Hubbry Logo
Biological rhythmBiological rhythmMain
Open search
Biological rhythm
Community hub
Biological rhythm
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Biological rhythm
Biological rhythm
Biological rhythm
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Biological rhythms are repetitive biological processes.[1] Some types of biological rhythms have been described as biological clocks. They can range in frequency from microseconds to less than one repetitive event per decade. Biological rhythms are studied by chronobiology. In the biochemical context biological rhythms are called biochemical oscillations.[2]

The variations of the timing and duration of biological activity in living organisms occur for many essential biological processes. These occur (a) in animals (eating, sleeping, mating, hibernating, migration, cellular regeneration, etc.), (b) in plants (leaf movements, photosynthetic reactions, etc.), and in microbial organisms such as fungi and protozoa. They have even been found in bacteria, especially among the cyanobacteria (aka blue-green algae, see bacterial circadian rhythms).

Circadian rhythm

[edit]

The best studied rhythm in chronobiology is the circadian rhythm, a roughly 24-hour cycle shown by physiological processes in all these organisms. The term circadian comes from the Latin circa, meaning "around" and dies, "day", meaning "approximately a day." It is regulated by circadian clocks.

The circadian rhythm can further be broken down into routine cycles during the 24-hour day:[3]

  • Diurnal, which describes organisms active during daytime
  • Nocturnal, which describes organisms active in the night
  • Crepuscular, which describes animals primarily active during the dawn and dusk hours (ex: white-tailed deer, some bats)

While circadian rhythms are defined as regulated by endogenous processes, other biological cycles may be regulated by exogenous signals. In some cases, multi-trophic systems may exhibit rhythms driven by the circadian clock of one of the members (which may also be influenced or reset by external factors). The endogenous plant cycles may regulate the activity of the bacterium by controlling availability of plant-produced photosynthate.

Other cycles

[edit]

Many other important cycles are also studied, including:

Within each cycle, the time period during which the process is more active is called the acrophase.[4] When the process is less active, the cycle is in its bathyphase or trough phase. The particular moment of highest activity is the peak or maximum; the lowest point is the nadir. How high (or low) the process gets is measured by the amplitude.

Biochemical basis of biological rhythms

[edit]

Goldbeter's book[2] provides a thorough analysis of the biochemical mechanisms and their kinetic properties that underlie biological rhythms.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Biological rhythm

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Biological rhythms are recurrent, endogenous cycles of behavioral and physiological processes in living organisms that persist under constant conditions without external environmental cues, while typically becoming synchronized to geophysical cycles such as the daily light-dark alternation. These rhythms are fundamental to life, enabling organisms to anticipate and adapt to predictable environmental changes, thereby optimizing , , and energy allocation across from microorganisms to humans. They manifest at multiple levels, including , secretion, body temperature fluctuations, and behavioral patterns like sleep-wake cycles. Biological rhythms are broadly classified into three main types based on their period length: ultradian rhythms, which have cycles shorter than 24 hours (e.g., the approximately 90-minute stages of or pulsatile secretions like insulin release); circadian rhythms, which approximate a 24-hour cycle (e.g., daily variations in alertness, production, and core body temperature); and infradian rhythms, which span longer than 24 hours (e.g., the or seasonal breeding patterns). Circadian rhythms, the most extensively studied, are orchestrated by a master in the brain's (SCN), which coordinates peripheral clocks in organs via neural and hormonal signals, ensuring temporal alignment of processes like and immune function. These rhythms are genetically regulated through transcriptional-translational feedback loops involving core clock genes such as CLOCK, BMAL1, PER, and CRY, which generate self-sustaining oscillations close to—but not exactly—24 hours in duration. Disruptions to biological rhythms, often induced by modern lifestyles such as , , or artificial exposure, can desynchronize internal clocks from external zeitgebers (time-givers like ), leading to health consequences including sleep disorders, metabolic syndromes, impaired , and increased risk of chronic diseases like cancer and cardiovascular conditions. Research in , the scientific study of these rhythms, underscores their evolutionary conservation and therapeutic potential, with interventions like timed or chronopharmacology aiming to realign cycles for better physiological harmony.

Definition and Fundamentals

Definition and Characteristics

Biological rhythms are endogenous, periodic oscillations in biological processes, encompassing behavioral, physiological, and molecular phenomena such as locomotor activity, hormone secretion, and , with cycle periods spanning from seconds to years. These rhythms are self-sustained and recur predictably, distinguishing them from or externally driven fluctuations, and they enable organisms to anticipate and adapt to environmental periodicities. Key characteristics of biological rhythms include their endogenous generation, whereby they persist under constant environmental conditions devoid of temporal cues, such as constant darkness or light; entrainability, allowing to external zeitgebers like light-dark cycles through adjustments; temperature compensation, ensuring the period length remains stable across physiological variations (with a Q10 value near 1, unlike typical biochemical reactions); and robust periodicity, characterized by a reliable, species-specific cycle length that maintains consistency over time. These properties arise from intracellular molecular feedback loops that drive the oscillations, with circadian rhythms—approximately 24-hour cycles—serving as the most extensively studied exemplar. Unlike homeostatic mechanisms, which maintain physiological variables at steady-state levels through to achieve , biological rhythms involve inherent oscillations that fluctuate cyclically around a mean, providing dynamic temporal organization rather than constancy. Representative examples include ultradian rhythms like heartbeats, which exhibit periodic variations in rate over short intervals, and infradian rhythms such as seasonal breeding patterns in mammals, which align reproductive behaviors with annual environmental changes. Basic measurement techniques for detecting biological rhythms include , a non-invasive method using wrist-worn accelerometers to monitor activity-rest patterns and infer rhythmicity over extended periods, and assays, which employ reporters fused to clock-controlled promoters to quantify real-time oscillations in in cultured cells or tissues.

Historical Development

The study of biological rhythms traces back to the early , when astronomer Jean-Jacques d'Ortous de Mairan conducted a pivotal experiment in 1729. Observing the diurnal leaf movements of the plant, de Mairan noted that the leaves continued to open during the day and close at night even when the plant was kept in constant darkness, suggesting an endogenous mechanism driving these oscillations independent of external light cues. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, research advanced through investigations into and rhythmic behaviors in plants and animals. German botanist Erwin Bünning, in the 1930s, demonstrated that endogenous circadian rhythms in plants play a key role in measuring day length for photoperiodic responses, such as flowering, through experiments on bean plants that revealed inherited rhythmic traits. This work laid the foundation for understanding how internal clocks interact with environmental signals. Building on these insights, American chronobiologist Franz Halberg coined the term "circadian" in 1959, derived from the Latin circa (about) and dies (day), to describe these approximately 24-hour endogenous cycles observed in diverse organisms. Concurrently, in the and , Colin Pittendrigh's studies on the eclosion rhythms of Drosophila pseudoobscura fruit flies established key properties of circadian clocks, including temperature compensation and to light-dark cycles, using controlled laboratory populations to isolate rhythmic emergence patterns. The field gained formal recognition with the establishment of the Society for Research on Biological Rhythms (SRBR) in 1986, which fostered interdisciplinary collaboration among scientists studying rhythms across scales from molecules to ecosystems. A landmark achievement came in 2017, when the in or was awarded to , , and for their discoveries of the molecular mechanisms underlying circadian rhythms, particularly the identification of core clock genes like in . Post-2020 developments have expanded chronobiology into microbial systems and emerging quantum influences, revealing broader evolutionary conservation of rhythmic timing. For instance, 2023 studies identified novel circadian clock components in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, highlighting essential genes for rhythmicity and adaptive fitness in prokaryotes, while research on Bacillus subtilis demonstrated light-entrainable bacterial clocks separable from direct masking effects. Additionally, integrations of quantum biology have proposed mechanisms like quantum coherence in enhancing circadian coordination, linking subatomic processes to macroscopic rhythmic phenomena. More recently, as of 2025, advances include the development of compounds like SHP1705 that target circadian clock proteins to combat glioblastoma and improvements in wearable technology for non-invasive monitoring of circadian rhythms.

Types of Biological Rhythms

Circadian Rhythms

Circadian rhythms are endogenous biological oscillations that approximate a 24-hour , persisting under constant environmental conditions without external time cues. These rhythms are self-sustaining and , allowing organisms to synchronize their internal clocks with the external solar day. In humans, the free-running period—the duration of the rhythm in isolation from zeitgebers like —averages approximately 24.2 hours, slightly longer than the 24-hour geophysical day, which necessitates daily entrainment to maintain alignment. These rhythms manifest across diverse taxa, regulating key physiological and behavioral processes. In humans, the most prominent example is the , where alertness peaks during the day and propensity rises at night. In like , circadian rhythms drive wheel-running activity, with bouts of locomotion consolidating in the active phase under a 12:12 light-dark . exhibit circadian control over stomatal opening, which typically peaks in the morning to optimize and while minimizing water loss. Even prokaryotes, such as the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus, display circadian regulation of , with peaks occurring rhythmically to align with daily environmental changes. Characteristic phases of the circadian rhythm include a minimum in core body temperature around 4-5 a.m., a peak in secretion between 2-4 a.m. to promote onset, and a rise in levels near dawn to facilitate waking and metabolic activation. These phases can shift in response to zeitgebers, with curves (PRCs) describing advances or delays induced by light exposure at different times. The free-running period exhibits minor variations, lengthening slightly in constant darkness compared to entrained conditions, and showing differences: women average about 24.09 hours, while men average 24.19 hours. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified 351 loci associated with —individual preferences for morning ("larks") or evening ("owls") activity—that underpin circadian timing differences, with analyses highlighting 15 genes linked specifically to morningness as of 2025. Such findings underscore how genetic factors modulate period length and phase, with implications for personalized strategies. serves as the primary , resetting the clock via the PER/CRY feedback loop in the .

Ultradian, Infradian, and Other Rhythms

Ultradian rhythms are biological oscillations with periods shorter than 24 hours, typically ranging from minutes to several hours, distinguishing them from the approximately 24-hour circadian cycles. These rhythms regulate short-term physiological processes, such as the alternation between rapid eye movement () and non-REM sleep stages, which occurs approximately every 90 minutes in humans during nocturnal . In , ultradian patterns manifest in feeding behaviors, with bouts occurring every 3 to 5 hours, influencing metabolic and energy homeostasis. Additionally, many hormones exhibit pulsatile release on an ultradian timescale; for instance, (LH) is secreted in discrete pulses every 1 to 2 hours, driven by episodic (GnRH) from the , which maintains reproductive axis function. Infradian rhythms encompass cycles longer than 24 hours, extending from days to years, and often align with seasonal or reproductive demands. A prominent example in humans is the , averaging 28 days, which coordinates development, , and endometrial preparation through fluctuating levels of and progesterone. In mammals, infradian rhythms also govern circannual patterns, such as in species like ground squirrels, where torpor-arousal cycles recur annually in response to photoperiod changes, enabling during winter. These longer rhythms facilitate adaptive responses to environmental predictability beyond daily scales, such as breeding seasons or molting. Beyond ultradian and infradian categories, other biological rhythms include circatidal and circalunar cycles, which reflect and lunar influences, particularly in organisms. Circatidal rhythms, with periods of about 12.4 hours, synchronize behaviors like swarming in the Eurydice pulchra, allowing alignment with flows for feeding and ; recent studies reveal crosstalk between circatidal and circadian clocks via specific genes like cry in these species. Circalunar rhythms, spanning approximately 29.5 days, drive synchronized spawning in corals such as Acropora millepora, triggered by the interval of darkness between sunset and moonrise post-full moon to optimize fertilization under calm waters. In humans, evidence suggests an internal circalunar rhythm influencing sleep and melatonin production. A 2013 study reported lower melatonin levels around the full moon, resulting in 30% less deep sleep, 20 minutes less total sleep, and poorer subjective sleep quality, even without exposure to moonlight, indicating an endogenous mechanism. A 2021 study observed similar sleep disruptions preceding full moons in both urban and indigenous communities, further supporting the presence of a human circalunar clock. Free-running ultradian rhythms also appear in autonomic functions, such as , which shows 2- to 5-hour oscillations detectable via analysis, contributing to cardiovascular . Emerging research highlights ultradian oscillations in the gut , with short-period fluctuations in microbial composition influencing host , as observed in recent models of hepatic and intestinal dynamics. These diverse rhythms often nest within broader circadian frameworks, such as ultradian cycles embedded in the daily rest-activity pattern, to fine-tune organismal .

Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms

Genetic and Biochemical Basis

The genetic and biochemical basis of biological rhythms centers on the transcription-translation loop (TTFL), a core molecular mechanism that generates approximately 24-hour oscillations in . In mammals, the TTFL begins with the heterodimeric transcription factors CLOCK and BMAL1 (also known as ARNTL) binding to promoter elements to activate transcription of the (PER1, PER2, PER3) and (CRY1, CRY2) genes. The resulting PER and CRY proteins accumulate in the , form heterodimers, translocate to the , and inhibit CLOCK-BMAL1 activity, thereby repressing their own transcription and closing the feedback loop. This oscillatory cycle, with a period of about 24 hours, relies on timed delays introduced by post-transcriptional and post-translational regulations to sustain rhythmicity. Post-translational modifications are essential for fine-tuning the timing and amplitude of the TTFL. Phosphorylation of PER proteins by casein kinase 1ε (CK1ε) and CK1δ promotes their nuclear entry and eventual degradation, with mutations in CK1ε (as in the tau locus) altering circadian period length. Ubiquitination of phosphorylated PER by the SCF-βTrCP ligase complex targets it for proteasomal degradation, resetting the cycle by reducing levels during the activation phase. These modifications ensure precise control over protein stability and localization, preventing damping of oscillations. Accessory feedback loops interlock with the core TTFL to enhance robustness. Nuclear receptors REV-ERBα/β and RORs form a secondary loop by competitively binding ROR response elements (ROREs) in the Bmal1 promoter, where REV-ERBs repress and RORs activate Bmal1 transcription, modulating the positive limb. Additionally, metabolic signals integrate via NAD+-dependent deacetylase SIRT1, which deacetylates BMAL1 and PER2 to influence their activity and stability, linking cellular energy state to rhythmic output. A simplified mathematical representation of the TTFL dynamics for PER concentration can be captured by an ordinary differential equation modeling synthesis, inhibition, and degradation: d[PER]dt=k1[CLOCK⋅BMAL1]−k2[PER⋅CRY]−δ[PER]\frac{d[\mathrm{PER}]}{dt} = k_1 [\mathrm{CLOCK \cdot BMAL1}] - k_2 [\mathrm{PER \cdot CRY}] - \delta [\mathrm{PER}] Here, k1k_1 is the transcription-translation rate driven by CLOCK-BMAL1, k2k_2 reflects inhibitory feedback by the PER-CRY complex, and δ\delta is the degradation rate constant; such models demonstrate how parameter balances yield sustained ~24-hour periodicity. The TTFL architecture is highly conserved across eukaryotes, though with variations. In Drosophila, CLOCK and CYCLE (ortholog of BMAL1) activate per and timeless (tim), with PER-TIM dimers providing repression, while CRY acts primarily in light entrainment. Plants employ a similar loop involving CCA1/LHY repressors and TOC1, which activates evening genes to sustain ~24-hour cycles. Remarkably, cyanobacteria generate rhythms through a non-transcriptional KaiC phosphorylation cycle, where KaiA promotes and KaiB inhibits KaiC autophosphorylation, forming a ~24-hour oscillator independent of TTFL. Recent advances highlight non-canonical mechanisms beyond the classic TTFL, particularly in biology. (ROS) oscillations can drive rhythmic processes in a transcription-independent manner, coupling mitochondrial states to cellular timing and persisting in the absence of core clock genes like Bmal1, as observed in mammalian cells. These ROS-mediated rhythms suggest parallel biochemical oscillators that integrate environmental stress with cellular timing.

Intracellular Clock Components

The intracellular clock in mammals primarily relies on a set of core proteins that form a transcriptional-translational loop, with specific positive and negative regulators driving rhythmic . CLOCK and BMAL1, both basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH)-PER-ARNT-SIM (PAS) domain-containing transcription factors, function as positive regulators by forming heterodimers that bind to enhancer elements (CACGTG) in the promoters of target genes, thereby activating their transcription. This activation primarily targets the genes encoding the negative regulators, ensuring oscillatory dynamics with a approximately 24-hour period. Negative regulation is mediated by the Period (PER1, PER2, PER3) and Cryptochrome (CRY1, CRY2) proteins, which accumulate in the cytoplasm during the day due to transcriptional activation by CLOCK-BMAL1. These proteins form hetero- and homo-complexes that undergo post-translational modifications, facilitating their nuclear translocation in the evening to repress CLOCK-BMAL1 activity by directly interacting with the heterodimer and inhibiting its DNA-binding or recruitment of co-activators. This repression prevents further transcription of Per and Cry genes, allowing protein levels to decline and the cycle to restart. Several kinases act as stabilizers and modifiers to fine-tune the timing and stability of these core components. Casein kinase 1 epsilon (CK1ε) and delta (CK1δ) phosphorylate PER proteins at multiple sites, which promotes their nuclear entry, stability, and eventual degradation, thereby setting the pace of the oscillator through a phosphoswitch mechanism that delays repression. Casein kinase 2 (CK2) contributes to rhythmicity by phosphorylating PER2, enhancing its stability and influencing complex formation, while also modulating CRY interactions indirectly through broader clock protein networks. Additionally, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) serves as a metabolic sensor, phosphorylating CRY proteins to promote their degradation and linking cellular energy status to clock phase, which helps synchronize rhythms with nutrient availability. The core clock components regulate output pathways through clock-controlled genes (CCGs), which mediate physiological responses in a tissue-specific manner. For instance, in neurons, CCGs such as exhibit rhythmic expression driven by CLOCK-BMAL1, linking the clock to signaling. In the liver, the CCG albumin D-element binding protein (DBP), a PAR-bZIP , oscillates under clock control to regulate downstream metabolic genes, ensuring temporal coordination of hepatic functions like and lipid metabolism. While the mammalian clock exemplifies these components, intracellular oscillators vary across organisms, reflecting evolutionary adaptations. In plants, the PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR (PRR) family, including PRR1/TOC1, PRR3, PRR5, PRR7, and PRR9, forms a sequential repression cascade that interacts with other clock genes like CCA1 and LHY to generate rhythms, with PRRs binding DNA to modulate morning and evening phases. In fungi, such as Neurospora crassa, the White Collar-1 (WC-1) and White Collar-2 (WC-2) proteins act as both light sensors and clock components, forming a WC complex that activates frequency (frq) transcription in a feedback loop essential for circadian conidiation. Recent studies have highlighted additional layers, including non-transcriptional oscillators that complement the primary TTFL. Peripheral clocks in tissues like the liver and vasculature exhibit diversity in component expression and phase, allowing localized to feeding or hormonal cues independent of central pacemakers. For example, calcium oscillations in cells can sustain rhythmic signaling via cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CREB) , providing a post-translational that persists even when transcriptional components are disrupted. Furthermore, in 2025 research on magnetosensitivity, quantum coherence in the (FAD) radical pairs of cryptochromes was shown to enable weak detection, potentially influencing clock through spin-dependent recombination dynamics in CRY proteins.

Systemic Regulation and Entrainment

Neural and Physiological Clocks

In mammals, the (SCN) in the serves as the central master pacemaker, coordinating organism-wide circadian rhythms through its approximately 20,000 neurons that exhibit synchronized oscillations. These neurons form a tightly coupled network primarily via synapses, with neuropeptides such as (VIP) and (GRP) facilitating intercellular communication to maintain rhythmicity. The SCN's molecular basis involves core clock genes like Clock and Bmal1 driving rhythmic in individual neurons, which collectively generate robust 24-hour outputs. Peripheral clocks, functioning as autonomous oscillators, exist in various tissues including the liver, heart, and pancreas, where they regulate local physiological processes such as metabolism and hormone secretion. These peripheral oscillators are primarily synchronized by the SCN through neural pathways, including autonomic nervous system projections, and humoral signals like rhythmic glucocorticoid release from the adrenal glands. For instance, sympathetic innervation from the SCN modulates heart clock activity, while glucocorticoids entrain pancreatic beta-cell oscillations to align insulin release with daily cycles. Inter-organ communication further refines systemic coordination, with feeding-fasting cycles acting as potent entrainers for the liver clock, shifting its independently of the SCN to optimize processing during active periods. Similarly, body temperature rhythms, driven by the SCN, influence clocks by modulating clock and protein synthesis, thereby linking core body heat fluctuations to locomotor and regenerative functions. In non-mammalian species, analogous neural structures handle rhythm coordination; for example, the pars tuberalis in integrates photoperiodic cues to drive seasonal timing of and via melatonin-responsive thyrotroph cells. In , retinal circadian clocks within photoreceptor cells autonomously regulate visual adaptation and protect against light-induced damage, contributing to overall behavioral rhythms. Recent research highlights the role of the gut-brain axis in synchronizing host-microbiome rhythms, where microbial metabolites entrain central and peripheral clocks to modulate responses and metabolic in a circadian-dependent manner. This bidirectional interaction ensures alignment between oscillations and host neural pacemakers, enhancing resilience to environmental challenges.

External Cues and Synchronization

Biological rhythms are entrained to environmental cycles primarily through s, external cues that synchronize endogenous oscillators to the 24-hour day. The most potent is light, which signals the (SCN) via intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) expressing , conveying photic information through the . Temperature fluctuations also serve as a primary cue, modulating clock in various organisms, while food availability acts as a strong for peripheral clocks, particularly in metabolic tissues. Secondary zeitgebers include social interactions and physical exercise, which can subtly adjust rhythm phases through non-photic pathways. Entrainment occurs via phase-dependent responses to these cues, characterized by phase response curves (PRCs) that map advances or delays in the based on timing of stimulus application. For instance, pulses during the subjective night induce phase shifts by rapidly upregulating (PER) gene expression in the SCN, resetting the clock through transcriptional loops. Feeding cues, in , entrain peripheral clocks independently of the SCN, shifting oscillations in liver and via nutrient-sensing pathways like SIRT1 and AMPK. These mechanisms ensure alignment of internal timing with external cycles, with the SCN integrating multiple inputs to coordinate systemic s. Mathematical models of , such as those incorporating Aschoff's rule, describe how free-running periods (τ) adjust under constant conditions; in nocturnal mammals, activity rhythms typically lengthen in constant darkness (), yielding τ > 24 h, which facilitates stable phase locking to daily light-dark cycles. has limits, however; human circadian pacemakers cannot reliably synchronize to periods exceeding about 27 h, leading to relative coordination or desynchronization when the imposed cycle deviates significantly from τ. Desynchronizers disrupt this alignment, such as rapid phase shifts from transmeridian travel (jet lag) or irregular schedules in shift work, which force transient misalignment between central and peripheral clocks. In totally blind individuals lacking ipRGC input, non-24-hour sleep-wake disorder emerges, where the endogenous rhythm free-runs at its intrinsic period, drifting against the solar day. Across taxa, entrainment cues vary adaptively; in plants, photoperiod modulates flowering via phytochrome photoreceptors, which detect red/far-red light ratios to entrain the central oscillator TOC1 and entrain peripheral clocks in leaves. In marine crustaceans like fiddler crabs, tidal cycles synchronize semilunar rhythms through mechanosensory cues and moonlight, involving cryptochrome-mediated photoperiodic entrainment to predict low tides for foraging.

Biological Significance and Disruptions

Evolutionary and Ecological Roles

Biological rhythms have deep evolutionary roots, tracing back to ancient prokaryotes. In , the core clock protein KaiC emerged as an early mechanism for timing oxygenic , aligning cellular processes with daily light-dark cycles approximately 2.5 billion years ago during the . This prokaryotic system, lacking a transcriptional-translational (TTFL), relied on post-translational oscillations to synchronize with environmental periodicity. In eukaryotes, events around 1 billion years ago facilitated the evolution of more complex TTFL-based clocks, enabling precise temporal regulation across diverse cellular compartments. These rhythms confer adaptive benefits by allowing organisms to anticipate predictable environmental changes, enhancing and . For instance, circadian rhythms promote dawn activity in many , optimizing while minimizing exposure to nocturnal predators. Circannual rhythms further support through torpor states, such as in mammals, which reduce metabolic rates by up to 90% during resource-scarce seasons, thereby preserving fat reserves for . In ecological contexts, biological rhythms facilitate population-level , coordinating behaviors for collective advantages. Firefly swarms exhibit synchronized flashing driven by circadian cues, amplifying mating signals and improving in dense groups. Similarly, in marine environments, circadian-regulated vertical migrations in dinoflagellates contribute to algal blooms, positioning cells optimally for nutrient uptake and exposure during daily cycles. Latitudinal variations influence rhythm strength, with weaker circadian entrainment near the due to more stable photoperiods, contrasting sharper oscillations at higher latitudes where seasonal changes are pronounced. Fossil evidence underscores the antiquity of tidal and daily rhythms. Growth rings in corals (approximately 400 million years old) reveal fine daily banding overlaid by monthly and annual layers, indicating early synchronization to lunar and cycles that slowed over geological time. Recent 2023 research on prokaryotic clocks in extremophiles, such as thermophilic , highlights their evolution in harsh, early Earth-like conditions, with implications for by suggesting rhythmic adaptations could enable life on tidally influenced exoplanets.

Disorders, Health Impacts, and Interventions

Disruptions to biological rhythms, particularly circadian rhythms, can arise from genetic, environmental, and age-related factors, leading to significant health consequences. Genetic mutations, such as variants in the PER2 gene, are implicated in familial (FASP), where individuals experience an abnormally early sleep-wake cycle due to accelerated clock . Environmental factors like and exposure to artificial light at night suppress production and desynchronize the (SCN), the brain's master clock. Aging contributes through progressive loss of SCN neurons, reducing the amplitude of circadian oscillations and impairing rhythm stability. Specific disorders exemplify these disruptions. (DSPD) involves a delayed endogenous circadian phase, often linked to mutations in clock genes like CLOCK or PER3, resulting in difficulty falling asleep until late at night and excessive daytime sleepiness. Non-24-hour sleep-wake disorder, prevalent in blind individuals lacking light input to the SCN, causes a free-running cycle longer than 24 hours, leading to recurrent and hypersomnolence. (SAD) manifests as during winter months due to reduced daylight, disrupting serotonin and rhythms via altered SCN signaling. Additionally, post-2020 research highlights how infections and lockdowns exacerbated rhythm disruptions, with quarantines causing irregular sleep patterns and persistent circadian misalignment in up to 40% of survivors with , correlating with long-term . Health impacts of these disruptions are profound and multifaceted. Circadian misalignment from is classified as a probable by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), with an approximately 20-30% increased risk of among long-term night workers due to suppressed and elevated levels. It also contributes to , including and , through desynchronized peripheral clocks in liver and that impair glucose . Mood disorders, such as and , are exacerbated by rhythm instability, with studies showing that 60-70% of patients exhibit phase shifts in onset. For ultradian rhythms, disruptions in the 90-minute cycles are observed in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), where fragmented non-REM correlates with impaired and hyperactivity during wakefulness. Furthermore, circalunar rhythms influenced by the lunar cycle can disrupt sleep quality and levels, with lower melatonin production around the full moon leading to 30% less deep sleep, 20 minutes less total sleep, and poorer subjective sleep quality, even without exposure to moonlight, suggesting an internal circalunar rhythm. Similar sleep disruptions have been observed in both urban and indigenous communities before full moons. Interventions aim to realign rhythms through targeted chronotherapies. Chronotherapy involves timing interventions to the circadian cycle; for instance, administering drugs during the circadian nadir of reduces toxicity and improves efficacy by up to 20% in patients. , using 10,000 lux bright light boxes for 30 minutes daily upon waking, effectively entrains the SCN in SAD, alleviating depressive symptoms in 60-80% of cases by advancing phase. agonists like tasimelteon, approved for non-24-hour , mimic endogenous to stabilize the clock, improving onset by 30-60 minutes in patients. Research on chronobiotic natural products, such as , indicates potential to influence peripheral clocks via clock activation, with ongoing studies exploring efficacy in conditions like . As of 2025, emerging research highlights the therapeutic potential of aligning cancer treatments with circadian rhythms to improve outcomes. Wearable technologies, like actigraphy-enabled smartwatches, now enable real-time rhythm monitoring and personalized feedback, with algorithms detecting misalignment with 85% accuracy to guide behavioral adjustments.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/biological-rhythm
  2. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pim.12905
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6707128/
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10094461/
  5. https://www.nigms.nih.gov/education/fact-sheets/Pages/circadian-rhythms
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/biological-rhythm
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6120700/
  8. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/10.1152/physiolgenomics.2000.3.2.59
  9. https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1741-7015-11-18
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3762935/
  11. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2017/advanced-information/
  12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6138759/
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11226508/
  14. https://www.cell.com/trends/plant-science/fulltext/S1360-1385%2801%2902035-0
  15. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06338
  16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/circadian-rhythm
  17. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2017/12/rosbash-lecture.pdf
  18. https://srbr.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Quinn-MS-Comments.final_.pdf
  19. https://srbr.org/about-us/mission/
  20. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2017/press-release/
  21. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36685199/
  22. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adh1308
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9296773/
  24. https://keck.usc.edu/news/new-compound-targets-circadian-clock-machinery-in-cells-to-fight-glioblastoma/
  25. https://www.chronobiologyinmedicine.org/upload/pdf/cim-2025-0011.pdf
  26. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0006014
  27. https://www.sleepfoundation.org/circadian-rhythm
  28. https://bmcneurosci.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2202-6-41
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8997731/
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4557074/
  31. https://jphysiolanthropol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40101-022-00294-0
  32. https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/15/7/1006
  33. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1010666108
  34. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep08381
  35. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-08259-7
  36. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-12423-7
  37. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-025-07514-0
  38. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(13)00754-9
  39. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abe0465
  40. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9160756/
  41. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9616112/
  42. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9428526/
  43. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10775102/
  44. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15917222/
  45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.032
  46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77078-5
  47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(94)90529-8
  48. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw7365
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4560116/
  50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4597257/
  51. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2021174118
  52. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1721076115
  53. https://genesdev.cshlp.org/content/23/6/708
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5553560/
  55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2665843/
  56. https://genesdev.cshlp.org/content/14/6/679.full
  57. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36125163/
  58. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9115195/
  59. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/atvbaha.107.144923
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8144308/
  61. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article/163/2/024110/3351956/Electron-hopping-in-cryptochrome-Implications-for
  62. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546664/
  63. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.650154/full
  64. https://www.jneurosci.org/content/34/46/15192
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3425819/
  66. https://academic.oup.com/edrv/article/38/1/3/2959892
  67. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2019.00682/full
  68. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0909591106
  69. https://www.gastrojournal.org/article/S0016-5085%2815%2901725-4/fulltext
  70. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/endocrinology/articles/10.3389/fendo.2014.00019/full
  71. https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1010021
  72. https://www.cell.com/cell-metabolism/fulltext/S1550-4131%2824%2900399-1
  73. https://elifesciences.org/reviewed-preprints/100640
  74. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07420528.2024.2325649
  75. https://iadns.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/efd2.70092
  76. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6492024/
  77. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1107848108
  78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982217306231
  79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC61161/
  80. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0702835104
  81. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5741691/
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6719598
  83. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/ijee/52/3-4/article-p331_9.pdf
  84. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC151369/
  85. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15680514/
  86. https://peerj.com/articles/5827/
  87. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/409594
  88. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38018106/
  89. https://aslopubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lno.10095
  90. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2013.0433
  91. https://www.priweb.org/blog-post/john-wells-and-coral-geochronometry
  92. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1040841X.2023.2220789
  93. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(25)00005-7/fulltext
  94. https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/QA_Monographs_Volume124.pdf
  95. https://hub.jhu.edu/2025/10/06/circadian-rhythms-and-cancer-treatments/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.