Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Asthenozoospermia
View on Wikipedia| -spermia |
|---|
| Testicular infertility factors |
Asthenozoospermia (or asthenospermia) is the medical term for reduced sperm motility. Complete asthenozoospermia, that is, 100% immotile spermatozoa in the ejaculate, is reported at a frequency of 1 of 5000 men.[1] Causes of complete asthenozoospermia include metabolic deficiencies, ultrastructural abnormalities of the sperm flagellum (see Primary ciliary dyskinesia) and necrozoospermia.[1]
It decreases the sperm quality and is therefore one of the major causes of infertility or reduced fertility in men. A method to increase the chance of pregnancy is ICSI.[1] The percentage of viable spermatozoa in complete asthenozoospermia varies between 0 and 100%.[1]
DNA fragmentation
[edit]Sperm DNA fragmentation level is higher in men with sperm motility defects (asthenozoospermia) than in men with oligozoospermia or teratozoospermia.[2] Among men with asthenozoospermia, 31% were found to have high levels of DNA fragmentation. As reviewed by Wright et al.,[3] high levels of DNA fragmentation have been shown to be a robust indicator of male infertility.
DHA
[edit]In 2015, Eslamian et al. found a correlation between the composition of the sperm lipid membrane and the odds of having asthenozoospermia. The sperm that have more polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) shown better fertility results. DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) is an acid formed by six double bonds which allows the fluidity of the membrane, necessary for the fusion with the ovule.[4]
Studies in mice have shown that DHA is essential for acrosome reaction and a DHA deficiency results in abnormal sperm morphology, loss of motility and infertility; which can be restored by dietary DHA supplementation.[5]
Furthermore, the supplementation with DHA in humans has been reported to increase sperm motility. But also, DHA supplementation can protect spermatozoa against the damage caused by the cryopreservation process.[5]
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d Ortega, C.; Verheyen, G.; Raick, D.; Camus, M.; Devroey, P.; Tournaye, H. (2011). "Absolute asthenozoospermia and ICSI: What are the options?". Human Reproduction Update. 17 (5): 684–692. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr018. PMID 21816768.
- ^ Belloc S, Benkhalifa M, Cohen-Bacrie M, Dalleac A, Chahine H, Amar E, Zini A (2014). "Which isolated sperm abnormality is most related to sperm DNA damage in men presenting for infertility evaluation". J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 31 (5): 527–32. doi:10.1007/s10815-014-0194-3. PMC 4016368. PMID 24566945.
- ^ Wright C, Milne S, Leeson H (2014). "Sperm DNA damage caused by oxidative stress: modifiable clinical, lifestyle and nutritional factors in male infertility". Reprod. Biomed. Online. 28 (6): 684–703. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.02.004. PMID 24745838.
- ^ Eslamian, Ghazaleh; Amirjannati, Naser; Noori, Nazanin; Sadeghi, Mohammad-Reza; Hekmatdoost, Azita (2020). "Effects of coadministration of DHA and vitamin E on spermatogram, seminal oxidative stress, and sperm phospholipids in asthenozoospermic men: a randomized controlled trial". The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 112 (3). Elsevier BV: 707–719. doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqaa124. ISSN 0002-9165.
- ^ a b Martínez-Soto, Juan Carlos; Domingo, Joan Carles; Cordobilla, Begoña; Nicolás, María; Fernández, Laura; Albero, Pilar; Gadea, Joaquín; Landeras, José (October 28, 2016). "Dietary supplementation with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) improves seminal antioxidant status and decreases sperm DNA fragmentation". Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine. 62 (6). Informa UK Limited: 387–395. doi:10.1080/19396368.2016.1246623. ISSN 1939-6368.
External links
[edit]Asthenozoospermia
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Classification
Definition
Asthenozoospermia is a medical condition characterized by reduced motility of spermatozoa in semen, which impairs the sperm's ability to swim effectively toward the ovum and thus contributes to male infertility. This condition is diagnosed through semen analysis, a standard laboratory examination that evaluates various semen parameters to assess fertility potential. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), asthenozoospermia is identified when the percentage of spermatozoa exhibiting total motility falls below 42% or progressive motility below 30%, based on the 5th percentile lower reference limits derived from semen samples of fertile men whose partners conceived naturally within 12 months, with 95% confidence intervals of 40–43% for total and 28–32% for progressive motility.[1] Sperm motility is classified into four categories for precise assessment: rapid progressive (grade a, ≥25 μm/s), slow progressive (grade b, 5 to <25 μm/s), non-progressive (grade c, <5 μm/s), and immotile (grade d, no movement). Total motility encompasses grades a, b, and c, while progressive motility includes only grades a and b, reflecting the sperm's forward-moving capability essential for fertilization. Evaluation is performed using phase-contrast microscopy on fresh semen samples within 30–60 minutes of ejaculation, assessing at least 200 spermatozoa per replicate to ensure reliability; computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) may also be employed for objectivity. These thresholds, established in the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen (6th edition, 2021), serve as evidence-based benchmarks rather than strict cutoffs for fertility, as low motility correlates with decreased natural pregnancy rates but does not preclude conception entirely.[1] The condition affects approximately 20–30% of infertile men and may occur in isolation or alongside other semen abnormalities, such as oligospermia (low sperm count) or teratozoospermia (abnormal morphology), forming syndromes like oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT). While not always symptomatic, asthenozoospermia underscores the importance of comprehensive male fertility evaluation, as it highlights disruptions in sperm function that can stem from diverse etiologies, though the primary diagnostic focus remains on motility metrics.[1]Types
Asthenozoospermia is classified primarily based on the degree of sperm motility impairment, which guides prognosis and treatment approaches. According to established grading systems in andrology literature, the condition is categorized into mild, moderate, severe, and complete forms depending on the percentage of progressively motile spermatozoa. Mild asthenozoospermia is characterized by progressive motility between 20% and 29%, representing a slight reduction from normal thresholds and often associated with better fertility outcomes through natural conception or assisted reproduction. Moderate asthenozoospermia involves progressive motility of 10% to 19%, indicating more substantial impairment that may require interventions like intrauterine insemination. Severe asthenozoospermia features progressive motility below 10%, typically necessitating advanced techniques such as intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), while complete asthenozoospermia denotes 0% motile spermatozoa, a rare presentation occurring in approximately 1 in 5,000 men and often linked to underlying structural or genetic defects.[16][17] In addition to severity-based grading, asthenozoospermia is delineated by etiology into primary (intrinsic) and secondary (acquired) types, reflecting whether the motility defect originates from inherent sperm production issues or external influences. Primary asthenozoospermia arises from genetic or developmental abnormalities in sperm flagella or energy metabolism, such as mutations in genes like DNAH1 or CFAP58, leading to isolated motility defects without other semen parameter abnormalities in about 19% of cases. This form is often irreversible without genetic intervention and is exemplified by multiple morphological abnormalities of the flagella (MMAF) syndrome, where asthenozoospermia combines with teratozoospermia in 50-60% of affected individuals. Secondary asthenozoospermia, conversely, results from environmental, lifestyle, or medical factors like oxidative stress, infections, or varicocele, which can impair motility post-spermatogenesis and may be reversible with targeted therapies such as antioxidants or surgical correction.[18][19] Asthenozoospermia may also present in combined forms, such as oligoasthenozoospermia (low count and motility) or asthenoteratozoospermia (motility and morphology defects), which complicate diagnosis and management compared to isolated cases. Functional asthenozoospermia represents a subtype where structural integrity is preserved, but defects in signaling pathways or mitochondrial function hinder activation and progression, often identified through advanced motility assessments like computer-assisted semen analysis. These classifications underscore the heterogeneity of the condition, with genetic evaluations recommended for primary or isolated forms to inform personalized reproductive strategies.[20]Causes and Risk Factors
Genetic Causes
Asthenozoospermia, characterized by reduced sperm motility, has a significant genetic basis, with mutations in nuclear and mitochondrial genes disrupting flagellar structure, energy metabolism, and signaling pathways essential for sperm movement. These genetic defects account for a substantial portion of idiopathic cases, often leading to isolated or syndromic forms of the condition. Recent advances in whole-exome sequencing have identified numerous monogenic causes, highlighting the complexity of sperm motility regulation. Ongoing research, including whole-genome approaches, continues to uncover additional variants, such as 2025 reports of IQUB mutations causing radial spoke 1 deficiency and asthenozoospermia with normal sperm morphology.[21][22] Nuclear gene mutations predominantly affect flagellar assembly and function. For instance, biallelic mutations in DNAH1, a dynein axonemal heavy chain gene, are found in approximately 25% of multiple morphological abnormalities of the flagella (MMAF) cases, resulting in defective microtubule-based beating and severely impaired progressive motility. Similarly, variants in CFAP43 and CFAP44 disrupt intraflagellar transport, leading to short or irregular flagella and asthenozoospermia. Other key genes include DNAH5, DNAI1, and CCDC39, associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD), where structural axonemal defects cause immotile sperm. Mutations in axonemal kinesins like DNAH17 destabilize flagella, further reducing motility. These defects often present with normal sperm counts but progressive motility below 10%.[23][22][19] Ion channel and transporter genes play a critical role in regulating calcium influx and pH balance for hyperactivated motility. Homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in CATSPER1, CATSPER2, or CATSPERε abolish the progesterone-induced calcium current, resulting in flagellar angulation and low motility. Similarly, SLO3 (KCNU1) variants cause acrosome hypoplasia and mitochondrial sheath malformations, leading to severe asthenozoospermia. Mutations in SLC26A3, SLC26A8, and SLC9C1 impair anion exchange and proton extrusion, disrupting membrane potential and motility. PKD1 and PKD2 defects, linked to polycystin signaling, also contribute to motility failure. These ion-related mutations typically yield progressive motility rates of 0-5%.[23][24] Energy metabolism genes are vital for ATP supply to the flagellum. Biallelic loss-of-function mutations in AK9, encoding adenylate kinase 9, disrupt nucleotide homeostasis, reducing ATP, ADP, and other purine levels, which inhibits glycolysis and causes progressive motility as low as 0.5-5.6%. Mitochondrial DNA alterations, such as deletions (e.g., 4977 bp affecting ND3/ND4 genes) or point mutations in COX and ATP synthase genes, impair oxidative phosphorylation, correlating with decreased motility. Increased mitochondrial DNA copy number and altered TFAM expression further exacerbate energy deficits. GAPDHS mutations hinder sperm-specific glycolysis, limiting ATP availability. Epigenetic modifications, like hypermethylation of VDAC2, also reduce motility by affecting mitochondrial function.[25][23][22] Signaling pathway disruptions, such as in AKAP3 and AKAP4 (A-kinase anchoring proteins), impair cAMP-dependent protein kinase localization, leading to defective flagellar waveform and reduced hyperactivation. These genetic causes often require assisted reproduction like intracytoplasmic sperm injection for fertility, though transmission risks to offspring necessitate genetic counseling.[22]Acquired Causes
Acquired causes of asthenozoospermia include a variety of postnatal factors that impair sperm motility through mechanisms such as oxidative stress, inflammation, and disrupted energy metabolism. These differ from genetic etiologies by arising from environmental exposures, infections, lifestyle choices, or medical conditions, and they often contribute to male infertility where sperm motility is reduced below World Health Organization thresholds (less than 30% progressive motility).[1] Varicocele, the abnormal dilation of scrotal veins, represents one of the most prevalent acquired causes, affecting 15-20% of men overall and up to 40% of those with infertility. It elevates scrotal temperature, induces hypoxia, and generates reactive oxygen species (ROS), which damage sperm mitochondria and flagellar structures, thereby reducing motility and forward progression. Surgical repair of varicoceles has been shown to improve motility in 60-70% of cases, highlighting its reversible nature.[26][27] Genital tract infections, including those from bacteria like Chlamydia trachomatis, Escherichia coli, or Staphylococcus aureus, promote asthenozoospermia via leukocytospermia and inflammatory cytokines that elevate ROS levels, leading to lipid peroxidation of sperm membranes and mitochondrial dysfunction. These infections are often treatable with antibiotics, potentially restoring function. Antisperm antibodies (ASAs), frequently triggered by infections, trauma, or vasectomy, cause sperm agglutination and hinder motility by binding to flagellar proteins, affecting up to 10% of infertile men.[28][27] Lifestyle and environmental exposures play significant roles in acquired asthenozoospermia. Smoking introduces toxins like cadmium and nicotine, which increase ROS and impair ATP production in sperm, reducing motility by 10-20% in habitual smokers compared to non-smokers. Excessive alcohol consumption disrupts hormonal balance and elevates oxidative stress, with daily intake exceeding 20 grams linked to a 15% decline in progressive motility. Obesity, via elevated estrogen and insulin resistance, alters spermatogenesis and contributes to motility defects in 20-30% of overweight men seeking fertility evaluation. Environmental toxins, such as pesticides (e.g., organophosphates) and heavy metals, act as endocrine disruptors, inducing apoptosis and flagellar abnormalities through similar oxidative pathways.[28][29][27] Endocrine disorders, including hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and thyroid dysfunction, represent another key acquired category, impairing motility by reducing testosterone levels essential for flagellar protein synthesis and energy metabolism. Medications like antihypertensives (e.g., beta-blockers) or chemotherapy agents can also induce transient asthenozoospermia through direct toxicity to spermatogenic cells, with recovery possible upon discontinuation in many cases.[28][26]Pathophysiology
Sperm Motility Mechanisms
Sperm motility is a critical process for male fertility, enabling spermatozoa to navigate the female reproductive tract to reach and fertilize the oocyte. This motility is primarily achieved through the coordinated beating of the sperm flagellum, a microtubule-based structure known as the axoneme, which is powered by the motor protein dynein and fueled by adenosine triphosphate (ATP).[30] In asthenozoospermia, defined as reduced sperm motility (total sperm motility below 42% or progressive motility below 30% per the sixth edition of the World Health Organization laboratory manual), these mechanisms are disrupted, leading to impaired flagellar propulsion and overall fertility challenges.[1][31] The flagellum's structure and function are foundational to motility, consisting of a 9+2 microtubule arrangement with outer and inner dynein arms that generate sliding forces for bending waves. Assembly and maintenance of this structure rely on intraflagellar transport proteins and radial spokes; genetic mutations affecting these components, such as in DNAH1 or DNAH5 genes encoding dynein heavy chains, result in flagellar instability and asthenozoospermia by hindering proper axonemal organization.[31] Additionally, defects in genes like CFAP43 and CFAP44, which stabilize the calmodulin- and spoke-associated complex, lead to shortened or dysmorphic flagella, reducing beat frequency and amplitude in affected individuals.[22] Energy production is another pivotal mechanism, with sperm relying on mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in the midpiece for ATP generation, supplemented by glycolysis in the principal piece under low-oxygen conditions. In asthenozoospermia, mitochondrial dysfunction—often linked to reduced expression of GRIM-19, a subunit of the NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase complex—impairs electron transport and increases reactive oxygen species (ROS), depleting ATP and causing flagellar rigidity.[32] Studies show GRIM-19 protein levels are approximately 45% lower in asthenozoospermic sperm compared to normozoospermic controls (0.458 ± 0.033 vs. 0.827 ± 0.063, P<0.001), correlating with diminished motility parameters.[32] Regulatory signaling pathways, particularly those involving ion fluxes, fine-tune motility acquisition during epididymal transit and capacitation in the female tract. Calcium (Ca²⁺) influx through CatSper channels triggers hyperactivated motility, characterized by vigorous, asymmetric flagellar beats essential for zona pellucida penetration, while bicarbonate (HCO₃⁻) entry via SLC26 transporters and CFTR alkalinizes the cytosol to activate soluble adenylyl cyclase and cAMP-dependent protein kinase A.[33] In asthenozoospermia, mutations in CatSper genes (e.g., CATSPER1-4) abolish Ca²⁺ signaling, resulting in straight-line swimming without hyperactivation, while CFTR or SLC26A3/8 defects reduce HCO₃⁻ influx, slowing beat frequency by up to 50% in affected sperm.[33] Proton extrusion by sNHE further supports pH homeostasis for dynein activity; its impairment exacerbates motility loss in oxidative stress conditions common to asthenozoospermia.[33] These interconnected mechanisms highlight how targeted disruptions—genetic or acquired—collectively underlie the pathophysiology of reduced sperm motility.DNA Fragmentation
Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF), often quantified as the DNA fragmentation index (DFI), refers to breaks in the DNA strands within sperm cells, which can compromise fertility by impairing fertilization and embryo development. In the context of asthenozoospermia, characterized by reduced sperm motility, elevated SDF levels are frequently observed and contribute to defective sperm function. Studies have demonstrated that men with asthenozoospermia exhibit significantly higher DFI compared to those with normal semen parameters, with mean DFI values around 20.3% in asthenozoospermic samples versus 12.8% in controls.[34] This association underscores SDF as a potential underlying factor in motility deficits, as fragmented DNA disrupts the sperm's ability to achieve progressive movement essential for reaching the oocyte.[35] Research consistently reports a negative correlation between SDF and sperm motility parameters in asthenozoospermia. For instance, progressive motility (PR%) decreases as DFI increases, with correlation coefficients indicating statistical significance (r = -0.37, p < 0.01 across multiple cohorts).[35] In a large study of 1,462 infertile men, those with DFI ≥ 30% showed markedly lower PR% compared to groups with DFI ≤ 15%, directly linking high fragmentation to asthenozoospermic profiles below World Health Organization thresholds.[36] Similarly, total motility and survival rates decline with rising DFI, highlighting fragmentation's role in progressive immotility rather than isolated static defects.[35] These findings are measured via assays like the sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test, which reliably detects fragmentation in clinical settings.[34] The pathophysiology connecting SDF to asthenozoospermia involves oxidative stress and inadequate protamination during spermatogenesis. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) from high static redox potential (sORP) damage sperm DNA, leading to fragmentation that impairs mitochondrial function and flagellar movement, key to motility.[35] Insufficient histone-to-protamine transition leaves DNA vulnerable, exacerbating breaks and correlating with reduced mitochondrial density in low-motility sperm.[35] Interventions targeting this link, such as Levocarnitine supplementation (1 g orally three times daily for three months), have shown efficacy in reducing DFI by approximately 20-30% while improving progressive motility and overall semen quality in asthenozoospermic patients (p < 0.05).[34] Antioxidants similarly mitigate ROS-induced fragmentation, supporting their role in managing SDF-related motility issues.[36] Clinically, SDF assessment enhances the evaluation of asthenozoospermia beyond routine semen analysis, predicting poorer assisted reproductive technology outcomes like fertilization rates. High DFI (>30%) in asthenozoospermic men signals increased risk of embryonic arrest, though it does not uniformly predict IVF/ICSI failure.[36] Routine SDF testing is recommended for unexplained infertility cases with motility defects to guide targeted therapies.[35]Role of Docosahexaenoic Acid
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), an omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid, constitutes a major component of the phospholipid bilayer in sperm membranes, comprising up to 44.9% of polyunsaturated fatty acids in human ejaculate.[37] It plays a critical role in maintaining sperm plasma membrane fluidity and integrity, which are essential for flagellar movement and overall motility.[38] DHA's highly unsaturated structure, with six double bonds, enhances membrane flexibility during epididymal maturation and capacitation, facilitating acrosome reaction and fertilization.[37] Additionally, DHA supports antioxidant defenses by reducing oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation in spermatozoa, thereby protecting against DNA fragmentation that can impair motility.[37] In asthenozoospermia, characterized by reduced sperm motility (total below 42%, progressive below 30%), spermatozoa exhibit significantly lower DHA levels compared to normozoospermic samples, with concentrations averaging 53.9 ± 11.6 nmol per 10^8 spermatozoa versus 98.5 ± 4.5 nmol per 10^8 spermatozoa.[39] This deficiency correlates positively with motility parameters (r = 0.53, p < 0.001), suggesting that inadequate DHA incorporation during spermatogenesis contributes to flagellar dysfunction and reduced progressive motility.[39] Observational studies further link higher dietary DHA intake to lower odds of asthenozoospermia (OR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.29–0.89, p = 0.002), highlighting its protective role against motility impairment.[38] Dietary supplementation with DHA has shown promise in ameliorating asthenozoospermia. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials involving infertile men demonstrated that omega-3 supplementation, including DHA, significantly improved sperm motility (RR 5.82, 95% CI 2.91–8.72, p < 0.0001), with notable increases in progressive motility observed after 3–6 months of treatment at doses of 0.5–2 g daily.[39] For instance, in asthenozoospermic men, 0.5 g DHA daily for 3 months raised motility from 31.7% to 39.2% (p = 0.03), while combined DHA (465 mg) and vitamin E (600 IU) for 12 weeks increased motile sperm count from 15.6 ± 4.1 × 10^6/mL to 28.7 ± 4.4 × 10^6/mL (p = 0.001).[38] These effects are attributed to elevated seminal DHA levels and enhanced antioxidant capacity, though results vary by dosage, duration, and baseline DHA status, with some studies reporting no motility improvement in select cohorts.[38] Overall, evidence supports DHA's therapeutic potential in targeting motility deficits, particularly when integrated into broader antioxidant strategies.[39]Diagnosis
Semen Analysis
Semen analysis is the cornerstone diagnostic test for evaluating male fertility and specifically identifying asthenozoospermia, a condition characterized by reduced sperm motility. The procedure involves the collection and laboratory examination of a semen sample to assess various parameters, including volume, sperm concentration, motility, morphology, and vitality when indicated. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, the sample should be obtained after 2–7 days of sexual abstinence and analyzed within 60 minutes of ejaculation at 37°C to ensure accuracy.[40] The process begins with macroscopic evaluation of semen volume, appearance, and viscosity, followed by microscopic assessment. Sperm concentration is determined using a hemocytometer or automated systems, while motility is evaluated via phase-contrast microscopy or computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA). Motility classification includes rapidly progressive (velocity ≥25 μm/s), slowly progressive (5–25 μm/s), non-progressive (<5 μm/s), and immotile spermatozoa, with at least 200 sperm counted across multiple fields for reliability. If total motility is below 40%, a vitality stain such as eosin-nigrosin is recommended to differentiate live immotile sperm from dead ones.[40][41] For diagnosing asthenozoospermia, the WHO 2021 reference values serve as the benchmark, derived from the 5th percentile of semen parameters in men whose partners conceived within 12 months. Asthenozoospermia is indicated when progressive motility falls below 30% (95% CI: 29–31%) or total motility below 42% (95% CI: 40–43%). These thresholds highlight the condition's impact on sperm's ability to reach and fertilize an ovum, though values alone do not predict fertility outcomes definitively due to overlap between fertile and infertile populations.[1][42]| Parameter | Lower Reference Limit (5th Percentile, 95% CI) |
|---|---|
| Semen volume (mL) | 1.4 (1.3–1.5) |
| Sperm concentration (10⁶/mL) | 16 (15–18) |
| Total motility (%) | 42 (40–43) |
| Progressive motility (%) | 30 (29–31) |
| Normal morphology (%) | 4 (3.9–4.0) |
