Hubbry Logo
Moisture vapor transmission rateMoisture vapor transmission rateMain
Open search
Moisture vapor transmission rate
Community hub
Moisture vapor transmission rate
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Moisture vapor transmission rate
Moisture vapor transmission rate
Moisture vapor transmission rate
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Moisture vapor transmission rate (MVTR), also water vapor transmission rate (WVTR), is a measure of the passage of water vapor through a substance. It is a measure of the permeability for vapor barriers.

There are many industries where moisture control is critical. Moisture sensitive foods and pharmaceuticals are put in packaging with controlled MVTR to achieve the required quality, safety, and shelf life. In clothing, MVTR as a measure of breathability has contributed to greater comfort for wearers of clothing for outdoor activity. The building materials industry also manages the moisture barrier properties in architectural components to ensure the correct moisture levels in the internal spaces of buildings. Optoelectronic devices based on organic material, generally named OLEDs, need an encapsulation with low values of WVTR to guarantee the same performances over the lifetime of the device.

MVTR generally decreases with increasing thickness of the film/barrier, and increases with increasing temperature.

Measurement

[edit]

There are various techniques to measure MVTR, ranging from gravimetric techniques that measure the gain or loss of moisture by mass, to highly sophisticated instrumental techniques that in some designs can measure extremely low transmission rates. Special care has to be taken in measuring porous substances such as fabrics, as some techniques are not appropriate. For very low levels, many techniques do not have adequate resolution. Numerous standard methods are described in ISO, ASTM, BS, DIN etc.—these are quite often industry-specific. Instrument manufacturers are often able to provide test methods developed to fully exploit the specific design which they are selling. The search for the most appropriate instrument is a zealous task which is in itself part of the measurement.[1]

The conditions under which the measurement is made has a considerable influence on the result. Both the temperature and humidity gradients across the sample need to be measured, controlled and recorded with the result, and the thickness of the sample should be the same. An MVTR result without specifying these conditions is almost meaningless. Certainly no two results should be compared unless the conditions are known. For example, the effect of temperature on the permeability can be as high as 10% per °C, making it possible that MVTR results achieved at 23°C and 37°C can differ by a factor 4.

The most common international unit for the MVTR is g/m2/day, or "metric perm". In the USA, g/100in2/day is also in use, which is 0.064516 (approximately 1/15) of the value of g/m2/day units. Typical rates in aluminium foil laminates may be as low as 0.001 g/m2/day, whereas the rate in fabrics can measure up to several thousand g/m2/day.[citation needed]

Often, barrier testing is conducted on a sheet of material. Calculations based on that can be useful when designing completed structures, clothing, and packages. Seams, creases, access points, and heat seals are critical to end-use performance. For example, the glass of a bottle may have an effective total barrier, but the screw cap closure and the closure liner might not. Performance verification and validation of complete containers, structures, or irregular objects is often recommended.

For the special case of OLEDs, where the levels of allowed permeation are in the 10−6 g/m2/day level,[2][3] the methods preferred exploit an oxidation of a metal upon the exposure to water.[4][5]

See also

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Moisture vapor transmission rate

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Moisture vapor transmission rate (MVTR), also known as water vapor transmission rate (WVTR), is a measure of the mass of water vapor that permeates through a unit area of a material over a specified time, typically expressed in grams per square meter per day (g/m²/day). This property quantifies the permeability of barrier materials, such as flexible films, sheets, or fabrics, to water vapor under controlled conditions of temperature and humidity, enabling assessment of their effectiveness in regulating moisture transfer. MVTR is a critical parameter in materials science and engineering, as it directly influences the performance, durability, and functionality of products exposed to varying environmental moisture levels. In packaging applications, particularly for and pharmaceuticals, a low MVTR is desirable to minimize ingress or egress, thereby extending and preventing spoilage or degradation. For instance, barrier films with MVTR values below 1 g/m²/day are often used to protect -sensitive goods, as higher rates can lead to product instability or microbial growth. Conversely, in textiles and medical dressings, a balanced or higher MVTR promotes , allowing to evaporate while blocking liquid , which enhances comfort and reduces risks in care. Standard measurement methods, such as ASTM E96 for gravimetric testing using or methods, and ASTM E398 for dynamic relative evaluation, ensure consistent and comparable results across materials like plastics, papers, and coatings. Factors like , material thickness, and polarity significantly affect MVTR, with increasing at higher s, underscoring the need for standardized test conditions to predict real-world behavior.

Definition and Fundamentals

Definition

Moisture vapor transmission rate (MVTR), also known as water vapor transmission rate (WVTR), is the steady-state rate at which permeates through a material, quantified as the mass of transmitted per unit area per unit time under controlled conditions of and relative . This metric serves as a key indicator of a material's barrier performance, assessing its ability to restrict or allow moisture passage in vapor-sensitive applications such as and protective barriers. Transmission encompasses the overall process of water vapor moving from one side of a material to the other, involving sequential steps of sorption at the entry surface, diffusion through the bulk (known as permeation), and desorption at the exit surface. Permeation specifically refers to the diffusive transport within the material matrix, driven by a concentration gradient, while transmission integrates the net flux across the entire barrier. Lower MVTR values indicate superior moisture barrier properties, essential for preserving product integrity against humidity-induced degradation. The concept of MVTR originated in during the mid-20th century, primarily to evaluate the integrity of packaging materials for amid the rise of synthetic films and polymers. Early standardization efforts culminated in the approval of ASTM E96 in , providing a foundational gravimetric method to quantify passage through thin sheets and coatings. Fundamentally, MVTR derives from and is given by the equation: MVTR=P×Δpl\text{MVTR} = \frac{P \times \Delta p}{l} where PP is the permeability coefficient (a material-specific combining and ), Δp\Delta p is the partial vapor pressure difference across the material (the driving force), and ll is the material thickness. This relationship highlights how MVTR inversely scales with thickness and directly with the , underscoring its role in characterizing barrier efficacy.

Units of Measurement

The moisture vapor transmission rate (MVTR) is most commonly expressed in the unit of grams per square meter per day (g/m²/day), which quantifies the mass of transmitted through one square meter of material over a 24-hour period under defined test conditions. This unit is widely used in global standards for , textiles, and other industries due to its alignment with the (SI) conventions. In the United States, particularly within the sector, the alternative unit grams per 100 square inches per day (g/100 in²/day) is prevalent, reflecting customary imperial measurements. The conversion factor between these units is derived from the area equivalence, where 1 m² ≈ 1,550 in², yielding 1 g/100 in²/day ≈ 15.5 g/m²/day. For applications in the building industry, MVTR values are often reported in perms, a unit of that accounts for the gradient across the material. Specifically, 1 perm (U.S. customary) equals 1 (approximately 0.0648 g) of per per hour under a 1 inch mercury (inHg) pressure difference; the metric perm is equivalently 1 g/m²/day per millimeter of mercury (mmHg). Conversions from g/m²/day to perms require dividing by the test-specific difference (ΔP) in the appropriate units, such as perm = MVTR (g/m²/day) / ΔP (mmHg) for metric perms. For instance, under typical ASTM E96 method conditions at 23°C (where ΔP ≈ 21 mmHg), a MVTR of 21 g/m²/day corresponds to approximately 1 metric perm. In scenarios involving ultra-low transmission rates, such as encapsulation for or advanced barriers, nanograms per square meter per second (ng/m²/s) is employed to capture minute values with greater precision. This unit facilitates reporting rates below 10⁻⁶ g/m²/day, equivalent to roughly 0.01 ng/m²/s or lower. MVTR specifications must always include the associated test conditions—such as (e.g., 38°C), relative gradient (e.g., 90% to 0%), and method (e.g., or )—since the rate varies significantly with these parameters, ensuring comparability across studies and applications. The following table provides key inter-unit conversion factors, assuming standard atmospheric conditions where applicable (exact values may vary with for permeance-based units):
From UnitTo UnitConversion Factor (Multiply By)Notes/Source
g/m²/dayg/100 in²/day0.0645Area-based; 1 m² = 1,550 in²
g/100 in²/dayg/m²/day15.5Inverse of above
g/m²/dayng/m²/s1.157 × 10⁴1 day = 86,400 s; 1 g = 10⁹ ng [derived from SI]
ng/m²/sg/m²/day8.64 × 10⁻⁵Inverse of above
g/m²/day (ΔP=1 mmHg)Metric perm1By definition
US permMetric perm0.659Standard equivalence

Importance and Applications

In Packaging

In packaging, the moisture vapor transmission rate (MVTR) is essential for safeguarding products against unwanted moisture exchange, which directly influences quality, safety, and longevity. For applications, low MVTR barriers prevent microbial spoilage in snacks by maintaining low levels to preserve crispness, while also averting excessive in baked goods through retention of internal moisture, thereby extending . In pharmaceuticals, controlled MVTR levels are critical for upholding , as ingress can trigger chemical degradation or loss of potency in moisture-sensitive formulations. For packaging, ultra-low MVTR materials shield components from corrosion and electrical failures, particularly in sensitive devices like perovskite solar cells where optimal rates range from 10^{-3} to 10^{-6} g/m²/day. Representative materials highlight the spectrum of MVTR needs: aluminum foil laminates achieve exceptionally low rates below 0.01 g/m²/day, providing superior barriers for impermeable applications, whereas high-permeability films such as (LDPE) exhibit rates of 16–23 g/m²/day, suitable for breathable packaging that permits controlled moisture egress in items like fresh produce. These variations significantly affect predictions; for instance, reducing MVTR from moderate to low levels can extend the viable storage period for perishable foods by limiting changes that promote decay. Within the flexible packaging industry, MVTR informs design strategies for multilayer structures, where testing—commonly conducted under ASTM F1249—verifies adherence to regulatory standards for product freshness and prevention. Optimizing these barriers not only minimizes overuse but also curtails economic losses from spoilage linked to inadequate packaging. Recent advancements as of 2025 include bio-based nanocomposites that achieve lower MVTR for applications. A notable case involves modern pouches employing oxygen and barrier multilayers, such as nanofibril/ combinations, which yield MVTR values of 5–6 g/m²/day alongside low oxygen transmission rates (3–4 cm³/m²/day). In testing with commercial crackers stored at 80% relative , these pouches preserved texture and content equivalently to conventional synthetic barriers over one week, demonstrating enhanced without compromising protection.

In Textiles and Apparel

In textiles and apparel, moisture vapor transmission rate (MVTR) is crucial for , enabling fabrics to allow sweat vapor to escape while repelling liquid , thereby enhancing wearer comfort during . High MVTR values are particularly desired in and outdoor apparel to facilitate moisture-wicking, preventing the buildup of that can lead to chilling or discomfort. For instance, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membranes like achieve MVTR ratings of 10,000–20,000 g/m²/day, permitting water vapor diffusion through microscopic pores that exclude larger liquid droplets. Breathable fabrics commonly incorporate hydrophilic polymers, such as (PU) or (PAN), which transport moisture via without pores, or microporous films like (PTFE) that rely on physical pores for vapor passage. These materials must balance MVTR with , as increasing hydrostatic head resistance—measured in mm of —to enhance liquid barrier properties often reduces vapor permeability; for example, fabrics with hydrostatic heads exceeding 10,000 mm may exhibit lower MVTR if the membrane thickness is increased to bolster durability. Evaluation of MVTR in apparel occurs under dynamic conditions simulating wear, such as the ASTM E96 wet cup method, where a water-saturated environment beneath the fabric drives vapor transmission to measure rates relevant to sweating skin. This testing evolved from military applications in the , where breathable gear was developed to protect soldiers in humid environments, transitioning by the to widespread consumer activewear through innovations like laminated membranes. MVTR directly correlates with user comfort by reducing evaporative heat loss resistance, with higher rates promoting drier skin and thermal regulation during exertion. Fabric performance is often rated using RET values from ISO 11092, an inverse metric where lower RET (e.g., <6 m²Pa/W) indicates superior breathability equivalent to MVTR >15,000 g/m²/day, guiding selections for everything from hiking jackets to athletic base layers.

In Electronics and Building Materials

In , particularly for organic light-emitting diode () displays, ultra-low moisture vapor transmission rates (MVTR) are essential to protect sensitive organic layers from degradation. Encapsulation materials must achieve MVTR values below 10−610^{-6} g/m²/day to ensure device lifetimes exceeding 10,000 hours, as higher permeation allows water vapor ingress that accelerates oxidation and of thin films. Thin-film encapsulation techniques, such as alternating layers of inorganic oxides like Al₂O₃ and organic polymers, are widely employed to meet these stringent requirements while maintaining flexibility for emerging applications in wearable and foldable . These barriers prevent moisture-induced failures, such as pixel blackening and interlayer separation, which compromise display performance. In building materials, MVTR plays a in vapor barriers designed to control moisture diffusion through walls and roofs, thereby preventing interstitial that can weaken structural integrity. sheeting, commonly used as a Class I vapor retarder with a permeance rating below 0.1 perm (typically 0.06 perm for 6-mil thickness), effectively limits movement in cold climates to avoid buildup within insulation. Vapor retarders are classified under ASTM E96 testing as Class I (≤0.1 perm, impermeable like or foil), Class II (0.1–1.0 perm, semi-impermeable like asphalt-coated paper), and Class III (1–10 perm, permeable like latex paint), with selection based on climate zone to balance moisture control and drying potential. Advancements in MVTR reduction have focused on barriers, incorporating materials like clay or nanosheets into matrices to create tortuous paths that impede vapor diffusion, achieving WVTR reductions of over 90% in some applications. For instance, clay-based nanocomposites have demonstrated WVTR as low as 10−210^{-2} g/m²/day while preserving transparency and bendability for encapsulation. In building contexts, cellulose-clay nanocomposites enhance performance beyond traditional , supporting sustainable designs. These innovations trace back to 1980s building codes that first mandated insulation and vapor control for energy efficiency, evolving into modern green standards like those from the , which emphasize low-MVTR materials for resilient, low-emission structures. High MVTR in can lead to rapid device failure through and , with thresholds above 10−610^{-6} g/m²/day significantly shortening operational life by enabling accumulation on circuit boards. In buildings, excessive MVTR in barriers permits vapor diffusion that fosters , raising relative above 80% and promoting mold growth on wood or surfaces, which degrades air quality and structural . Quantitative risks include mold indices exceeding 2 (indicating visible growth) when wall surpasses 10 perms in humid conditions, underscoring the need for low-MVTR materials to mitigate these issues.

Measurement Methods

Gravimetric Methods

Gravimetric methods determine the moisture vapor transmission rate (MVTR) by measuring the change in mass of a test assembly over time, under a controlled vapor pressure gradient across the material specimen. This approach relies on establishing a difference in water vapor pressure between the two sides of the sample, typically using a desiccant to absorb vapor on one side or liquid water to generate vapor on the other, while maintaining specified temperature and humidity conditions. The rate of mass gain or loss provides a direct quantification of vapor permeation, making it a foundational technique for assessing barrier properties in materials like films and papers. The ASTM E96 standard outlines two primary gravimetric procedures: the desiccant method and the water method. In the desiccant method (dry cup), the test specimen is sealed over an open dish containing anhydrous calcium chloride, creating a low relative humidity (near 0%) inside the cup; the assembly is then placed in a controlled environment with higher humidity (e.g., 50% RH at 23°C), driving water vapor through the specimen to be absorbed by the desiccant, resulting in measurable weight gain. Conversely, the water method (wet cup) involves sealing the specimen over a dish filled with distilled water to a depth of 19 mm (±6 mm) below the specimen, establishing a high vapor pressure (near 100% RH) inside; the assembly is exposed to a lower humidity environment, leading to evaporation and weight loss as vapor transmits outward. These methods differ in the direction of the vapor gradient (inward for desiccant method, outward for water method), though the magnitude of the differential is typically similar under standard conditions. However, the water method often yields higher transmission rates due to the higher average relative humidity across the specimen (75% vs. 25%), which can increase permeability for humidity-sensitive materials. The procedure begins with , where the material is cut to fit the test dish (minimum exposed area of 3000 mm²) and securely sealed using an or to prevent edge leakage, ensuring the specimen is taut and free of defects. The assembly is then equilibrated in the test environment until steady-state conditions are reached, often requiring 4–24 hours or more depending on the material. Initial weighing is performed using a balance with at least 0.1 mg precision, followed by subsequent weighings at regular intervals (e.g., every 24 hours) over a period sufficient to achieve linear mass change, typically until the transmission rate stabilizes (often days to weeks). The MVTR is calculated from the slope of the mass versus time plot, adjusted for the test area and difference, with results commonly reported in units such as g/m²/day. These methods offer advantages including simplicity, low cost, and the use of readily available equipment, making them accessible for testing a wide range of permeable and semi-permeable materials such as films, papers, and textiles. They provide reliable data for design and in moisture-sensitive applications. However, limitations include the time-intensive nature (often requiring extended exposure periods), sensitivity to sealing imperfections and that can introduce errors, and the need for stringent environmental control to avoid variability; they are less suitable for very low-permeability materials where detection of small mass changes is challenging. ASTM E96, originally approved in 1953 and revised periodically, serves as a foundational standard for these techniques.

Instrumental Methods

Instrumental methods for measuring moisture vapor transmission rate (MVTR) employ sensor-based technologies to detect and quantify flux through materials, offering advantages in speed and sensitivity over traditional approaches. These techniques typically involve directing permeated vapor via a carrier gas to a detection system, enabling real-time without relying solely on mass changes. Key techniques include , which detects by measuring absorption at specific wavelengths, typically around 2.6 μm for the O-H stretch. Electrolytic sensors, often based on coulometric detection, measure the electrical current generated by the of permeated in a (P₂O₅) cell, providing high precision for low transmission rates. These methods are particularly suited for thin films and barrier materials where vapor levels are minimal. The ASTM E398 standard covers the dynamic evaluation of transmission rate through sheet materials using measurement. It involves exposing a specimen to a controlled gradient in a test cell and using sensors to monitor the rate of change in , allowing conversion to WVTR values. This method is applicable to flexible barrier materials and provides faster results compared to gravimetric techniques, with good sensitivity for packaging and sheet applications. The ASTM F1249 standard specifies a carrier gas method using modulated analysis for flexible and sheeting up to 3 mm thick. In this procedure, dry sweeps vapor from the test cell to an , yielding results in hours rather than days, with enhanced precision for low-permeability materials down to approximately 0.05 g/m²/day. This approach is widely adopted for due to its efficiency and repeatability. Modern automated systems, such as the PERMATRAN-W series from MOCON, facilitate high-throughput testing by integrating infrared or electrolytic sensors with programmable controls for multiple samples. These instruments support applications, including the evaluation of like thin-film encapsulations for , where precise MVTR data informs barrier performance. Compared to gravimetric methods, which serve as a baseline for validation, instrumental techniques achieve higher sensitivity, detecting rates as low as 10⁻⁴ g/m²/day, though they necessitate regular to maintain accuracy.

Factors Affecting MVTR

Material Properties

The moisture vapor transmission rate (MVTR) of a is fundamentally governed by its intrinsic structural and compositional properties, which influence the and of molecules within the matrix. These properties determine how effectively a acts as a barrier, with key factors including morphology, additives, and overall architecture. Understanding these characteristics allows for the design of tailored barriers for applications such as , where low MVTR is critical for product preservation. Polymer crystallinity significantly reduces MVTR by creating denser, more ordered regions that limit paths for . In semicrystalline polymers like (PLA), increasing crystallinity from 0% to 35-40% can decrease MVTR by approximately 37%, as the crystalline domains exclude penetrants and slow molecular transport. Similarly, in ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH) copolymers, higher crystallinity enhances barrier performance by reducing free volume available for . Additives such as nanofillers further modify permeability by creating tortuous paths that impede vapor . For instance, incorporating 5 wt% or halloysite clay into xylan-alginate films reduces water vapor permeability by 49%, owing to the impermeable layers that force water molecules to follow longer routes. In PLA nanocomposites, 1 wt% organically modified clay (C30B) achieves a 44% MVTR reduction in crystallized states, demonstrating synergistic effects with crystallinity. Multilayer structures amplify these benefits by combining layers with complementary properties; for example, alternating and layers in renewable films can lower overall MVTR while maintaining flexibility. Materials are classified by their MVTR into impermeable, semi-permeable, and permeable categories, reflecting their inherent barrier efficacy. Impermeable materials like metals (e.g., aluminum foil) and exhibit near-zero MVTR due to their non-porous, crystalline structures that prevent any significant vapor passage. Semi-permeable materials, such as EVOH plastics, have moderate MVTR values (22-124 g/m²/day at 38°C and 90% RH), balancing barrier function with processability in multilayer films. Permeable materials like cellulosic films (e.g., regenerated or ) show high MVTR (>100 g/m²/day), attributed to their hydrophilic nature and abundant hydroxyl groups that facilitate and . The process in these materials follows the solution- model, where the permeability PP is the product of the diffusion DD (governing molecular mobility) and solubility SS (governing penetrant uptake): P=D×SP = D \times S This relationship explains variations across material classes; for , low DD in crystalline regions or high-aspect-ratio fillers reduces PP, while high SS in polar cellulosics increases it. Material thickness exerts a direct inverse influence on MVTR for homogeneous films, as vapor must traverse a longer path: MVTR∝1thickness\mathrm{MVTR} \propto \frac{1}{\text{thickness}}. Doubling the thickness of a uniform layer halves the MVTR, assuming constant permeability. For example, in (PET) films tested at 37.8°C and 100% RH, a 1 mil (25.4 µm) thickness yields an MVTR of 25 g/m²/day, while 5 mil (127 µm) reduces it to 5 g/m²/day, illustrating the linear scaling. This effect holds for single-layer films but can be modulated in composites. Recent innovations in bio-based barriers address demands by achieving low MVTR without petroleum-derived materials. Heat-treated nanofibrillated (NFC) films reduce WVTR by 50% compared to untreated versions, enabling recyclable packaging with oxygen transmission rates rivaling synthetic polymers. () blended with 5 wt% organomodified clay exhibits a 76% WVTR reduction, supporting compostable alternatives for . These developments prioritize renewability while maintaining barrier integrity comparable to traditional plastics.
Material ClassExamplesTypical MVTR (g/m²/day at 38°C, 90% RH)Key Property Influencing Barrier
ImpermeableMetals (e.g., Al foil), ~0Non-porous, crystalline structure
Semi-permeableEVOH, PET1-124Moderate diffusion/solubility balance
PermeableCellulosics (e.g., )>100High hydrophilicity and free volume

Environmental Conditions

The moisture vapor transmission rate (MVTR) of materials is significantly influenced by , primarily through its effect on the of within the matrix. The temperature dependence follows an Arrhenius relationship, where the coefficient DD is expressed as D=D0exp⁡(−EaRT)D = D_0 \exp\left(-\frac{E_a}{RT}\right), with D0D_0 as the , EaE_a as the for , RR as the , and TT as the absolute . This relationship implies that MVTR typically increases with rising , often doubling for every 10°C increment, reflecting the exponential acceleration of molecular mobility. for in common like range from 20 to 50 kJ/mol, highlighting how even modest changes can substantially elevate rates in applications such as exposed to varying climates. Humidity gradients across a material also play a critical role in determining MVTR, with the transmission rate exhibiting a linear dependence on the partial pressure difference of water vapor between the two sides of the barrier. This is captured in the permeance calculation, where MVTR is normalized by the partial pressure differential Δp=p2−p1\Delta p = p_2 - p_1, ensuring comparability across tests. At high relative humidity (RH) levels, saturation effects can introduce non-linearity, as increased water content plasticizes the polymer, enhancing solubility and thus elevating MVTR beyond simple linear predictions; for instance, effective permeability rises with steeper RH gradients due to polymer-water interactions. These dynamics are particularly relevant in humid environments, where the driving force for vapor transport intensifies. Other environmental factors exert more subtle influences on MVTR. Atmospheric pressure has a minor effect on most films under standard conditions, as is primarily -driven rather than pressure-sensitive in the typical range of 1 , with no significant impact observed on water absorption up to moderate pressures. Aging over time can lead to an increase in MVTR for many s, attributed to relaxation of the molecular structure, loss of additives, or physical changes that widen pathways, with exposure to and accelerating this process. In anisotropic materials, such as machine-direction oriented films, MVTR varies by orientation due to aligned chains that alter the of the path, often reducing transmission in the oriented direction compared to the transverse one. To ensure reliable and comparable MVTR measurements, standardized testing conditions are employed, such as 37.8°C and a 90% RH gradient in methods like ASTM F1249, which control temperature and humidity to minimize variability. However, real-world applications in humid climates introduce variability, where fluctuating environmental conditions can amplify MVTR beyond lab values, necessitating design margins for materials in or building envelopes.

Standards and Regulations

International and ASTM Standards

The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) has established several key standards for measuring the moisture vapor transmission rate (MVTR), commonly referred to as transmission rate (WVTR), of various materials. ASTM E96/E96M outlines gravimetric test methods for determining WVTR through materials such as plastics, papers, and laminates by measuring steady-state flow using or water cup procedures under controlled conditions. This standard, last revised in 2022, is widely applied to evaluate barrier properties in and building materials but is limited to planar sheet samples and may not suit very low-permeability substances due to extended test durations. Complementing E96, ASTM F1249 specifies an instrumental method using modulated infrared detection to assess WVTR in flexible barrier materials like plastic films, enabling faster and more precise measurements for thin sheets compared to gravimetric approaches. ASTM E398 provides a dynamic relative measurement technique for sheet materials, focusing on WVTR under varying gradients to simulate real-world exposure, and is particularly useful for materials where equilibrium conditions are challenging to achieve. As of 2024, the latest revision (E398-24) maintains core methods with minor updates for precision. Internationally, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) offers protocols aligned with global needs, particularly for textiles and plastics. ISO 2528:2017 describes a gravimetric method for determining the water vapor transmission rate of sheet materials, including textiles, by weighing changes in sealed assemblies over time, and is recommended for rates above 1 g/m² per day while excluding films prone to wax seal damage. For plastics, ISO 15106 comprises multiple parts specifying WVTR measurement techniques, such as Part 1 (gravimetric cup method), Part 2 (infrared sensor), and Part 3 (electrolytic detection sensor), applicable to films, sheeting, and multi-layer structures to ensure consistent evaluation across diverse applications. Regional standards include DIN 53122 from Deutsches Institut für Normung, which provides methods for WVTR in plastics, paper, and rubber sheeting; Part 1 employs gravimetry with wax-sealed dishes for rates from 1 to 200 g/m² per day (2001 edition), while Part 2 uses electrolysis for higher precision in low-permeability samples. Efforts toward harmonization between ASTM and ISO standards are facilitated through joint technical committees, promoting consistent reporting of WVTR data by aligning test conditions, units (e.g., g/m²·day), and scope for films, papers, and laminates, though full equivalence remains limited by methodological differences like types. These protocols generally apply to planar materials and face limitations with non-planar or highly irregular samples, where edge effects or uneven sealing can compromise accuracy. A draft revision of ISO 2528 is under development as of 2025 to refine procedures.

Pharmaceutical and Industry-Specific Standards

In the pharmaceutical sector, the (USP) General Chapter <671> establishes requirements for containers used in , focusing on moisture vapor transmission rate (MVTR) to ensure product stability. This chapter classifies single-unit or unit-dose containers into performance categories based on their moisture rates under controlled conditions of 23 ± 2°C and 75 ± 3% relative . Specifically, Class A containers (very low ) exhibit an average MVTR of ≤0.5 mg/day, with no more than one of ten test units exceeding 1 mg/day; Class B (low ) ≤5 mg/day average (≤10 mg/day maximum); Class C (medium ) ≤20 mg/day average (≤40 mg/day maximum); and Class D (high ) exceeds Class C limits. These classifications guide the selection of for moisture-sensitive drugs, such as solid oral , where excessive can lead to degradation. The (Ph. Eur.) and Japanese Pharmacopoeia (JP) harmonize with USP <671> principles for container performance, emphasizing MVTR testing to protect hygroscopic formulations, though without identical numerical classifications. Ph. Eur. Chapter 3.1.15 on plastic containers for pharmaceutical products requires evaluation of permeability as part of material suitability, often referencing stability data under accelerated conditions. Similarly, JP's Test Methods for Plastic Containers include a dedicated permeability test for hygroscopic drugs, calculating loss or gain to assess barrier efficacy. Both pharmacopeias recommend testing at 40°C and 75% for accelerated stability studies, aligning with ICH Q1A guidelines to simulate real-world exposure and predict . Beyond core pharmacopeial standards, the U.S. (FDA) extends MVTR considerations in guidelines for biologics packaging, requiring -closure systems to demonstrate protection against moisture permeation that could compromise product integrity, such as in injectables. For instance, FDA's Closure Systems guidance mandates documentation of moisture barrier performance in stability submissions, particularly for lyophilized biologics sensitive to humidity. In the , Standard J-STD-033 (latest J-STD-033D, 2023) specifies moisture barrier bags for semiconductors with a maximum transmission rate (WVTR) of ≤0.002 g/100 in²/day at 40°C/90% RH, ensuring devices remain below critical moisture levels during storage and shipping to prevent reflow-induced damage. Compliance with these standards plays a pivotal role in pharmaceutical stability studies, where MVTR data supports shelf-life claims and regulatory approvals; failure to meet thresholds can result in product , necessitating recalls, as seen in cases of moisture-induced degradation in packaged tablets. As of November 2025, USP chapters such as <661.2> for plastic packaging components (effective December 1, 2025) emphasize comprehensive testing including to meet demands for sensitive therapies like monoclonal antibodies.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/moisture-vapor-transmission-rate
  2. https://www.astm.org/e0398-20.html
  3. https://transhield-usa.com/water-vapor-transmission-rate/
  4. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/2432631
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10631281/
  6. https://www.astm.org/Standards/E96.htm
  7. https://www.pnnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-26070.pdf
  8. https://www.ametekmocon.com/knowledge/learnaboutpermeation/permeationfaq
  9. https://www.intertek.com/blog/2016/07-12-wvtr/
  10. https://ia801508.us.archive.org/7/items/gov.law.astm.e96.1995/astm.e96.1995.pdf
  11. https://www.physibel.be/uploads/knowledge_bases/document/134/F6_Unit_conversion_condensation_risk_assessment.pdf?t=1736433400
  12. https://blog.ansi.org/ansi/astm-e96-22-water-vapor-transmission-rate-standard/
  13. https://www.versaperm.com/Vapour%20permeability%20units%20and%20conversions.php
  14. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/solr.202201123
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949822825007233
  16. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.2c07579
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10419557/
  18. https://www.gomilitar.com/blogs/useful-information/waterproof-clothing-innovations-driven-by-military-needs
  19. https://quicksearch.dla.mil/ImageRedirector.aspx?token=604533.215079
  20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369702106714468
  21. https://courses.washington.edu/overney/privateChemE530/Handouts/Project1-OLED-heat-transfer.pdf
  22. https://www.uaf.edu/ces/publications/database/energy/permeability-water-vapor.php
  23. https://www.wrmeadows.com/concrete-vapor-barriers/vapor-barriers-vapor-retarders-explain-the-difference/
  24. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nn400713e
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10780723/
  26. https://www.nahb.org/-/media/A2DC847C76D341EC86BEB6472C11BDB4.ashx
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9319059/
  28. https://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB5413.pdf
  29. https://www.astm.org/e0096_e0096m-22.html
  30. https://www.stegoindustries.com/blog/which-permeance-test-should-you-use-astm-e96-or-f1249
  31. https://img.antpedia.com/standard/files/pdfs_ora/20200926/ASTM%2520E96-2016.pdf
  32. https://www.ametekmocon.com/-/media/ametekmocon/mediapreview/brochures/mocon-pb---web-versions/white-papers/wp-pps-3010-which-wvtr-test-method-0525-10-final-web.pdf
  33. https://www.astm.org/e0398-13.html
  34. https://www.ametekmocon.com/products/permeationanalyzers/wvtr-permeation-analyzers/permatran-w-101k-testing-analyzer
  35. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/admi.202300172
  36. https://www.ametekmocon.com/landingpages/astm-f3299-ametek-mocon-welcomes-another-wvtr-standard-test-method-to-the-family/-/media/ametekmocon/mediapreview/tn-pps-5005_astm-f3299-wvtr-test-method_en_web.pdf
  37. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.0c01468
  38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738817305458
  39. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/12/10/2279
  40. https://www.vp-packaging.com/substrate-materials/whats-the-most-common-used-barrier-film-layer-materials-for-standup-pouches/
  41. https://www.polyprint.com/understanding-film-properties/flexographic-wvtr/
  42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738815005335
  43. https://www.tappi.org/content/events/07europlace/papers/07europl36.pdf
  44. https://www.radtech.org/proceedings/2012/papers/Session%2014%20-%20Barrier%20Coatings%20&%20Conductive%20Films%20for%20Flexible%20Electronics/DBabcock_Sartomer.pdf
  45. https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/resources/bio-based-polymers-for-sustainable-packaging-and-biobarriers-a-critical-review/
  46. https://www.ametekmocon.com/pressreleases/news/2023/september/temperature-impact-upon-measured-gas-transmission-rate
  47. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11998-020-00421-5
  48. https://d-nb.info/1206533072/34
  49. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002199839302700801
  50. http://www.ccl-eclipse.com/tech_ref/Barrier.pdf
  51. https://www.intertek.com/polymers-plastics/testlopedia/wvtr-astm-f1249/
  52. https://www.ametekmocon.com/servicessupport/astm-f1249
  53. https://www.astm.org/f1249-20.html
  54. https://www.astm.org/e0398-24.html
  55. https://www.iso.org/standard/72382.html
  56. https://www.iso.org/standard/62026.html
  57. https://www.dinmedia.de/en/standard/din-53122-1/584943
  58. https://www.ametekmocon.com/solutions/testmethods/astm-test-methods
  59. https://www.iso.org/standard/88372.html
  60. https://www.uspnf.com/sites/default/files/usp_pdf/EN/USPNF/generalChapter671RevisionBulletin.pdf
  61. https://jpdb.nihs.go.jp/jp14e/14data/General_Test/Test_Methods_for_Plastic_C.pdf
  62. https://www.fda.gov/media/70788/download
  63. https://www.jedec.org/system/files/docs/J-STD-033D.01.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.