Hubbry Logo
Compressor stallCompressor stallMain
Open search
Compressor stall
Community hub
Compressor stall
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Compressor stall
Compressor stall
Compressor stall
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Comparison of normal and distorted airflow into the compressor section[1]

A compressor stall is a local disruption of the airflow in the compressor of a gas turbine or turbocharger. A stall that results in the complete disruption of the airflow through the compressor is referred to as a compressor surge. The severity of the phenomenon ranges from a momentary power drop barely registered by the engine instruments to a complete loss of compression in case of a surge, requiring adjustments in the fuel flow to recover normal operation.

Compressor stalls were a common problem on early jet engines with simple aerodynamics and manual or mechanical fuel control units, but they have been virtually eliminated by better design and the use of hydromechanical and electronic control systems such as full authority digital engine control. Modern compressors are carefully designed and controlled to avoid or limit stall within an engine's operating range.

Types

[edit]
An animation of an axial compressor showing both the stator blades and the rotor blades

There are two types of compressor stall:

Rotating stall

[edit]

Rotating stall is a local disruption of airflow within the compressor which continues to provide compressed air, but with reduced effectiveness. Rotating stall arises when a small proportion of airfoils experience flow separation, disrupting the local airflow without destabilising the compressor. The stalled airfoils create pockets of relatively stagnant air (referred to as stall cells) which, rather than moving in the flow direction, rotate around the circumference of the compressor. The stall cells rotate with the rotor blades, but at 50 to 70% of their speed, affecting subsequent airfoils around the rotor as each encounters the stall cell. Propagation of the instability around the flow path annulus is driven by stall cell blockage causing an incidence spike on the adjacent blade. The adjacent blade stalls as a result of the incidence spike, thus causing stall cell "rotation" around the rotor. Stable local stalls can also occur which are axi-symmetric, covering the complete circumference of the compressor disc, but only a portion of its radial plane, with the remainder of the face of the compressor continuing to pass normal flow.

A rotational stall may be momentary, resulting from an external disturbance, or may be steady as the compressor reaches a working equilibrium between stalled and unstalled areas. Local stalls substantially reduce the efficiency of the compressor and increase the structural loads on the airfoils encountering stall cells in the region affected. In many cases however, the compressor airfoils are critically loaded without capacity to absorb the disturbance to normal airflow such that the original stall cells affect neighbouring regions and the stalled region rapidly grows to affect the entire compressor.

Axi-symmetric stall or compressor surge

[edit]

Axi-symmetric stall, more commonly known as compressor surge; or pressure surge, is a complete breakdown in compression resulting in a reversal of flow and the violent expulsion of previously compressed air out through the engine intake, due to the compressor's inability to continue working against the already-compressed air behind it. The compressor either experiences conditions which exceed the limit of its pressure rise capabilities or is highly loaded such that it does not have the capacity to absorb a momentary disturbance, creating a rotational stall which can propagate in less than a second through the entire compressor.

The compressor will recover to normal flow once the engine pressure ratio reduces to a level at which the compressor is capable of sustaining stable airflow. If, however, the conditions that induced the stall remain, the return of stable airflow will reproduce the conditions at the time of surge and the process will repeat.[2] Such a "locked-in" or self-reproducing stall is particularly dangerous, with very high levels of vibration causing accelerated engine wear and possible damage, even the total destruction of the engine through the breaking of compressor and stator vanes and their subsequent ingestion, destroying engine components downstream.

Causes

[edit]

A compressor will only pump air in a stable manner up to a certain pressure ratio. Beyond this value the flow will break down and become unstable. This occurs at what is known as the surge line on a compressor map. The complete engine is designed to keep the compressor operating a small distance below the surge pressure ratio on what is known as the operating line on a compressor map. The distance between the two lines is known as the surge margin on a compressor map. Various things can occur during the operation of the engine to lower the surge pressure ratio or raise the operating pressure ratio. When the two coincide there is no longer any surge margin and a compressor stage can stall or the complete compressor can surge as explained in preceding sections.

Factors which erode compressor surge margin

[edit]

The following, if severe enough, can cause stalling or surging.

  • Ingestion of foreign objects which results in damage, as well as sand and dirt erosion, can lower the surge line.
  • Dirt build-up in the compressor and wear that increases compressor tip clearances or seal leakages all tend to raise the operating line.
  • Complete loss of surge margin with violent surging can occur with a bird strike. Taxiing on the ground, taking off, low level flying (military) and approaching to land all take place where bird strikes are a hazard. When a bird is ingested by a compressor the resultant blockage and airfoil damage causes compressor surging. Examples of debris on a runway or aircraft carrier flight deck that can cause damage are pieces of tire rubber, litter and nuts and bolts. A specific example is a metal piece dropped from another plane.[3] Runways and aircraft carrier flight decks are cleaned frequently as a procedure for preventing the ingestion of foreign objects.
  • Aircraft operation outside its design envelope; e.g., extreme flight manoeuvres resulting in airflow separations within the engine intake, flight in icing conditions where ice can build up in the intake or compressor, flight at excessive altitudes.[4]
  • Engine operation outside its flight manual procedures; e.g., on early jet engines abrupt throttle movements (slam acceleration) when pilot's notes specified slow throttle movements. The excessive over-fuelling raised the operating line until it met the surge line. (Fuel control capability was extended to automatically limit the over-fuelling to prevent surging.)
  • Turbulent or hot airflow into the engine intake, e.g., use of reverse thrust at low forward speed, resulting in re-ingestion of hot turbulent air or, for military aircraft, ingestion of hot exhaust gases from missile firing.
  • Hot gases from gun firing which may produce inlet distortion; e.g., Mikoyan MiG-27.

Effects

[edit]
Sukhoi Su-57 prototype suffering a compressor stall at MAKS 2011

Compressor axially-symmetric stalls, or compressor surges, are immediately identifiable, because they produce one or more extremely loud bangs from the engine. Reports of jets of flame emanating from the engine are common during this type of compressor stall. These stalls may be accompanied by an increased exhaust gas temperature, an increase in rotor speed due to the large reduction in work done by the stalled compressor and – in the case of multi-engine aircraft – yawing in the direction of the affected engine due to the loss of thrust.

Response and recovery

[edit]

The appropriate response to compressor stalls varies according to the engine type and situation, but usually consists of immediately and steadily decreasing thrust on the affected engine. While modern engines with advanced control units can avoid many causes of stall, jet aircraft pilots must continue to take this into account when dropping airspeed or increasing throttle.

A compressor anti-stall system is a compressor bleed system that automatically dumps away unwanted air to prevent compressor stalling.[5] Other methods of stall prevention may include an anti-stall tip treatment of the casing.[6]

Notable stall occurrences

[edit]

Aircraft development

[edit]

Rolls-Royce Avon engine

[edit]

The Rolls-Royce Avon turbojet engine was affected by repeated compressor surges early in its 1940s development which proved difficult to eliminate from the design. Such was the perceived importance and urgency of the engine that Rolls-Royce licensed the compressor design of the Sapphire engine from Armstrong Siddeley to speed development.

The engine, as redesigned, went on to power aircraft such as the English Electric Lightning fighter, English Electric Canberra bomber, and the de Havilland Comet and Sud Aviation Caravelle airliners.

Olympus 593

[edit]

During the 1960s development of the Concorde Supersonic Transport (SST) a major incident occurred when a compressor surge caused a structural failure in the intake. The hammershock which propagated forward from the compressor was of sufficient strength to cause an inlet ramp to become detached and expelled from the front of the intake.[7] The ramp mechanism was strengthened and control laws changed to prevent a re-occurrence.[8]

Aircraft crashes

[edit]

U.S. Navy F-14 crash

[edit]

A compressor stall contributed to the 1994 death of Lt. Kara Hultgreen, the first female carrier-based United States Navy fighter pilot. Her aircraft, a Grumman F-14 Tomcat, experienced a compressor stall and failure of its left engine, a Pratt & Whitney TF30 turbofan, due to disturbed airflow caused by Hultgreen's attempt to recover from an incorrect final approach position by executing a sideslip; compressor stalls from excessive yaw angle were a known deficiency of this type of engine.

Southern Airways Flight 242

[edit]

The 1977 loss of Southern Airways Flight 242, a McDonnell Douglas DC-9-9-31, while penetrating a thunderstorm cell over Georgia, was attributed to compressor stalls brought on by ingestion of large quantities of water and hail. The stalls caused blades to clash with stationary vanes in both of its Pratt & Whitney JT8D-9 turbofan engines. The stalls were so severe as to cause the destruction of the engines, leaving the flight crew with no choice but to make an emergency landing on a public road, killing 62 passengers and another eight people on the ground.

1997 Irkutsk Antonov An-124 crash

[edit]

On December 6, 1997, an Antonov 124 transport plane was destroyed when it crashed immediately after takeoff from Irkutsk-2 Airport in Russia. Three seconds after lifting off from Runway 14, at a height of about 5 metres (16 ft), the number 3 engine surged. Climbing away with a high angle of attack, engines 1 and 2 also surged, causing the aircraft to crash some 1,600 metres (5,200 ft) past the end of the runway. It struck several houses in a residential area, killing all 23 on board, and 45 people on the ground.[9]

Trans World Airlines Flight 159

[edit]

On November 6, 1967, TWA Flight 159, a Boeing 707 on its takeoff roll from the then-named Greater Cincinnati Airport, passed Delta Air Lines Flight 379, a McDonnell Douglas DC-9 stuck in the dirt a few feet off the runway's edge. The first officer on the TWA aircraft heard a loud bang, now known to have been a compressor stall induced by ingestion of exhaust from Delta 379 as it was passed. Believing a collision had occurred, the copilot aborted the takeoff. Because of its speed, the aircraft overran the runway, injuring 11 of the 29 passengers, one of whom died four days later as a result of the injuries.

Scandinavian Airlines Flight 751

[edit]

In December 1991 Scandinavian Airlines Flight 751, a McDonnell Douglas MD-81 on a flight from Stockholm to Copenhagen, crashed after losing both engines due to ice ingestion leading to compressor stall shortly after takeoff. Due to a newly installed auto-throttle system designed to prevent pilots reducing power during the takeoff climb, the pilot's commands to reduce power on recognising the surge were countermanded by the system, leading to engine damage and total engine failure. The airliner successfully made a forced landing in a forest clearing without loss of life.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Compressor stall

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Compressor stall is an aerodynamic in the section of a gas turbine , particularly in axial-flow designs, where separates from the blades due to an incompatible relative to the 's rotational speed, leading to disrupted smooth passage of air through stages and potential reversal of mass flow. This condition manifests as a local or propagating disruption in the , often indicated by a sudden rise in temperature, fluctuations in RPM, and audible banging or rumbling noises. If unchecked, compressor stall can escalate to more severe instabilities, potentially causing or physical damage to components. Compressor stall encompasses two primary forms: rotating stall and surge. Rotating stall involves localized regions of separated flow, or stall cells, that propagate circumferentially around the compressor annulus at a speed typically 30-70% of the rotor speed, creating a persistent but non-axisymmetric flow distortion without immediate full reversal of flow. In contrast, surge represents a more violent, system-wide oscillation where the entire compressor experiences a breakdown in pressure rise, resulting in pulsations, reverse mass flow, and high-frequency pressure waves that can propagate through the engine. These instabilities are mapped on compressor performance characteristics, with the surge line delineating the boundary of stable operation; operating beyond this line, often at low mass flow rates or high pressure ratios, triggers the onset of stall. Common causes of compressor stall include sudden disruptions to airflow, such as from foreign object ingestion, ice buildup, or bird strikes, as well as internal factors like , , or mismatches in matching due to transients. In multi-stage , separation on or stators exacerbates the issue, particularly during acceleration or deceleration phases where the incidence angle of incoming air deviates from design conditions. Prevention strategies focus on maintaining a sufficient surge margin through design features like variable guide vanes, bleed valves to vent excess , and multi-spool architectures that decouple and speeds for enhanced stability. Historically, compressor stall has been a critical challenge in , prompting extensive research since the mid-20th century to improve reliability and safety.

Fundamentals

Definition and Overview

Compressor stall refers to a disruption in the smooth through the stages of a gas turbine engine, where local or global on the blades occurs, leading to , reduced rise, or even reversal of direction. This aerodynamic phenomenon arises when the angle of attack on the rotor blades becomes excessive relative to the incoming , causing separation and a partial breakdown of the flow field. Unlike flutter, which involves aeroelastic structural vibrations of the blades, or choke, where excessive mass flow overwhelms the compressor's capacity without separation, stall specifically entails this flow detachment and its consequences. Key characteristics of compressor stall include a sudden loss of pressure rise, often accompanied by audible symptoms such as banging, rumbling, or popping noises as stalled regions propagate through the engine stages. These disturbances can manifest as increased engine vibrations, elevated exhaust gas temperatures, and in severe cases, visible flames expelled from the or exhaust due to reversal affecting . The primarily impacts axial-flow compressors, which are prevalent in turbojets, turbofans, and turboprops for their high in generating , though it can also occur in centrifugal compressors used in some smaller or auxiliary engines. Compressor stall was first prominently observed during testing of early jet engines, where it was initially mistaken for catastrophic engine failure due to the unfamiliar symptoms and lack of understanding of high-speed axial flows. These early designs, often single-spool configurations optimized for specific operating speeds, were particularly susceptible during off-design conditions like low-RPM , highlighting the challenges in achieving stable across varying engine demands.

Aerodynamic Principles

Axial compressors operate through a series of that progressively increase by imparting to the . Each consists of rotating blades, known as rotors, which accelerate the air by adding tangential , and stationary vanes, called , which redirect and slow the flow. This process relies on the diffusion principle, where the gained in the rotor is converted into in the as air decreases while moving through converging-diverging passages designed to manage adverse gradients. Compressor stall arises when the incidence angle—the angle between the incoming relative and the chord—exceeds the aerodynamic limits of the blades. This mismatch causes the on the suction surface of the to separate due to the , leading to a breakdown in smooth attachment. The separation results in a significant reduction in aerodynamic lift generated by the and a sharp increase in drag, which collectively blocks the flow passage and disrupts the rise across the stage. A key metric for assessing stall risk is the diffusion factor (DF), which quantifies the loading on compressor blades and the potential for separation. It is defined as DF=U1−U2U1+ΔCθ2σU1DF = \frac{U_1 - U_2}{U_1} + \frac{\Delta C_\theta}{2 \sigma U_1} where U1U_1 and U2U_2 are the relative velocities at the blade inlet and outlet, respectively; ΔCθ\Delta C_\theta is the change in absolute tangential velocity across the blade row; and σ\sigma is the blade solidity (chord length divided by spacing). Values of DF exceeding 0.6 typically indicate high risk of inception, as they correspond to excessive deceleration of the relative flow, promoting separation on the surface. The overall behavior of an axial compressor is characterized on a performance map, which plots total pressure ratio (π=Pout/Pin\pi = P_{out}/P_{in}) against flow coefficient (ϕ=Vax/U\phi = V_{ax}/U, where VaxV_{ax} is axial velocity and UU is blade tip speed). The operating line traces the steady-state trajectory of compressor performance under varying conditions, while the surge line marks the stability limit, representing the locus of peak pressure ratios at minimum stable flow rates beyond which aerodynamic instability, including stall, occurs.

Types

Rotating Stall

Rotating stall manifests as localized regions of stalled flow within the compressor annulus, forming one or more discrete cells that propagate circumferentially in the direction of rotor rotation at a speed typically between 20% and 70% of the rotor speed. These cells, typically numbering from 1 to 10 or more, create persistent blockages that modulate the circumferential pressure distribution, leading to alternating stalled and unstalled passages as viewed from the rotor frame. The phenomenon is distinct from uniform stall, as the disturbances remain confined azimuthally without immediate axisymmetric reversal. Initiation of rotating stall typically begins in a single blade row, most commonly in the rear stages of multistage axial , where axial flow reduction increases incidence angles and promotes local due to mismatch between incoming flow and blade geometry. This initial disturbance then propagates upstream and downstream through the compressor via acoustic or convective waves, establishing the rotating cells as the sustains itself. The effects of rotating stall include a gradual degradation in overall compressor performance, characterized by reduced pressure rise and efficiency as the stalled cells disrupt the mean flow field. This leads to increased structural vibrations at the frequency of cell rotation relative to the casing, though the engine can often continue operating in a subnormal mode without immediate shutdown. Detection relies on frequency analysis from circumferential arrays of pressure transducers, which reveal peaks corresponding to the cell passage frequency. Modeling of rotating stall draws from Emmons' seminal , which describes the of cells as a result of cyclic stalling and unstalling of blade passages in the relative frame. The predicts the angular speed of the cell ωc\omega_c (with respect to the stationary frame) as a k<1k < 1 of the angular speed ωr\omega_r: ωc=kωr\omega_c = k \omega_r where kk represents the fractional propagation speed, typically derived from assumptions of irrotational inlet flow and balanced lags between stalled and unstalled regions. This kinematic model has been foundational for understanding cell dynamics in axial compressors.

Surge

Surge represents the most severe form of aerodynamic in axial , characterized by a complete, axisymmetric breakdown of the flow that propagates through the entire engine, resulting in large-amplitude oscillations of and flow with axial flow reversal. This manifests as violent pulsations where the momentarily loses its pressure-raising capability, often accompanied by a loud audible such as a bang or whistle. The typical cycle frequency of surge ranges from 1 to 20 Hz, driven by the system's , which is significantly lower than the frequencies associated with other instabilities. The dynamics of a surge cycle begin with stall initiation at the compressor's peak pressure rise point on its characteristic curve, where the operating condition crosses into the unstable region, causing the flow to abruptly jump to a reversed state. During reversal, the mass flow reaches near zero or negative values, leading to a rapid drop in pressure across the compressor as momentum in the downstream plenum dissipates. Recovery follows as the reversed flow exhausts the plenum's stored momentum, allowing positive flow to re-establish along a different path on the compressor map; however, the system then re-enters the stalled condition, perpetuating the limit cycle oscillation. This cyclic behavior can escalate from a precursor like prolonged rotating stall, producing intense vibrations and potentially causing combustor flameout due to disrupted airflow. A key feature of surge is the hysteresis observed on the compressor map, where the line defining surge onset differs from the recovery line, forming a loop that requires a greater adjustment in operating conditions—such as increased flow—to exit the instability than to initially enter it. This hysteresis arises from the nonlinear compressor characteristic and system compliance, complicating control efforts as the operating point follows an S-shaped trajectory during transients. Unlike milder, localized instabilities, surge involves global, axisymmetric flow disruptions that affect the entire compression system, often evolving from rotating stall but distinguished by its high-amplitude axial pulsations and potential for reverse flow throughout the . Engineers quantify the buffer against surge using the surge margin (SM), defined as SM=(Ps,surge−Ps,op)Ps,op×100%SM = \frac{(P_{s, surge} - P_{s, op})}{P_{s, op}} \times 100\% where Ps,surgeP_{s, surge} is the pressure ratio at the surge line and Ps,opP_{s, op} is the operating pressure ratio; this metric represents the percentage distance from the current operating point to the surge boundary, serving as a design parameter to ensure stable operation under varying conditions.

Causes

Aerodynamic Factors

Compressor stall can be triggered by flow incidence mismatches, where high inlet distortion alters the incoming airflow nonuniformity, elevating the local angle of attack on compressor blades beyond their stall margin. Such distortions often arise from inlet geometry constraints or aircraft maneuvers, leading to regions of elevated incidence that promote boundary layer separation on blade surfaces. For instance, circumferential or radial total pressure distortions reduce the overall stable mass flow range by inducing localized stall precursors, as demonstrated in experimental studies on axial compressors. Boundary layer effects further contribute to stall susceptibility by accumulating low-energy fluid along blade surfaces, which thickens the and diminishes aerodynamic loading capacity, thereby eroding the stall margin. In particular, tip clearance flows exacerbate this issue, as the leakage vortex from the rotor tip interacts with the endwall , promoting early and reducing efficiency near the casing. These phenomena are pronounced in high-pressure-ratio stages, where even modest increases in tip gap can shift the onset of separation upstream, limiting stable operation. Stage interactions play a critical role in stall inception through the impingement of upstream wakes on downstream blades, generating unsteady aerodynamic loading that amplifies flow instabilities. These wakes, originating from prior rotor or rows, introduce periodic perturbations in incidence and , which can trigger modal or spike-type disturbances propagating as rotating cells. The Moore-Greitzer model captures this dynamic interplay, describing stall inception via coupled equations for pressure and flow coefficients; a key relation for pressure dynamics is given by ∂ψ∂t+UR∂ψ∂θ=−1BUR∂ϕˉ∂t,\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} + \frac{U}{R} \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial \theta} = -\frac{1}{B} \frac{U}{R} \frac{\partial \bar{\phi}}{\partial t}, where ψ\psi is the pressure rise coefficient, ϕ\phi the flow coefficient, U/RU/R the rotor speed parameter, θ\theta the azimuthal angle, and BB the Greitzer stability parameter, illustrating how spatial and temporal variations lead to cell growth without detailed derivation. Off-design operating conditions, such as reduced Mach numbers below design intent, erode the compressor map's stable operating envelope by narrowing the surge margin through diminished and increased risks. At part-speed operations, the mismatch between blade speed and airflow velocity alters incidence angles across stages, compressing the usable mass flow range and heightening vulnerability to . This effect is evident in multistage , where predictive models show that deviations from peak points can reduce stall margin by up to 20-30% depending on the loading.

Operational and Design Factors

Operational and design factors play a significant role in precipitating compressor stall by altering the compressor's operating conditions relative to its stability limits. transients, such as rapid or deceleration, can shift the engine's across the surge line, reducing the available surge margin and potentially inducing stall. For instance, during from to full power, the compressor's flow demand increases suddenly, while the rotational speed lags, temporarily decreasing the stall margin by up to 20-30% in some engine configurations. High-altitude starts or operations on hot days exacerbate this by further compressing the margin due to lower air density. Inlet conditions also contribute to stall through flow distortions that unevenly load compressor stages. Bird strikes or (FOD) can deform inlet geometry or blades, introducing circumferential distortions that propagate through the compressor and reduce stall margin by disrupting uniform airflow. Battle damage to the airframe or nacelle similarly distorts inlet flow, increasing incidence angles on the first rotor stages and promoting local stall inception. Ice ingestion, though less common with anti-icing systems, can cause sudden blockages leading to similar effects. Internal factors such as blade erosion from prolonged exposure to abrasive particles or fouling from atmospheric contaminants (e.g., dust, salt) can gradually degrade blade aerodynamics, thickening boundary layers and reducing stall margin over time. Design choices in early engines often incorporated insufficient surge margins, making them particularly susceptible to under off-design conditions. Modern mitigations include variable vanes to adjust incidence and bleed valves to vent excess flow, but errors can still lead to failures if not tuned to specific operating envelopes. Environmental factors like high ambient or erode compressor stability by affecting air and corrected parameters. Elevated s increase the temperature ratio θ (inlet to standard), reducing the corrected speed N_corr = N / √θ, which shifts the operating line closer to the stall boundary on the . contributes by lowering air through , further decreasing mass flow and compressing the surge margin, particularly in hot, moist conditions common to tropical operations.

Effects

Performance Impacts

Compressor stall significantly degrades engine performance by disrupting the normal airflow through the compressor stages, leading to an immediate and substantial reduction in output. During a stall event, particularly surge, the compressor pressure ratio can drop sharply, with documented cases showing reductions of up to 35% in overall engine at high altitudes due to the operating point shifting away from the stable region on the . This collapse in pressure ratio, often exacerbated by flow distortions, directly diminishes the air mass flow and compression work, resulting in a temporary loss typically ranging from 20% to 30% depending on the severity and engine configuration. For instance, in axial-flow compressors under distorted inlet conditions, losses of 23% at mid-altitudes and 35% at 50,000 feet have been observed, primarily from the stalled sections failing to contribute to overall compression. The of the is also severely impacted, as stalled stages behave like drag-inducing elements rather than efficient , lowering the polytropic by as much as 20% compared to nominal operation. This reduction in propagates through the cycle, increasing specific consumption (SFC) by 6% to 9% to maintain equivalent levels, as the compensates for the lost compression by burning more . Prolonged stall conditions further compound this by causing elevated temperatures in the inlet, acting as localized hotspots that reduce overall cycle and necessitate adjustments in scheduling to avoid exceeding thermal limits. Post-stall operation imposes operational limits on the , including of maximum to prevent recurrence and mandatory cooldown periods to stabilize temperatures before resuming full power. Recovery from a surge typically takes 5 to 10 seconds, during which the experiences sustained reduced output until the stabilizes, with fuel flow adjustments aiding restoration. These impacts are more pronounced in commercial engines during cruise, where sustained losses can degrade long-haul , whereas engines may tolerate brief derates better due to variable geometry features that enhance surge margin recovery. Overall, these degradations shift the 's on the toward lower regions, limiting achievable pressure ratios and requiring careful management to restore nominal cruise capabilities.

Structural and Safety Consequences

Compressor stall, particularly in its rotating form, induces high-frequency vibrations that can lead to in compressor , with the most vulnerable areas being 25-35% of the blade span from the base where over 40% of failures occur. These vibrations arise from unsteady aerodynamic loads during stall, reducing blade life significantly; for instance, a small 0.010-inch nick at the leading or trailing edge can decrease endurance from 10^8 cycles to as low as 2.3 \times 10^5 cycles under vibratory stresses of \pm 70,000 psi. In severe surge conditions, pulses generate rapid reversals, overloading thrust bearings and causing wear on rub-strips or even blade liberation through internal damage to labyrinths, diaphragms, and . Thermal effects exacerbate structural vulnerabilities during surge events, as flow reversal recirculates hot combustor gases upstream into the , potentially overheating blades and increasing temperatures by up to 60.6% of pre-surge levels. This hot gas recycling elevates discharge temperatures, leading to seal and bearing failures, while prolonged exposure risks distortion or creep in affected components. Such overheating can propagate damage to downstream turbine blades if not contained, compounding fatigue from vibrational stresses. Safety risks from compressor stall include engine flameout and resultant power loss, which can produce , pressure fluctuations, and visible flames at the or exhaust, heightening the chance of in-flight shutdowns. In multi-engine , a stall-induced shutdown on one may cause asymmetric , inducing yaw and potential disengagements, particularly during critical phases like takeoff or climb. Compressor surge contributes to a notable portion of reported malfunctions; a 2009 analysis of 79 events indicated 54 involved surge, often resulting in uncommanded power reductions that demand immediate crew response to avoid loss of control. Recent incidents underscore these risks. On February 10, 2025, a Hop-A-Jet crashed on Interstate 75 near , due to a non-recoverable dual rotating compressor stall caused by in the variable vane systems, resulting in four fatalities and highlighting structural degradation leading to . Additionally, a A330-200 experienced a right compressor stall during descent into on November 27, 2024, and another during climb from to on an unspecified date in 2024, both recovered safely but prompting investigations into performance impacts. In response to ongoing issues, the FAA issued Airworthiness Directive 2025-13-06 in June 2025 for LEAP-1A engines, requiring inspections following reports of high-pressure compressor stalls causing aborted takeoffs. Long-term consequences necessitate rigorous post-event inspections, as sustained stalls or surges often reveal cracks in blades or rotors, prompting hardware examinations to assess . FAA and EASA guidelines mandate such evaluations after surge occurrences; for example, Airworthiness Directive 2023-24-04 requires inspections and potential electronic control unit replacements on affected engines to prevent recurrent surges and associated structural degradation. These protocols, including checks and component overhauls, ensure engines remain serviceable, with non-compliance risking progressive leading to .

Detection and Mitigation

Detection Techniques

Compressor stall detection relies on a variety of real-time monitoring techniques that capture aerodynamic instabilities through acoustic, , , and operational signals. These methods enable early identification of to rotating or surge, allowing for timely intervention to maintain engine stability. Acoustic signatures provide a non-intrusive means of detecting events, with engine-mounted microphones capturing characteristic sounds such as the continuous rumbling associated with rotating or the loud bangs indicative of surge. of these signals reveals oscillations tied to flow disruptions, often in the low-frequency range (e.g., 0.3-0.7 times speed for rotating precursors), enabling differentiation between stable operation and impending instability. Pressure and vibration sensors offer direct measurement of flow perturbations within the compressor. Dynamic pressure transducers installed at various compressor stages detect rapid oscillations in static or total pressure, signaling the onset of stall through increased amplitude in the pressure signal correlation. Accelerometers mounted on the casing monitor blade vibration and structural stress, identifying high-frequency components linked to rotating disturbances or surge cycles, which can precede full instability by several seconds. Engine control systems, such as , integrate these sensor inputs into algorithms that track key parameters like pressure ratio, rotor speed deviations, and surge margin thresholds. By continuously monitoring for anomalies—such as a sudden drop in pressure ratio below a predefined limit—FADEC can flag stall risks and adjust fuel flow or variable geometry to avert progression, ensuring stable operation across flight regimes. In operational settings, pilots receive visual and auditory cues including master caution lights triggered by FADEC alerts, along with exhaust gas temperature (EGT) spikes from reversed hot flow during surge events. During ground testing in engine cells, high-speed cinematography and schlieren imaging visualize flow separation and stall cell propagation, providing qualitative confirmation of detected anomalies for validation and design refinement.

Recovery and Prevention Strategies

Recovery from compressor stall in flight typically involves pilots throttling back the to reduce flow, thereby moving the away from the surge line on the and restoring stable . This maneuver decreases the pressure ratio across the , allowing the to clear without further disruption. In cases involving variable geometry features, such as closing bleed valves after the initial stall event, additional management can aid recovery by relieving excess backpressure. Design strategies to prevent compressor stall emphasize incorporating sufficient surge margins and adaptive components in modern engines. Surge margins of 15-20% are targeted in contemporary axial-flow to provide a buffer against instabilities during off-design conditions, ensuring safe operation across the . Variable inlet guide vanes (VIGV) adjust the incidence angle of incoming airflow to the low-pressure , optimizing blade loading and delaying inception, particularly at part-load or transient operations. Active clearance control systems minimize tip clearances in the stages by modulating casing temperatures, reducing leakage flows that contribute to precursors and enhancing overall stability. Testing and simulation play critical roles in validating prevention measures before engine certification. Wind tunnel tests with distortion screens simulate inlet flow irregularities, allowing engineers to assess stall margins under adverse conditions like crosswinds or bird ingestion. (CFD) simulations predict stall onset by modeling unsteady flows and behaviors, enabling iterative design refinements to extend stable operating ranges. Ground-based engine run-ins using artificial inlets replicate flight-like distortions, providing data on transient responses and informing control schedules. Post-1980s advancements in bleed systems have significantly improved stall resilience, particularly during transients. Variable bleed valves extract air from intermediate compressor stages to reduce backpressure and maintain operability margins when acceleration demands push toward the surge line. These systems, refined through programs like NASA's High Stability Engine Control (HISTEC), dynamically adjust bleed flows based on real-time distortion estimates, minimizing fuel penalties while preventing in high-performance . Since 2020, further progress has integrated (ML) and advanced active flow control for enhanced detection and prevention. ML techniques, such as (LSTM) networks and convolutional neural networks (), enable early stall warnings 50 milliseconds to several seconds in advance by analyzing sensor data patterns, achieving accuracies up to 97.7%. Active flow control methods, including unsteady tip air injection and self-recirculating casings, have extended surge margins by 13-44% with minimal mass flow penalties (e.g., 1-3.6%), improving engine efficiency and reliability in axial compressors for gas turbines.

Historical Incidents

Engine Development Events

During World War II, the Junkers Jumo 004 turbojet engine, which powered the Messerschmitt Me 262, highlighted the vulnerabilities of early axial-flow designs to aerodynamic instabilities under varying inlet conditions, particularly in its eight-stage axial compressor. Post-war, the U.S. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA, predecessor to NASA) conducted extensive testing on captured Jumo 004 engines starting in 1946 at facilities like the Aircraft Engine Research Laboratory in Cleveland, Ohio, to study performance and improve compressor stability. This research laid foundational knowledge for subsequent jet engine designs by quantifying instability precursors and emphasizing the need for wider operating margins in axial compressors. In the 1950s, the turbojet encountered compressor surges during rapid acceleration, prompting a redesign that included revised blade profiles to reduce incidence angles and the incorporation of bleed valves at intermediate stages to vent excess air and stabilize flow. These modifications, implemented in the RA.14 variant type-tested in 1953, enabled the Avon to achieve reliable operation at higher pressure ratios, powering aircraft like the and . The engine, developed for the supersonic airliner in the 1960s and 1970s, faced repeated compressor stalls during wind tunnel tests at facilities like the National Gas Turbine Establishment in Farnborough, . These stalls arose from inlet-engine mismatches, where distorted from the variable-geometry —simulating Mach 1.7 to 2.4 conditions—exceeded the compressor's surge margin, leading to spatial and temporal distortions. Resolution involved refining variable intake ramps for better flow matching and enhancing engine mapping through integrated testing, which prevented stalls in subsequent prototypes and ensured stable operation across the . These development challenges drove broader advancements in during the and , shifting toward multi-stage axial configurations with interstage bleed systems to enhance margins and accommodate higher pressure ratios. Bleed valves, in particular, became standard for transient flow control, significantly reducing incidence in prototypes from frequent occurrences in early axial designs to more reliable performance in production engines.

Aviation Accidents

One notable aviation accident involving compressor stall occurred on April 4, 1977, when , a McDonnell Douglas DC-9-31, encountered severe and while flying through a near . The ingestion of massive quantities of water and hail, combined with thrust lever adjustments, induced severe stalling in the high-pressure compressors of both engines, leading to a complete loss of thrust. The crew attempted an on a highway, but the aircraft struck vehicles and a roadside structure, resulting in 72 fatalities among the 85 people on board and on the ground. This incident prompted the to revise penetration guidelines and enhance avoidance procedures for commercial aircraft. In the 1980s, the U.S. Navy's F-14A Tomcat experienced multiple fatal accidents attributed to compressor stalls in its engines, particularly during carrier launches where inlet distortion from high angles of attack disrupted airflow. One such incident involved an F-14A suffering engine failure shortly after catapult launch from a carrier deck, caused by uneven inlet air distribution leading to stall and subsequent loss of control; the pilot ejected safely, but the aircraft was destroyed. These recurring issues, which contributed to the loss of up to 40 F-14As overall, highlighted the TF30's vulnerability to stalls under asymmetric conditions and led to fleet-wide modifications, including improved engine controls and eventual replacement with the General Electric F110 in later variants. On December 6, 1997, a Antonov An-124-100 crashed shortly after takeoff from Northwest Airport due to compressor surges in multiple engines. The surges were triggered by contaminated with water, which froze and formed ice particles that clogged filters and disrupted operation during the initial climb, combined with a structural defect in the high-pressure compressors. The aircraft stalled and impacted a , killing all 23 occupants and 45 people on the ground, with the total loss of the plane underscoring vulnerabilities in system redundancies for large . The investigation emphasized the need for stricter quality controls and engine surge protection in cold-weather operations. An earlier commercial incident took place on November 6, 1967, involving Flight 159, a 707-131, during takeoff from . As the aircraft accelerated past a stationary DC-9, jet blast from the DC-9's idling engines disturbed airflow into the No. 4 JT3C-6 engine, causing a compressor stall and a loud bang that prompted the crew to abort takeoff. The 707 overran the runway and collided with a fence and an embankment, resulting in one passenger fatality four days later from injuries and minor harm to others among the 36 on board, with no structural damage severe enough to prevent evacuation. This event was instrumental in developing early engine surge detection systems and runway spacing protocols to mitigate effects. Compressor stall also played a role in the December 27, 1991, accident of , a McDonnell Douglas MD-81 departing . Clear ice accumulated on the wings during de-icing detachment broke off during rotation and was ingested into both engines, damaging fan stages and inducing surges that reduced thrust to idle. The crew executed an in a snowy field near Gottröra, , with all 129 occupants surviving despite the aircraft breaking apart on impact. The Swedish Accident Investigation Board recommended global improvements in wing anti-icing procedures and de-icing fluid residue management to prevent similar ice shedding. These incidents illustrate common triggers for compressor stall in operational , such as environmental and distortions, which often resulted in loss of and forced landings or ejections. Post-2000, advancements in engine design, including more robust stages and surge margin enhancements, have significantly reduced such accidents in commercial and fleets as of 2025. However, rare events persist, particularly from bird strikes that can induce stalls, as seen in isolated cases like the 2020 Canadian Forces Snowbirds CT-114 crash.

References

  1. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/airplane_handbook/20_afh_glossary.pdf
  2. http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/104719/14209546.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  3. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19840014498/downloads/19840014498.pdf
  4. http://mae-nas.eng.usu.edu/MAE_6530_Web/New_Course/Section5/Section5.3.pdf
  5. https://www.americanscientist.org/article/averting-the-pall-of-stall
  6. https://simpleflying.com/jet-engine-compressor-stalls-guide/
  7. https://www.ccj-online.com/combined-cycle-journal-number-50/gas-turbine-compressors-understanding-stall-surge/
  8. https://ntrs.[nasa](/page/NASA).gov/citations/20030013622
  9. https://netl.doe.gov/sites/default/files/gas-turbine-handbook/2-0.pdf
  10. https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/16-50-introduction-to-propulsion-systems-spring-2012/6242f54646f5274f1b7d809400e6fe00_MIT16_50S12_lec25.pdf
  11. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0011178.pdf
  12. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19650013744/downloads/19650013744.pdf
  13. https://www.cerfacs.fr/~cfdbib/repository/TR_CFD_10_115.pdf
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/rotating-stall
  15. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19830020904/downloads/19830020904.pdf
  16. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/turbomachinery/article/117/1/87/418922/Rotating-Stall-Acoustic-Signature-in-a-Low-Speed
  17. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/fluidsengineering/article/77/4/455/1142725/Compressor-Surge-and-Stall-Propagation
  18. https://home.iitk.ac.in/~aasheesh/Downloads/Term3Turbo.pdf
  19. https://www.kimerius.com/app/download/5784129470/Modeling%2Band%2Bcontrol%2Bof%2Bsurge%2Band%2Brotating%2Bstall%2Bin%2Bcompressors.pdf
  20. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/pof/article/35/11/114105/2921408/Effects-of-rotating-inlet-distortion-on-the-stall
  21. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/gasturbinespower/article/105/2/280/426393/The-Influence-of-Tip-Clearance-Stage-Loading-and
  22. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/gasturbinespower/article/108/1/68/406583/A-Theory-of-Post-Stall-Transients-in-Axial
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022460X09002296
  24. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19960002494/downloads/19960002494.pdf
  25. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20120001790/downloads/20120001790.pdf
  26. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20220016302/downloads/TransientOptimization_7.pdf
  27. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/turbomachinery/article/145/2/021011/1145892/Instabilities-Everywhere-Hard-Problems-in-Aero
  28. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20030013622/downloads/20030013622.pdf
  29. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/memagazineselect/article-abstract/135/04/52/395143
  30. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20230016154/downloads/SciTech%25202024%2520Stall%2520Margin%2520paper.pdf
  31. https://www.conceptsnrec.com/blog/performance-corrections-for-compressor-maps
  32. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19930088075/downloads/19930088075.pdf
  33. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19930088496/downloads/19930088496.pdf
  34. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19930088576/downloads/19930088576.pdf
  35. http://www.b737.org.uk/enginemalfunctions.htm
  36. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19930084117/downloads/19930084117.pdf
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128098950000089
  38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1270963822006836
  39. https://skybrary.aero/articles/compressor-stall
  40. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/aircraft/air_cert/design_approvals/engine_prop/engine_malf_report.pdf
  41. https://www.mysuncoast.com/2025/10/01/owner-jet-fatal-i-75-crash-files-class-action-suit-against-maker-of-engines/
  42. https://www.atsb.gov.au/media/news-items/2025/a330-engine-malfunction-incident-detailed-atsb-preliminary-report
  43. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/06/25/2025-11689/airworthiness-directives-cfm-international-sa-engines
  44. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_33.65-1.pdf
  45. https://services.casa.gov.au/airworth/airwd/ADfiles/TURBINE/AS907/2023-24-04.pdf
  46. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/7/8/766
  47. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0010749.pdf
  48. https://patents.google.com/patent/US6059522A/en
  49. https://hal.science/hal-03440929v2/file/AM_brandstetter2021interpretation_Turbo-20-1275_EU.pdf
  50. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IDETC-CIE/proceedings-pdf/IDETC-CIE2013/55997/V008T13A004/2464692/v008t13a004-detc2013-12810.pdf
  51. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20140011178/downloads/20140011178.pdf
  52. https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/44546/how-does-the-fadec-prevent-compressor-stall-during-rapidly-increasing-thrust-dem
  53. https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/334719-engine-surge-egt-rising.html
  54. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA194291.pdf
  55. https://www.pilotmall.com/blogs/news/compressor-stall-what-it-is-how-to-recover-prevention
  56. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20090030897/downloads/20090030897.pdf
  57. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/1.B39247
  58. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20030003697/downloads/20030003697.pdf
  59. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2003-89
  60. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/8/2033
  61. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19840013209/downloads/19840013209.pdf
  62. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20130013439/downloads/20130013439.pdf
  63. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20210017572/downloads/LSB_v2%2520%28002%29.pdf
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214914725003848
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037604212500082X
  66. https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/messerschmitt-me-262-a-1a-schwalbe-swallow/nasm_A19600328000
  67. https://www.thisdayinaviation.com/18-july-1942/
  68. https://www.valentiniweb.com/piermo/meccanica/mat/Rolls%20Royce%20-%20The%20Jet%20Engine.pdf
  69. https://www.aarg.com.au/avon.html
  70. https://www.icas.org/icas_archive/ICAS1988/ICAS-88-4.11.4.pdf
  71. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA176711.pdf
  72. https://airwaysmag.com/new-post/rolls-royce-olympus-concorde
  73. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR7803.pdf
  74. https://planehistoria.com/grumman-f-14-tomcat/
  75. https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/324091
  76. https://libraryonline.erau.edu/online-full-text/ntsb/aircraft-accident-reports/AAR68-AK.pdf
  77. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1270963825003748
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.