Hubbry Logo
ChasmaporthetesChasmaporthetesMain
Open search
Chasmaporthetes
Community hub
Chasmaporthetes
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Chasmaporthetes
Chasmaporthetes
from Wikipedia

Chasmaporthetes
Temporal range: Pliocene–Early Pleistocene
C. progressus skeleton at Hezheng Paleozoological Museum
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Carnivora
Family: Hyaenidae
Subfamily: Hyaeninae
Genus: Chasmaporthetes
Hay, 1921
Species

See text

Synonyms
  • Ailuriaena johnstoni Stirton & Christian, 1940
  • Euryboas

Chasmaporthetes, also known as hunting or running hyena, is an extinct genus of hyenas[1][2][3][4] distributed in Eurasia, North America, and Africa during the Pliocene-Pleistocene epochs, living from 4.9 million to 780,000 years ago, existing for about 4.12 million years.[5] The genus probably arose from Eurasian Miocene hyenas such as Thalassictis or Lycyaena, with C. borissiaki being the oldest known representative.[6] The species C. ossifragus was the only hyena to cross the Bering land bridge into the Americas, and ranged over what is now Arizona and Mexico during Blancan and early Irvingtonian Land Mammal ages, between 5.0 and 1.5 million years ago.[6][4]

Chasmaporthetes was one of the so-called "dog-like" hyenas (of which the aardwolf is the only survivor), a hyaenid group which, in contrast to the now more common "bone-crushing" hyenas, evolved into slender-limbed, cursorial hunters like modern canids.[4]

Taxonomy and etymology

[edit]

Chasmaporthetes was named (from chasm and the Greek πορθευτής (portheutes), "destroyer, ravager") by Hay (1921), who noted that the name meant that the North American species, Chasmaporthetes ossifragus (the type species) possibly saw the beginning of the Grand Canyon.

Species

[edit]
Fossil jaw of C. ossifragus, the only American species (FLMNH)

At least nine species are currently recognised:[7][8]

  • Chasmaporthetes ossifragus Hay, 1921 - North America, Pliocene to Pleistocene
  • C. australis Hendey, 1974 - Africa, Late Miocene
  • C. bonisi Koufos, 1987 - Greece, Late Miocene
  • C. borissiaki Khomenko, 1932 - Russia, Pliocene (disputed[9])
  • C. exitelus Kurtén & Werdelin, 1988 - China, Late Miocene
  • C. gangsriensis Tseng, Li, & Wang, 2013 - Asia, Early Pliocene[7]
  • C. lunensis Del Campana, 1914 - Eurasia, Late Miocene to Early Pleistocene
  • C. melei Rook et al, 2004 - Sardinia, Early Pleistocene[9]
  • C. nitidula Geraads, 1997 - Africa, Pliocene to Early Pleistocene

Anatomy and paleoecology

[edit]
C. progressus skull, National Natural History Museum of China

The limb bones of Chasmaporthetes were long and slender like those of cheetahs. It likely inhabited open ground and was a daytime hunter.[10] In Europe, the species C. lunensis competed with the giant cheetah Acinonyx pardinensis, and may have preyed on the small Bourbon gazelle (Gazella borbonica) and the chamois antelope (Procamptoceras brivatense).[10] The North American C. ossifragus was similar in build to C. lunensis, but had slightly more robust jaws and teeth. It may have preyed on the giant marmot Paenemarmota,[6] and competed with the far more numerous Borophagus diversidens.[11]

The cheek teeth of Chasmaporthetes were slender and sharp-edged like those of felids.[10] A study on the genus' premolar intercuspid notches indicated Chasmaporthetes was likely hypercarnivorous rather than durophagous as its modern cousins (excluding the aardwolf) are.[12] The microstructure of the enamel of C. lunensis lunensis consists of more gently folding enamel than that found in bone-crushing hyaenids, further supporting the notion that it was not a specialist osteophage.[13] Dental microwear of C. australis from Langebaanweg in South Africa shows that the species was hypercarnivorous and rarely engaged in durophagy; its dental microwear was similar to the modern lion, which seldom consumes bone.[14]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Chasmaporthetes is an extinct genus of hyenas in the family Hyaenidae, known as the "hunting hyenas" due to their adaptations for cursorial (running) predation rather than primary scavenging. These medium- to large-sized carnivores, with a wolf-like stature, longer legs, and powerful bone-crushing jaws, actively hunted medium-sized ungulates in packs while also scavenging carcasses. The genus is distinguished by slender, trenchant cheek teeth and a dental formula of I³/³, C¹/¹, P³⁻⁴/³⁻⁴, M¹/¹, features that emphasize hypercarnivory over heavy bone processing compared to contemporary hyaenids like Pliocrocuta perrieri. The genus Chasmaporthetes flourished from the through the and into the epochs, spanning approximately 7 million to 0.8 million years ago in the , with North American populations persisting until around 0.6–0.85 million years ago. It achieved a remarkably wide distribution across (from and to and ), (including ), and , where it was the only hyaenid taxon and likely dispersed via from northern . Notable species include C. lunensis from Eurasian Villafranchian faunas and C. ossifragus in North America, with fossils such as a complete from the Spanish site of La Puebla de Valverde providing detailed cranial morphology, including a broad rostrum and concave . Recent discoveries, including dental remains from the Yukon, extend its known range northward by over 4,000 km, confirming its adaptability to diverse environments from subtropical to . Chasmaporthetes species exhibited low population densities, as evidenced by their rarity in fossil records, and competed with other carnivores such as bone-crushing dogs (Borophagus) and emerging canids like gray wolves, potentially contributing to their eventual in before the end of the Pleistocene. Unlike modern spotted , which rely on robust premolars for extensive scavenging, Chasmaporthetes emphasized canine bites for predation, highlighting a distinct within the Hyaenidae family.

Taxonomy

Etymology

The genus name Chasmaporthetes derives from the Greek words chasma, meaning "chasm" or "gap," and porthetes, meaning "destroyer" or "ravager," evoking the predatory prowess of this hyena-like carnivore in rugged terrains. This etymological choice also alludes to the Grand Canyon in , the region where the type species was discovered, suggesting the animal may have witnessed the early stages of its geological formation. Oliver P. Hay formally named the in , designating C. ossifragus as the based on specimens from Pleistocene deposits in the American Southwest. The ossifragus comes from the Latin os () and frangere (to break), emphasizing its bone-crushing dental adaptations akin to those of modern . This naming occurred amid early 20th-century paleontological expeditions in the American Southwest, where explorers like Charles D. Walcott collected fossils from sites such as the Coconino Plateau, contributing to the recognition of North America's unique Pleistocene megafauna. Hay's description, published in the Proceedings of the United States National Museum, built on these efforts to catalog extinct carnivores from fissure deposits in Arizona's limestone formations.

Classification

Chasmaporthetes belongs to the subfamily Hyaeninae within the family Hyaenidae, representing a basal and extinct lineage that diverged early from the evolutionary path leading to the modern bone-crushing hyenas such as and Hyaena. Unlike the specialized durophagous forms of later Hyaeninae, Chasmaporthetes exhibits adaptations suited for active predation rather than scavenging or heavy bone-cracking, positioning it as a primitive member of the that includes both striped and lineages. The genus likely evolved from Miocene ancestors in Eurasia, such as Thalassictis or Lycyaena, during the late Miocene around 5–6 million years ago, with early species such as C. australis appearing in the Turolian stage. The age of C. borissiaki is debated, generally Ruscinian but possibly late Miocene. This origin reflects a transition from more generalized hyaenids to forms adapted for open environments, marked by the development of slender limbs and shearing dentition for pursuing prey. Phylogenetic analyses place Chasmaporthetes in a clade with Lycyaena and Hyaenictis, supported by shared reductions in molar size and premolar morphology that distinguish it from earlier percrocutines. Debates persist regarding whether Chasmaporthetes represents a primitive hyaenid retaining ancestral traits or a specialized form, with evidence from multivariate dental analyses indicating a mosaic of features leaning toward the latter, including unicuspid talonids and elongated metastyles for efficient slicing. The of the is well-supported by synapomorphies such as the reduced size of the M1, loss of the M1 metaconid, and postcranial adaptations for speed, including elongated limbs akin to those of canids. These traits underscore its role as an active hunter rather than a generalized . In relation to other extinct hyaenids, Chasmaporthetes differs markedly from bone-crushing genera like Adcrocuta and Pachycrocuta, lacking their robust premolars and hypoconulids suited for durophagy, and instead showing closer affinities to Lycyaena through shared shearing adaptations. While some species, such as C. bonisi, have been debated as potential synonyms of Adcrocuta eximia due to overlapping dental metrics, most analyses affirm Chasmaporthetes as a distinct lineage with canid-like cursorial specializations that facilitated its dispersal across continents.

Species

The genus Chasmaporthetes encompasses nine recognized , spanning the to across , , and . The taxonomic validity of some , such as C. bonisi and C. borissiaki, remains debated due to potential synonymies and age uncertainties. These are primarily differentiated by subtle variations in tooth structure, such as the shape and presence of cusps on the lower first molar (m1), development, and overall body size, reflecting adaptations to hunting lifestyles. Debates persist regarding the validity of some taxa, including potential synonymies among Asian forms and questions over whether certain European specimens represent distinct or . The following outlines the key , their type localities, temporal ranges, and diagnostic traits.
  • C. ossifragus (Hay, 1921), the , is known from Pliocene-Pleistocene deposits in , with the type locality in , . It exhibits a relatively robust build for the , with moderately developed premolars and featuring a prominent protocone on p4, distinguishing it from more primitive Asian relatives. Fossils indicate a body size comparable to a large , around 25-30 kg.
  • C. australis (Hendey, 1974) hails from (Langebaanweg, ) sediments, representing one of the earliest members of the in . Diagnostic features include elongated premolars with reduced accessory cusps and a narrow m1 lacking a metaconid, suggesting a more primitive morphology than later Eurasian . It is smaller than C. nitidula, with estimated weights of 20-25 kg.
  • C. bonisi (Koufos, 1987) is recorded from (Turolian) sites in , such as Dytiko 3 in Macedonia. It is characterized by high-crowned premolars and a notch on P4 that is less pronounced than in C. lunensis, though its validity is debated, with some researchers suggesting synonymy with Adcrocuta eximia. Body size estimates place it at approximately 22 kg.
  • C. borissiaki (Khomenko, 1932) originates from (Ruscinian) localities in and , including the type site at Guryev in , though its age is debated as possibly . Key traits include reduced p4 protocone and a slender m1 with minimal cingulum development, marking it as a transitional form between hyaenids and later Chasmaporthetes. It is among the smaller species, likely 18-22 kg.
  • C. exitelus (Kurtén & Werdelin, 1988) comes from (Turolian) deposits in , specifically Locality 116v in Province. This species features an elongated P4 metastyle and primitive, undifferentiated premolars, indicating basal position within the genus; it is smaller than C. ossifragus, with a estimated mass of 20 kg. Some Asian specimens previously assigned here may warrant lumping with related forms.
  • C. gangsriensis (Tseng, Li & Wang, 2013) is from (early ) strata in the Zanda Basin, , . Diagnostic elements include relatively undifferentiated premolars and a narrow with absent metaconid on m1, similar to C. lunensis but with smaller overall dimensions (around 18-20 kg), supporting its role as a basal taxon in high-altitude contexts. Potential synonymy with other Tibetan hyaenids remains under discussion.
  • C. lunensis (Del Campana, 1914), the most well-documented species, spans (Ruscinian-Villafranchian) sites across , including the type locality at Olivola, , with complete skulls from , , and . It is distinguished by a narrow m1 lacking a metaconid, high premolars with accessory cusps, and a elongated adapted for pursuits; adults weighed 25-30 kg. Subspecies include C. l. lunensis and C. l. ossifragus in some classifications, though recent analyses question this split.
  • C. melei (Rook, Torre & Cruise, 2004) is an endemic insular form from Pleistocene (late -early Pleistocene) fissure fillings at Monte Tuttavista, , . It shows dwarfed size (estimated 15-20 kg) compared to mainland congeners, with reduced robusticity and a shortened m1, reflecting island isolation; its validity as a distinct is supported by unique cranial proportions.
  • C. nitidula (Ewer, 1955) derives from deposits in , including Makapansgat and in . Features include high premolars with large accessory cusps and a robust P4, differing from C. australis in greater length; it represents a later African lineage, with body mass around 25 kg. Some fossils may overlap with Crocuta spp., prompting synonymy debates.

Physical characteristics

Size and build

Chasmaporthetes species displayed a slender, build optimized for high-speed pursuit, with elongated limbs and a narrow chest that enhanced agility and endurance during chases. This morphology set it apart from more robust, bone-cracking hyaenids, emphasizing active over scavenging or digging. The postcranial included long metacarpals and a reduced process on the , features that minimized drag and maximized stride efficiency for terrestrial locomotion rather than activities. Forelimbs were notably longer than those in extant , contributing to cheetah-like proportions that supported rapid acceleration and sustained high speeds. Heavily muscled fore and hindquarters provided the power for taking down prey, while gracile metatarsals and phalanges in the hindlimbs further underscored adaptations for hunting across open terrains. Body sizes ranged from 50 to 80 kg across the genus, akin to a large gray wolf (Canis lupus) or small (Panthera leo). Sexual dimorphism appears minimal, as evidenced by the sparse postcranial record, which shows little variation in limb robusticity or overall proportions between presumed males and females. These traits collectively positioned Chasmaporthetes as an efficient pursuit predator, with its build complementing shearing dental adaptations for dispatching live prey.

Cranial and dental features

The of Chasmaporthetes exhibits a characteristically elongated rostrum that is higher and wider than in contemporaneous hyaenids like Pliocrocuta perrieri, facilitating a lifestyle with enhanced predatory efficiency. A prominent but dorsally concave , less developed than in modern bone-cracking hyaenas, anchored the temporalis muscles for powerful closure. The braincase retains primitive hyaenid traits, including a straight dorsal outline in the temporal region and caudally elongated frontal sinuses, while sharing some canid-like proportions in overall cranial elongation. Cheek teeth are positioned more anteriorly relative to the orbits, and the zygomatic arches are relatively low, contributing to a yet robust cranium adapted for high-speed pursuits and initial prey dispatch. The dental formula of Chasmaporthetes follows the hypercarnivorous pattern I³/³ C¹/¹ M¹/¹, with slender, trenchant and emphasizing shearing over grinding. The upper fourth (P⁴) and lower first molar (m₁) form sharp, blade-like suited for slicing flesh, featuring well-developed posterior accessory cusps but lacking the hypertrophied, bulbous typical of dedicated bone-crushers. Enamel microstructure displays transitional Hunter-Schreger bands, providing moderate resistance to abrasion from hard or gritty foods without the extreme thickness seen in durophagous . show horizontal wear facets, indicative of processing tough, fibrous tissues. Although traditionally viewed as a flesh-slicing specialist due to its gracile , finite element analysis of C. lunensis crania reveals a stress-resistant morphology capable of occasional bone-cracking, with effective of forces during premolar bites comparable to modern hyaenas. This suggests the genus could process smaller bones or marrow-rich elements opportunistically, using relatively lower bite forces than Crocuta crocuta owing to a smaller occlusal surface on the third (P³). Fossils from the 2019 discoveries, including a right p³ and left m₁, exhibit enamel patterns supporting moderate durophagy, extending the known range of such adaptations in North American populations. Across , variations include a narrower talonid on m₁ in C. lunensis, as observed in the complete from La Puebla de Valverde, which enhances shearing efficiency but limits grinding.

Distribution and temporal range

Geographic distribution

Chasmaporthetes exhibited a broad geographic distribution across three continents during the and Pleistocene epochs, with fossil evidence spanning , , and . In , remains are primarily recorded from the southwest , including and , as well as and the northern Territory in . Eurasian fossils occur in , notably , , and , while Asian sites include and the . African occurrences are found in central (), eastern (), and southern () regions. Key fossil localities highlight the genus's widespread presence. The type species, C. ossifragus, was first described from specimens near the Grand Canyon in , representing one of the earliest North American records. In , a complete skull of C. lunensis was recovered from the Pliocene site of La Puebla de Valverde in , . African evidence includes material referred to C. cf. australis from Bed I at in . The northernmost discovery, two isolated teeth attributed to C. cf. ossifragus, comes from the Old Crow Basin in Yukon's permafrost, reported in 2019 and extending the range into Arctic . The genus originated in and dispersed widely, with migration to occurring via the approximately 5 million years ago during the early . This pathway facilitated the entry of C. ossifragus into the , allowing subsequent spread southward. An endemic form, C. melei, evolved on the island of due to isolation, with fossils from Late to fissure fillings at Monte Tuttavista in Orosei, representing a dwarfed insular .

Timeline

The genus Chasmaporthetes first appeared in the fossil record during the , approximately 5.3 million years ago (mya), originating in from ancestral hyaenids such as Thalassictis or Lycyaena. Its temporal range spans from the to the , ending around 0.78 mya, with the overall duration reflecting a period of intercontinental dispersal and adaptation. Peak diversity occurred during the (5.3–2.6 mya), when multiple species coexisted across , , and , supported by biostratigraphic correlations and of key assemblages. Major evolutionary phases include the initial diversification in around 5 mya, marked by primitive forms like C. borissiaki and C. exitelus. Immigration to occurred approximately 4.9 mya via the , with early records dated through layers and mammalian at sites like the Hagerman Fossil Beds (dated to about 3.5 mya via potassium-argon methods). In , the persisted longer, with fossils indicating presence until around 2 mya, based on stratigraphic correlations in and deposits. Key turnover events encompass the appearance of C. lunensis around 3.6 mya in during the Ruscinian stage, characterized by dental innovations like a complex m1 talonid, and subsequent diversification in with subspecies such as C. lunensis kani by 2.5 mya. A decline began after 1.5 mya, coinciding with faunal turnovers in the Villafranchian, leading to regional extirpations in by 1.8 mya, as confirmed by recent finds such as isolated teeth from Schernfeld, (~1.5 mya; reported 2022) and a maxillary fragment from Taurida Cave, (~1.8–1.5 mya; reported 2023), and final extinction in around 0.78 mya. These chronologies rely primarily on using associated mammals and radiometric techniques, such as argon-argon dating, to establish precise temporal frameworks.

Paleoecology and behavior

Habitat and diet

Chasmaporthetes inhabited a range of open environments during the through Pleistocene epochs, including grasslands, savannas, and woodlands across , , and . In , fossils from Toros-Menalla indicate association with open habitats dominated by C4 grasslands interspersed with trees, supporting a suitable for predators amid abundant large ungulates like anthracotheres and hippopotamids. In , remains from arid regions of the , such as the Blanco Formation in , suggest adaptation to semi-arid steppes and plains. Eurasian occurrences, including steppes in and , further highlight preference for expansive, vegetated open terrains that facilitated high-speed pursuits. Fossils from the Yukon Territory in 2019 provide the northernmost evidence of Chasmaporthetes, extending its range into steppe-tundra environments north of the during the early to middle Pleistocene (approximately 1.4 to 0.85 million years ago). These finds from the Old Crow Basin, including two isolated teeth, co-occur with Holarctic herbivores like mammoths, , , and caribou, implying tolerance for cooler, more open landscapes with forested edges during periods. This broad distribution—from subtropical African savannas to North American tundras—demonstrates remarkable climatic adaptability, likely enabled by its build for traversing diverse terrains. As a hypercarnivore, Chasmaporthetes primarily consumed meat from small- to medium-sized ungulates, such as pronghorns in North America, gazelles in Eurasia and Africa, and young camels, supplemented occasionally by smaller prey like rodents. Dental morphology, including trenchant carnassials and premolars with low radii-of-curvature suited for slicing flesh rather than crushing bone, confirms a diet focused on soft tissues, distinguishing it from durophagous modern hyenas. Stable isotope analyses of North American specimens, such as carbon and nitrogen ratios in bone collagen, indicate a predominantly carnivorous trophic level consistent with 70-90% meat intake, reflecting reliance on protein-rich animal sources. In Arctic contexts, it likely targeted herd animals like caribou and horses or scavenged larger carcasses such as mammoths, with enamel microstructure suggesting some bone-processing capability. Chasmaporthetes employed a pursuit-hunting strategy, leveraging its long legs and wolf-like build for diurnal chases across open ground, unlike the nocturnal scavenging of extant . Evidence from European guilds points to pack-hunting , enabling coordinated takedowns of agile prey in competitive landscapes. analyses of related hyaenids reveal undigested bone fragments, supporting opportunistic scavenging alongside active predation to supplement its hypercarnivorous diet.

Interactions with other species

Chasmaporthetes engaged in significant with other carnivores across its range, particularly in where it overlapped temporally and spatially with bone-crushing canids like Borophagus for approximately three million years during the Blancan North American Land Mammal Age (roughly 4.7–1.4 Ma). This competition likely involved niche partitioning, as Borophagus exhibited strong adaptations for bone-cracking, while Chasmaporthetes had limited capability alongside its primary flesh-slicing , and differed in locomotor morphology—Chasmaporthetes as a hunter-scavenger with cheetah-like proportions, and Borophagus as a more robust, pack-hunting canid—allowing coexistence at multiple localities such as , and Cita Canyon, Texas. In North American ecosystems, Chasmaporthetes also competed with felids such as the cheetah-like , both of which were swift pursuit predators adapted to open grasslands and likely targeted similar medium-sized ungulate prey like ancestors. Fossil evidence suggests Chasmaporthetes avoided direct confrontation with larger ambush predators, occupying a mid-tier carnivore niche focused on active hunting rather than scavenging dominated by short-faced bears ( simus) or saber-toothed cats (). During the Irvingtonian (1.4–0.85 Ma), additional competitors included the wolf-like Canis armbrusteri and the social canid Xenocyon lycaonoides, further intensifying resource competition in Beringian faunas. In and , where Chasmaporthetes dispersed during the , it formed part of diverse carnivore guilds, competing with other hyaenids like the giant Pachycrocuta brevirostris and modern-like Crocuta crocuta for access to carcasses in open habitats. Species such as Chasmaporthetes lunensis in exhibited social behaviors similar to spotted , overlapping ecologically with dirk-toothed cats () and early lions ( leo fossilis), potentially partitioning niches through daytime activity to evade nocturnal felids. In African assemblages, indirect competition with early hominins (e.g., ) is inferred from shared scavenging opportunities on remains, though direct predation evidence is lacking. Fossil associations in the Territory's Basin (~1.4 Ma) reveal Chasmaporthetes co-occurring with herbivores such as horses (Equus), deer (Rangifer), and mammoths (Mammuthus), suggesting opportunistic scavenging from kills as an indirect interaction that supplemented its predatory lifestyle. This scavenging role likely reduced direct conflicts with primary predators while exploiting resources left by larger carnivores like or in Beringian ecosystems.

Extinction

The genus Chasmaporthetes exhibited a regionally variable extinction timeline, reflecting its wide Neogene-Quaternary distribution across , , and . In , the genus appears to have disappeared around 2 million years ago, with the last records of species such as C. nitidula dating to the late . In , a gradual decline began around 1.5 million years ago during the early Irvingtonian North American Land Mammal Age, with the genus fully extinct by approximately 0.78 million years ago, as evidenced by its absence in Rancholabrean faunas. Eurasian populations persisted somewhat longer, with C. lunensis recorded until about 1.6 million years ago in and C. melei known from late to early deposits in , though claims of survival until 0.1 million years ago remain debated and unsupported by current fossil evidence. Primary causes of Chasmaporthetes extinction are linked to environmental and biotic pressures during the Pliocene-Pleistocene transition. Cooling climates reduced open and habitats essential for this predator, favoring forested environments that limited its hunting range. Increased competition from evolving advanced canids, such as Canis armbrusteri (appearing around 1.4 million years ago in ), and felids like the (Acinonyx), overlapped with Chasmaporthetes' niche as a high-endurance pursuit hunter. Declines in prey availability, driven by megafaunal turnover including the diversification and subsequent local extinctions of equids, further stressed populations. Regional factors highlight the absence of later hyaenid immigrants in , where no bone-cracking Hyaeninae crossed from , leaving Chasmaporthetes isolated amid intensifying megafaunal shifts but without evidence of human influence, as its predated Homo sapiens. In contrast, Eurasian s coincided with the rise of larger hyaenids like Pachycrocuta brevirostris. Chasmaporthetes occupied a distinctive hyaenid niche in the , emphasizing speed over bone-crushing, which was not recolonized by later carnivores following its disappearance.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.