Hubbry Logo
Weiyang PalaceWeiyang PalaceMain
Open search
Weiyang Palace
Community hub
Weiyang Palace
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Weiyang Palace
Weiyang Palace
Weiyang Palace
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Key Information

Weiyang Palace
Visual recreation of Weiyang Palace.
Chinese未央宮
Literal meaningThe Endless Palace
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinWèiyānggōng
Bopomofoㄨㄟˋ ㄧㄤ ㄍㄨㄥ
Wade–GilesWei4-yang1-kung1
IPA[wêɪ.jáŋ.kʊ́ŋ]
Yue: Cantonese
Yale RomanizationMeihyēunggūng
Jyutpingmei6 joeng1 gung1
IPA[mej˨.jœŋ˥.kʊŋ˥]

The Weiyang Palace (Chinese: 未央宮) was the main imperial palace complex of the Han dynasty and numerous other Chinese dynasties, located in the city of Chang'an (modern-day Xi'an). It was built in 200 BC at the request of the Emperor Gaozu of Han, under the supervision of his prime minister Xiao He. It served as the administrative centre and imperial residence of the Western Han, the Xin dynasty, the Eastern Han (during the reign of the Emperor Xian of Han), the Western Jin (during the reign of the Emperor Min of Jin), the Han-Zhao, the Former Qin, the Later Qin, the Western Wei, the Northern Zhou, and the early Sui dynasty.

Qing dynasty illustration of Weiyang Palace and Changle Palace

The palace survived until the Tang dynasty when it was burned down by marauding invaders en route to the Tang capital Chang'an. This was the largest palace ever built on Earth,[1] covering 4.8 km2 (1,200 acres), which is 6.7 times the size of the current Forbidden City, or 11 times the size of the Vatican City.[2] Today, little remains of the former palace. The site of the palace, along with many other sites along the eastern section of the Silk Road, was named a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2014.

Name

[edit]

"Weiyang" (未央) literally means "(something) hasn't reached its midpoint", "has more than a half to go", but colloquially it can be translated as "endless", which is probably what the name is actually alluding to. Together with the name of Changle Palace (長樂宮, perpetual happiness), which was built 2 years before, it can be interpreted to mean, "The perpetual happiness hasn't reached its midpoint yet."

Description

[edit]

Weiyang palace was sited to the southwest of Han dynasty Chang'an and is therefore also called the Western Palace (西宫). Surrounded by walls, the palace complex was rectangular, with a length of 2,150 metres east–west and 2,250 metres north–south. Each side of the walls had a single main gate, with the eastern and northern gates (facing Chang'an city) built with gate towers.

Major architectures within the palace include:

  • Front Hall (前殿)
  • Xuanshi Hall (宣室殿)
  • Wenshi Hall (温室殿)
  • Qingliang Hall (清凉殿)
  • Jinhua Hall (金华殿)
  • Chengming Hall (承明殿)
  • Gaomen Hall (高门殿)
  • Baihu Hall (白虎殿)
  • Yutang Hall (玉堂殿)
  • Xuande Hall (宣德殿)
  • Jiaofang Hall (椒房殿)
  • Zhaoyang Hall (昭阳殿)
  • Bailiang Platform (柏梁台)
  • Qilin Pavilion (麒麟阁)
  • Tianlu Pavilion (天禄阁)
  • Shiqu Pavilion (石渠阁)

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Weiyang Palace

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Weiyang Palace (未央宮) was the principal imperial residence and political center of the Western Han dynasty (206 BCE–9 CE), located in the ancient capital of in what is now , Province, . Spanning approximately 4.8 square kilometers, it was the largest palace complex in the world during its time and exemplified the grandeur of Han imperial architecture. Construction of the Weiyang Palace began in 200 BCE on the orders of (r. 202–195 BCE), with the project supervised by his chancellor, . The palace featured a square layout with gates on all four sides, corner turrets, major east-west and north-south roadways, and a prominent front hall built on a high platform, serving as the venue for imperial conferences and state rituals. Its design, including rammed-earth foundations and extensive gardens, influenced subsequent architecture for over two millennia. As the administrative hub of the Western Han Empire, the Weiyang Palace was where pivotal decisions shaped China's expansion, including the dispatch of diplomat from its front hall by Emperor Wu (r. 141–87 BCE) to explore the and establish the trade network. The complex housed royal offices, an imperial garden, and cultural facilities, and it marked the eastern terminus of the , facilitating cultural and economic exchanges across . After the fall of the Western Han, the palace continued to function as a political center for seven subsequent dynasties until it largely fell into disuse during the (618–907 CE). Today, only the rammed-earth foundations and remnants of walls, gates, and a survive at the site, which has been developed into a national archaeological park. On June 22, 2014, the Site of Weiyang Palace was inscribed on the World Heritage List as part of the ": the Routes Network of Chang'an-Tianshan Corridor," recognizing its role in global historical connectivity. Ongoing excavations continue to uncover artifacts and structures, providing insights into urban planning and imperial life.

Etymology

Name Origin

The name "Weiyang" (未央) for the palace originates from classical Chinese nomenclature, with 未 signifying "not yet" and 央 denoting the "center" or "midpoint," yielding a literal meaning of "not yet at the midpoint." This phrasing is commonly interpreted as "endless" or "without end," evoking notions of perpetuity in Han Dynasty imperial symbolism. The palace's establishment and naming during its construction phase are documented in historical records such as Sima Qian's Records of the Grand Historian (Shiji). Paired with the earlier Changle Palace (長樂宮, meaning "perpetual happiness"), the combined nomenclature of Weiyang and Changle reflects Han cosmological ideals, symbolizing "perpetual happiness not yet at its midpoint" to convey an unending era of prosperity and stability. This pairing aligns with broader Han conventions for naming imperial sites to embody auspicious, enduring concepts. The palace received its name in 200 BCE under Emperor Gaozu (Liu Bang), of the .

Symbolic Significance

The name "Weiyang" (未央), literally translating to "not yet central" or "has yet to reach its midpoint," carried profound symbolic weight in Han cosmology, evoking the concept of endlessness and the perpetual extension of imperial rule beyond any temporal limit. This interpretation aligned with the unending , portraying the Han dynasty's sovereignty as an infinite continuum, immune to decline or cessation, much like the ceaseless cycles of the . Integrated into broader yin-yang cosmology, the name "Weiyang" represented energy's dynamic, unending progression, complementing the yin-associated Changle ("everlasting happiness"), whose paired nomenclature symbolized cosmic and balanced perpetuity. This duality underscored the Han emperors' alignment with natural forces, ensuring the dynasty's stability through eternal equilibrium between opposing principles. Han rulers invoked the palace's name to bolster self-legitimization, weaving Confucian emphases on harmonious order with Daoist notions of timeless to affirm their divine right to rule. In Han literature, such as imperial edicts and poetic fu, "Weiyang" frequently evoked imperial longevity, as seen in references linking the palace to the dynasty's enduring and heavenly favor.

History

Construction Phase

The construction of Weiyang Palace was initiated around 200 BCE by (Liu Bang), as part of the broader effort to rebuild and establish as the new capital following the collapse of the in 206 BCE. This project marked a key step in consolidating Han authority after the turbulent end of the Qin regime, with the palace designed to serve as the central administrative and imperial residence. The initiative reflected Gaozu's vision for a stable dynastic seat, drawing on the strategic location of the former Qin capital while adapting it to Han needs. Supervision of the construction fell to Xiao He, a key advisor to Gaozu who had previously served as a local official under the Qin. Xiao He managed the complex , including the of materials and coordination of labor from across the , ensuring the project's alignment with imperial priorities. Historical describe his oversight as meticulous, with the personally inspecting progress and expressing admiration for the scale upon seeing the emerging structures. Xiao He's role extended to replicating elements of Qin architectural models while innovating for Han symbolism, laying the foundation for the palace's enduring prominence. The timeline for the initial phase spanned from shortly after the Han founding in 202 BCE to major completion by 200 BCE, though subsequent expansions occurred under later rulers to accommodate growing administrative demands. Construction began amid the post-Qin reconstruction efforts, with foundational work progressing rapidly to establish the core complex. This period of intense building activity underscored the Han's emphasis on monumental to legitimize rule. Materials employed in the construction included for the massive walls and platforms, providing durability and scale suitable for the expansive layout. Timber framing supported the upper structures, allowing for intricate roofing and interiors typical of early Han design. Foundations incorporated early forms of fired bricks, a refined from Qin innovations, enhancing stability against the region's seismic activity and conditions. These choices balanced practicality with the era's capabilities, contributing to the palace's reputation for grandeur.

Periods of Use

The Weiyang Palace served primarily as the imperial residence and administrative center during the Western Han dynasty (206 BCE–9 CE), housing all 12 emperors from Gaozu to Pingdi and functioning as the site for court rituals, imperial audiences, and key policy-making decisions. Completed in 200 BCE under Emperor Gaozu shortly after the establishment of the capital at , the palace hosted regular assemblies where edicts were issued and officials were summoned for governance matters. Following the fall of the Western Han, the palace continued in use under the (9–23 CE), where it remained the central hub for imperial administration despite the brief interregnum. Usage persisted into the Eastern Han (25–220 CE), during which additions and repairs were made to adapt the complex for ongoing court functions, particularly under Emperor Xian when Chang'an briefly served as the western capital alongside . The facility then accommodated successive regimes, including the Western Jin (265–316 CE) and non-Han states such as (304–329 CE), (351–394 CE), Later Qin (384–417 CE), (535–556 CE), and (557–581 CE), each employing it as a residence for rulers and a venue for issuing decrees and conducting rituals. In the early (581–618 CE), the Weiyang Palace saw limited continued usage as an administrative site before the dynasty shifted focus to the newly constructed Daxing capital south and east of the old complex, marking the end of its primary role. Over its active lifespan from the Western Han through the early Sui, the palace functioned for more than 800 years as a pivotal center of imperial power.

Destruction and Aftermath

The Weiyang Palace, already in disuse during the (618–907 CE) due to the construction of new imperial complexes such as the Daming Palace, suffered further damage amid the era's rebellions and invasions that ravaged , including during the (755–763 CE) and subsequent upheavals. Following these events, the palace fell into gradual abandonment as Tang emperors increasingly favored newer complexes like the Daming Palace for residence and administration. By the late Tang period, the site, along with much of the palace city, was officially abandoned under the orders of , a local , leaving the expansive grounds to decay. Over subsequent centuries, the ruins transitioned into areas of sporadic agricultural use and minor rural settlements, with villages emerging on the remnants of ancient as the region shifted from imperial to agrarian purposes. In medieval Chinese literature, particularly Tang poetry following the An Lushan Rebellion, the ruins of Weiyang Palace symbolized the transience of imperial glory and the devastation of war, as evoked in works lamenting Chang'an's fall. This motif persisted into later periods, where references in poetry and historical writings portrayed the site as a poignant emblem of dynastic decline and the impermanence of power. The 19th and early 20th centuries saw continued neglect of the site amid broader political upheavals in China, with the ruins largely overlooked until systematic archaeological surveys began in the 1950s. These efforts, led by Chinese scholars including teams from the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, confirmed the palace's layout and scope, marking its formal recognition as a key historical relic and paving the way for preservation initiatives.

Architecture

Overall Layout

The Weiyang Palace formed a vast rectangular enclosure, measuring 2,150 meters east-west by 2,250 meters north-south, encompassing approximately 4.8 square kilometers (1,200 acres) and ranking as the largest palace complex in ancient . This immense scale reflected the expansive ambitions of the , with the palace walls constructed from , featuring bases 7 to 8 meters wide to provide both defense and symbolic grandeur. Surrounding moats enhanced security, while the enclosure included four main gates, one on each side, with gate towers on the northern and eastern sides for oversight and access control. Integrated into the urban grid of ancient , the palace occupied the southwest quadrant of the imperial city, strategically positioned on elevated terrain to dominate the landscape and align with Han cosmological principles. Its north-south orientation embodied imperial authority, mirroring the cosmic order where the emperor served as the "," with the central axis facilitating ritual processions and administrative flow from southern entrances to northern ceremonial spaces. This placement not only separated the palace from residential and market districts but also reinforced the hierarchical structure of the capital, where the palace served as the political core amid the city's orthogonal street network. Internally, the palace was divided along its central axis into distinct functional zones, promoting efficient and imperial seclusion. Administrative areas, including halls for audiences and official deliberations, occupied the forward sections near the southern gates, while residential quarters for the emperor, consorts, and attendants clustered in more protected mid-sections. Expansive gardens and pavilions in the rear and peripheral areas provided spaces for leisure and symbolic representation of , all interconnected by broad avenues and walled courtyards to maintain order and privacy.

Key Structures and Features

The Front Hall, also known as the central hall, served as the primary venue for imperial conferences and administrative ceremonies within Weiyang Palace, standing as the largest and most prominent structure in the complex with dimensions of approximately 350 meters in length and 200 meters in width on a rising up to 20 meters high. Its elevated position on the Longshouyuan hills provided panoramic views, enhancing its symbolic authority, and it was adorned with intricate decorations including inscriptions, carvings, silk ribbons, gold elements, and other treasures. Among the other major halls, the Xuanshi Hall functioned as the emperor's principal sleeping quarters in the inner courtyard. The Qingliang Hall, one of the major structures, likely served seasonal or residential purposes, reflecting adaptations to environmental needs in palace design. The Rear Palace included quarters for the empress and imperial family, underscoring the segregated layout for imperial residences. Key platforms and towers included the Bailiang Platform, constructed under for ritual purposes, such as invoking immortals through ceremonies involving cypress beams believed to attract divine presence. The eastern and northern gate towers provided defensive oversight, with the eastern gate facilitating access for vassals and the northern for officials, integrating security into the palace's functional areas. Specialized areas encompassed practical installations like the armory, positioned between Weiyang and Changle Palaces to store military equipment, and extensive granaries supporting the palace's self-sufficiency. Underground drainage systems, utilizing large pottery tubes for sewage and water management, exemplified advanced Han engineering to maintain across the vast complex. Decorative elements featured gray or green-glazed tiled roofs with motifs like clouds on eave tiles, complemented by architectural fittings such as hinges and ornaments that added both aesthetic and functional value.

Significance

Political and Administrative Role

Weiyang Palace functioned as the central seat of the imperial court during the Western Han dynasty (206 BCE–9 CE), where emperors conducted daily audiences, proclaimed , and convened meetings with high-ranking officials. From the reign of Emperor Hui onward, it became the primary imperial residence, hosting routine court proceedings in structures like the Front Hall (Zhangtai), which served as the venue for official conferences and policy discussions. For instance, in 30 BCE, Emperor Cheng issued an addressing flood relief, underscoring its role in governance responses to crises. The palace also housed key administrative hubs that managed the empire's , including the (Shaofu) for financial oversight and , the Imperial Workshop (Shangfang) for producing state and equipment, and the Grand Herald's for handling diplomatic protocols, foreign relations, and ranks. The Secretariat (Shangshu), a pivotal buffering the from the and other ministers, operated within the palace grounds, drafting policies and managing edicts. command was coordinated through the of the Grand Commandant (Taiwei), who used the palace as a base for and defense against northern threats. These offices exemplified the palace's integration of censorship, , and functions, with the Grand Herald evolving by 148 BCE to oversee seals, noble appointments, and inspections. In diplomacy, particularly along the , the palace facilitated receptions for envoys, demonstrating Han power and initiating relations that supported trade routes. Rituals conducted at Weiyang Palace, such as annual audiences and state banquets, symbolically reinforced the emperor's divine mandate by positioning him as the cosmic center of the realm, with protocols dictating spatial hierarchies for officials and foreign dignitaries. During the (9–23 CE), repurposed the palace as the administrative core, implementing bureaucratic reforms like the Nine Ministers system while retaining its layout for court functions. In the Eastern Han (25–220 CE), it briefly resumed as the imperial seat during Emperor Xian's reign when the capital returned to , adapting spaces for the Three Excellencies (San gong)—, Imperial Counsellor, and Grand Commandant—to balance power amid influences. Subsequent dynasties, including Wei and Jin, continued using the palace for governance until the Tang shifted primary operations to new complexes, though remnants influenced later bureaucratic designs.

Cultural and Architectural Influence

The Weiyang Palace exerted a significant influence on subsequent imperial in , serving as a foundational model for palace layouts in later dynasties. Its expansive design, encompassing over 4.8 square kilometers with a central and multiple courtyards, informed the spatial organization of the Tang Dynasty's Daming Palace in and the Ming Dynasty's in , where similar north-south axes and hierarchical enclosures emphasized imperial authority and cosmic harmony. In cultural depictions, the palace symbolized the height of Han prosperity and imperial splendor, frequently referenced in historical texts and poetry as a locus of power and elegance. The Han poet Sima Xiangru (c. 179–117 BCE) immortalized such grandeur in his fu rhapsodies, including the "Rhapsody on the Imperial Excursion and Hunt," which evokes the opulent hunts and processions originating from Weiyang's environs, portraying it as a microcosm of the empire's vitality. Architecturally, Weiyang pioneered innovations such as vast multi-story halls and seamless garden integration, shaping enduring principles in Chinese design. The palace's main hall, measuring roughly 120 meters long by 35 deep, exemplified elevated timber platforms with surrounding colonnades, while adjacent imperial parks like Shanglin demonstrated early harmonization of built and natural elements, influencing orientations in Tang and later palaces to align structures with environmental flows for auspicious governance. The palace's decorative legacy permeated Han visual arts, with motifs of ornate pavilions, feasting scenes, and auspicious symbols drawn from Weiyang's embellishments recurring in reliefs and paintings. For instance, Eastern Han limestone reliefs depict elevated pavilions with figures in imperial attire, mirroring the palace's ceremonial spaces, while banners from tombs feature celestial and terrestrial motifs echoing the integrated grandeur of Weiyang's halls and gardens.

Archaeology and Modern Site

Major Excavations

Archaeological interest in the Weiyang Palace site began with preliminary surveys in the mid-20th century, but systematic excavations commenced in the 1980s under the auspices of the (CASS). Led by archaeologist Liu Qingzhu, these efforts from 1980 to 1989 focused on mapping the palace's layout through extensive trenching and exploration of key structures, including the front hall, Tianlu Pavilion, Shiqu Pavilion, and central administrative offices. This decade-long project yielded the richest findings to date, confirming the palace's vast scale and rammed-earth construction techniques, with foundations up to several meters thick preserved in sections of the enclosure walls and major halls. Significant discoveries during the 1987–1988 phase included 112 mud seals unearthed from administrative contexts, bearing inscriptions such as "Zhang Mu Da Fu" (indicating high-ranking officials) and "Chen Zun," which provided direct evidence of bureaucratic operations within the palace. These artifacts, alongside , wooden slips, and iron components, highlighted the site's role as an administrative hub. Rammed-earth foundations of major buildings, including gate towers and courtyard compounds, were also delineated through trenching, revealing a rectilinear layout aligned with cardinal directions and enclosed by walls originally exceeding 10 meters in height. In 2006, excavations by the Provincial Institute of , directed by Zhang Jianfeng, uncovered nearly 20 underground passages linking rear palace areas, with some extending up to 20 meters in length; these structures, built with brick and stone linings, suggested mechanisms for discreet movement amid political intrigue during the Han period. Advancing into the 2010s, non-invasive techniques like (GPR) were employed alongside targeted trenching to verify the overall layout and identify remnants of gate towers on the eastern and northern walls, confirming their strategic positioning toward the adjacent city. These methods minimized disturbance to the fragile site while enhancing understanding of the palace's defensive and circulatory systems. Excavations have faced persistent challenges from urban encroachment in modern , where expanding development limits access to peripheral areas, and natural affecting exposed rammed-earth elements, particularly the south palace wall, which shows progressive deterioration from roots and . These issues have necessitated adaptive strategies, such as phased digs and protective barriers, to safeguard findings amid ongoing threats.

Preservation and Current Status

The Site of Weiyang Palace was inscribed on the World Heritage List in 2014 as part of : the Routes Network of -Tianshan Corridor, with a core zone encompassing 611.09 hectares dedicated to preserving its historical layout and remnants. In 2021, it was designated as the Weiyang Palace in City of the Western National Park, covering 6.11 square kilometers and integrating protection measures with public visitation facilities. Conservation initiatives include ongoing wall protection efforts, such as stabilizing earthen structures against , alongside vegetation management informed by 2024 geospatial analyses that quantify plant-induced deterioration on the south palace wall. The site park facilitates public access through dedicated exhibition halls that display key artifacts, including bricks and tiles unearthed from the grounds, enhancing visitor understanding of the palace's . Contemporary challenges encompass environmental pressures like from Xi'an's urban expansion and surrounding development, which threaten site integrity through increased particulate deposition and alterations. Site management balances these with tourism development by incorporating educational exhibits and guided paths that promote sustainable visitation without compromising archaeological stability. Future initiatives focus on digital reconstructions using to visualize the palace's original form, alongside plans for targeted expanded excavations to uncover additional subsurface features while adhering to heritage protocols.

References

  1. https://en.shaanxi.gov.cn/tourism/aic/xa_2120/201712/t20171219_1595472_wap.html
  2. https://en.unesco.org/silkroad/countries-alongside-silk-road-routes/china
  3. https://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-asia/ancient-weiyang-palace-exemplifying-han-dynasty-splendor-0010069
  4. https://govt.chinadaily.com.cn/s/202107/28/WS6100c63c498e6a12c1203a9f/weiyang-palace-in-changan-city-of-the-western-han-dynasty-national-archaeological-site-park.html
  5. https://www.chinadragontours.com/weiyang-palace-the-site-of-changan-of-the-han-dynasty-in-xian.html
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095263522000036
  7. https://humanprogress.org/centers-of-progress-pt-10/
  8. http://www.chinaknowledge.de/Art/Palaces/palaces.html
  9. https://www.worldhistory.org/Mandate_of_Heaven/
  10. https://brill.com/display/book/9781684170555/BP000008.pdf
  11. https://read.dukeupress.edu/archives-of-asian-art/article/68/1/67/133947/Gateways-to-Power-and-ParadiseTwin-Towers-in-Early
  12. https://www.nature.com/articles/s40494-024-01485-x
  13. https://www.persee.fr/doc/arasi_0004-3958_2015_num_70_1_1883
  14. http://en.chinaculture.org/chineseway/2014-08/22/content_559022.htm
  15. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/weiyang-palace
  16. https://www.thoughtco.com/changan-china-ancient-capital-city-170478
  17. https://www.berkshirepublishing.com/ecph-china/2017/12/27/changan/
  18. http://www.silkroads.org.cn/portal.php?mod=view&aid=1975
  19. https://www.shigeku.com/xlib/lingshidao/hanshi/tang.htm
  20. http://casseng.cssn.cn/experts/experts_1st_group_cass_members/201402/t20140221_969620.html
  21. https://wwj.shaanxi.gov.cn/ztzl/ndzt/2013n/slsy/ycgk_2414/201211/t20121130_2143467.html
  22. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/early-china/article/archaeological-discovery-and-research-into-the-layout-of-the-palaces-and-ancestral-shrines-of-han-dynasty-changan-a-comparative-essay-on-the-capital-cities-of-ancient-chinese-kingdoms-and-empires/386138E6AC143C8B1F7D3630FC5AC88F
  23. http://kaogu.cssn.cn/zwb/xsyj/yjxl/jlycskg/202108/W020210831390404687834.pdf
  24. https://dokumen.pub/a-history-of-chinese-architecture-d-6591767.html
  25. https://search.proquest.com/openview/b97c5c41ac5829202fb81107da58e428/1
  26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7817/jameroriesoci.140.3.0549
  27. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/daily-life-in-ancient-china/cities-and-urban-life/AA045288DE75CC7DCA9F7188DD5D72ED
  28. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/700602
  29. https://escholarship.org/content/qt626034xg/qt626034xg.pdf
  30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvcwn7bq
  31. https://www.britannica.com/art/Chinese-architecture
  32. https://www.chinafetching.com/palaces-in-china
  33. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/place-and-performance-in-ancient-greece-rome-and-china/imperial-gardens-in-early-roman-and-chinese-empires/FCBE41CB501CFC7A424D7E4BE1AEFD51
  34. https://www.britannica.com/art/fu-Chinese-literature
  35. https://www.britannica.com/art/Chinese-architecture/Stylistic-and-historical-development-to-220-ce
  36. https://www.silkroads.org.cn/portal.php?mod=view&aid=1975
  37. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/44791
  38. https://souquee.com/news/63b4fc2d72410407e5736aad
  39. http://www.china.org.cn/english/features/Archaeology/187415.htm
  40. https://www.jcic-heritage.jp/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/silkroadreport_en.pdf
  41. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1442/
  42. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/778
  43. https://medicalimaging.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceedings/Download?urlId=10.1117%252F12.2246675
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.