Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Councillor
View on Wikipedia
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
| Legislature |
|---|
| Chambers |
| Parliament |
| Parliamentary procedure |
| Types |
|
| Legislatures by country |
A councillor, alternatively councilman, councilwoman, councilperson, or council member, is someone who sits on, votes in, or is a member of, a council. This is typically an elected representative of an electoral district in a municipal or regional government, or other local authority. The title of a councillor varies geographically, with a name generally being preceded by their title (or the shortened version Cllr or Cr when written) in formal or council-related situations in many places.
Canada
[edit]Due to the control that the provinces have over their municipal governments, terms that councillors serve vary from province to province. Unlike most provincial elections, municipal elections are usually held on a fixed date of 4 years.
Finland
[edit]This is about honorary rank, not elected officials.
In Finland councillor (neuvos) is the highest possible title of honour which can be granted by the President of Finland. There are several ranks of councillors and they have existed since the Russian Rule. Some examples of different councillors in Finland are as follows:
- Councillor of State: the highest class of the titles of honour; granted to successful statesmen
- Mining Councillor/Trade Councillor/Industry Councillor/Economy Councillor: granted to leading industry figures in different fields of the economy
- Councillor of Parliament: granted to successful statesmen
- Office Councillor: granted to leading university figures
- Councillor of Culture/Theatre Councillor/Film Councillor: granted to leading cultural figures
- Chamber Councillor: granted for successful officials in the field of local government
India
[edit]As per the Seventy-fourth Amendment of the Constitution of India, municipal governance in India is looked after by elected councillors who are members of either a municipal corporation (for cities) or a municipality (for towns).
The Philippines
[edit]Under the Philippine Republic Act No. 7160 (otherwise known as the Local Government Code of 1991), a councilor is a member of a local council that is the legislative body of the local government unit. The English term "councilor" (shortened as "Coun.") term is primarily used to refer to members of barangay, municipal and city councils; in Tagalog, the members of the Sangguniang Barangay (barangay council) and Sangguniang Kabataan (youth council) are called "kagawad", while the members of the Sangguniang Bayan (municipal council) and Sangguniang Panlungsod (city council) are called "konsehal".
Members of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan (provincial board) are never referred to as "councilors" but as "board members" or "Sangguniang Panlalawigan member".
United Kingdom
[edit]All local authorities in the United Kingdom are overseen by elected councillors. These include:
- unitary authorities
- county councils and district councils
- parish, town and community councils
- The Common Council of the City of London (in which councillors are known as aldermen and councilmen)
According to Debrett's Correct Form the English title "Councillor" (often shortened to 'Cllr') applies only to elected members of city, borough or district councils.[1] However, there is no legal basis for this restriction and in practice the title is applied to all councillors at all levels of local government. Where necessary, parish and county councillors are differentiated by the use of a fuller title such as "town councillor" or "county councillor". The title precedes the holder's rank or other title, as in Cllr Dr Jenny Smith or Cllr Sir Ricky Taing, and for women it precedes their title of marital status, as in Cllr Mrs Joan Smith.[1]
Councillors are typically elected as members of political parties or alternatively as independents. Councils may also co-opt unelected councillors to fill vacancies on a council where insufficient candidates have stood for election, although in practice this is rare outside parish councils. They are bound by a code of conduct enforced by standards boards.
In 2007 the Electoral Administration Act 2006 reduced the age limit for councillors to 18, leading to younger people standing.[2]
Youth councillors
[edit]Youth councillors are also elected in local areas by organisations that are members of the British Youth Council, such as Salford Youth Council.[3]
Remuneration
[edit]Most councillors are not full-time professionals.
In England, Wales and Northern Ireland most larger borough, unitary authority or county councils do pay them basic allowances and out-of-pocket expenses. In addition, special responsibility allowances are paid to councillors who carry out more senior duties. The basic allowances and special responsibility allowances are theoretically paid to compensate councillors for time spent on council duties and are classed as salaries for tax purposes. Parish, town or community councillors may, since the Local Government Act 2000, be paid for their services.
In Scotland, since 2007, councillors have received a salary of £15,000, as opposed to a series of allowances. This rises annually and as of 1 April 2023 councillor pay in Scotland stands at £20,099 per annum.[4] These are often topped up by special responsibility allowances.
Regional government
[edit]The London Assembly is regarded not as a local authority but as a regional devolved assembly and its members are referred to as Assembly Members, not councillors.
United States
[edit]Council member, councilman/councilwoman, councilor, or councillor is a title for a member of a council used in the United States.[5]
In particular, the title is used in the following cases:
- City councils or town councils that do not use the title of alderman.
- County councils or councils in county-equivalents in states that do not style their next-level subdivisions as counties.
- Council of the District of Columbia
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (June 2008) |
British Commonwealth
[edit]This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (March 2020) |
In Australia, The Bahamas, Canada, New Zealand, South Africa, Botswana, Trinidad and Tobago and other parts of the Commonwealth, as well as Ireland, a councillor or councilor is an elected representative on a local government council.
Netherlands
[edit]In the Netherlands, a member of the municipal council is called a gemeenteraadslid or raadslid. Someone out of this group who is elected to serve on the municipal executive is called a wethouder, which is usually translated as 'alderman' or 'councillor'. The Dutch word for mayor is burgemeester. This is expressed in English as "mayor" or "burgomaster". The municipal executive is referred to collectively as the College van Burgemeester en Wethouders.
Belgium
[edit]In Belgium, a member of the municipal council is called a gemeenteraadslid in Dutch, and Conseiller Communal in French. Someone out of this group who is elected to serve on the municipal executive is called a schepen in Dutch or échevin in French. This is usually translated as "alderman" or "councillor" in English. The municipal executive is referred to collectively as the College van Burgemeester en Schepenen ou Collège du Bourgmestre et Echevins.
Bangladesh
[edit]In Bangladesh, a member of the city council is called a Councillor. The Councillor of Bangladesh is a city corporation's ward representatives who are elected City Corporations election by popular vote in every five years. Councilors carry out the developmental works of their elected wards and perform the functions of local government act and assist the City Mayor in all works under the City Corporation and carry out his orders.
Luxembourg
[edit]In Luxembourg, an échevin (Luxembourgish: Schäffe, German: Schöffe) is a member of the administration of a Luxembourgian commune.
Norway
[edit]In Norway, a member of the municipal council, kommunestyret, is called a kommunestyrerepresentant in Norwegian. The Norwegian word for mayor is ordfører.
Hong Kong
[edit]In Hong Kong, members of district councils are also referred to as councillors.[6] Before 1999 the district councils were known as district boards, upon the abolition of the municipal councils (the UrbCo and the RegCo) in December that year. In addition, members of the legislative council are also referred to as councillors. From 1996 to 1998 the Legislative Council were known as "Provisional Legislative Council", upon the abolition of the interim legislature in July 1998.
Turkey
[edit]Two types of councillor are elected in local elections held every five years in Turkey. These include 1,251 provincial councillors and 20,500 municipal councillors. Municipal councillors serve on the council of the 1,351 district and 30 metropolitan municipalities of Turkey, while provincial councillors serve on the provincial general council (İl Genel Meclisi).
References
[edit]- ^ a b Debrett's Correct Form, pg 193, Headline Book Publishing 2002.
- ^ "Electoral Administration Act 2006". legislation.gov.uk. 11 July 2006. Archived from the original on 18 July 2022. Retrieved 18 July 2022.
- ^ "Salford Youth Council website". Salford Youth Council. Archived from the original on 17 May 2014. Retrieved 29 July 2020.
- ^ "Councillors' roles, conduct and pay".
- ^ Viser, Matt (7 August 2006). "Spelling spats divide City Council". The Boston Globe.
- ^ SCMP Archived 21 January 2015 at the Wayback Machine
Councillor
View on GrokipediaEtymology and Definition
Historical Origins of the Term
The term "councillor" emerged in late Middle English around 1429–1430 as a specific alteration of the earlier noun "counsellor," which had denoted a general advisor since approximately 1225.[7][8] This linguistic shift assimilated the form to "council," emphasizing membership in a deliberative assembly rather than personal advisory roles, thereby creating a distinction in both spelling and semantic nuance—councillor for council participants, versus counselor (or counsellor) for legal or therapeutic guides.[9] The root traces to Old French conseillier, borrowed from Latin consiliarius (agent noun from consilium, meaning "counsel" or "deliberation"), reflecting ancient Roman practices of advisory bodies like the consilium principis under emperors, though the English term itself crystallized in medieval governance contexts.[10] Early attestations appear in English records of royal and municipal administration, where "councillors" advised monarchs or local bodies on policy, as seen in 15th-century documents referencing privy councillors in the English court.[7] This evolution paralleled the institutionalization of councils in feudal Europe, distinguishing elected or appointed deliberators from mere consultants, a usage solidified by the 16th century amid expanding parliamentary and corporate structures.[9] The British variant "councillor" (with double "l") persisted in Commonwealth traditions, while American English favored "councilor" to align with simplified spelling conventions post-independence, underscoring orthographic divergences without altering core meaning.[11]Core Definition and Distinctions from Similar Roles
A councillor is an elected representative serving on a local government council, tasked with representing the interests of residents in a specific ward or division and participating in collective decision-making on local policies, budgets, and services. Elected typically for four-year terms by local voters, councillors must serve all residents impartially, regardless of voting preference, acting as a conduit between the community and council administration.[12] [2] Their duties include scrutinizing executive proposals, voting on ordinances, and engaging in oversight of local services such as housing, planning, and waste management, though they lack direct executive authority.[3] Unlike executive roles such as a mayor or council leader, who hold chief administrative responsibilities—including policy implementation, staff management, and veto powers in certain systems—councillors function primarily in a legislative capacity, debating and approving measures without day-to-day operational control. In mayor-council structures, for instance, the mayor serves as the chief executive officer accountable for administrative functions, while the council, composed of councillors, legislates and provides checks on executive actions.[13] This separation ensures councillors focus on representation and policy formulation rather than enforcement, distinguishing them from appointed bureaucrats or full-time administrators. Councillors also differ from higher-level legislators like Members of Parliament, who address national issues such as foreign policy and taxation, whereas councillors handle localized concerns like community infrastructure and social services within constrained municipal powers. Aldermen, in jurisdictions retaining the term (e.g., certain UK boroughs or US cities), often denote senior or honorary councillors selected by peers for ceremonial prestige or extended service, but their substantive roles mirror those of standard councillors without inherent executive elevation; direct election by voters defines the core councillor position, while aldermen may emerge via internal council election.[14] This contrasts with commissioners in commission forms of government, who may blend legislative and executive duties across broader districts, though terminology overlaps regionally.[15]Historical Development
Pre-Modern Foundations
The concept of the councillor emerged in ancient deliberative assemblies that advised rulers or prepared legislative business. In Athens during the classical period, the Boule, a council of 500 citizens selected by lot from the ten tribes, served as the executive committee of the democratic system, scrutinizing proposals for the popular assembly (Ecclesia), overseeing magistrates, and managing foreign policy and finances; its members, known as bouleutai, rotated annually and were compensated for attendance to ensure broad participation among eligible male citizens over 30.[16][17] Similarly, in the Roman Republic from circa 509 BCE, the Senate functioned as an aristocratic advisory body to consuls and other magistrates, comprising around 300 patrician and later plebeian members who influenced legislation, foreign affairs, and state religion, though without formal veto power until later precedents like the senatus consultum ultimum.[18] In medieval Europe, councillors primarily advised monarchs through royal councils, reflecting feudal hierarchies where governance relied on noble and clerical input. The curia regis, or king's court, originated in the 11th-12th centuries across Norman England, France, and Sicily as a fluid assembly of feudal lords, bishops, and officials convened by the sovereign for counsel on justice, taxation, and war; it evolved into more structured bodies like England's Privy Council by the 13th century, handling executive functions amid the decline of absolute royal prerogative.[19] These councils embodied the expectation that kings "rule by counsel," as articulated in contemporary legal texts, drawing from both Germanic tribal assemblies and Roman precedents to legitimize decisions and mitigate risks of unilateral action.[20] Local governance laid further groundwork for councillor roles through emerging municipal institutions. From the 11th century, medieval communes in northern Italy and the Low Countries formed self-governing councils (consilia) of merchant elites and guilds to manage trade, defense, and disputes, often swearing mutual oaths for autonomy from feudal lords; this model spread to England, where ancient boroughs—fortified towns granted charters from the Anglo-Saxon era—developed councils by the 13th century, typically comprising 12-24 aldermen and common councilmen elected or co-opted from freemen to oversee markets, law enforcement, and poor relief under mayoral leadership.[21] In England, over 200 such boroughs existed by 1300, with councils deriving authority from royal grants like the firma burgi (farm of the borough), enabling fiscal independence while remaining subject to overlords, thus prefiguring modern representative local bodies.[22]Modern Institutionalization (19th-20th Centuries)
The 19th century marked a pivotal shift toward the formal institutionalization of councillors through elected municipal bodies, driven by industrialization, rapid urbanization, and demands for accountable local administration in response to public health crises and infrastructure needs. In the United Kingdom, the Municipal Corporations Act 1835 reformed governance in 178 incorporated English and Welsh boroughs by abolishing self-electing, often oligarchic corporations and establishing uniform elected town councils consisting of councillors (termed burgesses' representatives) selected annually by ratepayers possessing property qualifications.[23] These councils assumed responsibilities for local services such as street lighting, markets, and poor relief, embedding councillors in a structured legislative framework that emphasized representative decision-making over patronage.[24] The reform dismantled Tory-dominated closed corporations, broadening participation while tying electoral eligibility to economic stakeholding, which initially limited the franchise but laid foundations for democratic localism.[25] This model influenced subsequent expansions, including the Local Government Act 1888, which created elected county councils with councillors responsible for broader administrative functions like highways and lunatic asylums across non-metropolitan areas, professionalizing oversight in larger jurisdictions.[24] The Local Government Act 1894 further democratized rural governance by mandating parish councils in England and Wales, where elected councillors—numbering from 5 to 21 depending on population—gained powers to manage commons, footpaths, allotments, and vestry-transferred duties such as appointing overseers of the poor, extending representative structures to over 6,000 parishes.[26] These acts collectively standardized councillor roles as part-time elected officials focused on fiscal prudence and service delivery, with one-third of seats rotating annually to ensure responsiveness, amid a backdrop of municipal activism that included "gas and water socialism" for public utilities.[27] In the early 20th century, institutionalization deepened through professionalization and adaptation to welfare demands, particularly post-World War I, as local councils integrated national policies on housing, education, and sanitation. In the United States, progressive-era reforms from 1900 to 1930 addressed urban corruption by adopting council-manager governments in over 1,200 municipalities by mid-century, where elected councillors delegated executive functions to appointed managers, prioritizing efficiency over partisan machines while retaining legislative authority.[28] UK reforms, including the Education Act 1902 and Housing Acts, amplified councillor oversight of compulsory schooling and slum clearance, with councils employing permanent staff and expanding electorates via suffrage extensions in 1918 and 1928.[29] By the mid-20th century, councillors in industrialized nations operated within hierarchical systems linking local autonomy to central grants, though persistent challenges like uneven turnout—often below 40% in UK municipal elections—and property-based qualifications until broader enfranchisement underscored tensions between representativeness and expertise.[24] This era solidified the councillor as a hybrid figure: elected intermediary balancing community input with bureaucratic execution, influencing Commonwealth models through exported British statutes.General Roles and Responsibilities
Legislative and Decision-Making Functions
Councillors exercise legislative authority as the elected representatives forming the governing body of local councils, primarily through deliberating and voting on local policies, budgets, and bylaws during formal meetings.[30] This process ensures that decisions reflect community needs while adhering to statutory frameworks, with the full council retaining ultimate sovereignty over major legislative acts, though much work is delegated to specialized committees for efficiency.[31] In practice, individual councillors propose motions, amendments, and questions to shape outcomes, influencing areas such as service delivery priorities and resource allocation.[3] Key decision-making occurs in full council meetings, where all members convene to approve strategic frameworks, including annual budgets and council tax rates, often following committee recommendations.[30] Committees, comprising subsets of councillors, handle detailed scrutiny and initial votes on specific legislative matters, such as adopting ordinances for land use or public health regulations, before escalation to the full body if required.[32] For instance, planning committees review and decide on development applications, balancing economic growth with environmental constraints through quasi-legislative resolutions enforceable as local law.[32] Licensing committees similarly vote on permits for businesses, events, and trades, ensuring compliance with national standards while tailoring to local conditions.[32] Beyond voting, councillors contribute to policy development by reviewing executive proposals, often from a cabinet or leader in executive-led systems, and exerting influence via scrutiny committees that can recommend revisions or call-ins of decisions.[3] This oversight mechanism promotes accountability, as evidenced by powers to appoint representatives to external bodies overseeing joint ventures or trusts, thereby extending local legislative reach into partnerships.[32] Empirical data from council operations indicate that such functions directly impact fiscal outcomes; for example, budget approvals determine spending on infrastructure, with councillors collectively setting levies that fund approximately 25-30% of local services through property taxes in many systems.[13] Variations exist across jurisdictions, but core legislative powers remain centered on collective voting to enact binding local rules, distinct from administrative execution by officers.[30]Oversight, Representation, and Community Engagement
Councillors exercise oversight primarily through scrutiny of executive actions, policies, and service delivery, often via dedicated committees that review decisions, budgets, and performance metrics to ensure accountability and effectiveness. In systems with separated powers, such as those modeled on parliamentary local governance, non-executive councillors investigate executive proposals, summon officers for evidence, and issue recommendations that can influence or amend policies, with the principal aim of improving outcomes rather than direct veto power.[33][34] This function relies on empirical review of data, such as financial audits and service user feedback, to identify inefficiencies or failures, though its impact varies by jurisdiction and council culture, with stronger enforcement in places mandating statutory scrutiny processes.[35] Representation forms the core democratic function of councillors, who serve as elected proxies for their wards or districts, articulating constituent priorities in council deliberations and advocating for resources or policy changes aligned with local needs. This involves casework on individual grievances, such as infrastructure repairs or planning disputes, and broader lobbying to align municipal priorities with voter interests, grounded in electoral mandates typically renewed every four years. Effective representation demands ongoing constituent contact to gauge sentiment, avoiding over-reliance on anecdotal input by cross-referencing with verifiable data like census demographics or surveys, thereby countering potential biases from vocal minorities.[36] Community engagement encompasses proactive outreach to foster participation and cohesion, including public meetings, consultations on proposals, and dissemination of council decisions to inform residents and solicit feedback. Councillors lead or participate in initiatives like ward forums or community grants, which empirically correlate with higher trust in local institutions when transparently executed, as evidenced by resident surveys in engaged councils showing improved satisfaction rates.[37] This role extends to bridging divides by representing diverse views without favoring ideological agendas, prioritizing causal factors like economic conditions over narrative-driven interpretations, and using tools such as digital platforms for broader reach since the early 2010s. Engagement metrics, including attendance at events or response rates to polls, provide measurable indicators of success, though challenges persist in low-participation areas where turnout can dip below 20% in non-election periods.[38]Remuneration and Incentives Across Systems
In systems derived from the Westminster model, such as the United Kingdom and Australia, local councillors generally receive annual allowances rather than salaries, reflecting the part-time, voluntary ethos of the role. In England, basic allowances for 2025-2026 typically range from £7,616 to £16,267, supplemented by special responsibility allowances (SRAs) for leadership duties, such as £20,436 for council leaders in some authorities.[39][40][41] In Scotland, the basic annual pay increased to £25,982 effective April 1, 2025, while Northern Ireland approved a 5% uplift for basic allowances from the same date.[42][43] Australian councillors earn fees scaled by council category and population, from 13,030 in small rural areas under 20,000 residents to a maximum of $35,620, with mayoral fees higher but still framed as compensation for duties rather than full-time employment.[44][45] North American systems exhibit greater variability tied to municipal scale and professionalization. In the United States, city council compensation spans from minimal stipends or unpaid service in small towns to salaried positions in urban centers, with national averages estimated at 42,067 annually as of October 2025; larger cities often provide benefits like health coverage to incentivize full-time commitment.[46][47] Canadian municipal councillors in smaller Ontario locales receive 15,000 yearly, escalating to $122,363 base in mid-sized cities like Edmonton and $137,537 in Toronto for 2025, where recent votes proposed further increases to align with workload and per-constituent costs.[48][49][50] Incentives commonly include reimbursable expenses for mileage (e.g., 45p per mile in some UK councils after the first 10,000 miles) and attendance bonuses to promote engagement, alongside SRAs or equivalent premiums for committee chairs and deputies, which can double or triple base pay in leadership roles.[51][41] These mechanisms aim to offset opportunity costs without enabling full-time reliance, though empirical reviews indicate low remuneration in smaller systems may limit candidate pools to retirees or the affluent, while higher urban pay correlates with increased policy expertise but risks politicized salary hikes.[52][53] Across jurisdictions, remuneration tribunals or independent boards periodically adjust rates based on inflation and benchmarks, as in Queensland's 2.5-3% increases for 2025, prioritizing fiscal restraint over competitive private-sector parity.[54]| Jurisdiction | Basic Remuneration Range (2025) | Key Incentives |
|---|---|---|
| UK (England) | £7,600-£16,300 allowance | SRAs up to 200% base; mileage expenses[39][41] |
| Australia | 35,620 fee | Scaled by population; mayoral premiums[45] |
| US (national avg.) | 42,000 | Benefits in large cities; variable stipends[46] |
| Canada (varies) | 137,500 | CPI adjustments; constituency-based supplements[48][50] |
