Hubbry Logo
CallicratesCallicratesMain
Open search
Callicrates
Community hub
Callicrates
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Callicrates
Callicrates
Callicrates
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Callicrates or Kallikrates (/kəˈlɪkrəˌtiːz/; Greek: Καλλικράτης [Kaliˈkratis]) was an ancient Greek architect active in the middle of the fifth century BC. He and Ictinus were architects of the Parthenon (Plutarch, Pericles, 13).[1] An inscription identifies him as the architect of "the Temple of Nike" on the Acropolis of Athens (IG I3 35). The temple in question is either the amphiprostyle Temple of Athena Nike now visible on the site[2] or a small-scale predecessor (naiskos) whose remains were found in the later temple's foundations.[3]

An inscription identifies Callicrates as one of the architects of the Classical circuit wall of the Acropolis (IG I3 45), and Plutarch further states (loc. cit.) that he was contracted to build the middle of three defensive walls linking Athens and Piraeus.

A crater on the planet Mercury was named in his honor.[4]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
Stub icon

This article about a Greek architect is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by adding missing information.

Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Callicrates

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Kallikrates (Greek: Καλλικράτης; fl. 5th century BCE) was an Athenian architect active during the mid-5th century BCE, renowned for his contributions to classical Greek architecture as part of the Periclean building program on the and beyond. Best known for collaborating with Ictinus on the Doric (447–432 BCE), a peripteral octastyle temple dedicated to , Kallikrates served as one of the principal architects overseeing its construction from Pentelic marble, embodying the pinnacle of High Classical proportions and optical refinements. He is also credited with designing the small Ionic Temple of Athena Nike (ca. 427–424 BCE) on the Acropolis's southwest bastion, an amphiprostyle tetrastyle structure featuring innovative mouldings like the cavetto-crowned sima and inclined columns, as documented in building decrees. Additionally, inscriptions record his involvement in fortification projects, including supervision of the middle Long Wall connecting to (ca. 445–440 BCE), which enhanced the city's naval defenses during the early era. Kallikrates' oeuvre reflects a mastery of both Doric and Ionic orders, with graceful adaptations in scale and detail that influenced subsequent Attic architecture, though few details of his personal life survive beyond these professional attributions in ancient texts and epigraphy.

Biography

Early Life and Background

Little is known about the personal background of Callicrates, the ancient Greek architect active during the mid-fifth century BCE, with no precise birth or death dates recorded in surviving historical accounts. His professional prominence emerges suddenly in the context of Athens' grand building initiatives, suggesting he reached maturity by the 440s BCE, when he is first attested in official commissions. Callicrates is widely regarded as Athenian by origin, an inference drawn from his deep involvement in state-sponsored projects on the , the sacred heart of the city, which typically favored local citizens for such prestigious roles. This connection aligns with the era's emphasis on civic identity, where architects contributing to monumental were often integrated into the Athenian demos, though direct evidence of his status remains elusive. Architectural training in fifth-century BCE Greece generally occurred through informal apprenticeships under experienced master builders, where novices acquired hands-on expertise in stonework, proportioning, and site management rather than through formalized schooling. Such education would have exposed emerging architects like Callicrates to the evolving traditions of temple design, including study of influential earlier structures at panhellenic sanctuaries like the Temple of Zeus at Olympia (completed ca. 460 BCE) and the Temple of Apollo at , which exemplified Doric and Ionic innovations that shaped Attic practices. However, no specific mentors or early projects are documented for Callicrates himself. Ancient sources, including inscriptions and later references by , offer no anecdotes about his family, upbringing, or initial influences, underscoring the scarcity of biographical detail for classical Greek professionals beyond their technical output. This absence reflects the broader historiographical focus on civic achievements over individual narratives in Periclean .

Professional Career in

Callicrates emerged as a prominent in during the mid-fifth century BC, active primarily between approximately 450 and 420 BC amid the city's democratic zenith and imperial expansion following the Persian Wars. His documented commissions reflect a focus on that bolstered Athenian prestige and security, often under the auspices of the Periclean building program. His earliest major collaboration was with the architect Ictinus on the , initiated around 447 BC as part of ' post-Persian reconstruction efforts on the . This partnership, attested in ancient sources, positioned Callicrates as a key figure in one of the era's most ambitious projects, though the precise division of responsibilities between the two architects remains unclear. Independently, Callicrates received the commission for the around 448 BC, as recorded in inscription IG I³ 35, which tasked him with planning and overseeing the structure's construction, ultimately completed between 426 and 421 BC. Callicrates also contributed to Athens' defensive infrastructure, including repairs to the circuit wall around 448 BC, per inscription IG I³ 45, which directed him to erect barriers against intruders such as runaway slaves. Additionally, ancient testimony credits him with building the middle Long Wall connecting to during ' leadership, enhancing the city's maritime access and fortifications in the 440s BC. He is further attributed with designing the Ionic Temple on the Ilissos (ca. 448 BC) and the Doric Temple of the Athenians on (ca. 425–417 BC), expanding his known oeuvre. Scholarly analysis debates the scope of Callicrates' oversight in these projects, with some viewing him as a high-level state architect coordinating multiple commissions, while others emphasize the role of on-site episkopoi (supervisors) in execution, suggesting his contributions were more supervisory than hands-on. This uncertainty stems from limited epigraphic evidence, which names him in decrees but rarely details operational roles.

Major Architectural Works

Parthenon Collaboration

Callicrates collaborated with the architect Ictinus on the design and construction of the , the grand temple dedicated to on the Athenian , as attested in ancient sources. According to in his Life of (13.4), the two were jointly responsible for the structure, which featured a measuring approximately 100 feet in length. Construction began in 447 BCE and continued until 432 BCE, marking a pinnacle of the Periclean building program. Scholars attribute to Callicrates a primary role in incorporating Ionic elements into the predominantly Doric , drawing on his demonstrated expertise in the from other projects. This likely included oversight of the continuous Ionic encircling the exterior of the walls, which depicted the Panathenaic —a ceremonial event honoring —and measured about 160 meters in total length. He may also have influenced interior details, such as the slender Ionic columns in the pronaos and the sima (roof-edge molding), which echoed his Ionic designs elsewhere. These features complemented Ictinus's focus on Doric proportions, creating a harmonious hybrid that blended the two orders innovatively. The project presented significant construction challenges, including the quarrying and transport of Pentelic marble from nearby , which provided the temple's fine white stone for nearly all visible surfaces. To counter visual distortions from afar, the architects employed optical refinements such as —the subtle convex swelling of columns—to enhance the structure's perceived stability and grace. The building was meticulously integrated with the uneven terrain of the , requiring extensive site preparation to level the rocky plateau while aligning the temple's orientation with sacred axes and surrounding monuments. The precise division of labor between Callicrates and Ictinus remains uncertain, with ancient accounts varying in emphasis—Pausanias and credit Ictinus alone in some contexts, suggesting Callicrates may have held a supporting or specialized role. Modern scholarship debates this, proposing that Callicrates contributed technical supervision or planning for Ionic components, while Ictinus managed overall Doric execution, though no definitive evidence resolves the allocation.

Temple of Athena Nike

The Temple of Athena Nike is attributed solely to the architect Callicrates based on the inscription IG I³ 35, a decree dated to circa 427–424 BC that commissions him to design the sanctuary's gates, temple, and altar as an amphiprostyle Ionic structure on the southwest bastion of the Acropolis. This small temple exemplifies Callicrates' preference for the Ionic order, featuring a tetrastyle prostyle arrangement with four slender Ionic columns on both the east and west fronts, but no columns along the sides or an opisthodomos at the rear. The continuous Ionic frieze around the naos depicts mythological assemblies of gods on the east, battles between Greeks and Persians on the south, and conflicts among Greeks on the west and north, while the surrounding marble parapet bears reliefs of winged Nikai preparing trophies and sacrifices, symbolizing victory. The structure's platform measures approximately 8.2 meters in length by 5.4 meters in width, constructed primarily from fine Pentelic marble, including the sculptural elements such as the parapet reliefs. Construction of the temple took place between ca. 427 and 424 BC, during the early years of the , as commissioned by the decree. This underscores the temple's role within ' wartime propaganda, celebrating victories like those at Marathon and through its iconography while adapting to resource limitations. Scholarly debate persists over whether IG I³ 35 specifically authorizes the surviving Ionic temple or an earlier, simpler naiskos (small ) on the site, as excavations have uncovered remnants of a pre-427 BC structure possibly intended for the new priestess appointed by the . Proponents of the naiskos interpretation point to the 's emphasis on a modest rather than a full temple, yet the precision of Callicrates' involvement and the stylistic coherence with mid-fifth-century Ionic designs support attribution of the amphiprostyle building to him, distinguishing it from any prior .

Fortifications and Other Structures

Callicrates contributed to the fortification of the Athenian through his role in constructing a defensive , as recorded in the inscription IG I³ 45, dated around 448 BC. This decree commissioned him to plan and build a structure swiftly to prevent runaway slaves and vagabonds from entering the , likely a section of the circuit wall or a temporary barrier integrated into the existing defenses. The project formed part of the broader post-Persian War reconstruction efforts following the destruction of 480 BC, enhancing security for the sacred site during the Periclean building program. The walls employed local for the main body, with some elements for reinforcement, adapting to the rocky terrain of the to create a robust barrier that rose up to several meters in height. A key aspect of Callicrates' work in fortifications was his contract for the middle Long Wall, one of three parallel defensive structures linking Athens to the port of Piraeus, built between approximately 461 and 431 BC. According to Plutarch in his Life of Pericles (13.4), Callicrates served as the primary contractor for this wall, which provided a vital corridor for supplies and troop movements during potential sieges, exemplified by its role in the Peloponnesian War strategy. The middle wall, positioned between the northern and southern Long Walls, utilized conglomerate for its foundational bases to ensure stability on uneven ground, topped with limestone blocks and mudbrick superstructure for efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Its strategic alignment followed the natural contours of the landscape, incorporating towers and gates to optimize defense while minimizing exposure. Evidence for other structures attributed to Callicrates remains largely epigraphic and unconfirmed, with inscriptions suggesting possible involvement in minor repairs or planning, though physical remains have been altered by subsequent modifications and destructions. These utilitarian projects highlight his versatility beyond temple architecture, focusing on practical that integrated with ' defensive needs, but surviving details are sparse due to the perishable nature of some materials and later interventions.

Architectural Style and Techniques

Mastery of Doric and Ionic Orders

Callicrates demonstrated profound expertise in the through his contributions to the , where the exterior features sturdy, fluted columns without bases, rising directly from the to convey strength and solidity. These columns incorporate —a subtle convex swelling along the shaft—to counteract optical illusions of concavity, enhancing visual harmony, while the includes a characteristic triglyph-metope with alternating carved blocks and sculptural panels. This application exemplifies the 's emphasis on and robustness, refined to a high degree in the compared to earlier structures like the , which lacked such precise optical corrections and proportional elegance. In contrast, Callicrates showcased his mastery of the in the , employing capitals that evoke scrolls, paired with moldings along the for a sense of graceful ornamentation and lighter proportions overall. The temple's amphiprostyle design, with four Ionic columns at front and rear, highlights these elements in Pentelic marble, creating an airy yet stable appearance suited to the site's elevated bastion. Unlike the heavier Doric, the here features bases with scotia flutes between tori, adding refinement to the decorative scheme. Callicrates' innovative hybrid applications are evident in the , where the Doric exterior encases an interior with Ionic columns and a continuous , blending the orders to symbolize Athenian cultural versatility without compromising structural integrity. This fusion, rare in earlier temples, allowed for the Doric's monumental presence alongside the Ionic's decorative interior, as seen in the pronaos and . His adherence to precise proportions underscored this mastery: Doric columns in the achieve a height-to-lower-diameter of approximately 5.48:1, promoting stability and scale, while the Temple of Athena Nike's Ionic columns use a stockier 7:1 —deviating from the typical 9:1 for Ionic—to harmonize with the compact structure and adjacent Propylaia. These choices reflect a more sophisticated calibration than in predecessors like the , where Doric proportions were less attenuated and details cruder.

Innovations in Proportion and Design

Callicrates contributed to the ’s innovative use of subtle curvatures in the and columns to counteract optical illusions that could make straight lines appear to sag or flatten when viewed from below. These refinements, including in the columns and an upward curve in the horizontal elements, ensured visual harmony and proportion, preventing the structure from seeming concave to the . As one of the principal architects alongside Ictinus, Callicrates played a key role in implementing these adjustments during the temple’s construction from 447 to 432 BCE. In the , Callicrates adapted Ionic elements to the site’s constraints by miniaturizing the overall scale while using stockier columns with a width-to-height ratio of approximately 1:7, wider than the typical 1:9 or 1:11 for Ionic orders, to ensure stability on the 7-meter-high at the ’s southwestern edge. This design choice harmonized the delicate temple with the massive underlying and adjacent Propylaea, addressing the precarious cliffside location without compromising structural integrity. Additionally, Callicrates employed an amphiprostyle layout with columns only at the front and rear, eliminating side colonnades and deep rear chambers like an opisthodomos, thereby maximizing the cult space within the compact for purposes. Callicrates favored fine Pentelic marble for both projects, polishing its surfaces to enhance its natural luminosity and reflective quality under , which amplified the temples’ visual impact and symbolic purity. This material choice, drawn from nearby quarries, allowed for precise carving of intricate while contributing to the buildings’ enduring brightness and elegance. Scholars view Callicrates’ work as advancing Greek architecture from the rigid, geometric forms of the Archaic period toward the dynamic aesthetics of the Classical era, with innovations like inward column inclinations and refined proportions emphasizing and viewer perspective to create a sense of harmonious movement. These techniques, evident in the Nike temple’s delicate mouldings and the ’s optical adjustments, influenced subsequent designs by prioritizing perceptual balance over strict .

Historical Context and Sources

Role in Periclean Building Program

The Periclean building program, active from roughly 461 to 429 BC during the leadership of the statesman , represented a transformative initiative in designed to restore and elevate the city's monuments in the aftermath of the Persian Wars (492–449 BC). This effort sought to commemorate Athenian victory, assert cultural dominance, and foster civic pride through grand architectural projects, particularly on the . Funding derived substantially from the treasury of the , an alliance originally formed in 478 BC to counter Persian threats, whose resources Athens increasingly controlled after relocating the treasury to the city in 454 BC. A key decree in 449 BC authorized the transfer of 5,000 talents from this treasury to finance the constructions, marking a shift toward using allied contributions for domestic glorification rather than solely military purposes. Callicrates, an esteemed Athenian architect, was deliberately selected for prominent roles in this program due to his expertise, integrating him into Pericles' vision of embodying democratic ideals and imperial authority through monumental works. Alongside Ictinus, he served as co-architect for major Acropolis temples, with appointments reflecting Pericles' emphasis on skilled professionals to execute symbolic dedications to Athena, the city's patron goddess. This choice underscored the program's role in projecting Athens as a beacon of cultural and political superiority, transforming war spoils into enduring emblems of hegemony. Economically, the initiative mobilized vast state resources from the for procuring materials like Pentelic marble and compensating labor, sustaining over 20,000 workers including skilled artisans, unskilled laborers, and support staff, as noted in contemporary accounts. Oversight fell to high officials such as the sculptor , who coordinated artistic elements, ensuring efficient allocation amid the scale of operations that employed citizens, metics, and slaves alike. Politically, the temples functioned as sacred dedications reinforcing ' religious and imperial narrative, positioning the city as the preeminent power in the Greek world. The program's breadth encompassed not only temples but also gateways like the Propylaea and colossal statues, though Callicrates' contributions remained focused on select structures; he also played a role in associated fortifications to bolster ' defenses.

Ancient Testimonies and Inscriptions

The primary ancient literary testimony to Callicrates' career comes from Plutarch's Life of (13.4-5), written in the late 1st or early 2nd century AD, which identifies him as one of the architects of the alongside Ictinus and credits him with contracting the construction of the . Plutarch's account, drawing on earlier lost sources such as the Atthides (local Athenian histories) and comic poets like Cratinus, portrays Callicrates as a key figure in ' building program, though it provides no biographical details beyond his professional roles. Epigraphic evidence offers direct attestation of Callicrates' involvement in specific projects. The decree IG I³ 35, dated to ca. 448 BC (though debated, with some scholars favoring the mid-420s BC based on epigraphic evidence such as the three-barred sigma), and discovered on the north slope of the , commissions Callicrates to oversee the construction of a temple and to Athena Nike, appointing additional overseers to assist him. Similarly, IG I³ 45, from circa 437 BC and found in excavations, names Callicrates as responsible for building a provisional enclosure near the Propylaea, part of the fortifications. The dating of IG I³ 35 remains controversial, with traditional views placing it around 448 BC and others arguing for the mid-420s BC. Other ancient sources provide only indirect or ambiguous references to Callicrates the architect; for instance, (Histories 9.72) mentions a Spartan warrior named Callicrates at in 479 BC, but this is likely a different individual, while Pausanias ( 1.24.5 and 1.28.2) describes the without naming its architects. No treatises or technical writings by Callicrates himself survive, unlike later Roman authors such as . The reliability of these testimonies is tempered by their temporal distance from Callicrates' era (mid-5th century BC); Plutarch's narrative, compiled centuries later, relies on fragmentary earlier records prone to embellishment or error. Inscriptions like IG I³ 35 and 45, however, are contemporary primary documents, offering precise administrative details. Archaeological evidence from Acropolis excavations corroborates the inscriptions' chronology, with building accounts and fragments (e.g., from the records) aligning the Temple of Nike's construction to the 440s BC and fortification works to the 430s BC, matching the epigraphic dates.

Legacy and Influence

Impact on Classical Greek Architecture

Callicrates' collaboration on the established a groundbreaking model for hybridizing Doric and Ionic orders, blending the robust Doric exterior columns with an interior Ionic and isolated Ionic elements, which set a precedent for integrating multiple orders within a single structure. This approach directly influenced contemporaneous and subsequent buildings, such as the , where Ionic capitals and moldings echoed the Parthenon's proportional refinements and carved details, promoting a more eclectic and visually dynamic temple design during the High Classical period. By demonstrating the aesthetic and structural viability of such combinations, Callicrates' work encouraged architects to move beyond strict adherence to single orders, fostering greater flexibility in Classical temple architecture. The dissemination of Callicrates' proportional ideals extended beyond Athens through the city's imperial influence, as Athenian architects and masons exported these techniques to allied territories and colonies via the . For instance, innovations in Ionic column bases and anta capitals from his and Ilissos Temple appeared in Ionian temples in Asia Minor, where developments in base moldings and compact capital proportions adapted local styles, enhancing the regional adoption of refined Classical proportions. This cultural transfer solidified ' architectural hegemony, with Callicrates' fortifications, including the , serving as symbols of imperial power and inspiring defensive and civic structures in dependent poleis. Callicrates' techniques also played an educational role, as his emphasis on optical refinements, such as inward column inclinations and precise , was transmitted to successors, contributing to the High Classical refinement evident in structures like the Temple of Apollo at . At , early Ionic capitals with flat forms and painted ornaments reflect the influence of Callicrates' compact, carved designs. These elements trained a generation of architects in achieving perceptual balance, elevating the overall sophistication of Greek public architecture. However, Callicrates' direct influence diminished after the (431–404 BCE), as ' reduced political and economic dominance curtailed the export of its architectural models to new projects. Despite this, his core principles of hybrid orders and proportional harmony persisted in Hellenistic adaptations, where they informed more ornate and expansive designs across the expanded Greek world, ensuring a lasting conceptual legacy in temple and civic building.

Recognition in Modern Scholarship

The rediscovery of Callicrates' architectural contributions began in the following Greek independence, with systematic excavations on the revealing key structures attributed to him. Ludwig Ross, as the first ephoros of antiquities, led excavations starting in 1835 that uncovered foundations and elements of the , confirming its identification through architectural analysis and inscriptions. Concurrently, the Society of Dilettanti sponsored surveys and publications that documented Athenian monuments, including early measurements of the co-designed by Callicrates, aiding in the attribution of optical refinements to fifth-century builders. These efforts, spanning the 1830s to 1840s, shifted scholarly focus from speculative drawings to empirical evidence, establishing Callicrates as a pivotal figure in Periclean . Key 20th-century scholars advanced interpretations of Callicrates' oeuvre through detailed attributions and technical analyses. Francis Penrose's 1888 survey meticulously documented optical refinements—such as and —in Athenian temples, including the and , attributing these illusions to architects like Callicrates to counteract visual distortions. Rhys Carpenter, in his 1970 monograph, expanded attributions beyond the to include the , the , and the Temple of Ares, arguing for Callicrates' consistent Ionic style based on proportional similarities and inscriptional evidence. John Travlos contributed to debates on the , proposing in his reconstructions that Callicrates innovated its amphiprostyle plan and frieze iconography, though he later revised some associations, such as with the . Modern scholarship continues to debate Callicrates' roles, particularly his division of labor on the . William B. Dinsmoor's chronological framework, refined in the mid-20th century, positions Callicrates as overseeing eastern sections and fortifications post-447 BCE, integrating epigraphic accounts to clarify his with Iktinos amid Periclean oversight. Feminist readings of the Temple of Nike's highlight gendered symbolism, interpreting Nike figures unbinding sandals as metaphors for liberation and agency in Athenian narratives, challenging traditional militaristic views. These interpretations draw on parapet reliefs to explore how Callicrates' designs encoded democratic ideals of inclusion. Callicrates' legacy endures in contemporary honors and preservation efforts. In 1976, the named a 68-km on Mercury after him, recognizing his architectural prominence alongside other classical figures. His structures feature prominently in UNESCO's restoration projects, initiated in 1975, where the underwent to preserve Callicratean proportions, emphasizing sustainable conservation of fifth-century Ionic elements. Despite these advances, significant gaps persist in understanding Callicrates' life and methods, with no surviving portraits, personal writings, or detailed biographies, forcing reliance on indirect like building inscriptions and ancient testimonies. Scholars note the absence of his name in later sources like Pausanias, complicating attributions, and advocate for further epigraphic studies to clarify his full corpus and influences.

References

  1. https://www.jstor.org/stable/147361
  2. https://www.atticinscriptions.com/inscription/AIO/314
  3. https://www.ascsa.edu.gr/uploads/media/hesperia/147361.pdf
  4. https://uapress.arizona.edu/book/archaeology-and-apprenticeship
  5. https://www.theacropolismuseum.gr/en/other-monuments-periklean-building-programme/temple-athena-nike
  6. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Plutarch/Lives/Pericles*.html
  7. https://smarthistory.org/the-parthenon-athens/
  8. https://www.theacropolismuseum.gr/en/sculptural-decoration/frieze
  9. https://ancient-greece.org/greek-art/the-parthenon/
  10. https://www.archdaily.com/803931/ad-classics-the-parthenon-ancient-greece-ictinus-callicrates
  11. https://www.atticinscriptions.com/inscription/BlokAthenaNike/1
  12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4436618
  13. https://smarthistory.org/temple-nike/
  14. https://www.academia.edu/60819777/The_Sanctuary_of_Athena_Nike_in_Athens_Architectural_Stages_and_Chronology
  15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250177614_The_Akroteria_of_the_Temple_of_Athena_Nike
  16. https://www.academia.edu/9533472/The_priestess_of_Athena_Nike_a_new_reading_of_IG_I3_35_and_36
  17. https://journals.openedition.org/kernos/2274
  18. https://www.ascsa.edu.gr/uploads/media/hesperia/hesp.80.1.0071.pdf
  19. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/plutarch-lives_pericles/1916/pb_LCL065.43.xml
  20. https://smarthistory.org/greek-architectural-orders/
  21. https://human.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Art/Art_History_(Boundless)/06:_Ancient_Greece/6.06:_The_High_Classical_Period
  22. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/architecture-in-ancient-greece
  23. https://oyc.yale.edu/sites/default/files/08athenianempire_3_0.pdf
  24. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-ancient-athens/akropolis/89BCC9E65EAA4413878BC8B7FB4DAACC
  25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/282652
  26. https://smarthistory.org/introduction-to-greek-architecture/
  27. https://archaeologia.eie.gr/archaeologia/En/chapter_more_3.aspx
  28. https://www.getty.edu/art/exhibitions/dilettanti/
  29. https://www.iccrom.org/sites/default/files/ICCROM_05_HistoryofConservation02_en.pdf
  30. https://digi.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/diglit/penrose1888
  31. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Architects_of_the_Parthenon.html?id=_qxPAAAAMAAJ
  32. https://journal.bezalel.ac.il/v1/en/protocol/article/2909
  33. https://jscholarship.library.jhu.edu/bitstream/1774.2/39598/1/CLEMENTS-DISSERTATION-2015.pdf
  34. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/404/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.