Hubbry Logo
Balance of systemBalance of systemMain
Open search
Balance of system
Community hub
Balance of system
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Balance of system
Balance of system
Balance of system
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The balance of system (BOS) encompasses all components of a photovoltaic system other than the photovoltaic panels.[1] This includes wiring, switches, a mounting system, one or many solar inverters, a battery bank and battery charger.

Other optional components include renewable energy credit revenue-grade meter, maximum power point tracker (MPPT), GPS solar tracker, Energy management software, solar concentrators, solar irradiance sensors, anemometer, or task-specific accessories designed to meet specialized requirements for a system owner. In addition, concentrated photovoltaics systems require optical lenses or mirrors and sometimes a cooling system.

In addition, ground-mounted, large photovoltaic power station require equipment and facilities, such as grid connections, office facilities, and concrete.[2] Land is sometimes included as part of the BOS as well.

Balance of plant

[edit]

A similar term to balance of system is balance of plant (BOP) which is generally used in the context of power engineering and applies to all the supporting components and systems of the power plant which are needed to produce the energy. These may include suitable transformers, inverters, cabling, switching and control equipment, protection equipment, power conditioners, support structures, etc., depending on the type of plant.

Cost of BOS

[edit]

Cost of balance of system will include the cost of the hardware (and software, if applicable), labor, permitting Interconnection and Inspection (PII) fees, and any other fees that may apply. For large commercial solar systems, the cost of BOS may include the cost of land and building, etc. The cost of BOS can be about two thirds of the total cost.

Downward trend

[edit]

While the cost of solar panels is coming down appreciably, the cost of BOS is not showing the same rate of decline. The solar cell technology is still evolving and improving, and costs are being reduced fast. The balance of systems consists mostly of items which are not specific to solar technology. As an example, the mounting structures are quite usual and the technology may already be mature, benefitting little from further innovation and research.[3]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Balance of system

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The balance of system (BOS) in solar photovoltaic (PV) systems encompasses all hardware, labor, and associated costs excluding the PV modules themselves, including structural components like mounting racks and foundations, electrical elements such as inverters, wiring, combiner boxes, and disconnects, as well as soft costs involving permitting, financing, , and installation labor. These elements ensure the structural integrity, electrical connectivity, and of PV installations, enabling the conversion of into usable grid-compatible power. BOS components are tailored to project scale, site conditions, and regulatory requirements, with variations between utility-scale, commercial, and residential applications. BOS costs have historically represented a significant portion of total PV system expenses, often accounting for 50-68% of installed costs in recent years, though this share has fluctuated as module prices declined sharply. From 2010 to 2024, global weighted average total installed costs for utility-scale solar PV fell by 87%, from USD 5,310 per kW to USD 691 per kW, with hardware costs dropping to USD 239 per kW (33% of total), installation costs to USD 151 per kW (18%), and soft costs to approximately USD 138 per kW (20%). These reductions stem from technological advancements like automated assembly, standardized designs, and in manufacturing and deployment, which have lowered expenses by up to 50% in optimized scenarios. The evolution of BOS has been pivotal to solar PV's global expansion, contributing approximately 56% to the 91% reduction in levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) from USD 0.460 per kWh in 2010 to USD 0.043 per kWh in 2024, thereby enhancing affordability and supporting a 46-fold increase in cumulative capacity to 1,859 GW by the end of 2024 (including a record 452 GW added in 2024). Regional differences persist, with lower BOS costs in high-volume markets like China due to streamlined permitting and labor efficiencies, compared to higher soft costs in areas with complex regulations. Ongoing innovations, such as advanced power electronics and wind-load-optimized structures, continue to target further BOS cost reductions, with 2024 costs already achieving USD 0.69 per watt and projections to USD 0.39 per watt by 2029, facilitating broader integration into the energy transition.

Definition and Scope

Core Definition

The balance of system (BOS) encompasses all hardware, software, engineering, and labor required for the installation, integration, and operation of an , excluding the primary energy-generating equipment such as photovoltaic modules or wind turbines. In contexts, BOS includes the supporting that converts, distributes, and manages power output to ensure compatibility with end-use applications or grid connections. This collection of elements is critical for achieving overall system performance, as it addresses the practical challenges of site-specific deployment and long-term functionality. For instance, in solar photovoltaic installations, BOS components such as inverters for to conversion and mounting structures for secure panel placement play a pivotal role in , efficiency optimization, and reliability under varying environmental conditions. Similarly, in setups, BOS facilitates the transmission of generated while incorporating and control mechanisms. These aspects underscore BOS's function in bridging the gap between raw energy production and usable power delivery. A related concept, balance of plant (BOP), applies more broadly to conventional power generation systems, encompassing auxiliary equipment beyond the core turbine or generator.

Distinction from Balance of Plant

The balance of system (BOS) and balance of plant (BOP) are related but distinct concepts in power generation engineering, primarily differentiated by their application contexts and scopes. BOS typically refers to the auxiliary components and infrastructure in renewable energy systems, such as solar photovoltaic (PV) and wind installations, excluding the core energy conversion elements like PV modules or wind turbines. In contrast, BOP encompasses the supporting systems in conventional power plants, including coal-fired and nuclear facilities, beyond the primary generation equipment like boilers, turbines, or reactors. This distinction arises because BOS emphasizes modular, distributed renewable setups focused on integration and scalability, while BOP addresses the more centralized, complex auxiliaries required for thermal or fission-based operations. In terms of scope, BOS includes electrical and structural elements tailored to renewables, such as inverters, mounting structures, cabling, and grid interconnection for solar PV, or roads, substations, and monitoring for wind farms, often accounting for 50-68% of total installed costs in utility-scale projects. BOP, however, extends to site-specific infrastructure in conventional plants, incorporating cooling towers, fuel handling, pollution controls (e.g., flue gas desulfurization in coal plants), redundant safety systems, and control rooms in nuclear facilities, which support operational reliability and regulatory compliance. While both terms cover non-core elements like electrical distribution and civil works, BOS prioritizes cost-effective, standardized components for rapid deployment in variable-output renewables, whereas BOP involves more intricate, customized engineering for continuous baseload generation in fossil or nuclear contexts. The terms are occasionally used interchangeably in hybrid or distributed generation scenarios, but their primary usage reflects the differing demands of renewable modularity versus conventional plant complexity. Historically, BOP emerged as a standard framework for large-scale conventional during the expansion of thermal plants in the mid-20th century, when auxiliary systems became essential for efficient and early nuclear operations. BOS, on the other hand, gained prominence following the oil crises, which spurred investments in alternative renewables and led to characterizations of supporting systems for emerging solar and technologies by the late . This evolution underscores BOS's role in enabling scalable, distributed energy solutions amid the shift toward , in contrast to BOP's entrenched application in site-intensive, capital-heavy conventional .

Components

Electrical Components

Inverters are essential electrical components in balance of system (BOS) setups for solar photovoltaic (PV) systems, primarily responsible for converting (DC) electricity generated by PV panels into (AC) suitable for grid integration or local use. They also perform (MPPT), an algorithm that dynamically adjusts the operating voltage and current to maximize energy extraction from the DC source under varying environmental conditions such as and . Common types include string inverters, which connect to a series of PV modules (typically 6-12) and handle capacities from a few hundred watts to several kilowatts, optimizing performance for uniform arrays but susceptible to shading losses across the string; central inverters, designed for large-scale installations with capacities ranging from several kilowatts to megawatts, aggregating multiple strings for efficient high-volume conversion; and microinverters, mounted directly on individual PV modules to enable module-level MPPT, mitigating mismatch issues like partial and allowing independent operation with efficiencies often exceeding 95%. String and central inverters are cost-effective for ground-mounted or commercial systems, while microinverters enhance reliability in residential rooftop applications by reducing single-point failures. Wiring and cabling in BOS encompass both DC and AC conductors that facilitate power flow from sources to inverters and , with sizing determined to minimize losses and ensure safety. DC conductors, often using UV-resistant cables like those rated for 600V or 1000V in PV arrays, connect modules in series or parallel strings, while AC conductors link inverters to distribution panels. Conductor sizing accounts for current-carrying capacity, derating, and , with a recommended maximum of 3% total drop (2% on the DC side and 1% on the AC side) to maintain efficiency. is calculated using the formula Vdrop=I×R×[L](/page/Length)V_{drop} = I \times R \times [L](/page/Length), where II is the current, RR is the conductor resistance per unit , and LL is the one-way of the circuit; for round-trip paths, this is often doubled to reflect bidirectional flow. Oversized conductors, such as 10 AWG for short DC runs or 6 AWG for longer AC feeds, prevent excessive heating and comply with ampacity tables in standards like the (). Disconnects, fuses, and surge protectors provide critical protection and isolation in BOS electrical systems, ensuring safe operation and adherence to grid interconnection requirements. Disconnect switches, required to be readily accessible, allow rapid isolation of PV arrays or inverters for maintenance or emergencies, with Article 690 mandating one disconnect per system not exceeding six switches or breakers in total. Fuses or circuit breakers offer overcurrent protection, sized at 125-156% of the short-circuit current for DC strings to guard against faults like ground shorts, preventing fires or equipment damage. Surge protectors, often Type 1 or 2 devices installed at the inverter input and service entrance, mitigate transient overvoltages from or switching, clamping surges to safe levels and complying with 690.11 for PV systems. These components collectively enable fault-tolerant designs that meet utility and safety standards, reducing downtime and liability in installations. Combiners and junction boxes serve to aggregate and securely connect multiple electrical circuits within BOS, streamlining power routing from distributed sources. Combiner boxes parallel multiple DC strings from PV arrays into a single output circuit for the inverter, typically incorporating fuses for each input to protect against string imbalances and overcurrents. They are weatherproof enclosures rated for outdoor use, often with surge arrestors integrated, and sized based on total array current (e.g., handling 15-20A per string for a 10-string array). Junction boxes, meanwhile, provide sealed connection points for splicing conductors or transitioning between cable types, ensuring moisture resistance and strain relief to maintain long-term integrity in harsh environments. By consolidating outputs, these devices reduce wiring complexity and voltage drops, enhancing overall system efficiency in multi-module setups. For residential systems, smaller combiners may suffice, while utility-scale installations require larger, automated units.

Structural and Mechanical Components

Structural and mechanical components in () encompass the physical frameworks and hardware that support and protect solar PV installations, ensuring stability and longevity under environmental stresses. Mounting and systems form the core of this , designed to securely position modules while accommodating site-specific conditions. These systems are typically engineered to handle dynamic loads such as wind and snow, adhering to standards like ASCE 7 for minimum design loads on buildings and other structures. Fixed-tilt mounting systems, which orient panels at a static angle optimized for local , are widely used for both rooftop and ground-mounted applications due to their simplicity and lack of , facilitating easier installation and lower requirements. In contrast, tracking systems—either single-axis (rotating along one direction to ) or dual-axis (adjusting in two dimensions for maximum exposure)—enhance energy yield by up to 25-40% compared to fixed-tilt but introduce mechanical complexity, including actuators and motors that demand periodic and inspection. Materials for predominantly include aluminum for rails and extrusions, valued for its properties and corrosion resistance, while is employed for robust structural elements like posts and foundations to provide durability in high-load scenarios. Wind load considerations involve calculating pressures and uplift forces per ASCE 7 Chapter 26, often requiring elevated clearances or aerodynamic profiles to mitigate gust effects on arrays. Similarly, snow load design follows ASCE 7 Chapter 7, accounting for ground loads, exposure factors, and sloped surface reductions to prevent accumulation exceeding 50 psf (240 kg/m²) on panels, with steeper tilts (e.g., 30°) promoting natural shedding. Balance of enclosure components provide essential protection against , integrating weatherproofing measures such as sealed housings and ventilation to shield sensitive hardware from , , and fluctuations in outdoor settings. Grounding hardware, including lugs, straps, and conductors, establishes a low-resistance path to earth for all metallic elements like racking and enclosures, complying with requirements to safeguard against and faults. Conduit systems, often rigid or flexible PVC/metal raceways, encase cables to prevent abrasion, UV exposure, and damage, ensuring reliable routing through structural pathways while maintaining system integrity. Mechanical integration ties these elements together via components like ballasts, clamps, and rail systems, which enable non-penetrative or secure fastening without compromising underlying surfaces. Ballasted racks use or water-filled weights (typically 3-8 lbs/ft²) to arrays on flat roofs or grounds, avoiding while distributing loads evenly. Clamps and rails, often with integrated channels for mid- and end-clamping, secure modules to the framework, requiring verification every five years to counter loosening from . Optimized designs streamline assembly on prepared sites, with labor efficiencies varying by scale (e.g., faster for utility-scale ground-mounts using automated tools). is briefly routed through these structural conduits and rails to minimize exposure and facilitate organized integration.

Safety and Monitoring Systems

Safety and monitoring systems in balance of system () configurations for solar PV installations are essential for mitigating risks such as electrical hazards and ensuring reliable operation. These systems incorporate protective devices that detect and interrupt faults, preventing fires, shocks, and equipment damage. For instance, arc-fault circuit interrupters (AFCIs) monitor DC circuits in PV arrays for irregular arcing patterns indicative of series or parallel faults, automatically disconnecting affected segments to extinguish potential ignition sources. Rapid shutdown systems, compliant with UL 1741 standards (as of 2023), enable the swift de-energization of PV arrays during emergencies like , reducing voltage to safe levels within seconds by initiating module-level or string-level isolation. Ground-fault protection devices, such as ground-fault detection and interruption (GFDI) mechanisms integrated into inverters, sense imbalances in current flow to and trip the circuit, safeguarding against leakage currents that could lead to or . Monitoring hardware provides real-time oversight of environmental and electrical parameters to track system performance and preempt issues. Sensors for solar irradiance, typically pyranometers, measure incoming radiation to correlate with expected energy yield, while temperature sensors—such as thermocouples or resistance temperature detectors—monitor module and ambient conditions to assess thermal impacts on efficiency. Voltage and current sensors, often hall-effect based, capture electrical outputs across strings and arrays for anomaly identification. Data loggers aggregate this data at configurable intervals, storing it for analysis, and integrate with supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems to enable centralized visualization and remote diagnostics across utility-scale renewable sites. Software components in BOS employ straightforward control algorithms for fault detection, relying on predefined thresholds to generate alerts without complex computation. For example, threshold-based monitoring compares measured voltage against rated values to indicate potential issues like shading or degradation. These algorithms process sensor inputs via programmable logic controllers (PLCs) or , facilitating automated responses like inverter or operator notifications to maintain system integrity. In residential systems, simpler monitoring apps may suffice, while utility-scale setups use advanced for . Compliance with international standards ensures BOS safety systems meet rigorous criteria for construction and operation, excluding direct testing of primary generation elements. The IEC 61730 standard qualifies PV modules for safety, specifying requirements to prevent electrical shock, fire hazards, and mechanical injuries through tests like impulse voltage withstand and bypass diode thermal evaluation (as of 2023). Adherence to such standards verifies that safety and monitoring features integrate reliably with electrical components, enhancing overall system resilience.

Applications

Solar Photovoltaic Systems

In solar photovoltaic (PV) systems, the balance of system (BOS) encompasses all non-module components essential for converting and delivering DC power from PV arrays to the grid or end-use, including electrical hardware, structural supports, and monitoring elements tailored to PV's DC-centric architecture. These elements ensure efficient power collection, voltage management, and structural integrity under varying environmental conditions, directly influencing system reliability and output. PV-specific BOS includes module interconnects, such as series-parallel wiring and boxes, which link modules into strings to aggregate current while minimizing resistive losses through low-resistance cables and weatherproof connectors. DC optimizers, deployed at the module level, perform (MPPT) to mitigate mismatch losses from shading or soiling, enabling significantly higher energy harvest in partially shaded arrays compared to string-only configurations. System voltage configurations vary by scale: lower-voltage setups (e.g., 600 V) suit residential and small commercial installations for simpler cabling, while higher-voltage designs (e.g., 1500 V) dominate utility-scale projects, reducing current by up to 33% and thereby lowering wire sizes, conduit requirements, and overall material costs by 10-20%. Installation nuances differ significantly between roof-mounted and ground-mounted PV systems, affecting BOS design and integration. Roof mounts, common in distributed generation, require lightweight racking systems with flashing and ballast to avoid roof penetrations, integrating with building structures while accounting for wind loads and limited space. Ground mounts, prevalent in utility-scale arrays, involve driven-pile or helical foundations for stability, often incorporating fixed-tilt or tracking mechanisms on expansive sites to optimize orientation without structural constraints. In utility-scale PV installations, typically accounts for approximately 50% of total system costs, driven by structural, electrical, and labor elements that scale with project size. A representative of utility-scale solar farms illustrates integration: the MW Topaz Solar Farm in employs single-axis trackers as a core component, elevating modules to follow the sun's east-west path and increasing annual energy yield by 20-30% over fixed-tilt equivalents, thereby enhancing levelized cost of energy despite added structural complexity.

Wind Power Systems

In wind power systems, the balance of system (BOS) encompasses all non-turbine components essential for supporting, installing, and integrating wind turbines into , including structural, mechanical, and electrical elements that ensure and stability. These components are critical for both onshore and offshore installations, where BOS costs typically constitute 20-30% of the total for onshore wind farms, rising to approximately 70% for offshore projects due to complex marine environments. Structural BOS elements include foundations that anchor the turbine towers, with onshore designs favoring concrete spread-foot types that distribute loads based on soil bearing pressure and turbine thrust, while offshore configurations employ monopile foundations—large steel tubes driven into the seabed—for water depths up to 40 meters, offering cost-effectiveness in softer soils. BOS also covers the installation of towers (typically constructed from tubular steel in multiple sections for hub heights ranging from 80 to 120 meters in modern onshore systems), including crane operations and assembly. For deeper waters (40-80 meters) or challenging seabeds, lattice or jacket structures, consisting of welded steel trusses, provide enhanced stability against wave and current forces. BOS supports mechanical systems such as and pitch controls through cabling and interfaces with plant-level control systems, enabling optimization of turbine performance by adjusting orientation and blade angles in response to variations. The rotates the to face prevailing , while pitch control regulates power output and protects against . These turbine-integrated mechanisms rely on BOS for reliable electrical and structural integration. Electrical integration forms a vital BOS aspect, facilitating power collection and transmission from multiple turbines to . Onshore farms utilize underground collection systems with medium-voltage cables (e.g., 34.5 kV) routed through trenches to a central substation, where step-up transformers elevate voltage for efficient grid export. Offshore systems extend this with cables at 33 kV or 66 kV connecting turbines to an offshore substation, followed by high-voltage export cables (132 kV or 220 kV) to shore, incorporating step-up transformers rated at approximately $12,500 per MVA to minimize transmission losses. These configurations account for turbine spacing, layout, and excess cable lengths to accommodate , ensuring reliable integration even in hybrid renewable setups sharing inverters.

Other Renewable Energy Systems

In hydroelectric systems, the balance of system encompasses for water management and power conversion, including penstocks that transport water under pressure from the intake to the turbines, structural supports for turbines to ensure stability under high hydraulic loads, control gates such as wicket gates that regulate water flow to match power demand, and electrical designed to manage variable flow conditions and integrate with . These components adapt core BOS principles to the dynamic nature of , enabling efficient capture while accommodating fluctuations in river flow and load requirements. Geothermal balance of system components focus on handling high-temperature fluids and subsurface risks, featuring specialized for transporting geothermal fluids from wells to the power , heat exchangers that transfer to a for operation without direct contact to avoid scaling and , and advanced monitoring systems for seismic activity to detect from fluid injection or extraction. These adaptations ensure safe and reliable operation in geologically active environments, where must withstand corrosive brines and heat exchangers optimize efficiency in plants common for lower-temperature resources. In biomass power plants, particularly small-scale facilities processing under 1,000 tons per day, the balance of system includes fuel handling systems such as conveyors and storage yards for receiving, sizing, and feeding feedstock to the , along with emission control equipment like baghouses, cyclones, and electrostatic precipitators to mitigate particulate matter, , and other pollutants. These elements represent 30-40% of total in small-scale plants, driven by the need for robust handling of variable, low-density fuels and stringent environmental compliance.

Economic Considerations

Cost Composition

The cost composition of balance of system (BOS) in , particularly in solar photovoltaic (PV) and installations, is typically categorized into hardware, labor, and soft costs. Hardware, encompassing structural, electrical, and other non-module components, accounts for approximately 40-45% of total BOS expenditures. Labor, involving installation, assembly, and commissioning activities, comprises 25-30%. Permitting, inspections, and other soft costs make up 25-35%. These ranges reflect aggregated data from utility-scale and commercial projects as of 2023, where hardware remains significant due to the scale of materials required. In solar PV systems, the hardware segment includes mounting structures, inverters, and wiring as key elements. Mounting hardware such as and trackers forms a substantial portion owing to site preparation and durability needs, while inverters and cabling support power conversion and distribution. These proportions are drawn from global benchmarks and can shift slightly with technology advancements, but they establish the core allocation within BOS hardware. Soft costs include (EPC) fees, along with permitting and , which vary regionally due to differences in labor markets and oversight. Labor within BOS tends to be higher in (up to 30% of BOS) compared to (around 20%), driven by elevated wage rates and more complex installation protocols in developed markets. EPC fees, as a key soft cost element, can add 5-10% to BOS in regions with stringent standards, emphasizing the need for efficient . For wind systems, BOS costs similarly include turbine foundations and cabling, with hardware often 40-50% due to larger structural demands.

Factors Affecting BOS Costs

The costs associated with balance of system (BOS) components in renewable energy projects vary significantly due to scale effects, where larger installations achieve economies that lower per-kilowatt expenses. For instance, utility-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) systems typically exhibit BOS costs around $0.40-0.50/ globally as of 2023, benefiting from bulk procurement, streamlined labor deployment, and optimized designs that reduce overhead per unit. In contrast, residential-scale systems often face BOS costs exceeding $1.50/ in the , as smaller project sizes limit these efficiencies and amplify fixed expenses like customized and on-site adjustments. Location plays a critical role in BOS cost variations, influenced by regional labor rates, terrain challenges, and . Higher labor costs in urban or high-wage areas, such as the Northeast U.S., can elevate installation expenses by 20-30% compared to rural Midwest sites, where lower wages and easier access prevail. Difficult , like rocky or sloped sites, requires additional site preparation—such as grading or specialized foundations—which can increase structural BOS costs substantially, often by 15-25% over flat-land projects due to extended equipment needs and safety measures. Supply chain factors, including transportation distances, further raise costs in remote or import-dependent regions, adding logistical premiums that compound with material volatility. Regulatory impacts also drive BOS expenses, particularly through permitting processes and incentives that affect soft costs. Delays in local permitting and inspections can extend project timelines by weeks to months, inflating soft costs—such as overhead and financing—by 5-15% in residential and commercial PV installations, as idle labor and inventory accumulate. Conversely, incentives like the U.S. Investment Tax Credit (ITC), which provides a 30% offset on eligible system costs including BOS, can reduce effective expenses by directly subsidizing non-module elements across scales. These regulatory dynamics vary by jurisdiction, with streamlined processes in states like California minimizing delays compared to more bureaucratic regions.

Historical Cost Reductions

The balance of system (BOS) costs for solar photovoltaic (PV) systems have undergone significant reductions over the past decade and a half, driven primarily by in manufacturing, advancements in efficiency, and increased global competition. According to National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) benchmarks, utility-scale solar PV BOS costs declined from $0.96/Wdc in 2010 to $0.33/Wdc in 2024 (in 2024 USD), representing a 66% reduction. This trend paralleled even steeper drops in module prices, which fell by approximately 90% over the same period, as hardware cost decreases accounted for a substantial portion of overall system cost improvements. Similar patterns emerged across market segments, with commercial rooftop BOS costs dropping 59% from $0.91/Wdc to $0.37/Wdc, though residential BOS saw a more modest 13% decline from $0.71/Wdc to $0.62/Wdc, reflecting persistent challenges in soft costs like labor and permitting. Globally, the (IRENA) reported utility-scale solar PV total installed costs at USD 691/kW in 2024, underscoring continued BOS cost reductions. A key driver in the was the of solar PV supply chains, particularly the rapid expansion of manufacturing capacity in , which shifted production away from , , and the and lowered component prices through massive scale. This period saw annual installation growth exceeding 50% globally, enabling bulk and standardized designs that reduced BOS hardware expenses, such as racking and wiring. By the mid-, these efficiencies had stabilized supply and fostered innovations in installation practices, contributing to an overall 83% reduction in utility-scale total installed costs from $6.94/Wdc to $1.15/Wdc. Post-2020, the initially disrupted global supply chains, causing temporary price spikes in materials and logistics that slowed BOS cost declines. However, recovery efforts accelerated localization in key markets like the , bolstered by policies such as the 2022 , which incentivized domestic production and reduced reliance on imports. This localization, combined with resumed manufacturing scale-up, enabled continued BOS reductions, with utility-scale costs falling an additional 12% from 2021 to 2024 despite inflationary pressures. By late 2024, these dynamics had positioned BOS costs at levels supporting broader adoption, with projections indicating further stabilization into 2025.

Emerging Technologies and Innovations

Recent advancements in balance of system (BOS) components are focusing on enhancing compatibility with high-efficiency photovoltaic modules, such as bifacial designs that capture sunlight from to boost yield by up to 30%. Trackers optimized for bifacial modules, including single-axis systems with terrain-following capabilities, have become dominant in utility-scale installations, enabling greater output and project viability by aligning module orientation more precisely with effects from the ground. These innovations build on historical cost reductions in by prioritizing modular designs that integrate seamlessly with emerging PV technologies. Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing BOS monitoring through and IoT integration, allowing real-time fault detection and performance optimization that can reduce operations and (O&M) by approximately 15%. AI-driven analyze vast datasets from sensors to forecast equipment failures weeks in advance, minimizing unplanned outages and extending asset lifespan in solar arrays. This approach not only cuts reactive costs but also improves overall by dynamically adjusting parameters like inverter settings based on and load forecasts. Material innovations in BOS mounting structures are emphasizing lightweight composites, such as advanced aluminum alloys and engineered polymers, which reduce overall system weight and installation time by up to 30% through fewer components and simplified assembly. These composites maintain structural integrity under environmental stresses while lowering labor requirements, particularly in ground-mounted and rooftop applications. Prototypes of (WPT) technologies are emerging to eliminate traditional cabling in BOS, with distributed systems demonstrating efficient energy delivery over short distances in solar farms, potentially reducing wiring losses and maintenance needs. As of 2025, BOS designs are increasingly incorporating integration, with DC-coupled batteries becoming standard for direct PV-to-storage connections that achieve roundtrip efficiencies exceeding 95% by avoiding AC-DC conversions. These systems, exemplified by hybrid inverters paired with lithium-iron-phosphate batteries, enable smoother grid interactions and backup capabilities during outages. Updated standards like IEEE 1547-2020, with ongoing revisions emphasizing ride-through requirements and , are enhancing BOS grid resilience by mandating advanced inverter functions for frequency and voltage support in distributed energy resources.

References

  1. https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/power-electronics-and-balance-system-hardware-technologies
  2. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2024/Sep/IRENA_Renewable_power_generation_costs_in_2023.pdf
  3. https://rmi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/RMI_Document_Repository_Public-Reprts_2010-19BalanceOfSystemReport.pdf
  4. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2025/Jul/IRENA_TEC_RPGC_in_2024_2025.pdf
  5. https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2023/residential_pv
  6. https://www.irena.org/News/pressreleases/2025/Mar/Record-Breaking-Annual-Growth-in-Renewable-Power-Capacity
  7. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2015/05/f22/solar_pv.pdf
  8. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/legosti/old/16319.pdf
  9. https://ei-spark.lbl.gov/generation/utility-scale-pv/bos/info/
  10. https://www.windfarmbop.com/bop-vs-bos-similarities-and-differences/
  11. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/gen/fy98/24496.pdf
  12. https://petrotechinc.com/balance-of-plant-in-power-generation/
  13. https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/buildings/dg_storage_chp/pdf/dg_storage_chp.pdf
  14. https://invention.si.edu/invention-stories/looking-back-1973-oil-crisis-new-perspectives-energy-innovation
  15. https://www.energystar.gov/sites/default/files/2025-08/Solar_PV_Inverters_Scoping_Report.pdf
  16. https://courses.ems.psu.edu/ae868/node/904
  17. https://extension.umd.edu/resource/working-solar-wiring-and-fusing-eb-2023-0676
  18. https://courses.ems.psu.edu/ae868/node/967
  19. https://courses.ems.psu.edu/ae868/node/915
  20. https://extension.arizona.edu/sites/extension.arizona.edu/files/pubs/az1742-2018.pdf
  21. https://amplify.asce.org/content/standard/9780784415788/part/provisions/standard-chapter/s26
  22. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/73822.pdf
  23. https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/solar-photovoltaic-manufacturing-basics
  24. http://www.i-asem.org/publication_conf/structures22/9.CD/CD667/2.%2520CD2667_7329F5.pdf
  25. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2021-09/pv-system-owners-guide-to-weather-vulnerabilities.pdf
  26. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy16osti/65286.pdf
  27. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/60660.pdf
  28. https://www.shopulstandards.com/ProductDetail.aspx?productId=UL1741_3_S_20210928
  29. https://www.fluke.com/en-us/learn/blog/renewable-energy/what-is-a-dc-ground-fault-in-a-pv-system
  30. https://www.hukseflux.com/library/solar-power-monitoring-how-to-do-that
  31. https://inductiveautomation.com/resources/customerproject/scada-solar-energy-system
  32. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/14/4140
  33. https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/59803
  34. https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/balance-system-equipment-required-renewable-energy-systems
  35. https://css.umich.edu/publications/factsheets/energy/solar-pv-energy-factsheet
  36. https://www.puc.pa.gov/media/2794/24_solar_electricity_faqs.pdf
  37. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/54876.pdf
  38. https://www.pv-tech.org/wp-content/uploads/legacy-publication-pdfs/287981e1ad-game-changers-the-rise-and-rise-of-1500v-technology.pdf
  39. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy10osti/46078.pdf
  40. https://www.wbdg.org/resources/photovoltaics
  41. http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2024/ph240/merrell1/docs/css07-08.pdf
  42. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/72201.pdf
  43. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy17osti/66874.pdf
  44. https://www.energy.gov/eere/wind/how-wind-turbine-works-text-version
  45. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-12/Hydropower%252520Supply%252520Chain%252520Report%252520-%252520Final%255B1%255D.pdf
  46. https://www1.eere.energy.gov/wind/pdfs/doewater-10107-vol.1-pt2.pdf
  47. https://info.ornl.gov/sites/publications/Files/Pub190558.pdf
  48. https://www.usbr.gov/power//data/fist/FIST_4-7_%288-2023%29.pdf
  49. https://www1.eere.energy.gov/geothermal/pdfs/lifecycle_analysis_of_geothermal_systems.pdf
  50. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/6531000
  51. https://publications.anl.gov/anlpubs/2010/09/67934.pdf
  52. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-07/documents/biomass_combined_heat_and_power_catalog_of_technologies_7._representative_biomass_chp_system_cost_and_performance_profiles.pdf
  53. https://restservice.epri.com/publicdownload/000000000001014290/0/Product
  54. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy25osti/92257.pdf
  55. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy23osti/87303.pdf
  56. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/77324.pdf
  57. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy25osti/92536.pdf
  58. https://www.iea.org/reports/solar-pv-global-supply-chains/executive-summary
  59. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy22osti/83586.pdf
  60. https://energy.sandia.gov/news/iea-task-13-report-offers-new-guidelines-for-photovoltaic-bifacial-tracker-systems/
  61. https://www.pv-tech.org/dominancf-pv-shift-to-bifacial-back-contact-c-si-technology-next-solar-decade/
  62. https://jmkresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/BifacialSolar_CI_Project_CaseStudy_JMKResearch_Radiance.pdf
  63. https://carbonminus.com/scale-your-solar-o-and-m-with-predictive-analytics/
  64. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/solr.202500289
  65. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4826/6/4/60
  66. https://solarbuildermag.com/mounting-solutions-guide/ground-mount-solar-bos-buyers-guide/
  67. https://www.s-5.com/products/solar-panels-on-metal-roof-pvkit-2-0/
  68. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-97709-6
  69. https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2024/utility-scale_pv-plus-battery
  70. https://www.tsun-ess.com/news/solarcan-dc-coupled-unit-efficient-pv-to-battery-storage.html
  71. https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002033780
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.