Autosuggestion
View on Wikipedia| Hypnosis |
|---|
Autosuggestion is a psychological technique related to the placebo effect, popularized internationally by pharmacist Émile Coué in the 1920s. It is a form of self-induced suggestion in which individuals guide their own thoughts, feelings, or behavior. The technique is often used in self-hypnosis.[1]

While Émile Coué created an autosuggestion craze in America in the 1920s, the technique had already been developed and widely taught by Dr. Herbert A. Parkyn through experimentation at his Chicago School of Psychology and in his 1906 book Auto-Suggestion: What It Is and How to Use It for Health, Happiness and Success.
History of Auto-suggestion
[edit]In Porphyry's Treatise on Abstinence, a certain Rogatianus, a Roman Senator, was cured of an articular disease of eight years' duration "by negligence of terrene concerns and a contemplation and intuition of such as are divine"[3].
Principle of Auto-Suggestion
[edit]Starting in 1896 at the Chicago School of Psychology, Dr. Parkyn taught that auto-suggestion was the key principle underlying both mental and physical transformation. He defined it as the process by which an individual consciously or unconsciously directs influence upon the involuntary mind. Students learned that every change in thought, emotion, or bodily function begins with suggestion, and that auto-suggestion is the means by which this universal law operates within oneself.[4][5]
Students were taught the dual-mind theory of the objective and subjective minds first outlined by Thomson Jay Hudson, though Parkyn described the two aspects as the voluntary and involuntary parts of a single mind. The involuntary mind, he explained, governs every function of the body, serves as the seat of the emotions, and holds the complete record of experience. It operates automatically and cannot reason independently, yet remains open to the influence of the voluntary mind, which is the conscious and reasoning faculty. Through repetition and focused attention, the voluntary mind can stimulate, restrain, or completely alter the operations of the involuntary mind. In this way, the thoughts held most persistently become the dominant forces shaping both mental and physical states.[4][5]
Voluntary, involuntary, and "involuntary-voluntary"
[edit]According to Parkyn, auto-suggestion operated through three distinct forms: voluntary, involuntary, and involuntary-voluntary. Voluntary auto-suggestion referred to the conscious and deliberate repetition of constructive thoughts or affirmations intended to reshape habits, behavior, or bodily function. Involuntary auto-suggestion occurred automatically, through impressions absorbed from one's surroundings, experiences, and emotions, without any deliberate effort. The third form, which Parkyn called "involuntary-voluntary auto-suggestion," combined both processes. It arose when a person consciously performed an action or followed instructions that unconsciously reinforced a mental impression. Parkyn illustrated this with the example of a patient who takes medicine prescribed for sleeplessness. Each time the dose is taken, the thought arises, "This medicine will quiet my nerves and help me sleep," regardless of whether the patient is aware of using suggestion. Similarly, individuals receiving "absent treatment" or "magnetic healing" engage in the same process by expecting beneficial results, thereby producing the therapeutic effect through their own suggestive belief.[4]
Parkyn explained that this hybrid form of suggestion could be deliberately employed to achieve results even with skeptical patients. By assigning simple daily tasks, such as sipping water slowly or performing physical exercises, while emphasizing that these actions would bring improvement, the practitioner caused the patient to generate involuntary-voluntary auto-suggestions each time the task was performed. In this way, Parkyn showed that suggestion could operate at multiple levels of awareness and that much of what appeared to be external healing was, in fact, the individual's own mind responding to inner conviction.[5][4]

Parkyn’s teaching marked the earliest systematic methods for consciously using auto-suggestion as a scientific tool. He taught that "anything that suggests is a suggestion," meaning that every sensory perception, spoken word, or environmental influence affects the subconscious mind. Because of this, he cautioned against the use of negative suggestions, explaining that repeating what one wishes to avoid, such as "I will not fail" or "I cannot be nervous," tends to reinforce the very condition one intends to overcome. Instead, he urged his students to affirm what they desired directly, using positive, rhythmic statements such as "I can and I will."[6]: 51
The methods taught emphasized the disciplined use of repetition, emotional conviction, and concentrated attention to implant affirmative thoughts in the involuntary mind. Once impressed upon it, these ideas manifested naturally in behavior and bodily function. This systematic approach to auto-suggestion, developed more than two decades before Émile Coué popularized the term, became one of the most influential elements of Parkyn's teaching and laid the conceptual foundation for much of the later New Thought and self-mastery literature produced by his students and affiliated schools.[4]
Typological distinctions
[edit]Émile Coué identified two very different types of self-suggestion:
- intentional, "reflective autosuggestion": made by deliberate and conscious effort, and
- unintentional, "spontaneous auto-suggestion": which is a "natural phenomenon of our mental life … which takes place without conscious effort [and has its effect] with an intensity proportional to the keenness of [our] attention".[7]
In relation to Coué's group of "spontaneous auto-suggestions", his student Charles Baudouin (1920, p. 41) made three further useful distinctions, based upon the sources from which they came:
- "Instances belonging to the representative domain
(sensations, mental images, dreams, visions, memories, opinions, and all intellectual phenomena)." - "Instances belonging to the affective domain
(joy or sorrow, emotions, sentiments, tendencies, passions)." - "Instances belonging to the active or motor domain
(actions, volitions, desires, gestures, movements at the periphery or in the interior of the body, functional or organic modifications)."
Émile Coué
[edit]
Émile Coué, who had both B.A. and B.Sc. degrees before he was 21, graduated top of his class (with First Class Honours) with a degree in pharmacology from the prestigious Collège Sainte-Barbe in Paris in 1882.[8] Having spent an additional six months as an intern at the Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital in Paris, he returned to Troyes, where he worked as an apothecary from 1882 to 1910.[9]
"Hypnosis" à la Ambroise-Auguste Liébeault and Hippolyte Bernheim
[edit]In 1885, his investigations of hypnotism and the power of the imagination began with Ambroise-Auguste Liébeault and Hippolyte Bernheim, two leading exponents of "hypnosis",[10] of Nancy, with whom he studied in 1885 and 1886 (having taken leave from his business in Troyes). Following this training, "he dabbled with ‘hypnosis’ in Troyes in 1886, but soon discovered that their Liébeault's techniques were hopeless, and abandoned ‘hypnosis’ altogether".[11]
Hypnotism à la James Braid and Xenophon LaMotte Sage
[edit]
In 1901, Coué sent to the United States for a free book, Hypnotism as It is (i.e., Sage, 1900a),[13] which purported to disclose "secrets [of the] science that brings business and social success" and "the hidden mysteries of personal magnetism, hypnotism, magnetic healing, etc.". Deeply impressed by its contents, he purchased the French language version of the associated correspondence course (i.e., Sage, 1900b, and 1900c),[14] created by stage hypnotist extraordinaire, "Professor Xenophon LaMotte Sage, A.M., Ph.D., LL.D., of Rochester, New York" (who had been admitted into the prestigious Medico-Legal Society of New York in 1899).[15]
In real life, Xenophon LaMotte Sage was none other than Ewing Virgil Neal (1868-1949), the multi-millionaire, calligrapher, hypnotist, publisher, advertising/marketing pioneer (he launched the career of Carl R. Byoir), pharmaceutical manufacturer, parfumier, international businessman, confidant of Mussolini, Commandatore of the Order of the Crown of Italy, Officer of the Legion of Honour, and fugitive from justice, who moved to France in the 1920s.[16]
Sage's course supplied the missing piece of the puzzle — namely, Braid-style hypnotic inductions — the solution for which had, up to that time, eluded Coué:
- "Coué immediately recognised that the course’s Braid-style of hypnotism was ideal for mental therapeutics. He undertook an intense study, and was soon skilled enough to offer hypnotism alongside his pharmaceutical enterprise. In the context of Liébeault’s ‘hypnosis’, Braid’s hypnotism, and Coué’s (later) discoveries about autosuggestion, one must recognise the substantially different orientations of Liébeault’s "suggestive therapeutics", which concentrated on imposing the coercive power of the operator’s suggestion, and Braid’s "psycho-physiology", which concentrated on activating the transformative power of the subject’s mind." — Yeates (2016a, p.13).[17]
Although Coué had abandoned Liébeault's "hypnosis" in 1886, he adopted Braid's hypnotism in 1901; and, in fact, in addition to, and (often) separate from, his auto-suggestive practices, Coué actively used Braid's hypnotism for the rest of his professional life.[18]
Suggestion and Auto-suggestion
[edit]
as discussed in his Lectures on the Philosophy of the Human Mind.[19]
Coué was so deeply impressed by Bernheim's concept of “suggestive therapeutics” — in effect, "an imperfect re-branding of the ‘dominant idea’ theory that Braid had appropriated from Thomas Brown"[11][20] — that, on his return to Troyes from his (1886–1886) interlude with Liébeault and Bernheim, he made a practice of reassuring his clients by praising each remedy's efficacy. He noticed that, in specific cases, he could increase a medicine's efficacy by praising its effectiveness. He realized that, when compared with those to whom he said nothing, those to whom he praised the medicine had a noticeable improvement (this is suggestive of what would later be identified as a "placebo response").
- "Around 1903, Coué recommended a new patent medicine, based on its promotional material, which effected an unexpected and immediate cure (Baudouin, 1920, p.90; Shrout, 1985, p.36). Coué (the chemist) found “[by subsequent] chemical analysis in his laboratory [that there was] nothing in the medicine which by the remotest stretch of the imagination accounted for the results” (Shrout, ibid.). Coué (the hypnotist) concluded that it was cure by suggestion; but, rather than Coué having cured him, the man had cured himself by continuously telling himself the same thing that Coué had told him."[21]
The birth of "Conscious Autosuggestion"
[edit]Coué discovered that subjects could not be hypnotized against their will and, more importantly, that the effects of hypnotic suggestion waned when the subjects regained consciousness.[citation needed] He thus eventually developed the Coué method, and released his first book, Self-Mastery Through Conscious Autosuggestion (published in 1920 in England and two years later in the United States). He described autosuggestion itself as:
... an instrument that we possess at birth, and with which we play unconsciously all our life, as a baby plays with its rattle. It is however a dangerous instrument; it can wound or even kill you if you handle it imprudently and unconsciously. It can on the contrary save your life when you know how to employ it consciously.[22]
Although Coué never doubted pharmaceutical medicine, and still advocated its application, he also came to believe that one's mental state could positively affect, and even amplify, the pharmaceutical action of medication. He observed that those patients who used his mantra-like conscious suggestion, "Every day, in every way, I'm getting better and better", (French: Tous les jours, à tous points de vue, je vais de mieux en mieux; lit. 'Every day, from all points of view, I'm getting better and better') — in his view, replacing their "thought of illness" with a new "thought of cure", could augment their pharmaceutical regimen in an efficacious way.
The Coué method
[edit]Continuously, unjustly, and mistakenly trivialised as just a hand-clasp, some unwarranted optimism, and a ‘mantra’, Coué’s method evolved over several decades of meticulous observation, theoretical speculation, in-the-field testing, incremental adjustment, and step-by-step transformation.
It tentatively began (c.1901) with very directive one-to-one hypnotic interventions, based upon the approaches and techniques that Coué had acquired from an American correspondence course.
As his theoretical knowledge, clinical experience, understanding of suggestion and autosuggestion, and hypnotic skills expanded, it gradually developed into its final subject-centred version—an intricate complex of (group) education, (group) hypnotherapy, (group) ego-strengthening, and (group) training in self-suggested pain control; and, following instruction in performing the prescribed self-administration ritual, the twice daily intentional and deliberate (individual) application of its unique formula, "Every day, in every way, I’m getting better and better".
Yeates (2016c), p.55.
The Coué method centers on a routine repetition of this particular expression according to a specified ritual, in a given physical state, and in the absence of any sort of allied mental imagery, at the beginning and at the end of each day. Coué maintained that curing some of our troubles requires a change in our subconscious/unconscious thought, which can only be achieved by using our imagination. Although stressing that he was not primarily a healer but one who taught others to heal themselves, Coué claimed to have affected organic changes through autosuggestion.[23]
Underlying principles
[edit]Coué thus developed a method which relied on the belief that any idea exclusively occupying the mind turns into reality,[24] although only to the extent that the idea is within the realm of possibility. For instance, a person without hands will not be able to make them grow back. However, if a person firmly believes that his or her asthma is disappearing, then this may actually happen, as far as the body is actually able to physically overcome or control the illness. On the other hand, thinking negatively about the illness (e.g. "I am not feeling well") will encourage both mind and body to accept this thought.[citation needed]
Willpower
[edit]Coué observed that the main obstacle to autosuggestion was willpower. For the method to work, the patient must refrain from making any independent judgment, meaning that he must not let his will impose its own views on positive ideas. Everything must thus be done to ensure that the positive "autosuggestive" idea is consciously accepted by the patient, otherwise one may end up getting the opposite effect of what is desired.[25]
Coué noted that young children always applied his method perfectly, as they lacked the willpower that remained present among adults. When he instructed a child by saying "clasp your hands" and then "you can't pull them apart" the child would thus immediately follow his instructions and be unable to unclasp their hands.[citation needed]
Self-conflict
[edit]Coué believed a patient's problems were likely to increase if his willpower and imagination opposed each other, something Coué referred to as "self-conflict."[citation needed] As the conflict intensifies, so does the problem (i.e., the more the patient consciously wants to sleep, the more he becomes awake). The patient must thus abandon his willpower and instead put more focus on his imaginative power in order to fully succeed with his cure.
Effectiveness
[edit]With his method, which Coué called "un truc,"[26] patients of all sorts would come to visit him. The list of ailments included kidney problems, diabetes, memory loss, stammering, weakness, atrophy and all sorts of physical and mental illnesses.[citation needed] According to one of his journal entries (1916), he apparently cured a patient of a uterus prolapse as well as "violent pains in the head" (migraine).[27]
Evidence
[edit]Advocates of autosuggestion appeal to brief case histories published by Émile Coué describing his use of autohypnosis to cure, for example, enteritis and paralysis from spinal cord injury.[28][unreliable source?]
Autogenic training
[edit]Autogenic training is an autosuggestion-centered relaxation technique influenced by the Coué method. In 1932, German psychiatrist Johannes Schultz developed and published on autogenic training.
Conceptual difference from Autosuggestion
[edit]By contrast with the conceptualization driving Coué's auto-suggestive self-administration procedure — namely, that constant repetition creates a situation in which "a particular idea saturates the microcognitive environment of 'the mind'…", which, then, in its turn, "is converted into a corresponding ideomotor, ideosensory, or ideoaffective action, by the ideodynamic principle of action", "which then, in its turn, generates the response"[29][30] — the primary target of the entirely different self-administration procedure developed by Johannes Heinrich Schultz, known as Autogenic Training, was to affect the autonomic nervous system, rather than (as Coué's did) to affect 'the mind'.
Efficacy of Autogenic training
[edit]Although, as Myga, Kuehn & Azanon (2022) observe, there has been very little research into autosuggestion, there have been a number of clinical trials supporting the efficacy-claims for autogenic training; and, along with other relaxation techniques — such as progressive relaxation and meditation — has replaced Coué's method in therapy.[31][32]
Wolfgang Luthe (Schultz's co-author) was a firm believer that autogenic training was a powerful approach that should only be offered to patients by qualified professionals.
See also
[edit]- Abulia – Neurological symptom of lack of will or initiative
- Adaptive unconscious – Psychological theory
- Affirmations – Practice of positive thinking and self-empowerment
- Akrasia – Lack of self-control
- Behavioral confirmation
- Ego depletion – Psychological theory
- Enkrateia – Virtuous self-control
- Émile Coué – French psychologist (1857–1926)
- Eudaimonia – Human flourishing in ancient Greek philosophy
- Herbert A. Parkyn – Canadian psychologist (1870–1927)
- Hypnotic Ego-Strengthening Procedure – Hypnotherapeutic procedure
- Implicit self-esteem – Characteristic of human disposition
- Inner critic – Concept in psychology
- Learned helplessness – Psychological behavior
- Learned optimism – Concept in positive psychology
- Locus of control – Concept in psychology
- Medicus curat, natura sanat – Medical aphorism ("the physician treats, nature heals")
- Mind–body interventions – Health and fitness interventions
- Mind-wandering – Experience of thoughts not remaining on a single topic for a long period of time
- Nancy School of Hypnosis – French school of psychotherapy from 1866
- Neurasthenia – Psychological term
- Positive mental attitude – Importance of positive thinking as a contributing factor of success
- Positive psychology – Approach of psychological scientific study
- Psycho-Cybernetics – 1960 self-help book by Maxwell Maltz
- Psychoneuroimmunology – Area of study within psychosomatic medicine
- Psychosomatic medicine – Interdisciplinary medical field exploring various influences on bodily processes
- Salpêtrière School of Hypnosis – French school of psychotherapy from 1882
- Self-defeating prophecy – Prediction that prevents what it predicts from happening
- Self-determination theory – Macro theory of human motivation and personality
- Self-efficacy – Psychology concept
- Self-enhancement – Type of motivation
- Self-fulfilling prophecy – Prediction that causes itself to become true
- Self-healing – Recovery or corrective process in living organisms, psychology, materials, and systems
- Self-help – Self-guided improvement
- Self-hypnosis – Form, process, or result of a self-induced hypnotic state
- Self-schema – Set of memories for a person
- Self-talk – Communication with oneself
- Subjective well-being – Self-reported measure of well-being
- Suggestion – Psychological process of guiding a person
- Telepathy – Psychic ability
- Think aloud protocol – Method to gather data in usability testing
- Thomas theorem – Sociological theory
- Vis medicatrix naturae – Latin phrase affirming the body's self-healing nature
- Visual thinking – Thinking through visual processing
- Vitalism – Belief about living organisms
- Well-being – Measure of how well someone's life is going
Footnotes
[edit]- ^ Maki, David. Henry Bluestone. David Maki.
- ^ Auto-Suggestion: What It Is and How to Use It for Health, Happiness and Success, by Dr. Herbert A. Parkyn. Suggestion Publishing Company, Chicago, 1905
- ^ Collins, Joseph (1922). "Couéism". The North American Review. 216 (801): 190–199. ISSN 0029-2397.
- ^ a b c d e f Auto-Suggestion: What It Is and How to Use It for Health, Happiness and Success, by Dr. Herbert A. Parkyn. Suggestion Publishing Company, Chicago, 1905
- ^ a b c A Mail Course in Suggestive Therapeutics and Hypnotism, by Herbert A Parkyn, Suggestion Publishing Company, 1900
- ^ Parkyn, Herbert Arthur (1898). Special mail course in suggestion. Chicago School of Psychology.
- ^ Baudouin (1920), pp.33-34.
- ^ Yeates (2016a), pp.6-7.
- ^ See Yeates, 2016a, 2016b, and 2016c.
- ^ As distinct from Braid's hypnotism, Liébeault and Bernheim's hypnosis "used a laborious, monotonous, 'sleep, sleep, sleep' hypnotic induction — thus, his inappropriate, misleading, and ambiguous term ‘hypnosis’ — to produce [what Bernheim called] a “charme” (‘spellbound’) state" (Yeates, 2016a, pp.11-12).
- ^ a b Yeates, 2016a, p.12.
- ^ Sage, Xenophon LaMotte (1897). Hypnotism as it is: A Book for Everybody. National Publishing Company.
- ^ Given that Coué could read Latin and was fluent in both German and English meant that an English language book presented no difficulty.
- ^ It is significant that the career of the French parapsychologist Michel Moine also began with Sage's course.
- ^ p.399 of Medico-Legal Society of New York (1899), "Transactions: Annual Meeting, December 1899", Medico-Legal Journal, 17(3), pp.399-402.
- ^ See Conroy (2014), passim.
- ^ For more on Braid's overarching conceptualization, "psycho-physiology" — "the whole of [those] phenomena which result from the reciprocal actions of mind and matter upon each other" — see Braid (1855), p.855.
- ^ Baudouin (1920), pp.257-258; Orton (1955), p.48; Yeates (2016a, 2016b, 2016c).
- ^ Yeates (2005), p. 119.
- ^ For more on Brown and "dominant ideas", see Yeates (2005), and (2016b), pp.30-35.
- ^ Yeates (2016c), p.63.
- ^ Coué, E: "Self Mastery Through Conscious Autosuggestion", page 19, 1922
- ^ "Émile Coué." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2008. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 26 Dec. 2008 [1]
- ^ Daitch, Carolyn; Lorberbaum, Lissah (1 December 2012). Anxious in Love: How to Manage Your Anxiety, Reduce Conflict, and Reconnect with Your Partner. New Harbinger Publications. ISBN 9781608822331 – via Google Books.
- ^ Brooks, C.H., "The practice of autosuggestion", p62, 1922
- ^ Coué, E: "How to Practice Suggestion and Autosuggestion" page 45. "un truc ou procédé mécanique" ('a trick, or mechanical process'). Note that when Coué referred to his "trick", he was speaking of the mechanism, or "the secret", that was responsible for the approach's success (as in, say, "the trick to the hook shot is …"), he was not speaking of deceiving his subject.
- ^ Wallechinsky, David. "Emile Coue (1857-1926) French Healer." The People's Almanac. 2nd Ed. 1975.
- ^ Self Mastery Through Conscious Autosuggestion:Emile Coue. Psychomaster.com. Retrieved on 2013-07-28.
- ^ Yeates (2016b), pp.39,40.
- ^ In 1853,Daniel Noble suggested that Carpenter's "ideo-motor", restricted to motion alone, was far to too narrow a term, and he advocated the adoption of the term "ideodynamic" on the basis that the term "was applicable to a wider range of phenomena" (Noble, 1853, p.71; 1854, p.642). Carpenter and Braid immediately agreed with their friend and colleague, Noble; and from that time, Braid, who had earlier spoken of a "mono-ideo-motor principle of action", continuously spoke of a "mono-ideo-dynamic principle of action" being responsible for the generation of hypnotic phenomena (e.g., Braid, 1855, p.852).
- ^ Stetter F, Kupper S (March 2002). "Autogenic training: a meta-analysis of clinical outcome studies". Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 27 (1): 45–98. doi:10.1023/A:1014576505223. PMID 12001885. S2CID 22876957.
- ^ Ikezuki M, Miyauchi Y, Yamaguchi H, Koshikawa F (February 2002). "[Development of Autogenic Training Clinical Effectiveness Scale (ATCES)]". Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 72 (6): 475–81. doi:10.4992/jjpsy.72.475. PMID 11977841.
References
[edit]- Baudouin, C. (Paul, E & Paul, C. trans.), Suggestion and Autosuggestion: A Psychological and Pedagogical Study Based on the Investigations made by the New Nancy School, George Allen & Unwin, (London), 1920.
- Carpenter, W.B., "On the Influence of Suggestion in Modifying and directing Muscular Movement, independently of Volition", Royal Institution of Great Britain, (Proceedings), 1852, (12 March 1852), pp. 147–153.
- Conroy, M.S. (2014). The Cosmetics Baron You've Never Heard Of: E. Virgil Neal and Tokalon (Third, Revised Edition). Englewood, CO: Altus History LLC. ISBN 978-0982631423
- Coué, E. (1912). "De la suggestion et de ses applications" (‘Suggestion and its Applications’), Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle et de Palethnologie de la Haute-Marne, 2(1), pp.25-46.
- Coué, E. (1922a). La Maîtrise de soi-même par l'autosuggestion consciente: Autrefois de la suggestion et de ses applications. (‘Mastery of One’s Self through Conscious Autosuggestion: Formerly “Suggestion and its Applications”’) Emile Coué, (Nancy), 1922.
- Coué, E. (1922b). Self Mastery Through Conscious Autosuggestion. New York, NY: American Library Service. (A complete translation, by unknown translator, of Coué (1922a).)
- Coué, E. (1922c). Self Mastery Through Conscious Autosuggestion. New York, NY: Malkan Publishing Company. (A partial translation of Coué (1922a) by Archibald S. Van Orden).
- Coué, E. (1923). My Method: Including American Impressions. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Page & Company.
- Coué, E., & Orton, J.L. (1924). Conscious Auto-Suggestion. London: T. Fisher Unwin Limited.
- Guillemain, H. (2010), La Méthode Coué: Histoire d'une Pratique de Guérison au XXe Siècle (‘The Coué Method: History of a Twentieth Century Healing Practice’). Paris: Seuil.
- Hamlat, S., "Autosuggestion: Theory and Practice", American Journal of Sciences and Engineering Research, 3(5), pp. 63-69.
- Myga, K.A., Kuehn, E., & Azanon, E. (2022), "Autosuggestion: A Cognitive Process that Empowers your Brain?", Experimental Brain Research, 240(2), pp. 381–394. doi:10.1007/s00221-021-06265-8
- Noble, D., Elements of Psychological Medicine: An Introduction to the Practical Study of Insanity Adapted for Students and Junior Practitioners, John Churchill, (London), 1853.
- Noble, D. (1854). Three Lectures on the Correlation of Psychology and Physiology: III. On Ideas, and Their Dynamic Influence, Association Medical Journal, Vol.3, No.81, (21 July 1854), pp.642-646.
- Orton, J.L., Hypnotism Made Practical (Tenth Edition), Thorsons Publishers Limited, (London) 1955.
- Rapp, D. (1987). “Better and Better—”: Couéism as a Psychological Craze of the Twenties in England. Studies in Popular Culture,10(2), 17-36.
- Sage, X. LaM. (1900a). Hypnotism as It is: A Book for Everybody (Sixth Edition), New York State Publishing Company, (Rochester), 1900.
- Sage, X. LaM. (1900b). Un Cours par Correspondance sur le Magnétisme Personnel, Hypnotisme, Mesmérisme, Calmánt Magnétique, Thérapeutiques Suggestives, Psycho-Thérapeutique, Etc, Etc. par X. LaMotte Sage, A.M., Ph.D., LL.D. (Edition Revisée), New York Institute of Science, (Rochester), 1900.
- Sage, X. LaM. (1900c). Cours Supérieur Traitant du Magnétisme Personnel, de l’Hypnotisme, de la Thérapeutique Suggestive, et de la Guérison pour le Magnétisme, par X. LaMotte Sage, A.M., Ph.D., LL.D., New York Institute of Science, (Rochester), 1900.
- Shrout, R.N., Modern Scientific Hypnosis: From Ancient Mystery to Contemporary Science, (Wellingborough), Thorsons, 1985.
- Westphal, C., & Laxenaire, M. (2012). Émile Coué: Amuseur ou Précurseur? (‘Émile Coué: Entertainer or Forerunner’), Annales Médico-Psychologiques, Revue Psychiatrique, 170(1), pp. 36–38. doi=10.1016/j.amp.2011.12.001
- Yankauer, A., The Therapeutic Mantra of Emile Coué, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, Vol.42, No.4, (Summer 1999), pp. 489–495. doi=10.1353/pbm.1999.0012
- Yeates, Lindsay B. (2005), An Account of Thomas Brown’s Philosophy of the Human Mind, (unpublished manuscript), School of the History and Philosophy of Science, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
- Yeates, Lindsay B. (2016a), "Émile Coué and his Method (I): The Chemist of Thought and Human Action", Australian Journal of Clinical Hypnotherapy & Hypnosis, Volume 38, No.1, (Autumn 2016), pp. 3–27.
- Yeates, Lindsay B. (2016b), "Émile Coué and his Method (II): Hypnotism, Suggestion, Ego-Strengthening, and Autosuggestion", Australian Journal of Clinical Hypnotherapy & Hypnosis, Volume 38, No.1, (Autumn 2016), pp. 28–54.
- Yeates, Lindsay B. (2016c), "Émile Coué and his Method (III): Every Day in Every Way", Australian Journal of Clinical Hypnotherapy & Hypnosis, Volume 38, No.1, (Autumn 2016), pp. 55–79.
Autosuggestion
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Historical Context
Core Definition
Autosuggestion is a self-induced psychological process in which individuals implant ideas or suggestions into their subconscious mind to influence thoughts, behaviors, or physiological states, often through the repetition of affirmations.[7][5] This technique operates on the principle that consciously held ideas become realized through the power of imagination over the unconscious.[7] Autosuggestion is closely related to the placebo effect, with some views considering placebo effects as forms of autosuggestion, where belief in suggestions generates measurable changes in cognitive and physiological responses.[5][8] Studies suggest that autosuggestion may explain aspects of placebo responsiveness by enabling self-directed modulation of perceptual and bodily states via repeated mental reinforcement.[5][9] A prototypical example of an autosuggestion tool is the mantra developed by French pharmacist Émile Coué in the early 20th century: in its original French, Tous les jours, à tous points de vue, je vais de mieux en mieux, which translates to English as "Every day, in every way, I am getting better and better."[7] The fundamental process of autosuggestion entails entering a relaxed state to minimize distractions, repetitively voicing or mentally reciting the chosen affirmation, and cultivating passive acceptance of the idea without resistance or forced effort.[7][10] This approach leverages the subconscious's receptivity during low-arousal conditions to facilitate idea implantation.[7]Origins in Hypnosis and Suggestion
The concept of autosuggestion traces its roots to the late 19th-century developments in hypnosis, particularly through the Nancy School, founded by Ambroise-Auguste Liébeault and advanced by Hippolyte Bernheim. Liébeault, a physician in Nancy, France, began using hypnotic techniques in the 1860s to treat patients, emphasizing the power of suggestion to induce physiological and psychological changes without the need for a deep trance state. Bernheim, who joined Liébeault in the 1880s, further refined this approach by arguing that hypnosis was fundamentally a manifestation of suggestibility—a natural heightened responsiveness to ideas implanted in the mind—rather than a mystical or pathological phenomenon. This perspective positioned suggestion as the core mechanism of hypnotic effects, applicable even in waking states through verbal cues that leveraged the patient's imagination and automatism. In contrast to the Nancy School's views, the Salpêtrière School, led by Jean-Martin Charcot at the Salpêtrière Hospital in Paris during the 1870s and 1880s, portrayed hypnosis as an authoritarian, trance-induced state primarily affecting hysterical patients, with suggestion playing a secondary role to the neuropathological alterations it induced. Charcot's model divided hypnosis into rigid stages—catalepsy, lethargy, and somnambulism—treating it as a symptom of hysteria rather than a universal psychological process. The Nancy proponents, however, challenged this by demonstrating that suggestive influences could produce similar outcomes without formal hypnosis, highlighting suggestion as an innate, everyday mental faculty that operated through attention and ideodynamic reflexes, independent of trance depth or pathology. This debate, peaking in the mid-1880s, shifted the understanding of suggestion toward a more democratic and naturalistic framework, influencing broader psychological thought.[11] Early applications of suggestion in medicine, as detailed by Bernheim in his 1884 work De la suggestion et de ses applications à la thérapeutique, focused on alleviating pain and modifying habits through verbal directives that induced analgesia or behavioral shifts. For instance, Bernheim documented cases where suggestion enabled pain-free dental extractions and toothache relief in single sessions by evoking sensations of warmth or numbness, as well as the resolution of chronic neuralgia and sciatica after 1–10 treatments via commands to restore normal function. In habit change, post-hypnotic suggestions successfully addressed issues like insomnia, writer’s cramp, and epileptic seizures, with examples including the regulation of menstrual cycles from irregular intervals to normal 28–29 days and the cessation of hysterical convulsions in two sessions, demonstrating suggestion's dynamogenic effect on functional disorders. These uses underscored suggestion as a non-invasive tool for enhancing natural healing processes, primarily effective for subjective symptoms rather than organic diseases.[12] By the early 20th century, the principles of suggestion began transitioning toward self-application, where individuals could harness similar ideodynamic mechanisms internally to influence their own mental and physical states, laying the groundwork for formal autosuggestion as a bridge from clinician-directed hypnosis to personal psychological self-regulation. This evolution emphasized the universality of suggestibility, extending its therapeutic potential beyond clinical settings.[5]Typological Distinctions
Suggestion vs. Autosuggestion
Suggestion refers to the process by which an external agent, such as a hypnotist or authority figure, imposes an idea upon an individual's subconscious mind, leading to its unconscious acceptance and realization as action or physiological change.[13] This form of heterosuggestion, as termed in psychological literature, relies on the operator's influence to bypass conscious resistance and embed the idea directly into the subject's imagination, often within hypnotic states.[14] For instance, in traditional hypnotic induction, a therapist might verbally direct a patient to experience relaxation or symptom relief, with the idea taking hold through the subject's passive acceptance.[13] In contrast, autosuggestion involves the individual actively internalizing and applying this suggestive process to themselves, generating and repeating ideas without reliance on an external source.[5] This self-directed mechanism empowers the person to influence their own subconscious by leveraging imagination over willpower, transforming self-generated thoughts into realized outcomes within the bounds of possibility.[13] An example is the self-repetition of affirmative phrases, such as repeating a statement of improvement to oneself during relaxation, which induces the same subconscious effects as external suggestion but fosters personal autonomy.[14] Historically, the distinction emerged from the evolution of hypnotic practices in the late 19th century, particularly through the Nancy School, where pioneers like Ambroise-Auguste Liébeault and Hippolyte Bernheim emphasized suggestion's role in therapy but initially required a therapist's intervention.[14] This therapist-led approach shifted toward autosuggestion as clinicians recognized its underlying self-reinforcing nature—all suggestion ultimately becomes autosuggestion within the subject's mind—promoting self-led methods for greater empowerment and accessibility beyond clinical settings.[13] Émile Coué further popularized the conscious variant of autosuggestion in this tradition, enabling individuals to harness it deliberately for self-improvement.[5]Conscious vs. Unconscious Autosuggestion
Unconscious autosuggestion refers to the involuntary process by which individuals implant ideas into their own minds without deliberate awareness, often stemming from habitual thought patterns, environmental influences, or pervasive negative beliefs. For instance, chronic worry about health can reinforce anxiety and physical symptoms, as the mind accepts these ideas uncritically and translates them into reality through subconscious mechanisms.[7] This type of autosuggestion operates below the level of conscious control, drawing from everyday experiences like repeated exposure to pessimistic narratives, which gradually shape behavior and physiological responses without the person's intentional direction.[7] In contrast, conscious autosuggestion involves the intentional and directed repetition of positive ideas to influence the mind, typically practiced in a relaxed state to counteract negative unconscious influences. Pioneered by Émile Coué, this method emphasizes deliberate verbal affirmations, such as repeating "Every day, in every respect, I am getting better and better" approximately 20 times, to imprint beneficial suggestions on the subconscious.[7] Coué stressed the importance of consciousness in this process to prevent unintended negative suggestions from taking hold, arguing that verbal repetition—performed mechanically without strain—bypasses the limitations of willpower and directly engages the imagination for lasting change.[7] At the core of this distinction lies the psychological principle, articulated by early theorists like Coué, that the subconscious mind holds greater power than the conscious will in directing actions and bodily functions. Coué posited that the subconscious acts as the "grand director" of physiological and mental processes, accepting ideas with unwavering credulity, whereas the conscious will often falters when opposed by stronger imaginative forces.[7] When will and imagination conflict, imagination—rooted in the subconscious—invariably prevails, making conscious autosuggestion a strategic tool to align the two by fostering positive, repeated ideas that override detrimental unconscious ones.[7] This framework builds on hypnotic traditions, where suggestion's potency was observed in altered states, but shifts emphasis to self-directed wakeful practice.[5]Émile Coué's Contributions
Background and Influences
Émile Coué was born on February 26, 1857, in Troyes, France. He pursued a career in pharmacy, apprenticing in Troyes beginning in 1876 and graduating at the top of his class with first-class honors from the École Supérieure de Pharmacie in Paris in 1882, followed by an internship at Necker Hospital. During the 1880s, as a prescribing pharmacist and dispensing chemist, Coué observed the significant role of placebo effects in patient outcomes, noting how patients' expectations and beliefs appeared to influence their physical recovery independent of the medication's pharmacological properties. Coué's intellectual development was profoundly shaped by the Nancy School of hypnosis and related psychological traditions. In 1885 and 1886, he studied under Ambroise-Auguste Liébeault, whose approach reframed hypnosis as a therapeutic process driven by suggestion rather than mystical trance. He was also influenced by Hippolyte Bernheim's theory of idea psychology, which posited that ideas implanted in the subconscious could direct physiological and behavioral changes. Additionally, Coué incorporated elements from James Braid's concept of hypnotism as monoideism, a state of intensified mental focus on a single idea. In 1901, he explored self-hypnosis through a correspondence course offered by Xenophon LaMotte Sage, an American advocate of personal suggestibility techniques. Coué maintained his pharmacy in Troyes while developing his psychological interests from the 1880s onward. In 1910, he sold his pharmacy and established a free clinic in Nancy, where he conducted extensive consultations, providing approximately 40,000 treatment sessions annually by the early 1920s.[2] Coué's seminal work, Self-Mastery Through Conscious Autosuggestion (1922), synthesized his biographical experiences and clinical observations into a cohesive framework for harnessing the mind's suggestive powers.Development of Conscious Autosuggestion
Émile Coué's development of conscious autosuggestion began in the 1890s through his interactions with patients at his pharmacy in Troyes, France, where he observed the therapeutic effects of placebos and verbal suggestions in alleviating ailments, prompting him to explore hypnotic techniques after studying with Ambroise-Auguste Liébeault in Nancy from 1885 to 1886.[2] By the early 1900s, Coué had refined his approach by integrating self-administered suggestions, distinguishing them from traditional hypnosis to emphasize patient-led processes, and in 1901, he acquired a correspondence course on hypnotism that further shaped his methods.[2] This evolution culminated in the 1910s with public lectures, including his 1912 address "Suggestion and its Applications" in Chaumont, where he formally introduced conscious autosuggestion as a deliberate, non-hypnotic practice focused on ego-strengthening and self-control.[2] A key milestone occurred in 1910 when Coué sold his pharmacy and established a free clinic in Nancy, where he provided approximately 40,000 treatment sessions annually until his death, allowing him to test and disseminate conscious autosuggestion on a large scale without reliance on hypnotic induction.[2] In 1913, he founded the Lorraine Society of Applied Psychology to promote his ideas systematically.[2] This period marked an innovation in shifting agency from therapist to patient, countering hypnosis misconceptions by promoting autosuggestion as an accessible, everyday tool for self-healing rather than a controlled trance state.[15] The method's spread accelerated in the 1920s through Coué's international tours, including multiple visits to the United Kingdom starting in 1921 and lecture circuits in the United States in 1923 and 1924, where he demonstrated techniques via gramophone recordings and a silent film released that year.[2][16] By 1923, conscious autosuggestion had gained widespread influence across Europe and the US, inspiring clinics like the 1925 Coué-Orton Institute in London and appearing in popular media, books, and self-help practices.[2][16] Coué's death on July 2, 1926, in Nancy, at age 69, coincided with the peak of his method's global popularity, after which it continued to shape psychological self-improvement traditions.[17]The Coué Method
Core Techniques
The core techniques of the Coué method emphasize a structured routine to instill autosuggestions through deliberate repetition, beginning with preparation for optimal receptivity. Practitioners are instructed to find a quiet environment, such as a comfortable chair or bed, and achieve physical and mental relaxation by closing their eyes and taking slow, deep breaths to calm the body without attempting to induce sleep.[7] This state facilitates focused attention on the autosuggestive phrases, ensuring the mind is unburdened by external distractions or tension. The central repetition protocol involves verbalizing the key phrase "Every day, in every respect, I am getting better and better" exactly 20 times, twice daily—once in the morning upon waking and once in the evening before sleep. To maintain accuracy, Coué recommended using a knotted string or similar aid for counting, while articulating the words in a low, monotonous tone and with a sense of conviction, allowing the phrases to imprint on the subconscious through conscious intent.[7] For targeted applications, the method allows adaptation of phrases to address specific concerns, such as health issues, habits, or personal goals, while retaining the general formula as a foundation. Examples include modifying the affirmation to "My pain is decreasing" or "It is going, it is going" for discomfort, repeated rapidly for 20-25 seconds with a hand placed on the affected area to enhance focus.[7] These customized suggestions should be positive, present-tense statements that avoid negation or doubt. Modern adaptations inspired by Coué's conscious autosuggestion extend the technique to psychological conditions such as social anxiety disorder, where tailored positive affirmations are used to alleviate symptoms including fear of judgment and physical manifestations like hand tremors (trembling induced by anxiety). These affirmations promote calmness, self-confidence, and relaxation, and are repeated calmly and consistently, often combined with deep breathing to enhance receptivity and reduce tension.[18][19] Effective examples include:- "I feel calm, confident, and relaxed in social situations." (我在社交场合感到平静、自信和放松。)
- "My hands are steady and relaxed, no longer trembling." (我的手稳定、放松,不再颤抖。)
- "I release the fear of others' judgment, and my body naturally calms." (我释放对他人判断的恐惧,身体自然平静。)
- "I am safe and accepted; my hands and body are calm." (我安全、被接受,我的手和身体都平静下来。)
- "With every breath, I let tension fade, and my hands remain steady." (每一次呼吸,我都让紧张消退,双手稳稳的。)