Hubbry Logo
EstemmenosuchusEstemmenosuchusMain
Open search
Estemmenosuchus
Community hub
Estemmenosuchus
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Estemmenosuchus
Estemmenosuchus
Estemmenosuchus
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Estemmenosuchus
Temporal range: Guadalupian (Wordian), 267 Ma
↓
E. uralensis skeleton
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Synapsida
Clade: Therapsida
Suborder: †Dinocephalia
Family: †Estemmenosuchidae
Genus: †Estemmenosuchus
Tchudinov, 1960
Species
  • †E. uralensis Tchudinov, 1960 (type)
  • †E. mirabilis Tchudinov, 1968
Synonyms
  • Anoplosuchus tenuirostris Tchudinov, 1968
  • Zopherosuchus luceus Tchudinov, 1963

Estemmenosuchus (meaning "crowned crocodile" in Greek) is an extinct genus of large, early omnivorous therapsid. It is believed and interpreted to have lived during the middle part of the Middle Permian around 267 million years ago. The two species, E. uralensis and E. mirabilis, are characterised by distinctive horn-like structures, which were probably used for intra-specific display. Both species of Estemmenosuchus are from the Perm (or Cis-Urals) region of Russia. Two other estemmenosuchids, Anoplosuchus and Zopherosuchus, are now considered females of the species E. uralensis.[1] There were many complete and incomplete skeletons found together.

Description

[edit]
Skull of E. mirabilis

Estemmenosuchus could reach a body length of more than 3 m (10 ft).[2] Its skull was long and massive, up to 65 cm (26 in) in length,[2] and possessed several sets of large horns, somewhat similar to the antlers of a moose, growing upward and outward from the sides and top of the head. The animal had a sprawling posture as indicated by analysing its shoulder joints.

The skull superficially resembles that of Styracocephalus, but the "horns" are formed from different bones; in Estemmenosuchus the horns are located on the frontals and protrude upward, whereas in Styracocephalus the horns are formed by the tabular and extend aft.

Species

[edit]
Life restoration of E. uralensis

Estemmenosuchus is interpreted to have lived some 267 million years ago. Two species have been identified, from the Ocher Assemblage Zone Belebei Formation at the Ezhovo locality near Ochyor in the Perm region of the Russia in 1960. They were found with the Biarmosuchians Eotitanosuchus olsoni and Biarmosuchus tener in channel flood deposits of the young Ural Mountains. They differ in size, shape of the skull, and shape of the horns.

Originally all specimens were included in Estemmenosuchus uralensis, but it was since realised that there were a number of different species. However, not all palaeontologists agree that these were different species. According to Ivakhnenko (1998) Anoplosuchus and Zopherosuchus are synonyms of Estemmenosuchus uralensis.[3]

Species Status Abundance[3] Remains[3] Skull length Body Length[3] Notes Images
Anoplosuchus tenuirostris Synonym of Estemmenosuchus uralensis Fairly uncommon Incomplete skeleton and skull Intermediate in size There are no horns or thickening, except in the front nasal region.[3]
Estemmenosuchus mirabilis Valid species Fairly uncommon Skull, lower jaw and vertebrae Up to 42 cm long 3 m long Unlike E. uralensis, which had only one horn on each side of its head, this species had 2 projecting bony knobs on each side of the cranium, one on the top pointing up looking like antlers and another pointing to the side similar to E. uralensis. Its snout is smaller and wider than its relative and looks vaguely like a modern moose. The palate teeth include six incisors, two canines and about twenty small incisor-like teeth at the rear. The lower palate contained six incisors, two canines and about thirty smaller back teeth.
Estemmenosuchus uralensis Valid species Common Elements of skulls and postcrania Up to 68 cm long 4.5 m long The species are characterised by horns which project upward and outward on the side of the head. The mouth contained large canines with small molar teeth.
Zopherosuchus luceus Synonym of Estemmenosuchus uralensis Fairly uncommon Poorly preserved skeleton and incomplete skull 1.5 m long Some of bones at the front of the skull are particularly thickened.[3]

Paleobiology

[edit]
A painting of an Estemmenosuchus wallowing in a lake.

Thermoregulation

[edit]

It has been suggested that the animal had a fairly constant internal temperature. Its large size and compact build gave a small surface-to-volume ratio and suggests it would not gain (or lose) temperature quickly. This phenomenon is called gigantothermy and was probably an important factor in temperature regulation in most therapsids.[4]

Skin

[edit]

P. Chudinov reported skin impressions belonging to Estemmenosuchus in 1968. The skin was described as being "glandular" like that of a hairless mammal or a frog.[5] More specifically, structures referred to as “lenses” are interpreted as glands, which would be their earliest occurrence in the fossil record if true. Melanosomes may also be preserved (one of the first recorded instances of such), as evidenced by darker areas surrounding the “lenses”. Alongside this, an osteoderm was associated with a sacrum recorded as belonging to “Anoplosuchus” (which is a junior synonym of Estemmenosuchus), suggesting the animal had osteoderms embedded in its skin, similar to those of mylodontid ground sloths.[6]


References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Estemmenosuchus

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Estemmenosuchus is an extinct of large dinocephalian therapsids that lived during the Middle Permian , approximately 267 million years ago, in the floodplains of what is now the Perm region of . Known from well-preserved , partial skeletons, and skin impressions, this is characterized by its massive, pachyostotic featuring prominent horn-like bony projections on the snout, above the eyes, and along the sides of the head, which likely served for display or intraspecific combat rather than aggressive head-butting. The two recognized , E. mirabilis and the larger E. uralensis, differed in horn configuration and overall size, with body lengths reaching up to about 4 meters and lengths of 35–65 cm, suggesting a bulky, hippo-like build with sprawling limbs adapted for a semi-aquatic or terrestrial lifestyle. Fossils of Estemmenosuchus were first described in the mid-20th century from the Ocher locality in the Cis-Ural region, forming part of the Estemmenosuchus Assemblage Zone, a key biostratigraphic unit of the series that documents an early radiation of therapsids in northern Pangea. Taxonomically placed within the Estemmenosuchidae as basal therapsids, the exhibits a mosaic of primitive and derived features, including a broad intertemporal region, a large for powerful muscles, and a long series of postcanine teeth, indicating an omnivorous diet that likely included tough vegetation supplemented by occasional animal matter. These adaptations highlight Estemmenosuchus as a representative of the diverse , which dominated Middle Permian ecosystems before declining toward the end of the period, providing crucial evidence for the evolutionary transition from reptiles to mammals. The distinctive cranial morphology of Estemmenosuchus, with its thickened bones and elaborate ornamentation, has sparked debate on its , with comparisons to modern ungulates suggesting roles in or territorial disputes rather than lethal combat. Associated from the same deposits include other therapsids like eotitanosuchids and pareiasaurs, illustrating a complex in a warm, humid environment conducive to the seen in many Permian synapsids. Phylogenetic analyses as of 2017 confirm its position among basal therapsids, underscoring Estemmenosuchus as a pivotal in understanding the origins of mammalian characteristics such as specialized and endothermy precursors.

Taxonomy

Etymology

The genus name Estemmenosuchus is derived from words estemmenos (from stemno, meaning "crowned" or "garlanded") and suchus (meaning ""), a reference to the prominent horn-like and boss-like cranial structures that give the skull a crowned appearance. The E. uralensis has an derived from the in , the type locality near the town of Ocher where the fossils were found in Middle Permian deposits. The second species, E. mirabilis, bears a Latin epithet meaning "wonderful" or "remarkable", highlighting the particularly elaborate and bizarre bony projections on its skull compared to the . The genus and E. uralensis were formally named and described by the Soviet paleontologist Ivan Chudinov in 1960 based on specimens from the Ocher locality, with E. mirabilis added by the same author in 1965; these names reflect the distinctive morphology and geographic origin of the fossils within the dinocephalian therapsids.

Phylogenetic classification

Estemmenosuchus is classified within the clade , specifically as a member of , the group that includes the stem-lineage to mammals. Within , it belongs to the suborder , a diverse characterized by thickened cranial bones adapted for intraspecific . is divided into two primary clades: the carnivorous Anteosauria and the mostly herbivorous Tapinocephalia, with Estemmenosuchus positioned within the latter. The family Estemmenosuchidae is monotypic, containing only the Estemmenosuchus. Key synapomorphies defining Estemmenosuchidae include extreme pachyostosis (thickening) of the roof bones and the presence of prominent, horn-like bosses on the nasals, lacrimals, postorbitals, and squamosals, which likely served display or agonistic functions. These features distinguish it from other tapinocephalians, such as the more derived Tapinocephalidae, which exhibit less pronounced cranial embellishments. Historically, Estemmenosuchus was first described by Chudinov in 1960 as a therapsid based on Russian Permian fossils, initially aligning with early views of as primitive relatives of anomodonts. Cladistic analyses in the late refined this placement, confirming as a monophyletic basal therapsid group and rejecting earlier anomodont affinities through shared traits like nonterminal external nares and a preorbitally positioned pterygoid flange. In recent cladograms, Estemmenosuchidae occupies a basal position within Tapinocephalia, as the sister taxon to a clade comprising Styracocephalidae, Titanosuchidae, and Tapinocephalidae, supported by characters such as a posterior shelf on the pterygoid and reduced vomerine processes. Anteosauria, including genera like Anteosaurus, forms the sister clade to Tapinocephalia within Dinocephalia, highlighting a dichotomy between carnivorous and herbivorous forms early in the group's evolution. This positioning underscores Estemmenosuchus's role as a transitional form in the diversification of large-bodied Permian herbivores.

Discovery

Initial discovery

The fossils of Estemmenosuchus were first discovered in 1940 by Soviet paleontologist Ivan Antonovich Efremov during field expeditions in the Perm region of , as part of his broader work on Permian terrestrial vertebrates. The initial excavation occurred at the Ezhovo locality within the Belebei Formation, corresponding to the Ocher Assemblage Zone of the Middle Permian (Urzhumian stage). This site yielded fragmentary remains embedded in a challenging red claystone matrix, which complicated efforts due to the rock's hardness and the fossils' fragility, requiring careful mechanical and chemical techniques to expose the specimens without damage. The genus Estemmenosuchus was formally described and named in 1960 by P. K. Chudinov, based on the PIN 1758/4, a well-preserved attributed to E. uralensis. The name derives from Greek stemmenos (crowned) and suchus (crocodile), referring to the prominent horn-like bony projections on the roof. Early interpretations portrayed Estemmenosuchus as a large carnivorous , potentially reaching over 3 meters in length, with the cranial "horns" suggested as defensive structures for intraspecific combat or protection against predators. These views stemmed from the robust morphology and , though later analyses revised its diet toward omnivory.

Known specimens

The known specimens of Estemmenosuchus are primarily housed in the collections of the Paleontological Institute of the (PIN) in , , and derive from the Ezhovo locality in the Perm region, representing fluvial deposits of the middle Permian (Urzhumian stage). The initial discoveries date to 1940 excavations in this area. Major specimens are summarized in the following table:
SpeciesSpecimen NumberDescriptionLocalityRepository
E. uralensisPIN 1758/4; nearly complete EzhovoPIN,
E. uralensisPIN 1758/327Referred; EzhovoPIN,
E. mirabilisPIN 1758/6; complete EzhovoPIN,
E. mirabilisPIN 1758/22Referred; partial skeleton including EzhovoPIN,
Additional referred material for both species includes several partial skulls and postcranial elements, such as PIN 1758/21 () and PIN 1758/279 (left upper fragment), contributing to a total of more than 10 known specimens, all fragmentary with no complete articulated individuals. Preservation is generally poor, with skulls often dorsoventrally crushed and requiring mechanical or digital reconstruction for study, reflecting rapid burial in riverine environments.

Description

Skull

The skull of Estemmenosuchus is massive and characterized by pachyostotic (thickened) bones, forming a robust cranial structure typical of dinocephalians. This thickening is particularly evident in the skull roof, providing structural reinforcement. lengths vary significantly, ranging from approximately 36 cm in smaller individuals to 65 cm in larger ones, with species-specific differences: E. mirabilis skulls reaching up to 42 cm, while E. uralensis skulls can attain 68 cm. A defining feature of the is the presence of horn-like bosses, which vary by and contribute to its distinctive appearance. In E. uralensis, these bosses are located on the frontal bones, forming upward-projecting structures. In E. mirabilis, the bosses are more elaborate, appearing as paired projections on the temporal and parietal bones, enhancing the overall cranial embellishment. These bosses are formed by pachyostosed and are interpreted as serving functions such as display, though their exact role remains debated. The broad, flat also features large temporal fenestrae, which accommodated powerful adductor muscles, supporting a strong bite. Dentition in Estemmenosuchus consists of conical teeth, including large incisors that interdigitate, suggestive of an omnivorous or herbivorous diet capable of processing tough , though some interpretations allow for opportunistic carnivory based on morphology. Up to 50 teeth may be present per , with serrations on the edges aiding in shearing or gripping. The braincase is small relative to the overall size, indicating limited cranial capacity typical of early therapsids, with a completely ossified structure enclosing the . Sensory adaptations include large parietal openings potentially associated with the pineal organ and a with vertically oriented , as inferred from comparative dinocephalian studies.

Postcranium

Estemmenosuchus possessed a robust postcranial consistent with its large size and presumed herbivorous lifestyle as a basal therapsid. The body reached lengths of 3 to 4.5 m, featuring a barrel-shaped ribcage that supported a heavy, stable frame. The indicates a sprawling posture typical of early therapsids, with short, stout humeri and femora adapted for weight-bearing on land. The included approximately 20-25 presacral vertebrae, characterized by low neural spines that reflect rather than aquatic specialization. The pectoral and pelvic girdles were broad and robust, enhancing stability during movement, though interpretations of potential semi-aquatic traits remain debated among researchers. The was long and muscular, functioning primarily to aid balance in this bulky form.

Species

Estemmenosuchus uralensis

Estemmenosuchus uralensis is the of the Estemmenosuchus, established by the Russian paleontologist Pavel Tchudinov in 1960 based on and postcranial material recovered from Middle Permian deposits. As the largest species within the , it attained a body length of up to approximately 3–3.5 meters and a length of approximately 65 cm, indicating a massive, heavily built therapsid adapted for a terrestrial . Diagnostic features of E. uralensis include a single pair of prominent, upward-projecting horns formed by the frontal bones, along with a more robust cranial and postcranial structure characterized by thickened bones and a sprawling posture. These traits distinguish it from the smaller congener E. mirabilis, emphasizing differences in overall size and horn configuration. The , featuring long curved incisors, short thick canines, and numerous small postcanine teeth, supports an interpretation of omnivory or herbivory. Formerly, specimens assigned to Anoplosuchus tenuirostris (Tchudinov, 1968) and Zopherosuchus luceus (Tchudinov, 1963) were recognized as separate genera, but revisions in the late 1990s synonymized them as junior synonyms of E. uralensis due to overlapping morphological variation within the species. This taxonomic consolidation reflects improved understanding of intraspecific diversity in Permian therapsids. The species is primarily known from the Ezhovo locality in the Belebei Formation (Ocher Assemblage Zone) of the Perm region, , where it represents a common element in the local tetrapod assemblage, comprising a significant portion of the large herbivorous/omnivorous niche during the Wordian stage.

Estemmenosuchus mirabilis

Estemmenosuchus mirabilis is the second of the genus, named by Pavel Tchudinov in based on a from the Upper Kazanian (Middle Permian) deposits of the Ocher locality in the Perm region of . The , specimen PIN 1758, represents a smaller individual compared to E. uralensis, with an estimated body length of about 3 meters and a measuring 42 cm in length. This was recovered from the same as the , indicating coexistence in a shared . Key diagnostic features of E. mirabilis include a more slender snout relative to E. uralensis and distinctive cranial ornamentation consisting of two projecting bony knobs on each side of the cranium, one pointing upward and one laterally. These horn-like structures, formed by thickened dermal bones, are more elaborate than the single pair seen in the , contributing to the species' ornate appearance. The validity of E. mirabilis as a distinct species has been supported by cladistic analyses within the Estemmenosuchidae, which consistently recover it as separate from E. uralensis based on differences in cranial morphology and size. It is not considered a of the , though early interpretations debated its taxonomic status. Some researchers suggest E. mirabilis may represent females of E. uralensis due to potential , though cladistic analyses support it as distinct. Known specimens of E. mirabilis are fewer than those of E. uralensis, with the skull and partial lower providing the primary material, alongside limited referred vertebrae and other cranial fragments from the Ocher assemblage. This relative scarcity highlights its rarer occurrence within the fauna compared to the more abundant .

Paleobiology

Diet and feeding

Estemmenosuchus possessed a characterized by conical teeth with sharp apices in the front, along with differentiated postcanines including widened "molars" with multiple cusps, adapted for piercing, tearing, and crushing, indicating an omnivorous diet that included tough supplemented by occasional animal matter. The presence of enlarged canines and incisors supported grasping prey or plant material, while the large adductor muscles, inferred from the robust cranial architecture, enabled powerful bites capable of processing tough foods. Wear patterns on the postcanine teeth suggest consumption of plant matter, with possible scavenging or incidental animal intake. The robust skull structure implies a high bite force suitable for grinding or crushing hard items, consistent with its riparian . As a large , Estemmenosuchus likely near water bodies, browsing on waterside and terrestrial plants, potentially using its semi-aquatic adaptations for accessing . This feeding strategy aligns with its bulky , emphasizing rather than pursuit. In comparison to other dinocephalians, such as the carnivorous anteosaurs, Estemmenosuchus exhibited cranial reinforcements for forceful biting but with greater dietary flexibility toward herbivory, reflecting early divergence within the group.

Thermoregulation

Estemmenosuchus, a large dinocephalian therapsid with an estimated body length up to 3 m and mass exceeding 500 kg, likely relied on gigantothermy as a primary mechanism for thermoregulation. This process involves the retention of metabolic heat due to a low surface-to-volume ratio in massive bodies, which minimizes heat loss and stabilizes internal temperatures without requiring fully endothermic metabolism. Such adaptations would have been advantageous for maintaining thermal stability in the variable Middle Permian climate of the Ural region, characterized by semi-arid conditions with seasonal precipitation and temperature fluctuations. Bone histology of dinocephalians, including taxa closely related to Estemmenosuchus, reveals fibrolamellar bone tissue indicative of rapid growth rates and elevated metabolic activity, suggesting a higher than typical in modern reptiles. This tachymetabolic condition points to transitional endothermy, where internal heat production contributed to beyond passive mechanisms like . Unlike ectothermic reptiles, the presence of parallel-fibered to lamellar bone matrices with vascular canals supports sustained high activity levels and efficient oxygen delivery, essential for coping with environmental . Vascular adaptations in basal therapsids, such as abundant foramina in long bones, imply enhanced perfusion that could facilitate countercurrent exchange in the limbs, preserving core body temperature during periods of activity or environmental stress. These features, inferred from relatives like other dinocephalians, align with evidence of elevated around 120 mm Hg, supporting efficient thermoregulatory circulation. In the context of the Middle Permian, such physiological traits would have enabled Estemmenosuchus to maintain amid warmer, moister conditions interspersed with drier intervals. Comparisons with other large Permian therapsids, such as gorgonopsians and dicynodonts, highlight a broader trend toward transitional endothermy in the group, evidenced by similar histological signatures of fast growth and vascular density. This evolutionary shift likely enhanced thermal independence, distinguishing therapsids from contemporaneous ectothermic amniotes and foreshadowing full mammalian endothermy.

Integument

Skin impressions of Estemmenosuchus were first reported by Chudinov in 1968 from specimens of E. uralensis collected at the Ezhovo locality in during the middle Permian. These impressions preserve a thin with a glandular texture, featuring small spherical structures (0.3–0.45 mm in ) interpreted as dermal glands, possibly for secreting or oils, separated by narrow gaps (0.1–0.2 mm). The skin lacks scales, appearing smooth and vascularized, akin to that of modern hairless mammals or amphibians. Preservation of soft tissue is rare in Estemmenosuchus, with no evidence of feathers or hair, aligning with the integumentary condition of basal therapsids. The impressions exhibit a dark brown to black coloration, attributed to calcite infilling that may include melanin pigments and possible melanosomes in deeper layers. Osteoderms are known from at least one specimen, consisting of a lozenge-shaped element approximately 15 mm thick from the sacral region, indicating localized dermal armor possibly present on the body. These structures, embedded within the skin, feature smooth bone tissue with Haversian canals. The skin impressions occur in association with skulls bearing prominent horn bosses formed from thickened cranial bone, suggesting the integument extended over these features without specialized differentiation.

Paleoecology

Habitat

Estemmenosuchus inhabited the Belebei Formation within the Ocher Assemblage Zone of the Cis-Urals region in , specifically near the Ezhovo locality in the . These deposits date to the Wordian stage of the epoch, approximately 267 million years ago. The formation represents a continental setting of fluvial-lacustrine environments, including river channels, floodplains, and associated lakes or playa systems. The paleoclimate was warm and humid overall, with seasonal influenced by monsoon-like patterns, yielding annual of around 400–500 mm. This supported lush vegetation on expansive floodplains, dominated by calamites such as Paracalamites, cordaitean conifers like Cordaites, and other elements including lycopods, pteridosperms, and ginkgophytes. dominate the , comprising siltstones, mudstones, and alluvial sandstones with intercalated marls, algal limestones, and evaporites like , reflecting oxidative, well-oxygenated conditions in a low-relief, deltaic to . Fossils of Estemmenosuchus occur primarily in channel lag deposits and fine-grained overbank mudstones, where rapid burial preserved articulated skeletons and associated remains from the Ocher faunal assemblage. Paleosols with gleization spots, calcareous nodules, and root traces indicate periodic flooding and soil development on these stable floodplains.

Contemporaneous fauna

The Ocher Assemblage Zone, a key Middle Permian locality in the southern Urals of , hosted a diverse terrestrial and semi-aquatic community alongside Estemmenosuchus, reflecting a complex fluvial ecosystem with biotic interactions among predators, herbivores, and aquatic forms. Synapsids dominated the , including biarmosuchians such as Biarmosuchoides romanovi and Syodon sp. that likely served as smaller carnivorous competitors or prey for larger therapsids, and dinocephalians (Deuterosaurus sp., adamanteus, Ulemosaurus cf. gigas) coexisted in this assemblage, contributing to trophic dynamics where Estemmenosuchus occupied a mid-level predatory role, preying on or competing with smaller synapsids. This biota underscores the Ocher Zone's importance as a hotspot for therapsid diversification during the Wordian stage. Other tetrapods included temnospondyl amphibians, such as Dvinosaurus sp. and Platyoposaurus vyushkovi, which inhabited aquatic niches and may have interacted with Estemmenosuchus through shared fluvial habitats, potentially as prey or scavenged remains. Pareiasaurs like added to the herbivorous component, forming part of the broader reptilian assemblage that supported the ecosystem's base. The assemblage also featured abundant fish, including actinopterygians such as Platysomus biarmicus and Samarichthys luxus, which occupied lower trophic levels in riverine environments, alongside probable aquatic invertebrates like that contributed to detrital food webs. Dominant flora consisted of seed ferns and typical of Middle Permian Urals wetlands, providing vegetation cover and resources for herbivores in this fluvial setting. Overall, these co-occurring organisms highlight Estemmenosuchus's position in a balanced Permian biota, where it functioned as an apex or mid-tier predator amid high before the Late Permian extinctions.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825217300673
  2. http://www.paleofile.com/Theriodontia/Estemmenosuchus.asp
  3. https://www.gbif.org/species/165664643
  4. https://benton.blogs.bristol.ac.uk/files/2019/07/2005Tverdokhlebov.pdf
  5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291843908_Estemmenosuches_and_Primitive_Theriodonts_from_the_Late_Permian
  6. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114113
  7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336262558_Cranial_morphology_and_phylogenetic_relationship_of_the_enigmatic_dinocephalian_Styracocephalus_platyrhynchus_from_the_Karoo_Supergroup_South_Africa
  8. https://paleobiodb.org/classic/checkTaxonInfo?taxon_no=116565
  9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0012825204000911
  10. https://academic.oup.com/book/40638/chapter/348297833
  11. https://incertaesedisblog.wordpress.com/2021/03/12/estemmenosuchus-skin-and-osteoderms/
  12. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/627048
  13. http://palaeos.com/vertebrates/therapsida/estemmenosuchidae.html
  14. https://www.gbif.org/species/9312344
  15. https://dinopedia.fandom.com/wiki/Estemmenosuchus
  16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239521875_Morphology_and_systematic_position_of_the_dinocephalian_Styracocephalus_platyrhynchus_Amniota_Therapsida
  17. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1125&context=peabody_museum_natural_history_postilla
  18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327969056_PALEOSOLS_FROM_THE_URZHUMIAN_MIDDLE_PERMIAN_REFERENCE_SECTION_KAZAN_VOLGA_REGION_RUSSIA
  19. https://scholarworks.alaska.edu/bitstream/handle/11122/10606/Anderson_K_2019.pdf?sequence=1
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9300183/
  21. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28589
  22. https://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/bitstream/net/27440/1/FieldGbook-ICCP2015_.pdf
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341374079_Early_Permian_Ferns_from_the_Fore-Urals
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.