Hubbry Logo
Anamorphic widescreenAnamorphic widescreenMain
Open search
Anamorphic widescreen
Community hub
Anamorphic widescreen
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Anamorphic widescreen
Anamorphic widescreen
Anamorphic widescreen
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Original, Anamorphic and letterbox

Anamorphic widescreen (also called full-height anamorphic or FHA) is a process by which a widescreen image is horizontally compressed to fit into a storage medium (photographic film or MPEG-2 standard-definition frame, for example) with a narrower aspect ratio, reducing the horizontal resolution of the image while keeping its full original vertical resolution. Compatible play-back equipment (a projector with modified lens, or a digital video player or set-top box) can then expand the horizontal dimension to show the original widescreen image. This is typically used to allow one to store widescreen images on a medium that was originally intended for a narrower ratio, while using as much of the frame – and therefore recording as much detail – as possible.[1]

The technique comes from cinema, when a film would be framed and recorded as widescreen but the picture would be "squashed together" using a special concave lens to fit into non-widescreen 1.37:1 aspect ratio film. This film can then be printed and manipulated like any other 1.37:1 film stock, although the images on it will appear to be squashed horizontally (or elongated vertically). An anamorphic lens on the projector in the cinema (a convex lens) corrects the picture by performing the opposite distortion, returning it to its original width and its widescreen aspect ratio.

The optical scaling of the lens to a film medium is considered more desirable than the digital counterpart, due to the amount of non-proportional pixel-decimated scaling that is applied to the width of an image to achieve (something of a misnomer) a so-called "rectangular" pixel widescreen image. The legacy ITU-R Rec. 601 4:3 image size is used for its compatibility with the original video bandwidth that was available for professional video devices that used fixed clock rates of a SMPTE 259M serial digital interface. One would produce a higher-quality upscaled 16:9 widescreen image by using either a 1:1 SD progressive frame size of 640×360 or for ITU-R Rec. 601 and SMPTE 259M compatibility a letterboxed frame size of 480i or 576i. Similar operations are performed electronically to allow widescreen material to be stored on formats or broadcast on systems that assume a non-widescreen aspect ratio, such as DVD or standard definition digital television broadcasting.

Film

[edit]
Main article: Anamorphic format

Many commercial films (especially epics – usually with the CinemaScope 2.35:1 optical sound or the older 4-track mag sound 2.55:1 aspect ratio) are recorded on standard 35 mm ~4:3 aspect ratio film,[a] using an anamorphic lens to horizontally compress all footage into a ~4:3 frame. Another anamorphic lens on the movie theater projector corrects (optically decompresses) the picture (see anamorphic format for details). Other movies (often with aspect ratios of 1.85:1 in the USA or 1.66:1 in Europe) are made using the simpler matte technique, which involves both filming and projecting without any expensive special lenses. The movie is produced in 1.375 format, and then the resulting image is simply cropped in post-production (or perhaps in the theater's projector) to fit the desired aspect ratio of 1.85:1 or 1.66:1 or whatever is desired. Besides costing less, the main advantage of the matte technique is that it leaves the studio with "real" footage (the areas that are cropped for the theatrical release) which can be used in preference to pan and scan when producing 4:3 DVD releases, for example.

The anamorphic encoding on DVD is related to the anamorphic filming technique (like CinemaScope) only by name. For instance, Star Wars (1977) was filmed in 2.39:1 ratio using an anamorphic camera lens, and shown in theaters using the corresponding projector lens. Since it is a widescreen film, when encoded on a widescreen-format DVD the studio would almost certainly use the anamorphic encoding process. Monty Python and the Holy Grail was filmed in 1.85:1 ratio without using an anamorphic lens on the camera, and similarly was shown in theaters without the need for the decompression lens. However, since it is also a widescreen film, when encoded on a widescreen-format DVD the studio would probably use the anamorphic encoding process.

It does not matter whether the filming was done using the anamorphic lens technique: as long as the source footage is intended to be widescreen, the digital anamorphic encoding procedure is appropriate for the DVD release. As a sidenote, if a purely non-widescreen version of the analog-anamorphic Star Wars were to be released on DVD, the only options would be pan and scan or hardcoded 4:3 letterboxing (with the black letterboxes actually encoded as part of the DVD data).

Laserdisc

[edit]

While not anamorphic widescreen per se, many of the earliest Laserdisc offerings forwent the pan-and-scan cropping typical of home releases at the time, the mastering-technicians opting instead to simply squeeze the film's original aspect ratio down to 4:3. While this resulted in an image that was overly compressed on standard televisions, many later HDTVs can stretch out this picture, thus restoring the correct aspect ratio.

Later during the 1990s, a handful of Laserdiscs were released with proper anamorphic transfers. Video was stretched vertically to fill the whole 4:3 picture of a Laserdisc (and add more information where black bars would be at the top and bottom) then either un-squeezed horizontally on a 16:9 TV set or using an anamorphic lens on a 4:3 video projector.

DVD Video

[edit]

A DVD labeled as "Anamorphic Widescreen" contains video that has the same frame size in pixels as traditional fullscreen video, but uses wider pixels. The shape of the pixels is called pixel aspect ratio and is encoded in the video stream for a DVD player to correctly identify the proportions of the video. If an anamorphic DVD video is played on standard 4:3 television without adjustment, the image will look horizontally squeezed. The menus are also anamorphic.

Packaging

[edit]
Pre-2001 MGM Anamorphic Widescreen DVD packaging sample.
Universal Anamorphic Widescreen DVD packaging sample. Also used by DreamWorks Home Entertainment and Sony Pictures Home Entertainment.

Although currently there is no labeling standard, DVDs with content originally produced in an aspect ratio wider than 1.33:1 are typically labeled "Anamorphic Widescreen", "Enhanced for 16:9 televisions", "Enhanced for widescreen televisions", or similar. If not so labeled, the DVD is intended for a 4:3 display ("fullscreen"), and will be letterboxed or panned and scanned.

There has been no clear standardization for companies to follow regarding the advertisement of anamorphically enhanced widescreen DVDs. Some companies, such as Universal and Disney, include the aspect ratio of the movie.

Blu-ray video

[edit]

Unlike DVD, Blu-ray supports SMPTE HD resolutions of 720p and 1080i/p with a display aspect ratio of 16:9 and a pixel aspect ratio of 1:1, so widescreen video is scaled non-anamorphically (this is referred to as "square" pixels).

Blu-ray also supports anamorphic widescreen, both at the DVD-Video/D-1 resolutions of 720×480 (NTSC) and 720×576 (PAL), and at the higher resolution of 1440×1080 (source aspect ratio of 4:3, hence a pixel aspect ratio of 4:3 = 16:9 / 4:3 when used as anamorphic 16:9). See Blu-ray Disc: Technical specifications for details.

Television

[edit]

Major digital television channels in Europe (for example, the five major UK terrestrial TV channels of BBC One, BBC Two, ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5), as well as Australia, carry anamorphic widescreen programming in standard definition. In almost all cases, 4:3 programming is also transmitted on the same channel. The SCART switching signal can be used by a set-top-box to signal the television which kind of programming (4:3 or anamorphic) is currently being received, so that the television can change modes appropriately. The user can often elect to display widescreen programming in a 4:3 letterbox format instead of pan and scan[citation needed] if they do not have a widescreen television.

TV stations and TV networks can also include Active Format Description (AFD) just as DVDs can. Many ATSC tuners (integrated or set-top box) can be set to respond to this, or to apply a user setting. This can sometimes be set on a per-channel basis, and often on a per-input basis, and usually easily with a button on the remote control. However, tuners often fail to allow this on SDTV (480i-mode) channels, so that viewers are forced to view a small picture instead of cropping the unnecessary sides (which are outside of the safe area), or zooming to eliminate the windowboxing that may be causing a small picture, or stretching/compressing to eliminate other format-conversion errors. The shrunken pictures are especially troublesome for smaller TV sets.

Many modern HDTV sets have the capability to detect black areas in any video signal, and to smoothly re-scale the picture independently in both directions (horizontal and vertical) so that it fills the screen. However, some sets are 16:10 (1.6:1) like some computer monitors, and will not crop the left and right edges of the picture, meaning that all programming looks slightly (though usually imperceptibly) tall and thin.

ATSC allows two anamorphic widescreen SDTV formats (interlaced and progressive scan) which are 704×480 (10% wider than 640×480); this is narrower than the 720×480 of DVD due to 16 pixels being consumed by overscan (nominal analogue blanking) – see overscan: analog to digital resolution issues. The format can also be used for fullscreen programming, and in this case it is anamorphic with pixels slightly taller (10:11, or 0.91:1) than their width.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Anamorphic widescreen

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Anamorphic widescreen is a cinematographic technique that uses specialized anamorphic lenses to horizontally compress a wide onto standard 35mm film or digital sensors, preserving resolution while capturing an image intended for expansion during projection or playback to achieve aspect ratios, most commonly 2.39:1. This process, also known as full-height anamorphic, enables filmmakers to record expansive horizontal perspectives without requiring wider recording media, resulting in a more immersive visual experience. The concept of anamorphosis, or image distortion for later reformation, traces back to 16th-century European art but was adapted for optical applications in the 19th century, with David Brewster patenting an anamorphic theory in 1862. French inventor Henri Chrétien developed the first practical anamorphic lens system, the Hypergonar, during World War I for military periscopes and patented it in 1927, later adapting it for civilian wide-angle viewing. In the 1950s, amid Hollywood's response to the rise of television, 20th Century Fox licensed Chrétien's technology to create CinemaScope, debuting in the 1953 biblical epic The Robe with a 2.55:1 aspect ratio achieved via a 2x horizontal squeeze. By the late 1950s, improvements from companies like reduced distortions in lenses, leading to the standardization of the 2.39:1 ratio by the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) in 1971. offered about 63% more negative area than flat formats like 1.85:1, enhancing image sharpness and detail on 35mm . Distinctive aesthetic qualities of anamorphic lenses include horizontal lens flares from cylindrical elements, oval-shaped due to the elliptical , and a shallower that emphasizes foreground subjects against expansive backgrounds. These features, combined with subtle barrel at image edges, have made anamorphic the preferred format for epic dramas, action films, and landscapes seeking a premium cinematic feel. In the digital era, anamorphic adapters and built-in lens options on cameras from manufacturers like and continue its use, alongside software de-squeezing in post-production.

Fundamentals

Definition and Principles

Anamorphic widescreen is a technique that horizontally compresses a widescreen image to fit within a frame of narrower , such as the standard 4:3 or 16:9 format, before it is expanded during projection or playback to restore the original proportions. This process, known as "squeezing," applies non-uniform scaling primarily along the horizontal axis, allowing the full resolution of the recording medium to be utilized without wasting on black bars. The core principle relies on optical or digital distortion to achieve this compression, typically by factors ranging from 1.33:1 to 2:1, depending on the desired output . For instance, a source image intended for a 2.39:1 might be compressed by 2:1 to fit a 1.195:1 storage frame, which is then stretched back during display; similarly, a 1.78:1 (16:9) image could use 1.33:1 compression for compatibility with 4:3 media. In optical implementations, anamorphic lenses incorporate cylindrical elements to squeeze the horizontal onto standard film or formats, while digital encoding applies pixel-level scaling during or video storage. This method preserves the image's vertical resolution fully, as no cropping or padding occurs. Visually, the compression distorts elements in the image: a circle captured through an anamorphic lens or encoded digitally appears as an when unsqueezed incorrectly, but proper expansion restores its round shape, demonstrating the reversible nature of the . Compared to letterboxing, which embeds a image within black bars to maintain proportions on non-widescreen displays, anamorphic widescreen avoids such bars by repurposing the entire frame, thereby maximizing detail and reducing visible or . This approach gained prominence in cinema during the to compete with television's narrower format.

Aspect Ratios Involved

Anamorphic widescreen systems typically involve source aspect ratios from cinema production, such as 2.39:1 for Scope format, which are projected or intended for display at those proportions. These wider ratios are adapted to storage aspect ratios like 4:3 (equivalent to 1.33:1) or 16:9 (1.78:1), the latter defined in standards by the (ITU). Anamorphic encoding bridges the gap by horizontally compressing the source image to fit the storage format, preserving vertical dimensions and allowing unsqueezing upon playback or projection to restore the original proportions. The compression is quantified by the squeeze factor, calculated as the ratio of the display aspect ratio (DAR) to the storage aspect ratio (SAR): squeeze factor=DARSAR\text{squeeze factor} = \frac{\text{DAR}}{\text{SAR}} For instance, storing a 2.39:1 source in a 16:9 (1.78:1) storage yields a squeeze factor of 2.39/1.78≈1.342.39 / 1.78 \approx 1.34. To derive this step-by-step: start with the desired DAR, which represents the uncompressed width-to-height ratio; divide by the SAR of the storage medium to determine the horizontal compression needed. The horizontal pixel count is then reduced by dividing the original width by this factor, while the vertical pixel count remains unchanged, resulting in a stored image with the SAR. Upon desqueezing, multiplying the stored width by the factor restores the DAR. This approach maximizes resolution efficiency without cropping. In , non-square pixels facilitate anamorphic storage through the (PAR), defined as the width-to-height ratio of individual pixels. For DVD anamorphic widescreen at 16:9, the frame dimensions are 720 horizontal by 480 vertical pixels, with a PAR of 40:33 (approximately 1.212). The DAR is computed as: DAR=horizontal pixels×PARvertical pixels\text{DAR} = \frac{\text{horizontal pixels} \times \text{PAR}}{\text{vertical pixels}} Substituting values gives (720×1.212)/480≈1.82(720 \times 1.212) / 480 \approx 1.82, but standards account for 704 active horizontal pixels (excluding ), yielding exactly 16:9 or 1.777:1. This non-square PAR ensures the stored image, when interpreted correctly by playback devices, displays at the intended proportions without additional scaling artifacts. Standards bodies like the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) and ITU establish these ratios for ; for example, SMPTE ST 2067-40 outlines frame sizes supporting 1.85:1 and 2.39:1 in workflows, while ITU-R BT.709 specifies 16:9 for HDTV production with square pixels in higher resolutions. These references provide the foundational ratios without prescribing media-specific encoding details.

History

Origins in Cinema

The origins of anamorphic widescreen in cinema trace back to the early , with French astronomer and inventor Henri Chrétien developing the Hypergonar lens system. Chrétien patented the technology on April 29, 1927, building on his earlier work in anamorphic optics dating to 1905, which used cylindrical lenses to compress and expand images horizontally for wider fields of view. Although the Hypergonar could achieve aspect ratios up to 2.66:1, its adoption was limited in the and due to the dominance of standard 1.33:1 formats and the complexities of optical distortion correction. In the , it saw experimental use in short films, such as Claude Autant-Lara's 1931 adaptation Construire un feu (To Light a Fire), based on Jack London's story, where the lens captured panoramic scenes but faced challenges in projection uniformity. The technology gained prominence in the 1950s amid Hollywood's response to declining theater attendance from television competition, leading to a boom in widescreen formats. 20th Century Fox licensed Chrétien's Hypergonar design in 1952 and collaborated with to refine it into , featuring a 2x horizontal squeeze for a 2.55:1 when unsqueezed in projection. debuted theatrically with in September 1953, the first feature filmed entirely with anamorphic lenses, showcasing enhanced immersion through wider compositions and . By late 1953, major studios including , , Universal, Columbia, and Warner Bros. had agreed to adopt the process, though Paramount initially pursued its non-anamorphic alternative before incorporating anamorphic elements later in the decade. Competitors emerged quickly, such as American Optical's , a 70mm non-anamorphic system used in Oklahoma! (1955), and , which developed improved anamorphic adapters starting in 1954 to address 's optical limitations. A key factor in anamorphic 's rise was the mid-1950s shift from 3D formats, which had briefly surged in early 1953 with over 50 releases but waned due to audience discomfort with glasses and projection synchronization issues. processes like proved more practical and appealing, offering spectacle without eyewear, as evidenced by the rapid increase from five widescreen films in 1953 to nearly 40 in 1954. Iconic examples include MGM's Ben-Hur (1959), shot in with a 1.25x anamorphic squeeze on 65mm for a 2.76:1 ratio, utilizing custom Mitchell lenses to capture epic chariot race sequences with unprecedented horizontal scope. Technically, early anamorphic systems evolved from adapter attachments—such as Bausch & Lomb's cylindrical elements fitted over spherical primes in —to integrated anamorphic camera lenses by the late 1950s, pioneered by to reduce and . Initial implementations relied on optical printing for some effects but shifted to on-camera squeezing for efficiency, though challenges persisted, including from the elongated cylindrical and edge softness that affected focus pulling across the wider frame. Despite these, anamorphic preserved the full vertical resolution of 35mm film by avoiding top-and-bottom cropping, providing sharper imagery than matted spherical alternatives.

Expansion to Home Media

The transition of anamorphic from theatrical cinema to home media began in the and , primarily through analog formats that offered limited support for the technology. tapes introduced widescreen presentations in the mid-1970s, but these were typically letterboxed rather than anamorphically squeezed due to the format's bandwidth constraints and lack of player support for unsqueezing, resulting in reduced vertical resolution and black bars filling the 4:3 frame. provided a superior platform for widescreen preservation, with pioneering letterboxed releases in the early ; for instance, the 1987 edition of (1982) was presented in letterboxed 2.35:1 widescreen, marking an early milestone in high-fidelity home viewing of anamorphic-sourced films. The 1990s saw a pivotal push with DVD, where anamorphic encoding was incorporated into the format specification from its 1996 launch, allowing horizontally compressed images to utilize the full vertical resolution of the 480-line frame for enhanced clarity on compatible displays. Studios rapidly adopted this for preservation, with early supporters like and Columbia TriStar releasing anamorphic titles such as (1999), while others like Paramount and followed suit by the early , making it a standard for major productions to maintain compositional integrity from theatrical masters. This shift addressed analog-era challenges, including VHS's resolution limits that often favored transfers—exposing the full 1.33:1 frame for 4:3 TVs—or simple letterboxing, which sacrificed detail without the efficiency of digital compression. By the , the move to digital formats culminated in Blu-ray's 2006 standardization, which supported higher resolutions natively in 16:9 without requiring anamorphic encoding, as the format's full-frame storage eliminated the need for squeezing to optimize bandwidth. played a key role in the home theater boom, enabling sharper, more immersive viewing that aligned home setups with cinematic experiences and driving DVD sales to a peak of $16 billion in 2005, as consumers embraced enhanced widescreen quality over prior analog compromises.

Film Applications

Production Techniques

In film production, anamorphic widescreen is achieved by attaching specialized anamorphic lenses to 35mm film cameras, which horizontally compress the image during capture to fit a wider onto the standard frame. These lenses, such as Panavision's C Series primes, feature a 2x squeeze factor and are available in focal lengths from 35mm to 180mm with T-stops as fast as T2.3, enabling compact setups suitable for handheld or use while maintaining full-frame coverage. Similarly, Primo anamorphics provide a consistent 2x horizontal compression on 35mm film, optimizing resolution by utilizing more of the negative's area compared to spherical lenses. This compression occurs optically through cylindrical elements in the lens design, squeezing the horizontal axis while preserving vertical dimensions, resulting in a captured image that appears distorted until unsqueezed. The production workflow begins in pre-production with aspect ratio planning, where cinematographers select lenses and camera formats to target ratios like 2.39:1, often conducting tests to assess flare, bokeh, and compatibility with visual effects grids. On set, monitoring relies on unsqueezed viewfinders—optical for traditional film cameras or electronic displays with real-time de-squeeze for hybrid setups—to ensure accurate composition without distortion. In post-production, historical optical printing techniques unsqueezed the negative by projecting it through an opposite anamorphic lens onto interpositive and internegative stock, though modern workflows favor digital intermediates (DI) scanned at 2K or 4K for software-based de-squeezing, color grading, and finishing while preserving grain and detail. Variations in squeeze application include constant 2x compression across the frame for uniform capture, versus variable approaches like switching lenses mid-production to adjust effective focal lengths or accommodate different scene requirements. Productions must address vertical information loss, which arises when anamorphic lenses are paired with sensors or gates that do not fully utilize the vertical frame height, potentially cropping details and reducing overall resolution. Focus breathing, a hallmark of anamorphic where the image frame expands or contracts disproportionately during focus pulls due to differing horizontal and vertical magnifications, is managed by selecting modern primes with minimized breathing, such as /ZEISS Master Anamorphics, to maintain subtle creative cues without distracting artifacts. In contemporary digital production, anamorphic techniques integrate seamlessly with cameras like the ARRI Alexa LF, which uses open-gate mode (4448 x 3096 pixels) but requires cropping to 3148 x 2636 pixels (~8.3 MP) for full 2x squeezed images targeting 2.39:1, enabling post de-squeezing to ~6296 x 2636 without further cropping. Similarly, cameras support anamorphic recording on their 16:9 sensors (e.g., Dragon or Monstro), capturing squeezed footage in 6K or 8K RAW for de-squeezing in post, though this involves horizontal cropping of the de-squeezed image to fit 2.39:1 and avoid pillarboxing, yielding effective captures of ~7.5K horizontal for 6K or ~10K for 8K sensors after processing. These digital workflows leverage in-camera LUTs for on-set monitoring and DI tools like for precise unsqueezing, ensuring high-fidelity results in 4K+ deliverables.

Theatrical Projection

In theatrical projection, anamorphic printed on 35mm stock require specialized expander lenses attached to the to unsqueeze the horizontally compressed image captured during production, restoring the intended wide on the screen. These lenses, typically featuring a 2x expansion factor to match common squeeze ratios used in , utilize cylindrical to horizontally stretch the image while maintaining vertical proportions, thereby utilizing the full frame area for enhanced detail and resolution compared to non-anamorphic formats. The Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) establishes guidelines for optimal anamorphic projection, including screen dimensions and to ensure uniform brightness and minimal distortion across wide formats like 2.39:1, where the screen width is approximately 2.4 times the height to accommodate the expanded image without cropping. For screens with a gain factor of 1.1 or higher, SMPTE recommends as outlined in Recommended Practice RP 95 to achieve light uniformity, particularly for anamorphic setups that illuminate larger surface areas. Additionally, 35mm anamorphic prints historically incorporated both magnetic and optical soundtracks; early releases used four magnetic tracks for superior fidelity, while later standards shifted to variable-density optical tracks to save alongside the squeezed image, with magnetic options providing crisper audio but requiring more maintenance. Since the introduction of the (DCP) standard in 2005 by the , anamorphic widescreen content is delivered in a flat, desqueezed format within the DCP, eliminating the need for physical expander lenses in digital projection. In this system, the image is encoded at the final —such as 2048x858 pixels for 2K scope—and projected directly by servers and projectors from manufacturers like Barco or Christie, which handle electronic mapping to fill the screen without optical squeezing. This shift maintains compatibility with analog-era aspect ratios while simplifying theater setups. Common challenges in anamorphic projection include keystone distortion, which arises when the is not perfectly aligned perpendicular to the screen, causing trapezoidal warping that is exacerbated by the wide . Correction involves mechanical adjustments to the or, in digital systems, electronic keystone compensation within the software to realign the geometrically. Compared to 35mm anamorphic prints, which offer standard resolution suitable for most theaters, 70mm prints provide significantly higher detail—up to nine times the area—due to the larger , though true anamorphic 70mm is rare; adaptations for theaters, such as digital remastering of 35mm anamorphic footage for projection alongside 65mm IMAX-originated sequences, as in Interstellar, leverage 70mm horizontal runs for immersive presentation on massive screens, enhancing clarity without traditional squeezing.

Home Video Formats

Laserdisc Implementation

The implementation of anamorphic on involved analog horizontal compression of the widescreen image during the mastering process, resulting in a squeezed video signal stored on either (CAV) or Constant Linear Velocity (CLV) discs at a resolution of approximately 480 interlaced lines for systems. This analog encoding lacked digital metadata or flags to signal the , requiring playback devices to manually apply unsqueezing or rely on basic detection of the video to restore the original proportions on 4:3 televisions. Anamorphic Laserdiscs, known as "Squeeze LDs," were introduced in the early primarily by Pioneer, with support from studios like Carolco for select titles, though they represented only a small fraction of the overall library and were mostly Japanese releases. Notable early examples included (1991) and (1995), which utilized the format to maximize vertical resolution while fitting content into the standard 4:3 frame, peaking in limited releases before the format's broader decline. Playback of these discs demanded compatible players equipped with internal unsqueezing circuitry, such as later Pioneer models, paired with standard 4:3 CRT televisions to expand the compressed image horizontally without additional black bars. However, the analog encoding often introduced limitations, including rainbow-colored artifacts along high-contrast edges due to signal processing and potential geometric distortion if the player's unsqueeze function was not precisely calibrated. By the mid-1990s, Laserdisc's high production and player costs—often exceeding $500—contributed to its obsolescence as DVD emerged with superior digital compression and native anamorphic support, rendering Squeeze LDs a niche experiment. Despite this, the format retains a legacy among collectors for rare titles preserved in out-of-print editions, valued for their analog warmth and historical significance in evolution.

DVD Standards

The specification, established by the in 1996 with enhancements formalized by 1997, incorporated support for anamorphic encoding to optimize resolution for 16:9 content within the constraints of standard-definition . This allowed DVDs to store images efficiently without wasting vertical resolution on black bars, building on earlier analog methods but leveraging digital compression for broader compatibility. Anamorphic widescreen on DVD relies on video encoding, where the anamorphic nature is signaled via the aspect_ratio_information field in the sequence header of the video stream. Specifically, setting this 4-bit field to the value 3 (binary 0011, affecting bits including position 6 in the header structure) indicates a of 16:9, prompting compatible players to horizontally unsqueeze the content stored in a 4:3 pixel frame of 720×480 for (Region 1) or 720×576 for PAL (Region 2). The (PAR) for 16:9 anamorphic content is 32:27 (approximately 1.185) in regions and 64:45 (approximately 1.422) in PAL regions, ensuring the unsqueezed output achieves the intended 1.78:1 after decoding. These regional PAR differences arise from the distinct frame dimensions and display standards, requiring region-specific authoring to maintain geometric accuracy. Packaging and on-disc metadata further clarify anamorphic content for users and players. DVD box art often includes indicators such as "16:9 Anamorphic," "Enhanced for TVs," or icons to signal the feature, though labeling practices varied by studio and were not always consistent or explicit. On the disc, the IFO (Information File) structure in the VIDEO_TS folder stores details in the PGC (Program Chain) general information, which can override or supplement the video stream's sequence header flag to instruct players on rendering. Common errors included "fake" releases, where 16:9 content was letterboxed into a 4:3 frame without the anamorphic flag, resulting in reduced vertical resolution and no unsqueezing by players. Adoption of anamorphic accelerated following the 1997 DVD Forum specifications, with Hollywood studios increasingly prioritizing it for major releases to maximize picture quality. By 2000, an increasing number of DVD titles featured anamorphic encoding, reflecting the growing prevalence of widescreen televisions and player support. Regional variations persisted, as discs (e.g., Region 1) used the 32:27 PAR while PAL discs (e.g., Region 2) employed 64:45, influencing authoring choices to align with local broadcast and display norms. DVD players handle anamorphic content through auto-detection of the sequence header flag or IFO metadata, with set-top boxes typically unsqueezing the video based on user TV settings (4:3 or 16:9). PC software like emulates this by parsing the flags during playback, rendering the content appropriately on monitors. On older 4:3-only televisions connected via composite or , mismatched player settings could lead to pillarboxing if the output signal was formatted as 16:9 without TV-side stretching, though most compliant players defaulted to letterboxing for proper preservation of the .

Blu-ray Advancements

Blu-ray Discs, introduced by the (BDA) in 2006, utilize H.264/AVC encoding to deliver at a native resolution of pixels with square pixels, enabling full-frame 16:9 presentation without the need for anamorphic squeezing in standard content. For legacy compatibility, the format supports anamorphic encoding at lower resolutions such as 1440×1080 for 16:9 aspect ratios, allowing seamless playback of imported DVD-style content with automatic unsqueezing by compatible players. The BDA's BD-ROM specifications, including Profile 5 introduced for 4K support, mandate aspect ratio signaling through container formats like MPEG-2 Transport Stream (MPEG-TS), where sequence headers and Supplemental Enhancement Information (SEI) messages convey details to ensure proper rendering on 16:9 displays. UHD Blu-ray, finalized in 2015, extends this with HEVC (H.265) encoding at 3840×2160 resolution, maintaining native 16:9 framing while incorporating metadata for dynamic aspect ratio handling in mixed-content scenarios, such as variable frame rates or legacy imports. Advancements in the 2010s integrated () and into Blu-ray profiles, preserving anamorphic details from original film sources by enhancing contrast and without altering aspect ratios; for instance, the 2022 remastered 4K UHD release of trilogy uses to maintain the original 2.39:1 anamorphic within the 16:9 container. As of November 2025, the BDA has specified 8K recording capabilities for Japanese broadcast formats on recordable Blu-ray media, though consumer playback discs remain focused on 4K with ongoing exploration of higher resolutions for premium archival releases. From a perspective, all certified Blu-ray players must support anamorphic flags in MPEG-TS containers to correctly unsqueeze legacy content, with built-in upscaling algorithms optimizing older anamorphic DVDs or SD imports for HD and UHD displays while adhering to BDA interoperability standards. This ensures , allowing users to enjoy enhanced presentations from pre-Blu-ray eras without manual adjustments.

Television and Broadcasting

Analog Systems

In the 1980s, analog television systems such as and PAL introduced content primarily through letterboxing, where 16:9 images were scaled to fit within a 4:3 frame with black bars top and bottom, reducing effective vertical resolution to approximately 360 lines for . Limited anamorphic compression was explored but rarely implemented due to bandwidth constraints; instead, these methods allowed broadcasters to deliver enhanced aspect ratios without requiring full bandwidth upgrades, as proposed in backward-compatible analog enhancements by companies like RCA and for . Early experiments, such as the BBC's 1986 tests in the context of emerging MAC-based systems, demonstrated the feasibility of analog signaling in PAL environments. Specialized equipment emerged to decode these signals, including VCRs and televisions equipped with anamorphic decoders that could unsqueeze the compressed image for proper 16:9 display. For instance, by the early 1990s, companies like introduced televisions capable of handling anamorphic formats, with models available in by 1991. In PAL systems, Widescreen Signalling (WSS) was standardized to embed information directly into the , transmitted as a bi-phase modulated data burst on line 23, enabling automatic detection and adjustment by compatible receivers (e.g., encoding 16:9 as binary 110 in the data bits). This signaling, formalized in 1994 by ETSI for 625-line PAL and , supported seamless switching between 4:3 and content. However, analog widescreen faced inherent limitations, including a reduction in effective vertical resolution to approximately 360 lines when letterboxing 16:9 content into a 4:3 frame, as the format sacrificed to preserve horizontal detail without full unsqueezing. In , the Hi-Vision analog HDTV system, which adopted a native 16:9 , began experimental broadcasts by starting in 1989, with regular satellite transmissions from 1991, offering higher resolution but still constrained by analog bandwidth. A key regulatory milestone occurred in 1994 when the FCC approved extensions to the standard for anamorphic widescreen transmission, though adoption remained limited due to bandwidth constraints and competing digital alternatives. These analog approaches declined with the global shift to , with major phaseouts including the U.S. in 2009 and much of by 2012, as analog signals were phased out in favor of more efficient digital formats that natively supported without resolution trade-offs. Similar techniques briefly paralleled home video formats like , which experimented with anamorphic encoding in the late 1980s and 1990s.

Digital and HD Broadcasting

The adoption of digital television standards in the late 1990s marked a significant advancement for anamorphic , enabling native 16:9 aspect ratios in compressed streams for (HDTV) broadcasts. The ATSC standard in , finalized in 1995 and rolled out for HDTV in 1998, incorporated video encoding that supports 16:9 widescreen without letterboxing, allowing for efficient transmission of horizontally compressed anamorphic content. Similarly, the European standards, also based on , mandated 16:9 support for integrated receiver-decoders (IRDs) from their inception, facilitating anamorphic encoding for both standard-definition (SD) and HDTV services. For legacy SD content, anamorphic is preserved through specific resolutions and metadata. In ATSC, SD broadcasts use 720x480 pixel formats with a (PAR) of approximately 1.212 for 16:9 anamorphic images, which are unsqueezed by receivers using Active Format Description (AFD) codes embedded in the stream per A/53 specifications. AFD, a 5-bit in picture user , signals formats like full-frame 16:9 (code 0010) or pillarboxed content, ensuring proper display adaptation on widescreen TVs. For wider formats like 2.39:1, AFD code 1111 signals letterboxing within 16:9, with bar data (SMPTE ST 2016-3) defining exact safe areas for preservation during transmission and display. employs similar mechanisms, with aspect_ratio_information flags (value 3 for 16:9) and optional AFD per ETSI TS 101 154, allowing anamorphic SD at 720x576 (PAL) or 720x480 () to be upsampled horizontally by 4/3 for 4:3 displays if needed. High-definition and 4K implementations further integrate anamorphic widescreen with advanced metadata. ATSC 1.0 supports and formats at 16:9 using Main Profile at High Level, with A/53 flags for and AFD to handle anamorphic encoding. By 2025, has enhanced this with support for 4K UHD (up to 2160p120) and HDR, incorporating anamorphic widescreen via HEVC (H.265) compression and extended metadata for dynamic range and color gamut, enabling higher bitrate efficiency for cinematic ratios like 2.39:1. For major events, such as the 2024 Paris Olympics, stations in 56 U.S. markets transmitted HDR coverage with anamorphic 16:9 framing and audio, demonstrating the standard's capability for immersive broadcasts. Consumer reception relies on automatic detection mechanisms in set-top boxes and smart TVs. HDMI's Extended Display Identification Data (EDID) allows displays to communicate native aspect ratios (e.g., 16:9) to sources, enabling auto-unsqueezing of anamorphic signals and pillarboxing for wider formats like 2.39:1. Devices such as streaming players and smart TVs use EDID handshaking to detect and adjust for anamorphic content, automatically applying pillarboxing on 16:9 screens for theatrical without user intervention, as verified in HDMI 1.4 and later specifications. Global variations reflect regional standards while maintaining anamorphic widescreen compatibility. In , supports 1080p50 anamorphic broadcasts at 16:9 using H.264/AVC High Profile at Level 4.2, widely deployed for HD services since 2010 and enabling efficient widescreen delivery across member states. In , particularly and , the ISDB-T standard includes built-in 16:9 support via and H.264 encoding, transmitting anamorphic HD channels (e.g., 1080i) alongside mobile 1seg services for seamless widescreen viewing.

References

  1. https://cookeoptics.com/news-and-events/an-introduction-to-anamorphic-lenses/
  2. https://www.studiobinder.com/blog/what-is-an-anamorphic-lens-definition/
  3. https://www.masterclass.com/articles/anamorphic-explained
  4. https://www.in70mm.com/news/2010/widescreen/index.htm
  5. https://www.red.com/red-101/anamorphic-lenses
  6. https://www.hypoptics.com/the-anamorphic-lens-is-the-key-to-widescreen-movie-images.html
  7. https://pub.smpte.org/doc/st2067-40/20210701-pub/st2067-40-2021.pdf
  8. https://www.red.com/red-101/video-aspect-ratios
  9. https://spotlightfx.com/blog/the-ultimate-guide-to-aspect-ratios-for-editors-and-filmmakers
  10. https://www.animemusicvideos.org/guides/avtech3/theory-videoaspectratios.html
  11. https://artsandculture.google.com/story/from-hypergonar-to-cinemascope-la-cin%25C3%25A9math%25C3%25A8que-fran%25C3%25A7aise/FQVBhBIIlKg2IA?hl=en
  12. https://www.in70mm.com/presents/1953_cinemascope/samuelson/index.htm
  13. https://festival.ilcinemaritrovato.it/en/film/lhypergonar/
  14. https://www.widescreenmuseum.com/widescreen/wingcs1.htm
  15. https://www.filmatlas.com/entry/149
  16. https://theasc.com/articles/the-big-changeover
  17. https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/88469/the-robe
  18. https://www.widescreenmuseum.com/widescreen/wingto12.htm
  19. https://sites.google.com/site/3dfilmarchive/first-year-of-widescreen-production
  20. https://filmforum.org/series/a-deeper-look
  21. https://archive.thedigitalbits.com/articles/anamorphic/aspectratios/widescreenorama.html
  22. https://theasc.com/articles/flashback-ben-hur-1959
  23. https://www.widescreenmuseum.com/widescreen/wingup4.htm
  24. https://hometheaterhifi.com/technical/technical-reviews/development-of-modern-anamorphic-widescreen-lenses-from-the-original-cinemascope-lenses-of-the-1950s/
  25. https://filmstories.co.uk/features/when-widescreen-vhs-videos-were-first-introduced/
  26. https://www.highdefdigest.com/blog/blade-runner-on-laserdisc/
  27. https://ptacts.uspto.gov/ptacts/public-informations/petitions/1458527/download-documents?artifactId=K1sDiRDfwXhWTQVuwamnve8TZWkx5Sz8i3JI9cQvMnirBcr4ZcvjXo
  28. https://www.digitalbits.com/columns/matt-rowe/item/119-the-ultimate-guide-to-anamorphic-dvd-for-everyone
  29. https://blogs.library.duke.edu/bitstreams/2017/02/16/outer-limits-aspect-ratios/
  30. https://www.avsforum.com/threads/why-so-few-anamorphic-blu-ray-discs.1046679/
  31. https://www.statsignificant.com/p/the-rise-fall-and-slight-rise-of
  32. https://www.arri.com/resource/blob/41434/9093dd51fa56328b70f56a718bac0e22/2018-10-26-alexa-lf-and-anamorphic-lenses-pdf-data.pdf
  33. https://www.widescreenmuseum.com/widescreen/cscope-ac.htm
  34. https://www.cinematography.net/edited-pages/Anamorphic_Super16mm_To_A_35mm_Print.htm
  35. http://www.fdtimes.com/pdfs/articles/anamorphic/FDTimes-Anamorphic-Special-May2015.pdf
  36. https://www.in70mm.com/presents/1976_dolby_stereo/mixing/index.htm
  37. https://en.easydcp.com/support-faq.php?id=24&p=which-aspect-ratio-should-i-choose-for-my-dcp
  38. https://simpledcp.com/picking-right-aspect-ratio/
  39. https://cinepedia.com/faqs/technology-faqs/
  40. https://schneiderkreuznach.com/en/industrial-optics/knowledge-hub/keystone-distortion
  41. https://www.film-tech.com/ubb/f1/t004711.html
  42. https://www.in70mm.com/presents/1963_blow_up/titel/i/interstelllar/imax/index.htm
  43. https://www.highdefdigest.com/blog/laserdisc-player-in-4k-home-theater/
  44. https://www.homecinemachoice.com/content/laserdisc-%E2%80%93-celebrating-first-premium-home-cinema-format
  45. http://www.mpucoder.com/DVD/mpeghdrs.html
  46. https://archive.thedigitalbits.com/articles/anamorphic/
  47. http://www.miraizon.com/support/info_aspectratio.html
  48. https://archive.thedigitalbits.com/articles/anamorphic/page2.html
  49. http://www.dvdr-digest.com/articles/42_1.html
  50. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna34455963
  51. https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/342457-Whats-considered-HD-Blueray-resolution
  52. https://us.blu-raydisc.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/09/20150513-BDA-Completes-UHD-BD-Spec1.pdf
  53. https://us.blu-raydisc.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/09/20171220-Recordable-UHD-BD-Spec-Completion-Release.pdf
  54. https://us.blu-raydisc.com/
  55. https://business.columbia.edu/sites/default/files-efs/imce-uploads/CITI/Articles/978-1-4615-4971-0_1.pdf
  56. https://tvradioschedules.fandom.com/wiki/High-definition_television
  57. https://archive.org/stream/video-magazine-1991-11/video-magazine-1991-11_djvu.txt
  58. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_i_ets/300200_300299/300294/01_60/ets_300294e01p.pdf
  59. https://www.cardinalpeak.com/blog/the-math-behind-analog-video-resolution
  60. https://www.nytimes.com/1989/06/04/world/japan-begins-broadcasts-of-high-definition-tv.html
  61. http://goelectronics.weebly.com/uploads/5/3/5/1/53518031/ntsc.pdf
  62. https://www.wired.com/2005/07/surviving-the-digital-tv-shift/
  63. https://www.atsc.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/a_53-Part-4-2007.pdf
  64. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/101100_101199/101154/01.10.01_60/ts_101154v011001p.pdf
  65. https://www.atsc.org/nextgen-tv/
  66. https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/broadcasters-transmit-paris-olympics-hdr-coverage-in-56-us-nextgen-tv-markets-says-pearl-tv
  67. https://www.extron.com/article/uedid
  68. https://www.dibeg.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/news/0610seminar_in_chile/chile_seminar-all.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.