Hubbry Logo
Single parentSingle parentMain
Open search
Single parent
Community hub
Single parent
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Single parent
Single parent
Single parent
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A single parent is a person who has a child or children but does not have a spouse or live-in partner to assist in the upbringing or support of the child. Reasons for becoming a single parent include annulment, death, divorce, break-up, abandonment, domestic violence, rape, childbirth by a single person or single-person adoption. A single parent family is a family with children that is headed by a single parent.[1][2][3][4]

History

[edit]

Single parenthood has been common historically due to parental mortality rate due to disease, wars, homicide, work accidents and maternal mortality. Historical estimates indicate that in French, English, or Spanish villages in the 17th and 18th centuries at least one-third of children lost one of their parents during childhood; in 19th-century Milan, about half of all children lost at least one parent by age 20; in 19th-century China, almost one-third of boys had lost one parent or both by the age of 15.[5] Such single parenthood was often short in duration, since remarriage rates were high.[6]

Divorce was generally rare historically (although this depends on culture and era), and became especially difficult to obtain after the fall of the Roman Empire, in Medieval Europe, due to strong involvement of ecclesiastical courts in family life (though annulment and other forms of separation were more common).[7]

Single parent adoptions have existed since the mid 19th century. Men were rarely considered as adoptive parents, and were considered far less desired. Often, children adopted by a single person were raised in pairs rather than alone, and many adoptions by lesbians and gay men were arranged as single parent adoptions. During the mid 19th century many state welfare officials made it difficult if not impossible for single persons to adopt, as agencies searched for married heterosexual couples. In 1965, the Los Angeles Bureau of Adoptions sought single African-Americans for African-American orphans for whom married families could not be found. In 1968, the Child Welfare League of America stated that married couples were preferred, but there were "exceptional circumstances" where single parent adoptions were permissible.[8]

Demographics

[edit]

Households

[edit]

Among all households in OECD countries in 2011, the proportion of single-parent households was in 3-11% the range, with an average of 7.5%. It was highest in Australia (10%), Canada (10%), Mexico (10%), United States (10%), Lithuania (10%), Costa Rica (11%), Latvia (11%) and New Zealand (11%), while it was lowest in Japan (3%), Greece (4%), Switzerland (4%), Bulgaria (5%), Croatia (5%), Germany (5%), Italy (5%) and Cyprus (5%). The proportion was 9% in both Ireland and the United Kingdom.[9]

Among households with children in 2005/09, the proportion of single-parent households was 10% in Japan, 16% in the Netherlands, 19% in Sweden, 20% in France, 22% in Denmark, 22% in Germany, 23% in Ireland, 25% in Canada, 25% in the United Kingdom, and 30% in the United States. The U.S. proportion increased from 20% in 1980 to 30% in 2008.[10]

In all OECD countries, most single-parent households were headed by a mother. The proportion headed by a father varied between 9% and 25%. It was lowest in Estonia (9%), Costa Rica (10%), Cyprus (10%), Japan (10%), Ireland (10%) and the United Kingdom (12%), while it was highest in Norway (22%), Spain (23%), Sweden (24%), Romania (25%) and the United States (25%). These numbers were not provided for Canada, Australia or New Zealand.[9]

Children

[edit]

In 2016/17, the proportion of children living in a single-parent household varied between 6% and 28% in the different OECD countries, with an OECD country average of 17%. It was lowest in Turkey (2015, 6%), Greece (8%), Croatia (8%) and Poland (10%), while it was highest in France (23%), United Kingdom (23%), Belgium (25%), Lithuania (25%), United States (27%) and Latvia (28%). It was 19% in Ireland and Canada.[11]

Among children living in a single-parent household, most live primarily with their mother, others primarily with their father, while other children have a shared parenting arrangement where they spend an approximately equal amount of time with their two parents. Among those living primarily with one single parent, most live with their mother. In 2016 (or latest year available), the proportion of 6-12 year olds living primarily with their single father ranged between 5% and 36% among the different OECD countries. It was highest in Belgium (17%), Iceland (19%), Slovenia (20%), France (22%), Norway (23%) and Sweden (36%), while it was lowest in Lithuania (4%), Ireland (5%), Poland (5%), Estonia (7%), Austria (7%) and the United Kingdom (8%). It was 15% in the United States.[12]

In 2005/06, the proportion of 11- to 15-year-old children living in a shared parenting arrangement versus with only one of their parents varied between 1% and 17%, being the highest in Sweden. It was 5% in Ireland and the United States, and 7% in Canada and the United Kingdom.[13] By 2016/17, the percentage in Sweden had increased to 28%.[14]

Impact on parents

[edit]

Over 9.5 million American families are run by one woman. Single mothers are likely to have mental health issues, financial hardships, live in a low income area, and receive low levels of social support. All of these factors are taken into consideration when evaluating the mental health of single mothers. The occurrence of moderate to severe mental disability was more pronounced among single mothers at 28.7% compared to partnered mothers at 15.7%.[15] These mental disabilities include but are not limited to anxiety and depression. Financial hardships also affect the mental health of single mothers. Women, ages 15–24, were more likely to live in a low socio-economic area, have one child, and not to have completed their senior year of high school. These women reported to be in the two lowest income areas, and their mental health was much poorer than those in higher income areas.[15]

A similar study on the mental health of single mothers attempted to answer the question, "Are there differences in the prevalence of psychiatric disorders, between married, never-married, and separated/divorced mothers?" Statistically, never married, and separated/divorced mothers had the highest regularities of drug abuse, personality disorder and PTSD.[16] The family structure can become a trigger for mental health issues in single mothers. They are especially at risk for having higher levels of depressive symptoms.[17]

Studies from the 1970s showed that single mothers who are not financially stable are more likely to experience depression.[18] In a more current study it was proven that financial strain was directly correlated with high levels of depression.[18] Among low-income single mothers, depressive symptoms may be as high as 60%.[19]

Inadequate access to mental health care services is prevalent amongst impoverished women. Low-income women are less likely to receive mental health care for numerous reasons. Mental health services remain inequitable for low-income, more so, low-income single women are more likely to suffer from depression, anxiety, and other poor mental health outcomes. Researchers Copeland and Snyder (2011) addressed the barriers low-income single mothers have on receiving mental health care, "Visible barriers often include the lack of community resources, transportation, child care, convenient hours, and financial resources." Meanwhile, low-income single mothers are more likely to bring their children in for mental health treatment than themselves. Researchers Copeland and Snyder analyzed sixty-four African American mothers who brought their children in for mental health treatment. These mothers were then screened for mild, moderate, and severe depression and/or anxiety. After three months the researchers used an ethnographic interview to address whether or not the participants used mental health services that were referred to them. Results indicated that the majority of the participants did not use the referred mental health care services for reasons that included: fear of losing their children, being hospitalized and/or stigmatized by their community counterparts.[20]

Impact on children

[edit]

According to David Blankenhorn,[21] Patrick Fagan,[22] Mitch Pearlstein[23] David Popenoe[24] and Barbara Dafoe Whitehead,[25] living in a single parent family is strongly correlated with school failure and problems of delinquency, drug use, teenage pregnancies, poverty, and welfare dependency in the United States. Using multilevel modelling, Suet-Ling Pong has shown that a high proportion of American children from single parent families perform poorly on mathematics and reading achievement tests.[26][27]

In Sweden, Emma Fransson et al. have shown that children living with one single parent have worse well-being in terms of physical health behavior, mental health, peer friendships, bullying, cultural activities, sports, and family relationships, compared to children from intact families. As a contrast, children in a shared parenting arrangement that live approximately equal amount of time with their divorced mother and father have about the same well-being as children from intact families and better outcomes than children with only one custodial parent.[28]

The United Kingdom Office for National Statistics has reported that children of single parents, after controlling for other variables like family income, are more likely to have problems, including being twice as likely to suffer from mental illness.[29] Both British and American researchers show that children with no fathers are three times more likely to be unhappy, and are also more likely to engage in anti-social behavior, abuse substances and engage in juvenile deliquency.[30][31]

Causes of single-parenthood

[edit]

Widowed parents

[edit]

Historically, death of a partner was a common cause of single parenting. Diseases and maternal death not infrequently resulted in a widower or widow responsible for children. At certain times wars might also deprive significant numbers of families of a parent. Improvements in sanitation and maternal care have decreased mortality for those of reproductive age, making death a less common cause of single parenting.

Divorced parents

[edit]
See also: Effects of divorce

Child custody in reference to divorce refers to which parent is allowed to make important decisions about the children involved. Physical custody refers to which parent the child lives with. Among divorced parents, "parallel parenting" refers to parenting after divorce in which each parent does so independently; this is most common.[32] In comparison, cooperative parenting occurs when the parents involved in the child's life work together around all involved parties' schedules and activities, and this is far less common. After a certain "crisis period," most children resume normal development; however, their future relationships are often affected, as they lack a model upon which to base a healthy long-term relationship. Nonetheless, as adults children of divorcees cope better with change.[33][34][35]

Keeping in touch with both parents and having a healthy relationship with both mother and father appears to have the most effect on a child's behavior; which leads to an easier time coping with the divorce as well as development through the child's life.[36] Children will do better with their parents divorce if they have a smooth adjustment period. One way to make this adjustment easier on children is to let them "remain in the same neighborhoods and schools following divorce."[37]

Unintended pregnancy

[edit]
Main article: Unintended pregnancy

Many out-of-wedlock births are unintentional. Out-of-wedlock births are frequently not acceptable to society, and they often result in single parenting. A partner may also leave as he or she may want to shirk responsibility of bringing up the child. This also may harm the child.[38] Where they are not acceptable, they sometimes result in forced marriage, however such marriages fail more often than others.[citation needed]

In the United States, the rate of unintended pregnancy is higher among unmarried couples than among married ones. In 1990, 73% of births to unmarried women were unintended at the time of conception, compared to about 57% of births overall (1987 data).[39]

Mothers with unintended pregnancies, and their children, are subject to numerous adverse health effects, including increased risk of violence and death, and the children are less likely to succeed in school and are more likely to live in poverty and be involved in crime.[citation needed]

"Fragile families" are usually caused by an unintended pregnancy out of wedlock. Usually in this situation the father is not completely in the picture and the relationship between the mother, father, and child is consistently unstable. As well as instability, "fragile families" are often limited in resources such as human capital and money. The kids that come from these families are more likely to be hindered within school and don't succeed[clarification needed] as well as kids who have strictly single parents or two parent homes.[40] Usually within these families the father plans to stick around and help raise the child but once the child is born the fathers do not stay for much longer and only one third stay after five years of the child's birth.[41] Most of these fragile families come from low economic status to begin with and the cycle appears to continue; once the child grows up they are just as likely to still be poor.[42] Most fragile families end with the mother becoming a single parent, leaving it even more difficult to come out of the poverty cycle. The gender of the baby seems to have no effect if the father is not living with the mother at the time of the birth, meaning they are still likely to leave after one year of the child's birth. Yet there is some evidence that suggests that if the father is living with the mother at the time of the birth he is more likely to stay after one year if the child is a son rather than a daughter.[43]

Choice

[edit]

Some women use artificial insemination to become single mothers by choice.[44] Others choose to adopt. Men may also choose to become single fathers through adoption or surrogacy.[45]

Adoption

[edit]
A single mother and child

Single parent adoptions are controversial. They are, however, still preferred over divorcees, as divorced parents are considered an unnecessary stress on the child.[46] In one study, the interviewers asked children questions about their new lifestyle in a single-parent home. The interviewer found that when asked about fears, a high proportion of children feared illness or injury to the parent. When asked about happiness, half of the children talked about outings with their single adoptive parent.[47] A single person wanting to adopt a child has to be mindful of the challenges they may face, and there are certain agencies that will not work with single adoptive parents at all. Single parents will typically only have their own income to live off of, and thus might not have a backup plan for potential children in case something happens to them.[48] Traveling is also made more complex, as the child must either be left in someone else's care, or taken along.[49]

By country

[edit]

Australia

[edit]

In 2003, 14% of all Australian households were single-parent families.[50] In Australia 2011, out of all families 15.9% were single parent families. Out of these families 17.6% of the single parents were males, whilst 82.4% were females.[51]

Single people are eligible to apply for adoption in all states of Australia, except for Queensland and South Australia. They are able to apply for adoption both to Australian born and international born children, although not many other countries allow single parent adoptions.[52]

Single parents in Australia are eligible for support payments from the government, but only if they are caring for at least one child under the age of eight.[53]

India

[edit]

The Supreme Court of India and various High Courts of India have recognized the rights of single mothers to give birth and raise children.[54][55] The High Court of Kerala, has declared in a case argued by Advocate Aruna A. that, the birth registration authorities cannot insist on the details of the father for registration of birth of a child born to a single mother, conceived through IVF.[56][57] The Delhi High Court has held that "mother’s name is sufficient in certain cases like the present one to apply for passport, especially as a single woman can be a natural guardian and also a parent".[58] Considering these socio-legal transformations, a study suggested that despite facing numerous challenges, single mothers who are raising their children with little support from the families, society or state are challenging the dominant male breadwinner and provider model while redefining the heteronormative model of parenting.[59]

New Zealand

[edit]

At the 2013 census, 17.8% of New Zealand families were single-parent, of which five-sixths were headed by a female. Single-parent families in New Zealand have fewer children than two-parent families; 56% of single-parent families have only one child and 29% have two children, compared to 38% and 40% respectively for two-parent families.[60]

Sierra Leone

[edit]

In Sierra Leone, a 1994 study observed that it was socially acceptable for unmarried single Mende women to have children due to the social stigma of being a woman with no children.[61]

South Africa

[edit]

In South Africa, the number of single-parent households has risen in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries due to a variety of factors, including the HIV/AIDs epidemic, increasing economic migration within the country, and the social changes brought about by colonialism and apartheid. As of 2012, 39% of children living in South Africa lived with their biological mother and not their father, and 4% lived with their biological father but not their mother.[62] In South African academic literature, single mothers are studied as a part of the "female headed household" demographic.[63] Colloquially, the term "single-parent household" or "single mother" is more widely used.[64] The perception of single mothers within South African society varies depending on the cause of their situation. Women whose husbands died are not typically judged in the same way as divorced, separated, or unmarried women.[65] Within South African media, the idea that unmarried women may seek to become pregnant in order to access child benefits is a common one.[66] To avoid social stigma, the families of unmarried women with children will often raise the child(ren) as their own.[62] It is especially common for the child to be raised as a sibling of their mother.[67] However, this is not the case when the child has a disability. A 2023 study found that South African women who gave birth to children with disabilities were often rejected and left by their partners, their partner's family, and their own family. This is due to stigma disabilities have carried in South African society and the blame placed upon the women for having a child with a disability.[68]

United Kingdom

[edit]

In the United Kingdom, about 1 out of 4 families with dependent children are single-parent families, 8 to 11 percent of which have a male single-parent.[69][70][71] UK poverty figures show that 52% of single parent families are below the Government-defined poverty line (after housing costs).[72] Single parents in the UK are almost twice as likely to be in low-paid jobs as other workers (39% of working single parents compared with 21% of working people nationally). This is highlighted in a report published by Gingerbread, funded by Trust for London and Barrow Cadbury Trust.[73]

United States

[edit]
Main article: Single parents in the United States
See also: Family structure in the United States

In the United States, since the 1960s, there has been a marked increase in the number of children living with a single parent. The jump was caused by an increase in births to unmarried women and by the increasing prevalence of divorces among couples. In 2010, 40.7% of births in the US were to unmarried women.[74] In 2000, 11% of children were living with parents who had never been married, 15.6% of children lived with a divorced parent, and 1.2% lived with a parent who was widowed.[75][76] The results of the 2010 United States census showed that 27% of children live with one parent, consistent with the emerging trend noted in 2000.[77] The most recent data of December 2011 shows approximately 13.7 million single parents in the U.S.[78] Mississippi leads the nation with the highest percent of births to unmarried mothers with 54% in 2014, followed by Louisiana, New Mexico, Florida and South Carolina.[79]

In 2006, 12.9 million families in the US were headed by a single parent, 80% of which were headed by a woman.[80][81] Single-parent households are on average much poorer, a pattern largely explained by the lack of a second source of income in the home itself.[82]

According to a 2016 report from the United States Census Bureau, the percentage of children living in families with two parents decreased from 88 to 69 between 1960 and 2016. Of those 50.7 million children living in families with two parents, 47.7 million live with two married parents and 3.0 million live with two unmarried parents.[83] The percentage of children living with single parents increased substantially in the United States during the second half of the 20th century. According to a 2013 Child Trends study, only 9% of children lived with single parents in the 1960s—a figure that increased to 28% in 2012.[84] Single parent households became more common after legislation allowing no fault divorce.[85]

Zimbabwe

[edit]

Historically Zimbabwe has had a tradition of polygamy, and so a second or third wife might run a household and take care of their children as a lone parent.[86] In contrast to Western societies, financial support for single parents (especially single mothers) typically comes from extended family support systems.[87]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Single parent

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A single parent is an individual who cares for one or more dependent children without the co-residence or support of a or live-in partner, often resulting from , widowhood, separation, or non-marital birth. In the United States, single-parent households represent a significant structure, with approximately 27% of children under age 18 living in such arrangements in 2022, including 22% with their only and 5% with their father only; the U.S. exhibits the highest rate of children in single-parent homes globally. These households are disproportionately headed by mothers, comprising about 80% of cases, and have risen notably since the mid-20th century due to factors including declining rates and increased out-of-wedlock births. Single-parent families confront substantial economic hardships, with poverty rates for single-mother households reaching 28% in 2022—over five times higher than for married-couple families—and persistent challenges in , time for , and dual-role burdens on the . Empirical research consistently links this structure to adverse outcomes, including lower , elevated risks of such as depression and , and increased behavioral problems, even after controlling for socioeconomic factors, underscoring the causal role of absent and stability.

Definition and Types

Core Definition

A single parent is an individual who maintains a with one or more dependent children in the absence of a cohabiting , domestic partner, or the other biological or adoptive , bearing primary responsibility for their upbringing, financial support, and daily care. This structure arises from circumstances such as , widowhood, separation, or nonmarital births, distinguishing it from two-parent s where child-rearing duties are typically shared. Single parents may receive intermittent support from the absent via custody arrangements or payments, but the household operates with one adult as the central figure. In empirical terms, single-parent families are characterized by the parent's sole or predominant role in and , often leading to heightened demands on time, income, and compared to dual-parent setups. Data from the U.S. Census Bureau indicate that such households numbered 9.8 million in 2023, comprising 7.3 million mother-only families and 2.5 million father-only families, representing a substantial share of units raising minors. Approximately 27% of U.S. children under age 18 resided in single-parent homes in 2022, with 22% living with mothers only and 5% with fathers only, underscoring the prevalence of maternal-led arrangements. The core feature of single parenthood lies in the absence of routine dual-adult , which first-principles suggests imposes asymmetric burdens on the resident parent, particularly in areas like , , and , as evidenced by patterns of elevated rates (37% for single-mother families versus 6.8% for married-parent families). While single fathers represent a minority—about 18% of one-parent households—they often exhibit higher median incomes than single mothers, reflecting differences in employment patterns and prior marital histories. This definitional framework emphasizes verifiable composition over subjective self-identification, aligning with methodologies that count coresident members.

Distinctions from Other Family Structures

Single-parent households are structurally defined by the presence of one adult caregiver responsible for the upbringing of dependent children, in contrast to nuclear families, which consist of two cohabiting biological parents sharing parental duties, financial provision, and household management. This unary structure in single-parent families eliminates the division of labor inherent in two-parent arrangements, where one parent may specialize in breadwinning while the other focuses on direct childcare, resulting in potential efficiencies in time allocation and resource pooling. Consequently, single parents often allocate a disproportionate share of their time to both employment and parenting, with studies indicating reduced parental investment in child-specific activities compared to dual-parent setups. Economically, single-parent families exhibit markedly lower stability and higher exposure than intact two-parent families; for example, children in single-mother households are approximately twice as likely to live below the poverty line, driven by reliance on a single stream and limited access to spousal support networks. This disparity contributes to reduced intergenerational mobility, as evidenced by longitudinal data showing children from single-parent homes achieving lower adult earnings and wealth accumulation relative to peers from stable two-parent environments, even after adjusting for baseline . In terms of outcomes, meta-analyses reveal that youth in single-parent families underperform on average in cognitive and educational metrics, scoring 0.2 to 0.5 standard deviations lower in achievement tests than those in two-biological-parent households, with effects persisting across diverse samples. Behavioral indicators, such as delinquency and , also show elevated risks—up to 50% higher incidence rates—in single-parent settings, attributable in part to diminished parental monitoring and modeling of cooperative gender roles absent in nuclear structures. While confounders like preexisting family conflict or selection into single parenthood explain some variance, causal estimates from fixed-effects models affirm that the absence of a second resident parent independently correlates with these deficits, underscoring the functional advantages of dual-parent complementarity over solo provisioning. Compared to blended families, which incorporate stepparents into the household, single-parent structures lack the additional adult authority figure, leading to comparable or heightened vulnerabilities in and resource distribution; research indicates that in stable nuclear families surpasses both single-parent and blended variants by 10-20% in standardized metrics. arrangements, by contrast, may embed single parents within multigenerational kin networks providing auxiliary support, mitigating some isolation effects not inherent in isolated nuclear units but often absent in modern single-parent isolates.

Single Mothers vs. Single Fathers

In the United States, single-mother households significantly outnumber single-father households, comprising approximately 80% of all single-parent families as of 2023, with 7.3 million mother-only households compared to 2.5 million father-only households. This disparity arises from factors including higher rates of maternal custody awards in proceedings and greater prevalence of nonmarital births to unmarried mothers. Single fathers are more likely to gain custody when mothers are deemed unfit or absent, often involving higher socioeconomic stability among custodial fathers. Economically, single mothers face greater challenges than single fathers, with median annual incomes for single mothers lagging $17,000 behind those of single fathers, largely due to gaps, patterns, and reliance on lower-paying sectors. Poverty rates reflect this: single-mother families experience at rates up to five times higher than two-parent families and substantially exceed those of single-father families, where only 24% live at or below the poverty line compared to much higher figures for mothers. Single fathers often maintain higher rates and incomes, enabling better resource allocation for child-rearing, though both groups lag behind married-parent households. Child outcomes differ markedly between the two, with peer-reviewed studies indicating children in single-father households generally fare better across metrics like , behavioral adjustment, and emotional health compared to those in single-mother households. For instance, children raised by single mothers show elevated risks of poorer school performance, social-emotional difficulties, and deviant behaviors, including higher incidences of and criminality, whereas single-father-led children exhibit outcomes closer to those in intact families. These disparities persist even after controlling for , suggesting causal influences from parental roles, stability, and selection effects—such as single fathers often being more resourced and positively engaged in than single mothers. Some research notes single mothers may display less anger and more joy in interactions, but aggregate data prioritizes broader longitudinal outcomes favoring single-father arrangements.
MetricSingle MothersSingle Fathers
Poverty Rate (approx.)30-40% higher than two-parent~24%
Child Behavioral RisksElevated (e.g., 5-14x higher for , )Lower, akin to intact families
Median Income Gap$17,000 less than single fathersHigher due to /

Historical Context

Pre-20th Century Norms

Prior to the , single parenthood in Western societies arose mainly from widowhood, driven by high adult mortality from infectious diseases, occupational hazards, and limited medical care, rather than from or nonmarital births. In the United States, historical analyses of data indicate that single-parent households accounted for approximately 7-9% of those with children in the late , with widowhood comprising 77% of single-mother cases and 83% of single-father cases by 1900—a pattern consistent with earlier decades given stable demographic pressures. contributed negligibly, affecting only about 2% of single-parent children, as legal barriers required legislative acts or fault-based proofs in most jurisdictions, yielding rates under 0.1 per 1,000 population. Nonmarital births were similarly marginal at 3.4% of single-parent cases overall, though higher among families at 11.4%, reflecting patterns of economic migration and urban instability rather than cultural norms. Social norms in and emphasized marital stability and legitimate progeny as foundational to , community, and inheritance systems, rendering alternative arrangements exceptional and often precarious. Illegitimacy rates hovered below 5% in countries like and during the mid-19th century, rising modestly to 5-10% in urbanizing areas by century's end, but carried profound stigma that equated unwed motherhood with moral failure and risks, frequently leading to , foundling hospital placements, or covert adoptions. Widows, while pitied, retained some legal protections such as dower rights to spousal property in common-law traditions, but faced economic vulnerability; remarriage within a year was common, with widowhood durations averaging 15-18 years only for those who outlived peers without re-partnering. Extended kin networks or communal charity supplemented nuclear remnants, as isolated single parenting clashed with agrarian economies requiring dual labor for subsistence farming or crafts. These norms reinforced causal linkages between intact families and societal order, viewing single parenthood—barring widowhood—as disruptive to paternal authority and child-rearing efficacy, with empirical outcomes like higher and among illegitimate offspring underscoring the preference for two-parent structures. In pre-industrial contexts, household composition data from records show single parents rarely heading independent units, instead integrating into multigenerational setups to pool resources and labor, a pragmatic absent in modern welfare-supported isolation. This era's low dissolution rates, under 5% of unions ending outside , stemmed from religious doctrines, community enforcement, and , prioritizing lineage continuity over individual .

Post-WWII Shifts and the Rise in Prevalence

Following , single-parent households remained relatively rare in Western nations, comprising approximately 7-9% of families with children during the , amid the era characterized by high marriage rates, low , and cultural emphasis on nuclear families. In , similar patterns prevailed, with nuclear family structures dominant and divorce rates under 1 per 1,000 population in countries like the and until the mid-1960s. This stability reflected economic prosperity, reduced male mortality from war, and social norms prioritizing marital stability and early marriage, which kept nonmarital births below 5% in the and most European nations. The late 1960s marked a sharp divergence, driven by legal, cultural, and technological changes that facilitated marital dissolution and nonmarital childbearing. laws, first enacted in in 1969 and adopted nationwide by the mid-1970s, correlated with a tripling of divorce rates from 2.2 per 1,000 in 1960 to 5.2 per 1,000 by 1980, accounting for much of the initial surge in single parenthood. Concurrently, the introduction of oral contraceptives in 1960 and shifting norms from the reduced stigma around , elevating nonmarital birth shares from 5% in 1960 to 18% by 1980 in the , with single mothers heading an increasing proportion of these families. In , comparable trends emerged, with rates rising fourfold in Western countries by the 1980s and preceding more separations, leading to single-parent prevalence climbing to 10-15% of households with children by 1990. By the 1990s, single-parent families had become markedly more common, representing 25% of children living in such arrangements in 1994, up from 11% in 1970, with the majority headed by mothers due to custody patterns favoring women post-. Factors like declining fertility rates and women's increased labor force participation enabled more independent households, though this rise disproportionately affected lower-income and less-educated groups, as marriage rates among college-educated women held steadier. In the , lone-parent rates varied but averaged 10-20% by the early 2000s, reflecting sustained high and nonmarital birth trends, though policy responses like welfare expansions in some nations may have further influenced formation decisions. Overall, these shifts transformed single parenthood from a marginal status—often tied to widowhood—to a prevalent family form, comprising over 20% of households with dependent children in the by 1988.

Causes of Single Parenthood

Widowhood

Widowhood results in single parenthood when the of a leaves the surviving responsible for dependent children under 18. This transition often imposes immediate emotional, financial, and logistical burdens, as the deceased partner's and support vanish abruptly, unlike gradual marital breakdowns. In historical contexts, particularly prior to the , widowhood dominated as the leading cause of single-parent households due to higher mortality rates from , , and limited medical interventions; for instance, in , widows and widowers comprised over three-fourths of single parents in the United States. Advances in healthcare, sanitation, and have sharply reduced widowhood's role in single parenthood, shifting prevalence toward and nonmarital births. In the contemporary , widowed individuals represent a minor fraction of single parents; data indicate that among single mothers, approximately 51% have never married and 29% are , with the balance including separated or widowed cases, though widowed status accounts for only about 1.7% overall. This low figure stems partly from the typical age of widowhood—around 59 years—by which time most children have reached adulthood, minimizing households with minors. Globally, widowhood's contribution remains higher in regions with elevated mortality, such as parts of and , where it affects millions of mothers, but even there, it constitutes under 4% of single-parent cases in aggregated data. In developed nations, remarriage rates among young widows with children further limit persistent single parenthood, though cultural and economic barriers can prolong it. Overall, widowhood's causal impact has waned as societal longevity outpaces other family disruptions.

Divorce and Marital Dissolution

Divorce constitutes a major cause of single parenthood, particularly in Western nations where legal and cultural shifts have facilitated marital dissolution. , nearly one-third of children experience parental before adulthood, frequently leading to single-mother households due to prevailing custody patterns. This annually transitions over one million children into single-parent arrangements in the alone. Among single mothers, approximately 28 percent are divorced, underscoring 's role relative to other factors like nonmarital births. Gender dynamics amplify divorce's contribution to single motherhood. Women initiate about 69 percent of divorces in heterosexual marriages, often citing unmet emotional needs or , while men initiate 31 percent. Custody awards favor mothers in roughly 90 percent of cases involving children, with 79.9 percent of custodial parents being female. Single fathers, by contrast, derive a higher proportion of their status from or separation rather than never-married parenthood, though they head far fewer households overall. The surge in divorce rates followed the adoption of laws, starting with in 1969 and spreading nationwide by the mid-1970s, which eliminated requirements to prove fault like or abuse. divorce rates doubled from the to peak around 1980 at 5.2 per 1,000 population, correlating with the proportion of children in divorced or separated single-parent homes rising from under 2 percent pre-1950 to over 25 percent by 2023. Similar trends occurred across , where crude divorce rates climbed from 0.8 per 1,000 in 1964 to 2.0 by 2023, though recent data show stabilization or declines amid later marriages and cultural shifts. Despite falling rates— at 2.5 per 1,000 in 2021—the cumulative effect sustains single parenthood levels, with marital dissolution accounting for a declining but persistent share amid rising nonmarital childbearing.

Nonmarital Births and Unintended Pregnancies

In the United States, nonmarital births have become a primary driver of single motherhood, with approximately 40% of all live births in 2023 occurring to unmarried women, totaling 1,440,031 such births. This rate reflects a stabilization after decades of increase, from 5% in 1960 to over 40% by the 2010s, often resulting in single-parent households when paternal involvement does not lead to marriage or sustained cohabitation. Empirical data indicate that nonmarital births are disproportionately linked to single parenthood because cohabiting unions at the time of birth dissolve at higher rates than marriages, leaving mothers as primary caregivers in about 50% of cases within five years. Unintended pregnancies exacerbate this pathway, as they are more likely to occur outside and contribute to unstable family formation. In the U.S., unintended pregnancies accounted for roughly 43% of all pregnancies among women aged 15-44 as of the most recent estimates around 2013-2015, with rates declining modestly to 35.7 per 1,000 women by due to improved contraceptive access but remaining elevated among lower-income and less-educated groups. These pregnancies often result in births to single mothers because they frequently arise from casual relationships lacking commitment, and the absence of planning correlates with lower paternal investment; studies show unintended births are twice as likely to be nonmarital compared to intended ones, directly increasing single-parent prevalence. Globally, nonmarital birth trends mirror this causal pattern, with the share averaging 42% across countries in recent data, driven by declining rates and rising premarital conceptions that do not transition to wedlock. In regions like and , unintended pregnancies—estimated at 40-50% of total pregnancies—further propel single parenthood by occurring in contexts of socioeconomic instability, where cultural norms tolerate nonmarital childbearing but economic pressures hinder dual-parent stability. Causal analyses confirm that unintended status independently predicts single motherhood through mechanisms like reduced relationship quality and higher risks, independent of socioeconomic confounders.

Deliberate Choice and Cultural Factors

A growing phenomenon within single parenthood involves women deliberately opting to conceive or adopt without a committed partner, often termed "single mothers by choice." This approach typically relies on assisted reproductive technologies such as donor insemination, in vitro fertilization with donor sperm, or , primarily among educated, higher-income women who prioritize career and personal autonomy over traditional partnership. Since the 1980s, the practice has expanded, with surveys of users showing that more than half of customers in some programs are single women pursuing this path, most aged 36 to 45 and intending to parent solo. In the United States, this deliberate subset contributes to the broader rise in nonmarital births, which reached 40% of all U.S. births by , though exact proportions of choice-based versus unintended cases vary, with choice more prevalent among older, professional demographics. Self-reports from single mothers by choice indicate high levels of fulfillment, profound love for their children, and minimal regrets, with the most common regret being delaying the decision to become a mother. Challenges such as financial strain, sole responsibility, and occasional loneliness are acknowledged, but overall satisfaction remains high, with emphasis on deep emotional bonds and empowerment through motherhood, as documented in qualitative studies and community accounts. Cultural factors have normalized and incentivized such choices by eroding traditional marital norms and elevating individual fulfillment. Post-1960s shifts, including the and widespread adoption of laws starting in in 1969, diminished the social and legal pressures to marry before childbearing, fostering a view of as optional rather than essential for family formation. Feminist movements emphasized women's and , framing single motherhood as an empowering alternative to potentially unfulfilling partnerships, though empirical data on long-term satisfaction remains mixed and often self-reported by participants. Media portrayals and policy expansions, such as expanded access to fertility services and welfare supports, further reduced stigma, with 78% of Americans in a 2023 Pew Research Center survey deeming single parenting socially acceptable—a marker of broadened tolerance despite rising public concerns over child outcomes. These factors interact causally: women's rising labor force participation, from 34% in to over 57% by 2023, enabled economic viability for solo , while declining rates—down to 50% of adults in 2019 from 72% in 1960—created a demographic pool more inclined toward non-partnered reproduction. However, source analyses from academic and think-tank studies reveal potential underreporting of relational regrets among choosers, as self-selection in surveys favors positive narratives, underscoring the need for longitudinal data over anecdotal endorsements.

Demographic Patterns

Globally, the prevalence of single-parent households shows significant variation, with women heading approximately 83-88% of such families worldwide. According to aggregated data from national censuses and surveys compiled by , the share of households consisting solely of a single parent and their children ranges from under 5% in many Asian countries to over 20% in parts of the and select African nations, with a global average for children under 18 living in such arrangements estimated at around 10-15% based on recent cross-national comparisons. A 2020 Gallup analysis of surveys across more than 140 countries found that 13% of women aged 18-60 are unmarried and living with at least one child under 15, underscoring the predominance of single motherhood. These figures reflect methodological differences in definitions (e.g., cohabiting vs. lone parents) and data collection, with underreporting common in regions where support masks nuclear single-parent structures. In , rates are among the highest globally, with 23% of U.S. children under 18 living with one parent in 2019—more than triple the average in other high-income countries—driven by elevated , nonmarital births, and incarceration patterns. reports similar trends, with about 20% of children in single-parent families as of recent data. exhibits comparably high prevalence, often exceeding 20% in countries like and , attributable to factors including early childbearing and marital instability amid economic pressures. European rates average around 14% across nations, with variations: Northern and Western Europe (e.g., at 17-20%, at 18%) show higher shares due to liberalized laws and declining rates post-1970s, while Southern and Eastern Europe maintain lower figures (e.g., and under 10%) linked to stronger cultural norms favoring two-parent structures and lower nonmarital fertility. In , prevalence remains low, typically 5-8% (e.g., at 6%, similar), reflecting persistent marriage-centric family models, low , and against nonmarital births, though may be slowly increasing rates in urban centers. Sub-Saharan Africa displays mixed patterns, with some nations like Kenya (12%) and Rwanda (11%) reporting elevated rates due to widowhood from conflict or disease, polygamous dissolutions, and migration, contrasting with lower averages elsewhere on the continent where extended kin networks often absorb single parents; overall, the region averages 10-12% for children in lone-parent setups. Trends indicate gradual increases in developed regions since the 1980s, correlated with secularization and women's economic independence, while stabilizing or fluctuating in developing areas influenced by mortality and cultural resilience.

Prevalence in Western Nations

In the United States, 25% of children under age 18 lived in single-parent households in 2023, up from 9% in 1960, with the vast majority headed by mothers. The U.S. Bureau reported 9.8 million one-parent households that year, comprising 7.3 million mother-only and 2.5 million father-only families. In the , single-parent families accounted for approximately 25% of all families with dependent children in 2023, totaling around 2 million such households. This equates to about 15% of all families being lone-parent, with the Office for National Statistics estimating just under 3 million single-parent households overall. Canada's prevalence stands at roughly 18% of children living with a single parent, based on data showing one-parent families as 18-20% of families with children under 15 in recent years. notes a decline in the share of one-parent families headed by mothers from 84.6% in 1981, though they remain predominant. In , one-parent families represented 16% of all families in 2025, or 14.7% in 2023, with 1.1-1.2 million such households; 18% of children aged 0-14 lived in one-parent families. Across the , single-parent households comprised 12.7% of households with children as of recent data, with national variations: higher rates in countries like the (around 24% of children) and lower in southern Europe, such as and (under 10%).
Country/RegionMetricPercentageYearSource
Children in single-parent households25%2023NIUSSP
United KingdomFamilies with dependent children headed by single parent25%2023Gingerbread
Children with single parent~18%2021Vanier Institute
Children aged 0-14 in one-parent families18%RecentAIFS
Households with children that are single-parent12.7%RecentEurostat

Variations by Socioeconomic and Racial Groups

In the , single parenthood rates exhibit pronounced variations by race and ethnicity, with children experiencing the highest prevalence. In 2023, 49.7% of children under age 18 lived in single-parent households, compared to 20.2% of non- White children, 42% of children, and 16% of Asian children. These disparities reflect longstanding patterns, as children have consistently shown single-parent living arrangements at rates two to three times higher than White children since the , driven primarily by elevated nonmarital birth rates and lower stability among families. Socioeconomic status also correlates strongly with single parenthood, with higher rates observed among lower-income and less-educated groups. Single-parent families are overrepresented in , comprising about 30% of such households below the federal level in 2022, versus only 6% of married-couple families. Women without degrees face single parenthood at rates exceeding those of graduates; for example, nonmarital childbearing, a key pathway to single motherhood, is far more common among high school graduates or dropouts than among those with bachelor's degrees or higher. This pattern holds even after for , as influences family formation decisions, with higher-educated individuals more likely to delay parenthood until . These racial and socioeconomic variations intersect, as minority groups disproportionately occupy lower socioeconomic strata, amplifying single-parent prevalence in those communities; however, racial differences in family structure persist independently of class, attributable to cultural and behavioral factors such as partner availability and norms around . For instance, among solo parents, 28% are despite comprising 13% of cohabiting parents, underscoring group-specific dynamics beyond economic hardship alone.

Challenges for Single Parents

Economic Hardships

Single-parent households encounter substantially higher rates than two-parent families, primarily due to reliance on a single amid comparable or higher living expenses for dependents. , the rate for single-mother families reached 24% in 2023, more than four times the 5% rate observed in married-couple families with children. Single-father families fared somewhat better, with a rate of 15%, yet still elevated relative to intact families. Across countries, the average rate for households consisting of a single adult and children stands at 29.3%, nearly three times the rate for couple-with-children households. Median household incomes underscore these disparities. In the U.S., single-mother families reported a of approximately $40,000 in recent data, contrasting sharply with $132,807 for married-parent families and $62,054 for single-father families. This gap persists despite high labor force participation, as 75% of single mothers are employed, though 18% work part-time—double the rate for single fathers—often due to childcare responsibilities. Childcare costs exacerbate financial strain, frequently consuming a disproportionate share of earnings; for many single parents, these expenses rival or exceed 20-30% of , limiting access to full-time work or higher-paying jobs. Employment barriers compound these issues, with single parents facing greater risks of job instability and from unpredictable childcare needs and lack of spousal support for household duties. Non-working single-parent families in nations exhibit poverty rates up to 68%, over three times higher than their employed counterparts, highlighting the critical role of consistent employment. Housing insecurity, food hardship, and delayed wealth accumulation further characterize these hardships, as single parents allocate limited resources across multiple needs without the buffering effect of dual earners. In Western contexts, these patterns contribute to intergenerational economic vulnerability, though targeted work supports can mitigate some risks.

Psychological and Time Management Strains

Single parents encounter heightened psychological distress, manifesting as elevated rates of depression, anxiety, and general stress compared to married parents. Single parents demonstrate significantly higher odds of depressive symptoms, with an odds ratio of 2.02 relative to partnered parents, based on meta-analytic evidence from multiple studies. Approximately 30% of single mothers report depressive or anxiety symptoms, alongside 37% experiencing general stress—rates approximately twice those among married mothers. These outcomes stem from the absence of spousal emotional and practical support, fostering isolation, low , and emotional tension, as documented in psychosocial assessments of single motherhood. Parental burnout, characterized by exhaustion and detachment from parenting roles, is more prevalent among single parents, correlating with their solo responsibility for child-rearing demands. Single parents report higher stress (26% vs. 16% for partnered parents), often intensified by financial pressures and lack of shared , though causation involves both selection effects and the causal burden of unshared loads. Longitudinal data link this overload to persistent strains, including increased service utilization for affective disorders. Time management strains arise from the necessity to fulfill multiple roles—provider, , and homemaker—without division of labor, leading to role overload and perceived . Single parents exhibit greater time deficiencies across occupational and personal domains, with empirical time-use analyses revealing inefficiencies in allocating hours for work, childcare, and . Maintaining consistent daily routines for children proves particularly challenging, as focus group studies of single mothers highlight disruptions from solo coordination of schedules, obligations, and tasks. This overload frequently results in and , with 44% of single mothers averaging fewer than seven hours of nightly , per survey data, compared to lower rates among coupled parents. Such chronic sleep deficits, tied to nighttime childcare and work demands, amplify psychological and impair cognitive functioning, as evidenced by studies on maternal patterns. While some time-diary notes single mothers may log marginally more hours than married ones due to fewer spousal interactions, subjective reports consistently indicate heightened strain from unbuffered responsibilities, underscoring causal links to burnout over mere time allocation differences.

Impacts on Children

Short-Term Developmental Effects

Children raised in single-parent households face heightened risks of short-term developmental disruptions in infancy and , including emotional instability, insecure attachment, and behavioral dysregulation, relative to peers in two-parent families. These effects stem from factors such as reduced parental , elevated maternal stress, and the absence of dual caregiving inputs, which impair consistent responsive essential for secure bonding and emotional regulation. Longitudinal data indicate that single-parent children exhibit more frequent , sleep disturbances, separation anxiety, and feeding problems in the first three years, often linked to distress during transitions like or nonmarital birth. Attachment security, a foundational short-term , is compromised in single-mother families, with higher incidences of insecure or disorganized patterns due to limited paternal involvement and overburdened maternal resources. highlights that infants in these households experience disrupted proximity-seeking behaviors and impaired social reciprocity, as the lack of a father's distinct interactive style—characterized by and exploratory encouragement—hampers balanced socio-emotional . For instance, studies report that children aged 2-6 in single-parent settings display greater fear, confusion, and abandonment-related distress post-separation, alongside weaker modeling of interpersonal boundaries, contributing to early relational vulnerabilities. Early cognitive and health outcomes also reflect disadvantages, with single-mother births associated with increased preterm delivery (rates up to 10-15% higher) and low birth weight (<2500g), predisposing infants to developmental delays in motor skills and neurocognitive processing. Behavioral markers emerge quickly, including elevated aggression, submissiveness, and noncompliance, as single parents report higher psychological control to compensate for time constraints, fostering externalizing symptoms like defiance by preschool age. While socioeconomic hardship mediates some risks—poverty rates in single-parent families exceed 40% in many cohorts—these patterns persist after partial controls, underscoring family structure's causal role in resource dilution and stress amplification.

Long-Term Educational and Behavioral Outcomes

Children raised in single-parent households exhibit lower in longitudinal studies, including reduced high school completion rates and fewer years of schooling by early adulthood compared to peers from two-parent families. For instance, of U.S. data indicates that adolescents from single-parent families receive fewer years of by age 24, even after accounting for socioeconomic factors. Meta-analyses and cohort studies consistently show deficits in cognitive scores, academic motivation, and performance metrics, with single-parent children scoring below two-parent counterparts on standardized achievement tests. These gaps persist into higher education, where only about one-third of young adults from intact two-parent homes attain four-year degrees, a rate notably lower among single-parent-raised youth. Mechanisms linking single parenthood to educational shortfalls include higher , disruptive , and reduced parental involvement due to time and resource constraints, as evidenced in European and U.S. longitudinal data. Father specifically correlates with diminished academic outcomes, such as lower verbal ability at age 11, independent of maternal or in cohort comparisons spanning decades. While some research attributes disparities primarily to , studies controlling for affirm family structure's independent causal role, countering claims that economic factors fully explain the differences. Behaviorally, children from single-parent families face elevated risks of externalizing problems, including delinquency, , and aggression, with longitudinal evidence showing increased criminality from age 21 onward tied to prolonged exposure to single parenthood before age 16. heightens these risks, associating with higher adolescent delinquency rates—particularly when occurring later in childhood—and issues like depression and anxiety, as sibling comparison studies demonstrate effects beyond genetic or environmental confounds. Externalizing behaviors emerge early and compound over time, with single-mother households linked to poorer emotional regulation and social interactions in meta-analytic reviews. These outcomes underscore paternal involvement's protective role against antisocial trajectories, per analyses of juvenile offender data.

Intergenerational Transmission of Disadvantage

Children raised in single-parent households exhibit elevated risks of educational underachievement that persist into adulthood, contributing to reduced earning potential and across generations. Longitudinal analyses from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) reveal that individuals residing with a single mother at age 17 are significantly less likely to complete high school compared to those in two-parent families, even after accounting for family and parental education. Similarly, research utilizing the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) demonstrates that single motherhood serves as one of the strongest predictors of low intergenerational mobility in the United States, with children from such homes showing diminished upward economic movement relative to peers from intact families. These patterns hold after controlling for socioeconomic confounders, underscoring family structure's independent role in shaping formation. The propensity for single parenthood itself transmits intergenerationally, as daughters of single mothers display heightened likelihoods of early childbearing and nonmarital births. Studies indicate a robust between a mother's age at first birth and her daughter's, with women who experienced partial childhoods in one-parent homes more prone to premature , adolescent , and out-of-wedlock . NLSY data further confirm that children from single-parent or unstable backgrounds are more likely to enter single parenthood as adults, perpetuating cycles of partnership instability and multi-partnered that exacerbate class disparities. This transmission is evident in analyses of nonmarital childbearing cohorts, where maternal disruption predicts replicated patterns in offspring relationship formation and timing. Mechanisms driving this transmission include diminished , reduced access to networks fostering stability, and of family dissolution, though emphasizes causal impacts beyond mere socioeconomic selection. For instance, PSID and related cohort studies attribute poorer schooling completion and early parenthood among single-parent offspring to factors like absent paternal involvement and maternal time constraints, rather than inherited traits alone. persistence amplifies these effects, with single-mother households correlating with adult rates that hinder mobility, as documented in intergenerational mobility research controlling for baseline . While some academic narratives downplay structure in favor of alone, large-scale datasets like those from Chetty et al. affirm family stability's distinct contribution to breaking cycles.

Societal and Economic Implications

Broader Social Costs

Single-parent households contribute to elevated public welfare expenditures due to their disproportionate rates and reliance on government assistance programs. , single-parent families face rates around 28 percent, compared to lower figures for two-parent households, driving higher participation in programs such as SNAP and TANF. Children in these families are approximately six times more likely to experience than those in intact two-parent homes, amplifying intergenerational fiscal demands through sustained need for support, subsidies, and services. This structural dependency imposes annual costs on taxpayers estimated in the tens of billions for welfare targeted at single-parent units, though precise aggregates vary by program and exclude indirect economic drags like reduced tax revenues from lower workforce attachment. The association between single-parent upbringings and criminal involvement generates substantial societal costs via justice system burdens and victim harms. A systematic review of 48 empirical studies across multiple countries concluded that adolescents from single-parent families face an elevated risk of criminal offending, independent of some socioeconomic confounders. In U.S. cities, higher single-parenthood prevalence correlates with 118 percent greater violent crime rates and 255 percent higher homicide rates, per analysis of FBI data from 2020-2022. State-level patterns further reveal that a 10 percent rise in the share of children in single-parent homes typically yields measurably higher violent crime incidence, contributing to elevated spending on policing, courts, and incarceration—where each dollar in corrections generates roughly ten dollars in broader social costs, including family disruptions and lost productivity. These dynamics foster broader erosions in social cohesion and economic vitality, as and instability link to patterns of reduced trust and formation. With about 18.3 million U.S. children—roughly one in four—growing up without resident fathers as of 2022, the cumulative effects include perpetuated disadvantage cycles, where offspring of single parents show heightened propensities for early parenthood and welfare use, straining public resources over generations. Empirical cross-national data reinforce that such structures correlate with diminished societal outcomes in metrics like stability and , underscoring causal pathways from household dissolution to macro-level fiscal and security expenditures.

Influence of Welfare Policies on Family Formation

Welfare policies that provide targeted financial support to single-parent households, such as cash assistance, housing subsidies, and food aid, have been empirically linked to reduced incentives for and increased rates of nonmarital childbearing . Under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program, which expanded significantly from the onward, benefit levels were structured such that a low-income absent could reduce a mother's eligibility or payment amount, effectively penalizing or . Cross-state analyses from 1940 to 1990 indicate that a 10% increase in AFDC benefit generosity correlated with a 4-7% rise in unmarried fertility rates and greater likelihood of children living in single-mother households, independent of other socioeconomic factors. Econometric studies, including those employing natural experiments from policy variations, consistently find that higher welfare payments exert a negative effect on probabilities among low-income women, with elasticities suggesting a 10% benefit increase reducing rates by 1-5%. This dynamic arises from the implicit marginal tax on family formation: for instance, in the pre-1996 era, a single mother earning minimal could receive benefits exceeding what a two-parent might access, subsidizing separation or nonmarital births. While some research attributes part of the post-1960s surge in U.S. out-of-wedlock births—from under 5% in 1960 to over 40% by —to these incentives, critics note factors like cultural shifts, though time-series data controlling for demographics affirm a causal role for welfare design. The 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA), replacing AFDC with (TANF), introduced work requirements, time limits, and promotion elements to counteract these disincentives, leading to a 60% drop in caseloads by 2000 and modest upticks in among single mothers. However, impacts on family structure were limited: evaluations of state waivers and TANF implementation show negligible overall changes in rates or , with some work mandates paradoxically increasing single parenthood among the lowest-income groups by straining two-parent coordination. Post-reform, nonmarital birth rates stabilized but did not reverse, suggesting entrenched behavioral responses to prior policy signals. Internationally, countries with more generous welfare regimes, such as those in , exhibit higher proportions of children born outside (over 50% in and as of 2020) and elevated single-parenthood rates compared to less supportive systems, though high rates mitigate some instability. Comparative analyses reveal no uniform inverse link between benefit levels and single-mother , but evidence points to welfare crowding out markets in low-skill populations across nations, with U.S.-style means-tested aid showing stronger disincentive effects than universal benefits. These patterns underscore how policy design—favoring solo parenthood over couple-based support—can alter family formation equilibria, though reforms emphasizing work and two-parent incentives yield only partial reversals.

Controversies and Empirical Debates

Claims of Functional Equivalence to Two-Parent Families

Some researchers and advocates have posited that single-parent families can achieve functional equivalence to two-parent families in child-rearing outcomes, attributing observed disparities primarily to socioeconomic confounders such as and parental rather than family structure per se. These claims often highlight variability within single-parent households, noting that supportive extended kin networks or high-quality can mitigate deficits, and cite public surveys where over 70% of respondents believe a single parent can perform as effectively as two. Empirical evidence from meta-analyses and longitudinal studies, however, consistently demonstrates that children in single-parent families face elevated risks of adverse outcomes independent of socioeconomic status, with family instability exerting causal effects through reduced parental investment, monitoring, and role specialization. Paul R. Amato's 1991 meta-analysis of 92 studies comparing children in divorced single-parent families to those in intact two-parent families found moderate effect sizes for poorer academic achievement (d = -0.26), conduct problems (d = 0.20), and psychological adjustment (d = -0.14), persisting after statistical controls for preexisting differences. An update incorporating 67 studies from the 1990s reaffirmed these patterns, showing no decline in structure-related deficits despite improved societal supports. Sara McLanahan's analyses of the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, tracking over 5,000 children born in large U.S. cities from 1998–2000, reveal that shifts from two-parent to single-parent arrangements correlate with deteriorations in cognitive, behavioral, and health metrics at ages 3 and 5, with effect sizes equivalent to one-third to one-half of the black-white gap in outcomes; these persist net of and income adjustments. Single-mother households, comprising the majority of single-parent cases, show heightened associations with adolescent , including doubled risks of depression, anxiety, and externalizing behaviors. Critiques of equivalence claims emphasize causal realism: while exacerbates risks, it does not fully explain them, as intact two-parent families buffer against similar stressors through models and resource pooling; experimental approximations, like comparisons, yield inferior results to biological two-parent benchmarks. Recent reviews confirm reductions in academic , , and performance among single-parent-raised , underscoring structure's role beyond confounds. These findings hold across cohorts, with no evidence of convergence toward equivalence over time.

Gender-Specific Outcomes and Father Absence

Research on , prevalent in single-mother households, reveals differential impacts on sons and daughters, with sons more susceptible to externalizing behaviors such as and delinquency, while daughters exhibit heightened risks of internalizing problems like depression and earlier sexual activity. Causal analyses, including comparisons and fixed-effects models, support these associations, attributing them partly to the lack of paternal and role modeling rather than solely socioeconomic confounders. For sons, correlates with increased delinquent behavior and suspensions. Longitudinal data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health indicate that boys in father-absent homes face a 0.183 higher likelihood of problems (p<0.05), linked to externalizing responses like , as evidenced in prospective studies tracking delinquency over nine years. These effects persist into , with meta-analyses of parental showing robust links to , where boys without fathers engage in more criminal acts compared to intact-family peers. Daughters of absent fathers, conversely, display elevated depressive trajectories, particularly if absence occurs in (birth to age 5), with birth cohort data showing females experiencing steeper symptom increases through mid-adolescence (beta difference 1.26 at age 16, p=0.002) that partially converge by young adulthood. Additionally, U.S. studies report earlier sexual debut among father-absent girls (mean age 15.5 years versus 17.0 for father-present, p<0.001), though this pattern is less consistent internationally and unrelated to timing. Mechanisms may involve disrupted relationships heightening stress reactivity in daughters (beta=0.29, p=0.037). While short-term behavioral divergences are pronounced, long-term shows no significant gender interaction from , with both genders facing reduced college graduation rates (boys: 18% absent vs. 34% present; girls: 24% vs. 42%). These patterns underscore paternal presence's role in mitigating gender-typical vulnerabilities, though selection effects like pre-existing instability warrant caution in inferring pure .

Policy Interventions vs. Cultural Incentives for Stability

Empirical analyses indicate that welfare policies, while intended to alleviate among single parents, often incorporate marriage penalties that reduce the financial incentive for or formal union, thereby sustaining or increasing single-parent household formation. For instance, higher welfare benefits have been associated with elevated rates of single motherhood and reduced transitions, as documented in multiple econometric studies reviewing U.S. data from the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) era. The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA), which replaced AFDC with (TANF) and imposed work requirements, correlated with a sharp decline in welfare caseloads from 31% to 7% among single mothers between 1993 and 2000, alongside modest increases in , but showed limited reversal in the overall trend of family fragmentation. These structural disincentives persist in contemporary programs, where benefits phase out upon , effectively penalizing two-parent stability. Government-sponsored marriage promotion initiatives, such as those under the Healthy Marriage and Responsible Fatherhood grants authorized by the Claims Resolution Act of 2010, have demonstrated modest efficacy in enhancing relationship quality but negligible impacts on long-term family formation rates. A 2018 evaluation of the Parents and Children Together (PACT) demonstration found that participation increased the probability of among unmarried couples by approximately 10 percentage points in the short term and improved dynamics, yet effects dissipated over time without broader systemic changes. Similarly, reviews of federally funded relationship programs for low-income groups report small gains in commitment among distressed married couples, averting some divorces, but fail to substantially elevate rates among non-married single parents or counteract selection biases in program uptake. Critics, including analyses of randomized trials, argue these interventions overlook deeper causal drivers like mismatched partner selection and economic instability, yielding cost-ineffective outcomes despite annual federal allocations exceeding $100 million. In contrast, cultural incentives rooted in normative disapproval of nonmarital childbearing historically constrained single parenthood rates, even amid economic adversity, as evidenced by U.S. trends prior to the . Out-of-wedlock birth rates stood at 3.1% for white infants and 24% for black infants in 1965, rising precipitously to 64% and higher by 1990 following the erosion of stigma through the , laws, and shifting media portrayals that normalized single motherhood. This surge persisted despite welfare expansions, suggesting cultural liberalization as the primary causal vector rather than material incentives alone; pre- social sanctions, including community and religious emphases on marital , maintained two-parent prevalence at levels above 90% of households. Cross-national comparisons reinforce the primacy of cultural factors over policy generosity in fostering stability. The exhibits the world's highest share of children in single-parent homes at 23% as of recent data, surpassing even high-welfare Nordic nations where cohabitation norms substitute for but yield comparable instability risks. In countries with robust familial collectivism, such as or , single-parent rates remain below 10% despite modest welfare states, attributable to entrenched values prioritizing intergenerational coresidence and marital permanence over individualistic autonomy. Generous transfers in mitigate single mothers' but do not consistently curb household formation, implying that policy buffers downstream effects without addressing upstream cultural dissolution; causal realism thus favors reinvigorating normative incentives—via education, media, and —to realign behaviors toward stable pairing, as top-down interventions alone prove insufficient against entrenched attitudinal shifts.

References

  1. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/family-dynamics/single-parent-family
  2. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/single-parent
  3. https://www.childstats.gov/americaschildren23/family1.asp
  4. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/12/12/u-s-children-more-likely-than-children-in-other-countries-to-live-with-just-one-parent/
  5. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/stories/single-parent-day.html
  6. https://www.americanprogress.org/press/release-the-economic-status-of-single-mothers/
  7. https://marriott.byu.edu/magazine/faculty-research/single-mothers-self-reliance
  8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4508674/
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5226056/
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9328442/
  11. https://datacenter.aecf.org/data/tables/106-children-in-single-parent-families
  12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2323136/
  13. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2022/americas-families-and-living-arrangements.html
  14. https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2023/demo/families/cps-2023.html
  15. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36626714/
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2930824/
  17. https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cdev.13342
  18. https://www.aecf.org/blog/child-well-being-in-single-parent-families
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4240051/
  20. https://cosm.aei.org/growing-up-in-intact-families-matters-more-than-ever/
  21. https://evidence2impact.psu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/s_wifis02report.pdf
  22. https://source.washu.edu/2005/02/school-achievement-higher-for-children-in-nuclear-families-than-for-children-in-blended-or-singleparent-families/
  23. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2020/01/why-single-parent-homes-affect-children-differently/
  24. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2013/07/02/the-rise-of-single-fathers/
  25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232984449_Comparison_of_Role_Demands_Relationships_and_Child_Functioning_in_Single-Mother_Single-Father_and_Intact_Families
  26. https://nyccounseling.com/2024/06/13-7-million-single-parents-in-the-u-s-are-raising-over-22-million-children/
  27. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/are-children-raised-with-absent-fathers-worse-off/
  28. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1756061616300957
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254368030_Comparison_of_Parenting_and_Children%27s_Behavior_in_Single-Mother_Single-Father_and_Intact_Families
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9368669/
  31. https://www.irp.wisc.edu/publications/dps/pdfs/dp91990.pdf
  32. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_21/sr21_024.pdf
  33. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01541861
  34. https://bigthink.com/strange-maps/births-out-of-wedlock-europe-us/
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3065932/
  36. https://www.irp.wisc.edu/publications/dps/pdfs/dp82287.pdf
  37. https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/family/Publications/mtcliquet.pdf
  38. https://www.finance.senate.gov/download/?id=A477EF54-427A-4F4E-A0AF-C466EA5F25D0
  39. https://academic.oup.com/book/58903/chapter/492909578/chapter-pdf/60524776/oso-9780199324323-appendix-1.pdf
  40. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2018/04/25/the-changing-profile-of-unmarried-parents/
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3928681/
  42. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs98/yi/yi11.pdf
  43. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/659870/IPOL_STU%282020%29659870_EN.pdf
  44. https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1990/03/art6full.pdf
  45. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07481187.2022.2048281
  46. https://online.csp.edu/resources/article/the-evolution-of-american-family-structure/
  47. https://sk.sagepub.com/ency/edvol/embed/the-social-history-of-the-american-family/chpt/singleparent-families
  48. https://www.jillgriefcounselor.com/blog/young-and-widowed-pbxaf
  49. https://makemothersmatter.org/widowed-mothers-mmm-calls-for-addressing-the-distinct-challenges-they-face/
  50. https://spacedoutscientist.com/2017/07/18/single-parents-worldwide-statistics-and-trends/
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9971110/
  52. https://www.niussp.org/family-and-households/americas-single-parent-households-and-missing-fathers/
  53. https://www2.census.gov/library/working-papers/2025/adrm/ces/CES-WP-25-28.pdf
  54. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3789&context=grp
  55. https://singlemotherguide.com/single-mother-statistics
  56. https://www.asanet.org/women-more-likely-men-initiate-divorces-not-non-marital-breakups/
  57. https://www.wf-lawyers.com/divorce-statistics-and-facts/
  58. https://ourworldindata.org/marriages-and-divorces
  59. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Marriage_and_divorce_statistics
  60. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/unmarried-childbearing.htm
  61. https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/republicans/2018/2/rising-unwed-pregnancy-and-childbearing-across-educational-and-racial-groups
  62. https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/dynamics-of-families-after-a-nonmarital-birth/
  63. https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/family-planning/reduce-proportion-unintended-pregnancies-fp-01
  64. https://www.cdc.gov/reproductive-health/hcp/unintended-pregnancy/index.html
  65. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK232137/
  66. https://webfs.oecd.org/els-com/Family_Database/SF_2_4_Share_births_outside_marriage.pdf
  67. https://archive-yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/out-wedlock-births-rise-worldwide
  68. https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-017-1223-x
  69. https://www.singlemothersbychoice.org/2022/07/22/single-mom-by-choice-statistics/
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8054653/
  71. https://www.npr.org/2023/10/22/1207322878/single-parent-married-good-for-children-inequality
  72. https://www.cryosinternational.com/en-gb/dk-shop/private/blog/becoming-a-single-mother-by-choice-the-complete-guide/
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4886836/
  74. https://www.singlemothersbychoice.org/
  75. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/growing-trend-women-single-parents-by-choice/
  76. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/03/11/rising-share-of-americans-see-women-raising-children-on-their-own-cohabitation-as-bad-for-society/
  77. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-of-single-parent-households
  78. https://news.gallup.com/poll/286433/women-worldwide-single-moms.aspx
  79. https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2020/2/experts-take-antra-bhatt-on-single-parent-households
  80. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/single-parent-rates-by-country
  81. https://www.educationnext.org/international-look-single-parent-family/
  82. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-of-children-living-with-a-single-parent
  83. https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20240404-single-parents-financial-security
  84. https://webfs.oecd.org/els-com/Family_Database/SF_1_2_Children_in_families.pdf
  85. https://www.gingerbread.org.uk/our-work/single-parents-facts-and-figures/
  86. https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2023-03-14/debates/2A21A4E5-5CE0-44C3-A40A-E173E2766881/Single-ParentFamilies
  87. https://vanierinstitute.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Families-count-2024-family-structure.pdf
  88. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/o1/en/plus/7523-despite-progress-one-parent-families-headed-mothers-continue-face-labour-market
  89. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/labour/employment-and-unemployment/labour-force-status-families/latest-release
  90. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/labour/employment-and-unemployment/labour-force-status-families/jun-2023
  91. https://aifs.gov.au/research/facts-and-figures/families-and-family-composition
  92. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Household_composition_statistics
  93. https://marriagefoundation.org.uk/research/uk-lone-parent-capital-of-western-europe/
  94. https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb//population/qa01202.asp?qaDate=2023
  95. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4850739/
  96. https://iwpr.org/single-mothers-with-college-degrees-much-less-likely-to-live-in-poverty/
  97. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-economic-status-of-single-mothers/
  98. https://iowastartingline.com/2024/08/07/new-data-shows-how-little-single-moms-make/
  99. https://webfs.oecd.org/els-com/Family_Database/CO_2_2_Child_Poverty.pdf
  100. https://datacenter.aecf.org/data/tables/10278-median-family-income-by-family-type
  101. https://vadogwood.com/2024/08/07/new-data-shows-how-little-single-moms-make/
  102. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2792579/
  103. https://shs.cairn.info/revue-regards-2024-1-page-47?lang=en
  104. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9716188/
  105. https://fredblog.stlouisfed.org/2024/09/single-parent-poverty/
  106. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11231931/
  107. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165032718307900
  108. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12910340/
  109. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-024-17829-y
  110. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10664807221104134
  111. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/14142992_Single_motherhood_and_mental_health_Implications_for_primary_prevention
  112. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10424026/
  113. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51541007_Single_Mothers%27_Views_of_Young_Children%27s_Everyday_Routines_A_Focus_Group_Study
  114. https://scispace.com/pdf/the-experience-of-single-mothers-resilience-in-their-2t9d7ypbo1.pdf
  115. https://www.medicaldaily.com/sleep-deprivation-affects-single-moms-worst-cdc-finds-50-single-parents-often-wake-368790
  116. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6747144/
  117. https://www.popcenter.umd.edu/research/selected_research/research_1520261526557
  118. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09731342231179017
  119. https://ifstudies.org/blog/research-on-mother-infant-attachment-should-guide-our-child-care-policies
  120. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/2/e043361
  121. https://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_8_Special_Issue_April_2013/26.pdf
  122. https://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2015/february/teens-from-single-parent-families-leave-school-earlier.html
  123. https://ifstudies.org/blog/for-getting-kids-through-college-single-parent-families-are-not-all-the-same
  124. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10502556.2017.1343558
  125. https://theconversation.com/having-a-single-parent-doesnt-determine-your-life-chances-the-data-shows-poverty-is-far-more-important-217841
  126. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/482426
  127. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306003580_Father_Absence_and_Adolescent_Depression_and_Delinquency_A_Comparison_of_Siblings_Approach
  128. https://www.irp.wisc.edu/publications/focus/pdfs/foc113c.pdf
  129. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5858195/
  130. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/228954
  131. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X00906975
  132. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0049089X05000153
  133. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2831755/
  134. https://thelifeofasinglemom.com/single-mom-statistics-the-truth-about-single-moms/
  135. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1068316X.2020.1774589
  136. https://ifstudies.org/ifs-admin/resources/reports/ifs-strongerfamilies-final-1.pdf
  137. https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/report/the-real-root-causes-violent-crime-the-breakdown-marriage-family-and
  138. https://ijrd.csw.fsu.edu/sites/g/files/upcbnu1766/files/Publications/Economic_Burden_of_Incarceration.pdf
  139. https://www.americafirstpolicy.com/issues/issue-brief-fatherlessness-and-its-effects-on-american-society
  140. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK230345/
  141. https://users.pop.umn.edu/~ruggl001/Articles/afdc.pdf
  142. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w6047/w6047.pdf
  143. https://www.irp.wisc.edu/publications/dps/pdfs/dp101193.pdf
  144. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4260339/
  145. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK230338/
  146. https://cmepr.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Moffitt-Phelan-Winkler-final-draft-7-17-2018.pdf
  147. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/document/95264/1/ssoar-aaapss-2022-1-biegert_et_al-Cross-National_Variation_in_the_Relationship.pdf
  148. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/00027162221120760
  149. https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/2023/09/why-the-problem-isnt-single-parent-families
  150. https://ifstudies.org/blog/when-it-comes-to-child-well-being-is-one-parent-the-same-as-two
  151. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1832495/
  152. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4902167/
  153. https://ffcws.princeton.edu/publications/family-structure-transitions-and-child-development-instability-selection-and
  154. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/17/opinion/single-parent-families-income-inequality-college.html
  155. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3904543/
  156. https://docs.iza.org/dp10814.pdf
  157. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9599777/
  158. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10666570/
  159. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5497959/
  160. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w9338/w9338.pdf
  161. https://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2005/200545/200545pap.pdf
  162. https://www.heritage.org/welfare/report/how-welfare-programs-discourage-marriage-the-case-pre-k-education-subsidies
  163. https://acf.gov/opre/report/parents-and-children-together-effects-two-healthy-marriage-programs-low-income-couples
  164. https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/are-federally-supported-relationship-education-programs-for-lower-income-individuals-and-couples-working-a-review-of-evaluation-research/
  165. https://www.the74million.org/zero2eight/why-invest-in-public-campaigns-to-promote-marriage-when-whats-needed-are-effective-policies/
  166. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/an-analysis-of-out-of-wedlock-births-in-the-united-states/
  167. https://newcommandment.org/single-motherhood-in-america-how-we-got-here/
  168. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6177052/
  169. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00027162221120760
  170. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365832361_Cross-National_Variation_in_the_Relationship_between_Welfare_Generosity_and_Single_Mother_Employment
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.