Hubbry Logo
Jobe's testJobe's testMain
Open search
Jobe's test
Community hub
Jobe's test
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Jobe's test
Jobe's test
Jobe's test
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Jobe's test
PurposeDiagnose shoulder instability
Test ofShoulder joint

Jobe's test, also known as empty can test, is an orthopedic examination used to test stability of the shoulder.

Purpose

[edit]

The purpose of this test is to determine instability for the shoulder. This test should be performed bilaterally to compare stability of both right and left shoulder joints.[1][full citation needed]

Procedure

[edit]

The patient is to lie supine on the table. They are to place their shoulder at 90° abduction. The elbow should be flexed at 90°. The examiner should stand beside the patient with distal hand holding the patient's wrist and hand. The examiner's proximal hand is to be placed over the patient's humeral head.[2][1] The examiner applies a posterior force to the humeral head and externally rotates the patients humerus.

Mechanism

[edit]

The examiner applies a posterior force to the humeral head and externally rotates the patients humerus.[1]

Results

[edit]

A decrease in pain or apprehension or an increase in range of motion is a positive sign for anterior instability.[1][2][3] Anterior pain may be caused by laxity in anterior ligaments or capsular structures or a tear of the labrum. Posterior pain may be caused from internal impingement of the posterior capsular or labrum.[2]

History

[edit]

Jobe's test is a physical exam test that is used to detect anterior shoulder instability. It is used to distinguish between anterior instability and primary shoulder impingement. This test should be performed after the Apprehension test.[3] This test was named for Christopher Jobe.[4]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Jobe's test

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Jobe's test, also known as the empty can test or supraspinatus test, is a widely used orthopedic clinical examination technique designed to evaluate the strength and integrity of the and tendon within the of the , aiding in the diagnosis of conditions such as tears, , impingement syndrome, or involvement. The test was originally described in 1982 by Frank W. and Diane Radovich Moynes as part of a diagnostic and rehabilitation framework for injuries, emphasizing the isolation of individual muscles to improve accuracy in identifying . , a pioneering orthopedic known for contributions to including the surgery, developed the maneuver to specifically target supraspinatus function while minimizing deltoid involvement.

Introduction

Definition and Purpose

Jobe's test, also known as the empty can test or supraspinatus test, is a manual muscle strength assessment that evaluates the function and integrity of the within the . This test was originally described by and Moynes in as a method to isolate muscles for precise clinical evaluation. It is distinct from the Jobe relocation test, which is used to assess anterior instability rather than rotator cuff pathology. The primary purpose of Jobe's test is to detect abnormalities in the supraspinatus tendon, including full-thickness or partial , , and subacromial impingement syndrome, by measuring the patient's ability to resist downward pressure during abduction. By focusing on the supraspinatus, which primarily initiates abduction of the in the scapular plane, the test helps clinicians differentiate issues from other sources of weakness, such as deltoid involvement. In performing the test, the is positioned to maximize supraspinatus weakness and minimize contributions from other muscles, achieved through abduction to 90 degrees in the scapular plane combined with full internal of the , resembling the motion of emptying a can. This configuration isolates the supraspinatus by placing its under tension while reducing the mechanical advantage of the deltoid, allowing for a targeted assessment of integrity through resisted elevation.

Clinical Relevance

Jobe's test serves as a key component in the orthopedic evaluation of the , integrated into a cluster of special tests performed after obtaining patient history and conducting inspection to help differentiate disorders from other causes of shoulder dysfunction. This approach enhances diagnostic precision in clinical practice by isolating supraspinatus involvement within the broader rotator cuff pathology. The test is particularly relevant in common clinical scenarios characterized by shoulder pain, , or restricted overhead activities, including those affecting athletes engaged in , manual laborers performing repetitive overhead tasks, and older adults experiencing degenerative joint changes. In these populations, early identification of potential issues can inform targeted interventions to mitigate functional decline. Positive findings from Jobe's test influence patient management by prompting further diagnostic steps, such as to confirm integrity, or directing conservative strategies like focused on strengthening and mobility restoration; in cases indicative of significant supraspinatus compromise, it may lead to surgical consultation for repair. This framework supports timely escalation of care to optimize outcomes. Given the prevalence of rotator cuff tears, which impacts 20-30% of individuals over 60 years—rising from approximately 15% in the 60s to 27% in the 70s—the test holds substantial value for facilitating early detection and preventing progression to chronic impairment or arthropathy.

Background Anatomy

Shoulder Structures Involved

The , a key component targeted by Jobe's test, originates from the of the and inserts onto the superior facet of the greater tuberosity of the . Its primary function is to initiate abduction and assist the deltoid in elevating the to the horizontal position. The supraspinatus forms part of the , a group of four muscles—including the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor, and subscapularis—that collectively stabilize the humeral head within the of the . These muscles provide dynamic stability to the glenohumeral joint by balancing force couples in both the coronal and transverse planes, preventing excessive translation of the humeral head during movement. Related structures in the subacromial region include the subacromial space, bounded superiorly by the of the and the coracoacromial ligament, which extends from the to the , forming an arch over the space. The subacromial-subdeltoid lies within this space, cushioning the tendons, particularly the supraspinatus, against the overlying bony and ligamentous structures. Biomechanically, the supraspinatus is most active during the initial phase of shoulder abduction, from 0 to 30 degrees, where it generates the primary force for humeral elevation before the deltoid assumes greater dominance. Internal rotation of the increases the supraspinatus's vulnerability in this region by narrowing the subacromial space through approximation of the greater tuberosity toward the coracoacromial arch.

Pathophysiological Basis

The supraspinatus is prone to several pathologies that manifest as and weakness during resisted shoulder abduction. Partial or full-thickness may arise traumatically from acute impacts or degeneratively through chronic attrition, compromising the tendon's structural integrity and leading to humeral head instability. Tendinitis, characterized by and degeneration rather than acute inflammatory processes, often stems from repetitive microtrauma, resulting in nociceptive and functional impairment. Calcific involves the deposition of crystals within the tendon substance, progressing through formative, resting, and resorptive stages; this elicits from localized and pressure, with weakness emerging from inflammatory disruption and increased rupture risk. Impingement syndrome further contributes to supraspinatus pathology by mechanically compressing the beneath the coracoacromial arch, particularly during overhead , which irritates the and . This extrinsic narrowing of the subacromial space—exacerbated by acromial morphology or humeral head migration—promotes , neovascularization, and progression to partial tears, amplifying pain and weakness. Intrinsic factors, such as hypovascularity in the critical zone 1 cm proximal to the insertion, compound this compression by fostering degenerative changes. Suprascapular neuropathy represents a neural , where compression or traction at the denervates the , yielding isolated weakness in abduction without prominent pain if sensory branches remain unaffected. This condition often links to paralabral cysts or repetitive traction in overhead activities, mimicking tendon-related deficits. Key risk factors include age-related degeneration, with tendon degradation accelerating after age 40 and affecting over 80% of individuals beyond 80, alongside disorganization and fatty infiltration. Repetitive overhead motions in sports (e.g., , ) or occupations induce overuse and impingement through cumulative microtrauma. Acute trauma, such as direct shoulder injury, can initiate tears or neuropathy, disrupting and integrity to provoke these abnormal states.

Performing the Test

Patient Positioning

In Jobe's test, the patient is positioned either seated or standing with the shoulders relaxed to facilitate accurate assessment of supraspinatus function. The affected arm is elevated to 90 degrees of abduction in the scapular plane, which is approximately 30 degrees anterior to the , to optimize isolation of the supraspinatus tendon and reduce deltoid activation. This positioning aligns with the anatomical rationale for targeting the supraspinatus, as discussed in the Shoulder Structures Involved section. The is fully extended, and the is pronated with the thumb pointing downward, simulating the "empty can" configuration to place the supraspinatus in a position of maximum weakness and stress the tendon. This arm orientation enhances the test's specificity for supraspinatus pathology by limiting contributions from other muscles. The test is typically performed bilaterally to evaluate for asymmetry in strength and pain response, using the unaffected side as a baseline for . This comparative approach helps distinguish unilateral deficits from generalized weakness. Precautions include avoiding the test in cases of acute shoulder inflammation or severe pain to prevent aggravation of the condition, and instructing the patient to immediately report any discomfort during positioning or testing.

Examiner Technique

The examiner stabilizes the patient's elbow with one hand to prevent compensatory scapular elevation or movement, while using the other hand to apply a downward force proximal to the wrist or along the forearm. The patient resists this force isometrically by attempting to maintain the abducted and internally rotated arm position (thumbs pointing downward, as in the empty can posture). This resistance is applied gradually, building to maximal effort over 3-5 seconds to assess the patient's ability to sustain the isometric contraction without breakdown. Key observations during force application include the onset of pain in the superior or lateral , demonstrable (such as dropping of the or inability to resist the applied pressure), and any substitution patterns, including trapezius shrugging or excessive upper or deltoid recruitment to compensate for insufficiency. The examiner ensures consistent force application bilaterally for comparison, typically matching the patient's perceived maximal effort on the unaffected side. As an alternative to minimize subacromial impingement and potential false positives from the internally rotated position, the full can modification can be employed, where the patient maintains the same 90-degree abduction but with the thumbs pointing upward (slight external rotation) during resisted downward pressure.

Results and Interpretation

Indicators of a Positive Test

A positive Jobe's test is primarily indicated by pain and/or weakness elicited during resisted shoulder abduction in the described position. Pain is typically localized to the supraspinatus insertion point on the greater tuberosity or the anterolateral aspect of the shoulder, reflecting irritation or pathology in the supraspinatus tendon. This pain may be reproducible during resisted abduction between 60 and 120 degrees, a range where the supraspinatus is maximally active, and can sometimes radiate to the deltoid region. Weakness manifests as reduced strength compared to the contralateral side, often graded as 4/5 or less on the manual muscle testing scale. In cases of significant weakness, the patient may demonstrate an inability to maintain horizontal abduction against moderate examiner pressure, suggesting a full-thickness tear or involvement. However, a positive result due to pain alone can represent a false positive if stemming from or impingement without , necessitating correlation with imaging or additional tests for confirmation.

Indicators of a Negative Test

A negative Jobe's test is characterized by the absence of during resisted shoulder abduction in the empty can position, along with the maintenance of full strength. Specifically, the patient exhibits no discomfort and achieves a strength grade of 5/5 on manual muscle testing, indicating normal supraspinatus function against downward pressure applied by the examiner. This response confirms the patient's ability to hold the abducted and internally rotated arm steadily without compensatory movements. Symmetry assessment is a key component, involving comparison to the contralateral , where equivalent resistance capacity is demonstrated bilaterally without evidence of substitution by other muscles or rapid fatigue. Such bilateral equivalence underscores the reliability of the negative finding, as any could suggest underlying , though its absence supports normal performance. Clinically, these indicators suggest an intact supraspinatus tendon and preserved function, helping to exclude primary involvement of this structure in pain. A negative result prompts further evaluation of alternative components, such as the , through targeted tests like cross-body adduction. However, this does not definitively rule out partial-thickness supraspinatus tears, as compensation from adjacent muscles, such as the deltoid or infraspinatus, can obscure subtle deficits, particularly in chronic cases.

Diagnostic Utility

Evidence on Accuracy

Research on the diagnostic accuracy of Jobe's test for detecting supraspinatus tears and pathology shows variable sensitivity across studies, ranging from approximately 47% to 88%. A 2024 of 9 studies reported a pooled sensitivity of 72% (95% CI: 59%-82%) and specificity of 57% (95% CI: 44%-69%) for tears, with a of 3.54. Earlier systematic reviews reported a pooled sensitivity of 77% (95% CI: 67%-85%) for disease. For full-thickness tears specifically, sensitivity is often higher, around 74%-88%, particularly in studies using as the standard for confirmation. Specificity for Jobe's test ranges from 62% to 89%, reflecting a good capacity to rule in supraspinatus pathology but with a notable risk of false positives, especially in cases of subacromial impingement. Pooled specificity from systematic analyses is approximately 67%-77%, underscoring its utility in confirming disease but highlighting limitations in distinguishing isolated tears from other conditions. Reliability assessments indicate moderate inter-rater agreement for Jobe's test, with values around 0.43-0.44 in earlier studies, suggesting variability depending on examiner experience. is generally higher, ranging from 0.6 to 0.8, as reported in reviews up to 2011 and confirmed in later analyses through 2023. More recent evaluations, including a 2023 study on single- and double-arm variants, show improved inter-rater values of 0.72-0.77, indicating substantial agreement in controlled settings. Diagnostic accuracy of Jobe's test is influenced by patient factors and testing context; it performs better when clustered with other maneuvers such as the Neer or Hawkins-Kennedy tests, enhancing overall for tears. However, accuracy decreases in early-stage , limiting its value for subtle or partial lesions without confirmatory imaging.

Comparisons and Limitations

Jobe's test, while valuable for assessing supraspinatus pathology, exhibits lower sensitivity compared to (MRI), which achieves sensitivities exceeding 90% for full-thickness rotator cuff tears, though it remains more accessible as a bedside clinical maneuver without the need for specialized equipment or . The full can modification of Jobe's test, performed with the thumb pointing upward to minimize subacromial impingement provocation, demonstrates higher specificity (up to 81%) relative to the original empty can position (62%), albeit with reduced sensitivity (70% versus 88%), making it preferable in scenarios prioritizing rule-in accuracy for supraspinatus tears. Although inferior to the lift-off test for detecting subscapularis involvement—where the lift-off test offers targeted internal assessment—Jobe's test complements it by providing broader screening, particularly for supraspinatus-dominant lesions. Key limitations of Jobe's test include its susceptibility to false positives, often arising from pain inhibition during resisted abduction, deltoid fatigue contributing to perceived weakness, or confounding conditions such as subacromial impingement, calcific tendonitis, or adhesive capsulitis. The test is not diagnostic in isolation and performs best within a cluster of maneuvers alongside patient history and imaging, as standalone use can lead to overinterpretation of nonspecific pain or weakness. It is contraindicated in cases of acute fractures, glenohumeral instability, recent surgery, or dislocations, where provocative maneuvers risk exacerbating injury. Clinical recommendations emphasize integrating Jobe's test with comprehensive history-taking and confirmatory imaging like MRI or to enhance diagnostic confidence. Recent evaluations of the lateral Jobe variation, involving abduction to better isolate supraspinatus , indicate improved sensitivity (81%) for tears compared to the original test (58%), supporting its adoption for refined screening. Evidence gaps persist regarding Jobe's test performance in asymptomatic populations, where tears occur in up to 39% of individuals over 60—often without clinical correlation—potentially leading to and unnecessary interventions in older adults with incidental findings.

Historical Development

Original Description

Jobe's test, also known as the empty can test, was originally developed by Frank W. Jobe, an orthopedic surgeon renowned for his innovations in , including the pioneering procedure commonly referred to as surgery. As the longtime physician for the , Jobe focused on addressing shoulder injuries prevalent among overhead athletes, such as pitchers. The test was first described in 1982 by and Diane R. Moynes in their article titled "Delineation of diagnostic criteria and a rehabilitation program for rotator cuff injuries," published in the American Journal of Sports Medicine. In this seminal work, they outlined specific maneuvers to isolate individual rotator cuff muscles during clinical evaluation, with the supraspinatus test designed to target weakness or pain in the supraspinatus tendon by positioning the arm in 90 degrees of abduction in the plane and full internal (thumbs pointing downward, resembling an empty can), followed by resisted downward pressure. This original formulation was informed by electromyographic (EMG) studies on shoulder function in throwing athletes, aiming to isolate supraspinatus activation while minimizing contributions from other muscles like the deltoid. The primary intent was to differentiate isolated supraspinatus pathology from broader deficits in overhead , facilitating more precise and tailored rehabilitation for athletes.

Subsequent Modifications

Following the original description of Jobe's test in 1982, subsequent modifications aimed to refine the procedure for greater clinical reliability and reduced provocation of extraneous structures. One prominent early adaptation is the full can test, introduced by Kelly et al. in 1996 through an electromyographic study of activation. This variant alters the hand position to neutral (thumb up) with slight external rotation of the at 90 degrees of abduction in the scapular plane, thereby minimizing subacromial impingement compared to the original empty can position while effectively isolating supraspinatus activity. In 2010, Johansen et al. proposed the lateral Jobe test as a procedural evolution to improve diagnostic precision for tears. Performed with the abducted 90 degrees in the , the flexed 90 degrees, and the in internal (thumbs pointing downward), this modification applies downward resistance to the and was developed to better target supraspinatus without the overhead elevation's factors. A more contemporary bilateral variation, the double-arm Jobe test, was evaluated by Kim et al. in 2023 for enhanced reproducibility in clinical settings. This approach simultaneously tests both shoulders in the standard position to facilitate comparison and asymmetry detection, demonstrating moderate to substantial (kappa values ranging from 0.51 to 0.78) across examiners. By the , these adaptations gained traction in professional guidelines, including the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' clinical practice guidelines on injuries, which reference variants like the lateral Jobe test for routine use in evaluating diverse patient groups, including non-athletes with chronic shoulder complaints.

References

  1. https://www.physio-pedia.com/Empty_Can_Test
  2. https://www.medbridge.com/blog/empty-can-test-purpose-procedure-and-clinical-considerations-for-physical-therapists
  3. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/036354658201000602
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2966749/
  5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441844/
  6. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658201000602
  7. https://www.physio-pedia.com/Jobes_Relocation_Test
  8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4799540/
  9. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2016/1201/p925.html
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3768248/
  11. https://www.orthobullets.com/anatomy/10013/supraspinatus
  12. https://www.orthobullets.com/shoulder-and-elbow/3043/rotator-cuff-tears
  13. https://www.orthobullets.com/shoulder-and-elbow/3041/subacromial-impingement
  14. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537148/
  15. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554518/
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6253746/
  17. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/93095-overview
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3482552/
  19. https://www.cureus.com/articles/410491-shoulder-impingement-pain-syndrome-pathophysiology-diagnosis-and-a-review-of-current-treatment-strategies
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8567757/
  21. https://www.orthobullets.com/shoulder-and-elbow/3063/suprascapular-neuropathy
  22. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/92814-clinical
  23. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03635465990270011901
  24. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551702/
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6044121/
  26. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2000/0515/p3079.html
  27. https://musculoskeletalkey.com/strength-testing-2/
  28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/47756051_The_lateral_Jobe_test_A_more_reliable_method_of_diagnosing_rotator_cuff_tears
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3826176/
  30. https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/neurologic-disorders/neurologic-examination/how-to-assess-muscle-strength
  31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538309/
  32. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/23259671231187631
  33. https://upload.orthobullets.com/journalclub/pubmed_central/27386812.pdf
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11660602/
  35. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32725446/
  36. https://bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12891-017-1400-0
  37. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20674649/
  38. https://www.physio-pedia.com/Shoulder_Special_Tests
  39. https://www.cureus.com/articles/350159-correlation-of-preoperative-mri-and-shoulder-specific-tests-with-intraoperative-findings-in-rotator-cuff-tears
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5218987/
  41. https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v6/i11/902.htm
  42. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/07/sports/baseball/dr-frank-jobe-who-pioneered-tommy-john-surgery-dies-at-88.html
  43. https://hscnews.usc.edu/frank-jobe-keck-school-physician-inventor-of-tommy-john-surgery-88
  44. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7180952/
  45. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8883676/
  46. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37547080/
  47. https://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/rotator-cuff/rc-cpg-eappendix-2.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.