Hubbry Logo
Covert hypnosisCovert hypnosisMain
Open search
Covert hypnosis
Community hub
Covert hypnosis
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Covert hypnosis
Covert hypnosis
Covert hypnosis
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Covert hypnosis is an attempt to communicate with another person's unconscious mind without informing the subject that they will be hypnotized. It is also known as conversational hypnosis or sleight of mouth.[1] (although both Conversational Hypnosis and Slight of Mouth can also be done overtly). It is a term largely used by proponents of neuro-linguistic programming (NLP), a pseudoscientific approach to communication and interaction.[2][3][4][5][6]

The objective is to change the person's behavior subconsciously so that the target believes that they changed their mind of their own volition. When or if performed successfully, the target is unaware that they were hypnotized or that anything unusual has occurred. Arguably there is a debate about what hypnosis is, and how covert hypnosis should be classified. "Standard" hypnosis requires the focus and attention of the subject, while covert hypnosis seems to focus on "softening" the subject by using confusion, fatigue, directed attention, and interrupted sentences. This is most similar to salesmen talking to customers when they are tired. Critical thinking and questioning of statements likely requires mental effort.[7][improper synthesis?] The theme of "covert hypnosis" appears to be along the lines of causing the subject to enter "down time".[8] Regardless of whether "covert hypnosis" fits the standard definition of hypnosis, fatigue appears to impair critical thinking.[7] This might explain why interrogation, military training, and cult-recruitment practices prefer to deprive their new recruits of sleep.[9]

Technique

[edit]

Covert hypnosis is a phenomenon similar to indirect hypnosis, as derived from Milton H. Erickson and popularized as "The Milton Model"[10] in style,[11] but the defining feature is that the hypnotized individual subsequently engages in hypnotic phenomena without conscious effort or choice. Covert hypnosis, like "Ericksonian Hypnosis",[clarification needed] "operates through covert and subtle means... to reach deeper levels of consciousness than are touched by the surface structure of language".[12] It is the concept that an individual, 'the hypnotist,' can control another individual's behavior via gaining rapport.[13] During hypnosis, the operator or hypnotist makes suggestions. The subject is intended to not be completely aware, on a conscious level, of the suggestions.

The hypnotist gains rapport[13][14] with the listener(s) and the hypnotist maintains psychological congruency[15] (the act of truly acting towards your goals without hesitation[clarification needed]), both linguistically and in one's nonverbal communication. As the subject listens while feeling a psychological connection with the hypnotist and the hypnotist displaying behaviors such as confidence and understanding,[13] the hypnotist then presents linguistic data in the form of metaphor:

The Metaphor presents a surface structure of meaning in the actual words of the story, which activates an associated deep structure of meaning that is indirectly relevant to the listener, which activates a recovered deep structure of meaning that is directly relevant to the listener.[16]

In other words, this process builds most likely unconscious states within the listener, and then associates those states through covert conditioning, also known as covert anchoring, thereby forming unconsciously controlled behaviors and thoughts. Often methods of tricking the listener to believe that the hypnotist is talking about something else other than the subject are employed, for instance, by shifting use of time and use of identity in language. One famous example is employed by Milton H. Erickson "and a tomato can be happy".[16]

An example

[edit]

A state of forgetfulness may be elicited by talking about what it feels like to be in that state in a manner that implies the other person is currently experiencing it. Once this state is at a heightened peak the hypnotist can then talk about that state, relating to a concept like the unsuspecting subject's name (a phenomenon called name amnesia), and the subject will suddenly be unaware of his/her name on questioning (provided the suggestions implied immediate effect and the subject is suggestible enough to be influenced in this way). The purpose of covert hypnosis is to shut down or at least reduce the analytical part of the subject's mind, lest they suspect something. This may be achieved fairly quickly by someone with practice.[13]

In the media

[edit]

Real estate trainer Glenn Twiddle in June 2010, appeared on the Australian television show A Current Affair. The segment explains how he teaches real-estate agents these techniques to use on unsuspecting buyers of property.[17]

In fiction

[edit]

In fiction "covert hypnosis" has been featured in television series, though rather overrepresented. In The Mentalist, covert hypnosis is portrayed in an episode when a perpetrator uses it to control others and attempts to kill her employer.[18] In an episode of The X-Files, a man with a brain tumor gains additional skill in hypnosis, and he utilizes it to escape police captivity.[19]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Books

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Covert hypnosis

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Covert hypnosis, also known as al hypnosis, is a subtle form of hypnotic influence that communicates with a person's through indirect suggestions embedded in normal , without the subject's or a formal induction. This technique leverages language patterns, pacing, and leading to bypass conscious resistance and facilitate changes in thoughts, emotions, or behaviors. The practice traces its roots primarily to the work of psychiatrist in the mid-20th century, who pioneered indirect and utilization-based methods to engage the unconscious subtly, influencing modern approaches in . Key techniques include building through mirroring and tone, employing pattern interruption to shift focus, using verbal confusion to heighten , and incorporating vague or metaphorical language to embed suggestions. Covert methods often involve anchoring—associating stimuli like touch, keywords, or gestures with desired responses—to trigger unconscious reactions post-session. Applications of covert hypnosis appear in therapeutic settings, such as to reduce anxiety and improve cooperation during procedures, as well as in for addressing habits like substance use through aversion or positive reinforcement. However, ethical concerns arise due to its potential for manipulation, emphasizing the need for client collaboration in suggestion formulation to prevent unintended effects and ensure .

Definition and Overview

Definition

Covert hypnosis, also referred to as conversational or indirect , is a subtle form of aimed at communicating with and affecting an individual's without their explicit awareness or consent that is occurring. This approach leverages everyday verbal and nonverbal interactions to embed suggestions that target processes, distinguishing it from more explicit hypnotic methods by its seamless integration into routine dialogue. The technique operates primarily through normal conversation, where the hypnotist uses indirect language patterns, metaphors, and to bypass the subject's conscious critical faculties and access deeper levels of . By embedding hypnotic suggestions within seemingly innocuous exchanges, it seeks to evoke automatic responses or behavioral shifts without triggering resistance or detection. This process relies on the principle that the is more receptive to influence when conscious attention is diverted or aligned through . At its core, covert hypnosis follows a basic sequence: first, establishing to build trust and with the subject's ; second, subtly inducing a trance-like state of focused attention and heightened ; and third, delivering targeted suggestions that align with the desired unconscious influence. This methodical progression ensures the interaction remains conversational and non-intrusive, facilitating subconscious uptake without formal induction rituals. It draws briefly from Ericksonian principles of permissive, indirect suggestion to achieve these effects. While rooted in Ericksonian , the efficacy of covert hypnosis has limited empirical support in .

Distinction from Overt Hypnosis

Overt hypnosis encompasses traditional, direct methods designed to induce a state through explicit techniques, with the subject's conscious awareness and participation. These approaches typically involve formal induction procedures, such as eye fixation on an object to narrow or progressive relaxation, where the hypnotist verbally guides the subject through sequential steps of physical and mental unwinding to achieve heightened . Covert hypnosis, by contrast, eschews these overt rituals and subject notification, integrating hypnotic suggestions seamlessly into casual using indirect, permissive patterns that bypass conscious resistance. Unlike overt methods, which rely on structured inductions to establish a recognized altered state, covert hypnosis operates without such labeling, drawing on everyday interactions to access unconscious processes subtly. This distinction enables covert hypnosis to offer advantages in subtlety, making it more versatile for non-clinical environments where formal sessions would be impractical, and allowing potential for deeper unconscious engagement by avoiding the resistance that explicit induction might provoke. However, these benefits come with limitations, as the absence of controlled structure can make outcomes less predictable and demands advanced practitioner skill in reading subtle cues and tailoring suggestions in real time.

Historical Development

Origins in Traditional Hypnosis

The roots of hypnosis, which later influenced covert approaches, can be traced to ancient civilizations where trance-like states were induced for healing purposes. In , around 3000 BCE, priests utilized "temple sleep" rituals in sanctuaries dedicated to deities like , guiding patients into deep relaxation through incantations and suggestions to promote recovery from ailments. Similar practices appeared in , where healers at the temples of employed incubation techniques to evoke dream-like trances for therapeutic insight, and in , where yogic and recitation induced akin to suggestible relaxation as early as 1500 BCE. These methods relied on environmental cues and verbal guidance rather than direct commands, laying early groundwork for subtle induction techniques. In the 18th century, Franz Mesmer introduced "animal magnetism" in the 1770s, positing an invisible universal fluid that could be manipulated to restore bodily harmony, marking a pivotal shift toward formalized hypnotic practices in Europe. Mesmer and his followers employed indirect methods, such as subtle hand passes over the patient's body without physical contact and atmospheric suggestions via music or dim lighting, to evoke crises of convulsion or calm that purportedly redistributed the magnetic fluid. By the mid-19th century, Scottish surgeon James Braid advanced this evolution in 1843 by coining the term "hypnosis" from the Greek word hypnos (sleep), reframing the phenomenon as a neurological state induced by focused attention and verbal suggestion, divesting it of Mesmer's mystical elements. The late 19th century saw further refinement through studies on , particularly in during the . Neurologist at the Salpêtrière Hospital conducted experiments demonstrating as an artificial extension of , inducible in susceptible individuals via visual fixation or verbal cues, though he emphasized its pathological nature. In contrast, Hippolyte Bernheim, a physician in Nancy, argued through clinical trials that was fundamentally a state of heightened achievable through verbal means alone, without physical manipulation, influencing a broader understanding of indirect suggestion's power. These developments highlighted the efficacy of non-coercive, conversational inductions, paving the way for 20th-century therapeutic innovations.

Ericksonian Influence and Modern Evolution

(1901–1980), an American psychiatrist and psychotherapist, played a pivotal role in developing indirect during the mid-20th century, emphasizing subtle techniques such as , metaphors, and the utilization of a patient's resistance to facilitate therapeutic change without overt induction. Erickson's approach bypassed conscious defenses by embedding suggestions within narratives and everyday conversation, allowing the to process them more receptively. His methods were informed by his personal experiences with , which heightened his sensitivity to nonverbal cues and indirect communication. Erickson's influence is evident in his extensive publications, including over 90 articles and two by 1960, many featuring detailed case studies from the and 1960s that demonstrated the efficacy of his indirect techniques in treating conditions like and phobias. These works, often published in journals such as the Journal of Clinical and Experimental , showcased practical applications through real-world examples, establishing a foundation for modern covert approaches. In the 1970s, Erickson's patterns were popularized through neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) by and , who reverse-engineered his hypnotic language in their 1975 book Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D., introducing the "Milton Model" as a framework for conversational influence and . This model codified Erickson's use of vague, artfully ambiguous phrasing to guide listeners toward desired outcomes, extending his ideas beyond clinical settings into broader communication strategies. Following Erickson's era, covert hypnosis evolved through NLP's integration into 1980s self-help literature and sales training, as seen in Tony Robbins' 1986 book Unlimited Power, which adapted Milton Model techniques for personal achievement and persuasive selling to enhance rapport and decision-making. In therapeutic contexts, Erickson's principles influenced solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT), a model developed in the 1980s that prioritizes future-oriented solutions over problem analysis, incorporating indirect suggestions and metaphors to empower clients rapidly. This evolution marked a shift toward accessible, non-authoritarian applications of covert methods in both professional and everyday influence.

Techniques and Methods

Core Principles

Covert hypnosis operates through , which targets the mind to influence beliefs, emotions, or behaviors without the subject's conscious awareness or detection. This approach leverages subtle linguistic and nonverbal cues to bypass critical conscious processing, allowing suggestions to take effect at an implicit level. Drawing from Erickson's indirect style, it emphasizes permissive and metaphorical language to facilitate this subconscious engagement without overt induction. A foundational element is building, which establishes trust and alignment by the subject's , vocal tone, and behavioral pacing. This synchronization creates a sense of familiarity and safety, reducing resistance and enhancing receptivity to influence through nonconscious and empathetic attunement. induction in covert hypnosis often occurs via overload techniques that employ , rhythmic patterns, or sensory distractions to overwhelm conscious attention and detach it from analytical thinking. Ambiguous phrasing, for instance, creates that prompts the mind to disengage critical faculties, fostering a receptive altered state. Similarly, confusional techniques can induce dissociation, allowing processing to dominate. Suggestion embedding relies on principles such as , which assumes the acceptance of an idea within a statement, and nominalizations, vague nouns that invite the listener to project personal meanings. Presuppositions subtly imply outcomes as inevitable, embedding directives without direct command, while nominalizations like "change" or "understanding" evoke individualized interpretations that align with the desired influence. These elements ensure suggestions integrate seamlessly into the . Neurologically, covert hypnosis exploits individual suggestibility by modulating brain networks, particularly reducing activity in the (DMN), which is linked to self-referential thinking and . This alteration promotes heightened absorption and responsiveness, as evidenced by decreased DMN connectivity during states, enabling suggestions to reshape perceptions and behaviors more effectively. Empirical reviews indicate mixed support for the efficacy of these Ericksonian techniques, with recent meta-analyses (as of 2024) showing benefits for in general but limited specific evidence for covert applications.

Specific Strategies and Examples

One key strategy in covert hypnosis is pacing and leading, where the hypnotist first matches the subject's current sensory experience or emotional state (pacing) to establish , then gradually guides them toward a desired (leading). This technique leverages the subject's unconscious agreement with accurate descriptions of their reality to facilitate subtle shifts. For instance, a practitioner might say, "You're sitting here, feeling the support of the chair beneath you, noticing your breath slowing naturally, and now you can allow yourself to relax even deeper." Embedded commands involve concealing direct suggestions within casual conversation, often emphasized through subtle pauses, tone changes, or gestures to target the while remains engaged with the surface narrative. These commands bypass overt resistance by appearing as ordinary phrases. An example is, "You might not notice how you can feel more relaxed right now as we continue talking." This method draws from Ericksonian indirect suggestion patterns, where the embedded directive implies acceptance without explicit instruction. Metaphors and stories serve as indirect vehicles for suggestion, presenting narratives that parallel the subject's issue to allow unconscious processing and resolution without direct confrontation. By embedding therapeutic ideas within relatable tales, the hypnotist evokes analogous experiences that the can apply to the real situation. For example, a story about a seed growing through obstacles might subtly encourage resilience in someone facing anxiety, fostering change through symbolic identification rather than explicit advice. In a practical scenario, a therapist might employ these strategies during an initial casual with a experiencing anxiety, unaware that is occurring. Starting with pacing by acknowledging the 's observable tension—"I see you're fidgeting a bit, perhaps feeling that knot in your "—the therapist transitions to leading with embedded commands in a : "It's like a tight on a beginning to loosen as the wind calms and carries you forward more smoothly." This builds on the core principle to reduce anxiety covertly through conversational flow. Advanced tactics include double binds, which present the subject with two or more choices that both advance the desired outcome, creating an illusion of freedom while limiting resistance. For instance, "Would you prefer to relax your shoulders first or let the relaxation spread from your feet upward?"—either option promotes deeper . This permissive structure enhances compliance in covert settings. Sleight of mouth patterns, derived from neuro-linguistic programming (NLP), involve verbal reframing techniques to shift limiting beliefs through nuanced linguistic challenges, often integrated into covert hypnosis for persuasive influence. These 14 patterns, such as redefining intent or consequence, subtly alter perceptions by questioning assumptions in conversation, e.g., responding to "I can't relax" with "What stops you from discovering how relaxation feels even better than tension?" Developed by Robert Dilts based on Ericksonian models, they facilitate belief change without overt confrontation.

Applications

Therapeutic Contexts

In therapeutic contexts, covert hypnosis, often aligned with Ericksonian approaches, employs subtle suggestions to facilitate analgesia in medical settings, particularly for management. Milton Erickson utilized indirect hypnotic techniques, including and embedded commands, to alleviate pain in patients without inducing a formal . These methods have informed modern clinical applications, where covert suggestions integrated into conversation help patients achieve pain relief by altering pain perception pathways. Covert hypnosis also supports anxiety and phobia treatment by employing indirect reframing techniques to build emotional resilience, bypassing overt induction to make interventions feel more natural and less intimidating. In clinical sessions, therapists use conversational metaphors and pacing to subtly shift anxious thought patterns, fostering a sense of control over responses. A meta-analysis of 17 randomized controlled trials demonstrated that , including indirect variants, significantly reduces anxiety symptoms with a moderate to large of 0.79 at the end of treatment compared to controls, outperforming standalone use when combined with cognitive-behavioral elements. For , such as dental anxiety, evidence indicates that hypnotic interventions inhibit fear responses in the brain's , leading to sustained symptom reduction. In smoking cessation and habit change, covert hypnosis leverages conversational embedding to reinforce intrinsic motivation during therapy sessions, embedding positive suggestions within everyday dialogue to disrupt habitual cues. Therapists might pace the client's current smoking rationale before leading toward aversion-free imagery, promoting subconscious shifts toward abstinence. A 2019 Cochrane review of 14 trials found insufficient evidence that hypnotherapy, including Ericksonian-style methods, is more effective than other behavioral supports or no intervention for long-term smoking abstinence, with a risk ratio of 1.08 (95% CI 0.74-1.59) for sustained quit rates at 6 months, though comparable to other behavioral therapies. The evidence base for covert hypnosis in brief therapy models underscores its efficacy, particularly in Ericksonian frameworks, where short sessions yield measurable improvements in anxiety and habit-related outcomes without requiring deep trance states. Practitioners must undergo rigorous training through ethical certification bodies, such as the American Society of Clinical Hypnosis (ASCH), which requires a master's or doctoral degree in a field, professional licensure, completion of approved workshops (typically 20-100 hours), and supervised practice to ensure consensual, evidence-informed application.

Non-Therapeutic and Persuasive Uses

Covert hypnosis techniques, often integrated with neuro-linguistic programming (NLP), find application in and marketing to subtly influence and build during interactions. Sales professionals leverage presuppositions and embedded commands to steer negotiations, for instance, by framing statements that assume agreement, such as "When you choose this option, you'll experience immediate benefits," thereby increasing the likelihood of closing deals without direct pressure. These methods enhance communication by aligning language with customers' sensory preferences, like emphasizing visual cues for those who process information primarily through sight, leading to higher engagement and conversion rates in commercial settings. In , Ericksonian hypnosis principles are embedded in slogans and texts to target the , using techniques such as generalizations ("everyone deserves luxury") and causal linking ("Indulge today and transform tomorrow") to foster emotional responses and memorability. For example, campaigns may employ truisms like "All successful people prioritize " to create alignment with the brand, subtly driving consumer preferences and purchases. A structured in ads often follows stages of affiliation (building trust via rhythmic ), fixation (deepening with ), and conducting (implanting directives through indirect commands), as seen in promotions like "Discover the taste that exceeds expectations," which embeds persuasive cues without explicit calls to action. Beyond commerce, covert hypnosis supports interpersonal influence in and by fostering subtle and understanding in team environments. Leaders apply —subtly matching a colleague's and tone—to establish , followed by pacing and leading to guide discussions toward consensus, such as acknowledging current frustrations before suggesting collaborative solutions. This approach enhances and resolves disputes by reframing perspectives, promoting buy-in without overt authority. In and , NLP-based programs from the 2000s popularized covert methods for , with seminars teaching participants to use hypnotic language patterns for self-motivation and influence in daily interactions. Influential works like those by NLP pioneers emphasized practical exercises in conversational to build and skills, often delivered through workshops that focused on embedded commands for habit change. Real-world examples extend to political , where subtle pacing and presuppositions sway audiences, as in speeches assuming shared values to lead toward policy support, and everyday like motivational talks that employ indirect suggestions to inspire action. Despite these applications, the reliability of covert hypnosis in non-therapeutic contexts is generally lower than in controlled therapeutic environments, as uncontrolled variables like distractions or individual resistance can diminish the subtlety and impact of persuasive techniques.

Ethical Concerns

One of the primary ethical breaches in covert hypnosis is the violation of , as individuals cannot provide voluntary agreement to the process without being aware of its occurrence. Professional ethical codes emphasize that must be conducted with full disclosure to ensure and prevent . For instance, the National Guild of Hypnotists requires members to provide clients with a that includes the right to refuse services and demands truthful disclosure of the hypnotic process before any session begins. Similarly, the Society for Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis mandates for any extension of hypnotic techniques, underscoring that non-disclosed applications undermine client welfare and professional integrity. Covert hypnosis poses significant manipulation risks, particularly for vulnerable populations such as those in coercive relationships or cult environments, where subtle influence can exacerbate undue control and dependency. In destructive cults, unethical hypnotic techniques have been employed to manipulate spiritual experiences and foster obedience, heightening suggestibility and isolating individuals from external support. This can lead to profound psychological dependency, as repeated subtle inductions may erode critical thinking and promote over-reliance on the influencer. Such practices exploit inherent power imbalances, amplifying harm in groups already susceptible to isolation and emotional coercion. The potential for psychological harm from covert hypnosis includes the induction of false memories and heightened dependency, as seen in the recovered memory controversies where hypnotic suggestion contributed to confabulated recollections of trauma. During this period, courts recognized that often contaminates memory through suggestion, leading to unreliable testimonies and family disruptions, with experts concluding that repressed memories recovered via were frequently false rather than authentic. Subtle applications can also foster long-term dependency by increasing without resolution, potentially resulting in distorted self-perception or emotional instability. Ethical debates surrounding covert hypnosis center on the practitioner's intent, distinguishing benevolent applications—such as therapeutic surprise elements in Ericksonian approaches aimed at positive change—with malevolent uses intended for control. While some argue that covert methods can ethically facilitate when aligned with client benefit and eventual awareness, others contend that any non-disclosed influence inherently risks abuse, regardless of intent, due to the potential for unintended escalation. Professional guidelines prioritize avoiding harm, recommending overt methods to maintain transparency and . Covert hypnosis raises significant legal concerns regarding , as non-disclosed hypnotic influence can implicate or battery statutes in various U.S. jurisdictions. In therapeutic settings, doctrines require practitioners to fully disclose methods and risks before engaging in any hypnotic techniques, with failure to obtain explicit agreement potentially constituting battery, particularly if the subject experiences harm. For instance, some states, such as , have enacted specific legislation addressing facilitated by hypnotists, criminalizing non-consensual hypnosis that leads to exploitation. Similarly, in cases involving minors or vulnerable individuals, parental or guardian is mandatory prior to any hypnotic procedure. Fraud and coercion claims arise when covert hypnotic techniques are employed in deceptive sales or persuasive contexts, subjecting practitioners to prosecution under consumer protection laws. In the United States, the (FTC) enforces against misleading claims in self-improvement programs. Coercive uses, like undue suggestion in financial transactions, may also trigger civil suits or criminal charges for if hypnosis induces actions against the subject's will. International variations in regulations reflect differing approaches to and professional oversight, with the imposing stricter frameworks compared to the more permissive U.S. standards. Under EU consumer protection directives, such as the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, hypnotic techniques in sales or therapy must not mislead or exploit vulnerabilities, with penalties for non-compliance including fines and contract invalidation. In , is restricted to licensed medical doctors, psychologists, or psychotherapists; in , while medical applications are limited to professionals, non-therapeutic uses by lay practitioners are permitted under less stringent oversight. By contrast, the U.S. lacks federal regulation of , relying on state-level guidelines that generally permit practice without licensure for non-medical applications, though this leniency has led to calls for uniform and disclosure rules. Professional licensing requirements emphasize disclosure and scope limitations to prevent unlicensed practice, with violations carrying civil and criminal penalties. In , for example, hypnotherapists are exempt from licensing if services focus on self-improvement rather than diagnosing or treating medical conditions, but they must provide signed disclosures stating they are not licensed by the state and cannot practice . Failure to disclose can result in disciplinary actions, fines, or injunctions under the Business and Professions Code, particularly if covert techniques cross into . Other states, like Washington and , mandate registration for hypnotists, requiring proof of training and adherence to ethical standards to ensure methods are not concealed from clients. Landmark cases illustrate the application of doctrines to hypnotic suggestion, particularly in contexts like or contracts. In Rock v. Arkansas (1987), the U.S. addressed hypnosis's reliability but affirmed defendants' rights to use it for memory refreshment, indirectly highlighting risks of in non-consensual scenarios by noting potential . More directly, claims in wills influenced by covert suggestion have succeeded in courts, such as under California's Code, where hypnotic manipulation voids bequests if proven to override , as in litigation involving suggestive therapies. These precedents underscore liabilities for practitioners, often resulting in testamentary invalidation or damages awards.

Representations in Culture

In Media

Media portrayals of covert hypnosis have often highlighted its controversial applications in sales training, where techniques are promoted as tools for persuasion but criticized for ethical lapses. In the early 2000s and beyond, news outlets covered seminars and programs teaching "hypnotic selling" methods, such as embedded commands and pacing language, as ways to influence buyers subconsciously without their awareness. For instance, a 2010 article in Selling Power magazine detailed how sales professionals used self-hypnosis and suggestive language to boost performance, sparking debates on manipulation in commercial contexts. Documentaries have explored the roots of covert hypnosis through Ericksonian methods, emphasizing indirect suggestion in everyday interactions. The 2011 film Wizard of the Desert, produced by the Milton H. Erickson Foundation, chronicles the life and work of psychiatrist , whose permissive, story-based hypnosis techniques laid the groundwork for modern covert approaches used in therapy and beyond. This documentary illustrates how Erickson's subtle inductions, avoiding overt trance states, influenced contemporary media discussions on as a tool for behavioral change without formal consent. Interviews with experts like Kevin Hogan have brought ethical conversational hypnosis to mainstream podcasts and television, positioning it as a positive force in influence and communication. Hogan, a prominent author on persuasion, appeared on the Salesman Podcast, explaining how to build rapport ethically in business settings. Sensationalism in media has amplified fears of covert hypnosis as "mind control" in politics and advertising, particularly through 2020s articles on social media's persuasive power. A 2024 e-flux journal piece linked historical CIA hypnosis experiments to modern AI-driven psyops, warning of subliminal influences in political campaigns that echo covert hypnotic patterns. Similarly, coverage in The Consilience Project described social media algorithms as enabling "mass hypnosis" via repetitive suggestions, heightening public anxiety over advertising tactics that subtly shape consumer and voter behavior. These portrayals have significantly shaped public perception, often exaggerating the dangers of covert while downplaying its controlled applications. A 2024 analysis in Joymind noted how media depictions sensationalize as a mysterious force for control, leading to widespread misconceptions about its risks despite evidence of its safety in professional settings. A 2017 study published in the Contemporary Hypnosis & Integrative Therapy journal surveyed public views, finding that most associate with altered perception and , influenced by dramatic media narratives that overlook collaborative and beneficial aspects. Such exaggeration fosters distrust, portraying covert techniques as inherently predatory rather than context-dependent tools. In , podcasts such as those from HypnoThoughts Live continued to discuss conversational hypnosis, highlighting its applications in communication while addressing ethical considerations.

In Fiction

Covert hypnosis has been a staple in since the late , often depicted as a tool for insidious manipulation. In Richard Condon's 1959 novel , communist agents use techniques during the to covertly program an American soldier, Raymond Shaw, as an unwitting assassin triggered by subtle cues, reflecting anxieties about psychological control. Earlier works like George du Maurier's (1894) portray through the character , who exerts covert influence over a young singer via intense gaze and suggestion, blending artistic seduction with coercive control. In film and television, covert hypnosis frequently appears in heist and crime narratives, where characters employ conversational tricks for deception. The 2013 film Now You See Me features mentalist Merritt McKinney, played by Woody Harrelson, who uses subtle hypnotic inductions and embedded commands during interrogations to extract secrets or compel actions, such as hypnotizing a woman to reveal personal details in a theatrical demonstration. Similarly, the television series The Mentalist (2008–2015) showcases protagonist Patrick Jane employing covert suggestion and rapid hypnotic techniques to manipulate suspects, often through casual conversation and observational cues to elicit confessions or hidden information. Common tropes in fictional depictions exaggerate covert hypnosis for dramatic effect, portraying it as an irresistible force in , seduction, or misguided therapy. In scenarios, it manifests as programmed obedience, as seen in plots where agents implant post-hypnotic triggers for betrayal or violence, amplifying real suggestive techniques into total mind control. Seduction tropes involve hypnotic gazes or patterned language to ensnare victims romantically, echoing early films like Svengali (1931) where subtle influence overrides . Therapy-gone-wrong narratives depict covert methods backfiring into unintended compulsions, such as forced regressions leading to chaos, heightening tension through ethical overreach. Influential non-fiction works blending real techniques with narrative have shaped modern fictional portrayals. Neil Strauss's 2005 book The Game: Penetrating the of Pickup Artists details hypnotic language patterns from neuro-linguistic programming (NLP), used by pickup artists like for covert seduction through embedded suggestions and rapport-building, influencing later thrillers that incorporate similar conversational . The representation of covert hypnosis in fiction has evolved from mid-20th-century science fiction rooted in overt brainwashing fears to contemporary thrillers emphasizing subtle, NLP-inspired persuasion. Early depictions in works like The Manchurian Candidate focused on authoritarian control amid geopolitical tensions, while modern examples in films and series reflect the 1970s rise of NLP, portraying hypnosis as everyday conversational influence in personal or criminal contexts. This shift mirrors growing cultural interest in psychological subtleties over fantastical domination.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12488509/
  2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289367817_The_Use_of_Covert_Methods_in_Hypnosis
  3. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00029157.2018.1441802
  4. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2024/04/science-of-hypnosis
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6357291/
  6. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3101
  7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370401113_Advancing_hypnotic_inductions_An_Ericksonian_perspective
  8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2018.1441802
  9. https://iamdrshort.com/New_Papers/Conversational%20Hypnosis%20%28Prepublicatin%20Manuscript%29.pdf
  10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353681191_Learning_From_the_Past_From_Incubation_in_Ancient_Egypt_and_Greece_to_Modern_Hypnosis
  11. https://www.sas.upenn.edu/psych/history/orne/ornewhitehouse2000infinkbc.html
  12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3705676/
  13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20166775/
  14. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2025-11084-001
  15. https://www.nap.edu/read/2303/chapter/14
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5554306/
  17. https://sk.sagepub.com/book/mono/milton-h-erickson/chpt/life-milton-h-erickson
  18. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00029157.1976.10403856
  19. https://archive.org/details/unlimitedpowerne0000robb
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340912787_Ericksonian_Hypnotherapy_Resemblances_in_Solution_Focused_Brief_Therapy
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4644316/
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810024000977
  23. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/women-with-autism-spectrum-disorder/202505/what-is-ericksonian-hypnosis
  24. https://www.lidsen.com/journals/icm/icm-05-01-010
  25. https://britishhypnosisresearch.com/about-ericksonian-hypnotherapy/
  26. https://www.gothampsychotherapy.com/ericksonian-hypnosis/
  27. https://ericksonianhypnosis.com/how-to-induce-a-hypnotic-trance-ericksonian-way/
  28. https://www.unk.com/blog/the-hypnotic-art-of-confusion/
  29. http://fast-humanities.com/fh/article/view/1
  30. https://www.nlpworld.co.uk/nlp-training-the-milton-model-language-for-change/
  31. https://besthypnosisscripts.com/how-to-hypnotize/hypnosis-suggestion/milton-model-techniques/
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6248753/
  33. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22443526/
  34. https://sleepandhypnosis.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/1c211e6eed3647b883972bd90ecb85ab.pdf
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10807512/
  36. https://mikemandelhypnosis.com/hypnosis-training/pacing-and-leading/
  37. https://mikemandelhypnosis.com/hypnosis-training/how-to-use-embedded-commands/
  38. https://www.sleightofmouth.org/
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3717822/
  40. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00029157.2025.2460581
  41. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31251710/
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9138388/
  43. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD001008.pub2/full
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6568235/
  45. https://asch.net/asch-certification-program/
  46. https://www.ijmae.com/article_117553_922badce1d27f8e7992323133e49cc34.pdf
  47. https://acr-journal.com/article/download/pdf/1123/
  48. https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/97/e3sconf_bft2023_04034.pdf
  49. https://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/download/2600/761
  50. https://www.nlp-techniques.org/what-is-nlp/nlp-books/
  51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/20091955_Word_magic_and_the_rhetoric_of_common_sense_Erickson%27s_metaphors_for_mind
  52. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/246914173_Unwanted_effects_of_hypnosis_A_review_of_the_evidence_and_its_implications
  53. https://www.cga.ct.gov/2006/jfr/h/2006HB-05215-R00JUD-JFR.htm
  54. https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-293-factors-consider-prior-use-hypnosis
  55. https://followourcourts.com/2024/01/is-it-legal-to-hypnotize-someone-without-consent/
  56. https://hypnosiscredentials.com/hypnosis-regulations-around-the-world/
  57. https://cascadehypnosistraining.com/hypnosis-requirements-by-state
  58. https://www.hypnotherapy.com/lawca
  59. https://hypnosiscredentials.com/business-practices/hypnosis-regulations/
  60. https://cascadehypnosistraining.com/hypnosis-requirements-by-state/california
  61. https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-290-hypnosis-defendant
  62. https://www.elderjusticecal.org/blog-elder-justice-viewpoints/undue-influence-and-the-law
  63. https://www.sellingpower.com/2010/02/02/3909/hypnotic-selling-techniques/
  64. https://www.erickson-foundation.org/wizard-of-the-desert
  65. https://salesman.com/how-to-influence-anybody-with-kevin-hogan/
  66. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/148/631017/society-of-the-psyop-part-2-ai-mind-control-and-magic
  67. https://consilienceproject.org/social-media-enables-undue-influence/
  68. https://joymind.com/how-media-portrays-hypnotherapy/
  69. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28619308/
  70. https://blog.hypnotechs.com/posts/hypnosis-media
  71. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pI1KhEmex6A
  72. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-asylum/202504/charles-manson-and-the-enigma-of-mind-control
  73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6898194_Hypnosis_in_Film_and_Television
  74. https://www.looper.com/491116/the-magic-tricks-in-now-you-see-me-explained/
  75. https://www.wired.com/2013/05/now-you-see-me-magic-tricks/
  76. https://hypnosociety.com/patrick-jane-techniques/
  77. https://johndray.com/2024/09/02/does-the-tv-series-the-mentalist-have-anything-to-say-about-mental-health/
  78. https://www.shortform.com/blog/pickup-artist-techniques-the-game/
  79. https://www.popmatters.com/game-penetrating-2005-2496245276.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.