Hubbry Logo
Bikini bridgeBikini bridgeMain
Open search
Bikini bridge
Community hub
Bikini bridge
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Bikini bridge
Bikini bridge
Bikini bridge
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A flickr image tagged as bikini bridge

A bikini bridge is defined as "when bikini bottoms are suspended between the two hip bones, causing a space between the bikini and the lower abdomen".[1] The phrase originated in the United States[2] on January 5, 2014, coined by users on the /b/ board on the imageboard 4chan as a parody of popular thinspiration memes.[3] According to a posting on the website, users intended to spread content across social media regarding bikini bridges.[4] It was reported on by U.S. television program Today on January 7.[5] Several commentators critiqued the posts for displaying insensitivity or being "dangerous"[6] for women with an eating disorder.[7][8][9]

Bikini bridges have been described as "fake",[10] and compared to the Chinese trends "Collarbone Challenge", and the "A4 Challenge".[2]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Bikini bridge

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The bikini bridge is a visual phenomenon in which low-waisted bottoms or similar apparel are suspended between the protruding hip bones (iliac crests), creating a gap resembling a bridge over the concave lower abdomen, typically observed when a person lies . This effect, dependent on low subcutaneous fat in the abdominal region and appropriate clothing fit, gained prominence as an through a coordinated launched on January 5, 2014, by users on the imageboard's /b/ board under "Operation Bikini Bridge." Intended as to parody thinspiration trends and fixations, the campaign employed automated posts—exceeding 3,400 in 48 hours—alongside fabricated celebrity endorsements to simulate organic virality. Although predating the 2014 operation with earlier instances, such as a blog launched on February 26, 2009, collecting related images and an entry from April 24, 2009, the propelled it into mainstream discourse. The ensuing media coverage framed it as a potential successor to phenomena like the "," sparking debates on social media's amplification of aesthetic pressures, yet its origins underscore the manufactured nature of such viral body ideals rather than adoption. Public reception varied, with some fitness influencers and outlets decrying it as promoting unhealthy thinness, while the prank's architects aimed to expose gullibility in online trend propagation.

Description

Physical Characteristics

The bikini bridge manifests as a visible gap between the waistband of low-rise bikini bottoms and the skin of the lower abdomen, with the fabric suspended across the protruding hip bones, typically the iliac crests or anterior superior iliac spines. This structural effect arises from the prominence of the pelvic skeleton, particularly the superior borders of the ilium, which project outward when subcutaneous fat layers over the lower abdomen and suprapubic region are minimal, often below 15-20% body fat in women depending on frame size. Anatomically, the feature highlights the natural concavity between the and the iliac crests, exaggerated in lean physiques where the rectus abdominis and obliques do not fill the space, creating a taut "bridge" span of 2-5 cm in width across the hips. Visibility is enhanced by the bikini's elastic tension resting directly on the bony prominences rather than , a configuration more apparent in ectomorphic body types with narrower pelvises or during postures that flatten the . In contrast, higher body fat distribution or muscular in the hips obscures this by elevating the waistband uniformly against the skin.

Formation and Visibility Factors

The bikini bridge refers to the visible gap formed between low-waisted bikini bottoms and the lower abdomen, where the fabric rests on the iliac crests (the upper edges of the pelvic bones) while spanning over a concave central area. This effect arises from the relative protrusion of the hip bones compared to a hollowed lower abdomen, primarily due to reduced subcutaneous fat in the supra-iliac and hypogastric regions. Key formation factors include skeletal , where a narrower or more angular pelvic structure accentuates the iliac crests' prominence, combined with low body distribution that minimizes padding over the . Women with body percentages typically under 18-22%—achievable through and exercise—exhibit greater concavity, as excess would fill the dip and obscure the bridge. Genetic predispositions influence pelvic width, storage patterns (e.g., less android distribution in the lower ), and muscle attachments, making the trait more common in ectomorphic body types. Visibility is optimized in the , such as when lying on a or , where gravitational flattening of the exaggerates the abdominal hollow relative to the fixed hip points. Low-rise swimwear, positioned below the umbilicus but above the , enhances the effect by leveraging the hips as support points. Toned core muscles, particularly the obliques and transverse abdominis, contribute by providing underlying that sustains the contour under low-fat conditions, though in these areas can sometimes reduce the gap. In standing postures or with higher-waisted garments, the feature diminishes due to tension and fabric adjustment.

Origin and Early Development

4chan Inception as Parody

On January 5, 2014, users on the /b/ board of launched "Operation Bikini Bridge," a coordinated trolling campaign parodying popular "thinspiration" body ideals such as the . The operation involved posting images of women whose hip bones created a visible gap over low-rise bottoms or , framing it as an aspirational fitness feature to mock the promotion of extreme thinness in trends. Participants aimed to generate buzz by disseminating fabricated endorsements from celebrities like and , alongside memes listing "perks" of the bikini bridge, such as enhanced sex appeal or clothing fit. The parody drew from 4chan's of internet hoaxes intended to satirize cultural obsessions with , exaggerating visible skeletal structure to absurd levels to highlight the irrationality of such standards. Users explicitly discussed the campaign's goal of eliciting overreactions from media and feminists by simulating a thinspo movement, only to reveal its artificial origins later. Despite the satirical intent, the term and imagery quickly escaped 4chan's confines, spreading to platforms like and where it was initially adopted without awareness of the prank. This unintended virality underscored the platform's influence in seeding memes, even those designed as critiques.

Pre-2014 Precursors in Body Ideals

Prior to the emergence of the bikini bridge as a in 2014, cultural ideals of female thinness frequently emphasized visible skeletal features as markers of attractiveness, rooted in fashion and media portrayals of low body fat. In the 1990s, the "" aesthetic dominated high fashion, promoting emaciated bodies with protruding bones, including collarbones and ribs, as exemplified by models like in campaigns from 1992 onward. This trend, criticized for glamorizing drug-like gauntness, correlated with body mass indexes often below 18, where pelvic and prominence would naturally occur in supine positions, though not explicitly named as such. The early 2000s Y2K fashion era further normalized hip bone visibility through low-rise jeans and , which sat below the natural waistline and exposed the in slim figures. Popularized from the late 1990s, these styles—worn by celebrities like in 2001—encouraged displays of "hip bones and lower belly" as desirable, with ultra-low cuts measuring as little as 7-9 inches from crotch to waistband. Peer discussions from the period recall comparing protruding hip bones in such attire, linking thinness to sexual appeal amid a cultural shift toward midriff-baring looks. This exposure prefigured bikini bridge dynamics, as low body fat (typically under 20% for women) allowed iliac crests to create gaps against taut fabric. Immediately preceding the 2014 bikini bridge, the "" trend gained traction around 2012-2013 on platforms like and , idealizing a space between inner thighs when standing as evidence of minimal thigh fat and low overall . This phenomenon, often tied to "thinspiration" communities, shared biomechanical prerequisites with the bikini bridge—such as a waist-to-hip under 0.7 and body fat below 18%—and was dubbed a precursor by observers noting its evolution into more niche visibility markers. Societal pressures on hip and abdominal leanness, amplified by these ideals, set the stage for the bikini bridge's rapid spread, though earlier trends lacked its specific supine focus.

Viral Spread

Social Media Amplification

The bikini bridge trend amplified rapidly on platforms following its initiation as "Operation Bikini Bridge" on January 5, 2014, by anonymous users on , who posted manipulated images of women lying on beaches with captions promoting the feature, such as "#bikinibridge" and phrases like "I love it when boys notice my bikini bridge." The campaign included fabricated pages mimicking celebrity endorsements, such as altered tweets from figures like , which were shared across and to simulate grassroots enthusiasm. This orchestrated propagation leveraged hashtags for visibility, with #bikinibridge enabling algorithmic spread on , , and , where users began uploading personal photos attempting to replicate the low body fat indicator, often in or fitness contexts. Within one week of the operation's launch, analysis of data showed that 63% of #bikinibridge posts came from established users unaffiliated with the trolls, evidencing a shift from coordinated to organic adoption amid broader cultural pressures on thinness. Proponents countered criticisms by framing it as a natural outcome of fitness dedication, while the trend's persistence on platforms like —evident in dedicated accounts persisting years later—highlighted social media's capacity to normalize engineered ideals irrespective of their parodic origins.

Media Coverage and Public Reaction

The bikini bridge phenomenon first garnered attention in early January 2014, shortly after its promotion on platforms. Outlets such as ABC News on January 7 described it as a potential successor to the "" trend, expressing concern that it represented another unhealthy body ideal encouraging extreme thinness among women. Similarly, on January 8 framed the emerging discussion as a 4chan-orchestrated that inadvertently amplified risks to by normalizing low body fat as aspirational. Public reaction was swift and polarized, with widespread online commentary decrying it as "thinspiration" that could exacerbate eating disorders and poor self-esteem. Social media users and bloggers, including fitness influencer Cassey Ho on January 6, highlighted the hoax aspect—revealed when 4chan users admitted to "Operation Bikini Bridge" as a satirical campaign—yet noted how it exposed societal vulnerability to viral body standards. Coverage in Cosmopolitan on January 8 emphasized the trend's body-shaming implications, attributing its spread to manipulated images and hashtags that tricked platforms into treating it as genuine. Subsequent analyses, including a 2017 study in journal, documented how the trend propagated rapidly despite its fabricated origins, with Twitter activity peaking in the first week of January 2014 as 63% of #bikinibridge posts came from non-troll accounts adopting it organically. Critics in outlets like argued the ease of manufacturing controversy underscored believable cultural pressures for skeletal visibility, while defenders online countered that media overreaction ignored natural variations in hip structure and fitness levels. By mid-2014, the discourse had largely subsided, though it resurfaced in 2016-2017 pieces linking it to broader "ab crack" trends as evidence of persistent, media-fueled obsessions with isolated body features.

Aesthetic and Biological Significance

Evolutionary Basis for Attractiveness

The visibility of a bikini bridge, characterized by the gap between low-rise swimwear or underwear and the lower abdomen due to prominent iliac crests, typically emerges in women with body fat percentages below 20-25%, indicating minimal subcutaneous and visceral fat in the abdominal region. This feature signals efficient fat distribution and metabolic health, as low visceral fat correlates with reduced inflammation and lower risks of metabolic disorders, traits that may have conferred survival advantages in ancestral environments by reflecting resistance to famine and disease. Evolutionary psychologists posit that such cues of leanness, when balanced with reproductive capacity, enhance perceived mate value by suggesting vigor and genetic fitness, though preferences for extreme thinness remain debated as potentially maladaptive in resource-scarce settings. A key aspect of the bikini bridge's appeal lies in its accentuation of a low waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), often around 0.7, which highlights the contrast between a narrow waist and wider hips. Cross-cultural studies demonstrate consistent male preferences for this WHR, interpreted as an honest signal of high estrogen-to-androgen ratios, ovarian function, and fertility potential, as higher estrogen promotes fat deposition on the hips and thighs while restricting it from the waist. In evolutionary terms, this distribution supports gestation and lactation demands, with the visible bony landmarks of the bridge underscoring a waist circumference under 70-80 cm in many attractive exemplars, aligning with data from diverse populations where lower WHR predicts higher reproductive success in pre-modern societies. However, the evolutionary link between bikini bridge visibility and attractiveness is indirect and contested, as empirical tests of WHR's fertility signaling yield mixed results; while low WHR correlates with perceived and nubility (peak reproductive age around 18-25 years), it does not consistently predict actual fecundity or health outcomes in contemporary cohorts. Optimal attractiveness ratings often peak at body mass indices (BMI) of 18-20 kg/, where bikini bridge prominence is feasible without compromising fat reserves essential for evolutionary fitness, suggesting selection favored over to avoid signaling nutritional deficits. These preferences likely arose from Pleistocene-era pressures, where visual cues of balanced adiposity indicated partners capable of bearing and nurturing offspring amid variable food availability.

Cultural and Societal Preferences

In many societies, particularly within fitness, modeling, and online aesthetic communities, the bikini bridge is regarded as a desirable feature signifying low body and abdominal definition, often targeted by women pursuing athletic physiques with subcutaneous percentages around 15-20%. This preference mirrors empirical findings from attractiveness , where lower body levels correlate with higher ratings of physical appeal. For instance, a study across ten populations spanning Caucasian, Asian, and African groups demonstrated an inverse linear relationship between rated attractiveness and body ness or BMI, with no observed peak and continued increases in appeal down to BMI ≈19, a range where visibility emerges prominently due to minimal overlying . Cross-cultural investigations further indicate consistent male preferences for reduced female BMI as the primary driver of perceived attractiveness, overriding variations in local body ideals, though absolute thresholds may shift slightly by region. In European contexts, for example, slimmer figures with BMI below 22 receive markedly higher attractiveness scores compared to higher-fat alternatives, aligning with the leanness implied by a bikini bridge. Such patterns suggest societal valuation stems from cues of , , and reproductive fitness, rather than mere cultural imposition, as evidenced by the uniformity across diverse raters. In non-Western societies, preferences lean toward moderately lower body fat than local averages but avoid extremes, with prominence less emphasized than overall curviness via low waist-to-hip ratios (≈0.7), which universally signal . However, global dissemination has amplified the bikini bridge as a Western-derived standard, influencing urban youth in and toward emulating such markers of leanness, often in tandem with fitness trends prioritizing visible muscular separation over higher adiposity. These preferences persist despite critiques, as and visual media data reinforce male selectivity for leaner forms indicative of metabolic efficiency.

Health and Physiological Aspects

Indicators of Body Composition

The bikini bridge appears as a visible gap between the suprapubic skin and the waistband of low-rise bottoms when an individual lies , resulting from minimal subcutaneous over the iliac crests and . This structural visibility requires low overall , typically 10-15% in women, as higher levels of fat pad the pelvic region and prevent protrusion. Such leanness aligns with profiles in bikini fitness competitors, where fat mass reduction exposes underlying skeletal and muscular contours without excessive muscular . As an informal proxy for body composition, the bikini bridge signals reduced fat mass relative to lean mass, particularly in the lower trunk, where android fat distribution patterns (favoring abdominal deposition) inversely affect its prominence. Genetic variations in pelvic morphology and fat partitioning further modulate expression, with narrower hips or favorable bone structure enhancing visibility at marginally higher fat levels. Empirical observations from physique assessments indicate that body fat below 14-16% often yields this trait in athletic women, contrasting with average female body fat ranges of 25-31%, which obscure it. Quantitatively, methods like (DXA) confirm that low trunk correlates with such phenotypic markers, though the bikini bridge lacks standardization as a diagnostic tool compared to anthropometric calipers or bioelectrical impedance. It thus reflects a composition skewed toward athletic leanness—high relative (potentially increased by 1-2% during fat-loss phases)—but does not distinguish visceral from subcutaneous or account for essential minima around 10-13% for female reproductive health. Sustained visibility may imply caloric deficits yielding 50%+ mass loss over extended prep periods, as documented in contest preparation cohorts.

Potential Benefits and Risks

The enabling a bikini bridge—typically involving low subcutaneous fat around the hips and strong core musculature—can offer physiological advantages in athletic performance, such as improved power-to-weight ratios and reduced loading during activities like running or . These benefits arise from minimized excess mass, enhancing movement efficiency and economy when body fat remains within athletic ranges (generally 14-20% for women). However, such leanness must be sustained through balanced and nutrition to avoid counterproductive effects. Conversely, achieving and maintaining the pronounced hip protrusion characteristic of a bikini bridge often requires body fat percentages below 15-18% in women, predisposing individuals to hormonal disruptions including suppressed production and hypothalamic amenorrhea. Reduced levels contribute to diminished bone mineral density, elevating long-term risk and incidence, as observed in female athletes with chronically low mass. Immune function may also compromise, increasing illness frequency and training disruptions. Efforts to attain this feature via caloric restriction or heighten risks of nutrient deficiencies, metabolic adaptation (e.g., lowered ), and impairment, with studies linking prolonged energy deficits to irregular menstrual cycles and poorer reproductive outcomes. In non-athletes, the trend's emphasis on isolated leanness over holistic health correlates with patterns, potentially exacerbating psychological strain and cardiovascular vulnerabilities from extreme undernutrition. Optimal body for physiological resilience typically exceeds the extremes needed for bikini bridge visibility, underscoring the narrow margin where benefits do not yield to risks.

Controversies and Debates

Criticisms of Promoting Disordered Eating

Critics contend that the promotion of the bikini bridge as an aesthetic ideal fosters unrealistic body standards requiring extremely low body fat percentages, often achieved through caloric restriction and other behaviors linked to . Lynn Grefe, then-president of the National Eating Disorders Association, argued in January 2014 that for individuals predisposed to eating disorders, the trend acts as a psychological challenge, intensifying internal competitions over thinness where sufferers perpetually feel insufficiently lean. She emphasized that such ideals contribute to pathways where escalates into full disorders, noting eating disorders carry the highest of any psychiatric condition. The trend's dissemination via hashtags and thinspiration ("thinspo") content further embeds it in pro-anorexia online spaces, where images of protruding hip bones are shared as aspirational goals despite the originating 4chan hoax intent. Katie Lowe, writing for FatGirlPhD.com, highlighted in 2014 how this pressures individuals without genetic predispositions for such skeletal visibility to adopt disordered patterns, including extreme , while enabling dynamics. Empirical associations support these concerns: studies link prolonged social media engagement with thin-ideal imagery to elevated body surveillance, internalization of slim standards, and symptoms, with the bikini bridge exemplifying rapid viral propagation of such pressures. Even as a satirical launched in late 2013 on , its unintended mainstream uptake—evident in over 10,000 mentions by early 2014—demonstrates how transient trends can sustain long-term body dissatisfaction risks.

Counterarguments on Realism of Preferences

Critics who argue that preferences for the bikini bridge promote unrealistic or unhealthy ideals often overlook empirical evidence from indicating that such features signal underlying biological fitness. Studies consistently demonstrate male preferences for female body shapes with low waist-to-hip ratios (WHR) around 0.7, which correlate with indicators of , , and low visceral accumulation—qualities that a visible bikini bridge approximates through prominent iliac crests and minimal abdominal adiposity. This preference persists independent of modern media, as evidenced by consistent ratings in non-Western and pre-industrial societies, suggesting an innate rather than socially constructed . Further countering claims of unattainability, survey data on perceived attractiveness reveal that optimal female body compositions for aesthetic appeal—typically involving body fat percentages of 18-22%—align with achievable levels for active women through standard exercise and nutrition, without necessitating clinical status (BMI <18.5). For instance, observers rate bodies with lower fat mass as more attractive than those optimized purely for , yet these preferences fall within ranges sustainable long-term for metabolically healthy individuals, distinguishing them from pathological thinness. Attributing solely to such preferences ignores factors like preexisting vulnerabilities, as longitudinal research links media exposure to body dissatisfaction primarily in predisposed individuals, not as a universal causal pathway. Mainstream critiques, often amplified by body positivity narratives in academic and media sources, may reflect a toward minimizing in favor of , yet fail to reconcile with showing that low abdominal visibility (as in the bikini bridge) inversely correlates with metabolic risks like , supporting its realism as a proxy rather than a disorder trigger. Preferences for these traits thus represent adaptive realism, grounded in causal links between cues and reproductive viability, rather than ephemeral trends divorced from human physiology.

Broader Impact on Body Image Discussions

The bikini bridge phenomenon, peaking in media attention during January 2014, amplified debates over social media's role in disseminating fragmented body ideals that prioritize isolated features over overall physique. Platforms like and propelled images of the visible pelvic bridge—formed by low subcutaneous fat allowing bikini bottoms to gap from the —into viral status, with over 10,000 related tweets analyzed in one study revealing rapid propagation driven by controversy rather than endorsement alone. This trend paralleled earlier fads like the , redirecting attention to hip bone prominence as a proxy for leanness, which critics argued fosters dissatisfaction by implying universal achievability despite skeletal and fat distribution variances. In scholarship, the trend underscored mechanisms of "viral contagion," where algorithmic amplification and user debates—splitting between condemnation as thinspiration and defense as natural —sustained , potentially normalizing extreme thinness cues in demographics vulnerable to peer comparison. Empirical analyses of thinspiration content linked higher hip bone visibility to pro-anorexia imagery, correlating with and heightened risks in observational data from samples. Yet, such critiques often overlook biomechanical realities: the feature emerges at body fat percentages around 15-20% in women, overlapping with athletic norms rather than pathology, as evidenced by studies on where low fat signals metabolic efficiency absent nutritional deficits. Broader discussions invoked , positing that preferences for visible skeletal markers reflect adaptive cues of and , akin to waist-to-hip ratio optima (0.7) in cross-cultural attractiveness ratings, though media narratives frequently frame these as culturally imposed harms without engaging causal evidence from mate selection experiments. The backlash, including claims of orchestrated trolling to provoke fatigue, highlighted tensions between realism in aesthetic variation and interventions promoting acceptance of higher fat distributions, which empirical ties to elevated cardiometabolic risks at levels. Ultimately, the bikini bridge catalyzed scrutiny of digital ecosystems' outsized influence on perceptual norms, prompting calls for to discern between volitional leanness and coercive pathology.

References

  1. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/bikini-bridge
  2. https://www.yourdictionary.com/bikini-bridge
  3. https://www.indiatoday.in/world/mad-mad-world/story/bikini-bridges-hoax-viral-trend-on-internet-176142-2014-01-08
  4. https://www.rezanassab.com/blog/what-is-a-bikini-bridge/
  5. https://drshortt.com/achieving-natural-contour-bikini-bridge/
  6. https://theconversation.com/social-media-the-bikini-bridge-and-the-viral-contagion-of-body-ideals-87262
  7. https://www.cpsdocs.com/blog/5-beauty-trends-youll-want-avoid/
  8. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and-entertainment/wp/2014/01/08/the-bikini-bridge-4chans-latest-prank-is-actually-pretty-dangerous/
  9. https://www.theinternetpatrol.com/bikini-bridge-newest-4chan-internet-hoax/
  10. https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2022/nov/20/heroin-chic-fashion-skinny-worship
  11. https://equip.health/articles/diet-culture-and-society/heroin-chic-body-image
  12. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/fashion/style/ageing-millennials-warned-low-rise-jeans-back-time-little-belly/
  13. https://slate.com/culture/2003/10/the-woes-of-low-rise-pants.html
  14. https://www.vox.com/the-goods/22364404/low-rise-jeans-trend-y2k-fashion
  15. http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/2014/01/07/is-bikini-bridge-the-new-thigh-gap
  16. https://www.teenvogue.com/story/bikini-bridge-thinspiration
  17. https://www.latintimes.com/bikini-bridge-gap-4-fast-facts-about-internet-fad-144094
  18. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-12-04/bikini-bridge-social-media-and-viral-contagion-of-body-ideals/9216876
  19. https://science.thewire.in/culture/how-the-bikini-bridge-went-viral-and-why/
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321838234_Crossing_the_BikiniBridge_Exploring_the_Role_of_Social_Media_in_Propagating_Body_Image_Trends
  21. https://www.vh1.com/news/mnlobg/bikini-bridge-controversial-instagram-hashtag
  22. https://www.blogilates.com/blog/bikinibridge-pointing-out-our-mental-flaws/
  23. https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a24801/bikini-bridge-body-shaming/
  24. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-31385-003
  25. https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2014/01/60319/bikini-bridges
  26. https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/ab-crack-thigh-gap-just-161144239.html
  27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S109051381200044X
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6563790/
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0162309595000682
  30. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1474704918800063
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513819300418
  32. https://www.psypost.org/women-with-lower-waist-to-hip-ratios-are-not-healthier-or-more-fertile/
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4556148/
  34. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2007-13862-006
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886901000733
  36. https://gym-mikolo.com/blogs/home-gym/the-ideal-body-fat-percentage-for-bikini-competitors-what-you-really-need-to-know
  37. https://fitblissfitness.com/2024/11/11/achieving-your-best-look-for-bikini-competition/
  38. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28253030/
  39. https://www.instagram.com/reel/C8zyDR_u1Aa/?hl=en
  40. https://mennohenselmans.com/understanding-body-fat-percentages-for-women-a-visual-guide/
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2769821/
  42. https://health.ucdavis.edu/sports-medicine/resources/body-fat
  43. https://www.freeletics.com/en/blog/posts/dangerous-beauty-hypes/
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9929756/
  45. https://thewell.northwell.edu/healthy-living-fitness/low-body-fat-risks
  46. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5222856/
  47. https://inbodyusa.com/blogs/inbodyblog/is-it-healthy-to-have-a-low-body-fat-percentage/
  48. https://www.nydailynews.com/2014/01/08/bikini-bridge-started-as-an-internet-prank-but-will-likely-do-real-damage/
  49. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26995158
  50. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23712456
  51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222650823_Waist-to-hip_ratio_and_female_attractiveness_Evidence_from_photographic_stimuli_and_methodological_considerations
  52. https://bonytobombshell.com/most-attractive-female-body-survey-results/
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4892674/
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6861923/
  55. https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article/24/4/914/219755
  56. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/beastly-behavior/201706/the-relationship-between-waist-hip-ratio-and-fertility
  57. https://scholars.luc.edu/files/40133064/Crossing%2520the%2520_BikiniBridge_%2520Exploring%2520the%2520Role%2520of%2520Social%2520Media%2520in.pdf
  58. https://www.promises.com/addiction-blog/social-medias-potential-influence-eating-disorders/
  59. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/of-images-depicting-body-image-attributes-for-each-of-the-three-different-hashtags_tbl1_320042958
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4050298/
  61. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30347463/
  62. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/positive-body-image_b_4556910
  63. https://www.today.com/health/dont-fall-bikini-bridge-prank-internet-playing-you-2d11872362
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.