North and South Vietnamese that even without significant U.S. Army ground forces, the United States could still influence the war. The air war for the United States ended with Operation Linebacker II, also known as the "Christmas Bombings." These helped to finalize the Paris peace negotiations.

The insurgent nature of combat operations early in the war, and the necessity of interdicting the North Vietnamese regular army and its supply lines in third-party countries of Southeast Asia led to the development of a significant special operations capability within the USAF. Provisional and experimental concepts such as air commandos and aerial gunships, tactical missions such as Operation Ivory Coast deep inside enemy territory, and a dedicated Combat Search and Rescue mission resulted in development of operational doctrines, units, and equipment.

Combat operations since 1975

[edit]

The USAF modernized its tactical air forces in the late 1970s with the introduction of the F-15, A-10, and F-16 fighters, and the implementation of realistic training scenarios under the aegis of Red Flag. In turn, it also upgraded the equipment and capabilities of its Air Reserve Components (ARC) by the equipping of both the Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve with first-line aircraft.

Expanding its force structure in the 1980s to 40 fighter wings and drawing further on the lessons of the Vietnam War, the USAF also dedicated units and aircraft to Electronic Warfare (EW) and the Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD). The humiliating failure in April 1980 of the Operation Eagle Claw rescue mission in Iran resulted directly in an increased USAF emphasis on participation in the doctrine, equipment, personnel, and planning of Joint Special Operations.

The USAF provided attack, airlift, and combat support capability for the invasion of Grenada in 1983, the bombing of Libya in 1986, and invasion of Panama in 1989. Lessons learned in these operations were applied to its force structure and doctrine, and became the basis for successful air operations in the 1990s and after September 11, 2001.

The development of satellite reconnaissance during the Cold War, the extensive use of both tactical and strategic aerial reconnaissance during numerous combat operations, and the nuclear war deterrent role of the USAF resulted in the recognition of space as a possible combat arena. An emphasis on "aerospace" operations and doctrine grew in the 1980s. Missile warning and space operations were combined to form Air Force Space Command in 1982. In 1991, Operation Desert Storm provided emphasis for the command's new focus on supporting combat operations.

The creation of the internet and the universality of computer technology as a basic warfighting tool resulted in the priority development of cyber warfare techniques and defenses by the USAF.

Gulf War

[edit]

The USAF provided the bulk of the Coalition air power during the Gulf War in 1991, flying alongside aircraft of the U.S. Navy. The F-117 Nighthawk stealth fighter's capabilities were shown on the first night of the air war when it was able to bomb central Baghdad and avoid the sophisticated Iraqi anti-aircraft defenses. The USAF, along with the U.S. Navy, later patrolled the skies of northern and southern Iraq after the war to ensure that Ba'athist Iraq's air defense capability could not be rebuilt: Operation Provide Comfort 1991–96 and Operation Northern Watch 1997–2003 – no-fly zones north of the 36th parallel north and Operation Southern Watch – no-fly zone south of the 33rd parallel north.

In 1996, Operation Desert Strike and 1998 Operation Desert Fox, the USAF bombed military and chemical targets in Iraq.

Bosnia and Kosovo

[edit]

The USAF led the NATO intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina with no-fly zones (Operation Deny Flight) 1993–96 and in 1995 with air strikes against the Republika Srpska (Operation Deliberate Force). This was the first time that USAF aircraft took part in military action as part of a NATO mission. The USAF led the strike forces as the NATO Air Force (otherwise mainly composed of RAF and Luftwaffe aircraft) with the greatest capability to launch air strikes over a long period of time. In 1999, the USAF led NATO air strikes against Serbia and Montenegro during the Kosovo War (Operation Allied Force).

Global War on Terror

[edit]
Aircraft of the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing and coalition counterparts stationed together at Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar, in southwest Asia, fly over the desert. April 14, 2003. Aircraft include KC-135 Stratotanker, F-15E Strike Eagle, F-117 Nighthawk, F-16CJ Falcon, British Tornado GR4, and Australian F/A-18 Hornet.

At the beginning of the War on Terror in 2001, the USAF was deployed against the First Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. Operating from Diego Garcia, B-52 Stratofortress and B-1 Lancer bombers attacked Taliban positions. The USAF deployed daisy cutter bombs, dropped from C-130 Hercules cargo planes, for the first time since the Vietnam War. During this conflict, the USAF opened up bases in Central Asia for the first time.

The USAF was deployed in the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Following the defeat of Saddam Hussein's regime, the USAF took over Baghdad International Airport as a base. USAF aircraft were used to provide support to the Multi-National Force – Iraq and the Iraqi security forces in major operations to eliminate insurgent centers of activity and supply in north and west Iraq. Operations in both Afghanistan and Iraq demonstrated the effective utility of unmanned air vehicles, the most prominent of which was the MQ-1 Predator. Fifty-four USAF personnel died in the Iraq War.[26]

The USAF maintains a Combined Air & Space Operations Center in Qatar to direct air combat operations and Predator actions.[27][28][29]

In March 2011, USAF jets bombed Jamahiriya Armed Forces targets in Libya as part of the NATO-led international military intervention to enforce a United Nations resolution that imposed no-fly zone over the country and protected its people from the First Libyan Civil War that occurred when its dictator, Muammar Gaddafi suppressed the protests calling for the end of his regime. Protests were inspired by the Arab Spring revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt.

In the summer of 2014, President Barack Obama announced the return of US Forces to Iraq. The US Air Force is undertaking a significant humanitarian effort in order to assist Iraq's imperiled minority groups.[30] When permission was later granted for USAF airstrikes, it was on condition that the types of aircraft not be announced so as to obscure which countries they were based in.[31]

2010s

[edit]
U.S. Air Force F-22A and F-35A over Florida's Emerald Coast

Today, the United States Air Force is the largest air force in the world, with about 5,778 manned aircraft in service, approximately 156 Unmanned Combat Air Vehicles, 2,130 Air-Launched Cruise Missiles, and 450 intercontinental ballistic missiles. The USAF has 328,439 personnel on active duty, 74,000 in the Selected and Individual Ready Reserves, and 106,000 in the Air National Guard. In addition, the Air Force employs 168,900 civilian personnel including indirect hire of foreign nationals. However, after two decades of failure to recapitalize its aircraft under Clinton and the two Bushes, the USAF has its oldest and most outdated fleet ever. Tactical aircraft purchases were put off while Fifth-generation jet fighters were facing delays, cost overruns and cutbacks and the programs to replace the 1950s bomber and tanker fleets have just been started over again after many aborted attempts.[32]

An Air Force fighter pilot died February 20, 2008, after two F-15C jets collided during a training exercise over the Gulf of Mexico.[33]

On February 29, 2008, the USAF announced the service had chosen Northrop Grumman over Boeing to replace its aging air refueling tanker fleet. This would become one of the largest military acquisition programs in U.S. history.[34]

The pilot of an F-16C fighter General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon#F-16C/D jet that crashed in a remote area about 80 miles northwest of Phoenix, Arizona, was killed when his plane went down. The plane was spotted late March 13, 2008. Rescuers could reach the site only by helicopter and arrived at daybreak March 15, 2008. There had been 17 other crashes of Luke Air Force Base F-16s since 1998, and only one of those resulted in a fatality. That crash happened in May 2004, when a pilot with the Republic of Singapore Air Force died after his jet went down during a training mission at an Air Force bombing range in southwest Arizona. The most recent crashes came in 2006. A pilot ejected safely from an F-16 in April 2006 after the lone engine on the jet exploded just after takeoff from the base. The aircraft came down in a cornfield.[35]

The Taiwan Event

[edit]

On June 5, 2008, Robert Gates announced the results of an investigation into the mistaken shipment of four MK-12 forward-section reentry vehicle assemblies to Taiwan. The investigation, conducted by Admiral Kirkland H. Donald, director of the US Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program, found that the Taiwan missile incident was, in Gates' words, "A degradation of the authority, standards of excellence, and technical competence within the nation's ICBM force. Similar to the bomber-specific August 2007 Minot-Barksdale nuclear weapons transfer incident, this incident took place within the larger environment of declining Air Force nuclear mission focus and performance" and that "the investigation identified commonalities between the August 2007 Minot incident and this [the Taiwan] event."

In his investigation report, Donald stated that the issues identified by his investigation were, "Indicative of an overall decline in Air Force nuclear weapons stewardship, a problem that has been identified but not effectively addressed for over a decade. Both the Minot-Barksdale nuclear weapons transfer incident and the Taiwan shipment, while different in specifics, have a common origin: the gradual erosion of nuclear standards and a lack of effective oversight by Air Force leadership"[36]

As a result of the investigation, Gates announced that, "A substantial number of Air Force general officers and colonels have been identified as potentially subject to disciplinary measures, ranging from removal from command to letters of reprimand," and that he had accepted the resignations of USAF Secretary Michael Wynne and USAF Chief of Staff Michael Moseley. Gates added that he had asked James R. Schlesinger to lead a senior-level task force to recommend improvements in the stewardship and operation of nuclear weapons, delivery vehicles and sensitive components by the US DoD. Members of the task force came from the Defense Policy Board and the Defense Science Board.[37]

In 2012, the USAF discovered that their billion dollar investment in the Expeditionary Combat Support System "has not yielded any significant military capability" and that it would take another billion dollar investment to gain even one quarter of the planned capability.[38]

Also in 2012, the USAF received push back from the Congress over a plan to retire multiple reserve squadrons, leading to the formation of the National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force to resolve the proper balance between active and reserve air forces.[39] This was followed in 2013 by the Total Force Task Force in an attempt to handle budget disagreements between the active and reserve forces.[40]

In 2014, the USAF's 30 year strategy document cited a need for both low end and high end capabilities, and so called for cuts in high demand UAVs in favor of retaining "outdated fighter aircraft that would not be survivable in a high end conflict".[41]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The (USAF) originated as a component of the U.S. Army's aviation efforts in the early , formally beginning with the Aeronautical Division of the in 1907, and evolved through the Army Air Service during , the Army Air Corps established in 1926, and the Army Air Forces during , before becoming an independent branch of the armed forces on September 18, 1947, pursuant to the National Security Act signed by President on July 26 of that year. This separation reflected the growing recognition of air power's distinct strategic role, distinct from ground and naval forces, enabling focused development of doctrines emphasizing air superiority, strategic bombardment, and technological innovation in . Throughout its history, the USAF has achieved dominance in air campaigns across major conflicts, securing air superiority over Europe by 1944 and in the Pacific by late 1945 during World War II, which facilitated decisive Allied advances through unchallenged aerial interdiction and close air support. In the Korean War, it rapidly established control of the skies by 1950, enabling effective interdiction of enemy supply lines despite challenges from Soviet-supplied MiG fighters. The Vietnam War highlighted operational adaptations, including extensive tactical air support and search-and-rescue missions that recovered over 4,000 personnel, though strategic bombing faced limitations due to political restrictions on targets. During the Cold War, the USAF maintained nuclear deterrence via strategic bombers and intercontinental ballistic missiles, forming a key leg of the nuclear triad and preventing direct superpower confrontation through credible second-strike capabilities. The service's defining characteristics include pioneering advancements in aviation technology, from jet propulsion and precision-guided munitions to stealth aircraft like the F-22 Raptor and unmanned aerial systems for reconnaissance and strike, which have sustained U.S. advantages in contested airspace. Controversies have arisen over the human and material costs of high-altitude strategic bombing in World War II and the ethical implications of drone warfare in asymmetric conflicts, yet empirical assessments affirm air power's causal role in shortening wars by disrupting enemy logistics and command structures more efficiently than ground alternatives alone. Today, the USAF oversees global operations, space domain awareness, and cyber integration, underscoring its evolution from auxiliary Army aviation to a force multiplier in joint military strategy.

Precursors in U.S. Army Aviation

Early Development and World War I (1907–1918)

The Aeronautical Division of the U.S. Army Signal Corps was established on August 1, 1907, marking the inception of organized military aviation in the United States; this unit, recommended by Maj. George O. Squier and approved by Brig. Gen. James Allen, was tasked with overseeing all matters related to military ballooning, air machines, and related technologies. Initially comprising just a handful of officers and civilians, the division focused on experimentation with balloons and early aircraft, conducting trials at sites like Fort Myer, Virginia. In December 1907, the Signal Corps issued Specification No. 486, soliciting a powered flying machine capable of carrying two people at 40 miles per hour for at least one hour, with a bonus for exceeding speed requirements. The Wright brothers secured the contract in February 1908, delivering their modified Wright Flyer after demonstrations in 1908 and 1909; the Army accepted Signal Corps Airplane No. 1 on August 2, 1909, for $30,000 following successful trials averaging 42.5 miles per hour. This acquisition enabled initial military flights for reconnaissance and training, though crashes and mechanical issues limited operational use, prompting further procurement of aircraft from manufacturers like Curtiss. Congress formalized aviation's role with the Aviation Section of the on July 18, 1914, authorizing it to operate and supervise all Army , with an initial of $125,000 reduced to $100,000 amid fiscal constraints. By 1914, the section had established flight schools in , and , , training a small cadre of pilots—numbering around 60 officers and enlisted personnel—while deploying for border patrols during the Mexican Punitive Expedition starting in 1916. The U.S. entry into in April 1917 catalyzed rapid expansion; the Aviation Section, with fewer than 200 personnel and 30 aircraft at war's outset, grew to over 10,000 aircraft produced domestically and trained thousands of pilots through programs in the U.S. and abroad. In May 1918, amid wartime exigencies, President issued executive orders establishing the Army Air Service as a temporary independent branch under the War Department, separate from the , to streamline command and operations in the (AEF). Key formations included the 1st Pursuit Group in July 1918 and the first U.S. squadron entering combat in February 1918, primarily for , pursuit, and bombing roles supporting ground offensives. Brig. Gen. William "Billy" Mitchell, appointed air commander for the AEF's First Army, exemplified emerging air power doctrine by coordinating large-scale operations, such as the September 1918 Battle of St. Mihiel, where 1,481 aircraft executed massed assaults to disrupt German lines and achieve air superiority. The Air Service's contributions included over 1,500 aerial victories and significant reconnaissance enabling Allied advances, though production delays and reliance on Allied aircraft underscored logistical challenges. By the Armistice on November 11, 1918, U.S. military aviation had transitioned from experimental novelty to a proven combat arm, laying groundwork for postwar advocacy for greater autonomy.

Interwar Period and Advocacy for Independence (1919–1939)

Following the of November 11, 1918, the U.S. Army Air Service experienced swift demobilization, shrinking from a wartime peak of approximately 195,000 personnel and over 11,000 to a force of about 9,000 officers and men with fewer than 300 serviceable planes by mid-1920, amid broader Army reductions driven by postwar and budget cuts. This contraction exacerbated tensions between aviators and Army ground commanders, as the Air Service struggled for resources and doctrinal clarity while subordinated to infantry-centric priorities under the National Defense Act of 1920, which formalized it as a temporary combat arm without enhanced autonomy. Persistent advocacy for air power's strategic role emerged, rooted in observations of , pursuit, and bombing's potential to disrupt enemy independently of ground advances. Brigadier General William "Billy" Mitchell, appointed assistant chief of the Air Service in 1919, became the most vocal proponent of an independent air force, arguing that air power's offensive capabilities—particularly long-range bombing—could decisively target industrial and command centers, rendering sea power and massed armies obsolete in future conflicts. Mitchell's demonstrations, including the 1921 sinking of captured German battleships off Cape Henry using aerial bombs, empirically validated aviation's anti-naval potential, yet met resistance from Navy and Army leaders who viewed such claims as threats to service roles. His public criticisms intensified after the 1925 crashes of the airship Shenandoah and the bombing plane T-19, which he attributed to inadequate funding and leadership neglect; this led to his court-martial on October 28, 1925, for insubordination, resulting in suspension and resignation in 1926, though it galvanized airmen and highlighted systemic underinvestment. The Air Corps Act of July 2, 1926, redesignated the Air Service as the U.S. Army Air Corps, granting nominal prestige, a chief with permanent rank, and slight administrative gains, but preserved subordination to the Army General Staff without operational independence or guaranteed funding, reflecting congressional compromise amid interservice rivalries. Annual appropriations remained meager—averaging under $15 million through the 1920s—limiting procurement to obsolete biplanes like the Curtiss P-1 pursuit and Keystone bombers, even as advanced via the Air Mail Act of 1925, which spurred technological spin-offs but underscored military lag. Doctrinal evolution occurred at institutions like the Air Corps Tactical School (ACTS), established at Langley Field in 1920 and relocated to Maxwell Field in 1931, where instructors refined concepts of high-altitude daylight to sever an enemy's "industrial web," drawing from ideas but emphasizing strategic autonomy over tactical support. Budgetary constraints deepened during the , with Air Corps strength hovering at 1,600 aircraft by 1934, yet innovations persisted: the bomber (introduced 1934) achieved 210 mph speeds and 2,200-pound bomb loads, enabling four-engine bomber experiments like the Boeing YB-9. The Army Industrial Mobilization Plan and Lampert Committee hearings (1924–1926) exposed procurement inefficiencies, prompting calls for centralized control. By 1934, amid rising European tensions, Army General endorsed a centralized striking force, leading to the establishment of General Headquarters (GHQ) Air Force on March 1, 1935, at Langley Field under Brigadier General Delos Emmons, which consolidated tactical, pursuit, and bombardment wings for independent operations reporting directly to the during war, marking a pivotal concession to air advocates without full separation. This structure facilitated exercises like the 1938 maneuvers, testing strategic bombing's feasibility, though persistent Army oversight and fiscal limits—exacerbated by priorities—delayed full realization until exigencies.

World War II as Army Air Forces (1940–1945)

In response to escalating global tensions, the United States Army Air Corps underwent significant reorganization in 1940–1941 to prepare for potential involvement in World War II. On October 5, 1940, Army Chief of Staff Gen. George C. Marshall approved a proposal by Air Corps Chief Maj. Gen. Henry H. "Hap" Arnold to restructure along functional lines, establishing an air staff and unifying commands under one headquarters. This culminated in War Department Circular No. 59 on June 20, 1941, redesignating the Air Corps as the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) with semi-autonomous status within the Army, headed by Arnold as Chief of the Air Staff. Concurrently, pre-war mobilization under the Selective Service Act of 1940 and Lend-Lease aid spurred rapid expansion; by December 1941, USAAF strength had grown from approximately 20,000 personnel and 2,400 aircraft in 1939 to over 50,000 personnel and 7,000 aircraft, though many remained obsolete or in training roles. Arnold, leveraging his aviation expertise, prioritized procurement of modern types like the B-17 Flying Fortress and P-40 Warhawk, while establishing training commands to build pilot cadres. The Japanese on December 7, 1941, propelled the USAAF into full-scale war, with immediate operations in the under Far East Air Force (later ), where over 100 B-17s and P-40s were destroyed on the ground, marking early heavy losses. In , the USAAF established the in England by July 1942 under Maj. Gen. , focusing on daylight of German industry per the of industrial web theory, contrasting RAF night area attacks. Initial raids, such as the first heavy bomber mission on August 17, 1942, targeting Rouen rail yards, demonstrated feasibility but highlighted vulnerabilities without long-range escorts. The , activated in November 1943 in under Maj. Gen. James H. Doolittle, complemented efforts by striking southern targets like Ploesti oil fields. Challenges peaked during "" in October 1943, when unescorted B-17 and B-24 raids on ball-bearing plants suffered devastating losses—60 bombers shot down on October 14 alone—prompting a temporary stand-down and shift to shorter-range targets until P-51 Mustang escorts became available in 1944. The "" offensive from February 20–25, 1944, involving over 1,000 USAAF bombers daily alongside RAF support, crippled German aircraft production by destroying factories and engaging the , resulting in 345 USAAF bombers lost but Luftwaffe fighter strength reduced by over 600 planes. By D-Day on June 6, 1944, USAAF tactical air forces under Ninth and others provided close support, achieving air superiority that facilitated Allied landings; overall, the dropped 1.4 million tons of bombs on Europe, disrupting German logistics and morale. In the Pacific, the USAAF shifted from defensive postures to offensive campaigns, highlighted by Lt. Col. James H. Doolittle's raid on Tokyo on April 18, 1942, using B-25s from USS Hornet to boost morale despite limited material damage. The Fifth Air Force under Gen. George C. Kenney supported MacArthur's Southwest Pacific push, pioneering low-level tactics and skip-bombing against Japanese shipping, as in the Battle of the Bismarck Sea on March 2–4, 1943, where eight transports and four destroyers were sunk with no Allied losses. The Twentieth Air Force, formed in 1944 with B-29 Superfortresses under Arnold's direct command, conducted high-altitude raids on Japan from Marianas bases, evolving to low-level firebombing; the March 9–10, 1945, Tokyo raid killed over 100,000 civilians and destroyed 16 square miles. Culminating operations included atomic bombings of Hiroshima on August 6 and Nagasaki on August 9, 1945, by the 509th Composite Group, contributing to Japan's surrender on September 2. Throughout the war, the USAAF peaked at 2.4 million personnel and 80,000 aircraft, producing over 300,000 planes domestically, but suffered 88,119 deaths—52,173 in combat and 25,844 in accidents—with training crashes claiming more lives stateside than some combat theaters. Innovations like radar-directed bombing, proximity fuzes, and women's auxiliary roles in ferrying (Women Airforce Service Pilots) enhanced effectiveness, while Arnold's strategic vision integrated air power with ground and naval forces, proving decisive in Allied victory despite high costs and doctrinal debates over strategic versus tactical emphasis.

Establishment and Korean War Era (1947–1953)

Formation under the National Security Act

The National Security Act of 1947, signed into law by President Harry S. Truman on July 26, 1947, established the Department of the Air Force as a coequal executive department alongside the Departments of the Army and the Navy, thereby separating air forces from ground army control for the first time in U.S. history. This reorganization responded to the demonstrated strategic importance of independent air power during World War II, where Army Air Forces operations had grown to over 2.4 million personnel by 1945, highlighting inefficiencies in subordinate command structures under the War Department. The Act's Section 207 explicitly created the Department of the Air Force to promote "prompt and sustained development of air capabilities" as essential to national security, mandating unification of military efforts while preserving service-specific roles. Implementation occurred on September 18, 1947, when the Department of the Air Force was formally established, with W. Stuart Symington sworn in as the first Secretary of the Air Force. General Carl A. Spaatz, formerly commanding general of Army Air Forces, was appointed the first Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force on the same date, overseeing the transition of approximately 500,000 personnel, 70,000 aircraft, and supporting infrastructure from the Army. Symington, previously Assistant Secretary of War for Air since 1946, prioritized rapid demobilization adjustments and procurement reforms to maintain readiness amid postwar budget constraints, emphasizing strategic bombing capabilities central to U.S. deterrence doctrine. The separation process involved transferring Army Air Forces assets to the new service by September 26, 1947, under orders from Secretary of Defense , who coordinated the National Military Establishment's initial operations. This included reassigning air units, bases, and research facilities, though interservice rivalries persisted over roles like and unified command, leading to subsequent amendments in 1949 that strengthened the Department of Defense. The Air Force's inaugural organization focused on three major commands—Strategic Air Command for long-range bombing, Tactical Air Command for battlefield support, and Air Defense Command for continental protection—reflecting lessons from wartime operations where air superiority proved decisive in campaigns like the strategic bombing of and . Early challenges included retaining skilled personnel amid and integrating emerging technologies like , setting the stage for expansions.

Korean War Operations and Lessons Learned

The United States Air Force entered the on June 25, 1950, following North Korea's invasion of , with Far East Air Forces (FEAF) under Lieutenant General George E. Stratemeyer conducting initial strikes against advancing North Korean columns and airfields. By July 1950, FEAF had achieved air superiority over , destroying approximately 39 of North Korea's 44 combat aircraft on the ground in the first days of operations, enabling unchallenged (CAS) for ground forces during the Pusan Perimeter defense. Tactical units, including the 5th Air Force with F-51 and F-80 Shooting Star squadrons, flew missions under operations such as Strangle and Trade Wind, targeting bridges, rail lines, and supply routes to disrupt North Korean , though terrain and weather limited effectiveness against troop movements. Strategic bombing operations began in earnest with B-29 Superfortresses of the 19th and 22nd Bomb Wings targeting industrial sites and supply depots in from July 13, 1950, escalating after China's intervention in November 1950 to include hydroelectric dams and systems in 1953, which flooded rice fields and disrupted . FEAF bombers dropped 476,000 tons of ordnance over the course of the war, but faced increasing threats from Soviet-supplied MiG-15 jets operating from sanctuaries in , leading to the loss of 16 B-29s to enemy fighters by 1951 and necessitating escort by F-86 Sabre jets. Overall, FEAF units flew 721,000 sorties, including 86,000 by bombers, supporting ground advances like the Inchon landing on September 15, 1950, and subsequent retreats during Chinese offensives. Intense air-to-air combat erupted in "MiG Alley" along the Yalu River from November 1950, where U.S. F-86 Sabres of the 4th Fighter-Interceptor Wing engaged Soviet, Chinese, and North Korean MiG-15 pilots, marking the first major jet-versus-jet battles. USAF pilots achieved 792 confirmed aerial victories against MiG-15s, with losses of 78 Sabres in air combat, maintaining qualitative edges through superior tactics like the "fluid four" formation and pilot training despite the MiG's initial advantages in climb rate and ceiling. Communist forces, constrained by rules of engagement prohibiting incursions into Manchuria, flew fewer sorties from protected bases, allowing FEAF to retain control of the skies south of the bomb line. Total USAF casualties numbered 1,841, including 1,180 killed in action, with 1,200 aircraft lost across all causes. The highlighted the transition to and high-speed warfare, exposing vulnerabilities in straight-winged fighters like the F-80 against swept-wing MiG-15s, which prompted accelerated procurement of the F-86 and influenced subsequent designs emphasizing speed, maneuverability, and radar integration. Operations underscored the necessity of air superiority for enabling ground maneuver, as interdiction alone proved insufficient without it, while sanctuary areas in limited strategic bombing's coercive impact, leading to doctrinal refinements prioritizing rapid response forces and all-weather capabilities. Logistical strains from extended supply lines and harsh winters revealed inadequacies in and base hardening, spurring investments in (e.g., C-54 and C-119 units) and forward operating bases. These experiences validated the Air Force's independent service status under the 1947 National Security Act, reinforcing emphasis on technological superiority and integrated air-ground operations, though critics noted over-reliance on air power failed to force decisive victory amid political constraints on escalation.

Cold War Deterrence and Vietnam (1954–1975)

Strategic Air Command and Nuclear Posture

Following the Korean War, the Strategic Air Command (SAC) solidified its role as the executor of the United States' nuclear deterrence strategy, maintaining a fleet of heavy bombers equipped for atomic strikes. By 1954, SAC had transitioned from its early post-World War II struggles to a highly capable force, with General Curtis E. LeMay's command since 1948 emphasizing rigorous training, alert postures, and rapid response capabilities. SAC's bomber wings, including the B-47 Stratojet entering widespread service in 1951, formed the backbone of the "New Look" policy under President Dwight D. Eisenhower, which prioritized massive nuclear retaliation to deter Soviet aggression while reducing conventional ground forces. This posture relied on SAC's ability to deliver overwhelming nuclear firepower, with over 1,000 bombers by the mid-1950s and the development of airborne alert operations like Operation Chrome Dome starting in 1958. The introduction of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) in the late 1950s marked a pivotal shift in SAC's nuclear posture, diversifying from manned bombers to unmanned delivery systems for faster, less vulnerable strikes. The Atlas ICBM achieved initial operational capability on September 9, 1959, followed by the Titan I in 1962 and the solid-fuel Minuteman series, with the first Minuteman I squadron operational on October 1, 1962. By 1965, SAC controlled 1,000 Minuteman missiles, enhancing survivability against preemptive attacks through hardened silos and quick launch times. This missile buildup addressed perceived "bomber gaps" and later "missile gaps" with the Soviet Union, driven by intelligence assessments and events like the 1957 Sputnik launch, though declassified documents later revealed U.S. advantages in deployable strategic forces. SAC's dual reliance on bombers for flexible targeting and ICBMs for assured retaliation underpinned the Single Integrated Operational Plan (SIOP), first formalized in 1961, which outlined coordinated nuclear strikes against Soviet and Warsaw Pact targets. Doctrinal evolution during the challenged SAC's dominance in nuclear planning, as the Kennedy administration's adoption of "" sought options short of all-out nuclear war, reducing emphasis on . Secretary of Defense McNamara's push for targeting and controlled escalation led to revisions in SIOP-62 and subsequent plans, incorporating limited nuclear options, though SAC resisted shifts that might dilute its strategic monopoly. During the 1962 , SAC elevated to 2 on October 22, placing 29 bombers on airborne alert and dispersing ICBMs, demonstrating the command's readiness but also highlighting risks of accidental escalation from heightened postures. By the early 1970s, amid distractions and emerging submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) under Navy control, SAC's nuclear arsenal peaked with over 4,000 warheads, but (SALT I) in 1972 capped ICBM deployments at 1,054 launchers, prompting modernization toward Minuteman III with multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs) tested in 1968 and deployed from 1970. This period affirmed SAC's central role in deterrence despite inter-service tensions and budgetary constraints.

Vietnam War: Air Campaigns and Controversies

The United States Air Force (USAF), through its Seventh Air Force, executed the bulk of fixed-wing air operations during the Vietnam War, focusing on interdiction, close air support, and strategic bombing to disrupt North Vietnamese logistics and support South Vietnamese forces. Major campaigns included Operation Rolling Thunder, launched on March 2, 1965, which targeted infrastructure and supply routes in North Vietnam to coerce Hanoi into halting support for the Viet Cong insurgency, though restricted rules of engagement (ROE) limited strikes on key areas such as Hanoi, Haiphong harbor, and dikes to avoid escalation with China and the Soviet Union. Concurrently, Operation Arc Light commenced on June 18, 1965, deploying Strategic Air Command B-52 Stratofortresses from bases in Guam and Thailand for saturation bombing of enemy positions primarily in South Vietnam, with the first mission involving 27 B-52Fs striking a Viet Cong stronghold near Bien Hoa; over the war, B-52s flew more than 126,000 sorties across Southeast Asia, delivering massive tonnage to break sieges like Khe Sanh in 1968. In 1972, amid the North Vietnamese , President Nixon authorized I, unleashing USAF and Navy aircraft to mine and bomb military targets without prior constraints, dropping over 150,000 tons of ordnance and halting the invasion through interdiction of supply lines. This was followed by Linebacker II from December 18-29, 1972, an 11-day intensive B-52 campaign against and , with 729 sorties delivering 15,237 tons of bombs on rail yards, power plants, and storage depots, which pressured Hanoi to return to peace negotiations despite heavy anti-aircraft defenses downing 15 B-52s. Overall, USAF operations inflicted significant damage on North Vietnamese capabilities when politically unbound, but earlier efforts like Rolling Thunder resulted in 1,096 aircraft losses from 1965-1968 due to permissive sanctuaries allowing SAM and MiG buildup. Controversies surrounding USAF campaigns centered on their effectiveness and collateral impacts, exacerbated by White House micromanagement under President Johnson, who personally approved targets via "Tuesday lunches," prohibiting B-52 use over and strikes on vital logistics until late in the war, thus enabling to sustain infiltration with minimal daily imports of 34 tons while USAF pilots faced daylight-only missions and ROE for threats. Analyses contend that Rolling Thunder's graduated approach failed to interdict the decisively or alter Hanoi's resolve, as resilient truck convoys and external aid compensated for losses, though Linebacker operations demonstrated airpower's potential to blunt conventional advances when restrictions were lifted. Civilian casualties, estimated variably but often inflated in perceptions, arose from area bombing tactics, with some studies arguing indiscriminate strikes alienated rural populations and bolstered recruitment, yet long-term economic data show no persistent negative effects on bombed areas' development through 2002. Critics, including post-war assessments, labeled early campaigns a "miserable damn performance" due to doctrinal mismatches with , while proponents highlight tactical successes in supporting ground troops and the decisive role in 1972 negotiations.

Post-Vietnam Modernization and Late Cold War (1976–1991)

Force Restructuring and Technological Investments

Following the ' withdrawal from in 1975, the confronted profound operational shortcomings, including inadequate realism and leadership complacency, prompting internal restructuring initiatives. A cadre of mid-level officers, dubbed the "Revolt of the Majors," criticized the service's Vietnam-era performance and advocated for rigorous, combat-mimicking exercises to enhance pilot survivability and mission effectiveness. This culminated in the establishment of Red Flag exercises in 1975 at , , which simulated large-scale aerial combat with aggressor squadrons employing adversary tactics, yielding a documented 10-to-1 kill ratio improvement in participants' subsequent engagements. These reforms emphasized professional military education and a shift from quantity-focused force structure to quality-driven readiness, amid post-war drawdowns that reduced active-duty end strength from approximately 543,000 in 1975 to around 400,000 by the early 1980s. Technological investments accelerated in the late 1970s with the introduction of advanced fighters designed for air superiority against Soviet threats. The achieved initial operational capability in January 1976, with the first delivery to a combat squadron marking a leap in beyond-visual-range engagement capabilities via its AN/APG-63 radar and missile integration. Complementing this, the General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon entered service in January 1979, introducing controls and multirole versatility at lower cost, with over 2,000 units eventually procured to modernize tactical fighter wings. These platforms embodied investments in digital avionics and composite materials, addressing Vietnam-era vulnerabilities like maneuverability deficits and electronic warfare limitations. The election of President Reagan in 1980 catalyzed a defense spending surge, peaking at 6.2% of GDP by , which reversed Carter-era constraints and funded expansive recapitalization. This enabled of the Rockwell B-1B Lancer , which entered operational service in with variable-sweep wings and terrain-following radar for low-level penetration missions, replacing aging B-52s in . Simultaneously, classified stealth research yielded the , whose development began in 1978 with the Have Blue demonstrator's first flight in 1977, achieving initial operating capability by October 1983 through radar-absorbent facets and infrared suppression. By 1991, these investments had expanded fighter squadrons and integrated precision-guided munitions, fortifying deterrence against numerical superiority while streamlining force structure toward high-technology enablers like E-3 AWACS for .

Gulf War Prelude and Cold War Endgame

Following the , the United States Air Force prioritized recovery and modernization amid escalating tensions, particularly under President Reagan's defense buildup starting in 1981, which increased annual budgets to over $100 billion by the mid-1980s, enabling procurement of advanced fighters like the F-15 Eagle (first operational delivery January 9, 1976) and F-16 Fighting Falcon (initial squadrons activated by 1979). This era emphasized technological superiority, including the secretive development of to counter Soviet air defenses; the F-117 Nighthawk achieved its first flight on June 18, 1981, and became operational by 1983 under the at , , designed for precision strikes on high-value targets with cross-sections reduced to that of a small bird. Complementing this, the B-1B Lancer bomber reached initial operational capability on October 1, 1986, with 100 approved for production to replace aging B-52s in Strategic Air Command's nuclear and conventional roles. Investments in precision-guided munitions (PGMs), such as laser-guided bombs, addressed Vietnam-era inaccuracies, with systems like the GBU-10 tested in exercises, laying groundwork for integrated air campaigns. Demonstrations of these capabilities occurred in limited operations that foreshadowed tactics. In Operation El Dorado Canyon on April 15, 1986, F-111 Aardvarks from struck Libyan targets in retaliation for terrorism, flying 6,400 miles with mid-air refueling and employing terrain-following radar for low-level penetration, validating long-range precision strike doctrines. Similarly, during (July 1987 to 1988), the Air Force supported naval escort of reflagged Kuwaiti tankers in the Persian Gulf amid the Iran- War, deploying E-3 Sentry AWACS for surveillance, KC-10 Extenders for refueling (first delivered March 17, 1977), and AC-130 gunships, accumulating over 25,000 sorties to deter Iranian aggression and protect oil flows critical to global markets. These missions honed joint operations and electronic warfare, with EF-111 Ravens (first delivered November 5, 1981) jamming radars, while surveillance assets like JSTARS prototypes emerged to track mobile threats, directly informing the command-and-control architecture used against . As the Cold War waned from 1989 onward, the Air Force shifted from massive deterrence against the Soviet Union—evident in the termination of Strategic Air Command's airborne alert on September 27, 1991, after 30 years—to flexible regional responses, though initial force reductions were modest amid ongoing commitments. The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (ratified 1988) led to inactivations like the 501st Tactical Missile Wing at RAF Greenham Common on May 31, 1991, dismantling Pershing II missiles, while USAFE personnel dropped from 60,471 in 1989 to planned cuts of 20-30% by 1992 as Warsaw Pact threats dissolved. The B-2 Spirit's first flight on July 17, 1989, symbolized enduring strategic investment despite détente, but Gorbachev's reforms and the USSR's collapse on December 26, 1991, prompted doctrinal reviews toward "Global Reach Global Power," emphasizing airlift like the C-17 Globemaster III (first flight September 15, 1991) for rapid projection. This pivot enabled swift Desert Shield deployments after Iraq's August 2, 1990, invasion of Kuwait, surging aircraft from 77 to over 2,000 in theater, leveraging 1980s innovations for air supremacy without Soviet distraction.

Post-Cold War Interventions (1991–2001)

Persian Gulf War Air Campaign

The Persian Gulf War air campaign, part of Operation Desert Storm, commenced on January 17, 1991, following Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in August 1990. Commanded by U.S. Air Force Lieutenant General Charles Horner as the Joint Force Air Component Commander, the campaign integrated coalition air assets under a centralized structure to systematically degrade Iraqi military capabilities. Initial strikes targeted command and control centers, air defenses, and leadership sites in Baghdad, achieving surprise through stealth aircraft and suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD) operations. Planning originated with Colonel John A. Warden III's group in , which developed the "Instant Thunder" concept emphasizing strategic paralysis of Iraqi leadership and infrastructure over immediate battlefield . This evolved into a phased campaign expanding from an initial 84 targets to over in the first air tasking order, incorporating parallel operations against Scud missiles, nuclear facilities, and units. The U.S. contributed the majority of sorties, flying more than 65,000 during the 38-day air phase, which accounted for approximately 80% of coalition . Key aircraft included F-117 Nighthawk stealth fighters for precision strikes, F-15 Eagles for air superiority, A-10 Thunderbolt IIs for , and B-52 Stratofortresses for long-range bombing. Technological innovations proved decisive: the debut of in combat with F-117s executing 1,271 sorties and dropping laser-guided bombs on high-value targets with minimal losses, alongside extensive use of precision-guided munitions that comprised about 8% of ordnance but inflicted 75% of damage on strategic targets. Coalition forces achieved within days, downing 31 of 35 Iraqi in aerial combat, while the Iraqi Air Force—numbering around 800 aircraft—largely fled to or remained grounded, suffering over 100 losses on the ground. SEAD missions neutralized much of Iraq's integrated air defense system, including surface-to-air missiles and radars, enabling unchallenged follow-on operations. The campaign's effectiveness stemmed from superior intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance (ISR), and joint integration, though challenges included Scud hunting's limited success and weather impacts on visual targeting. By February 23, 1991, air operations had crippled Iraqi logistics, command nodes, and armored forces, setting conditions for the 100-hour ground offensive that liberated . Post-war assessments, such as the Gulf War Air Power Survey, affirmed air power's role in minimizing coalition casualties—39 fixed-wing losses total—while inflicting disproportionate damage, validating effects-based targeting over attrition models.

Balkans Operations and No-Fly Zones

In response to the escalating conflict in Bosnia-Herzegovina following the breakup of Yugoslavia, the United States Air Force participated in NATO's Operation Deny Flight, which commenced on April 12, 1993, to enforce a United Nations-mandated no-fly zone prohibiting unauthorized fixed-wing and rotary-wing aircraft operations above the 44th parallel north. This operation succeeded the monitoring-only Operation Sky Monitor and involved USAF assets such as F-16 Fighting Falcons for air patrols, intercepts, and close air support to UN ground forces, with missions expanding to include strikes against ground threats to safe areas. Over its duration until December 20, 1995, Deny Flight logged thousands of sorties, including the first NATO combat engagement on February 28, 1994, when USAF F-16s from the 555th Fighter Squadron, alongside other NATO aircraft, shot down four Bosnian Serb G-4 Super Galeb jets violating the zone. The USAF's role intensified amid ongoing Bosnian Serb attacks on UN-designated safe areas, culminating in , a targeted air campaign launched on August 30, 1995, against Bosnian Serb military infrastructure following a marketplace artillery strike that killed 38 civilians. USAF aircraft, including F-15E Strike Eagles, F-16s, and AC-130 gunships, conducted over 750 strike sorties in the initial phase, focusing on command-and-control nodes, artillery positions, and ammunition depots, with precision-guided munitions minimizing compared to unguided alternatives. The operation paused on September 14 but resumed briefly, contributing to Bosnian Serb concessions that facilitated the Dayton Accords in November 1995; USAF contributions emphasized joint operations with allies, validating post-Vietnam doctrinal shifts toward integrated air-ground coordination. Shifting to Kosovo amid rising ethnic violence against Albanian populations, the USAF led NATO's Operation Allied Force from March 24 to June 10, 1999, a 78-day air campaign comprising 38,004 sorties—two-thirds by USAF platforms—to degrade Yugoslav military capabilities and compel withdrawal from without committing ground troops. The effort unfolded in phases: initial suppression of enemy air defenses using F-117 and B-2 Spirits, followed by attacks on fielded forces and leadership targets, with USAF tankers enabling extended-range operations from bases like , . No USAF combat losses occurred despite intense threats, attributed to and electronic warfare; the campaign pressured Yugoslav President to accept terms on June 9, 1999, leading to deployment. operations highlighted USAF advancements in precision strike and , though debates persist on airpower's coercive limits absent ground follow-on, as evidenced by prolonged flows and damage estimates exceeding $4 billion.

Global War on Terror (2001–2014)

Afghanistan and Initial Counterterrorism Strikes

The U.S. Air Force launched the initial phase of aerial operations in on October 7, 2001, as part of , targeting military infrastructure, air defenses, command-and-control sites, and training camps in response to the . That night's strikes hit 31 priority targets using submarine-launched cruise missiles supplemented by long-range bombers, marking the start of a campaign that emphasized precision-guided munitions, with nearly 70% of ordnance in the opening months being laser- or GPS-guided to minimize while degrading enemy capabilities. B-2 Spirit stealth bombers, flying from in , conducted the longest combat sorties in history—exceeding 44 hours with multiple aerial refuelings—to strike high-value targets deep inside , enabling global reach without forward basing vulnerabilities. By October 17, operations shifted to round-the-clock "target zones" supporting U.S. Forces (SOF) and ground elements, with B-1 Lancer and B-52 Stratofortress bombers delivering heavy ordnance against troop concentrations and armor. AC-130 gunships provided (CAS) for SOF teams linking with anti- fighters, as exemplified by a B-52 strike at directed by combat controllers, which neutralized entrenched positions and facilitated airfield seizure. These efforts crippled fixed defenses, enabling rapid advances: Mazar-e-Sharif fell on November 9 after air strikes broke lines at key chokepoints like the Darya Suf Valley; was captured by November 13; and , the 's last stronghold, surrendered by December 7. Air power's integration with SOF and indigenous forces proved decisive in ousting the from power by mid-December 2001, with strikes at in early December targeting leadership, including , though he evaded capture. The campaign demonstrated the U.S. Air Force's shift toward dynamic targeting and joint fires, flying the majority of coalition sorties—over 6,500 by year's end—while adapting to rugged terrain and limited ground presence, setting a template for operations that prioritized disruption of terrorist networks over territorial occupation. Initial strikes extended beyond conventional targets to include early drone and precision hits on safe houses, foreshadowing expanded remotely piloted aircraft roles, though ground coordination challenges occasionally led to reported civilian casualties amid fluid battlefields.

Iraq Invasion and Sustained Air Support

The initiated combat operations in support of the invasion on March 20, 2003, as part of Operation Iraqi Freedom, with Lt. Gen. serving as the Combined Force Air Component Commander. Initial strikes included F-117 Nighthawk stealth fighters targeting suspected leadership sites, such as the Dora Farms complex on March 19, 2003. Over the first six weeks of the campaign, coalition forces flew more than 41,000 sorties, with the USAF accounting for over 24,000, dominating strike, mobility, and refueling missions. was declared on April 6, 2003, enabling unrestricted (CAS) for advancing ground troops using aircraft like A-10 Thunderbolt IIs, F-16 Fighting Falcons, and bombers including B-1 Lancers, B-2 Spirits, and B-52 Stratofortresses. USAF assets also facilitated rapid maneuver by destroying Iraqi command-and-control nodes, units, and supply lines, with bombers delivering a significant portion of precision-guided munitions despite comprising less than 3% of strike sorties. Airlift operations, conducted by C-130 Hercules and C-17 Globemasters, included the airborne insertion of approximately 1,000 paratroopers on March 26, 2003, and the transport of over 12,000 short tons of . Tanker aircraft supported these efforts with over 6,000 sorties, offloading more than 376 million pounds of fuel. Intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) platforms flew nearly 1,000 sorties, collecting 42,000 images and over 3,000 hours of video to guide targeting. Following the fall of on April 9, 2003, the USAF shifted to sustained air support amid the emerging , providing CAS, , and ISR to protect coalition and Iraqi forces. A-10s, for instance, expended around 600 rounds of 30mm cannon fire during operations in in early April 2003. Throughout the occupation, USAF fixed-wing and rotary-wing assets, including growing fleets of MQ-1 Predators and MQ-9 Reapers, conducted precision strikes with low-collateral-damage munitions like 20-pound Hellfire warheads to counter improvised explosive devices and insurgent positions. and refueling sustained troop surges, such as 325 inter-theater and 1,059 intra-theater missions between January and April 2005. By 2011, USAF operations emphasized mentoring the while maintaining combat patrols and evacuation support, culminating in the final combat mission flown by F-16s of the 79th Expeditionary on December 18, 2011. The expanded significantly, from 12,195 personnel in 2001 to nearly 20,000 by 2005, integrating capabilities like the CV-22 Osprey for special tactics insertions. These efforts, supported by technologies such as terminals for real-time targeting and Joint STARS for ground surveillance, adapted air power to demands, influencing post-conflict doctrine.

Drone Warfare Expansion and ISR Dominance

The United States Air Force's adoption of remotely piloted aircraft (RPAs) accelerated after the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan, evolving from limited reconnaissance roles to integral components of strike and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) operations. The MQ-1 Predator, initially deployed unarmed for surveillance starting September 18, 2001, conducted its first armed mission on October 7, 2001, armed with missiles to target and positions. This capability enabled the first confirmed RPA strike on November 14, 2001, against enemy combatants, minimizing risks to aircrews while providing precision engagement in dynamic environments. By 2003, during the Iraq invasion, Predators executed their initial combat strike on March 22, destroying a radar-guided anti-aircraft site, underscoring the platform's dual-role versatility in suppressing air defenses and supporting ground forces. The introduction of the MQ-9 Reaper in 2007 marked a leap in endurance and lethality, with its first combat mission flown on September 25, 2007, in under . Capable of carrying up to 3,850 pounds of ordnance and loitering for over 24 hours, the Reaper augmented Predator operations by delivering heavier precision-guided munitions for and time-sensitive targeting in by mid-2008. The USAF's RPA fleet expanded over 40-fold between 2002 and 2010, driven by Department of Defense priorities for persistent operations in counterinsurgency theaters, with Predators and Reapers forming the backbone of USAF contributions. By 2011, U.S. military UAVs, predominantly USAF-operated in theater, had accumulated over 2.3 million combat flight hours since 2001, reflecting scaled procurement and operational tempo. ISR dominance emerged as RPAs' defining advantage, offering continuous, wide-area unattainable by manned platforms due to superior —Predators averaging 24-hour missions and Reapers extending that to multi-day orbits with relays. This persistence facilitated real-time battle damage assessment, for high-value targets, and cueing of joint forces, reducing collateral risks through electro-optical and feeds relayed to ground commanders. In and , RPA-derived intelligence drove over 80% of time-sensitive strikes by the late , establishing USAF RPA squadrons as force multipliers that reshaped air-ground integration without forward-deployed pilots. The shift prioritized remote operations from bases like , , yielding operational efficiencies but straining maintainer and sensor operator pipelines amid surging demand.

Reorientation to Great Power Competition (2015–Present)

Pivot to Pacific and China Challenges

The 2018 National Defense Strategy formally prioritized competition over , identifying as the primary pacing challenge and directing the U.S. to reorient capabilities toward the theater to deter aggression and maintain freedom of action. This shift built on earlier efforts like the Obama administration's 2011 "rebalance to ," but emphasized -specific adaptations to counter 's expanding (A2/AD) systems, including ballistic and hypersonic missiles designed to target forward bases and disrupt . China's military advancements posed acute threats to Air Force operations, with its deploying over 1,000 short- and medium-range ballistic missiles capable of cratering runways at U.S. bases in , , and other Pacific locations within hours of conflict initiation, potentially degrading sortie generation by up to 50% or more in initial salvos. Hypersonic glide vehicles, such as the , further complicated defenses by maneuvering at speeds exceeding Mach 5, evading traditional missile interceptors and threatening aircraft on the ground or in transit. These capabilities aimed to create a "no-go" zone for U.S. , undermining deterrence in scenarios like a contingency. In response, the Air Force developed Agile Combat Employment (ACE) as a core operational concept starting around , enabling dispersed operations from austere locations to enhance survivability against missile barrages by shifting from centralized "hub-and-spoke" basing to networked, smaller-scale "spoke-to-spoke" maneuvers with minimal forward infrastructure. (PACAF) integrated ACE into exercises like Mobility Guardian and Pacific Iron, testing rapid dispersal across allied territories in 2024, while investing in rapid runway repair teams and prepositioned equipment to restore operations within hours of attacks. Complementary efforts included advancing for resilient data links amid jamming threats and prioritizing platforms like the B-21 Raider bomber for long-range strikes penetrating A2/AD envelopes. By 2022, the updated National Defense Strategy reaffirmed the focus, prompting budget reallocations—such as $4.7 billion in FY2023 for Pacific deterrence initiatives—to fund hypersonic countermeasures and base hardening, though analysts noted persistent vulnerabilities in sustaining high-tempo operations against sustained Chinese salvos. Challenges persisted, including allied basing access limitations and the need for integrated air defenses to protect dispersed nodes, as evidenced by wargame simulations showing potential for initial U.S. air losses exceeding 50% without mitigation.

Creation of Space Force and Domain Expansion

Amid rising threats from peer competitors, the U.S. Department of Defense increasingly viewed space as a contested warfighting domain by the mid-2010s, driven by China's and Russia's development of counterspace capabilities such as anti-satellite (ASAT) weapons and orbital maneuvers that could deny U.S. access to space-based assets critical for , , and communication. The 2017 National Security Strategy explicitly framed orbits as a warfighting arena, reflecting empirical assessments of adversary tests, including Russia's 2015 ASAT demonstration and China's 2007 satellite destruction, which generated thousands of pieces endangering U.S. . This shift marked a departure from post-Cold War benign-space assumptions, prioritizing resilience against kinetic, cyber, and electronic attacks on systems like GPS and warning . In response, President directed the creation of a dedicated space service in 2018, culminating in the (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2020, signed on December 20, 2019, which established the (USSF) as the sixth armed service branch, the first since the 's independence in 1947. Organized under the Department of the , the USSF initially transferred approximately 2,400 personnel in early 2020, along with space-related units, bases, and assets from Space Command, including Delta 2 for domain awareness and Delta 4 for missile warning. This realignment separated space operations from air domain responsibilities, enabling specialized doctrine, training, and procurement focused on space superiority, such as resilient satellite constellations and counterspace defenses. The USSF's formation expanded the U.S. military's domain architecture by institutionalizing as a distinct operational environment parallel to air, land, maritime, and cyber domains, allowing the to concentrate on atmospheric airpower while the USSF addresses orbital threats and enables forces through assured space access. By 2025, the USSF had grown to over 16,000 personnel, incorporating advancements like the ATLAS system for enhanced against adversary maneuvers. This domain expansion supported competition by countering empirical risks, such as Russia's 2021 ASAT test creating 1,500+ debris fragments, underscoring the causal link between space denial capabilities and force vulnerabilities.

Technological Advancements and Recent Operations

The United States Air Force has pursued advanced stealth platforms to maintain superiority in contested environments, exemplified by the B-21 Raider program, for which Northrop Grumman received the engineering and manufacturing development contract on October 27, 2015. The first B-21, designated Cerberus, began flight testing on January 17, 2024, with a second aircraft achieving its maiden flight on September 11, 2025, from Air Force Plant 42 in Palmdale, California, signaling accelerated testing ahead of initial operational capability targeted for the late 2020s. Complementing this, the Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) initiative advanced to select Boeing's F-47 design in March 2025 as the sixth-generation fighter, entering engineering and manufacturing development with a contract awarded on March 21, 2025, to counter peer adversaries' air defenses. Hypersonic capabilities represent a critical offset against (A2/AD) systems, with the developing the air-launched (HACM) through ongoing tests and funding, including over $3.9 billion allocated in the fiscal year 2026 budget request for hypersonic munitions. Parallel investments in and have enabled demonstrations of human-machine teaming, such as the July 8, 2025, flight of autonomous collaborative platforms alongside crewed fighters, enhancing intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) while reducing pilot risk in high-threat scenarios. Upgrades to existing fifth-generation assets, including sensor enhancements on F-22 and F-35 , integrate with the Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS) to facilitate against near-peer threats. In alignment with reorientation toward great power competition, recent operations emphasize deterrence and readiness in the , featuring recurrent Bomber Task Force (BTF) deployments of B-52, B-1, and B-2 bombers to bases like , , and , , to project power and integrate with allies amid Chinese expansionism. The REFORPAC 2025 exercise in July 2025 tested rapid surge capabilities, deploying personnel, equipment, and aircraft across multiple Pacific locations to simulate mass generation of combat power against a peer adversary. Agile Combat Employment (ACE) concepts, formalized in doctrine by 2022, underpin these efforts by dispersing forces to austere sites, training multi-capable airmen for hub-and-spoke operations that enhance survivability under A2/AD conditions prevalent in potential conflicts with . These activities, including bilateral exercises like Talisman Sabre, underscore the Air Force's pivot to sustained presence and for strategic competition.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.