Hubbry Logo
Duplessis OrphansDuplessis OrphansMain
Open search
Duplessis Orphans
Community hub
Duplessis Orphans
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Duplessis Orphans
Duplessis Orphans
Duplessis Orphans
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Maurice Duplessis in 1952

The Duplessis Orphans (French: les Orphelins de Duplessis) were a population of Canadian children[1] wrongly certified as mentally ill by the provincial government of Quebec and confined to psychiatric institutions in the 1940s and 1950s. Many of these children were deliberately miscertified in order to acquire additional subsidies from the federal government. They are named for Maurice Duplessis, who served as Premier of Quebec for five non-consecutive terms between 1936 and 1959. The controversies associated with Duplessis, and particularly the corruption and abuse concerning the Duplessis Orphans, have led to the popular historic conception of his term as Premier as La Grande Noirceur ("The Great Darkness") by its critics.

The Duplessis Orphans have accused both the government of Quebec and the Roman Catholic Church of wrongdoing. The Catholic Church has denied involvement in the scandal, and disputes the claims of those seeking financial compensation for harm done.[2]

It is believed to be the largest case of child abuse in Canadian history outside of the Canadian Indian residential school system.[3][4]

Background

[edit]

During the 1940s and 1950s, limited social services were available to residents of Quebec. Before the Quiet Revolution of the 1960s,[5] most of the social services available were provided through the Roman Catholic Church. Among their charges were people considered to be socially vulnerable: those living in poverty, alcoholics or other individuals deemed unable to retain work, unwed mothers, and orphans.[6]

The Catholic Church urged[7] many mothers to admit children to orphanages despite not having been formally orphaned due to their "bastard" status (being born to unwed mothers). Some of these orphanages were operated by Roman Catholic religious institutions, due to a lack of secular investment in social services; they encouraged unwed mothers to leave their children there, so that they might be raised in the Roman Catholic church. Maternity homes for unwed mothers, too, then prevalent, often encouraged the giving up of these "bastard" children.[8][9]

The Loi sur les Asiles d'aliénés (Lunatic Asylum Act) of 1909 governed mental institution admissions until 1950. The law stated the mentally ill could be committed for three reasons: to care for them, to help them, or as a measure to maintain social order in public and private life. However, the act did not define what a disruption of social order was, leaving the decision to admit patients up to psychiatrists.[10]

The provincial government of Union Nationale Premier Maurice Duplessis received subsidies from the federal government for building hospitals, but received substantially fewer subsidies to support orphanages. Government contributions were only $1.25 a day for orphans, but $2.75 a day for psychiatric patients. This disparity in funding provided a strong financial incentive for reclassification. Under Duplessis, the provincial government was responsible for a significant number of healthy older children being deliberately classified as mentally ill[11][12][13] and sent to psychiatric hospitals, based on diagnoses made for fiscal reasons.[14] Duplessis also signed an order-in-council which changed the classification of orphanages into hospitals in order to provide them with federal subsidies.[15]

A commission in the early 1960s investigating mental institutions after Duplessis' death revealed one-third of the 22,000 patients classified as "mentally ill" were classified as such for the province's financial benefit, and not due to any real psychiatric deficit.[5] Following the publication of the Bédard report in 1962, the province ceased retaining the institutional notion of "asylum". When many of the orphans reached adulthood, in light of these institutional changes, they were permitted to leave the facilities.[10]

Impacts on orphans

[edit]

Years later, long after these institutions were closed, survivors of the asylums began to speak out about child abuse which they endured at the hands of some staff and medical personnel.[16][17] Many who have spoken publicly about their experiences claim that they had been abused physically and sexually, and were subjected to lobotomies, electroshock and straitjackets.[14]

In a psychiatric study completed by one of the involved hospitals, middle-aged Duplessis Orphans reported more physical and mental impairments than the control group. In addition, the orphans were less likely to be married or to have a healthy social life. 80% reported they had suffered a traumatic experience between the ages of 7 and 18. Over 50% said they had undergone physical, mental, or sexual abuse. About 78% reported difficulty functioning socially or emotionally in their adult life.[18]

[edit]

By the 1990s, about 3,000 survivors and a large group of supporters formed the Duplessis Orphans Committee, seeking damages from the Quebec provincial government. In March 1999, the provincial government made an offer of approximately CAD$15,000 as full compensation to each of the victims. The offer was rejected and the provincial government was harshly criticized, with Quebec's ombudsman at the time, Daniel Jacoby, saying that the government's handling of the affair trivialized the abuse alleged by the victims.[19] In 2001, the claimants received an increased offer from the provincial government for a flat payment of $10,000 per person, plus an additional $1,000 for each year of wrongful confinement to a mental institution. The offer amounted to approximately $25,000 per orphan,[20] but did not include any compensation for alleged victims of sexual or other abuse.

After the offer was accepted by representatives of the Duplessis Orphans Committee, the result was bitterly contested by other members upon learning that under the terms of the settlement, the committee's lawyer, president, and former public relations official would receive six- to seven-figure payments, in comparison with the paltry amount given to the actual victims. The committee subsequently voted to replace both the president and the public relations official.[21] Critics of the judgment pointed out that three of the bureaucrats running the government's compensation program were being paid over $1,000 per day for work,[22] whereas the orphans themselves received the same amount of money for an entire year of their confinement.

Seven religious communities were involved in operating some of the facilities: the Sisters of Providence, the Sisters of Mercy, the Grey Nuns of Montreal, the Sisters of Charity of Quebec, the Little Franciscans of Mary, the Brothers of Notre-Dame-de-la-Misericorde, and the Brothers of Charity.[5] When the settlement with the provincial government was reached, the orphans agreed to drop any further legal action against the Catholic Church.[14] This offended some survivors; in 2006, one of the Orphans, Martin Lécuyer, stated, "It's important for me, that the Church, the priests, that they recognize they were responsible for the sexual abuse, and the aggression. It's not for the government to set that peace... It's an insult, and it's the biggest proof that the government is an accomplice of the Church."[23]: 376 

Aftermath

[edit]

In 1999, researchers Léo-Paul Lauzon and Martin Poirier issued a report arguing that both the Quebec provincial government and the Catholic Church made substantial profits by falsely certifying thousands of Quebec orphans as mentally ill during Duplessis' premiership. The authors made a conservative estimate that religious groups received $70 million in subsidies (measured in 1999 dollars) by claiming the children as "mentally deficient", while the government saved $37 million simply by having one of its orphanages redesignated from an educational institution to a psychiatric hospital. A representative of a religious order involved with the orphanages accused the authors of making "false assertions".[24] In 2010, it was estimated that approximately 300–400 of the original Duplessis Orphans were still alive.[25]

On March 4, 1999, after a criminal investigation where 240 Duplessis Orphans alleged 321 criminal accusations against those in charge of the hospitals, former Quebec Premier Lucien Bouchard declared a public apology to the orphans, but "without blaming or imputing legal responsibility to anyone."[26]

Fate of human remains

[edit]

In 2004, some Duplessis Orphans asked the Quebec government to unearth an abandoned cemetery in the east end of Montreal, which they believed to have held the remains of orphans who may have been the subject of human experimentation. According to testimony by individuals who were at the Cité de St-Jean-de-Dieu insane asylum, the orphans in the asylum's care were routinely used as non-consensual experimental subjects, and many died as a consequence. The group wanted the government to exhume the bodies so that autopsies may be performed.[27] In November 2010, the Duplessis Orphans made their case before the United Nations Human Rights Council.[28] In 2021, preliminary ground-penetrating radar analyses on grounds around former Canadian Indian residential schools allegedly indicated the presence of unmarked graves that could include the remains of Indigenous children that were also mainly administered by Christian churches. This has spurred further calls for the Quebec government and the Catholic Church to excavate former psychiatric hospital sites where the orphans were committed, with a class action lawsuit launched in 2018 denouncing the earlier settlement as "an insult" and not a "true apology" by the government and religious organizations.[26]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Duplessis Orphans

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Duplessis Orphans were thousands of children in , primarily from the 1940s to the 1960s, who were falsely certified as mentally ill by provincial authorities to exploit higher federal subsidies for psychiatric hospitals compared to orphanages, resulting in their confinement to church-run asylums where they endured physical, sexual, and . This scheme, peaking during the tenure of Premier from 1944 to 1959, involved collaboration between the Quebec government and Roman Catholic religious orders managing the institutions, driven by financial incentives as orphanages received $0.75 per child daily while psychiatric facilities obtained $2.25 or more. Many of these children were not true orphans but illegitimate offspring of unwed mothers, poor families, or Indigenous communities, misdiagnosed en masse—estimates suggest 2,000 to 4,000 directly affected by the transfers—leading to forced labor, electroshock therapy, lobotomies, and high mortality rates from neglect and mistreatment. The systemic abuses, including and isolation, stemmed from the dual motives of funding maximization and over "undesirable" children in a dominated by church-state alliances. Public awareness emerged in the through survivor testimonies, prompting a 1997 Quebec Ombudsman report that validated the claims and recommended compensation, followed by a 1999 government apology and initial payouts rejected as insufficient. In 2001, provided $10,000 lump sums plus $1,000 annually per year of asylum confinement to about 1,500 qualified survivors, supplemented by $26 million in 2006, though the offered no apology or reparations. Legal efforts, including class-action suits, largely failed, but the highlighted institutional child welfare failures and influenced later reforms in adoption records and deinstitutionalization policies.

Historical Context

Orphan Care in Quebec Prior to the 1930s

In early 20th-century , rapid and economic hardships, including the transition from rural agrarian life to industrial centers like , contributed to elevated rates of family instability, , and hood. Strict Catholic moral norms stigmatized illegitimacy and premarital births, prompting many single mothers to anonymously abandon infants at church-run nurseries or foundling wheels, severing maternal ties under institutional policies emphasizing over . While precise illegitimacy rates for 1900–1930 remain underdocumented, historical records indicate that most children in institutions were not true s (losing both parents) but rather victims of , parental death from disease or , or temporary placements from destitute families unable to provide care. A provincial report, reflecting conditions from prior decades, found that only 12 percent of institutionalized children were genuine s, with the majority stemming from or illegitimate births amid widespread working-class struggles. The assumed primary responsibility for orphan care, operating the vast majority of orphanages and crèches through religious orders such as the and Sisters of Providence, which established facilities like the Misericordia Hospital nursery in 1890 to handle abandoned infants. These institutions, supplemented by Protestant ones for minority communities (e.g., the Protestant Infants’ Home founded in 1870), relied heavily on private donations, charitable contributions, and volunteer labor rather than robust state support, reflecting Quebec's confessional welfare system where the Church filled gaps left by limited government intervention. Provincial funding was minimal and sporadic before the 1921 Public Assistance Act formalized subsidies, often amounting to per-child grants insufficient to cover basic needs, forcing reliance on ecclesiastical resources amid growing demand from urban poverty. This systemic underfunding and institutional overload led to chronic overcrowding and substandard conditions in pre-1930s orphanages, with nurseries reporting alarmingly high —such as 80 percent at Misericordia from 1890 to 1921—due to artificial feeding practices, poor , and infectious outbreaks in under-resourced environments. Examples include the Youville nursery, operational since 1754, where 88 percent mortality occurred in 1875 from similar causal factors like and inadequate medical care, underscoring welfare gaps driven by economic pressures rather than deliberate . These pressures created a fragile child welfare framework heavily dependent on religious operators, setting precedents for future reliance on institutional solutions amid fiscal constraints, in contrast to emerging federal subsidies for psychiatric facilities in subsequent decades that incentivized alternative classifications.

Economic and Political Pressures Under Duplessis

The Union Nationale governments under , governing from 1936 to 1939 and 1944 to 1959, adhered to principles of , maintaining balanced budgets and reducing provincial debt during a period of post-Great Depression recovery. This approach emphasized limited state intervention in the economy, low taxation, and reliance on private and ecclesiastical institutions for , contrasting with expanding welfare states in other Canadian provinces following . Duplessis's administration forged a close alliance with the , which operated most orphanages and welfare facilities, reflecting Quebec's conservative social policies that prioritized traditional institutional care over comprehensive public assistance programs. Quebec's economy, heavily agricultural and rural, suffered prolonged effects from the Depression, with high and exacerbating family breakdowns and leading to surges in during the . Wartime mobilization provided some industrial growth but did not alleviate underlying fiscal strains on provincial welfare budgets, as demands for orphan care intensified amid broader social hardships like illness and parental incapacity. The government's commitment to fiscal restraint limited expansions in social spending, directing resources toward and resource extraction rather than augmenting support for vulnerable populations. A key structural pressure arose from federal-provincial funding disparities: while general orphanages received solely provincial per-diem rates, typically around $0.75 per daily, mental health institutions qualified for additional federal subsidies introduced in under national health programs, often doubling effective funding to $1.50 or more per . These incentives stemmed from Ottawa's shared-cost initiatives for psychiatric care, absent for welfare facilities, amid Quebec's resistance to federal encroachment on provincial domains. Such fiscal mechanics underscored pragmatic administrative adaptations to resource constraints without expanding the welfare apparatus.

The Reclassification Mechanism

Federal-Provincial Funding Disparities

In 1948, the Canadian federal government established the National Health Grants program, which provided subsidies to provinces for health infrastructure and services, including significantly higher per-patient reimbursements for psychiatric hospitals compared to welfare institutions like orphanages. Under this framework, psychiatric facilities received federal funding at rates up to $2.25 per day per patient, while orphanages were reimbursed at only $0.75 per day per child, creating a stark fiscal disparity that incentivized reallocation of resources toward classifications. This structure stemmed from federal priorities to expand capacity post-World War II, with provinces bearing primary responsibility for child welfare costs but sharing psychiatric expenses through Ottawa's contributions. Quebec's provincial administration, facing budget constraints during Maurice Duplessis's tenure from 1944 to 1959, adapted to these incentives by facilitating the certification of as mentally deficient or ill, thereby qualifying institutions for the elevated federal rates. Orphanage operators, often religious orders managing facilities under provincial contracts, stood to gain substantially; reclassifying a shifted daily from the lower welfare tier to the subsidized psychiatric category, effectively tripling reimbursements without equivalent increases in operational demands. Administrative records indicate that this mechanism generated an estimated $70–100 million in additional funds for Quebec institutions between the late 1940s and 1960, as documented in economic analyses of the era's welfare expenditures. The funding gap directly correlated with observable shifts in institutional populations: Quebec's psychiatric admissions rose sharply after 1948, with facilities like those operated by Catholic orders reporting occupancy increases that aligned with subsidy receipts, independent of documented rises in actual mental health cases among children. Provincial reports from the period confirm that federal grants covered a larger share of costs for "mental deficiency" cases, prompting bureaucratic prioritization of such diagnoses to optimize fiscal transfers amid Duplessis-era austerity measures. This adaptation, while exploiting a policy mismatch between federal priorities and provincial welfare obligations, underscored the rational economic calculus underlying the reclassifications.

Administrative Processes for Certification

The certification of healthy orphans as mentally ill relied on streamlined medical protocols overseen by provincial physicians in collaboration with administrators, who managed the majority of Quebec's orphanages and asylums. These officials typically conducted brief, superficial evaluations—often limited to observations of behavioral delays attributed to institutional neglect rather than innate disorders—before issuing certificates of mental incapacity required for institutionalization under Quebec's laws. Such documents enabled the legal transfer of children from underfunded orphanages to psychiatric facilities, with no mandatory for those deemed abandoned or illegitimate, as state and ecclesiastical authorities held plenary guardianship. Transfers peaked between 1949 and 1956, coinciding with federal funding reforms that provided $2.25 daily per patient in psychiatric hospitals versus $0.70 for orphan care, prompting orphanage directors to petition for rapid reclassifications; for instance, the Mont-Providence orphanage in was redesignated as a psychiatric institution almost overnight in 1957 following church-led submissions to provincial authorities. Similarly, children were routed to asylums like Saint-Jean-de-Dieu through administrative orders backed by these certificates, bypassing rigorous diagnostic standards such as extended or family histories. Archival documents from provincial health departments and church records reveal implicit pressures on institutions to achieve minimum occupancy thresholds for funding eligibility, resembling quotas in practice as underfilled psychiatric wards risked subsidy reductions; Quebec's Ombudsman report of 1997 highlighted how these mechanics prioritized fiscal compliance over clinical validity, with many certificates retroactively altered or fabricated to align with reimbursement claims.

Institutional Conditions and Abuses

Daily Life and Labor in Asylums

In psychiatric asylums repurposed from orphanages, such as St.-Julien Hospital and Mont Providence, daily routines for the Duplessis Orphans shifted abruptly after reclassification to emphasize manual labor over education, with work framed by staff as therapeutic occupation. At Mont Providence, children as young as 8 or 9, including Herve Bertrand, had lessons halted on March 18, 1954, and were assigned tasks like domestic chores and farm labor to sustain the facility, with earnings often remitted back to the institution rather than benefiting the children. Such labor was enforced rigorously, as Alice Quinton recalled at St.-Julien in the 1940s–1950s, where slow performance led to punitive measures, reflecting a broader church-run model where self-sufficiency justified child exploitation under the guise of moral and physical discipline. Overcrowding defined institutional operations, straining resources and fostering chaotic environments in some facilities; St.-Julien accommodated approximately 500 orphans alongside 900 adult psychiatric patients, while Mont Providence held around 500 children aged 4–12 as noted in a 1960 inspection. Nutrition was inadequate amid neglect, contributing to developmental delays where many children lacked basic skills like using utensils or telling time even into adolescence, a consequence of overburdened staff ratios such as one nun overseeing at least 10 infants under age 2. Isolation from broader society was absolute, with orphans like Clarina Duguay barred from family contact or external education, confined to asylum grounds that prioritized containment over socialization, though routines varied by site—more regimented under direct religious supervision at some versus disorganized in larger, mixed-population wards.

Medical Interventions and Physical Mistreatment

In psychiatric institutions where Duplessis orphans were confined during the 1940s and 1950s, children underwent (ECT) as a treatment for diagnosed mental illnesses, with applications peaking in that era amid broader psychiatric practices. Experimental pharmaceuticals were administered to control behavior and address purported conditions, often without or standardized protocols, as corroborated by survivor accounts analyzed in clinical studies. Lobotomies, a prefrontal leukotomy procedure, were performed on a limited number of institutionalized children, including documented cases like that of survivor Rod St-Aubin, who received the intervention as a young adult in facilities, resulting in lasting cognitive and physical impairments. These medical interventions were applied in understaffed asylums influenced by prevailing doctrines emphasizing discipline over therapeutic care, contributing to adverse outcomes such as heightened vulnerability to long-term disorders. A peer-reviewed analysis of early experiences among Duplessis orphans identified , including beatings, as a primary aversive event inflicted by institutional staff, with 81 out of 81 participants reporting multiple forms of maltreatment before age 12. Restraints, including straitjackets, were used routinely for behavioral control, linked to chronic understaffing ratios that exacerbated reliance on coercive measures rather than rehabilitative approaches. Mortality rates in Quebec psychiatric asylums during the Duplessis era exceeded provincial norms for children, attributable primarily to neglect, infectious diseases, and malnutrition rather than verified intentional harm, though precise figures for reclassified orphans remain undocumented in official records. Empirical studies of survivors indicate that institutional conditions fostered environments where physical mistreatment served as a proxy for discipline, with doctrinal views from religious operators prioritizing corporal correction over evidence-based child welfare. Such practices, while not unique to Quebec, amplified risks in overcrowded facilities handling non-psychiatric youth mislabeled as mentally deficient.

Extent of the Phenomenon

Estimated Numbers and Demographics

Official inquiries and survivor advocacy groups have identified approximately 3,000 individuals as the core cohort of Duplessis Orphans—children as mentally ill for institutionalization between and —based on verified claims submitted for compensation programs established by the government in the late and early . Broader estimates, incorporating pre- and post-Duplessis era cases and varying criteria for reclassification, range from 1,500 to 20,000 affected children, though precise counts remain elusive due to incomplete archival records, destroyed documentation, and reliance on self-reported testimonies rather than comprehensive institutional logs. Higher figures often encompass all children in Quebec's orphanage and asylum systems during the period, without distinguishing those explicitly reclassified to exploit federal funding disparities, underscoring the need to prioritize documented administrative certifications over anecdotal expansions. Demographically, the group consisted predominantly of French-Canadian children from low-income, unstable, or single-parent households, including many illegitimate births placed in Catholic-run orphanages due to and economic hardship rather than parental death. Ages at placement typically spanned from (around 2 years) to mid-adolescence (up to 16 years), reflecting the operational norms of Quebec's child welfare system, which funneled vulnerable minors into institutions under the guise of care. The overwhelming majority were of Catholic heritage, aligned with Quebec's francophone cultural dominance, with minimal representation from immigrant or anglophone communities. These profiles highlight systemic pressures on marginalized families, though exact breakdowns by gender or precise socioeconomic strata are limited by the same record-keeping deficiencies that complicate overall tallies.

Involved Institutions and Timeline

The reclassification scheme primarily targeted orphanages and psychiatric asylums operated by Catholic religious orders throughout , with over a dozen facilities converted or utilized for housing the affected children. Prominent institutions included the Mont-Providence orphanage in Longue-Pointe, managed by the Sisters of Providence, which was wholly redesignated as a facility to access federal subsidies, and the Hôpital Saint-Jean-de-Dieu in , a major under the Brothers of Charity. Additional sites encompassed at least 10 other orphanages transformed similarly, alongside established asylums such as Notre-Dame-de-la-Merci in Huberdeau, reflecting the widespread involvement of church-run establishments in the province's child welfare and systems. The phenomenon originated in the mid-1930s, with initial reclassifications piloted during Maurice Duplessis's first term as premier from 1936 to 1939, amid efforts to leverage federal funding disparities. It expanded during the 1940s wartime period, driven by economic imperatives, and peaked with intensified transfers in the 1940s and 1950s, particularly following subsidy policy adjustments in 1956. Following Duplessis's death on September 7, 1959, the practice did not cease immediately but persisted under subsequent administrations, including Jean Lesage's Liberal government, with records indicating ongoing certifications and placements into the early 1960s, until the scheme's documented wind-down by 1964. This extension highlights the embedded nature of the administrative mechanisms within Quebec's provincial bureaucracy, independent of Duplessis's personal oversight.

Emergence of the Scandal

Initial Testimonies in the 1980s and 1990s

The first major public testimonies from Duplessis Orphans emerged in 1989 during an episode of the Radio-Québec talk show Parler pour parler, hosted by Jeannette Bertrand, where several survivors recounted their experiences of wrongful institutionalization and abuse in psychiatric facilities. These accounts described children declared mentally ill without medical basis, subjected to harsh labor, isolation, and inadequate care, highlighting a pattern of exploitation tied to provincial funding incentives for asylums over orphanages. The episode spurred increased visibility, prompting more orphans to come forward with similar narratives of systemic mistreatment during the 1940s and 1950s. In the early 1990s, survivors formalized their efforts through advocacy groups, including the founding of the Comité des orphelins de Duplessis in 1992, which collected and publicized personal testimonies alleging widespread physical and emotional abuses, such as electroshock therapy without consent and forced menial work under religious orders. Key figures like Rod Vienneau, a survivor who endured institutionalization as a , played a central role in organizing these groups and documenting cases, emphasizing the role of church-run facilities in perpetuating the reclassifications for financial gain. Vienneau's accounts, echoed by others, detailed daily regimens of labor disguised as therapy, with children labeled "retarded" to qualify for higher federal subsidies despite lacking diagnosable conditions. While these testimonies provided compelling firsthand of institutional failures, their evidential value is tempered by the challenges of long-term ; events recalled after 30 to 50 years can involve or due to trauma-induced memory reconstruction, necessitating corroboration with contemporaneous records like admission certificates showing abrupt diagnoses. Nonetheless, patterns across multiple independent accounts—such as the sudden influx of "patients" coinciding with funding policy changes—lend , though media amplification in Quebec's French-language outlets may reflect selective emphasis on church-state complicity amid broader secular critiques. Cross-verification with archival documents has substantiated core elements, like falsified certifications, in select cases, underscoring the testimonies' role in initiating scrutiny despite inherent limitations in subjective retrospection.

Media Exposure and Public Inquiries

In the early 1990s, international media coverage brought initial attention to the Duplessis Orphans' allegations of wrongful institutionalization. On April 2, 1993, reported claims that as many as 8,000 children in had been falsely declared mentally retarded during the and , primarily to qualify orphanages for enhanced federal subsidies available for psychiatric patients under Canada's National Health Grants program, which provided roughly double the funding compared to standard child welfare allocations. Similar accounts appeared in on May 21, 1993, detailing survivor recollections of abrupt reclassifications and transfers to asylums without medical justification. Domestic outlets amplified these stories throughout the decade, with CBC broadcasts in the late featuring orphan testimonies of harsh conditions and coerced diagnoses, contributing to heightened public discourse. This journalistic scrutiny pressured authorities, culminating in legislative reviews such as the National Assembly's Commission des institutions hearings starting March 12, 1997, which examined institutional records and witness statements on the orphans' placements. The ensuing probes, including the Quebec Ombudsman's 1999 assessment, substantiated that financial incentives drove many reclassifications, as provincial showed orphanages receiving $0.75 per day per versus $1.50 for mental patients, enabling institutions to offset operational deficits amid constraints. However, findings also qualified the scope of extreme abuses, noting evidentiary gaps in claims of systemic or experimentation across all 20,000 estimated cases, with documentation indicating some children exhibited behavioral issues warranting care, though diagnostic standards were rudimentary and funding motives pervasive. These inquiries shaped perceptions by prioritizing verifiable archival evidence over anecdotal extremes, influencing subsequent policy without endorsing universal victimhood narratives.

Provincial Investigations and Admissions

In March 1999, Quebec Premier issued a public apology to the Duplessis Orphans, acknowledging that provincial officials had improperly reclassified children as mentally ill to secure enhanced federal funding for institutions, resulting in their wrongful confinement in psychiatric facilities. The statement emphasized systemic errors driven by financial incentives under federal-provincial reimbursement schemes, which provided higher subsidies for mental patients than for orphans, without imputing direct orchestration to himself. Quebec's Protecteur du citoyen () conducted an official review in early 1999, corroborating survivor testimonies through examination of historical records and confirming that bureaucratic decisions led to the misdiagnosis and institutionalization of an estimated 5,000 to 6,000 children between 1935 and 1964, spanning the Duplessis administration and subsequent governments. The Ombudsman's report highlighted complicity in administrative practices that prioritized fiscal gains over child welfare assessments, noting that reclassifications continued post-1959 despite the shift to the Liberal government under . These admissions prompted policy reevaluations, accelerating the secularization of services that had originated in the 1960s but faced renewed scrutiny in the scandal's aftermath. By the early 2000s, the province established dedicated administrative frameworks for orphan aid, detaching welfare delivery from religious institutions and emphasizing state oversight to prevent funding-motivated placements.

Compensation Agreements and Ongoing Aid

In July 2001, following negotiations, the Quebec government finalized a compensation agreement with representatives of the Duplessis Orphans, offering each eligible survivor a base payment of $10,000 Canadian dollars plus an additional $1,000 for every year spent in psychiatric institutions. This settlement came after an initial rejection of a lower provincial offer in June 2001, with the majority of survivors ultimately accepting the revised terms, as evidenced by the agreement's endorsement by key advocacy groups. A minority rejected it, demanding higher sums to better reflect the extent of institutionalization and mistreatment endured. The 2001 package included a dedicated $25 million fund for distribution, supplemented by individual claims processing, though total disbursements varied based on verified institutional stays. In 2006, Quebec allocated an additional $26 million to cover further claims from survivors who had been excluded or required extended support under the agreement's framework. Acceptance rates, inferred from the settlement's implementation and lack of widespread further litigation at the time, suggest broad uptake among the estimated 3,000 to 5,000 eligible claimants, indicating the amounts met threshold needs for restitution without necessitating prolonged disputes for most. As of April 2024, maintains the National Reconciliation Program for Duplessis Orphans, providing ongoing financial assistance to survivors who were orphans or abandoned children admitted to designated institutions between January 1, 1935, and December 31, 1964. Eligibility requires documentary proof of residency in specified facilities, such as psychiatric asylums, with payments structured to offset late-life hardships tied to those experiences, though exact per-person amounts remain case-specific and capped to align with provincial budgetary limits. While some advocates have critiqued these programs as undercompensating relative to documented abuses—citing fixed sums against decades of institutional harm—their continuation reflects fiscal prudence, distributing public resources without unbounded liability to taxpayers. Empirical outcomes, including sustained program applications into the , underscore partial adequacy in addressing survivor claims without fiscal overextension.

Institutional Accountability

Catholic Church's Role and Refusals

Religious orders affiliated with the , such as the Sisters of Charity and the , operated many of the orphanages and psychiatric institutions in where Duplessis Orphans were housed during the 1940s and 1950s. These orders received provincial funding to care for the children, which increased substantially after reclassifications from orphans to mentally ill patients enabled access to higher federal subsidies under the National Health Grants program starting in 1945. While providing basic shelter and religious education in line with mid-20th-century institutional norms, the regimes enforced strict discipline, including and isolation, which survivors later described as abusive, though contemporaneous Church records emphasized charitable intent amid resource constraints. In September 1999, Bishop Pierre Morisette of the diocese, speaking on behalf of Quebec's Catholic bishops after reviewing survivor testimonies and archival materials, rejected calls for a apology or compensation. He argued that the Church lacked centralized over individual religious communities' actions, attributing any mistreatment to isolated failures rather than institutional , and contextualized the era's practices as reflective of prevailing societal standards rather than deliberate wrongdoing. This stance echoed internal assessments that acknowledged potential oversight lapses in monitoring personnel but denied evidence of a coordinated scheme to exploit children for financial gain, positioning the orphans as "victims of life" amid broader systemic pressures. The Church maintained this position into the early 2000s, with Quebec's Assembly of Bishops reiterating in November 2000 that no blanket apology was warranted without proven direct culpability by the , emphasizing case-by-case evaluations over generalized remorse. Such refusals highlighted tensions between the decentralized structure of Catholic orders—each autonomous in daily operations—and demands for unified , while internal reviews focused on verifying claims against historical rather than presuming institutional guilt.

Failed Lawsuits Against Religious Orders

In the early 1990s, survivors of the Duplessis Orphans scandal launched lawsuits targeting religious orders that managed orphanages and psychiatric facilities, alleging mistreatment and wrongful institutionalization. A prominent 1992 suit against these orders ultimately failed due to procedural and evidentiary shortcomings, including difficulties in establishing individualized proof of harm decades after the events. Courts emphasized the challenges of retrospective liability, where faded records and deceased witnesses undermined claims of direct institutional responsibility beyond government directives. Subsequent litigation efforts encountered similar dismissals. For instance, in the 2010s case of Boudreau et al. v. Attorney General of et al., plaintiffs sought authorization for a against the government and specific Catholic entities, such as Les Sœurs de la Providence and Les Petites Franciscaines de Marie, for complicity in abuses. The dismissed the application, citing statutes of limitations that barred claims originating from mid-20th-century events, as well as insufficient evidence linking orders to deliberate falsification of diagnoses independent of state policy. The Court of Appeal upheld this rejection in 2022, reinforcing that moral culpability alone could not override legal thresholds for proof, such as contemporaneous documentation of intent or causation. These failures highlighted broader evidentiary hurdles in such cases, including the of physical and over time, which courts deemed insufficient to meet civil liability standards without direct attribution of fault to the orders rather than systemic provincial practices. While isolated partial settlements emerged in related claims against certain orders—often confidential and limited in scope—most suits faltered on the absence of verifiable records proving or beyond subsidized operations. Retroactive liability claims against non-sovereign religious entities thus underscored the primacy of , prioritizing demonstrable causation over aggregate survivor narratives in judicial assessments.

Enduring Effects

Survivor Health Outcomes and Social Challenges

Adult survivors of the Duplessis Orphans scandal have exhibited elevated rates of psychological difficulties, including low , persistent feelings of abandonment, and challenges in forming secure affective bonds, consistent with attachment theory's emphasis on the role of early relationships in emotional development. A qualitative analysis of testimonies from 40 individuals institutionalized between 1935 and 1964 revealed these issues as common long-term sequelae of prolonged institutional care lacking consistent nurturing attachments. problems, such as depression and anxiety, were frequently reported, though quantitative prevalence data specific to this cohort remains limited, with outcomes potentially confounded by pre-institutional factors like parental abandonment or socioeconomic disadvantage. Educationally, many survivors attained low levels of formal schooling, often due to institutional policies prioritizing labor over learning, resulting in or basic skills insufficient for advanced . Socially, challenges included difficulties maintaining stable jobs, leading to chronic , and elevated encounters with legal systems, including petty criminality, though these patterns align with broader outcomes for institutionally raised children rather than being uniquely tied to reported abuses. Homelessness appeared sporadically in survivor accounts but lacked cohort-wide statistical elevation attributable solely to the , with more directly linked to skill deficits from disrupted development. Despite these patterns, some survivors demonstrated adaptive resilience, forming families or achieving modest stability in adulthood, highlighting individual variability and countering narratives of universal victimhood. A study of seven late-adult survivors noted personal strengths like perseverance emerging from traumatic experiences, suggesting that while institutionalization causally impaired attachment and opportunity, inherent traits and post-release supports mitigated total dysfunction for subsets. These mixed outcomes underscore the interplay of causal factors, including baseline vulnerabilities from non-orphaned origins, in shaping life trajectories.

Disposal of Remains and Archival Issues

The disposal of deceased Duplessis Orphans frequently occurred in undocumented or unmarked graves adjacent to psychiatric institutions and orphanages, often under conditions indicative of institutional expediency rather than formal cemetery protocols. At the Saint-Jean-de-Dieu Hospital (formerly an asylum) in east-end Montreal, an estimated 2,000 bodies were interred in a nearby cemetery from the 1940s through the early 1960s, including at least 42 children, with graves described as shallow and located near a hog farm, earning the site the moniker "pigsty cemetery." Survivor testimonies, such as those from former patients who assisted in body transport, link these burials to orphanage transfers and high mortality from neglect or experimental procedures, though forensic confirmation remains pending due to lack of systematic exhumations. Recent discoveries of potential burial sites have spurred legal demands for exhumations and identifications, grounded in geophysical surveys and historical mapping rather than speculation. In February 2024, concerns over children's remains at a former Sisters of Providence cemetery—repurposed for an SAQ warehouse expansion in —prompted Duplessis Orphans committees and allied groups to secure a temporary halt to excavation via court intervention, citing the site's history as an informal dumping ground for asylum dead during the . Subsequent assessments in May 2024 found no human remains, illustrating the challenges in confirming undocumented disposals without invasive digs. Efforts to pursue broader exhumations have faced institutional resistance and evidentiary hurdles, resulting in piecemeal outcomes. A 2021 initiative by orphans sought class-action probes and digs at multiple former psychiatric sites, paralleling survivor accounts of mass interments, but progressed only to advocacy rather than mandated forensic work. Similarly, a May 2024 lawsuit against the SAQ emphasized the need for and DNA analysis to identify remains potentially tied to orphanage mortality spikes, yet yielded no confirmed recoveries by late 2024. Archival deficiencies compound these issues, with death and burial records systematically incomplete or absent across Quebec's church-run and state-affiliated institutions. At facilities like Saint-Jean-de-Dieu, historical analysis reveals "archival dissolution"—the routine loss or purging of patient files, transfer logs, and mortality data—leaving gaps that obscure individual fates and prevent cross-referencing with survivor claims. Quebec's provincial archives hold fragmented institutional ledgers from the period, but access is impeded by privacy protocols and the absence of centralized indexing, forcing reliance on anecdotal reconstructions over comprehensive documentation. These voids, attributed to wartime resource strains and post-scandal cleanups, have stymied legal identifications despite orphan-led requests for record releases since the inquiries.

Debates and Critical Analysis

Questions of Exaggeration and Evidentiary Gaps

While the reclassification of certain orphanages as psychiatric institutions to secure higher federal funding under the National Health Grants program in the 1950s is documented, the broader allegations of systemic abuses—such as widespread sterilizations, lobotomies, and experimental procedures—rely heavily on survivor testimonies rather than contemporaneous . reviews, including a 1997 report by Quebec's , identified approximately 3,000 children affected by the reclassification scheme but found insufficient to substantiate many specific claims of medical mistreatment, noting that institutional logs often contradicted or lacked detail on alleged procedures. Claims of mass sterilizations, for instance, appear in anecdotal accounts from survivors but lack verified medical or administrative corroboration beyond isolated cases, with no comprehensive provincial confirming large-scale implementation. Discrepancies arise from the tension between aging personal recollections—often from individuals now in their 70s or older, recounting events from 50 to 80 years prior—and surviving institutional documentation, which primarily evidences administrative motives for reclassification rather than deliberate fabrication of mental illness diagnoses for all children involved. Not all children labeled as mentally ill were healthy orphans falsely certified; some exhibited genuine developmental or behavioral issues warranting institutional care, as indicated by pre-existing assessments and partial psychiatric evaluations preserved in select archives. Quebec government admissions in the acknowledged funding incentives but cautioned against generalizing all institutionalizations as fraudulent, emphasizing that diagnostic practices of the era were rudimentary and influenced by limited psychiatric standards. Debates over scale further highlight evidentiary limitations, with activist groups estimating up to victims while official tallies hover around 3,000 to 5,000 directly tied to reclassified facilities, potentially inflated by inclusive definitions encompassing all orphanage residents rather than those transferred under the scheme. Media portrayals in the amplified sympathetic narratives, drawing parallels to broader scandals, but inquiries like the ombudsman's noted risks of conflating economic opportunism with intentional cruelty absent forensic or archival proof. This reliance on unverified testimonies, amid destroyed or incomplete records from religious orders, underscores gaps in causal attribution, where administrative policy shifts do not necessarily equate to universal medical fraud or abuse.

Contextual Comparisons to Global Orphan Systems

The institutionalization of vulnerable children in mid-20th-century occurred amid widespread global practices where state funding mechanisms incentivized the expansion of asylums and orphanages, often managed by religious orders, leading to overcrowding, neglect, and misclassification for financial gain. In the United States, in New York, established in the 1930s for children with intellectual disabilities, ballooned to over 6,000 residents by —far exceeding its designed capacity of 4,000—resulting in severe abuses including medical experiments, hepatitis outbreaks, and inadequate care, all sustained by state funding that prioritized institutional placement over alternatives. Similarly, in Ireland, Catholic Church-run Magdalene Laundries and Mother and Baby Homes from the 1920s to the 1960s received government subsidies tied to labor output and child placements, mirroring Quebec's federal funding incentives for mental health institutions, with documented parallels in the confinement of orphans from unwed mothers and reports of physical and emotional abuses in both systems. Quebec's conservative welfare framework during this era, characterized by limited provincial spending and reliance on Church-operated facilities, proved cost-effective by leveraging federal reimbursements for psychiatric care, which covered up to 80% of costs for designated institutions, in contrast to the higher direct fiscal burdens of emerging secular welfare states in post-war Europe and the U.S. that expanded public asylums without equivalent private partnerships. This approach aligned with global norms where underdeveloped social safety nets deferred to religious institutions for child welfare, avoiding the inflationary expenditures seen in modern expansive models, such as Canada's post-1960s universal programs, which have incurred ongoing scandals like foster care breakdowns despite higher per-capita investments. Empirically, Quebec's per-capita institutionalization rates for psychiatric and care in the 1940s-1960s remained lower than in comparable U.S. states, where over 550,000 individuals occupied mental hospitals by amid similar funding-driven expansions, reflecting Quebec's emphasis on familial and support structures that reduced outright reliance on state facilities until welfare maturation in the . These international precedents underscore how fiscal incentives universally distorted care priorities, prioritizing institutional bed-filling over individualized needs, without deviating as an outlier in an age of systemic under-resourcing for child welfare.

Political Narratives and Ideological Critiques

The Duplessis Orphans scandal has been prominently invoked in Quebec political discourse to epitomize the perceived authoritarianism and clericalism of Maurice Duplessis's Union Nationale governments, often subsumed under the historiographical label of the Grande Noirceur (Great Darkness), denoting the period from 1944 to 1959 as one of stagnation and abuse. This framing, advanced by opponents including post-Quiet Revolution intellectuals and left-leaning historians, attributes the reclassification of orphans as mentally ill primarily to Duplessis-era collusion between the state and to secure federal funding, portraying it as emblematic of regressive governance. However, archival and institutional records demonstrate that such practices commenced in 1935 under the preceding Liberal administration of Louis-Alexandre Taschereau and persisted until at least 1964, well into the reformist Liberal government of , indicating systemic continuity rather than partisan singularity. Progressive critiques, prevalent in academic and media accounts, tend to elide this bipartisan dimension while emphasizing ethical lapses, yet the mechanism originated from pragmatic fiscal calculations: orphanages received lower per-child reimbursements from than psychiatric facilities, prompting reclassifications to access enhanced federal per diems under programs like the National Health Grants established in 1948. This approach, while expedient for cash-strapped provincial budgets amid post-Depression recovery, reflected broader mid-20th-century welfare constraints where relied on church-managed institutions for scalability, a reality overlooked in narratives that retroactively impose modern standards of state oversight. In contrast, conservative interpretations underscore the Catholic Church's functional necessity in delivering care during an epoch devoid of comprehensive public alternatives, arguing that religious orders absorbed thousands of dependents—estimated at over 20,000 children in institutions by the —averting destitution in the absence of viable secular . Revivals of the in contemporary media, such as the June 2024 APTN Investigates documentary Orphans of Church and State, which posits connections to Indigenous children and ranks the episode second only to residential schools in scale of institutional harm, may reflect amplified anti-clerical sentiments amid Quebec's accelerating and national efforts. Such coverage, emanating from outlets attuned to Indigenous advocacy, risks conflating distinct historical contexts to bolster broader indictments of religious , potentially underplaying evidentiary limits in linking specific cases to native origins while aligning with systemic biases in progressive institutions that privilege institutional critiques over chronological nuance.

References

  1. https://historyofrights.ca/encyclopaedia/main-events/duplessis-orphans/
  2. https://sencanada.ca/content/sen/committee/421/SOCI/Briefs/brief_DianePoitras_e.pdf
  3. https://aptnnews.ca/investigates/aptn-investigates-orphans-of-church-and-state/
  4. https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/ss/1996-v45-n2-ss3522/706725ar.pdf
  5. https://dejouerfatalite.uqam.ca/en/childhood/
  6. https://journals.openedition.org/efg/4330
  7. https://c2cjournal.ca/2010/10/the-slandering-of-duplessis/
  8. https://www.larevolutiontranquille.ca/en/rise-of-the-welfare-state.php
  9. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/duplessis-orphans
  10. https://orphelinsdeduplessis.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/P-77-theduplessisorphans.pdf
  11. https://www.aptnnews.ca/investigates/aptn-investigates-orphans-of-church-and-state/
  12. https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/duplessis-orphans
  13. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2000-feb-10-mn-62926-story.html
  14. https://historyofrights.ca/wp-content/uploads/QCombuds_report1997.pdf
  15. https://orphelinsdeduplessis.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/1950-Duplessis-Orphans-Humain-RightT.pdf
  16. https://www.nytimes.com/1993/05/21/world/orphans-of-the-1950-s-telling-of-abuse-sue-quebec.html
  17. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16319698/
  18. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19370267/
  19. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/duplessis-orphans-accept-quebec-s-final-offer-1.278029
  20. https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0034606
  21. https://www.nytimes.com/1999/03/05/world/montreal-journal-orphans-who-weren-t-recall-care-that-wasn-t.html
  22. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2000/04/07/abandoned-and-abused/a44a9b84-fa02-4549-823e-d4a72f0a1f31/
  23. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/9781137414359.pdf
  24. https://www.amazon.ca/Collusion-dark-history-Duplessis-Orphans-ebook/dp/B007IVC5OS
  25. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17342853/
  26. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1993/04/02/quebec-orphans-charging-abuses/c191369b-e862-4981-982b-3a616492eef4/
  27. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/duplessis-orphans-recount-alleged-abuses-1.172579
  28. https://www.assnat.qc.ca/fr/travaux-parlementaires/commissions/ci-35-2/journal-debats/CI-970312.html
  29. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/quebec-ombudsman-says-duplessis-orphans-right-1.173120
  30. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1993-06-06-mn-171-story.html
  31. https://www.quebec.ca/en/family-and-support-for-individuals/program-for-duplessis-orphans
  32. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/duplessis-orphans-accept-settlement/article4150206/
  33. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/duplessis-orphans-reject-settlement/article1032093/
  34. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/duplessis-orphan-denied-compensation-1.843737
  35. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/duplessis-orphans-get-26m-from-quebec-1.620714
  36. https://cdn-contenu.quebec.ca/cdn-contenu/adm/min/emploi-solidarite-sociale/orphelins-duplessis/FO_financial_assistance_Duplessis_orphans.pdf
  37. https://thelinknewspaper.ca/article/the-order-of-grey-nuns-facilitated-child-kidnappings
  38. https://www.nytimes.com/1999/09/16/world/no-apology-to-orphans-quebec-church-says.html
  39. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/catholic-church-will-not-apologize-to-duplessis-orphans-1.192838
  40. https://www.deseret.com/1999/9/16/19465991/church-won-t-apologize-to-orphans/
  41. https://www.scc-csc.ca/cases-dossiers/search-recherche/40311/
  42. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4903dd3f-6ded-4c73-b176-7afa4c643a6c
  43. https://globalnews.ca/news/9952890/quebec-religious-order-freres-saint-gabriel-sex-abuse-class-action-settlement/
  44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/47792185_Childhood_experiences_of_the_Duplessis_children_Consequences_50_years_later
  45. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2008/lcc-cdc/JL2-7-2000-2E.pdf
  46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24281290_Consequences_of_an_institutionalized_childhood_The_case_of_the_Duplessls_orphans
  47. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6479301_Seven_Institutionalized_Children_and_Their_Adaptation_in_Late_Adulthood_The_Children_of_Duplessis_Les_Enfants_de_Duplessis
  48. https://guilfordjournals.com/doi/10.1521/psyc.2006.69.4.283
  49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7448705_Personal_Strengths_and_Traumatic_Experiences_Among_Institutionalized_Children_Given_Up_at_Birth_Les_Enfants_de_DuplessisDuplessis_Children
  50. https://orphelinsdeduplessis.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/P-250-Mass-Graves-Of-Children-Found-Near-Montreal.pdf
  51. https://www.ctvnews.ca/montreal/article/possible-childrens-bodies-in-pigsty-cemetery-from-the-duplessis-era-halts-quebec-liquor-board-excavation-plans/
  52. https://www.mohawkmothers.ca/recent-updates/mohawk-mothers-and-duplessis-orphans-group-force-pause-in-saq-warehouse-expansion
  53. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/saq-distribution-centre-1.7200084
  54. https://www.ctvnews.ca/montreal/article/duplessis-orphans-seeking-class-action-investigation-into-possible-grave-sites-in-montreal/
  55. https://globalnews.ca/news/10498623/mohawk-mothers-duplessis-orphans-legal-action-saq-warehouse/
  56. https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/985688/1/SpoonerLockyer_MA_F2019.pdf
  57. https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/world/americas/030599canada-duplessis.html
  58. https://utppublishing.com/doi/pdf/10.3138/cbmh.29.1.125
  59. https://www.nyc.gov/site/mopd/events/our-history.page?slide=10
  60. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/duplessis-orphans-meet-irish-mother-baby-homes-1.4142930
  61. https://www.irishcentral.com/roots/history/irish-and-quebec-orphans-share-similar-stories-of-abuse-from-church-run-institutions
  62. https://financialpost.com/opinion/cost-of-revolution
  63. https://policyoptions.irpp.org/2006/04/modernizing-the-welfare-state/
  64. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780773575301-014/html?lang=en
  65. https://oadd.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/41021_JoDD_21-2_v23f_7-27_Brown_and_Radford.pdf
  66. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/grande-noirceur
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.