Hubbry Logo
Class-D amplifierClass-D amplifierMain
Open search
Class-D amplifier
Community hub
Class-D amplifier
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Class-D amplifier
Class-D amplifier
Class-D amplifier
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Block diagram of a basic class-D amplifier.
Note: For clarity, signal periods are not shown to scale.

A class-D amplifier, or switching amplifier, is an electronic amplifier in which the amplifying devices (transistors, usually MOSFETs) operate as electronic switches, and not as linear gain devices as in other amplifiers. They operate by rapidly switching back and forth between the supply rails, using pulse-width modulation, pulse-density modulation, or related techniques to produce a pulse train output. A simple low-pass filter may be used to attenuate their high-frequency content to provide analog output current and voltage. Little energy is dissipated in the amplifying transistors because they are always either fully on or fully off, so efficiency can exceed 90%.

History

[edit]

The first class-D amplifier was invented by British scientist Alec Reeves in the 1950s and was first called by that name in 1955. The first commercial product was a kit module called the X-10 released by Sinclair Radionics in 1964. However, it had an output power of only 2.5 watts. The Sinclair X-20 in 1966 produced 20 watts but suffered from the inconsistencies and limitations of the germanium-based bipolar junction transistors available at the time. As a result, these early class-D amplifiers were impractical and unsuccessful. Practical class-D amplifiers were enabled by the development of silicon-based MOSFET (metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistor) technology. In 1978, Sony introduced the TA-N88, the first class-D unit to employ power MOSFETs and a switched-mode power supply. There were subsequently rapid developments in MOSFET technology between 1979 and 1985. The availability of low-cost, fast-switching MOSFETs led to class-D amplifiers becoming successful in the mid-1980s.[1] The first class-D amplifier based integrated circuit was released by Tripath in 1996, and it saw widespread use.[2]

Basic operation

[edit]

Class-D amplifiers work by generating a train of rectangular pulses of fixed amplitude but varying width and separation. This modulation represents the amplitude variations of the analog audio input signal. In some implementations, the pulses are synchronized with an incoming digital audio signal removing the necessity to convert the signal to analog. The output of the modulator is then used to turn the output transistors on and off alternately. Since the transistors are either fully on or fully off, they dissipate very little power. A simple low-pass filter consisting of an inductor and a capacitor provides a path for the low frequencies of the audio signal, leaving the high-frequency pulses behind.

The structure of a class-D power stage is comparable to that of a synchronously rectified buck converter, a type of non-isolated switched-mode power supply (SMPS). Whereas buck converters usually function as voltage regulators, delivering a constant DC voltage into a variable load, and can only source current, a class-D amplifier delivers a constantly changing voltage into a fixed load. A switching amplifier may use any type of power supply (e.g., a car battery or an internal SMPS), but the defining characteristic is that the amplification process itself operates by switching.

The theoretical power efficiency of class-D amplifiers is 100%. That is to say, all of the power supplied to it is delivered to the load and none is turned to heat. This is because an ideal switch in its on state would encounter no resistance and conduct all the current with no voltage drop across it, hence no power would be dissipated as heat. And when it is off, it would have the full supply voltage across it but no leakage current flowing through it, and again no power would be dissipated. Real-world power MOSFETs are not ideal switches, but practical efficiencies well over 90% are common for class-D amplifiers. By contrast, linear AB-class amplifiers are always operated with both current flowing through and voltage standing across the power devices. An ideal class-B amplifier has a theoretical maximum efficiency of 78%. Class-A amplifiers (purely linear, with the devices always at least partially on) have a theoretical maximum efficiency of 50% and some designs have efficiencies below 20%.

Signal modulation

[edit]

The 2-level waveform is derived using pulse-width modulation (PWM), pulse-density modulation (sometimes referred to as pulse frequency modulation), sliding mode control (more commonly called self-oscillating modulation.[3]) or discrete-time forms of modulation such as delta-sigma modulation.[4]

A simple means of creating the PWM signal is to use a high-speed comparator ("C" in the block diagram above) that compares a high-frequency triangular wave with the audio input. This generates a series of pulses of which the duty cycle is directly proportional with the instantaneous value of the audio signal. The comparator then drives a MOS gate driver which in turn drives a pair of high-power switching transistors (usually MOSFETs). This produces an amplified replica of the comparator's PWM signal. The output filter removes the high-frequency switching components of the PWM signal and reconstructs audio information that the speaker can use.

DSP-based amplifiers that generate a PWM signal directly from a digital audio signal (e. g. SPDIF) either use a counter to time the pulse length[5] or implement a digital equivalent of the triangle-based modulator. In either case, the time resolution afforded by practical clock frequencies is only a few hundredths of a switching period, which is not enough to ensure low noise. In effect, the pulse length gets quantized, resulting in quantization distortion. In both cases, negative feedback is applied inside the digital domain, forming a noise shaper which results in lower noise in the audible frequency range.

Design challenges

[edit]
Boss Audio mono amp. The output stage is top left, the output chokes are the two yellow toroids underneath.

Switching speed

[edit]

Two significant design challenges for MOSFET driver circuits in class-D amplifiers are keeping dead times and linear mode operation as short as possible. Dead time is the period during a switching transition when both output MOSFETs are driven into cut-off mode and both are off. Dead times need to be as short as possible to maintain an accurate low-distortion output signal, but dead times that are too short cause the MOSFET that is switching on to start conducting before the MOSFET that is switching off has stopped conducting and the MOSFETs effectively short the output power supply through themselves in a condition known as shoot-through.

The controlling circuitry also needs to switch the MOSFETs as quickly as possible to minimize the amount of time a MOSFET is in linear mode—the state between cut-off mode and saturation mode where the MOSFET is neither fully on nor fully off and conducts current with significant resistance, creating significant heat. Failures that allow shoot-through or too much linear mode operation result in excessive losses and sometimes catastrophic failure of the MOSFETs.[6]

With fixed-frequency PWM modulation, as the (peak) output voltage approaches either of the supply rails, the pulse width can get so narrow as to challenge the ability of the driver circuit and the MOSFET to respond. These pulses can be as short as a few nanoseconds and can result in shoot through and heating due to linear mode operation. Other modulation techniques such as pulse-density modulation can achieve higher peak output voltages, as well as greater efficiency compared to fixed-frequency PWM.

Power supply design

[edit]

Class-D amplifiers place an additional requirement on their power supply, namely that it be able to sink energy returning from the load. Reactive (capacitive or inductive) loads store energy during part of a cycle and release some of this energy back later. Linear amplifiers will dissipate this energy, class-D amplifiers return it to the power supply which should somehow be able to store it. In addition, half-bridge class-D amplifiers transfer energy from one supply rail (e.g. the positive rail) to the other (e.g. the negative) depending on the sign of the output current. This happens with both resistive and reactive loads. The supply should either have enough capacitive storage on both rails, or be able to transfer this energy to the other rail.[7]

Active device selection

[edit]

The active devices in a class-D amplifier need only act as controllable switches and need not have a particularly linear response to the control input. MOSFETs are usually used.

Error control

[edit]

The actual output of the amplifier is not just dependent on the content of the modulated PWM signal. A number of sources may introduce errors. Any variation in power supply voltage directly amplitude-modulates the output voltage. Dead time errors make the output impedance non-linear. The output filter has a strongly load-dependent frequency response.

An effective way to combat errors, regardless of their source, is negative feedback. A feedback loop including the output stage can be made using a simple integrator. To include the output filter, a PID controller is used, sometimes with additional integrating terms. The need to feed the actual output signal back into the modulator makes the direct generation of PWM from a SPDIF source unattractive.[8]

Mitigating the same issues in an amplifier without feedback requires addressing each separately at the source. Power supply modulation can be partially canceled by measuring the supply voltage to adjust signal gain as part of PWM conversion.[9] Distortion can be reduced by switching faster. The output impedance cannot be controlled other than through feedback.

Advantages

[edit]

The major advantage of a class-D amplifier is that it can be much more efficient than a linear amplifier, dissipating less power as heat in the active devices. This is especially compelling in compact portable, battery-powered devices. Also, given that large heat sinks are not required, class-D amplifiers are much lighter weight than class-A, -B, or -AB amplifiers, an important consideration with portable sound reinforcement system equipment and bass amplifiers.

Uses

[edit]
  • Home theater in a box systems. These economical home cinema systems are almost universally equipped with class-D amplifiers. On account of modest performance requirements and straightforward design, direct conversion from digital audio to PWM without feedback is most common.
  • Mobile phones. The internal loudspeaker is driven by up to 1 W. Class D is used to preserve battery lifetime.
  • Hearing aids. The miniature loudspeaker (known as the receiver) is directly driven by a class-D amplifier to maximize battery life and can provide levels of 130 dB SPL or more.
  • Powered speakers and active subwoofers
  • High-end audio is generally conservative with regards to adopting new technologies but class-D amplifiers have made an appearance[10]
  • Sound reinforcement systems. For very high power amplification the power loss of class-AB amplifiers is unacceptable. Amplifiers with several kilowatts of output power are available as class D. Class-D power amplifiers are available that are rated at 3000 W total output, yet weigh only 3.6 kg (8 lb).[11]
  • Bass instrument amplification
  • Radio frequency amplifiers may use class D or other switch-mode classes to provide high-efficiency RF power amplification in communications systems.[12]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Class-D amplifier

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A Class-D amplifier is a switching that utilizes (PWM) to drive output transistors between fully on and off states, thereby achieving high by minimizing power dissipation in the switching devices. Unlike linear classes such as A, B, or AB, which operate transistors in their linear region and convert excess power to , Class-D designs theoretically approach 100% through binary switching, with practical efficiencies often exceeding 90% at rated output power. The core operation involves a modulator that compares the input to a high-frequency carrier (typically 200 kHz or higher) to generate a PWM , followed by a power stage of MOSFETs or other switches and a low-pass output filter to reconstruct the amplified audio while attenuating switching harmonics. The concept of Class-D amplification, invented by Alec Reeves in the early 1950s using technology, with the "D" designation simply following the alphabetical progression after Class-C amplifiers, rather than denoting "digital" operation. Commercial availability began in the 1960s with early kits from , though initial designs suffered from performance limitations; significant advancements occurred in the driven by affordable, high-speed MOSFETs and integrated circuits from companies like Tripath Technology and . A pivotal development was the Universal Class-D (UcD) topology invented by Bruno Putzeys at in the late and early , which achieved low (around 0.02%) alongside high , enabling widespread adoption in audio. Class-D amplifiers excel in applications requiring compact size and extended battery life, such as portable devices, automotive sound systems, and home theater receivers, where their reduced heat dissipation allows for smaller heat sinks and power supplies compared to traditional linear amplifiers (typically 65-70% efficient). They now dominate modern audio equipment, including smartphones and smart speakers, due to their ability to deliver high-fidelity sound with minimal energy loss, though challenges like electromagnetic interference from switching frequencies necessitate careful filtering and shielding. Ongoing innovations, such as gallium nitride (GaN) transistors, continue to enhance performance by further reducing distortion and enabling higher power outputs.

Fundamentals

Definition and Principles

A Class-D amplifier is a type of switching that utilizes power transistors, such as MOSFETs, operated strictly as on/off switches rather than linear devices to amplify an input signal. The process involves converting the analog audio input into a train of high-frequency pulses whose width or density encodes the signal's amplitude, followed by low-pass filtering to recover the amplified analog output. This switching paradigm contrasts with linear amplifiers by avoiding continuous power dissipation in the output stage. The fundamental principle relies on (PWM) or analogous techniques, where the of the pulses proportionally represents the input signal's . In ideal operation, the transistors experience either full current with minimal (when on) or full voltage with no current (when off), resulting in negligible power dissipation across the switches. This enables a theoretical approaching 100%, as the output power nearly equals the input power from the supply. Efficiency is defined as η=PoutPin≈100%\eta = \frac{P_\text{out}}{P_\text{in}} \approx 100\% under ideal conditions, stemming from minimized dissipation PdissP_\text{diss} in the switches, where conduction losses are limited to I2RonI^2 R_\text{on} during the on-state and switching losses are reduced by high-speed transitions. Practical efficiencies often exceed 90%, far surpassing linear classes due to these principles. The designation "Class-D" originated in the 1950s to signify this switching-based operation, following the alphabetical progression after Class-C amplifiers.

Comparison with Other Amplifier Classes

Class-A amplifiers operate with constant conduction throughout the entire input cycle, achieving a theoretical maximum of 50% while providing very low levels, typically below 0.01% (THD). Class-B and Class-AB amplifiers employ a , where Class-B conducts for exactly half the cycle to reach a theoretical maximum of 78.5%, though practical implementations often yield 50-70% due to in Class-B, which is mitigated in Class-AB at the cost of slightly higher quiescent power. Class-C amplifiers, biased beyond for less than half-cycle conduction, achieve efficiencies exceeding 80%—up to 90% theoretically with tuned loads—but introduce significant nonlinearity and high , making them unsuitable for audio applications and primarily used in (RF) systems. In contrast, Class-D amplifiers utilize (PWM) or similar switching techniques to achieve practical efficiencies of 85-95%, far surpassing linear classes by minimizing power dissipation as heat during conduction. This high efficiency enables compact, battery-friendly designs for portable audio, with output filtering required to reconstruct the analog signal and suppress switching artifacts. While early Class-D designs suffered from higher THD compared to linear classes, modern implementations with feedback loops achieve THD below 0.1%, approaching the of Class-AB amplifiers (typically <0.01% THD). The following table summarizes key performance metrics for comparison:
Amplifier ClassTheoretical Max Efficiency (%)Practical Efficiency Range (%)Typical THD (%)Primary Application Notes
Class-A5020-50<0.01Low distortion, high heat for audio
Class-B/AB78.550-70<0.01 (AB)Balanced for audio, moderate heat
Class-C90>80High (>10)Nonlinear, RF-tuned loads
Class-D~10085-95<0.1 (with feedback)High efficiency, audio with filtering
Class-D amplifiers offer substantial advantages in power dissipation—up to 27 times lower than Class-A at clipping— but introduce trade-offs such as electromagnetic interference (EMI) from high-frequency switching and increased design complexity due to modulation and filtering requirements. Linear classes like A and AB provide simpler circuitry and inherent linearity without filtering, though their inefficiency leads to greater thermal management challenges in high-power scenarios.

Historical Development

Origins and Invention

The concept of the Class-D amplifier was proposed by British scientist Alec Reeves in the early 1950s as an efficient method for signal amplification through high-speed switching rather than linear operation. This innovation aimed to minimize power losses by having amplifying devices operate primarily in on-off states, drawing from principles of pulse modulation to reconstruct audio signals with reduced heat dissipation. The term "Class-D" was first used in the 1950s to differentiate it from earlier linear classes (A, B, and C), marking its formal introduction in technical literature as a distinct amplifier category. Reeves' work was motivated by the post-World War II push for more efficient electronics, particularly in communication systems where power consumption and heat management were critical constraints. His ideas built directly on his wartime contributions to , a digital encoding technique he pioneered for secure and noise-resistant signal transmission during WWII. PCM's use of discrete pulses to represent analog signals provided the conceptual foundation for switching-based amplification, allowing for potential efficiencies far superior to continuous linear methods. Early designs remained theoretical, focusing on vacuum tubes configured as switches to generate and modulate pulses for amplification. These prototypes emphasized pulse-width or pulse-duration techniques to encode signals, prioritizing theoretical efficiency over practical implementation. The foundational theory highlighted switching's ability to approach near-100% efficiency by eliminating the quiescent power losses of linear amplifiers, where devices dissipate energy proportionally to signal amplitude. This recognition of inherent efficiency advantages—contrasting the 25-78% typical of classes A through C—positioned Class-D as a promising solution for high-power applications, though realization awaited advances in switching components.

Key Milestones and Commercialization

The earliest commercial attempts at Class-D amplifiers emerged in the 1960s, marking the transition from theoretical concepts to practical products, though limited by contemporary technology. In 1964, Sinclair Radionics introduced the X-10, a kit module amplifier utilizing (PWM) that delivered approximately 2.5 watts of output power. The design was inspired by a 1963 article in Wireless World magazine on PWM amplification techniques and developed by Clive Sinclair and Gordon Edge; the X-10 represented the first significant commercial Class-D product but was constrained by its reliance on transistor-based switching, resulting in lower-than-advertised performance and inconsistencies in audio quality. This was followed in 1966 by the Sinclair X-20, which achieved 20 watts of output and improved upon the X-10's design, yet still suffered from the era's technological limitations, including inefficient switching and poor reliability, hindering broader adoption. The 1970s brought a pivotal shift with the adoption of silicon MOSFETs, enabling faster switching speeds essential for effective Class-D operation and paving the way for higher-power applications. This era's advancements in semiconductor technology addressed earlier bottlenecks like slow switching devices. A landmark product was Sony's TA-N88, released in 1978, which delivered 160 watts per channel (320 watts total) using power MOSFETs and a switched-mode power supply with PWM at 500 kHz. As the first high-power commercial Class-D unit, the TA-N88 demonstrated viability for consumer audio systems, though its size and cost restricted it to high-end markets. The late 1990s ushered in the integrated circuit (IC) revolution, dramatically simplifying Class-D design and accelerating commercialization. Tripath Technology, founded in 1995, released the first Class-D audio IC, the TA1101, in 1996, followed by controllers like the TC2000, which integrated digital power processing to enable compact, efficient amplifiers with low distortion. These ICs facilitated widespread adoption in the 2000s, particularly for portable audio devices such as MP3 players and laptops, where space and battery life were critical. By the 2010s, Class-D amplifiers had achieved dominant market penetration, driven by efficiency demands in consumer electronics and automotive applications. Advancements in digital signal processing (DSP) during the 1990s further refined modulation and error correction, enhancing audio fidelity and enabling scalable production. Market analyses indicate revenues growing from approximately $334 million in 2006 to $688 million by 2011 at a 15.6% CAGR, reflecting their shift from niche to mainstream technology.

Operating Principles

Basic Operation

In a Class-D amplifier, the basic operation begins with the input analog audio signal being compared to a high-frequency carrier wave, typically a triangular or sawtooth waveform, in a comparator to generate pulse-width modulated (PWM) pulses. The duty cycle of these pulses varies proportionally with the amplitude of the input signal, encoding the audio information into the width of the pulses while the carrier frequency remains constant, often in the range of 200 kHz to 1 MHz to ensure it is well above the audible spectrum. These PWM pulses then drive the power stage, which consists of either a half-bridge or full H-bridge configuration using power transistors such as MOSFETs. The switching cycle operates by rapidly alternating the transistors between fully on and fully off states to minimize power dissipation as heat. In a half-bridge setup, for instance, the high-side transistor connects the output to the positive supply when on, and the low-side transistor connects it to ground or the negative supply; the PWM signal determines the duration each is active within each cycle. A 50% duty cycle, for example, results in an average output voltage of zero across the load, while varying the duty cycle modulates the average voltage to represent the input signal. The resulting switched output is a series of high-frequency pulses that approximate a square wave modulated by the audio content. Following the power stage, a low-pass LC filter—typically second-order with an inductor and capacitor—reconstructs the original analog audio waveform by attenuating the high-frequency switching components while passing the low-frequency audio signal to the loudspeaker. The average output voltage VoutV_{out} is approximately proportional to the duty cycle DD (ranging from 0 to 1) and the supply voltage VsupplyV_{supply}, given by: Vout≈D⋅VsupplyV_{out} \approx D \cdot V_{supply} where DD is directly related to the input signal amplitude. To prevent destructive shoot-through current—where both transistors in a bridge leg conduct simultaneously—a brief dead time of non-overlap is inserted between switching transitions, typically lasting 10-100 ns depending on the device characteristics and operating frequency. This dead time ensures safe operation but must be minimized to avoid introducing distortion in the reconstructed signal. Detailed aspects of PWM modulation techniques are covered elsewhere.

Signal Modulation Techniques

In Class-D amplifiers, signal modulation techniques convert the input audio signal into a series of pulses that control the switching transistors, enabling high-efficiency power amplification while preserving the signal's fidelity. The core methods—pulse-width modulation (PWM), pulse-density modulation (PDM), and delta-sigma modulation—differ in their pulse generation mechanisms, impacting distortion, electromagnetic interference (EMI), and suitability for analog or digital inputs. These approaches encode amplitude variations as changes in pulse characteristics, such as width, density, or shaped noise, before the pulses drive the output stage. Pulse-width modulation (PWM) employs a fixed-frequency carrier, often a triangular or sawtooth waveform at several hundred kilohertz, to vary the width of output pulses based on the input signal amplitude. The audio signal is compared against this carrier using a comparator, producing pulses whose duty cycle directly corresponds to the instantaneous input voltage, ensuring the average output voltage matches the input after low-pass filtering. This technique is straightforward and widely adopted for its low computational overhead in analog implementations. However, the fixed carrier frequency can generate ripple components that, if not adequately suppressed, alias into the audio band and introduce distortion. The duty cycle DD in PWM is given by the equation D=Vin+Voffset2×VtriD = \frac{V_{\text{in}} + V_{\text{offset}}}{2 \times V_{\text{tri}}} where VinV_{\text{in}} is the input signal voltage, VoffsetV_{\text{offset}} provides centering for a 50% duty cycle at zero input, and VtriV_{\text{tri}} is the peak amplitude of the triangular carrier waveform. PWM supports audio bandwidths up to 20 kHz, aligning with standard audible frequencies for analog inputs. Pulse-density modulation (PDM) represents the input signal by varying the density of fixed-width pulses at a high constant frequency, typically in the megahertz range, such that the number of pulses over a given period is proportional to the signal amplitude. Unlike PWM, PDM lacks a fixed carrier tone, distributing switching energy more broadly and thereby reducing EMI peaks. This makes it advantageous in noise-sensitive environments, though the higher pulse rate leads to increased switching losses and greater demands on the output filter. Delta-sigma modulation uses oversampling combined with noise-shaping feedback to encode the signal into a 1-bit pulse stream, shifting quantization noise to ultrasonic frequencies beyond the audio band for enhanced resolution. This method excels with digital inputs, as it leverages high sampling rates (often 64 times the ) to achieve fine dynamic range without excessive switching. Delta-sigma implementations in Class-D amplifiers can deliver total harmonic distortion (THD) below 0.005%, supporting high-fidelity reproduction. PWM remains the choice for analog-driven Class-D designs due to its simplicity and adequate performance up to 20 kHz bandwidth, while delta-sigma modulation is preferred for high-resolution audio applications, offering superior noise shaping and digital compatibility at the expense of higher oversampling complexity. PDM bridges these by prioritizing EMI reduction over PWM's fixed-frequency drawbacks, though its elevated switching losses limit efficiency in power-intensive scenarios.

Design Aspects

Switching Devices and Selection

In Class-D amplifiers, the switching devices are critical components that operate in a fully on or off state to minimize power dissipation, with metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors () serving as the primary choice due to their low drain-to-source on-resistance (R_DS(on)) and fast switching times typically below 100 ns, enabling high-efficiency operation at audio frequencies. For applications requiring voltages above 600 V, insulated-gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs) are preferred, as they provide superior conduction performance and voltage handling in high-power scenarios compared to MOSFETs. Selection of these devices hinges on several key criteria to optimize efficiency and reliability. The figure of merit (FOM), defined as the product of R_DS(on) and total gate charge (Q_g), quantifies the trade-off between conduction losses (proportional to R_DS(on)) and switching losses (influenced by Q_g), with lower FOM values indicating better suitability for high-frequency switching in Class-D topologies. The device's voltage rating must exceed twice the supply voltage (BV_DSS > 2 × V_supply) to accommodate transient spikes from inductive loads and ensure without failure. Additionally, the current rating should handle peak audio currents, determined by the maximum RMS load current at elevated junction temperatures, often scaled for dynamic music signals that can exceed continuous ratings by 2–3 times. Switching losses, a primary concern in device selection, arise during transitions and can be approximated as Psw=12VsupplyIloadtswitchfswP_{sw} = \frac{1}{2} V_{supply} I_{load} t_{switch} f_{sw} where tswitcht_{switch} is the switching transition time (rise plus fall), and fswf_{sw} is the switching frequency; these losses are minimized by selecting devices with low tswitcht_{switch}, such as those with reduced Q_g and optimized gate structures. The evolution of switching devices for Class-D amplifiers traces back to silicon MOSFETs in the 1980s, which enabled the technology's commercialization through affordable, fast-switching alternatives to earlier bipolar transistors. More recently, wide-bandgap semiconductors like (SiC) and (GaN) have emerged, offering superior FOM, higher breakdown fields, and reduced losses for advanced high-efficiency designs.

Power Supply Design

Class-D amplifiers impose unique demands on power supplies due to their switching nature, which results in abrupt, pulse-shaped current draws from the supply rails rather than smooth, continuous currents seen in linear amplifiers. These pulsed currents require a power supply with a high current capability to prevent voltage droop and maintain stable operation, ensuring minimal in the audio output. Additionally, the inductive nature of speaker loads generates reactive that is returned to the power supply during portions of the switching cycle, necessitating designs that can efficiently recapture this energy to avoid voltage spikes or inefficiency. Failure to address these requirements can lead to increased (EMI) or audible artifacts. Common power supply topologies for Class-D amplifiers prioritize efficiency to complement the amplifier's inherent high efficiency. Switch-mode power supplies (SMPS), often incorporating correction (PFC) stages and forward converters, are widely adopted, achieving overall system efficiencies exceeding 90% by minimizing dissipative losses. These topologies allow for compact designs suitable for consumer and professional audio applications. In contrast, linear regulated supplies offer superior performance and simpler integration for low-power scenarios but suffer from low efficiency (typically below 60%) due to constant power dissipation as heat, making them less viable for high-output Class-D systems. Key design considerations include sizing reservoir capacitors to limit supply ripple voltage, which directly impacts audio quality by reducing power supply rejection ratio (PSRR) sensitivity. Capacitors must provide low (ESR) and be dimensioned such that ripple remains below 1% of the nominal supply voltage, often requiring values in the range of several hundred microfarads for multi-hundred-watt systems. To manage back-EMF from inductive loads, which can cause voltage pumping and exceed device ratings, SMPS designs incorporate clamping diodes or circuits to safely dissipate or recycle excess energy.

Output Filtering

The output filter in a Class-D amplifier serves to reconstruct the desired analog from the high-frequency pulse-width modulated (PWM) output by attenuating switching harmonics while preserving the audio bandwidth up to approximately 20 kHz. Typically, a second-order LC is employed due to its simplicity and minimal component count, consisting of an in series with the output and a shunted to ground. For applications requiring steeper to further suppress high-frequency noise, higher-order filters—such as third- or fourth-order configurations with additional LC stages—may be used, though they increase complexity and cost. The cutoff frequency fcf_c of the filter is a critical design parameter, calculated as fc=12πLCf_c = \frac{1}{2\pi \sqrt{LC}}
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.