Hubbry Logo
Compassion fatigueCompassion fatigueMain
Open search
Compassion fatigue
Community hub
Compassion fatigue
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Compassion fatigue
Compassion fatigue
Compassion fatigue
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Compassion fatigue is an evolving concept in the field of traumatology. The term has been used interchangeably with secondary traumatic stress (STS),[1] which is sometimes simply described as the negative cost of caring.[1] Secondary traumatic stress is the term commonly employed in academic literature,[2] although recent assessments have identified certain distinctions between compassion fatigue and secondary traumatic stress (STS).[3]

Compassion fatigue is a form of traumatic stress resulting from repeated exposure to traumatized individuals[4] or aversive details of traumatic events while working in a helping or protecting profession.[5] This indirect form of trauma exposure differs from experiencing trauma oneself.[1]

Compassion fatigue is considered to be the result of working directly with victims of disasters, trauma, or illness, especially in the health care industry.[6] Individuals working in other helping professions are also at risk for experiencing compassion fatigue.[7] These include doctors,[8] caregivers, child protection workers,[9] veterinarians,[10] clergy, teachers,[11] social workers, palliative care workers,[12] journalists,[13] police officers,[14] firefighters, paramedics, animal welfare workers, health unit coordinators,[15] and student affairs professionals.[16] Non-professionals, such as family members and other informal caregivers of people who have a chronic illness, may also experience compassion fatigue.[6] The term was first coined in 1992 by Carla Joinson to describe the negative impact hospital nurses were experiencing as a result of their repeated, daily exposure to patient emergencies.[1]

Symptoms

[edit]

People who experience compassion fatigue may exhibit a variety of symptoms including, but not limited to, lowered concentration, numbness or feelings of helplessness, irritability, lack of self-satisfaction, withdrawal, aches and pains,[17] exhaustion, anger, or a reduced ability to feel empathy.[4] Those affected may experience an increase in negative coping behaviors such as alcohol and drug usage.[4] Professionals who work in trauma-exposed roles may begin requesting more time off and consider leaving their profession.[4]

Significant symptom overlap exists between compassion fatigue and other manifestations, such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).[18] One distinguishing factor lies in the origin of these conditions, with PTSD stemming from primary or direct trauma, while compassion fatigue arises from secondary or indirect trauma.[7]

History

[edit]

Compassion fatigue has been studied by the field of traumatology, with Charles Figley playing a pivotal role by characterizing it as the "cost of caring" experienced by individuals in helping professions.[1] The term was introduced to the literature in 1992 by Carla Joinson to describe the negative impact hospital nurses were experiencing as a result of their repeated, daily exposure to patient emergencies.[1] However, the phrase had been in use as early as 1961,[19] and was popularized in 1985 when Bob Geldof cited it as his reasoning for ending his charity work after Live Aid.[20]

To a certain extent, the term "compassion fatigue" is considered somewhat euphemistic and is used as a substitute for its academic counterpart, secondary traumatic stress.

Compassion fatigue has also been called secondary victimization,[21][22] secondary traumatic stress,[23] vicarious traumatization,[24] and secondary survivor.[25] Other related conditions are rape-related family crisis[26] and "proximity" effects on female partners of war veterans.[27][28]

Measuring and assessments

[edit]

Some of the earliest and most commonly used assessment are Compassion Fatigue Self Test (CFST), Compassion Satisfaction and Fatigue Test (CSFT)[29] and Compassion Fatigue Scale—Revised.[30][31]

The self-assessment ProQOL (or Professional Quality of Life Scale)[30] contains three sub-scales: compassion satisfaction, burnout, compassion fatigue / secondary traumatic stress.[29]

The Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale (STSS) assess the frequency of intrusion, avoidance, and arousal symptoms associated with indirect exposure to traumatic events through clinical work with traumatized populations.[29]

Risk factors

[edit]

Many organizational attributes in the fields where STS is most common contribute to compassion fatigue among the workers, such as in healthcare where a "culture of silence" is normalized by not discussing stressful events, such as deaths in an intensive-care unit, after the event increase rates of CF.[32] Additional contributing organizational factors can result from conditions such as long work hours, short-staffing, workplace incivility, and feelings of dismissal or invalidation by their managers.[33]

Lack of awareness of symptoms and poor training in the risks associated with their trauma-exposed profession results in higher rates of STS.[34]

Traumatization symptom levels usually depend on three criteria: proximity, intensity, and duration. Proximity refers to how close the provider is to the traumatic event, intensity is defined by how extensive and extreme the traumatic event is, and duration refers to how long the provider is involved with the traumatic event.[35]

Compassion fatigue increases in intensity with increased interactions among the needy. Because of this, people living in urban cities are more likely to experience compassion fatigue. People in large cities interact with more people in general, and because of this, they become desensitized towards people's problems. Homeless people often make their way to larger cities. Ordinary people often become indifferent to homelessness when they see it regularly.[36]

Family

[edit]

Recent studies reveal that the "overall compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction levels were moderate, thus highlighting the potential risk of compassion fatigue for family caregivers", indicating that primary family caregivers of patients could also experience compassion fatigue or STS.[37]

In healthcare professionals

[edit]

Between 16% and 85% of health care workers in various fields develop compassion fatigue. In one study, 86% of emergency room nurses met the criteria for compassion fatigue.[38] In another study, more than 25% of ambulance paramedics were identified as having severe ranges of post-traumatic symptoms.[28] In addition, 34% of hospice nurses in another study met the criteria for secondary traumatic stress/compassion fatigue.[28]

There is a strong relationship between work-related stress and compassion fatigue which include factors such as: attitude to life, work-related stress, how one works, amount of time working at a single occupation, type of work, and gender all play a role.[39]

Compassion fatigue is the emotional and physical distress caused by treating and helping patients that are deeply in need. This can desensitize healthcare professionals to others' needs, causing them to develop a lack of empathy for future patients.[40] There are three important components of Compassion Fatigue: Compassion satisfaction, secondary stress, and burnout.[41] It is important to note that burnout is not the same as Compassion Fatigue; burnout is the stress and mental exhaustion caused by the inability to cope with the environment and continuous physical and mental demands.[42]

Healthcare professionals experiencing compassion fatigue may find it difficult to continue doing their jobs. While many believe that these diagnoses affect workers who have been practicing in the field the longest, the opposite proves true. Young physicians and nurses are at an increased risk for both burnout and compassion fatigue.[43] A study published in the Western Journal of Emergency Medicine revealed that medical residents who work overnight shifts or work more than eighty hours a week are at higher risk of developing Compassion Fatigue.[44] Burnout was another major contributor to these professionals who had a higher risk of suffering from Compassion Fatigue. Burnout is a prevalent and critical contemporary problem that can be categorized as suffering from emotional exhaustion, de-personalization, and a low sense of personal accomplishment.[45] They can be exposed to trauma while trying to deal with compassion fatigue, potentially pushing them out of their career field. If they decide to stay, it can negatively affect the therapeutic relationship they have with patients because it depends on forming an empathetic, trusting relationship that could be difficult to make amid compassion fatigue. Because of this, healthcare institutions are placing increased importance on supporting their employee's emotional needs so they can better care for patients.[46]

Studies compiled in 2018 by Zang et al.[47] indicate that the level of education one obtains in the field of healthcare has an effect on levels of burnout, compassion satisfaction, and compassion fatigue. Studies show, it is indicated that those with higher levels of education in their respective field will experience lower rates of burnout and compassion fatigue, while also having increased levels of compassion satisfaction.

Another name and concept directly tied to compassion fatigue is moral injury. Moral injury in the context of healthcare was directly named in the Stat News article by Drs. Wendy Dean and Simon Talbot, entitled "Physicians aren't 'burning out.' They're suffering from moral injury."[48] The article and concept go on to explain that physicians (in the United States) are caught in double and triple and quadruple binds between their obligations of electronic health records, their student loans, the requirements for patient load through the hospital, and procedures performed – all while working towards the goal of trying to provide the best care and healing to patients possible. However, the systemic issues facing physicians often cause deep distress because the patients are suffering despite the physician's best efforts. This concept of moral injury in healthcare[49] is the expansion of the discussion around compassion fatigue and burnout.

C.N.A.s/caregivers

[edit]

Caregivers for dependent people can also experience compassion fatigue, which can become a cause of abusive behavior in caring professions. It results from the taxing nature of showing compassion for someone whose suffering is continuous and unresolvable. One may still care for the person as required by policy, however, the natural human desire to help them is significantly diminished, causing desensitization and lack of enthusiasm for patient care.[50] This phenomenon also occurs among professionals involved in long-term health care, and for those who have institutionalized family members. These people may develop symptoms of depression, stress, and trauma. Those who are primary care providers for patients with terminal illnesses are at a higher risk of developing these symptoms. In the medical profession, this is often described as "burnout": the more specific terms secondary traumatic stress and vicarious trauma are also used.

Mental health professionals

[edit]

Many that work in fields that require great amounts of empathy and compassion are exposed to these stressful experiences in their day-today work activities.[51][52] These fields mentioned include: social workers, psychologists, oncologists, pediatrics, HIV/AIDs workers, EMS, law enforcement, and general healthcare workers like nurses, etc.[53] Social workers are one group that can experience compassion fatigue or STS from experiencing a singular trauma or it can be from traumatic experiences building up over the years.[54] This can also occur because of a connection with a client and a shared similar traumatic experience.[54] Overall, healthcare professionals in general are finding that they are burnt out with the price of empathy and compassion, otherwise known as, Compassion Fatigue. Most often describe feelings of "running on empty".[53] The importance of the contribution of education and recognition cannot be negated in its import  of counter of compassion fatigue.[53] Other evidences support theories that meditation and reflection techniques such as Mindful-Based Stress Reduction Training and Compassion Cultivation Training, along with the support of administrators helps to fight and reduce STS.[53][55]

Critical care personnel

[edit]

Critical care personnel have the highest reported rates of burnout, a syndrome associated with progression to compassion fatigue. These providers witness high rates of patient disease and death, leaving them to question whether their work is truly meaningful. Additionally, top-tier providers are expected to know an increasing amount of medical information along with experienced high ethical dilemmas/medical demands.[56] This has created a workload-reward imbalance—or decreased compassion satisfaction. Compassion satisfaction relates to the "positive payment" that comes from caring.[57] With little compassion satisfaction, both critical care physicians and nurses have reported the above examples as leading factors for developing burnout and compassion fatigue.[58] Those caring for people who have experienced trauma can experience a change in how they view the world; they see it more negatively. It can negatively affect the worker's sense of self, safety, and control.[59] In ICU personnel, burnout and compassion fatigue has been associated with decreased quality of care and patient satisfaction, as well as increased medical errors, infection rates, and death rates, making this issue one of concern not only for providers but patients.[45] These outcomes also impact organization finances.[57] According to the Institute of Medicine, preventable adverse drug events or harmful medication errors (associated with compassion fatigue/burnout) occur in 1% to 10% of hospital admissions and account for a $3.5 billion cost.[60]

There are a total of four factors that are used to describe the underlying reasons for burnout, STS, and compassion fatigue: depressive mood, primary traumatic stress symptoms, responses to their patients' trauma, and sleep disturbances.[61]

Those with a better ability to empathize and be compassionate are at a higher risk of developing compassion fatigue.[62] Because of that, healthcare professionals—especially those who work in critical care—who are regularly exposed to death, trauma, high stress environments, long work days, difficult patients, pressure from a patient's family, and conflicts with other staff members- are at higher risk.[60] These exposures increase the risk for developing compassion fatigue and burnout, which often makes it hard for professionals to stay in the healthcare career field. Those who stay in the healthcare field after developing compassion fatigue or burnout are likely to experience a lack of energy, difficulty concentrating, unwanted images or thoughts, insomnia, stress, desensitization and irritability.[50] As a result, these healthcare professionals may later develop substance abuse, depression, or commit suicide.[63] A 2018 study that examined differences in compassion fatigue in nurses based on their substance use found significant increases for those who used cigarettes, sleeping pills, energy drinks, antidepressants, and anti-anxiety drugs. Unfortunately, despite recent, targeted efforts being made to reduce burnout, it appears that the problem is increasing. In 2011, a study conducted by the Department of Medicine Program on Physician Well-Being at Mayo Clinic reported that 45% of physicians in the United States had one or more symptoms of burnout. In 2014, that number had increased to 54%.[45]

In student affairs professionals

[edit]

In response to the changing landscape of post-secondary institutions, sometimes as a result of having a more diverse and marginalized student population, both campus services and the roles of student affairs professionals have evolved. These changes are efforts to manage the increases in traumatic events and crises.[64]

Due to the exposure to student crises and traumatic events, student affairs professionals, as front line workers, are at risk for developing compassion fatigue.[65] Such crises may include sexual violence, suicidal ideation, severe mental health episodes, and hate crimes/discrimination.[66]

Some research shows that almost half of all university staff named psychological distress as a factor contributing to overall occupational stress. This group also demonstrated emotional exhaustion, job dissatisfaction, and intention to quit their jobs within the next year,[67] symptoms associated with compassion fatigue.[68]

Factors contributing to compassion fatigue in student affairs professionals

[edit]

Student affairs professionals who are more emotionally connected to the students with whom they work and who display an internal locus of control are found to be more likely to develop compassion fatigue as compared to individuals who have an external locus of control and are able to maintain boundaries between themselves and those with whom they work.[65]

In lawyers

[edit]

Burnout and compassion fatigue can occur in the profession of law; it may occur because of "a discrepancy between expectations and outcomes," or thinking one may have a larger task to achieve than provided resources and support.[69]

Recent research shows that a growing number of attorneys who work with victims of trauma are exhibiting a high rate of compassion fatigue symptoms. In fact, lawyers are four times more likely to suffer from depression than the general public. They also have a higher rate of suicide and substance abuse. Most attorneys, when asked, stated that their formal education lacked adequate training in dealing with trauma. Besides working directly with trauma victims, one of the main reasons attorneys can develop compassion fatigue is because of the demanding case loads, and long hours that are typical to this profession.[70]

Prevention and mitigation

[edit]

In an effort to prepare and combat compassion fatigue, many organizations have been implementing compassion fatigue and secondary traumatic stress prevention training which educate workers on the occupational risk[71] in helping and protecting professions, raise awareness about symptoms, and teach skills such as coping tools to apply before and after stressful situations, working with integrity, and creating a support system that includes individuals and resources that can provide understanding and are sensitive to the risks of compassion fatigue. Workers also learn how to decompress and destress, utilizing self-care, and traumatic stress reduction tools.[72]

Staff education and training

[edit]

Significant improvements in awareness of compassion fatigue and identification of strategies to handle the different stressors are associated with a reduction in symptoms such as feeling significantly less tense, jittery, or overwhelmed, while having increased feelings of being calm and peaceful.[34]

Leadership and supervisory training

[edit]

Leaders, managers, and supervisors who possess skills in leading teams exposed to trauma, can mitigate the impact of indirect trauma exposure through such strategies as awareness training, peer support training, applying psychologically safe debriefing methods after potentially traumatizing events, monitoring employee exposure levels, developing incentives, and providing flexibility.[73]

Peer support training

[edit]

One-on-one peer support can be applied formally or informally after emotionally challenging or stressful events to lessen the risk of developing compassion fatigue and secondary traumatic stress in team members.[74]

Peer support groups

[edit]

Peer support groups have led to participants feeling "less alone" and demonstrating increased interest in learning how to support each other. Participating peers reported feeling more supported, performing better, being healthier, and having a greater likelihood of enjoying extended professional careers.[75]

Workplace culture

[edit]

Having a work culture that supports the physical and emotional health of professionals in trauma-exposed roles is critical. Some cited effective workplace changes include encouraging professionals to take some time off, ensuring that professionals eat during their shift, and promoting self achievements to minimize the likelihood of developing compassion fatigue.[34]

Social support

[edit]

Social support and emotional support can help practitioners maintain a balance in their worldview.[76] Maintaining a diverse network of social support, from colleagues to pets, promotes a positive psychological state and can protect against STS.[8] Some problems with compassion fatigue stem from a lack of fundamental communication skills; counseling and additional support can be beneficial to practitioners struggling with STS.[77]

Therapeutic interventions

[edit]

Various therapeutic interventions are available to address and alleviate symptoms of compassion fatigue including various forms of psychotherapy such as Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) which is commonly used to treat trauma, Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy (EMDR), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), somatic or body-based therapy and group support programs.

Self-care

[edit]

Stress reduction and anxiety management practices have been shown to be effective in preventing and treating STS. Taking a break from work, participating in breathing exercises, exercising, and other recreational activities all help reduce the stress associated with STS. There is evidence that journaling and meditation can also mediate the effects of STS.[78] Conceptualizing one's own ability with self-integration from a theoretical and practice perspective helps to combat criticized or devalued phase of STS. In addition, establishing clear professional boundaries and accepting the fact that successful outcomes are not always achievable can limit the effects of STS.[8]

Self-compassion

[edit]

In order to be the best benefit for clients, practitioners must maintain a state of psychological well-being.[79] Unaddressed compassion fatigue may decrease a practitioners ability to effectively help their clients. Some counselors who use self-compassion as part of their self-care regime have had higher instances of psychological functioning.[80] The counselors use of self-compassion may lessen experiences of vicarious trauma that the counselor might experience through hearing clients stories.[81] Self-compassion as a self-care method is beneficial for both clients and counselors.[82]

Mindfulness

[edit]

Self-awareness as a method of self-care might help to alleviate the impact of vicarious trauma (compassion fatigue).[83] Students who took a 15-week course that emphasized stress reduction techniques and the use of mindfulness in clinical practice had significant improvements in therapeutic relationships and counseling skills.[71]

Scales used for assessment Administration Measure Accessible
Professional Quality of Life Measure ProQOL[84] self-test compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress online, available
Compassion Fatigue and/Satisfaction Self Test for Helpers[85] self-test compassion fatigue online, available
Maslach Burnout Inventory[86] administered burnout available for purchase

Compassion fade

[edit]
Main article: Compassion fade

Compassion fatigue is defined as "the physical and mental exhaustion and emotional withdrawal experienced by those who care for sick or traumatized people over an extended period of time".[87] Compassion fatigue usually occurs with those whom we know; whether that is because of a personal relationship or professional relationship.[88] Compassion fade is defined as terminology to describe the way in which an individual's compassion and empathy are reduced due to the amount or intricacy of the issue.[89] This also includes when the need and tragedy in of the world goes up and the amount of desire to help goes down (similar to a see-saw).[90] For example, an individual is more likely to donate more money, time, or other types of assistance to a single person suffering, than to disaster aid or when the population suffering is larger.[88][89][91] It is a type of cognitive bias that helps people make their decision to help.[92]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Compassion fatigue

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Compassion fatigue is a form of psychological distress characterized by emotional and physical exhaustion resulting from prolonged exposure to others' , often manifesting as a combination of burnout—sustained work-related stress that diminishes abilities and —and secondary traumatic stress, which involves symptoms like anxiety and intrusive thoughts from indirect trauma exposure. The term was first coined in 1992 by nurse educator Carla Joinson to describe the burnout observed among hospital nurses dealing with repeated distress, and it was later formalized in 1995 by psychologist Charles Figley as the "cost of caring," emphasizing its impact on helping professionals' ability to nurture. This condition reduces compassion satisfaction—the fulfillment derived from helping others—while increasing vulnerability to helplessness and depersonalization. Primarily affecting individuals in caregiving roles, compassion fatigue is prevalent among healthcare providers such as nurses and physicians, social workers, psychologists, and like firefighters and paramedics, who routinely encounter trauma and high emotional demands. Studies indicate varying prevalence rates, with high levels reported in up to 60% of healthcare workers in regions like and during the 2020-2023 period, particularly exacerbated by the , and remains prevalent as of 2025, with rates up to 80% in some nursing populations. Unlike general burnout, it specifically stems from the interpersonal nature of caring, where the internalizes clients' , distinguishing it from vicarious trauma while sharing overlaps in physiological responses like elevated levels. Early recognition through tools like the Professional Quality of Life Scale is crucial.

Definition and Characteristics

Definition

Compassion fatigue refers to the emotional, physical, and psychological exhaustion that arises from prolonged and intense exposure to the of others, particularly in roles involving caregiving or . This condition is often characterized as the "cost of caring," a term coined by Charles Figley to describe the deep depletion of an individual's capacity to respond with compassion due to the cumulative toll of witnessing and absorbing others' pain. At its core, compassion fatigue is understood as a convergence of two primary components: secondary traumatic stress and burnout. Secondary traumatic stress involves the that occurs when caregivers internalize the traumatic experiences of those they assist, leading to symptoms akin to through indirect exposure to others' stories of suffering. Burnout, on the other hand, stems from chronic workplace stress that manifests as , cynicism, and detachment from one's professional responsibilities. Together, these elements result in a state where caregivers may feel overwhelmed by exhaustion and emotional numbness, impairing their ability to engage empathetically. The term "compassion fatigue" was first coined in 1992 by nurse Carla Joinson in her article published in the journal , where she described it as the emotional strain experienced by nurses dealing with high levels of patient trauma. This introduction highlighted the unique faced by those in direct caregiving positions, framing it as a response to the unrelenting demands of compassionate work. While initially rooted in professional contexts, the concept has since been recognized as applicable beyond formal occupations, extending to informal caregiving roles such as family members supporting loved ones with chronic illnesses or disabilities. Compassion fatigue is often conflated with burnout, but the two differ in and focus. Burnout represents a broader of emotional, physical, and mental exhaustion resulting from prolonged stress and overload, characterized by depersonalization and reduced personal accomplishment, without a specific tie to trauma exposure. In contrast, compassion fatigue specifically arises from the empathic engagement with others' in helping professions, incorporating a trauma-informed element that burnout lacks, as highlighted in theoretical reviews distinguishing general occupational strain from empathy-driven depletion. Secondary traumatic stress (STS) shares similarities with compassion fatigue as both stem from indirect exposure to clients' traumatic experiences, manifesting in PTSD-like symptoms such as intrusive thoughts and hyperarousal. However, STS emphasizes the direct and behavioral responses from hearing trauma narratives, functioning as a more acute, trauma-specific reaction, whereas compassion fatigue encompasses a wider erosion of compassionate capacity due to cumulative caring demands, often integrating elements of exhaustion beyond pure traumatization. Seminal conceptualizations position STS as a core component within compassion fatigue, but the latter uniquely blends this with broader professional overload. Vicarious trauma differs from compassion fatigue by focusing on long-term, cognitive shifts in a helper's , beliefs, and sense of safety, resulting from repeated empathic absorption of others' trauma stories, leading to profound alterations in identity and . Unlike the primarily acute emotional and physical exhaustion in compassion fatigue, vicarious trauma is a gradual, insidious affecting core schemas, as delineated in qualitative reviews of empathy-based strains. This cognitive emphasis sets it apart, though both arise in trauma-exposed roles. Moral injury, while overlapping in distress among caregivers, centers on the psychological anguish from perpetrating, witnessing, or failing to prevent actions that violate one's moral or ethical codes, often due to systemic constraints or ethical dilemmas in professional duties. In distinction, compassion fatigue derives from the relational and empathic toll of sustained caregiving rather than value-based transgressions, foregrounding exhaustion over ethical conflict, as explored in analyses of occupational hazards in helping fields. A key differentiator across these conditions is compassion fatigue's unique integration of empathy-driven exhaustion with the intensifying professional demands of trauma-informed work, as synthesized in 2025 scoping reviews of literature on helping professions.

Symptoms

Physical Symptoms

Compassion fatigue manifests through various physical symptoms that arise from the chronic stress of empathetic engagement with individuals. Common signs include chronic fatigue, headaches, gastrointestinal issues such as and upset stomach, , and dizziness. These symptoms reflect the body's response to sustained , often leading to where psychological strain translates into tangible bodily complaints like muscle tension and weakened immune function, resulting in frequent illnesses. Appetite changes and disturbances further exacerbate the physical toll, contributing to overall exhaustion. At the physiological level, these symptoms are linked to the prolonged of the body's stress response system, characterized by elevated levels. This hormonal imbalance from chronic and exposure to trauma disrupts normal , promoting and suppressing immune activity, which heightens susceptibility to infections and somatic ailments. The progression of physical symptoms typically begins with subtler indicators like muscle tension and intermittent headaches, escalating to severe exhaustion and persistent if the underlying fatigue remains unaddressed. Recent research on healthcare workers post-COVID-19 pandemic highlights the scale of this issue, underscoring the need for early intervention to prevent long-term deterioration. These bodily effects often intersect with , amplifying the overall impact of compassion fatigue. Symptoms can vary in intensity depending on individual factors and professional context.

Psychological and Emotional Symptoms

Compassion fatigue manifests in various emotional signs that reflect an individual's internal distress from prolonged exposure to others' suffering. Common indicators include , anxiety, emotional numbness, guilt, and toward others' pain. Irritability and anxiety often arise as heightened emotional reactivity to stressors, while numbness represents a protective detachment that diminishes the capacity to feel deeply. Guilt frequently emerges from perceived inadequacies in providing care, and involves a constant state of alertness to potential trauma cues, exacerbating overall emotional strain. Psychological effects further compound this distress, leading to reduced , cynicism, feelings of helplessness, and intrusive thoughts about clients' traumas. Reduced occurs as caregivers struggle to connect emotionally, often resulting in a diminished ability to respond compassionately. Cynicism develops as a defensive mechanism against repeated emotional demands, fostering a skeptical or detached outlook on one's work. Feelings of helplessness stem from the overwhelming nature of unrelenting suffering, while intrusive thoughts—such as recurring memories of clients' experiences—can disrupt daily functioning and intensify psychological burden. These effects highlight the profound toll on mental among those in helping professions. Cognitive impacts of compassion fatigue include difficulty concentrating, impairments in , and a pervasive sense of dread about work responsibilities. Difficulty concentrating arises from mental overload, making it challenging to focus on tasks amid emotional . Decision-making impairments manifest as hesitation or errors due to clouded under stress. The sense of dread involves anticipatory anxiety about engaging with demanding situations, further eroding professional confidence. These cognitive disruptions underscore how compassion fatigue permeates thought processes, often accompanying . Recent highlights the of these symptoms in high-trauma environments, such as psychiatric care settings. A 2025 study of psychiatric nurses found mean compassion fatigue scores around 58%, with emotional numbing noted as an indicator among those in prolonged exposure to patient distress. This underscores the urgent need to address psychological symptoms to mitigate broader impacts on caregivers.

Historical Development

Origins of the Concept

The roots of compassion fatigue trace back to the , when discussions of burnout among helping professionals in and began highlighting the emotional toll of prolonged exposure to others' suffering. These early observations built on the broader concept of burnout, first clinically described in the , but adapted to the unique stressors faced by caregivers in high-empathy roles. Pre-1990s precursors included ideas like in psychoanalytic literature, which described the psychological burden on therapists from deep emotional engagement with patients' traumas. The formal term "compassion fatigue" was coined in 1992 by Carla Joinson, a nurse educator, in her article examining the exhaustion experienced by nurses repeatedly exposed to crises. This introduction framed the phenomenon as a specific form of distinct from general burnout, emphasizing the "cost of caring" for those in direct emotional contact with suffering. Shortly thereafter, the concept gained traction in trauma studies through the work of psychologist Charles Figley, who integrated it with secondary traumatic stress disorder. Figley's contributions solidified compassion fatigue's place in psychological literature, particularly through observations of hospice workers and therapists who absorbed clients' and trauma over time. His seminal 1995 , Compassion Fatigue: Coping with Secondary Traumatic Stress Disorder in Those Who Treat the Traumatized, provided the first comprehensive framework, defining it as the natural emotional and physical consequences of empathic involvement with traumatized individuals. This marked a pivotal moment, shifting focus from vague strain to a structured understanding rooted in .

Evolution and Research Milestones

In the 2000s, research on compassion fatigue advanced by integrating it with (PTSD) models, particularly through the lens of secondary traumatic stress, where prolonged exposure to clients' trauma led to PTSD-like symptoms in helping professionals. Post-9/11 studies revealed elevated compassion fatigue among and social workers exposed to collective trauma, underscoring the need for targeted interventions in emergency settings. This period also saw increased emphasis on how personal trauma history amplified to these effects among therapists and caregivers. A pivotal milestone occurred in 2002 when Beth Hudnall Stamm introduced the Professional Quality of Life (ProQOL) scale, a 30-item self-report measure designed to assess both the positive aspects of helping (compassion satisfaction) and negative outcomes like compassion fatigue and burnout in professions involving trauma exposure. The tool's development built on earlier work in compassion fatigue assessment, enabling more standardized measurement and facilitating broader empirical studies. During the 2010s, research expanded on high-stress contexts like , with s of reporting low to moderate secondary traumatization rates, often linked to cumulative exposure in events like and terrorist attacks. A landmark 2015 of 40 studies on emotional distress involving over 14,000 professionals included two studies that found compassion fatigue prevalence of 7.3% and 40%, highlighting its significant impact on healthcare workers and calling for routine screening. In recent years (2020–2025), the intensified focus on compassion fatigue, with scoping reviews documenting heightened burnout and emotional exhaustion among healthcare providers amid surging loads and isolation measures. A 2024 scoping in BMC Psychology synthesized 42 studies, identifying burnout as a primary predictor and noting stable but persistent compassion fatigue levels among nurses during the , often exacerbated by prior illness history or suffering. This era also marked the rise of resilience models, incorporating and training programs to buffer against fatigue, as evidenced in meta-analyses of mobile interventions showing moderate efficacy in enhancing compassion satisfaction. Following the 2022 publication of the World Health Organization's guidelines on at work, global recognition grew through frameworks addressing occupational , emphasizing prevention of burnout and related psychosocial risks in high-exposure professions, indirectly encompassing compassion fatigue dynamics.

Causes and Risk Factors

General Causes

Compassion fatigue arises primarily from the core mechanism of empathy overload, where repeated exposure to others' leads to emotional depletion and a diminished capacity for . This process involves prolonged engagement with trauma or distress, causing caregivers to experience secondary traumatic stress as their own emotional resources become exhausted. Individual factors significantly contribute to vulnerability, including high levels of personal , which can intensify emotional absorption and accelerate depletion. Unresolved personal trauma heightens susceptibility by reactivating past emotional wounds during empathetic interactions, while poor skills—such as avoidance or suppression of —prevent effective recovery from stress. Environmental triggers encompass situational elements like a lack of boundaries in caregiving roles, which blurs personal and relational limits, fostering ongoing emotional drain. Isolation from networks exacerbates feelings of helplessness, and sudden increases in care demands, such as during family crises, can overwhelm adaptive capacities without adequate recovery time. The theoretical foundation for these causes is outlined in Figley's 1995 compassion stress/fatigue model, which describes pathways involving from traumatic recollections and life disruptions, through and concern for others' , and suppression via disengagement or unfulfilled helping efforts, ultimately leading to .

Occupational and Environmental Risk Factors

Occupational risk factors for compassion fatigue primarily stem from the demanding nature of roles involving repeated and exposure to trauma. High caseloads and prolonged direct patient contact, particularly in high-stress environments like emergency services or intensive care units, significantly elevate vulnerability, as professionals must continually engage with patients' without adequate recovery time. Inadequate supervision and limited access to further compound these risks, especially during crises such as the , where healthcare workers faced intensified workloads and fear of infection. For instance, emergency responders and nurses in trauma settings report heightened due to graphic exposure to or , which erodes emotional reserves over time. Environmental factors within the also play a in exacerbating compassion fatigue. Organizational cultures lacking emotional support, such as those with poor or insufficient , create isolating conditions that hinder resilience-building. , common in healthcare and public safety professions, disrupts sleep patterns and personal recovery, while resource shortages—like staffing deficits—lead to burnout through overextension. These elements often intersect, as seen in under-resourced facilities where professionals handle multiple roles without breaks, amplifying overall stress. Demographic vulnerabilities heighten susceptibility to these occupational and environmental pressures. Women, who comprise a majority of caregiving professions, face elevated risks due to greater emotional and dual burdens like responsibilities, with studies showing higher compassion fatigue rates among female nurses compared to males. Younger workers, often with less professional experience, are similarly at greater risk, as their developing mechanisms struggle against intense exposures, per 2024 analyses of healthcare providers. Prolonged exposure without structured breaks further intensifies these demographic disparities across fields like and . A 2025 study introduced the concept of "digital compassion fatigue" as an emerging phenomenon for registered nurses experiencing in remote patient care, characterized by emotional disconnection from virtual interactions lacking physical cues and worsened by home-based settings without supervision. Additionally, 2024 research on practitioners conducting telepsychology during the highlighted risks such as blurred work-life boundaries, high workloads, and difficulties in rapport-building, contributing to isolation and fatigue. As of 2025, recent analyses link higher compassion fatigue to increased suicidality among healthcare workers and note persistent post-pandemic factors like elevated workloads and infection fears as ongoing risks.

Measurement and Assessment

Assessment Tools

The Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL), developed by B. Hudnall Stamm, is a widely used 30-item self-report instrument that assesses three key dimensions: compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress (a core component of compassion fatigue). Each item is rated on a 5-point (1 = never to 5 = very often), with subscale scores calculated by averaging relevant items to yield totals typically ranging from 10 to 50, where higher scores on compassion fatigue and burnout subscales indicate greater risk. The original version was published in , with version 5 refined through 2012 for broader applicability across helping professions, and it remains the standard form available for free use. A 2024 reliability generalization confirmed the ProQOL's strong , with coefficients exceeding 0.80 for all subscales across diverse samples including healthcare workers, social workers, and educators, supporting its validity in multicultural and occupational contexts. This tool is particularly valued for its brevity and ability to provide a balanced profile of positive and negative professional experiences, though interpretation in clinical settings often requires comparing scores to normative data for targeted interventions. The Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale (STS Scale), developed by Brian E. Bride and colleagues, is a 17-item self-report measure specifically designed to evaluate symptoms of secondary traumatic stress arising from indirect exposure to clients' trauma. Items are scored on a 5-point (1 = never to 5 = very often), focusing on three subscales—invasion (5 items), avoidance (7 items), and (5 items)—with total scores ranging from 17 to 85, where scores above 38 suggest clinically significant secondary traumatic stress akin to PTSD criteria. Originally validated in 2004 on a sample of social workers, the scale demonstrates good reliability ( = 0.93 for the total scale) and has been adapted for use in various trauma-exposed professions. The Compassion Fatigue Self-Test, introduced by Charles R. Figley in 1995, represents an early standardized aimed at identifying compassion fatigue through of empathy-related strain and trauma exposure. This 40-item tool uses a 5-point frequency scale to probe factors such as , interpersonal disconnection, and , with higher aggregate scores indicating elevated risk; it was initially developed for clinicians and educators dealing with . Though less empirically validated than later instruments, its psychometric properties were reviewed in Stamm's 1996 compilation, showing adequate (alpha ≈ 0.85) and utility as a screening in high-exposure fields.

Diagnostic Approaches

Diagnosing compassion fatigue typically begins with a screening process that incorporates routine self-assessments in high-risk occupational settings, such as healthcare facilities or crisis response teams, to identify early indicators of risk. Tools like the Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL) are commonly employed for this purpose, where individuals complete the questionnaire independently during checks. If the score on the secondary traumatic stress (compassion fatigue) subscale exceeds 22, indicating moderate to high risk, the process advances to a clinical conducted by a qualified to explore the presence and severity of symptoms. A multidisciplinary approach to integrates these screening results with established psychiatric criteria, particularly from the , to differentiate compassion fatigue from related conditions like adjustment disorders or (PTSD). This involves collaboration among therapists, supervisors, and occupational health specialists who observe symptom clusters—such as , reduced , and intrusive thoughts related to patient suffering—through structured interviews and behavioral assessments. Therapists play a key role in evaluating how these clusters manifest in daily functioning, ensuring the diagnosis accounts for occupational context without pathologizing normal stress responses. Recommendations for screening frequency emphasize proactive monitoring in high-risk professions, with annual assessments advised to detect progressive changes before symptoms intensify. This aligns with broader workforce wellness protocols from organizations like the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), which promote regular evaluation for crisis counselors to support early intervention. However, challenges in include potential biases in self-reported data, where individuals may underreport symptoms due to stigma or denial, and the necessity for longitudinal tracking over multiple assessments to distinguish chronic compassion fatigue from transient acute stress.

Impacts on Individuals and Groups

Effects on Family and Personal Life

Compassion fatigue often manifests in relational impacts within the , leading to emotional withdrawal and increased interpersonal conflicts. Affected individuals may become detached from loved ones, exhibiting reduced and heightened that strains close bonds. For instance, caregivers experiencing this fatigue report difficulties maintaining intimacy and frequent disappointments in relationships due to pervasive cynicism and . In family caregiving contexts, such as supporting adolescents with needs, this can result in , where the caregiver becomes emotionally dependent, further disrupting family dynamics and fostering isolation. On a personal level, compassion fatigue contributes to diminished overall and the abandonment of hobbies or activities, as chronic overrides individual pursuits. This state is characterized by profound fatigue affecting every aspect of well-being, often leading to heightened risks of issues such as depression and anxiety, alongside physical symptoms like and sleep disturbances. Family caregivers, in particular, face amplified personal consequences, including low , guilt, and a of hopelessness, which erode and satisfaction with daily life. Surveys among such caregivers indicate moderate levels of secondary traumatic stress in up to 81% of cases, underscoring the pervasive toll on individual functioning. Long-term effects of compassion fatigue extend to sustained personal declines and potential intergenerational patterns of emotional unavailability. Persistent exposure without resolution can perpetuate cycles of relational disconnection, where parents model limited emotional to children, mirroring broader trauma transmission dynamics observed in caregiving families. This ongoing strain particularly affects informal caregivers, such as those in elder or end-stage illness support, leading to enduring family system disruptions and reduced over time.

Prevalence in Healthcare Professionals

Compassion fatigue is highly prevalent among healthcare professionals, particularly in the wake of the , with rates varying by role and setting. Recent 2025 surveys indicate that approximately 46% of nurses report moderate to high levels of compassion fatigue, often linked to prolonged exposure to patient suffering and workplace stressors. Among physicians, related symptoms such as and detachment—key components of compassion fatigue—affect over 50%, with 54% experiencing burnout that exacerbates these issues. In critical care environments, prevalence is notably higher, reaching up to 76% for moderate levels among nurses, where acute patient crises amplify the risk. The effects of compassion fatigue in healthcare settings are profound, leading to impaired patient care, increased medical errors, and elevated staff turnover. Professionals experiencing compassion fatigue often exhibit reduced and attentiveness, which compromises care quality and heightens the likelihood of errors such as medication mistakes or overlooked symptoms. For instance, burnout associated with compassion fatigue has been shown to correlate with a 1.96 times higher of adverse patient events. Turnover rates rise as a result, with affected workers more likely to seek new employment, contributing to staffing shortages; nearly half of U.S. healthcare workers reported burnout-related job searches in recent studies. Prevalence and manifestations differ across healthcare subtypes, reflecting unique occupational demands. Certified nursing assistants (CNAs) often face compounded physical strain alongside emotional depletion, as their roles involve intensive hands-on care that leads to exhaustion and reduced capacity for . Mental health professionals experience pronounced emotional drain from sustained empathetic engagement with trauma, resulting in symptoms like and self-doubt. In critical care personnel, acute exposure to trauma and life-threatening situations intensifies compassion fatigue, fostering a sense of helplessness. Contributing dynamics include irregular , frequent encounters with death, and ethical dilemmas in , such as decisions on withholding treatment, which erode professional resilience. Recent trends from 2024-2025 research highlight emerging challenges, particularly in psychiatric settings where has increased isolation and blurred work-life boundaries, exacerbating compassion fatigue among practitioners. The shift to virtual therapy during and post-pandemic has led to difficulties in building and higher client loads without in-person support, intensifying . These developments underscore the need for targeted monitoring in evolving care delivery models.

Compassion Fatigue in Other Professions

Compassion fatigue manifests prominently among professionals in higher education, where they routinely provide emotional support to s facing trauma, challenges, and personal crises. Research indicates prevalence rates ranging from 30% to 50% in this group, driven by factors such as blurred professional boundaries with students and chronic understaffing that limits opportunities for recovery. A 2025 study highlights how repeated exposure to student distress exacerbates , often leading to and reduced in advising and counseling roles. In the legal profession, particularly among public defenders, compassion fatigue affects 20% to 40% of practitioners due to prolonged exposure to clients' traumatic experiences, such as , , and systemic . This condition contributes to ethical fatigue, where attorneys struggle with moral distress from inadequate resources and high caseloads, ultimately increasing attrition rates and impairing professional judgment. A seminal 2011 study of state public defenders underscored these impacts, revealing widespread symptoms of burnout intertwined with vicarious trauma. Beyond education and law, compassion fatigue is prevalent in other helping professions, including , where rates exceed 50%, often stemming from intensive client interactions involving abuse, neglect, and loss. Veterinarians face significant emotional strain from performing animal euthanasias, which evoke grief and similar to human , contributing to overall fatigue in clinical practice. Journalists embedded in conflict zones also report heightened , with chronic exposure to violence and human suffering leading to desensitization and psychological withdrawal. Recent 2025 analyses reveal unique challenges in hybrid work environments, where isolation in legal and educational roles amplifies compassion fatigue by reducing and increasing remote boundary management difficulties. These post-pandemic shifts have intensified feelings of disconnection, particularly for professionals handling virtual trauma support without in-person .

Prevention and Mitigation Strategies

Organizational Interventions

Organizational interventions for compassion fatigue focus on systemic changes within workplaces, particularly in high-empathy professions like healthcare, to mitigate risks at the institutional level. These strategies aim to build resilience through , , and cultural shifts, reducing the incidence of compassion fatigue among employees by addressing environmental contributors such as workload and support structures. Staff education programs are a cornerstone of organizational prevention efforts, often implemented as mandatory to equip employees with skills for recognizing early signs of compassion fatigue and establishing boundaries. For instance, workshops on management teach techniques for balancing emotional involvement with self-protection, helping workers identify triggers like prolonged interactions and implement strategies such as reflective journaling during shifts. Such educational initiatives can enhance and mechanisms. Leadership training emphasizes equipping supervisors with tools to create supportive environments that prevent compassion fatigue escalation. This includes protocols for balancing, such as rotating high-stress assignments and ensuring adequate ratios, alongside regular sessions after emotionally taxing events to process experiences collectively. Studies highlight that trained leaders who prioritize these measures foster reduced turnover and improved team morale. Peer support systems provide structured avenues for employees to share experiences, normalizing the challenges of empathetic work and reducing isolation. These often involve formal mentoring pairings or group sessions facilitated by trained peers, allowing discussions on boundary-setting and emotional regulation without fear of judgment. In healthcare settings, initiatives have demonstrated effectiveness through ongoing, confidential access to support networks. Workplace culture reforms further embed prevention by promoting work-life balance through policies like flexible scheduling and mandatory time off, alongside anti-stigma campaigns that encourage about . Organizations that cultivate these elements, such as by offering on-site wellness resources and leadership accountability for employee , see sustained improvements in overall resilience, with showing decreased of compassion fatigue in environments prioritizing holistic support over productivity alone.

Individual Self-Care Practices

Individuals at risk of compassion fatigue can incorporate daily routines focused on physical to mitigate exhaustion. Regular exercise, such as aerobic activities or , helps alleviate stress and restore energy levels among caregivers. A balanced, nutritious diet rich in whole foods supports overall resilience by maintaining stable energy and mood. Practicing good , including aiming for 7-9 hours of quality rest per night through consistent bedtime routines and minimizing before bed, counters the physical toll of prolonged . Boundary setting is a key individual strategy for preventing emotional overload. Learning to say "no" to additional responsibilities protects personal capacity and reduces buildup in high-empathy roles. Time-blocking dedicated periods for recovery, such as scheduling uninterrupted after work shifts, allows for mental recharge without external demands. Journaling serves as an effective tool for emotional processing, enabling individuals to articulate and reflect on accumulated feelings from helping others, thereby fostering clarity and release. Self-compassion techniques further bolster resilience by promoting kinder internal responses to stress. Positive self-talk involves replacing with affirming statements, such as acknowledging one's efforts in caring roles without judgment. exercises encourage releasing guilt over perceived shortcomings, viewing personal limitations as part of shared human experience. These practices align with Kristin Neff's 2023 model of , which emphasizes self-kindness, common humanity, and as core components to buffer against fatigue. Recent meta-analyses demonstrate the efficacy of such practices among caregivers, highlighting their role in enhancing professional .

Therapeutic and Support Interventions

Therapeutic approaches for addressing compassion fatigue often involve structured clinical interventions aimed at processing vicarious trauma and reframing negative cognitive patterns. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has been shown to be effective in reducing compassion fatigue among healthcare professionals by targeting problematic thinking and avoidance behaviors associated with prolonged exposure to others' . For instance, internet-based CBT stress-management programs have demonstrated feasibility and preliminary efficacy in lowering compassion fatigue symptoms in randomized controlled pilot trials. Similarly, () facilitates the processing of disturbing memories through bilateral stimulation, which may help with vicarious stress and PTSD-like symptoms that can overlap with compassion fatigue. Mindfulness practices tailored for caregivers, such as and yoga-integrated programs, provide group-based or facilitated sessions to foster emotional regulation and reduce exhaustion. A involving nurses caring for older adults with found that a short online -based intervention significantly decreased compassion fatigue and burnout scores, with effects persisting at three-month follow-up. Another 2024 RCT demonstrated that interventions enhanced awareness and substantially lowered burnout and secondary traumatic stress levels among nurses, highlighting their applicability in high-stress caregiving environments. These programs emphasize breath-focused and body awareness techniques, which help caregivers interrupt cycles of emotional depletion without requiring extensive individual . Social support interventions, including formal peer groups and , play a crucial role in rebuilding interpersonal connections eroded by compassion fatigue. networks, often structured as facilitated groups, have been effective in boosting compassion satisfaction while curbing fatigue-related sequelae, as evidenced by pilot implementations in settings where participants reported improved emotional and intellectual after six weeks. Such groups provide a for sharing experiences, reducing isolation, and normalizing reactions to vicarious trauma. extends this by addressing relational strains in caregivers' personal lives, helping to restore supportive dynamics and prevent spillover effects from professional exhaustion, though empirical focus remains more on peer formats in professional contexts. Advanced options like resilience training programs offer integrated, evidence-based strategies to reverse compassion fatigue through skill-building. The Mindfulness-Oriented Professional Resilience (MOPR) training, a six-week program combining , arousal modulation, and resilience techniques, significantly reduced secondary traumatic stress and burnout while increasing compassion satisfaction in a 2025 pilot study of healthcare workers. These facilitated interventions, akin to Compassion Resilience Training models, emphasize proactive coping and have shown promise in psychiatric and settings for sustaining long-term professional .

Compassion Satisfaction

Compassion satisfaction represents the positive emotional reward and sense of fulfillment derived from effectively helping others, particularly in professions involving caregiving or support for those experiencing trauma or . It involves deriving pleasure from competent performance in one's role, positive relationships with colleagues, and a perceived contribution to societal . This concept serves as the counterbalance to compassion fatigue within the framework of professional quality of life, promoting resilience among helping professionals. Within the ProQOL framework, higher compassion satisfaction scores inversely correlate with compassion fatigue, as evidenced by 2025 research on healthcare professionals. In the Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL), compassion satisfaction is quantified through a dedicated subscale comprising 10 items that evaluate these affirmative aspects of work. Scores on this subscale range from low (≤22) to high (≥42), with an average of 37 (standard deviation 7) indicating typical levels; high scores exceeding 42 signify robust protective effects against burnout and secondary traumatic stress. The subscale's reliability is high (alpha = 0.88), making it a validated tool for assessing how satisfaction buffers negative occupational impacts. The benefits of compassion satisfaction extend to improved job retention and overall for individuals in demanding fields like healthcare, where it correlates with reduced stress and enhanced outcomes. Key factors fostering it include engagement in meaningful tasks that align with personal values, institutional recognition of efforts, and supportive , all of which contribute to sustained and lower turnover rates. For instance, healthcare providers reporting high compassion satisfaction demonstrate greater professional longevity and emotional stability compared to those with lower levels. Strategies to cultivate compassion satisfaction emphasize intentional practices such as regular reflection on successful interventions and aligning daily responsibilities with a broader to reinforce the rewarding elements of one's work. These approaches, including exercises and peer acknowledgment, help maintain high levels amid occupational demands. Recent 2025 research underscores that elevated compassion satisfaction is linked to diminished compassion fatigue, acting as a key mitigator of associated risks in clinical settings.

Compassion Fade

Compassion fade refers to the phenomenon where individuals experience a diminished emotional and motivational response to as the scale of victims increases, particularly in the context of widespread crises such as or humanitarian emergencies. This decline arises from cognitive overload, where the struggles to process the magnitude of need, leading to reduced and compared to responses toward a single victim. The underlying mechanisms include psychological distance, which makes large-scale suffering feel abstract and remote, and the identifiability bias, where empathy is stronger for a single, identifiable individual than for a statistical group. Seminal by Kogut and Ritov (2005) demonstrated this through experiments showing that participants expressed greater distress and willingness to donate when presented with an identified single child in need versus a group of eight unidentified children suffering from the same condition, highlighting how singularity enhances affective responses. These findings underscore that is driven by attentional and motivational factors rather than . In contrast to compassion fatigue, which involves burnout from prolonged caregiving, compassion fade operates as a scope-insensitive response primarily affecting the general public exposed to mass , without requiring personal involvement in provision. It manifests motivationally, with individuals allocating less and resources to expansive tragedies due to perceptual limits on . Recent analyses in 2024 have examined during global events like climate crises. For instance, studies on advertising reveal that personalized appeals tied to specific locales can enhance and donations through , potentially mitigating fade in environmental devastation contexts such as wildfires or floods.

References

  1. https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-023-10356-3
  2. https://www.apa.org/topics/covid-19/compassion-fatigue
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6697064/
  4. https://jag.journalagent.com/phd/pdfs/PHD-25582-REVIEW-PEHLIVAN%5BA%5D.pdf
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8812061/
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12075678/
  7. https://sigmapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/wvn.70033
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/compassion-fatigue
  9. https://proqol.org/proqol-health-measure
  10. https://library.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/sma14-4869.pdf
  11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4924075/
  12. https://www.who.int/news/item/28-05-2019-burn-out-an-occupational-phenomenon-international-classification-of-diseases
  13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1570090/
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3170786/
  15. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.893165/full
  16. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41542-019-00045-1
  17. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1500305/full
  18. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00131911.2025.2504523
  19. https://www.cma.ca/physician-wellness-hub/content/compassion-fatigue-signs-symptoms-and-how-cope
  20. https://www.psychiatryadvisor.com/features/compassion-fatigue/
  21. https://www.apa.org/topics/psychotherapy/compassion-fatigue
  22. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/676518
  23. https://theconversation.com/compassion-fatigue-can-happen-to-anyone-heres-how-you-can-overcome-it-217212
  24. https://nursingcecentral.com/compassion-fatigue-the-neurological-impact-on-emergency-department-nurses/
  25. https://www.osmosis.org/answers/compassion-fatigue
  26. http://www.figleyinstitute.com/documents/Workbook_AMEDD_SanAntonio_2012July20_RevAugust2013.pdf
  27. https://homevisitingtraining.umbc.edu/curriculum/compassion-fatigue
  28. https://journals.plos.org/mentalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmen.0000187
  29. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-95832-y
  30. https://bmcnurs.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12912-025-02802-w
  31. https://www.dvm360.com/view/compassion-fatigue-and-burnout-history-definitions-and-assessment
  32. https://www.giftfromwithin.org/ptsd/cmpfatig/
  33. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/153760103.pdf
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8413200_Compassion_Fatigue_following_the_September_11_Terrorist_Attacks_A_Study_of_Secondary_Trauma_among_New_York_City_Social_Workers
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11704991/
  36. https://proqol.org/
  37. http://compassionfatigue.org/pages/ProQOLManualOct05.pdf
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6346705/
  39. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136955
  40. https://bmcpsychology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40359-024-01869-5
  41. https://sigmapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/wvn.70033
  42. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240053052
  43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7560777/
  44. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-06950-6
  45. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/healthcare/risk-factors/stress-burnout.html
  46. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10905984/
  47. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1402532/full
  48. https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/a-2564-8809
  49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388615319_Experiences_of_Compassion_Fatigue_Among_Mental_Health_Practitioners_Conducting_Telepsychology_During_the_COVID-19_Pandemic
  50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625004571
  51. https://proqol.org/proqol-measure
  52. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379298011_A_Reliability_Generalization_Meta-Analysis_of_Scores_on_the_Professional_Quality_of_Life_ProQOL_Scale_Across_Sample_Characteristics
  53. https://proqol.org/proqol-manual
  54. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1049731503254106
  55. https://nwdrugtaskforce.ie/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Compassion-Fatigue-Handout-6.pdf
  56. https://www.samhsa.gov/resource/dbhis/professional-quality-life-scale-compassion-satisfaction-compassion-fatigue-version-5
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12366571/
  58. https://www.gavinpublishers.com/article/view/addressing-compassion-fatigue-of-a-family-caregiver-of-adolescents-in-a-mental-health-setting
  59. https://www.verywellmind.com/compassion-fatigue-the-toll-of-caring-too-much-7377301
  60. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37263637/
  61. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pmrj.13383
  62. https://physiciansfoundation.org/research/the-state-of-americas-physicians-2025-wellbeing-survey/
  63. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391100313_Prevalence_of_Burnout_Compassion_Fatigue_and_Compassion_Satisfaction_among_Critical_Care_Nurses_at_Kenyatta_National_Hospital
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6780563/
  65. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-74086-0
  66. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/07334648251328400
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8671334/
  68. https://www.thecardiologyadvisor.com/features/compassion-fatigue-when-care-becomes-overwhelming/
  69. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6901773/
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6343956/
  71. https://bmcnurs.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12912-024-02673-7
  72. https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/a-2564-8809.pdf
  73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362786312_Prevalence_and_Predictive_Factors_of_Secondary_Trauma_in_College_Student_Affairs_Professionals
  74. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1644643/full
  75. https://besustained.org/2019/10/13/is-working-in-public-defense-good-for-you/
  76. https://www.michbar.org/file/barjournal/article/documents/pdf4article4116.pdf
  77. https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/downloads/fb494c496
  78. https://www.mentorvet.net/articles/compassion-fatigue
  79. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/veterinary-science/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1425741/full
  80. https://oxfordre.com/communication/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-791
  81. https://digitalcommons.wcupa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1365&context=all_doctoral
  82. https://www.gluckstein.com/event-item/18th-annual-compassion-fatigue-conference--ready-to-re-think
  83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.00429-8/fulltext
  84. https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-025-12888-2
  85. https://www.thegypsynurse.com/blog/compassion-fatigue-resources/
  86. https://nam.edu/perspectives/organizational-evidence-based-and-promising-practices-for-improving-clinician-well-being/
  87. https://www.myamericannurse.com/peer-support-and-nurse-well-being/
  88. https://www.va.gov/NURSING/docs/ONS_AR_2024_508c_digital_version_12-18-24.pdf
  89. https://www.goodtherapy.org/for-professionals/business-management/human-resources/article/cost-of-caring-10-ways-to-prevent-compassion-fatigue
  90. https://www.bvhealthsystem.org/expert-health-articles/focusing-on-self-care-during-compassion-fatigue
  91. https://www.oakstreethealth.com/what-is-compassion-fatigue-9-coping-tips-for-caregivers-1543936
  92. https://thehonormovement.org/compassion-fatigue-strategies/
  93. https://www.samhsa.gov/technical-assistance/dtac/ccp/self-care
  94. https://projectaccessnw.org/ask-a-therapist/understanding-compassion-fatigue
  95. https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-031047
  96. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371364806_Self-Compassion_Interventions_to_Target_Secondary_Traumatic_Stress_in_Healthcare_Workers_A_Systematic_Review
  97. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inr.70023
  98. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11543797/
  99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2022.100574
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10418657/
  101. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9946305/
  102. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36141714/
  103. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39166821/
  104. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30431516/
  105. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39857119/
  106. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38016857/
  107. https://socialwork.buffalo.edu/content/dam/socialwork/home/self-care-kit/compassion-satisfaction-and-fatigue-stamm-2009.pdf
  108. https://www.phoenix.edu/articles/healthcare/the-role-of-compassion-in-healthcare.html
  109. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4062481/
  110. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597805000336
  111. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/judgment-and-decision-making/article/compassion-fade-and-the-challenge-of-environmental-conservation/21D72101A0ACD52E4737642102335EEE
  112. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924001516
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.